well, seconds, who are you lieutenant colonel smoky husband, i'm not officially here. i wanted to talk to you about marina and what's wrong with her? as a result, there are serious grounds to suspect that the murderer and fraudster iskra skorokhodova is impersonating your daughter. you're crazy lieutenant colonel fingerprints matched. but you already guessed that something was wrong with her. i also lost my children in the war. give me time until morning. i need to talk to my wife. it will be very difficult for natalya to lose her daughter again. thank you dear

do not call her by that name. what's your name tatiana

in russia premiere of sovcombank get down to business straight away planned repairs took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank and now you're already arguing from the light of the wallpaper in the children's loans from sovcombank to the branch and online conceived done, and in the delicious point of the alps mont blanc a burger with cheese

patties mouth-watering cheese triangles and cappuccino hazelnut chocolate alpine delicious at a delicious point order skip the line in the app. on the constructors city of masters, as well as toys books and board games benda umka do not miss in black friday. fixed rate is great, and now for all fixed rate for all fix the loan rate of 8.9%. this is the opening of more than 100 million prizes and your dreams have come true lama and 100 million rubles. which are sure to be drawn, whether it is from the national lottery dreams,

can take you to the dream. just buy a ticket at iloto.ru and post offices. hello, how i miss you friends. well, when will we meet? good afternoon, i like brother, you are sagittarius my wife's daughter hello, you

yourself must find out what kind of rat is in our department got wound up, you understand for yourself how he is talking to someone from the center and asking them to send an independent person. mom is it true you wanted to get married for giving you can invite you to dance. dance can you hear me? what will you do? just try to kill the builder. cinema one tv presents if you think so.

cinema 1tv presents, well, how was your benefit performance, the sea of ​​​​flowers was wonderful, they were also stolen. i gave them to a friend. and what was the name of this friend alexander the song will be judged by the best producers.

walked through the mountains slopes you mosquitoes sidewalks containers-bars and the oxen falls from their feet voice children tenth anniversary season from december 9 on the first arrested

as i would like to be present at the interrogation. i want to hear in person. what happened to my daughter. well, as you say, sit down from you marina gradova now we will be together.

wait we have to wait a little more. we'll be leaving soon. sit closer to each other. be warm. move on, come on, sit down. come on, my dear . come on boys. everyone sit down wrap it up, it'll be warmer. and my mother loves to cook vanilla syrniki for breakfast, and i always eat them with honey, but dad loves it when syrniki are salty, and mom always makes them separately, that’s

enough, i’ll go, my guts are buzzing. yes, i really want to eat. let's just not another thing tell me about your ear. you know, it was a very funny case. she even talked about her ears. personal information i took marina with me on a business trip for a whole week. i loved it so much, just don’t try to pity someone here. how did marina die?

gradova guys, remember how they rake in the camp?

mom dad let's talk about the great now. lived with him. then she offered to replace the horses. the money was big, but there was nowhere to spend it. and i also dreamed of paris killed it for what? he wanted me back. i

repainted this whole thing. my ear tore. well, then hailstones dragged me to the hippodrome. i hoped that the giants would not notice me, well, the blonde, and why should he look at the stands? well, i noticed. did you know? found and began to threaten that he would tell everything. return to him.

marina in general, i thought. i agree that we can be together again. but only like marina gradova come on, after the races, we'll get to know each other, you'll get divorced later. too bad this name is gone. find the main thing is that i myself do not disappear, yes. good luck. bitter, i bit his lip and fed candies with

poison, i drove him into candies with a syringe. why was it necessary? for me to bleed. if you just drink snake venom, it won't work. and then ugradovo houses books about the snakes of the mountain. you do not feel sorry for the hailstones. they are the second daughter because of you once lost no. the second time they lost it was because of

you. i would go with them to paris, i would run away. but they would have continued to live happily, knowing that their marina was alive, yes, after such a gradov, at least from the service with a bang, they would have been dismissed because their daughter had betrayed his homeland. you are not a daughter. how do you always manage to find something

good. even in such a terrible place. it's better late . it's time for me to go home. probably, my husband has already lost me. who is he, what is his name. what does his name is grigory, is he a polar explorer? was before. good evening, yes, of course. i came.

