it turns out that you give birth, and you do. yes, as a woman i tell you, if a wife does not want to give birth from her husband, so she does not love him grisha you dragged her to the registry office . she didn't want to. grisha doesn't love you, grisha don't you understand that? who ryan goslin no, mr. creed no, she didn't specifically guess easter on duty took over. well, a very stupid precinct gamovich christ has risen on our territory. earrings are

real, let's not be stupid. i looked the jury of respected people sitting in moscow on saturday at the first on the stage of donetsk what are you talking about? yes, yes, right here this is what the new russians look like now. we prepare treats for the festive table with the whole family. and, of course, special attention. we give the sauce mayonnaise, mahei, it will make the festive dishes tastier. day after day, anxiety anxiety, and with them insomnia , habitual actions no longer help to cope with anxiety and insomnia afobasov 4 weeks for the most pronounced action black friday discounts

up to 50% on your favorite toys. create fashionable looks with barbie dolls and dive into the magical world of enchantis. knows that difficult times require profitable solutions, zero commission for the purchase of securities and guaranteed cashback up to a million rubles. open the world of investments. you see, someone who will no longer overpay for communication. yes in reflection you get 350 minutes 35 gb popular. social networks of the video service for 399 rubles. in yota, connect to yota now and in all megafon stores, each order of products in yandex food is an order for yours, because you choose the best for yours, and we try to

match. everything will arrive in the best possible way or we will return the money yandex.food products with delivery for its buyers new hopes download participate in snow promotions and send thousands of bonuses every day in the magnet application, this is something they usually don’t say hemorrhoids, and this helps to fight the symptoms of hemorrhoids at any stage and act on their cause. there are ordinary people, and they have the right to a fair trial. i will take up the zhuravlev case and win it. damn you what are you doing,

if you think so, then you do not belong in the profession? cinema one tv presents tomorrow morning, if she gives me an apron, you will kill her and promised to spend me. in france mata hari it should be an execution,

not just a murder movie 1 tv presents yes, i remembered who i am, but i don't understand how we are and why. new series you are a songwriter, but only relatives and friends know about it. the thirst for self-expression does not give you peace, and friends say that a big stage is crying for you, fill out an application and participate in international competitions. and who knows, maybe your song will be appreciated by the best producers, and your

favorite idols will perform, we call the author to the stage. this is your debut. his whole being, it is an angel. in that in a sense, of course, he is absolutely not vulnerable. when i was 12 years old, i heard scriabin for the first time, a strong impetus was taken to compose music by artemyev, a brilliant melodist and too russian a person. he played absolutely disinterestedness and mikhalkov would have shown, yes, we take everything to eighty-five. tiyu and rainmetev on sunday at the first in this i have not yet participated.

well, there, just half? or can my friend and i stay here alone for 10 minutes. a

cache and a box and there is nothing here. what's this? looks like french

phone no, then you need to look for a phone even faster . an interesting story is outlined. what else do you want to know? tell me about the lawsuit, yeah, a horse, a two-year-old breed cannot be stitched, but about a girl. iskra , a student of veterinary surname skorokhodova ugu , could take a difficult birth at an asterisk, then a

weak horse came out to clean her horse, they called her. and if i'm not mistaken, the spark at the kuni factory no longer works, she quit six months ago. more. i haven't heard anything about her. and you know that iskra and the giants were lovers. velikanov in this sense, he was always not a fool, but specifically i didn’t know anything, americans are very rare in the factory. do you happen to know where you can find it? i don't know where to look for her at the vet anymore. i beg you, we found these fingers on a metal box from a hiding place under the floor; these fingers we found on a thermos-giant, from which he drank on the

day of his death. the spark is the most obtained, she met with the giant one of his death, right before the race. so the cunning woman erased her prints all over the room. only found in a secret it's good that you have now found a question in french . it's better that it was written on a piece of paper with a complex text. no, just very easy, but for beginners to learn french, this is a grammar exercise.

