and i just went to the store and decided to make mugs, but there is no kefir. hello zinaida ivanovna i have returned to see this. i went very well. first time in pyatigorsk very beautiful city well, and we just live here.

congratulations on the rescue of the actor zalessky, just don't make excuses. i had time to think. well, of course, you could not pass by, of course, you had to come to the rescue rescue to solve this case. bones, i understand your craving for investigation, but i don't understand your lies. what should i do? what should i do? if you won't let me do it , that's what i was thinking. do you understand that we are better? break up no.

we don't need to be together. we are somehow very bad influences on each other. i'm just asking you to consider her difficult fate. the court will take this into account. maria go home i want to see my brother.

how do you look like your mother? good evening, the big game is on the air today, vladimir putin had a telephone conversation with iraqi prime minister mohammed assudani. efforts were discussed. the west is artificially limited. uh, the cost russian oil. let me remind you that so far the eu countries have not been able to agree on what this artificial ceiling should be. however,

the very intention of the eu countries and the g7 to establish such an artificial limit is to try to reduce russian oil revenues, but at the same time prevent an oil shortage on world market of a sharp rise in world oil prices. this intention remains in force. so vladimir putin said today that such a restriction would lead to serious consequences for global energy market, this initiative, which was proposed by the united states and then convinced the g7 countries to join it. this is one of the tools and hybrid warfare. against russia, an attempt to inflict damage on russia, but not to substitute ourselves exactly like with a military conflict. in ukraine , but in addition to the military and economic war, and against russia, a cultural value war is being waged, russia is being demonized, while they continue to interfere in its internal affairs. striving to impose alien eggs. so today the state duma unanimously adopted in the third reading a law banning propaganda in russia. lgbt

pedophilia and gender reassignment. but, as yesterday on the adoption of this law, in the second reading, the secretary of state of the united states reacted not blinkin, listen to the proposed tightening of the ban on the dissemination of information about lgbt people q+. will be another major blow to freedom of expression and the rights of lgbt q plus in russia, we call on russian lawmakers to revoke bills and respect the rights and dignity of all people. we will discuss this ideological dimension of the foreign policy of the united states and how it is a struggle for democracy and liberal values. and how much and the suppression of those who disagree with the american hegem. we will discuss this with the president of the center for national interests, dmitry syme, and professor mgimon andronik migronyan, dmitry drake vsevich. good evening. good evening. good evening dmitry but, and even in the best times of russian american relations, this is like

interference in the internal affairs of russia when the us secretary of state demanded that the russian state duma withdraw the bill already passed in a certain reading. it was unacceptable. now it's just ridiculous. the united states continues to do this, and not only in relation to russia, but the world is already becoming different. take for example the history of saudi arabia. e from e by mohammed ben salman. learned nothing, the united states they are still. here they follow the same courses in relation to russia and in regarding other countries of the world, well dmitry let me answer a question with a question, because you are also good. you know, the united states, you can imagine the secretary of state fucking really thought the state was listening to his price on such a sensitive issue of russian domestic politics. that is, he addressed an internal

audience in the united states andronicus well, i know that for many years in america, by the way, they were engaged in a dialogue with the united states on the issue of democracy. here understand that's why i don't think, i don't finish it, because mr. glinkin. it's no there a uh multimillionaire who gave big money to uh a biden company and that's why he was made secretary of state. he was still in the previous administration the first deputy secretary of state, he was the deputy assistant to the president at the same time the administration. obama on national security worked for biden, as his national security adviser. he met with so many leaders. he accompanied biden on his trips, for example, to russia when the byte met with putin at one time. here is how it is possible in the current

conditions, understanding the attitude towards the united states on the part of the state duma, a significant part of the deputies, uh, who are under american sanctions. well, why do you think this was done? i understand that, as it were, without double standards, it is often difficult to conduct diplomacy, but usually it is somehow assumed. that what you do has long been aimed at some kind of results you hope for some success. what we are dealing with right now. dmitry thank you for your question. great question. i have thought about this a lot and i have an answer to this question. this is actually another clear statement that american society is split not by social economic