one more. come on, go. he smells kostya . i'm getting married. in general, iskra confessed everything. belykh was interrogated, i was present. all

the best good evening on the air big game today russian foreign minister sergey viktorovich lavrov gave a big press conference on european security issues. it was timed to coincide with the meeting of the osce council of foreign ministers, which began today in the polish city of lodz warsaw, this year sergey lavrov chairs the osce himself, this year the osce smith does not participate under the far-fetched pretext of the polish authorities. they simply refused him a visa, referring to the sanctions of the european union, this is

an unprecedented case in the entire history of this organization, which has existed as an organization since 1995. prior to this, this structure was called the conference on security and cooperation in europe, and this is a flagrant violation of poland and the function of the chairing country and the rules adopted by the osce, the structure that was created as a platform for dialogue. now he is trying to prevent such a dialogue and is turning into another tool flagellation of russia and this scandal, of course, very clearly reflects the current one. the standing of the osce and the current state of european security in general, the latter is counter-intuitive nato proclaims russia an adversary and wages a hybrid war against it is the actual side of the war in ukraine and all this war, fueling the qualitatively increasing military infrastructure of nato in central eastern europe and so on, the cause of a deep crisis and the european

security system and the osce itself, sergey lavrov sees in the desire of the united states to consolidate its hegemony in this system. actually, through nato, he said this at a press conference today and listen to the cape, of course, uh, we remember how nato was created when the first secretary general of the alliance, mr. control. now what is happening absolutely means the return of nato to those conceptual priorities that were developed 73 years ago, nothing has changed russians want to keep. outside europe the americans want yes, they have already enslaved the whole of europe, and it keeps under control not only the germans, but the entire

european union, so nowhere after the end of the cold war, the philosophy of the dominance of unilateral advantages did not disappear, this basic instinct, which never disappeared from the americans or other nato members. uh explains the reckless expansion of nato, which has also devalued the basic meaning of the osce as a collective instrument of ensuring equal indivisible security and has depreciated all these beautiful documents that have been adopted in the osce, uh, since the 1990s years. today we will discuss this bleak situation in the field of european security and the prospects for the development of both this system and the osce, as well as how all this is seen from china a and how the new cold war affects china with dmitry sals, president of the center for national interests and

a professor at the higher school of economics and professor mmo sergey dmitry sergey gennadievich good evening. good evening, dmitry, but the united states stood still. at the origins, sbse osse henry kinsenger still took part in the first meetings on security and cooperation in europe which began to be held in the seventy- third year. and gerald ford signed together with brezhnev. uh, the final helsinki act and so on. and now the united states is playing a leading role in marginalizing and actually destroying this organization. how did it happen. well, dmitry happened, as in the first place, because this is and the united states with a different president with a different secretary of state, because russia is not the soviet union and russia does not have up to the end of those opportunities to force yourself to be taken

seriously that the soviet union had, but in general, i want to tell you from the very beginning, when this organization was invented. it was a double-nome organization, because for the uh of the soviet union, the main thing was the provisions on the inviolability of borders and on trade cooperation. well , in general, you know that then all these provisions were ignored, we see what happened with trade cooperation, but they are the determination of borders. look how yugoslavia was redrawn. uh, and how generally helped to break it down. eh, the soviet union and suddenly. uh, ukraine, for example, and ukraine is fine to secede from the soviet union, but almost god so that crimea could afford to secede from ukraine well, there was also a third basket. and this

is what interested me the most. i'll tell you the west, and dmitry that i then when i was logged into his advisers agreed to this, i was surprised. did n't they realize that these were delayed action mines? well, immediately after all, how was the helsinki final act signed, uh, a group appeared that became the strike force of the struggle against the soviet regime. so it turned out. it turned out that there was a group of people in uh? including cska of the cpsu, including in the world, which then decided that the third basket what should be accepted if you want to promote, because they

