thanks my friend. are you already saving the second size ? i hope the third will not answer yet about this, she will not say a word to the patient went. thanks

yes, this is mine. i've been waiting for real evidence for a long time. now they are. evidence of another terrible personality and now not a friend, if not an enemy remains. there is a big game on the air, a special issue with the minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey viktorovich lavrov with me, dmitry suslov, and we are in the reception mansion of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia , mr. minister. thank you very much for you

found time, and this is the end of a very interesting year, but i want to ask you about the next year, and a few years ago. i spoke with the former secretary of state, and henry kesem, whom you know well, and this has just returned from moscow and told him. that there are such sentiments in moscow, that if, uh, us policy and nato policy are ignoring russian concerns, and, if you like, with such a satisfied smack, that if this policy continues, then it is very likely that russia will come with the use of force, to which did answer but if they do this for his behat in rome, if they do this, they will bear the big ones, and he said that then they will unite against them.

everything is necessary kissinger was right. in the sense that the west is indeed the collective west united, and in response to the special operation, and demonstrated perhaps, if you like, more solidity than most of us expected. it’s standing here as a racist, it seems to me, proudly and confidently and definitely does not give the impression of a city that somehow trembled and doubts its own righteousness in their power. and i have a very simple, very complex question for you. how do you see the prospects for next year, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the prospects for serious negotiations? well, first of all, you are absolutely right about how the collective west has rallied its ranks, but it

did not happen at the call of the heart of every member of this alliance. and yet, this alliance was rallied, rallied first of all, the united states and, uh, mentality. uh, dominance hasn't gone anywhere, just a couple of weeks ago. i paid attention to a statement by one of the professors at stanford university e don't remember his last name now, but he said the united states must be a global gendarme to save the world. and uh, how, uh, not only nato but also the european union as an association, which not so long ago, but claimed, at least in the speeches of some of its egrands, auto -strategic autonomy. he completely submitted to this single western line, and centers for coordinating the actions of nato and the european union are being created, and neutral

states are being drawn in. in particular, finland, sweden and already long before that. and first , a mobility program was introduced, which allowed. uh, according to its purpose , use the transport infrastructure of other non-nato countries to advance nato equipment to the east closer to our borders. i would also like to note that and by the way, i'm watching a big game and, in my opinion, just the other day. the topic of those profound changes that are taking place in the european union in europe as a whole regarding the shift of the center of gravity in favor of the pro-europeans was condemned, first of all, poland of the baltic countries, but the czechs of slovakia and euro-grands are actively playing along in this situation, and

emmanuel macron, who 2-3 years ago spoke about the need for the euro for europe to rely on its own forces, to have almost its own army the strategic compass was invented as a step towards strategic autonomy, and the macron even talked about nato's brain death, showing his disillusionment with the processes that were imposed primarily from across the ocean. now there is no talk of this. the president himself france periodically makes a statement that someday it will have to do, uh, build a security architecture in europe, taking into account the interests of all countries, including russia, it was immediately pulled down by the younger members. e of the western alliance and this is perceived by everyone as the

natural course of things. well, and uh, about how russia was perceived all these years, including the period you mentioned when you and henry kessor touched on this topic. yes? of course, you said it well. russia should know its place, western colleagues sentenced, they did it with pleasure. it's a pleasure. actually. this is a very rare observation. it showed up. almost all the years after the soviet union disappeared and at first we were patted on the back and literally and figuratively believed that we were in the pocket of that same golden billion that we were becoming part of the western system of globalization. now it is called the system of rules on which the world order should be based. as a junior to an ordinary

junior partner who has the resources the west needs and to whom the west will give technologies, preserving and consolidating the position of this partner in its coordinate system, where music is ordered by western leaders, primarily the united states and its closest allies in europe, who now straightened their shoulders and consider themselves entitled. but to dictate the further ways of development of this continent, and the future is, well, firstly, by the way, you mentioned the caseman. this is very interesting, because it was called just recently. uh, many comments on his article paid attention, both to the assessment that he gave and to the forecasts that this article contains including options. and how he sees the final settlement, but it is surprising

