tv Bolshaya igra 1TV December 15, 2022 10:45pm-11:46pm MSK
10:45 pm
10:46 pm
oh come here swept out. we prepare treats for the festive table for the whole family. and of course, special attention. we give sauce mayonnaise, mahi, will make festive dishes, tastier voice children tenth anniversary season. tomorrow on first, toilet paper, surname 1990 pyaterochka helps out and prices are reduced by the transparent conditions of the new gazprombank credit card card with the most advantageous grace period of 180 days and guaranteed free service forever.
10:47 pm
what is the most cost-effective medicine for insomnia? melatonin evalar is up to 60% more profitable new glycine plus melatonin in one tablet reduces anxiety and speeds up falling asleep glycine plus melatonin evalar double action of juicy ham with pieces of smoked brisket until golden brown, polarushka sounds delicious new year's mood comes with panda and gifts for the whole family from 299 rubles. fantoy. give your loved ones and yourself the artificial intelligence of the space station mira for an advertising message on december 22, a blockbuster in the world comes out in the cinema of the country. every
10:48 pm
product order. this is an order for your own, and the first order with a 20% discount . auchan and everything is profitable here 1tv cinema presents i can’t believe my eyes. is this whole nightmare over? what are we going to do now, will we work in the prosecutor's office or will the police live? svetka
10:49 pm
10:51 pm
or is this an englishman? water with lemon well, that's understandable. which wine is better red or white? water yes, what's funny, a whole theory, but for the benefit, after all, imagine even counting an imperial award. i hope that the award will not be posthumous, better tell me, if you were my verdi in this city. tomorrow grigory orlov will show the public something from the field of unicorns. really managed to bring out the mythical?
10:52 pm
thank you, arrange for the crew and the gendarmes. i want to visit a lady directly at the caravan station. now go closer to a better place, i want to take her by surprise, stepanov ivanovich would take pity on himself and get enough sleep. i do not lose sleep, because it is not at all. but the horror of the guilty will overshadow all his lies and lies. how's the fucking book?
10:54 pm
10:56 pm
10:57 pm
10:58 pm
11:00 pm
11:01 pm
11:02 pm
good evening, the big game is on the air today, vladimir putin made a big speech at the council on national projects and strategic development and announced, among other things, the sanctions aggression of the west against russia, which obviously did not achieve its results. listen to what the president said. as you
11:03 pm
know, against russia, it was aimed at ensuring that in a short time, in fact, through the robbery of our foreign exchange reserves, collapse the national currency and provoke. this calculation, as we see, as everyone actually sees, was not justified, the russian entrepreneurs, authorities, worked in a collected and professional manner, citizens showed solidarity and responsibility, thanks to the joint work of the government of the bank of russia of the constituent entities of the federation , it was possible to stabilize the situation. well, at the same time, the sanctions war. unfortunately, it continues only today. the united states introduced new anti-russian sanctions, in particular, against the interos holding and its head vladimir potanin, as well as against rosbank, whose shareholders are
11:04 pm
the interos holding. in addition, sanctions were imposed against first deputy prime minister of the government of russia andrey belousov, deputy prime minister dmitry chernyshenko of a number of russian governors. e members of the board of directors of russian railways, representatives of new regions of russia, and so on. in addition, the united states continues to increase the quality of military assistance to ukraine more and more directly, becoming involved in military conflicts. more and more it violates its own taboos of recent times in terms of what can and cannot be supplied to the kiev regime. the white house has not yet made a decision on air defense systems, but since will most likely accept after the relevant reports from the ministry of commerce. in addition, as the washington post writes today, the united states transfer equipment to ukraine to modify free-falling aircraft bombs into guided bombs, and the new york times reports a more than two-fold expansion of the united states training program for ukrainian military in germany
11:05 pm
and according to the publication, the united states will now train a battalion of the ukrainian military every month and the coverage of these. ah, training. the russian embassy in the united states will also be expanded today, once again it was stated that such provocative steps as the supply of parentins could lead to unpredictable consequences. well, that is, escalations, including a direct military clash between russia and nato, and we will now discuss these risks of escalation and the prospects for a dialogue between russia and the united states as a whole with the president of the center of national interests. dmitry dmitry good evening. dmitry mutual dmitry well, as you can see, the risks of escalation are growing, but at the same time interaction? the whole united states remains. well, i would say sporadic. at best, we interact through prisoner exchanges and the recent exchange of viktor bout and britniner is a clear confirmation of this, although through mediation. uh, third
11:06 pm
countries, we also have a format for a dialogue between intelligence leaders, respectively, burns, uh, naryshkin. a. but if, uh, as, as he says, uh, the white house is dedicated to, uh, exclusively to the nuclear risk and nothing more than that, the embassy still operates, but they interact with the governments of countries stays predominantly on technical issues do not discuss political issues as we have repeatedly heard from both sides. here, what do you think dmitry a. do you see any prospects, but strengthening the russian-american dialogue of interaction in this difficult time is expedient. uh dmitry well, uh, you know it was officially reported that there are uh, and others. uh, communication channels that go directly to uh, two presidents and such conversations. e take
