but in this main point, everyone agrees, and not so long ago, many commented on the well-known article of a merchant in america about the need to negotiate and so on, but in the same article he spoke about the same thing, that we must continue to restrain moscow, and so on. . and this is another confirmation that this is the main trend. and no matter what they say in europe in america, they set the tone and order the music, just in washington, even the macron's speech at the naval base in toulon. she showed that no matter how he beat his chest with his fist, no matter how he puffed out his cheeks, but in fact he repeated it again. here is the same tone set by washington that it is necessary to restrain russia, he agreed there to the point that geopolitics is now. there is such a

copernican, revolution, they say, before everything was spinning, uh, around washington and now there will be new centers of power. and then he immediately sank into the same thing that they are talking about in washington, that it is necessary to restrain russia, that it is necessary to increase the budget, because the main threat from there, he announced the termination of the terrorist operation in africa in malia, which really worries me a lot, because the threat of terrorism is international terrorism. it has not gone away all the talk of french americans of someone else that is finished with terrorist organizations such as alcaet, yes, the islamic state or groups similar to them in africa in the same maliva in the same moth, these are all talks of no one serious specialists. even in the west they don't believe it, because organizations. they continue to

exist and suddenly here is the transfer of gravity to a completely different direction. of course, causes anxiety. i completely agree with you. this is just another example of irresponsibility. this is the approach of the west to issues of global governance and issues of international security, because, of course, the problem of international terrorism has not gone anywhere, but both in europe and in the united states it is treated like an inverted page, that everything we have now is global adversaries, china and russia forget about terrorism, which is absolutely not true absolutely yes preparation, and participation in a new global confrontation, we throw all our resources there, we carry out the appropriate mobilization, and so on. this is indeed reflected in the doctrinal documents of the united states. yes, in the new defense strategy on international terrorism. there's just a little literally two words, yes, and everything about e russia is chinese. the main imperatives and france there too. by the way, in france too. accepted. just

yesterday in tuna da macron announced the new defense strategy, which refers to the need to prepare for a big war, that france is not ready for a big war, i mean a war with russia . naturally, yes, and it is necessary to make appropriate preparations, and of course. the military infrastructure that the united states is now building up and nato in general is building up central eastern europe it will not go anywhere. even after the completion of the special operation in ukraine, he will not go anywhere. yes, that is, the general focus on confrontation will certainly continue, and i’m actually talking about this, well, the west does not give up economic pressure on russia , including on, the issue of the notorious price ceiling on e, russian oil. just the other day, uh, a ministerial meeting of the g7 took place in münster, and in germany and there, one of the decisions was in the coming days. that is, before the end of

november, they are in a hurry to agree on a price, uh, ceiling, because the introduction of the price ceiling, as we know, is linked to, uh, the entry into force of the oil embargo by the european union on december 5th. this means that neither china ninja nor the countries of the middle east have joined this initiative and the price ceiling, except for european union sevens and uh, sevens only australia is everything, only australia has joined this idea of ​​a price cap. russia says it will not sell oil to the countries that, uh, this ceiling is leading, but the united states secretary of state tony linkin continues to say that russia will sell oil at a set price set by the big seven of the european union, as i am quoting glinkin is interested in continuing to sell its e, energy resources. and alexander mikhailovich how do you evaluate prospects? this approach and how

events will develop in this area. well, if it were voiced by those persons who mentioned it could be said that this is political myopia naivety, but it is so difficult to suspect that these people are not able to give a forecast for the coming years. i think that despite the certain absurdity of all these statements, the americans continue to push forward with stubbornness. e your economy your resources. after all, we, if we pay attention today, europe is filled liquefied gas, uh, and we understand perfectly what they have. e pipe nord stream-2. they continue not to see it, you don’t notice it, but at the same time they continue to fill the storage, including at the expense of liquefied gas, that is, they are, well, in common sense. it doesn't even smell at all. uh, the americans in this case show uh, demonstrate the ability or desire to exercise violence over economic processes. well, how can one imagine the world economy, where they, contrary to even not relations with a, contrary to the opinion

many other state saudi have already explained all this several times they continue to insist that they are able to set the world price for energy, but let's rain all the time because it's useless to communicate with people who do not hear. you. we need to give them the opportunity to make sure that they are wrong, so it seems to me that we should be calm about this. it has already been stated at our leadership. yes, and not only our leadership of the state, others who are involved in similar kinds of transactions and who are ready including trading with russia, they will see the result of this results in person. they. first, we will continue to sell. the price will rise. this is not even discussed, the second. they 're discussing the price. they don't hear the same, uh, the head of saudi arabia that explained, but you do. okay, you're talking about trading. and where are your initiatives connected with your daughters with the search for oil. you continue to ignore this topic and no matter how you control the market process, you do not try to control it. a topic that has been around for a long time

years before that she will remain, so it seems to me here. well, i repeat, they are pursuing their goal , they need to attach their own resources, but with all this, they are destroying and destroying not their own economy. if you pay attention, they only earn loses not to say that only europe but europe first of all, and we will see soon and the consequences of this so you mentioned a very important topic about liquefied. uh, natural gas. now in cairo e is passing e. e climatic themselves european by the way, biden is going there the european union positions itself as such a world leader a in the fight against e reduction, e greenhouse emissions and emissions. e carbon and so, but now buying liquefied natural gas from all over the world, because the european court for political reasons refuses the russian pipeline, and the european union condemns the development of natural gas. all countries are in

favor of using dirtier fuels, because gas is the cleanest ecological fuel, but the price of gas has led all europeans to opened everything and already coal and diesel is already nuclear power. everything is already open. they are going to use it. this china has not yet opened. now china will open and they will forget about liquefied gas in general, there is no pipe, what will remain firewood and coal coal. yes, but uh, here, i just mean that by buying up available volumes of liquefied natural gas from world markets, and europe leaves developing countries no other choice but to use dirtier fuels, and at the same time, europe says something else about the need fight with climate change, that is hypocrisy in its purest form. we will now pause for a moment and then we will continue and talk about i am

a member of british intelligence. i want to offer my services to the soviet authorities. you're wrong, buddy. what do you think is the probability of failure? if you do everything right, nothing threatens you with a double agent, no one will pull it by the ears. people like you find cut-throat drains. you passed on, constituting a state secret. this is absurd just a coincidence, but there are too many of them. george beat you to death, if you refuse to work. centenary of the famous soviet intelligence officer on sunday on the first everything is told here,

however, i have nothing to justify, and even more so to repent. we have always admired you for investing in your future, you are already 25 million. those who trust us, and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkov bank photo in russia sale 11 11 on yandex.market buy america vermicelli for only 8 rubles. november 9th to 11th. never compared prices for osago and bought do not overpay the policy in the same insurance, draw up a policy on sravni and

save up to 5,500 rubles. after all, the price of osago is different. if insurance, then compare choose better gloria jeans started making jeans more than 40 years ago. and we're not going to stop what we're doing. this is for you gloria jeans us small you. well , we measure the river twice seven times what we need to cut off a little. even the juice of vegetables and fruits, so we have a double cashback loan for any purpose, and business strata are extra words, papers and trees, and for someone there is nothing in this special. boredom started. we return sale, 11 11 on ozone only from november 11, a group of bulgur for 9 rubles. smartphone realme for 6.99 rubles. there is a shower cream for

89 rubles. buy on sale 11 11 only on yandex.market for only 5.000 490 rubles. and 30% cashback. hi alice, nice to meet you. the halva installment card is acutely relevant tele2 presents the content of subscriptions is an illusion of an offer. it does not take into account individual preference. welcome to the real world. we at tele2 give you the opportunity to collect a subscription for this unique offer pay only for the selected content and this has no analogues. and they ca n’t even buy a subscription mix, they didn’t even find it. only selected

subscription services of a mixer in the technique suddenly burned out. it's not a problem when buying. shoot. transfer 120 days without interest after admission. acting on the cause of the disease on the position. start treatment on time protect yourself and your loved ones, issue up to five and a half thousand rubles, if insurance is only 999 rubles. i'll pay the guys, and you won't transfer aha oh , i have a credit card. only if i translate for you me a commission. take you crazy interest on the loan. and i can

not take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so he knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff he is the only one. four big game today in samarkand , a meeting of the heads of foreign ministries and the organization of turkic states was held, and tomorrow a corresponding summit will be held there, and let me remind you that the organization of turkic states includes turkey uzbekistan kazakhstan kyrgyzstan azerbaijan well and hungary and turkmenistan are observers. e in this organization already. actually, all the heads of the respective states arrived in samarkand. tomorrow. eh, it is expected that a certain strategic document on implementation will be adopted at the summit, and the so-called vision of the turkic world 20 40 adopted exactly a year ago in istanbul

sounds quite grandiose. in addition, a trade facilitation strategy is expected to be approved, as well as a decision to establish an investment fund and a development bank of the development bank . here is the brix development bank the organization development bank was created. in turkey , the state, that is, it is a very important institutionalization. it seems to me that it is taking place within the framework of the turkic world, which, in addition to turkey itself, completely extends into the post-soviet space, because we are talking about the countries of central asia and azerbaijan, yes, and these same countries are members of the commonwealth of independent states of the eurasian economic union and its dkb. she is nasevich, how should one relate to this, but you do not consider tajikistan a country of central asia, of course, i do. well, he's still, well, this persian. he stays away. you just said that all the countries of central asia are still not all. and what do i want to say that, firstly

, the holding of such a summit, despite the fact that, of course, everyone associates it primarily with turkey and personally with president erdogan, holding such a summit in samarkand, first at the level of foreign ministers, and then heads states - this is a great success, and ah, uzbekistan and the diplomatic service of uzbekistan because uzbekistan offers a lot of effort within. this is their policy of openness in order to attract various international meetings to their territory by the tt themselves and especially. of course, they are promoting, uh, samarkand. as you remember , at the last sco summit, even the samarkand spirit got into, so the final documents. and therefore , this, of course, is the success of uzbek diplomacy, but it is clear that he will try to be the soloist and will be

the soloist at this meeting. and turkey , indeed, in recent years turkey has been offering quite a lot of efforts in order to try to organize a community of countries that have her a certain community of historical cultural linguistic and e translate. this is from such a humanitarian and cultural sphere to a more political one. and sometimes there is even talk about the military-political dimension and the economic dimension. for example, they even talked about some kind of, uh, unification of some armed groups and so on. that is, in some military element. here are the turkic states. and it seems to me that this will be a very interesting experience for turkey, because turkey’s previous attempt to declare itself the leader of the turkic world like this was in e, at the beginning nineties and that wave of this leadership of

turkey in the turkic world. it extended not only to the post-soviet states. she even climbed. this is a wave to the territory of the russian federation to the turkic ones, and the peoples of the russian federation, that wave is very quickly relaxed, no, but for various reasons we will not go into it with it . but she went to no now, like a new edition. here it is, but this one, but this bid for turkey's leadership is very important here as well, how it will happen, because being a leader is very difficult. turkey is demonstrating its ability to be an independent player, but an independent player like turkey and to be the leader of something bigger than yourself is to share something with others. it's not in the modern world. it ’s impossible to be such a hegemon leader as they try, the

united states builds everyone so simply, but they manage to turn europe and japan and south korea into their vassals from europe there and saudi arabia doesn’t work with others, it doesn’t work, and uh, if turkey tries to follow this path. then this, of course, most likely, will end extremely unpleasantly, including for turkey itself, because you know the leader, the overseer, the leader of the gendarme leader , hegemon, no one needs him, but to be a leader, so positive, that is, to try, but to share, first of all, economic growth, but to provide additional opportunities for development. so we 'll see if turkey's cake definitely has ambitions for this. and turkey has an idea that some kind of cultural and historical baggage

gives her the right to do this, but if there are real opportunities for this , the real potential is still a very big question, given the economic situation of turkey itself, which is not very, uh, serious, therefore, considering the fact that, well, the first. a partner for all the countries of central asia is, well, it changes a little from year to year, but it’s either russia or china russia and china russia and china, and can turkey really wedge, uh, into everything, this, that is, let’s say for countries central asia for azerbaijan a participation in various international mechanisms is an element of policy diversification. yes, this is an element of multi-vector. here it is quite a sensible rational policy, but attempts rather to play it in such a way as to become someone's big brother. and uh, pull over.

here are all the links. well it's pretty pretty iffy, so we'll see how it goes, uh , and i think it's going to be a very interesting test next year for a for turkey. well, to some extent, all rising countries go through this test, when they ambitions collide with their capabilities and, probably, turkey should also pass such a test well , you are really in the post-soviet space, turkey is very actively using soft power, and this does not cause rejection, but uh, let's say, uh, in the same states of central asia act. uh, or recently, two systems of turkish soft power acted in parallel, the state system turkish soft power, which comes from the turkish state and the hulon system of soft power, but after that, after an attempt

coup d'etat in 2016, when e gulen's supporters became enemies of, uh, the modern turkish state. here are the two systems. uh, they are soft power. they cannot exist in parallel from the point of view of turkey, but from the point of view of the recipients of the recipients. uh this soft power. it’s quite possible that i can tell you that in some countries, for example, they told me that a, despite the fact that the turkish government, so to speak, expresses dissatisfaction with the fact that gülenav institutions work, they like the garland institutions more because they are pegged to hard currency and not to the falling turkish lira. i think here is an important point. this is what the countries themselves of this organization of turkic states will make of this organization regardless or even despite the leadership ambitions of ankara, because the fact that turkey

is pursuing a very ambitious policy in the post-soviet space, because turkey wants to form a certain community of turkic states led by itself, yes. as if under the leadership of turkey, this is indisputable, and this indeed, this e-turcocentrism comes into conflict with russia's centrism in the post-soviet space. but, uh, what about the countries themselves? and, that is, the same countries of central asia will do with this project, here, but at the opening of today's meeting of the organization of turkish states at the level of the ministry of foreign affairs. here is a very interesting statement made by the minister of foreign affairs of uzbekistan vladimir norov, who made the main emphasis just on the development of economic transport arteries in eurasia listen, the new geo-economic situation emerging in eurasia opens up

very favorable conditions for us to transform our region, which connects the strategic corridors of eurasia into a powerful transport and logistics link. global manufacturing with household chain to achieve. there is a wider need to create a single transport space that will firmly link the land and sea borders of the otg countries with world markets. i literally have one turnip, if i may, i agree with solovyevich, what else should i see? what results will achieved, but it seems to me that one of the main points of this whole situation is connected with the fact that this is another demonstration of the fact that we live in a multipolar world. and that even the countries themselves, where perhaps we are today, are not yet actively involved in the work, but are invisibly present, as other countries demonstrate that there is a clear consciousness around the world that the unipolar world has disappeared and today everyone is looking for any