that no one paid attention to the phrase, which in this article is mentioned as a matter of course. and it says something like the following that there are two nuclear powers. compete but who will get non-nuclear, ukraine this is, well, probably, according to freud although henrikessinger, he is a wise man, and he does not say anything in vain, but this is an open frank admission of who is fighting with whom the collective west, led by nuclear power, united states america and this war was declared to us quite a long time ago. and after the coup d'état in ukraine, orchestrated by the united states and, in fact, supported by the european union and

after the minsk agreements, as it now finally turns out, no one was going to fulfill and mrs. merkel reaffirmed. by the way, she was a few years before the end of her chancellorship in a conversation with president putin and when he once again a drew her attention to what was written in black and white about the need solving issues of special status in a direct dialogue between kiev, donetsk and lugansk, she told him, vladimir well, you understand, it 's all right, uh, constructive ambiguity, but in fact you decide everything in the donbass you have to negotiate with kiev so this is not at all enlightenment and not quite and not desire at all. here, at the last moment, do not fall behind the train, which is gaining russophobic pace. this was deeply rooted in her, and

in december 2019, when the summit of the normandy four was held in paris, because there experts and kremlin experts from the administration and our ministry prepared an agreed text of the agreement, which confirmed the fundamental, theses, the fundamental provisions of the minsk agreement and the first number in these paris agreements was a ceasefire and disengagement of forces along the entire length of the line of contact. this was agreed upon by everyone when the four leaders sat down at the round table, and we, who were accompanying us, settled down along the perimeter of the elysee palace zelensky was the first thing he said that he would not do this and subscribe to the disengagement of forces along the entire line. he can't connect. and the maximum that he can do is to choose

three experimental sites on this line of contact and there we have clarified to try to carry out this breeding. well , the suspicion arose instantly, but they clarified the reason why there is between the consensus of experts and the destruction of this consensus at the level of heads of state. but such a metamorphosis took place, the americans sent him a signal that if you disengage forces along the entire line of contact, then the russians will never donbass will not be given away. well, you see, probably this is logic and you know, as a fact, when he received this kind of advice, an instruction, i don’t know from whom specifically, but i know exactly what they told him, what i just mentioned, if you spread your strength , then in essence. you will drastically reduce your chances of taking these

territories by force, and taking them by force. they wanted one simple reason, that they wanted to fulfill the minsk agreements in the part that contained the condition for restoring the territorial integrity of ukraine. these are simple russian languages. its local police, as in the united states in different states, plus the right to conduct with them. or rather, is it the obligation of the central government to consult with them on the purpose of judges and prosecutors and to have special ties with the neighboring regions of the russian federation economically, as it is in the republika srpska in bosnia and how is it provided? uh, the agreement between pristian and belgrade, reached with a fanfare in the thirteenth year, with the mediation of the european union, to create a community of serbian municipalities in space. there are about the same

the rights of the serb in the north of this region e were granted, as in the minsk agreements , to the russians living in the territory, as they were then discussed. but the refusal to restore its territorial integrity by and large, granting part of its population the rights that are enshrined in numerous international conventions, and in the constitution of ukraine itself, which still spells out the duty of the state to ensure the rights of national minorities and the russians mentioned separately. so plan b existed for a long time also existed in paris in 1919 , and sometimes the ukrainian leaders blurted out that the minsk agreements were not in our interests. let's take all this strength, so the history of the process of the ukrainian

tragedy. she's rich and now they're trying to explain the whole part of the story that explains what's going on and they're trying to undo it. how are they trying to cancel many other things, that is, russian culture in ukraine has been canceled for many years by laws that they began to take under poroshenko and which continue to be stamped under zelensky? when they approved the law a couple of years ago, and the status of the ukrainian language as the state language caused alarm even to the venice commission of the council of europe. and in the european union, they also expressed concerns in the osce, but the maximum that these respected institutions could do then, and so to speak, to ukrainians. well good in this law. leave, but er then update

in some way, er, the existing legislation of national minorities. it was about two years ago, probably, and just a couple of weeks ago, the supreme the rada passed the law on national minorities in the second reading. this is an example of ukrainian lawmaking. it says that the ukrainian state guarantees the rights of all national minorities to the extent that follows from the current legislation. that is, everything that has already been destroyed the formation of mass media culture and much more. and all this is now in the new law, it is recognized with minorities as the basis of the rights that kiev, the kiev regime is ready to give to the national minority already romanian

