let me not answer for now. delusion except you.

you said next to this descent of stone, that's over the hill. kick off, fucker, i'll get the king. go home, listen.

passionate flamenco dance mixture of feelings of moors, spaniards gypsies in one territory danger and anticipation of new roads children's blood of desperate and free poor as a result , a frantic dance of spanish gypsies appeared. they

held the victory. moms are you gypsies? you are a master who does not want to leave traces of your stay in russia

good evening on the air a big game today in petersburg, an informal cis summit ended in addition to a working breakfast with all the heads of the commonwealth countries, by the way, in one of the halls of the russian museum. it all happened vladimir putin held bilateral meetings with president of belarus alexander lukashenko and prime minister of armenia nikol, pashinyan

one of the topics of this informal summit was certainly the ukrainian crisis and the hybrid war of the united states and its allies against russia, which, of course, affects all members of the commonwealth and creates in region of the post-soviet space. additional tension reinforces this often and fuels regional tensions and conflicts and the notion that the ukrainian crisis is nothing else. as part of the global struggle of the united states and nato to weaken russia in order to restore western dominance in world affairs. and what risks does that entail? today once again said e, in an interview published today in the tass agency, and russian foreign minister sergei lavrov listen to the actions of the countries of the collective the west and zelensky under their control confirm the global nature of the ukrainian crisis, it is no longer a secret to anyone that the strategic goal of the united states and its nato allies is to defeat russia on the battlefield, as

a mechanism for significantly weakening or even destroying our country in order to achieve. for this purpose, our opponents are ready for many things. the main beneficiary of the hot conflict is the united states, which seeks to extract the maximum benefit from it, both in economic and military-strategic terms, at the same time, washington decides an important the geopolitical task of disrupting traditional ties between russia and europe to subjugate the european satellites even more. at the same time, the westerners declare their desire to remain, as if above the fight and the unacceptability of a direct clash russia’s natus is pure hypocrisy, we do not stop warning our enemies in the west about the danger they have taken to escalate the ukrainian crisis with the contingent that raised the risk of uncontrollable in kiev development of the situation remains very high, it is important to prevent. catastrophes. not boring. well, here, uh, as sergei lavrov rightly pointed out, the

united states has found a very convenient formula for itself. they say they're in a fight. e, that they are not participants in the military conflict. at the same time, they provide kiev with absolutely everything for the continuation of hostilities and for economic survival, and at the same time feels safe. how to break this vicious circle without sliding into the third world war? the fact that westerners are playing dishonestly is that their position is constantly very high degree of hypocrisy. just lies - this is not a secret, of course, in the current situation - it has also reached some new heights, new levels, but in principle it cannot be said that we are used to it, but this is not news to us. and what is a little unusual is that the westerners, if translated into a simpler language, then what

sergei viktorovich lavrov said, they started playing and playing very seriously from my point of view , they do not adequately assess the situation , moreover, and they inadequately assess immediately in several opposite directions, then it seems to them that everything is in order. and they are not in any danger at all. everything is fine, then suddenly they are so scared. they begin to shout about a nuclear war when they enter and point their fingers at russia and at russia, and these changeable moods from hot to cold from one madness. oh, to another madness. this is changing very, uh, very much. and this is now hindering not only that we do not have a dialogue. actually no dialogue. this makes it difficult to give them the right signals and get the right signals from them, because they behave quite inadequately from my point of view. that's the main thing, uh, they are delusional, uh, and you very often

discussed this with dmitry sals. e in your broadcasts they see the situation. so russia marks the red line. at first, they approach it neatly and move it, then brazenly finally throw it away. they go further. russia puts some new red lines. they again successfully overcome them, it seems to them that they are such an obstacle course through the red lines, they have mastered everything and everything, and everything great. and they just know, they sniff around a little. this is not yet a nuclear red line. if not nuclear, then they say we are not afraid of anything, and from my point of view, the situation looks completely different in a different way. russia has no red lines. do not shift, there were red lines. designated at the end of last year. and in principle, the situation is such that they simply cross the line and are on the minefield, and in the minefield they continue to

try to find out from us. and what is the map of this not a single field, and of course no one else no signals to them. where and what will happen to you? when yes, and in what way they are not going to give and from time to time they have some kind of such an idea, and then they get very frightened and start throwing tantrums, as they arranged about yakov , uh, some kind of plans for using tactical e , tactical nuclear weapons, but uh, really. eh, you need to somehow sum up their thoughts that you guys have climbed into the very middle of the minefield. and if before we would be like the rest of the world. they would play with you, they would give you some kind of path, how to retreat from this minefield, that is, now the peculiarity of the moment is that no one else

