where will you be? maybe they took something with them or put it in another cache? thanks to this icon perished, let him stay here as he wanted. the sadness of your swept heart is flexible or give

it back we have changed the concept three times. two layers. it will be just an ecstasy, it is best to sew it without a line, then velvet will give such a necessary soft wave, because they are velvet, or something, of course they are about comfort and now the cranes are being ironed. premiere on saturdays on pervoiy we have always admired you for 25 million. those who trusts us and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank in russia treats to the festive table. we are preparing all families. and, of course, special attention. we devote mahi sauce to

make festive dishes tastier. all the people of flit at all can play the premiere in the online cinema. i will give you a way to manage people. i want to listen to him an action-packed detective from the creators of the crystal negotiator series, watch the mts premium ocean in the online cinema as a gift.

climax and tortured tides. this is not for me. tame hot flashes from cyclimonine cyclimalanine up to 50% more profitable cyclimalanin from evalar in lenta november, discounts walnut vsevushka 399 backs knows that difficult times require profitable solutions zero commission for the purchase of securities and guaranteed cashback up to a million rubles. open the world of bcs investments tell me, what kind of hope did you meet, she will live with us, we missed you, marriage contract, he does not claim property. why didn't you get married? vanya wanted to give her a normal life?

okay. cinema 1tv presents forgive me calmly. i have nothing to hide. fitin. paul mikhailovich, born in 1907, head of intelligence.

now you have nothing of your own. there is only someone else's. someone else's life. will the russian rocket be able to take it? revenge at the young

rival, because sasha according to be only the first hot ice live broadcasts on the weekend on first we have always admired you for 25 million. those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia people to kill and steal brave was well, come on in order.

do not rush. and his encrypted journal. brought me. i went to draw up, except for the magazine, i decided to solve it myself did not work out. he brought mikheev, he kumekl and then patsadal to them home. and killed him. and took it. and it turned out that the cipher was on each page, and therefore

the place where he buried the treasure was further, then they appeared. immediately understood who they were because then she stole it so that she could unravel the cipher. and then you , we were going to sell the icon. to whom for how much? the buyer has already been. i wasn't interested. golden gold, in which precious stones were inserted, there

were no salaries. only rare icons, true, but you would not have these icons, except for museums would attach. i want misfires. the faster you tell everything, the faster we will pass it on. this is a case to the court, there they will pronounce a sentence and shoot you. and everything will end.

you only have one way now. if you want, we will go for a long time, if you want it fast. then in more detail. how he killed mikheev look at how she arranged it according to the notes . she came to the sanatorium to rest. so now it's up to you to decipher everything to the end and find neumann's cache. but it's simple. you imagine what kind of event it will be all the newspapers will write. that's just everything in moscow, most likely, i'll take valery stepanovich what a big deal, we

'll do it with you. all i sign and i'm looking for you everywhere. where were they? i know that your friend is missing, if i can somehow help support or somehow participate in the search. you

just say. thank you, we already found. she went for a walk along the mountain path. oh yeah nightmare and you know what, well, let's go to these shameless baths of yours. are you serious that i need somewhere to properly wash, only of course. that 's what it was for, look and the seam can be seen to be thrown away

or left to yourself today as much as it went. i don't i can throw it out and have to wear it. for my sake, i don't want a second time. stay understand be neat no you don't understand. after

the wedding, i will never take part in any investigation again. i give you my word. that bread no thanks sour cream it was sour cream, please, thank you

