and, at the expense of the europeans, he is trying to save. e your hegemony, including, by the way, industrial and the fact that the war continues in ukraine is certainly at hand with the secluded, what is it? yes, they will continue to support it. well, i think that even the fact that the republicans took control of the house of representatives and many expected that i would stop allocating money. uh, most likely not, because it is beneficial primarily to the american military-industrial complex, that is, war, as an engine of progress, like uh the engines of the economy, which are now experiencing not the best of times, but the europeans will certainly suffer to a greater extent, firstly, the theater of war is closer. secondly, the americans have, uh, the resources to force. eh, the europeans, and in the same way, including within the framework of nato , to help more actively. eh, ukraine, yes. let's remember. how trump is at home well, yes, forcing him to increase

defense spending, and the european, the europeans saluted and did what the americans told them and, of course, what we talked about at the beginning, that the fact that it was the united states and nato led by the united states to ensure the security of europe is another option. no, he will certainly force the europeans to obey the americans in everything . and what benefits the americans is that americans really benefit the most from this conflict. and in general, it is not yet clear that they are going to turn it off. and, of course, quite funny. this is what zelensky will decide something. zelensky, of course, will not decide anything, but will do what i tell him, uh, senior partners. uh, first of all, the united states well, and great britain, which the americans appointed to oversee the ukrainian issue, indeed, the united states considers this conflict as a central element of their new foreign policy strategies, and strategies aimed at the revival of the collective west to

strengthen its reincarnation, and its recovery in in a certain sense of overcoming that crisis. and discordant, by the way, that steven wald wrote about iraq afghanistan libya yeah, now we're turning the page. now we uh like a knight we are entering a new e, a cold war with what we consider to be world evil, and so to speak, we are strengthening ourselves, consolidating our health and so on, but the same stephen volk and i promise, this will be his last quote, he believes that, and the united the states can play the game and put themselves in a very serious, and they drive you into a very serious impasse. i continue this policy of maximalist goals, that is, to say that it is necessary to defeat russia, and they say everything will be decided by zelensky, that is, without victory ukraine is impossible, and to go to poli tika diplomatic settlement, listen to the last quote of professor steven wald.

the biden administration may find itself in an uncomfortable position in the coming months or years on the one hand, it is publicly committed to winning the war and hopes that american soldiers will not participate in the fighting. although the entire national security machine is helping ukraine in many ways from the other side. administration. a similar one is aware of the risks of escalation and does not want to get involved in an active war with russia a some american officials. obviously , they believe that a complete victory for ukraine is unlikely and that in the end they will have to negotiate. here's the catch, if the war does end up with a messy and disappointing compromise on them happy endom, the hollywood ones that many in the world would like to see, if russia retains control of a large part of ukrainian territory in a year, ukraine will suffer additional damage, for past tense. putin will still rule in moscow and

the us european allies will be forced to accept. another the flow of refugees and severe economic hardship associated with ukraine then it will be increasingly difficult for the biden administration to present this war as a success story , us president joe biden and his team have not left themselves much room for maneuver and it continues to shrink whenever there is any hint of incomplete kiev's support is caused by a flurry of hawkish condemnations. i agree with the same question. well, comment, you can not only this one, there were quite a few more quotes. thanks first. i want to say that apparently steven wall is watching big game because just yesterday, uh, this studio was talking about what uh is about what the americans are doing. there is an element of them taking revenge for their own failures. and so he perfectly listed afghanistan and the cancer of libya, uh,

everything, where they are, uh, so. eh, they couldn’t, then, as they say in one joke, it didn’t work out, and even there it causes a storm of psychological, uh, experiences. and that's why, if now here's to make russia feel bad for them, of course it will be much easier. and this is very correct psychological feature. e notes. well, in your studio they noticed her, but before that it was necessary. so, this is to admit, but in essence, but very much. it seems to me the central question. the next one is really, the united states, the current administration has found. this is a niche where they do, practically everything they want and do not carry. no responsibility for this. in the sense that here, as in that joke. yes, so that we could do everything and we had nothing for it. so they found this niche, and at first they were very excited. but

then, apparently, they realized that, in fact, they are in a minefield, because now anything and everything and completely unforeseen things can happen to them, and the world situation is changing very quickly. and already, if america suddenly stumbles, uh, or someone trips her. here, no one will rush to the rescue of america, and the realization comes that all this hegemony, about which we are right to say, she lived for the last, well, 10 years for sure. and maybe already 15 on doping. we all fed the american hegemony, it was easier for us to say so. here she was than with her mess around. we thought she was lying there. naturally, in this way, over time, we , uh, so to speak, eh, they brought such dope, or something, which means that there were some words they said the right

words, so that’s it. and uh calm down. we played along with american hegemony, all the chinese played along. it's perfect. this is absolutely clear. we also played along to some extent. it was easier, it was rational. it was absolutely. that's right, we didn't lose our mind, our pride, not ours. this was rational behavior. and they understand that no one is going to play along anymore. and so the current game. it is extremely dangerous and further the question arises. and so, yes, now there is no responsibility and i would like it to continue like this, but they understand that they have come to a fork in the road. walt - this fork shows very clearly. he says guys. and by the way, just the other day you had another quote from a retired reagan adviser. where he said, we throw off the same thing , yes, that's enough, we've played enough will be worse. it will be horror, we must refuse

it, because the realists say, guys. bye. it's too late, if we want to continue not to bear, responsibility must be put a cross. on this in this enterprise. it is necessary to throw off this matter, because it is clear the factory of death, the pentagonians i.ru. everyone there is spinning some kind of budgets, everyone is solving some of their own issues, but political ones are extremely. this is extremely dangerous. they have to screw up without us saying the realist. if we want to remain without responsibility, so that we are not called to account. it is necessary to reset the balance in time, the logic of the realists boils down to this. and the logic, and the liberals in a different form. there are no liberal interventionists. there the liberal neoconservatives are the liberal messianic progressive movement. it brings together. although there is an element of love in the world among the progressives, there are also messianic elements. so it boils down to no. we need to cover up to the full, that

is, this is the field where they can do everything. it is pleasing to bear responsibility for this, like shagreenev. volzac skin, she she disappears and further appears it is necessary or to write off. uh, close this whole story and remain irresponsible, or take full responsibility and old screams, just beats the bells. are you crazy , we never played such a risky game in our lives, and most importantly, why do realists always say this, what are we playing for? this is a sign, what? eh? what will be all the same russia does not collapse. but well, that 's what we win? yes? it seems to us that we are doing something there in the process, and the result may be too risky for us, so they say, no in which case it is not necessary. there is no need to go for the option of glossing over and taking responsibility, as liberal circles suggest. well, let them argue with each other. the main thing is that this is a field of irresponsibility. it's uh, it's shrinking and soon

it'll be gone. eh, absolutely but further there is a question. that's when you ask a question. do you agree or disagree with this? after all, i have already talked about this, the question of what we want, we want the americans to come to their senses. and this is, roughly speaking, what it means realists offer to change their minds finish, before it's too late to write off, uh, risks and so on. it still fits in a row to change your mind. we want them to come to their senses or we want them to be epic. yes , they stumbled epic. that's what we want, and therefore your questions agree or disagree, he's not even about these quotes, but he's talking about that in the end, we want something that they change their minds or that, and they finish playing at last. a dead-end scenario, well, of course, i would like not to finish the game at all, but to all sorts of horrors, like nuclear ones, it seems. here

it may also be that the realists and idealists did not finish the disk successfully, but the question is, that we must, uh, fully realize this change in the world situation, that the world no longer feeds american hegemony, if you are so strong, well, try to drag your hegemony without the fact that we all play along with you. well, try it too hard, but in today 's world, if you remember a few years ago, china, too, let's say so. there were moods that now we are so strong, but they changed their minds in time. well, of course, the option is psychologically desirable, and, probably, the more attractive option is that yes, for the united states to suffer an epic catastrophe, but steven wald, being a realist, he just says that the prospect of a catastrophe, the prospect of losing the united states is fraught with a new escalation ,

because in order to prevent this loss, the united states will be forced to take steps already when we can definitely collide. in a direct military confrontation, a hot third world war will begin in this stalemate. yes, because er, indeed, the united states can keep this niche, which is convenient for itself, until they lose, and the loss will either have to be sold as a loss to their internal electorate. and this will be very difficult to do, as promised. it 's something else. yes, or already move on to the third world war. yes, and old calls not to bring. uh, up to this body up to this limit. yes, and i, too, being a realist, by the way, the wolf said in one of his other articles that they don’t like realists, because they often turn out to be right, so, here, uh, i also consider myself a realist school. and despite the fact that i

would like, of course, the united states to suffer an epic defeat, but being a realist. i understand how dangerous it is, but to bring it to this situation, therefore, it’s better that they change their minds halfway dmitry vyacheslavovich this is absolutely correct and you are hinting at the fact that i’m talking about the epic stumbling variant, as if something liberal is saying in me , but on the other hand, but in hoping that the united states will come to their senses. here is in this some kind of idealism not realism agrees anyway . we will now break for a short advertisement. and then we'll talk about transport relations. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers from a tinkoff platinum credit card. tinkoff platinum is so able to issue a

tinkoff platinum credit card in the tinkoff application and transfer money without commission and interest tinkoff is the only one and now he arrives. our life is a magnet lucky in the new year. buy with a card from the magnet application. play and win a car, as well as a car of new year's prizes. never compared the prices for osago and bought in the same insurance do not overpay the policy for comparison save up to five and a half thousand rubles their price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better on yandex.market new year's sales from december 5 to december 25, new

discounts every day. buy a vitek district blender for only 990 rubles. the vtb team will offer a solution with a high rate of up to 9.5% on vtv.ru. go to ntv and that's it, you will get pure products of harmless additives. you can find out business loan amount without opening an account, just upload your bank statement. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account. the best digital bank for lending to small businesses tinkoff, he has one bonus every day in the magnet application. it acts as a selective spasm and disruption of the neobutin stool when it hurts somewhere here. i’ll find a solution and buy

a credit card up to 50% discount opportunities on city of masters construction sets, as

well as toys books and board games by dent umka don’t miss out on black friday at wildberries check your credit score and get approved for a loan at compare if credit, then compare and here comes our conversation. the magnet will take me to the new year all the time. and now she pleases, even my friends. the number of friends for one or two is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. what if you get free service forever? have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win. the

big game is on air today the state visit began french president emmanuel macron to the united states of america and this is the second state visit of macron to the united states, the first one, i recall, was under the trump administration in 2017. well, this is the first visit of the head of state visit of the head of a foreign state of the united states since the inauguration of joybiden during the presidency. ah, byton, that is, everything will be very solemn. uh, directly bilateral negotiations. biden. macron, will be held tomorrow, uh, december 1, the main issues on the agenda are, well, me i will list them in order. uh, so to speak , priorities for the participants themselves, that is, for france for the united states. especially for france, firstly, this is the economy, but it takes into account the de -industrialization that takes place in europe as a result of the policy of the united states both energy and non-energy. and this is ukraine ah, the macron is still a supporter of

the political and diplomatic settlement of the united states no, ah and this is china well, and we will talk about each of these areas, in fact . uh, the visit won't be easy. yes, that's all the french american press writes that these will be very difficult negotiations. despite the fact that outwardly everything will be very solemn and beautiful, nevertheless. here, uh, the essence of the negotiations will be. uh, heavy enough for both sides. well , uh, if we start with ukraine, after all, what is closest to us, and the macron. e already at the g20 summit and after the g20 summit spoke about the need to move to a policy of diplomatic settlement. and even asked pope francis to speak with catholic joe biden that the biden wow, encouraged zelensky to negotiate and, as the wall street journal writes, citing high-ranking persons in paris, a. macron will

ask e. biden, firstly, to prevent the risk of confrontation, prevent the risk of an escalation of confrontation between russia and the west, and secondly, to put e. zelensky at the negotiating table nikolai yuryevich do you think anything will come of this or is it just with the denial of the air, and i would not overestimate their differences on this issue. i think the united states is out loud they say that they will support ukraine zelensky will decide for himself and they cannot say anything else . uh, after all those words that they said earlier about the fact that there is nothing about ukraine without ukraine, about the fact that there are no deals and so on and so forth on the other side. i think the united states is looking at different levels through different mechanisms for ways to uh, policy of diplomatic regulation. and they evaluate,

among other things, that they can sell us uh-huh as such a regulation, but a macron. e, in this case performs the role plays the role of such a kind investigator. uh, who says that we need political and diplomatic regulation, that we need to call the pope, uh, that we need to agree on something? so for that part, i would have them . i mean, i don't think the united states and the foreign policy decision makers. uh, as caricatured as uh, the unwitting was drawn by the wolf we were discussing. i think that they are also discussing, also deciding to seek. uh. what mechanism could help them get out of this situation, but the problem is that they still can’t offer anything that

would provide, but reliable and long-term security for russia and the task is the opposite, i think yes, and uh, i believe that to solve these two tasks simultaneously , namely to somehow jump out of ukraine and still sell it. uh. this is for us , and also, uh, while maintaining u a threat to russia on ukrainian territory. i think that these tasks are not solvable. at least, in the conditions that we see now on earth, uh, and so i suppose that's why that, so the question they hmm is unlikely to come up with something. well, it seems to me that this problem can be solved. if desired, and a solution, but which russia will certainly not be satisfied with. this is a freezing of the conflict, and

even with the de facto agreement of the collective west with the fact that the south east is the former and the southeast of ukraine , that is, ours. bas and kherdzhon, zaporozhye region, despite the fact that ukraine remains pro-western anti-russian, pumped up by western weapons and retains itself as such an anti-russian foothold, yes, and as a permanent threat of instability and, uh, risks in relation to russia. here is this scenario. yes, on the one hand, he can allow the united states to jump out, that is, not to lose. and on the other hand, to maintain a threat to russia to maintain a constant source of instability for russia is possible for this, and they will e come, and moreover, and european countries agree with this, including a macron and agree with you that the biden administration has no unity on this

issue. yes, here i do not see such a contradiction with walt. walt talks about what realists and liberal interventionists are arguing with. here in the administration of the byte. there are realists, such as mark a mile, and there are interventionist liberals who want to go. it should be said so, to try to finish off russia, but of course, uh, discussions are underway. yes, there were recently negotiations between e, naryshkin and william bers, director of the cia in ankara and according to naryshkin, they discussed there not only nuclear weapons, but also sounded like words like the kyiv regime. u ukraine yes, they are only nuclear deterrence and, uh, nuclear risks. in general , we'll see, but here's the question, where is a between macron and biden, there really are disagreements, where really, uh, they will go tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. a very serious debate. these are questions of the economy, but because really europe is suffering from d

industrialization. she herself allowed herself to be put in such a position. the united states sells them expensive gas, but much more expensive than russian gas. ah, the united states accepted investment law anti-inflation investment law i'm sorry. uh, the biden law, yes the anti-inflation law, which provides almost $400 billion in subsidies to support the american economy of american manufacturers bayer american and this applies primarily to electric vehicles and europe in this regard is facing the prospect of d-industrialization . and apparently, the macron wants to put at least this question, but before the biden. here is how wall street describes the situation. economic and geopolitical issues are expected to be high on the agenda of the macron's visit, which

