Skip to main content

tv   Bolshaya igra  1TV  December 8, 2022 10:45pm-11:45pm MSK

10:45 pm
you listen to me, troubadour. wow . masha conscience drove mom. i sent a friend to the village for a couple of days until monday. you and i alone propose to start, going to a restaurant. then i have to change. well then. hurry up. in 5 minutes i have to leave the house, i won’t have time in 10 minutes.
10:46 pm
masha is very much needed. i don’t need about masha and tolya, tell me directly, you need me specifically . it’s you. i thought you had the guts to say.
10:47 pm
well done. this business should be celebrated with cognac. no, victor is now only essentuki for you. flowers. give it to me and go to the store, buy something for cutting and take mikhailovna offend. let me lay the table for you, the way i can. how do you know how to ennoble everything around you, even this one is a little enviable to
10:48 pm
turn into. and you wouldn’t have been waiting for this a little bit, but you would have already taken the peasant into circulation. when he becomes envious, you won’t get through to him with such and such manners. what are my manners? stripes with people should be. rinse the case of the murder at the hippodrome brought to court. this is a confession to a triple murder ok, that's ok. but there are questions. i've been preparing your presentation for the award. requested some important cases that you were investigating. i read it. and noticed. strange coincidence the
10:49 pm
same people in different cases in different roles, but the same women. anna dorofeeva irina zimina katerina sviridova and vershinina, the former teplitskaya, whom you once arranged to work for us in and close to a very good employee. zimina irina is the wife of your old comrade in one case, she is a witness in another, her enemy of the motherland finds a corpse in fourth. she reports the location of the perpetrator and so on and so on and so forth. your
10:50 pm
ex-fiancee who is suspected of murder is either caught in speculation, or she suddenly accidentally followed someone and reports this to the investigation, then her killer kidnaps her, but it is not her fault that she was kidnapped. i don't understand what you are getting at. you you divulged the secret of the investigation to them. is it yours? they are not agents. ha, you will go and pull me along with
10:51 pm
you. partly from this happened even before me , i can only indirectly relate to this. so so you are writing a letter of resignation from the authorities. i transfer these cases to the archive and no one else comes back to this clear report report. you quit on your own. without scream and noise today right now
10:52 pm
good evening on the air big game today an event took place that once again proved why, with all the confrontation, the total distrust of russia, the united states needs to maintain contacts and, even more so, maintain diplomatic relations viktor bout is a russian who extradited to the united states from thailand back in 2010, and in the twelfth year. he was condemned. there's 25 years in prison for arms dealing. by the way, he never admitted his guilt. so. today, viktor bout finally returned to his homeland. russia has achieved his return. she sought his return from the first day of imprisonment. and it happened today at the airport in abu dhabi. he was exchanged for american basketball player britney kryner, who was convicted in russia on drug possession charges. this is a very important bright. let it be small, but a bright spot in the current generally dark, uh,
10:53 pm
russian-american relations. well, there is one more. to maintain and even strengthen contacts with the americans. these are the risks of escalation, and even the hybrid war that the united states is waging against russia in general and in ukraine in particular, the risks of this hybrid war escalating first into a direct military clash between russia and nato and then into a nuclear war yesterday. by the way, vladimir putin, speaking at the human rights council, noted that the threat of nuclear war is growing and today we on this we will have a talk with the president of the center for national interests, dmitry syme, and lieutenant general, professor of the higher school of economics, evgeny buzhinsky, dmitry evgeny petrovich good evening. good evening. well start. i want from the anniversary, uh, and this is not the anniversary of the belovezhskaya accords, but another anniversary exactly 35 years ago, uh, on december 8 , 1987 in washington, mikhail sergeevich gorbachev and ronald reagan signed an agreement on the
10:54 pm