form of cooperation in the economy of culture, anywhere and demonstrate readiness for recognition this multifaceted world. well, i completely agree with you. and look, the minister of foreign affairs of uzbekistan spoke about the eurasian processes. the word with which e began, the formation of greater eurasia is conjugation yes , let me remind you, back in 2015 there was a russian chinese memorandum on conjugation of the eurasian economic union and the silk road economic belt. so, do you think, alexander mikhailovich, we will be able to pair or pair this economic dimension of the turkic world, about which the minister spoke foreign affairs, and uzbekistan with other economic processes in greater eurasia , to make the turkic world, and not a competitor, but a complementary normal. a member of a harmonious member of greater eurasia, in short, yes. but then i must say that, of course, this will depend a lot on how ready we are, first of all, to

propose those projects that affect the fate of a huge number of people living in the territories. you look at what is happening today due to the fact that the west has opened up in its desire, destroying russia to change relations and indicate, as it seems to him, russia to this place in the economy of the world, and we made a simple conclusion from this that you don’t want us to look to the west, we will turn to the east; moreover, this is a natural process. today we understand not only the necessity, but the underestimation of those projects that were not implemented or considered, and today the real explosion is also in the direction of the persian countries and countries, uh, that were previously considered as minimal partners. and today we see not only in terms of trade, but most importantly in terms of the scale of the task. and so, when it was said here about transport corridors, but what is the transport of the arteries, through which then economic life will pass, uh, through all these countries and this is very good, because today russia takes an active position and most importantly,

there has been a change in consciousness , including russian politicians, economists, there do not know the leaders of the country, who definitely will not return in a past life. but this one is completely to end. known, how would i say the direction of the region. so this is a guarantee that in the near future we will see completely new projects and the involvement of a huge number of countries there. well, turkey, er, russia itself, by the way, positions turkey as a gas hub. that is, it is also complementary to the processes that are being discussed at this meeting. well, turkey is also a middle eastern state. and in the middle east , uh, iran-related tensions are on the rise again . first, iran announced the creation own hypersonic missile. yes, and i think that both in israel and in saudi arabia this will be perceived with at least concern, and secondly, and iran, the head of iranian intelligence, ismail khativ. yesterday, the united states accused britain, israel and saudi arabia of

involvement in mass protests in iran that have been taking place for more than a month. and he especially accused, by the way, saudi arabia and announced that the permanent ter. tehran does not, yes, and before that, the commander-in-chief of the iranian army, general mousavi , said that the iranian special services had intercepted, just saudi cargo, uh with instructions, uh, money and equipment for protesters in iran and on the eve of the midterm elections in the united states yes as icing on the cake again. u.s. president joe biden made a very interesting caveat. yes, speaking at a rally in california he said that we were going to liberate iran yes, and when he understood, in general, what he said, yes, in fact, such an announcement of the policy of regime change, he, uh, decided to correct himself and said that they were themselves will be released. soon. yes, having i mean, just those protests, uh, that are happening

in iran or at the same time. what's really happening and what to expect? this is the aggravation of a long-standing dispute in america itself, uh, there uh, there has long been a discussion about what the long-term sanctions against should lead to. eh, iran, they have been operating primarily from the side of the united states of america since the time of the icelandic revolution in iran, that is, the end of the seventies of the xx century and until now. uh, the americans did not come to a common denominator, that is, these sanctions should still lead to successful negotiation process with tehran or should be shaken. eh, the situation inside the country so that serious changes take place there, but the most serious specialists are the most prominent specialists. in america, they still believe that iran, despite all the protests, has not even come close to the threshold of these serious changes, and the

cake is happening. this is a behind-the-scenes bargain. the americans generally believe that once again playing off iran and saudi arabia might be in washington’s favor in order to increase its pressure on both to another country iran is a long-time adversary of the united states of america and saudi arabia is out of control as crown prince mohammed bin salman rises to power. uh, not yet well, his father. actually, king salman and this game continues to visit. e. patrushev in tehran, he is very indicative of a meeting at the highest level with the president of the country at the level. hey colleagues. eh, the leaders of the iranian security council and it is clear that

many positions between iran and russia coincide. being many times in tehran. i heard from the iranians complaints about the fact that russia is not cooperating as much as we would like is not activated. this is cooperation. now the situation has changed. the political will in moscow to build up this cooperation is there, but let’s not be fair-hearted, there are difficulties, this and sanctions pressure, probably the first difficulty, and yet, the second. i would point out that the situation is not so simple. there is a behind-the-scenes struggle for the promising iranian market, and both europeans and americans are playing this game, some contacts between washington and tehran have here , for example, an agreement between lebanon and israel on gas fields. on the sea

chef. these agreements took place only thanks to the behind-the-scenes participation in them, both of iran on the one hand, and the united states of america on the other , took place. let it be in a truncated form, but the deal on, uh, the inmates and returned to the united states of america and the knapsack of advanced age, who was accused long ago in earlier in espionage and so on. that is, there are some contacts going on, there is a struggle, but in tehran, of course, feel this hostility and understand. eh, in practice understand here. responsibility for which the islamic state terrorist group took, he greatly worried the iranian society, the iranian elite, because, well, from somewhere these same terrorists come from, i really think. what is behind the aggravation between iran and saudi arabia, which we are now witnessing, so far it is the united states that is rhetorical, but the main

direction, and china is definitely the confrontation from the united states today it became known that november 14 in the fields themselves is the big twenty in bali ah. president biden will meet with the chairman of the people 's republic of china in gray hair and will discuss taiwan e, the ukrainian conflict, and the north korean nuclear program, there may be some other issues, but it is clear that this meeting will not entail any significant improvement in us-china relations . it will be devoted specifically to the management of the confrontation. rather than overcoming confrontation, confrontation with china has now become the imperative paradigm of american foreign policy, and the debate that is now taking place in america is devoted to how to subordinate the development of the country, including the economy of the united states, to the interest of this very confrontation, that is, there is no way to bring the confrontation into line with the

realities that exist in the united states , but on the contrary, how to adjust the realities within the united states to the interests of a confrontation with china, and we have already discussed on previous programs those conversations that are being held in american experts in the community and even among officials, for example, general charles richard, head of the strategic command of the us armed forces, that the united states needs to make a comprehensive total restructuring of its economy, and in the interests of this very confrontation. now listen as a prominent american expert , andrew miht, dean of the college of international studies at the george marshall european security center, determines the victory of the united states, er, in their new global confrontation. and what for this victory need to listen victory in the current round of great power confrontation against china and russia means demonstrating once again that

if democracies mobilize for the sake of common interests, they are invincible, for, despite all our shortcomings. we are better than visa. to do this, it is necessary to bury once and for all the globalist ideology, which in the west has led to the undermining of the most important function of the state to ensure national security and made us dependent on our enemies. simply put, we cannot compete with a designated adversary on whom we depend for most of the energy critical parts and medicines. our victory must involve breaking supply chains with china, and returning key elements of those supply chains back to the us, europe, and our allied democracies in asia, the beginning of our renaissance must be the recognition that some of our past decisions were wrong. and that any kege that does not involve a quick break in the supply chains of the us and europe with china and

ending europe's dependence on russian energy resources once and for all will not lead us to victory alexander mikhailovich the total severance of economic ties is total and this is the path to victory, but one can only wish that the americans close there on this island of theirs as soon as possible, of course, this is all unrealistic and unfortunately, this once again demonstrates. well, it’s not the desire to admit that it’s not the chains that are really broken today, they are breaking the relationships that they themselves built before, and they don’t want to agree with this, and they try to impose, but it doesn't work anymore. after all, who could have imagined a year ago that we would talk all over the world that the hegemony of the dollar would not exist. well, it was hard to imagine , who could imagine that coming to saudi arabia, the americans would hear. uh, polite refusal to raise the price. or restrictions on oil production, you know, they broke everything with their own hands, and they don't want to

offer a new one, they want to return the old one. and this is the road to nowhere and what is today and through the mouth of our president, yes, and those who want to hear from you, and who want to see russia as a partner, use completely different words, not consolidating around us, but offering to consider the possibility of the emergence of new centers of influence related to satisfaction and interests. these are the countries included in these new centers. this is the opposition of a natural process, and the americans continue to impose on all of us and on themselves. first of all, i think that this is the way to nowhere. but of course, under this time we should not be idealists. we don't have to think about what they are. so weak. they are strong, they are very strong opponents, so all the answers to these questions, as i like to say, lie within us, if we oppose our own sovereign economy with our own position, which will attract allies, we will achieve results faster. yes, not anywhere, probably rather. well, as a consequence , never, which, in the sense that it is impossible to return the old, of course, and fighting for it, sooner or later they

will begin to use means that can lead to increased confrontation. ivan alekseevich well, mihta calls for a tough bloc confrontation. that is, they are not capable of accepting a multipolar world, but in fact it calls for a bipolar world. yes, where, on the one hand, there is a very close-knit collective west with supply chains within itself, on the other hand , opponents of russia and china, then there is a global confrontation. well you are right. a return to the old only to the old woah, global disarming along the lines of past cold wars. this is what calls them to you, you know, since this author still runs a little ahead of the locomotive that is called it expresses, uh, what they are thinking about, but this is still not yet the official uh, official line. i think for now the strategic course of the united states is to slow down the pace of the escalation of this

strategic confrontation with china and try. hey, i'll try now. it's careful to say try to retain the strategic initiative, because what the united states is afraid of, they are afraid that china will determine, and how exactly the us-china confrontation is going, and the americans would like for to determine the levers for controlling the speed, scale, and depth of this confrontation. i think that is why it is very important for baidan. meeting, he wants to understand what happened there at this twentieth congress, what is the mood after all? uh, it’s a different matter for the chinese leadership that we know that recently biden has been inadequately perceiving the signals that they give him. why, for some reason he was sure that in saudi arabia he made a secret deal, no one in saudi arabia thought that they had made some kind of deal with him.

secret deal, and he left. uh, that means home and thought that he had agreed on something with ukraine , what is here, well, yes, and kherson is better yes, he thought that he made a secret deal, so of course not. there are guarantees that he will adequately consider all all signals, but apparently it is very important for them to understand, uh, what are they dealing with? and who will be now? actually in this in this growing confrontation, who will set the tone china will set the tons or they? the americans will uh will set the tone, as far as that's concerned this forced decoupling, so to speak, is what they call decoupling in america, that is, the rupture of economic ties. yes , such a disconnect. uh, with china, you have to understand that in uh, the forced path is feared in america, because it means an increase in

already high inflation, because prosperity. uh, there is american or largely visible, but including at least some kind of appearance of well-being in the last 30 years has been supported, including by reducing the cost of mass-produced goods mass consumption, because they were produced in china and other asian e-e countries, but first of all with china and the forced disengagement of economic ties with china and there are other production facilities. what will the new capital investments mean, the new costs, the adjustment of everything in a new way and in general? this will most likely hit american e american consumers, therefore, you know such a strategic one, such a strategist, yes, who planned everything on paper. it's not as easy to pull off as he thinks, not to mention that a question will arise with such a forced

coloring. and what about the large part of the american debt, which is owned by the chinese, he does not finish, but in the logic that he expresses it means that hmm, the chinese will be told that these are all, uh, pieces of paper that you have. they stand right there, like pieces of paper. you can ask them for waste paper. and if these are just electronic records, then you don’t even have waste paper, but realizing that china well, it just won’t let it through. this means then confiscation. a-a property western companies in the territory, china in general, this is practically such a very fast path to a very tough confrontation. i don't think americans are ready for that. well, despite all the difficulties, uh, which both of you rightly, you rightly identified everything. it seems to me that the systemic and global confrontation between the united states and china is

serious. and this is a strategic course for a long time, and this will undoubtedly require such forces from washington that they spend tens and hundreds of billions of dollars on ukraine to devastate their military stockpiles build up more and more military presence in europe to the united states eventually. they simply won’t be able to prioritize in favor of asia and the military and economic, it will ultimately not be. after all, agree to defeat russia at the expense of the conflict in ukraine. the united states has already failed, after all, when mark milli says that complete victory in a military way is unattainable, he also implies the unattainability of victory. they tried over russia, but it did not work out, and therefore the united states. will have to again shift the focus to china and negotiate in ukraine. it was a big game. goodbye.

hello, on the first channel, within the framework of the information channel, the program time will tell is working live. i'm artyom sheinin discussing the most important events that leave no one indifferent. for the past day, of course, all of us have not been left indifferent, but the events in fact, which have become events. ah. here. yes, in fact, exactly a day ago, and after the report of the commander of the united group, and the generals of surovikino to the minister of defense. shoigu and about that, due to the circumstances that were

outlined, he proposes, uh, to move, in strict accordance with the plan, our troops to defensive lines along the left bank. and the dnieper well, all the necessary arguments were given there, but for a military man, the argumentation was given that what was drawn on the map on which it was shown by the generals was a surovikin. of course, we don't know and we won't know. and this is right, just as we will not find out what is indicated on this map in the action plan for the next week, a month, six months, a year and so on and so forth, and the military of this level is always on these maps also these things, so to speak, dotted lines, eh. they mark none of this, we do not know and we are not supposed to know this. well , of course, the reaction is emotional in any society of any person who is not indifferent. she is. naturally. i yesterday at the beginning of the program. literally 20 minutes later. after it was officially announced, i stated my point of view on this matter, and by saying that i may

like the order, i may not like the order, but the moment it becomes a prize for military men in war, it becomes the only law of life. a. well, if someone wants to survive in the war, then, but for people for whom, as it were, survival in the war is not such an urgent prospect. and you can somehow speculate. well, yes, they can reason, and i said it yesterday. god knows, uh, i didn’t read anything on purpose and didn’t write anything else. so i said here on the air in my telegram channel e, hung up and you can check anything. on this occasion i didn’t write anymore, because i wrote that i think that i have nothing to add to this and i wouldn’t read it, but good people, of course, sent it, but in a natural way. uh, well, a huge palette of opinions, e emotions , statements, and across the entire spectrum, which , in fact, should be. you know

, in an amazing way, having already lived through several such outbreaks of bursts or waves, reactions to something to which society is painfully fixed. i've come to some conclusion that all in all, it's pretty predictable from the fact that of course, well, sort of some people knew everything in advance and understood everything and they said, as it should be, if they had done it, as they did, then this would not have happened. and perhaps it would have been, oh, perhaps not, but we will never know. well, shaking those who, as always, operate those my you there, that you are there for yourself here and there to stop, and so on, i emphasize again. i think that for a society that is not indifferent to what is happening. the spread of opinions is normal, you can discuss the motivations of those who do this, someone politically positions themselves somehow, someone positions themselves in information space in terms of journalistic hype and likes . that's another question, but society naturally has to

experience such painful things in some way. how else can he experience them? this in my opinion is not a problem problem. in my opinion and the task is how to work with it, because a person who may even be there is 8 years old. watched this whole story on tv. or maybe an observer - and did not observe, he was used to it over the years, even understanding and sympathy. yes, there is no one from lugansk with anyone, there he is russian in ukraine, he is used to the fact that these difficult, complex, sometimes deadly events are somewhere on tv. is it somewhere out there is something that's going on? why is he going through, but for some time now, for a lot more people than before that they watched tv, this has become a fact of their personal lives. for a month and a half now, as we have repeatedly said here, several million of our citizens, at least those who have

mobilized and who are mobilized, this is a fact of their personal life, which somehow went on, in which there were loans, a car not repaired, there was a washing machine for a kindergarten. e, electricity bills, but it was e and suddenly his world narrows down to the position of observation, like this, which i was 10 days ago, and from that side every day, a heimer arrives ten times, either at you, or next to you , here at this position i specially filmed, so that it would not be visible, one of those who was mobilized in this position. or the life of this person, and therefore his loved ones. narrows to the entrance to the dugout, and in the dugout, the same fire beats in a cramped stove. bunks and sleeping bags on them