will arrive in washington late tuesday night and kick off a four-day official visit by 1 foreign leader since president biden was elected, according to french officials. macron, considers the law to reduce inflation, which should come into force in january, a threat to european industry. the law provides huge subsidies and tax breaks for products made using parts manufactured and assembled by north america, european officials say measures known as domestic production requirements penalize european-made batteries and electric vehicles that are not eligible for tax credits. french officials are concerned that producers, burdened by high electricity prices in europe, are starting to consider moving their production to the us in order to receive subsidies in addition to cheaper fuel, according to french officials, macron plans

to ask biden for exceptions for european companies similar to those received by canada and mexico, representatives of the white house admitted that this issue will be the main topic of negotiations between the two presidents, but they do not expect that this issue will not be resolved during this visit nikolai viktorovich well, uh, politics magazine writes that this macron visit is actually the last chance for europe and the united states to avoid a trade war, but judging by the publication in the wall street journal and the position taken by the american representatives answer already dan no, well, i think that the american representatives know the answer better than some representatives, there were no others, but today we recalled all kinds of quotes. i would also like to contribute to this piggy bank quote attributed to nikita sergeevich khrushchev. only one disagreement on the land issue, who will bury whom in the ground. it seems to me that the level

of discussion between europe and the united states will not be on this high intellectual uh podium, why yes, in fact in fact, the united states of america, having unleashed a military conflict in the center of europe, is burying the european economy in europe. this is happening, but at the same time, both partners and the one who is being buried by europe and the one who is burying the united states pretend that they are doing. it is in the name of freedom that russia is going to bury it, but in fact europe is already waist-deep in the ground, so it ’s too early to talk with europe about ending the conflict. after all , the conflict gives reason to accuse russia of everything bad to explain, albeit anchoredly, but nevertheless european residents. why everything is bad and expensive for them, and most importantly, this is a calling card for european business, because, as the situation looks, firstly, a law was passed in the united states to reduce inflation. yes, 400 billion dollars have been allocated there, and let us not be led aside, let us not be led

aside by talking about what it is for green energy on an electric car. let's simplify the task 400 billion dollars in subsidies subsidies for what is produced in the usa, no matter the electric car 400 billion. that's a lot and four times more cheap energy sources. and now imagine that you are the head of a large european corporation , they tell you, firstly, 400 billion. and secondly, you are four times cheaper. and there, maybe it will be eight , and at nine, who knows, waist-deep, standing in the ground macron and macron arrives, says this comradely we agreed to bury russia and bury us, let's dig us a little . and well, okay, take away not the entire industry. we only have a part. well, who will discuss these issues with them, but notice how serious you are. macron, four-day hanging. yes, some people say that it is a five-day trip, because you have to look there yesterday , in fact, if you report to the

five-day trip yesterday, it gives the impression that the president of the french republic is very much. no, no business at home. he takes his wife with him and flies away. to cool off a little, it means that the issues are really very serious and the macron will make several visits, but i do not believe in a trade war. most likely, he will try to rise a little above the surface in order to they dug in not so fast and not so deep, but, uh , the macron, apparently, he himself does not really believe in the success of his enterprise in the united states, because inside the european co. they really begin to discuss, uh, the trade war by the united states, or rather the war of subsidies, the war of subsidies by the united states. as the most realistic scenario, macron, already before leaving for the united states, held talks with germany that it was necessary to give a pan-european pan-european union response to this policy the united states, that is to say, also begin to introduce

this kind of subsidies, which will actually tear to shreds the remnants, but from the world trade system, because this is all contradictory. uh, according to wto rules, the european union is starting to play the same game, and germany is joining the same game here. hear what u writes u, the newspaper politics is already the opposition of germany and in particular the german economy minister robert habib is urgently developing plans to support its core industries against the backdrop of fears that new us subsidies could destroy european businesses in the future, german economy minister robert hubback said. he said he is working closely with officials in brussels and allies in paris to develop measures that could include requiring european manufacturers to use domestic products or technologies so they can qualify for

government subsidies. eu this would be a controversial measure, going against the traditional free trade rulebook, but such a radical intervention. increasingly seen as necessary in berlin, paris and brussels to avoid the massive flow of costly investments from europe to the us as a result of joe biden's tax reforms and subsidies, as well as higher energy prices in europe well, on the one hand increased friction in the tracks of atlantic relations. from the russian point of view, this is good, but on the other hand, ah. this is such a collight damage, that is, collateral damage, and from these transatlantic frictions in the field of the economy is the entire world economy is the entire world trading system. yes, because europe germany france does not hide the fact that now it will also begin to grossly violate the rule, uh wto uh,

trade rules in order to at least somehow strengthen its position, uh, facing colonial policy from the outside. uh, the united states, this is the very europe that says that it is a flowering garden, and around, uh, the jungle. here it is to create these jungles. dmitrievich, what you are saying is this logic that you describe, it very persuasive. it really looks like this, the only thing that confuses me in this is that such a picture is being intensively painted for us, and almost in unison by the european american media. ah. that is, uh, well, something in this makes me wary, and in unison. it’s not some dissident voices that sound reasonable, but straight stream and this is suddenly maine you see, if you see, for example , a man, stands with a bunch of guards next to his

chic mansion. oh, and this is the owner an enterprise that ruined the entire district and distributes to the poor. e, soup, yes, and everywhere they write that he is fighting poverty. well, you buy such a story. here is khabib yes who makes such beautiful statements. this is a man who just stands with his chest that we don’t turn on, nord stream, we will save ourselves, the trade war with america is such big words there. and here it’s just, well, turn the tap, that is, people say that we ’ll go to a trade war with america there, but they don’t dare cry to turn on, uh, gas valve to the side to there is no side of russia. there is something strange here. yes, but here's the easiest way out of all. that's why go to a trade war with america when you can make peace with russia well, yes, that is, a trade war with

america is a terrible war. so it will stop being just a trade war. they are. well, i think it's kind of weird. ah, the script. it's about how to heal. uh, guillotine headache. yes, here you have it. uh, like, well, nothing to advertise, right? some medicine is lying, a simple drink, no headache, and here some kind of story about a trade war with america is being twisted up in order to save the e european economy, although it will save it. well, it won’t save, of course, already, but they’ll fix it a little. at least join the remaining branch of the gas pipeline. it seems to me that if a person refuses to make an explicit decision, but talks about some kind of fantasy. yes, but in the trade war with america, well , the same macron leads me to the astral, everything is inflated, that they are pumping pumping pumping. maybe it really is maybe, but here i will offer another version, which also does not contradict the facts, and then we

'll see how it is correct e, which means the macron e plays on contradictions. e on different images with germany , what he said there first with germany, but where he flew in a short attempt with e, to save. apparently, really save at least part of the chinese. eh, german. that is, he tried to beijing, apparently, not very successfully. eh, disgraced him poured slop. that's why they doused him with slop, and macron, by the way, licks. where is he macron washington washington that is, you understand, when you see this french story, with all these injections, consider it isolated. this is one story. and look at the contrast yes scholz flies to save in china and gets a lot of slop. this means that the macron is flying us through the most difficult negotiations on the eve of a trade war. with e. with america, that 's all, she flies to america for an official visit 4 days everything is solemn. oh, and a state

visit. well, something is not right here. eh, here. well, it seems to me so uh, it seems to me so uh and the scholls are clearly in china does not achieve what it needs, and i can't rule out getting wet. this means that he will receive a discount on gas or biden, promises $ 400 billion before it seems to me that biden has found the key to macron. you understand this to this narcissist, yes, who is all focused on himself, who now pats biden on the shoulder endlessly. here is biden, i found him. eh, to him to him the key. eh, i found something to dilute him with. here's to this personal ego. and yes, i do not rule out that he will receive something. and it will look like. so go to china get on the nose, how it turned out to be a click on the nose, how you got it, uh, scholz already got it, but you’ll go

right for the pra- like the expression yes there, but you’ll go to america correctly . uh, completely shameful with hunger, again, i do not insist on this version, but i cannot rule out that all this is like this, at least the contrast is schulz in china and a lot of wash on it, but a macron. e to america and so, in general, of course, they pump it up, but on the whole it is licked. here it is for me we'll talk more, actually about china and, uh, china. that's also a very important part of the agenda. uh, macron-biden talks. this is also the issue on which they do not really agree. and also tomorrow the visit to china will begin necrone macron will be in washington and charles michel, and the head of the european council, so everything is really complicated there too. but i

said a very correct thing that it would seem turn on the nord stream-2, and you will increase your competitiveness. the ability is here, and the negotiations of the macron with biden. they just show. what a truly subservient position is europe europe of the european union because that's what they ca n't do, they can threaten a trade war, they can disagree rhetorically about ukraine or about china but challenge the united states, and basically one of the priority questions today of american policy in europe, mokron’s strength, as well as that of scholz and others, will certainly not be enough, of course, but here, and one more loser, and apart from the whole world trading system, but from the us-china trade oh, from the european chinese transatlantic trade war. and if it

takes place like this, it will be in great britain because it left the european union, but it did not enter the united states of america. it is, as it were, between yes and the forces of the uk in the national capacity in order to have its own mega- subsidies program. uh, it won’t be possible to launch, and therefore , here it will somehow be sandwiched between these two, uh, millstones, and about this, uh, the politics magazine writes, listen three years after leaving the eu to chart its own course, britain is caught between two economic giants in a brewing trans-atlantic trade war. now sitting right outside the ring, the uk can only look on in horror and silently beg washington to soften the blow britain is now in danger of being crushed by both sides the us is the second largest destination for british -made cars after the eu and the automotive sector is one of britain's leading exporters

goods. manufacturers such as jaguar land rover have publicly warned of very serious problems with the new us law and its electric vehicle tax credit plan aimed at stimulating american industry. igor georgievich and that's what to do from the european union came out, so protect yourself with european subsidies. it won’t work, the trade agreement with the united states was never signed, by the way, eh richer, sudak met with the baiden. he is on the margins of the twenty, even talking about it not talking about a trade agreement, which, by the way, was sold as one of, uh, such carrots. uh, one of the bonuses. ah, brexit. and here and now, what now, well, after all, in my opinion for britain, uh, the industrial sector is not key to the british economy. we close the range rover there. well, they are no longer british. yes, that is, the entire automotive industry, bought by a foreigner by foreigners. yes, that is, only the

name marks themselves remained. yes, but the company is owned by e not the british. it's well known, therefore, of course, for germany uh, and even for france uh yes, the allocation of subsidies to maintain competition in the industrial sector is much more relevant than for britain, britain has other problems there now, as we know, yes, the highest inflation among the major uh, western european countries, and again the energy crisis and so on, so britain is in this battle between the us and the european union. she always led. remember the competition there boeing and rybas. yeah, yes, that is, here you don’t have to think that in the old liberal okay. and yes, everything was good and wonderful and there was no competition, there was no battle. but i would also draw your attention to the fact that the law on the fight that was adopted in the united states really allocates, in my opinion, after all, 380 billion. yes, but 389 yes,

yes, yes, the european union and the countries of the european union separately. yes , because the european union simply does not have the opportunity to allocate such gigantic funds for support. and yes, these are all elements. yes, and we are back to the liberal order. which, respectively, does not but imply potential. just the opposite, freedom of trade. well, there is also a colossal minus in this, because collectivism, as you know, is declining for him. develop by the enterprise. why do something? why invent something? why somehow increase your own competitiveness? yes, here is the state to lend a shoulder. here the british are in this fight. uh, of course, it is much more important to maintain your position as one of the largest financial cents. here, so that investments do not flow away to america , but, therefore, in this regard, it is interesting that will do. uh, the british authorities are within the framework, again

, of this anti-crisis strategy that they are now planning, but something will tell me that here, too, they are unlikely to have any serious success and, most likely, investments really flow to america and the city of london's position as a major financial centre. they are of course. they will disappear, but e has seriously weakened, especially since the uk has problems in relations with another major world financial economic center with china and that's exactly china and the commercials. china is number in transatlantic relations. we 'll talk after a little commercial. the vtb team will offer a credit card solution to the possibility of a reliable vtb bank - 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now at vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything

will work out and here comes our conversation. sweets golden lily 31,99 magnet will be lucky in the new year on yandex.market new year's sale, buy yandex.station lite for 3.990 rubles. and get cashback up to 2.000 plus points and pay with split immediately the rest, then you buy one smartphone, and the second as a gift, because we are agents. because the subscriber is a gift only for subscribers. better

chance to win a million rubles for the new year. and here and here. and even here, in general, and in general, wherever sbp is accepted. pay for purchases through st. petersburg and check, we deliver the winnings on the ozon website. with love, yosan panty diapers for 1086 rubles. and 25% off cat food. it 's nice to wake up on black friday because beds , mattresses, sofas, and everything you love is discounted up to 90% black, friday in ascona. only until december 4, new year's billion. i'm even waiting for i'm the king, but i want to win now the stoloto application is playing money. every 2.5 minutes. only until the fourth of december receives 5,000 welcome bonuses and win millions stoloto is where the

money is when other laxatives are not satisfied boxing master for 189 rubles. a year, two, two magnitka cares for cosmetics means to love toothpaste, alloy 159-99 10% bonuses in your favorite category with the magnet application. well, imagine that this is the price. 18 months and no installment card interest, we rejoice at a large number of services, but even more rejoice when they recognize us mts has created a single entry mts id by phone number in all services for ease and comfort. on yandex.market new year's sale from december 5th to december 25th new discounts every day buy sprats in oil 5 seas in total for 8 rub. we here in the national lottery

came up with this for you, there are many prizes of a million each and a super prize. even the lama will. on black friday. choose polaris smart appliances with discounts up to 55% for a comfortable sleep in order at home and delicious gifts. well, or a big game is another issue that will be on the agenda of the macron's visit to

washington and which is becoming increasingly acute in transplant relations. generally. these are questions of china a, because, despite the fact that china e is named as a general challenge for nato countries and today stoltenberg is also following the results of the second day, and the meeting of the foreign ministers of the nato countries stressed that it is necessary to reduce. to all nato countries, their dependence on china, to eliminate vulnerabilities and so on, the china factor is becoming more and more a disengagement factor, and in relations between the united states and europe, not a consolidation factor, and wall street twitched with reference to american officials. also writes that the positions of the united states and france on china do not quite coincide, listen europe has its own interests, our views on china are not the same, but i think there is a strong opinion that we should express a common

position on china and on all important issues for its high-ranking official of the baidan administration. well, that's exactly when macron will discuss tomorrow, including china's issues and relations with china, xi jinpingem. another high-ranking european official will be visiting beijing itself. and charles michel ah, head of the european e, council and, ah. his agenda quite saturated too. here, michel will hold talks with the chairman of the prc and with the premier of the state council liki tsaraam and with the chairman of the standing committee of the entire chinese people's congress, that is, the parliament, but also the janshau, and nikolai yuryevich well , it turns out, not only olaf-scholz is trying to save remnants of it. k- economics and normality, uh, in general, in foreign economic relations, but here is also a macron and uh, sharm michel that is, let's say, let's

say the western continental part of the european union e still does not agree fully join the united states in their uh, crusade against china. well, it would be strange if they were, uh, more american in this case than the americans themselves, because no one in the united states said that with china does not need to negotiate, that with china it is necessary to break through, that ties must be destroyed. and in this regard, but they do not do anything that they did everyday life is another matter, that everything is of course, this also turns out awkwardly, because in recent years it has been european and european union leaders and european diplomats. sometimes they talked about china a lot of things, which, probably,