elimination of intermediate-range missiles, which for almost 30 years served as one of the strategic stability and military security in europe and in in the world as a whole, let me remind you that this treaty obliged the soviet union and the united states to abandon a whole class of weapons of ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km. well, launchers for them, but in 2019 the united states unilaterally withdrew from this treaty, accusing russia of violating it. although they violated it themselves, and this week the first battery of the new american medium-range attack missile system, called typhon, was handed over to the pentagon. this is the first such complex after the end of the cold war and, accordingly, the termination. eh, drsmd. first, these complexes are supposed to be located on the american pacific. coast. well, in the next two years. they can
10:55 pm
be deployed in europe as far as germany is concerned. dmitry well, i would like to ask you in this connection. uh, uh, today the deputy head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, sergei alekseevich ryabkov, has already announced that while russia will adhere to the moratorium that, uh, announced, uh, a couple of years ago, vladimir putin on the deployment of e russian ground-based intermediate-range missiles, but if the united states will deploy its missiles, either in europe or in asia, russia will naturally reconsider its e, position and most likely the answer will be symmetrical. that is, it turns out that in addition to the military conflict in ukraine, we still need to prepare for a repeat of the missile crisis. here is similar to what was in the early eighties . i dmitry remember this date very well. because e was arranged very magnificent. uh, lunch at honor gorbachev white house. it was called
10:56 pm
the state supper. this uh meant that how it was done, uh, with all the honors and mood, frankly speaking, it was very, very solemn, but i also saw it, so i was very glad that this contract was signed, eh, but i saw something that worried me. uh, i, uh, sat at the table between alexander yakovlev, who was then a member of the politburo, secretary of the central committee, and a barbarysh. in general, they did it by mistake, because they thought it was barbara. bush will find it difficult to communicate with yakovlev, and yakovlevstvo spoke english very well. so it wasn't really a problem, huh, but it was a very interesting conversation and, uh, very disturbing. he was very interesting, because yakovlev, frankly, really wanted to be liked. uh,
10:57 pm
boobbed barbara. she was the vice president's wife. and there have already been talks that, most likely, her husband will run for president. so that's understandable. why did the secretary of the central committee seem to want to please her. but he alerted her very much by the way he praised america all the time throughout the dinner and khayal his country, including other members of the soviet leadership. and when dinner was over and we were taken, and ivan klina changed the concert to the concert, why is this such a strange person? she couldn't understand what was happening. well, i couldn’t explain it to her properly, because i myself, mr. yakovlev , didn’t know the stage at all then. it was truly amazing. why was it disturbing? because it was absolutely unexpected
10:58 pm
that high soviet leaders. they wanted to please the americans so much that, in general, they didn’t even knew where to stop and it occurred to me that this could have unfortunate consequences, because if this happens, then for sure, knowing russia, i expected that there would be some kind of buran and there would be problems, unfortunately, so it turned out to be and of course, today the situation is radical, different. there can be no talk of any magnificent reception at the white house, and in honor of the russian leadership, and in general, from my point of view, there is, perhaps, a relationship. well, in general, the worst points, and even i would say the cold war. and now we're starting
10:59 pm
for the first time to speak seriously about the possibility of using nuclear weapons, president putin spoke about this yesterday, who said, let's listen, we are not crazy. we haven't gone crazy. we are aware that we have such nuclear weapons with these funds, and they are in a more advanced and more modern form than any other nuclear country. this is obvious today, yet another fact, but we are not going to brandish these weapons. uh, like razors, running around the world. of course, let's go from what it is, it is, naturally, a deterrent that does not provoke an expansion of conflicts, a deterrent and
11:00 pm
i hope everyone understands this, but the general. that's when i hear restraining, it can be understood in different ways. one can understand this, as it has been understood for many years. those who believed in the so-called mat doctrine, ah, mutually assured destruction, and in general proceeded from the fact that nuclear weapons are only good for deterring the use of nuclear weapons by another country. but uh back in the seventies in the united states, other approaches of well-known doctrines began to emerge , a man who was then the secretary of defense of the united states, who said that in order for deterrence to be effective. there must be some possibility of using this weapon, because if something cannot be used, then there is a deterrent effect. in general, it is minimal.