, and it's good that i took it off on the second line, because on the first line in their world there aren't even these stoves, because you can't have stoves, because it will immediately fly along the thermal string, what i 'm all for i tell. i tell all this to the fact that some exaltation of the reaction of people to the news, which, of course, do not like it, is normal and natural. fixing them to something. she is normal and natural important to people talked and told them yes. now this is an unpleasantly inevitable forced, but this is not a non- issue. it's like an ellipsis in a very broad context where there's a lot more going on that it's not the only one. yes, it is as if important, difficult, we leave it out of the scope that we still do not understand, in fact, what is happening? well. sane people,

even in ukraine, they will be surprised there, even in ukraine, sane people lead round dances. they do not treat this as some kind of their own military victory, the changeable western analysts also do not introduce no round dances. i mean, this is the difference. it is also very noticeable, but of course, many people fixate on this matter, forgetting that this is a 1,000 km front, forgetting that, for example, for the people who are storming pavlovka today, for them, the fate of the front is decided there in pavlovka for the marines for obtf cascade of the people's militia. and yes, the ministry of internal affairs of the dpr but for them the fate of the war is decided there and this is right for the soldier and for the relatives of those who have boys fighting there , the fate of the war is also decided here, and someone storms, artyomovsk and someone is storming some other directions of pavlovka as a result, i remind you of the very

pavlovka about which there was the same surge a week ago, which means that these surges of this fixation have passed, and the marines here they are fighting and together with the cascade armored personnel carrier today they took this pope pavlovka and clean it up and this is also a context, as if a wider one, in which all this happens and artyom in the context and many, many, many, many other contexts, so it seems to me that he flies and flies to artyomovsk and to donetsk flies and a lot where flies and by the way, there are still people who are sitting in the trenches in the belgorod region, and who are also fighting ukrainian sabotage reconnaissance groups, and for them this is also quite a front line. by the way, i really hope that these people who carry out these tasks are on the territory of the belgorod region. they, too, will not be forgotten and included. as it is called in the register or list of veterans of combatants, there are quite

the boys in the trenches. they are quite at war, so it’s natural that at some point it happens fixation, but our task is people who, well, somehow , have been watching this for a long time and analyze it in a wider context. well, try to somehow this thing. here. well, if you like, yes, if you like, stop by offering your own context of what is happening within the framework of which yes , unpleasant events occur. well, in such a serious war it doesn’t happen differently, therefore, i propose. that's just to start with a discussion of how each of us in this sense, i was lucky today with the guests, because i know that each of you has your own context and perception of what is happening in the broadest sense of the word and how certain events are independent of the hype of some exotics and emotions. it fits here, i propose to start with this, please, thank you. first of all, i will say two

words that yesterday i got into an information storm. i personally got into it, because 2 hours before the report of the general of the army, the severoviki probably wrote a post there for 600,000 views, and the volume , why kherson can not be taken aha and brought there about a dozen. on my look still yesterday in fact and today, too, this is an important reinforced concrete argument. a military character is not political, it's all military history. that's what i'm saying right away, this is all a story about the war, not about politics. this is how our western partners are trying to imagine. this is a political story. it is not true. it's military , and uh, 2 hours later. i was live on one of the channels at 18:00 and they just started talking about what i wrote, they start quoting the car to the right no, i, well, i tell many people how to do it the most

do instantly. that is, i need a second to accept the state of water. that is, to turn off the emotions of water. these are absolutely slots with water. so completely turn off the emotions. so having said and i can repeat that this decision did not bring me any joy, but i will say that general surovikin did not bring joy either. yes , he said, not an easy decision for me. this is also not an easy decision. and considering what i said yesterday. i may even understand, and also, as it were, the depth of this not simplicity, because there are certain canons of the military art of military strategy. they are eternal here for any belligerent. a bridgehead on the other side of a large water barrier is an invaluable resource, and therefore i understand with what gnashing of teeth our

military made this decision. it is much more difficult for them, but there is a lot more. of course, all the information. we do not know, uh, and we will learn much later from the history books the arguments that general armenia surovikin brought yesterday, if we exclude them humanitarianly, uh, in fact, they one and a half. and one is very serious. here i underestimated to admit. uh, as if the problematic of this resource is logistics. uh-huh uh, because today i'm discussing with professionals. e with er, those hostilities that were even 2 weeks ago. and on the right bank, in fact, these were positional battles. yes , after our departure from the north from the high field. we

fixed and stabilized the fund. these were positional battles for positional battles, and one not very convincing crossing through the khokhlovskaya hydroelectric power station antonovsky is still not suitable and constantly erected. well, of course, our engineers have perfected the art there. that is, they build, uh, a temporary crossing for literally 2-3 hours, then they remove it themselves, because it immediately becomes a goal. uh, the supply of resources in this way for our grouping during positional battles was enough, but if a full-scale offensive begins on us. ammunition consumption triples and famine sets in. that's it, and then a disaster. that is, there is another argument about him said. yesterday general surovikin. here are two more moments of his speech, on who have received insufficient attention. first he gave an argument, but not as an argument. well, as if he

was stating a fact, he also mentioned the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station , he also mentioned the kiev hydroelectric power station, which is located over there a little higher than kiev. he did not mention the rest. why is this not a geography lesson, but from kiev to kakhovka there is a cascade he said that there they will start the water supply on kievskaya and then he did not add. and if it continues at all stations, it doesn’t include progress, then they will artificially organize that same shock wave that will simply blow away kakhov’s needs to be minimized. but what is happening, then not so long ago the germans published maps that were very adequate and checked. after the instantaneous disappearance of the dam of the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, whether it was undermining , or here, if the shutdown fails. but instantaneous disappearance or a shock wave from above.

firstly, the shock wave itself, which goes up to 5 m. oe, this is about a third of e kherson will blow it away with a wave and raze more than 40 settlements to the ground. ah. well, this wave will pass. e, flooding from 10 to 15 days, depending on weather, and the width of the spill, by the way, on the left bank. it is low, the spill width will be from 7 to 15 km. and if our adversary does. if only he had done it yesterday morning. yesterday, our grouping would have remained on the island absolutely inaccessible to us, and then you can step on it, you can use everything you can to actually destroy it, work about the dam. yesterday the general said, i do not rule out that our military command has information. uh, that the enemy is ready for this, for example, and the second

a moment from the speech of sura riki, which is generally almost when emotions blind their eyes. i drew immediately from the first time from the first listening. one of the goals for which our grouping of selected troops is being redeployed on the right bank to the left bank. there, the airborne forces there are cossack marines, who have been professionals for many months in battles with experience. personnel is one of the goals of the relocation. i have already said in russian to conduct offensive operations. this is understandable, and therefore, if more precisely, not if when we see the next steps. our military command there will be a concession operation, perhaps it started today and

information about pavlovka and about artyomovsky parts of this information. perhaps not excluding. either in other directions, which even our enemies are talking about, then we are after the fact, as is often the case in war, because we are not given information and should not be given, even should not be given. then perhaps this story with kherson is built in a different logical series and says, well done, perhaps this is one of the possible approaches. that's what i'm saying that e is and he is to us, perhaps for the time being, and most likely, for the time being, some wider context is not available, in which what many today are emotionally, who do not see this card, is not available. and who does not know these tasks is perceived as unconditional emotionally, and it would be strange to blame people for this, but in this wider context of time or space. uh, you said it right. it will take. e your place. in that sense, i can. remember the story. for me, she is a model. i bring it to everyone everywhere. that's when

i went and started talking history there with the exchanges. e azov, who was also one of informational e storms, when everyone did not understand why and no one paid attention that there appeared one of the e, so to speak, e negotiator. eh, saudi inheritance and the principle, then, when the custody deal happened, plus, and so on and so forth, the puzzle took shape and it became clear. well, how does it work in a broader context. this is one possible approach. when i am talking about a broader context for the perception of this story, i am talking not necessarily even about the military, not necessarily even about such a foreign policy context. and there is also uh, well context, if you like, well, here is the inner mood of people, understanding of people, because the fact that people perceive it so painfully emotionally. this suggests that so many people are finally beginning to come to the conclusion that this is not on purpose, but the operation is on tv every day, and that this is some kind of completely different story that

requires the attention of another from each of us and from all of us taken together. i think this is also a very important topic. i would consider this situation with kherson. like the second part of a very simple puzzle so the first puzzle - it was a partial mobilization so, but out of the ordinary, emerging in modern history. that is, as everyone remembers, we didn’t have it in the forty-first year, that is, in fact, when the supreme commander-in-chief announced partial mobilization, that is, everything should have been crystal clear for everyone. but to become clear that the format of the military company is completely different, it doesn’t matter who is to blame, it doesn’t matter. here's who made a mistake in the calculations. here is a given. we took it further what we did, and the commander, uh, special military operation surovikin general. yes, he took full responsibility for this, and the decision there he simply took

upon himself, well, he took it here, and you can continue to rage here, cry, cry, but this is completely inevitable. here i am pulled by my consciousness when the generals utter a phrase, in my opinion, inappropriate in their mouths. the main thing for a person is to save soldiers, so civilians can talk about it politicians should talk about it military thoughts in other categories, but if you translate into such, uh, ordinary military language, it would be, probably, it would sound like this, we do not have enough people on a 1,000-kilometer front. we just do not have enough people, therefore, based on what has already been done. first step 300,000 reservists. they should have been called upon to prepare them now. they need to be armed. well , here is the whole, but a giant lump of problems, which is no secret to anyone, how hard it is, it is going hard putin indirectly. yes , what kind of house directly says this, that now

80,000 out of 300 have been sent to the front, he says that 40-50 are directly involved in combat action 80 is in range again. here, as if we remember this figure, we look. the length of the front line, yes, and we understand how much of this. well, it’s not enough, even now it’s not enough, we understand that the rest of the 250-240, it doesn’t matter, thousands of people are at the training grounds; they make the soldiers the task of the russian army, by and large, to hold out until these three hundred thousand reservists approach. here i explain it to myself. so i'm not a fighter. i am not a military man. well, here, i'm drawing this line, i'm trying to figure it out. with what group we started this company, it is clear how many people there fought in the people's militia. i know perfectly well that people without rotation are at the front. since february. and it's completely unimaginable. well, there are hard decisions. well, these are adult decisions, as

for the bridgehead, i do not pretend in any way to any military analysis. simply, well, even a superficial knowledge of military history, oh, what it is, says the bridgehead is being captured in order to develop an offensive from it, but there were yesterday or today there is strength in order to develop a large-scale offensive on nikolaev on odessa in transnistria , but it’s obvious that it’s not, but, if not, but then a bridgehead, especially on the banks of such a wide river it turns under under a certain set of circumstances or it can turn into a strategic trap, can a responsible general afford it? no, of course, a responsible honest general cannot. he honestly talks about it, so i propose such an explanation for myself, it doesn’t make me. emotionally easier.

here but because it has become an international thing. well as if it were emotions, that is, we can deny reality, or we can realize it and say it. yes, it's hard. yes, it will be even harder obviously, but this is how it happens in life, in fact. that's what you said here about the fact that it doesn't make it easier emotionally. yesterday, when i was thinking about all this, i swore not to read and did not read, but when i was thinking about all this, i found such an image for myself. this is when well, on yourself, as they say, it does not show well. a. well, let's say i was a witness. and this is when a person is torn off leg? he screams in pain, kill me, he can’t focus on anything but this pain, this is an emotion, and rationality lies in the fact that at this moment, if there is no one to make a tourniquet next to him,

he must impose a tourniquet on himself. there is a tourniquet to stop the bleeding, and so on and so forth, and your life depends exactly on that at the moment when your leg is torn off, you focus on the inevitable pain, or you focus on the need to apply a tourniquet and stop the bleeding, in the first case, you most likely you die in the second case you survive. hands tight, again boredom has already begun right now gls multivitamins for men and women for 399 rubles. final sale of the year up to 80% off your credit card clothing. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. so he knows how to issue

a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff.ru website and transfer money without interest commission tinkoff is the only one like him. sale 111 on yandex.market buy a vitek immersion blender for only 990 rubles. november 9th to 11th. wilson is no longer afraid of bad sleep. honey,

get more internet. upgrade the applet in the beeline application and get 50 additional gigabytes for families with a 30-year tariff on your side, the vtb team will offer no solution. the main thing is that you didn’t choose, i’ll probably leave a small bank, otherwise i’ll worry about money. you don’t have to be calm about your savings, you can also use your own juice rate, if it’s a reliable vtb bank at 9.5%, it’s opened down profitable. now you. open at nine and a half percent on w point ru, go over and everything will work out. you see, the one who is no longer pay for connection. yes in reflection you get 350 minutes 35 gb popular. social networks of the video service for