it would be appropriate to regret during this visit. but because there was too much ideology in the yasty, there is in the growls. ah, europeans. there are too many strange claims about china. what about economic agreements? the situation is so difficult for everyone and for the european union first of all, perhaps, if we talk about the largest players, what is it, uh, well, what is called i don’t get fat, i have to go, we have to negotiate. well, these besides, it seems to me, china, uh, is the issue on which the western continental european countries in the first place, france and germany are still trying to maintain the remnants of their autonomy, that they are not there, uh, the fifty-first fifty-second state of the united states they are

still sovereign states, they are the leaders of the european union. and here they have the opportunity to pursue some kind of independent, but autonomous policy, while actually preserving some remnants of economic relations. e s china, therefore, not only olaf-scholz, but also macron and even michel's ball, which represents primarily the interests of france and germany in european institutions. they like to find some form of constructive cooperation with beijing, but here is a country that has left the european union but at the same time follows washington's lead. and on china , this is the uk prime minister this week. rishi sunak delivered a keynote speech on foreign policy. in great britain , he spoke at the banquet of lord chalk, the mayor of london and this speech demonstrated in fact. how little in substance, but the foreign

policy of great britain under sunak differs from the foreign policy of great britain under a liter and more than johnson, uh, his predecessors. here, listen. what are the general priorities of british foreign policy proclaimed in this speech. rishi sunak. today, the speed of geopolitical changes is increasing, our opponents and competitors are planning for the long term. after years of trying to expand its borders russia is being challenged, a founding principle, of the un charter china is defiantly fighting for global influence, using all the levers of state influence in the face of these challenges, short-term planning or wishful thinking insufficient we can not depend on the arguments or approaches of the cold war or simply on a sentimental attitude to the past, so we will take an evolutionary leap in our approach, firstly,

as we support ukraine we will also intensify our european ties to address issues such as security and illegal migration. second, we look to china for the long term, strengthening our resilience and protecting our economies. czech security, and thirdly, we capitalize on the enormous opportunities offered in the endo-pacific region by building deep and long-term partnerships. sudak said directly about china policy we also need to change our approach to china let's clarify the so-called gold. the era ended with the naive idea that trade will automatically lead to social and political reforms, but we also should not rely on the simplistic rhetoric of the cold war. we recognize that china presents a systemic

challenge to our values ​​and interests, a challenge that is growing ever more acute. as he moves towards even greater authoritarianism, igor georgievich well, how about this approach, and riche sunak is going to overcome the crisis, uh, in the uk economy and it seems to me that with such a foreign policy, this crisis will only get worse. well, it’s paradoxical that when talking about policy towards china, he also used one phrase that was not included in these quotes, well, the concept of pragmatism among the leaders of britain is very strange. therefore, yes, i certainly agree with you that this is very much reminiscent of the steps that the united states is taking with respect to china yes, i am trying to compete putting pressure on china

united states and in a sense, deduce that, well, they are led by or in the format. let 's just say that the politicians of the united states are trying to please washington, but on the other hand. we must not forget that the british foreign policy strategy, which continues to be implemented by 600. yes, is called global britain uh-huh, that is, they are trying to make themselves known, and these quotes that sounded clearly demonstrate that britain is trying. well see yourself how about that she really will try to play important role in all regions of the world, although certainly forces. no, and of course, how to build a global britain if you quarrel with, uh, the largest economy in the world, yes, they quarrel quite obviously, yes, compared to the delegation to taiwan, for example, yes, that is, it is clear that the chinese will not leave it just like that or they called huawei there yes, they kicked huawei out, when they did it again, that is, it also just won’t stay like that. and and here it’s not even just a matter of

confrontation britain china let’s see, and the chinese have already completely captured the entire former english east africa where did grandparents come from ? rishi bitch, they came to the uk, that is, they are displacing britain and it would seem that those former colonial possessions that were absolutely indestructible. and of course. uh, this is such an approach, such a policy towards china is a very serious mistake and a very serious problem for britain, again in the conditions of the crisis that is now turning nikolay viktorovich and how do you assess the policy of great britain under sunak? and here, among other things, the software the performance he gave me, to be honest, it seemed empty. hmm well, i think there are some extra meanings, probably not worth looking for. but what catches the eye would be a sin not to use its origin. and so he says that we will look for chances in the indus asian region.

obviously i'm appealing. so to say to your current past, and perhaps to future compatriots, but the most important statement is that the golden age of development of relations with china is over, and is being made. it's on level ground. after all, no scandals. now there were none. china did not attack taiwan, there is no formal reason for this, which they would have invented or created , but new examples come out and say that all friendship with china is over in translation into russian . this means that the invisible hand of the market is buried on a global scale, but in the sense that some common sense is pure and economic. uh , look what he says, he says, uh, trade doesn't mean china's political and economic reforms. listen maybe we people are very old school, but, in my opinion, trade should lead to the fact that i buy your product. and you get my money. what political and economic reforms should follow? it's just a market. you told us all

about it. there is an invisible hand. she chooses the cheapest goods and the biggest money, it turns out that there should not be political economic reforms, and if there are no political economic reforms in china, that is, no, there, apparently, a multi-party party, condom, beijing is not then he moves and we don’t need these relations with china, he says, nothing will happen, that is, the splitting of the world into parts continues in the full channel of the united states of america , 360 operates. well, he is trying to sign india to this. well, and some other asian countries. well , rishat really works farvatt. here the united states, e mokron scholz, and charles michel, who joined them, are still trying to maintain constructive interaction with beijing. here's how you think trans -atlantic relations on china will develop. i have a big question, but please be very brief. it will be difficult to develop and, objectively, europe cannot

support the american anti-chinese line. but objectively, they could not support these russian lines, but they supported a suicidal , uh, line for themselves, so the question is, this is still a community. uh, let uh, very dependent, but still independent, at least somewhere somewhere in the depths of the soul of the state, this or this is actually the club, uh, suicides of suicides. e , objectively, they cannot go about the united states to these chinese lines. after all, we believed that they could not objectively go to the anti-russian one. yes, uh, but in any case, and it seems to me that china's relations with russia will strengthen with russia, and today vladimir putin sent, uh, a letter of condolence. uh, chinese president xi jinpingo. uh, in connection with the death of the former. uh, chairman of china tianjin. and this death is

indeed a great loss, since it was during his reign that the foundations of the russian-chinese partnership were laid - the heyday that we are seeing now after all, back in 1997, moscow and beijing signed the russian-chinese declaration on a multipolar world and the formation of a new international order, and in this declaration. they just reflected the philosophy of the world order, which is now being implemented to this day. and now it is being implemented before our eyes. that declaration formed the ideological basis of the world that is being formed before our eyes. and it was jian who was the chairman of china at that time; work on the formation of a multipolar world has become since the time of the jian zmin elements of russian chinese relations and remains to this day. well, in 2001, in moscow , vladimir putin and jian created the main

political and legal basis for our relations with china and signed an agreement on good neighborliness, friendship and cooperation. it was a big game. goodbye. hello, as part of the information channel on the first live, the time will tell program continues to work. i am artyom sheinin. ah. today, of course, we will talk about the most important and interesting of what concerns the geopolitics of the policy of negotiations by imitation negotiations, uh, imitation of some conditions of ultimatums, we will talk about the economy in the same way. e about how they are trying, so they

put pressure on us to drive us somewhere and so on, but every time we lead on all these conversations and we will continue them. we somehow understand and every time we make a reservation. something about how certain agreements will go, this or that pressure. and this or that, so to speak, rhetoric regarding what we will do, what they will do with russia or what, we will not allow everything to be done with him it’s one way or another, but all these conversations and assessments are based on what is really happening in the theater of operations, military operations, which, well, we won’t discuss today e, nevertheless, they underlie all this, therefore, as the background of our conversation let's say that e fighting . e come with such a very difficult heavy phase. yes, this, of course, in the language of military strategy is called an operational pause, but an operational pause is the most severe rubilovo for those fighters and those units that are on those strikes,

where this operational pause is operational, but in a tactical sense, and there the most important tasks are solved. perhaps even not so tactical today, the ministry of defense reported that under the control of the armed forces in the russian federation and the taken settlements, and belogorovka and pershit weed, well pershitravni. i hope it will be today or sometime soon . again again may 1, since this is may 1, but here. uh, actually this is a message from the department of defense, and also today, uh, report there are reports that the andreevka settlement was liberated in the donetsk people's republic, also with a reference, but ivan sergeevich prikhodko, mayor of gorlovka, also wrote to the ministry of defense of the russian federation in his telegram channel. ivan prikhodko, i

understand him perfectly, because everyone who reads. uh, the telegram channel of the mayor of horlivka. they understand that this is a locality from which it hits very hard , that is, there is a lot in this phrase in this phrase. so, why am i saying this, that i think information. eh, prikhodko can also be relied upon in general, i don’t think that he would have run ahead of the locomotive in this sense, because well, this is a question about shelling, and, besides, it is reported that not the first day has already been reported, but about the fact that the hardest fights of this are about what. i said that the hardest battles are going on, and in the area of ​​​​artyomovsk, but or bakhmut, as they call it, you know how the herbalist is in a hurry. here he is still half. eh, more half-baks. here is already semi-artem here. in fact, this is how it happens. the most severe i think that rubilovo battles are taking place there

on both sides, because, well, firstly, in 9 months, of course, the war between uh, who know how to fight, and the slavs has already reached a level where, well, everyone just bites into each other . well, plus everyone understands the importance. not so much even this locality, as such. and how much does the military understand? uh, how much uh, it is important to say so informationally, and the military informational, uh, component, and this is understood by the military at various levels in a surprising way for people who probably they had no idea even there a year ago, where artyomov was, they would bang there, and so on and so forth. well , look. what is the significance of the battles for this settlement, but they occupy in a conversation from the leading western channel with the former, and the commander of the nato allied grouping. in europe at the end of the last century, it’s so easy now at the end of the last century. yes, but it's not that old yet. although

not young styling. listen. you say the russians ca n't win on the battlefield. they are trying to win in at least one city. donetsk region, bakhmut, the russians claim to be surrounding it and the ukrainians that they continue to defend it, despite russian attempts to transfer there, which you think the russians want to achieve reinforcement with targeted attacks on this city. look, the opposing sides are always trying to somehow concentrate their combat power, which is why they concentrated on this location, taking it. they will get access to kramatorsk and slavic, also the city serves as a kind of fire bag for grinding ukrainian forces, which is why the russians and seek, if they can get the ukrainians to ask the leadership of the country for a ceasefire and a respite, who will win here the ukrainian forces. we must hold on, they have dug in and are holding on,

but they are suffering heavy losses. this is a meat grinder. well, actually, this is to the question of what, among other things , probably dominates the command of e apu. why do they continue this meat grinder for the sake of it, because that 's how they evaluate. these are western, and so to speak , advisers, to whom, willy-nilly, they listen to them anyway , and, uh, listening to them willy-nilly. they involve themselves. here in this one. well, it's like a corridor of illusions, because well, today you see how it is already here. well, either, it means they will take it, or they won't take it, the meat grinder holds on, but, well, that is, how a person evaluates that well, here's the military balance. here is what this same great military strategist a said, for example, in march in march. he was far more optimistic. and that this is not just a ceasefire, a serious success that will last a long time. maybe it's the sixteenth of march. today's meat grinder is in including the result. here are some of the encouragements of the

ukrainian leadership and command from such unfortunate commanders. here it is in september. that is, in fact, just over two months have passed, that everything russia is losing continues to lose, and suddenly 2 months have passed and clark is already talking like that. well, what are you doing there somehow with artyomovsk, in general, it’s somehow incomprehensible fire bag and so on. this is actually very revealing model symbolic, because the trouble, and the trouble of ukraine is that it yourself some time ago. and so to speak, it left to the will of such american generals, commanders of politicians, for whom it’s not at all what it is, artyomovsk bakhmut, even kiev, even all of ukraine, for them it’s some kind of mythical not even cells on the map. here, on which they play, it’s generally there, here’s a speck of dust on this very map, they will hand over this ukraine to any meat grinder. but here. in words, here they cheered them up.

come on, let's do it, there is a strategic success, despite the fact that there is an interesting moment here. for example, if clark is an american general, commander-in-chief of the nato armed forces in europe, this is an american general, everything that he really won back in his life was vietnam, which they lost miserably, miserably lost without showing. as a matter of fact, nothing and his second great military operation. it was just the kosovo operation, in which from 9 to 1997 to 2000 the team. well, how would you understand what military leadership talents could be shown by the commander of nato forces, which, in all respects, at times and orders of magnitude outnumbered the army of yugoslavia, who simply bombed the serbs, but into the ground. a and. as a matter of fact, they wrote down e for themselves, while yugoslavia was then, no one helped, neither with weapons, nor with air defense. well, except that there are planes? and then by civilian planes that were deployed there. actually, all this is

all that this general himself, from his own experience, as if somewhere once won and understood, and this is a big trouble that the ukrainian authorities are not much earlier than today in 1914. that's symbolic, namely in bucharest passes by themselves nato is regular, and at the level of e ministers. but why am i speaking symbolically, because back in 2008, that meat grinder that clark spoke about today , it was laid back then, because it was in 2008 and it was here in bucharest that ukraine was first told or hinted that, like guys, yes, it’s possible, so when it started to unwind, let’s say this here is the story of this tragedy of this meat grinder with death, there are thousands of ukrainian soldiers, because then in 2008 they believed and were led to believe that now they are listening to these

american generals, who by and large are nothing close to the war that is now taking place on earth. none of them have ever seen or participated in them and do not understand at all what he is talking about, not to mention the fact that none of these american generals do not understand. what is this war. when russians are cut on both sides with our military culture, with our so to speak, e obstinacy and so on and so forth, but the ukrainian authorities are listening to this one while listening. they listen, they alone fly, because if they heard with two ears, they would perfectly understand what stoltenberg is talking about today . once again i told them that the doors, of course , the doors, of course, are open. well, actually, if ukraine is not preserved as the independence of modern states, then the question is. more precisely, it will not be necessary to stand at all, that is, the doors are open, but not now. and if the ukrainians, so to

speak, the leaders could insistently ask, and when they say, well, when, when will you be satisfied with the last ukrainian? that is, if you don’t bring it up, then the question will be closed, and if you do, well, how would it be then, well, while you are fighting, while you are fighting, you are still dying . and we will, as it were, gather for ourselves and watch the most terrible thing, that these collective kulebs are ready for this anyway. since 2008 they have been going to this, they can no longer turn back. even against the backdrop of these interesting incidents, when the head of the european commission, today, uh, published a video in which there is, or rather there was a very interesting phrase about losses, and the ukrainian army is on the way, uh, to membership in nato without which no membership won't listen course fondle, please. ukraine brought

death, devastation and untold suffering, we all remember from ibuchi to date, more than 20,000 civilians have died and more than 100,000 ukrainian military have been killed. more than 100,000 ukrainian soldiers were killed, ursula vonderlein said, and then, uh, of course, more than one pukan broke uh, in kiev, immediately send, uh, uh, a refutation from the general staff, more precisely, as a refutation. they say that we cannot discuss these figures at all. well, of course, as if there is no such figure. although, well, it's right here, well, you can immediately see. here is bogdan senek - this is fate and a diagnosis. he says, no figure, of course. well, it's wrong and we can't discuss it. but if you need this figure in order to do something in russia, then, like, it’s normal. well, we’ll discuss this later e about what they are going to do, so about these hundred thousand, which means about 100,000, then there was another refutation of her assistant, who speaks. yes