11:01 pm
it may be enough to prevent you yourself from being dealt a strategic nuclear strike that destroys, but everything else is less serious, but also very threatening. e, he considered it impossible to restrain and therefore began to think about some other options that would allow him to do it. ah, nuclear weapons. if i may, so to speak more flexible to look, is there something that can be done with nuclear weapons, that would allow nuclear weapons to be used and this part of their arsenal , not necessarily in order to hit someone, but desirable in order to to understand, but if you want. the sincerity of your intentions the sincerity of your willingness to do whatever it takes to protect your safety and your legitimate interests. are there any echoes
11:02 pm
of the hlyazenger doctrine in the modern russian approach to the threats that now arise against russia on dmitry but before answering your question. i'll say a few words about the inf treaties, the anniversary that we are celebrating. and naturally. i didn’t know about this insult there at the state reception that you talked about, but the fact that the soviet, political leadership, in general, deliberately gave up positions, therefore absolutely, i tell you well, this is actually the soviet union changed. exchanged a deployed group of medium-range missiles in the western part. e of the soviet union and on the territory of the members of the warsaw pact to the plans of the united states to deploy e, similar missiles in western europe. therefore, such an asymmetry of the destroyed e, missiles, there 1846 in the
11:03 pm
soviet union 846. e for the united states, this is not an extension of the treaty to the cruise missile of the sea and air-based, where the united states had an overwhelming advantage it and in the end, like cherry on the cake. this is destruction. uh, complex aka iskander's predecessor , moreover, uh, the americans are not third-party . in one-sided, moreover, the americans are not embarrassed. what was the reasoning? yes, we understand that he has that the range of this complex does not exceed 500 km. but, that is, it does not reach the border of the designated agreement, but it is too good. it is quickly deployed. it can, e, be used in a nuclear version. and in general he has a very e, so we believe. uh, good upgrade potential moreover, i talked, then with the chief
11:04 pm
designer already, uh, all the design documentation was restored from memory . passion will please the americans now about nuclear weapons. there is such a thing as nuclear deterrence. you are absolutely right. uh, mutual mat mutual assured destruction - this, of course, you know, is an arbitrary journalistic definition, but nuclear deterrence, of course is aimed at ensuring that, uh, the side of which intends to use uh, nuclear weapons understand that there will be a response and the response will be adequate, but still, nuclear deterrence refers mainly to strategic nuclear forces, as far as the schlissinger doctrine is concerned. by the way, i must say that now in the united states, uh,
11:05 pm
a new generation, i call it an unafraid generation of military leaders who do not know what a real war is after vietnam, the americans actually did not fight on land, mainly from the air from the sea. first, everything is in tatters, and then it is only possible on the ground, as in iraq, but they bought the republican guard there and practically lost no one. so, but the whole point is that the americans believe that they can use e nuclear weapons somewhere in a remote theater in europe on tuesday in the middle east, while they themselves will sit across two oceans on their own continent and, so to speak, watch the conflict unfold, and in the russian federation , uh, there is no such doctrine, so uh, president putin and uh, said his famous phrase that in the case
11:06 pm
the use of a nuclear warhead on the territory of the russian federation of any power, the answer will be at the decision-making centers and the answer will be strategic. general, what you said is very convincing, because it is clear that if the strike would have been delivered on the territory of russia or on the other hand on the territory of the united states you are absolutely right. but i read one interesting study not so long ago about how russia could very effectively use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, let's say, completely, paralyzing ukrainian energy system, but by completely blocking the use of ukrainian railways . no, it was not the russian military who revealed state secrets to me. and i voice it on
11:07 pm
russian television. this is an american study. ah and uh, it intrigued me, it intrigued me, because in general, in fact, the authors of this study. uh, they wanted to say that they did not use the russian opportunities, which moscow does not want to talk about. well, about which she can not know. no dmitry but in order to paralyze the ukrainian energy system, the russian armed forces do not need any nuclear weapons - this proves it, because already 50% is ukrainian estimates. well, the western ones are also put out of action with very vague prospects for restoration, the same applies to the railway network. because it hasn't been hit yet. i don't know, uh, why, but i've read that it's very easy to restore. if the beat you know, you know i'm not