parameters, but by sociocultural parameters, american society, we are dealing today in america with two americas, if you are a member of a democratic administration, and the democratic party relies on the democratic administration, and in the democratic party, the left wing has the leading role, then you are already a hostage of this left wing of the democratic party, everything that they mark as important, necessary exemplary. you have to follow it differently, but by the way, damn, i could afford it. uh, the executive branch doesn’t have some room for maneuver, but you remember, we talked about this, that when in many constituencies elections without elections are cut in such

a way that the democratic constituency or the republican constituency, but there the radicals in the primaries vote for you. try not to be an ideological radical, that is, to sum it up, as it were. i think today. the american political system has become insanely politicized, and if anything, it says, when so i carlson says, if we don’t vote like this commentator, if we don’t vote for biden, then we are fascists, we are reactionaries, then we are against democracy, that is, today there is an attempt in america, one party monopolizes power and its vision of the world of the device, and the other party in this case, therefore, is perceived as fascist, as semi-fascist, this is a monstrously

monstrous situation, because i have loved this country all my life since childhood. i have been reading and have visited many times, but how is this possible when, in fact, one party does not perceive another party as a legitimate participant? of the political process this is monstrous, you know, precisely the participant in the political process, so for them to report once again to the left wing of the democratic party to kick russia is just kick russia in modern america, this is, in quotation marks, sacred a business. well, and here it does not surprise me so much, but there is such a country as qatar yes, which is a country friendly to the united states. the largest us naval base in the tourist bay is located there, and i don’t have to explain to you how important

the terrorist bay is for the united states and what does the secretary of state do pancakes just one day before he decided to teach the state duma let's hear what he said uh, secretary of state blinkin about the world cup in qatar uh. and i i think that restrictions on freedom of expression are always a concern, especially when it comes to supporting a diverse and inclusive society. in my opinion, no one on the football field should be forced to choose between supporting these values ​​and playing for their team. well, by the way, when you went russian athletes to many international competitions. uh, they were told what they could wear. and what kind of banner can they carry, what slogans on their part are absolutely unacceptable. so

i don't remember what mr. blinkin had then there were some problems with it even better. and if you look at the united states, let's see what the biden administration has done with this one. in general, it seems to me, but an innocent project. and how does the movement of veterans and not only veterans celebrate the anniversary of the russian international victory, of course, i'm talking about the immortal regiment. let's get a look. the united states not only banned the procession of the immortal regiment, but even laying traditional flowers at the memorial, the spirit of the elbe, and this is prohibited. ok, coming the most important, most beloved, like an american client in europe this is ukraine and we know what

is happening in ukraine, let's say, and with those who want to practice their religion, where right now russian priests were arrested in ukraine. but even more abruptly, how they treat those who just want to speak russian, and not only those who, as it were, support moscow , are known as opponents of the kiev authorities, but those who, like the current mayor of kharkov terekhov , consistently consistently supported central government in ukraine and, in general, supported zelensky here. look what happened to him. issued resolutions on the imposition of an administrative penalty in the form of a fine for violating the law of ukraine on ensuring the functioning of the ukrainian language, as the state mayor of kharkiv, igor terekhov, terekhov used a non -state language during his speech on the air

of the national telemaran. for this violation, within the framework of the law of ukraine, an administrative penalty is provided in the form of a fine in the amount of 3.000-400 hryvnia. a. well, these are examples from different countries, where there are different situations. well, in general, it turns out that the biden administration tolerates this very calmly, and violations of the principle of inclusiveness, when it comes to russia and even qatar, yes, well. here is the populist. this is my question to you. you just talked about american polarization, it is based not only on the fact that people have different political views, but on the fact that they are democrats, especially as long as they controlled all branches of government with the exception of the supreme court is all a democracy. it's just that many things did not allow, for example, monuments

to the southern generals and even the former president began to be destroyed, but let's focus even on the southern generals. after all, the monuments there were not some kind of criminal, but people who were completely rehabilitated after the end of the civil war, who actively participated in political life, who were considered respected members of society. and now their monuments were demolished, and i never heard from president biden, or from high-ranking members of the administration, that it seemed to them that there was something unnatural in this, so disregarding the millions of their citizens, for whom these people are people under whose banner their ancestors fought, well, let's say that slavery is a special topic and it needs to say that during the

