and this situation requires it, firstly, of course, i would like to know what is happening in the theater of operations, where you are located more widely, as far as you know, but my second question is for you, as a person who is responsible for his soldiers for their lives, but because of the success of their operations. how concerned are you about this new american and more broadly western collective military aid package for ukraine and do you think it will really affect the course of hostilities, does that represent for you and your subordinates a real call? hmm yes, well, to say that any weapon that falls into the hands of the enemy does not pose a threat. well , of course, this will probably not be for the military, it is clear that if the enemy skillfully manages the resource that falls into the hands, then this will lead to some

losses for us and will require some additional efforts from us, but you know we lately. i'm off to math. so, when we make some calculations , draw some conclusions, we translate it all , so to speak, into mathematical language and talk about efficiency percentage. now, if, for example, we are talking about the supply of some kind of high-precision weapons, such as hymars, especially if they are still beyond a greater flight range, then, yes, of course, practice has shown and everything that we say, so we analyzed, shows that this is quite a serious weapon capable of inflicting and again a tragedy. in makiivka, recent shows are capable of inflicting damage on us, both in terms of human effort and in technology. so, let's say so, when striking at our ammunition depots. and here we have 1% efficiency, when we are talking about some kind of tracked or wheeled unit, lightly armored or heavily armored, then we

must understand. uh, what are her tactical missions? under what conditions when deciding? what tasks does she have? it has been used and we understand that, of course, when some kind of armored vehicle is operating, then the degree of efficiency is lower than that of one rocket launcher. for the simple reason that it acts on someone in a very narrow area, most often this is a type of weapon, if we are not talking about self-propelled artillery systems. it's like weapons that fire direct fire at close proximity to opponents, i will say that according to statistics on our e-tank collisions, as on the kursk bulge there is no tower to tower there, and there, before it gets to the enemy’s position, they found a clip or enemy tank there , he must overcome minefields, he must overcome ambushes that are organized using tours that strike from large landing distances and over 5 km, and i will remind you that there, as a rule. here in combat use shoots from a distance of 4 km, and most often no more. especially considering the terrain.

sometimes it simply cannot even choose a position for direct fire, because the terrain of the forest planting does not interfere. directly, that is, he should go to some very short distance from half a kilometer. a little more, and our possibilities. well, if possible, carry the enemy for us, marveling at some ambush places. from where the reviews open, it is possible to aim at the tank, and they are much larger, that is, accordingly, any technique that enters the fight. she is subject to a number of, so to speak, e risks and opportunities are destroyed. so, yes, of course, it will have an impact, but it will have a very relative impact, as deliveries will have much more, m-th big consequences. again, i repeat high-precision weapons systems, for example, air defense well, or some new unmanned observation vehicles that operate in an unusual range for us, often here we have radio control or e. in terms of ammunition for the

americans that can be used against us, they are already appearing now on theater of operations. today we are already facing this, to be specific. and in my area, that is, they are such types yes, they can influence to some extent the events that take place on the front line, but as for heavy armored vehicles that can be delivered. well, the question here is very relative actually. so i was talking yesterday with an officer, or rather a general, who, uh, is very involved in this operation, and asked him the same question that i asked you, and he told me. here is what you they said, by the way, konstantin just said that these deliveries would not be of decisive importance, and he also said, as you said, that in general, there are definitely a lot of talks about the ravings of this system, but you won’t scare russia, but he said on the other

hand, of course, this is serious, of course, it raises the stakes. and here's what else he said. what, uh, the enemy must understand that this may force the russian armed forces to look for some new methods to use some new techniques, and in the fight against the enemy. that's when you think of your a specific area of ​​responsibility, you assume that if everything is like this, and the americans and the collective west promise ukraine that all this will arrive and be used, you assume that you will have to do something in a new way and if you have to, maybe something then you can tell us about it. i am sure that in order to saturate enough of the front in sufficient quantities. eh, equipment that could be represented there at every kilometer of the length or not of the front