11:08 pm
talking about the tracks, i'm not talking about the rail ways about the railway track that hangs. i'm talking about two tunnels that connect the western part of ukraine with the central and eastern ones to put them out of action. yes, this is a difficult goal, but it solves the problem, and without not far from murmansk and or even from the russian coast. ok then. in russia, too, can carry out such an explosion near alaska, what's the point? i don't see any military sense in it, you get out much better than uh. i will not enter. uh, what is being called into the dangerous field of controversy with you clearly much better equipped, but i understand a little, uh, in geopolitics. and so they say, geopoliticians give me the impression that if washington, uh, headquarters in brussels will not exclude the
11:09 pm
russian nuclear arsenal as something that could be related to a possible escalation. if there is, if you want a healthy respect for the presence and capabilities of this arsenal, i think that it would not only be in the interests of russia, but i think that this would also contribute to strategic stability dmitry, i completely agree with your last statement. and it seems to me that this is a very important statement by vladimir putin that you have cited. in principle, it should remove all insinuations about the possibility or impossibility of russia using tactical nuclear weapons inside ukraine against ukraine. because when we hear such talk, we understand that the west just wants to damage russia's relations with the strange world majority, that is, with china with india with other countries. putin said, here i want to emphasize again that he said that nuclear
11:10 pm
weapons are a deterrent that does not provoke the expansion of conflicts, but deterrent what this means in relation to the ukrainian conflict. this means that russia's nuclear deterrence is intended to keep the united states from either going into direct conflict, going to direct war with russia, or ramping up its aid to ukraine in such a way that russia perceives it as violating its, e, vital interests and creating a vital threat, that is, the object of the policy of nuclear containment of russia is not ukraine at all, but the united states and nato and partially. i would say yes. and basically uh, this policy of holding back work because the administration is byno. yes indeed constantly underlining. that a direct military clash is unacceptable, that it does not want to
11:11 pm
supply long-range weapons, long-range missiles to the kiev regime, and so on and so forth in this regard. here containment works as it should work, but er the problem is that conflict can escalate. not only intentionally, but even unintentionally, nuclear deterrence successfully prevents a deliberate spillover of a hybrid war into a direct military clash between russia and nato, but i see the main threat in the fact that this can happen unintentionally as a result of provocations. provocation from the kiev regime. and here is a series of recent provocations e we saw as before the kiev regime. e, launched e drones are not western. yes, but, nevertheless, he launched drones at airfields in the ryazan , saratov and kursk regions. what was the reaction united states it was very, i think ambivalent, because on the one hand, uh,
11:12 pm
secretary of state, damn it, and national security council spokesman john kirby said they don't encourage or recommend that kind of statement. here is the statement. uh, john kirby was not encouraged and, uh, not granted the right, but at the same time, and the united states secretary of defense floyd austin made such a statement that can only be interpreted in one way, we do not encourage, but we do not prohibit and if ukraine is so say, she can, then, then, please, listen to what he said, let the united states work to ensure that ukraine cannot develop its own means for striking long distances the short answer is no, of course , we are not we do, in fact, dimitri is carte blanche. here's how this relates to the position of the biden administration, and not the permissibility of escalation. you raised one very difficult question.
11:13 pm
how to find the right balance when talking about nuclear weapons without being accused of that brandishing nuclear saber used it against you on the international stage, and uh these are far away. not everyone would like it in russia, i meant by the fact that you create an artificial impression of permissiveness, that you can endlessly pump ukraine with all kinds of weapons, that you can use these weapons to strike at the territory of russia itself, they and russia exclude in advance some part of a very important part of your arsenal from a possible answer. let's hear what the president has to say about this. putin when he spoke about russophobia. the fact is
11:14 pm