11:07 pm
place, i don't know how often, let's just say regularly. and this is the channel that i want to repeat directly to the two presidents. as a result, you know that this is a rare case in modern russian-american relations. there is one format of dialogue that, uh, russia refuses to have from the united states. they really want consultations on strategic forces, but it's true. uh, the united states basically at this stage, as we hear from the white house in washington and the main thing from the kremlin in moscow that in general the focus of the american is to achieve inspection, and here to speak more broadly, uh, about strategic weapons, apparently, the united states is not yet fully ready. and most importantly, uh, you know, dmitry is
11:08 pm
what he is trying to do now. uh, the united states would be proud of this unforgettable. and as vladimir putin, an outstanding statesman , leodite of the ancients, said, and putin said a little sarcastically, he compared him with his brother. do you remember, uh, when, uh, the nixon administration, and then gerald ford, began to make claims, and to the soviet union about soviet actions, and in africa remember the african rock year and so on. uh, he was told, uh, through andrey agromyko, the ministers of foreign affairs were told that this is also called apples and oranges. these are different things. and uh, as if the discharge can
11:09 pm
continue by itself. and the soviet union will support the national liberation movement. to which the then secretary of state henry kiselenger said that detente cannot survive irresponsibility in key areas of the world and he began to talk about a principle that is good for you dmitry izvestia linkovich. ugh link. yes, he began to say that it’s impossible, but on one train to go forward on another train, e back and hope that these two trains will accelerate, but somehow, nevertheless, there will be real progress in general terms. it's unrealistic. here. the same thing, as i understand it, was just said from moscow to the white house, but the white house refuses to seriously discuss the problem of ukraine with russia, and this is not a problem of ukraine, this is a fundamental problem, not only
11:10 pm
of russian-american relations. and if you want international security, and in moscow it looks completely different. you know this, they don’t see it better than me on the conflict in ukraine, how russian aggression in ukraine is seen as russian aggression of the collective west against russia, and if e bely there refuses to talk about it. in general, it is difficult for you to achieve success in some other areas. well, and besides, sort of the general american behavior, er, that you just mentioned. and patriots patriot in general, as i hear from washington this is not a question. uh will or it will not be a question of what will be and when will it be uh uh, talk about what to provide the patriots in limited quantities in minimal quantities at the beginning and uh give what moscow
11:11 pm
calls a blunted option. that is, you understand this is such an export option, which, in general, has always been lightened, the united states , uh, said that this blunted version is very, very effective on its own, of course, on its own, of course, but the patriots they are part of against air defense system. and also they seem to influence the course of hostilities. yes, they immediately say at the same time that it is necessary to supply ukraine with more long-range weapons, including the possibility of new himes models, and with a large range, and dmitry i need to tell you, this is not a theoretical conversation, this is a conversation, but the desire and capabilities of ukraine to strike at
11:12 pm
russian territory and let's think about what it means if the united states allows ukraine to have the ability to have a reliable missile defense and at the same time new capabilities to strike strikes on russian territory, but it would be very strange to me if moscow agreed to talk about strategic stability. that releases such things from the species. let's listen to what vladimir putin said about such an e about russian president vladimir putin, it is impossible to grab hundreds of missiles. and this, of course, is a deterrent. seriously, a deterrent fact, well, if the enemy considers potential, what is possible, yes, perhaps the use of the theory of a preemptive strike, but we are not,
11:13 pm
then it still makes us think, but about those threats posed to us. you understand that we are talking about more and more giving. e ukraine of systems that could potentially strike not just at russian villages or warehouses, but at some very important russian military systems and decision-making centers, and e you repeatedly spoke to dmitry about the danger of escalation, which is obvious to me that this is what he said just putin this is a very serious warning that if such threats are created, then russia will, perhaps, find an answer for them and so they showed just recently the installation of a new russian
11:14 pm
missile. and of course, fury is not a system that uh will start with, but some kind of escalation of the conflict and which in moscow will come to use against the united states for no reason. but if but if, uh, the united states forced would uh, russia seriously think about the use of tactical nuclear weapons in moscow deny that there are such plans in washington about this, what is called and more and more becomes concerned, then uh, nato warns specifically, and the white house warns that the united states and nato in general. they would inflict some very serious military blow on russia. not using, though,
11:15 pm