. i should have been imprisoned for dealing with the greeks. yes, they haven’t been smeared, right? you need russian language pasha. what kind of review is this? sorry. thank you that my mothers did not say anything. mommy didn't say anything. how beautiful is it here? saxophone

good evening on the air big game today deputy foreign minister of russia sergey ryabkov once again reminded of russia's readiness for a policy of diplomatic settlement of the

ukrainian conflict about the absence of preconditions and what kiev is doing. this diplomatic solution is impossible. listen to what the deputy minister said. the negotiating position has been repeatedly formulated by our leadership. ah. we are not against negotiations with ukraine but the longer the process. uh, not negotiating drags on, the harder it will be reach an agreement. by the way, i wanted to add a phrase, but due to the fact that in recent days there have been many different kinds of speculation about whether there are some preconditions, there are no preconditions. you know, well go out to negotiate. uh, having preconditions in front of you is counterproductive. it means people don't want negotiations and don't want results. this is exactly what we see now from

the position of kiev, they do not want negotiations, so they put forward preconditions. well, in your russian presidential press secretary dmitry peskov today pointed out the role that the united states could play in ending and resolving the ukrainian conflict . if desired , washington is able to take into account the concerns of our country. washington is able to abandon its militaristic plans for ukraine, pumping it with weapons and so on for everything. this is washington, if desired, it is obviously capable that while washington has no desire to play such a positive role, and it continues to use ukraine as a key tool in its hybrid war against russia at least. this concerns pumping up ukraine with weapons and refusing to take into account moscow's concerns . just the day before, under the chairmanship of

the united states secretary of defense, floyd. austin, a regular meeting of the so-called rammstein group was held, this is a contact group for military support for ukraine, and there it was announced about regular military aid packages from european countries and canada, the biden administration itself. this week. she asked congress for as much as 37.7 billion dollars for ukraine, of which almost 22 billion are expected to be spent specifically on the military needs of the kiev regime, that is, the course for the long-term militarization of ukraine, but at the same time the biden administration. nevertheless, she began to put pressure on kiev on the issue of possible negotiations with moscow, and more than anyone else, this is done by the head of the joint committee of chiefs headquarters. and mark miles the day before, he made the second public statement lately that a military victory over russia is impossible. well, or at least unlikely, as mili said, and

therefore the solution must be sought precisely in the politics of the diplomatic plane, and not on the battlefield, listen to the general. the military challenge of physically getting the russians out of ukraine is very difficult and will not happen in the next few weeks, unless there is a total collapse of the russian army, which is unlikely, therefore the probability of a military victory of ukraine, defined as the court of russians from all over ukraine, including crimea, the likelihood of such a development of events in some near future is militarily low vladimir vasilyevich well, it seems to me that it is very significant. what exactly in the us military, which is most involved in managing this conflict from the side of the kiva, speaks of the impossibility of maintaining a military victory over russia and although the us media wrote that the united there is no position in the biden administration, and therefore the issue of miles is persistent. yes, this is the second time he has publicly spoken about the absence

of a military solution, the expediency of moving on to a political solution, so that you think about it. well, i said this, e apparently , people like mile and this is with him. in general, work. he thinks, not even in the present tense and not in the past. he's thinking ahead. it 's clear that the biden administration. well, at least the white house, i would say, after the election turned out to be in such a position when it is necessary to make some decisions that will be of a long-term nature, and at least the situation in ukraine in this regard. i would go back a year and see what was happening in afghanistan . it seems to me like, yes, you understand the american troops in this, the military, including those who said that there is no need to withdraw troops, you understand, you need to stay in september. we need to see what happens should not be a hasty decision, but the white house in the face of biden

said, we are leaving on the 31st and that's it. and no problems followed, what followed here. and i say, this is very important to keep in mind from the point of view. well, if i can put it this way, the norms of the framework, to make these decisions today, the general, as if he also took such a position. let's not go further. these are the spirals of the military conflict. it can lead us very far the military is against the untwisting of this situation. but it turns out that today is just the result, and you understand that the administration has created a it seems that this is rhetoric, it brings political dividends of a certain kind for dividends, including personally for biden. and today, as it were, makes a decision apparently. you see, apparently the administration. you have already shown well. here