plays along. they climbed themselves. yeah, you yourself will e get out to smash the world, we will not let you. because we have a very big responsibility to this world, but to help you save face or help you save your crippled satellite. we will absolutely not. this is your ah. this is your task, and from my point of view, it is very important that china is moving around this position playing along will no longer be screwed. choose yourself. well, we will talk about china in sufficient detail today. but it seems to me that here we also need to take into account that when the united states throws a tantrum about nuclear risks. this is also a significant degree of hypocrisy, but, because the purpose of the american statements that russia can allegedly use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine sooner or later is to quarrel russia with the world majority, and to demonize russia so much that, yes,

and discredit and demonize russia in in the eyes of those countries that now support russia that are building friendly partners with it. relations, including china because, of course, no one will support a country that unleashes a nuclear war against a non-nuclear state. e without an existential threat to e. for themselves, this does not mean that there are no risks of nuclear war, but they do not exist, but they lie in something else. they lie in the fact that a direct military clash between russia and nato in the non-nuclear sphere may occur as a result of american policy in against ukraine which is already in turn. might escalate to uh, nuclear level. this is what russia is constantly talking about, and this is emphasized by sergey lavrov, and he is talking about the inadmissibility and great danger at the same time of a direct military clash between russia and nato outside the nuclear sphere. anyway. uh, russian-american relations. ah. to

date, the nature of hybrid warfare is deplorable, and mini also spoke about this today. pp, listen to russian american relations indeed, they are in an extremely deplorable state, practically frozen through the fault of washington, the confrontational anti-russian course pursued by it is becoming more acute and comprehensive. to maintain normal communication with the biden administration, which declares strategic defeat of our country as the goals objectively does not work in our planning, we take into account the principle that worked during the cold war, the principle of peaceful coexistence of states with different political and socio-economic systems. he may well come to court in the new geopolitical conditions, vladimir sergeevich, but it seems to me that the principle of peaceful coexistence is such an almost unattainable blue dream of russian american relations, based on their

current one. e states of e hybrid war. here. and what forecast do you give for russian american relations for the year, will something change with the formation of a republican majority in the house of representatives, can we hope to move towards peaceful coexistence as united states next year? well, if you look , uh, at the statement of sergei viktorovich lavrov , even if you look between the lines, what was said and will just be shown to our viewers it is obvious that the russian side has come to the conclusion that there are no prospects for conversations and negotiations with the baida administration. if we talk about that, there is sometimes such an expression to skip this or that administration, but if today we proceed from what is necessary with this administration, what is called waiting until the exodus at least the next presidential elections. well, maybe

such a concept is given that there is such a signal that the next 2 years. we should not expect anything special here, but indeed. the situation that is developing in the united states of america is such that, in general, a domestic political crisis can arise at any moment. it may arise due to the state of health of president bayda, but it may arise due to the fact that relations between the republicans and democrats will sharply worsen now, and in america they are already directly saying that, in principle, republicans emphasize, in principle, you know, are ready to start or turn the house of representatives into some kind of such a body of litigation, all abuses of power and all the not plausible acts of the biden administration. well, in this case, they remember that in the family in the mid- seventies there were such commissions, damn it, which had a very serious impact on the functioning of the american

political system, where they understood the issues of state administration intelligence and so on. well, that is, in general, before shake. are you serious about the administration? i'm not talking about what may be, the democrats and the republicans are raising issues of debacle. this i am the administration, but given the state of the subjective state. maybe today the republicans cannot expect this exodus either, you cannot help but expect it, you understand, and everyone knows very well everyone is hanging. this is nixon's early bid, and, in principle, it may be in the case of biden. also, perhaps, you understand, therefore, this is the uncertainty that she creates. it feels like america can change something from a point of view. uh, the alignment of political forces is a very simple hint that sometimes there is such an understanding that the us foreign policy is acting as a result of such a washington consensus, if