nuclear weapons. so i think that putin answered this, of course, that if this happens, russia's response may be the most destructive and this may include a clarification. uh, russian military doctrine dmitry. i don't have to wait too long. this is a dangerous road. dmitry you touched very much. uh, i will comment on some very important and fundamental aspects. some of which, first of all, the united states now. uh, they simply completely violate the rules that were established in soviet american relations during the period of détente. you mentioned détente, but also that at that time the soviet union, uh, expanded, let's say , uh, its sphere of influence in africa, and the united states fought in southeast asia. but détente was based on mutual. mania and very clear adherence to this understanding that we
11:16 pm
can compete on the periphery. we can fight even lead a proxy warrior on the periphery, but in no case should we undermine the existentially vital interests of each other in the central direction of confrontation, which was then europe and indeed dmitry during the period of détente, and the united states did not try , let’s say, to win over to its side. ah, countries. uh, the warsaw pact or make velvet revolutions there. ah. and while the soviet union , accordingly, pursued a responsible policy towards europe, and ukraine for russia is not a peripheral direction. this is fundamental difference with the discharge period. ukraine - this is the central direction europe and european security is the central direction. and now the united states is supporting a hybrid war. uh,
11:17 pm
in ukraine using ukraine not angola not vietnam ukraine as a proxy. uh, threats to russia undermine vital russian interests, so uh, let's defuse us. i would say very, very far from the nature of soviet and american relations. this is the first second and you mentioned, and the desire of the united states to unfreeze inspections and unfreeze dialogue. e, in framework. uh, treaty commissions. snv-3 here. uh, from the russian point of view today - this is, in principle, a third-rate issue not only for russian security of international security, but even for strategic stability and nuclear security. why because ? these are the threats to use nuclear weapons from the
11:18 pm
russian point of view, the threat of a global nuclear war does not stem from the absence of inspections. they stem from the risk of a direct military clash between russia and the united states in ukraine in europe, which, in their all stem from the hybrid war that the united states is waging e against e, against russia, that is, in order to reduce the danger of a global nuclear war, it is not necessary to resume inspections, it is necessary to somehow normalize. if you want to or pursue a more responsible policy towards ukrainian can be part of the package. they cannot be its center in a. they may not even be one of the important components of this package. yes, they can be part of the package, but first of all, it is necessary to somehow manage the conflict that the us are now involved and in which the united states is
11:19 pm
directly involved. it is precisely here, from the russian point of view, that the main risks lie, including a nuclear war, because a direct military clash in its nuclear sphere may occur, and it will grow further, and er, it may outgrow, and military experts say that escalation to control if it is an escalation between two nuclear superpowers is almost impossible. and then we will reach, that is, this threat does not come from above from the lack of inspection or there is a threat, but an unexpected strategic nuclear strike, and from below as a result of this escalation and the third, vladimir putin made a really very important statement. concerning pre-emptive strikes of course, he did not speak about preventive nuclear strikes, e, strikes - this contradicts, e, russian military doctrine. moreover , the russian nuclear
11:20 pm
doctrine is fundamentally contrary to the concept of a response to a counter strike, not even a second, so to speak, e or a response, but a response to an oncoming one. that is, if russia sees the launch of an attack, but ballistic missiles, or other carriers of nuclear weapons against it, then russia will respond to a counter strike without waiting until these missiles reach the territory of the russian federation or the allies of the russian federation and russia is unlikely to abandon this doctrine, but in the case if the united states will be located in close proximity to russia, and here you really emphasized correctly. and if they deploy on the territory of ukraine those strike weapons that can finish off strategic e-objects on
11:21 pm
the territory of russia deep into the territory of russia, or if the united states will deploy medium-range missiles in europe, including primarily in central eastern europe, then in this case, since the flight time of these missiles is extremely short, it will not be up to tens of minutes for minutes, but to go, then in this case russia will simply have no other choice but to adopt the doctrine of preventive strikes, but it will be all non-preventive nuclear strikes, and preventive non-nuclear strikes against these objects. i think i mostly agree with you. but it also seems to me that the russian nuclear doctrine is not a revelation of god, but an analytical document that reflects current events and naturally. as russia sees in and around ukraine, this
11:22 pm
doctrine is changing somewhat. here i will give you a guess, but let's just say from my point of view an informed guess. yes indeed, but russia will not inflict. i also tried to say a preventive nuclear strike, what is called out of the blue, but uh, russian nuclear doctrine includes the provision that nuclear weapons could be used if a fundamental threat to russian nuclear deterrence and russian command and control systems arises, if the united states, on its own or through nato allies, or using ukraine, tries to strike at russian strategic forces and control command systems, then it would be struck there with nuclei or non-nuclear weapons.