399 rubles. in yota, connect to yota now and in all megafon stores sale 11 11 right now up to 30% discounts on synthetic motor oils rolphs, unrealistic, delicious ice cream negative emotions. black friday champions sale 1111 up to 50%

off tefal immersion blender 50% off. in m.video and eldorado in tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave a request on tinkoff dot ru and find out the amount of the loan without opening an account the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkov he is such a sale, 11 11 on yandex market buy a bq smartphone for only 2.000.990 rubles. and pay with gossip. we continue to work live and try to figure it out live. well, if you like, both in itself and in how society is going through, and it, of course, is going through, but difficult, uh, news that a, as it were, announced that the plan for the withdrawal of our troops will be implemented, on the right the shores of kherson is normal, that it hurts people

naturally, but we are talking about the fact that in a situation, let's say, a wound, but in the emotional sense of the word, of course we are, well, wounded by this news, the situation of injury is important to focus not on bleeding and pain. and in order to impose a tourniquet, well, or there is a turnstile, yes, and in this sense, the understanding of what is happening in a more rational sense is it. it seems to me very important for those who are destined to survive and who are able to switch to a rational one, that is, to as if they are burning for all that it hurts, please doctor your tourniquet option. well, a well-known commonplace is that panic is worse than a fire and, for obvious reasons, it is necessary to maintain composure in a variety of conditions. keeping a cool head is difficult, because at first he was a special military operation, civil society perceived it as something abstract. well, we are fighting somewhere, we see it on tv, they tell us about it . yes, we empathize there is empathy and

all that. someone looked up. who left? we are following this , watching with sympathy. or vice versa we condemn, that is, lived a full life. uh, with hmm the announcement of the partial mobilization of a special military operation has become part of our lives directly. that is, we ceased to be. eh, purely civil society. we have become a military civil society. yes, he ceased to be spectators and uh, in this case uh, the qualitative state of our perception. it just changed, yes. uh-huh. it just changed. we perceive this pain as our own, well, we used to perceive it as our own, only now it touched us directly. yes i mean it appeared. if before it was not very important. it would be desirable, then in this changed situation there was a request for the truth, because uh, when a politician burns or hides something or says, uh, evasive it is immediately perceived as something very bad. this is precisely the

reason for the emergence of panic moods, and the larger the audience of this politician, the larger he is. uh, the more it resonates in society. not in vain. er, well, some people were surprised for some reason. by the way what uh starting now legislation responsibility for spoken words. and this is a very natural process, which is a way of healing. ah, society. after all, if this metaphor that you brought to develop. then , in order to apply a tourniquet, you must first fix the patient, because otherwise he will interfere with you, just being in a state of passion. yes, uh, of course, i studied it, uh, in school. here but nevertheless. even even that, even i know that. uh, now returning to the situation that has developed here and now, when uh society empathizes with the need for truth; it is more or less satisfied precisely by such generals as surovikin. they come to the fore. these are not

politicians. these are doctors. as you rightly said, they simply explain on their fingers to relatives who are in a semi-conscious state and to the patient himself what needs to be done and such doctors must be trusted, because if you do not trust them, you start to reason, and let's call doctors from abroad. let's have a council and so on. all the patient is already counting dead because, uh, when you start behaving in this chaotic, panicky way. uh, there is no success in treatment, so i guess in this situation. it is necessary to focus on that, not on that, or rather, how to experience or get some kind of emotion as a result of what is happening, especially since all these incidents are just e-points in a series of integers, e-e of this point and events in a row. uh, big panorama, which is a tactical plan of action not a strategic tactical plan of action, so when we trust, er

the people who are assigned to lead the tactics and strategy of this operation. we must trust them to the end, as doctors. if we stop trusting them. uh, for some external reasons, it really pushes us to this. you noticed, probably our uh authors are from abroad. they really want that we began to doubt. they really want to excite the public consciousness in such a way that we begin to act destructively to our own detriment, cause panic, and so on. so. i consider it an indicator of the maturity of civil society, as once how it reacts to these grooves to these at tyva to how it is, how it continues to trust in any situation, because the saying of horses at the crossing does not change, well, or uh, they remove it. yes , no one has canceled those who interfere, it is still in effect and it seems to me that it was e during the great patriotic war, when the society of the soviet society concentrated from the adopted yes, it ceased to be sensitive to e-e german propaganda,

although in the first m. there are months of war. it was horror. it was just filled up at the end of february at the beginning of march. commissars deceive you, and so on, when the society experimented. and it seems to me that we are now straightening already, then the victory has become close, with what am i called? on what? actually, i would like to end my speech. we in this case, uh, reworked your words. we're on our way to striving for yes, we're on our way to striving and indeed. or, yes, another context. that's when i talk about different contexts that can and should be offered to people not the fact that they will perceive them, one of them will say no. oh, you're there. you're a propagandist. you, uh, you don't let us enjoy your pain. you don't give us. here to open our wound. you are trying to convince us that no matter how much life is pumped up on this, because you are normal, especially when you are standing nearby, well, a certain number of people who, well,

earn points and scream in this matter. no, no, no, no, no, don't help, they're in a lot of pain, they're in a lot of pain. here is the pain. she is unbearable. it's all understandably. oh that someone will use it. and these are the different contexts. i'm here in an amazing way today, well, out of necessity, i was forced to communicate with a lot of people there with my brother-soldiers, who, of course, write tyoma what is happening there? how to understand this? well, it's okay, i talked with the officer who is there in the zone. the fighting is very close to just this very one, i will even tell you more. he just, well, including there, is also partially located. well, i'm writing to him today. how are you? he's writing. well things normal mood. i say, well, i understand your mood, but you can imagine what the mood was like. here, somewhere, too, on november 10, 1941, among the commanders of the red army, the

invincible and legendary finnish soldiers who passed there, liberate the campaign of khalkhin naked and so on, when they rolled back from brest to moscow in 4 months when i had to give kiev, minsk, ah resin, yes, a lot of things had to pass. i say, you imagine what their mood was like. and what would be. if they're in that mood, would have become fixed, and this mood would have become important to them. nothing would have happened, they were fixated on something else. this, too. by the way, it’s like such an important story with the application that you also need to learn how to experience it, because there’s still a lot of hard and difficult things ahead, it’s hard to come to terms with that. and so on. this is about the question of different contexts , of course, everything is not solved in one conversation, and i know that many do not perceive these words and someone else wants to enjoy it so to speak

pain or survive it for god's sake, the question is that sooner or later you still have to switch to rational e, rails and go somewhere further, because who knows, war is always about going somewhere further forward or backward in depending on what order or what situation, so we are now also moving on with you, because in fact, and the war does not end there. it continues and in this war, as we have said many times, we have a very strong and insidious enemy in the nato lyceum and the united states of america is a host of our enemies, which i must say, of course, are also quite strong. and so to speak, they perked up at the beginning of this operation, and now, in a strange way, well, not that in a strange way that is not entirely explainable to me, and i am very interested to understand how you explain this, it is introduced into their rhetoric, some of these are still in the spring, but not

notes that were not there. and when i hear miles, four-star general chief of the joint chiefs of staff. i think that would mean. let's listen to mil together and think about it. if the front line stabilizes in winter there may be a window of opportunity to negotiate an end to the conflict, when there is an opportunity to negotiate, when peace can be achieved, seize the moment should be mutual recognition that a military victory is likely. in the literal sense of the word. may not be achievable by military means, and therefore other means must be turned to, but if the talks never take place or the us fails will continue to arm ukraine even though a complete military victory for either side looks increasingly unlikely, the question remains. i have a four- star general. with whom does the conversation about negotiations generally talk - this seems to be the lot of politicians. of course, in this position he

is also partly a politician, but the question arises. with whom is he talking at this moment, given that, well, there are, as it were, two parties to the conflict, but in fact there are more. well, of course, in kiev well, since kiev believes that in general the whole world politics revolves around them and when talking to someone it is talking to them. and if the americans are talking, it is clear that they must react in any case. well, podolak reacts to this rhetoric in a rather strange way for a healthy person, but quite understandable for an adviser to the office of the president of ukraine, listen. you understand that few people in washington and europe share your preconditions about the need for regime change in moscow, we will consider as a partner who agrees to lead negotiations on our preconditions, the preconditions are important, not the person who accepts them. i don't think that putin can accept them anyway zelensky will decide with whom to talk? that is, what we have is we have

an interesting feature in the rhetoric of an american general, who, of course, is more than a general. we understand this very well, who says, well, you know, something is stabilizing there, maybe you should think about the talks, and this is the answer. we don't just think about negotiation. you told us to think about negotiations. we are thinking about negotiations. and we think that negotiations are a good thing, when on our terms, and on what are your terms yes, on all our terms, and moreover, he says, in the fields, we are generally so constructive. we even changed how we would make ourselves even one concession. we are talking about these unfeasible conditions, our unacceptable initially, we were not ready to talk with putin and now we are talking about our unfeasible conditions, obviously impossible. we are ready to talk to anyone. in which we now the question arises. so millie talks to him or talks to someone else . and what happens in this sense?

miles talks like a person who is somehow riveted to the eyes of all the military e of all parties involved in this conflict, but simply because he is, well, akin to our chief of staff of the united states of america who are a key player in this, albeit local conflict of whom to negotiate and and whom and why is he to negotiate this, let's say, shot in many directions at once, including, including the establishment that no one is like that, to which he inclines so that they don’t stop talking that everything will be decided on the field, including the eu establishment and there the old fascist barrels of everyone else to them too, but the main ones, of course, are two. uh, the other two audiences are kiev and moscow, this is understandable. given that at the current

time then it turns out. i'm sorry that kiev has already answered him that you want negotiations, we are generally ready, well, as it were, on our terms look. in this case, there is an objective look at things. yes, kiev has different starting positions in moscow. kiev's starting position after an appeal, for example, by general mile, was that we were not going to negotiate with anyone at all. we even adopted a presidential decree so that people will lead. now they say, okay okay. our starting position, unchanged since february 24th. we are always open negotiations. we have different starting positions, but at the same time, the paradox lies in the fact that they are with a deliberate refusal to negotiate. they will be forced to lead them, but we are not going to lead them with our readiness. not going two more words about not going. now i will even say a short speech by putin, which will be delivered after a while. here it is

careful no, wait. i'm our army is not the same. let's. i saw the girl off and wrote to me, i already wrote so much about him there that now one of the most fashionable words here in this here is emotional rubbish. yes, it's a contract word. so how does an agreement differ from negotiations, by the way, there is even such intermediate negotiation room overheating so why is the negotiation has nothing to do with the e-e withdrawal of ours. uh, troops, on the right side of the bank, because an agreement is an exchange and an agreement in the current situation suggests that we are ready to exchange something for something. well, like kherson, we will exchange something there for the western part of the dpr, we cannot exchange anything, because all this is the territory of the russian federation. we have a constitutional law. that's why here it is generally unsuitable for us vitorika, with regard to

negotiations. see well elementary logic. by the way, i cited it in the fact that yesterday point by point, right by the dotted line, we carried out a partial mobilization until the end of november, another 220-240,000 of our soldiers enter the line of contact. they continue to come in and it will be tomorrow and in a week or two. that is, we are increasing our resources. we launched our factories for three shifts and opened new ones. where is the street equipment is done well, not stamped. where is ammunition stamped in commercial quantities and that's all it goes to the front. that is, we are launching lokomotiv in a war economy. today, here today , mishustin said that there are additional means of control and so on. that is, this is a process that is just unfolding. i won’t move. there are many, many, many more things, we launched all this in

order to talk. interestingly, in the near future, vladimir vladimirovich in response to a question. but how did you e didn’t say that there was a report from the supreme commander-in-chief, moreover, today peskov said that the last time shoigu was 29 october reported to putin, that is, as if putin did not exist. here in this story yesterday today and when in the near future, i hope that peskov will remain silent on this topic. uh, because that would be worse. uh, when they turn to putin with a question or he did it the most proactive. he will say something like this. our military reported the situation to me. and i agreed with their decision regarding the withdrawal of troops from the right bank. the goals and objectives of special military operations remain unchanged. the territory of the

russian federation must be liberated forward, comrades, to victory. but he will show them, yes, alexey alekseevich i would imagine this situation. e with a short scene with three characters. mark miley is certainly a favorite podolak, so i would introduce more here. hmm barrel. i 'll explain why, uh mark miles, referring to what you just described, with all this he says, well, winter is coming. uh, with us, as if he were, yes, until he stabilized and it’s not clear what will be there at all, but among the russians, remember, i said a fight, you should not underestimate the russian military sense of this word. mark miles says, oh well. eh, of course, we will continue to supply weapons to you. well, it would be nice to agree, but we will do it. in any case, it refers to boris johnson as a refrain . remember the war to the end of ukraine, this is a task on their part, no one canceled it on their

part. the west has also set it up, just like we have disinfection, demilitarization further, mr. barrel says, listen. and here you are today’s e pearl that we are ready to bring european capacities to ensure that e as much as possible quickly transport any weapon. i'm doing well. any any weapon to transport. yes, and here mikhail podolak on behalf of the offices, speaks with delight. i surrender to the hands of my native justice. if you tell us we really decided before that we will not negotiate with putin, but if you tell us we will negotiate with anyone. well, except for putin, leave us this e this opportunity to save face. had him say, well, apart from putin, we have no one for you. so i think that it’s exactly, that’s why they let me in go ahead, because the back word, as podlyak said, will still be for zelensky, who will have to, uh, swallow this insult and will have to

negotiate with whoever the west points out with, because either to the last ukrainian. and this is a plan, or plan b will need to negotiate with anyone , just to stop this russian military machine. uh-huh, it’s clear, yes, in fact, to this scene that you just indicated, and in this scene, well, there are photos on the wall, and since in general , personally, there are few photos that change, but however, i would add biden as well. e, our beautiful joseph, and who is very cheerful. uh, in light of the fact that the red wave did not happen, which means the rumors about the loss, the democrats. it is not clear why? yeah, well, it's not clear. why did he say no. it wasn't at that time the cap was a little on him. eh, tanned, but it doesn't matter, but the old man says interesting things too, let's listen to him. we gave them a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves, we gave them highmars. they can be

equipped with two types of missiles with a range of more than 600 miles, about 160 miles. we didn't give them the ones that have a range of 600 miles because we don't expect them to start bombing russian territories by the way we didn't give ukraine carte blanche . american planes ensured the security of the airspace over ukraine. however, no, we are not going to do this. we do not intend to get involved in the third world war, shooting down russian planes and directly getting involved in the conflict. note that he says, when already so to speak, electoral history is over, and he would, in principle, have nothing, without risking. in terms of the electorate of the republicans, who do not really like it, the whole story with ukraine could give a tough one, but it seems to give such a kind of middle ground, moreover, and the pentagon, which could keep silent about this. how to, well, do it, more precisely, do not do it and keep silent, but the pentagon officially says, that 's what, please. them gray eagle drones were

considered by the us for several months, the pentagon refused to approve this request, given the concern that providing these drones could escalate the conflict and demonstrate to moscow that the united states is providing weapons capable of hitting targets on russian territory, what an interesting point again in understanding who they are talking to and what all this conversation is about and these publications of these statements, but the fact is that, when it comes to the fact that they do not want to provide weapons capable of hitting targets on the territory of russia, but this is a bluff because ukraine has hymars. and ukraine has three axes and they can achieve their goals on the territory of the russian federation with a margin, not to mention the fact that they do not consider the territory of the russian federation but donetsk luhansk

zaporozhye kherson. but yes, and crimea well, excuse me, there is the belgorod region to the belgorod region. all those that the americans have already handed over. they finish it off completely, nevertheless, these are the words. you know, we have been asking ukraine for a long time, but we do not give them what they asked for, because we don't want to, but biden doesn't want to. this and so on and so forth, when politicians say such words, especially in a situation with biden, when he could give a tough one. this is also a question that says something, what does this very simple dramaturgy say for you. so alexander said that while the eyes of all the participants in the conflict were riveted to the speech of the american chief of the general staff, this is the participant in the conflict, the key participant in the conflict, by and large, is american. people are very rational, their goal is to force russia to the world on its own terms. moreover, the world should be such that russia does not survive it and simply collapses. just imagine khasavyurt after which there is no second chechen