the leadership got excited became loud. talking about the need for consultation, that no one asked them about the attitude of the hungarians towards ukraine and how the kiev regime treats the hungarian minority, is also good. it is known that there is nothing to say in russian, so i'm sorry for what i'm doing to your questions, but it's actually about the statement. or not in the approval of that colonial non-colonial world order, which our president spoke about and which the west hides under the slogan of respect and a world order based on rules. i am many times, when this term appeared, i asked my western colleagues, with whom we were still talking then. can you

send me a list of the list of these rules, where it is related? to my surprise, well, or rather, it was already pointless to be surprised, no one ever, no references to these specific rules, where one could read how to behave, did not convey, but the answer is very simple, because these rules mean that everyone must obey the connected states that now quotes the rules they are put forward by the collective west. they never were approved by the un nowhere ever. moreover, no one saw them, when they first began to throw this term into the discourse of international thought, they immediately asked, er, these questions and tried to draw them into some kind of sane discussion, but they didn’t want to do anything. and i guess it reflects these rules best of all. uh, the statement of the same professor before who said the us should be

the world's gendarme to save the world. well, then they already have many doctrinal documents. you know, russia is declared immediate a threat, because not because, uh, she is somehow going to attack someone, but because she challenged this world order, and the next in line is china, which is no longer an immediate threat, but the most systemic, but a formidable long-term challenge is the only power that can overtake the united states in almost all areas and which is about to reach the level of moscow and washington in terms of stockpiles of nuclear weapons to develop its nuclear potential ah, the answer to the question of whether to expect or escalate, you can search. in a variety of statements, assessments of

political scientists, our leadership does not say that we intend to promote, an approach that involves escalation. we intend to ensure the fulfillment of the objectives, as a special military operation. and as the president emphasized, our absolute priority is the four new regions of the russian federation, which must be freed from the threats of nazism to which they have been subjected for many, many years, and which must ensure the security of all the people who live there, ensuring their rights. a. well, and of course another important goal of the special operation is to prevent the creation and preservation of any threats to our security on ukrainian territory. now they say that the west did not

somehow try to push ukraine into hostilities against russia, but rather the strangulation of the russian russian-speaking population of ukraine. i think this is real aggression. i want to clarify when you are talking about four regions. are you talking about these regions in their administrative boundaries or that part of the territory that is currently under real control. ah, the states of russia no, i'm talking, of course, about their borders within the russian federation in accordance with the russian constitution, in my opinion, these territories are obvious things. still have to be, russia liberated of course, this is a demand for expressions of will that took place in all these four regions, well in the donetsk and luhansk people's republics for a long time and in

zaporozhye and kherson regions this autumn what do you expect to achieve at the end of the negotiation process or confession this fact of ukraine is a condition for the start of negotiations. the president has repeatedly said that we never reject the proposal to reach diplomatic agreements . the conditions under which we are ready to start discussing these agreements are well known and an integral part of these conditions is the ownership of four territories by four regions of the russian federation, but this is not all that needs to be discussed, but because the second big block of problems, in addition to the fate of citizens who do not want to live under power the current regime with an overtly nazi

russian focus and philosophy, and the second was a big bloc of problems. this is the security of the entire russian federation , which was subject to numerous threats that were created on ukrainian territory. uh, when someone now says that this is not at all true, that all these exercises that were carried out in ukraine, including on the black sea. it was just military cooperation for peaceful purposes. eh, the territory was developed in ukraine quite actively, including planning. we know this too. uh, planning the creation of a naval base on the sea of ​​azov. you understand, when this sea was a sea of ​​two states, the appearance of a naval base there. and, well, so to speak, of anglo-saxon origin, but it would radically change the situation in the security sphere in the same way as long-term coup a

was hatched and before the referendum , plans were hatched to create a military base in the then ukrainian crimea a with an eye to neutralizing our capabilities in the black sea, that's why we don't do business somehow. find spontaneous offensive bright operations, as the ukrainian side practices sometimes sometimes not sometimes. and as a rule, i don’t count with losses, as long as the media effect is achieved here and today and that the west continues to sing of the current leadership as representatives of true democracy. zelensky is a hero for all time. eh, and that's why he can't be denied anything. well, what are you denying him. there are also smart