republicans and democrats really act, how would you understand somewhere together? somehow like this. you see, based on the difficulty, how else to get out, you understand, either biden, or no one, uh, here. and, if some kind of crisis somehow arises, then maybe today congress and the white house will somehow work out together. that's when this principle of peaceful existence is proposed in the form, by the way, to say that it is given to clearly understand what is indifferent to us. in this case. what kind of administration do we approach the united states of america as a country and you should appeal not from the point of view of your republican self or your democratic super self, but the understanding of the country, that here we have the united states of america on one side of russia on the other side. let's build relationships not on personal, and at the interstate level. this is what has been invested today, and the words of sergei viktorovich lavrov are clear

enough. it is clear because, by the way, it happened in the sixties and seventies . more specifically, in the seventies. it seems to me that we really need to study something more thoroughly. experience the historical experience of the cold war, but in order to give russian american relations a more working, but character, including to manage the confrontation that we have now, well, here is one of the tools american uh economic war against russia uh, is uh, the idea of ​​a price cap, and this price cap has been introduced. i will remind the g7 countries and the european union and australia, uh, december 5th. this year, russia, too, immediately said that it would ban it by law, and it would ban it. uh, supply oil. uh, to those countries that will directly or indirectly comply with this price ceiling, deputy prime minister alexander novak and finance minister anton

siluanov spoke about this, and so on. this is what happened today. uh, vladimir putin signed a decree in in accordance with which oil supplies are prohibited, uh, to those countries that will prescribe, at least directly or indirectly, the price ceiling in the corresponding, uh, relevant contracts, vasily georgievich here. eh, in this regard. yes , uh, this ban has already been legalized. and how will this affect the geography of russian energy supply, and in principle, for e, how do you see the prospects for the development of the world oil market with geography, everything is approximately, i understand. because the turn to the east has occurred, it will continue for the purchased russian tankers. i think even more of them will be purchased, and they will be transferred to ports more actively. oil will be processed even more actively. we know that refineries

are now loaded more than even 100% and the reason is the avalanche demand for diesel fuel. one of the reasons on the part of the european union is that they are trying. enough of the latter, at least in the form of diesel fuel, but the price behavior is the most interesting thing that happens here, because initially we we saw that the introduction of a ceiling on oil prices, but led to, well, a continued decline in oil prices for gaz, that is, initially this decrease was oil. at least judging by the brand, the brand has gone below 80 dollars per barrel and now it is 84, that is, there has been a rebound , because panic has begun. price. well, it means selling oil, but it's another matter when you discover that you are this oil, first, don't get it. secondly, your function of oil refining in the european union is about it. it will go to russian enterprises or to russia's partner countries

who will receive oil and, along with oil, will receive the added value that hmm gives the processing of russian hydrocarbons. given to the countries of the european union, they are losing, which means they are losing in petrochemistry. they are losing production of plastic. they are losing production of various engineering products, which is also a problem here. that is, they lose another competitive advantage. they had several of them and they were all connected with goods coming from russia from gas and oil. and this is very bad news for the european union, because there has been some such calm in the west that the prices of oil , food, coal at gaz have started to decline in recent months. and if you look at the eurostat data, yes, you can see that even well, energy costs are from 40%, uh, 35% of the cost went there. yes, that is, the cost of rising cost turned out to have begun to decrease. yes, here years, if you look, and that is, it seems, here

it is the onset of some at least some kind of relief, it turns out, no, it turns out. you just don't physically get that oil. this oil is coming. u will go to other countries stay in russia and uh along with that what happened in the oil market, china went out largely due to the quarantine regime began to actively buy resources in the market one moment, the united states found that the attack on the market oil they produced this year. she was very expensive. they are sold oil and stocks and need to buy. it seems that prices have dropped and you need to buy now and prices have gone up. and this suggests that oil prices will not fall indefinitely, and besides , americans also have a certain fear about the fall in oil prices. they survived the big drop in oil prices in march 2020, when even negative oil competition was the result, what did they get? it would seem that here it is, the desired reduction in the cost of resources. well, here they are, yes, they are very they are cheap, but the economy collapsed . western economies collapsed and they had to be

saved and saved them for a very long time. it’s been there for a year and a half, and it’s an extremely expensive company, uh, there’s only one government budget deficit in 20-21 in the united states was 5.9 trillion dollars, then they had a deficit this year of another trillion 400 billion dollars, which called the record at a low . actually. this is a lot. compared to the deficit that was in the period of obama and, uh, donald trump. uh, so the situation is by no means unambiguous for the west. they wanted here to catch a fish in a clutch of water, but it turned out that this fish escapes, but for the russian economy. this is undoubtedly an incentive to intensively develop trade with their new old partners with strange eurasian with india and china and refine oil to the maximum. this will make it easier to transport. it will take up less volume, well, oil production, at least, and if at some point

