ah, the implementation of the american foreign policy from uh next january , when the new congress will uh, be a little more difficult, and the republicans will indeed prevent u from issuing endless open checks to u ukraine, but the course itself will not change. and now, the united states is already making it clear that for the time being they are precisely the course with respect to the ukrainian conflict, including with regard to the issue of negotiations, and do not intend to change, moreover, in the last couple of days, even the rhetoric of the united states to some somehow rolled back to a tougher side on the issue of the prospects for a diplomatic settlement policy, and the conflicts in ukraine, i remind you that for just two or three days, a lot of mainstream american media in sharp black a and the washington post wrote that the united states was kind of pushing

kiev in order to take a more flexible position on the issue of negotiations, well, a little line is seated zelensky, at the negotiating table. yes, now the united states has rolled back a little and a bright an illustration of this backlash was, the statement that i made, uh, united states un ambassador linda thomas greenfield during her recent visit to kiev and she met with zelensky there and listen to what the united states envoy said in we are united from the very first day of the war europe united nato countries are united us both parties are united on aid to ukraine our support is unwavering we will be united until ukraine wins this war and until russia withdraws its troops in any potential negotiations. ukraine should ukrainians must decide when they are ready for these negotiations with the support of the

international community and in accordance with the un joint that russia violated, we made it very clear no negotiations in which ukraine is not at the helm no negotiations without ukraine here. pay attention to the old american rhetoric until ukraine wins this war. ukraine must decide to be or not to be negotiations. and when they will be and so on, but in fact, of course, it is not ukraine that decides the west and the west again openly makes it clear to russia that those conditions for the transition to peace that russia offers with the recognition of the prevailing realities are categorically unacceptable for the west. listen to the statement on this subject by the general secretariat of jens stoltenberg will comply with russian demands and accept the fact that russia has invaded and seized territories. there is a risk of more attacks continuing, it will be a disaster for

ukraine but also a danger for all of us, because. this would send a signal that the use forces allows you to achieve political goals of gaining control over neighboring countries, sergey sergeevich, as you will comment on the statement of linda thomas greenfield and the statement of the general secretariat. i suggest that a fairly well- played team that is trying to build traps for us, and they are very clear. look russia violates the un charter does not regulate in any way. you understand this with such trump cards, you can’t rush. you know what's the matter, no one is negotiating, no one has outlined the four principles of negotiations, which we outlined were very simple, denocification, demilitarization, status neutrality. you know, there is nothing complicated, in a neutral status. we know very well how it is done. we have not heard a single counter-proposal. very important words were said, according to the fact that ukraine will fight to the bitter end, read between the lines. so we will finance the zelensky regime and

let them turn into all their citizens into the firewood that we will heat hell and wars. they absolutely do not care how it will happen? the fact is that when we watch we say it is a zero-sum game. in fact, it is zero sum. the fact is that any attempt. this is the same stoltenberg attempt. well, supposedly to seat russia at the negotiating table. actually. this is a very advantageous position for the large collective west. we understand perfectly well, any reconciliation from this. for some time, this is very important for them. they understand that any protracted conflict is negotiations with a positive amount for them. they are already winning in this case, because russia she does achieve success in the military. uh, lady of the fields, we know perfectly well that our time of war, when we can advance and hostilities, of course, comes when our very big ally comes. forgive me, general, frost, about whom we spoke, they may smile, they may not smile, but this is a fact. this is a reality, and now he is trying to simply trap us and say, look, terrible russians. again, they decided

not to go sit down at the negotiating table . look now. here, uh, there is a classic doctrine from those countries that are the axis of the node. it turns out that way over time. and north korea iran russia but now the conversation is not so much iran, not so much, but north korea, which is ready to practically turn on at any second with its nuclear, if small, potential. well, the main threat is russia because they are well aware that sometime. gruzinsky was told there would be no second chance. but this second chance they are playing now, because they are great understand further collect. now this coalition will be impossible, they no longer believe. they see that this is a magician who plays with a marked card. he is a marketer. you know, i would like a very short addendum to what sergei said. the fact is that it is an interesting matter that politicians and experts who allegedly have different positions. some

say it is necessary that ukraine fought to the bitter end. well, the truth is different, they see the end. e, here, then there until 20 e of the third february there, then there until the year 14 , then there the ninety-first year, and so on, and others, as it were, peace-loving people like peacekeepers, they say, no, they should be put at the negotiating table, but when i compare and now, by the way, in my opinion, you even cited this article from a foreign country on some program. queen charap with his this miranda and me why is this the freshest? yes , a recently published article, why do i give this example in both cases, it turns out a very interesting picture the end is one, that is, russia that it must be defeated by military means, after

which it means paying reparations there, then other. but when they offer the same end through negotiations, that is, russia must agree through negotiations to defeat on reparations there for punishment. well, listen, this is a crazy house. well, you understand, i'm telling you dmitry, i'll kill you or give me a wallet. or i'll kill you right away. give me a wallet or let's negotiate . i’ll take this wallet anyway, but do you really have a choice, or something, they practically don’t put a reasonable choice in front of russia and some real option that could be discussed. that's how it is. that's how it's unfolding in the west today. well, in fact , they are strategically driving themselves into a dead end. yes. uh, because, well, the balance of power is still

undeniably in favor of russia. of course not, and the military and economic in the west. eh, running out. here, look at what is happening in europe, and ukraine is actually a dead man, located on the system of life support for the western system of life support completely, yes, but in terms of the budget structure, and ukraine now reminds me of afghanistan of the period anshafani. yes, when most of the profitability of budget items was formed at the expense. uh, foreign aid. but even in the west, the western ones, by the way , are very pro-ukrainian, uh-minded authors. uh, they write that without receiving this western assistance, ukraine will not and will not be very fast. here, listen. on this score, and a quote from uh, forina, face, which was written very, by the way, about ukrainian ah by a researcher from the atlantic council. and melinda haring is the editor-in

-chief of national interest magazine. jacob hairu, listen in order for ukraine to survive the winter, the united states of europe must act now to take a number of measures, including additional financial assistance for equipment to restore electricity to heat, as well as air defense systems to protect ukrainian infrastructure from the ongoing onslaught of russian missiles, the money that the west sends to ukraine is as important as the supplied weapons system, if it were not for the injection of eight and a half billion dollars from washington, ukraine would have gone bankrupt overnight. well, that's just today hungary blocked. uh, the allocation of the european commission 18 billion euros to ukraine for the next year. yes, this money was, uh, recently promised by the head of the european commission, usulov and underline. and now their selection is a big question. yes, and

it is reported that the european commission will seek some reserves. in the current budget of the european union, yesterday i will remind the vice. european commission president valdis dombrovsky said that the european union will not be able to allocate to ukraine those 3 billion euros out of the nine billion promised back in may. and that's it. yes, i these 3 billion will not be provided, that is, things are going to the fact that ukraine is simply becoming an inevitable bankrupt, while the financial and economic situation in europe is not getting any better. yes, given the aggravation of the financial and economic crisis, taking into account the inevitable and the new wave of ukrainian refugees, and as a result of the onset of winter. yes, er, europe will have fewer financial resources to pay for ukraine, but in conditions when europe cannot pay either $3 billion or $18 billion, what will the republicans in the house of representatives say? and

what are we supposed to, but fork out? when europe and what about bronton sherry yes, that is, a fair distribution. no, so to speak financial time. this is the first thing the republicans will say. yes, uh, uh, yuri nikolaevich , you will agree, they are constantly. and they are just pedaling the topic, that europe must also pay, after all, hostilities are being conducted on european territory. why does the united states pay more than 90% of all percent there, while europe pays nothing? yes, what do you think, this prospect is the prospect that ukraine, uh, becomes bankrupt. it will not push, the united states , to somehow correct its position. well, you know, i agree with everything. i would even uh, maybe the accent would have strengthened ukraine now already bankrupt, because its monthly budget deficit, one and a half billion dollars a month, if they are this for a year, calculate this is just

the amount of about 18 billion comes out. that's the european union and wanted to time to allocate to ukraine one and a half milli a month, but taking into account the veta that hungary imposed, this is a big question now do not give this money. it all means that state employees do not receive salaries, military personnel do not receive salaries . uh, infrastructure doesn't work infrastructure. need to rebuild parts. no, you have to buy from them. they have already said many times that in order to restore the energy system, they need solid injections there, and serious equipment must be purchased. uh, that's why ukraine is now bankrupt. the thing is, it seems to me that in this situation, which, unfortunately for us. uh, ukraine is experiencing it to some extent. here this is the feeling of the americans and partly of the west as a whole, that they can still win one position a war of attrition. uh-huh first of all, the depletion of

russia as soon as they feel that they are beginning to deplete, so to speak, yes, then well, they will , of course, according to the circumstances of the action. here is the life support system is already obvious. yes, you know the anglo-saxons. traditionally, neighboring countries are set against russia, they are armed, they prevent them from agreeing to peace agreements. and if you go, then on humiliating conditions for russia, i mean during the russo-japanese war of 1904, the british built battleships for the japanese fleet, which sank our ships in the suseme. the british drilled the japanese army. the americans gave

loans to the japanese . ah , the idea of ​​peace talks was put forward. they took place in the sport and the americans who took over. uh, the role of an honest broker. actually. they, of course, stood behind the uh, the japanese and imposed on us the humiliating uh clauses of this treaty, according to which we have lost half of sakhalin, we have lost our positions to a large extent in manchuria, the kuril islands. here is a typical example of this anglo-saxon meanness, which has always been and will be hostile russia for a very short time. you know traditionally. here you correctly said that the americans can say,

let the euro. it saves. indeed, it’s nearby, but what did the americans usually do traditionally ? it, but the americans destroyed the german economy. the german economy is on its side, that is, it is no longer possible to say yes, billions to help our 200 billion. what happened, so excuse the germans, they will say, hear you made us disabled, and now you want us to sprint with olympic champions. well, uh, actually the conclusion that can be drawn here is that regardless of the desire or unwillingness of the united states, rather the unwillingness of the united states to adjust its policy, they will face and are already facing resource scarcity problem. yes, politics is determined by a combination, and intention, that is,

desires and courses that are or are not, uh, resources are running out and as these resources are exhausted, the correction of the american political course will eventually become. it seems inevitable to me. we will now break through, and then we will talk in more detail about us-china relations. he blew up russian literature and created his own unique style. before him, no one wrote like that. what if, for example, in my place happened napoleon, in order to write well, one must suffer, dostoevsky nevertheless gave him a colossal capacity for work, some, let's say, negative qualities, for example, epileptics are characterized by extreme irascibility. and where did you hide her, the fates of the three main women of dostoevsky will intertwine together, they die, they are jealous and quarrel over him. roll out the roulette,

as much as possible i went with the idea of ​​winning back at least something and lost everything, anya, he loses the rings. i lose my wife's skirts 6 a.m. semyonovsky platz athos dostoevsky, in one shirt with his head uncovered, listens to the sentence of death and shooting that flashes through his head at that moment, dostoevsky 21 between hell and heaven on friday on pervoi we have always admired you , who believe in yourself and reach for the stars, you who live in a huge country over which the sun never sets, and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia with welson. you can fall asleep after 20 minutes, welson is no longer afraid of bad sleep.

the decision to worry is not necessary to be calm , the reassuring bank vtb has opened up to 9.5%. now it's your turn.

already started right now a set of rondell dishes for 5.990 rubles. warm, slimming tights from tiatro for only 259 rubles. over 40 years ago. we started making jeans. we know the details that transform ordinary jeans into perfect ones and we're not going to stop at the uniqueness in the changes. we do it for you gloria jeans up to five and a half thousand rubles, if insurance, then compare anxiety stress, motherwort hawthorn and mint only until november 13, any lottery ticket

from stoloto is a chance to win another 100,000. every day i take everything, get it, win on our website and stoloto branded stores. i'll pay for the guys, and you will transfer it to me. oh, i have a credit card. only if i transfer a commission from me to you, take it, you are a crazy interest on the loan. and i can do not take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so he knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without interest commission tinkoff you don’t want to give it alone, because euphoria was the most amazing world in this sector; it attracted tourists with extraterrestrial landscapes of archaeologists, the ruins of civilization. all

of a sudden, euphoria showed us its true colors with books, podcasts, and exclusives, new bestsellers, just in a row. download, use 14 days for free. what about you yet? lines, where at the same time another good book follows. there's a big game on the air its policy towards the ukrainian conflict. this is a shortage of resources and this shortage. it seems to me that it will be connected not only with the internal political

struggle, not only with it, but also with europe, but also with the confrontation that the united states themselves imposed on china, because this confrontation will delay. america has more and more resources. over the past few weeks, there has been a literal rhetoric in the united states that the united states is already losing the arms race from china, that they are rapidly losing their military-technical superiority over china and therefore must build up in every possible way, and their military resources their muscles, in fact, play out a new global arms race. here, uh, just the other day, but about the united states. it is necessary to prepare for a war with china and that while the united states is losing the preparations, and also that the war is a big war, a great power war. with china very likely spoke, uh, the head of the strategic command of the united states armed forces, general charles

er richard but the answer came from beijing. in fact , very quickly put on a military uniform and inspected, the joint operations center of the supreme military council, and the chairman of the people 's republic of china xi. jin said the following , listen, the world is rapidly changing and epochal changes, it is necessary to focus all efforts on military affairs at an accelerated pace to improve the skills of our troops in waging a victorious war, it is necessary to strengthen the comprehensive training of the armed forces and ensure their readiness for combat operations. and just the day before, taiwan's chief of staff father yi wei said that the threat of an invasion of taiwan is real, according to her. listen . this is not just hype shumikhimovich. this is how much you

share the threat of an invasion of taiwan after the 20th congress, which is said and wen the hype is either reality, and what kind of war does blueprint suggest preparing for in a war with taiwan or in a war with the united states? you know i'm sure xingping will do his best to avoid any form of military conflict. with america , china will not make the first move, but china, uh, takes american cargoes very seriously and is preparing for this, moreover, he is preparing not some kind of operation against taiwan, which, from the point of view of chinese strategic plans, is a fragment. china begins a new decade of its development under the motto of a new campaign. these are the first 10 years of sisenpin's reign. it was called new

epoch here they rebuilt everything there differently than antiopin did. they strengthened china. and now a new campaign begins. the long march. remember, when the communists, being in the minority, meandering, there mountains and cliffs reached these caves, and in the end. they have taken all of china and all of china has turned red so now china is setting out on this journey in 1927, 5 years earlier than planned by the chinese armed forces. must reach a level there. eh, well, let's say different things with america, yes. i do not think that there will be in us-china relations or there is a taiwanese operation or what, the chinese will hit, firstly, the harbor, although their aircraft carriers and ships are already moving towards the shores. uh, to. to the west coast. uh america i think they are preparing

you know for that war, uh, which uh, fans of electronic games are engaged in satellite launches of missiles, that is, no one will storm. there are some san francisco beaches, yes, to land on the coast of taiwan or bomb the harbor there, they are preparing for the war of the 21st century. they have huge resources huge developments, but very technical and they have a strong rear called russia who are ready to share their strategic achievements, like us. we installed a missile attack early warning system. hmm, and i think that this is far from all that we shared with the chinese and our scientific and technical developments, because if the americans and the west will press hard on us. to the wall, yes, then the tiger will jump, this is the

chinese say, there is no need to drive the tiger into a corner, he will jump and one of the forms of our answer may be. the creation of a military union has already begun to write about this, for example, hong kong newspapers, yes, what, in principle, uh. well, what have to go, the chinese do not want, the chinese always want to be on their own. but if necessary, this will be china's answer, uh, strategic uh, xi jinping and his political handwriting is called strategic patience, he delayed the solution of the sitan issue to the last. he delayed the solution of the hong kong question to the last opportunity. he's pulling with it now. e with taiwan, everyone there hatches everything especially our brother expert, uh, and russian enthusiasts among sinologists, who yes