that, just as in the previous case, when they said russophobia, no one notices and does not want to notice and see what is being done and said in e, in the neighboring countries. e in western countries. here i already said. we do not have our own nuclear weapons, including tactical ones on the territory of other countries, do not have americans from turkey and in a number of other european states, so they are training on the possibility of using carriers of these countries to use american nuclear weapons. we haven't done this yet. we have n't done anything yet. that's when you hear, and so far the expression is from the president of russia, who, in my opinion, is very attentive. e your choice of expression, especially on
11:15 pm
such occasions. this word still seems to me very important, where it ends. i don't know, well, i know, that was a very interesting interview. uh, i think yesterday or today at cnbc the head of the pcp company who explained what his company is doing for the military capabilities of ukraine, let's listen. without going into details, i can say that we are cooperating with government agencies in order to provide real-time data on the battlefield in ukraine it seems amazing to me that the us army has the ability to transmit real-time information to the ukrainian military about emerging threats, for example, we see a russian tank or an armored personnel carrier or we see that the russians launched a rocket and we pass this information on to the ukrainians. and
11:16 pm
they have the ability to respond almost instantly. i think attacking. well ukraine russians the russians did not expect this at all. you will deplete russia's ability to provide adequate uh resistance to retaliate to take the offensive in ukraine and i know another thing that this will cost russian lives, and therefore i ask myself the question. here's the word for now. is it necessary that russia's opponents pay attention to this word, realizing that russia's ability
11:17 pm
to show restraint here, which russia has been very commendable and reasonable from my point of view, has appeared so far. is this word still possible? infinitely regardless of the circumstances, what do you think the general knows, but first, i want to say a few words about what he said to dmitry, what is the reason for the use of nuclear weapons. it can be either a direct clash, i completely agree, or the supply of some types of weapons. e ukraine i. this is what i don't agree with. i think that there are several intermediate solutions, in particular, very painful blows to the territory of poland can be found where they have concentrated. actually, there are logistics centers, not nuclear. yes, not with the same nuclear weapons, except for uh iskander daggers , and see what the reaction of the americans will be and how they will make decisions, uh,
11:18 pm
whether to enter into a direct collision with uh, the russian federation, i mean escalation nuclear escalation, and i am absolutely sure that limited nuclear war just can't seem imminent now uh, uh, about for now. uh, that's right, president putin, by the way, is not the first time he uses when the united states withdrew from the pro-presidential treaty in 2002 putin made a statement that we regret that the united states unilaterally withdrew from the treaty, but as long as this does not threaten russia's national security interests, it implies that the americans promised not to go beyond the north american continent to deploy their pro e-systems after as they began to place in europe, of course, the position of the russian federation , therefore, the matter has changed with regard to
11:19 pm
nuclear weapons. there is such a moment, for example, all tactical nuclear weapons of the russian federation located in centralized warehouses. e storage of the twelfth e head department of the ministry of defense, which is responsible for e, the nuclear component of nuclear weapons and so on. and the americans in europe have these b61 bombs of various modifications, located at five european air bases, they are actually stored in hangars. under the planes, the americans consider them non- deployed. and we believe that it is deployed, because to hang, uh, nuclear, uh, nuclear bomb on the plane. i don't think it'll take weeks there days. i think it's a clock issue. and in the russian federation, it has all the possibilities to also place tactical nuclear weapons at airbases at, e-e, sea, bases, e, that
11:20 pm
is, bring these weapons, really, practically into a deployed state, but so far we are not doing this , hoping for, hoping for the prudence of the american leadership that it will not supply ukraine with those types of weapons that are capable of reaching the territory of the russian federation. so as for the ukrainian ones. yes. they, uh, ukraine, at the time of the collapse of the soviet union, they had 2,000 enterprises of the military-industrial complex 700. of these, there were purely military, purely military products, they produced another thing, that in 2000, out of 200, 400 remained, and, then there were still , but that's another matter, but they only have three before that produce rockets and are capable of producing rockets. so to speak, increased range. this is yuzhmash and two. uh, one plant in pavlograd produces fuel for another rocket.
