adopt the defense budget oh, you know, the first time in the united states of america, uh, maybe such a budget will not be adopted until the end of the year. and why? and you know, it's all about vaccination, you have to respect the rights of the military, the biden administration, introduced the principle that a soldier must be vaccinated without fail, if you have not been vaccinated, please, so to speak, leave the ranks of the us armed forces, they said no. no , let's keep the rights of our military personnel. if they want to be vaccinated, let is vaccinated. and if they don't want to be vaccinated, then don't, but those who were fired under the article that they don't want to be vaccinated can even be reinstated. e back in his rights and go back, but i do not know in the barracks or doing my duty. these are also curiosities that are going on today. well, how is her way. they will already be specifically resulting. i think he is through, at least in the next 2 weeks. we'll see it, but the struggle that's

the inner tension. it is felt and undercover struggle. she is here, of course, decisive with january. this struggle will only be intensified and, of course, the bureaucratic decision-making process will be hampered and the work of the bureaucratic mechanism. the investigations that the republicans initiate in relation to the biden administration will also be difficult, so to speak, they will not make life easier, at least in terms of implementing the policy towards ukraine well, here's another factor, uh, that affects the us in general western policy is the exhaustion of weapons, and the united states and especially europe are facing this a. here is a situation that is really critical . tony blinkin, for example, spoke about this at the meeting of the foreign ministers of the nato countries that took place this week. he says that it is necessary to restore the old soviet-era factories in the countries. harassing europe so that they again

produce soviet weapons and ammunition for soviet weapons to supply ukraine, because western stocks are already, but coming to an end, but uh, here, and even more so, this problem is typical for france today, macron, just e promised to talk about ukraine with biden. yes, and the publication of the politician planted a big pig on the macron, because it was on the day of biden's negotiations with the macron. and this publication wrote that france would no longer be able to supply weapons to ukraine simply because of the depletion of its own resources and would try to compensate. this is economic civil assistance and so on. in any case, a meeting of the biden macron has already taken place. i mean the negotiations, a took place and in the welcoming words that they uttered. naturally they they emphasized the common values ​​that historically

unite france. the united states and that now they are for these common values, supposedly fighting together against russia, especially joe biden emphasized this. here, listen to what he said. as nato allies, together with the countries of the g7 of the european union and our partners around the world, we are today confronting the ambitions of vladimir putin and the war against ukraine, which once again broke the peace on the european continent france and the united states once again together defend the democratic values ​​that lie at the foundation of both of our states, both of our countries are committed to ideals. freedom freedom equality brotherhood we prove to people around the world that democracy works. well, macron, of course, also didn’t get into his pocket for a word. um, listen to what the president of france said. it's a

great honor for us, mr. president, to be here today at your white house. as you yourself just said, our two peoples fought together for freedom. at first they fought for the independence of your state. then the united states brought great sacrifices, storming the beaches of normandy, therefore, our common history unites us today. when the war returned to the european continent due to the fact that russia attacked ukraine, our countries again stand by the bulls. we have become brothers in arms again, because we have fraternal ties. bonds. we must set high goals for ourselves. our countries are united by common democratic values, common ideals, a common desire for enlightenment for science for knowledge. we must meet these challenges together. this is our common destiny. we must give the world hope, long live the friendship between france and the united states. uh, ivan alekseevich here. here, i

paid the most attention to the phrase or reservation to macron, but it seems that he read from a piece of paper that the united states and france are brothers in arms, as far as i remember, the official position of nato is that they are not a party to this conflict, and macron says brothers in arms. here is how to interpret this and how it generally fits with the fact that this morning the macron spoke about the expediency of political and diplomatic settlement. well uh. you probably noticed more. i don’t even know what to pay more attention to the fact that it was read by a macron or even that someone wrote it to him, that two. so these people are together for independence. uh, the american fought. here too. in general, it's funny. i think that here, uh, the americans were packed, as they say, very tightly. uh, very important for the macron now.

theses, namely, he needs to create this whole atmosphere, that france and america stand shoulder to shoulder , we are companions, we are together, even now, as it were, he is like that virtually pushes britain away from the american master with his elbows. here he is in this fight of elbows for a place closer to the owner. here he clearly now won this visit. here we are next, well, then in the closed part, of course, it will follow that we are companions do not destroy. yes, this is returning here to the law about the fight against inflation, what else to talk about it, but we are companions. we are here together, and the whole story. well, they lied a little embellished somewhere. here are the facts, so to speak, corrected from the oven writers, but this is necessary was to create a feeling we are close. we are together do not destroy, and as i said. here is a macro.

i relied on bending before the americans in such a way that they really didn’t destroy, and all this, in contrast to, of course, is very difficult. we don't look good yet as a result of scholz's visit to uh. china what, then, how does this contrast with some other macron statements? yes, of course, it contrasts because there were expectations that he would come to washington almost to knock on the table with his fist and demand something, uh, and so on and so forth is clearly the atmosphere in washington this visit is rather different. eh, if you speak a little to such simple language. e macron, he greases up, but he greases up, and i do not exclude that it will be another matter for him, as the americans are proya. yes, that's what will throw what bones as a result of the macron? ah, the macronooks will throw

more, or in general, like this, purely on e, here they will divorce on e, all these big words, but they wo n’t throw anything material. well, maybe something material will be thrown in, but these are all statements about him that france will take some special position there and strive, among other things, to resolve the ukrainian crisis. i think it was all. it was a trade. uh, it was he who was building a position for a trip to washington. and in washington, everything will be rented out for a good or not very good price. well, it seems to me that macron has become a victim of his own pathos. that's right, uh, because the united states and france were brothers in arms, indeed, uh, during the american war of independence in world war i war in world war ii, yes. and the macron, on the same level, put the

current nato hybrid war against russia on the same board. that is, in fact, he acknowledged, thereby, that they are fighting against russia, but ivan tsarevich completely agrees with you that the main priority of the macron in these negotiations, the other it is economic. macron, trying to convince biden to do for europe for france well, or the european union in general, exceptions to the application of the american anti- inflation law, which threatens europe yes industrialization. and here i am speaking at another event this morning. macron has already made completely different statements, both in tone and in content, there, if shoulder to shoulder, then with a very active elbow. yes, but the macron worked. listen to what he said today. the risk is that when faced with the crises that i spoke about, the united states of america

looks first and foremost towards the united states of america, which is normal. we ourselves do this , secondly, the united states looks towards rivalry with china and europe and, accordingly, france is becoming somewhat of a variable political choice of the last few months. in particular, the plan to fight inflation is a choice that will split the west. and vladimir sergeevich well, macron is criticized by the united states in e. accuses the united states of protectionism threatens to split the west by splitting the west so do you think the biden will, uh, listen, will the united states change its policy? how will transatlantic relations develop in the trade and economic sphere? yes you correctly placed accents, really. uh, the problem is growing and it has been growing for quite a long period of time, when there

were already headlines in the press that week that a trade war between the european union and the united states was starting precisely in connection with the act that you mentioned. the fact is that the act is absolutely protectionist, it contradicts not only interaction and relationships, uh, the us and allies, but also, uh, it contradicts, uh, wto rules. that is, these are absolutely protectionist acts. we have long been talking about what the united states is promoting protectionist policy. as a matter of fact, the idea is to get rid of dependence on russian gas at 200 euros for even less per thousand cubic meters and impose on the american gentlemen 2,000 euros per 1,000 cubic meters, and on which now the united states has received steady economic growth rates in the third quarter. purely through sales. uh, gas to europe, so here are all these positions. they say that this is an annoyance. no, by this act, it grows. why because the usa it seems to me that they will not give up this position. in any case, they will pursue their interests, and note that this is exactly what the macron said, that for the us, us interests are a priority. he already

understands that most likely they will not refuse, and, uh, why they will not refuse, the fact is that there is no unity in europe on this issue. please note that germany initially adopted a plan to save the economy in the amount of 200 billion euros. the first who began to condemn them for this was germany. i'm sorry, france france was the first to start right away that you you destroy the split of the european union, you break it, and the only one of the european union, you make a split in the ranks. this is all incredibly wrong. you have to distribute the funds to all the countries of the european union germany said no, and also added 100 billion for the purchase of american weapons, which france did indebted, thought of something else and provided it 2 weeks ago. uh, so to speak , the french economy's own program of fears. for what amount of 200 billion euros? the same penny for a penny, what does it say? this says that the unity did not work out, in addition, the problem associated with the gas pipeline, er, which was supposed to go through france towards germany, where again the only one did not work out.

we remember the famous summit, and germany and france on the results of which they did not even go to the press together, so, uh, that's it. this suggests that the split in the european union is forcing these former allies, let's say directly, to move towards the united states and sit around for some relaxations to be made in the act. and since this is a request, she unlikely to be satisfied. and vladimir sergeyevich , you agree that the united states will not renounce this act and will not make concessions to the macron, these are videos that, from my point of view, showed the matter not in statements. look at biden's facial expressions. after all , he looked maliciously at the macron. we already beat you guys. you and i figured everything out. now you're singing, so to speak. quite obvious yes, the economic doctor of the united states of america is incommensurable with the economic power of france and the question. in general, it's really settled here. come on, but a purely american approach. come on, in general,

you first help us in ukraine. and say help, and then we will go to meet you. and here the question arises. what meeting? i would say another thing, but this one, macron, went to houston with a kamala grayling. and what did he say there? a take our french cosmonaut to the moon. so i think this will end, biden. he understands perfectly well that macron's fanfare may not be limited to these billions of dollars, but let's take the cosmonauts of france to the moon and guys. take it easy straightaway. you see, we will raise the prestige of france, now we are playing the height that we will lower your economy. well, this may not be very important. the main thing, as they say. once again you confirm that you will fly on american technology, and these american technologies will determine both your domestic and your foreign policy. well, uh, we thought that the macron is one of

the most outrageous, uh, politicians in europe in a positive sense, i’m also negative there, like johnson is fighting, but fanfare is typical in europe not only macron, but also, as it turned out, ursula von der lein, which is strange, because she is german, but yesterday ursula von der lein made a lot of noise with a loud statement that the european union is making a decision and will confiscate russian not only private, well, state assets, that is, the sovereign assets of the central bank, are frozen. uh, according to the european unions. this statement had the effect of a bombshell yesterday. today, according to the wall street journal, the european union is already, in fact, refuted the words of ursula von deret. and they said that they cannot confiscate the frozen assets of the russian central bank because of the international principle of state immunity and in this regard. uh, the european commission

will propose to establish a fund to manage liquid assets, and give profits from these liquid assets to ukraine vladimir sergeevich please explain what we are talking about? well , the fact is that yes, it was really quite recently literally . this is indeed a very strong statement and confiscation of assets. and we will wait for things by their proper names robbery, in broad daylight. what is there to say? ah, of course it was absolutely against the rules against. uh, in general, everything that can be called so. why. because it really was a pure robbery. that is, and the most interesting thing is that when it came up, ursula vonderlein said that we will bring the rules under this confiscation, that is, there are no rules yet, but there are no straightened ones yet, then, accordingly, it’s, so to speak, e to pull out the wallet in the subway. that's about from the same series, and today's statement really sobers up this situation somewhat. why because it is this scheme that is by and large used in relation to the assets that the russian federation uses, and in relation to those companies that have left our country and in order

to save jobs, save and, in fact, factories and enterprises, trade enterprises , and so on , accordingly, a new, so to speak, administration has been introduced there, which manages these assets. and i think it's about the same story. another thing is that you understand, as soon as we are talking about creating a certain structure that will manage something, it is immediately clear. where will the income go? here, well, they will not go to ukraine. this is how any fund that creates to save poor countries always ends up with all the money i spend on experts from abroad from western countries who receive money for the fact that they advise something there for translators for trips, flights of residence and etc., i.e. african countries. so why are they used to the fact that when a rescue fund is created, er, african countries of poverty, everything always ends up with just this money. as a result, they don't get about the same story in ukraine; in fact, the interest lies in the fact that these funds are managed and profit from it. that’s it, we’ll form for a few moments now, and then we’ll talk about china

basta concert at luzhniki tomorrow after the

time of a thousand books program

dear passengers, the ozon sale is starting and more. and what kind of wagon is the wagon of the final sale of the year, jump in. the final sale of the year on ozone lacquer charm for 109 rubles for 999 rubles. sovcombank go straight to the point, conceived repairs, took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank . we are pleased to receive cashback for

services, but it is even more pleasant to see how it turns into something really tangible. now a single cashback wallet has appeared in the mts ecosystem, with which you can pay for your favorite services or buy gadgets. the vtb team will offer a solution credit card opportunity from a reliable vtb bank is 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now at vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. don't worry about it so much with these gifts we'll manage to do everything. choose goods in the citylink app and immediately pick up in the store conveniently. it works here, remember all the gifts, we take discounts up to 60% for 1,000 dollars a million and your dreams come true lama and 100 million rubles. which will definitely be

play the national lottery. can take you to the dream of just buying a ticket on iloto.ru and post offices. burn fill a bunch of applications for loans in banks. compare will help fill out just one application for loans. get approval on the best terms from the largest banks in the comparison. if credit then compare. choose the best. my ex is calling, partner listen, let's go faster at work, by the way, we are just an envious operator number one in terms of internet speed and coverage. the megaphone

of the ground forces was already fundamentally different from what they saw on the fields of the second world war. if you create tools that can hit there, well, the moments when he can set you up for you, you get a significant advantage , the most powerful scientific forces, the most powerful design teams will be attracted, and in total it turned out with a system of efficiency, which was simply indescribable russian god of war history artillery premiere on saturday on the first broadcast of the

big game, we already mentioned today that three-hour talks took place in beijing today president of the people's republic of china xi jinping and e, head of the european council, charles agenda. in fact, it was very extensive, it included both ukraine and the situation in the south china sea, that is, the taiwan conflict a and trade and economic relations between the european union. and china and even the issues of protests. well, in china now there are e going, well, quite large-scale protests against anti-covid, and restrictions and a, as the press service of charles michel reported. he raised this issue. uh during the negotiations cd-pinem and uh, even stated that human rights are universal, that is, criticized , uh, cd but as far as the economy is concerned, otherwise, in fact, the eu and china are very large trade economic partners. to date, their trade turnover in the

twenty-first year is 732 billion dollars, and china is the main partner of the european union for imports and the third partner of the european union for exports. yes, that is, most of the imports from china and a little less, but nevertheless, uh, 10% of all exports of the european union accounts for china and 22% of all european union imports also come from china, but in europe they believe that such an imbalance, with a very serious economic interdependence , adds strength to the position of the european union, saying that china will be interested in maintaining access to the european market, because china has a lot of things going there, but they export, but at a meeting with charles, michel, siddimping said that the european market is not open enough and called for greater openness , obviously, probably. keeping in mind technological

restrictions. hear what sit-down china said stay open to european companies hope the eu can remove interference to ensure a fair and transparent business environment for chinese companies china and the eu should strengthen macro policy coordination and complementary benefits. jointly create new engines of growth and ensure the security, stability and reliability of industrial supply chains and sergey gennadievich, how important is europe for china as a trade partner? and, and, does china expect that europe will maintain a relatively independent course, and in economic, at least, e cooperation with china, that is, will not follow the path of decoupling. uh, what is the united states required of europe? yes, you know, in general, of course, china 's european relationship, and trade in general, of course, lies on a wider scale. e mutual well, the chinese are primarily