, you know, uh, so something is not right, we published it, you know, like with dad rimsky, who blurted out stupidity about cruelty, and the buryats and chechens, and then when they said, uncle, what are you, it’s somehow, maybe he ate too much henbane, right away it’s some kind of it. here is some of his diana spinats said. oh, you know, we use the wrong sources that the monitos said, here, uh, but here, what’s interesting is that the figure of 100,000, which is 100,000 dead ukrainians, which sounded from the lips, and the ursulas and these 11 seconds because why do i say they say, because those 11 seconds are cut and removed from her twitter. well, it correlates very interestingly with the figure that ah-ah announced yesterday. zelensky is the one who continues this crazy path to nato at any cost to the last ukrainian, who he voiced in his evening message.

drug commissar about our losses, please. russia this year russia will lose 100,000 of its soldiers killed and only god knows how many mercenaries, and ukraine will stand, and the world will do everything so that everyone who is guilty of this criminal war is on the bench defendants. and now i have a suspicion, to be honest, that ursula today returned to him 100,000 dead, uh, ukrainians. well, because not the first and not the second and not the third time. e, zelensky, as it were, has a feeling that e is running in front, and a locomotive, but because he is saying this nonsense of his and drawing them somewhere. and the fact that he himself stands and the fact that he put ukraine on a very dangerous path is not very clear to me. does everyone in europe want to go there, but nevertheless continue to go in this

sense, where do you think we are now from the point of how what happens here affects what happens there. here are all these games about numbers and so on. and i would suggest the next version, put aside the statements of our officials, they are very contradictory in fact . but we discussed this last week, someone says that we will change it. regime in kiev well, in some perspective there is another saying that no , we won't. it does not matter. that's when they ask. and for what purpose is russia purposefully destroying the energy infrastructure of ukraine, that is? well, it seems to be, how is it not strikes on the location of military units and strikes on artillery shells depots. it seems to me that a decision has been made, a decision has been made to deconstruct the ukrainian state in order for the state to disappear. it is not necessary at all. this is what is called to strike at the decision-making center and kill a specific zelensky, there will be another zelensky. but if

the state loses its ability to resist, and for this it is necessary to destroy its entire potential by the industrial transport infrastructure. but this is what it means it means either the wild field, which, well, becomes some kind of complex territory managed somehow, but it will definitely not be a state. and this is not good and not bad. this is a choice that the ukrainian elites also made, and many years ago, not in the fourteenth year. they did it back in the mid-nineties, and they have been going to this for 25 years. they brought ukraine to this catastrophe. and this choice was quite consciously made back west, i don't know for what reason in this. no logic, there i find only one a simple explanation is that they did not believe until the very end that russia would go to the end, that is, they are the west or they are a collective of collectors. i do not share there, the united states here, i mean , the west or the ukrainian ah with the ukrainian

elite. i already said, not my choice. but they did not do it and were not considered possible options to move towards the west from russia. so, i will say, that is, for some reason, back in the mid -nineties, they decided that russia still eats everything in life. here i will fix it. here they are believed in it to the very end. they believed until february 24 that nothing would happen. well, not that is, not the crimea, the donbass did not teach anything, anyway , some kind of compromise will be found, but god is with them. this is a specific political culture, very much because the collective wesleyan classes, including them, had their own logic, that is, you don’t need to think that they were completely meaningless murzilki, they had their own strategic goals is another matter. as far as here they are well, on real data, they had one goal, we will do we thought they would do it. uh, so to speak, with this warhead of the west, if necessary, and then they will not jump anywhere, they will not go anywhere . and actually, the way

zelensky kuleba behaves today, and everyone else, confirms that this ukrainian elite has achieved its goal. they are all this ursol, in fact. they dictate to them. now they are driven into the corridor. yes, the west, in fact , ended up in a corridor, from which he, too , cannot exit again. why? after all, they were warned one, two three, that guys, let's let's sit down. let's talk for the first time. it was in 2008 when putin then said, don't make it good, it won't end. someone listened to him no, and then did not listen many times did not listen. they didn't believe until february 24th you can bring in large quantities our appeal of november january of absolutely 21-22 that the type of guys let's. let's not make it bad. let's not make it bad. let's e, let's, let's putin talked about it ryabkov talked about it lavrov talked about it, who only he didn’t say about it, what we heard in response in response. we heard this as a confirmation of your words, that is, until february 24, the tone

of the answers to us she was so relaxed , imposingly so, that is, it feels like people were sitting having dinner and drinking, so there, uh, this is kakabu with tea and wrote these stoltenberg answers there. these here are the idea of ​​the ghosts of the new conference. uh, t-t- with all these, then christina lamps. they say that this is it, which means, well, duda is clear there with dudo and that's it. well etc. that is, it is not in words. this is a practical illustration of your words that this has been warned for many years, and november december 21 january 22 february 22 almost every day. decided. here's another minute i like it. yes, i will finish. just a thought. you can continue. yes actually. and now, if you dig, and-and speeches there in the remarks that putin made last. well, let's say three years. after all , he spoke openly, but for some reason everyone believed that it

was some kind of manipulation, diplomatic steps, he openly said that if you bring it to this . it may happen that ukraine simply will not exist. he said it. he said this repeatedly. here's what's happening. now this is actually. this is part of the process that is called, and the disappearance of the state of ukraine as a viable system. that is, you are talking about the fact that the words that we are not going to change the kiev regime, as specific people, as authorities, they do not contradict what we are doing, because , in principle, a good word. you said deconstruct. well, of course, the ukrainian state. that is, actually, as it were, but, well , well, as if these people are different in order to liquidate the system, it is not enough to liquidate. a person or a group of people, because if you destroy, indeed, the main energy industrial transport centers of the state there is no modern urbanized state falls apart, that is, it absorbs, anarchy well, which, at best, can be

controlled , for example, the military is not enough, they also feed on something it is necessary, but the state will not have taxes, there will be no receipts, there will be no loans. well, actually, the result, which ukraine objectively suits simply and then, accordingly, i’m interested in the framework of this logical structure that you are building, with which, in general, it’s probably hard to argue that we warned. ah, we talked, then we started to embody it probably. and how we began to embody it in a purely military way. and it was just such an attempt at a conversation that, like guys, well, you didn’t believe until 24. well, look how it would start. let's stop now no one has stopped anything stopped now started. this is the deconstruction of the state by destroying critical infrastructure. only then i have such one question here, the very smell that led them, and the ukrainian elites were not led to

all this for many years. he now understands that in a military way. so we started with the military situation, everyone understands what it is. well , here's the clinch. seeing what we're deconstructing with with the help of strikes, in your opinion, on the infrastructure, in your opinion, this west, now tied to them, taken, in fact, as a hostage, will continue to increase pressure on us already along some other lines or what other options they have, well, option , if they always have options. in the end, they don’t fight with their own soldiers, therefore, well, fly inside political problems, they have an extremely limited scale there. well, if we talk about the americans, then for sure. here but here, if we turn again to the rhetoric, the general kra- clark, here is how it changed, it is also very logical, he reasoned, like a military man, the first month of a special military operation, that is, they looked at the 150,000 grouping of the russian army. it is clear that this is an expeditionary corps, that is, which was supposed to go there, which comes to kiev, which

means changing power. there he puts in a new president and leaves. after that, for nothing else, there are not enough troops there, therefore. he said, but putin did not succeed. that's it, so we won the calculation that well, everything, how if the operation had failed. we leave and sign the contract. everything is over. the next time - september is already kind of softer, anyway, the ukrainians are winning. well, that is, it was said before partial mobilization. yes, this was said after the kharkov problem, which then arose. there we are about them. we know we talked about them, so his statement was also absolutely logical. that is, everything, as it were, there is a stalemate situation, they need to end, and then they did not believe that nothing would end. oh after this is partly happening mobilization shoigu today reports that 300,000 reservists have been trained and we are starting the next parts of the

moralized ballet, that is, a large real military group, the russian army. well , it's coming out. we are pleased to receive cashback for services, but it is even more pleasant to see how it turns into something really tangible. now a single cashback wallet has appeared in the mts ecosystem, with which you can pay for your favorite services or buy gadgets.

new cream arthroxican three-component composition modern painkillers contribute to accelerated penetration into the focus of pain arthroxicam complex treatment of joint pain with a credit card. tinkoff platinum does not charge any fees for transfers. tinkoff platinum is so able to issue a tinkoff platinum credit card in the tinkoff application and transfer money without commission interest tinkoff is the only one like that. i help cells produce antibodies and capture viruses polyoxidonium for colds and flu, you buy one smartphone and the second as a gift, because we are agents. because the subscriber buy 19 and get it, the second smartphone of texts as a gift only for megafon subscribers will offer a solution for another credit card with him i took care of finding and buying a vaz-2invention credit card of opportunities from a

reliable vtb bank this is 200 days of purchases free service and the ability to support loved ones the most necessary moment. apply for a credit card right now.ru. go to vk and that's it. it will turn out ozone we deliver with love vitamins to vitr. magnesium b6 and that's it, the line with a 30% discount, and didn't bury it with a discount of up to 20% angstrem designer living room from 39 thousand rubles choose your style angstrem don is changing life is updated during a pandemic, the risk of developing a heart attack and stroke increases for the secondary prevention of such diseases cardiomagnyl can help heart health under control.

what is common in pneumofibrosis of chronic prostatitis of the evaporative process, we explain on the fingers at the site of inflammation, fibrosis can appear, which prevents the organs from working normally. against fibrosis. and eat, otherwise it will cool down, otherwise it will cool down the last page remains. finally. i am pleased to. i part with my favorite book, and you rejoice. i am glad that you are waiting for a lot of new line applications from mts read and listen to the book by sally rooney, a wonderful

world, where are you and other exclusives in the lines? what where when is the winter series of games on sunday after the program time for the matches? so the program will show live, we continue the conversation , the conversation, which by and large is the answer to the question, which is still often they ask me and i am sure of the guests. what's next for me, how long it's going to be, how tough it's going to be. and how far and what tough actions

our opponents can go and, of course, is being discussed. in this case, it’s not about the ukrainians, but about those who stand behind them. well, look, we recorded that, but we were not heard or listened to for a long time, because we did not believe. and that we are ready to go as far as we went, about which we, in fairness, warned for a long time and no one believed in it, even in general did not believe it, when we already went for it purely military. it's there all the time. i just realized now, it was very clear. determining what the answer might be, military and military-technical. at first, we gave, as it were, a military scenario, on which it was still necessary to stop and, as it were, get a divorce, everyone did not want to, not believing, and began to say through the mouths of all kinds of wesley clarks that, like, yeah, remember this barrel. this means that we will crush this spring russia on the battlefield, then it immediately became clear that it was on the battlefield. it turned out so difficult and then a military-technical response followed, strikes on critical e,

infrastructure, but it is critical, because it , among other things, makes the army combat-ready, and its absence makes the ukrainian army incompetent. this is its criticality within the framework of what we are now talking about, so what other options are there for pressure on us by this very west , our opponents in the west, who did not expect and did not believe either in november, or in december, or in january that that we really seriously warn for the last time. and i remind you these are the words of the representatives of the ukrainian general staff, which intertwines in this here is its means. knitting about the fact that here, well, there are the loss figures that ursula voiced, we cannot discuss this, but if it is necessary for punishment for the aggressor country, then we will here is the punishment for those who arranged this here is this she flies. well, the representative is, as it were, from the press service of the european commission there, too. in general, he says about this that, uh, the cruelty of russia,

what is all this all about, that the guys do not stop trying to put pressure on us in that including, but economic and financial, uh, well, in simple terms, they are looking for reasons to rob us and bring a legal basis for this, because listen to what ursulov fondleyin said today. and it's just that no one cut it out, please. your russia must pay financially for the damage it has caused. for ukraine, it is estimated at 600 billion euros for russia, and its oligarchs must compensate ukraine for the damage and cover the costs of restoring the country. we have the means to make russia pay, we have blocked 300 billion euros of reserves. the central bank of russia and froze 19 billion euros of russian oligarchs in the short term. we could create a structure with our partners to manage these funds and invest them. then we

would actually use the proceeds for ukraine . it's not just about robbing and embezzling our money, which for the west has always historically been, as they say, well, a holy cause. this is also such a warning that the more you work as a military-technical response on a critical infrastructure, the greater will be the damage that you cause to the economy of ukraine the more we say full fo we will consider ourselves entitled to appropriate your money from the state and the money of your oligarchs, but with the oligarchs somehow they are so something like 19 billion in total somehow so. here they are, apparently, very so gently with them, but all 300 state-owned, apparently, they are less afraid of our state than our oligarchs. i guess so. so. she says that we will then take this money from you, that is, translated into russian. she says the following bomb bomb, the more you bomb, the more

money you have, uh, take it, and here is a very interesting precedent. why because, in principle, however strange it may sound, this is the military-technical way to achieve your goal. it was invented, invented by the same west, executed and very methodically described, who does not know, this was done by the nato press secretary of the very one who is lamenting there in bucharest about the cruel blows of russia this tt ninety-ninth year. when will you listen? just replace the country name, how would the goal and how would you understand these guys wrote this training manual 23 years ago, please. unfortunately, the command and control system also depends on electricity. if milosevic really wants his citizens to have water

and electricity all he has to do is accept the terms of nato and we will stop this company until he does. we will continue to attack targets that supply his army with electricity if this has consequences for the population. this is a problem. milosevic, water supply and electricity is being used against the people of serbia, we turned it off permanently or for a long time for the sake of the lives of 1.6 million kosovars who were driven out of their homes and the lives of which were significantly damaged. this difference will not please everyone, but for me this difference is fundamental. in principle, it is possible every time when some european and nato leaders gather somewhere in brussels, washington or in some other european capital to cackle about what is happening. what is happening. once, but just change the kosovars to the donbass and not 1.6 million, and much more millions and so on and the

like, change milosevic for zelensky and, in principle, all the guys you yourself came up with this and summed up the material and technical base for it. and something i did not see against jamie's neck against. wesley clark, who carried out all this, and the leaders in those countries that substantiated this, because it’s a normal policy for someone to talk about some kind of sanctions, about some money , i’m not talking about some kind of indemnity, even about the courts. i did not hear. maybe i missed something, they tell us about it, moreover, they say that now we guys will take your money from our world. he stated that if there is such an a attempt, if russian assets in the eu are confiscated, then we will take adequate measures in this sense, i have a question, or rather two, firstly, in your opinion. is it real, although it is clear that in this world for a long time everything is real, is the situation

in which the european union goes to the next round real, well, the aggravation is with us, and this money is real. what is called grabbing? and second economic in your opinion, what options do we really have for an adequate response to this economic and if they are ? bargaining actually says that let's discuss how much we can leave you. e, and how much will we take from you ? uh-huh uh, and if you kind of stop then it turns out that the delta that stays in your pocket, it's maybe more really

