Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American Libraries
TV News
Understanding 9/11tv Bomba 1TV December 20, 2022 11:45pm-12:46am MSK
11:45 pm
partners and now we are excellent, we understand, we are increasingly aware of these actions and intend to fight them, we have seen how they exchange hybrid war tactics. i think china is watching very closely how russia uses disinformation and tools like coercion or energy security, malicious or malicious cyber operations for clarity, we are talking about trying to understand how china operates in the euro-atlantic region and around him, how can he, through some of his actions, create risks security or vulnerability for the entire alliance or individual member states artyom pavlovich will olaf scholz be able to resist such an american approach a and. will germany, as the united states would like to perceive russia and china as such a single inseparable threat to the entire west, that is, to the entire nato, that is, including europe, that is, including germany, well, here , the main
11:46 pm
opponents of this moderate, probably schultz course. they are inside the german government. this is precisely the green party, which is controlled by the ministry of foreign affairs, and we have already discussed the draft new strategies for china that it was the ministry of foreign affairs that developed and the ministry of foreign affairs will defend a 59-page document in which there is a lot of politics of values and much less, but economic politics, and this is what a the ministry of foreign affairs will fight the office of the federal chancellor on the chinese foreign policy direction of germany, of course, everything that will take place in german-chinese relations in the foreseeable future will take place taking into account experience of what was happening in germany in russian relations and, of course, the german economic and political elites see what comes from decuffing with russia, if i may, so to speak, mainly, but energy. and what will happen, when such and such a coupling will be with china, which has a
11:47 pm
structure of economic interaction with germany, and a little more, let's say, the versatile consequences of this. well , it’s quite difficult to predict and it’s clear what scholz will do, but try to try such a policy here too, maybe try to pursue exceptions really. well, somehow, as ivan alekseevich said implicitly, conduct physical actions, but uh, it will be difficult, because i repeat the main opponent here. this is not even the united states of america, but its own ministry of foreign affairs, which, by the way, can be considered here as the main such trans-atlantic ram inside, but of the entire german politicians. well, uh, when german experts and western experts analyze the differences in the policies of the united states and germany towards both china and russia, they sometimes pay attention to the fact that, in their opinion of germany, the united states
11:48 pm
learned fundamentally different lessons from the end of the cold war. here. hear what two prominent german experts write about this mood in american magazines. thorsten benner is the director of the global public policy institute in berlin or is she a fixed, which i now work at the council on foreign relations, and before that i worked in the german fondekerber. the united states and germany have learned opposite lessons from at the end of the cold war, the united states emerged from the confrontation with the conviction that president ronald reagan's approach led the soviet union to negotiate through the force and acceleration of the arms race . germany emerged from the cold war convinced that the cooperation and policies of chancellor willibrant. change through rapprochement later, called the variable through trade , were the winning formulas that bridged the gap between east and west through political and economic cooperation, which led to a positive
11:49 pm
internal changes in the soviet bloc. the idea of change through trade survived the end of the cold war and remained an influential concept in the bonny and berlin capitals of germany before and after reunification for a generation of german politicians. it was a concept that artyom pavlovich conveniently linked in the treatment of non-democratic countries such as china and russia in the pursuit of economic success. yes , transformation through trade. and this is all from she has already been officially rejected or she still has some prospects. i think that here the points of view that we have just heard, they have quite rational reasons. and germany after world war ii. naturally, she could not be a significant independent military force, but at the same time she had the opportunity to work on the tools of economic power of soft power because of the decade that had passed since the formation of the
11:50 pm
west german state she had achieved here. really. well outstanding some practitioners of outstanding experience. naturally politics. uh, changes through convergence through trade through economic interaction in fact, and the german political elite of that time can really put themselves in an asset, like, uh, the policy is successful, which allowed, in the first place. to form constructive relations with the countries of eastern europe and the soviet union and which really influenced in many ways the position of these countries, firstly, the moment of german unification, that is, at the turn of the eighties and nineties years and then later in the nineties. and now, uh, on the one hand in berlin criticizes this concept, because it is believed that here she led to what yes led to, but on the other hand. uh, as we saw at the scholz meeting with representatives of the eastern committee of the german economy, and the approaches themselves, they are not discarded, no one
11:51 pm