civil war the south was presented as a party of slavery and therefore the feelings of black americans today could be considered more important than the descendants of young generals and everyone else felt on the side of the south, but in the future you know very well, what happens when conservative speakers come to american universities. here you see the scenes, how they are not missed, right? do you know that i would investigate this at least once, as a violation of human rights, as a violation of the american constitution, do you know? no, i do not know. does it seem to you that, objectively speaking, is the administration of the bayna really in the country of the principle of inclusiveness and tolerance? i think the biden administration is not on

the side of inclusion because we see what they really consider and it has become common place. here we are and they are strangers, by the way, for them the republicans are even worse than some overseas enemies in other places and in other parts of the putinist world. yes, here you are yes, you said, by the way, you gave the example of a boat. i thought about that too when i was driving. i think you are amazing . who gave the americans the right and not only the americans, but the west, or rather, they themselves once respected such a right to believe that their civilization is the highest civilization, and therefore they have the right to teach other civilizations to correct other civilizations. but it's outrageous you

come to a country where there are rules. follow these orders. well, how many of these outstanding great uh you understand sayings on this topic, if you have time do as the romans uh with your charter in a strange monastery, then you don’t have to go then what is it? you come and demand that lgbt er, communities have the same opportunities that they have in america or in europe if it is not accepted in this culture, and you are trying to get them to accept it, you know to me. here i am is a good thing. you asked me about the boat. after all, i was in new york in the thirteenth year of the fourteenth year and found myself at the

epicenter, when i was an empiaru. this is a national radio involved and you and a number of other goals of the company were invited and you think for what reason. here you have a very olympics. and then just the state duma decided to ban the propaganda of same-sex relationships, the presence of minors, well, teenagers. they have already accused putin of russia of some monstrous crimes, that this is homophobia. it's generally intolerant of all me most of all amused that they were jenking. this is an outstanding tennis player who in the olympic movement in the american one of the leaders has been started to speak. i won't go. i didn’t want to disrupt the olympics , they wanted to ban them, so we could go, because at first they said that the russians would not be able to provide

security, and then they said, well, there will also be obstructions and they will almost imprison, or maybe they will rape these lgbt participants. i had to say two things. i'll tell you now, i said, listen. i am a very big tennis fan 73 in 1998, jenking was played in demonstration performances in moscow at luzhniki when in the children's union of criminally punishable same-sex relationships today there is no trace of this, and the second is with russian principles. we left you alone. leave us alone and therefore we don't mind. we are not fighting against you living the way you want. we are simply fighting against you forcing others to live. how far you are on this wave

note. i think that we should get directions from the main host dimitri yes, i think first, that a here is a statement that the united states promotes liberal values. this is one of the greatest myths, uh, in uh humanity and in the history of mankind, because in fact they were clearing towards liberalism. and the value basket that the united states is promoting has nothing to do with it. liberalism is and when you really respect a different point of view and other values, as walter said, i do not share your conviction, but i am ready to give my life for your right. this is another belief to separate the united the states act just the opposite, the united states is a country. indeed, the idea of ​​this country is the messiah, this country, which operates as a religious order of the middle ages or a religious sector. and of our days, that is, this

country, but, which is based on its exclusivity on faith in its exclusivity, which in turn. what is american exceptionalism? it is the belief that the united states is the bearer of the only right values, that it is the first country to embody these values ​​in its political the system brought them to life and, by which god himself is destined to bring these only ones to the right values ​​to everyone else, this is how religious sects behave, this has nothing to do with liberalism. this is the first second and here are the examples dmitry that you showed and how criticism, the united states, qatar and the absence are combined. any criticism of the kiev regime, where a totalitarian dictatorship is really being established today is authoritarian. yes, because freedom of thought is being eradicated, and even the right of russian people to speak russian even

for those people who are loyal to the kiev regime, this was indeed quite rightly shown by the example of a russian-speaking mayor. e russian city of kharkov in my opinion. it is considered very, uh, simple, and the united states believes that they are now at the start of a new global cold war, the past cold war. you are better than me. you know, the united states supported a lot of openly cannibalistic dictatorial regimes. brought them to power supported when they were needed in places where, with the help of these regimes, the united states fought the spread of communism. fought the influence of the soviet union today and the biden administration in plain text. she says that the middle east is no longer a priority region for her in a region where it is important for them to fight the russians with china yes, maybe there yes, but this is not the main region. here is ukraine . uh, this is much more important, yes, so really in the spirit of the past cold war, the