war. yeah, nothing good would happen to us, most likely nothing good, there wouldn’t be an even more dramatic story here, because a lot more people are involved in, like, uh, war. here is a gigantic number of people affected part of the russian. now e territory is occupied. let's keep this in mind, so no peace. here in the current configuration it is impossible, therefore a mile with such a benevolent expression on his face. he's talking about the world. he says, yes, of course, because the situation can develop in such a way that really peaceful negotiations can be the right reasonable way out of this situation . we are for peace. there are two more points here. well , that is, as if we were talking about the world, now let's give you a little, then, uh, we will tickle you with a sharpening, so that you understand what will happen if there is no peace, but there are hammers. do you remember that we have

hummers that hit 600 miles. they are, we won't give them, although the ukrainians are asking, and needles, then needles, we have raptors that can fly 1,500 km. we also refused them. well, as long as refused is implied. here. actually, as it were, the story of this scenario. on the one hand, it is incredibly primitive there, but on the other hand. and who said that very complex structures work in politics. that is, how do you formulate a proposal so that your visa understands you that you are from him. do you want something for him offer, and what are you threatening him with? that is, you are telling me that in this scene, a performs miles. gingerbread, and biden means the pentagon, and arias of possible whips, that's a mile, he says, guys, so let's negotiate. and they say, because if we do not agree, then now we do not

give. but we can give. yes, but stubble, they remembered about the pdalek podlyak - this is not even a party. this is, in principle, such a squeak. somewhere there is an ishora, so i don’t know, there it’s rattling, some kind of letavra to women, women to women. we against we do not agree, we will not fight, it's all the same, as long as putin is. we will fight. yes, yes, good. we understood, wait but nevertheless. let's talk about the world, and they continue their story. they tell their script in this script. yes, there is a place for a gift and for zelensky, but no one, no matter how much is distracted there. they they don't think they're idiots 100% they understand how people are on the rise. here they have a war going on there and everything, it seems, seems to be developing, they consider them to be idiots, but useful yes, but they understand that in principle. they have such a strict collar that just a little pull, and that's it, as if this dog sat on its ass, and that's it, that's why the americans are making an offer. it was the americans who began to negotiate with russia so that russia actually surrendered. yeah, i wanted to add something

briefly, but briefly in this biden statement, if someone did not pay attention, if we convert miles to kilometers. uh, perhaps true, therefore also in kilometers, yes, perhaps true, biden confused in the world. just like kherson with filoji. it's quite possible, but he said that we don't give 600-mile rockets for highs, right? and 160 miles further. and these are the same missiles that are 260 kilometers away. i specifically counted. it is possible from kharkov that he will finish it both along kursk and voronezh . and from the right bank of the kakhovka reservoir , the whole crimea is covered, and nothing they were given, he said that we would not give it. grandfather old either try or talk. well, listen man, for whom kherson and fudge. it's pretty much the same thing. well,

what do you say? tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so he knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff.ru website and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff is so powerful, issue an osago on compare save up to 5,500 rubles. if the insurance sale is 11, 11 on yandex market, buy a box bot drill driver for only 799 rubles. and pay a quarter immediately from the split, the rest , then you need money for the purchase. how much can the bank approve for us? let's see if you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without scanefustav certificates from the usr contracts by counterparties photo 3x4 without going to the bank and, most importantly, without opening an account. just upload your bank statement only the bank statement only issue.ru and find out the loan amount

without opening an account. the best small business lending bank buy in the sportmaster mobile app with a discount on your first online order. we have always admired one thing. those who build not a business, but the future you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank five and a half thousand rubles, their price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better. hands zakrebuki again yes, again hands zagrebuki sale, or boredom in november 11 11 sale on azov has already

begun right now gls multivitamins for men and women for 399 rubles. final sale of the year up to 80% off your clothes. we are always satisfied. predated by you who know how to give more. what is obtained. there are already 25 million of you. those who trust us, and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkov bank photo in russia brilliant design in the forefront of fashion strong jacket for winter weather kupina on the website in the application is about you from a credit card. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. tinkoff platinum knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on site tinkoff dot ru and transfer money without interest commission tinkoff he is such one sale, 111 on yandex.market buy

america's vermicelli for only 8 rubles. november 9th to 11th. at tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account. the best digital bank for small business lending tinkoff, he is the only one who will offer a solution to stay. you don't have to worry about your savings, it is possible with a high rate, if it is a reliable bank vtb by 9.5% opened. now it's your turn to always be happy knowing. what to do? you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything

to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia program time will tell on we continue to work live. just before the advertisement, discussing what our opponents or our collective enemy are actually doing, and in the form of the west well, which they are now fighting against. uh, the ukrainian infantry is his weapon for his purposes for his interests and burning himself, so to speak, precisely for his sake. and we started trying. just imagine these sort of mini-scenes or mini-reprises. and what, in fact, is going on in their heads in their plans, and in rhetoric and hmm, you mentioned aleksey alekseevich just in one of your scenes. about which we will now talk, but in general this is the rhetoric of some upcoming big war. it began to sound, that is, against the background of the rhetoric that they need, as it were, negotiations, the rhetoric of some

kind of big war, as in general, the prospects european, it surprisingly began to sound quite active. well, macron, of course, is a so-so participant in a skit about world politics. well , some kind of french president, again, another. well, we have it for you. no. he, too, is interesting in this sense of things, he declares, listen, the war is returning to europe in the past. we tried to build peace by creating mutual dependency. now we are looking for independence to expand our economy, push our defense industry and put the country in the position of a war economy within the new national security concept. france is an independent, respected power at the heart of europe's strategic autonomy within nato. france will continue to play the role of a model ally and is ready to play the role of a frame nation supporting efforts to secure the

eastern flank. nato is just a defensive posture. can be perceived as a form of passivity. it is not our choice that the conflict in ukraine risks leading to a more bitter geopolitical standoff in the future. us will have to deal with the consequences of this conflict. this is a dangerous moment when the old equilibrium is challenged and the new one has not yet been reached. it would be now a different time, not military. i would, of course, here remember the vow, something goes to war and would show here, of course, a moment from my favorite movie. remember the same munchausen, so i declared war on england, uh, there they still have time until four, there la-la poplars, but unfortunately the time is different. and when he talks, in this one of his, i think he's yawning over there, man it is very interesting to him when he says these are his, uh, some crazy ideas, by the way, not for the first time. it can still be somehow embroidered, but when the barrel, which was revealingly sick, the european diplomat develops this idea of ​​​​a macron, the right-hand

flag of nato and the flank of nato and the entire eastern flag of nato , we understand this, well, the border or, as it were, the zone of contact with whom? so it becomes no time for jokes, especially when we listen to the barrels, this one sold in earnest, and right now on the map i began to draw with an arrow, please. we need to adapt our mobility system so that our troops can quickly transport and deploy their full military potential. it is critical for our defense to be able to quickly transport forces from one part of the european union to another, mainly from west to east to our external borders, but also from outside the external borders, when we deploy our military missions around the world, the eu must strengthen cooperation in increasing military mobility not only with nato but also with partners, in particular with ukraine, moldova and the balkans. something shakes him right

away, but he shakes something, but we all understand that when he is going to orient the entire infrastructure to throw, accelerated troops to the eastern flank, and also moldova, ukraine and the balkans, we all kind of understand perfectly, this is in the direction of what, then decipher it to me, he has something like that. it 's called trump on the host. yes, and you are definitely a diplomat, mister. i'm talking about this, yes, in fact, he quite suits himself for some kind of military leader who develops these ideas, but it just needs to be deciphered. uh, the onslaught, it seems, is first a fascist living space that needs to be moved east at the expense of the slavic lands due to the destruction of the slavic and so on and so on and so on. it seems to me that, uh, you know, here, i have been in uh, correspondence discussion and war with a barrel for a long time. i'm not a baron, right away, but and sometimes the remarks are very painful in the

european community about the barrel, but i really, i can't understand how this person occupies a diplomatic position. he is anyone, he can be the minister of war in the european union, he may be, i don't know, the anti-russian minister there. uh, a special post, such a danger can be created, yes, propaganda without uh for insecurity. yes, but, but he cannot be a diplomat, he is not professional in this sense. and by the way, its unprofessionalism. he demonstrated very well. in the russian federation, when he came here, he began to receive from us, and then it all started. uh, i think so, just like that a person with a certain psychological make-up, e he e it was then that he decided everything for himself, you know how he stumbled here and is limping from that moment on. he just was against it. in my opinion. and this is a big problem for the same european union of european countries that uh were uh, well. i want to say the word is dependent, but which were powered

by russian energy carriers to russia and so on. this man ursulov uderline is still an oblique dozen. uh, anna lena burbuck. uh, hmm. these people just started to cut these ties due to, uh, degradation. and destruction of the european industry industry. uh, hmm for anything and everything . i just don't understand how european countries tolerate this and, uh, accept it as, uh, one of the vectors of european politics. this is a complete destructive activity, for which you can, i apologize, just plant in a good in a good way, but in order to, how to plant, there must be someone to plant, then i’m like in this whole bouquet, but a wonderful diplomatic european democratic peaceful and so then i'll add one more fruit in the literal sense of the fruit, because ben wallace is all fruit, huh? fruit too. in general, he is about the same, and,

speaking about the support of ukraine, he does not even hide that for them the support of ukraine is not about ukraine. look at russia for many years was an active opponent of britain, many remember the poisoning in salisbury, where they were used nervously paralytic substances. russia is regularly behind cyberattacks in our country, of course russia does not like the fact that britain opposes it, we stand up for values, freedom, democracy and human rights, but this will not stop us. we are going to continue to support ukraine in protecting its sovereign territory from illegal invasion. that is, look, of course, this fruit can be presented as, well, a list of claims against russia for its hostility. well , it’s so liquid, because, well, take the sauce and cyberattacks, as it were. but it’s like, well, in fact, that ’s what the fields are, but in principle, we all

understand very well what he says that a lot russia has been an active adversary of britain for years but we understand that he means that it is britain for many centuries it has been an active adversary of russia yes and here is just an example of how active it is. here are the documents published today, and the federal security services. yes , it means britain, which, being an ally of the soviet union in world war ii, at the same time supported the army of the province in poland. and here is what is actually said in these documents. uh, oh, uh about what this krai army was doing, supported by the british. army, region. i was directly involved in cooperation with the most, that neither is, uh, nazis, hitlerites, and so on and so forth, this is just a small touch in which you can shower the whole studio here with these touches. and about our, so to speak, problems with them in this sense, but a belligerent

barrel. ah, militant macron, nevertheless, what is not, but a nuclear power. and ben wallace who says that no matter how russia is our enemy, and so on and so forth, this is all in your opinion, the rhetoric is like this, the time is like this, or they are all really somewhere dunk, nah. here is a stop, again, that is, in this sense, what we are preparing for. i think they are very reasonable, they almost all tell the truth. well, barrel is the most decent person among them. he calls a spade a spade. i find him extremely likable. he says that there is an enemy on the eastern flank. we must deal with communications, what to transfer there, tanks and that's it. rest. here will from the place of this talks about some senseless cyber attacks. it's boring and uninteresting so, what is the reason, as i understand it, and for almost 30 years russia lived in the paradigm of defeat in the cold war. yes, this is a fact, this is a given,

and they perceive it. it was like the defeat of russia and themselves they saw how the winners they were the winners of the beneficiaries, they received all the possible prizes from this ninety-first year, then something happens there, i don’t even dare to say in which particular year it became clear to them that russia tore these invisible papers, where she signed the acts of surrender and said, probably, the munich speech in deeds. the eighth year, probably, yes, probably the eighth year, it is already final. in general, it became clear that this is in general, and some such failure of the 2014 program is 2014. i think the fourteenth year. i think that they gathered, as it were, and in general, here, uh, a secret province conferred and realized that, well, apparently, yes, we will have to fight again. yeah, it's not very clear how in what configuration. well, in general , russia got out of control, we didn’t finish them

off right away. well, in principle, we passed, we know what is needed make. and here's one of the scenes. in which, probably, they had it there. so they are implementing it now, when the conflict in ukraine began, and this is an acute phase of the conflict - this is when all the masks are actually dropped, when both sides say to each other, well, almost everything that they think about each other, well, russian, especially covering ukraine on in fact, not russia yet. what in general, well, so here, well, there, straightening his tie, he says no, in principle, we will climb, as if we are ready to agree there. there's a win-win business there, but no one believes in it anymore, that is. well, what the hell is a dog business, nord stream was blown up there, and they pay any price for other energy sources there. that is, they are torn, and the key ones are simply fundamental economic ties. if there is no trade in a strategic territory , war always comes to the place of trade. here the third is not given, therefore. well, here we go from a very simple

historically very understandable to us. familiar configuration, we have an enemy who has not come to terms, but with our uprising. i mean, we have n't won yet. uh-huh, we've risen so far. here gathering militia. so far, we are demonstrating, uh, a lack of loyalty and intention to somehow, well , show ourselves. i would say so, but we, er, have kicked the khan's baskaks away with kicks and are gathering an army on the corner. now, if there is an analogy there, well, it is, as it were, for all, uh, russian viewers, understand? that is, everything, as if formally, the end of the mongol yoke is over. we are all more than an anglo-saxon. well, we don't pay anymore. but when next, well, on the battlefield - this will formulate the battlefield is ukraine yeah, that's the question. only whether ukraine or is it further away? yes, for now yes, but i

just don’t know today, now he’ll have time, the guys will find him or not. today, some retired, albeit an american general, said that what is happening here is just a warm-up for the united states of america, that is, in general, they also say and understand this. yeah, uh, it 's good that we moved to this level, because if we are now for one second literally from this level, which we are talking about, look at a local redeployment operation. our continent. from the right bank to the left bank, we will understand that this is really a local operation in time and space, that when you move to another context. you understand that against the background of this here is the statement of the head of the us strategic command yes, there is a warm-up coming even more level of confrontation. here, then, you understand that it is like pavlovka today in this direction. yes, although pavlovka is more important than important, because it is the key to the railway there. and volnovakha is coming. so, here, returning to this

level. i have been talking about this for several weeks now, thank god that they are american. i am there retired generals confirmed my words that it was not i who invented it, that for several weeks already several weeks, at least 3 weeks in washington and in the pentagon, the issue has been discussed behind closed doors. uh, about what they should do here, because for any literate general, a mil general is a very literate general. he perfectly seeing the whole picture he perfectly understands. ukraine has a chance what kherson for him? uh just like biden will confuse the name in the global sense of this conflict. he understands that ukraine has no chance. e in the end. they can accidentally turn off the outlet and it will blow away like a balloon, understanding this and proceeding from the fact that they all said in turn that the defeat of the military defeat of ukraine is the defeat of the west. they resolve the issue. well,