commercial, trade, investment technological interest. you correctly cited the numbers 732 for this year will be smaller, but not critically smaller, that is, it is more than sino-us trade. it is somewhere around 600 e 30-640 billion, and, therefore, the most important thing is, that's when charles michel formed the agenda under this negotiation. there was an emphasis on economic trade issues quite right, but this is the agenda, but it was. well, as if deformed, it has been refined, or rather, slightly changed in connection with the unrest that you quite rightly mentioned. they are under anti-covid restrictions. and here it is, uh, subject well, classic violation human rights. she became, as it were, well, not that mainstream, that is, the main theme, but she began to be present there in these negotiations. she will be present and this is a mistake. the first is charles michel, because yes, five years ago, the economy determined china's position in terms of. anyway, but

today the economy does not always determine, er, well, the logistics of chinese steps. yes, of course, this is important, but not only does it really show both chinese-american and other tracks, and the second moment is fundamentally important, you understand, that charles michel uh, well, how would he try to reconcile the incompatible on the one hand. these are, uh, the so-called western well, european values, and europe is more zealous. just for the observance, so to speak, of human rights. even more than the americans and others, they generally have some kind of universal feature. here and at the same time get to achieve some commercial trading benefits by saving. here is this moment, that is, an unconnected thing, and you understand before that. well, a month ago or a little less there was a visit. uh, halls and scholts in germany and there schultz, as it were, in a pekinsor. yes, of course, i dragged part a, but there were agreements on the problems of german china projects, of course. well, the french, so to speak, were

excited in the plan too. and why are we, they are all on the same side? i mean, the european leaders, led by charles michel, line up for the reception of the sindipin, and on the other hand they cave in, well, in front of their american voters there, according to criticism, china contradiction. and they do, that is, uh, a meeting with a likasian. yes, china has it, but jamshuli will also follow as a speaker in the snp, all the chinese are representatives of the people, and this, of course, is the topic, but this struggle for human rights, and it can even be somewhere more than economic. and, after all, even charles michel has a certain, well, no offense, when they threw out his performance at the shanghai expo when he tried on the chinese already at home. so to speak, to criticize the chinese for violating rights and so on. and even more so now these anti-covid ones reinforce this agenda. well , the struggle, that is, e is not an easy task for a very simple one, that is, to get out of these scissors, and what

will outweigh the commercial or political, this humanitarian in quotation marks. uh, the ingredients are unclear. but the fact that these relationships will not be easy. it’s definitely a question that they correctly posed, will there be hmm well, the chinese-european version in terms of colors, how american-chinese is a good question, because but because brussels still works, it sort of defends an autonomous position with respect to washington, here you have a disconnection, and we have quiet and smooth surface and god's grace there will be no god's grace, because the most important thing is, after all, these so-called political values. they will undermine to dismantle this foundation. this is very important. here, i just wanted to say, vladimir sergeevich, well, indeed, in europe there is no single approach to relations with china, and anna lena ber god is the minister of foreign affairs. e of germany says that human rights are more important than the economy of scholz, it seems to adhere to another. opinion sharn

michelle is apparently trying to really crossbreed. horror hedgehog, yes, and save. uh, economic cooperation with china while uh pointing to china means human rights issues. here in the economy, europe will be able, in your opinion, to save. here are some remnants of constructive interaction with china, all the more so. we remember that jose barrel , the eu high representative for foreign security policy, called cooperation with china in the economy one of the pillars of european well-being. get all your priorities right everything. right. the only thing that, uh, today's visit of michel, spoiled it very much. so to say, this visit, uh, schultz's previous visit, which was just mentioned. the point is, uh, when schultz was on his way to this meeting with the chairman. from the people's republic of china, he would have gathered a representative delegation of businessmen from germany and, uh, the press was about the fact that there was, literally, almost a fight for a place in this retinue.

why because the germans really want to get new sales markets and they are accordingly focused on this and i am sure that the chinese comrades knew about this, respectively, the visit of e, scholz, and, so to speak, his attempt to establish cooperation with china to expand cooperation, despite the fact that the united states clearly does not want this cooperation. and here is michel's visit today. he was spoiled by this chinese leader already knows that europe glory he knows that europe will not refuse cooperation with china he knows that he has the ability to push. the same, the same situation as just discussed with you in president bider europe will ask for cooperation impossible to replace chinese goods. today. it is necessary to rebuild all production chains, and it is impossible to do this quickly in europe, and already there are problems with food and fertilizers. well , now let's do it lightly. with light industry, which is not so easy to change over with shoes with uh, technology and so on. well, it will. complete in general, uh, complete degradation of

the european economy, no one will allow this, and the chinese leader knows this, well, we have already mentioned a little problem e protests. uh, in china, actually, their scale should not be overestimated compared to what is happening in europe. this is not a protest at all. yes, but nonetheless. that's just a certain fermentation. let's just say e in large chinese cities began immediately from washington, we heard old songs about the main thing, and moreover, a in the presentation of the republicans. yes, those who now u work in u institutions that seem to be almost in favor of neo isolationist, uh, foreign policy, but the united states, but nonetheless. here. uh, listen. e. listen to what two prominent figures in the foreign policy establishment of the republican party, and a former deputy national security adviser, write. vice president richard's reading is the

bush jr administration, meaning steven gates and the former senior adviser to the us state department under the bush jr administrations and uh, donald trump, christian whit, winton. listen to what they write. eh, in general, the times. the chinese took to the streets in several major cities to protest the tyrannical covid-19, due to which many people have been locked up in protests for months, however, not only were they directed against these restrictions, but they also demonstrated the calls of the chinese for democracy, including the end of the rule of the leader of the chinese communist party, physical zenping, as usual, the biden administration . she was caught off guard and did not pursue a policy aimed at advancing the interests of the united states the white house issued a mild statement about the right to peaceful protest and could not even bring herself to condemn the quarantine measures due to covid-19 in china that can do today on china congress and the white

house must provide clear and unequivocal moral support to the protesters we and our allies must make it clear to beijing that the suppression of peaceful demonstrations will be strongly condemned and cease cooperation on other issues president biden must clearly say that america though has to deal with the government in beijing but my support for those chinese who want democracy in china at last when we are dealing with the communist party. china, we must understand that the party is not speaks for all the chinese people , it should be clear to the entire us government that we share the ultimate goal of protesting in china as much as we would with those who fought against the communist soviet bloc in the last century. well, it seemed that the opposition was the science- conservatives, who prevailed at the beginning in the first part of the bush presidency in the early 2000s. they are weakened because of the defeats

that the united states suffered in iraq and afghanistan well, well, here again yes, as viktor stepanovich said, this never happened, and now again, vladimir sergeevich well, the humpbacked grave will fix it. well, in short, this is an important symptomatology. now, from my point of view, it’s just a powder to breed the biden administration. but the most important thing behind this, in order to clearly articulate it, is to put china at the center of american foreign policy today. that's when maybe today the administration is balancing, on the one hand, russia on the other hand. china, maybe even the administration would give more, and priority with its relationship with russia through ukraine and in second place. china that's exactly what the republicans want to push, they want to depose. this vector, you know, they want really quite seriously. in this case, quarrel uh, china uh, the united states. the americas will be back, maybe someone to the degree of

tension that was on the tromp. that's taking advantage of the very thin. these are human rights. that being said, the creed of the democratic party is behind it. as they say, the party stood and even the pilose came, and for us this is important again. what emphasize that this shift could lead to , and could be within 23 years, that the administration would put less emphasis on the confrontation with russia, respectively, the priority of e-ukraine, so to speak, and focus its efforts on china because the confrontation with china cannot pass. if i may say so, well, as they say in america with one hand, china is not the same, as they say, uh, the country and not the enemy in the american sense, to which you can lead like this through the sleeves. no, he demands really serious restructuring of all

foreign policy priorities. this is what we need to emphasize clearly. and today the republicans are trying to turn this around. well, at the same time justify. if you want trump, trump was right. this is how you should build relations with china and not the way you built under obama and now have a bit more. they would continue this course based on the idea of ​​this hellebore. what are you, here, if here is china and america - these are the two shores of the great pacific ocean there, i don’t know the west of the harbor and so on. no it is a serious adversary, and he must stand at the center of american strategic interests. in any case, the republicans insist on an even tougher confrontational policy towards china in all forms. economically , militarily and politically ideologically , therefore, with the strengthening of the position of the republicans in the united states government, us policy towards china is no more constructive. will become in

any case, but even the current policy of the biden administration does not show any signs of their decision to easing here this week the secretary of the united states department of defense e. she presented another policy document on china, which just testifies to the invariability of the course towards the continuation of confrontation , this is the pentagon's annual report to congress on the development of china's military power and chinese security policy. first, listen to how this paper assesses china's overall security strategy. china's national strategy aims to achieve a great revival of the chinese nation by 2049, the strategy is to resolutely pursue political social and military modernization to expand the national power of the prc, improve governance and redefine the international order in a way that supports the political regime of beijing and advances its national interests. the

prc strategy involves a determined effort to accumulate and the use of all elements of its national power to bring the prc to the leading position, the continuous competition of the system, since the prc aims to achieve a national renaissance by its centenary in 2049. this report highlights beijing's desire to reform, the existing rules-based world order, to achieve this goal, an external environment conducive to the fulfillment of the prc's strategic imperatives were defined in the concept of a community of shared destiny of xi jingping and implemented through the global security initiative and the global initiative for development ivan alekseevich but uh, how do you rate a similar american perception of china 's goals, and what is especially important here for me is that they still proceed from the fact that china wants to change the world order, but under the world orders. they

understand american leadership and american hegemony. yes, you are absolutely right that they emphasize this, but to me, uh, uh, i don’t want to say that i’m completely sure of this, but i gradually see such a thought while i ’m working with this, like with the hypothesis that after all this is rhetoric rhetoric, because here they are screwing it up. uh, there are some negative meanings in these texts. yes, someone here, a, is trying to disrupt the order. yeah, that means he's a mess. yes, that's something bad or is there something aggressive there. well, some of the root links above the text said that the alternative to the american rule-based order is chaos, yes, it's easy for them. here they are trying to return all sorts of such words, but after all, if we discard these stratifications, there is such an impression that the special words used with a negative, and the meaning with

negative connotation is the essence of a very simple china is growing. the guard continues to wind up on this, that and he uses his height to harm everyone, and he will be bad. this is purely an assumption. while the united states is scolding the seceded states, i'm already scolding the fact that china is growing, did the united states have the idea that they gave china growth? yes, they allowed him to occupy a certain niche in the global economy. therefore, in america there was such an idea, what does it mean that they want to turn off chinese chinese growth, in fact, trump tried. on how much do we do it? and when it didn’t work out, they are worried about this fact that someone is growing up without them, they are worried about someone else’s independence, and then the notions begin about the fact that allegedly someone will take advantage of this negatively. i want to emphasize this evolution, because for what they used to

criticize, for example, the soviet socialist system, we were told that you are growing wrong. i don’t know about you, stalin’s repression camps, humanitarian. the price of your growth is incompatible with the goals and achievements of this growth, therefore, here is our communism, our capitalist system , they said, it provides, as it were, a more humane growth without such mass repressions, and so on and so on and so on. well, it seems like, well, everyone there believed or did what they believed, well, there really were a lot. costs, what can i say in e socialist model of growth. and now now china is growing there, which is solid. what is a violation of human rights? well, there are, of course, some separate phenomena, but what about the western point of view of the western point of view. and that in america there is no violation of rights

human? well, there is also, but in france, therefore, this is all exaggerated. and then when they make these assumptions about the fact that somehow china will misbehave. it's all this assumption that will concern them with the fact that there is sovereign growth. and they can do nothing about it, and china intends to continue this sovereign growth. that's what it's about that the united states they thought that here they are in control of the world system. so this is, as they say now, such an ecosystem of them. yes they some people will be given the opportunity to get rich, while others will not. for example, they were sent to staffing. uh, in a long japan yes, japan grew up, and then once again for 30 years in a flat trajectory. yes, it seemed to them that they could do it right, but with china it did not work. this doesn't work with us. and this is where they care. well, they can't just

say. that's honest. you know the problem is that they are on their own and we want everything to mean, uh, they can’t dance to our tune, so they still lay the essence of it, so to speak, and then layered on it. here is the disruptor. yes , we use this powerful for something for something else, therefore. it seems to me that this is a layering, but the essence is simple; they are worried about someone else's sovereign development, which becomes a fact, and they cannot come to terms with this fact, but they are really worried about the fact that they have realized that they have realized not the ability to control the development of the world, not the ability to direct the development of the world in the right way for their channel, because i completely agree with you in the nineties and two thousandth years, american magazines on international relations and was filled with articles about how the us manages the development of other great powers. and it is in these terms. but now it turns out that it does not manage in any way and but the independent

development of other great powers is really. it is perceived by them as a challenge, and, of course, the strengthening of china is perceived by them as a challenge, especially in the nuclear missile sphere. let's hear how the pentagon assesses the prospects of this area, and china's military power in 2021, china continued to build three mine fields for solid -fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles, which together will contain at least 300 new missile silos in 2021. beijing has probably accelerated the pace of its nuclear arms build-up, the ministry of defense estimates that china's operational stock of nuclear warheads has exceeded 400 units, but the ak plans to generally complete the modernization of its national defense and armed forces by 2035, if china maintains the current pace of nuclear expansion, then in 2035

he will probably have a reserve of about 1,500 warheads. from this it follows that by the thirty-fifth year, according to the us department of defense. china will become a full-fledged third nuclear superpower practically on the level of russia and the united states. and if you believe, here they are. opinion about 300, and mines, then this is a two-fold doubling in a year among gennadievich here. do you agree with such assessments and also with the general, so to speak with the general leitmotif of this report that china wants to change the world order. well, first of all, as far as this report is concerned, and here, uh, these figures they are somewhere overpriced somewhere politicized. of course, china is developing its strategic triad, this is quite obvious, but this is a medical fact that there is a very large asymmetry between the usa and china, of course one to three one to four 1:5, there is a 350 and

1,500 ratio of warheads and so on. this is in general, uh, and the western one is the swedish institute, the stockholm institute confirms and so on. here, as if here we are talking about such nuances, the second point is more important. here's what if they asked and the fact that ivan alekseevich raised this problem. you understand three points, and the first one, well, wow, you understand , in the very chinese, as it were, geopolitical thinking. e, for 5,000 years , there is no modern plast and for the future, e, unlike the americans, the same british, the british empire does not have this innate world expansionism, as a global world empire in the historical context. yes, there have always been empires, but they have always been local and regional. that is, it is not british, the empire and so on. that is, this here, uh, feelings or as if attempts, but to create some kind of chinese. ah, the great empire after all. this no is ontologically no, as it were, at the level of gene memory. it