refuses the leading role of the german business of the german economy in foreign political activity . banner or anafix. they correctly interpret this the concept of vandal dur-handel, that is, changes mean changes in relations, improving relations, building partnerships or transforming those with whom germany enters into trade relations, because they actually say that they are villibrant. uh, building your eastern policy. i wanted to change to transform the gdr and the soviet union and so on. yes, bring the soviet union and all the countries of the eastern bloc, so to speak, e in the state of western democracies. yes to produce a regime change policy. they are right, uh, such an interpretation let you know, this is a very bold interpretation in relation to those times when villebrand worked, because even if he had such thoughts, he, as a person, still
11:52 pm
very rationally understood that germany, for all its economic power. at that time, there were no real tools for pursuing such a policy, and, accordingly, such a goal could not be set. the main goal, in general, of german foreign policy of the post-war period. this is, uh, in some perspective to provide. german unity, albeit in the distant, albeit in some indefinite, but this is how, uh, it was read that the maximum that a german politician can afford, and in this respect, the policy of change through rapprochement should at least normalize relations with the eastern neighbors so that you can normally talk to them normally and discuss those issues that the frg is worried about getting into working good contacts with the german democratic republic. so i understood this concept of van del dur handel in the same way, so for me what these two respected german experts wrote it seems, well, but a lie. yes, but they perverted this concept, attributing it to its
11:53 pm
current one. yes. e understanding after the end of the cold war and oleg anatolyevich here they wrote that the policy of germany of the united states is different, that they have drawn different conclusions. but here is what unites these two concepts in the sense that they are a concept. changes through trading a-a are interpreted by these two experts. this is that both the united states and germany, in this new interpretation, are focused not on coexistence, not on partnership, but on the transformation of those who differ from them, that is, the west is not able to coexist with other centers of power. he is necessarily focused on somehow rebuilding them for himself, either, uh, the way the united states did it through the harsh use of force or the threat of force, or transformation, but such a soft one through trade. i completely agree that such a modernization of the approach is taking place here. e,
11:54 pm
means of the past german and explicitly such an american kn or e, an american point of view that represents german the approach is just a little bit american, because really germany was not set. its such a transformation and could not put it. and if such a slogan was formulated, then it is rather such an easy hypocrite for the united states in order to still get those very cheap resources from russia that make the german economy competitive and ultimately, so to speak, contribute to the revival of germany as the great power to which all the germans, both then and now, of course, aspired there, but hmm if there was a discussion, so to speak, with these comrades, i would generally say to en, but whose approach is it? even if we consider e, for the
11:55 pm
truth, here is what you wrote. and whose approach actually won? do you still think that there were problems with the soviet union, but only in the pressure of reagan, what did he manage to do? eh, so to intimidate, the soviet people or the leader, and so on? that they raised their paws up and said, we all give up. we don't go anywhere else. yes, nothing of the sort. and it’s not without reason that they say that we lost the cold war, that is, war, what is called in soft herring, we were defeated by our thoughts and fantasies about jeans and chewing gum that we can a or it's ours, but the youth, okay, we are jeans and gum and the elite was convinced that you can easily transform to become more democratic, that socialism capitalism can converge once everyone read galbraith , which means that he showed, it means that he demonstrated that he had business and large ones
11:56 pm
, large state corporations can coexist. hospitalism is quite compatible with private entrepreneurship. and it was on the tables of our members of the politburo. and they believed that this is how the velybrandt turns out, his concept won. so let's put it into practice. if in the conditions of some new cold war, but certainly not reagan's and certainly not. that's the pressure that didn't work then and doesn't work now. that's why the article is uh, crafty, uh, and uh. well, weak, so to speak, and theoretically, but she is trying to pull an owl, she is trying to prove to everyone on the globe that you need to talk with russia from a position of strength. well, let them try to make it worse for themselves, an illustration of how much the german political elite has changed not for the better, including foreign political ones in the analytical expertise of analytics. yes, because it is mainstream
11:57 pm
today, and the experts in germany, we will now break through and continue in a few moments. hot ice is the champion of russia from december 22 on pervy with a tinkoff platinum credit card you will have time to give a holiday to everyone apply for a credit card in the tinkov application we got him today tinkoff he is one of a kind. absolutely everything for the new year with discounts up to 50% will give nonsense for hair, hea for 179 and even the aroma of this earth for 20374 rubles. absolutely everything for the new year in the ritual. now tinkoff black fall not only me. invite your friends before december 20, have time to bring your friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more
11:58 pm
chances to win tinkov, he is the only one. subscription mix from tele2 empowers each subscriber movie subscription discounts on smartphones and 50 gb for something else subscription mix the choice is yours to make aromatic coffee and keep the house clean. create a cozy atmosphere with smart polaris appliances with discounts up to 60%. we have learned to control
11:59 pm
the energy of the atom and are moving forward into a safe tomorrow in a world where distance is not terrible. we create the future and open the way for new ideas and professions by rusatom.