so scroll learned french, and in secret from the giants. otherwise. why hide all this in a hiding place ? you can learn french in courses for adults, there are not so many of them in moscow. but you can take private lessons enough. uh-huh or on your own? look, take a coin of 10 francs and go to the grocery store . coins were taken out of circulation by 1914. this is a very old textbook. i have courses. mainly used new teaching material in schools changes less frequently. and we are talking about the textbook of the beginning of the century. wow, scratched anywhere. according to the textbook, but if i excluded the french independent ones, then this clue is unlikely to help us. but if i took private lessons, i think i know who to contact.

we found out from which educational institution the sincerity of a student's personal file without photographs and with standard information was sent to practice. orphanage girl, we rolled up there they got photographs, but old ones. where is it? and now iskra skorokhodova was born in zvenigorod no father, mother died during the bombing, the girl grew up in trouble. it means you let me spend the night with you, well, yes, i did such

a noble deed with your wallet. mom, mom, are you crying? no, something mom, don't lie, i don't need it. tanya will return tanya and her dad

won't last a week. he is a good father, a bad husband, a good father. he loves you takes care of you walks. mom, it's you who always told dad to take a walk with us, that he bought gifts to he took us to school, he loves us, but he does not know how to take care of her at all. they'll be back soon, because you're a good mom. and if you are so sad, then let's call uncle zhenya for dinner, he is cheerful. really

let's call him. and where to look now for this beauty? i have already put her on the wanted list, but i think that with velikanov's money she could have gone anywhere, to any city. such a young, beautiful, smart , she came up with such a scheme with horses. no, i know such people of my own free will. he won't leave moscow. why because capitals are all life, only there is something to spend velikanov's money on exactly in moscow

good evening, the big game is on air today, russian defense minister sergei shoigu announced that next year the amount of funding for state defense orders will increase one and a half times and special attention will be paid to capital construction in the interests of nuclear forces. this is absolutely understandable in the conditions of the hybrid war that the united states and its allies are waging against russia and which is of a complex, almost total nature and combines both military and political-diplomatic and informational and economic measurements. today in bucharest ended a two-day meeting of foreign ministers of nato countries, there again sounded spells that ukraine must win, and as nato secretary general ian stonetenberg said. i will quote him, the best way to achieve sustainable peace in ukraine is to continue to supply it with weapons. the end of the quote, that is, nato's course to continue the war in ukraine in

order to ease the exhaustion. russia remains unchanged today. the next volley of the economic war against russia was fired. although the european union, has not yet been able to agree on the level of an artificial price ceiling for russian oil. he openly proclaims a course towards the confiscation of russian and private and state assets frozen in the european union in order to later finance the kiev regime with their help. listen to what the head of the european urson commission, ursula vonderlein, said today. your russia must pay financially. ukraine and its the oligarchs must compensate ukraine for this damage and cover the costs of restoring the country. and we have ways to make russia pay. we have frozen 300 billion euros from the reserves of the central bank of russia and 19 billion of funds from russian

oligarchs in the short term together with our partners. we could create a structure to manage this money and invest their proceeds. we will use for the benefit of ukraine as soon as the sanctions are lifted, these funds should be directed to ensure that russia has fully compensated for the damage done to ukraine we will develop international agreements together with our partners to pretend this in life together we can find legal grounds for this. we will discuss this unprecedented for modern international relations encroachment on the theft of private and state, but most importantly, someone else's property on an international scale. what consequences can this have with dmitry simes, president of the center for national interests, and mgimo professor andronik migranyan dmitry andrey sasovich? good evening. good evening. dmitry but, but what ursula von der lein said. it smacks of the use, i would say, of economic weapons

of mass destruction. here, but in washington it seems like they want to avoid escalation. but the escalation, perhaps not only military, but also economic, this is how washington assesses such initiatives, given, for example, that the united states has a huge trillion-dollar debt and many developing countries. after such statements, they might think that from western countries to withdraw their money and not be afraid of such a prospect of the united states well, washington, that is. the initiative is more cautious and uh, us treasury secretary yen u said just a few months ago that the idea is something interesting, but within the framework of american law, this can not be done. ah, but uh, as they say in such cases, bad examples are contagious. and if just proposes now, uh, the european union if it is