did not have influence and did not have arguments, how to achieve internal reforms in the soviet union on their own and they were looking for how involve the west in this process, if you want soviet internal reforms, the third basket, reticle vision was a useful tool for them. i'm sure they never thought it would go this far. how did it go now? well, in general, they wanted to promote this third picture. how do i know about this, it's not conspiracy theories. and the bazaar said this opinion and not some official person secretly shared it with me. people who occupied large, not the most important posts, well, at the level of deputy ministers, deputy heads of departments of cska how did they

promote this third basket, which is for them was also the most important and now it has grown. uh in what we see when uh let the foreign ministers out. e russia to the osce session, but under an absolutely far-fetched pretext, what they say? against him, the sanctions of the european union for sanctions, this applies, and not to his viz, but not to his existing financial assets in europe. and er, that's what they allowed themselves to do for me. i'll tell you honestly, on the one hand, how unpleasant it is for him that this happened, and it is unpleasant for me that the essay is necessary for the russian delegation to be there i was still present, and i understand why it was necessary. i know how, for example, and the soviet

delegation left the security council, when the korean war was being discussed, as a result , they could not curl. they couldn’t curl, but the resolution on the use of force in korea and this gave the united states a mandatory war and everything operates on the principle of unanimity, and therefore it would be a mistake for russia, i think, i’m actually present there, but as a human being it’s unpleasant for me that after the foreign ministers, there they didn’t let me in, after all, russia was forced, but rightly so. considerations, but there attend, but the degree. er, here it is, indeed. you have used it several times, i think. this expression is rudeness , the degree of rudeness, which we usually identify with ukraine. but it began to manifest itself from the side of traditional large e,

states of europe and beyond. i think lavrov is absolutely right in the conclusion he drew from this regarding russia's ability to cooperate with this new europe, let's hear it. is it clear that if and when at some point in time our western neighbors, and our western neighbors and former partners cannot escape from the neighborhood. uh, if they suddenly become interested in somehow restoring joint work on european security, then restoration will not work, because restoration means returning to something that was before. but business, as usual, will not. here is sergei. i wanted to ask you a question, like, we are talking about european security about

what happened in warsaw in general, because there is another very important key platform for the geopolitical struggle. and there will be a lot to depend in this fight on the position that china will take and uh that's what russia can realistically count on. when it comes to china in the current situation, but i have the impression that china is clearly sympathetic. e russian impression. sorry i also have the impression that, and sometimes chinese companies behave according to the principle of friendship is friendship, but tobacco is blood. well, here's a specific question. and if you were to give, uh, advice to the russian leadership, what to expect from china in this crisis, they will give in, they will broadcast

from washington to separate itself somehow from russia a, despite the fact that at the same time, uh, the united states is going to give 10 billion military aid. the question is a good one, voluminous and strategic. the point is that there are two levels here. here in this question. the first level is the chinese european track, which, before our eyes, is practically right after sunok's speech, where he stated the end of this british era of the chinese era, so to speak, the golden age. quite right. and by the way, after the uh, uh, uh, nato ministerial summit in bucharest, where for the first time, by the way, at the nato level china is designated as a challenge, as a threat, there is no military unit, but the political one is very important. these two points, well, they affect, although the chinese position, although in fact, of course, the basic foundation of the colossal sino-european. come

on the interaction of nearly 700 billion trade investment technology. it remains it will be smaller this year, but it remains another matter that the chinese policy in europe becomes more flexible , more diversified. and most importantly, beijing is not wants brussels to work in washington on one track against china, scholz's visit showed, well, some attempt at autonomy, on this track it did not quite work out washington expressed his dissatisfaction and so on. but this is only the beginning of the story. the most important thing is that history will be ahead . the fact is that china, uh, well, first of all, it, of course, froze china, 16+1. this is the madness of lithuania discovered. there is a taiwanese office. e, all e, partially froze one belt at a time, one way across europe it's all there, but the most important thing is that beijing will maneuver, of course, it will maintain the status quo in the economy, but politically, all the more so, all these attacks on human rights in china, traditional for europe, are tougher even than american ones, they will

intensify and remain. you are right. taiwan well , that means that the visits of british parliamentarians to taiwan and so on will remain, that is, the contradiction will intensify, but china will continue. op opposition regarding russian-american-chinese interaction - this is the most difficult issue bali atc a series, uh, a series of all of these, uh, well, first of all , the look itself, of course, biden showed that they understand the problem of the current sino-american interaction. she is also multi-layered. she also has this decoupling economic decoupling. but the most important thing is that biden has an absolute false. in my opinion, the feeling that he agreed on everything, allegedly. er, well, bali and so on. this is actually called the chinese strategy of tricking the emperor into swimming across the ocean, which is the number one strategy. that is, as it were, biden, well an image floats, and across the ocean a conditional chinese one. e.