hear. it's really. well, the interpretation is very interesting, although to me personally. well, i understand her, if this cake really has a place to be. i still think it won't end well for us. well, i, for example, uh, i have no doubt at all. to be honest, we won't be refunding anything. uh. no, after all, when i say that this is an element of an element of enticement. this is an attempt to stop our blows. and as if by threats, what is under, and the damage from these blows. they will confiscate our money, despite the fact that the money they have, most likely, is already muddied it's under. well, yes, that’s why i also think that, unfortunately, we can’t count on the fact that we will return at least some of the frozen funds. although maybe you are really right, because the amount of the damage assessment so far does not look like, uh, impressive compared to the seized funds. that is, it should be, of course, more. that is, in this regard, there

should still be some kind of rationale, justification, justification, that is, in this regard, it is necessary to somehow pack it all beautifully. but they are in it plan is quite large wizard, so in terms of answering your questions. do we have options to return these funds. i think no. then the second thing is not, here is the second question of an adequate response, which the ministry of foreign affairs is talking about so that we can tell the guys now in response to them, if you think about taking our sovereign gold and foreign exchange reserves with a false pretext of restoring ukraine. we will adequately answer you and further. there must be some sort of enumeration. what would you list? well, let's start with what if, uh, we kept reserves there, and they kept reserves in return. it would be much easier for us, because i would be a grandfather. you understand, well , probably, but this is also a question for us. actually, why did we do that, but unfortunately, we

did it already uh, and uh, i would be glad. if at least now we can draw some conclusions from this in terms of the accumulation of reserves. by the way, i'll note that next year's budget has an idea, huh? again, the budget rule, which involves the accumulation of funds is returned, that is, russia is going to save 5 funds, but now, as they say, yes, in friendly currencies, apparently, uh, we will wait what the chinese will do if we save up . er, now they have reserves and how they will deal with it, but i personally do not think that this is the right policy. but this is my point of view so ah, but at least it seems to me that it would be nice if we started at least with the fact that we draw some lessons from this, to be honest, i don’t see it to the end yet that we extract them completely. and so, and we understand that here there was such, as it were, the policy of the idea that it was necessary. uh,

saved money not in my own country to spend. and you need to take them away, because if you spend them in your own country. this will cause inflation to increase the theft of corruption. but if you put them there, then they will be there. calm down and wait for a rainy day. i don't know what a black day is. because we've already left. they left us here, but now we are again talking about how we will save them, and to our great regret, our business, uh, partly also thought in such categories that it earns it’s necessary here, but it’s necessary to spend, but it’s necessary to spend, there and store a football club there, buy real estate there, eh. well, we also say that it is a sin to answer. many, probably, at night, officials also thought so, and therefore, children also ended up there, uh, and uh, and real estate is also found there. so , in this sense, do you understand? this is also a question for

us. that is, if we already had such a model that we unfortunately, yes, uh, the europeans did not store reserves, so let's just say so. you have us there take e. and we'll take it from you here, only it won't work. harder is not good. then ask a tougher question, when the foreign ministry says that we will adequately respond to the midja. i hope, he says, this is, well, based on some practical possibilities, but i don’t know, i take it from the ceiling, for example, and what amount can be estimated? um, is there real estate or is there any manufacturing facility that western companies own here? yes, i understand. but, i just don’t even understand these volumes, that is, roughly speaking, when we talk about an adequate answer, about which writes the ministry of foreign affairs and we are at least approximately. well, here you are, a person who understands economics. we are at least approximately, but we evaluate or imagine. here they have our 300, plus not ours, 19. and what do they

have? we definitely have something. i understand what you are driving at, that is, er, there are indeed foreign companies that own some assets in russia. and in principle, them, too, e. in response, withdraw, because yes, we have arrested reserves. this is a rather crude form of theft of these assets. to be honest, to be cunning and now this figure can be estimated. well, for example, let's give an example, let 's say bp owns about 20% of the shares in rosneft. well, hypothetically. uh, here 's one example for you, that is, property, which is, and it's just shares. how do you understand? that is, it's not that some one is standing there, you can't take it out of here. yes, that is, in this regard, the securities that the bipishniks themselves, it seems, have even written off their balance sheets, and moreover, but the russian federation is still showing certain humanism. she even dividends, which

dividends, which, say, should have been received by bp as a shareholder are credited to a certain account. and there we are still a guard, because as before, but does not give does not give. all the same, take this money, but, nevertheless. well, in fact, well, this is also a form of freezing, but we say, this is your money, it is on a special set, we will continue to see what and how such work can be done. and honestly, i just don't want to from the ceiling. i don't like to take any numbers, so i didn't count. i did not count. how much property do we have a track in russia can this be done? right off the bat, i can still name a few about large assets, but i think that, to be honest, it won’t reach 350 to 350 billion , of course, yes, two words and yes, yes, but in fact, how would such estimates by government economists that the value of the assets of european countries is approximately equal to the volume of frozen assets. this is the only figure, the only one, as if here is a statement that was such a statement, yes, but there is a difference there

real money, and here are assets that are still unknown, how to evaluate? how to count this is not a conversation, but there money or assets is a conversation. now for now, but about what they're telling us guys, if you don't stop e work off. although we will squeal about critical infrastructure, it means that this is a crime and so on. let's forget about the ninety-ninth year, we'll run into you and under this case we'll hurt you. well, in brackets, consider taking your money, then the conversation was like this guys should be like me understand i don't water guys. well, as it were, if you are going to hurt us, then, in principle, we, too, in response, can hurt further. i don’t understand, firstly, whether there is something to put pressure on further , konstantin vasilyevich is absolutely right that the readiness to put pressure is also for me for the time being. well, such we rather want for the time being not to press, but so that they continue to somehow love us and believe that we are, as it were , good, apparently illusions. well, this is such a thing. well , this is where it goes fast. and, apparently, that's how the eastern ones are still there, no matter how much,

respectively. you wanted to add something about the pressure or move on. yes, let's just add about the fact that we have leverage . yes, literally short. let's see, just a week ago i was looking at e experts at pho. they sit, how much they can take away our western assets with real money, meaning the russians. and if we block a little more than 300 billion from them. so they shot about 260 billion somewhere. yeah, this is their estimate. they voiced. it opened the companies. they said they included it there, but the whole thing called the material base that exists here, plus the shares that exist today. but then there was a very important phrase. but the biggest thing they can take from us. this right is our intellectual property. yeah, but here the numbers are completely different if russia stops using the right or intellectual property. it will simply assign any of our innovation patents. that is, they will come to the classical withdrawal of everything that we have invented, they will not pay us a single ruble, they will follow the chinese path completely right. here the losses will be completely different and

the next stages, which they say, as soon as the europeans find a false basis. how to steal russian money? they say, they are very good americans, this is fox they say, here is a chain reaction even among the little ones. states that are invested in our three sacrifices, they will understand. oh, and you can trust them after all, if they stole a nuclear power. and what will happen to us understood? well, what is this treasury to steal, you know, such reflections of the tenth order, they are there cynic on these small states, and everyone there will wipe themselves off with some kind of intellectual property. i am very careful. here's to these conversations. let's be close to china, i'm very close to it there, but this part of the chinese way is in our performance. it seems to me that it should already begin to be times. they themselves are afraid of it. so you have to say yes, yes, yes. yes, of course, we did it. at least, i believe that since they are discussing the withdrawal of our gold and foreign exchange reserves. why we do not even allow ourselves to be discussed at the state level

taking something from them. i don't understand this. why is this here, as if the desire is still. uh, that is, not even the sumerians are playing with us, but they are just robbing us, and we are still like this now, when you said. the fact that good americans are bad americans, just about americans, means, uh, we have already done this more than once. a note about money. but you say that right there, uh, how would they calculate the amount of damage, the one that they need for this, they have this same clown potion that needs to be calculated, uh, 100 billion 100500 billion, 188.500 300 billion. he already said that even now they are attracting to the restoration of ukraine and in general the amount of work. he already counted in the trillions. he just now counted in the trillions. we still have to put it this way, only recently we started 750 kw each, and he has already read a trillionth. he needs to read 10 trillion and, as it were, this is this for you, this is for you, this is not this for me, too

, but here an interesting moment arises about what will happen next. those voices are already starting to sound. how do you say management americans are not good, there is no good. this is the kind of america that zelinsky can shake even more money out of uncle sam, and the bidens are happy to meet him halfway. so now we have grown bolder and demanded another 55 billion dollars from the american daddy in addition to those 90 that congress has already allocated to ukraine vovka this doesn’t work like that protracted conflicts give rise to entire classes of experts with selfish interests, for whom it is profitable to add fuel to the fire zelensky can afford make the most incredible demands, which will turn ukraine into a fabulous country of eternal war of money rain, the developer of leadership or steve, he begged america but in fact he meant, drive money. yes, this is america senker - this is the correct americans in the sense that they

seem to know their interest very, by the way, interesting, i specifically checked. that's when something that our transfusion there they wrote vladko. okay, vladka well, it's kind of like, by the way, the polish version of such a polish czech slovak version is vladka. here, but the conversation is about what it is already it starts to annoy some people there, but american singing, let's face it, but it's not that right here, right now, they do not influence politics. but even more interesting is what happens next in the analysis of what is happening and, in fact, how this should be treated, the forint, the policy. but the foreign policy, it’s like, yes, it’s already, so to speak, a kind of trendy thing. it is very interesting what they write, evaluating, in general, how to relate to what is happening. and what is important to its causes, americans in general do not often analyze the causes with the point of view that maybe we were also wrong in some way, and the fact that this makes foreign policy. this is very revealing, please. emotional

outrage is not politics, and anger at putin and russia does not answer our question. which approach is best for ukraine or the world, perhaps the hawks on the right are the best course of action to give ukraine everything it thinks it needs to win but the success of this approach. it is hardly guaranteed that the us foreign policy establishment does not like to admit its mistakes, but to lay all the blame for conflict on putin this is a jailbreak card that absolves supporters of nato expansion from the blame for this tragic turn of events. yes, of course, i understand that the foreign policy publishes this under the rubric argument. well, that is, it’s like an opinion, this special opinion and so on, but nevertheless , such voices are heard there and this question is about how much, uh, this way of thinking, what is possible, we just said, it’s november there december. january, that perhaps we really pulled the wrong thread. and it guides us all.

not there. perhaps it is inherent not only to some columnists, but to some part of american politics, or a very important moment when you quote friends, all this, first of all, those people who coordinate each of their articles, everything is agreed there. if you quoted at the very beginning, you would also be intact, it would be the same thing, you can’t say anything yourself, and in the states the so-called litmus test is very accepted, you have to say something to see how he reacts. what criticism will come to this, and how rational will be what you say, we can say that it is litmus. mashka e of the american establishment through the stems so to speak. so. this is the kind of boston establishment, first of all, who can afford it, first of all, new york. this is washington, this is boston , these are the three big centers that allow themselves to think differently. uh-huh i was very surprised when, in pursuit of this article, i read another blastondem, which usually deals with someone’s own issues exclusively in new england. then they suddenly start talking about what they need

think in some way. will we be able to stop this snowball because the feeling that we have blinded a lump we started to roll it to roll and they said it won’t go, it won’t go. and the next phrase will not stop will not stop will not stop and the americans are starting to talk about it. they are now all reflecting on the topic, what is now their controlled chaos. hmm became completely out of control. you know how when you're blind as a child, this snowy one, who just picked it up like that to push, and mittens and he starts to roll. and you understand that you are already rolling somewhere with him. yes, and that's the feeling, right? you are rolled up this lump is permeated with absolutely all americans, first of all, those who are not connected with the tsisteblishment. and those who are connected with regional elites at the level of large cities at the level of so -called rural america are starting to raise key issues thanksgiving is over christmas is coming and they are starting to talk about very simple things this year, the united states of america set the record for the most expensive thanksgiving in history america over the past 40 years

and the price, first of all, is not from the basket of what they ate, but from flights, because they are used to relatives flying by planes that cost a penny, if everyone who has been in america knows very well that domestic flights are absolutely expensive. now the average price has risen to over $400 round three round trip. it is expensive such prices in america never knew . now they say it will be christmas our basket. and what we could spend at christmas is extremely expensive. and that means helping ukraine, we rob ourselves. means that for the first time a very tough mumbling is going on in all walks of life in american society. we don't know america, we don't want to know about zelensky return our money. you know, we know ukraine yes, we don't know ukraine, they know and i'm sorry, we don't even want to know where it is, but we don't want our children to suffer from a lack of material benefits because of an incomprehensible policy. it seems

to be while the lowing is going on. yeah, but politicians are starting to adapt, here are politicians for them begin to adjust and, given that we have already discussed, that they left the cycle before the intermediate ones. uh, elections and are slowly entering the presidential one. here i'm just curious. is it possible, for example, to somehow say this cycle of the conditional transition of mooing. uh, so to speak, well, a layer of ordinary one-story americans, when it starts to influence politics, such a top one. taking into account the presidential elections, what is the period of a month, two months? i believe the key moment will be march i will explain why the fact is that in the united states of america there are very many, and the companies that plan, first of all , both seed and everything else new expenses, they are planned for march. primarily. yeah, including in march, they begin to collect money. now the company has not yet started for the future company. once again, it has not started, but the money will start to collect the question, when a victim comes to you and says

$ 50,000 is not the biggest money, for whom will you donate? we have, uh, the finest presidential candidate, maybe it's will be a byte, perhaps it will be someone from the new who's there, for example, such as the governors of california. why not? but there's a lot of newssom questions here, a good guy, probably, but in a good guy - it's not enough when you're asked. and what concrete steps will you take for me. that's what you do as a politician. we already believed biden, we believed trump, there is nothing after zero, that is, i understood from your explanation that this is all so to speak, as it were, well, fathers for a month, but for now this will all be come from christmas. uh, baskets, flights, and so on down to some kind of politics where decisions are made. that's it, this is the end and there's nothing more to come. why will i have a love story and a detective story? what about you yet?

read thousands of books in the new application line from mts and listen to the book of omar tolza of the lincoln highway and other exclusives in the lines credit card opportunities

and natural spices are impossible to resist. hirkizovo, but the decision is so tasty for me, you buy one smartphone, and the second as a gift, this is because because the new items of the menu are all at 99, 99.