in a significantly sufficient amount. well you can probably disarm a couple of the armies of europe well, probably in the army of america from single ones, even if there are dozens of them, even if there are hundreds of them, uh, this will not allow us to front with this. e such content that it was, well, it’s just that at each sector it was decisive and decisive, it’s clear that they can be used somewhere after retraining training comes in some offensive areas, as an additional means of reinforcement, but in general generally. if, for example, well, already today the circumstances show that in some matters we need to change tactics and we understand, again, returning to our mathematics, which we have grown fond of lately, that our main enemy and our main means, so to speak, which we fear. this, of course, is enemy artillery, as for the enemy, as our artillery, because 90% of the losses we have are no tanks, not from small arms combat. we

have artillery, which stands in remote closed positions, works on us with sufficiently high accuracy and efficiency. and we we often don't have the ability to respond effectively because, well, we have our own specific limitations. well, of course, now it is necessary to introduce some new tactics and some understanding. well, not to be unfounded , just two words. let's say the fact is that when we, for example, take a table of ranges, the flight of a projectile of one or another artillery system there, starting, for example, well, the same two out of 19 there are 29 km, ending with some 120 mortar there, 7 km, relatively speaking, then we need to divide the real flight range by two, because the positions on which our artillery systems are placed. as a rule, they are deepened into our rear zone from the point of view of safety, and our flight distance does not exceed, well, about half, at best, two-thirds of the distances that are declared according to the performance characteristics. that is,

this significantly reduces our capabilities for counter-battery combat , especially when it comes to 155 artillery systems that have a long range of projectile flight, that is, we already have developments here. there are suggestions. there is a vision. naturally in we will not talk about it on the air as they say, because it’s kind of like information for , so to speak, for let’s say it is very important that you think about this topic, and you are preparing correctly, well, of course. we cannot but draw conclusions and analyze what we ourselves observe as participants, what we are, therefore, of course, today we already have specific proposals that can seriously affect the effectiveness of our work, which our natural objective shortcomings from which you can never get away, not one artillery system will stand directly on the line of contact, because it will be hit by everyone. as much as possible, of course, the artillery crew removes its

position by five by seven by eight, and sometimes by 10 km deep into our rear, respectively, the projectile travels up to half its distance, flying over our territory, that is, the effectiveness is reduced, but we have means of destruction that are able to reach the distance we need and be launched. and we are talking about leading. means, we launch from the safe zone so that for example the calculation or the group itself, which will be. well, they haven’t yet come up with a name for these, let’s say , specialists who will launch it. uh, an unmanned aerial vehicle that barrages or something else there is a kamikaze board, that is, there are enough safe distances. and if we now just increase the production of these funds. they have already tested themselves. they have already shown themselves proven to be effective, especially since they are guided not by the gps system, which is considered enemy and, unfortunately, to which many of our high-precision types of weapons are tuned. they

are guided by other principles, and we have already established all this in production. as a matter of fact, it has been launched, but not in sufficient numbers, as i have already said, and our task is only to increase volumetric production, to create the necessary units at the subdivision of ordinary subunits precisely at the battalion level. how now a unit of operators is appearing would be for reconnaissance or some kind of shock actions. that is, to expand this undertaking to make it more systemic, and then we will get the means that will deal with the threat that creates 90% of losses, now it’s not tanks that are flying, it’s not any other types of weapons supplied that are dangerous to us, but artillery an enemy that hits from a long distance. and, if such shells are used there, as they were looking for this and 40 km and, accordingly, if they shoot with depth, they are absolutely out of reach for us nothing but use, for example, iskander or caliber for destruction any unit of one calculation of a combat

self-propelled or towed is absolutely irrational, but we have such means, since the same lancet, which is capable, for example, of reaching the enemy and has the appropriate properties to be disassembled and even reprogrammed by self-propelled artillery mounts , so now all this is, you just need to make certain changes to ours. our approaches to our tactics to increase the production of the necessary proven ammunition and then, in principle, we don’t really need to talk about some tactical nuclear ammunition or just something else, we would have enough of our own means of destruction in order to deprive the enemy of the main strike force of artillery, infantry without artillery, never like this will not work, respectively, we use the effective potential. i just wanted to confirm to say that there should be no doubts and actually during this military operation. it has already been shown that in response to