united states i think, but they allow criticism in relation to the once close middle eastern allies of saudi arabia, i already mentioned it. qatar is the same. despite the fact that the american navy is located there , but this is a region that the biden administration calls less significant peripheral for the hierarchy american foreign policy priorities in terms of. a new logic is a new paradigm, and new paradigms are the fight against china and the fight against russia. yes, and not necessarily. now this fight should be equally intense everywhere, including in the middle east in europe in asia , it should be more intense in the middle east less intense, so they turn a blind eye to their current bitch words, yes, in the words of one of the american presidents again, but uh, do not close their eyes to a those countries where the united states no longer thinks

it should be there. uh, the main place of application of their, uh, efforts, but uh, you need to understand that the world has really become so multipolar so diverse that commitment the united states. the same policy. including double standards, it weakens the position of the united states everywhere, and the middle east is a very clear illustration of this, the united states is losing its positions there. that's when they start. and other countries teach, but the need to promote lgbt values, they, but simply push these countries away from themselves, this is typical for africa, this is typical for the middle east, this is typical for latin america according to the ancients. naturally. you know i agree with that, but i i would like to offer one thing, after all, you said about america. well, only liberals and the democratic party accept such america. america is

split by another america. 75 million who voted for trump - this is another america and therefore i have a proposal to our state duma, because you you know, why not do it the way the americans do, otherwise they always think that what is allowed by jupiter was not allowed on the bull. here is our state from home. maybe continue this line of adoption of the resolution and adopt the next the nature of the resolution, i will not be able to formulate a state duma resolution right off the bat, but a general idea, but i can formulate it. we are concerned about the fate of american children who are exposed at an early age at their will, although they do not realize what they are doing, change sex, then change this again

consultations with parents do not allow parents to participate in the process. what are their children being taught? for example, critical racial theory, if you are at all, all issues that are considered in american public life come down to race. if you are white. well you mean inferior here, if you are black, you advance, you have other rights, other ideas about how everything works in this life , there and so on, and the white one constantly experiences an inferiority complex, because in america, in fact, the narrative of 1619 won over the liberals, who says this country was built on slavery. this country is on falsehood on lies on the face of the world and that's why we were crushed here. and

now they have to give us the opportunity to do whatever we want in this situation. i think that the state duma can express concern. this will be the first time. this will be the first time this will actually be an appeal. i do not rule out that i myself, and it seems that the state duma will read this resolution on its fox, because we are concerned about the fate of the american society of american children and american parents. the american family is in danger. i would even call it like this american family in danger of the russian state duma stands up for the protection of the american family andrey androynik, throughout the meeting. on the one hand, of course, russian foreign policy is based on the principle interference in internal affairs including the united states, but when i agree with you, i agree with you that since we are in a state of hybrid war, including an

informational cultural value war in this war, it is necessary not only to defend, but and of course, representing russian values ​​are in no way conservative values, but as human values ​​and a common person in american society , there is a huge mass of people who share our positions, but here, i would like, uh, to focus on what, that we are really in a state of informational and cultural value war? and lgbt propaganda is not the only one, but a tool. here is a very important instrument of the information war is an attempt to demonize russia, and today another example has appeared. similar attempts to demonize russia, and the publication of the politician, citing someone on a source in the united states, wrote that allegedly russia a can use chemical weapons in ukraine, moreover? what kind of newcomer is the same newcomer who allegedly hounded the violinists, who allegedly

they poisoned navalny, but it's just that it's hard to come up with more idiocy on the one hand. yes, that's just faded theme and because of its simple artificiality with tactical nuclear weapons. here take the topic of chemical weapons immediately appeared. and with a newbie. yes, it’s really stupid not to come up with anything, but since the western audience knows this word, since the western audience reacts, uh, with the corresponding instinct already, and the newcomer to the word, then, accordingly, a demonic image of russia is immediately created, and one more thing scares me. e dmitri already in direct american politics, the biden administration claims that its policy towards russia does not pursue the goal of regime change, and it seems that after leaving afghanistan, the united states as a whole proclaimed that there was a forceful change of regimes. they are no longer engaged, but the other day,