, soon everything will be there for 22 or twenty- first years, we are there . they have already eaten afghanistan, they have eaten syria they actually still have bruises left from vietnam and korea, and they will look for volunteers like, taiwanese in fools, maybe the japanese, they won’t climb and the chinese don’t want only the first, it will be, uh, contact , but without a fight. well, i don't see that kind of strategic forbearance in the united states, rather the policy of strategic patience towards china has been recognized as a mistake by the united states. and now, uh, the course is set to escalate this confrontation. and i just see in unison both representatives of the command like charles

richard and representatives of the expert community and former american high-ranking officials like michelle flurno and deputy minister under the obama administration uh, write the same thing or say the same thing that we are losing the military superiority and should be carried out, a total or at least large-scale military-economic mobilization, similar to the one that the united states conducted. uh, in the fifties at the beginning of last. uh, the cold war, you share this is the vision here. yes, that is, having declared a cold war against china yes, and having called china the main not only strategic, but also military opponent of the united states, they now want to ensure these confrontations with appropriate military resources and an appropriate military race weapons. we are seeing this does not go to the last line. he's not giving up on the one china policy as soon as he crosses over. if the devil, now it will be hot water. right now we

are talking about cold ones. i still have to say that this is again, well, the traditional american approach. uh, that's it to me knows the situation from the 1960 campaign campaign kennedy advocates. uh, here's nixon speaking. what they were talking about we lost in the soviet union we cede military power to the soviet union when kennedy elected he gathered the generals asks, well, what are we really, or what? are they performing in the soviet union? yes, that's what there is generally impossible to even compare in terms of superiority. you know, you can't compare. when they were talking about preparations here, i immediately had a question, and he has nuclear weapons. he also means, china china has nuclear weapons hypersonic missiles, which are written in black and white in the united states nuclear doctrine, which, by the end of this decade, according to united states, china will enter

the level of the usa and russia yes, that's what i wanted to say, that is, yes, this is actually a position it is to disperse the arms race to disperse its military-industrial complex, so to speak, this is in general, a typical approach for america does not mean that they are losing in china like that well here, and sergey sergeevich and the strength is enough to disperse the arms race, because i completely agree with yuri nikolaevich by analogy with the sixties, but in the sixties the united states was somehow economically industrially more powerful than it is right now and and. really. they had superiority over the soviet union and was created vvph and was created high. now the industrial pantry is still china, the united states , where a is no longer industry, but the financial sector plays a predominant role in the economy. here they are ready to disperse the arms race, about which e. e says. here you are absolutely right when you say that, for example, a very good approach was

made from an enhancer. we remember, uh, how he used a very important term, which is called not sling teng, which we usually say inventory paws, and he gave birth to many, many inventories and began to invest real money in them. well, not that money, it's rubbish, compared to what america wants to get now, and now we are transported from those distant fifties of our time. we see that the united states of america is starting to churn out inventory at the pentagon in order to study new types of weapons, new weapons, create new technologies and buy them for a lot of money, which is practically uncontrollable, and every time they come and circulate, we need more money. us more money is needed to shift them from one pocket. in the other, a cold arms race begins first inside between those clans that make money in the united states of america. let's be honest a bad word, but they are hucksters at their core, they are used to making money, no matter who. the main thing is that i should be profitable americans, they are very cynical and hypocritical. they are very normal people from the point of view of themselves. they are such normal good egoists who

don't give a damn about everyone else, and the arms race, of course, they need fake money, but in the next 3-5 years, which will bring them not fake money. and perhaps, good puffed cheeks that will allow them to dictate their will , including at least from afar, but you threaten china , of course, you need to show your potential, of course, you just need to threaten china with your bare palms, the chinese will no longer work. they are very difficult guys and yes, do not forget about the thing america is very much afraid of the ligament that has developed. well , china is terribly afraid. good god be with him, but china plus russia no, they won't outdo, but an-reissovich. after all, they only make this bundle stronger and stronger with this policy of theirs. it's true. but you know, here's what i wanted to draw attention to. you are right that in america there is a rethinking of its strategy towards china is really practical, although

it was not written down in the papers, but already at the highest level, true, some people think he and from his dementia said twice that if the chinese go to taiwan, then we let's go to war, but in fact he said absolutely the truth, because this is the line at the white house. this is the line in the expert community. and this is indeed today's line of the most respected strategists, such as speech, da has and many others, who say we must abandon strategic uncertainty. and will declare that we will enter with our armed forces immediately from the very beginning, if you attack taiwan but here, that's what i wanted to say. i remember very well that a year and a half ago, probably, when we talked about the escalation of the crisis with ukraine, literally standing here, well, i said, yes, maybe the americans

will not go to war against us, but they can provoke a proxy war through ukraine that 's what i'm talking about, indeed the americans will not go directly against china but why don't they provoke taiwan to pull china is in this war, but using its own informational political and any other means to say, well, china started the war and attacked china and accused china of aggression against taiwan, after which military involvement is already underway, unlike the current situation with ukraine and plus the mobilization of the whole world with its allies and so on. and why did you want to say the last thing? you are absolutely right what

many american researchers say while working on the guitar. and this, by the way, was the main one, why did he write a trap with a thunder? fu, the spartans threw, why they attacked athens because they were afraid that athens was working for athens well, it’s really true in the context of that long-term and systemic confrontation from china to the united states in recent times more and more more often they talk about the need to carry out approximately the same economic and military-economic mobilization that was carried out by them at the beginning of the last cold war in the fifties and beyond. otherwise, as stated in the new cold war against china and russia, america cannot be won, but the reality is. in my opinion, if then in the middle of the 20th century, the

united states really was the industrial and economic center of the world, and then they accounted for about 40% of world gdp, then today this industrial pantry is just china and overtake it in terms of production. the united states obviously will not be able to bypass it in the arms race. their only hope is the technological isolation of china and even tough consolidation with the allies, but even here it seems to me that washington most likely will not succeed, because the west is no longer a monopoly in the field of high technologies, and not all allies, the united states is in e. we are ready to meekly cut our ties with china, and moreover, if during the past cold war the united states worked to strengthen their allies, today, as we have already discussed at this table, the united states is directly weakening its key allies, primarily european allies and, above all, germany. so, ultimately,

the adaptation of the united states to a multipolar world is inevitable. it was a big game. all the best. hello on the air of the information channel on the first program time will tell we are working live. i am artem shenin. and now, more than ever, i understand what the news is. right now right on the air. the most important thing about which i have to say. of course, i will tell about it, but i want to start with something else. although this is also related to what is the main news of today . that's a few days ago. ah, it appeared. this

video appeared on western sources, but it was also actively played. we, like a ukrainian drone, are dropped in a row two grenades on our wounded fighter, apparently, who is in storage. and yet he throws both of these grenades, remains alive and continues to fight today there was news that this fighter is alive and his name is alexei, his last name. i hope we get to know the person's face too. i hope we will see, but i'm not really talking about this here in the information war on the information front, on which the fate of many of us has fallen . from time to time you feel the same way as this fighter and people in telegram channels in news e, sources are divided into two parts. one of them. these are those who only after seeing a grenade

or seeing a drone or assuming that he is there start talking, everything is gone. i died. i died. i blew myself up. he says they usually die. and others, even when a grenade has already flown into his trench, concentrate on throwing this grenade out of a cold head. and after that you're about. no, you have no idea. in this case, i still have no idea what kind of adrenaline it is, and after that they focus again and throw another grenade out of the trench in a situation in which another would have buried himself twice buried, because, well, how did the grenade end, it flies from above. i understand everything. and this one, with a cold head, took and threw out one, and then with a cold head took and threw out another and remained alive and continues to fight, so what i

mean is that on our information front in the information space, many of us are divided into those , who, as it were , begins to die from a grenade in advance, and everything is gone and lose everything because of this grenade, and the other, even when two flies in, does not lose his cold mind and continues to fight, because if you are collected. cold head is a grenade, even flying into your trench. this is not the end of the war. you probably perfectly understood what i'm talking about in a figurative sense, because, of course, many of us started waiting for this drone and this grenade a month ago. a lot of people started talking about this a week ago. for me, the most important indicator is that this is, as it were, what happens when i have to close comments in my telegram channel, because this is foam, oh, a grenade will fall, and how would we all we're all going to die, it's all gone. not everything is lost. yes , it's a grenade. yes, it's annoying. yes, it's dangerous. but

if you don't focus and throw it out, the dig will tear you apart, not with a grenade. so from the inside it will break from hysteria, and hysteria in war is deadly exactly, therefore. i believe and believed that in the war everyone who wants to be in the war to discuss the war to live the war. he must live by the orders of the senior commander. and today such an order came. he. maybe i like it. i may not like him, but it ended exactly at that moment, when this order was received and now all those who want to stay alive so that it does not break. this informational grenade should throw out everything that interferes with him and digging, and proceed from the fact that if the general of the army is a surovikin, reporting to the minister of defense shoigu what he reported and answered his question as he answered. it means that this decision was considered by

all third parties. about the meaning of all the risks are all the pros and cons of a particular decision. considered and weighed, and he does what he considers necessary and necessary, and we cannot. in fact, to the end to know what he is actually doing now and in the future now everything that we have. this is what we heard in the performance of two senior military leaders and i suggest that everyone listen to it again with a cool head, throwing out a grenade, tantrums, fuck and dig we listen. earlier you reported that the situation that is developing in the kherson direction, the defense here is stable, but there are some peculiarities. how are things now. we successfully resist all attempts to attack the

enemy in the course of repelling him in this area during the period from august to october, the armed forces of ukraine lost more than nine and a half thousand servicemen killed wounded. more than 200 tanks 500 armored fighting vehicles about 600 vehicles of various types more than 50 artistic mortars as you know, the attacking side suffers more losses than the one that is on the defensive. in this case, our losses are 7-8 times less than those of the enemy. we think, first of all, about the life of every russian serviceman. the enemy strikes at the organs of the local self-government schools, hospitals, other socially important objects of civilians who are evacuated to the other side of the dnieper, as well as at

points of distribution of humanitarian aid. we successfully repel these shellings, about 80-90% of the missiles are shot down by russian air defense systems. at the same time, up to 20% of them still achieve their goals. the engineering subunits of the grouping of troops restore the neprovsky crossings almost daily and take measures to keep them in working condition. under these conditions, the city of kherson is not lying nasal points cannot be fully supplied to function. the lives of people behind shelling are constantly endangered by the enemy is coming non-selective shooting around the city. perhaps with me prohibited methods of warfare. the administration of the region decided to evacuate the population from the right bank of the dnieper crimea and other regions

for this reason. at present, more than 115,000 people who wish have left the area. for our part, we have done everything possible to ensure their safety after deevacuation. delve consequences, it is possible to carry out the implementation of the enemy’s plans to create a flood zone below. confirmation of this is the constant missile strikes. on the dam of the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, as well as on the drain gates of this dam, on september 26, the blow was balanced and one of the spillway gates was damaged. intensive discharge of water through the kievskaya hydroelectric dam and hydroelectric power stations downstream on october 10 is also a

cause of concern for coastal heating . in the event that the kyiv regime goes to a further increase in the release of water from reservoirs? or a more powerful missile attack of the kakhovka dam will form a stream of water, which will create an extensive flood zone and cause significant casualties among the civilian population. take an additional threat to civilians and complete isolation. our grouping of troops on the right bank of the dnieper in these conditions, the most appropriate option is to organize defense along the barrier line of the dnieper river, the crows, having assessed the current situation , are invited to take up defense. along the left bank

rivers, dnieper i understand that this is a very difficult decision at the same time. we will save the most important life of our servicemen. and in general, the combat capability of the grouping of troops to keep, which on the right bank in a limited area is unpromising, in addition, part of the forces and means will be released, which will be from odessa for active operations, including an offensive order in other directions in the zone of the operation with your conclusions and proposals. for life, the health of russian servicemen is always a priority. we must take into attention and threat to the civilian population. make sure all civilians who want

to leave can leave. proceed to this troops and take all measures to ensure the safe transfer of personnel, weapons and equipment across the river, the dnieper is the maneuver of the troops will be carried out as soon as possible. the connection of the part will be occupied by the prepared engineering relation on the left bank of the river, the dnieper the report is finished. once again the report was finished by general of the army surovikin. the one about which we are all when he headed united grouping said, well, now he knows what he will do now things will go. and this he said in this report, that he comprehensively

analyzed all the circumstances. and it was he who told us some time ago that we might need to prepare for making difficult decisions, and he repeated the word not an easy decision once again, he commands the united group and was appointed supreme commander there. he reported this to the minister of defense of the russian federation and the minister of defense of the russian federation with agreed with him. i may be in a little bit. a better position than many. it’s easier for me when i need to, but now i need to switch to the mode of a sergeant of the airborne troops, and there are many officers and soldiers of the airborne troops and marines and other troops on the other side, and they understand what an order is. i am in touch with many of them again now, when the order is our relationship to it,

our perception of it, our conjectures, our reflection, is of no importance. i think so, you can disagree with me, because in the war, when there is an order, all reflection must remain outside its scope. and it must be carried out, moreover, you and i do not know what is drawn on the very map that the general of the army points to. surovikin, explaining, on the basis of what he made, then the decision. which he accepted. and he offers what he offers. we do not know what the situation is on this map now and what the expected situation may appear on it in a week. a month later, after some time, we do not know this and should not know, but the general of the army surovikin knows i don't know him personally, but my observations of him allow me to judge that what he reported to the minister of defense is not

something. with which he personally does not agree. and what does he personally not share? this is his decision, which he reports, realizing all his responsibility , you understand that for a person who recently came in command of the united group. it is a very difficult decision to start with such and once he does it. this means that he sees no other options, which means that all discussions are for the sake of discuss god. i pass, i will follow what will happen at the front, pray for our boys who are fighting there now and carry out tasks and withdrawal by the way. this is also a very difficult operation. and someone else will cover it and i hope that this is a challenge. which somehow we will throw out the grenade and buy it and continue to fight, there, it’s really a very

difficult situation, the indicators of this are that today kirill died from a tremous car accident everything is not simple there, and no one promised that it would be simple. so let's do our own thing. i'll pay the guys, and i ca n't take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. tinkoff platinum is so able to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff he is such one sale 111 on yandex.market buy a bq smartphone for only 2.990 rubles. and pay with splits. all three at once,

the rest later. we never compared prices for osago and bought a policy in the same insurance company overpay, issue a policy for comparison, save up to five and a half thousand rubles, the price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better vampire and airy chocolates. this is pure line, unrealistically delicious ice cream. insomnia often wake up, not getting enough sleep in the morning with these horrors, it's time to finish with welson. you can fall asleep after 20 minutes, sleep soundly

during the night and wake up easily, in the morning wellson, bad sleep no longer scares you on yandex market . buy a digma laptop for only 10.990 rubles. and pay a quarter immediately from splits, the rest then you need money for the purchase. how much can the bank approve for us? let's take a look in tinkov, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without scanning a certificate from the usr of contracts with counterparties photo 3x4 without going to the bank and, most importantly, without opening an account. simply upload your bank statement only statement only statement. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount. see also the best digital bank for small business lending tinkoff , he is the only one. you see, the one who is no longer pay for connection. yes in reflection you get 350 minutes 35 gb popular. social networks of the video service for 399 rubles. in iota, connect to yota now in