accepted. if this embodies life, then i am sure that the pressure on the administration to go, because the same way, will increase dramatically. i would only just say that from my point of view. it's, uh, not just drinking breaking the law, but it's not even just a very dangerous precedent for the united states, it's actually crossing some other red line, not necessarily a red line. voiced by russia but a red line in international relations and in the positions of the collective west, russia has been accused all the time of not considering international law and some not fully understood rules, which, apparently, based on how the world worked in conditions western hegemony. here, look what mrs. wonderline said. she

said that for this very radical measure, we are going to take hundreds of billions of dollars from russia and give these funds to the enemy of russia and ukraine during the war, and she will find some kind of legal justification. uh-huh on principle. who seeks will always find. how are they going to find it, and in some garbage, but going to some secret party to discuss it. but you see, she has already explained this many times , and the supporters of this confiscation have also spoken about it in united states that new laws need to be passed to allow this to be done, a new law, perhaps, can be passed, but what's the matter. all

western jurisprudence was built on the same principle. the law cannot be retroactive. whatever laws you have not adopted now, they may concern the future of some future actions on the part of russia and other states. they are what has already been done and here on this basis. complete trampling of one's own tradition of one's own practice. here they are going to go to that measure and talkin to one sides of this world to laugh a little at him, because these funds are not controlled by russia like that, and until there is some serious reconciliation between russia and the collective west , these funds will not be given away and scratched back. it's not easy to be. i am sure that those in moscow who are planning the distribution of the russian budget, including the military budget. uh, these funds in no

foreseeable future do not count on the nets of vision. this is, in general, not such a big blow or, in general, maybe not a blow to russia, but it's that they're going to give this money to ukraine. well, i don't know what to call it. i don't know what to call it if stealing is okay. no, from my point of view, this can be considered, how like wars when they are already supplying ukraine with billions of dollars of military aid. this is the last figure, and more than at least equal to two french military budgets and at the same time they are providing huge economic assistance and at the same time they are trying to cut russia off from the international financial system and prevent entry into

russian advanced technologies. and now, if they are still giving ukraine $600 billion, $300 billion , it’s true that they say today that they will give these funds for the economic restoration of ukraine dmitry, these are like stories a few months ago. what weapon systems the collective west will not give ukraine is changing all the time. yeah, ukraine needs weapons all the time if there is a special fund. hundreds of billions of dollars are destined for ukraine. what kind of russia can you be, i would say not even guarantees, but a reason to think that these the money will not go to military purposes in ukraine, but in such a word, in conditions, of course, in russia , uh, it is significantly uh, military tasks are difficult. and it

at some stage really starts from my point of view to threaten. well, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of this russia, i know that this sounds very serious. i see a very serious, but the threat, and uh, in moscow, this is very unsettling, but i must say that it’s not at all, i don’t see that officials in moscow didn’t see this threat and somehow moved it, they don’t see it and they say very seriously and they say that greetings were stolen or, more precisely, they plan to try to steal these funds, they half stole when they froze, and here they want to finally steal them, but then the question arises. what is there to do? and this is the most difficult question, because you can be indignant

as much as you like, but in the end. i think that there is already enough representation in the russian leadership and among the russian public. what is the collective west the position of the collective west towards russia and to what extent the extent to which the collective west is ready to disregard international law, the main question is what to do? andronik mihran i know that you have thought a lot about these topics and looked at what international experience is on this matter, whether russia has any possibilities other than a mirror answer, which was in this case a very difficult symmetrical answer, most likely not, and we are with you this issue was discussed. what are the problems in order to confiscate, here i think, here i want to refer to our conversation, and you yourself are wonderful. uh, they answered this question that people who

got used to investing here settled down and these people were deprived of their property. it will be somewhat disorganized. here russia is still thinking in such categories, because it is necessary to think one step ahead , two steps forward and it is not known. if you do this to them, they will either return or not return , or the spat ones will say yes to their own isolation. yes? yes, now i remember, wonderful sober. a balanced judgment by one of the most interesting analysts in the us brookings institution, which is always the think tank for the democratic party and recruits from there for the state department of the national security council califageda.