russia, uh, means it reduces production, then this is a signal for our buyers. what, uh any discounts are impossible that you should get ready to be taken seriously, uh, a deal, because you will get russian oil, but not in the way that you would like, which is at a very, very big discount. the discount will be more moderate. well, indeed, china is today one of the main importers of russian oil, and the energy turn to the east has taken place. and at the same time, this turn is not only energetic, but complex in nature. and, in principle, it seems to me, one of the conclusions. uh this year is the strength of the russian chinese partnership sustainability. they are passed the stress test, er, and the results of this is not a simple year, but the minister of foreign affairs, china baths. and, uh, he recently stated that russian-chinese relations are as strong as the monolith, and uh, the recent visit of dmitry medvedev

to beijing also confirmed this stability of the russian chinese partnership. but you can’t say the same about us-china relations, uh, the outgoing year sharply worsened us-china relations, the summit, uh, between sidimping and biden, which took place at the g20 summit in bali did not change and did not even slow down. er, the deteriorating momentum in us-china relations. i think a very clear illustration of this ongoing and worsening near free fall is the recent telephone conversation that took place between chinese foreign minister wang and united states secretary of state anthony b linkin. here. hear how the contents of this conversation and the main statement of the baths and the hong kong age times, us secretary of state anthony blinkin

probably thought that the most proclaimed the role of world policeman gives him the prerogative to check what is happening between germany, china and russia where he was not enlightened . collect details of the two high-level contacts that chinese president xi jinping had in succession last week, first with german president frank walter stanmar, and then with the former chairman of the united russia party russian president dmitry medvedev respectively, but damn it, ken fulfilled his mission clumsily by nominating. at the forefront are contentious issues between the us and china, especially the current situation with covid-19 in china and the importance of its transparency for the international community. not surprisingly, vann and blinken sternly told customs that the us should not start a dialogue. reflection at the same time or talk about cooperation,

but at the same time strike at china you and said, this is unreasonable competition, but irrational suppression. it is intended not for the proper resolution of disputes for inciting conflicts. actually. this is the old practice of one-sided intimidation. it didn't work in china in the past and it won't work in the future. well, first of all, this shows how serious the fears in the united states are, er, the further strengthening of the russian-chinese partnership and the possible preservation of economic relations between china and germany. yes, the united states is directly watching. did steinmeier and the children disagree about something, what happened would be beyond, but american preferences, but secondly, and yuri vadimovich, after all, such a statement by wang and they say that here is the american logic to go chew gum

at the same time, that is, on the one hand, restrain china and on the other hand try build a dialogue with china in areas where it is beneficial to the united states china is unacceptable. but it was this model that biden tried to impose on china at the summit in bali. you know the chinese, in my opinion, the last illusions have been dispelled, and they are entering 2023 with such a very decisive mood. they see the intransigence of the chinese-american vital interests of the national interest. here, the newspaper global times, which we often quote, wrote that today it wrote that and if russia and america have a main problem - this is the ability of russia to destroy the united states with a nuclear strike. then china has three such e at once,

a problem with the americans, and in addition to the same opportunity to destroy america too, there is still a confrontation that is irreconcilable between american e, liberal capitalism and chinese socialism with chinese specificity, and it is quite clear especially after the twentieth congress that the chinese will intensify the socialist content of their domestic and foreign policy, it is quite clear that china will overcome. uh, covid problems will, uh, develop more and this will threaten the american model, but the development of the world. here is the third irreconcilable hmm and the contradictions are racial. americans are white chinese, so to speak, yellow among americans. there is a feeling that the triumph of the yellow race over the american edition of the white race is unacceptable. and

this uh feeling it uh arose back in the 19th century, when the famous chinese exclusion act was issued. and this is what is unacceptable. she, uh, looked through. here, uh, and with trump, but now with biden. it is especially clearly seen even in the statements of american diplomats who said that well, okay, we are with russians and soviets. we could still somehow agree during the cold war, because they are still white with them. uh, different logic, different introduction traditions. ah, conflict. yes, but with the chinese it is not known how we will build e relationship, so this is e for the chinese. uh, very important. and these three points really. the articles of the global

times newspaper that i wrote were presented and it was published today, but the fact is that it was published. yes, respectively, the editorial board of the newspaper, which is published by the propaganda department of the cpc central committee, accepts this. yes, therefore, the chinese. uh, of course, they look at the year 23 as a year of continuation of conflict situations, and i don't think that blinkin's visit. uh, something will change in beijing, the chinese are waiting for very big changes in america . as for europe, the americans managed to very quickly create anti-russian sanctions as a bloc immediately after the start of the ukrainian events and they, uh, decided to repeat the same trick. e. in asia, by creating the same anti