lay out your cards, blue laid out until the big two is, of course, in the classic version of the attempt there, but the eighties. yes, it is impossible today in the current geopolitical situation, because it is clear that china and russia are one. not an unformed union, but geopolitically. well, even though this has already been repeated 100 times back to back, the zandemin left. under him , this formula was born, but, but this remains in any case. and most importantly, you understand actually. today we are entering. e in the lane. here again, on this second level of the united states, china is in a strip, not just unpredictability, but in a strip of what well, the taiwan issue, of course, will aggravate this permanently, and the situation between beijing and washington is traditionally, a permanent situation on the other hand, what will be the result of economic relations is also not clear. there 's a lot of problems that remain contradictory. and most importantly, of course here. uh, joint patrol

of two strategic bombers, not two. there but two plus two was along the south e, the china sea. well, how would it be a message to washington. yes, there are diplomatic games. yes, there are some, as it were, but mutual well, not exactly a promise, well, contacts are at the highest level, but there is no main military security. this is the most important thing, moreover, look, we have reduced criticism of north korea on launches, and beijing and moscow, we are strengthening the strategic military interaction between russia and china, in fact, we are already de facto not happy about it, the fact that we have formed a security axis in east asia is not called whistle, but she's more flexible. it is more, it is, as it were, more plastic. she responds to challenges. it is quite obvious that you understand this in washington and london in this sense, but most importantly, you see, returning to the european story. the chinese have clearly americans in their subconscious, yes, overseas, but britain is europe how

did centuries of humiliation begin, in general, si came from the british colonial opium expansion, this has not disappeared from the mentality, the political of the entire chinese people. it's in the mind. something he opium colonial semi-colored status, the nanjing treaty, it was britain that opened this historical track. well, you can say the humiliation of the humiliation of china, all this remains, and when london brussels criticizes for violating the rights of rights, well, then the same chinese and historians. yes, and politicians say, excuse me. and where does the humiliation begin? here i have for you. ah, a specific question. uh, now he is going to introduce a ceiling, uh, on the price of russian oil. china can join this, a good question in part, china in my opinion replied to the message speech. well, like a video message from xi jinping at the fourth russian chinese energy forum, which is vladimir vladimirovich putin and the chinese

leader and there uh. well, let's say, well, chinese leaders never play on a straight line, but it was said that china fully supports russia in ensuring global energy security in this, a capacious concept is invested in china will definitely not join. yes, especially since, in principle, all hydrocarbon exports. now the russian is turning. i have in view of china, we have already overtaken saudi arabia. well, almost on a par, we are going to import oil and so on, that is, in fact. it means this one. well, this fuss is european scenes. this one here, where there is a price and political what kind of resource, but pekinul - it's absolutely unimportant. and that's what putin and the dolphin were made to do. their uh, statements made their announced their position. this means absolutely that, well, at least on the chinese track. these here in the so-called m-m ceiling prices or something else some levels absolutely they have resolved these issues,

at least there is stability for russia dmitry do you think this means that in general, here, the hope of the collective west is that they will, so to speak, beat china russia one by one that this is not justified. and that this will greatly interfere with the plans that are being developed in washington. and it seems to me that the policy of the united states creates additional incentives to accelerate russian-chinese rapprochement and strengthen their partnership, united all sorts of states, uh, continue to bet on the fact that sooner or later, china's russia will disperse to different poles; this will not happen. and not only because of the policy of the united states, there is also purely. there are internal bilateral factors that keep russia and china together, but the policy of the united states certainly strengthens the russian-chinese partnership. well, here's what else i wanted to say. we are now witnessing two revolutionary changes simultaneously. the first is