some challenges from the side, whether new techniques or some new episodes of hostilities, we will answer, when the terrorist attack took place on the crimean bridge. after that, strikes were inflicted on the energy system of ukraine, which was demonstrated for the first time on a sufficiently large scale and wait several times. i do not rule out that it is not at all, i am sure that if there is a buildup of these weapons, it does not control and so on, then all these scenarios, which have been discussed many times. they will have to be involved, concerning, concerning communication, concerning strikes against objects, which hitherto had not been hit, and so on. it is absolutely clear that we will not sit idly by. here was two. very interesting performances from my point of view. and although you spoke a little differently on the main idea, as i understand it. what is the challenge ? well, in general, the

supply of armaments will not be of decisive importance, and mr. khodakovsky is sure that both his armed forces and russian industry will be able to deal with this matter. andronicus but you don't worry about the direction that it accepts military aid. for example, i absolutely agree with zatulin's execution that , uh, this particular package. it will not be of decisive importance, it has a symbolic meaning, of course, here, but it has not only a symbolic trajectory. i'm worried about where this is all going, because every time there are practically new elements in every package. about which we were told earlier that this cannot be done, because it could cause a

russian escalation, even including, possibly, tactical nuclear weapons. here i am i want to say right away that sometimes she is on russian television, especially the two concepts of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons are replaced, as if this is not the same thing, i don’t know a single person. in his right mind , from a solid memory, which he would speak today about delivering strategic nuclear strikes in everyday states. there are people who like to shave their weapons. well, in general, there is nothing behind this scolding, as far as tactical nuclear weapons have arisen. you know, not worse than me. what to do is a weapon. and capable of your good friend henry kissinger began to write about it suitable for application in the seventh year, yes, then in the

seventieth year. say write about it continued your other friend. jem lobenger was the secretary of defense of the united states and, of course, both of them said, don't go. we're going to use nukes and hit somebody, and they were talking about having an arsenal of tactical nukes for deterrence to work, because if all you have is the ability to learn by numbers. in general, you can’t believe that you will use it, and therefore nuclear weapons cease to bring you real political advantages and be an effective element of deterrence. i would like to know your opinion on this issue and is it right to create in advance the impression among the opponents of russia that

tactical weapons, not under what conditions? will not apply. no, i would not argue that under no circumstances will any weapon be used, not even tactical or strategic, but i would like to say other dmitry first on i want to answer this question. here, firstly and in general, who wrote about tactical nuclear weapons, and not just his right. they wrote about this weapon as a weapon of deterrence. today there is no such problem for russia in this war in ukraine, whom to deter with tactical nuclear weapons. here i want to say, other in connection with this. in general, i am categorically opposed when they say, here is another type of weapon, put by the

americans. here's something else i put on. and where is the red line no russia has red lines about the supply of weapons. during war proxy. this is a normal phenomenon, firstly, and secondly, if it justifies itself, if ukraine has turned into a hired army, that is, because there is no state economy. no, here are the people who are fighting supplying them with weapons, and they are fighting if it works. and if it gives certain results, the americans and the west follow this path. there is only one remedy here. it is not we who should be afraid of the american side of the escalation. i would now say, maybe not a very popular thing. it is russia, for its part, that must go to

escalation. and how many times i apologize, what exactly do you have in this now i will say. we 've heard it here a hundred times already. that, in fact , there are two tunnels and a couple of bridges on the polish-ukrainian border, still not, not bridges have been destroyed, not destroyed. that is, when we begin to destroy them very seriously with mass strikes with the most powerful bombs, all these things and the second thing, of course, this should also be very seriously announced. what in the case of such an adventurous policy regarding the application deep into the russian strike territory? yes, i adore, kiev is a beautiful city, but that bankovskaya street all

government buildings will be destroyed in a very short time. this is just what can put in place and sober up these people with simple conversations. it's not up to anything at all. we can't get there. there is only one thing i can tell you. i'm not an expert on tactical nuclear weapons, just as i'm not an expert on the means that russia can uh use today to destroy uh, those tunnels, those warehouses, oh, which we are talking about, but the same railway bridges through which these weapons enter. i understand, i understand, but i understand that if this is not done, then this is probably not someone's evil, will and uh, not because it did not occur to someone from those people who make the decision, therefore i will express one, uh, simple