tomorrow ukraine will be blown away, here russia will go on the offensive, and the ukrainians will not be able to oppose anything, and again the question will arise that they asked in march, where will they stop and they will decide the issue. will they intervene directly on the territory of ukraine in this limited conflict. eh, general petrenus, and directly with the troops it was general petraus who already issued the uniform, even if he is a retired, but a retired military general and chief and chief of the cia, he said multinational forces led by the united states without nato without the fifth article multinational forces. they are already sitting on the air of the country, they are counting contingents, germany poland scandinavia slovakia. no who how much? yes, what territory of ukraine, well, parts of ukraine, western ukraine, or somewhere in

area of ​​unrest they are still sure that as soon as they cross the border of ukraine, that is, from romania they cross, they close odessa, they just stand there, they say, that's it, this is our territory, as they stand in syria, by the way. so they are there, they are there, as if not. uh-huh this is our territory and are we ready to kill soldiers on average something in america, these very screaming ones there, yes, which formally will not be nato, but they are american yes, and, accordingly, another contingent crosses. uh, the western border there in two directions, and they enter 5-7 regions there, including near kiev and stand. there they are sure that only their entry there will force us to stop and start negotiations, and then they will offer us to divide ukraine, but we do not plan to divide ukraine. and what we plan is that we

need it all, but we are one people. why are we going to keep two russian states again. that's why, but this issue is discussed and sometimes their statement, including biden's, are, as it were, fragments of those conversations, because, well, it is clear there, but they let him in. then he brings a certificate, bitch, i remember, that is, in fact, now, and therefore all this whole zoo, which just now you showed there the three of you, and they don’t know the same thing, so they calmly talk about the global war in plain text, they say, oh internationalization of this conflict, that it and the status of the local will pass into the global one, that is, it's all in the same logic, and they don't scare. what's the laugh they really know by the end of your performance laugh somehow and all about it argue and, by the way, ours. the headquarters also

know this, and therefore many of our actions in the theater of war of actions, including this, are conditioned, and when they see these very building-up drawings of ours, they all think it stinks, this mathematics. they realize that they are not ready for expression. well, in fact, this is your conversation within the framework of the image that i asked at the beginning, that when a person is injured it hurts him very much and he screams, then the person who tries to help him and apply a tourniquet. it kind of pushes him away and repels what you just did. you just said the following. don't yell! you have only a bullet you will yell shoot. yes, that is, you have now brought it to the context that all of our guys are, as it were, the most, as if serious problems are yet to come, such as do not race. well, i don’t know someone, i guess that calmed them down. time will tell. i am a member of british intelligence. i want to offer my services to the soviet authorities. you're wrong, buddy.

what do you think is the probability of failure? if you do everything right, you will not threatens you double agent no one will pull by the ears. like you find sewage analysis slit throat you passed to the kgb information constituting a state secret. this is absurd only a coincidence but there are too many of them george i hope you understand me he was shot down tortured threatened to kill if you refused to work for the kgb you had no other choice george no i offered my help please report me to the soviet authorities. centenary of the famous soviet intelligence officer on sunday on first everything is told here, however, i have nothing to justify, and even more so to repent. in tinkov, you can find out

the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account . mom, dad recommended for children. we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about there are already 25 million people who trust us close to you

and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia sportmaster presents brandvencher, reliable clothing and footwear designed for winter travel. buy in the sportmaster mobile application with a discount on your first online order. we have always admired in the army those who choose faith in hope, love, not only as the names of you, there are already 25 million. those who trust us, and we are doing everything to have the right to say cherkizovo represented cherkizovo. today i ready. cherkizovo and i need money for the purchase so tasty. how

much can the bank approve for us? let's see tinkov, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without scanning a certificate from the usr of contracts with counterparties photo 3x4 without trips. and most importantly without opening an account. simply upload your bank statement only statement only statement. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account the best digital bank for small business lending finish with wales. you can fall asleep after 20 minutes, sleep soundly through the night and wake up easily. bad in the morning, sleep no longer frightens. no commissions for transfers tinkoff platinum is so able to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without

commission interest tinkoff he is so powerful brilliant design in the forefront of fashion stylish jacket for winter weather, buy on the site in applications in the store it's about you with credit card. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. tinkoff platinum knows how to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card on the tinkoff dot ru website and transfer money without interest commission tinkoff he is such one of the environmentally friendly region of russia comparison of the economy up to five and a half thousand rubles, the price for the year is different, if insurance, then compare choose better we have always admired you, who believe in yourself and get stars, living in a huge country, over which the sun never sets, and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank in

russia well, whatever lies ahead, whatever we were passed, did not expect difficulties and trials. they are definitely waiting for us. life goes on in this life. uh, there must be law and order and those who defend this law and order in our streets. today they have a holiday for all those who are engaged in this and have been doing it, and it happened in more difficult conditions. we congratulate all employees of the internal affairs bodies of the russian federation, all honest bold courageous decisive who protect and protect us. i hope and i take this opportunity to remind the leadership of the ministry of internal affairs already congratulates on the holiday that a huge number of employees in the reserve, and the ministry of internal affairs are ready and waiting for the opportunity to go voluntarily

to work in the liberated territories, which have now become the territories of the russian federation, don't let's talk about them, this is a huge resource of all from the holidays. the information channel on the first continues its work, this time will show with you anatoly kuzichev. we work live. and that's what i want to start yesterday. kirill strimausov, deputy acting governor of the kherson region, tragically died, an absurd, very insulting death, an insulting death, his car got into an accident, he was a patriot. and you know, without any, uh, without any, so to speak, false and unnecessary pathos with a real hero yesterday. vladimir putin signed a decree awarding kirill strimausov the order of courage posthumously in our victory kirill semyonovtsev. never doubted. let's listen to him. alexander nevsky spoke, and

in this, in fact, the whole philosophy of life. if someone has not yet hacked into his nose that it is not necessary to fight with the russians, the russians always win not only by force, but also by the nobility that we are demonstrating today, believe me everything will be fine? far from all problems have been solved, but the beginning of the great victory has been laid, which we will soon celebrate together as one big country. i hope that the truth triumphs with you and everything will fall into place, we break these chains, we become happy, we raise the values ​​of our russian world. believe me, everything will be fine in any case, we will go to rejoice and remember that this is a very big one. she is very here just loving. we love all of russia, we love all the people, all over the planet earth, and we believe that everything will be fine with us, that everything will work out for us, that we will be able to love all this beauty once.

no. i don’t know what words can be said here, but words of support words of sympathy words of condolences to his family, wonderful to his wife and his to the kids, who i hope, i'm sure will grow up worthy of their father, just a few more words. as for the courage of the order of courage, which he was awarded posthumously, and it is clear that the very fact of being in office at that time is already, uh, real courage. but when we talked with kirill just a couple of weeks ago, he told me what kind of text messages he received , what threats they promised to bury , kill, destroy, liquidate, and so on. and how , despite this, he continued to do so with laughter your business. i thought, here a person, of course, has both nerves and faith. so he is worthy of this word in every sense, the word courage and the order of courage, of course. but what is left for us to be worthy of those who leave? i

pay, and you bring me oh, and i only have a credit card. i can't translate. from me i will take a commission and a crazy interest on the loan. and i can do not take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so he knows how to credit card.ru and transfer money without interest commission. he is such one, draw up to five and a half thousand rubles, if the insurance mom mom from an ecologically clean region of russia is recommended children need money for the purchase. how much can the bank approve for us? let's take a look in tinkov, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without a scan-custom certificate from the usr of contracts with counterparties photo 3x4

without going to the bank and, most importantly, without opening an account, just upload your bank statement only the statement only the statement. leave a request on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account business tinkov he is such a one guest brilliant design strong jacket for winter weather on the application website choosing faith hope, love not only as the names of you already 25 million those who trust us and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia clean products without harmful additives i'll pay for the guys. oh, i have a credit card. only if i transfer you a commission from me, will you take a crazy interest on the loan. and i

can do not take any commissions for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. so knows how to credit tinkoff dot ru card and transfer money without interest commission and shoes designed for winter travel. buy in the sportmaster mobile application with a discount on the first online. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account - the best small business lending bank. cherkizovo and i have never compared

the prices for osago so deliciously and bought a policy in the same insurance company, do not overpay, draw up a policy on sravni and save up to 5,500 rubles. after all, the price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about your loved ones already 25 million of those who trust us, and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkov bank of russia of the clean land of russia we have always admired you for investing in your future. we continue

to work live. that's so worrisome. or maybe not worrying. now our esteemed experts will not explain there, well, of course, the alarming news, nato and swedish aviation increased the number of developed flights along the borders of belarus, ukraine , russia in the form of e-e in the crimea in the period from october 5 to on november 5 to 5, suspicious activity was noticed in the black sea and in southern ukraine, where the activities in the kherson direction were intensified, as well as ukrainians in belarus, on whose territory russian military regional groups of troops arrived. here's how you can look at the maps, how much, so to speak, how intensively they study. i don't know. or maybe they are preparing or preparing for something. and vasilievich please explain, uh, it's like that. well, standard practice. uh, so to speak, all sorts of intelligence activities in the background military operation. or is it not standard. i don't see it here, do i? just for the reason, uh,

repeatedly at the highest level, uh , explained to us by our leadership that we are at war with all countries on the fact that when there was, let's say, i just take an example of an attack massed on sevastopol, which fortunately is practically nothing for them bad is not crowned, then hung there. uh, western in my opinion, an american drone. we , unfortunately, took pity on him, although we clearly signaled from him. this was fixed. he dealt with the purpose of pointing. well, yes, we didn't shoot down, why don't i know why? in addition, he didn’t even have a pilot there, if he did it right. yes, well, he was engaged in vision on our ships to our city of sevastopol, their attack air drones and sea ones, but since he hung, as it were explained, in neutral waters, that is, over neutral waters hmm well, it’s clear, that is, we have to shoot down. well, that is normal. we didn't have a foundation. we had every reason. he was engaged in the purpose of indicating combat. drones of the state at war with us, and we honor him

sorry. well, perhaps we are somehow here trying to try to admit that we are at war with nato all the same, probably, being afraid to take some steps so that, god forbid, we do not get involved in the third world war. well, my personal opinion. clearly, it was necessary to shoot down and they did nothing in response. no matter where they get involved, but their strength is demonstrative, because these jackals feel only strength. yes, i understand that when there is absolutely no contract. here it was not even necessary to show strength. and so to speak, determination determination, yes political will, but this is all this is artistic. here it is on the map. they are at war with us. they are engaged to provide their intelligence. not just for some kind of analytics, but in order to kill our soldiers of specific people, understand? it is clear, please, gevork, and you have a political point of view, so to speak. and this, of course. directly shocked in the heart. this means that they

took pity on the drone, okay, but is it george that worries you or is it also like that? what do you think is standard practice? firstly, nothing special politics always implies some kind of compromise. yes, some negotiations are possible, and from the point of view of compromises in negotiations and negotiation opportunities, the drone, of course, had to be shot down, because the negotiations were conducted without demonstrating political will and readiness to use force. these are not negotiations. it's nothing this intercom is a very bad environment. there would have been no third world war because of this, because the drone was in neutral waters. if we were to shoot down on the territory of poland, for example, yes, it is a kazbel, which i considered, first of all, not only from a military point of view, that is, from a political point of view, the twenty possible negotiations, conversations, discussions. and now this is a demonstration, and a certain western force to us, that is, the smell shows that he is ready to continue pumping us up to threaten

belarus no wonder lukashenka is talking about some kind of threats to his address. it's me that they will invade the territory of belarus there is no attention, which means they demonstrate such an opportunity, stretching our forces and our capabilities, so we absolutely correctly placed a group of troops in belarus to pull back, and ukrainian forces to the northern border. so by this very thing they are trying to somehow force us to strengthen conditional garrisons in kaliningrad and in our other territories in order to somehow a minimize our participation in a special military operation from the point of view of the ex-members of the group, that is, in the political sense - this is a demonstration of the fortress hardness. e conversational position. so to speak, we say, so to speak, we will not back down. on this, it is necessary to block the extreme calmly and neutrally love the invasion of western territory, then a nuclear strike on the western table there, the point is understood, well, as for the war, it’s completely peaceful. rather, these are, by the way,

the wars of the whole world against us, these are already facts, so to speak, this is no longer some kind of metaphor, not political science. i don't know, it's hyperbole. no, this is a fact, in fact it is an illustration of this fact. well you know, uh now it’s already clear that it’s really not there, not squabbles with neighbors, for which a large number of countries fit in there and even one large military bloc. this is actually a clash of ideas, a clash of different worlds. yes , now it is clear that the civilization clash for me became obvious on may 2, 2014 after the events in odessa, so i then realized that all this was such a real war. and so our colleague ekaterina strizhena discussed this and other related topics in an exclusive interview with soviet and russian rock musician, by the way, a rock musician. you are a very good person who knows him personally by the founder of the legendary serga group sergey hollandin. let's get a look. all the masks have been thrown off