's a completely different story americans do not understand they have on their own, as a whole, the west more than that, here, mentioning in the document a community of a common destiny. these are not exactly political documents. this is some. uh, such a mental concept of soft power, china, where there is an idea of ​​pluralism of civilization of the most diverse values, unlike the americans, who on imposing their universal in china, this is precisely the community of a common destiny, that is, there are different parallel tracks of civilizational economic political. and the third exchange is the most important thing that causes hysteria in americans. this was not the case when china was in the system of american globalization in the nineties. and today it's just some kind of crazy screeching. the fact is that china has managed on the one hand for 30 years. uh, make a convergence model synthesis. like, ah, well, a socialist hard economy with elements or sectors of a liberal economy like it or not, socialism with chinese characteristics is an option. well, a new one, or, as

it were, an update of some kind of modernization option, it is successful. he is. there, cons. there are pluses and difficulties, but it is definitely developing on its own. regardless, now the stage has come, when china has entered a new qualitative growth. here is this synthesized model of socialism and capitalism, as if breaking away from that monopoly anglo-saxon. american model and it causes crazy frenzy in washington dc in brussels and so further. that is, it just doesn’t fit , the idea of ​​​​the so-called, well, a head-on collision here, uh, means that the trap is not a trap, but the trap the fukedin trap, perhaps it is, but this does not mean that a head-on collision. china will avoid this frontal. he is not ready, neither military-technical, nor does he want to. but this, in his mentality, he will avoid walking. but the fact that, of course, this is a gigantic convergent synthesized chinese model, dzhonka shukhoy, sh-shvy. uh, the jury, that is

some socialists with chinese characteristics is that it will continue to be filled with further development, independently more and more independent. this is absolutely accurate, and therefore all these documents are political, military, strategic, they all show that china is bad. well, in the sense that it’s bad systemically, it’s not just that the uyghurs, so to speak, are supposedly offended there, or the tibetans? no, he 's bad. according to the system, because he found his way, neither a copy there, liberal or there, well, as if socialist in its pure form, stagnant master your model your way. and it doesn't fit at all. here in this in this vision of the future of the world. well, i mean, the anglo-saxon, which has long been established from here, the rules of the game from here, the system mode, and the auto- well, sort of a sitimpin dictatorial mode and so on, synjing improves on the danceopin model. - it 's completely, understandable. yes, there are problems. and as for the anti-covid ones, the regime is already softening, china will decide all this. rest assured. everything, it will come to naught, after a while they will forget

in general about it. that is, this is an attempt, as it were, to pull out a small one and make it. the main thing from the side. in the west, it will be constant. well, the chinese are calm people in this regard. they are, as it were, ah, well, what if they are fueled by their many thousands of years of history , their philosophy, their religions, their sense of history in general. just like one, uh, one moment. and as the stories are long, where everyone should live equally in parallel, not absorb each other, so to speak, the most important thing for china is to keep harmony in the big and, as it were, b applied sense, well, really for the united states is very difficult to accept in the united states. it is very difficult to accept something independent development. and here are the numbers on china's nuclear missile arsenal, which they call, they are also largely aimed at trying to control chinese development in the field of nuclear weapons in the field of nuclear weapons missiles. and because in

the same report it is written that china is so rapidly, supposedly developing and generally uncontrolled and there are no inspections and no agreements on control over weapons. we urgently need to involve china in a dialogue on arms control. impose weapons on it, based on american competitive advantages, of course, and american interests. that is, to put china in a losing position a and in conclusion, i would like to actually return to sergey viktorovich lavrov’s speech today, to his press conference, because in this press conference he spoke, including about nuclear questions and about nuclear war, listen we, as i have said more than once, were ready to go further and to say that not only is it impossible to unleash a nuclear war, but any war between

nuclear powers is also unacceptable, even if someone decides to start it by conventional means, the risk of escalating into a nuclear one will be enormous. for me, this statement by sergey lavrov is very important , firstly, because he told the absolute truth, and secondly, because back in 2019, as part of our situational analysis program, we, sergey aleksandrovich karaganov, prepared a report on strategic stability, where we wrote, in fact, exactly what sergey lavrov just said that strategic stability is the ability of nuclear powers to prevent any military. collision with each other and it is necessary to focus not only on the prevention of nuclear war, but on the prevention of any collision of an open direct military clash of nuclear powers with each other. this was the main thesis of our report, and it is very pleasant

when you now hear e, this is from the lips of the minister of foreign affairs, but even more important. and what is really the main threat to the strategic stability. today, it is not the absence of inspections, but russian and american nuclear facilities within the framework of the cst, but the hybrid war that the united states unleashed and continues against russia because at any moment, this hybrid war can turn into a non-bred one, turn into a direct military clash. we are really very close, but we have come to this perspective, we must stop and stop. should, of course, uh, the united states i hope so, but this thesis, which has now been expressed russia's foreign minister in washington will hear. it was a big game. goodbye.

information channel on the first program time will tell, uh, today is the first day of winter on december 1, nature on this occasion, well, nature in karelia was sent to me today by my readers and rather such a photograph of nature. i think congratulations. uh russia in the colors of the russian flag congratulates us all at the beginning of winter. well, after all, winter is our russian time, in which we are somehow like this, well, yes, unlike bears, with which many of us associate in ourselves are, as it were, special russian bears who

somehow feel quite cheerfully in winter. it is quite possible that this flag is not only about, but the beginning of the calendar winter, but due to the fact that today is another important day for many people who perform. there are many places on the territory of the special military operation and in syria where they carry out their tasks today, the day of the military police . this service was created 11 years ago. and everyone who served and everyone who serves e is not always happy meets with employees of this service, but understands that it is very important and necessary in any army that must perform the most difficult task. and this is a service. e. today in this because. today they have a holiday, and today also, i think that it is an important day for sergei vladimirovich surovikin, the commander of the united group, since he was directly the person who at the very beginning of the formation of this service today, and he was directly related to its creation. and i think that today

congratulates him. uh, all his colleagues are all those who participated with him, and in this, well, as they say, from moscow to the very outskirts? and not only russian even. from kulyab, i think that greetings are coming to him. i hope from the kulyaba, he gets them. well, and many more people, and i congratulate e terek and swag lithuania and the joker e vorman owl, and the nose and the dawn. and these are only those whom i have time to congratulate now, and they will already pass it on. uh, to all the boys guys, let's work, everything will be fine. but sergei vladimirovich a, who had a direct relation to the creation of this service. and also directly related to a lot of complex important military work, and now he is the commander of the united group, in fact . well, a lot of different hypostases. just the

other day, uh, well, with the light hand of one ukrainian channel , he got another one. well, in a sense , positions, as they say, for what i bought for something and i sell it. this is how the caption of the ukrainian channel sergei surovikin. terenergetiki of ukraine as a whole as a whole, and i would say that the editor, according to the titles of this channel. in general, i didn’t mix anything up, because the minister of energy is the one who manages, and, as it were, critically influences the work of this industry , i think that m-m general of the army surovikin quite critically influences the energy sector in ukraine today. how much of it and i think what's next and i hope that in the future it will also be very scrupulously influencing how much of it will remain there, depending on how the former ukraine will behave after saying all this. i emphasize once again, as i always emphasized, no gloating over about the work that is being forced and without any joy on the destruction of a double

critical infrastructure, and ukraine, without which i hope it will not be able to function. and so to speak, but the terrorist unit of this gang. it is called everything, but it is impossible to agree. god knows 8 years. we tried to negotiate so that it would be possible without it. god knows seven months. we tried to agree that it was possible without this in return. we got a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge and a lot more hmm and you know what's the matter, we we still remain people, and we sympathize with, uh, ordinary civilians who are freezing, who are without heat without water, and so on and so forth, but again, god sees when you hear, and zelensky, who has both water and heat and everything else, who brought it to all this, who communicates with elon musk at some regular endless conference, at which zelensky, who is responsible for all

this, also communicates with them. tells him ilona mask. if you want to understand what russia was doing here come to ukraine and you will see it with your own eyes. after that, will you tell us how to end this war? who started it? and when can it be finished? that's honestly when i hear it, but i keep telling myself, don't get fooled, don't get fooled, don't get fooled, he's gone , but it's impossible, because you're a beast. you call him to come to donbass. you call him. in order for him to come to donetsk, to gorlovka, to yesenovata, to golmovsky, to stakhanov, to perevalsk, he would have come to many other places, so that he would not remain anywhere at all, in principle. here are some pictures of the destruction don't search. it is in kiev that you still need to find some kind of angle to shoot here. it is destroyed here. it is not

destroyed here, because it works on critical infrastructure. there is nothing to look for. here he is holmovsky there living place. no. i filmed this myself in july. it's just that there's still an empty place in gorlovka to look for. from where to remove it so that the destruction is not visible today, in donetsk, again flew in nova kakhovka, again flew in. and it didn’t fly in the last few months; it flies to donetsk , it’s a bit blue, to gorlovka, to zaitsevo, to gomelsky 8 years and 8 years old. nobody invited anyone to come there. and look, who really started this war? because if they get there and these people show them destruction. we here these here photos were given by my editors. i said, you don’t even choose by dates, you can take any, the fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth , seventeenth, they are all about this, about the fact that now this hypocritical beast is telling the whole world. come to ukraine for 8 years 8 years this war

was waged by ukraine and for some reason no one came anywhere and they didn’t want to see this and brazenly declared that they only needed these minsk agreements and declared and declare through the mouths of those who unleashed this war. including the predecessor of this clown, poroshenko, they say that they used these eight years to prepare for war, and to prepare the army, and so on and so forth. and when you see this hypocrisy. well, it would seem that i've been standing here since the sixteenth year, but i understand everything about these bastards. but you, well, sometimes it's just that, well, it doesn't fit. here is the presentation. about what a hypocrite, maybe, but when i need to somehow myself, i say, well, listen. well, why do you get turned on by this bloody clown, he is nobody and he is also like that because he made himself the tools of people who are deceitful and hypocritical from and to, because

all these people who are also 8 years old. they didn’t see the one who started the war, which they could for 8 years, but didn’t want to make it end, for example, beautiful france, which was the guarantor of the minsk agreements, knowing full well that the ukrainian authorities were not going to do anything. and so say, do nothing now, this hypocritical france says that now they are discussing with their european ukrainian partners the creation of a tribunal. these are the people who for some reason did not discuss the creation of a tribunal for the crimes of ukraine in all these 8 years. by the way, on the territory of ukraine, because they considered the territory of ukraine to be the donbass. they did not discuss any tribunal for the crimes of the americans. they didn't discuss the iraqi crime tribunal, but the americans and many others. they none of this was discussed. now they are talking about the

podium, and then, of course, the question arises. well , actually, in order to be their dolls. well, actually such hypocrites. how can it not be hypocritical, not deceitful, nor a two-faced doll, of course not, what else can he say? what else can he say, if such owners want to look at another guarantor of the minsk agreements, please, germany germany than the minister of foreign affairs signed guarantees to yanukovych from the violation of which and after the coup, all this bloody mess began. and germany was the first when it was tainted with these guarantees, then it was the guarantor of the minsk agreements, which no one was going to. now germany has suddenly woken up and recognized the famine as genocide, but the point here is not even that she recognized the naked famine as a famine, although any historian is well aware that the famine was not a

famine. it was a terrible tragedy, but not directed against people who had a nationality, ukrainian, russian tatar. you just read what was in the volga region at that time and it doesn't have. it was terrible, but it had nothing to do with trying to destroy the ukrainian ethnos, the russian ethnos or the tatars, it was about something else and anyone who makes up for it, and in the current context, he is either a scoundrel. or an idiot, most likely, a scoundrel idiot, but, but when i say it fits in today's context, we all understand that they are not interested at all, they don’t even need to understand this famine at that time. they draw a direct parallel. they talk about the dictator in the kremlin then wanted to destroy ukraine and the dictator. the kremlin now wants to destroy ukraine, that is, they take that context and drag it into today

. that is, as it were, the sins of the soviet regime. then they add to those sins. they do not see their own, which they are looking for with us with the help of various tribunals and are going to hang on this, as it were, everything else. now i have a question sasanich to you, as a specialist, in all this, but muddy goo. and since well, you, by virtue of your profession, you still, well, sort of lay it out on the faction and understand how it is there, right? what is attached to what ? tell me, please, besides this, well, journalistic deceitful, as it were, pathos. this one. there are some prospects. what do they expect. this is history. it's just, well, so to speak, the creation of a certain emotional background for their own. well, such readers are already quite hamsters, or in your opinion. it's more far going. eh, like a plan. well, uh, let's talk about unpleasant things, of

course, this is a long story, playing far, going as we discussed many times in this studios, as far as all this, as it were, the civilized west, in principle, benefit from this situation and ukraine both as a testing ground for testing weapons and as a testing ground for writing off huge sums, but now they have another opportunity. they have their own dark pages of history. they are rewriting at the expense of ukraine, so let's go in parts by factions, yes, germany, that is, this country, whose history is tainted by a monstrous genocide and not only the holocaust. yes, just to discuss, uh, the holocaust of belarusians, yes, well, that means i see. so, uh, they're up to their ears. it's just that in the thirties and forties there, yes, well, the guilty ones and they, as it were, put it out of brackets and say no. let's talk about the monstrous genocide of the ukrainian people by the bloody soviet dictators there and their

guarantors there. and as if hitler is already leaving them in the background, because in this way another year or two or three will pass, it will already reach the point that hitler was not so bad, because he probably fought for the happiness of the ukrainian people against stalin. well, before that will also rewrite this first one over time. france is creating a tribunal, which means for our supposed crimes. there it is france i want to say, why don't we then with the professor drum. unit with asian african counterparts and do not set up a tribunal for the crimes of france in algiers in vietnam by the way, why not you with a professor? uh, barabanov, we are a deputy of the state duma , we did not announce a comma there, we will find it. how much will we return now and get, no matter how it is now , if we present some kind of discussion in france and the professor suddenly says, let's let's figure out what you were doing there in the volzhire, this is such a wait, this is filevsky propagandist. it 's not like you at all now, you can talk about it differently, of course, it's different. how can you, when

this is happening in ukraine now and these pages are being rewritten and exhausted. all that remains is the struggle of the french for a bright future for ukraine, what is what, and in your opinion, they do the following: merge it all into one. this tank is all there to stay clean white and in white absolutely and like every reasonable person. which they also have there, which crawls out with the words, wait, but let's repent. maybe there, in front of the algerians, he says, the propagandist is a provocateur, and then, as you and i know, you can, by analogy with the czech republic, and even pack it, that is, propagandists will say somewhere kremlin and in the czech republic just two 49 at once. already 49 people 49 human. what is it for? it’s easy there, even if you are on social networks, in fact you will write there that, well, no matter how zelensky is wrong and there tra-la, because 49 for supporting russia, but

we'll see the wording, you need to look, but it's very wide, what does it mean there? somehow, he did not approve of ukraine's action, somehow he was not very happy. uh, we have a minimum of victories for ukraine, therefore the broadest possible interpretation. and any man out there you know, that is, he sticks out his opinion whatever he risks. so it means to be silent and under this sauce you can write off everything to rewrite all your past. eggs are white and clean, look. here, look. i understand what you mean say, i agree, i see that this is happening. but now here’s the question that i’m asking, well, well, they rewrote all the black paint that they themselves have been smeared from head to toe over the years and even centuries, they rewrote it for us, because now everything doesn’t count. now there is ukraine, they have their own population. even thinkers disagree. intimidated, it was not guessed or zombified. they created, uh, this picture and then i ask. well, what, and then it means that russia is dehumanizing as much as possible, moreover, and she