cia deputy director davit marloweville said that the cia is ready to recruit very actively ready for massive cooperation with those russian citizens who have been in the past few months. uh, they left from uh, the country and are willing to consider them as agents, uh, of the central intelligence agency. dmitry in intelligence, including in agents, there is nothing shameful, but when it comes to the mass recruitment of thousands of russians who left the country and who do not agree with e, many of whom do not agree with the current self-political leadership and when the cia talks about that we need people who do not agree with, uh, the current russian authorities and their policies, does n't it really smell here. e return to regime change policy. it seems to me that this is very dangerous, but dmitry, but let's stand up for this cia, i

rarely stand up for the american authorities, but even then i consider it necessary. and i am not a familiar gentleman, you never know what motivated him when he made such a statement. in general, it seems to me that if i were in his place, i would not say such things . eh, as if, perhaps , without realizing it, he monstrously framed these people that i'm with you here together. i would not said, but on the other hand. listen, and people are leaving russia in this i am. some other prejudicial i once left the soviet union myself although there is a big difference between the soviet union and russia, but i recognize the rights of people to leave russia unless they break the law without having some kind of critical opinion on this . they do not dwell on

those who do not leave, those people whom the mister spoke of are people who frankly declare that they do not just condemn russian policy in in relation to ukraine and that they are consistent resolute opponents of the russian authorities, but listen, so that the cia is not interested in such people. it would be very natural, and they would not justify their appropriations. why this is said is another matter. but a summing up, here's what worries me. uh, what worries me the most is my own behavior. i once came to russia several times, accompanying a speech before nixon. andranik can you remember this? yes, and nixon, who did not like, and the policy of the administration clinton we even spoke on channel one

absolutely right with you with nixon and with your beloved, but nixon very often, uh, spoke here in his speeches, and he says to me i don’t like much in america, but i won’t talk about it, because as a former the president. i believe that i should criticize america inside america. of course, i was a former president and in general i was not a former official, but in general, let's say that reasonable restraint in criticism when i was outside of it has always been for me natural. but no more and no more , not only because i have serious disagreements with the policies of the current administration, but also for another very practical reason. i came to the conclusion that

if you want america to be respected, if you want america not to be perceived as a semi-fascist power at all. you have to be honest about your differences with this administration and show and show that there is another america and there can be other perspectives. for me, this is not a very pleasant conclusion. but this is a significant conclusion for me, because i see that we are at a stage where the real protection of america and her honor, her reputation, if you want some opportunities for cooperation with russia and many others, and it is strange to say openly seriously about the fact that this administration has gone completely wrong, and is putting more and more, the united states to use

its favorite expression on the wrong side. thank you stories dmitry nikolayevich thank you very much for this interesting conversation, the big game will be back. a few days later, the operational-tactical missile system iskander is a unique modern and currently unsurpassed command. du if compared with the american self-propelled gun, of course i will look more preferable, from all points of view the smerch system revolutionized military affairs, a special gasonomic control system for the movement of this 1.200 mm rocket was invented, armor

behind the dynamic protection unit supersonic flight speed does not exist today. it’s not enough for us to go out into the same river twice seven once we measure what we need to cut off, it’s not enough for us. even the juice of vegetables and fruits, so we have a double cashback loan for any purpose, and business strata are extra words, papers of trees, and for someone there is nothing special about that black again wildberries main sale of the year more products more discounts do not miss.

trying to guess if your loan will be approved. a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit score, apply and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms at compare if loan. then compare choose better faberlic is 25 years old. and that means discounts. choose any 50% discount on beauty cafe shower gel. a carefully cautious decision to save someone's life is a risk doing what i say. you consider yourself untouchable natalya vladimirovna pregnancy, new season. watch it in the online cinema mts premium as a gift. all the possibilities of the fsb bank for business when other

laxatives do not suit phytolax fruit-based chewable tablets only two per night for comfortable relief in the morning only phytolax produced by a special technology evalar phytolax number one in russia only for four days a year, the columns of this turn into a side. 500 years waiting for such a sale that you are 200 black friday only from november 25 dress, stop for 899 rubles. smartphone infinix for 4.99 rubles. shampoo nature siberica for 99 rubles. tele2 presents the content of the subscriptions as an illusion of an offer. it does not take into account individual preferences. welcome to the real world. we at tele2 give you the opportunity to collect a subscription