all megafon stores. she returns sale, 11 11 to ozone only from november 11, siberia for 129 rubles. xiaomi smartphone for 6.99 rubles. a set of kumar frying pan for 999 rubles. for your savings, you can also at a high rate, if this is a deposit of a reliable vtb bank at 9.5% opened. now it's your turn egoist for only 399 rubles. from november 9

to november 11, we are always those who do not build a business, and the future of you is already 25 million of those who trust us. and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank is a bot in russia program. time will tell, we continue to work live on channel one. ah, and we continue to discuss, uh, what is happening in other sectors of the front, what is happening as part of this special military operation that we are conducting, as you all understand , not against the armed forces of ukraine and not against. uh, a certain state, ukraine, which has long ceased to exist, and there is a certain infantry, armed, supported by the united states of america and exactly, therefore, of course, one of the main ones. today's topic is the elections in the united states of america, which are also

of interest to us from this point of view. well, how and from the point of view of how things will be further in the country with which, by and large, we are participating in a global conflict. let's talk about it. we are later. and now just to the question of what actually happens. here in the military sense of this confrontation, since it it no longer consists of one section of the front, it consists of different sections of the fronts. which, by the way, general of the army surovikin also reported to the minister of defense today about the alignment of the front in the e, artyomovsky direction in the donetsk direction and many other places. and on the territory of the former ukraine a, which deprives, of course, of a large part of, uh, the necessary resources and the ukrainian army, and for a long time now, well today we have the ninth, well, for almost a month these strikes have been inflicted, and according to the ukrainian

side, up to 40% of this critical infrastructure. but it is damaged, and here a very important interesting question arises. to what extent is it connected? the states and europe are ready to continue to support ukraine in this sense, can they become how and what and in this sense important news today also from america about the fact that it seems that the americans are supplying them with some kind of air defense systems and that means two installations for sams. let's have some details let's listen, please. we can confirm that two anti-aircraft missile systems were delivered to sams, these systems will help strengthen the air defense capabilities of ukraine and help protect the ukrainian people from air attacks from russia, including with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles or cruise missiles. and so, now look at this wording. it immediately raises a number

of questions, and relatively speaking, political and political, and purely military and professional, given that you are, as it were, an air defense specialist, it means, firstly, well, that they will help strengthen the air defense potential and help protect against air attacks. i immediately raise the question of two complexes for sams. this is, well, roughly speaking, how much of a tangible contribution in the military-technical sense of the word is, or these are rather political gestures from the a series and, as it were, we wo n’t feed and die, please we won’t give the first from the point of view of security. part of kiev they can cover part of kiev so uh, more some other objects, and we will not be able to cover up . it means that this complex is really the only one so far, more or less, modern of the anti-aircraft missile systems that are supplied to ukraine in a block. hockey nato is a development of the seventies, respectively, there are

french complexes also of the seventies. firstly, another feature of this non-soms complex is that it has never fought anywhere. yeah, that is, if our complexes fought everywhere they showed themselves with a good no, it’s interesting, especially in what the rocket was used by the air class at one time, the americans produced a lot of them and did not know what to do with them. well, we came up with this version. and let's adapt them, like anti-aircraft missiles earth to air. yes, they do have some advantages. that is, on the one hand, there is a thermal infrared homing head, but the peculiarity is that it does not just flow, but works according to the images of the target, that is, the thermal images of the target are laid there and for each target it has eight images, that is, interference. here are the traps crushing is hard, but we have other ways. i won’t talk about them, it’s not necessary, yes, which allow such a missile to be knocked off course, which means that, in addition, there is an active radar

guidance head, when the missile simply hits the square, and it is already pointing itself further. that is, how the station itself works, it itself emits a signal from the target and flies to the target, but here there are already systems, the rf with which our aircraft is also equipped. they can also work, and plus another important point, there are anti-radar missiles that we actively used at the beginning of the war. true, according to the old soviet systems, and they proved to be excellent. they are guided by received missile guidance stations on their own. that is, if we use the whole range of measures. i think we can in any case, efficiency is a system to suppress and dali for what this fight uh with a massive strike of cruise missiles and uh, swarm of drones yeah, no more my second question. give me back this quote, yes, yes, that is, not one of the complexes, even here and rest. he is not able to fight, we don’t build drones with a massive strike of cruise missiles, and this complex is supposedly intended, but it has a

modification. i think that it is further this modification, not yet, but the necessary information, the launcher, it is on the truck. but, when a truck pulls up, it has to be taken off, placed on the ground from leveled, tied, then tied, and it takes time. and to turn it off for another 15 minutes. yes, here we have somewhere from three to five minutes. it leaves because we shoot right away from they have up to fifteen cars in 15 minutes. we have the opportunity to sweep everything there, therefore. uh, i guess. so for some time these complexes will work, we will take a closer look, we will take off the characteristics, and then we will deal with them and deal with them very seriously, as in our time in the middle east with complexes like in vietnam and so on, that is, in other words, if it starts now, but, most likely, this next cargo cult will begin. uh, well, they make kargopol out of everything there out of javelins from their lags for everything

ttt that is, if another cargo cult starts now, from these to sams, we now have everything on our own since we are great, then i’m sure that we can handle it , we’ll find the key . before it worked. only the third beech started working now. basically the shell is great. now, if the reserve allows it to go astray 100%, if the ammunition does not allow, but, that is, the missiles simply do not have the strength of what is actually very good that you just said this and is especially important. here today, taking into account what i started the program with, because all these cargo cults of theirs are about some great western weapons that will break everything now - this is another one. here is an information grenade, which is thrown into the trenches for us. many of us are starting. all right, now they have sanctions. it's an unpleasant grenade - it's also unpleasant, but you can get used to it and work with it. you can now, accordingly, you already said about the swarm of drones, that is, these

here are uh on sanctions they are uh, here with these beautiful flying balalaikas, which we called uh, geranium, which geranium is me. i hope we keep planting and planting and planting space. so this country 404 they can also work against geraniums. you know the peculiarity of our drones that are now going to the halls, especially the heroines , but i think that we will not finalize the hero so often. here on a geranium stands, for example, an air -cooled engine, what does it give? his tour is almost the same as atmospheric, that is, his stinger in general do not see. yeah, you know, there is no thermal radiation. it means half racket. well, from this non-soms they will not see him either, they will not be able to capture it. this means you can’t shoot, which means you can only with an active self-guidance head, and given that it is made of composites from various such radio-transparent materials. that is, there the only engine creates some kind of stain. well, maybe a carrier beam. that is, this is a

microscopic electronic trace, so a poop station from this complex will cope with such a goal. i don't know, maybe she will be mistaken for a bird and indistinguishable from a bird. which means it won't open. fire, that is, in general, even if there are not two of these complexes, but more, then from the point of view of their performance characteristics that you described these balalaika concerts, in principle, you can successfully enjoy it, moreover, especially since in this one, how if the orchestra was laech, perhaps, and we, uh, so to speak, some new, uh, technologies. e. e, let's borrow from our, so to speak, colleagues who have been developing these technologies for a long time in conditions sanctions. i mean our iranian colleagues, they accidentally got so tense in the west about the visit, and nikolai patrushev in iran met with the highest, and the leadership, with the president of iran, a rasi. that is, something else and new, taking into account, and research on the experience of working with these on sams,

ours may also appear. yes, you know, after all, especially since we don’t even need ourselves here. we just need to look at the technology. uh, now almaz antey is very seriously engaged in the development of our drones , the company of the hall is engaged in about a thousand quadrocopters should be done by the new year. that is, in fact, we are them. we need to see new visions and these new brooms. we immediately put it into production. and right there they will work against these anti-aircraft missile systems. by the way, i apologize. what is special about her geranium? there is a passive homing head mode there, that is, when the missile guidance station starts working on it, it’s precisely the geranium that is induced along this beam that hits the antenna system perfectly. well, the success of this geranium. uh, here the last thing i want to ask about is the conclusion they said about the fact that by the new year 1.000. here today. i also saw a message that the plenipotentiary representative of the president of the russian federation in the

far eastern district, trudnev, said that they had begun to open the production of quadrocopters. and drones and so on. in this sense, i have a question for you, based on what you said, so we didn’t have enough technologies to finally establish the mass production of drones, or we didn’t have enough, as it were, the technology to apply technologies. well, that is how would be more e and the decision that it is still the second. i think that we knew how to do it, but we did not have an industrial base and a friend who would take care of it all, but after the appropriate decision was made, they began to build factories very quickly. here's the production. these are just these, that is, we did not repurpose something. and we will build it from scratch. here are these lancets, the third one - this is generally the most unique thing that officers praise. uh, from the front line, that's who he's running, just on the front line up 40 km. the range of about 40 minutes is in the

air. note. what attention due to this, it is very compact. and most importantly, the station takes it very often for a bird, thanks to these maneuvers. i understand everything perfectly, just a very important question that often sounds, to which you partly answered. that is, we were so late at the beginning of mass production, because we built the entire production chain from scratch. yes, this important clarification is important, actually for me, because i also did not understand. well, how would not all that but, that is, roughly speaking, it’s not that there was some kind of conversion there before. yes, they did, and now they called the enterprise directly. they built it like yes, that is, that is, roughly speaking, this is about the same thing that happened in the forty-first year, when yes, uh, absolutely, when we transported enterprises, yes, beyond the urals, in a bare field, they actually put machines on concrete and in parallel erected a wall and a roof, and the electric power was summed up. after all , we are also reproached for not preparing for war, in fact in fact, they were brought to where the transformers were already standing and actually concrete. well, as a matter of fact,

this is a very important understanding, which expands my understanding of what is focused on today, as it were, an informational picture of the day, but nonetheless. you see, where we asked questions. where are our drones? it turns out that yes, factories were built, now they have been built. now they will start to produce something, there is technology, where to take and accept the experience of iran, i repeat, which i did under the sanctions, then, well, in general, it seems to many. all at now we can’t do anything with sanctions, that is, we are expanding, so to speak, as if the spectrum of military-technical influence, now we are moving on to political things, and recently the topic, let’s say so diplomatically, is the topic of apparent pressure, which seems to be exerting, at least informationally news about this has become quite common in the united states of america, in the kiev regime, almost every day. and that means the price is either saliva, or someone else. well, here's a pretty typical publication for you already in the very policy that well

apparently knows something, judging by everything, they started to sound the alarm there. yes? let's listen. ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky's new stance on peace talks with russia and with vladimir putin was directly linked to the biden administration's gentle nudge, one source said it happened a few days after talks between kiev and washington, including after a personal visit to the zelensky adviser u.s. national security president jake sullivan u.s. officials did not tell zelensky and his aides in ukraine directly to change their position, but convey that kiev must demonstrate its willingness to reasonably and peacefully end the war. well, actually, konstantin vasilievich, i have a question for you about your kind of political science intuition, yes, and er, about your political science rationality. what do you think, these publications and these, as it were, signals that the

americans are, as it were, pushing the kiev regime towards greater accommodating peace or pushing them to portray some kind of readiness for peace, then there is some kind of tactical story, both in the first and in the other case, how would you explain the motivation. why is the united states now on this, let's say, informational track, but it got up and it must be actively said through demonstration, how do you explain this. well, thanks, of course, for the compliment about intuition, but really. ok, let's assume that she doesn't exist, but she's telling me something, uh, well, actually. indeed, the situation is quite difficult and easy to understand, and it seems to me personally that the united states a interested in this conflict being as protracted as possible. ah, uh, this is what

fits into the concept, as they see it, of a managed conflict. so they don't e need this conflict to end here, so it doesn't really contradict. the idea that the kiev regime can be pushed to some kind of negotiation process, because the negotiation process does not mean the end of the conflict itself, as we understand it, uh, and this is only the beginning of some conversations and it is not clear. in this regard, it does not mean that everything is there uh sowed at the negotiating table, and otherwise talk about something , because now i agree, we see that the situation is such that, uh, in general, well , both sides can present some arguments in favor of their successes . correctly, that is, in this respect, it can be interpreted in a completely opposite way. here, uh, but but in reality, we see that after all, uh, the conflict is in the stage of such a temporary time. in my opinion, despite

today's events , there is a certain temporary freeze. that is, we are also moving away, fixing line of defense. as said, this means that the conflict is on hold, and uh, in this regard, the start of negotiations. doesn't mean anything. i mean that both sides have positions, that is, it cannot be said that someone can impose something by force. yes, in this regard. in my opinion, the united states is interested in the fact that this conflict continued. eh, an idea. uh, there is a study of the topic of negotiations by the ukrainian leadership. in my opinion, this concept fits completely, uh, the conflict should not create, after all, uh, excessive risks for the united states, uh, that is, we said a lot that the united states is part of let's say, the united states is a complex part of the country. the american elite does not perceive this conflict as vital or did not initially perceive it. that is, it was believed that this was all. it would not affect the united states very far, but since in recent weeks

the topic of the use of nuclear weapons has become more and more obvious, and not only tactical, not only local , and, unfortunately, to a great extent. nuclear conflict theme became discussed. well, because i can’t be ignored and maybe, yes, a number of people in the united states realized that this story is about them uh-huh well, maybe people there don’t know, like elon musk, maybe not only uh, people who dream about politics, like elon musk a is already in it and in this situation. it turns out that the conflict should continue, but should not, uh, go beyond some limits that create a vital threat. already in the united states they don’t care about the fate of the european union, of course they don’t care about the fate of ukraine itself, but their own skin worries them very much and therefore, to actually keep the conflict within the framework, but on the other hand, to preserve its political potential for the united states itself this is important for them, that is, in other words, right? i understand you, if you translate, this is in the language of images, they are still those who are interested in keeping the fire of this conflict burning, but now they

are trying, as it were, to reduce the flame a little bit so that they themselves not scorched, they must throw up firewood, but so that this fire, do not let god did not fly out of the stove and burn them into the house. understandable accordingly. eh, within. and this, but talking about what they are doing, what is the task of the united states? they are now deciding. well, obviously launching this track here, moreover, surprisingly, i agree here, they are in some aspects. they do not even hide what they are inclining. uh, the kra-kiev regime not for negotiations, but for demonstrating readiness for negotiations. this is a very interesting nuance. in this sense, the first question. the same one, in your opinion. what task? they decide already purely more practical and secondly, we understand that the united states, as it were, is not united, and there is. different and there are different, so to speak, some wings of the conditional. e -shaped white house. well, for example, yes, we

all read these publications, which means to push them there to show the tet negotiations, on the other hand, a representative of the united states comes to kiev on an unannounced visit, uh, that means at the un but next to which barely looks. it's just, well, in general, actually, how should he look like, as if a pupil junior group of kindergarten. here, and the aunt teacher tells, as it were, yes, so, here is what she is, what texts she speaks against the background of all this, as it were, negotiation rhetoric, please. as you know, there have been some suggestions that there might be ukraine fatigue, don't you think that opinions on sanctions for russia may eventually disperse, which could undermine support for ukraine around the world. we are united from day one and we do not see any cracks. in this unity, europe is united with nato, we have two-way support ukraine in the united states, our support is

unwavering. and we will continue to be united until ukraine wins this war, until russia withdraws its troops. we understand that the united states is trying to push president zelensky to do something with russia do you think that now the united states should put pressure on ukraine listen the international community only wants justice for the ukrainian people and in any negotiations that take place ukraine should not be the main one , negotiations that ukraine directly relates should not take place without its participation. i mean, do you understand what this lady is doing? she, uh, says no, no, of course we are pushing them to negotiate, but we are pushing them to negotiations that would be conducted on her terms, that is, in essence. we are not going to have any negotiations, so that evelivili in this sense, this is a lady. she imagines only herself, and she came to somehow morally support the earth, or she also has some