dehumanized over the centuries. that is, they will retroactively rewrite everything ivan the terrible there , peter will be added there, all terrible, really. i think that before that, the tribunal’s arrogant baptism of vladimir’s russia was, as it were, absolutely good, then in a year or two we’ll see what they will create and understand, what was foreseen under this sauce then any absolutely barbaric actions in relation. our country, they will be justified, that is, they have actually already agreed. to the point that all our gold and foreign exchange reserves there are property, everything is taken away. everything is possible, because we are not people for them, which means that we can be ignored. or rather, with legal norms in relation to us, with none. aha, but now you have brought us to a very important point, from which it now begins. the most important question is that when they bring us to this point where we are

dehumanized. and as you say, no laws work. there are two options, either they bring themselves to this point in relation to us in order to further rob both this and this one move, or how often it happened. this usually happens in history. dehumanization when they are going to continue to fight. well, okay first. that is, in your opinion. this is dehumanization. it's just such, as it were, inertia, scoundrels and liars, and which they got carried away. uh, washing yourself there, summing up the base under uh, there is a theft of our line or in your opinion. this is really informational preparation and, uh, mental specifically for war, as for war, i am with people with whom everything is already possible, that is the second option, yes, but they will first go through the first stages. they first full rob. everything will be taken. yes here here the question is that they will definitely pass this stage to pick up everything. here is the main question. still, do they

go here, as it were, quite there? well, that is, relatively speaking, let's say so in the thirty-third thirty -fourth year. and when it was already there and the crystal tries something in germany and already jews. they started to blame. there, in all crimes, in principle, the forty- second forty-third year, there were ovens before hava auschwitz, and so on and so forth, it was not in the plans , it happened. well, sort of naturally . yes, respectively, if dehumanization of russians in your opinion. now it's just like some kind of process, after all, at the end of which they don't think of a big war with us. or is it already a conscious preparation for a big war with us, in which we must be combed. i think that while they say so, while they are still afraid of war with us. and with an emphasis on the word more but what they do step by step. i absolutely agree with alexander, but why is this humanization, let's take any textbook on military

propaganda, and the key thing is the demonization of the enemy. yes it has been in all wars in all societies. it may like not like to say this phrase now, then in fact, it turns out you are already answering my question. that is, you say, this is the demonization of the enemy before the war, which is not being prepared for the date, but they started. actually. this demonization has always been. uh, if not from ivan the terrible, then from the crimean war, 19 people, no one is going to the fifth column, including this is also one word. yeah, what's important right now. yeah, they're opening, like, a judicial front. this is the tribunal zelensky tells the tribunal the french, they say something else for the tribunal. i mean, they already hate wars. they feel like winners, it's true, but the point is why i'm asking this question, that if we proceed from the fact that they are not ready to fight seriously and for the most part, then we can

say spit on all these tribunals on all these their speeches by zelensky and so on and so forth, if they are preparing for a big war in this way, then it’s like a different conversation here in this sense, i want to hear your opinion anyway. well, here is the diagnosis of what they are preparing for, or is it just some kind of inertia of liars so far. no, there is no inertia, because it goes by increasing inertia. so it means that once the humanization of the enemy is carried out not in order to treat him like a human being. yes, so the discussion tom is going to be so rob or rob kill. she is absent. this is a very strange discussion, because if you rob someone uh-huh , then in order for the screwdriver to never fly by, you still need to kill him. well, not always logical. no. sorry, these are our stories. it didn't happen. and if you look at english history, if you look at american history, that all these european clowns are not independent. it

was exactly there, so the indians were robbed and 130 million indians of north america how few remained there of them from 30 to 50 were from the civilization of south america how many left let's go, there were spaniards and so on? that is, you are telling me that, in principle, the process, of which we are a part, is a process. here are these scales in relationships the intention is to prepare for genocide. yeah, it’s clear that the europeans themselves are not going to fight. all they have for this is the ukrainian fascists. yes, they have the poles for this, the ukrainians will put on weapons of mass destruction, they will be perfectly working. yes, that means you understand further, that is, since the russians are not people there, then, in principle, all deliveries of ukrainians are precisely to free the land from this. as the jews were called there in nazi germany, he will not recognize this on the air. yes? especially since it's all there now. what is addressed to us is sometimes obscured, so to say, it’s very good that you reminded me three or four years ago, when in our studio, well,

including in my programs, and many experts, in my opinion, even mikhail, you said that russians, i say, these are jews xxi century. well, to be honest, i'm so, well, like, well, michael, we have passed. now i have to admit that they still laugh about it. now they don't believe in it. well, in our state to organize. here, then, what to do with it you understand, if you want to be a victim like that, if you want to be an impotent masochist, well of course, put the dead ahead of time, he helped yeah, both outside and inside, good civilized people from the tribunal and the strigun from the fifth column and the sixth column from the relevant departments, etc., so here's a simple thing. why the french are so impudent is very simply not enough that we actually macrons of this london investment banker by supporting him took senseless. rocked him international authorities allowed him to win the elections. we are still. if i understand correctly, we accept

according to international agreements, radioactive waste from nuclear power plants france which provides the podium, yes, which stole our money, which, uh, three-quarters of the nuclear power, three-quarters of the electricity, and france provides and their nuclear power plants . why do we accept them? they have wonderful places on the côte d'azur, they have a beautiful city of cannes. well, you will probably be told that this is profitable and earn money on it. but if you earn on what, and what, and you you pay for the rope on which you will be hanged strictly by lenin well done. continue in the same hall, which will lubricate this rope. oh no, he just didn't say. he says that the capitalists, the capitalists, will sell us a rope on which we will hang them, so they say in relations. why openly calmly cynical and we act strictly? in accordance with these instructions, in germany, and in addition to energy problems in germany, these are the americans, we will try our best to

save them, but there was not enough power. are you a grain the deal halved the price of food in the world, thereby, thereby solving all the most important political resource. because if we didn't go for a grain deal, it would be very easy for those who are on good terms with us, those who are on bad terms with us, don't eat here. you don't recognize anyone here. always always been in the center always been the number one person at any table. in any compartment of the train, in any plane, they recognized you, i remember you well. i can say that i now have a completely different attitude to the issue. i think, that this is a real big adventure writer fantasy was not candious, but within a minute to change four or five moves in his letter. and

sometimes it’s scary not to have time to write everything that is required to write a documentary about yulian semyonov. hello, eavesdrop, call back, there are adaptations of his famous bestsellers, you will be patient on first saturday. with love 50% on

mechta brand pilaf cauldron during a pandemic, the risk of developing a heart attack and stroke increases for the secondary prevention of such diseases, cardiomagnium health can help hearts under control. the credit card solution of the opportunity from a reliable vtb bank is 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. you see, someone who will no longer overpay for communication. yes in reflection you get 350 minutes 35 gb popular. social networks video services for

399 rubles. in iota, connect to yota now and in all megafon stores. maybe you just got unlucky. come true new year's sword million from the national lottery, can take you to a dream. just buy ticket for loto.ru and post offices. dear passengers, the ozon sale is being postponed and more. and what kind of wagon is the wagon of the final sale of the year, jump in. the final sale of the year for ozone foundation for 169 rubles. corn

globus for 29 rubles. tv for 6.99 rubles. like boxing master for 189 rubles. cup all for 999. we are pleased to receive cashback for services, but it is even more pleasant to see how it turns into something really tangible. now a single wallet has appeared in the mts ecosystem, with which you can pay favorite services or buy gadgets. the vtb team will offer a solution possible from the high bid.

open photo 9.5% on vtb.ru. go to tv and that's it. it will turn out. get 5,000 welcome bonuses the app wins a million. what where when the winter series of games on sunday after the time program choose your favorite team and get increased odds for all its matches the whole fairy tale of the championship in the winline application. will show we

continue to work live. we discussed before the commercial that uh cynical, become cynical hypocritical not yesterday, not the day before yesterday and not in the fourteenth year, but centuries a few years ago. the west today plays such a game when it, with the help of ukraine, and the fact that ukraine has arranged itself on its territory since the fourteenth year, it is discussing all sorts of things for us, and there are tribunals, but they recognize genocides, which are also trying to hang on us, and we came to the conclusion that well is, and dehumanization and such a large-scale deformation. it is always a preparation, as if for some kind of war, given that they have someone to fight and considering there is where to fight and well, everything seems to be logical, but here such a moment arises that, after all, the americans, who rule this whole process , being the main country, all this beautiful in a gathering. they're hypocritical. well,

many times more than we can imagine, and they know how to sell all sorts of, as it were, lies in such a package. well, what do you give diva? it would seem that this would be impossible. yes? and most importantly, why, why sell what you sell? in general, it’s not necessarily what kirby sold today. when i heard i didn’t believe my eyes, they asked him a question about the withdrawal from afghanistan well, as you remember, this is shameful, the flight was abandoned by all their people, there they clung to the wheels of the planes. well, that is, as it were, complete. and you don't understand anything at all. you don't understand what it was at all, because you don't understand how lies are sold. packed with pr and kirby understands learn. countries such as russia and china have seen what we have done in afghanistan, which we have already talked about many times this year, they can only be amazed the speed and efficiency with which we succeeded with such small forces. it's seriously no.

right? yes listen so. you never know how many forces managed to safely evacuate a huge number of afghans from the country and chairs, no other country could do this. you see, even the host, uh, you are such that, here is a kerbit, and this is serious. yes, he is serious, their strength lies in the fact that they are able to believe in their own lies so much that they infect those whom they deceive and the afghans who they were believed by it, before that they infected the south vietnamese, who believed them, infected them, and then many more who believed them were infected and threw, threw, threw, threw, but surprisingly their professionalism in selling this heresy of lies is such that each next allies whom they use only as well as a rag in order to wipe the shoes. each of the following believes

that they will become those whom the americans will not surrender, because they are vital to them and will support them to the last pay pay and so on. in the case when these next allies, and these are also ukrainians. i specifically say khokhols, because in this case we are not talking about ukrainians, but we are talking about khokhlov in the interpretation that perfectly a few years ago, the actor zelensky, who had not gone crazy, beautifully outlined this one in his series, uh, as it were e logic, how a ukrainian becomes a ukrainian. so it is precisely having khokhlov as his allies in the worst sense of the word, and they have the impression that they are sure that those are already so in all this already. uh, how would they believe that they will never be abandoned, that i have a feeling that they are also starting to play some strange game with them, the americans with uh, uh, the kiev regime, why because they

endlessly ask them weapon? well, how would more range, right? that is, they tell them the guys, we need something with the russians that could turn the tide of the war, and how would you like us to tell you about it, then give us something that answers them the same kerbir. the same kirby answers them with the following. speaking about the possibility of supplying new longer -range weapons, we also stated and did not justify our fears that we do not want further escalation in this war, and i think this is right, following from the ukrainians. we need a chestnut chestnut on fire. and you have to get it to us. they say yes, no question at all. we will rake all the chestnuts out of the fire for you, but just give us , as it were, such a long shovel, they are told, no, guys with a gin shovel chestnuts from the fire each fool. maybe you can try to get children's scoops here for the sandbox, because then it

will be cool. and by the way, i'm not exaggerating, because, damn it, in fact, he says, they are even. it's kirby saying the long shovel. somehow, we won’t give something yet, because, well, somehow the russian may not like that we gave you a long shovel ourselves, we’ll hit your forehead with this shovel, and blinkin, the guys say. well, everything is fine. we will give you these. you will simply like scoops, because you know how to use these scoops use do not believe that he literally says it, well, how would you listen and understand the blinks themselves, she answers the question. the same one about weapons, please. is nato really considering investing in factories in slovakia, czech republic, bulgaria that will produce soviet-era munitions for ukrainian artillery? we are exploring all options to make sure ukraine gets what it needs . in a number cases, it is necessary to produce something that has not been produced normally for a long time. that is, he says, no

guys, well, as it were, this is a modern weapon. why is this needed? we are now thinking and possibly investing in the production of weapons of the soviet era, many of which have not been produced for a long time, we could produce them stock. right now you will be ukrainians with blood spitting up to the last for a long time, because there, in principle, we will now produce 152-mm shells for you, but, in principle, we will still establish the production of powerful screws. there ppsh somewhere we will find these same ones, he tells them exactly. these are guys. we don’t, well, there is such a russian phrase, but it sounds obscene, so i can’t say it, but you all know it, it’s army we don’t need you to win right away, we need you to croak blood for a very long time. and then those such begin to scratch their turnips and understand something like that, like they are somehow soviet weapons, that is, imagine, that’s against it, but the russian army will be

soviet weapons, uh, they start to roll up scratching turnips, and here they are encouraged about modern air defense to them. they say guys. the pentagon all means the company has signed a contract for 1.2 billion us dollars for the supply of a single missile, here they are cracking down on sweat they read the last line of the estimated date of completion. they did not understand november 28, 1925, but 3 years until november 25, 26, when the beginning is incomprehensible, yes, but nonetheless. that is, as it were, it is assumed that all this time they will stretch this story, especially since they can also search for it no but this is what we have now produced. this is what we used to give you back and forth, that is, for 3 years it is assumed that they will spit blood with this very soviet weapon against us, yes, and it ’s not only french americans who do this,

beautiful french, which means their help lies in than, firstly, a tribunal with weapons. they don't really listen to politics anymore. unofficial french admit they can't provide more weapons to ukraine due to the state of their own supplies, but paris hopes to make up for it civil assistance by hosting a sustainability conference this month. ukraine yes. yes, yes, yes, yes michael that's it, you know, it's the same, that is, if you're not a zombie, but it's like , that is, the french, they say, the next guys. well, as it were, it’s not very good with weapons, but, but we won’t leave you like that, we’ll make such a conference, just such a conference, so that you just don’t see such a conference for you . there will be no weapons. after that, after you visit our conference, they say they every time these start too much, it means that something sticks out, they click on their nose, as the mission clicked on the player, saying that

they would not apologize they would put it in its place and all this under the sauce of the fact that they have been leading them since the eighth year for nato carrots, but the column is already now. that is, to what extent people should be zombified, but no one is hiding anything from them. he says, guys, in fact , nato, he tells us nato, in principle, this now it’s not your problem, in principle, the doors of nato are open, but now you seem to have problems so that you can preserve your sovereign state, he said, so that his text follows that ukraine’s entry into nato will mean the loss of ukraine as a sovereign. yes, the question arises, some people have the feeling that already now and the americans, well, all these wonderful people, that they are already playing some game with ukraine, not the one they think, uh, the kiev regime, then there is the kiev regime thinks that this is it, how would they

now money, which means weapons and so on, like they will bring down russia and then they will be here, which means they will manage everything. yes, but there is a feeling that the game is somehow different. well, firstly, i would not use in one, in one sentence the words kiev regime and thinks, this is a very strong hypothesis. agreed. secondly, and we know. um , how are they sent? so, we don't know. what kind of weapons were actually delivered to ukraine. yeah, and they are there, maybe not under the control of ukrainian fascists, but maybe we are we just don't know. and so, that is a purely military aspect of this case. well, at least in open sources we do not know him and cannot know. it is possible that there is already enough in ukraine to strike deep into russian territory. well, just for now from a point of view. the time has not come for the west to apply this matter, that is, this is all verbal bullshit. it is your view, this informational cover of what may

have been for a long time, informational discovery. or maybe because the gentleman is telling the truth. only a gentleman with whom he studied together in the same frequency. these are not people in relation to them, the word is a lie, it is not applicable, yes, that's what glass bosses are for, comrade truman in his time, when he was still a senator about our war with the nazis. let them kill each other. and let them kill each other, as much as possible, since the strategic task is to clear the fertile territory of ukraine, even the indigenous population, then the smaller there are, the better from the point of view, at least, of historical germany and also poland, hungary, romania and some other wonderful glorious states, finally, you understand the last one, we absolutely wonderfully comment on what they are doing uh-huh, but you know the very fact of the conversation, this one zelensky’s bastards by the way, why didn’t we show it now?