is the package of shares. she begins to make the exact opposite decision. you understand this time. we stay in ukraine, you tell us that is, and leave ukraine on principle. yes, no, in afghanistan and we are staying here today, apparently understands that this is, of course, a very serious decision. and maybe it is precisely a certain distrust that affects here, you understand the balance or thoughtfulness of the decision of the administration, or at least the president and those people who stand behind him, who are clearly civilians, and the military does not trust them, because if tomorrow something goes wrong , then the situation that will be in afghanistan will very well arise . the house of representatives said they will deal with everything complexes. they won't do it anymore. there are reforms within the country. they will only deal with disassemblies, of which afghanistan will be the first , and afghanistan is just that, because the

administration covered all e military and no one flew. or not the rest of the military leaders, and today all of a sudden, maybe today these military amelia - this is such a political general you know, it’s not by chance that he is called a political one, he is not a military general. he may suddenly begin to understand that in some circumstances he they may or the military may be framed for afghanistan, but it may happen. so something will go wrong in ukraine. here is the missile incident - it showed very well and then you understand, again the fifth corner will be made to the military leadership, and the military leadership is really represented today, well, formally miles, as the highest military commander, chairman of the committee. e chiefs of staff. he is, as it were, considered the most important military man, so my husband should ask something from him. and he understands this well somewhere, maybe

today it is still growing. the most important process i don't i will talk now about china. there are experts here who will say. this is better in terms of prioritizing military building between the european and the eastern, so to speak, asian or asian texan region, but i have a growing feeling that perhaps the military is most afraid of this ineffective aid, which the republicans will definitely deal with. at least audits of where and how this military aid is going. and here , just in the fifth corner, they will certainly make the pentagon, because it is precisely the pentagon and this is the corrupt corrupt component or the corrupt component of us military aid in us military programs is only too well known for miles. moreover, we definitely. today we will talk about the impact that the republican majority in the house of representatives will have on the policy of the united

states, including, of course, in relation to china , but what about the ukrainian case? i don't think that miles support the withdrawal from ukraine i think that either supports the long-term militarization of ukraine and its consolidation on an anti-russian basis, including a militarized ukraine, but he believes that it is better and more efficient for the united states to use ukraine against russia by freezing, at least, the military conflict, but without continuing it, bringing the matter to the total defeat of ukraine. it seems to me that that miles come from this, but it's interesting, but it seems to me that certain progress is still certain results, of course, insufficient, of course. eh, very half-hearted, but still some. it seems to me that there is a movement, but there is, that is, american has an impact. eh, it turns out to be quite effective, we know from the same american media leaks that in early november he flew to kiev and came by train. a jake

sullivan is the national security adviser and pressured zelensky to take more. a flexible position on negotiations with russia and, in general , a more realistic assessment of the outcome of these possible negotiations. and in particular, as they wrote in the american media, i completely forgot about crimea further, and this week the head of the cia of the united states flew to kiev states william bers and moreover, he flew there directly from ankara. and where he negotiated with the director of the russian foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin, and the very next day after the meeting with william burns. and vladimir zelensky said the following , listen so, yes, i received certain signals from the leaders of states. it seems that putin wants direct negotiations. i received such signals. i proposed a public form, because russia is waging a public war with ukraine. well, of course, for russia, such a statement of questions is not acceptable dmitry

peskov has already stated today that , in principle, there are no public negotiations, but ivan vasilyevich, you see a certain dynamic. i see, i see some confusion on the american side. so, i can’t talk about the trend yet, about the dynamics, but i see something clear, most likely a rebellion, and in this sense, to some extent, of course, i sympathize with russian diplomats and our politicians, because signals coming from washington are multidirectional, but very different, it’s not clear how to understand them and, in my opinion, sergei viktorovich lavrov, our minister of foreign affairs, and after the day of his stay in bali at the g20 summit, he said that, well, something is happening. well, in general, uh, he said the eu