weight and, accordingly, what kind of game is there between by whom and by whom, please, it’s very simple, if we look carefully, uh, the same zelenskaya looks very pale compared to this madame, and literally in a figurative sense. the fact is that all the officials who are appointed out, they just get it clear that this is a certain kind of game that is being played by the united states of america. they perfectly understand why they need this grotto not a result, but a process. yeah, it’s very important for them now the process, what will you negotiate with the subject of negotiations? yes? no, in principle, no. or maybe let's discuss at least some example of a roadmap. no, why? and now we have so-called insurmountable obstacles that absolutely do not pave the way for us in negotiations, and she is about new. she is a top-level diplomat, then in but that is, she is on a level with the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, practically on the same level in terms of. orang tables, that is, roughly speaking, that four-star general and she are four-star generals, as it should be in america, and from the point of view of unknown shoulder straps, and you know there are weights

generals with the same number of stars on shoulder straps, and the real briefcase is shapeless, yes, with a briefcase and without a briefcase, but he has a briefcase without a handle, a briefcase without a handle. she herself is not a briefcase without a handle. that is, it was a shame to sell like this, but you very correctly noted very correctly. that is why she came to a psychotherapeutic visit, absolutely everything came to the lady who turned out to be behind you there are 192 countries. well, if not 192, but at least 180 and so on, that is, by and large, now there is a game about that sooner or later. we'll drain you, well, the process of draining it will be whom and heavy, and perhaps you will use more than one mountain, uh, depressants or antidepressants? it depends on what you will have what task will be set you may not live. and maybe so many of ours did not live. well, then she would not have come with this news. and i look sullivan flew sullivan very clearly explained your position from everyone to the fence. do not think of going anywhere further, your threshold is limited. she comes

and speaks. well, let's limit it a little more. we now we will expand its international borders a little, but we will explain to you what we are real americans, we don’t need a game with a positive sum, we don’t need it. whether you're alive or dead, we still need you. here is its essence. yeah, we need a process for the sake of the process, and not for the sake of the result. he also believed that sullivan came for the sake of the result. he wrote whether he came for his own sake and she comes solely as a negotiator who has to do this to make the weight on her real monstrously small and a miracle. on the small ones, on the one hand, it sounds good the us representative to the un does not decide anything. she can only inform, but not decide. she even she can’t even give him her oscar, like sean penn who gave his e, oscar for the potion, and he doesn’t even have an oscar, she doesn’t have anything, but that’s why she comes to him as a psychotherapist. well, this is an interesting story, all the more interesting in the framework.

the same, uh, well, important and one of the main topics today is the information space. need money to buy. how much can the bank approve for us? let's take a look at tinkoff you can find out loan amount for business without a scan-court certificate from the usr of contracts with contractors photo 3x4 without trips. and most importantly, without opening an account, just upload your bank statement only statement only statement. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account, the best digitalkbank small business lending tinkov he is such a one sale 11-11 on yandex market buy a drill-driver box bot for only 799 rubles. and pay a quarter immediately from the split, the rest, then in tinkov you can find out the loan amount for business without opening an account, just upload your bank statement. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an

account. the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkoff is such a magnet. buy turkey breast steak. delight, get a scratch card in the magnet mobile application and win discounts every day. apply for osago on sravni and save up to 5.5 thousand rubles. if insurance, then compare the brilliant design and the stylish jacket for the winter weather at the forefront of fashion. buy and on the site in the application it's about you with a credit card. tinkoff platinum. i don't get any fees for transfers. how can a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without a commission interest tinkov , he is so alone hands of hardening, again boredom in

azov has already begun right now gls multivitamins for men and women for 399 rubles. final sale of the year up to 80% off your clothes. i chose the decision, probably, i ’ll leave a small deposit in the old bank, otherwise i’ll worry about money. not you need to be calm about your savings, you can also with a high rate, if this is a fee from a reliable vtb bank up to 9.5%. this is what they opened for you for you. now you. open a deposit up to nine and a half percent on vtb.ru. go to tv and everything will turn out sale 11-11 on yandex.market buy america vermicelli for only 8 rubles. from 9:30 november. we have always admired you who choose faith hope, love is not only the name of you already 25 million of those who

trust us and we do everything to have the right say tinkoff bank of the year in russia sale 11 11 on azov has already started right now a set of dishes for 5.990 rubles. warm tights from the theater for only 259 rubles. you have never compared the prices for osago and bought a field with the same insurance, do not overpay, draw up a policy on compare and save up to five and a half thousand rubles, because the price of osago is different. if insurance, then compare choose better sportmaster presents, but austrian technology for reliable protection from the cold. buy on mobile sportmaster application with a discount on the first online order with a credit card. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. tinkoff platinum is so

able to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff he will show such one, we continue to work live. well, and now. as a matter of fact, let's talk about one of the important information sense of the word. one of the brightest topics today, of course, is the midterm elections in the united states of america, which we here more than once discussed in terms of what will change or what will not change. what layouts we are all fine with, among other things, we understand that the alignment that is now already. well, it did or almost did. this is the alignment from which the elections will take place. uh, the next election of the president of the united states of america and this, of course, is no less important, for what will happen next from this side , where it will begin to move now and further. here, in fact, how does this one look like at the moment. map or graphic the results of these votes in the senate, it's almost

head to head, well, there's practically a in the house of representatives. e. well, in general, the picture is also the same. here is such a red wave or red tsunami republican crushing victory overweight. well, apparently it didn't happen. uh, then a lot of interpretation on the one hand and on the other hand. well, let's start with the person who , unlike us, followed all this, not only with professional and expert attention. well, with the person who lives there and for whom it is now, whether or not michal vladimirovich telman personally means something, we are also in touch with the united states of america. good afternoon or i don’t know, maybe for you, taking into account your political preferences, not good afternoon. i don't know what you were looking forward to this day. in general, tell us what kind of day it is and how it is. this is in the history of the united states of america, er, and in the history of your life and the life of your family and your loved ones, please. well,

firstly, good evening to all, my friends, well, and secondly, yes i will tell you of course, i will share how always, there are, there are winners, the loser is those who breathed a sigh of relief the democrats breathed a sigh of relief. it's true, uh, it's not as bad as they feared. and whoever won is the winner, really the clear winner of yesterday and i just want to correct you a little, artyom the red wave really took place, but only in one single article, by the way, florida, where the republicans really managed to implement this very red wave and just purge the democrats. uh, in general races and uh won by a convincing margin roman de santis, what does this mean for the united states. this means that the chances of an amphibious assault being launched, uh, the republican presidential question of the united states has increased dramatically , moreover, yesterday, when he gave a speech, his

supporters chanted 2 more years, 2 more years, and not four, as required by law for a governor's term. uh, also the other side of the coin is the loser and we are not talking about specific individuals who lost this race, but we are talking about one specific loser. and it's uh the president of the united states and already donald trump since. he is very many not all. well, a lot. uh, the candidates he supported, which he openly publicly. uh, so they supported uh, a lot of people lost their races, and this just caused damage. and actually contributed to the fact that the red wave - this most did not take place, because so many voters voted not only for the democrats. how many voted against trump in the face of the candidates he supported in this way? as always, twofold unambiguously, they there are uh, rarely uh, but here i think the most interesting thing is precisely the changes in the political

configuration within the republican party on the eve of the start of the presidential race, which in fact begins today after the midterm elections there will already be the first steps. uh, hmm these companies, uh, did uh. well, as for the congressional layouts. i think that, well, it's obvious to everyone. eh, a small majority. uh, get the republicans. this is clearly fundamental. it won't change anything except what's on the democrats' agenda now. she will be much harder to push. uh, but i wouldn’t wait for some serious cardinal, uh, domestic political changes e, but foreign policy oil, especially since foreign policy in the united states is traditionally the prerogative of the executive branch of government, that is, the white house . a. well, in fact, an exhaustive answer to my question about the situation. and how would you personally

move away from all this. well, maybe you don't want to talk about it? what does it mean personally for you, yes for what can i say, artyom why? well for me personally it means that the person i am personally going to support. e in the presidential race. uh, yesterday i won in florida, so i'm not going to. yes, well, you understand that i live in chicago, uh, chicago uh, my friends, this is the kind of city where we live, by the principle of vote, do not vote. you still get a democrat. here, but because the last time i say a chicago republican was in 1931 was bill thompson so called. that is, everything is here, as they say, predetermined, and everything is predetermined here, i see. but at the same time, i must say that despite such a characteristic feature of the political life of chicago and the surrounding area, i must say that this time i was surprised to find e in many places in chicago posters. e with the support of the republican candidates and er,

just the elections were in the state or another in general in chicago e, in particular, although they brought the expected result, but er were not so. uh, there weren't such big user gaps, it's understandable, that is, well, the good news is that things are starting to change for the better in chicago and illinois. you hang in there, uh, the russians don't abandon their own. here. well, the extreme questions from what we often discussed here in this regard. it was quite actively discussed here that if the republicans take both chambers, or at least one chamber, then this may somehow affect the level of support for ukraine. the united states of america pre-election. and no matter how they campaign, there is quite a lot of emphasis on this, here are these republican posters, which means that there is not a cent for ukraine there, la-la, in your opinion, now the elections are over. and this rhetoric among the

republicans will also end, and all together they will continue what they were doing. after the support of ukraine or this is a very good question that prompts me to the following reflection. well , first of all, there is indeed a large segment in the republican party. uh, uh, actually the electorates, which are represented by these people, which will hold out in the traditionalist american positions, namely isolationism. that is, why do we worry about ukraine when we have such chaos on the mexican border and we need to invest money, so in order for us to make america great again, it is, in fact, those people who voted for trump, well, the republican party, not only consists of them . let's just look at things, so to speak realistically. firstly. ah, the republican party. among many others. uh, other things it also represents that the us military-industrial complex is interested in the military-industrial complex that you stopped uh, stopped support and assistance to ukraine uh. combat

action. of course not, because they are interested in military orders that are made by the americans. in order to supply weapons to ukraine in addition, ukraine is an excellent testing ground for american weapons in combat real combat conditions. it's just a dream for vk e. the republican party also represents uh, us armed forces the us military votes nearly unanimously republican. naturally. it is too. e. it's interesting for them because they have the opportunity. i have already mentioned a number of factors, but they also have the opportunity to study the tactics and strategy of the introduction of hostilities of the armed forces of the russian federation as well, and also study. uh, russian weapons are also in action in real real combat conditions, so naturally, uh, there is a very influential wing within the republican party that categorically. yes, that is, well, to save some of them america the last moment from here it is important to say that the republicans want to control the cash flows so that they are not stolen like about the democrats who are going to ukraine here

in ukraine this is actually also an important point . and then help understood? thank you very much for this, as if a story from a person who is there, and a lot of e explained, as always, very calmly and with a healthy share of eroni thank you very much mikhail telman, we were in touch from united states of america where on chicagen for him, uh, is there some good news on illian cabbage soup? well, as far as you and i are concerned, we are still watching this a little from the outside, although, as if out of habit, we are still immersed in all this, we argue, and so on. well , really. let's try to figure it out from one side. yes, the republicans in whose victory many believed crushing. well, in general, as they say. e. well, what else can they do? they are politics. let's listen, please. it is clear that we are regaining the ward. when you

wake up tomorrow, we'll be in the majority and nancy pelosi in the minority. apparently, he has something personal for that same nancy pilosi. well, maybe this, as it were, is also a result, but i must say that this is the red wave. well, that is, such a crushing, republican victory was prepared for it not only by many experts and presenters in our television channels. and well, biden himself, in general, was preparing for this, because here are the words that he said, just the other day, please. if we lose the house of representatives to the senate it will be a terrible 2 years, the good news is that i will have a pen to sign the veto for the sake of it preparing for things to get worse. what happened. well, and, accordingly, now the question, uh, is the same for everyone. and what happened, is it some kind

of accident and something went wrong or is it some kind of natural course of events. and what exactly does that mean for america er, and if that means anything for the rest of the world and for we are welcome, well, this is a natural course of events, both historically and objectively, historically, the president’s party has always lost congressional elections in the subsequent midterm elections, if it previously controlled both congress and maybe the white house. it has always been the americans do not like excessive concentration of power in their hands. republicanism - this force was actively used during the election campaign. this time or two, of course, the republicans did the main thing. on a economy on rights biden administrations in the economy are precisely connected not with their relationship with putin's tax, as the biden administration called it, but with the systemic errors of the current administration since its very coming to power. and this also went down to the americans, because, judging by all the questions, about 32% of americans

considered the economy to be the main topic, but it turns out that it didn’t go so well, because the people who appealed to the mistakes of the biden administration, which has historically the lowest rating. it turns out that these republicans appealed mistakes, but roughly speaking a crushing uh, preponderance - it happened because the democrats draw astride the second most popular among americans. uh, the election thesis, the second topic is the second most important question vote or lose the so -called abortion, that is, the point is, not even that the republicans have abolished allowing abortion. not in this case. democrats have been able to position the current republican party as outspoken. to demons who, when they come to power, are absolutely correct, which rushes power will begin to tighten the screws even more with their obscurantism. well, how the democrats positioned it 27% of americans read abortions the second most important topic, but on issues after inflation, thus the democrats did not just saddle this topic. they consolidated their base around the topic of abortion, that is, the

so-called democratic voters who could not come to collect funds at home, and so on. you and i understand very well that the election is won not by the one who has the highest rating, but by the one who brings their voters to the democratic precinct were able to mobilize in this regard, therefore, yes, the result is not the one that the republicans would like, but nevertheless, they still have two terrible years of bidden, they still expect it, because the representatives of the democratic republican chamber are here to nightmare the current administration for each and every reason, in including in order to create a reserve for the truly fateful presidential elections of 24 years before the party, especially. biden will go for them? and i don’t know about it myself, but he said that he wants to go, but he seemed to gather that he wanted to go, firstly, it was not clear whether he understood where he wanted to go and whether he remembered it the next morning. as far as i remember, in all our conversations you just were not the person who bet on red. i say

that they can beat 2-3 votes there very slightly. i say very little. i said that there would be no red wave, as such, because i tried to assess the situation from the inside. i kept in touch with them. who lives permanently to see how the system works from within, what's going on what has changed in the last two years? yes, the pandemic has made its own adjustments? yes, and the crisis that came. he was really tough, but he votes. not always those who are called rednecks and those collars. if you really look at this map, but it will seem very red to you, and if it were measured in square miles, then, of course, the republicans rode this wave, you see some kind, but america consists of those claviations where they still vote city ​​try to outdrink her little blue, new york and goodbye. yes, do not interrupt, york is moving on. jersey next. eh, it turns out we have or noice. further meat is felt with absolutely ponya. boston, i'm very good at and that's it, west coast that's right, and gone

west. everything that we understand how it happens. there are many, many, many voices. uh-huh falsifications were from two sides. this is important the fact is that we are always shown one side, probably the one we want, and we say, look, what scum democrats are. look they go for absolutely everything. and there are even facts when, fucking, active clinics, people vote in those who are on the border of life and death. yes, it was and this is a fact, but look at the centi from which the choice won. look how cynically he went to this victory, he didn’t give a damn about absolutely all the rules and there were stuffing and carousels and voting was simple, but there was a vote before everything and this was fixed by various observers, he let him into the general prosecutor’s office. yes, he didn’t let him in, of course, he let him in. observers yes, he didn’t let him in either, but you understand what's the matter, if we look from one side of some kind, you are definitely talking about america about it. here is the citadel. we won in this case, and we won a very strong one not in

the fact that they immediately turn off the tap of the war and stop financing any production. you must understand that today the production, which is controlled by the arms lobbies, is not loaded until 2025. yep, you know what's going on. they have now squandered those warehouses that they buried for a very long time. i need to bet, first of all, my reserves. and the money that they are now they send to ukraine, they first of all go to european corporations that give away their old tanks to old equipment, but the europeans complain, they say exactly the payments that you give us for a whole tank. there is enough to buy one abrams caterpillar. cool. yes, you, - he says, we are giving us a whole tank. and the money that you compensate for this again came from the war, of course, they have excellent rivers, because they now received you showed the italians on the map, who are happy, but we forget to say that he is happy to her personal victory because he became the third person in the state, she sang to herself in belos. he becomes the person who makes the real decision and the money. yes, america is always talking about profitable unprofitable. this is money. you are

now destroying so many illusions in ours. but what about the values ​​of this red hill. here it is, like justice, first of all, and justice is when, after a fight , someone survived and left rich and happy. this is fair. got it, no matter who's right what matters is the one who left with the money is right. now the republicans, they understand that they really saddled the wave of money, they will interfere very much, and they will put a spoke in biden’s wheels, but they will feed non -democratic lobbies about their relatives. and therefore, and we do not care who they form. i just wanted to say. right now, i would like to say that, well, now i feel better, no, it’s not easier, because our only plus is that there are also second lobbies of the war, which provokes new conflicts in the caucasus , impose new conflicts on this money, don't equalize. there are lobbies, there are military lobbies, there are gun lobbies, there are gun lobbies.