11:21 pm
i believe that if there is such a danger, then it's just that these objects need to be destroyed without any nuclear weapons. you know, general, the last thing i would like to give my impression is that i am for the use of russian nuclear weapons, and i am going to return to washington soon, i have a house there. uh, work a lot of friends. i'm not talking about them. i'm talking about that, i'm talking about that. what should washington understand about the possibilities of the russian response, if they constantly move the bar of what is allowed uh-huh and uh, i really prefer that if the situation goes like this, firstly, who did not know where on time stopped. secondly, i prefer that if they do not know that the russian response, of course,
11:22 pm
does not include any tactical nuclear weapons , let alone strategic ones. i still think. that since such an unfavorable turn of events cannot be ruled out cannot be completely ruled out, then the responsible people of washington should think and understand this topic. what kind of nuclear fire can they play with, isn't that right dmitry dmitry i completely agree with you? ah, but uh, somehow it seems to me that as long as the united the states will not face a direct and immediate threat to themselves with the threat of a direct military clash between russia and nato, which is really inevitable, but will lead to a nuclear escalation. global nuclear war, the united states will not stop until they think they are safe. they will constantly move this bar. and by the way, right here this week right. today we are seeing another episode with
11:23 pm
this shift, uh, red lines with the overcoming of the next taboo. i mean, the western tank. just a couple of months ago uh uh nato was told that the issue of transferring western tanks to ukraine is taboo, that they do not support this because of the threat of escalation, but, nevertheless. today, the head of the defense committee of the bundestag, her name is maria agnes stark. zimmerman returned from washington where she held meetings at the state department senate. and she said to the house of representatives that yes, the united states encourages and openly asks germany to transfer leopard 2 tanks to ukraine. and that is the information that was recently described in frankfurt al-gemine caiton that jake sullivan, the national security adviser to the biden administration, told, uh, germany that the united states does
11:24 pm
not mind at all if germany transfers, uh, leopard tanks, that this information is true moreover, here, if you believe in stark zimmerman to the united states only they don’t mind, and they are completely for germany to transfer these tanks, this is another episode of such overcoming of the taboo and until the united states is faced with the limit that russia will create for them with the military limit. and here this, it seems to me, will continue dmitry that we started with a dispute about came to a consensus. well, let's say not very optimistic condensation on summing up. i want to mention again the scandal we are waiting for, which got interesting. eh, continuation. estonia or two after. for latvia, too, they decided to exclude, and the radio station or rain station with its territory and deprive the license. and here i have a question. look at what this station
11:25 pm
is saying right now. they are completely talking about how they are against the russian operation in ukraine and little to say that this is counterproductive, that this is not being done correctly, is a vile abomination of all who not only support this, but are even neutral. uh, so the occasion should either send me a rebrand, or at least there should be some kind of illustration. they already share. uh, russia's division pie on your own. and yet, nevertheless. from this station they decided to do so unceremoniously and cruelly, what can i say? it's a phobia. because no other explanation can be found. look at these same people. yesterday, literally the day before yesterday. we heard some heroes of the liberation of russia some wonderful people many of them from the people who
11:26 pm
appear where the most famous signed a letter of defense. so what? and nothing is nothing and i can't find any other answer. why do the balts consider it possible to enter the house, because they despite all, attempts to show their usefulness and devotion, because they are russian but this approach to a certain nationality is called not just russophobia, not outright fascism. that's from the nationalism that we saw in the baltics we see the gradual evolution of course-phobia and further and further to fascism and i will say the last. those who support fascism? they can't pretend
11:27 pm
that they don't know what they're doing. they support fascism and fight against them. yes, dmitry becomes an anti-fascist fight. thanks dimitri, i totally agree with you. and i’ll even emphasize that, unfortunately, it was from the baltic states. and this fascism began to spread to ukraine and other countries of the post-soviet space. dmitry evgeny petrovich thank you very much. behind this one is very interesting talk. we'll be back at the studio in a few moments. to the 95th anniversary of vladimir naumov on saturday on the first dear passengers and more
11:28 pm
for 239 rubles. for 999 rubles. black tea curtis for 59 rubles.
11:29 pm
boundless immersion in the content of light in the magic of sound technology inspired by life moscow where is this hotel is an advertisement for a loan without surprises mail bank. and this is me sergey garmash i wonder what's in the box? four and
11:30 pm
a half percent per annum with the guaranteed rate of guarantee without surprises mail bank on yandex.market new year's sale and new discounts every day. buy action stain remover for 429 rubles. and pay a quarter immediately from the split, the rest later. choose goods in the citylink app and immediately pick up in the store at home. situations, taking only two tablets a day instead of the usual six magnesium hillar is better than magnesium stressful situations.ru
11:31 pm
we rejoice at a large number of services, but even more rejoice when they recognize us mts has created a single entry mts id by phone number to all services for ease and comfort . choose realme 9.5j with ultra-smooth display and performance processor and other smartphones of the brand with discounts up to 40%. we have learned to control the energy of the atom and are moving forward into a safe tomorrow in a world where distance is not terrible. we create the future and open the way for new ideas and professions.