by the way, who published several works together with yona, hill and languages, or rather, good languages, said that e fiona has largely earned the reputation of a serious specialist, and because he said the following. yes, of course, you can try to punish russia, but you can’t help but assess russia’s capabilities. and he just absolutely doesn’t talked about a symmetrical or some kind of answer, which, in general, rebounded. here you are to me, and i told you so, he said, a very interesting thing that impressed all the participants of the valdai forum in the fourteenth year. this is the first forum after the crimean events. he said, you know, what if russia has cyber ​​troops. russia has cyber capabilities, what if russia strikes at the

american or western financial and banking system. this is the paralysis of the entire economy of social and economic life. you understand what an escalation can be. and where can it lead, so i want to remind you of this eight-year-old conversation performed by a person from a brokerage institute. and i think quite from the american table sometimes and i think they should. i think that people in our analytical structures and in the security council and in the administration and in the ministry of defense probably have many other answers, but i just voiced one of which can really be a crushing answer. and i think that this is the action that ursula von der, lein, spoke about. it's not just an act war, but this, as i said at the very beginning, is the use of economic weapons of mass

destruction for those consequences for that tsunami, moreover, a global tsunami. they are only the russian western ones, which consequences will be triggered if, uh, the west really confiscates both private and sovereign state assets of russia really freezing and, uh, the confiscation of western investments of western private ones, because there are no western state assets of russia, respectively, western private assets. this is what lies on surfaces, but i completely agree with androydik. russia does not always respond mirror and symmetrically russia responds based on its national interests. as, for example, on the issue of visas. yes. e, the european union has significantly tightened the procedure for obtaining schengen visas by russian citizens. russia refused to respond symmetrically, because it does not correspond to russian interests. here are cyberattacks against the banking system, or threats, at least bring some discord into the banking

system. i think this is what will be. well by at least to be on the agenda from birth of tens of millions of people, of course, yes, and because it really threatens with paralysis, but for western countries. ah, but there's something else i'd like to point out. here is the punishment for the collective west, if such a measure is taken, it will not necessarily come from russia, it will come from all over the world. because, to a large extent, the well- being of the collective west, and especially in the united states of america, is still based on those deposits of those foreign exchange reserves that other countries like china, india, saudi arabia, and the very same russia were kept and are kept in the e western financial system, and here is a similar step against russia, and it will really have the effect of exploding bombs, and the process of de-dalarization. yes, the process of jewishization

of the flight of money from western financial institutions will sharply accelerate. what will happen in this case with the economies of the united states and the european union, i understand perfectly. why does janet helen and the biden administration approach this issue with more concern, because it is the united states in this case, and are the main place where other countries are traditional. money and if they take this money , then a dollar. in principle, this will be the end of the dollar as a currency of international settlements and especially as a reserve currency, which in turn will be lethal not just damage, but become lethal damage. that would be all you said, correct your point of view. this was a big blow to the international financial system. well, uh, i had a call. from one person who plays a significant role in

my life he is an unofficial face. he is not an investigator. he represents the fund that holds my modest savings, and he told me that this is the situation that they are closely monitoring and asked me what my opinion was about a possible russian response, because he said this is one of the largest and the success of investment funds of the united states and he told me that, of course, if russia had struck a blow at the american financial system, which is incredibly profitable for america, but which is very fragile, it would certainly lead to the great depression in america, and given the polarization that is already taking place in america and

the tendency of the party to blame each other for everything, this could also affect american political stability. a sane person is a sane person who makes a decision in america this information is very easily available. he would stop there. but when you look, especially at the members of congress, you see what carries them. understand stop them with logic very difficult. and it would seem dmitry they saw what russia did in syria how did russia stop in 2008? well, as russia entered used here it would seem. and they should have understood that there is no need to joke with russia, but they don’t see it that way. and

you know why this is my guess, no one told me. i can't document it in any way. and because they themselves are not beaten. they see how the bloody meat grinder is going on in ukraine they see what big problems are in syria for both the syrians and the kurds, but every shvili, georgia suffered a lot of damage in 2008. this has never touched america directly, and now, i'm just afraid that these are not the people who will wake up until something starts happening specifically with the united states, and in general with the collective west. dmitry, i completely agree with you, and we have already spoken with you on this program. it seems to me that everything that follows is the same as a santanik, until the united states, the american political elites, begin to experience healthy fear. to me