-chinese e front, while it is being built in the military field, but also preparing in the technological field with chips in the economic field, and they are very hopeful for indo-pacific solidarity yes, there was atlantic solidarity and here you can talk in the indus pacific solidarity but there are problems you know, uh uh steinmeier and his colleague scholz. they have already broken through this great wall that the americans are trying to put up around china. and it is generally unknown. what did the leaders of the 20 european leaders negotiate with children in bali because they are already waiting for the macron in china, and you see, the italians will catch up and others for the americans. it is very important. because the. they have now found a new corn disease

of the chinese, in addition to taiwanization of these technologies. yes, these are technologies, and they are very afraid that europe will create some kind of gaps , some chinese or say goodbye or through which from europe on technology. they will go to america and in china yes, this is very their uh, worries worries. and this will be, i think, um, such a trend, er, the beginning of next year and that's it. this will last as the united states unleashed a full-fledged technological war against china and more and more american experts. including the most profound experts, they argue that in fact, the us economic war against china began right now and it was the bytan administration that unleashed it, that that trade the war that was under trump. it was so kindergarten and flowers. here is a real confrontation in the economic sphere. started right now under, uh, the biden administration.

for example, here is what the well-known american international realist professor at harvard university, stephen wald, says about this. did it seem to you that the us sanctions on chinese semiconductors went beyond what was expected from the biden policy towards china in fact. this surprised me greatly. i think it shouldn't underestimate the importance of this step. this is far more important than what the trump administration has done. it was a major escalation. we have declared economic war on china and in fact declared that as a national goal we are going to maintain economic superiority, the united states is ready to do anything to make sure that it continues to dominate the field of the most modern and important technologies, and it will take active measures to prevent china from developing these technology vladimir sergeevich a full-fledged economic war and the united states hopes to win it. well, in general, you can say in this way that now the

united states of america is really. uh, as if they have some kind of rosy hopes that a very important stage has really come to shake the alignment and fit in the world economy precisely on cp ken washington and that one for the previous blinken conversation that you saw is precisely that the american press is now spreading the report that in china the number of cases of coronavirus is already tens, even hundreds of millions of people, the approach is very simple. we know that in the twentieth-21-22 year. china in general , it was relatively painless. uh, this corona virus pandemic, and in general, this only led to the fact that the pace of economic growth slowed down. america true has already made similar pants were there, i don't know, seven eight became five six. they really already believe that everything is almost to be said not for the economic development of the whale. it did not stop, but, nevertheless, today

, given the fact that the role played by the coronavirus pandemic for the economies, uh, the us and western europe, is roughly the same forecast. this is also important to keep in mind. here is this too. by the way, i want to say the warfactor, which, perhaps, today is also pushing from china to a greater, so to speak, from the alliance, much closer rapprochement with the russian federation, here you should keep in mind, with regard to the american strategy of technological warfare, america is like would be here for now, but this game is long, because today semi-urban residents and a lot what is connected with this it was really made in taiwan in china and so on. and by the way, to say from this, the military-industrial complex of the united states of america mainly benefited, and therefore, when the question arose of creating, so to speak, such a deployment of a full-fledged arms race, it suddenly turned out that it was a supplier? is almost a people's republic of china, will china uh, in this

case, it will contribute to strengthening the military potential of the united states of america from my point of view, while we have to look and personally, i'm fine with that. carefully, this is a declaration in order to, perhaps, so to speak, psychological pressure on china, that we are ready to challenge you, but unlike the trump administration, which, as in which words and deeds diverged to a lesser extent, as for the biden administration, this can be clearly to say that this administration’s words and deeds diverge to a much wider extent, therefore this is a general declaration to what extent the americans will have enough, so to speak, funds in order to reformat the development of the american economy, it is difficult to say the idea is the same, that scientific, technical and financial capital should flow into the united states of america. that's what is behind this is not an attempt. maybe today. return production directly and rebuild