12:00 am
any business vision can become a reality with the support of products from uralsib uralsib for business prospects where you are gifts for the whole family from 299 rubles. we have a new a year, so every month a gift awaits new subscribers when you connect your gigabyte, you will constantly wait for doubling if you want also, then hurry to the tele2 salon to everyone who will become our opponent before january 17th. we will double gigabytes of tele2 internet other
12:01 am
rules 25% discount on dry wet cat food from december 5th up to 40% discount on beauty gifts what where when is the final of the year? hockey where emotion is at its peak do you need high odds your hockey app? the big game is on the air very important the factor that determines the policy of the collective west towards ukraine is the depletion of military resources. and most importantly, the difficulties that the united states and
12:02 am
allies are already facing in order to replenish, and those weapons that were transferred from warehouses to ukraine and er, that and more and more. uh, actually western experts write that it will take years to increase the volume of production of weapons of military equipment, and, accordingly, there may be a gap between those current obligations that west a has pledged to fulfill before ukraine and the possibility of the american military-industrial complex. and not to mention the western european countries to produce the necessary amount of weapons, so as not to leave the western countries themselves. well, what is called naked? here in particular, what do the directors of defense of the center for the new american security write? casey page the war in ukraine has focused attention on the scale, foreign commitments in the us, and current industry limits. since february, washington has sent more than $ 19 billion in military aid to kiev, including thousands of missiles and
12:03 am
millions of shells from the pentagon reserves, these supplies helped the ukrainians to resist the russians, but they also depleted american stocks and weakened the us military's readiness for war. so it will take years for washington to replace the 1,600 stinger anti-aircraft missiles that were not handed over to ukraine. because the production of the stinger was discontinued in 2003 . even in the presence of the current serial production. the industry cannot immediately increase the pace of work to meet demand according to our research, starting from 2009. the us department of defense purchased an average of 900 javelin anti-tank guided missiles annually. the us has already provided ukraine with 8,500 jevelins, since the pentagon for 9. months handed over to the ukrainians the jevelin complex, which accumulated nine years of stock. overnight. there is
12:04 am
a potential solution to this difficult situation in which the military finds itself, congress should authorize multi-year contracts for key munitions to create an effective defense base needed to confront moscow and beijing vladimir sergeevich well recommends a comprehensive militarization. yes, fire up the american military-industrial complex to re-launch multi-year contracts. actually, as it was at the dawn of the past and the cold war. here. and what are the prospects, uh, of this policy, and how many years will it really take the united states to reach the required production volumes? i would slightly change the emphasis here, because you understand that in the situation that is developing today, well, maybe relations between the political washington and the military-industrial complex, well dominated by the view, who is what? in fact, e moves and pushes. in this case, who is a hostage
12:05 am
of something washington official political leadership is a hostage of the military-industrial complex, or still washington would like today, how to say that he is the most important. here we want to allocate contracts to you. we have identified, that is, all decisions are made directly in washington well, at the level of the white house there national security council of the pentagon and this is, in fact, this is cunning, it is here and passes. if this mechanism is really launched, if it is really untwisted, or rather, if we recall again what has already been said here, as it was during the years of the cold war. that's when it seems that political washington is really a hostage of the military-industrial complex, which, as it were, says, well, here they made you a jewelin, stingers, some other hymas. well, let's have them. use it, you can't say that. well, where else to send them, but send some hot spots there and,
12:06 am
you see, an even more serious problem begins. today we have ukraine’s problems. yes, we are talking about it, but if today we produce large stocks of these weapons, it turns out that washington is ready to again further promote special ones, if tensions in all other world points are, then the middle middle is high, taiwan and etc. this is somewhere today and maybe today you understand, but washington may be considered that if today we proceed from the need to modernize the american economy to use the real sector of the economy, then the most such area that will respond. it will be yours on the industrial complex. we need to support the military-industrial complex. as such, because the administration. they come and go, and the lochids boeings and other martin mariettas not to mention the ratios, they remain you see, this is the whole point, because if today these firms
12:07 am