yourself, this unique offer to pay only for the selected filling and this analogues. and even a subscription mix can be purchased not even by our subscribers. only selected services in the tinkoff mix subscription you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account. the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkoff, he is the only one, we came up with this for you in the national lottery, there we got prizes of a million and about a super prize. even lama will. spend time outdoors in comfort. buy clothes from adidas with discounts up to 60% on black friday at wildberries agree

what where when the winter series of games on sunday after the time program free bet from winline to all new players up to 10,000 rubles. wenline? find out what free bet you get. the big game was on the air today in brussels, where the energy ministers of the european union countries gathered. but they didn’t even start discussing the issue of a ceiling on the price

of russian oil, because yesterday the issue was discussed by the ambassadors of the countries of the european union , they did not agree on anything, and already this morning the news agency wrote that there was a complete impasse, which means that the impasse lies in the fact that a most of the countries of the european union agree in principle with the proposal of the european commission to establish ceiling at the level of 65-70 dollars per barrel and as i understand it, a little bit close, yes, to the market price, e.g. for russian oil, while greece and those countries that provide tanker services are in favor of no less 70 e dollars per barrel ae, poland and countries. the baltics insist that the ceiling should be no higher than $20 per barrel. it is difficult to agree, but at the same time, let me remind you that this idea of ​​a price ceiling

is linked to the entry into force of the eighth package of anti-russian sanctions of the european union, and in particular on december 5. ah. looks like this package. uh, this price cap should uh be passed to at least it's supposed to be passed by the 5th of december, because that's the 5th of december that the embargo should come into effect. european union on the import of russian non- pipeline oil, and the idea of ​​a price ceiling is aimed at ridding the european union of this embargo. yes, and thus prevent the aggravation of his energy deficit. at the same time, the russian government alexander nova says that we will not supply energy, and in particular , no, to those strange who will introduce a similar ceiling , regardless of, and at what price, in general, the situation is absolutely incomprehensible grigory markovich

here is how the situation will develop further. yes , look, and and most importantly, after all, they can not, and after the decision of the big seven after the adoption of the eighth package by the european union. they ca n't just play it back and pretend it never happened. it will be a colossal loss of face, that further they lost the site for your part, they are for ours and economists. well what a face we have pipe loss of money. this may be, firstly, firstly, after all, this is the political side that is clear. and what, since the sanctions and we know this the first day, they only work in one direction, their elasticity is in one direction, and in addition, there are crowds of people who, if they do not impose sanctions for a week, they get sick of anguish, they must feel the process of pressure on uh, a neighbor from the east, this part is understandable , so you can sympathize. they lost another week of life, and

the second. why ? this is not only because we do not want and do not let's go to. this is sort of understandable, yes, that is, the leadership, but we can’t arrange dumping inside custody plus. well, this is nonsense, but then these are other volumes. by the way, for now. as you know, uh, europe's purchases of our oil are coming. uh, how they go with this coal with a crazy zap, and how it was gas, uh, with a crazy reserve, just in case, i don’t know everything, tankers are flooded or what, and thirdly, and our budget is so arranged a little differently idea that we are funding the war with whose oil revenues is not true in many respects, but the main thing is that if they allowed it at the same time, imports would be removed for us as a restriction on imports, but,

well, we would buy something good then, maybe some kind of lack of money, but the situation in which we earn these poor money, and we have shopping problems, a and we still have a positive trade balance, and still e, we would even more easily pass on the weakening of the ruble for all sorts of monetary matters. that would be nice, so why is it being held this right is introduced for fun. here you see what there is no economic reason. now global consumption. well, somewhere roughly speaking, 100 billion bars, a 100 million barrels a day. and this is about the world back to the nineteenth year, and a little re-sorted, in my opinion, a little more, uh, a little less diesel. dark kerosene, uh, by the way, i had a big job at the time, uh, with a very smart student. we have shown that

in terms of gasoline, motor fuel responds to all these ten-year climate program incentives, while diesel almost does not respond, because it is a truck fuel. and you have to carry it, so there are a lot of pieces. ah, the consumption of oil nerfs, which you can’t, but on the other hand, if it makes you happy, then it immediately hits us more, in fact, of course, not cars. they are important for the american elections, but the elections are over. but diesel is a problem. you know, in brazil this is a problem in europe, and diesel transport at the price of diesel transports the inflation of the country to the country from the industry, here is the industry, therefore, they are practically discussing the problem. how to fix inflation at home? this is extremely amazing finally, clean technologically. this is incomprehensible. how to do? one of the options that was discussed is to consider it europe a and at a price somewhere at the level of the strait, in my opinion, tyagapeleskogerak. here but then