soul, but in general, in general, this is the western soul of darkness, what they want there is not even what they want at all, what they want to tell us about them, because signals. multidirectional and and very uh very happy, the signals have become multidirectional. this is also a dynamic a couple of months ago, there were no such divergent directions. no well, why did we several times over the last six months, i think, passed. uh, such bifurcations, when when in waves, when there were votes in washington, what, maybe enough? well, maybe everything is already clearly nothing is working out and not only crippling and, uh, the ukrainian people and this kiev regime becomes an increasingly strange creature. maybe enough, and then not. but no, but still, but if the search. and if we try again, and if at a new level of escalation they always generally won, here are those who, and who advocated escalation, so you will be able to eat some

signals that, with great optimism, can be perceived as what they are pushing. to the negotiations, but again before the big twenty , uh, that's it. it could rather be interpreted in such a way that they want to clean up their image a little bit, because they act as warmongers, and then they suddenly start talking about negotiations, because they go on their own, where everyone wants a speedy end to the conflict, then in general to go there with such a reputation as arsonists , well, somehow not very good either, however, like zelensky with his video message to speak, but with the image of warmongers, therefore , it was logical to interpret the signals before the summit from this point of view. what will happen after the summit, we will see, while there is still very little time, and it will not be ruled out that it will be true. there is a faction of those who want to

freeze the conflict in order to make from the standpoint of a frozen conflict from uh, that means from the remnants of ukraine. such a militarized one can even be dictatorial. uh wicked aggressive anti-russian regime, but such a freeze and such a settlement have no meaning for russia from my point of view, but i would like to draw attention to what, and in zelensky’s statement, when he talks about public negotiations, it is not at all clear what public negotiations are. i have something with such a term, well, i have never come across a show. yes , there are public statements, public police. yes, and here is the public age, which i don’t know what it is, but it’s clear what he means, he means that uh, let’s just shout to each other quarrel. yes, that is, he means no negotiations. here are the public talks. this is now such a yefimism for no negotiations. here he takes the position of no negotiations.

now it's just called public negotiations, but from the russian side, in my opinion, it was very important and there were words. according to uh, in the statement just dmitry peskov and there i think that the key there was the following, that ah the russian position, it is known and the negotiations can be within the framework of this position, that is, within the framework of what is no less bloodshed with less damage, and so on , the goals of a special military operation are fulfilled. and it seems to me that this is the key thing that was said about the negotiations - this is not this continuation. roughly speaking, i agree to paraphrase a well-known phrase specifically for a military operation by other means in the west, they often say that the problem of a shortage of resources is getting worse, and it is one of those factors that actually creates

the prerequisites for a transition to a policy of diplomatic settlement. a and, a. the problem is it concerns. only the exhaustion of military resources this is also there. the united states is already even importing 150 five-millimeter caliber shells from south korea. because their own resources are running out, but the problem is also of an economic nature, a and is connected with the economic state in which ukraine is located and with how much will cost the west to keep ukraine afloat. preserving it in the truest sense of the word is life support. here is today's publication of a politician with reference to ukrainian officials. he writes that there will be soon. maybe just stop food production and transportation. and that in kiev in this way, in general, everything will just stand up and today it does not have enough spare parts to restore heat and electricity. this is very

serious in this environment. i have a question for egor alexandrovich in general. can ukraine maintain economic viability given? the current and future destruction is connected, of course, with the blows that russia is inflicting on ukrainian infrastructure. how much will the west cost keeping ukraine afloat, and is the west ready to pay this price? well, according to the forecast of the world bank, ukraine's gdp in the form in which it now exists will decrease by 35-40% by the end of the year. in general, this is decent enough. uh, although a significant part of this economy will remain another problem is that a significant part. e, yes, almost all government spending at the moment is formed by receipts from other countries to ukraine through financial assistance and the volume of this financial assistance zelensky for the next year zelensky announced at a meeting with the world bank a