many competitive advantages within the united states of america. america has already lost. and here again take advantage of the fact that today with all may be due to the pacific region. maybe from others today an influx of these e, capitals of this technological know-how will begin, the calculation is being done on this, but on the other hand. we see that the economy of the united states of america is also in a very difficult position and many american economists. they say 23 could also be a recession year for the united states of america. a recession. well, they are not very favorable, uh, background or not very favorable environment for uh, restructuring of the scientific and technological potential, given, so to speak, that today the democrats are more involved in social programs. for them, the problem of ensuring social peace is much more important than the restructuring of the functioning of the real sector of the economy. here trump assessed his role in this way, maybe as

a result he lost the presidential election. well, the democrats seem to think that they can play on several boards at once, we'll see how they succeed, but personally, i still have very big doubts about this vasily georgievich well, if my memory serves me right, and china intends to invest in the development of semiconductors in the next few years about twice as much. uh, than the biden administration under the inflation reduction act and that's to encourage us high-tech production. but as an economist, do you think the united states will be able to win a technological and thus economic victory over china, or has the train left? they can lead for a while , they can do it, given that taiwan is under their control, they have already got everything they wanted from there, or almost everything they wanted, but the problem of the united states is that they a

lost in many respects that industrial basis of their domination and at the same time lost the function in the world economy, the economic function of the hegemon, the hegemon, should drag the process of the world economy. it is precisely because of this that he is a heemon, precisely because they play along with him, because it means they try not to quarrel with him, because he has a very hard job in the economy. he drags processes behind him, he drags them, of course, not without destructive consequences for other countries, but at least crises begin and end in the depths. uh, economy and the united states for decades gave its industry to other countries, this process was recorded already in the second half of the sixties of the last century. it grew in the seventies. it increased very strongly in the nineties at an incredible rate of zero this allowed china to grow allowed to have growth rates, there is about 10% of gdp annually in growth, but the united states has found itself in a situation where it can have several advanced clusters, but everything else is in what

condition, because it's one thing when you have microelectronics is part of the most powerful system of mechanical engineering mechanical engineering is based on a developed hundred-resistant metallurgy, and on a fairly complete chemical industry. that is, when you have, well, all the basics that were, by the way, the americans in the seventies , but modern america is not america of the seventies, so they can really invest in getting leadership, but after a while the technologies will be stolen , copied, and these open solutions finally the problems themselves that the americans will create china and other countries in the development of semiconductors. and even in mastering the production of some parts that are simple . and machinery and equipment, these are all tasks that economic growth produces because you face difficulties. you begin to solve them and invest. you get product jobs, you get orders and growth in the end,

and the united states gets a not-so -steady leadership position, maybe a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, which will inevitably be lost. here they are they are now in a difficult struggle to maintain this position, in principle, but partly, uh, strengthen and create, but they must understand that they will lose it, as in due time. england england, yes, in the 19th century, and having transferred to other countries the ability to produce their own products using machines, leaving behind the role of a machine-builder, it lost this position as a leader, well, not even a world factory, but a world machine builder. it turned out that german cars in 1900 were already not only worse. they are better english and the same most will be from china china will bypass them and we, i think, too, will not stand still and other countries. so the united states is playing a game that cannot be won in the medium to long term again. the united states is trying to slow down, or even stop the course of history

, it will not work. so we have already begun to talk about the fact that, facing such severe pressure from the united states, china is not only developing its own production. he, of course, does this within the framework of a dual policy rather than circulation. but also and china is trying to bet on europe, trying to maintain, ah, preferential intensive economic relations with europe , thereby, by the way, bringing discord or at least trying to bring discord into transatlantic relations, but the united states, for its part, is increasing hard pressure on europe forcing it to actually follow within the framework of the american format and also pursue a policy of technology. the czech war and do-coupling, that is, the disengagement of a divorce from china, here, listen to an example of such american pressure on europe and the article columnist. e bloomberg matthewbrooker.