11:23 pm
that would be a secondary issue. it seems to me that this is very important that your no one we understood that if there was an attack on the russian arsenal, the detention of you would be perceived in moscow, as putin said, with a very big one. seriousness is the first. secondly, you need to understand how an escalation can occur and what this build-up of the american presence is fraught with. and i will give you one example on the territory of ukraine. the patriot system is a very complex system, much more complex than the hummers, a completely different one is required. uh, training personnel in order to master the name and use them effectively they say that u will be u ukrainian
11:24 pm
military personnel, if patriots are provided, that they will be trained to use the patriots not on the territory of ukraine itself, but somewhere in europe , perhaps in poland, germany, and so on. i believe that there are such intentions. but i asked the question, but to my american sources. but ukraine wants to go on the offensive soon. and this idea of an attack in the direction of or poplars, it is generally supported by the united states. and nato and now, if uh they tell you, and ukrainian commanders, if this is supported by analysis to the american committee of chiefs, if they tell you that it is very important that the patriots earn faster immediately, because otherwise russia will continue to deal crushing blows on
11:25 pm
ukrainian territory and on ukrainian military installations, then i asked. would you consider it possible to send american advisers along with the patriots? i was told, but what do you mean by advisers, if it means that they will somehow actually command there. no , we are not talking about this. well, if we are talking about some e people who, perhaps even at this moment, are not military personnel, but have the appropriate training. you probably could consider this, but now you clearly asked a rhetorical question. what will happen if russia strikes at these patriots and a certain number die, and american military personnel, even a small one, can you imagine what kind of noise there will be in the
11:26 pm
american congress in the media information and under what pressure the administration of the canoe seems to be responding to russia very seriously, this is a topic, uh, very, very important, and so i want to tell you that, uh, i see a readiness for dialogue, uh, by the united states in russia, both on an official and unofficial level. and when i talk to officials in moscow, they talk about it seriously and specifically, but it seems to me that they have one very important point that they do not understand or misunderstand in washington, and which i think you understand better than me, because that you live permanently in moscow in the russian leadership, they really believe that there can be no return to the past, that russia will not agree. if it won, it
11:27 pm
agrees to dialogue with russia, but it will not work to play dialogue as a camouflage. and, uh, the people who help president putin implement his policies in relation to the united states. they're not just very experienced people. and these people are very experienced and american direction. who had many years sent. in general, who are they sergei lavrov was for many years, and the ambassador to the united nations and his headquarters was in new york, but these are also other people. you see, we everyone has learned something, and therefore, if they in washington in the biden administration hope that, if i may say so, they will be able to, and bypass those who formulate russian foreign policy on a crooked goat, then i am sure it will not work. and i
11:28 pm
am sure that in washington it is very important that they understand that there is such a suspicion in moscow, if they want to achieve something, then they need to open their cards and speak very, very seriously. and then i think from what i heard in moscow, i think a lot will turn out to be possible, but we are not there at all there dmitry i completely agree with you, and russia does not need dialogue for the sake of dialogue with the united states and the decision of the russian side to postpone the meeting, just this bilateral commission on the start-3 treaty. this is a clear and irrefutable confirmation of this, and those scenarios, those risks, but that you described, they just confirm where the main threat of escalation is, and this is the non-use of nuclear weapons, not tactical or strategic. this is a far-fetched
11:29 pm
threat. this is part of the information campaign against russia when the west says that russia can allegedly use a tactical nuclear bomb in ukraine and, of course, the threat of an unexpected strategic nuclear strike is extremely small. e against each other, the threat of escalation in another is exactly what you described dmitry, and according to american data, to manage only one petrite installation, 90 people are needed; one installation is not a battery; one installation is served by 90 people. because it is a whole complex. if you want, an infrastructure complex, there are radars, and anything and everything, and, of course, there is a big risk that the united states will send to ukraine about this, by the way, the american media have already written, let's say, military advisers. they call them military advisers,