few weeks ago, approximately in the region of 50 billion euros - this is an approximate amount up to the military budget of ukraine, that is, in fact, the country is in a full subsidized position. this is the moment related to finances, if we talk about the energy infrastructure at the moment. now, if we assume our attacks on energy and critical infrastructure will stop. at the moment, restoration is possible, most likely, the power supply indirectly speaks of this on the facts that after the strikes of e, in large cities, electricity supply was restored. well , somewhere in the evening, despite all planned outages and planned and so on. if the blows continue, then it's real. in general, by and large , m-m. well, let's say destroy this physical critical infrastructure. although there are a few things here. uh, the physical generation of electricity would probably be hard to eradicate completely, because at the moment, about half or so of the electricity

is produced in nuclear power plants, well it is rather difficult to imagine the fact of shelling a nuclear power plant, but it is possible to damage, well, distribution networks, all these transmissions of electricity. and in principle, nuclear generation can also suffer from this at the moment. here is the latest data from the international energy agency. it cannot be said that the production and consumption of energy is very strong. i wanted at the expense of our strikes, at least the october ones. uh, moreover, the demand, in principle, is satisfied by the current capacities. the capacities decreased in february, somewhere by 40%. and right in february. that is, after the twenty-fourth, the collapse immediately happened by almost 40%. but answering your questions. uh, and just yesterday or today there was an article in the washington post, and the concerns that any sane person has about this is an armed conflict. after all, it will end sometime, and the economic state at the moment is,

well, simply critical, what will it do next, taking into account the global economic crisis, which will hit the global economy. at next year even stronger than this year, i completely agree with you, and it will certainly be very difficult for the west to endlessly issue checks for e-life to ensure ukraine and even the united states, despite the fact that they have a printing press, despite the factor that vladimir sergeevich has already outlined and the transition of the house of representatives under the control of the republican party today it became known that the republicans took such the rest, they have one more seat. they got the required 218 votes of 218 seats in the house of representatives and form a majority, respectively, from january 3 next year, when the new congress meets, and all committees will be headed by republicans. and kevin mccarthy, the current leader of the republican minority, will become the speaker, and the house of

representatives and vladimir sergeevich have already quite correctly noted that the republicans will make it difficult to allocate money to ukraine . like the majors tail green yes. and yes there will be more. whale more accountability will be required. spears will be put in the wheels, at least in the process of automatic allocation of money. all this will create an additional headache for the biden administration, at least. i don't think the republicans will completely stop allocating money. well, here's a headache, and the biden administrations, they will create the full program. and, perhaps, the amount of this assistance will also decrease. but besides the audit and so on, a very interesting aspect that will also make it difficult to single out e ukraine's endless money was noted. still the main

republican, and in the committee on foreign affairs of the house of representatives, and since january 3, the chairman of the house of representatives of congress, michael mccall. now, listen to what he said, we're going to set conditions for help, for example, we'll give you this help. but we want our partners to freely share this burden, and not just the united states . if it's a condition, he said condition. and what should europeans fair. eh, a fair burden to bear. this condition is not met. europeans cannot bear. eh, fair time. they are already reducing physical volumes, and they will only decrease. that is , it turns out that things are really bad. and here, again, we remember michael, mark of a mile, yes, with his calls. after all, he understands it all. well , actually, the republicans barely played e4

, which they always talked about, if the americans do not have enough funds for one reason or another, even in order to save money. well then we'll connect our us all. e let go of allies, they pay, then the point is that today, in addition to this. i think the author's allies are even afraid of another that over time. and if and here are many of the current members, they are so tropical tuned, you all remember well that they remember it well, we don’t remember, but they remember well what trump once said ukraine is a problem for europe well, let her and is engaged, that is, it does not matter to shift the main burden of military spending. in what form in nato allies and yourself? as they say or the united states in america to leave? i think that this will really be a headache for, uh, european allies. well, the second thing about i want to say why today there are problems in the infrastructure, because today the infrastructure of the ukrainian economy. just