remain, then yes, they begin to dictate their own, as they say, their will and their priorities. e we should say here directly here is the ration, which today supplies a significant part of the weapons for ukraine but after all, to its main lobbyists. uh, or rather before the arrival of all everything in the seventeenth year on the post of turnover was angry. that is, he, who before that was the ration in washington yes. and after that he joined the board of directors. well, in general, the person who represents the interests of theon washington and today it seems that yes. this is how this situation develops and we return again to history. you know once, as they say in january sixty-first year. dwight eisenhower and said something about the military-industrial farewell message about it, by the way, no one ever remembered the consequences. do you understand? well, well, somehow you know, so to
12:08 am
speak, there was an original person, so to speak a little bit. so he decided to shockly end his presidency, which may have been unsuccessful in many things, but he really told, maybe really those driving forces that determined much that in america determined the path of the war in vietnam, whether it was in the persian gulf with global terrorism. you see, the pentagon is preparing for the well, global warriors, you see , i would say so. you see, this is what we must see today is this craftiness. we see it , we need to understand it. yes, this is an arms race, but with a certain kind of political accent, that today decisions will be made in california in texas, uh, stand up washington where it is located in the very center of the military-industrial complex, usa anatolyevich but after all, such articles, and they prove another lie. may be even more cunning in the current american rhetoric, cunning that russia allegedly turned out to be not as strong in military relations
12:09 am
as they thought, uh, in previous years, because when they write that their reserves are so exhausted that everything urgently throw billions of dollars in order to increase the volume of weapons and so on. after all , they prove, thereby they do not want, and the power of the russian armed forces, which really oppose the collective west, which has already largely bled nato militarily, when the united the states are turning for arms to south korea, to bahrain, to north african countries , from anywhere. it's just that they are trying to fish out weapons of military equipment for ukraine from the world by thread. this is all proof of our military might. our military-industrial complex, unlike the american military-industrial complex, is not only effective, but also extremely cheap compared to the american one. that is, what costs in america
12:10 am
a conditionally similar product is sometimes a 10-fold difference, so the so-called arms race, if they are going to start it, now it will harm the united states, and, uh, it has been said a lot that the united states resembles the late soviet union, if they now also turn on what is called the arms race flywheel, then they will completely look like this same soviet union, this is the second time when they talk about the fact that hmm uh, there uh, russia was not strong. and this is looking. uh, what goals do you suppose that russia had, on the one hand, we had to scare, and scare, including to distract and tie some. it's groupings down there kyiv and so on. but generally speaking, to force them to put all their cards on the table and force them to conduct this huge help, to force all their javelins to be dragged back and forth in 10 years to, more precisely, to ukraine
12:11 am
for recycling, then generally speaking, we are doing everything that is necessary and if our task, if our task is to turn ukraine into vietnam for america, then we are coping with this task , we are coping and we will cope, and judging by their statements that they are going to make, they are going further this bird, which, uh, shoved its skating rink, so to speak, the birds will disappear and disappear and disappear, because we just, uh, uh, we implement our strategy, we just effectively implement it, and for them it became vietnam they think they built afghanistan for us uh-huh yes, what we will now go to control all of ukraine that there will be partisan detachments that will blow up the forest brothers from morning to evening, the unconquered bandera ukraine will not rebel and so on. and we don’t do anything like that, we didn’t let it be turned. uh, that means uh for ukraine for themselves in afghanistan, in an
12:12 am
unbearable burden. but for them we did vietnam, well, indeed, among the goals of the russian special operation there was no word to occupy, ukraine yes, there is even an open one or what is not going to, there was and remains a goal, a neutral status, demilitarization, denatification there was no goal, but to occupy. well , we talked about the difficulties the united states is facing in terms of replenishing its military reserves in europe, of course, the situation is worse, and immanuel macron. today he said that france should it is better to arm yourself. and in the context of the events in ukraine, germany also declares its intention to build up its weapons. olaf scholz pledged 100 billion euros for development. the ppc promise there some twenty-fifth twenty-six years to reach the level of e- military spending in the amount of two percent of the gross domestic product, but now many are saying that this will not happen, not
12:13 am
only and not so much with germany, but in general , let's say, the remilitarization of europe that they will not fulfill their obligations, that once again the whole thing will end with these loud conversations about what we need right now, we already understand for sure and we will now, uh, uh, build up our military muscles. there's a lot of people who think it won't happen, and won't happen, because the united states is still there. a-a are the hegemons in the field of european security, that this is american hegemony, it simply does not give either a chance or an incentive. it's real for europeans to develop something of their own. this is precisely the opinion of the researcher of defense prior s and daniel deprete, listen to the usa however, never really didn't want europe to take the initiative in their affairs on you in american foreign policy circles , the opinion prevails that washington, and only