here is a wonderful passage where ukrainians tell zelensky how the khokhol differs from ukraine. we respect their intellectual right in order to appreciate it is quite long. it is very bright, but it is long and very good. i would spin it every day, but very quickly it turns out that we respect the intellectual right of the fascists, and we do not allow ourselves to rather protect our interests even in this way. maybe you're right. although, in my opinion, we showed this passage on the air, because i usually remember that i gave it on my telegram channel. and that's good. no, i mean, most likely, i will get it, and here i could not a huge number of people who think that using the word crest. we consider this to be a synonym for ukrainians. hmm, and they need to be explained that there is a difference, that they themselves perfectly understand, they beautiful, then the difference, yes, a lot more citizen zelensky so, this is still a washed-up citizen. as the mask is so very good in front of the gentleman, but it didn’t hurt me

a single one that the gentleman from zelensky turns out to have a connection. yes, i would say that the ukrainian civilian population used to kill russian military personnel has not yet been transferred to the state of space debris. although it seems that we have the opportunity for this, that so far, citizen zelensky, in addition to sveta, i'm not talking about a warm newspaper. he still has security cartoon mr. tudaev was hiding. uh, every night i changed my location so that they didn’t fly in, in the end. i spoke with one of our liberals. it ended his life. and why zelensky is absolutely safe, although there is more blood on him than there, much more, much more. and why have we still not been recognized as terrorist organizations not only by the all-union forces, which are no different from the nazis in their hiddenness? except for the

civilian population, but the ukrainian gist to me . explained that it turns out that we we cannot recognize as terrorist, but a state organization of other countries, if we recognize this state. and if we recognize it, we recognize it. why do we recognize it? sorry? state duma i don't know why you don't think that the task of demilitarization and denocification of ukraine implies, among other things, the liquidation of this statehood. as such, in effect, so to speak, her, so to speak, hopelessness, or at least recovery. why? here we consider this state to be of equal value to ourselves, well, probably, because we we believe that he is the minister of energy, and of ukraine sergey suroviki is now engaged in the fact that he disassembles, including the state. they consider it their opinion. that's why they are competent in this regard. and we, so to speak

, behave as if nothing had happened the last day together. here is an interesting question. why do you have a sansanych for one of these? why is there an answer from professor barabanov while mikhail was speaking there was an answer, because we are not like that, and then i think that i am waiting for the tram. yes yes only in this case we are. uh, with this tram in position. in fact, he uttered a popular very bad meme, which sounds in many offices as an excuse for our helplessness, including, and the very first one was said by the master general when they were asked, well, they do not respond with a nato strike. well, yes, no, at first we are not aggressive with me. wow, we 'll be patient. well, by the way, this continues what mikhail zilyagin said about copyright . i've been talking about this since spring in relation to tv channels and cinemas.

what the hell are we not showing? oh yes, copyright infringement? in cinemas and on the air, there are some good western classic old films and so on and so forth, uh-huh and they tell us. we are not like them, we will respect copyright. why removed from the tongue. why is there no answer to me some tried one person is also some kind of deputy. there the regional says because they are there in court. i say what's next? well, let them take it to their own court. may they win there. uh, like they're arresting something of ours. and you to them say they seem to have already arrested, even if they win this trial, they themselves do not have the right to receive money from us because of the sanction. they are great sanctions that need to be corrected, you know, impotence means the question is not why, but the question of why there is actually enough sansarych in general, you can immediately see, and the fighter is an experienced fighter of the information front. i shuffle him, which means questions. e, mikhail dilyagin and i say.

look, there are so many sansanych, why do you have at least one answer. he says of course there is does not list 10 more questions, but he starts them with the word, what the hell is not? what the hell yes , further, and i'm telling you, it's just that you just what and what michael is talking about and what to talk about? you and in terms of addition. they are thinking. what are we thinking or not thinking about? this is the main argument that you understand, if we pay attention to this now, that is, we have a war there for a tribunal. and that means there is genocide, that's all they have for us. i mean, yes, they have us. yes, but the argument is sound. you understand that if we do this now, then then attention, when everything is over, and they will not return to us. and you think so, don't you? seriously, that is, this is the main thing to think about now, and this is happening, but then we need to make a list of these people who say this publicly. they don’t do it publicly on the sidelines, because they want to look into the eyes

of some official who says, no, you need to understand, but after a year, when everything is over, and everything will return as it was, all of a sudden, they will get this one here's judicial sincerity, eh the first channel showed, and there were american films of the fifties without rights. now you have to pay for it. well, it won't be in a year, not in two, not in. three of these, because we said everything, they will have one tribunal, the second third the fourth fifth. we'll be covered up to our ears. and, of course, in my beloved wikipedia in quotation marks over the years they will rewrite everything to hell about us completely, it will be written there that shane means cannibal delyagin there is enough for me already . but they are just of high quality everything is completely people who will grow up both here and there in all countries in different languages ​​will also be rewritten. yes they are there what a nightmare and all? why don't you bomb them?

of course, of course, there is another wonderful image when you tell people guys. look here you have problems here problems here problems here. why don't you solve them? know some answer. well , you've heard it many times. you know, now is not the time after the victory, let's deal with these problems, as if i'm driving in a tank with me, it means that the running gear is broken. i answer you understand, we now it will not be very much after the victory. clean up a minute with us, i always answer that guys wanted guys. yes, if you think the way you do, then there will be no defeat and genocide was usually filmed during the great patriotic war, i just recently watched 200 feature films 200, and what is documented? well, 41 years, of course, collections and all two 200 yeah, and now it means taking an assist. and where have we been for how many 9 months now and one feature film has been released, we have been going on for 8 years

war in donbass how many films do we have four four of them two hours now i am one lugansk, that is, the state one donbass outskirts. yes, now danya will return to milokhin, and then it will be possible to inquire about something. well, now we will finish everything and after the victory we will shoot when we need to fix it now. this is the story of a huge number of heroic tragic stories you can wrap up during the war. they made comedies, after all. what were the great films, where is it all? after the victory, we will figure it out, now the hands do not reach. and why they reach, then everyone who says this strongly does not want victory and categorically the citizens of the defeat of russia here, just this is actually a very interesting moment, which i don’t know how much they understand and learn from our program, but, but the enemies i mean, well, it's really michael after all. so we got to the point where we were going. the

fact is that after the victory, if we do something now, they will not return, this is a conversation about the fact that this person does not believe in victory. why because if we win they'll come back like a nice little one. yes, they will come back like a nice little one and so on and so forth, because if we win, and when we win, it will be other thoughts that they will talk to in a different way and on other grounds, but here the question arises. what does it mean that we are not all and not everywhere completely believing in victory and the question arises. why is it really so uh from my point of view, yes, sometimes it can feel like we don't want to win. well, not us, but we are part of us. we are in general uh, but like this and because that there is a solution. yes, i don't want to go back. we all know them, yes, uh, and a list of goodwill gestures and

everything else that is hard to explain, uh, in terms of fighting for victory. uh-huh, but which are very easy to explain, uh, or here's a desire for it to end soon and return to the old ones, or , uh, just inertia of thinking, but unwillingness to take responsibility. by the way, this is a very terrible problem. here we agree. a and as a result, we are trampling, yes, that is, we pronounce very correct and sometimes very harsh words, but sometimes i repeat. naturally, this does not apply to all, and not to all representatives of the authorities. yes, but sometimes one gets the feeling that, but according to our deeds, not according to our words. if we are talking about the totality of us, i am not saying that sheinin malkevich drums are there, huh? there is a monstrous feeling from my

point of view that we russia do not want to win, having started to fight, we do not want to win, but here there is, well, two options, one to go into an agreement. uh and merge. yes, there are two new ones. uh, term 22 years old. yes, well, they used to be, but now they have blossomed much more. well, it means to agree to return, anyway, then there and continue to return to the old. yes, or yes, and if you don’t want to win, you lose in sports, in chess, in life and in war, and the last thing i would like to draw, she remember once again about shame and war. yes, it’s necessary , and i’ll remember melyukov, a liberal on the one hand, a cadet, but the man who in world war i obviously advocated an effective war for victory before victory yes, and melyukov said the famous one here milyukov's speech in the state duma in november. nonsense or treason, of course, and he did not address

the kaiser. there's not someone else asked for it to our authorities. yes, but emilyukov spoke one of his arguments. well, let's then after the victory. debriefing will be later yes, now during the war is not the time, and melyukov answered this in such a way that only during the war is there time for this, since such an approach such an unwillingness to win is dangerous for the war. that's what's the matter. well, it seems to me that in addition to everything that is said here three of my guests, each of whom, i am sure , wants victory and wants it, so to speak, with all his heart. in general, i have nothing to add, because all this is true, all this is so and that's it. we need to continue to discuss this and find out why it is so and it needs to be changed. gold answer, personally. you will send gold. today, only today and without any protection. you understand me? if anything,

if he knew, when something goes in it will be taken. how could he know. and you yes, you think that i am a chekist chekist chekist i collected gold prepared, and you took it all in, lord, why are you helping this loan, and not me, the 85th anniversary of eduard artemiev on sunday at the first what? they didn't believe me. we are pleased to receive cashback for services, but it is even more pleasant to see how it turns into something

really tangible. now a single wallet has appeared in the mts ecosystem. black fall not only me. invite your friends before december 20, have time to bring your friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize he is such one vtb team will offer a credit card solution of the possibility of this reliable vtb bank that is 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card right now at this point and everything will turn out new year's mood

comes with a panda and a gift not for the whole family from 299 rubles. fantoy. give to loved ones and yourself, tinko pleases me all the time. and now it pleases even my friends. bring one or two or three friends, the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. a friend will get a free service forever have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize , he's the only one, why haven't i won the lottery before? maybe just bad luck. pomelyosha's dreams came true lama and another 100 million rubles. which will definitely play the new year's sword million from the national lottery. can take you to your dream. just buy a ticket at lotto.ru and post

offices. the vtb team will offer a solution to worry. no need to be calm for your savings, you can even with a high rate. open go fantastic and everything will work out. nine final sale of the year at ozon spaghetti ameria, for 9 rubles. appetite for 799 rubles. warmer toy.

crumb and for 149 rubles. burn fill a bunch of applications for loans in banks. compare will help fill out just one application for a loan and get approval on the best terms, and the largest banks in comparison. if credit, then compare choose better.

what where when the winter series of games on sunday after the program time in the winline application any of your bets will be accepted instantly the whole fairy tale championship in the winline application will show we continue to work live. and now, following the results of our previous conversation, mikhail delyagin mentioned, just ah. remember this conversation that here we are fighting all mention the word crest. although, well, ukraine, everyone understands what a crest means, and indeed we mentioned it. this, as it were , episode where in the series the servant of the people, who had not yet descended the noise and completely smoked zelensky , he had a wonderful monologue there in the form of the president of ukraine goloborodko, which he

perfectly explained the difference between a ukrainian and a ukrainian, because. i really don't know, maybe there really is some kind of ownership there and so on. i can’t show it to you on air, but right now i’m in advertising for anyone who is interested, and who is too lazy to poke buttons on youtube right now. channel come to me sheinin. i just reposted this post, a, which i had there some months ago. who cares to see how quickly go telegram-channel and forward and more after that no need to make a reservation crest and ukrainian. they themselves understand everything perfectly. and now we are leaving this topic. to be more precise, there is no need to enter shen's channel now. now we have to watch. now you don’t need to, put your phone aside, then you’ll come in after the broadcast, you’ll come in. everything is already some kind of idiot. yes , i really got carried away. so, it means that now we will talk, just not about it. and we will talk about what you can not get carried away. this is how i am now, but with one thing what is happening in the world, because it is all interconnected and when it starts to smoke in one place, smoke skrit

and so on. you need to be very careful not to spark somewhere else, because the world is interconnected , and these rubbing ones, it means gears or millstones, they never spark in one place. do you know how the wiring went went went ah? already against the backdrop of the conflict in ukraine discussed. here is the history of the middle east there, turkey not turkey syria not syria americans. what kind of game are we there, in fact, there are such places where a lot of them can hide, and one of them, given that the united states of america is involved in the conflict in ukraine, and they are also going to actively try to involve the ukrainians in one way or another in israel for several months. hmm plus. uh, well, actually, an old story. uh, the conflict between the americans and iran is very interesting, what is happening or what may start to happen or not start to happen, but just be rhetoric around iran, why now i started this conversation, because one of the

representatives of the united states of america said like this here is an interesting text, but about possible plans, and the us regarding iran if if anything, please. president biden said he would, at the very least, agree to a military scenario if it would help prevent iran from developing nuclear weapons. however, the time has not yet come for this. that's how this statement is, but it 's still the us special representative for iran. and if he refers to biden, then in general, he didn’t even speak well. this biden did not say, this is biden, but if he says this, then this is some kind of card that is not laid out on the table, but it’s not the only card they lay out on the table is precisely this statement, for example, the exercises passed. there, in this, as it were, difficult e region, the teachings of ah, israel and the united states, during which

a simulated attack on iran was simulated, it is clear that this is not the first time such exercises have been carried out, the israelis periodically not only imitate, but something there, and so on and so forth similar, that is, there are words and statements. there are some, as it were , warning actions and the main question. maxim that arises, how much do you evaluate a real perspective of what's in this place. smoke is no longer only in words and at the level of simulation exercises. what does this depend on and is there such a prospect in real life? can elementary smoke despite the fact that we do not even know. and where it will explode because of what it will explode, maybe, but in iran, israeli relations, something will happen, especially when the turn comes now, the radical team of the prime minister, netanyahu , there will be more tension, maybe in saudi arabia where too. in general, we do not

we do not pay much attention, because we have good relations with tehran and raw materials, but at the same time, many of us have both iran and israel. in general , do not pay. well, at the same time, we still know the degree of mutual hatred for him in these states. as for saudi arabia, it's just experts, like ice, people know about it, and ordinary people somehow move away from this, but nevertheless. there is great potential here. conflicts potential, as for the americans, they also have this at any moment. there's a military presence in region, that somewhere, someone you put up will hit the americans, and everything will begin. i recently read a book here about the iran-iraq war, by the way, the longest war. there are a million people there, in my opinion, the police is the longest war of the 20th century. what else happened to us? i still remember, but at the beginning they supplied weapons to

both of them and entered into direct military clashes with the iranians. actually. they took over two oil platforms. for this, there was such a thing . the naval battle sank the iranian. uh, frigate is another one. and also almost sunk, that is, there are fights. wow, what were at any moment, something can happen and the iranians. also, after all, they are the avengers, this is such a people who remember insults for a very long time. i guess what else does that mean? behind them 1.000 years of history they consider themselves not without reason. here what is called, well, sometimes vindictive, maybe it's good to be, because revenge is, uh, good , cold, so it can break out here at any moment. or for example, now that these unrest are taking place, the iranian authorities are convinced that behind it? well, there the americans are not americans, but there external forces are behind these unrest. it seems to me that fortune-tellers did not go. well, uh, the iranian authorities convinced us and we have enough further

already there. i think that the internal reasons were also very serious, but naturally, there are those who will lose their hands. you understand the internal reasons for excitement are everywhere, but at the moment when these unrest splash out, you can immediately judge. are these only internal reasons, or is it someone pouring kerosene, who benefits and can at some point, if the situation is already out of control in iranian cities, and more and more protesters will take the initiative. to intercept, maybe even the difference here is better to go for some kind of provocation in order to intercept patriotic rhetoric, because here you need to understand, even those guys here are students who are now opposing the authority of the ayutul, who are really, well, so creepy, there regime in terms of religious from its point of view. let's not discuss how creepy he is. here but but while for me, for example, american democracy in its current form is rather creepy. well, on that you understand us, yes, each widget is very stiff in places. well, uh, to. why am i saying

that even those who are now in opposition, and if it smells of fried and really their country becomes an object of attack, everyone will unite. and this is such an opportunity for the authorities somehow. uh, thereby drowning out the protests, and then you, a partly, began to answer. oh, one more question. no, on the contrary, to the question i asked, because you still answered the question that i asked, but i had in mind a little different, because maxim is right. and very detailed and qualitatively described where it can blaze. here, in general, about the middle east, any specialist can add 10 more points where he can get worse, but maxim moved on to this. to the more important question, where it can flare up, because one side or another needs it to blaze. here maxim described one situation, that it is possible that a wound for a certain solution of certain problems will need some exacerbation. yes, that's how to gather a society.