adequate is the most important factor of the military, so to speak , in actions, you understand, the army cannot fight in a clean field without having food energy under transport e. so to say subscription supply provision understand this too, maybe even this is more understood by people like miles who have been engaged all their lives, maybe even planning a few military. how many operations are there with their logistics support? we will now break for a short commercial and then we will continue to talk, including about us policy towards china this is walter kron kite from our studio i just got an urgent message from the united press in dallas shot at president kennedy you were misinformed by ballistics, nothing at all not proved, palm print, commission, crow

hid its head in the sand. they could not recognize that there were three shots if there were four or more. it pointed to a conspiracy in oliver stone's how john f. kennedy was assassinated next sunday on first in 1999, i found one document in the national archives that had been hidden for 35 years.

at tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening accounts of the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkoff, he is the only one you don’t want to finish reading, because euphoria was the most amazing world in this sector, it attracted tourists with extraterrestrial cunts of archaeologists, ruins of civilizations. suddenly, euphoria showed us the book's true colors.

there will be nothing. why will i have a love story and a detective story? what about you yet? rows, where at the same time a good book follows, another more than 40 years ago we started making jeans. we know the details that transform ordinary jeans into perfect and we're not going to stop uniqueness in changes. we do it for you gloria jeans

powerful lightweight cordless vacuum cleaner smart electric grill, durable roomy frying pan and other goods with discounts up to 50% all people at all can play as a gift. agree, we are a unique hook. especially when the desired is at hand, like an online fsb loan for any purpose, the fsb believes in people, monday is not a gift. the mood falls already in the morning, so on mondays they receive gifts from the subscriber. tele2 choose three at once look into your smartphone. everything

there is already a present inside in order. we know, monday is tele2 gifts other magnet rules. buy cheaper discounts on chayzer tea up to 40%, 10% bonuses of your favorite magnet category, we always get in a huge country over which the sun never sets, and we do everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of russia alexey egorov russia and arsent gulamine france fight which has been waiting for a whole year fight for the world title live broadcast from france on saturday on the first aired big game we talked about that

the e biden administration is already putting pressure on the government of ukraine towards greater flexibility in terms of a political and diplomatic settlement, and i do not exclude that the catalyst, which will lead to even greater intensification of this pressure, could be the missile incident, uh, which happened the other day in poland, uh , when a ukrainian missile hit the e territory of a nato country and it is quite obvious that this was a deliberate provocation on the part of kiev in order to draw nato into a direct war, and with russia in the united states they are already talking about that, and more and more and more publications on this score, that the interests of kiev and the interests of washington do not coincide, and here is one of the main points, but one of the main

issues of non-coincidence is precisely the question of participation or non-participation of nato in a direct war with russia , kiev is interested in nato nato entered the war with russia and the united states is not interested in this. and this again demonstrated this missile incident. yesterday, speaking at the un security council, vasily greeted our permanent representative in this organization. just stated that he had place deliberate provocation with the aim of dragging nato into the war about the same has already started talking in poland, not at the government level, but at the level of city mayors . and now, it seems to me that this one is very dangerous. in fact, the incident could be a definite turning point. i don't insist on it. yes, but i do not rule out that this could indeed be a turning point when zelensky crossed the red line, because he violated the vital interest of the united

states not to be drawn into a direct war, and with russia and zelensky, his behavior has already caused the connections. states are also seriously annoyed about the terrorist attacks on the crimean bridge and about the refusal to negotiate with the russian leadership. and then there's this, yes. this is no longer just a terrorist attack. this is an attempt to drag the united states into a nuclear disaster with russia and the rhetoric of the united states and the west in general. in fact, joe biden has already tightened up, and in response to zelensky’s statement, zelensky ’s yesterday’s statement that and this is definitely not a ukrainian rocket said that zelensky’s words are not proof and catches austin and tony blinkin. today. uh, they immediately unequivocally stated that the rocket was definitely ukrainian. polish president andrzej duda today refused kiev to participate in the investigation. e of the fall of the rocket said that