they are about 75%, these are republicans 25 democrats, and there are also war lobbies who stake more on high money on military spending on iraq on syria on afghanistan on libya i will spend more money than on the production of weapons, restoration of infrastructure, construction of new bases pumping resources out of the country. is not gun lobbies. the military understood this. now i understand. and konstantin vasilyevich well, actually, as they explain to me. here are already three colleagues and not only here, in principle, there is nothing special about the results of these midterm elections. well, what we should be discussing. well, that is, there are abortions, not abortions. there, we are a little worried about this, in your opinion, somehow the alignment from the point of view. well, since we understand that now this is already such a start of the presidential, as it were, history. and presidential handouts are somehow what happened now will affect the same after all, who

will? who will take the presidential prize is important. well, you know, first of all, i would like to say that if we assessed the situation more soberly, it would be easier for us to perceive what is happening, by the way, vasilievich think, ah. no, in fact , because you will agree that we are discussing. now the results of the elections in the united states are connected with the fact that many of my fellow citizens have formed such an illusion that these elections are very important and i heard from many that this means that they will win now from publications. and now everything will change with the help of ukraine, it will stop, but it was clear that this was not so, yeah. now, if we weren’t initially so furious, we said that now everything will be decided, it would be easier to perceive what is happening now. by the way, if you know, i also heard from many experts in the previous nine months on the topic of ukraine, which means they are supplying old weapons of aid is nonsense. now we’ll take it in 2 days, kiev. now, if we didn’t talk, it might be so for us. it would be easier to evaluate. e the news that you started broadcast or we hear all the time that europe will

freeze, there in a month and so on. again, if we look at things a little realistically. now , i repeat, we are dealing with serious problems. but why should they often be presented in such hyperpolized forms, so that later e disappointed with america, everything was, in my opinion, very clear. i would comment briefly. here, in addition to what dear colleagues said the economy. take everything is not so bad in the american economy. as again, uh, many thought. look at the unemployment rate in in the united states, look at how enterprises have already begun to move there. look up look at the dollar, because very often look at the price of gasoline. and even then, usually at summer levels, which, by the way, have already changed. therefore, yes, in fact, yes, the americans were not satisfied with the price of gasoline, the price of diesel, but on the other hand, there are many factors that allowed the democrats to do it a little. here is this story about the fact that the economy has loaded with work - this is a problem. now as for the future

these stories about republicans and democrats, but in fact, we also understand that the story about ukraine it could not end, even if the republicans took all the positions, uh, in the senate, because this story began and there already is a certain thing that is called a two-port consensus. in this regard, this help will not stop. yes. i think that if trump had won the previous elections 2 years ago, everything could have gone differently. why because trump had a different approach to russia. in my opinion the key point is china because uh and the democrats and the republicans understand that they need to do something, first of all with china, but trump believed that relations with russia should be better than those of the united states than relations between russia and china and therefore he is more likely i played in an attempt to somehow win russia over to my side in order to prevent more intensi. relations uh, china and russia, the democrats acted differently; they believe that they are able to arrange a conflict here and there to arrange a leaving

grandmother-drinking sent. uh, it's in taiwan also a demonstration that they are capable of arranging the same scenario from taiwan, and the republicans may not agree with this for china. but i think that's how they judge. well, since you’ve boiled it, you’ve already made this mess, so somehow you need to do something about it, it’s clear that we won’t stop it quickly. so if you wait, uh, another 2 years to come to power, the governor of florida or someone else from the republican party is there, and he will change something there again right now. i think so, stop waiting. yes, that is, you do not think that now you can somehow stretch it out for 2 years, and then the republicans will win and it will all be over. no, this will not happen. by the way, and nato, uh, nato secretary general jens, stoltenberg said absolutely. it is clear that there is strong support in the us for continued assistance to ukraine and this has not changed. the elections that took place yesterday in the united states and the state department, by the way, have already spoken on

this subject, please. the current administration is confident that support for ukraine will continue and be unwavering. yes, there are certain voices that express a different opinion, but the congress represents a lot of opinions, and i think that the majority of republicans and democrats alike take a clear position regarding support for ukraine. yes, you wanted to add something. and we certainly have a society of extremes. we love, either in that direction quality, or in this direction, of course, among the experts of the supporters of the extreme. not if they are experts and none of the serious experts. at least from those whom i think, i did not say that when the democrats came, the congress with the help of ukraine stop. oh sorry democrats. the republican asks for forgiveness. yes, in congress, assistance to ukraine will stop talking about reducing assistance, what will be said about the complication of the procedure will be. well, at least, as we have already said here that the republicans are preparing for the elections 24 years old, elected at 24 years old. they should prepare, taking into account the point

of view of their voters. the republican electorate is much more. democratic, i am inclined to believe that the united states is obliged to help ukraine, speaking of elections, respectively, now for 24 years you think that they are now telling voters that they need to transfer money to domestic economic problems in their own states or constituencies with the allocation of money to ukraine, this is one and two, and part of the republicans of the position believes that the ukrainian project. in its current form , there is a project of the baidan administration and, accordingly, since it is republican. uh, the republican house of representatives will attack the paid for any reason, then here. she , too, will also put wear and tear. at least on the subject of how it already is, they correctly said how these funds are spent. let's do an audit. let's see where that money went. it's already hello to lower support levels. i'm not saying, that is, this wheel will still spin in the same direction, but the coefficient of friction, yes, and for these reasons, i understand that it's pointless to discuss this trump's twitter

. that's all too. already some kind of foam i have absolutely only two comments. yes, trump is unpopular in the united states of america among the republicans for supported only 29% we need to figure this out for ourselves. and trump will never be a person who, at least somehow, at least somehow looks positively towards russia . this issue has been closed. and yes, there are things that upset me in these elections, jane was very much worn out. uh, head of the department. cyber ​​threats. in the biden administration. she stated very unpleasant facts to me in the first place on the intervention. elections in the united states of america remains china. we are in second. yes, what is some kind of horror, and there the chinese are ahead. well guys, well hackers, well, what are you doing? well, maybe even now something can be somehow, well, not to refine, not to refine, not to refine. and trump’s twitter is no longer discussing that twitter was a very important moment, which trump is indicative for us and i will explain why he is gaining his social networks indicatively. here is the message.

get out, get out. yes, this is actually not twi. network own private yeah, he writes in it, but does not speak publicly he was told by a friend my a can repeat the same thing brightly and cool on camera. and me it was interesting. i have quite a few people from boston who graduated from harvard law school. i called them older people than me. i say, why did he write and did not open his mouth? yes, and opened his mouth is already an article. and here you need to prove that the assistant wrote or someone used your phone to write this message, the russian hackers broke, of course, of course, that is, roughly speaking, everything that is called. the topic is actually closed. yes, in fact , everything is closed further, how would it work the wheel the way it worked with certain coefficients of friction and, accordingly, just tell me now to discuss the elections. after how many in a year, you can come or still something, which is very fast now, because now

the candidates must be determined, who sings, first of all , must be determined. inside the democratic party, if the old biden once again wakes up and decides that he will go, it will be very difficult, he has no, u, according to the results of these elections, no obligations. something is there now declare now no now different. forgive me please, i’ll just say one very straight word very important. the fact is that now the republicans must show the result that they are somehow different, but certainly. they must now, among other things, show not the negotiation process, but that their cost-effectiveness of money, it is higher than the democrats. the fact is that many politicians, including those in the state department. and those who put in and made real bets on congressmen. they will now wonder how we we will recapture our money, including the money that will be spent on ukraine. now this is a very important moment. how could one account for the money, because now you can only account for 10% of those expenses that are gone and have become different, how to make money in a new way and how to make money in conditions of defeat, not victories. now it’s difficult, we still have a word here, in all these discussions the

word impich somehow sounded like it. uh, why well, look, let's say now the democrats really want the republicans want to do impeachment. suppose. well, wait a second, all the reasons. to do this, there is a corresponding amendment to the constitution, within the framework of which, with an incompetent president. goodbye. and why is there such a biden at the head of the united states who greet the air, he suits absolutely republicans. he he was bringing down the rating of the democratic party in turn. democrats also understand that healthy people are on the air. well, at least a little more or less, an adequate grandfather is much better than the vice president of the united states which are absolutely, but radically, that is, kamala haris. kamala haris. it is so to say. the cherished lifesaver of jubaiden, paradoxically paradoxically. well, about the same scheme was torture when they tried to impeach trump, democracy also carefully looked at who would come to replace us. they said no. a yes a yesterday i literally had a conversation with an assistant. it

's interesting. history. i say you will fight, after all, he says the president no with the vice president, right? aha well, i briefly said now go back, for example, to the eighteenth year and ask yourself in the eighteenth year. did you know. how will the presidential elections end in the twentieth year or, even better, go back to the fourteenth year and ask if it was possible to imagine in 2014. how will the elections in 1916 end in this regard? it seems to me that american politics will present a lot of surprises and now one grandfather will go there, the second grandfather is there, uh, because it seems to me that many paratroopers have already gone to the white house in american politics. this is such a political culture, there will be many more surprises in 2 years that will surprise us, so i suggest, frankly , do not start talking now, who will come to the white house, because these conversations. it seems to me that i agree with george, what i said, he may not be talking about a significant part of the expert community, but once again i repeat the participation of our fellow citizens for sure. here we have formed a feeling that

now everything will be decided, therefore, if we start now, we told that and let's now let's think. well it didn't happen now. well, let 's just happen in 2 years. but why are we going to mislead people again, so that instead of really seeing what, well, in general, the difficult situation begins to think, well, okay. seriously, the weather is about to change. why it's just not even about going back 18 or sixteen, listen to 10 months back. uh, how would it be enough to go back to realize that 10 months ago. none of us had any idea where we would be in 10 months. so in everything will change in this situation, and very important words that all these conversations are important, all these analyzes , expert assessments are important, but no one will give them. we are not redeemed by republicans, not democrats, no election results in the united states except ourselves, who will work on their problems to solve on the battlefield and not only. i'll pay for the guys, but you won't

transfer, oh, i have a credit card. only if i transfer you i will take a commission. you're mad interest on the loan. and i can do not take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so he knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without interest commission. he is so alone. in the loop, all crust perfectionists eat only grain feed. never use and will never use growth hormones and harmful additives. and they care a lot about freshness. yes, these are high standards, loops, loops are pure products, no harmful additives. we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about your

loved ones. there are already 25 million of you who we trusts and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia wellson. represents insomnia often waking up, not getting enough sleep in the morning with these horrors, it's time to finish with welson. you can fall asleep after 20 minutes , sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily, in the morning welson bad sleep no longer scares tinkoff, you can find out the loan amount for a business without opening an account, just download your bank statement. leave a request for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account digital bank lending to small businesses tinkov he is the only one in sportmaster presents austrian technologies for reliable protection from the cold. buy in the sportmaster mobile application with a discount on the first online order . never compared prices for osago and bought

a policy in the same insurance company. increase, issue a policy on sravni and ecota up to 5.500 rubles. and the price of osago is different. if insurance, then compare choose better cherkizova. imagine what we will have for dinner tonight i cook meat, from my own farms and natural spices it is impossible to resist chirkizovo. and i need money to buy so delicious. how much can the bank approve for us? let's see tinkov, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without a scanner, charter certificates from the usr of contracts with counterparties photo 3x4 without trips. and most importantly without opening an account. simply upload your bank statement only statement only statement. leave an application on denkov.ru and find out the amount of the loan without opening an account. the best digital bank for small business lending. brilliant design forefront of fashion strong jacket for

winter weather. in the application in the store, this is austin, this is about you with a tinkoff platinum credit card, they do not charge any commissions for transfers. tinkoff platinum knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff.ru website and transfer money without interest commission he is so alone. today in moscow in the cathedral of christ the

savior, the funeral of father mikhail vasilyev took place, a priest who was also called the chief priest of the airborne troops, this is a man whose life was completely given up. to the lord god and the armed forces of the russian federation this man, who went through more than one conflict with our fighters, who was awarded military awards, who jumped with the paratroopers, who was with them in hot spots. and a man whose life and service to the armed forces

ended the way life should end. if a person, a military man, is already cut off in the zone of a special military operation in the kherson region. and his service to the lord god will not end there, because his soul is immortal. and there he will stand before the lord to implore souls. fallen fighters, the kingdom of heaven to him forever is his memory. and next to him, another clergyman of the russian orthodox church, father alexander, was wounded. we pray for his speedy recovery . god's help of recovery

information channel on the first continues its work. this program time will tell is working live in the studio of anatoly kuzichev and i want to start with this on the weekend, in my opinion, well, a couple of days ago a video appeared amazing in general, it is, of course, creepy on the one hand, on the other hand very inspiring. well, he saw it, in fact, somehow they dropped grenades from a copter onto a russian soldier, and he throws them away with his hands, takes them and throws away the grenades that you look at, this is the second one, this is not a repeat. it's not alone. and the same two ammunition. here he is, and there are three of them even saying it was crazy. well , that's what i'm saying. i don't know, this is amazing . and not only mine, by the way, the name of this russian soldier has become known. here is one who threw grenades away with his bare hands. so, this is an infantryman, 138 separate motorized rifle

brigade, which is stationed in the village of kamenka, vyborg district, or not the leningrad region, leningrad region, but his name is alexei, not only so to speak, we were shocked by this video here. the telegraph posted the building on its website on its page. this video commentary was darkness, and that's it, they are about the same character. maybe, here's an example, very typical. yes, he may be an orc, but he deserves applause for what he did, like surprised, until the next comments, surprised that he didn’t catch, that he didn’t catch, with her teeth , incredibly, cool russians. they laugh in the face of death. there is something to do in ukraine in the second half of the game. and so on and so many comments. as a result, the telegraph closed the comments. well, i just closed it. we would like to show them to you, but here it is. look here. yes, uh, almost one and a half million views in 2 days and comments completely shut off. well, here, uh, the publication managed to chat with alexey and here is how he commented on this video with grenades. i can not.