the chinese communist party has never made a secret of its hostility to the liberal values ​​that underlie the us-led world order. although this antipathy has gained more openness and confidence under xi jinping for europe, which has witnessed the largest military conflict on its territory since world war ii, the de facto support. china russian aggression. to give a new level of reality to this clash of values, the eu's trade relations with china is valued at $700 billion such extensive economic ties make it necessary to negotiate and cooperate where possible, it shows some european leaders, however, shows that their view of china is clearly outdated, saying that this is a regime that is formally an ideological rival, but which can be contained and appeased through trade and investment ties. it 's like germany when you looked at putin's russia we know what came of it there will be no excuse for this

errors. well, i must say that american agents have become more active in europe, not only in russia but also in the chinese direction. and in general, in principle, here is another such result , peculiar, but of the outgoing year. this is how strong the american agents of influence are among the european, including the western european elites. here's an example. listen to what one of the most prominent representatives of the european foreign policy expert community writes, a director of the italian institute of international relations, and in the past adviser to the high representative. e of the european union foreign affairs. natalie some europeans may wonder. why they should go out of their way to support taiwan while incurring china's wrath the answer is that they should not only do so because taiwan is of strategic importance to europe 40% europe. trade flows across the strait and the eu is taiwan's biggest investor. but above

all, the main lesson learned from the war in ukraine is that it's much cheaper to prevent a war than to fight it. consequences. after it began, taiwan, although it is much further from europe than ukraine, but the consequences of the war in asia will be just as devastating for the continent the atlantic link, and that europe will strengthen partnership with russia, create common spaces, an inclusive system of european, security and so on, nothing came of it. and now this quite obvious. china does not risk, in fact, repeating the same story as russia, the story of disappointment in relations with europe or in beijing they are sure that they will succeed, but to keep with europe , at least in the field of economics, and

constructive close economic relations, including in the field of high technologies. i think that the chinese have some illusions, because they know the figures for trade. they understand how much europe depends on china, uh, $700 billion. if you do, and in my opinion, even more, in my opinion, 800 usa 800 billion 800 billion europe yes, but in any case, i think that relations with europe are less, uh, still important for them than relations with after all, america is the direction of the main blow - it is america, it is america that is now building this one, and the eastern front of the cold war, which consists of trenches, military blocs that are created by all sorts of aukuses and treasures and japanese. south korea consists of sanctions and

trade agreements against china and technological, of course, yes, that is, the americans, because in fact they started a technological war against china before the start of the trump trade war a few months before the 18 year, when the trade war began, a billion dollars in indemnity was imposed on the corporation, then the war with huawei started only after that the sanctions started trading and uh, biden. really. uh, expanding this technology war. and this is another trench of this e cold war. ah, this front is being built for the long haul. i think that forever 23 will be the year when simply the gaps in these front lines will be

filled. it will be like, uh, on the western anti-russian front, a continuous front line has already been created from finland to bulgaria and yes to romania, yes, and here it’s not completely yet. again, the geography of the sea, that is, this is the tenth, but here is the technology, it will be very important, but it seems to me that in the field of technology, americans should not consider themselves such, uh, kings overlords, in fact, uh, this front line is technologically normal on in some areas, the chinese have gone ahead into space with artificial intelligence, and in some areas, america really is in the lead. yes, and therefore it will be very difficult to build such a complete technological line and let's not forget. that this chinese eastern front has a second front, russian russia is its

classic second front and this is its rear and, uh, under certain conditions, russian developments, scientific technological can, uh, achieve synergy with the chinese and then the americans it will be even more difficult, but in any case, this world conflict is on the face. it will grow and there will be no way out of it in the foreseeable future, but by the way, indeed, the strengthening russian-chinese partnership, which has only strengthened by the end of the year and has become even more without borders , causes great concern for the united states, indeed, the united states this year they found themselves in a state of full-fledged full-scale confrontation from china and with russia at the same time. about the russian- chinese bond is getting stronger and more western experts. eh, wondering. can they even

lose in this regard? look, uh, an example of such concern is an editorial in iconamist magazines. russia is only a short-term problem from america's point of view, a more serious threat to the world order is what the pentagon calls its long-term challenge and comes from china, the only country capable of dethroning america from the throne of the world's dominant power. armed forces. china is expanding rapidly it already has the largest navy in the world the third largest air force a large number of missiles and the means to wage war in space and cyberspace that if the friendship without borders between russia and china turns into a real union there is now little evidence that china is helping russia in the war, but eurasian autocracies regularly are conducting military exercises and some senior us officials believe they are sure to get closer as china plans to build its nuclear arsenal to around 1,500 warheads

by 2035. it is approaching the size of the american and russian arsenals in the united states. you have to learn new arts. from a tripartite nuclear deterrence, the transformation comes at a time when america's relative weight in the global economy has declined ever since, for the past century america's gdp has been much higher than rivals germany and japan during world war ii of the soviet union and china during the cold war. however, in today, china's gdp is not far behind the us and already exceeds it in purchasing parity. ability of us defense spending. although giant in absolute terms, in percentage terms, they are close to the historical minimum as follows. it seems to me that this is such a weighty argument, because indeed the global alignment of forces , namely the global one, is far from being in favor of the united states both in the field of the economy and in the field of nuclear weapons. and so, as yuri vadimovich suggested, even in the field of russian technology, chinese tandem can