ukraine could get acquainted with the results of the investigation, but it would not participate in this investigation, and the fine shell times writes directly that they are annoyed in the west by zelensky a's lies about the fact that the rocket is supposedly not ukrainian, and uh, in particular, what writes uh, final times listen. this is getting ridiculous. ukrainians are destroying our trust in them. nobody blames ukraine. they are outright lying. it 's more destructive than a missile, nato country diplomats finational times said in response to a request for comment on zelensky's statement. well, of course. uh, republicans, especially donald trump supporters in the united states , reacted even more harshly to this. major ellar green, which we already mentioned today, and about the trap-minded member of the house of representatives said that everything is necessary. right from this moment on no longer allocate, not a penny, uh, not a cent, but to ukraine in the same spirit. the son of

donald trump, donald trump jr., spoke out that now he has come. the horse has come to stop the moment completely, and military assistance ivan alekseevich do you think this episode can really become some kind of turning point in relation to the united states and ukraine to the ukrainian crisis. i don’t think that those people in the united states who really hold this whole situation in their hands had absolutely any illusions about zelensky. well, in general, they are like this brought up that this creature in the form of such a field commander created. he created for himself such an image of a field commander. it's not even the president anymore. this is some kind of field commander. and the fact that from time to time he is strongly carried away by the fact that he is rude, it seems, to his own masters. this has already happened before. can it all

come to some kind of critical mass, when washington says no-no, that's enough we close, that is, this story. or at least we close this story with personal zelensky, this may be whether this particular incident will be, uh, the last straw, but i'm not sure. i'm sure, but in principle, as far as i can tell back in the spring in march in april in the united states, uh, let's say in political and information circles. preparations would have already been created to throw zelensky like uh, the americans say under the bus. yes, to write him off and say that he didn’t live up to our hopes, he didn’t succeed, everything failed, and so on hmm but uh, then this scenario was postponed, in principle, such a scenario is it prepared, will they let him in when they let him in. and i think that it depends not only on

zelensky's behavior, after all. if it is necessary and will substitute not that he messes up something and they will write him off for this, if the time comes to write him off. uh, they'll find a reason and find a way to set it up. and i think that we are gradually approaching this time, you know, the united states has come out of many conflicts, in some way, changing , among other things, acting figures. here, if you remember, when the geneva agreements, uh, were regulating the situation in afghanistan in the ninth year, who died after that? the president of pakistan, i am an olhak, the main opponent of these agreements, which i resisted and tore off some important points in these agreements , i had to sign them without them. here. well, in general, he took a bellicose position and, after

signing them, died in a car in a car accident. in general, nothing was raised, so this is a fairly standard technique when it is applied to zelensky. and in what form it will be used. well, let's see if your question can be reduced, uh, with all the specifics, is this the critical point? i can agree with yours, maybe, but nothing more powerful than maybe, i can’t say u, i’ll just add that, uh, since it’s not an introduction into a direct war with russia and for the united states in life it is an important interest in what the kiev regime did. it's not a drop. bucket, and here's how to react to this bucket. this is already really a choice for the united states, but within the republican party about the policy towards ukraine consensus. no, some are in favor of ending aid, some like mitch maconal. uh, or lindsey graham uh, in the senate they are even in favor of building it

up, but here's the question on which within the republican party. there is a consensus - this is china and this consensus is that the us policy towards china will become even more confrontational and here are the prospects for us policy towards china after the formation of the new congress bloomberg writes in the house of representatives, republicans will pressure president joe biden to become more hawkish on china . the republican party will likely try to present biden's attempt to ease tensions as well. with china during the meeting in bali is not as a reason for rejoicing, as a sign of weakness republican leader. kevin mccarthy who will replace nancy pelosi. as