i can’t surprise you here with anything, france damych. tell me, please, this is this amazement shock. i do not know this guy's composure courage, do not know and so on. it is so pure, purely civilian or really such a case out of the ordinary. that's how you, how the military will comment, it's in any way it's out of the range. won. trust me regardless. whatever training a soldier’s training is, when you have a live grenade thrown, and you know that you have 3.8 seconds there to make decisions and actions. still, there are some personal qualities and courage here, of course, it is clear that this soldier was already at war, he saw, and not

only a grenade was thrown here, but also a small enu and seeing that after the third grenade, which fell beside him. eh, he dropped out. he just decides that the fraction is hung and it is necessary from this place all the same, probably, he picked up and got ready and left. eh, beyond any doubt. this is an example. for everyone, this is a handsome man of such people, thank god, there are a lot, and i also watched my life a lot from such things when and i begin to react differently to danger, when people realize, when they understand that they still have time that it can save your life, because a person will spend more time getting up and getting away from a grenade than we just take, yes, and it is extremely difficult to accept in such stressful situations no, in the studio we understand this, there are 3.8 seconds.

we can even calculate 1 2d for ourselves there for two branches. well, you understand, right? what is it, what is it that doesn't work like that? what is it? of course, this is what i often love to quote. yes, about what kills, so to speak, it’s not panic water or a grenade that also kills, but panic, composure saves guys, i don’t know, there is a bow with no one applause and admiration, his name is alexei, i’ll repeat it again. in tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload your bank statement. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account. the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkoff, he is the only one to issue osago on sravni and save up to 5.5 thousand rubles. if insurance, then compare with a credit card. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. so he knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without

commission interest tinkoff he is the only one. pure products without harmful additives, we are always you admired by you investing in your future you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia sportmaster presents brand evening, reliable clothing and footwear designed for winter travel. buy in the sportmaster mobile application with a discount for the first online order , you need money for the purchase. how much can the bank approve for us? let's see tinkov, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without scanning and supplying a certificate from the usr agreements with counterparties photo 3x4 without trips. and most importantly without opening an account. simply upload your bank statement only statement only statement. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account . i pay, and

you bring me oh, and i only have a credit card. i ca n't translate. from me i will take a commission of a mad interest on the loan. and i can use a tinkoff platinum credit card, they charge me no fees for transfers. this is how a tinkoff point credit card can ru and transfer money without interest commission. he is such a one brilliant design, stylish jacket for winter weather kupin's app store website. it's about you, we always did not admire it. those who build not a business, but the future of you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of the year in russia on wednesday. we have turkey kupaty. dad

thursday. russia to children we have always admired you who know that deeds are more important than big words. you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we do everything in order to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia, they never compared prices for osago and bought a policy in the same insurance company, do not overpay, draw up a policy on compare and save up to five and a half thousand rubles, and the price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better. oh, i have a credit card. only if i transfer the commission from me to you. take it, you're crazy interest on the loan. and i can not take any commissions for

transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. tinkoff platinum knows how to arrange tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff is the only one. we have always admired you for giving more. what is obtained. there are already 25 million of you. those who trust us, and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkov bank of entry in russia. we continue to work live . the united states has begun the counting of votes voters who voted in the midterm elections vote counting, the most holy white house. carine jean-pierre will take a few days. we must be prepared for this, the leading american media have already begun, however, the publication of the results of exit polls. most of them so far are talking about almost equal to none, so to speak, as they say victory in one wicket. uh, netu uh, almost equal distribution of seats between

republican-democrats in both houses of congress. here, it's almost that, of course, a significant caveat, but nonetheless almost equal to the democrats preliminarily. this preliminary information occupies 216 seats against 219 for the republicans. whereas for the majority needs attention 218. it's kind of a small overshoot, but you know, it's fundamental, which means, well, ex-us president donald trump has already called on his supporters to start protests, because many voters according to him . they simply could not vote because of the quote and confusion in the election commissions. here, well, the government, of course, these accusations were immediately rejected. i think it's like the biden election. remember, there's just forbidden to doubt. i'm not kidding. they forbade doubting the results of honest results elections. that's it, yes you are arranged. simply stunning, of course, the imagination okay presenter. uh, cnn is such a channel that is very pro-democracy , and again, uh, they talk about democracy in the states a long time ago. so to speak, the publication, they are party media

. they are just party people. let's say with the tin - it's about democratic, so to speak, if the mass media , and now, the host of this pro- democratic media turned to the americans. with good free democratic advice. people stay away from social networks if you trying to figure out if you're trying to figure out if there really is a problem with voting trust your local officials and trust us here trust the news outlets you know trust they are honest they do. everything is correct. something tells me that when a person says all this 18 times in a row, believe it. believe, believe, believe, something is not right there, but michael is not. wait, that's not the question. now i just wanted to show you. what biden said on the eve of the election on the fourth. he said in event of a republican victory. here, how does biden evaluate, so to speak, the prospects are good? if we lose the house of representatives to the senate -

it will be a terrible 2 years, the good news is that i will have a pen to sign, veto so, well, the democrat republicans, apparently, also have not even pens, but hands for you to pass your veta a, then impeachment. somehow you evaluate these preliminary ones, but still the result is the third possibility in the congresses. yes, there would have been some surprises in the voting. but this red wave ah victory for the republicans, and which we've heard a lot, it doesn't seem to . this will not e be implemented. and i think that trump is a rather disappointing result even now, but because he will lose the republicans, this is a key state. a hmm merging banding. yes. and if there is a loss in george it is still unclear, but very very close, then you can not

confuse the state with the chest. yes. and if it's this, maybe it can deliver. uh, cross, why do i say that a of this this election? uh, intermediate is everything anyway, this is a referendum on the presidential election for both biden and trump. why do i say, that's trump to be honest, because a bad, well, unimportant results. excuse me please, now listen, but based on your logic. if it's really a referendum, like this. yes. if you perceive that this is actually what he is, so to speak, trust is distrust, then, in fact, for the incumbent president. these are very bad results. it's just a terrible result. if you are acting, the president and here it is for you, so to speak your trust. here it is. well, yes, then this is generally, so you're sorry. this is bad because even without that, he has, but a lot of minuses. ay, and the fact that he lost the payment of representatives, this is another minus he will be 80 years old, and on november 20, 80 years old is still a big minus, and if he

is not trusted, but in contr yes, i am very short. i really want her this is terribly interesting to russia why because if uh he, if the republican party loses in georgie , too, this can put an end to the pre-election trump campaign in 2 years. i say, this is very bad for russia because trump is a friend in russia that, my friend, in general, it’s just that he will replace trump if he told me who russia’s friends are, i served in the navy, for example, this is one of my friends, france yes, we now the second friend of friends in america and in america yes, well, the problem for russia is that if trump already understands, if it will be a loss for trump, who will replace trump, uh, as candidates for the landing, yes, our viewers. maybe you are not familiar with this surname, no need no need. i love you conjure. you don't want to go deep into it, we just want to do it in russia. you have to learn it in russia, in the states

. there is no such formula for you. what house friend? remember his presidency right. here, many experts reproached, saying that they drank champagne in the sixteenth. yes, but what now? how was your mood said, they are in the seventeenth eighteenth and so on and in the nineteenth year of russia's friends in the states no, well, that's it, let's be political, of course. there is a political aspect here. thank you means, i mean relatively friends regarding everything in the world regarding michael means bye. uh, the results of the vote, while the ballots are being counted, mean, but what is known for sure is that the majority of voters - this is already a sociological fact - would negatively perceive the second term of joseph biden as president. this follows from these exit polls and look, so to speak, well, that is, it's not just, so to speak, some consideration of a sociological nature. he has, as it were, a continuation, he has consequences for this attitudes of americans in the biden, and the consequences can be theoretical. that's how there is already

a huge demand for impeachment, but just the university of massachusetts van hurst, held in may showed that 68% of republican voters believe that the house of representatives should impeach biden. so impeachment, but uh in the us i believe that these elections really determine the political future is ridiculous. this is strange. this is to pronounce the political future of 80-year-old joseph biden. ok, so millions of politics will remain intrigues the washington post reader or will finally retire, because, of course, the guy, so to speak, is in the very juice of 80 years old, but nevertheless, you can know how things can turn out not so clear for him, so we read washington post, please. the election was a major event for biden personally and politically, and the outcome could determine whether he continues his agenda for the remainder of his term, otherwise a gop victory could turn into a confrontation with investigations and

confrontation, the election results may also show whether biden, who turns 80 this month, is capable of convincing his increasingly worried party that he will be able to lead it in 2024. medvedev georgievich hmm well, i understand that we can’t say so the fact that you understand better than me that we are not only following the fate of biden for us in principle. it means that there is a biden or not a bayton, but you know, it occurred to me, of course, about the friends of russia, it’s not that we are waiting for some friends of russia parish. there are none. well, the internal tension of the american people, first of all at the head of the united states , will change a lot. as an option or another option, let there be one not a friend of russia, the other is suddenly not russia, but internal tension. well, yes, so to speak, well, that's a lot for short. because so much time would have been quoted, and ah, it seems to us, maybe it may seem to someone that this is such a partisanship of the media such news of the modern world 100

years ago this was not news for vladimir ilyich lenin and the arbiter of the great october socialist revolution, which is only his formula, of course, is 105 years old, so he talked a lot about the partisanship of literature. i mean, everything, this is a cultural environment, an information environment in the broadest sense of the word. and now we are getting the american to implement a lot of evidence of this, and we will receive a lot more. 'cause i just thought that when that uh hmm trump threw a tantrum about punishing a communist, so he tried to use this argument is its own e, pre-election, but program. well, probably, he probably also remembered the seventh of november in this way. and it was just not long ago. seventh eighth all this somehow falls very close to further and now he himself at the same time, despite the fact that he does not like the bolsheviks for their radicalism. he himself is in the eyes of many americans. uh, biden voters, probably will seem radical because it calls for people to take to the streets and fight for the cleanliness of, uh, election

campaigns in the united states america applaud trump in this part mentally, because let him protest as much as possible first, because the american people have every reason to protest against the dirty, and the electoral system in the united states of america as a whole, the political system is absolutely oligarchic. secondly, they really stole voices and it looks like they are going to steal more. well, even if it does not affect the outcome. uh, there is a distribution of mandates, and at the federal level in the united states, in any case, this will help to form public opinion to solve a number of problems, other presidential elections and, finally, the topic of impeachment, which just sounded here. the monitor is just also connected here, because all people are all subject to certain moods. and even with all their system of interconnection, these people who are elected to congress and the senate are also not free from these mindsets, so the protests, which are a wave of protests, which can go

now, which trump would like to deploy now. this, of course, is a very serious contribution for them to future political struggle and cooking around impeachment and around all those political election nerd batteries that are just around the corner, and accordingly, so to speak, this will undoubtedly affect the foreign policy of the united states of america in some way. why are we discussing this? not because we are terribly involved in the american there political system. and there is a choice and so on. well, i just have a feeling that it might somehow affect. eh, and not in the sense that will come in terms of terminology. michael there is some friend of russia or not russia biting nails. the lord will also come. no, the point is that and this means that this inner tension is like that. well, serious inner tension. well, at least somehow, it will distract, so to speak, the united states of america quite so, uh, well, i don’t know, i almost said it’s ridiculous, there’s some other word, but now, so to speak, sponsoring this conflict and you are inciting. you are forcing distracted. still, this is the first chance, so to speak. why

is it very important, and, the second - it’s still, with a fair remark there, it says that no we have, so to speak, friends among the american political elite, but still a personal relationship. yes, yes, it’s not for the sake of a historical digression that i now recalled about lenin and about the seventeenth year and about trump, who now turned to these stories in a modern context. that is, when he periodically speaks for him with these anti-communist tantrums. this is also a factor in the fight against china and russia, you understand, right? it is understandable by the communist power, but with russia, it’s all the same, having this experience is traditionally all russian they call it, therefore, for him these are elements of propaganda and desantis, if he becomes, and the candidate for the president of the republicans, exactly the same terry anti-communism. urusophobia is also manifested by being. uh, so he introduced may 9 as the governor of his state there on his initiative. pay attention on may 9, he signs the state law absolutely anti-communist anti- communist propaganda in educational institutions

oblige, uh, to reveal the vile essence of communism, socialism in the soviet union and so further. this is also part of the struggle against modern russia of modern china, the trump and biden paratroopers. they are all in this sense one of the sophobic. ah. in short, no, no illusions, we do not eat exactly. let's not wait for some friend to act. and you are waiting for attention, of course we all want to have friends in our outer environment. i'm on another note. i would like to draw specialists, uh, who just turn to american history, counts uh, sociological analyzes, that is, history comes to a conclusion every time by-elections show a loss of votes. the president who well, the party that the president represents, yes, yes, yes, that is, this is a pattern, that is, the opponents of the incumbent president always win, their mood fluctuates. i almost always almost always only there twice,

probably it was different, but uh america is a characteristic of the american society of the american electorate. it is very mobile. ono uh, ready to move on to another point of view. here , 2 years after she expressed, it seems, er, a firm position for this or that person, and therefore, taking into account this experience, one should also treat the current elections as results, but you also mentioned age. uh, his autobiography was published in russian. this is a very remarkable book. excellent translation. he did it well himself . they probably helped him, and people with a light pen express gratitude there, but he this is about his life and uh, he had a lot of tragedies in this life, but for example, uh, he stuttered very much before his student years. and thanks to medicine, through personal efforts, it overcame it, in

addition, suddenly once in fact. it's like you're campaigning for someone, what is 80 years in america a and he's all gone. he was on the uh, edge. e life death. he had neuroscience. if not, that is, a person almost went to the next world and now he is 80 years old, and he is the president, can you imagine what kind of system, but still health care, that is, yes, i say, what is the point of life semyonovich stuttered an adult says this why is this not supported. we can predict that 80 years for modern american politics, this is a kindergarten sober and respectful to the representatives of those families who can take advantage of all the benefits of justice for the sake of it. it seems to me in the system. excuse us, and him. do not listen to 80 years, so to speak, anything at all to leave the stage. yes, not

the first time. yes, in the wrong direction, but on his own well , not that on his own, but nevertheless, this is normal. this is good, but listen, well, to be honest, if this has nothing to do with the healthcare system, our general secretaries. i will tell you you see, there is chuckling and so on. well, he understood them all. well, he is konstantin ustinovich. i just know that he was in a difficult state, he was supported and led by specialists and so on whole groups. i am sure that this has nothing to do with the healthcare system . it has to do with his current status to the fact that he is really one of us there are two dozen families for whom there is a health care system for the rest worry everything there, but what a guy at 8 years old. maybe something let, and here is called time will tell one of the main ones, yes in biden's autobiography time will tell, but i think i say so rather vulgar, but still interesting it from your conclusion about

the health care system. i somehow here, maybe you're right. i do not want to say anything, but about the bad things about the american health care system, but the political system. i think she's in big trouble. yes and that's what yes no, she is not treated. unfortunately, and what is happening with biden. here we are now looking at this pen. yes, this is just a classic example of what pupation can lead to. you see, uh, the sealing of the uh political system, in which at some point there is no influx of fresh forces, the blood flow stops. it's my favorite. excuse me, please leave the bushes. yes. excuse me please, yeah, that's what michael was talking about this pen. yes, so to speak. here about. biden says i have a pen. yes , obviously yes. biden has. yes? you see, here is the pen. come on, look, the hand is a problem