thought. i don't know where the real russian red lines are. and i'm not sure that they even exist in the sense that someone, somewhere, decided in advance that if someone is done, then we will have such responsible. that, uh, every time washington decided that russia was just making empty threats, and then it couldn’t or wouldn’t dare, that in general it turned out to be an illusion when russia said that the recognition of kosovo’s independence without any observance international law that this would set a precedent. this was ignored. russia showed

its willingness exactly when uh putin warned that uh the syrian government is a friendly government for russia. and that russia be all sorts of resist that, so that the united states and its allies can restore their regime in syria. again they thought what russia could do so far from its shores. and she has limited naval capabilities, she does not have a serious one. and in 2014 putin warned. what if the military coup in ukraine leads to the

suppression of the legitimate desire of the people of crimea and the donbassians, primarily the crimea , to establish their identity and preserve their culture and their rights, which, again, will not work. it was ignored by the watchers. here the maidan came from the fact that the rest will not be the same, and therefore i personally will say from the fact that if this path of creeping escalation from the collective west continues. i'll tell her because russia will give a very decisive answer. now we are going to advertise. and many thanks to mr. khodakovsky for a very interesting and informative conversation. we hope to see you on our live soon. thank you shoot when you do not want to sleep people

lions, eagles, partridges can fly or amphibious man some kind of image do not sleep. you then they made a lot of mistakes. hello , how are you? she will cry. today at pervy kagocel, from the first day of admission, it begins to reduce the severity of the symptom of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus, therefore, kagocel is a higher antiviral measure

big premiere at

kinopoisk protection against spam and scammers tinkoff he is the only one that contributes to the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections, strengthening immunity and restoring strength trekrezan. be healthy for styling at home against sports uniforms after the new year's feast. this is our food. she gives me strength. dad can taxonal in a big red

package rushes to your aid at the moment when the fire. it makes you climb the wall thanks to the latest generation molecule dexanal is ready for action in 30 minutes taxonal is charged against more dexonage the leader in the category new year in sokolov 69% discount on everything beneficial drink kind 64-90 pyaterochka helps out and lowers prices. and i often take pictures of mine. girlfriends, but if in the pictures any skin problems are easy to fix in life, their disguise is not an option. the complex action helps fight inflammation, infections and judgment on the skin and gives more confidence in life complex action akriderm gk healthy skin beauty, so a gift is waiting for you every month. stand up for our subscribers and every

month you get twice as many gigabytes of internet tele2 other rules. and a flask with cashback up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, only one card for everything love fast. love long. love sweet, we are talking about sleep. and what did you think about with wilson you can fall asleep after 20 minutes , sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily, in the morning velson does not cause addiction for those who like to sleep up to 50% affordable clothing for the whole family of ergoferon reads several effects at once and withdrawal, and also suitable for children colds, viruses season. remember, check feron. it's me maxim nikitin , the creator of skills that can more accurately deliver medicine to diseased cells. and this is the moment when

decided to become a scientist, we experimented in a real laboratory, then i wanted to make an important discovery. cultivate an interest in science from childhood decades of science and technology russian federation actions of european countries promised ukraine in the spotlight there were 15-15 rounds of voting to elect the speaker of the house of representatives of the united states congress, some found it boring, some found this circus. actually. it was a very, very

important thing, because it determined what, uh, the republicans would do when they will actually establish control over the house of representatives, what course will the house take, what will it try to do? what changes will he try to make to the internal? and, of course, for us, the foreign policy of the united states is more relevant and today with us from washington is christian wars, who held major political posts in the state department, an expert among the pros on military-strategic issues and an old researcher at the center for national interest and an influential commentator fox tv channel which is often quoted in russia is the only channel that, as it were, allows at least individual people, starting

with carlson's stacker, to say that maybe american policy in ukraine, well, let's say, not the only one reasonable, but we are looking for hello. thank you for taking the opportunity to show up. and i have a simple question for you. well, we watched what happened in the house of representatives, we know that kovin mccarthy managed to win by a small margin. tell me why, from your point of view, this should be significant in the first place, of course, for the americans themselves, but also secondly. can it have any meaning for russia invited to see you brother. you know, it is generally believed that if it took 15 rounds, this weakens mccarthy's position to some extent. i