it is necessary to add. uh, shipping costs. uh, somewhere in china, suppose suppose some asian country agreed to the option then if we count 60, there we say herake plus shipping we hit 80, then. this is generally meaningless, therefore, and most likely, they are victims of their promises. they can retreat politically. uh, to be honest, i never do forecasting, i took a chance on new year's eve. i think that everything will be quietly demolished somewhere closer to tatyana's day, well , after the old new year, so that finally the people of yes and themselves can celebrate christmas and new year, and then they will again take up the packages. it seems to me that janet yellin is to the secretary of the treasury of the united states who actually came up with this idea. she needs it worthy of the ig nobel prize, because the idea is absolute

idiotic and now it has uh, created more problems for the united states and their allies even than uh than for us, because the idea is really blowing up the world oil market, it is incompatible with the rules of guardianship. and it is not clear how to implement it, neither china nor india, neither turkey nor the middle east, strangely, have joined it; everything proceeds from the fact that russian oil will not go without western insurance companies. well, uh, the western world cannot create other insurance companies, or something, after all, even to serve such uh, such oil supplies, yes, uh, that is, uh, not only is this idea not feasible. she just shows. why, the west is no longer able to dictate the rules of world energy. well , in any case, in any case, this does not cause any damage to russia in the real e short-term

period, which, apparently, was discussed in the long-term changes will be terrible for everyone. as they say, something similar, but most likely, this is a fixation. anyway. rather, all deviations from the norm lead to increased inflation about them weakening. that's for sure. but here's another problem that the west is facing in its hybrid war against russia is the depletion of military e, reserves of military supplies. and as the publication writes, the policy is to quickly increase the volume of production of weapons and restore those losses, uh, that were transferred. e ukraine is impossible. this is already causing very serious concern in nato. look, governments from ottawa to oslo are actively trying to procure and produce new weapons as soon as possible. as the war in ukraine relentlessly depletes their supplies. the west is looking for ways to increase the production of anti-tank weapons and new air defense systems against the background of the widespread use of its reserves of

artillery ammunition for the needs of the ukrainian army, firing five to six thousand rounds daily. by tens of billions after the start of the russian invasion of ukraine, but in view of the fact that the enterprise of the military-industrial complex of european countries is only waiting for the signing of new contracts. they have there was not enough time to ramp up production or hire new employees. this caused serious concern during the last buck of nato in brussels last month, given reports, closed meetings of the meeting, which the policy was familiarized with. treats deep concern about the ability of the defense complex company to satisfy requests in a short time. today, they are now saying how much time they will need in order to increase the volume of production to restore stocks. and they also need to take into account the chinese factor

, and work to build up their military power against china. well , increasing production in different directions will take different times. uh, the longest cycle will be for uh more high-tech precision weapons. and for air defense systems, air defense systems are so sick. uh, a question, because ukraine provided its air defense with stocks of soviet anti-aircraft missiles, which turned out to be completely bottomless and they really are. e, i got it very much a lot of ukraine e. the moment of the collapse of the ussr, they are now gradually beginning to come to an end, and their replacement by western systems will require a sharp increase in the pace of production. and, by the way, big expenses, because, for example, uh, one anti-aircraft missile for the sams complex

costs more than a million dollars apiece. usually, two of them are fired at the target for the german iresti complex, one anti-aircraft missile, if i'm not mistaken, this is about 400,000 euros. that is, uh, if we uh proceed from the fact that such a weapon will be be used at the same pace with the same intensity as the old soviet anti-aircraft missiles were used, which were in ukraine, there are many dozens of them a day. well, such a new big component could be fired and, of course, a very large load on production capacities, which are everywhere after the end of the cold. wars have been drastically reduced as production is hard to come by and it doesn't always need a trained workforce. you can hire from the market like this. yes, there it is necessary to prepare additional labor, then it is there for more than months a few months over a year. that is, this is a

long cycle of increasing production.