11:30 pm
indeed, it is unlikely that they will be people on active military service, here and now, but these will be people trained to manage this very poet, and they will lead directly. what is called actions on the ground, and ukrainian, uh, military personnel are already much deeper involvement in the conflict than even the transfer of intelligence information. e is in operation . this is actually the management of strikes against e-russia using the same e -systems. e pent, russia officially declares that all such installations. there will be legitimate targets, respectively, and those western citizens, these same quoted military experts or specialists who are likely to be sent, if it is necessary to send e patriot in the short and medium term, without waiting, there half a year, what is required for training, yes, and
11:31 pm
then there really is a big risk that russia will strike at, among other things , this same military expert and political pressure. you quite rightly said, and in the direction of the escalation of this conflict and already a direct military clash with russia, it will be great, as for the russian, and again, the nuclear doctrine, the dmitry scenario that you described, it does not even require a serious change or rewriting, especially russian nuclear doctrine, because it really states that even an impact is not just a blow, but an impact. the impact can be different, because it can be with the help of cyber means here, so the impact on strategic nuclear facilities, which hypothetically could make it difficult for russia to launch a nuclear strike, will be perceived as , uh, a situation where russia will have the right to launch
11:32 pm
a nuclear strike. i, i wouldn't call it a pre- emptive nuclear strike. this can be called pre-emptive or, again, the answer is in the opposite direction. nuclear strike, but this scenario is also unconditional, it would not be preventive, because there would already be an attack, and an impact on the russian deterrence arsenal. uh, we might have some minor uh, disagreements about the urgency of nuclear escalation. it seems to me that we absolutely agree on one thing - that this is not what the russian leadership wants. and that this is what is needed as much as possible. avoid and e last it seems to me that in moscow there is interest both among ordinary people and among the elite and from the russian leadership in a serious dialogue with the united states. and uh, president putin and his closest
11:33 pm
advisers have repeatedly stated, including most recently, that they are not open to serious dialogue with the united states, but for the russian leadership, as i heard, the position is that let's negotiate a prisoner exchange. or let's talk about inspections. but we will not touch the central topic of the conflict in ukraine, that such an approach, but it seems unacceptable and, frankly, it seems nerves directed, because for russia this is a central issue and the choice is the choice that will have to be made in washington and i hope that washington especially with the house of representatives prepared the republicans dmitry fundamental question arose. sorry for being rude. do we want to die for kiev, and here is the readiness to die for kiev in america, i do not
11:34 pm
detect. thank you dmitry thank you very much for this very interesting conversation. the big edge will be back in this studio in a few moments. fall not only invites me friends under 20 december. kill bring friends until december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize, he is the only one. moscow
11:35 pm
11:36 pm
11:37 pm
instant messengers are available to all mts subscribers, they even forced them, and your communication will not be interrupted by calls from the court system of defenders. activate the defender option for 30 days for free in magnet time of miracles, right now alex will meet his first school love. ozon final sale up to 45% off
11:38 pm
gifts & personal care up to 65% off playtown kids toys. what where when the winter series of games on sunday after the time program choose your favorite team and get increased odds for all its matches the whole fairy tale championship in the application. thank you very much game, and today i speak at the council on national projects. vladimir putin cited very interesting
11:39 pm
interesting data, it turns out that during the russian special operation in ukraine over the past 9 months, deliveries, and the volume of deliveries of basic russian goods to the european union, despite all the sanctions, restrictions increased one and a half times. listen to what the president said. despite the sanctions, these are, uh, curious observations, despite the sanctions for the nine months of this year at the rate the main goods from the russian country have grown one and a half times. in total exports, russian exports increased by 42% and trade surplus. in our favor, two and three tenths of the time to 138 billion dollars, in fact, the european union continues to consume our goods and services. and reverse flows are constrained by the