a revolutionary change in china's foreign policy because for the first time in history, in general for the first time in the history of not only the last few decades, but in general for the first time in history, china has a policy and position on european security issues, this has never been uh in previous eras, even under mao zedong, especially , uh during the densiopina and khuzin tau period, china abstained from any position on european affairs, in principle, now china clearly states its position, it criticizes nato expansion, it says that it was us policy and nato expansion that created prerequisites for the ukrainian conflict. and china is in favor of the soonest. uh, settling this conflict through a policy of diplomatic negotiation and criticizing, the united states is openly for continuing to supply ukraine with weapons and so on for continuing the war. i say again, for the first time china has a european policy,

especially in the field of security, and the second revolutionary change is exactly what sergei lavrov was talking about in the quote you quoted, because sergei lavrov said that neither one of the previous models of european security is not suitable for russia, and it is not satisfied with the model promoted by the collective west that russia should take a peripheral position in the nato-centric system of european security will agree with the american hegem and take its place somewhere on the butt chair , or even squatting, so to speak, nearby. here, uh, s, but the nato assistemy for russia is categorically unacceptable. well , that model is also unacceptable for russia. which on over the past 30 years, russia itself has been promoting yes, this model was more equal in rights, but this model was still guided by the fact that russia and the west russia and europe would form a kind of community, a kind of common space. that is something

we must form a joint and integral , including on security issues. we focused on the common security space with the european union mikhail sergeevich gorbachev spoke about a common european home and so on and so forth with this orientation towards something in common joint, and between russia and the west there is no longer and will not be, this does not mean that there will be no more relations with the west at all. and, by the way, lavrov today said hinted. uh, in his speech on, and what will be the new model in relation to russia of the west, including on security issues, this model of neighborhood, this neighborhood, that we need to be neighbors, lavrov said, this model assumes that we are just neighbors yes, and we are not guided by uh, some kind of, uh, common spaces. and that's really important because

that one of the main problems of russian foreign policy is western centrism and europe centrism. here is the orientation of the same gorbachev and after gorbachev towards the formation of an equal, but equal, but european security community. this is also europe centrism of russian foreign policy. it is necessary to move away from this, to finally make it so that europe and the west cease to be for russia what is called the constitution is different, and to get away from the model. and when we shy away from love to hate, the relationship should be neighborhood calm. yes, without focusing on some kind of joint community. that's what lavrov was talking about and it's really easy to do today, because we're building a different community, we're building a common eurasian community with china. we now have a community, and not a pan-european one. russia is moving from greater europe to greater eurasia. that's what we'll talk about today.

it seems to me that sergey lavrov dmitry said. i agree. uh, with everything you said, uh, with one exception, that the transition to this new world order will be easy. eh, i think that the collective west will not give up so easily and that it will take effort. i'm sorry i'll say sacrifice willingness to make sacrifices. and in order for this order to become possible and allow the results. i want to move from the great to the funny and the outrageous to what happened at the munich conference. and you have already spoken about this, this is the munich conference. for years it has been a symbol of a joint conversation between russia and the west about european security. well, there in russia for many years they sang all sorts of sweet songs about how we

love you, how we appreciate you. no, of course, you don’t we will listen about nato expansion no, of course, we will do in yugoslavia what we see fit. no, of course, if we decided to bomb libya, then, in general, you better keep quiet in a rag, but nonetheless. that's how we treat you well. you just learn how to behave well. and now the new head of the munich conference, who, in general, was considered a sane person. for many years he was the chancellor's chief foreign policy aide, he said. that no russians are just officials, but no people who are not part of the russian opposition or who have not fled russia as a sign of protest will not be allowed into this conference at all. he will negotiate. he will negotiate with the russian opposition. let's switch to russian, he will

negotiate with people whom the west controls and pays for. but this one shows that the old model of promises of seduction and ignorance that the collective west applied to russia did not work. now trying the model open confrontation. and uh, they say the launch of such a big russia, of course, huge in territory, but also in terms of population and gross national product of 50 countries of the west of the collective west along the road of ukraine. they are so much stronger. all this is not true, this is all not true, because the collective west does not have the impossibility of indecision to go to the third world war and use nuclear weapons, and without this