12:14 am
washington, should remain at the head of the pack if europe really wants to assert itself as a security partner, and not as about dependents in the field of security. it should be within the nato security organization that the us has dominated since its inception in 1949. in other words, while the us wants more european military capability. they also they also want european subordination. we know this because the previous us administration often frowned on any attempt by europe to become a more independent player. in the field of defense. add this story to the sizable us military presence in europe, and it's no wonder why germany calmly reneges on earlier commitments at any given moment, more than 35,000 us troops are deployed in germany and there is a well-scattered, fortified network of bas and training centers throughout the country ivan vasilievich here. agree do you agree that as long as nato exists, there will be
12:15 am
american hegemony within nato as long as the united states insists that nato and no one but nato, uh, be responsible for european security, europe will really do nothing. and what, uh, the current reasoning of the macron and others, these are really regular words, words similar there to the old project and the european army by the independent army of the european union, and so on. i agree. u with this u with a little clarification that europe nothing will be decided. but about nothing will do all the same. uh, let's see, because i'll repeat it again earlier, and the entry into the alliance by the united states for these americans, as the union used to be, meant that they can really relax a little at the front, so to speak, in the military-military field. yes and here is an american
12:16 am
umbrella for them here. and now it is the united states that will force its vassals to work very hard. and actually. sports are on. what is it about since the re-electrification of the western bloc is clearly part of the german and french military-industrial complex is growing, he says. and we can also take part in this, both scholz and macron, they cannot but respond to this. they begin to lobby for the interests of their own, uh, companies of the military-industrial complex, but still, the americans are bent on the fact that you don’t need to spend money on your own, give the money of european taxpayers. we will supply you with everything you need. do you work? uh, earn money, and we'll find which missiles to spend on, and that's actually, germany once and buys american f-35 fighters, e, much to the anger and displeasure of the macron, because but what about us europeans right?
12:17 am
let's go european. uh, that is, french uh, or at least joint uh, to produce fighters, but not from germany, it is american authors who buy it again, i repeat, the europeans will not decide anything while they are in nato under the american pita. but will they not do something. now they will do much more than before, because the united states has decided to seriously strain its vassals on their geopolitical projects, and now the vassal can't sit comfortably. and so to speak , they will have to seriously work on reciprocity only with economic affairs on the geo and on the foot of the american political program. will someone in europe be able to earn extra money on this ? will the european military-industrial complex try? but, most likely, america will nevertheless integrate these european military affairs to an even greater extent, and
12:18 am
artyom pavlovich into its military-industrial complex. military-industrial complex of its own and er, strengthen the common european there cooperation with france common european military-industrial complex. and now, and many accuse berlin precisely of the fact that although 10 months have passed since the beginning of the russian special operation. in ukraine, the state of the bundeswehr. it has only gotten worse over time. yes, and it seems like money promises to allocate money, but somehow nothing happens. something will happen in terms of the military strengthening of germany. well, it would be strange, in fact, to expect that in 10 months at once will turn into a powerful modern army, since the blow, starting from 90-91, the bundeswehr continued to reduce its combat capabilities, there was a rejection of the universal. duties in germany and, in principle, uh , approached this year in a rather deplorable state. that's literally. uh, today there was a
12:19 am
message that puma armored cars, yes, they turned out to be faulty, they will be abandoned, which, of course, is a significant reputational blow to the german military-industrial complex, since this was one of the main such brands. it is important for the german military industry to understand that these 100 billion euros that are planned to be spent on the modernization of the bundeswehr, in terms of their spending structure, are aimed at ensuring that the bundeswehr can perform combat missions in remote regions of the world, because most of this money goes to modernize the air force and the navy, that is, we are not talking about building a trench along the odor, yes, and that it was some kind of line there, of defense against. yes , a potential enemy in the east. no, we are talking about participation. ah, in remote regions of the world this is what a fleet is for , this is what aviation is needed for, and here, of course, the purchase of american fighters shows, er, in
12:20 am