well, imagine that this is the price of anything, just cut the price for 18 months and no interest , the halva installment card is acutely relevant. what do pneumofibrozil of chronic prostatitis from the finger process have in common? on the fingers , fibrosis can appear at the site of inflammation, which prevents the organ from working normally . choose your angster style. don change life tinkov is being updated, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account. the best digital bank

for small business lending tinkov new checks in the menu we are pleased to receive cashback for services, but it is even more pleasant to see how it turns into something really tangible. now a single cashback wallet has appeared in the mts ecosystem, with which you can pay for your favorite services or buy gadgets. the program time will tell, we continue to discuss live, what other ways are there to put pressure on us. uh, economically for our uh opponents. eh, and it's

certainly not ukrainians. and this is the same collective american-centric west, we have already begun to talk about a thousand and one ways of relatively honest withdrawal of money. uh, russia, which they are now discussing. here is ursula fondylein. uh, well, and the whole gop company, which means they are sharpening their teeth together with zelensky on these our 300 billion gold and currency leaders and 19 billion. uh, some not the most lucky oligarchs, on whom they decided to raise their tail after all, but, but they still have ways to do it, well, in general, the guys show such miracles. but, well, sophistication, and i would say, well, just creativity. here's an example. i directly, i directly admired it means that the german company uniper is filing a lawsuit against gazprom gazprom about which it accuses it of

losses from undersupply of gas. i estimate the current cost of replacing russian gas at 11.6 billion. i re-read this news four times, that is, roughly speaking, the german government is involved in sanctions, which lead to the fact that this gas is not supplied there. they are forced to look for other sources to fall for the money. plus, it’s not clear who is blowing up the gas pipelines through which this gas goes there, but they bring a lawsuit against gazprom , which itself suffers from the actions of the government of the country in which this wonderful and resourceful company is located with its excessively resourceful lawyers. it is, of course, just uh. well, what is called? ah, the top. it's like you don't know. there you have a bakery and a man signed that you will supply him with bread all year, then he comes and burns your

bakery. or i don't know, it breaks half of the equipment. and the next day, says buns, where i have to buy buns in another bakery. they are more expensive there. you owe me money. it 's like from this series another thing that i started thinking about, but it can't be. it's so stupid, maybe they are trying somehow gazprom now here are the publications gazprom is considering back and forth, as i understand it. well, maybe i understand correctly, as i understand it, gazprom now, in response to this, should forward this lawsuit, probably to the german government or those who led all this and i don’t know how it will work, but in this sense it will be very interesting to understand what are the e mechanisms. e in this story, a with gas, because a lot of interesting things are happening there, for example, a certain e, which means a contract that the germans signed with an e boat, which will be theirs from the age of 26. it means to drive some volume of gas, but the question arises. if

it will be only in the twenty-sixth year, then this, as it were, solves the problems in germany, why only in the twenty-sixth and in general, does this have anything to do with it ? to this gas pressure and talk that they should no longer become dependent on gas, especially not as democratic as russian boat tegas , everyone knows, he is super democratic and a boat, as shown by e gestures. the german government about the world cup, they do not at all consider it a democratic country, but, it turns out that the gas is nothing or suggests that for 3 years. uh, it means that the leadership of qatar will somehow change its mind and change its attitude towards the minorities that the germans are so worried about, it’s not very clear. what does this mean now, and even more so that all this is happening against the background of the fact that it is not norway that declares that it stops issuing licenses for the development of the shelf for the same 3 years, which is interesting, prices against this background. well, here, i went on the air, and there were already 1.600. uh, i don’t know,

so sometimes we used to have something when you enter, there 1.600 you get 1800, i don’t know, now it won’t be like that, there won’t be any interesting gestures either. and, of course, within the framework of this economic one. all energy stories i would even say, this is the story of uh, that there is nothing left until monday. on monday we are to enter ceiling prices for our oil. they still can not agree. uh, they say, about six they talked about 670. right there, then, these psychopaths. uh, the polish- baltic ones turned on about 30. well, there are ukrainians, of course, the ukrainian authorities cheered about 30, but today the european commission made a tough statement, which means they are not going to postpone, because they seem to be unable to agree, but they are not going to postpone. after the fifth of december, they will still introduce it. yes, he does not plan to change the term of entry, and so it was called here in this publication. well, that is, that he does not plan, now it has already gone that 60, which seemed to

be 62.5 before. now it's already 60, and so on, respectively, for these three, as it were , situations. and what hmm do you think, uh i said right, what did i say wrong, what do you consider it necessary to explain. refute clarify deepen and so on. there are many questions. let's figure out what's going on. uh, this lawsuit, well, from the point of view of corporate corporate law, the company is not the first to understand, you can why because they operate under an existing contract. yes, they are. they are not engaged in such global geopolitics. they say the following. listen, we have a contract with gazprom. e, the contract provides for certain volumes of deliveries. e, we did not see these volumes. e, we are suing you. further, it is clear that your car is small, what happened there. here we are just a corporation that didn't get your gas. but hello further, let's go to court and we'll figure it out. that is, in this regard, when you say, listen with your eyes there, nord stream, uh, sanctions have been applied. they say we

don’t know, yes, how would someone blow it up, we don’t know we don’t have gas, but in fact, it’s still , uh, you drew historical parallels today . uh, actually, you can think of another situation with the gas contract in 2009, and the first such serious gas war, the so -called 2009, when ukraine began, what we called unauthorized selection, that is , gas theft, and we could not deliver this gas to the europeans, and we explained that they brought these europeans, they don’t know anything, ukraine here gas comes in and doesn't come out. they talk about the contract. here there is a point on the border, we must get it, we don’t know anything, how cool, ukraine is your problem under the contract. you must transfer gas to the border of ukraine to us. your problems. they then spoke ukraine your problems. we must get gas. er, that's why we think you're at fault here, that's why the uniper company is here, they pretend that, er, they live in such a vacuum that they don't understand how

the formal gas path works. no, let's go to court further, indeed. interesting question. uh, of course, arbitrage will begin and the company uper will not be the only one who will go to arbitrage all companies that have not received enough volume will go. the court will continue gazprom to prove that force majeure occurred, because this is history started with these turbines. first, the europeans will prove that gazprom could accept these turbines. this will be the first document that the turbines were actually working. gazprom pretended that they were not working, and then i assure you, they will say that gazprom itself blew up the nord stream so that it would have more serious, and such, by the way, i read publications. why blow up the stream? here are the turbines - it's kind of like it didn't really look like that. but when they blew it up, it’s definitely force majeure, because gazprom drove force majeure back turbines. yep, in the contract. he says we have force majeure in the contract, if possible. and what force majeure can you use a turbine here? we can't. no, we think we can, and now they can be lawn, he says, listen to the blown pipe. well, it was you yourself who blew up

some kind of force - you yourself blew it up, not you. here, how will it be? prove that it was blown up, so here, of course, it will be quite long, uh, and serious arbitration, it’s true, it happens, and you’re news from europe, for example, one trial has recently ended, and with such an arbitration awarded that the finnish company must pay about 300 million gazprom for gas that has not already been selected, here, and they tried to prove that they, uh, were incorrectly converted into rubles. and the court decided that it was not force majeure. they have to pay for the unselected volume. so here, by the way, sometimes miracles happen within the framework. here, uh, so to speak, as if the first case. i have a very short clarification, really interesting. but this, although of course, is a more political issue than an energy one. and how are you? eh? rate mine here version, and it's mine. as you say, this is my purely personal opinion that it is possible for the german government to be a test that unipero, apparently other companies, submits. this is a good way to understand that the risks will come to them later. on

the part of gasma, somehow start, uh, jump off these very sanctions, because, well, can you imagine the frg, you say, the americans are there. yes, you speak americans. you say guys. yes, we with parole would have strangled the russians to the end with sanctions, but then you understand what garbage our company started exhibit discs, but gazprommatically expose us. and what if we lose in court, if you compensate us with 11 billion, we will continue to strangle the russians, that is, maybe this is such a cunning move with the country. i would go this route. i'm really not german. well, to be honest, i think that this is still more of an attempt to say that gazprom is once again to blame for everything and that it has such big losses, by the way, 11 billion - this is not their first loss. they are already estimated at 40 billion. that is, they will be much more, but i would still drew attention to the fact that they honestly admit that the replacement of russian gas costs a lot of money. this is also a very interesting moment. that is, they kept saying that we received russian gas - this is a trap, we drove ourselves into a trap. but now they were a good argument. and now they

say, listen, that is, they are public. we say we are for non-russian gas. overpaying for a colossal day. you yourself admit that they simply took it themselves, began to refuse russian gas, became their own pocket, get gigantic money and they. today i read somewhere from some german e, either a minister, or some one who apologizes apologizes for the fact that they tried on, which means they have become overly dependent on russian gas and this will not happen again and so on and so forth, by the way, about gas pipelines. so you just said and literally fell. e on tape. right there 10 minutes ago, germany and norway will jointly ask for attention. this, of course, is very funny, germany norway will jointly ask nato to create a coordinating office to protect the underwater infrastructure in the light. attacks carry gas pipelines to the nord stream. this is olafl, said no one should think that attacks on europe's critical infrastructure should go unanswered schultz said at a briefing together with norwegian prime minister

jonas this, by the way, to the question of whether this is not so, by the way, an indirect allusion to that that those who blew up the gas pipeline are not a strange nato, of course, that is, they, too, but they still have enough. we will give it to him, too, have the conscience not to say that we blew it up correctly, then there is an obvious hint. yes, that is, no one is forbidden. from whom from whom they are going to protect. you correctly say that the nato countries did not blow up. yes? someone, i'm sure that just here the caretakers of this structure, if the british rise up, that's the most who don't. no complaints, the british are good with a boat very short, so with a boat. and well, how do you understand to get gas? uh, we need to build a factory first, and so now qatar is starting a new investment cycle, and we are waiting for the appearance of this gas, just in the twenty-fifth-26 year. and that is, in this regard, everything is clear. why are they contract issues. ah, hypothetically, only part of these problems are solved. the key issue is that there are several years left in the twenty-sixth year. and that's what will be in these

years on the market. and this is a huge question, because in the twenty-second year the europeans still lived at the beginning with russian gas. this is the third year when there will be no more dar gas, not a new american hectare. in that amount it's a huge question, but the german government it is trying to sell the future to its electorate. it says, listen here now in the winter with you. well, still horror, but not horror anymore. horror, but in the future and in the twenty-sixth year already about the entire agreement, although the volumes there, of course, are ridiculous. but they are trying to sell what we have come up with next, if the german voter is smarter, he will ask, and how will we live until the twenty- sixth year. and what will it be in germany, in which this one will come to ride, he bought 50 billion russians. and how many skatars did you agree on, but i i think shois hopes that such difficult questions will not be shown to him. clearly schultz is cunning. uh, how well done he is now, but how would the topic be about this one of their butts about prices, which means the marginal prices for our oil, that the poles demand 30. uh, so, uh, everyone else. well

, as it were, the main countries, as they say in the news, which means they colleague somewhere in the sixty, while we make a statement that whatever the price threshold. in any case, for those countries that join this price cap, we, uh, in fact, it’s not alyo that now raises the question in your non-economic apolitical view, but these tough statements that i welcome, they are, uh, it’s just a statement, or are we at the beginning of our conversation with you, that here we were ready not ready. do you think they seriously evaluate these statements of ours already now that we will really do this and will not sell oil to them according to the ceiling. uh, that's all, what i'm talking about in the previous part, they say how much they did not take seriously. i'm afraid that here too, well a fairly significant part of, uh, there, the european american establishment is sure that the

logic of russia is economic, and the economic format of the nineties loot defeats evil, that is, russians will always choose loot. that is, you say. about the story with the warning of our military-political leadership about ukraine and nato to which they reacted. this is how it is now, in any case, doomed to repeat itself, and we will need to demonstrate this, which is more likely to repeat itself, because that's the story. well, the economic history of russia for the last 30 years. she gives a huge number of examples when russia really chose the loot instead of choosing its own national interest. but this is completely impossible. in this case, any acceptance of a price ceiling is a demonstrative open complete renunciation of its sovereignty. it's the same as being dictated there, but i don't know american experts to sit down and rewrite the constitution exactly the same thing. it's impossible to sell. this is impossible to substantiate.

you say that everything can be justified. no, not everything , this thing cannot be substantiated. that is, it could be justified. something like this guys, we were surrounded on all sides, we have nothing to buy medicines. like cancer, for example, when creating it, when creating it, we do not have a balanced budget. in general, we can stand there in the regime of a besieged fortress for three or four years, and in general, we don’t even really feel it, so here it will be a question of exclusively interests. well, i don’t know any conditional e oil magnates who indeed, some of them would play this game, but i am sure that the political leadership of russia is absolutely sober in its assessment. that's what we're talking about. this is a stupid, primitive trap, but this is a trap that they think that russia can swallow. when you tell me that you will tell me that this can somehow be substantiated. i wo n’t tell you anything sergey, except for my favorite phrase within the framework of this work, time will tell, but it’s a lot of

different things during this time. time to show up, yes, a short question. i really hope that time will now begin show something else, but because it is a lot of things. the previous time at that time will show, here is how the ideal wording would be, but a short question. uh, also in connection with this price ceiling, uh, more precisely with this trade in the european union, where , in my opinion, it is already obvious to everyone that there are some mad countries like poland and the baltic states who insist, well, on an unrealistic thirty. well , the rest say about 60 in your opinion. which of these positions, let's say, is agreed with the americans, this is, uh, the senior players of the european union agreed 60 with the americans, a and 60, like normal, or it's still more and the balts teach them to the americans, or they play on two tables. i guess the united states of america never plays the same table, they offered $70 and they believe $70. that would be a fairly fair price

that russia could agree to, and yes. and if we look closely, and those interviews given by experts in us television. they say, of course, russians for 70 will not sell. but, most likely, this will be the threshold where 85 is there. it’s not something that they discuss openly, when we see that it’s about 62 dollars they offer us, but someone says 30, this is not discussed even on american air, you need to understand that there the figures are completely different and yes, and there is now a very important point another is being discussed regarding diamonds and gold are being discussed. and yes, titan is a must. yes, uranus and titan will be very important for them to discuss, we will then discuss, as it were, what we can about this, of course, of course. oh, that is, your version of that this crazy version about 30 is, uh, the poles with the balts. it’s just that they’re swaggering, or is shaving somewhere there absolutely throws. here is my understanding, they cannot understand, absolutely not a single story can be brought to an end. today, this is absolutely britain's game, which absolutely does not like the dictates that the white house brings,

because the white house is trying to give out some kind of picture that could at least be realized at the level of several, at least contracts, to show, look they are already are lost sure. yes they sold out, they are traitors. and the british say let's get 30 is so cool. that is, and the white house, well, it sounds conditional. i still put in quotes. well, at least, as it were, he is trying to portray some kind of constructive, hegemonic, but constructive, and the british are just breaking bad at all. well, and, accordingly, extreme questions for you, but about, uh, here's what sergey commented on the issue, look very much, and the european union has been introducing an embargo since december 5th. that is, you need to understand that from monday and the eighth package comes into force and the sixth package favors the force ie the european court of justice. it simply prohibits sea supplies of oil to the territory of the soviet union. the united states introduced it on the 22nd . this imbargo britain wish barrga. what i 'm talking about is that when we say that russia should accept the ceiling. you have to understand

that in fact, only one country outside the g7 of the european union has officially maintained this ceiling. this is a country called australia where? well, we're there a few and delivered the so-called everyone else is not. the european union led the embargo. the united states led the embargo britain led the embargo. that is, by and large, e, not china, not india, not turkey, not all of them introduced a ceiling, you know, look at the ceiling. what is the danger of the ceiling europeans americans say companies that, uh, for example, european or american, that transport russian oil insure russian oil, and they are obliged to transport this oil to any country, either to china or india, uh, if the ceiling mechanism is used, but such a situation arises. here you are you are taking oil to india, go the ceiling does not lead. this is obvious. that is, politically, there will be no need to humiliate yourself, but the question is, let's say the greek shipowners are transporting oil to india, uh, the european government asks you the ceiling, do you use it,

he says, well, india does not use it. how can i use? what is your price and here the question is that if they keep the price at 60, if you sell to india for 60, it automatically hits the ceiling and says, brussels i am a greek shipowner, i bring russian oil, it is under ceiling. well, everything, then, take it further, roughly speaking, they are destroying the market for the supply of this oil, in fact. of course, they hit the infrastructure for the press, trying to ban their companies from transporting this oil. therefore, from the point of view. i repeat once again, not one country, except for australia, has introduced any ceiling and will not introduce it. well, except for the ones driving the tougher gear. it’s just that they banned us from supplying their oil by sea, well, from monday, officially ban , roughly speaking, uh, like novak’s statement. this is to those, and which, uh, those strange just in case, so that the chinese people just in case do not think, i see, well, interesting, we will observe. in principle, this is how politics is arranged. that, as it were, some press others resist, i would like to say that in our case, those who resist also began to press pressure themselves. well, time will show

everything in its time. never compared the prices for osago and bought a pole in the same insurance do not overpay, draw up a policy on compare and save up to five and a half thousand rubles their price differs per year. if insurance, then compare choose better bacon and champagne. cheese novelties on the menu all for 999 vtb team will offer a solution, other services will find and buy more percent. how convenient it is for you to return to her friends, vaz-2vennie, vdv one solution credit card opportunity from a reliable vtb bank is 200 days of purchases without trans free service and the ability to support loved ones at the most needed moment and a credit card opportunity right now on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. only

grain feed never uses and will not use hormones. and cares a lot about freshness. yes, these are high standards of harmless supplements to buy for the new year. bring one or two friends, the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. and a friend will receive free service forever