11:32 pm
what where when is the winter series of games on sunday after time online? the big game is on the air this week in the united states, the midterm elections are finally finally over, and the second round of elections in the state has taken place. georgia senate elections, but won there in the end democratic candidate raphael warnack, who actually was a senator from georgia. that is, he retained his seat, and his rival, the republican herschel, who was supported by donald trump, lost and, as a result, the democrats even strengthened their
11:33 pm
majority in the senate. if now they have 50 to 50 there and the majority is formed taking into account the vote of the vice-president's mosquitoes, or even from next year. actually, the alignment in the senate will be 51 for the democrats and 49 for the republicans in the house of representatives, uh, the republicans formed most since january. they will have 222, and a place against 213, and the seats of the democrats and yes, they formed a majority. let them lead. what about all the committees? ah, there will be a republican speaker. uh, kevin mccarthy yes, they will set the agenda , and the work of the house of representatives, but that red tsunami of the red wave, and the decisive victory of the republicans, about which many in the united states spoke and for several months did not take place and we decided to discuss not only why didn't it take place? but in general, what
11:34 pm
sociological alignment yes in the united states how different groups of the american population vote, moreover, in dynamics and compare the situation of the elections of the twentieth year with the current situation. that's just past the midterm elections lind. markovich grigoriev e, professor of the higher school of economics prepared the relevant study. i ask you to. firstly, i must say that well, for my whole life i have been doing, so to speak, including, although an economist delve into these stories. roosevelt's democratic grand coalition was formed in the thirty-second year, and the trade unions were for the democrats, and then they were strong liberal intelligentsia of the national minority. well, first of all, the irish and italians and the crimeans voted for them in the south, and the southern racist voted for the democrats, because they could not vote for the republicans, because linkin was a republican, respectively, uh, for the
11:35 pm
republicans there were farmers, the petty bourgeoisie. this coalition lasted practically, so almost until the end of the 20th century, and about 10 years ago. i am published an article that in the year 2008 a minority will begin to determine victory in the elections, but due to specific events around trump in the 20th year. this happened already in the twentieth year. well, first of all, it was men who voted for trump. ah, trump is voted for by the married and the married, and he loses a little on college graduates in general and especially uh, but then it turns out that uh, he only loses three points with whites, and he starts uh, losing more and more national minorities, and the rich for him working full- time for him served in the army 54% for trump, and
11:36 pm
believes that the economy is in good shape for trump. and this is the whitest voters, and for trump their weight is 67, do not confuse the weight of the group with someone, but still in general, including women, then the whites voted for the trumps, watch all the talk, but look at african americans. so they voted totally, especially the women for the spanish bidens. and the asian e groups voted two to one for biden. that is it’s really real that whites have a little more trump well , especially, uh, so to speak, especially simple people, so to speak, but it’s very curious if we decompose u e incomes in prime numbers, the average incomes of these groups, then the asian group is nine
11:37 pm
conventionally and nine and their 5%. and white ordinary two or three there are seven of them, spaniards and african americans. and the spaniards have five, the africans have four. this is the ratio 4 5 7 9 ampho-americans most of all lived in america during the revolution, and during the struggle for liberation. there were less four million inhabitants, almost 20% was. the africans who were not released, that's when, and the smallest number, probably before the first world war, was 10%, because there was a wave of people who came. uh, these very whites, e whites from europe and now what has happened is the latin population in huge numbers over these decades, it has overtaken the african american in numbers, but the real situation is in
11:38 pm
which, in which we see this, uh, that is both asian and a latin latin population somewhere around 60 to 40 percent in favor of the democrats african a lot more. now let's see the last election again, the same republican man for them. uh, no women, married 58% republicans single 60% democrats. uh, white colleges, like, this way and that. ah, about whites without a degree for the republicans, not whites without a degree engaged. ah, family income is again more than 100,000 - that's quite a lot of people, and since this is even before taxes are deducted, and for the republicans, working normally for the republicans, they served in the army for the republicans. ah, believing the economy
11:39 pm
in excellent condition for the democrats. that is, there is a feeling that the reality of the average economy does not matter party affiliation completely determines the relationship to the outcome of economic development under your president was our president. well, that is the objectivity of the voters of course not explicit therefore it is not necessary when we talk about the influence of the economy of other factors, that the perception of the economy goes through a party prism. well, of course. same for spanish and asian e bands, but 60x40. what is important is that the country and divided in a very interesting way. this is what we perceive as the old imperialist, so to speak, america that we knew here in the 20th century. it, uh, she, she votes republican, and she votes locally, the way democrats win votes.