agree with this. indeed, this to some extent limits his control on the other hand. and now the biden administration will no longer be so easy to act in the hands of the administration will be bound to a certain extent, it is clear that now, inside the party, they had to make certain agreements on certain deals with people who are critical or skeptical of the administration's policy towards ukraine, because in principle, of course, by and large . there are two party ends, one at the same time saying that more attention should be paid. the main adversary is still china, and yet we hear voices among the republicans who say that the money that the buydn administration is going to spend in ukraine is too much and this process needs to be slowed down,

ukraine needs to be pushed to negotiate with russia but there are still few such voices, but over time there are more and more of them. well, when you say that there are more and more of them, huh? here, for example, these votes will be a few more. i think it's quite real. how this may affect the unrealistic policy of the united states towards ukraine and this entire conflict. the thing is, when it comes to money, you don't have to have a majority, but in the house of representatives, because these processes always involve a lot of things. internal deals of internal agreements, therefore, when it comes to ukraine, uh, it can turn out, so that a minority can

play a decisive role in this process. i also want to remind you that the historical and american people and congress have such a tendency that they gradually get tired of the war. it is clear that now the media are actively warming up to the interests of ukraine in the media, they talk about the counteroffensive in which ukraine crossed and talk a lot about what ukraine can achieve in the spring. at the same time, no one explains what such a victory is what stands behind this term, but sooner or later, americans will definitely get tired of such wars, so it was in relation to afghanistan in relation to iraq and in relation to syria, i believe that the american people. basically, never support the vietnam war. also, of course, it took about 15 years for the people to get tired and the congress to get tired of this war when it

happens in a few months or in a few years is not so important, but we see that now that the republicans have gained control of the house of representatives, they have there is a desire to reconsider foreign policy. uh, konstantin made you a russian legislator? yes and so i wanted to give you the opportunity to ask mr. whiten a question from the point of view of your interests as a russian legislator. well, you know my interests as a russian legislator in my opinion. uh, it doesn't depend much on the outcome of the choice of the speaker of the house of representatives, although the devil is in the details, and we know that in order to be elected in the fifteenth round, he had to go to certain concessions on certain promises. they have all been announced, including

cuts in the military budget, which , of course, cannot but rejoice in our country. i do not believe, just in fundamental changes in the policy of the united states, at least at this stage it will last for a long time. i don't know, yes, the republicans got the house of representatives, at least for the speaker. yes, a candidate for chairman of the defense committee is a person who is clearly critical of the whole story with ukraine, in my opinion, pobediteley has great sympathy for k. they do not feed russia and are unlikely to feed, but they feed a big and healthy skepticism about ukraine. this seems important to me, because sympathy or for russians after in relation to ukraine results. in this case, some of that can be learned and i, uh, would like to ask the following question. elected kevin mccartney uh, there is some

hope for well in detail some change easing or vice versa tightening supply controls and ukraine's arms as well. the other side has a simultaneously released article by condoleezza rice and bill gates yes, bob bob gates is a former secretary of defense in the republican government, as well as condoleezza rice, who says ukraine is fighting for us and that's good. let it fight and it is necessary as quickly as possible and as many weapons as possible. that's what kind of logic will actually win against the republicans, who become not just uh, the opposition becomes one of the accomplices of the decision-making process in reality. thank you very much for your question. it seems to me that in congress, indeed something is changing. but those who run for

president ron desantes, for example, from florida or the candidate from avergina, they will all be looking for an opportunity to criticize the democrats in terms of foreign policy, so you are right, indeed. there are people like condoleezza rice or bob gates when you look at them , they are indistinguishable from the democrats, what they say about foreign policy is no different from what the democrats say. they are also in favor of continuing the war in ukraine, but big changes in foreign policy. they come never anything changes in the house of representatives, they come when there's a new president, so now, and there's talk about china there's talk about needing more ships more planes in the pacific,