. have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize, he is such one main prize, as part of this we will play among the lucky ones. believe in a miracle. buy tickets. new at least all 99-99 my effect is studied in clinical trials polyoxidonium for colds, will the bank approve the loan? a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit score. try the application and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms. if credit. choose better sportmaster presents reliable clothing and footwear designed for winter travel. buy in the sportmaster mobile application with a discount on your first online order. and natural

spices are impossible to resist. cherkizovo and me so delicious solution.ru go. the menu is all for 999 new cheese bacon and cheese bacon burgers, cyrillic foot menu, 99, 99 now tinkoff black pleases not only me. invite your friends before december 20, have time to bring your friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the

more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize, he is the only one. we often discuss here on the air. here, well, what is the reason for the seemingly, sometimes completely illogical actions of statements of approaches, in general, the lack of logic among western european politicians. here are all these ursulas fonderine. eh, scholz, sometimes carries. something incomprehensible there macron periodically. well, there i’ll sell duda in general, it’s just, as it were, the moravians who are tense there all the time. well, in general, with european politicians. often we discuss that something is not looking for some reasons, which means conspiracy theories. and it often happens that the reason is simpler, and this reason was revealed to me yesterday when i saw the news that psychiatrists are on strike in paris, they are on strike because there is not enough staff or medicines, and i thought. and what is it, unless in paris enough, and they are on strike, and in other countries there is a lack even more and all these people who have to

say so before. well, somehow they were kept stable. it's just that now the psychiatrist can't cope with their clients, and from the political circle it may be easier to solve problems, maybe send some medicines there. well, as it were, from russian psychiatrists to a european psychiatrist, and maybe then, as it were, the theme of our programs shines yes. an amazing story. surprisingly and unexpectedly , we will help everyone, we will cure everyone, information channel on the first continues its work on the air program time will show with you anatoly kuzichev. it is clear that people in our country have accumulated a lot of questions. many of them, most of them they cannot solve themselves, and the all-russian popular front provides them with a platform where these questions can be asked and these problems, thanks to the appeal, thanks to the wide publicity,

the people's front has launched online broadcasting on the internet, respectively, any willing. may take advantage of this opportunity. let's see what's going on there and how . popular front i remind you that this is a presidential movement that helps thousands of people in our country to solve their problems. we have another call. let's turn it on then. no. hello hello could you please introduce yourself so that the audience will know your name? anastasia tell us what is your problem, what happened? how can i help you? i want to know if my

husband can be there especially this, well, on the left eye, sees minus four to the right -2, at the same time. i’m telling you, but i’m in the position of a sniper-sniper, he wears glasses, he wears glasses and the sniper at the same time, yes, that is, he was taken away, and as if the administrators were taken away, but he has some kind of reservation or how he got, how he got something, in general? and with such vision, we had armor. he works at the ignatiev mental factory, they took us away, stopped the car there, and received it, we thought this reservation, and we were told that this bro does not apply to the donetsk region hmm if if they took him away, that would be a different conversation. and the way he was in donetsk, and he was taken away. well , let's try to talk then. we have a doctor dmitry mutnykh in touch, he is the leader of the project of doctors at the front of the national center. the department of defense of the russian federation, uh, and i think that dmitry, as a specialist, will now prompt us and give practical recommendations. and how can we

get out of this situation dmitry hello. good to see you. yes, that's the first time i heard various interesting stories. ah, as for the specific situation, i immediately want to give such a comment enough. uh, quite specific as uh, first of all. uh, the standards for determining suitability or unsuitability, they are the same in all regions and territories of the russian federation, which is why this, firstly, as for the essence of the issue, of course, uh, a person who has vision problems, and now slot in this situation we are talking about cataract cataract - this is according to the lens. this clouding of the lens, which is actually accompanied, well, often serious enough. there are several stages of cataract. and uh time you have a young man with glasses. so, this is already at least, but the initial, or there, er, the second stage of cataract, that is, er, they were crunched from the menu. uh, violated violated color

sensation. and, of course. eh, well, let's just say in- even under normal conditions of military service. this is always a restriction on suitability, either by type of troops, or by type of troops, the same situation, if he is with a confirmed diagnosis of cataract, he is a sniper. it is, of course, serious the question is because well, its and and this feeling and e color perception. and most importantly, uh, directly, and the ability to see, uh, far away clearly and perform the assigned tasks is a question, so about commissioning, of course, this is always decided by the local. eh, the military medical commission and only she, but here, of course, you need to contact, again, the method of the e part of the uh, garrison. we are not the first time the issue. uh, we

say so, uh, the fact is that here such a situation arises that any commander, let's say, it already by default considers, uh, the arrived soldier of the year and today's military service. e, in one form or another. according to the harmful e-e educational specialty, therefore it is very important here that there be an e relationship with the military settlement commission. of course, it needs to be named and, of course, it needs to be checked and at least, or change it e. the type of service is not activity or, in general, in fact, the position, so to speak, of a sniper to remove him, because this, well, is not good. look dmitry. i think there was a situation connected with the fact that, as it were, in february, he was mobilized for it. yes , it was just february, when donetsk was still an independent donetsk people's republic, so now, when they became part of the russian federation, we began, in fact, all-russian rules to apply to

all this, just. i think that it is possible to deal with this problem from the point of view of russian, uh, legislation. i am sure that we will definitely take this issue under control, yes, and together with you. well, you know, i hope that, uh, that this issue will be resolved, like other issues , moreover, i will say, maybe a strange thing. it seems to me that the more such unpleasant questions will sound in these streams. the more. responsibility will not be obtained, the better efficient. as a result, we will become stronger, the cleanest and the snow will rain while there is no around

in the center of the immortal urban, dear, the most important failure was chosen high once. on friday at the first tinkov bring one two three the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. and a friend will receive free service forever

. have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize, he was the only one cherkizovo imagined that we would be for dinner today, i am ready and it is impossible to resist natural spices. cherkizovo and it's so delicious for me, the vtb team will offer a solution with a high interest rate on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. nine will the bank approve the loan? compare

will help you know for sure. check your credit score. try the application and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms on compare if a loan then compare. choose the best products without harmful additives in clinical trials of polyoxidonium for colds until december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances. merkel new cheese bacon and cheese bacon chicken new menu all at 99, 99 cherkizova

cherkizovo and it’s so delicious for me to find a solution for a credit service and buy more friends. you have two opinions of a reliable vtb bank, this is 200 days of purchases without interest. compare you can fill out just one application for a loan and get approval on the best terms from the largest banks for comparison. if credit then

compare choose better with bacon and cheese bacon, chicken cheese novelties on the menu are all 99-99. in petinka. all crust perfectionists eat only grain feed. never use growth hormones and harmful additives. yes, these are high standards. loops, loops, pure products of harmless additives tinkov you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without opening an account, just download an extract from your bank. leave an application for tinkoff dot ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account . you know, in this one. forgive me for the sake of god for the harshness in this course, you need to somehow explain. who are we. and who are they? here vladimir putin is quite accurate, but he gave a definition

difference. well, at least the difference in approaches, at least the difference in cultural approaches, let's listen. you see, our culture is being canceled by stupid people, and we are nothing of the best works of the best samples. eh, the cultures of, uh, other countries are not only not canceled, but we are moving forward. e those, e those ideas that are egoistically the beginning, which are embedded in these works, we are smart. and those who cancel our culture are not very good. and it's hard to argue with that. and now so this is what concerns us, what concerns our approaches, how we see the world in general and life culture and works of art and so on. now, so what do they live by byte. look, it means that lgbt supporters in the usa are preparing to celebrate another next, uh, victory. joe biden promised to sign the same-sex

marriage bill. he said that i will refuse myself the pleasure of quoting. e. union americans have the right to marry whomever they love. that's all, this is for the sake of future, of course, generations, where future generations will come from, while it is not explained, this is a mystery, listen to biden. today when the bipartisan senate passed the respect for marriage act, the united states reaffirms the fundamental truth, love is love and americans should have the right to marry the person they love, this law will protect the rights of millions of americans, as well as lgbtq + and interracial couples and their children . it also ensures that the next generation of lgbt co-plus and youth grow up knowing that they, too, can lead full happy lives and start families of their own, this whole story scares me. well, except that we are all in this story

it scares me that in this abbreviation you understand more and more letters, more and more and more. let me remind you, just in case, that in the english alphabet, for example, there are 27 letters, and in the russian t-33. that is, when they run out of theirs, they will come to us in every sense. this is very important for us, you know, no, but let it go right there. solves all these questions and criticisms, the last letter qr daiden is modern. yes, he, too, goes a lot with time, despite 80 years. he adapts at first seemed to the us team you are an outsider world championship and loser. and now he was the first to congratulate them on entering the group screen. that is, indeed here is his culture and his personal culture and culture. his country is changing , developing, that is, being ahead of the curve. and then we start talking like that, as if to tell you so, biden's approach, actually pretty. and you yourself, you yourself, so to speak. hmm, where do you feel? here in this one. excuse me again, this word is a stupid dichotomy. here you are, we are or they are no, i

feel in my place, of course, at the same time look. like our entire culture. still looking at what's going on in the united states what's going on in the uk is what shows you understand, he opened a london gallery. tate in 2000 since then, everything that has been opened in russia is all of our, let's say, large museum centers. this is an exact copy of tate mods. by the way, uh here i don't know about the tate gallery. but the fact that we are there is our modern culture there, er, the newest. this is at best an attempt to imitate. but this, unfortunately, is absolutely true and thank you for this, really, with whom? well, you are again forcing people to decide with whom you are masters of culture, moreover, as it was already in the thirties . here is an experienced person and does not want to evaluate events, but neither you nor we have to evaluate. no, you rate it, for example. what

sports do you do? you can also rate your masters of culture. you must decide with whom we will have such, at least such an aggressive attitude. that is, you are like, that is, you are not you state. and you, so to speak, about the ubiden, that is, the biden elections, he poor fellow understands that since he is traditionally oriented for trump, then he should take the non-traditional oriented ones for himself, so he will soon be traditionally oriented for trump, that is, like this in the majority, his doctor . they are traditional diseases. they are traditional somehow . that was not. and now he is pulling up their bastards. i hope he i hope he will see them off the animals will protect them, too, it will be possible to marry. well, you don't respect animal rights. that they have here they have you understand your dances. and now we have fallen into this trap. you already imagine your own to decide who you are with cyril in the subject with these, it's only tolya kirill, will you be with whom you want? the main thing is not to inform me about

this, so to speak, as persistently as these attacks for god's sake, whatever you want, please. yes, i’m looking at all this and i’m starting to seriously think that the writer viktor pelevin came from somewhere in the distant future to us, because his such a futurological dream novel, which many people know, it just becomes a reality before our very eyes. well, only here here is the lgbt there, plus he invented it there on this topic, the magnificent abbreviation gulag, which at first is exactly the same, that is, if you decipher it, it was the most influential. uh, social stupidity, which in general in the future determined everything gula, which meant exactly the same thing that lgbt people understand, and in this case i would have read pelevin’s novel in a completely different way. well, yes, all kgbt is a plus. yes, that is, it came out, which is now there is a feeling that we are, yes, that we are really in a novel in some kind of dystopian novel. i no longer know there pelevin is not pelevin well, yes, well, let's move on. here i am, uh, actually thank you unity for that remark. i don’t agree, and i don’t

demand anyone to decide, and the masters of culture and so on. although although if they are determined, it would be, of course, good, but to demand from me, so to speak, there are no such opportunities. and such rights, but nonetheless. look, as for the masters of culture, after all, these are they and we, uh, we are external very similar. put it right next to it. well, if there is not a man in a dress, but, so to speak, approximately like me in a suit. well, you can’t tell the difference, well, in general, you can’t tell the difference. well, why what's the matter, but as soon as he and i open their mouths, everything is immediately clear that there is a very big monstrous difference between them and us. it's not just there, as the british say gap. this is not just a gap, it is, of course, the farther, the more it resembles an abyss. look, it means that it is clear that the west has a fetish, if you say religion human rights human rights, and here in the pursuit of this human rights, and man after all begins. from where it starts from the very start to walk. or maybe the person hasn't started yet. and you know, he has a right. this means that the scandal around the balenciaga fashion house has not subsided on social networks for a week now, an advertising campaign for

brands that, uh. here, yes, the majority saw the sexual exploitation or attempted sexual exploitation of children. it has already been deleted, but the question remains here, you understand, right? what is the meaning of the kids, and all these teddy bear cubs are somehow incomprehensible animal animals. they are all these same bdsm paraphernalia in bandages in these straps and so on with whips, everything is as it should be. so the main thing - this is a question - is to say a trick. this is someone's bad photo stupid advertising campaign, which, so to speak, well, too bright, they tried to make it exotic or it's all the same. excuse me please, systemic and planned, as they say, an overtone window and someone's action, let's listen. consider the latest advertising campaign for clothing brand balenciaga, a few photos were recently published. in social networks. you can see that the purpose of the photoset is to sell their

stuff. they used a little girl holding a teddy bear in a bandage moreover, in case you didn't understand what it is about in one of the photos you can see some documents the content of most of them cannot be read, but in one sense, of course, that you noticed it's an approximation. this is a reference to the u.s. supreme court decision in ash croft v. free speech coalition, whose decision was overturned some provisions of the child pornography law. what is it exactly what it seems to be, this approval of child pornography, what else is it, maybe we would really like to know how it seems to us, rightly we must ask where is the wave of moral indignation in our country there is a whole industry built on there's an entire sector of our economy devoted to attacking people who live up to expectations, and here a luxury retailer is promoting child pornography in an advertising campaign no one notices this no, boycott. on the front page of the new york times, there is no editorial condemning

this and of course. social networks allowed to publish these photos promoting child pornography. if you have any alternative explanation for this. let us know tucker carlson volodya well, how do you understand this is the same thing. well, there is such a fashionable thing, you know, yes, a story with high school. e overtone, which you first open with a click and unthinkable yesterday becomes normal the day after tomorrow. well then today debatable yesterday, not conceivable today debatable tomorrow. well, it's normal to usually make a mistake. if we show it, we discuss it, because when this is what the overton window does, that is, we open it a little, we discuss it, then they have finished their job. maybe not. without a verton window in germany it was about this that they began to talk after the death of the main ideologist. it was a famous psychologist who went on all the talk shows, his books were insanely fashionable, and he had just such an idea. he got funding. this idea that