now i ask further, having a conflict between americans and iran, iranians, saudis, iranians from israel, if in your opinion, now there is one of the parties to these numerous conflicts that are now in the foreseeable future, it may be necessary and beneficial for there to be an escalation. these are different things , one thing can happen, and another thing happens. our diplomats are talking about the soviet minister of foreign affairs, mr. no, gromyko was told that he lamented every time when it was a question of the middle east and said, yes, why are you such hooligans you constantly kill someone every day, then some kind of conspiracy, then a war. when this stops will not stop, the middle east will always be a powder keg and blaze. maxim is right. absolutely. maybe anywhere, but the situation around iran is heating up. yeah, i was shocked

when i heard it. this is a statement from robert maley why because he came to diplomacy from academia, he is a political scientist he led the brussels international crisis group and he has always been a supporter of peace negotiations with iran , even in israel they were not accepted at the proper level, because they suspected that he was breaking through these eggs and the nuclear deal with iran, he wants to achieve america's return to this agreement, but to the israelis. it always didn't like it. uh-huh and they tried every time to prevent him from doing this, and suddenly this man, who, like no one else in america, is set on a peaceful settlement of the issue, threatens war, and refers to joe biden, the special representative, whom he is on my sight. it is very dangerous. it's no longer just scary. so it really means that

there is a threat. that is, it is already such a smoke with tongues. eh, it’s not yet fire breaking through in places, but you already know such ones. here, when such hollow ones are like that. yes , the nail in the coffin of the nuclear agreement of this joint action plan, which in 2015 was around the peaceful iranian nuclear program, was drawn up because of the americans. e. for a while, as i understand it, beneficial for europeans, beneficial for europeans, but for russia sergey lavrov is our the minister of foreign affairs did a great deal to ensure that this agreement took place. well, then came, you know, donald trump destroyed everything, but also joe biden, who promised, by the way, to return to this agreement. so he did not succeed in this, and his special epistle to robert male did not succeed either. now most of the experts. it is said that it is unlikely that this nuclear agreement will be saved. and then i just wanted to ask you, in your opinion,

this mali e, you told in a very interesting way how it turned out that you changed your shoes from the academic peacemaker. that's how it is, ah, referring to biden. is he threatening the iranian leadership and the state, or is he fighting with a deal , saying, to someone, that guys, that’s how the deal will be, there won’t be a deal, because then we will see something like that . recognition that it is unlikely to survive, that it can be buried. now in expert circles, more precisely, to bury. yes, in fact, this consent is very true. the remark is consent in washington that it will be kept, despite the fact that europeans resist russia doesn't want it either. china also does not want, and these guys say. well, either you make a deal, or we will see something, either we will fly to you with an israeli, or we will do with you as we did with iraq in 2003, but, but the power of iran and so on i will completely add to brackets from myself

personally and today's russia in relation to iran. i think that he will take a different position than the then russia in relation to the upcoming one in a different weight category now, and maybe too say no and say naturally. well, iran, i must say now, is an ally for us more than important, and therefore, well, here the partner took the word of the allies, the partner took the word about the existence of a small middle eastern state, israel, where netanyahu has been tormented for days over the formation of a government and now he may also need it, in your opinion, some kind of aggravated supporter of military action. he is a hardliner, contrary to the position of some israeli military generals, but uh, but on the recommendations of the israeli intelligence agencies mossad that is, there is some split massage. in general, not only there for the military

operation against iran, military intelligence is against. when you say that netanyahu and massat are for a military operation against iran a a what is the possible scale of the operation in question? is this a blow to some capacity or is it, well, a full-scale military. what are we talking about, at least the eighties are remembered? xx century, when the israelis attacked the reactor in aga cancer and in 2007, when the israelis struck unusual missile attacks on a mysterious object in syria , at least, at least only such an option, maybe they don’t have a land border, that is, there will be no landing, no offensive. that is, it will. ah, air warfare. just what intensity. so we'll see, when you say there will be only an air war, there

will be no landing. even further i ask, why not? it depends on what kind of escalation in a given situation, who will need to go, in the end there is no common front line, listen for you to sit yourself not needed at all. you understand that e is the history of e the israeli army. and by the way, the most netonyaku. it has a large number of landing operations. with a landing in countries with which there are no borders no at all, they could have done this in uganda, but you can’t do this against the iranians , it’s fair, but we understand this, yes, it’s more stupid than us, that’s how it is at least. this is at least. i am begging you. yes, but now, as it were, just the question of what may or may not be this very catalyst. and here i am, i don’t know if you or one of your respected colleagues, as far as you understand, in this specificity, iran made a statement, made

a statement that, uh, that is, he confirmed, but a sixty percent enrichment. iran next. i don't know uranus. and i don't fully understand the 60% enrichment claim. i understand uranus, you understand. here to explain, that is, roughly speaking, this is a reason for them to be told a60 - this is no longer the peaceful atom on which you did it here. like there somewhere, but the veteran said this, in in principle, he could not have said it, but he said it was about what it is, on the one hand, to show that iran is going its own way, but uh, and no one is rocked by it. uh, if we open u textbooks on nuclear physics of nuclear power. here you open them to us and tell us open and a short lecture can create an atomic bomb in two ways: on plutonium, which is obtained from spent nuclear fuel for the need for uh, reactors and on enriched earlier like this, and according to open material, it is believed that uh, so that

the bomb was transportable in size from our studio. yeah, but you need, but you need interest enrichment. in general, higher therefore, out of sixty percent. you can't create a transportable bomb like that, but on the other hand, here i connect iranian, so to speak, the question of iran and all-nuclear research from the pakistani military nuclear program, yes, and since it's all open. and back in the seventies , when pakistan, under the e, ziyahu ilhak, went to its atomic bomb in response to the indian nuclear program and was already trying, as if the non- proliferation regime and they were trying on the gray market, somewhere something something expertise technologies, and that's it to receive it, and from that moment on, in the seventies , he believed that on this shadow nuclear market , it was iran that had one of the best technologies for

the production of centrifuges for enriching uranium ugu, and therefore, and iran knows how to do it, knows how to do it and has known for a long time and raz you are this one, by the way. here's what i recommend. that is the faculty of moscow state university incidentally. i just skipped that lecture of the middle ages, and that's all in the pulpit of the middle ages. we have studied this very carefully. i was at the department of anthropology, we are there more on geopolitics specialized. here, as if i recommend it, but since you didn’t skip this lecture, but i skipped it, then , please tell me, does it mean that the one who made him 60 to 90, well, how could it be within easy reach or this is some kind of completely different levels are not here. um, actually there is a threshold-mate that they consider officially high rich. this is 20. yeah, and, accordingly, with each e percent, on the one hand, everything is more difficult, and on the other hand, everything is getting easier. yeah, but here it seems to me that why all

this is happening, why is iran also raising rates, as a matter of fact. says the americans make these statements. mali has a formal reason, that is, iran says guys. we are moving, but the iranians are also not the first to start, that is, here too. uh, i will put our ukraine in the center and since, uh, let's not all of ours, but we are working on this our beloved, yes, and we are discussing. yeah, ukraine, so since, starting from february 24, the americans in general, very directly made it clear to all their former opponents and enemies. uh venezuela iran italy move away from russia move away from russia yeah and now we we see that in venezuela they are already talking about the almost complete lifting of the sanctions. well, yes, there is already almost his sleeve. yes. i remember these discussions of ours in the studio, everything is guaido maduro, they will already demolish it. yes, and now they are condemning the easing of the sanctions. iran,

at least. i do not know what is happening there in reality, but seeing the information space, primarily western information spaces. they are pumping up something there that iran has not departed from russia. yes, iran allegedly supplies drones to russia. and not just drones. or maybe you are talking. uh, to us with the audience that it all aggravates a calm kid. it's some kind of pressure guys. we can see and produce. and you have a chance, as it were, to move away from russia, and we, as it were, quite right, and this is precisely the point, yes, and another topic god bless them with supposedly drones. and what else is very important, but you can see it in the western information field. and that iran jacob is supplying us with drones? no, just for money. and for some allowances, i answer with

pleasure for some supposedly reciprocal services from russia, and what can russia supply for the military iran nuclear programs? uh-huh and so they beat their information policy very, very hard, that is, they link russia to iran around ukraine, and now you misspoke. uh, saying that iran is an ally, there is no formal union but de facto they actually consider iran to be allies. they are laid under this in advance, they tell the iranians guys. yes, i don't need to. and i however get back a little not agree, briefly. in just three phrases, the iranians do not believe these promises. and they are unlikely to go to them, they think they also know about israel. what is the impact because of israel in america and america they will not believe. well, uh, believe it or not , time will tell, as it will. all the rest. well, today you know me once again, when you invite three people who understand and they

throw you so choo-choo-choo, and you seem to be, here's an incomprehensible knot that you untied it is another matter that each of them still tied three knots. well, let's untie. gorite fills out a bunch of applications for bank loans. compare will help fill out just one application for loan and get approval on the best terms from the largest banks in comparison. if the loan is comparable. choose better. and more. and what is the sales of the year jumping in? the final sale of the year on ozone max extreme t-shirt for 99 rubles. stain remover mine or for 89 rubles. new year's peacock blanket for 299 rubles. on wednesday we have turkey kupaty. on thursday, friday, turkey fillet is all

baba from an ecologically clean region of russia recommended for children now tinkoffleks falls not only invites me friends before december 20, have time bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of two hundred million rubles, the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkov prize, he is so alone all p99. the vtb team will offer a credit card solution to the possibility of a reliable vtb bank - 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now at vtb.ru. go to vtb and that's it, you'll get a new year's mood comes with a panda and gifts for the whole family from 299 rubles. fantoy.

give cherkizov to your loved ones and yourself. imagine what we will have for dinner tonight i cook meat, my own it’s impossible to resist farms and natural spices, cherkizovo and it’s never been so tasty for me to compare prices for osago and buy in the same insurance don’t overpay the policy for comparison save up to five and a half thousand rubles differs, if insurance, then compare better. the final sale of the year on ozon water lilies aquaphor for 239 rubles. to the royal garden service for 999 rubles. black tea kurti for 59 rubles. the vtb team will offer

a solution, no need to worry, and with a high rate of up to 9.5% on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. only grain feed never uses and will not use growth hormones and harmful additives. and take great care of the freshness of the products no harmful additives. the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive free

service of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances. well, we have interestingly discussed a variety of topics. everyone has their own job. our job is to talk, but to explain, er, to argue, to find out the truth, there are people who have a different job. and now i’m just turning to these people. i know that tomorrow, and the war and his team goes beyond the tape. i wish them successful work. i wish you successful work. to all those who will be with this team. i am sure that the war will be able to ensure the safety of each of those who will go with him. well, of course, as it should be

the solution of all problems. the teams are run by brothers. the information channel on the first continues its work on the air the program time will tell the studio anatoly kuzichev in our country people have a lot of questions a lot of difficult questions have accumulated heavy themselves, of course. they can't always decide. here the all-russian popular front launched online broadcasting on the internet, anyone can call. now you see, it's all going on live online, anyone can call with their problem. they will help him. let's see what's happening on this stream right now.

we received another call from the popular front. good afternoon, my name is svetlana pavlovna chigireva yes, now tell us your problem, with which you turned to the popular front. so i live in the city of moscow, the printer district, shosseynaya street, 11, and i am addressing you on behalf of the residents of our house, our next problem has been going on for almost 9 months. the fact is that after the start of a special military operation in ukraine in our house from march to - present time. no , someone paints and scratches the doors and walls of elevators, as well as the doors of apartment halls on floors

on other floors, which means that they regularly do this to us. we turned to him. he paints regularly. first founded then it means that it’s no longer possible to emerge, because they began to scratch the anti-vandal elevator in our elevator, which means scratching. steels are waded and, accordingly, our extra paints over. so what do these so -called vandals do. they are right on the fresh paint that has not yet dried, and not again scribbles the same thing again, monstrous, but can you say an insult to our president? what exactly do they write? what is there, as it were, well, so what? what? what can i say on the air in this, because i can’t repeat everything, unfortunately, for example, an insult to the president is the most monstrous, they are even obscene, i can’t name them. it means that they write wake up. eh means e. you mean, uh, it means, well, it's clear, there,

what, uh, well, the children even call for some kind. yes, yes, russia without putin russia without putin, they, therefore, write further they do not plan. i know that you sent us photos. we will now ask that these photos be shown to us, if you please. yes , show me. this is only a part. yes, i see. hmm . well, it’s clear. general orientation understandable svetlana pavlovna please tell me, did you apply to somewhere you say, yes, to some authorities you said that something and what was the result of your appeal? so we turned to them. they clearly said that this is not our competence, their competence. they just paint over this to remove it, which they do regularly. we turned to the ovd printer. and

many times. i used whatsapp to drop these photos on a daily basis. here's how they and we get these new inscriptions. they ask here. this precinct was further addressed in writing by means of an electronic form. uh, with these photos attached. so the police department, the police also received an answer, but it’s about nothing, so, uh, they don’t find corpus delicti, since we can operate the elevator, well, the meaning of such an elevator, so it’s not the same thing that is not broken to operate. it is possible, but it is not possible to view it on video cameras in order to do this. why is it impossible to look at the video camera? do you have a camera there? and i’m saying that we have a video camera there is on the floor. the ride is inside the entrance in front of the elevator cabins right billy but on the eternal platform, but these inscriptions are all inside the elevator cabin and on floors where there is no video camera. that is, where there is no video camera. that's where it all goes,