it is impossible to defeat russia. they have this superiority, which in practice is very difficult. but in general, at the end of the day, what is said is impossible to realize, that's why i agree with you that we will come to that new world order that you, sergey and you both spoke about to dmitry, but i think that we will come to it with great difficulty and with great efforts. and you need to be ready for it. and god grant that while we go to this world order. we did not get involved in the third world war. dmitry sergey gennadievich thank you very much for this very interesting conversation. we'll be back in a few moments. great, and now for everyone a flat rate

for all bravos and for you. thank you fix online loan rate is a discovery. years for ozone water lilies popor for 239 rubles. to the royal garden service for 999 rubles. black tea curtis for 59 rubles. will you be approved for a loan? a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit for the best

terms if the credit is better. you see, someone who will no longer overpay for communication. yes in reflection you get 350 minutes 35 gb popular. social networks of the video service for 399 rubles. in yota, connect to yota now and in all megafon stores i wonder what's in the box? ogo loan at 4.5% per annum with a guaranteed rate guarantee without surprise mail, bank stressful situation. i recommend magnesium hillar this magnesium hillar is the best absorption and convenient. taking only two tablets a day instead of the usual six, magnesium filatellar, better magnesium and stressful situations. books as a gift from 199 rubles. buy profitable

anatomical for 9.490 rubles. reliable bank. perm moscow arkadak yes, there is no such city. i went there on vacation, and checkin there is a new convenient service for booking hotels throughout russia, which will definitely be the national lottery, can take you to your dream. just buy a ticket to nlotu.ru and post offices like boxing

master for 189 rubles. a year, two, two on black friday. choose polaris smart appliances with discounts up to 55% for a comfortable sleep in order at home and a delicious dinner. tinko makes me happy all the time. and now it pleases even my friends. bring one or two friends, the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. and the friend will get free service forever. kill bring friends until december 20 and participate in the drawing of two hundred million rubles, the more friends, the more chances to win. what where when the winter series of games on sunday after

the time program free bet from winline to all new players up to 10,000 rubles. screw, find out what free bet you get. the great game we just talked about how china has a european policy for the first time in its own history and today. uh is meeting with the president of the european council, charles michel. ah, the leader of china, xi jinping, once again quite clearly and unambiguously stated about the need for a speedy policy of diplomatic settlement of the ukrainian conflict. hear what he said. there is an old saying in china that when the city gates are on fire , the fish in the pond is badly resolved

by political means of the ukrainian crisis. it is in the best interest of europe and the common interest of all countries of eurasia in the current situation. expansion of the crisis should be avoided persistently push for reconciliation and encourage negotiations be vigilant about the risks of bloc confrontation. well, among the european leaders, emmanuel macron, more often than others, speaks of the need for a policy of diplomatic settlement of the ukrainian conflict. today immanuel macron. he held talks with joe biden, and in washington, as part of his state visit to the united states and before these negotiations, the macron said that, in his opinion, negotiations on the settlement of the russian-ukrainian conflict. anything is still possible, and he promised to bring it to biden's attention. but it is clear that the united states is still follow these guidelines. e that from sidimpinya,

that from the macron, the more they are not inclined. here today is our old favorite, now the deputy secretary of state of the united states, victoria nuland. e spoke at the so-called kiev security forum and said, old songs about the main thing that russia needs to inflict a strategic defeat and stated that ah president biden requested an additional 37 billion dollars of military assistance to ukraine from congress here. listen to what victoria said, well, literally just the president baidan, asked congress for an additional $37 billion aid package to ensure that ukraine not only survives these ordeals, but also flourishes as a sovereign, secure, and democratic country, while vladimir putin suffers a strategic defeat. also this week , the lens secretary, in a meeting with g7 colleagues in