pedophiles who are recognized as pedophiles. that is, it could be a convicted person, and it could be a person who asked for help. well, his brain is going crazy, he came and said. here i have such a crazy woman, that is, a recognized pedophile gets the right to guardianship of homeless children. and this program was funded by the senate. berlin, it was here the other day, you can, so to speak, in the thirteenth year. he died. this is still a flaw, some unnecessary inaccessibility, like a program for one simple reason, that pedophiles in in this case, they will find their zone of calm and will not kill their victims. he had the exact deal it was the moment. and now let's see a man in the seventies was professional. in the school of psychology, one of the most recognized authorities , people with problems came to him. someone has no problem. you know, in any industry, he will not come, and the descendants of this upbringing today are in the it-sphere in computer games in brands. they are

finally, despite the fact that legal documents are very important, because they are beautiful understood what they would do. they blew my mind. actually teaching kids certain things in terms of venal justice. you know, when you understand that you have no control over your child, the conversation should not be reduced to bsdm, non -kosher iron, please, juvenile justice says, for example, in those united states in some states in belgium in sweden that from the age of 12 a child has in the right to determine their gender to make a decision on hormone therapy, parents do not have the right to transfer it if the parents list, then parents commit criminal space, if we give a definition of this phenomenon in general. here's how it can be called that's all happened. downward sorry for such a slightly broad question. i would not diagnose. i would think of a protection system, because if you look at it from a marketing point of view, they are absolutely right to have a brand. they took the rainbow from us. well , now i will not draw a rainbow with a child with agony. they won't understand, they have a clear

brand, they have clear holidays, they have clear demonstrations with tech music, and there is a brand. uh, healthy family, or is it normal? and there is a brand. here, so that i put on a badge for myself and walked around the city and spoke. here i am, and there is family day, which is celebrated in the same way or something else, that is, this is a clear marketing ploy that has had an effect over 30 years, but i realized, i would have dug even deeper briefly. and in short, this is uh, non-traditional orientation. it was born, in principle, in the third reich, as the consequences of the fact that the constitutions destroyed the jews homosexuals, mentally normal people, and these people who destroyed them came up with a new program, if we destroyed them then, let's make them feel in and they coincided with the process, not just people, but superhumans, understandable, understandable. well, here's an important question. dima to you. he, uh, i address him to volodya is right, probably, after all, uh, the point is not to see, so to speak, to stigmatize, to be amazed, i don’t know how to turn away and so on in some way,

uh, to resist and simple, so to speak, well, in mechanical prohibition, it is unlikely that this can be done effectively. what do you think, i think that in 2022 we don't have the biggest problem - it's lgbt huh ka plus plus. no matter how many pluses there would be, the problem is not in the mail, respectively, the most terry conservative segment, as if we are discussing plus, minus and so on from all over the state customs committee, what we are trying to understand there, we are trying to take a definition for ourselves and them in order to in order to define oneself, it is necessary, accordingly, to make self-identification. so this it is necessary, accordingly, how to be determined in relation to what you are identified so, by the way. here, as it were, respectively, i doubt that identification occurs by some important event. now the historical component, as it were , according to the points, as it were, as it were, the formation, and now there are such suspicions. here they are on several other planes. but if we talk about it, let's figure it out, and the question is the following: what are the main markets china, for example, china is the largest at 4 billion. there, respectively, lgbt plus that it is actively

developing this, of course. no. that's respectively china's largest market. this is also of interest to saudi arabia, by the way, here are the data of these largest countries, which are represented, respectively, they have their own conservative positions, as it were, what they do. they just take their brands and clog what they think is necessary. you have economic leverage. you have accordingly consumption. if it wasn't consumed at this level, no one would, accordingly, this one did not move in this direction. never, when you have it, respectively, it consumes, when in the main communication, how would it be connected with it, how would it be, what will you do with it, you have two options. you take the first option, of course, everything bans the series. that is, in principle, as if, well, limit all segments. accordingly, speak as if, respectively, as if your own, but you do not create anything in return. this is north korea what to do? naturally, there is salt? some they take bought set their channels create their social networks create properties formats. you try some canoe, for example, some or wech concerns all means of cultural components. do not like it the games that we, unfortunately, make here the games

you have an atom of cards the only one, as if there is a limp gradually towards the release someday, probably, will come out. that is the problem lies next week. and tom hard is naturally russian, to play accordingly. so, you can say, respectively, which will soon it turns out, that is, the federation in general, that is, roughly speaking, the problem is as follows. here right now. stop, what is the easiest option, if he says that everything is there, everything is 40 minutes, as if, in principle, the lost generation, as if, as if, as it were, well, that's the format. by the way, in kokoshniks. here, either, respectively, to say that we have some kind of alternative, not the past, the present, which constitutes this alternative position. here it is, you make up all the variables there, you can take it, respectively, from from there, let's suppose some kind of military man, everything is clear, it is clear that in order to fight this you must how does it work? this concerns oil, this concerns citizens. this applies to the military-industrial complex, this applies to everything. if you just sort of switch off and say it doesn't exist, because i don't believe it. this is a good remedy with a subjective idealist approach. but, accordingly, it does not work effectively. it's for you. eventually it will come. it's just that in different forms there will be a military

component of the economy or, accordingly, another. if you want to do something. you must create an alternate finger. to do this, all this will have their own platforms. to do this, they must have their own, the components have just now launched an alternative to the streams, which is the most important fact in the political component. in the economic component, dmitry is absolutely ready, you know, ready, and so everyone left, in fact, bulgakov’s. remember the session with black magic followed by exposure. here, uh, we started, with this we mean horror from everything. uh, with these one-liners was married to this disease siagi. with this and so on. and now i catch really and cyril unfortunately is who is a conservative. yes, i understand, but nevertheless, yes, what's right? well , imagine. yes, we say, this is not an american movie. this means that he is promoting a disgusting vile alien to us values, and we have two options for dealing with this. first. to remove the cinema altogether, so to speak, there is no change. we have more movies, we’ll get by with walks in the forest or shoot

some kind of our own movie that promoted the necessary values, and so on and so forth, we iconify this. quite naturally and logical, as it were, reasoning. and suddenly we understand that, so to speak, we have learned to see. it is too. horror we have learned to stigmatize him. but to offer something in return. well, i don't know, however, for the time being , at least i have a fan development of society. that is up down up down, it's not a problem. this is just how society develops, and plus for the speed we already reacted to there in the 19th century under pushkin oh lady she showed her leg, now she doesn’t work anymore. and now the child showed the toy. bdsm attire is still punching people behind the scruffy places. okay nonetheless. listen, let's listen to the colonel directly, as if briefly in quality, so to speak, well, i don't know the modes of our discussion, this is an american colonel. well, what does he say counterquestion about this confrontation, because at least you

can’t go anywhere, because if they exist, we and they understand this very clearly, we will listen. the upcoming offensive phase of the conflict will give an idea of ​​the emerging new russian forces and their capabilities, biden's performance. in warsaw it was emotional and mired in the ideology of moralizing globalism popular in washington london paris and berlin but for moscow the speech was tantamount to the carthaginian world biden's course in us foreign policy not to take prisoners means that the outcome of the next phase of the ukrainian war will not only destroy the ukrainian state, it will also destroy the last remnants of the post-war liberal order and will cause a sharp shift power and influence throughout europe, especially in berlin, it will pass from washington to moscow and to some extent to beijing. well, you can say that e in different ways, but to some extent it was thrown, mainly moscow and so on. let's say this. let's just say it's not an indisputable thesis. but about

the collapse of the liberal world order, as the main one, and i think that these thoughts, so to speak, these words wander through the high offices. in berlin, mentioned in washington and in london and in paris and this is a fact, this is a fact, and now, as an addendum, so to speak, to our e to our main theme. see. today, for half a day, we discussed the sudden speech of ursula vonderleien, which she said, suddenly announced about the gigantic, terrible, uh, terrible losses of the ukrainian army. she said about 100,000 people. somehow it was generally shit estimated to date over 100,000 ukrainian military personnel have been killed. in less than a couple of hours, why exactly this passage was deleted from her account and replaced with a slightly cropped, compressed, so to speak video, on which, uh, on which there are no these there are no more references. here's how they explain it, please. many thanks to those who pointed out the

inaccuracy of the figures in the previous version of this video, the data used from external sources should have been about the loss. that is, both the dead and the wounded and should have shown the cruelty of russia dan of course. she just generally understands this, you were supposed to show the cruelty of russia, but something did not go according to plan. everyone misunderstood it, so we therefore cut it out in general, nina, how do you understand, this performance and subsequent cutting out. here, as a clinical, that is, sherlock that is, if she wants ukraine to know that the charm is strong, and the enemy’s army was immortal, and mortal only or stupidity that is why the ukrainian general staff always announces the losses of the russian side and counts them already the olympic stadiums one stadium and so on are never announced very important clinical idiocy or a political act. no, i. what she sees to her is some numbers, most likely, these are numbers

along with the losses of the civilian population. yes, well, in in general, there, most likely, there was still confusion in the numbers , and she apparently wanted to say, well, let's somehow pull up the americans. nato european pole forces. maybe, somehow , yes. yes, maybe we’ll still pull ourselves together and help the ukrainian armed forces, and from this came the phrase absolutely demoralizing and ukrainian peaceful life is simple human stupidity. got it. well, somebody big told her beautiful. well do not know anyone big western handsome phrase. understood? we are not going to yield our human resources. on this one, not designed for our military, they will not enter ukrainian territory, and it is also not necessary to scare ukrainians with the number 100,000, they will not fire correctly. understood zrada, please, well, i think,

i’m sure that this is what is called a leak, a leak is not on purpose, because it’s not on purpose, because ms. very real scouts, these figures are quite real and they live among themselves quite in the real world. this is when they come out of the curtain, they begin to sound completely different things. and when she stepped out of the curtain she just didn't have time to change the channel in her head. and what is called blurted out, and then it was slightly corrected, you said and that we saw it many times at all, not only there, it happened in many situations even during this war when it was first voiced, well then , too, no no no, and everyone leaves you understand that it could still be the head of the european commission. i thought she went to the podium. she said all this. this month there will be political calculations political acts. so thin, long no, very short. well, if you briefly know, what is the difference between ursula fondelin and fake meths of her level. and what did zelensky not

freak out? and what about the president in poland, duda, or the prime minister, the marovets dissemination of fakes, and their legalization - this is, in principle, like, like some kind of suspicion. but what if she definitely had to voice this fake even for 3 minutes. yes, it was later taken away, yes, then it was corrected. that's what she had to do purpose. i do not agree with it, it is not ukrainian, the agenda is absolutely european and scare the europeans. of course, just the participants dream half of the participants. so european. you how you feel right at all for 40 seconds, please, the first most important place of something statement. was of course about the experiment. he is depicted here, in my opinion, six hundred billion dollars, more precisely, as if the euro in this case is included somewhere. the next one is indeed a serious situation, a difficult humanitarian situation. naturally, the need to increase support, as it was originally supposed to support ukraine, more than one trillion one trillion will be required, at least gradually as the amount is selected, that is, these are just the conditions and there was an argument up to increasing funding. listen, as i did, i knew

how as a sailor and what they started talking about, all the same, women forgot about funding. what are they talking about? there is an amazing feeling here, you know, like nato is the most serious alliance of military organizations, serious ian stoutenberg, head of the most serious military alliance in general in the history of mankind, too, everything seems to be serious, but for some reason, here i am, stoltenberg evokes a feeling of some kind of association with its heroes ilf and petrov , who today suddenly from means to replace hard bargaining. not appropriate here. remember, it’s not time for a comrade to switch to this formula. what is it about, according to stoltenberg, the main task for ukraine now is to preserve as a state, and not some kind of entry into nato thank you

program time will tell, we are working live and now the founder of the brigade is getting in touch with us. east alexander khodakovsky alexander sergeevich hello at one time, yes, and that there at one time and now they say that general moroz is helping the russians well, foreign journalists are sure that now the general’s dirt is helping, in any case, reuters reports, what exactly on the side of russia, it means that dirt is also fighting, and here information appeared and even video frames as shocking as the soldiers vysul literally drown in mud near artyomovsk alexander sergeevich well, immediately, both for me and for many, who saw these shots , the question arises, but ours are also trenches of mud . well, i would definitely say no. if such situations happen, it is extremely rare due to some circumstances. well, for example, we

move around the area and use such defensive lines prepared by someone once in order to take cover, for example, from fire and wait out such a time. we practice it often enough, well, not a red-haired own cop. if there is with someone carefully dug up to us. as a matter of fact, well, during this time they crumbled the walls. uh, water, of course, got mixed with dirt, of course, this is possible, but for a constant finding they are in combat contact. so you turned over with us now alexander sergeevich returned back. so far you have seen alexander sergeevich upside down , but we hear and see him, okay? anything happens, right? so, we are on the line of combat contact. this is not the first month we have been stationary, uh, most of them or performances. she is moving static. only some

plots, respectively, we have a fairly equipped position there. and even more so with the onset of cold weather. we make sure that there are conditions for cooking, first of all. well, for heating, the difficulty arises from the fact that all means of heating are ordinary potbelly stoves, which are carefully provided to us by volunteers. of course, they are understandable in the sense that the infrared technique is lysion. she sees heat signatures very well. and when there is a table of smoke or or a chimney pipe. this, of course, does not disguise positions, therefore, we try to get by with some kind of gas burners, something like ceramic ones, they cook food on them, but in fact, they are also a source of heat, but nonetheless. it's always there. uh, the guys provide us from the cooking system, that is, everything that is needed. we provide, of course, the soldiers on the leninsky touch. at the same time, uh, a mandatory finding. there it happens in a rotational mode. that's where the soldier does not live for weeks, and because there are

no conditions for hygiene there. naturally. we are in a day, two through three, who determines the schedule. it depends on the terrain and your own difficulties. we rotate people, take them to temporary deployment points, and they put themselves in order there. they quickly organized some kind of rural yards, even baths for themselves, therefore, in principle, the conditions of existence are quite acceptable. well, as for military conditions, of course, tell me, dirt really helps us here. well, perhaps only in the context that during the thaw it is very difficult maneuverable some actions large-scale movements, therefore, in this sense, since we are working from the defense of the dirt. she, of course, is on our side, because it is more difficult for the enemy, who is now planning some more offensive operations through the mud, to move alexander sergeevich well, all attention is now focused on artyomovsk. uh, and the us military already right

now. they say that this is the key to defeating the protrusion in the donbass, and if you have not heard the statements of the us army general donkey clark, let's now let's all listen together. i'll ask you to comment on whether this is really true ? let's listen. what do you think the russians are trying to achieve, they will claim to be attacking this city. well, well, look how you act in the army. you have to focus your combat power, so they are focused on this moment, if they take bakhmut, then this will open the door to kramatorsk slavic, but also serve as a kind of springboard for grinding ukrainian forces. and that's what they want to do if they can lend unbearable pressure on these ukrainian forces, if they can get the ukrainians to ask for a ceasefire or a breather, putin will win. so there are places where the ukrainians really need to hold on, they entrenched hold on, but not the essence of big losses. this is a meat grinder.