, now it is clear that there is a conversation about, well, at least, to somehow say so, well, at least to dismember, and it would be better if we didn’t exist and there wasn’t a russian language and books, maybe they will start soon burn for the russian language. we all laughed that in ukraine no one would touch. russian language, lord, how naive we were. well now the same thing can happen in the baltic states, such bells have already gone. it's all the world passed, then people walked with yellow stars sergey galanin russian rock musician, composers and singer, founder of the legendary band. earring 20 october. the premiere of his song took place. we will live about the events in the donbass. sergei is always with his people. he is sure now is a difficult time, which obliges us to unite for the future of russia, the russian language and russian culture. this

may be our last chance to be an independent sovereign state cannot avoid war. galanin understood this back in 2014, then in odessa during a fire. 48 people were burned in the house of trade unions. the words of the song dedicated to this tragedy are prophetic and creepy. what is the big secret ? the eternal war between darkness and light there is a great world history. this is not our trouble with the neighbors. this is not a local war. it's all much more complicated motherland or death. free will and weave a common thin thread to the homeland we will live. just

the other day, the premiere of the song we will live took place. uh, how did you write it? everything was very. i just saw the poems of vladimir skoptsov. well, look, if after 100 shirts, then separation in heaven is not scary, there is no fear, if you want to look without the sound of their blue elastic? mix in an easel, if you hug each other, you can forget about death and the song was written, well, right away, probably within an hour or two, as you got up at all, it all started on the side of donbass from odessa from that very second of may of the fourteenth year, but it was absolutely such a terrible kind of terrible fairy tale. ouch, everything that happened, and no one could believe it,

but it happened and no one paid attention to it, when people die, uh, and such a terrible death, it cannot but excite and touch you. and uh don't flip let's say. so the second of may. uh, in the fourteenth year, deputy goncharenko went to be photographed against the backdrop of dead people. e aleksey goncharenko right from the scene in odessa now i am translating with a camera. this is burning, set up separatist camps near kulikov on the kulikovo field. and even if the station we took his camp destroyed part of the separatists ran into the building and unfortunately, it seems that some of them died there during the fire. i just suffocated in carbon monoxide. i am now approaching the building itself, which is the entrance to the burnt-out entrance to the buildings. yes, here now a

serious kneading is going on with real carbon monoxide on a black woman breathing, or she's just a corpse. and one more bug. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 corpses on the top floor of this world after this tragedy, the song romeo and juliet was written the memory of these people who died this

is a love song about how people burned burned burned in this hellish flame and were near. in these last minutes, always romeo and juliet , always here the story began with the unrecognized republics and the children began to die, we all know about it and we know about the line of angels. who are you, wrote somewhere, as some, in my opinion, a woman. well , how long can this go on? paradise is full of children. i immediately fell in love with this wheel. and when

will it end paradise overflowing with children. whether we want or don’t want to remain people, we have become strangers, but we were on you, and this is all for a reason. we are in the garden trampling the holy dispute with foam. by the way, now a lot of people are trolling me. e for my song that we need , they perceive me. uh, such a kind of person, who somewhere, so to speak, turned around like a weather vane, that is, he wrote there that the war is over now, like, yes, no one is for war, no one ever needs a war, but if you are a normal person . what do i need? yes, i just dream that the war is over, i'm going there. i go where it

shines, the sun was only brothers to get. what are you dreaming about? yes, only loot from childhood i believed in your songs disappointment to tears, as if they betrayed their own song and value, what do you read at all, eh yes, you answer people. well, now no , previously answered. uh, this is a stupid thing, people confuse freedom. people confuse freedom with some kind of hollywood that is imposed on the entire planet, but this is not freedom, this is nonsense, everything that we are now, what they are trying to accustom us to, this takes us and takes us and takes us away from goodness from beauty from love. and now you already understand that this is not a fairy tale, that this is all done very thoughtfully and

it all goes very well. eh, what leaps and bounds is purposefully changing the essence of man. this is a song hmm and applies to me personally, because every day you have to fight with your demons with your passions. i'm not very successful, but i try, otherwise uh hmm well, you can't survive on your own, otherwise you can't save your soul, that we are all claims of claims to someone. here he left. here he is gone. and you, uh, so you sold out, you stayed here. sold out. but this one left and was sold there. and here we are throwing these labels. so the special operation began. yes, and uh, many people left the country are still leaving russia, and you suddenly, uh, rock musicians got together and recorded the song i'm staying.

it remains to live. it is very important for a creative person to stay where he is needed, where the very russian language is where it is understandable, otherwise everything is meaningless for us in our profession. i mean , probably, yes, it makes some sense to me, but i can perfectly well be aware that i would be without this profession. uh, i would find myself and live, but i have to be here, because it's all hmm feeds it all. well, as air, i don’t

need these people who really leave them to me, well, humanly, it’s somehow a pity, because dragging you there will eat you. i stay where i don't want to be the meaning of the stomach, because this is, this is your life. she is connected to that place. in my opinion, he was born somewhere. i respect those who change. eh, a nest, so to speak. god bless them. in this sense, i have some questions for those people who, having left, cannot calm down, so to speak, but you are people from the earth, and you make a claim only to your former motherland, not to the whole land, father, or if you rejoice, for some reason you rejoice for something, in terms of, so to speak, in addition to the motherland, but you have to rejoice in everything once you are such people and worry about everything that happens.

remember yourself in 20 years someone believed in 20 years in gagarin in god, i did not believe in 20 years, but i believed in gagarin and i believed in those guys who during the great patriotic war. uh, being with everything young were heroes. what do you say to your children? who is the hero of your sons is not gagarin, why is the elder gagarin, because the elder is friends with the tereshkov family, and he is the youngest, he is strange, he reads books. your granddaughter is over four years old. yes, here she is our girl our little red riding hood, yes,

with your grandfather, how do you bring her up so that in general you speak the same language. for a long time the volga river flows or she sings wonderfully with me apple trees and pears blossomed, that is, one must sing. must read. we need to talk, we need to walk and at this time to communicate we go to the temple, if she understands what love is within the family, then it will spread to everything else. i will now say such a thing that is quite tough since childhood, they impose on children this kind of excessive freedom. children should have freedom, but this is the freedom of their children's grandfather.

let's go there for a walk on the playground there, yes, let's go where? yes, i want to, but let's see something else. let's grandfather talk about freedom in young children. this is one of those again. of such a secret weapon. eh, here are our opponents because they take us through the children. and what the devil knows is already allowed, that with the permission of the child, that is, in all these operations and sex change, that's all. the rest is about us. and if we don’t cleanse ourselves of this in this and become dirty in this, then everything is really meaningless, you understand? this. you can see how the world has changed over the past 20-30 years, when we believed in hollywood then it was interesting, but those were some other times and apparently, we still didn’t really understand how and where will move there is no eye. you will make sure you feel that he is no more. you open

your eyes you will see us. you will become so divine. he's always been like that. what kind of hero can we offer today? hey, here's the youth. and the hero who died in the donbass is this. you don’t have to go far, these are people, and i say, they are real real. one day i was acquainted with alexander zakharchenko from that one day for one hour, or rather, and i still remember this meeting. though she was so laid back and no one knew what would happen after a while. are there exactly as many stars in the sky as there are our eyes?

how many of our eyes? the most important thing is that all these people are younger than me and how much more they apparently understood what was happening than i did. well, we do what we can, but what they do. the fighters are very strong, and the spirit of love for the motherland for everything native is golden. there are a lot of young guys who are much stronger than you in spirit, but in spirit, for sure

. of them this and how they suddenly something understood and maybe even more than me, but definitely more than me. this is it these meetings these shake-ups are very important for me, because we all sit here and we somehow know everything, well, somewhere there is something rumbling, but somewhere there is someone sheds his blood. and you are trying to figure it out sitting here, but you can definitely figure it out only in your homeland, only by being with your audience with your people. you can really somehow understand something for yourself and tell them something further. make try to make our homeland different, we must make it different, we must change. eh, something very serious in

our life in our surroundings. it is necessary to change something, be sure to change in education. something needs to be changed on television. excuse me, but in this sense it is necessary to give an account that you are not being manipulated. you have to be right here, to say something like that, if you are not sure, then at least ask yourself questions. are they manipulating me, you should still be with the motherland at this moment, because now they openly say that it is necessary to destroy this has never happened at all. but when this american senator uttered these phrases. eh, plain text. it is a senator that we should be destroyed because we are too committed to our traditions, my country is too orthodox this week congressman. from bethesda gave such an answer. russia is an orthodox christian country with traditional social values ​​and for this reason, it must be destroyed. whatever it

costs us for the future, which is planned for the winter per expression in that global western world of the future the ordinary person will not have it, he will be tied hand and foot. it will remain a kind of application to some owners by some kind of production. at best, we are a country that is trying to live with god, and maybe because of this, our country still exists, because our ancestors lived correctly. how many collapsed these empires? how many of these countries do not exist, there are generally more on the maps, and we still have this root root some sense of justice, this is our and our strength and our misfortune. yes, sometimes this is such a struggle for this very justice. sergey now is the time to say the most important words. well, the most important words for me, they

will live in the song, and now there are four more lines of poetry by vladimir skoptsov, who comes from donetsk . if you close your ears, you will hear the skin of god exploding souls, you will hear them, too, motherland or

death. free will, or weaving a common thin thread motherland we will live peaceful sky for all tears and joyful light. holy water, milk and bread motherland or death. general thin copper motherland we will live common thin thread motherland we will live. if the shirt is clean, then separation in heaven is not terrible, there is no fear, if you look without sound, their blue is elastic. do you want to mix it in an easel, if you hug each other

, you can forget about the death of the motherland or death? free will, or whip motherland will live? zaya zada, milk and bread motherland or death? free will or shoulders common thin thread motherland we will live peaceful skies for all who have tears and joyful laughter. holy water milk and bread motherland or death

common thin thread motherland will live common thin thread motherland we will live we will live we will live motherland we will live. we will live, we will live. motherland will live. we continue to work live. and here is our

interest. you sometimes ask why you are discussing so much, so to speak, the united states well, as the united states is our main geopolitical adversary, they declared us some kind of there, remember, this is an acute threat, an endless destabilizing evil. well, hell, that's why, of course, we are watching closely and trying to understand what else they will come up with against us. the president of the united states of america is joseph biden. experienced person. that's because it's an adult. well, he again turned off again, got confused in geography and very symbolically mixed up in this way. uh, i said i wanted to say there is no iraqi iran. it's just that and we're all confused no. iraq from ukraine, let's listen. i think the context is better or not, i mean, kherson city kherson it looks like

entertaining. how do you say that biden behaves like when he did this with his lips, he was trying to pronounce the word optically. i 'm trying to parody the old man now. well, these bytes are shoals. well, why do we tell all this, what to laugh at an elderly person. and you know? it 's not our style at all. and, well, it's kind of completely vulgar, but we don't do that. we are trying to assess the prospects. and so to speak, the form of the leader of our main geopolitical opponent of the baydan. all this does not bother, but he announced plans to fight for re-election to the post of head of state in the 24th year, regardless of the very ones that we also have a lot of with you, but discussed independence from the midterm elections that have just passed. parameters, but i have great respect for fate. and it's ultimately a family decision. i

think that everyone wants me to participate in the elections, but we will still discuss. this, of course, is what everyone wants. yes, in the meantime , two democrats were re-elected to the house of representatives, regarding these very elections in the midterms. well, who, unfortunately, did not live to see the elections. well , you know, according to fox of pennsylvania, former congressman from that state anthony deluca, who died on october 9th, died. yet he was re-elected 85%, by the way, got well done by the way, the tennessee race was won by barbara cooper, who died on october 25. i'm afraid that's not all that we know about these elections. well, you know, here i see smiles on your faces. well, they died. the main thing is that people are good, you know, then i can really give 5% more for them one more now gevorka is another interesting news, jubaideno considers it necessary to check for cooperation with other countries, damn it, painfully suspicious somehow the greyhound behaves freely ilona mask check just in case,

please. is elon musk's collaboration or technical ties with other countries worthy of a check to see if he's doing something inappropriate or not? i think it's worth looking at. he will say everything. i think no, he said everything, he forgot what he should say? friends, what's going on? we are not on air right now. and lord god my. i thought he was thinking. just sorry for god's sake, and he's never spoken so slow before. here, pay attention to everything, yes, after all, i used to hold it, and now some kind of me really, now i didn’t parody him and stood here portraying this one. i

really didn’t understand whether he finished or not yet, please, so the task is not not to laugh, not to come up with the maximum amount of juicy metals. yes, which means i’ll start from the end, yes, with elon the mask and here’s the mask is a threat, and a threat to both biden and the republicans and all those that he will go to the elections, if he goes, because unlike the as, as it were, the key figures of both the democrats and the republicans, and musk likes him. people he is moderate in his views, and the key figures of both the democrats and the republicans are radicals. i like without sports voters that's their problem. all the key leaders in the us right now, everyone from president biden to the leader of some republican minority in the senate, have a negative rating, and a double-digit negative rating. and a with this point of view, of course, what musk is doing right now is promoting twitter making political statements. this is considered by many as

a kind of application for his participation from some party or as an independent mass, of course. remember how trump also went from the party to the republicans of special importance, no matter how he treated him, that is, he just went yes, people from him voted putty that you think that in moscow in this sense he is a security threat, that he he's got real political ambition, beper prospects for the elites who have already snickered everything, divided or that parker in which he will go. maybe there will be democrats. i don't know what the american tradition is about e-bans for re-election. c yes, if the president, the current one, who has served one term, wants to be re-elected, and no one convinces him, the party supports him, the primary is not held. if biden is in such a state, he wants to go to the polls. and rests a horn. democrats will be forced to accept his candidacy as the party's nominee.

democrats in the elections. and so on are obliged, but in fact. i say tradition is so political and they will lose the elections in the fourth year. if he lives on them, of course, if he lives, they will still lose. that is, it would be nice if he passed. although it doesn't matter, it would be nice if he went, because if he stays, you will continue to go. why is this good for us, because there will be a mess in the states, because the republican will strive in every possible way to sit up, baid, in every possible way to show what kind of no better that inadequately, no one will arrange any impeachment for him. it's cool when your political opponent is headed by such a person who speaks regularly, but from your political party. i am at your house and every day you can demonstrate the adequacy of this person as a republican, in theory, according to this logic , gevorg, and in she is enough. well, no matter how interesting and elegant such a version is and vice versa, it is necessary in every possible way not only to impeach and in every possible way to welcome biden on this act. the further, the more, the more obvious er, so to speak, naturally, a normal choice of a

normal person. indeed, just pay attention. yes, the republicans emphasize in every possible way that musk began to drift them aside, that he has respect. at the very least, he directly called for voting, or other experts close to the republicans or sympathizers say, what an interesting smear the president of america could get from the republic, they say, yes, that is, it is already called married now. and although now they have not taken the senate. they understand that them, of course, a great promotion and why the states well, if anything come out. they come out, do you remember him, this is an election advertisement, when obama doubted whether he had the right to make irrefutable evidence found, watch the video, the curtains move apart and then a fragment of the cartoon from the lion king where they raise lions and say that he was born . yes, as for the mask, i still have a feeling that he wants to be

the king of the hill, and not the president. that is, he wants to manipulate them and these as long as he has it quite successfully turned on or off starling. sorry. now he is solving the issue of the battle that has unfolded on the ukrainian field. and this is a battle between two supers. i understand that we have already heard such an image in this court for an hour, like, therefore, well, this is not quite a biden, in general, you can perceive the american government as a collective biden and so on. well, that is, we assume and everyone agrees with him that there are some forces. uh, there are some structures, some people, probably. which dictate even to the president bye to the president. yes, what and how to do? not not so not vulgar there in the form of training manuals. well, somehow, so to speak, by a collective decision and a collective will in this sense. well, the newmask has an opportunity. u stand up one of the same yes of the elements of the collective will, please me. i'll just remind you. we make out not a mask, a very charming figure too, and he naturally

draws attention to himself. i want to understand the situation in the states of the american system, which yegorka spoke about and which they fear, and i'll just remind you of 2016, when trump won, he won, in fact, thanks to social networks twitter was pulled out of him in power, they made him president. for which he then received a lifetime bank on twitter until the moment when he was already in moscow it seems to be unbanned. yes, he also had problems on facebook, and i’ll just remind you that after these elections, the same zuckerberg was called to the carpet and reported. yes, before the senate about ah, if he knowingly hurt the american electoral system, and then there have been intensive searches there for russian hacker trolls who have interfered in us elections, hence to social networks. very close attention in the united states of america, because they perfectly understand what strength is strength, if you want, it is behind this even now, when the

mask has become the owner of a huge social network twitter which is very popular in the united states. naturally, he poses a risk, especially when he is not shy calls to vote for this or that force, especially if he does strange for the american political system of statements, this crazy guy, and, most likely, will also be called to the carpet and asked sternly, dude. and you generally act in the interests of the united states or in the interests of some other state , such accusations are very serious for america, and such accusations. well, ask snowden , for example, yes, we are now. still, here it is again. yes, it's not that we are studying fate, there is an illusory mask and his personal perspectives there. we're trying to figure out what's going on in the states and lo and behold, for example, to a question. but this would be conceivable, there some years ago there, but what is happening, uh, biden’s rhetoric, biden’s state, elon’s statement with a mask, and so on, yes or no, for example,

there, for example, you will say no, not mentally, apparently, that's what it's about, therefore, i'm not that i'm bringing you to this thought. i'm trying to understand, so to speak, and i don't know how to generalize all these signals from i repeat in a state, a biden and a statement in a mask and some kind of general movement and strange, completely unprecedented statements that so to speak, these we will close these, we will ban here at all it is not appropriate some freedom of speech to say that, so to speak, democracy is in danger. well, it seemed madness orwell pure, well, we hear. we hear all this, please, so let's try to realize what they have going on there in general and explicit and although the republicans could. drink more successfully than they performed, but nonetheless. they took the house of representatives, they took the majority, but everything that happens inside the democratic party. inside there is a publican party statement ilona mask their support from a significant part of society. e, says that the crisis continues, e, split, and america is not overcome, but only deepens and