produce such a cumulative effect that will be able to compete with american technologies, the universal anti-russian anti-chinese alliance ah, the united states could not form a world majority not with them, and what to do in this situation? a this is a very good question, but the united states does not look at the situation objectively, therefore, how to be it to become a normal country and u become part of a multipolar world. this is against american ideology - this is against american exceptionalism - this is against the history of united states involvement states of world affairs and so forth, yes, but ultimately it's a contradiction. this is what they invented for themselves, and they are not an objective situation. i would like to clarify the last phrase that was quoted here and show why this is important,

but it is said that american military spending is at historical lows, you are relative, which means in the nineties, the united states set itself the task of having more to have half of all the world's military spending, to no one ever. in which combinations could not have a military budget more than, more than them. so for a long time they balanced at the level of 50%, and then they began to move out, move out and move out a and especially this is noticeable in purchasing power parity, but also in exchange rates. eh, that's pretty pretty too. it is noticeable and it turns out that during the 20th century the united states got used to the fact that they can talk to others only from a position of strength, and not only with their enemies, but also

with their friends in no other way than being, the king of the hill, they themselves they can't lead. you especially, of course, became stronger at the turn of the 20th and the 21st century, it seems to them that someone will be theirs. to overthrow from their pedestal, on which they have piled themselves up, is an inadequate view, because his task is to overthrow america. no, in principle, all, uh, gradually come to the idea that how can we get around america. she wants to sit there somewhere. you remember how in the movie, uh, 12 chairs, one of the hunters behind these chairs grabbed a sausage and climbed a hill, and then could not go down from there. here, the united states is about the same. well, they want to sit on this symbolic hill, and goad their own, that means, european, asian satellites there. well, for god's sake, if

crawling on this mound of american hegemony means uh doing q well, but this is their strategic and choice, or at least khabib the rest want to expand the world space where this is american uh american hegemony, is there any kind of reservation left in the world with the american hegem, well, it is desirable that it be smaller, but well, let it be, well, so say, let some remain. well, we lived for a long time on the planet, where there were some tribes that did not go there to modern life. this is how the world will move forward and the united states will remain. here in this reservation of his with his hegema there are very vivid images. yes, from their hegemony and that means, with those who, who bow down to them, from my point of view, this is the task of solving the space without america a and but the united states again believes that everything without them is necessarily against them and goes to

positions. that's what i said before. they talked more about leadership. yes, leadership, they wanted everyone to follow them, so that they would lead everyone forward somewhere. well, there were problems with that too. but at least something like that was preserved now. they are practically openly moving to a policy of shitting other people. here we have problems, but this is very often biden, he says, in the last month. and you look at others there even worse. well, in this sense, of course, europe helps them a lot, because against the backdrop of europe, the united states is economically look like uh, with everything garden blooming garden blooming garden, so uh, that's their job. they actually come to the task of hindering everyone and everyone else. and whoever does not agree with this, of course, is trying to expand the space, and the space without the united states seems to me that russia and china have it completely. uh, it's quite successful, and i think that

other countries will actively join this position, but in the end, the united states is in deep strategic disorientation. and unfortunately it hinders, uh hinders others very much the united states has gone from uh a producer of global public goods, uh, to a global spoiler. and that part of the world, which is headed by the united states from the world society, as the prominent british theorist hedley bull once said, to the world reservation. it's really very. it seems to me the correct and accurate term, which now characterizes the role of the west in the international system within the framework of the emerging multipolar world, and now we will interrupt for a while , and then we will talk about part of this reservations. but in europe it

is not for sale. cheburashka in the cinema from the first of january we deliver the fire with love polaris robot vacuum cleaner for 16.990 rubles. write, the benefits of the zone search bar, look for different discounts. in lenta, night sales from december 26 to 29,

for example, 60% cashback for a salmon game 40% discount on sweet sets 60% cashback for cheese buy one smartphone, and the second as a gift , because we are agents. because subscribers buy xiaomi redmi note 10 pro and get a second smartphone as a gift only for megafon subscribers with bonuses in their favorite category with the application magnet large tortilla cole slow many chicken and fries new large megaroll, kfc