general, the goals and objectives of this reform. although , of course, they will try to bring the dsr to life, since the current state does not suit anyone. this is the most sore point of the entire german political discussion, but what will it be like in the future? here, uh, this is a question, and it will, of course, be decided here primarily at the expense of american weapons, but german industry will also try undoubtedly, the military has its say here, the question is, whose lobbying forces will turn out to be more active and more effective. well, here's another important factor that i think will limit the ability of the europeans to spend money on weapons. this is an energy crisis. e compensation, er, the consequences of which, according to bloomberg, cost europe 1 trillion. he euro listen europe has suffered about 1 trillion dollars from the sharp rise in energy prices as a result of the russian war on
12:21 am
ukraine, and the deepest crisis in a decade is only just beginning after this winter, the region will have to replenish its gas reserves with little or no russian supplies, which will increase competition for tankers fuel even with the emergence of new opportunities for importing liquefied natural gas. the market is expected to remain tight until 2026, when additional manufacturing capacity from the us becomes available to the frame. this means there will be no respite from high prices, although the government has been able to help companies and consumers mitigate the part of the blow by providing more than $700 billion in aid, according to the brussels-based think tank brüggel, the emergency could last for years and with rising interest rates and a likely economic downturn, government support that softened the blow for millions of households. and enterprises the budgetary possibilities of the government are already becoming more and more inaccessible, about half of the
12:22 am
eu member states have a debt exceeding the limit of 60% of gdp established by the bloc vladimir sergeevich well, how is it in this situations to increase defense spending. well, not only is it all about the fact that you are not even defense, the costs are generally about the future of dragging european industry. at the same time, we must understand what is modern. in general industry. it is organized as a very complex interweaving of various kinds of industries and so on firms. eh, for many, this is, in general, an american practice, but europe also borrowed from this. this is a firm that produces dual-use technology , both civilian and military. this is an experience that, by the way, europe borrowed from the united states of america, maybe america paid more attention to the military component, and europe to a greater extent. to the civilian component, well, it is quite obvious that we are talking about the future of this industry, this industrialization of europe, and this may be the most serious
12:23 am
development that european politicians can have today. they don’t even understand it for them, what is called maybe for german, yes, and it can be for french, these competitive positions or competitive opportunities of european industry. well, maybe there was the essence of this, this is what was just acquired in the region. ah, as a result of globalization. i would even say integration processes for the creation of the eurozone and the creation of the european union. but today it turns out that yes. in general, europe is decided by industry. and if she loses her industry, it’s not even clear what she will get tired of, it turns out only because of the sphere and services, moreover, if you think about it, and what service sector, i’m not talking about medical education now. we get it like the classics the only thing left of the third world is tourism, and in europe, where is the war blazing? what is this tourism? similar is the question that today apparently european politicians do not have an answer to, especially military spending. it turns out that these will be such, you know
12:24 am
, paramilitary tourists, so to speak, trips to the zone of some kind of military operations, from which it is very dangerous to travel, from which not everyone can return. well, actually what you're saying, this once again confirms. uh, the definition that we somehow sergey aleksandrovich karaganov gave the current european. union great venice indeed. that's what tourism is. yes , this atmosphere that will remain in them, and europe as a whole, it seems to me, has fallen into a stalemate without becoming, largely through the fault of the united states, an independent geopolitical and military center of power. she is now unable to get out of the american tutelage and is terribly afraid of the changes that are rapidly taking place in the world. that is, the rise outside the western centers of power of the formation of multipolarity, the strengthening of the role of military force and rivals of the great powers europe is afraid of all this and therefore cannot refuse the subordinate position of the united states. but the preservation of the
12:25 am
united states in the orbit and participation in the american confrontation with russia and china finds europe even more marginalized. moreover, not only geopolitical, but also economic, if during the years of the former cold war europe was a political dwarf, but managed to become an economic giant, now it can become a dwarf there too, but as vladimir putin recently said, this is their choice. russia forms a multipolar world with such truly giants as china, india and brazil and with such sovereign centers of power as turkey, saudi arabia, many countries of asia, the middle east, africa and latin america by the way, just tonight , vladimir putin spoke on the phone with the new and at the same time the old, and the president of brazil louisiva and, according to the kremlin, both leaders expressed confidence that russian-brazilian relations will continue to develop successfully, both in a bilateral format and within the framework of the brix, it was
12:26 am