people there and they understand what these people need for this regime. uh, you can’t let any types of weapons be handed over, although anonymous experts from the pentagon basically said more than once that we have no right to forbid zelensky to strike at those territories that are internationally recognized as ukraine , meaning, and you directly call crimea included. there were several, again, anonymous, but very reliable testimonies the fact that the modernization of the corresponding multiple launch rocket systems so that they gained a range of up to 1,000 km was directly done by an american specialist, no one hides the fact that data from satellites, both military and

from civilians owned by american owners is actively used in real time for adjustments. the fire of the goal of positing is directly carried out with the involvement of american specialists. now , uh, we asked the americans, uh, through the channels that our embassy still has, does the decision to transfer the battery to the loop mean, given the complexity? in its use, that there will be american specialists, we were explained at length enough that this is not planned, that precisely because the americans do not want and will not fight directly against russia, uh, the patriot will be put into action for several months, until the ukrainian

military personnel master this technology, but dozens. yes, maybe even hundreds of american troops in ukraine were there. as a matter of fact, for a long time since the cia coup, cia employees have occupied at least one floor in the ukrainian security service now, and there is also a very significant military relations apparatus, where military specialists are clearly involved. only making visits to the ministry of defense of ukraine. but of course, one way or another, they provide direct advisory, and maybe more than advisory services, there is also a group of specialists, who, as the pentagon explained in congress, is a special group that has controlled all these months how american

weapons are used, therefore, when congress tried to demand the creation of a special mechanism. that's what the pentagon said. no, there we are already following all this. uh, but it's quite an interesting situation, because facts about how western weapons pop up on the black markets of europe for the time being, there may already be plenty of them in other regions, and by the way, i asked my employees to simply make a selection from open sources so that we can show our interlocutors what is being swept up so far under the carpet we are not in a hurry, the president said, of course, i probably want to end this situation as soon as possible to end this war that the west was preparing and eventually unleashed against us through ukraine, but the priority for us is life

soldier lives the world on the citizens who remain in the war zone, and therefore we are a patient people. good evening. hello comrades broadcast from red square , it is necessary to emphasize in this document special correspondent, i have a fierce debate at the national ice hockey championship , the release took place, we begin the information details the slavic song festival ended in novgorod, journalists on space correspondents tell the state in detail today. we live remained cooperation in the new year depends on him. interesting. so from the inside , the special edition of 55 years on the air on

january 1 on the first parrot . therefore, every month a gift awaits you, become

our subscriber and every month you get twice as many gigabytes of tele2 internet other rules on yandex.market new year's sale and new discounts every day. buy a cordless drill-screwdriver zitrek green-12 for only 750 rubles. with subscriptions up to 50%, it's fair for 179 and even the fragrance is absolutely everything for the new year, medicine and health products, you will find on health, for example, severe pain or temper and other russian medicines with a 10% discount on the first application order.

new curling iron you and you with a new curling iron with a new chest of drawers with a new blender. better take these, they are more powerful and cheaper. meet the new year holidays with ozon to skate. play snowballs, conjure in the kitchen, but most of all i want to lie on the couch and watch a good movie. and now it 's also beneficial only to the video service wing you watch movies. we pay get 500 rubles. for any three films way. include holidays

super prize from 100 million 99 magnet will be lucky in the new year. with a smart system, the spam defender will not disturb you, the system will process and decrypt you in the my mts application, activate

the defender for 30 days for free. buy the future today, productive and stylish infinix smartphones with discounts up to 45% on wildberries can degrees make life go downhill yes, and then, when you least expect it, life is worth looking at it from a normal angle, so zero is the best degree for life. sergey viktorovich you quite rightly said that the west is leading a war against us through ukraine and not only, but the west is hypocritically asserting that the united states hypocritically claims that since they do not send their troops to officially open against russia on the territory of ukraine, they are not a party this conflict, and therefore without fear. uh, third world war, including nuclear war. they