with the hand, there is a pen, but there are problems with the hand. here is the hand. we don't see the president's hand. here is the real one , just the way it should be. wait, seryozha is a little confused in yours. wait, we are hands a country like america needs a firm hand of the president what is now for what they are now doing what he is now specifically doing what he says, all his rhetoric all his follow. rigidity look at this hand, yes, hands are all reflexive. it's chaotic. it's unsystematic. it has no it has no logic. but really the hand sends a signal to the brain. you see, this is the problem. and i generally urge not to cling to this date of 80 years. and here 80 years? and here 80 years? you know, i'll tell you a few years ago as well. likon-yu, who was under 90, the author of the singapore miracle, came here. and here we were in the

balchik hotel with him for 3 hours. you can not imagine he gave us all the form of his measures in knowledge, he did not look at any cribs. there are many more examples. i can bring in the east, 90 years old wave, yeah, yeah, so it's all good at the age age has taken away well the problem in political dementia. do you understand how, as far as the american system is concerned? i'm back a little. listen it sounds beautiful effect. on, but then you can explain to me, so what is this hypothetical possibility manifested in. i'm also not ready there man. now there, uh, i don't know, discuss and laugh and so on. what is biden's hypothetical dementia about, all the american american media have written about it here, which means he walks around the stage, looks at one point, picks up something, and so on. i understand this, yes again. and that's all wait and what is the political dementia? yes , i don’t really understand, because there are consistent, clear, tough decisions, including unpopular ones. i'm talking consistent crisp and hard. is

n't dementia good? well, that could be perfect. okay, i'll decipher this lie. i deployed it about political dementia. what is, from my point of view, the political dementia of the payden, and some political rights that a crosses out from political experience, what his predecessors, in particular obama brother, stood on etc. this is an attempt to climb into the field of the republicans on someone else's field and create some kind of such an eclectic mixture here, but from some kind of intuitive republican approach of fragments. uh, liberalism, globalism and just misunderstanding. what to do? this is the same political uninteresting example, for example, afghanistan leaving afghanistan here is an example of political dementia. the democrats built it all, yes, then once everything is

ready. yes, listen, maybe dementia is political, but many believe, i understand, but many believe political observers. what that just in order to make a decision, it was inevitable and simply no one dared to take it upon themselves. i repeat. i quote you in some political results. nobody dared to take this very popular. so to speak. this is a very humiliating function, but the canoe found in himself both the strength and the will to do, i repeat, i quote. you bet, i'm quoting you political observers who think they found themselves both the strength and the will to do what was necessary, that in any case, i understood your thought, please. it seems to me that with this rather deep professional analysis, which has now sounded in the studio. we are still paying

attention to the wrong thing, and i explained that it is necessary to understand that today it is very important for us and for tv viewers that people get an answer about what is happening in the united states of america and what will be the consequences for us? who is better who is worse wonder yes from a professional point of view, speaking professionally, i want to answer for us it does not matter who is president trump or canoe? uh-huh why. because the current state of the political situation in the united states seems that way to me, and it's absolutely obvious to me. this is a very big boon for us, because they have big serious contradictions. they go. as the people say, a tyutelka in a tyutelka. yes, and in this process there is a contradiction

that will constantly shake and escalate american society and the political system. and this means, according to my understanding and my logic, less time will be devoted to some others. reply problems because it will be distracting. actually. we have repeatedly said in this studio that the situation does not depend. foreign policy military-political. uh, an economically strategic challenge in the united states of america and in terms of global processes from a one-man president. there is a collective biden and a collective trump, and believe me, given my age. they are now nostril to nostril, apparently. this is how preferences are given , preferences are given to someone yes , a democratic process is being played out, although with

the other side. here dmitry grigorievich will not let you lie from what we see how the election campaign is going on in the united states from the point of view of the formal logic of the organizational processes of violations. well, this is monstrous compared to how we see how the election campaign is developing. how unorganized we are . how much there is a lack of democratic democratic system russia is not ready to accept. no, it's shiny. me too but but what she looks like is an american democratic. yes, it has long been known, the speed listen. you and i represent, uh, different political parties. but this does not stop us on the one hand. i just think that the introduction of electronic voting systems in russia will end altogether. this is not a small system does not have consent. today we speak for russia, for our country, absolutely for her

, and in this sense there is no difference, and there is no difference, and today we see only one of the processes that are taking place there will not help will help will help. bider. everything will be open trump will be closed the war will be. this means help, which means they will try to destroy us. naturally, the most strategy is a strategy. yes, the consensus is that there is absolutely one strategy and the same there is no need for a biden or trump, maybe a landing party. no, guys, what's the difference in this sense ? attention, so to speak, of course political projects. type of crisis in ukraine. here is a chance. we continue to work live. but

as far as support is concerned, which the francais said it would be, well, in this sense, the consensus will be supported, will be supplied, will be paid, and so on. so far, i don’t know, yet, that until they get tired. it’s good that we agreed that, so to speak, that we won’t have too big illusions there, we agreed, and it seems to me, a completely fair formula, so to speak, e formulated here, what they say? eh, everyone there is against for russia, the question is, so to speak, the difference in tactics and in intensity, well, the strategy is the same, nevertheless, nevertheless, there are great fears in ukraine, at least that in connection with the victory with a possible victory, there are republicans. eh, a trickle, many can dry up or become much thinner, so to speak, there was not much panic there because of the us elections, a representative constantly came to ukraine. uh, the united states of america at linda thomas greenfield. you see, like like headlines. well, let's che- let's listen to them. news linda thomas greenfield

is in kiev to hold meetings to reaffirm the united states' unwavering support for ukraine. while the country is defending its freedom and sovereignty in the face of russia's brutal and unprovoked invasion, see how the meeting is to reaffirm ukraine's unwavering support by the way, uh, zelensky has already met with an american, according to zelensky, at the meeting they discussed the situation at the front and creating an air shield over ukraine here amazing that he is said that they discussed the creation of an air account, but did not tell. what did they agree on there well, then we'll talk about it, because, of course, such an important important very significant. so to speak, the element of support, until recently , the americans have refused you a whole series, so to speak on any kind of, as it is called, weapons, you simply refuse fundamental considerations. not wanting to provoke and so on, but now something has changed, and as i understand it, everything has been thrown into battle, everything has been thrown away everything

old sentiments. now everything is thrown in. just recently, this very linda thomas greenfield was asked if she thinks that sanctions against russia and support for ukraine could create a split in the un. that's what she is very characteristic of, but she answered, please. as you know, there has been some speculation that there might be ukraine fatigue given the cost of energy, given the pain of every country europe is going through some really hard times, don't you think opinions on sanctions against russia might end up dividing and it could undermine support for ukraine around the world. we've been united since day one and we don't see any cracks. in this unity, europe is united with nato, we have bipartisan support for ukraine in the united states, our support is unwavering. and we will continue to be united

until ukraine wins this war, until russia withdraws its troops. well, it’s amazing, of course, i haven’t seen such interiors for interviews, but it’s interesting to interview in the boiler room, so that it kind of hints that this is some kind of power plant the implemented old scheme here is the control of uh-huh station. well, they are in the museum, understood well, and the museum is somehow a museum of energy. uh, energy supplies to ukraine sergeynovich. that support is unshakable, according to lida thomas grifield and other officials. do you know what ? now, if i were sitting on this chair, talking to her, as a journalist, yes, and i would hear these statements, and these statements are righteousness, i would say, that is, uh, i translate there is such a saying, understand? yes, nothing is written in stone. yes, that's it, it's actually very

relevant. this is very suitable for this situation with ukraine it would seem that the appearance of unity remains yes, the flywheel of sanctions has gained momentum. flywheel yes supplies and stuff, but in fact, and she, well, she has to say it, she wishful thinking cracks have already formed. they may not be so visible not only at the level of civil society in europe but at the level of politicians at the level of headliners at the level of experts. we are constantly talking about this with you, all the time it is breaking through. do you understand? yes, of course, this rethinking will take place slowly, but the pendulum is designed in such a way that it cannot understand you, hang in one direction, it will definitely go in the other direction, which she does not want to talk about, so he is our inventor, you understand? yes, i understand, nothing is higher, they are nothing carved into stones and, uh, what are the republicans, if you say, going back to the american elections, then what are the republicans. and now, well, maybe not so convincingly, but, nevertheless

, they take the house of representatives to indicate that, well, at least some here, but some attempts. the way to take control of this help. i say it won't. i take it under control somehow it can be reduce this, of course, is also the beginning of this process, because otherwise it cannot go on forever, because in fact it contradicts the interests of one-story deep america, which is there to ask a person of some kind what is in general, where is it, where is ukraine on a map? he will say, yes, i don’t know, in general, in fact, you understand this in principle, uh, people, here like guys, what are we doing in ukraine? they ask you normally, a fucking peasant. what would you answer ? well, of course, the depth, and not experienced by ukraine, they don't even think that ukraine is practically very thinking of the washingtons. and perhaps, and therefore fatigue fatigue is not

observed on fatigue. i think that the yellow one will tell him that he and her sheep. the united states supports ukraine listen , michael, you are an interesting guy, a political scientist, you often travel to russia, you perform there in television shows and so on, please tell me, but here we are we read in the newspaper that we support ukraine with all our might. yes, and what, it seems, changes in our way of life, so to speak, are connected with this support, i would try, i would like to agree on the question, why do we support it? and for what, what are we from this topic when i explained that we need to look beyond the nose, that this is a very high stake here, that, if there is such a principle, domino that is, if russia is not stopped from ukraine, this may be far- far, but go is it really so yes, well, but he’s not there, but i’m there before europe i would explain then, why am i here

? i say this is a complex topic, but it is necessary to explain that well, explain it already. yes, what about and the us has huge obligations, agreed obligations with europe if it happens if it is if this is a conflict of war a conflict, but to transfer to europe it will still be drawn into the usa, because we have obligations to our allies, and therefore we must stop this conflict in ukraine listen, why do we need without obligation, which our lives are made worse, but this is and by the way, and trump just said that you need to spit. wait and you understand her unfortunate sheep, she is talking to me or someone else. listen , there are 70 years. hmm no one is going. this is an obligation to nato to nato and no one is going to. cancel this commitment. it is being broadcast. by the way a. he is such a district court . look, it's amazing, it's a must.

as far as i know on my commitment, as a daughter does not fall out. he accepts and refuses them people and depending on their interests, it happens for a high value, and i would tell him that american politics is not working on this, he left disappointed. it seems to me somehow louder that why it is important. here is the publication of the majority in the house of representatives, because they are always in favor of a fad of production, rather of american production. this is understandable. it's normal industrialization in our unfortunate country where all production is in china well it's normal for oil prices to drop and us gas is the largest gas producer is falling has always been against it. and how much can you eat the plan? e lowering, probably not for long. yes , sometimes not, because i repeat reindustrialization - this is an understandable thought, and some of these

abstractions, it means that everything can be in the domino effect right up to iowa, although i hardly give it. well , of course, it all sounds pretty enough to convince you, it’s not very lame, because yes, it ’s your feeling, of course, he doesn’t like inflation a lot of claims, but they attribute this inflation to the american military support for ukraine he does not connect it, that is, you somehow relate to the intellectual abilities of your fellow countrymen. not very quickly against the support of ukraine is not a protest, friends, dear, comrades. i ask you to pay attention to how this interview is built, after all, what did the correspondent lindon ask, the correspondent asks her. and how do you see if there is a split in the un in international public opinion on the topic of ukraine and what does she answer? yes? there is no split between us and europe as united as ever. we are united in nato as never before. we have a two-party consensus on this issue, she is asked about the world. she answers about

nato, that is, nato for her is the whole world for everyone. she wanted to sneeze the rest in the fact that she is a representative, it seems to be a prion, yes, almost him, when she has nato, what is he for him when, as she thinks, about ukraine, is there in the united states, but is there a consensus in the political elite? it is very important. in my opinion, the moment, therefore, yes, they wanted to spit on world public opinion in the united states with a large bell tower. i'm sorry, but this so and uh, they are not at all afraid in this respect to remain alone at all, not even what is there, and nato is enough for them, they themselves are enough. here is the most recent example in the united nations, by the way, there was just a vote to lift the us sanctions on cuba and the world community voted against it only the us is there ukraine israel everything from the us is not afraid of this loneliness , you know, they still stupidly and brazenly carry out their point vision. wait, really, wait, now they voted for what to remove. you are everything time to say, the international community. i remember

how you always refer stress to him. demands that you remove the chance that i say, and you talk all the time about american dictatorship, america is there, you understand where the whole world is. i will remove the sanctions, they violate the rules of the person to my question. answer, so you keep saying to the international community that this is very important , essential, so to speak, the elements are vital, that we should listen, that this is life. actually. here in between requires you to take off sanctions from cuba you answer him that america says this is taken into account. thank you. we heard you. we listened to you. she speaks perfectly. we heard you, dear friends. yes, russia is carried out. russia just does not get you how to live a truly democratic pattern. that's the whole difference is small, and you're trying to me. it 's a little embarrassing, you know, and unfair. you don't have to teach me how to live. i myself can whoever you want, please, regarding support regarding unshakable support regarding the crack, at which sergey vladimirovich says, in my opinion, cracks, which michael denies , you see it all like this, well, i absolutely agree with seryozha and this

trend is tr. went they are extremely concerned and despite the fact that they constantly dictate their diktat to the whole world. eh, it stays the same. you know, i recently, in my opinion, read somewhere today. e in one piece of news, where many, many years ago, one representative of the united states of america and they are talking about democracy said e while talking with some leader of ours. listen, you do as you are told, and that's it. you will be fine. this is the only right and legal thing to go on. well, colleagues do not want to offend our friends partners in any case. e chinese, but when we talked together for a long time about the multipolar faith. i believe that the chinese congress

caved in, showing its own kind of exclusivity, and a bipolar world was announced. but life does not stop there, and it is not like that and their arrival. with that democracy, a demonstration of some support. it is still unknown how events in ukraine will develop in the near future, as they say. here i want to remind you again. it's true, there is fighting going on. we prepare resources, we conduct, and repel counterattacks. uh, those are serious enough, but we haven't started walking yet. who comes and those who supply they understand. i want to remind everyone we are on the border. we have a different logistics nearby, and they have to bring everything, then the main majority by planes. even if it’s not so much to ask the francidam, now it’s not so much the technical part of the support, so to speak,

but about the ideological one, but i if i i understand correctly, so to speak, we formulated it long ago. uh, and, in my opinion, there is no protest of this consensus. we have our own consensus of expert states perceive this as a holy war, which you perceive as a chance that generally falls out once every 100 years, so that really that chance that appears by proxy is to take and break, well, or at least significantly weaken russia's chance, which are not scattered. if i understand the western one correctly, well, that is, the states and the western worlds in general, so to speak, this block is perceives. this is exactly so, but this is how you repeat the chance that falls once every 100 years, oh, which is not scattered from him, but they are not actually scattered from it. they do n’t just retreat like that, of course, they don’t throw them on the floor. eh, way, even let this suitcase without a handle. well, you have to carry it. i don't understand, not even a suitcase, but without a handle. i once again refer to what i told serezha, they fully support him, because here the situation is completely different when you speak. the holy war that i, as they declare,

which they announce, as they supposedly punish the aggressor. actually. all this is artificially created in the informational information space and imposed on the human by all these things. in fact, there is a colossal struggle going on to destroy russia, not to weaken a change in power, or, as they say, regimes to destroy, and they are not succeeding and russia has not yet turned on. after all, they imposed the nuclear agenda, and then everyone said that russia began to blackmail, and russia did not blackmail anyone and the nuclear agenda was not with anyone discussed before the start of the operation, experts from ukraine e, together with foreign experts created a dirty nuclear bomb at chernobyl. before the situation, we already know specialists from ukraine,