breaks out, as they say, yes, they will not experience the fear that they have experienced in years. in the case of the cold war, american policy will not change more than that, and the actions of the united states now supporting ukraine, pumping up its weapons to keep ukraine from continuing hostilities, allow the united states. take. revenge, more precisely, the foreign policy elites of the united states to take. revenge for the failures they suffered. eh, very recently. this is hierarch. i am afghanistan and now they hope to a victory that can start, e, launch the process of such a grandiose and victorious revival of the collective west in the conditions of a new confrontation of the new cold war, respectively, against, but against china. yes, therefore , here i completely agree with you, which still amazes me. in fact, these are double standards that are monstrous in their scale, and that's the moral

basis of all the talk about the need to confiscate russian assets, a. and both private and public is, uh, an assessment of that the damage that russia inflicts on the ukrainian economy, ukrainian energy, and it is said that this is unacceptable in the 21st century, that this is the embodiment of barbarism, and so on. now let's see, let's remember, more precisely, what nato spokesman jamiesha said in may 1999, when nato bombed yugoslavia, listen if you say that the yugoslav army has a lot of generators, then why are you depriving the country of seventy percent not only electricity, but also water supply, because, according to you , nato strikes only at the military objects. unfortunately , the command and control system also depends on electricity. if milosevic really wants his citizens

to have water and electricity all he has to do is accept the terms of nato and we will stop this company until he does. we will continue to attack targets that supply his army with electricity if this has consequences for the population. these are milosevic's problems. this is a problem with darlings, yes, a spoke to jaime neck, who, by the way, then until 2018 was deputy general secretary, summing up, they agreed on alexander the great but who had a very unpleasant situation during his asiatic company. we showed an incredibly tightly tied knot and said that no one could untie this knot. and the prediction of the prophet was that he could not untie, could not win, what alexander the great did. yes, he took the sword and cut this knot. the gordian knot is absolutely accurate.

and so, uh, i just think that washington in brussels in london in the collective west, they underestimate the capabilities and determination of russia, and this is a very serious mistake for them. hope they understand it. until some more serious more tragic events begin to occur and the very last. and i was lucky when i was asked several times to talk with the president , when he was preparing for his first meeting with gorbachev. and what made a big impression on me was that although reagan was known as an enemy of the soviet union as a strangely staunch ardent anti-communist. remember all these expressions evil empire and so on. nevertheless,

one of the first tasks that he set for himself , before he was going to meet with gorbachev. how to show the new soviet leader that he does not want evil for the soviet union and that he shares in many respects, and the interests and values ​​of gorbachev himself, without gorbachev's new initiatives, of course, this second detente would not have arisen, but without reagan's openness, nothing would have happened either. and today, in the collective west and washington, they have absolutely lost interest the ability to think about how their actions are perceived by another country, and in such a soon they will admit that they did not destroy russia. and that they will not be able to defeat russia here, i would not really like to

understand, but what these people are counting on. what kind of world are they going to live in if they make russia their sworn enemy, while russia is like a sworn enemy. i didn’t behave, i don’t know, you must admit, dmitry dmitry, i completely agree with this, but continuing the historical conversation about i will answer your questions with a quote from louis xv after us at least the flood. i think it is precisely this principle that the collective west today is guided by. dmitry andronik vsetselovich thank you very much for this intellectually and historically rich conversation dmitry thank you very much. thank you. the main thing is that everything is in place, yes. that is, the war years of the ground forces were already fundamentally different from what they saw on the fields of the second world war. if you create a cut

that the tank can hit, it's great the moments when he can put you on you get significant advantages were attracted by the most powerful scientific forces, the most powerful design teams, it turned out to be systemic efficiency, which was simply indescribable. god of war the history of russian artillery premiered on saturday on pervyy. go to vtb and everything will work out.

at tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave a request on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account - the best digital bank for small lending tinkoff's business he's the only one healthy can't be tasty we've prepared something convincing for us without excess sugar, salt and fat healthy hyphen. nutrition.rf is an individual program of delicious recipes from simple and inexpensive products. calorie calculator. articles with recommendations, healthy nutrition.rf. this is what you like on black friday. hairdryer, steamer and discounts up to 50% on the entire range in the scarlett technique

no commissions are charged for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. tinkoff knows how to platinum apply for a tinkoff platinum credit card in the tinkoff application and transfer money without interest commission tinkoff he is such a father when other laxatives do not suit phytolax fruit-based chewable tablets only two per night for comfortable relief in the morning only phytolax is produced using a special technology evalar phytolax number one in russia billion. pink, will play a billion, buy tickets. tele2 mix subscription is a unique offer,

collect it yourself and pay only for the selected content to this. mix subscription can be purchased not even our tele2 other rules, send one loan application to the selected banks and get approval for comparison. if credit then compare. i help cells produce antibodies and capture viruses polyoxidonium for colds is an advertisement for a loan without surprises in the bankesh mail. curious what's in the box? wow, a loan at 4.5% per annum with a guaranteed rate of guarantee without surprises mail, bank and here comes our conversation 69.99 magnet will also bring my friends luck in the new year. one two the number of friends is not

limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. and a friend will receive free service forever on the twentieth of december and by participating in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win. what where when is the winter series of games on sunday?

on the air of the big game today, nato secretary general jens stoltenberg, following the results of the meeting of the ministers of foreign affairs of the nato countries in bucharest, which ended today, said that the issue of ukraine's accession to nato today is not the most urgent practical agenda, since much more urgent and priority issues are the actual survival, and ukraine, e.g., as a sovereign independent state. but let me remind you that yesterday, following the results of the first day of this nato meeting, a joint statement was adopted by the foreign ministers. and where did they fully confirm the promise of 2008, given just in bucharest in april, that ukraine and georgia would someday become members and

military conflict. not avoidable, and this decision was pushed through by the united states, since it was the bush administration that sought in every possible way for ukraine to join nato, and designated this as its own. and the priority of this, for example, is recalled by a participant in those events, and in the late 2000s , who was then the secretary general of the french foreign ministry and adviser to the president. jacques ichirac maurice gourdo montan, listen in 2006, after the missile war, chirac was worried about the balance of power in europe, he was worried about the independence of ukraine and he sent me to negotiate with the diplomatic adviser to the president of russia, sergei prikhodko. i proposed to him a plan for a joint protectorate over ukraine from russia and nato countries to guarantee the neutral status of this country, my russian colleague, the project was interesting, since he removed the issue of crimea and the russian fleet could

stay, where there was contact at the time was the us secretary of state and my constant interlocutor, looking at the plan. she told me, well, france broke up, you've been blocking us for so many years the first wave of entry with the transom of central europe into natu. and we won't let you block the second of this, we realized that the ultimate goal of the americans is ukraine's accession to nato, nikolai yuryevich well, uh, then this obsession of the united states with ukraine's accession to nato was largely based on the feeling, er false as it turned out? yes , on the understanding that nothing will happen to them for this. eh, that e to seek ukraine's accession to nato and perhaps ukraine's accession to nato will not lead to any serious consequences. uh, russia is not dare to, uh, take some serious steps to protect their national interests. and actually. this is where the whole philosophy came down. uh, nato expansion that nato expansion is safe for the united

states itself. well, now russia has already demonstrated that this is absolutely not the case. yes , absolutely irrefutable proof of deceit. this initial theory, on which the expansion of nato was based, and we are now precisely because of this, but we are in a state of hybrid war, which many compare not only with caribbean crisis. they say that this is much worse than the previous one, and the cold war and the worst moments. that is the coldest war. here, based on current realities. do you think the united states will refuse to continue to seek ukraine's entry into nato after the end of this conflict, if, in fact, ukraine remains a or still recognize the fallacy of their previous policy. i allow myself to challenge one of your thesis that the united states thought that nothing would happen to them