can send any weapons to ukraine, but provide them with intelligence and advice on the battlefield, and so on and so forth. similar and we see that both the quantity and quality of the weapons that the west provides to ukraine is growing and the west is overcoming its own taboo that was established a few months ago. that's what russia is doing. and most importantly, what will russia do next year to convince the west to abandon this rather dangerous logic. and suspend this trend here. i believe that we must continue , er, our line, which was marked by the president on the ground. we must strengthen our capabilities. how technologically so of course, from the point of view of military personnel who, after partial mobilization, underwent serious training. a significant part of them, but is already on the ground, so to speak,

but most of them are not on the front line , professional contract soldiers are fighting on the front line, and a significant part is in the reserve and we will continue to strengthen our grouping. this decision was made in september. as you know, the commander of this grouping of the joint forces has been appointed, and we are engaged in actions that will allow us to much more effectively. i have no work in these territories in the near future. we pay attention to what you said pumped up ukraine more and more in more and more western weapons, more and more modern, and i follow the discussion in our society and your program and in other political science, circles and formats and

professional military retirees, and they say about the need to block the supply channels of western weapons. er, referring, of course , to railroads and bridges and tunnels. and i sit down what the pros can't on is to ignore and do. this is quite a long time ago, and they have to make professional decisions about what methods can make it difficult, and ideally interrupt these supplies, one of the methods has been and is being used this damage to infrastructure, including energy. which serves the delivery of these weapons, i am convinced that there are other plans that will be involved. on this account, but with the west. well, we have very few opportunities to talk now. yes

, in fact, there is no special desire, when you read the statement of the foreign ministers, the prime ministers, the presidents that it is necessary to deal with the security of europe against russia they used to say without russia, now they are against russia and i’ll note in parentheses that the macron’s idea of ​​​​creating a european political community, if rudely, is an osce minus russia to belarus, and this was said by a person who a little later said that it was important, not to lose the opportunity to build some kind of security structures with russia, but the european political community, but would be strengthened. they already they are planning a mounted next one themselves and are trying to draw it in there. well, in general, all of our neighbors, except for belarus, ah. and against this

background, of course, we have no special desire to talk with the west, but when when a specific situation arises when the west openly does illegal things. yes, we ask questions. here is some recent information. because, say, greece is going to hand over its s-300s to ukraine. we instructed our ambassador, he turned to the ministry of foreign affairs of greece of the ministry of defense of greece and reminded that these systems were transferred to greece, remember there was a story when they were supposed to be delivered to cyprus, but then the west began to do everything to prevent this, given the insular position and pro, and given that it was not a member of nato, and as a result a compromise was reached, which greece bought these systems, but according to the contract that

secured this deal, greece does not have the right to transfer to anyone without our consent. we reminded the greeks of this. they said they were mindful of this commitment of theirs. so we're keeping a close eye on this kind of things, especially since the same problem, but the provision on the ban on the transfer of our weapons. whoever it was, it also applies to most of the weapons that were in eastern europe where they are, and they were produced under licenses in the countries of the former warsaw pact. so you have to be on the alert, because many, many illegal things are being committed, and under the slogan we will save ukraine, because ukraine is europe and europe is for ukraine well, the united states is wrong when they say they assume that they are in a situation security, they should not be afraid of any escalation, they should not be afraid of a direct

military clash with russia, and therefore, before entering directly into the war with russia, they can do whatever they want in terms of providing military assistance to ukraine president putin said this not so long ago in my opinion, speaking at an extended colleague of the ministry of defense, and he, as commander in chief, formulated our position. i will not add anything regarding those, uh, new systems of our navy, and which were now now put into operation, and dmitry began, uh, our conversation with the fact that the west has consolidated, but it seems to me that last year he showed an even more important trend. this is the formation of the world majority. these are the countries of the east and the south, which do not agree with the western hegemony, which refused to join the west. uh, against uh, russia happened. well