2 years ago this assault. the congress was only the first sign. in fact, these are the problems, they are only getting worse and the conversations can be how they can these problems, but i don’t know if they will be realized there in the form. god forbid there is a civil war, to which, by the way, many american experts write, they argue in the form on the contrary, some kind of cruel, i don’t know the repressive machine and the democratic dictatorship. naturally. if bets on the leader continue, which is not the first time confuses the erak. u with ukraine and uh, then, of course. c will only get worse, but if some part of society, the same elon mask, his followers or the kind of desantis from the republican party realize that something needs to be done, then here, in general, it is possible that they will try overcome these problems, but it will not be easy to overcome, because

that this is a deep crisis. it's a deep crisis across the board from colored america to white america to rich america to poor america from evolutionary america or vice versa. e globalist america uh-huh this is very difficult to overcome or unlikely they are in the near future. it will be overcome. there are talks about the need for even a third batch of third forces. see what's happening in the third installment. says maybe even the democrats here need to create a third class, and he threatened. i mean, i'm a democrat. in the sense of a party accessories. and in general, so to speak. i mean. these are democrats on the eve of the elections, and, having carefully studied these surnames and there are rohana, and rashida aphids, half of them are e or measles. bush here, like the surname corey bush yes bush but uh, this is uh of indian origin. uh, another

split line. yes, of course, within the same democratic party. there are these semi-coloured americas that speak as they say, for example, the republicans letter thirty, it was sent. uh, with a bideno call to loosen sanctions against russia start negotiations and don't help ukraine to the extent that they do. now, this is how this democratic wing within the democratic party differs from what some republicans say from the same congress green, except for one, except for one. in addition, this letter is famous, but it was the table hit was otozno and it was necessary to come up with some kind of we discussed it, but uh. yes, i would absolutely like that they came up with an excuse for why it was published, in general, they said, says, it says, helpers, helpers. we are just outside the threshold talking from this very office with the workers, and the assistant went to sign the letter, and they said

that we signed it in june. yes, a completely different time, but no matter how it passed, and for some reason the assistants once published, in general, now, because they are good. look at ukraine, well, at israel in short, quite seriously. come on, look, it is important to understand, of course, the deepest systemic crisis. it's true. but if you think that by the end of our program everything will be done with america. no, you're wrong. the reserve is such that, so to speak, that this process will be stretched out there, which causes a crisis, will be regarded as expected for years. if not at 10 l another do something tell us we noticed signs of a systemic. from the states it is true, yet not very strong. here people feed no need to be very strong, and in general, and in general, in general, in fact, by and large, so to speak, in terms of their main strategic goals and objectives unified, and strategic goals and objectives. this is what russia is and up to china ah, let's look further and listen to the statement of joseph biden. here , extremely healthy, in fact, extremely healthy, well, healthy

. in the sense of a coherent and logical statement regarding whether the united states will be drawn into a conflict with russia or oiled into a conflict with russia there in ukraine and what they are going to do about this, i repeat an extremely clear statement, please. we gave them a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves, we gave them highmars. them can be equipped with two types of missiles with a range of more than 600 miles, about 160 miles. we didn't give them the ones that have a range of 600 miles because we don't expect them to start bombing russian territories by the way we didn't give ukraine carte blanche . american planes ensured the security of the airspace over ukraine. however, no, we are not going to do this. we do not intend to get involved in the third world war, shooting down russian planes and directly, getting involved in conflict. well, that's another matter, so to speak, there

was rhetoric in the spring, uh, one, but in the summer you see already another, and in the fall already the third. i mean, she is a different rhetoric, but all the time, so to speak, the level of support and the quality of it has been increasing all the time. so after all. eh, vasilyevich, or already, or is it not so? biden is absolutely consistent here, remember the meeting of the canoe watched, they are very putin, yes, when it was stated that e s is absolutely futility and the impossibility of a nuclear war. it will lead to nothing and canoe, but despite to the fact that, of course, he is now a sick person, he certainly feels bad, but he is an experienced, very experienced, competent politician, and certainly. he understands that he is responsible, not only for himself, that he speaks until i live. this is him personally. well, he's responsible. eh, not all people are behind the screen for their country and understand perfectly well that today, as they say, if they strike our territory, then our nuclear response will follow

immediately, and nuclear consultation between the two great powers. this is the death of the whole world. he is understands and sends, as it is now customary to say a clear signal. we need to realize once again to articulate the signal of honor, and the clear signal is that he is not going to cross, some red lines behind which there is a nuclear conflict, no matter how he was asked, because zelensky is already begging so actively that he is preparing to take everything and commit here this same nuclear deck interprets these requests of zelensky precisely as a step towards nuclear confrontation is unacceptable, of course, this is unacceptable for him. by the way, yes, this part of my speech. he laid out pretty well clearly, but because he lays out the whole time of his presidency. here are the last eight and a half months. he. well, it states exactly this and this reprise. he learned. this logic does not change, it turns out and this speech and this passage, of course, is dedicated to the g20 yes, putin will not go there. we already know this. yes,

then lavrov will go at the head of the delegation, and this is quite a lot; we see the plan of the sallion, which was somehow made public, that is, some field for ramiss is already enough, a firm grope, it is most likely that jumping over bumps is coming to an end , and most likely, those who go to the g20 will still complete this so-called peace plan, which will allow all parties to stop quite nicely in this ukrainian company and say everything. well, in principle, their results. i have reached. i think this is what we will be talking about, did you understand about this peace plan? yes, they talk a lot. yes , there are a lot of rumors going around, so to speak, about some agreements under the carpet on such even here. well, you are probably yourself interested in these are described them so to speak, there according to the parameters and so on. i don't know, i don't know, i'm not a politician. you are not a military man. if there is a chance to get out. right now, from this point, where we are now beautifully, i don’t

know. we continue to work live, but it's interesting to listen to the head of the us strategic command, admiral chause richard man. you understand, convicted, so to speak, and shoulder straps, authority, knowledge , understanding of the overall strategy. here, and he interprets what is happening today as a conflict in ukraine as a warm-up before a really real serious fight. let's listen to him. this ukrainian crisis, which we are now experiencing is just a warm-up, an even bigger crisis is coming, we are waiting for trials that we have not had for a long time. we must quickly and dramatically change our approach. on the defensive, our level of deterrence against china, i estimate as follows. our ship is sinking slowly, but sinking as china implements new capabilities faster. and if you extend these curves further, it will not

make any difference. how good is our operational plan, our commanders are our horses, we won't have enough of them anyway. and this is the problem of the near future. yes, that means the ship is sinking , this is what the head of the strategic command says. usa richard must be understood, so to speak, there in brackets to note that such a phrase is always, uh, and under it or behind it the intention to knock out some kind of, so to speak. e financing signing an additional ship sinking is still to be done. clear. it exists, but it is another matter that it is impossible to say such things without having some real foundation. you understand such words, so maybe this should be divided by two, but no more than just two, in the meantime. uh, how is it really going on, these confrontations, not military so far such a global economic to a greater extent, the united states and china, it’s very interesting, it’s very interesting to look at the map on the map, and on two maps here of the sample of 2000 and 2020, the left

one on the left map, respectively countries are relationship oriented. basically. this applies, of course, to the economy. although the military too e, the relationship concerns and so on the left in 2000, blue is, so to speak, from the side, which, relatively speaking, under the states or with the states, but the twentieth year. look at the right map. and the red one is the countries that from e. china well , this is how the map of the world has changed a little, but if you look from this angle, and how and how it has changed radically, therefore, perhaps, so to speak, behind the words, what kind of richard is and this understanding and this feeling, what to say so . it's easy to have, as he put it, horses there. yah you still need to have a territory through which they would ride, so to speak, and the territory is closed , closed, closed, such opportunities are closed there. the farther here, the more. well, here is a very good map, very interesting. okay , let's release. uh, one more statement on the same topic and we will discuss

the president of france, macron, macron, felt, so to speak, that for a long time he did not make any global generalizations, bach came to the podium and announced a new system of world order in europe, listening to macron . when the world returns to ukraine, we will have to deal with the consequences of this conflict. this means that we will have to build a true new security architecture and an updated framework of stability in the field of arms in europe, the conflict in ukraine risks leading to a more bitter geopolitical confrontation in the future and there is no reason for france to take the situation calmly and passively wait out the situation in ukraine is a dangerous moment. when the old equilibrium is challenged and the new one has not yet been reached. now i have the same face now, when i listened, i just didn't understand anything. well, you do n't have this set of words, and i can say that the world is going through difficult times and we all need to unite in front of the ever-growing threat of future instability. well said. i name- thank you.

here the pasta, it seems, did the same thing . i'm just an interpretation. free, certainly, but not approved by the macron. we understand the text of the guys, the redivision of the world has begun, you can only rely on yourself, but your own. and i'll just remind you what jose barel did today a statement where he called for the restructuring of the entire transport infrastructure in general, including taking into account military needs, so that yes, in order to be able to quickly deploy troops in particular. e to the east. therefore, what until recently was rejected by the european continent. although they have come to this topic repeatedly over the past 15 years, when they called for a review of the european security system, the germans and the french repeatedly cast aside the bait. eh, now it's just calls develop into concrete actions , you can only rely on yourself. why did the world start?

it feels like, in fact, the european system is european, well, now the security biobe, at least, that the states insist on such it, so to speak, such an interpretation of its architecture is provided, the united states of america as a private way, so to speak. well, or rather, how. how exactly how the united states and how the main thing and , uh, part of the nato bloc, so to speak. well, the interests of this conflict, they realized it now. yes they are we clearly realized and before that there had already been a statement that somehow the americans were not quite honest with us here and the australian made a deal. you can remember the ancients with submarines and what was happening now at the rate of liquefied gas at inflated prices for the european continent, and the europeans understand that no one will seriously harness for them if they themselves are an asset. earn elbows, otherwise they have already begun. no, you remember that the same macron that spoke about the need remembered the other day. well it's just very typical that uh made it there a couple of years ago. well, or when there it was with trump and

said that we need our own army in europe. what says it's me so nothing. sorry it got out. everything is perfect speech. this is the perfect speech for the future. here, for example, he can chat about something for a cause, russia the states fit perfectly, even if china wins the confrontation between the three, the superpowers also fit perfectly at any moment, can say so i'm talking about you and said. actually. you are our security system for you, and they were oriented there, of course, europe does not have any security system. they, of course, shifted these functions to nato, and she is the states. this is all absolutely obvious and we remember, not only the macron scandal, which was announced by our army. we remember trump like this trying to dunk merkel who spoke. yes, i don’t want to deduct so much for

nataska. how much you demand from me is not so easy , after all, not a macro, but when was the next g20 she said that her plane was broken, spent the night somewhere in germany, not even in berlin, but flew in so that trump had already left. yes, that's all, we were witnesses of what he said during the aftermath. format in the elysee palace yes, it's just that e is not a vest, but he has something. in general, he vomited on himself about what kind of fountain pen yes, let's say, embroidered. yes, what he is, it means, against russia, yes, what he is, that means all of himself is a democrat. now everything is blurring, because they do not see the starting point they don’t understand the point where, but the states are drifting, either globalism will win there, or the idea of ​​isolation will win there. here, as soon as they figure it out. they will already understand how to build relationships. with china, of course. europe wants to cooperate with china

the european union is very calculated on chinese goods. we need chinese production, yes, and everything was done in taiwan. yes, you are not allowed. if anything, you are engaged in self-isolation, then ok, they are immediately in the direction of china. that is, they now have options for backlash, but they must understand the starting point of globalism or isolation sounds quite sensible. but uh, you know the options for backlash. uh, well yeah for the backlash for for the movement for the drift. rather, yes, yes, like, you know, how they will stretch out to say things, and then, no matter what happens. you can be quoted in general in all publications of the world, but the most important question. is it such a passive drift or do they have a chance to somehow show their position in such a way that they influence the circumstances of the situation, that it was in europe in general and the french in particular, that it was not passive drift. and so to speak about the movement of the ship. me too or like its now. and europe, of course

, amoebas, but amoebas that are somehow trying to move, and the visit of the scholites. china merkel's statement well, nevertheless, he himself took merkel's pressure on a collective security system with russia's participation in europe, the current macron's statement that it would be nice to build. yes, this one shows that europe is somehow moving somewhere and the weaker american control over europe will be, the more americans will be in to drown in your mess there, the more europe will have the opportunity to move. but understand, please, it's one thing to move, and another thing to systematically move in the right direction, remember the wonderful story, and after the arrival of trump, when donald freudovich said everything. i don't need a liberal world anymore. i am no longer the head of the liberal world and i have thrown this liberal crown into the dirt. it would seem that merkel should raise it. merkel seems to be trying to do something about this, but nothing happened. why? because maybe merkel

wanted something, but a bunch of german officials. uh, politicians managers said yelled at. how so? no, no, you can't. how can we manage without the americans, we are not used to it, we do not know how to govern without the americans. we can't control european affairs without the americans. we no longer know how it is done in times when europe could govern itself. clearly disappeared europeans did not learn this. they are accustomed to live according to the american nuclear political even economic to some extent no umbrella, therefore, unfortunately the euro. i'm a little fan here, and the current european faces in terms of the manifestation of some kind of political will, but even more macron. yes, but perhaps the next generation of european years. if, for example, as if partially from non-systemic persons are not those who were brought up. i understand, i understand. i just look at the angel merkel never thought that they would be so nostalgic, so to speak. yes it is clear