as far as i understand. uh, the problem is that there are video cameras to identify these hooligans, who these people are, right? you understand? i. hmm, you know, we have your data here, they are recorded by pechatnikov highway, house 11. i think that with this problem. we will help you. here now i agree with you. no little things. yes, the situation is not so simple now in our country and there should not be trifles. yes, maybe there is no corpus delicti, but these people who spoil the elevator in this way, not only spoil the elevator, there is also a call to wake up. we must know them, we must see them. you understand, this is publicity. i think she will stop them. thank you very much. thank you very much and valery barinov and svetlana that's who called. well, listen right here is some kind of remember, there are claims to the buttons. no. well, then, sorry lift

rides rides. goodbye. well, on the other hand, however, there is no such formal history of the corpus delicti. well, they wrote that in our house there was a plus or minus. the same problem, no one painted the elevator, but there were security issues. the issue is solved very simply by installing cameras, but no one here can help them install a camera installation cameras, i decided to go to bed. on the shoulders of the residents of the house, if they have a large apartment building, you understand, but i don’t want to talk about sorry , no, it’s clear how to somehow solve the ideal, so that two cameras due installed and so on. wait, i don't want to talk about his camera. i want to talk about who writes this. why write this about civic activism if people don't like it, and they do n't like it. and it's right that they don't like it. they must make efforts to prevent this from happening, that is, to put cameras, if there is a person in the house who, in his opinion, is a partisan of the information struggle and partisans by the fact that the property itself, and, firstly, the residents even know this

person by sight . and yes he will guerrilla on the order is more complicated, because now he paints the elevators. tomorrow he will set fire to the doors. and this is, firstly, and, secondly, he has a corpus delicti, at least in the form of hooliganism, because these actions do not fall under this, oddly enough, this is because i will join this phrase. here is valery barina yes, he was surprised, that is, these are already prizes. what is some? well, of course, the call and i call, by the way, all russia will begin friends, stop living, so to speak, such euphoria, with self-deception and so on. us really give a damn. we need to understand that they are fighting with us not so to speak, they are not clearing their throats, but they are fighting, you just need to understand this and you are called wake up. wake up russians. yes, dmitry , most likely, this is all done by some comparatively sincere person, crazy or not. i don't know, but sincere only uh, it seems to me that uh, the main goal that he sets, maybe not even propaganda of ukrainian nazism there. this is a kind of expression of dissatisfaction

with the existing system to power. but i am not i understand what he wants to achieve if he spoils the lives of specific residents who would like to live in a more aesthetic atmosphere; they entered in a clean one, where the entrances are clean and not stuffed with bad inscriptions with good names, because because you need to somehow express your opinion in a different way . if you want to achieve the goal, and so, it seems to me, he just needs to explain what he has achieved. the opposite effect and its slogan will cause even more rejection due to the fact that this is an action. if we say so, we perceive him or her. we are not we know we still carry equality, friends, let's not dump our beings. so he or she just, uh, georg immediately called him or her an information war guerrilla. he is. well, maybe, maybe, can you imagine, i remember myself in this. well, we don't know about that. in what well at some young age and you understand that a large number. uh, so to speak, body movements and acts and actions that you produce. they have nothing to do with ideology. they are related to only one substance, adrenaline. that's all

it could be like this too. if it was money, well, please, where? to the eighty-fifth birthday and artemyeva on sunday at first petelinka pure products without harmful additives zenkov black keeps me happy, and now it also pleases my

friends. bring one or two or three friends, the number of friends is not limited and for each you will receive 1,000 rubles. and a friend will receive free service forever. have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize he is such a one attention when poisoning allergies and hangovers drink a vacuum cleaner like a boxing master for 189 rubles. coupon 22 cherkizova, represent today i'm ready. cherkizovo and it tastes so good to me. the vtb team will offer a

credit card solution from a reliable vtb bank . this is 200 days of purchases without interest. for secondary prevention of such diseases can help? i open lime on my smartphone with a task, i complete it in

the beeline application and get 50 additional gigabytes for the family with the beeline tariff 30 years on your side, the new year mood comes with panda and gifts for the whole family from 299 rubles. fantoy. give to your loved ones and yourself. komandova tv will offer a solution to worry. no need to be calm for your savings, you can even with a high rate. open fanta 9.5% on vtb.ru. go to vtb and that’s it, it’s nice to wake up on black friday, because the bed is mattresses, sofas and everything you love at a discount of up to 90% black, friday in a dream only for the fourth of december cherkizova imagines that we will be for dinner. today, i'm cooking. meat from our own farms and natural spices impossible to resist cherkizovo and it’s so delicious for me new items on the menu 99 99 things to do at

work and at home more and more mildronate activator of my strength, work of abilities and mental activity, so that my business is done, and not accumulated mildronate i am able to do this not only me. invite your friends before december 20, have time to bring friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends. the more chances to win the tinkov prize, he is so alone in petinka all perfectionist chickens eat only grain pockets never use growth hormones and harmful additives. yes, these are high standards for harmless additives. we continue to work live today sergey lavrov said very important words, in my opinion. for the first time such

wording was heard, i had a very strong feeling that until today, before this speech, our foreign minister’s speech was online. still. we had some. well , such is our traditional hope that all well, our partners will come to their senses, so to speak in quotation marks, that somehow they will still be ready for dialogue and so on and so on and so on, but today lavrov said at an online press conference on european security issues that the train has left and there will be no more business as usual. what is clear is that if and when, at some point in time, our western sessions, our western neighbors and former partners cannot escape from the neighborhood. if they suddenly become interested in somehow restoring joint work on european security, then restoration will not work, because recovery means to return to something that

was before. but business, as usual, will not. and when the west realizes that it is still better to coexist on the basis of some mutually agreed upon foundations, but we will listen to what the west proposes and, uh, it is clear that these should be fundamentally new principles of interaction, but will it be possible for such interaction in the foreseeable future? i don’t know how to decide for the west, which systematically destroyed everything that was laid down as principles of functioning of a unique pan-european organization called the osce. here is yanin oddly enough. i want to be the first to hear your comment. and you, too, like me

, hear a completely new tonality in this, well, the tonality from you is new, but the fact is absolutely old. yes, that is, while biden is president, it is absolutely clear that he had a bite to do. and this is his last chance in life to destroy russia , so he will do everything for the sake of destruction. ideally outside the ideal weakening. that is, they are not back off. and when the president changes, it is also a possible option. that is, it is not clear here as regards lavrov's statement. but in my opinion, these are absolutely obvious things. after what is happening now, the old security system cannot exist, the old system of checks and balances cannot exist. the map of the world is being redistributed. each of the superpower. now he will try to grab his piece of those who are closer ran to the superpowers of the type more. they will also try to comply with their geopolitical interests, or two will try from small

the geographical size of the countries, that is, now everyone has got everything understood- well, how, but wait, i'm restoring the commonwealth with poland and a piece of belarus. this is a very interesting project. ah, and they talk a lot about him, so now everyone understands that since the world systems of weights have fallen uh, the laws do not work. it is worse than the league of nations and , it turns out, there is no world gendarme and overseer from above, no one drives the stalls of laws, er, and in order and decency. everyone is falling apart. everyone drags his own, of course, it won't be like that security systems. no, really. here it is interesting, as you say, and those who managed to come running. how are the small powers subject. i thought that for the first time listen, well, the usual one. remember the haberdasher, the cardinal, who is now together, and there are already two pigeons, and the cardinal is still the same old one, yes, the cardinal,

who was not there, that's the point, they didn't find it, because it's difficult with the americans. and look, it means, ah, there really is a redistribution. yeah it really goes, uh try to bite each one trying to bite off everything that is possible just in the fact, will everyone be able to digest what he wants to bite off or am i here to bite off the others? here is the question. the main thing that concerns specifically lavrov's statement . i am actually very pleased with such a tonality, because in my opinion. it means that our, and the negotiations with the west, which were going on, including in turkey, failed. and that's good. this is absolutely wonderful in my opinion, because it means that the west refuses continues to refuse accept new realities. he continues to impose those conditions of compromise that do not suit us, which means that if we do not like the compromise , we are not going to sign it further, we will continue to solve our problems within the framework of the sw in the way we should continue to solve, that is, by

military means unfortunately, it seems to me that i am even more western comrades who are about the trap those western comrades who are ready to accept our conditions absolutely not new conditions were announced to putin at the beginning at the end of the last the beginning of this year. they do not have sovereignty. to do this, they can only sit and whine about how bad it is to live, for example, there france, which swears at this new american law of super processes , came to washington, hit the table with his fist and said it like he was there about submarines. yes, about the same way, so those who understand that something is wrong, they can’t do anything they don’t have. who understands what is wrong? and i'm afraid of these words. this is a new tone in the mouth of our minister. this is an indication that we are not agreed. there were attempts, but all new rpg negotiations have failed now, two words literally about the trap. still, a trap, very interesting. and what kind of traps are you, a trap and a

trap, yes, i will explain what kind of trap you have in the ukrainian trap. you, uh, quarreled forever. well , for the foreseeable our of our life is always the largest country in europe and the closest place. first, it's not the biggest. second, not forever. so you spend talking to you forever, with our lives already, uh, there will be no warm and friendly. although, in general, maybe we even live up to 120, which means, uh, you are wasting your strength, you are wasting energy. you are not developing yourself. your categorically no, so you can answer america your america earns. yes, very briefly, i wanted names for military operations that brought great benefits to russia because it creates

a civil society in russia that we could not do years before. and now we are created just to worry. and your who listen to us is interested, so to speak. no no no no, i must say that i am interested in the state, the states of europe and so on, but we are interested we, of course, have our own country, we are even studying and listening to what the states say in europe well, what they say in ukraine we certainly mean that we are trying to understand, so to speak, our situation, and so to say our own perspective. here, for example, is what the adviser to the head of everything says to the president of ukraine mikhail podolak in ukraine. here, for example, he believes that the collective west wants negotiations with russia, in contrast to the fundamental one, which stands on its own positions. ukraine listen. in europe still and not only in europe, but also in other countries and in the united states, there is still a lack of understanding of how this war should end , there is still a conservative view of russia as a country with which you need to have, uh, dialogue forms, that is, some then to conduct substantive conversations

with the russian federation and so on, but this fear. i think it will dissipate in the near future and in the end all the necessary decisions will be made so that we can be effective. well, a lot of nikolaevich's questions. what kind of effective solutions? do you know which ones have not yet been accepted? here, how is it, like a wunder, wonder, somehow waffles are called? yes, there are no such decisions that have not yet been made. he says this is it. secondly, see how he says that he says that he is no longer tired. they want negotiations. and also keeping in mind russia as partners before, and so on. here's how you feel. more and more often and more and more mentally i turn to the primary sources of my university youth, that is, the work of vladimir ilyich lenin and a little, because for all my disagreement with the goal, i certainly always admired

the methods. and here, accordingly, i will rephrase a little the originality and complexity of the current moment lies in the fact that a huge number of very different contradictory tasks have converged in one temporary node. in this situation, build uh, whatever forecasts were. and even more so, build to implement political plans. extremely difficult. i see well what i see is no way out on this subject. that address, in fact, went exactly by whom the way in which until now, according to the words of the padalek, the west is ripening tell me directly what it is so

that i understand them. how can i tell? when they did not clearly formulate this, it is about the fact that either the west will set the task of the final collapse of russia in its current form, and then some new system of relations will be built with those subjects that will form it together, or either this will not will happen , and so on, to be honest, no, yes, that is, either they will pass through red square or they will not. yes, but for you really have to go through red square, such a small snag. well, no one is ready to go through the painted area, and then this is the whole situation. it drags on for an indefinite number of years. that is, you want to say that either the west will fight, what is it called? determination to go hard at war on

russia what they want but can't, what is ukraine's victory ukraine's victory in the eyes of ukraine is the return of the territorial situation. uh, well, january of the fourteenth year, relatively speaking, so well, how are they they say, 91, well, the nineties are fine. yes, it's wonderful, but it doesn't solve anything. not for anyone but ukraine and russia retains its potential is preserved as russia and for the west, you think this is unacceptable. and then why they got involved, it was generally acceptable then it was not necessary to understand that it is clear that, well, they don’t know about the collapse, it’s still such a process that can bury everything and all people with an excellent militia under the rubble. just en masse and in chorus. but , but there is such a concept that like russia they don’t want her to break up, they want to strangle her, but not strangle her, so that she twitches, but does not die, you know, well, there is such a version that

they did it all in the ninety-first. i just generally, yes, they did. that's what they did, so we survived pancakes. yes, yes, yes, everything i went everything started. yes, yes, ours is not going anywhere, but we are concerned with traps. that’s just a podolia, and when making his statements, he would like the zach- west to drive himself into a trap in a trap, so that he sets himself only one goal - destruction russia no negotiations and so on people. who determine the policy in the west do not want to be driven into a trap. they want to see the world differently , they want their hands to be free. they want one scenario with regard to russia that doesn’t work, you can try it, another third, fourth scenario, so just for this reason, they really allow and do we allow negotiations, and lavrov said that we allow? and what is not? yes, and what some experts think is that lavrov said obvious things. maybe they were

obvious to someone, but when they are articulated by a representative of russian diplomacy, they sound completely different. therefore, you need to be very careful. listen to this question absolutely on this level. they sound like this in some key, please, dear colleagues, and i’ll look at the problems a little, otherwise we are all hostages of the mathematical model that we all created to the future of infinity. who even said that the west will exist, what are the constants or what? so i don't say. hi him for the simple reason that the spare part fights its existence somewhat incorrectly, we see the problem. this is not a colonial war. this is not a colonial war, but for some other half-thrown piece of paper called ukraine, this is a struggle for itself. lumen with frame. this is a struggle for one's own living space, a struggle for one's life on the edge of the abyss , in fact, an intermediary. i will tell you what is mathematical models invented daily, which give the west a very, very short

existence in quality. here is some subject in the event of the defeat of ukraine well, it is clear from the point of view of a short history, there is not up to a year in its current form. here, yes, in which you can see how everyone is interested good question a question from a physicist in our program. where will he go? i'm talking about the same scenario, which in all the soviet union in the ninety-first year, the european union today is actually a common passport with the same with a common banking system with a single government and so on. and in principle, this is, well, let's say, the passion with which ursula fondyrlyan, who has abandoned his basic profession, defends, so to speak, literally a barricade to prove only one thing, that they are really on the edge of the abyss, who doubt. look closely at their energy. think about the fact that education is a very specific thing. look at the rise of islamic banking on who knows islamic banking and how

way they now live already on the money of the boat. and what principles to confess the largest banks that give narrowing money. you don’t know the west, this is a very interesting topic, which, by the way, explains in many respects the friendship of russia with saudi arabia and not only it. yeah, it's understandable about what awaits us, we'll see very good very good in the coming months. it will be very difficult, but the west is on the verge of a deal. now it’s hard to say if the european union is on the verge of collapse, then i fully admit such a thing, but i will remind you that at the heart of the european union in fact, there was an agreement between germany and france and there was an idea that these two countries should stop being at enmity with each other. uh-huh, everything that was on the layer and superimposed. sorry for the expression on this design in the late nineties early 2000s. this, of course, all this, all this liberal ideology should be thrown into the trash. and so i said that many things that are called throwing away and really