, i perceive this year as a kind of moment of truth both in terms of relations with the west and in terms of relations not with the west. and sergey viktorovich, but is it really? our turn towards the world majority, this is not an opportunistic, but a strategic direction of russian foreign policy, which will continue and intensify in the coming year 2023, what will russia do in the coming year to strengthen its ties with the world majority and strengthen the role of this very world majority in the world in world affairs. i agree with those. uh, analysts who mention, analyzing the outgoing year, mention that here is the discord between the west, claiming hegemony, claiming control over the implementation of its ruled everywhere on the one hand and the world

majority on the other. it has an objective character, and it matured sooner or later. it would still take on some material shape, but our decision that we can no longer tolerate how russians are humiliated, how they create threats to the security of our country in ukraine, and therefore we launched specially military operations. it, of course, served as a catalyst and dramatically accelerated this process. i think most countries. where the western course has already been seen to that time after the sanctions that were introduced following the provoked coup d'état against russia after the crimean referendum. they have already seen the precariousness, that is, the system in which they are, like everyone

else, the system. hmm, the international currency of international finance, and the globalization of the logistics chains of international transportation insurance. uh, freight rates and a lot of other things and technology, of course things that, in general, only a handful of countries produce the same semiconductors, and which now the americans are trying to impose too veto, and here were sanctions against chinese companies that produce conductors clearly seeking. it will slow down the development of the people 's republic of china, but everything happened much faster and many countries were faced with the need to choose now, here and now, to choose here and now, it is probably difficult considering how tied everyone was to

the system of globalization created by the americans and discredited by them, because that, in general, he proved his unreliability there, as a curator, as an operator of this system. but yeah we heard the statement, uh the chinese leadership that they are against hegelmony, that it is necessary to build a fair world order. we heard the statement of the indian leadership that they will be guided by the interests of india and senseless persuasion for the sake of some american geopolitical interests forget about their own turkey algeria not to mention venezuela. and mexico and argentina from brazil also, in general, do not

join the sanctions, so the process. the formation of this new world order, and it, of course, will accelerate and is already accelerating, but it will objectively be a whole historical epoch. i think at one of your programs i drew attention to someone's statement that globalization is ending, regenalization is beginning, that there will be several large blocs that, uh, are formed around regional leaders, and within these blocks will be created, a replacement will be created all the dark, tool and mechanism, which now has a global character, but which are abused. and those who created these tools and the dispute was about whether the united states and someone understand this mentioned, what do they understand? and what is more, the

united states would like to accelerate the process of this regionalization of the world economy and international relations in general, and china, also realizing the need for such regionalization, has nothing against creating its own. uh, tools and structures. i would like this process to take. eh, more time. i’m like this offhand, when i heard this, it seemed to me that this is a very interesting observation and i need to better understand it, but if it’s really the americans, they would like to speed up the process regionalization of the world, but of the system, then, probably, this would mean that they want to reach an agreement as soon as possible , because the sooner you agree, the more chances you have to keep all the levers that they still had , which had global coverage is thinking aloud, but that the process has

gone, uh, there are no questions, what we are betting on is not even what we choose between the world's majority and the west. we choose those who are reliable, who are able to negotiate. uh, who's promising in terms of long-term projects, and who will not opportunistically look at where you can benefit, where you can not. i already mentioned it once and, uh, discussed this with my american colleagues in the past, when we had channels for regular dialogue. uh, there are many in the american administration. since the start of the pandemic, it has been recognized that there are limits. democracy in the western sense has the advantage that america is for those whom americans call autocracies, because autocracy is, by and

large, a centralized state, strong, vertical, which can quickly and efficiently make decisions, executable throughout the territory, and unconditionally. uh, if you compare how different countries coped with the covid crisis. there are many examples in one direction in the other direction in china , our comrades, for example, eventually admitted that it was not entirely correct to completely close completely at once, that this prevented the development of collective immunity. now they are fixing it, but in terms of the number of victims, of course, the united states far ahead of everyone and in this regard, i also

came to the americans, the conversation was still brawling on this topic, i asked if it didn’t interfere with leading a country with a huge great diversity, by the way, to say, despite the fact that a half-cauldron turns everyone into americans , ah, but it’s still different, doesn’t it interfere. e. here, uh, a distraction every 2 years for a presidential or parliamentary election campaign, well, she told me that well, of course, it’s like a distraction and our system is cumbersome. but it's like you do not worry. this is our problem. we know how to solve these problems. but these are their problems, on the one hand, these are the problems of the rest of the world, because every time when some kind of election campaigns go to the americans, you need to invent some kind of external topic. threat or task, and then, given their weight on the