speaker of the house of representatives said that he will lead the visit of members of congress to taiwan, similar to the trip pelosipe. in august. this is likely to provoke a sharp chinese reaction including military exercises of missiles near the owl of the controlled island, and also may force beijing to cut off the channels of communication established after the biden meeting with mccarthy. in addition, it wants to form a special committee in congress to investigate everything related to china from trade and national security before covid-19 origin issues each of these issues may provoke condemnation and possibly retaliatory measures from beijing nikolai nikolayevich beijing is already preparing for further crises and aggravation of relations between the united states it seems to me that what happened at the end of the twentieth congress. personnel appointments show that china began to consider the taiwanese military option to solve the taiwan problem as the main one, if 5 years ago. it was a minor secondary possibility of the scenario, while the main one was mirny, now it is more inclined after all according to the results

twentieth congress, because this will be the main scenario for the decision, but i want to draw your attention to the following facts. now we are guessing, and perhaps the americans themselves do not understand. this is political ambiguity. yes, in washington, how the balance of power between republicans and democrats has changed , what we know is the upper house. still, there remained the predominance of the democrats. but, as we see for ourselves right there 20, that is the reaction of european leaders. us one pina is more than positive and sidimpin actually this strido incident when in fact, on sizinpin he openly showed that he was the eldest. well, somewhere i read an annotation to one of the leaders of the big seven, then it shows what the environment of european leaders is. there is an understanding that strategic washington is now very weak and uh, let's say the balance of influence is now shifting towards beijing because we see that as a result , blinkin will fly to china to negotiate on china's terms about some kind of resumption of dialogue, uh

melodies. e, also accepted the invitation to visit china, eh, macron, will visit china and that's it. it's in the background the fact that some timid awkward rhetoric of the european union is european union, bureaucracy and the probable isolation of china is excessive, which means that depending on china, that is, american rhetoric at the level of sovereign leaders of european countries. they work. this is what european leaders are reading many factors, the weakness of the biden administration and the biden itself. we see what it means, and as a result of the negotiations , none of the negotiation tracks that were frozen achieved practically anything. after drinking. no, it didn’t work again, that is, about what we are talking about, which, in fact, by the way, was already clear to many in europe and many provoked the defeat of the baidan and weakness, that this was all his visit, actually showed weakness under the administration, baidan, opened this pandora's box, and the chinese themselves bet that and the strategic predominance or the balance of power

will still swing in their direction, otherwise there would not have been such a crushing deliverance from the pro-american oppositions and the lobby, which was under the bureau. yes, and so on. that is, it tells us that the chinese have become to play some more active game, and in a big game, the balance is still shifting towards china. and you are absolutely correct bloomers. he is absolutely correct in saying that the new lower house will be an absolutely anti-chinese macarte. uh, by the way this is a very programmed and controlled action. he will fly again to taiwan china will blockade the taiwan strait again, but this time it will be tougher. he will continue to film the reaction of the surrounding countries, of course, he will try to show again that, uh, it means strength on him side. again, covid investigation. this is also provoking china and much, much more. and what situation will the united states find itself in, that not a single initiative of the republicans will be approved by the senate. and no initiative. actually

, the bideno will not be approved by the lower house, that is, this is paralysis, the next 2 years, than the chinese will use, the next 2 years, respectively. i mean , this is the story. it continues to develop, moreover, we understand that the launch of a rocket is the last tea attempt, too. zelensky, who believed that the weakness of the biden administration was to be drawn into some kind of adventure, which means that his and his fan allies. understanding that already in ukraine the weakness of this situation is realized and around the world they are also aware of this in relation to china's russia, no changes are expected, relations will continue to strengthen steadily as the chinese american crisis develops. it will definitely develop. well, now let's break for a short advertisement, and then we'll talk about the role of europe in this american chinese condition. i hope to be an actress before i hit 90 on my first.