11:40 pm
it's a liberal university and a pretty poor neighborhood with minorities. and therefore, er, in principle, for those who want to go into this matter to delve into. we must go further here is a simple contrast to look at, but in more detail. and as far as i understand, the most expensive surveys, which are preliminary in including, which we do not see, they are very expensive. they don't show us they go to 200 different national groups. the age income principle and these are the projections of the elections and, accordingly, the finetuner. this establishment of a message for winning is going on precisely here, you need to study the details. i'm not a big sweetie. thank you, really. it's very interesting, uh data, because it shows. actually the electorate. e one other party. and i conclude that indeed you confirmed
11:41 pm
the split in the united states on the implementation, which acquires, among other things, an ethnic racial character, because indeed the vast majority of african americans are democrats, and the vast majority are not, well, uneducated, but whites without higher education, traditional whites, but republicans. and that's very interesting, by the way, and as far as what happens next, because this traditional white republican electorate right here, it's shrinking . uh, the democratic party is desperately trying to become a permanent majority party. e in united states by establishing a de facto one-party system. uh, the system, the republicans are against this, uh, in every possible way, uh, in every possible way, but the fact is that the split in the united states has not only a value, not only a socio-economic, but increasingly, a racial ethnic
11:42 pm
character. and this is, of course, due to the decrease in the proportion of whites in american society, which in a couple of decades will become just a minority in the united states yes, and the total number of non-whites will become more than, uh, the number of whites. it's a fundamental trend a fundamental trend from which the american political system will remain in deep crisis. yes, it is unlikely to fundamentally get out of this crisis do not agree. no not quite. i'll just remind you that when the founding fathers, they built. something madison once said that if a majority ever arises in the history of america, then it is the duty of every honest american to immediately split it into many sections and minorities. the fact is that the founding fathers proceeded from the simple thing that the president should be a hired political the manager and further the system of costs of counterbalancing the chaggin palatos, it was made so that this mayor could not make a coup, as, for example,
11:43 pm
he did, e, triumveration by caesar and beauty to him by pompius in ancient rome. after all, they wrote under the pseudonym of the public. yes, that is, in this regard, it is clear that the roman republic was a model for them. that is, you hint that the democratic party. in this case, it will split, as in the first half of the 19th century the democratic republican party split, with which, in fact, they went into democratic yes the fact is that initially american forces are built. so that the president of the elected amount of minorities can always find that his support. has crumbled. what makes electoral support for minorities different is that it can be scattered instantly without much effort. therefore, in the history of the united states, there have been only two presidents who were elected by a majority. well , that is, it’s relatively not that the majority of everyone, but a large array of such people is the trump roosevelts, all the rest were based on a minority, they perfectly understood their place, which was not hired political and did not try to cross the red lines, that is, in the american systems.
11:44 pm
a little more complex. it is, among other things, in conflicts of this kind, it is implied that a change in composition is an extremely, important thing, it will change qualitatively very significantly, but if a minority becomes a majority. well , then i already agree. so far, the republican party is decreasing in terms of its electorate, but a very interesting process is taking place inside the republican party. the elite, the republican party, decided to take advantage. e the fact that the red tsunami did not happen in order to get rid of donald, trump, and he was already vinili, uh, that he was actually to blame, but in the absence of the red tsunami, that he was pushing uh, including those candidates, by the way, a herschel walker, who lost, e, the democratic candidate, and, accordingly, he must give the road to the young, despite the fact that e donald trump remains the most popular in all opinion polls, but politicians. e republicans, here's how his
11:45 pm
rapidly weakening position is assessed by the publication the hill listen former president trump was dealt a double whammy on tuesday kept walker defeated in the second round of elections for the state senator of georgia and in new york, the trump organizer and associated companies were found guilty on all counts.

21 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on