world stage. global processes become, well, hostages or under the strongest influence of their internal conversations and internal internal political struggle. uh, autocratic states, how they are characterized by the united states, uh, centralized system and authorities. er, well, is there at least an advantage to horizon being much more predictable? ah, here in china, for example, one can argue how much this corresponds to the principles of democracy, but one can also argue about, and whoever said that democracy in the american version is the best form of government, maybe churchill was partially right when he said that democracy - this is the worst form of government. he added further, but they didn’t come up with anything better, but the world doesn’t stand still. maybe something

another interesting saying will be invented. if you want to understand the limitations of democracy, talk to the average voters. so, i would like to say sergeevich if you want to understand that it is wrong for american democracy to talk to the middle cross. what is the most cost-effective medicine for insomnia melatonim evalar is more profitable up to 60% new galicin plus melatonin in one tablet reduces anxiety and accelerates falling asleep glycine plus melatonin evalar double action in the tape night sales from december 26 to 29, for example, 60% cashback for salmon game 40% discount for sweet sets 60% cashback for cheese.

with a new curling iron you with a new chest of drawers with a new blender. meet the new year holidays with ozone discounts up to 40% on beauty products, hygiene and home care and discounts up to 65% on children's playtown toys, a suspicious operation kidnapped a defender, connect calls will not disturb you, the system will process and decrypt the application my mts activate the defender for 30 days for free.

the magnet will bring you luck in the new year. buy. play win a car and a wagon of prizes many guests many movies. see more more get 500 rubles as a gift for any three films you watch on the wink video service. include medications and health products during the holidays. you will find on health, for example, balgin for severe pain or haratka and other medicines for the first order of applications.

yandex.market has a new year's sale and new discounts every day. buy a cordless drill-screwdriver zitrek green-12 for only 750 rubles. for preparing aromatic coffee and maintaining cleanliness in the house. create a cozy atmosphere with smart technology polaris with discounts up to 60% inscription tele2 odessa. we have new year more than once a year, so every month a gift awaits you, become

our subscribers and every month you get twice as many gigabytes of tele2 internet other rules stressful situation. i recommend the magnesium account of this lar - it's the best absorption and convenient. taking just two tablets a day instead of the usual six, magnesium chilatellar is better than magnesium in stressful situations. you mentioned a few days ago that there were reports in the american press, the new york times, among others, that there were people in biden administrations who are seriously thinking about launching a pre-emptive strike against russia's top leadership a. i rang. uh, washington spoke to two people in

the administration who preferred to remain anonymous, and they said, i also quoted an anonymous source, and they told me that they cannot vouch for any administration, al-ha administration. well , of course, such plans to strike at the top russian leadership. e is not and cannot be in this context. i want to ask you if you believe based on what you know that indeed in washington, someone with real power is developing plans to strike at the russian leadership and the second. uh, on numerous occasions in washington, both the secretary of state and the national security adviser have talked about how washington is warning russia about what you shouldn't do. it is you who should not follow any path, otherwise there will be the most serious consequences. would you like to take advantage. uh this opportunity to

tell uh administration what would happen if uh such a hit, someone really tried to inflict. well, first of all, uh, i used an anonymous source, but unlike you, you know, she's your sky, and i don't know him, but he was advertised as staged and so on. yes? well, we are somehow used to the fact that this is serious journalism. although there is more and more indication that this is not always the case, but nevertheless, i also wanted to consciously exaggerate this anonymous leak, but because he said, this source, maybe it was somewhere and now politically correct, because he or she or it. yes? the source said that, uh, this is how such a threat sounded, that in principle, the kremlin should not feel

safe either. somehow there was nothing about putin personally, but uh, that's it. it was clear. and i decided to make it so consciously accentuate, because it sounded against the background of those who did not stop. uh, talking heads. uh, says the talking head. this is apparently a head that can only speak of thinking, not really a sketch. the same danilov is a big big specialist, yes, in international affairs. and yes, a bastard. e we yes, and your crimea and the kremlin let it in, they know that we will fly to them and drop our bombs there. this is what they say every day and when it seems, but a little less vulgar thesis sounded from an anonymous source in washington and all this was perceived. well, somehow without any reaction.