big game. all the best. russia really has an atomic bomb, the minister, vyshinsky remains silent, perhaps the most brilliant intelligence operation in the entire history of the special services, not a single mouse will slip through ; , and in them i never said these people had absolute confidence in the rightness of their cause, the russians blew up the bombs and a terrible rose from where, why and that the bomb ours in los alamos today on the first electric grill cable coffee maker and other
12:27 am
kitford equipment with discounts up to 30%, on wildberries wednesday in the sportmaster mobile application, a wide selection of skiing equipment and only original brands with a 15% discount on the first online order sportmaster mobile is more convenient hypothermia is not scary if you strengthen urinary immunity bladder uranium next is a unique combination of three natural components of cranberry fumes vitamin d3 that supports the protective barrier of the bladder, uranex triple protection formula and course, 7 days the tanker is selected for profitable loans. and loans. everything is online. i have three
12:28 am
approvals. the bet is excellent, the tanks bring suspicious to everyone. the operation kidnapped the defender connected his hand take it. with smart systems and a defender, spam calls will not disturb you, the system will process and decrypt you with the my mts application, activate the defender for 30 days for free. absolutely everything for the new year with lists of up to 50% eyebrow and eyelash gel for 249 and even lambar fragrance for 2016-24 rubles. everything for the new year. now tinkoff black fall not only me. invite your friends before december 20, have time to bring your friends before december 20 and participate in the drawing of 200 million rubles. the more friends, the more chances to win the tinkoff prize, he is the only one. we have learned to manage energy and move forward into a safe tomorrow in a world
12:29 am
where distance is not scary. we create the future and open the way with new ideas and the profession rusat overeating and alcohol load the liver three times more than normal. how to protect the liver during the holidays is aimed at triple protection of the liver heparin from the company evalard, is already waiting for you on the website in branded stores and convenience stores. today for purchases of lemonade cola kind, one and a half liters 82.99 gifts for the new year grandfather frost and also grandma frost mom frost is happy, frost and dad frost grandfather, baby you are not the only new year's sale on yandex.market big tortilla cole slow a lot of chicken and potatoes fries, but new big megaroll. dear passengers, the sale is leaving and
12:30 am
jump in for more than a year. for 109 rubles. into the depths of light into the magic of sound haer technique inspired by life
12:31 am
doomsday clock more than 70 years, they are counting symbolic time until nuclear midnight because of all these years the world has never been so close to disaster. today, nuclear scientists announce that yes, nuclear is better left. the paradox of this watch was invented by american scientists in 1947. those who after hiroshima and nagasaki were horrified. realizing. what deadly force put into the hands of the us government robert oppenheimer, the scientific director of the american atomic project,
12:32 am
said we did the work behind the devil long before this famous statement immediately after the creation of the bomb. he said we made a bomb. let's make sure we don't blow up the world by learning about the theme of our film, the grandson of robert oppenheimer, charles, for the first time agreed to an interview for russian television. my grandfather believed that for the sake of success, scientists from all over the world should work together and be able to talk to each other. it was the military who believed that the main thing in nuclear development was the secrecy of people. such a pacifist position was not close to the states, only a nuclear balance could maintain an unsteady geopolitical balance, and in 1949 it was achieved. created in the soviet union the atomic bomb prevented a nuclear
12:33 am
catastrophe, the americans realized that they were not the only ones who possessed such a terrible weapon and from now on they must act with caution. thanks to whom and at the cost of what efforts the soviet atomic bomb was created in the shortest possible time, the world will know much later the merit of creating the soviet atomic bomb, of course, first of all belongs to our scientific designer engineer, but the soviet foreign intelligence, which managed to penetrate in the most top-secret projects the united states of america and great britain for several years in the west, near foreign counterintelligence, the soviet intelligence network operated, and today we
12:34 am
will talk about them, the people and the fates behind this grandiose operation. about those whose names have been kept secret for decades. i was amazed and thought that it took so many years for my father, and my mother , too, managed to keep this secret about people who risked their lives without thinking about awards and titles. there was no resentment. they were people, uh, made from a different batch for free, they worked. and in general, without everything, the intelligence officers who prevented the third world war. it was massive. can this operation
12:35 am
be the most brilliant intelligence operation in the history of the special services? on august 6, 1945, an american b-29 bomber with the female name enola gay
12:36 am
dropped a nuclear bomb on hiroshima, the bridge hit the epicenter of the explosion, all that was left of the people who found themselves on it at that moment were only oily ashy puddles in the form of human bodies, in general, you know, what is a nuclear explosion. and what's the worst? most terrible in it, that a person evaporates? instantly, on august 9, another bomb destroyed the city of nagasaki. but the fact that the americans also had the third goal of the ussr for many years remained a secret. april 1945, the legendary meeting on the elbe, while ordinary