and so far nothing has happened. and the problem for us, but was just that we could raise the price and easier or the price of nato expansion for those countries that are going to nato. ah, but we could n't drive that price for the united states in that sense, the nato expansion policy for the united states proper remains safe. and therefore, there is no reason to think that they intend to turn off this path. in addition, the policy of nato expansion is now for the united states a symbol of their superpower status and a symbol of their hegemonic status. we will expand where we want to go, and no one can order us, and

no one can stop this process, but on the status of the united states as a guimon. as the only superpower, a lot is based on it based based on the network the security guarantees that the united states gives to its allies based on it based on it . ah, their problem is that uh they do, very high stakes. in those regions and in those situations that do not pose a direct threat to them. eastward nato expansion didn't add security to the united states, but the bet has already been made, and unfortunately, i don't see

mechanisms that will force the united states to abandon this bet. i agree with you that nato expansion did not add security to the united states in the traditional sense, but added their hegemony, that is, it was aimed precisely at strengthening and universalizing american hegemony, er europe and definitely. ah, the russian demands for a security guarantee that we offered, and to the united states and nato at the end of last year , what could actually prevent, and the current military conflict in ukraine and it would not happen if the united states became serious with us. uh, russia demanded to revoke this promise to discuss these issues 200. the united states categorically refused to even discuss this, not because it allegedly violated the provisions of the charter of paris for a new europe

ninetieth year. actually, it didn't break anything . but it was just violating that same american hegemony that you are talking about, that is, the right of the united states to do whatever they want to create such systems. uh, what they want , yes, and without the participation of russia with the participation of russia , it does not matter what the united states is doing. uh, here, uh, the world order, and ah, respectively, expand nato to wherever they want to bomb. uh, other sovereign states and so on, because russia essentially demanded to revise this particular rule and form a new rule that let's create security systems. jointly. yes, where russia would also have the right to make decisions. the united states categorically, but refused. and at the same time, the united states categorically refuses. and you well, for the current conflict, and they demonize russia, they say that only russia is responsible, they refuse to recognize the

nato expansion factor a to a in the current conflict, and this feature, so to speak, of the american approach is very correctly pointed out by one sensible american realist thinker, uh, professor at harvard university, steven wolf. listen to me, it is especially striking that liberal interventionists, unrepentant conservatives and a handful of progressives are going all-in on the ukrainian issue. it seems that they do not doubt the origins of the conflict, nor the correctness of the plan of action that the russian president must follow today for them. vladimir putin bears sole and complete responsibility for the war, the only mistake others may have made in the past was that they were too kind to russia and too willing to buy its oil and gas. the us foreign policy establishment does not like to admit their mistakes, and in laying out all the blame for the war on putin, this is a trump card that frees

supporters of nato expansion from any responsibility for these terrible events. putin is clearly responsible for this war, but if the actions of the west that preceded it made him the decision is more likely, then western politics is not without sin, but, uh, nikolai viktorovich agrees with the theses of stephen walt and yes and no. it seems to me that his material gives us the opportunity to remember a little bit what happened in 2008. a little earlier, actually. uh, the united states of america has always wanted to maintain and increase its control over russia. why did you and i speak repeatedly to use russia as a tool in the fight against china uh-huh, the putin era was marked by the loss of control by the united states of america over russia in different steps? no, and so to speak, finally and irrevocably, in the most recent time, therefore, 2008 is a year of talk that

ukraine can be admitted to nato, but i will not agree in the same way as my dear colleague with one of your theses. you said that the united states wanted to take ukraine into nato. they didn't want to take ukraine into nato. they wanted to hang a carrot in front of a horse's head. they wanted to create tension, and that is tension, of course, between russia and ukraine, but it wasn't enough when it didn't work. this is a mine for the future. they just started a military conflict, provoking saakashvili to attack south ossetia after all, i think that we have no doubt that it's not just saakashvili who went crazy and suddenly decided, uh, to make war with russia. of course not. this is then condoleezza rice in her stories. tries to make him look crazy. and even now it seems to me, uh, the story will climb over in jail, where it's at the end of the con. they'll poison us, and then they'll accuse us of supposedly doing it, but in fact, just, uh, history will go somewhere to the bottom, so 2008 is