there 's going to be talk about syria and ukraine distract attention from china too much but i repeat again, i would not expect big changes in foreign policy due to some changes in the house of representatives, but, in principle, such voices sound that let the europeans support the ukrainians. and we will look at a more important danger. well, i think that baptized is absolutely right that we are talking about two , uh, people who are experienced in their own way, deserved, but in their orientation. they are especially when a little different from the democrats, as for robert gates it's a more difficult situation. but here, uh, i must say honestly, this is a flaw of the russian government, and andronic mihran was the owner of the order of friendship in new york, and i repeatedly

met with him robert herzen work, i witnessed their constructive conversations, and andronicus was returned to moscow, but that’s all, of course, without such guidance. robert gates lost. uh, lost the direction for everyone seduced by the shackles beforehand uplifting this, of course, was a joke. andronicus is your question. you know i have a question. eh, it's more of a few questions. how much temptation response on the left with this or not? i just want to divorce one of the topics that you touched on. i just think that there have been significant changes and that's it. by the way, representatives and this is very important for the next two years. i think that the house of representatives will turn into trial courts for the biden and for corruption cases and the

biden, his family's brother's son, there and so on, but beyond that i must say that it is not necessary that it be removed. you won’t succeed, but it takes 2 years. in general, this dirt was shown to the american society, especially since elon musk showed that twitter and others. uh, the tech giants worked literally under the control of the dnc, which is generally monstrous, so the commissions they created will work and in this case i must say that you said one correct thing. house of representatives, maybe not, right here. uh, konstantin fedorovich said, no one loves us will be there. well, these congressmen do not need to love us, they need to love america, and they are these conservative

parts, they especially love america, they say. 45 billion ukraine in a situation where our southern border is open in 2 years 5 million. illegally crossed its american border , something must be done about it. and where to get money? here, please, don’t need this money for ukraine, don’t need this money for the southern border, and so a huge number of other places where these conservative people who hung mccarthy and mccarthy will be. they just know what an experienced washington politician is. he is for sale. he is always ready to negotiate there. he is ready to give up all his promises, because they said that he gave them before the eyes of the macon, this is the

leader of the republican minority in the senate all the time. if not for him, by the way, his and accuses that the senate would have taken several senators. now there would be more republicans there if he really and aggressively pursued this line against the remain and against the democratic party. therefore, i think that the house of representatives in this matter is not because they will love russia, but because they will promote it, they correctly said and second question - this is a bipartisan consensus. everyone says that the number one danger and enemy is china this is not russia and therefore there is a possibility that the russian-ukrainian problem will be pushed aside some. in general, aside, this will no

longer be the main problem, but the main problem will be discussed internally, especially, of course, another commission that will create this investigation of the ministry of justice and the fbi investigation. edik , these two structures, which are generally monstrous intervened in american politics and destroyed american democracy. we're here to listen to one very authoritative statement right now, absolutely because of the things you mentioned and i hope, baptized, that you will find this saying, and not too contradictory. let's listen. to stop the war in ukraine in the near future, washington will have to negotiate directly with moscow, the sooner this happens, the better. and if the biden administration is unwilling to take that step, perhaps the republicans will finally be able to pursue a foreign policy that is distinct from that of the democrats. washington should focus

on containing china, but currently can not do enough, for example, weapons destined for taiwan 100 billion dollars were redirected to ukraine, which washington allocated to ukraine could be more effectively used in the asian pacific region. ah, baptized. i think that we will not try but repeat what you said. i hope that you have just written in the journal once again and demanded that you agree with what is happening with what is happening, but i have a practical question for you. but konstantin zatulin, as i understand it, said that these are the changes that are still taking place in congress in washington, that they will not be of fundamental importance to american foreign policy. and as i understand it, you agreed with this. here i have a very simple question. right now, the visible jim jordan will become chairman of the subcommittee

that the house of congress will investigate. how the democrats, how the biden administration used law enforcement as their political weapon, and they will watch how the law enforcement agencies of some, that is, republicans, enthusiastically investigated, and others, for example, democrats, including son of war. for some reason they were very protective. and as i understand it, the gentleman will not only be the chairman of this committee, but he will also be the chairman of a wider committee, a for the republic. justice, which will give him great authority and great opportunities, and send subpoenas, demanding information and organize a hearing by witnesses. here is my very