they are working, including with other nuclear powers, to create nuclear weapons in their own countries, and the worst thing is that they can’t use it today, they don’t succeed. they saw a big problem. there are smart, sensible and literate people there who have serious weapons and serious potential. russia has not yet strained. she carried out the first mobilization. in this mobilization media coverage is underway. we're talking about how the preparations are going. you forgive me but 2 months. this is the normal time for a person who has at least some experience to gain at least some skill so that he can adequately behave in battle, as we showed today, but the first pictures. yes, this is the behavior of the infusion. his soldier is still coming back once more, we are not talking now about technical details about the ideology for

them. this is holy war. no one ever jumps off of it from the holy war. you see as far as i understand myself. you represent. well, well, maybe jumping off in the holy war is not so easy. yes, it is necessary there, the ideological postulate is imposed on everyone like a holy war, and they need it to pool the resources of all, including europe, uh, nato well, and other countries. here, yes, the physical yes, the destruction of russia, i'm afraid that they are at war with russia. they understand perfectly well that they are waging a war, and russia has not waged this war yet. she hasn't started yet, got it? understood, please, as you understand it, and you know now one second. here, i don't however. sorry later. i would like to find out to see what to discuss there, there is still one element there, yesterday. rather. uh, here's the current midterm election campaign election campaign . well, first your comments. i think that, here, what else is very important to pay attention to, and the american society, the

european community, they are seriously different from what is today in russia , it was correctly said that this party, democrats, is hiding on the scales and republicans straight head to head. as you said, these same divided societies are going on. we see in europe, remember the elections to the fund, too, these parties are just for some, uh, pitiful percentages. uh, the social democrats outplayed the christian democrats this time. and it is everywhere e in many other countries, but here is this split. uh, it does not at all affect the general strategic course of a particular country sometimes. that's how i see it, it immediately takes on other people not along the line, russia does not take the west. uh, there is some strategic goal, it may have been set, let's say in the xix century and the country. eh, stubbornly changing their political regimes,

political institutions are moving towards this goal, and this must be very clearly understood. well, uh, for example, uh, let's say the german empire had uh, and the idea uh, to gather the germans within uh their borders, and they uh, the vilmore republic pursued this course, and i 'm not talking about writing to the vaper republic in a creepy way . this was continued by hitler after the war, everything was returned in the same way, paradoxically, but such different names and what the same strategy, in the end realized or e. russia has the same thing, let's say alexander ii carried out his own, and the famous reforms. after all, at that time he had a general goal, as i understand it, and to bring heterogeneous e, elements of state administration into some kind of unified system changed our political regimes. we are all working on this goal, now let's get back to what we were talking about in the american society.

also there. this is what is bad for us. it may be a conscious, but behind the current events, the general goal, and it is, and since the time of the first world war, but to retain uh, world, lead-leadership and uh, the iowa man. i think even when plowing my own farmland, i think about it. he wants to be first and that's why michael i think that's poorly prepared his campaign speech. yes, because in his arguments there was nothing that affected. here we had to tell this by guy. and you want to live, and you want to live in great america uh-huh yes, and you say that she should continue to be great uh-huh yes, but you understand that it depends not only on our desire with you. yes, you understand, we must not only fight for our greatness from

yours, even every single day. i would say to the guy and wins, why am i helping american polytechnologists like that, but it seems to me, yes, it would sound much more convincing for him, because we also want to win our right to life and we will do it. yes, and the latter asks you to show that 70% of americans support, and american support for ukraine means that it doesn’t really need to be explained by ferman and others. why is it necessary support ukraine they already understand, and without my explanation and your explanation, i say why didn’t he explain anything to him? and so everything is clear, and therefore did not explain. look, well, i don't agree with a about the holy war. no, wait, you never know, wait, you don't agree. well bring you that now the holy war is, of course, volume related. but it is that this is a very important conflict on the biden. it's like this because it's fucked up, and for the states it's 1983. yes, as a joke, i forgot to turn off the microphone, i said, like attention

country i sent to the soviet union a flock of nuclear missiles speed with them. everything will be over. but if the president turns on the microphone, but it turned out to listen. he just let it out, you know? what's the matter? this is, of course, the holy war. yes , of course, for decades there, if not a century. yes, of course, yes. well, why argue with that? well, it means that it’s just an on-air occupation with us, but in fact you are good friends with us and love to be friends, right? or what? or what they think is reciprocal reactions to uncovered aggression? yes, yes, stop this aggression so 12 times, yes, well, this is a very important conflict administration. and this fits in with them in his main one of the most important act, between there was an example of ronda reagan, who is against the state between democracies autocrats, please, well, time, let's not waste airtime or you will be the whole truth in a minute of your retreat. well, listen,

i'm his family. no, no. this is for the canoe. it is a very important moment, and what the hell are the rest? they do the same. the same they said what the hell, if this is a pure personal bideno, how do you explain it to me? there is no consensus. well, that's what i was talking about. thank you for these 7 minutes, so to speak, we will have time to lose the air. we will show that she will have time, which means that once again sean penn came to kiev to support, so to speak, symbolically support ukraine, uh, the actor conveyed to the actor, so to speak. look, yes, i handed over my oscar statuette to zelensky, which means i don’t know anything more useful in the bins. here she is. here she is not found, i don’t know for what kind of theatrical there acting for merit. perhaps for sorry tough joke, but nevertheless, perhaps, setting in the butch bloody and infernal. well, whatever. so he handed over, uh, this one, this statuette, such a thing happened between them, so to speak, a dialogue.

no, please, it's yours. no, i feel terrible. i'm just it's just a symbolic, stupid thing. yes but yes. i know, i know, if she is here with you, i will feel better and i will be confident in the strength of the fight, great. gorgeous such an honor, but yet invincible, when you are winners. bring it back to malibu. that 's right, i agree. feel better knowing that a part of me is ambiguous here, which means such an honor is great, which means it will be here until we win, that is, it is foamy, i understand, uh, broke up with them forever. and zelensky, on the contrary, to himself under the table with a cross. now i have an oscar forever. what we are seeing in ukraine is only one of the key elements for us and the main one, perhaps objectively key. the main but not the only

element. so to speak, the mosaics of international tension in common are somehow connected, and here we go. that's where we go through ukraine and china chinese investors of the ukrainian company motor sich accused ukraine of plundering the assets of china's foreign assets, imposing unreasonable sanctions on the abuse of power on november 6. we also spoke. let's do it again. i repeat at the national securities and stock market commission decided to take away the state's ownership of the shares of several companies, including ukrainian investors of the autocracker and that very mentioned motor, chinese investors, accordingly , they declared that they would have their rights to fight, and in the statement of the chinese side, absolutely clear and absolutely precise definitions of the actions of modern ukraine were finally sounded. we strongly oppose ukraine's shameless behavior regarding the politicization of normal business conduct, the forcible nationalization of motor sich and the unreasonable plunder of the

legitimate rights and interests of chinese investors. well here, of course, stylistically, you can ask again. and what happens? sometimes justified looting, but this is the shameless behavior of us , this is the phrase shameless behavior of ukraine . these conversations through the lip of some completely boorish. i don't know from the market for recruited ukrainian diplomats. that's how they think, how to generalize this shamelessness, of course, this is absolutely shameless. habitual already, but absolutely shameless behavior. e ukraine well, god be with him. we are now talking about china in general, but here is a parallel with this statement such, well, frankly, not very not very characteristic of modern. greedy statements remember, there's linda thomas greenfield date demoss dame the whole world the world the whole world, this is not the world, it turns out. this is such an appendage of some unimportant. here they are using it. this world here

uses, the phrase shamelessness of ukraine is good, meanwhile, china for the first time demonstrated to the general public its supersonic anti-ship missile or warn washington do not interfere with plans to reunite mainland china and taiwan, the south china morning post writes about it, in the sense that it reports that the characteristic conical shape of the warhead, capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, has a range of up to 2,000 km. well, so to speak inspires. of course inspires agree. and finally, representatives of china xi. jinping said that the people's liberation army. china must increase its combat capability and be ready to any time for hostilities. epochal changes are taking place faster and faster in the world, it is necessary to strengthen the comprehensive training of the armed forces to ensure their readiness for combat operations. but look at this time. well, here we are, on the one hand, as if they showed you a picture. and here's a

picture from the other side. uh, from taiwan, the head of taiwan announced the existence of a real threat of invasion from china, so they are real simple hype, respectively, to repeat. let's not that i myself am scared there again, i rejoice general movement, voltage and so on changes. everything , of course, is frightening, but in every ugliness there is, so to speak, a positive downside. strange as it may sound, for example, in the case of really some kind of escalation from some kind of tension in this direction. it is clear that, in simple terms, they will finally leave us at least a little behind, and we, as it were, will be able to finish what we started much faster and easier or not, or is it naive, so to speak, naive. hope is naive, this assumption will not be dmitry georgievich do you understand? we have been talking for so long, well, we, including all the experts in general, many about the formation of a multipolar world. and by the way, the 20th congress, which the cpc held , nevertheless spoke more about the need to form a multipolar world, and together with

china they are worthy in this multipolar world, but everyone needs to understand that on the one hand. this, of course, is a world of new opportunities, since it eliminates the dictate of one power, but the world is also very polyphonic, and in this polyphony, make sure that your voice was going to be hard to hear. and in this sense, just many scold erdogan for being inconsistent , now with some, then with others, he is consistent in terms of defending the interests of his country in a multipolar world, just in this complex and contradictory world. this means that what is happening now in beijing, from where one statement after another is heard, and all these statements exactly and accurately fall into the outline of the decisions that the 20th party congress adopted and although the shift change. not yet completed. still to be. one to vacate his post and another to a new generation chinese leaders come and the likites are still fulfilling their duties as premier, but the decision is already being fulfilled three words that were most often heard at the congress in the twentieth congress of the cpc - this is

development socialism and security this is and these actions. now, if the denpen military uniform symbolizes just what their security is, they advocate the development of security. yes security, so your security. they will defend on all circuits, so in relation to taiwan. they will uh stick hard the principle of one whale, with which we the united states once agreed as well. well, in ukraine, they will also defend their security interests in the part that chinese business, chinese citizens, chinese interests have suffered from the behavior of the zelensky team, and of course. for us. it's good because it will be, and for russia it's good because it will do it. china is even more confident and will give. i would even say give a reason. inwardly, they have long been ready to support us, they support us in many ways without waving some kind of torches, but such stories will give them the opportunity to more decisively support us on ukrainian issues. understood everything. what do you think? here is all this hype, you know, there is. i have

a feeling, some kind of underlying in any way. nothing confirmed, only intuitive that somehow it started synchronously. uh, so to speak, the noise about this , says, not so much intentions. how many expectations exactly provoke, well, some kind of public reaction, i look after not necessarily a military one. well, that's some really painful synchronizes you do not have such a feeling. i want to remind, uh, many historians. including russian historians suggest considering the second world war not from september 1st. uh, thirty- nine to expand those boundaries. think back to the conflict to come further in the east that preceded the spanish civil war and so on. here, i guess i'm the mistress of history , we can and modernity. here in this coordinate system somehow in a new way to estimate. and what it is likely to arise, yes, there is some tension in the world and she manifests herself not only at one point. but

like a disease, like a virus, it also spreads to some other regions, but i want to say, that’s what china, which, on the basis of an agreement, but peacefully adapted hong kong and macau, did all this happen before our eyes. and actually there was no military experience yet . well, let's forget about the chinese vietnamese armed conflict, but let's talk about the current stage. i remember materials. i dealt with this, and the visit in the fifty-fifth year of contra daden to moscow was very difficult negotiations for the restoration of a type of relationship, but not for some meetings, were in a frank atmosphere and shared with the very different reflections, khrushchev and adenoir. and uh, having returned that you were the first post-war federal chancellor of the federal republic of germany at the end of the federal republic of germany , he reported back to the bundestag about this trip and said, that's what

khrushchev is very concerned about. and that in modern china, on the border of its 300 million country, 650 million chinese live. today we have 144 million and one and a half billion chinese. if today they acquire military experience, then, uh, it is not known what will happen next and how this military experience will be used by these big ones, who feel their strength. and your vegetables have their place in the sun. and uh, power uh-huh, so it seems to me that this conflict should, including uh, be in our field of vision. we must understand what is happening there. naturally. we understand that something else is going on behind him, that we are georgievich's rules. yes, and we, and most importantly, the united states of america has long declared its own. so to say your consent, declared in turn. china the principle of one. so to speak, an indivisible whale. we confirmed the americans confirmed, then nancy

pelosi got on the planes and denied a little. i think this is a show. let's socialism and development, but there is a third security and peaceful way. and so, that is, ah this one whale definitely starts from the seventy-first year, when we get to know that ah u have the concept of one chinese, that taiwan may not need to be recounted. and what are the ways of peace? like when is when is when c stops talking about the peace way? that is, when he talks about what is possible by military means , this, of course, causes fear in the united states among many. that is, can it be done? it's not fighting taiwan is already a violation. i understand this, i don’t know why you are telling me this, but in a peaceful way, key words. but nancy pilose, she is an adherent of the peaceful path. if she so clearly unambiguously provokes. and the pilot backs

up this is an attempt to prevent a peaceful takeover. taiwan, that is okay, we are talking about the world. when when i was talking about, basically, domino you know, a taiwan is watching. uh, he is talking about russia's behavior in ukraine, but we also want to regain our original chinese lands. taiwan means, only i don't know, and since when taiwan is the ancestral earthly prc, taiwan has never ended in 49 years, however. you are at the end of an icy chinese completely chinese story. you know there are missions in it, about 20 years of the history of the united states is a very important issue. let me. in short, seryozha yes , explain what is at stake, really, really really china to the last talked about peaceful reunification with taiwan for a while, but stops, but, but now the us strategy is to provoke china, emphasize

provoke china into a forceful action and draw china in, play the ukrainian scenario in the pacific ocean, in order to then set all its allies on china and bleed china ah weaken china lead. what are the possible sanctions? that's real, what is the plan of a-and america yes, they realized to provoke in the pacific ocean. and now china is looking at how not to fall into this trap, yes, after all, the system to unite to unite with taiwan. this is where the whole intrigue is, in fact, about this. yes, they say it's really funny. well, as if the third one got hooked on. yes, i remember a person in the states. well, of course, she flew in, she says, she has her own opinion there. just why are we not children of a t-shirt. let's save time, please. this is the protection of the taiwanese michael by the military michael when the country was 6,000 years ago for the entire community in the world. it seems like a colossal

date, no people were buried before the doctor look at the disadvantage. from what he died. it was in china and you, with your slightly over 200 years of history, today, in fact, are trying to dictate to the whole world the conditions of the circumstances and, most importantly, the conditions that are beneficial for yourself, the conditions imposed on the whole world. china without a doubt. this territory in taiwan is the territory of china and the forty-ninth year for chinese history. this small date is another matter that there are circumstances related to us. this is our closest strategic friendly neighbor and we must build these relations, but, unfortunately, as long as there is a world provocateur, the united states of america, then such a prostitute

behavior of european countries of other countries will be an attempt to set them up. and if you can by proxy and clean up everything you do. you are not doing it by chance, thought out and on purpose, and this performance with the elections and these presidents of the elderly is not for you. it does not matter, because you have a different goal of world hegemony, pressure and control of everything, of course, so that you can get some absolutely. the only thing. i want to stand up for europe, after all, here are the girls you mentioned , uh, after all, about them, so to speak, they have them. they have a choice. and so to speak, we call the price, but these ones were simply bent over. i'm talking about europe, europe , which i love, they bent down to make it mean that you need some kind of church on saturday, so why not?