bucharest, announced $53 million in aid in the form of power equipment, in addition to the generator already provided. the total cost is about $50 million. ivan alekseevich well exchange rates do not change the united states hm. no, the course does not change, although the internal tension about this course, of course, is growing. yes, we see what is. uh, disagreements are disputes, you know. ah, those disputes. they are like that, they argue. uh, whoever supports the kiev regime more strongly, then they begin, uh, to point the finger that you are wasting american taxpayers' money. what i am trying to say by this is that there is no consistency in positions from different factions within the american state. but that is tension there is tension, apparently, there is a feeling that everything is not going according to plan. and you have to think of something. uh,

there are conflicting statements for the future, but the course does not change, creaks, but does not change. well, there is a contradiction inside. biden administrations, and we talked about them, there are just those like victoria nuland, uh, who say to inflict a strategic defeat on russia, there are people like, uh , mark ellie, chief of the joint chiefs of staff, who says that a military victory is impossible, a therefore it is necessary move to a policy of diplomatic regulation. and then there's the debate between democrats and republicans. a and. uh, future speaker of the house kevin mccarthy reiterated the other day that he will not allow open checks to continue. and to quote this is hard -earned taxpayer money, and he wants to make sure the funding goes where it's supposed to . that is, he did not say that the republican house of representatives would

block the allocation of money at all, but would, uh, put it under more control. a vladimir sergeevich, at the same time, the biden administration writes out just dozens of dozens. billions of dollars, yes, but, that is, to that amount of almost 100 billion dollars, now we need to add 37 billion dollars. now, do you think this will continue under the republican house of representatives, but there is such a good saying, as we know, from our childhood folklore, we would stand for a day. yes, the night to hold out all the activity of the administration is currently aimed at ensuring that until the end of december here in this e session the last session, as in america they say the sessions of the lame duck, and the 117th convocation is to push this application for 37.5, and billions through congress where they control both the house of representatives and the senate, and

i must tell you that a very serious one is really going on in washington right now, so to speak struggle. how to do this, the administration is putting pressure on the leadership of congress and judging by some. uh data, in general, the leadership of the republican faction in the senate, headed by mitchell mcconal, seems to be bending the idea precisely. such is that these 37 billion left by steam locomotive. so to say, a gift to the twenty-third year of 22 in order to secure. that's exactly the administration's policy of further unwinding the spirals of the arms race, you understand . large enough if congress approves these very financial amounts that can be spent, you must tell you that the republicans. well, at least they didn't in the house of representatives

. uh. well, maybe in the open, as it were to oppose, uh, the american general such policy towards ukraine, but they say they are dealing with procedural issues. like, you know, let's do it in such a way that the congress should take some such steps in order to continue funding the government, but we should not do it in such a way that this funding goes far enough, or at least spreads for a significant e, a period of time in the twenty-third year. let's make sure that when congress 118 meets in early january convocation, so that the republicans can also contribute to something, at least to the preparation of these budgets and the budget, including the budgets of the pentagon, because the administration is a rather cunning position. she believes that now it is

necessary to approve. rather, it is necessary to approve, but the budget of the pentagon, er, the law on the allocation of funds for national defense, and somehow so cunningly make up here. it’s ukraine, like that it’s also part of the security that will work out today or not , it’s rather difficult to say, but uh, this is the position that makonal took and uh, in general, leadership republicans in the senate. it is, as it were, the position that, by the way, he occupied throughout. and, to be more precise, since february 1924 and since january, to tell the truth, it has also remained unchanged, and it is rather difficult how the alignment will actually take place here. at the same time, i would even tell you that the opponents of makonal in the person of cruz, uh, also began to indulge in tricks. they suddenly announced that they would not

accept the defense budget. you understand the horror, for the first time in the united states of america, uh, maybe the budget will not be adopted until the end of the year. and why? and you know it's all about vaccination, here. respect the rights of the military, the biden administration, introduced the principle that a soldier must be vaccinated without fail, if you have not been vaccinated, please, so to speak, leave the ranks of the us armed forces here they said no no. let's save the rights of our military personnel. if they want to be vaccinated, let them be vaccinated. and if they don’t want to be vaccinated, then don’t, but those who were fired under the article that they don’t even want to be vaccinated can be restored. e back in his rights and go back, but i do not know in the barracks or doing my duty. these are also curiosities that are going on today. well, how is her way. they will already be specifically resulting. i think he's through, at least in the next two weeks.