simple question. if such hearings would be held, if you really began to ask questions. who, how and why helps ukraine the interest of the biden family and maybe even more general, but it doesn’t work, or something, ukraine begins to interfere in the domestic politics of the united states and tries to influence american elections. now, if we all these questions, at least were voiced, you didn’t think that this could affect the nature of american support for ukraine, of course. yes, i agree with you. i think that over time it will turn out that way. i spoke with the staff of some congressional committees, and they say that serious investigation. it is clear that hunterbiden is the

president's son. ah, dealt with prostitutes and drugs. all this, of course, is interesting, but the main thing is not this, the main thing is necessary, but to figure out how, and the babin family is influenced by some companies of some forces in ukraine or in china and how this affects us foreign policy what happened before? what may be continuing to influence until now so that, i would not focus here on drugs for us prostitutes, but we need to look at the money. where is the money what is there was with borisma? why did hunter biden receive such a gigantic salary? despite the fact that he did practically nothing there, it turns out that ukraine is now, as it were, being used, as it

was once used in britain in the middle of the 20th century, but uh, it doesn’t matter. i think that all the same, support for ukraine to one degree or another, but it will continue to be perceived as a victim, but it seems to me that gradually attention will shift to other topics, maybe the military budget will actually be reduced. or perhaps there will be a turn towards china now, and a special committee on china is being created that will be chaired by mike galaker and a lot of attention. now it will be paid specifically to china and attention will gradually move away from the committee, its views are known. he perceives china as the main threat so. and with the other

leg he is with the reformers with those who want change, so naturally he does not approve of the naval policy towards ukraine but at the same time, i believe that in his opinion, congress missed the opportunity to make something about china got too carried away by ukraine and forgot about china. so this is a matter of priorities, you can’t simultaneously enter syria somewhere else in the middle east and ukraine is also called the first priority and says that the chinese region is also a priority. so you can't waste your efforts. despite the fact that now there are not enough ships, there are not enough satellites , everything is not enough. thanks for sharing with us. thanks do

you have antibodies to hiv charged? in your clinic, right under your nose, do you answer? in a small town, little children there are people we live each other, they will start eating. let's go through the newspapers. explain everything, are you naive or stupid if the virus gets thousands through them millions. big

premiere on january 16 at the first infection for 599 rubles. ola jacket for 1.499 rubles. kanka trousers for 399 rubles. this is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without

exaggeration and double meanings, because already from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of the symptoms of influenza and sars , regardless of the type of virus, and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagocel is a higher antiviral measure. and this you can easily find packages of kagocel in a pharmacy. when did you become number one? already got up, the main thing is not to stop. higher. one more step

, another success. thank you for being with us for 30 years . megafon is just the beginning. i came to the fifth wish that a million gifts came true here. open the tinkoff app and go to payments. click on the scanner icon. point the camera at the phone number, the scanner recognizes

even handwritten numbers install the tinkoff application and transfer money easily and without commission tinkoff is the only one. from runny nose, and temperature and fight viruses. i choose ergoferon, it combines several effects at once, the fight against viruses , the elimination of symptoms. sars inflammation removal. also suitable for children are colds, viruses the season remembers checking feron comfortable walks in any weather in clothes from food to the winter collection of your favorite brand with discounts up to 55% on wildberry. we have new year more than once a year, so a gift is waiting for you every month. stand up for our subscribers and every month you get twice as many gigabytes of internet tele2 other rules.

when the headache is cornered, take it thanks to the directed action. it helps to expose the pain nurofast leave the territory of pain, and nurofast also helps to fight fever. children from 6 years old are allowed to drink a good 64-90 pyaterochka helps out and lowers prices. there may be important discussions about changes, there may not be very important discussions.