11:40 pm
situation of such imbalances cannot continue indefinitely. well, what the president said, in fact, completely coincides with the recent revelations of the resigning head of the austrian energy concert energy energy ag's name is werner steiner, who said russian gas is still there. and, by roundabout ways, it enters the european union in full, and the real share, for example, of russian gas in austrian imports, is not 20% now, as kassler recently said. e karla is not a hammer, but 50%. said the man who actually deals with gas supplies to austria . werner steinecker also pleased the european public with the fact that, in his opinion, high gas prices in the european union will remain for 20 years. said to be 20 years old. this, in his opinion, is due to the fact
11:41 pm
that long-term contracts by the united states have been signed for 20 years, and they contain the formula of take or flesh. and accordingly, uh, europe will have to. uh, unless it reappears, of course. uh, direct import of uh gas from russia uh, live with high gas prices for 20 years ah, vladimir dmitrievich uh, what will become of european industry in these 20 years. and how can you, in principle, comment on both the words of the russian president and the words of the austrian leader energy corporation, well, uh, first of all, i would like to say that uh, everyone really does and despite such a frontal, if i may put it this way, statistics that are given, for example, germany, which, allegedly, is already almost completely. russian gas was refused there. in fact, this gas is supplied, firstly, by the flow that is now going through the pipeline, and we must not forget through ukraine. uh, the turkish south streams, through which
11:42 pm
gas is also supplied, and one way or another, they flow into the european gas system, so they don’t by chance. uh, so actively, the topic of creating gas in a hub in turkey is now being discussed, which will replace the gas hub in germany, which has always been traditional . this is first. secondly, it means, uh, there have already been many publications in general, western publications that russian lng is quite actively supplied to europe, including that it is starting to flow and to germany through the floating rick here is the gasification terminal, which they are now planning to put up at their place build another, so yes, indeed gas from russia goes there. and at the same time, uh, despite, again, this rainbow-colored statistics in quotation marks that the germans sometimes give. they themselves admit that for all their remarkable rejection of e-e russian gas, e not
11:43 pm
only valuable ones have grown. yes, there are several times relatively speaking, yes, but also the share of coal that is used in the energy balance of germany is now more than 45 percent. that is, in fact, residential uh, to get rid of uh fuel, so to speak, russian. in fact, they are going to the worst models and energy. what is it, first. secondly, with regard to the american gas, of course. uh, america- america today is a major gas producer under 27 years. uh, they plan to introduce a number of gas terminals, but nonetheless. still, the increase in their capacity is not so great as to satisfy, in principle, the growing demand for gas in europe, because therefore, naturally, there is a long-term upward trend in the cost of prices, especially since there are no comments, i, too, they were in the foreign press about an agreement with qatar, which supplies gas.
11:44 pm
uh, in the end, anyway, the germans had to agree to a long-term contract, because today this is the only way to provide a long-term vision, because being in a coalition in the same germany yes green uh, enough is a significant risk, because at any moment situations. you can change and start again. so to speak, various green projects are being broken through. what awaits europe was asked taking into account the situation, but you understand, there are many numbers to be given here. and about the increase in price increases manufacturers are almost there under 40% inflation, 10%, which the president called. eh, so, and so on and so forth. but there is one nuance, which literally recently there was a very interesting article in the tricostum magazine. e, they, on the basis of significant data in the network, including semantic analysis
11:45 pm
, analyzed e texts, e-e party texts of the party of european parties and found out that e in europe in recent years in e. up to thirty percent of the texts of modern parties that are in lande, they refer to antagonistic theses in relation to growth and only about 10%, they are what they call, but explain that there should be growth, and now this is the new philosophy that is rushing today, uh, which is actually antagonistic to, uh, economic. growth, which calls for a general abandonment of growth, books appear in which, uh, it is written that stagnation in general is a sign. ah, prosperity, which is prosperity without growth. there stagnation, a sign of success, there and so on. that is yes, absurd so to speak. if we look at what strength such a one is gaining, so to speak anti-growth, right?
16 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1246979896)