a bookmark for the future. at first they tried to maintain and strengthen control over russia by means of a war in the caucasus by financing the terrorist underground where it did not work out, then terrorist attacks began in moscow, hostage-taking. that is how to keep financing. uh, hitting russia didn't work. the next stage begins to prepare ukraine for the future, but they will not accept it, i don’t know, direct pushing georgia into a war with russia, and this trump card did not work, and russia was able to prove that these were retaliatory actions. although now in the west they do not want to remember this. and so bets raised raised raised raised raised and when you say that the united states of america does not want to admit responsibility. and for what to admit responsibility for them is a chess game, on which they were beaten. but the stakes are rising all the time and have reached the point where the collapse of the financial system is now at stake, the collapse of the dollar, as such , if they steal other people's reserves, but

they perceive this as an attempt to maintain their hegemony. they sincerely i am sure sincerely do not consider themselves guilty of this, but in the depths of their souls. they are well aware that they upped these stakes and provoked a war in europe to control russia to control their european allies. well, of course, those who are fighting for american hegemony. they accept no responsibility. they really proceed from the fact that they acted correctly, expanding nato, correctly, correctly seeking saakashvili to attack south ossetia , correctly militarized ukraine and turned it into a de facto nato country . conflict with russia from the point of view of these people is all right. yes, this is wrong from the point of view. stephen who adheres to a different foreign policy philosophy and, uh, believe that the united states can go too far, that is, play out to the third world war

, in fact, while continuing such a policy, but so far the united states is not going to radically change its policy, and at today's meeting and yesterday meetings in bucharest, no one spoke about the peaceful settlement of the ukrainian conflict, on the contrary, they say all about the need to continue arms deliveries . and that only zelensky will actually decide when, under what conditions, ah, it will be possible to end this military conflict, in particular, eh, a similar statement was made by the official representative of the national security council, john kirki this is what president zelensky should decide, we we are not going to push and force him to sit down at the negotiating table. we intend to ensure that we continue to help his armed forces to succeed in battlefield. so when he is ready to sit down at the negotiating table, he will be able to negotiate from

a position of strength, and that is what we intend to focus on, but nato secretary general ian stoutomberg made an even more striking statement. it may seem paradoxical to you, but the reality is that the best way to achieve sustainable peace in ukraine is to continue to supply it with weapons. here is such a paradox uh, but here is the answer to the question why the united states u continues such a policy, despite all that the price paid by both the people of ukraine and european citizens. by the way, yes, pay with your wallets with your level of e life, and, despite the risks of escalation that arise in this regard, the answer to this question is also, e, given by professor e of harvard university world his answer, by the way, is not very different from what we say what we talk about at this table, listen the war

was a disaster for the ukrainians, but supporters of american liberal hegemony, especially the more hawkish elements of the foreign policy establishment. they regained some of their influence again, if the support of the west will enable ukraine to defeat the invading armies and humiliate the dangerous dictator, then the mistakes and cancer of afghanistan libya and syria a. also, the balkans can be forgotten. and the campaign to expand the liberal order at the head of the united states will receive a new right to life. igor georgievich with this. do you agree. you are traditional. perhaps i should say, no, i certainly do not agree here that the liberal order has nothing to do with the liberal order, in my opinion, that order. yes, that is, well, clearly the configuration of assets, this does not fit into the liberal understanding of ownership. yes, private property of her land. yes, the protectionism that america is now active. promotes and at the expense of the europeans

is trying to save. e your hegemony, including, by the way, industrial and the fact that the war continues in ukraine - this is certainly in the hands of the united, what is there, and yes, they will continue to support it. well, i think that even the fact that the republicans took control of the house of representatives and many thought that everything i will stop giving money. uh, most likely not, because it is beneficial primarily to the american military-industrial complex, that is, war, as an engine of progress, like the engines of the economy, which is now experiencing not the best of times, but europeans will certainly suffer to a greater extent, in- first, closer theater of operations. secondly, the americans have, uh, the resources to force. uh, europeans, and including within the framework of nato more actively help uh, ukraine, yes , remember how trump raise.