12:37 am
soldiers share tobacco and booze, the american government is already thinking about how the soviet union will share spheres of influence in the world. just 10 days after the victorious fireworks in moscow, us deputy secretary of state jazz gru will say, if anything can be quite certain in this world. so it is the future war between the ussr and the usa was a protracted war, and not like hitler was an unbearable war. on august 30, 1945, major general loris norstat submitted a plan for a nuclear attack on the ussr for consideration by the us air force headquarters; 20 key soviet cities, headed by moscow and leningrad, appeared as targets in the document, relations were such that the
12:38 am
cold war could turn into a hot one hotter than a real war, the americans had these plans, a troyan plan, a tablet where it was painted how much it was necessary to throw there on moscow on leningrad when did this attack start? the united states was not afraid of a retaliatory strike, because the ussr did not have a nuclear bomb in 1945, and according to the forecasts of pentagon analysts. it could have appeared no earlier than the year 1954, but in august 1949, an american meteorological service plane spotted it during a scheduled flight to the pacific ocean. there are traces of nuclear decay in the air near kamchatka. it meant only one thing , the soviet union tested an atomic bomb, when you have about 20 kilotons exploding there, and a huge fireball goes up the shock wave, light radiation and
12:39 am
fission fragments they rise to great heights and spread throughout the world. soviet science owed its success in many respects to intelligence, which prepared and carried out a large-scale operation erns, translated from english as something monstrous bomb scientists, would shoot, well, materials. if not for the operation and the norm, i'm afraid that the americans would not have resisted the temptation a second time. to use nuclear weapons already on the territory of the soviet union as the starting point of operation normas
12:40 am
considered the summer of 1940, then from western scientific journals. suddenly, all publications on the nuclear topic disappeared at once. it was strange, because ever since the germans discovered nuclear fission in 1938, the young science of nuclear physics became topic number one by scientists all over the world, then they were talking about the peaceful atom as new sources of energy. it was a wonderful time for humanity.
12:41 am
the last article on the nuclear topic, written by the american physicist macmillan, was published in the journal physical review in june 1940, and not a word after it. it seemed suspicious young soviet spy. leonid kvasnikov kvasnikov. this is a unique individual. he thrice. he was a talented person, because he was a scout and a scientist and a seer was leonid kvasnikov. one of the initiators of the normas operation dreamed of a scientific career, he entered the moscow institute of chemical engineering, then to graduate school, but in 1938 a young graduate student was unexpectedly invited to the nkvd and informed that he was suitable for work in intelligence in all respects. i’m interested in time, i was going to do something new, as many as two dissertations to write one on
12:42 am
military topics on shells, and another on peaceful topics, a very important extraction of water from the air, which is needed, for example, by the people of the desert and he had to give up two dissertations in order to be in the intelligence of young educated and talented then they were looking for throughout the union, intelligence was in dire need of frames of repression, the thirty -seventh year she was bled to death. of course they ruined intelligence. if you count the percentage there from 400, so to speak, employees, there were 275, so to speak, expelled.
12:43 am
leonid kvasnikov who was identified in scientific and technical intelligence read all foreign scientific periodicals from cover to cover, the sudden nuclear lull seemed to him a suspicious departure. and such publications from all open sources. he connected with the fact that it is possible that work has begun on the use of atomic energy for military purposes. everything would be fine if not for the damned betrayal in south africa colonel kozlov was arrested, it was a catastrophic torture. it was just a disaster behind the back of the chair , handcuffed handcuffed hands, in general, my hands were knocked down here for the fifth time. when you fall, you lose consciousness, there they passed, your guy keeps beating him. well, why didn't he say a word tomorrow at first? it
12:44 am
's really our employee who found that we will work. look at the new year in a kind way, as in childhood capture magical moments with the new riomi by buying 10. in the largest smartphone store svyaznoy with a benefit of up to 4,000 rubles. sberbank presents a loan with the lowest rate over the past 10 years from 4.5%. apply for a loan at sberbank and return one and a half percent of the rate with bonuses sber thank you monthly.
12:45 am
order medicines and products for the health of the nostril in the city profitable, for example magne b6 for irritability fatigue disorders magne b6 and other medicines city dot ru order with discounts somewhere, to get the benefit you need to turn everything upside down profitably. sparkling chernogolovka with a new year's mood inside is charged personally by santa claus dear and more. and what kind of wagon is this car, the final sale of the year, jump in. years on ozon foundation for 169 rubles. for 29 rubles.
23 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