really thrown away are two different things after all . here alexander believes that this one hundred percent already going. a in. a. you are yours to tell us that the willingness to throw away the trash heap of the liberal idea is just emerging and right-wing forces in the west are just emerging and this process is long and it is not necessary and, accordingly, a change in the position of the west, including will be, if it is connected with the decision and islamic. sorry question and many more questions. the european union will not be like that. tomorrow, as a result of their own , some constructs may destroy, the west , for example, atlanticism, in other words, the control of the united states over europe may sharply weaken. yes, perhaps, perhaps, this concept of the collective american-european west will collapse, but the west will remain. as such, moreover, we will do everything possible so that it remains, as such, the west and the european union remain, because firstly, if they collapse, they will cover us with rubble so that it does not seem small, because

if the system collapses, we have europe will have a set of countries, either fascist or islamic, not this or that scenario, we categorically do not need, especially eastern europe, europe was, but our our biggest trading partner after it will again be our biggest trading partner is pure geographic determinism. excuse me, please , to sum up our discussion so to speak, that here, er, means that the world cannot. the former it is also quite obvious when lavrov explains to western partners that it is impossible to go back. and in fact, at what stage, after all, er, the old structures, the old system of checks and balances, the old security system, which took shape over decades, well, it was destroyed for almost decades. and when the west says let's go back to some situation where there will be negotiations. perhaps they are also proposing a

situation two years ago, which we are not satisfied with, and therefore they suggested that the west sit down at the negotiating table to develop some kind of new security system, so that they take on obligations, so that they confirm on paper what is so long about they said that the expansion of nato, the emergence of new bases near our borders does not threaten us, but they refused to do this, because it is completely clear that now, if we talk about something negotiations, then it's uh no longer return to the wreckage. and we are at least 5 years ago. we walk at least 10, even 15, anyway, this is a certain stage of the wreckage of the former security system. it is necessary to create a completely new system lavrov said this, this is absolutely linked to how we see the situation regarding ukraine, there can be no international security system at all as long as there is a nazi enclave in the center of europe, until the enclave is abolished in this form nazi no system at all safety is out of the question, i see . thank you very much. and let's and let's now excuse me

please about this. and what's best is the best situation. still, this is what is happening in the world reflected demos. that is, when everyone at the g20 learned that a rocket had fallen into poland, all these or the leaders of the world were sitting. so somehow, like this, everyone was grouped together, and in the corner stands like this johnson looks at it, as if in time. i left the european union you are all fools, yes, let's listen now they were talking about europe about. what will she be in? in the form of a euro? union and so on. look here. uh, the information of the director of the russian foreign intelligence service sergey naryshkin varsha is very interesting. it's actually not just watching everything that happens. warsaw has a product, going plans. what are these ? do you understand? that part of the polish

lands, due to an oversight of fate, is located on the territory of present-day ukraine, i understand correctly this thought. i think this is very outdated information for a long time everything has been warmed up for a long time everything has been said for a long time the supreme joy and public opinion of ukraine began to remove the border between poland and ukraine in time, so ukraine willingly, uh, merges with poland in a unified impulse in return. poland promises to cover those territories that she can hold her position, and this is only from russia can be a partner in joint debt. this is such a ukropol. the union is very similar to the euro, but more compact and well expandable, yes lithuania yes belarus speech post-spaly public opinion polish public opinion agrees with this. i agree with this and the process will go. and when in this ring the

ukrainian construction becomes the largest super-mega-state, its ukrainian is gone, yes, when dmitrievich says, but what about, what about patriotism? so they see how they live. in the same place they have european patriotism now europe, please, more for a long time, they have been preparing the annexation of a question in time. yes? question this is called comfortable. it is called thank you and the time will begin when the uncontrolled disintegration of ukraine begins, when the kiev regime collapses, when everything gets really bad, when everything starts only then more only it will become a trigger to start nexia more until there are more fish for the price, because if there is more now will go to do it already, then in this situation she will be accused of ruining ukraine, but the poles are waiting and not only the poles and romanians and a little bit of the hungarians. they are waiting for the kyiv regime. and to crumble, and when it starts to crumble, they will

will receive the full blessing of the european union to collect crumbs to collect just not enough they are drawn. yes listen to this program at least. this program is at least where the crumbs extend. i understand, because i depend on us more they extend everything that has been said here, friends. it is clear that everyone seems to be afraid of the word annexation, but i will tell you, so be afraid of friendly mergers much more, because they are not what they want to seem. you know, many build in vain, but the president of joseph biden united states of america that supposedly he does not remember anything, he does not know anything and does not know where to go, he is always confused. i'll tell you this, you know man, where to go if he put a clear, unambiguous goal. here's a biden on stage, sometimes i don't know, and when there is a goal, he knows where to go. this means that this

byte is located on the site itself. just unparalleled, clearly and unparalleled, so to speak, uh, so to speak, knowing the direction, but look what happens . look it up with a macron sits. this one is burning precisely at this table, the macron hit his rather dry fist. i just said, don't you dare do this to europe anymore, it's frosty. here they sit, so to speak, and eat and rejoice with each other, and the woman to give us about the woman, the wife of the presidents, is content with water. so remember, as a soviet comedy. they said , child, ice cream to the women, there are no flowers, and then everything will be mixed up. the information channel on the first continues to work live, this program time will tell appeared in kiev supermarkets de russified moscow sausage. now,

as you understand, it is called kievskaya. well, real ukrainians, even their teeth are not the same as everyone else's dentist, apologize, showed the patriotic crowns of his patient. they say that the ukrainian put this prosthesis 5 years ago. well, meanwhile, in lvov, as it turned out, they are already doing dna tests for the absence, genes are mosquitoes, and they even issue official documents stating that a person is a racially pure ukrainian. it’s interesting just how this muscovite gene is detected, but even more i wonder what to do with those who have it or will act according to the laws of stepan, bandera and hitler. well, in kiev, they probably forgot how the nazis still acted. the fifties measured the skull and those for whom it did not meet the specified standards. we just sent them to the crematorium and actively discussed the topic of dna tests, we assumed that if the dna test itself costs 6,500 to prove that you

do not have muscovite roots, then as much as the bribe costs, that you do not have such muscovite roots, because there almost everyone has them, meanwhile friends at work calculations in the vicinity of kurdyumovka in the artyomovsk direction can now only be observed from cover. one of the main tasks of artillery is to prevent reinforcements from being transferred to artyomovsk about the intensity of its work. on this area. says a large number of shells that our guys use. and here is a video that confirms this fact, a video of the destruction of ukrainian militants with water has appeared on the network. scouts of the third guards separate battalion inflict heavy hitting the enemy using drones . apparatuses residents of pavlovka say that ukrainian troops fired on the force with phosphorus bombs, let us remind gods, several conventions prohibit their use if peaceful life can become victims. we are already 70 years old, we

have received a bag. we are in the basement of the explosion. what's happening there? everything is exploding, all the houses are throwing these forceful bombs. uh houses say how the candles, how the candles hit the roof. it is impossible to extinguish it is not extinguished. she is not a thread of water to the ground. and there's a lot people need this, well, it burned half the strength on the head and was broken. who is shooting, in general, apparently ukrainian troops. the united states is going to

continue to help ukraine, they plan to purchase equipment to maintain the energy security of the independent washington will supply kiev with backup generators, first aid, body armor for public utilities, mobile boilers, and equipment for heating networks. everything. they are going to buy it for $23 million, it is expected that these deliveries will provide heating for 7 million civilians . residents in 19 regions of ukraine in addition, nato gathered to finance the production of soviet-style ammunition for ukraine, the head of the state department. usa n. you're not blinkin said that america is considering all options to provide all the necessary weapons. we are exploring all options to make sure ukraine gets what it needs. this also applies to soviet-era systems. nato, as always, is also trying to provide assistance to ukraine ; western tv channels tell on interruptions how the

alliance will send independent generators and weapon. and maybe someday they will accept non -false nato members. the north atlantic alliance promises that nato will help ukraine both with military equipment and with the stabilization of energy supply. spare parts are needed as urgently as emergency generators and all forms of winter aid, the president of russia with his insidious plan in how many days to seize ukraine by military means cannot be successful, now he wants the ukrainians to break the backbone of ukrainian society and we will do everything to prevent . it's on the wish list of ukraine there is also more ammunition and other weapons. like the german rocket launcher, for example. mars weapons are currently being destroyed in ukraine faster than they can be replenished and there is no denying that there is a shortage in supplies. this place is very symbolic for the alliance. after all, it was here that the defense alliance formulated the prospect

of ukraine joining nato in 2008. on the air of a german talk show, there was a serious skirmish between the german journalist alisa schwartz and the ukrainian correspondent of rd vasily golod schwarzer called the hostilities in ukraine a proxy war between russia and the united states well, that is, in fact, she started things by their proper names, but the famine strongly disagrees with her. for ukraine , too, the conflict in ukraine is not only defensive in nature against putin against russia, it is also a proxy war between russia and america, we have entered the sphere of conspiracy theory and myths colleague. let's just avoid this controversy in such an extremely serious situation. no , this is not a controversy, ms. schwartz, this is not a controversy. you don't want to seriously say that this claim that america is playing in this conflict, this conspiracy theory and myth america has nothing to do with the fact that russia attacked

ukraine to the fact that russia does not accept that ukraine is a democratic state and wants to decide her own future. i don’t even know if he let go of this hunger with america, that america doesn’t solve anything or tried to save it, but somehow it didn’t work out very well, donetsk is in touch with alexandra raskoboynikov, a journalist. e, alexander hello. here's a specific question for you there. western armament ends in the west, they are trying to start producing the soviet model . a lot of things are real, because you understand that they just print money, so you give yourself a loan and do it. uh, what they do not consider necessary and now they have a fire. i just don’t understand that now the army of the russian federation is preparing for a very serious offensive, in principle, it doesn’t even hide it to the ukrainian media therefore, for example, now with you, a blow was struck back in the center to a few hail of nezadeevka. they know they don't see. they have a very similar, how to say the same

thing with the russian federation you about humanity. i will take this avdeevka as an example. yes, they are constantly hitting this girl in the city. in principle, it could have been erased from the earth a long time ago, because only it brings a storm. no, we only know god. tell me, hands are dying, well, ours don’t do this for the time being, and that’s why they use it and supplies weapons. the theme is the remnants of the ukrainian militants, who are at the same time, you know, that they even speak. uh, here is a loving trained one, who is now in kiev there, ah, podlyako, who is the adviser to this drug addict. they smile, boast and say, and they will give us more, and they will bring us more. and there will be more of us and we will fight now, because we are ready to endure. i said wife. a drug addict that they are ready to endure 2-3 years even further than the united states, yes, for americans this is such a war that they cannot lose, what we cannot sell. but if it’s small, but we are fighting on our own land, and they just supply weapons and pieces of paper with their fabric, which no one feels sorry for, so you can expect anything from them , but at the moment i can tell you that they are here colossal losses. they are simply from their anger from their hatred of

everything russian. right now, it’s just that every day they are very cruelly shelled, donetsk is killed every day, and it’s beating from this avdiivka, which you already understand everyone curses here. it's already just goes over all the brink it's, well, it's impossible. just endure in the city when he gets into kindergartens. uh, it's on the street. the day before yesterday, a man drove up to a gas station, refueled the car in the evening, grad flew in and killed him on the spot. it's just that he was just refueling the car, so it seems to me that for the time being there will not be very hard blows, as many of us here say about it. uh, infrastructure bridges. they can't deliver. just ukraine, how much of it is nothing, when it will be very dark there and let's be say, let's not. it turns out that a large number of refugees will go from the ukrainian who they are, for example? the same europe europe loves them. she loves them, too, loves them , you know, so they should be closer to europe. otherwise, you won’t win, because now there is a full-scale third world war. there is a war for our survival. that is, if we defeat him this is not we will live. if we lose, no one will understand us, they will destroy everyone. there's such rage there's such hatred. you can see what they are doing now, for example, with

churches on the territory of the ukrainian colony. they completely destroy. e, according to orthodoxy, it is completely erased, that is, never for them. well, as he says, we are really at war with the devil on the understanding of the word. this is darkness, they seized the priests and now declare that they will not change priests far. well, even if you would have been told about it 3 years ago. i think that at that time you hardly believed it, but they, if you tell now, some of us are ukrainian experts in journalists. they will also say that the kremlin's inventions, in fact, there is no such thing, but we will show the footage. they will also say everything, it's not true on mosfilm filmed. they openly say, openly now they say that yes, we will change. we will be his poroshenko yesterday poroshenko spoke yesterday on the channel and says all these verbatim. i say all these priests need to be seized, he says, thank god we are now seizing them, i say, and we will change all of them, he says, moreover, he says, ukrainian citizenship needs to solve them all. thank you so much. yes, alexander raskoboinika was in direct contact with us with such a breath of reason for many from ukraine for the military medics who are

now in the donbass there is no such thing as a shift day night evening they work around the clock 24/7 without rest here, our colleague ekaterina strizhenova talked to one of these heroes, alexei zarov. i am in captivity. well, you do not understand, why now? how can a new one treat me, yes, a childish choice, tired strings treated me? you hear from mom and i hit the city from the mountains and was hospital just in the trash, but he treats me, so she. lord have mercy lord forgive me one

of those doctors who could not stay in the country and went to the donbass to help all those in need was alexei zarov, chief physician of the central clinical hospital of st. alexei doctor. he dreamed of becoming since childhood. after all, this is a special calling to serve the sick and suffering, a third -generation doctor, the father of five children, two of whom are already continuing the family tradition, and not a student of medical universities over the past six months. he eight once visited the donbass, he was one of the first to organize medical assistance, aleksey yuryevich is sure that the opportunity to help people in trouble gives a feeling of closeness to god aleksey yuryevich you first came to the

donbass hotel for us another world. in general, it began in the same way as for many with the speech of our president. i remember when we went down, uh, for breakfast, yes, after listening to her, we met this news. here is the first employee hotels. he says, you know she didn't know, by the way, here we explain that this is such a situation that she cried? the only thing she said was that the boys would be back soon. of course, we had the feeling that, probably, e we could be the senior triesde. uh, a few donbass peace came, that it will probably end quickly. what many. guys, people arrived fighters are thrown out.

one of those highlights. e of that trip is uh. this is precisely the state of people, the state that it is now, we are slowly coming to. uh people at that point, there were already deprived. eh, what we are now so quietly losing. remember how sick she was to us uh, hmm departure from our country famous brands. uh, the fact that we don’t have the card, that is, they haven’t had anything like this for a long time. they are a long time ago. uh, already those who remained, uh, to live in donetsk and donbass, they made their choice and they understood, what is the value of life i was lucky to be. uh, back in gorlovka in may, and here we are talking there in the hospital. the second hospital, where so recently? uh, together there back, probably, yes, we are there too the doctors who work there, these doctors who

work there, were transported there, the regenev digital apparatus. they don't know the weekend. what are the most common injuries? well, now, uh, the main injuries are precisely the explosive injuries. injury here is such a rare bullet very went to bed ninety-seven percent of the minosaurus injury. i remember when visiting a new new gift, just from the staff. well, the hospital. they say that he says all the medical unit comes running to look at the bullet wound, because it's mostly a mine, uh, who arrive, who lie on the ground in the donbas, uh, there are no military hospitals, they do not have their own medicine.