they don't like it. uh, i don’t like the current chinese political system, but you won’t see the conclusion that they hang out all the corridors of congress, that they go to american law enforcement agencies and gave lists of people who should be punished in china. against which in china it is necessary to impose sanctions, but there is no this iran, the clerical regime has a lot. in general, who are they in america in general,

iranian americans who have succeeded in america, people who do not like what is happening in tehran, which was organized by influential organizations of iranian americans and these organizations express their positions on sanctions. we must be more careful. what if you are howling sanctions against a large number of people who are not specifically guilty of anything, then this, firstly, it is unfair, and secondly , it is counterproductive, because you are leading the consolidation of a society that does not like foreign intervention, but foreign influence. and the russian opposition. it fills the corridors of congress. it fills the reduction pages of american publications, and they are all the time punishment and punishment and punishment. and here is

yulia latynina, who, uh, a former columnist, may still be the current new newspaper. she had an interview with michael machon at tempo university today, and before that, in the american word, russia and i were most interested in the reaction of yuli latynin to the fact that precisely the changes that we were talking about took place in the american congress. about it with horror. and he calls those people in congress who are not ready to expose ukraine to a villain. so i want to ask you konstantin and where is there little time for suvlenie? that's what's wrong with the russian opposition, what makes their people violent, i understand that they may not agree with the authorities. i understand what they might feel

that the authorities took some completely wrong measures, but in the case of ukraine well, where does this come from, i’m not afraid to say fury and hatred not only for the authorities, but also in general for their own people. in general, i understood that you wanted to praise dmitry because , as a result of the actions of the political class and political regime existing in russia, the opposition. completely lost all hope of ever being accepted by the vast majority of our people. she has lost all national traits, which is why they are so allow. they allow themselves this, because not in china, not in iran, there was no liberal period of the existence of iran or china during which what they say today abroad would be. they would be able to speak freely here in our country and receive their dividends for this, positions of opportunity, and

so on. we had this period. they are so brought up, they are brought up in the idea that this should bring them success, the fact that it is now that success does not irritate them to an extreme degree, but for the authorities in russia, in my opinion. no, nothing is better than speak. look here is the opposition. do you want such an opposition that speaks like one of the artists, i will not repeat having emigrated from russia, i just said that if at all everyone will die in a nuclear one, but he does n’t care. that there will be delennonucleization of russia beyond the ural ridge, and so on, it is absolutely possible for him to get with such ideas, at least some sympathy here in russia, no matter how the government does , no matter how wrong it is, would not make any mistakes. these are all the consequences of a certain period life, during which these people believed that everything that happens should be dictated

by the will of the collective west. when we have the ministry of foreign affairs, they said in order, jokes you have a position on kosoy , you know, he says no, we have no positions. what is the neighboring side there is the fact that our fax got broken, we could not receive it from washington and as a result we do not have a position yet. waiting for it to be fixed. that's why what is happening now with this position is the results of it. well, i would like to add to say that of course however, returning to the previous part of our program, of course, i appreciate the fact that the new speaker of the house of representatives did not mention anything about ukraine in his opening speech. but he said that the main thing is the choice to win the economic competition in china accidentally. this is no coincidence, but i would hate to fight for the tit of change in the american public line or political class. we missed the crane of victory, therefore, no

matter how much we argue on this topic, what is in this in the case of a crane, in this case i am talking about the real threats that exist today and i spoke in the first part of our program about what is happening. right now, these days, these days, a crime against religious freedoms is taking place in ukraine, and these, by the way, are questions that were once in the west, not only in the west, all over the world. well, they were very loud. how can it not be religious free churches with a huge number of their believers are prohibited in order to achieve a general break in all ties with russia is possible. so that this happens in our eyes and does not cause absolutely no reaction from the outside, then the most enlightened democratic friend. it's a different america andronicus knows as well as i do from your american experience and, of course, from your experience of studying america, that this is, in general, a different country in many respects, but tell me about your opposition. why these people? but now i

understand what konstantin said in the main. i agree with you, but still trying to understand. the degree of their hatred for their own people or i exaggerate it when i speak of their hatred of my own. there is no dmitry to the people , this is even putting it mildly, because i have never read or followed these people who left russia and fled, but i am simply forced by the strength of my professional duties to watch and listen, what do they say? not a single ukrainian demagogue, a bastard who hates russia comes close to these people. about who. you say, they say, this is it. well, i can add ksenia larina. there are a number of other people who say, you are russian. guilty that they didn’t do it to you and

deserved it. this is still not enough. you have to repent in the morning , repent in the evening, go to bed to repent, because your country is criminal, uh, in your criminal goal, it has always been so not only these people, what dmitry says, well, here i am armenian, but i adore this country. i have lived here for 55 years. i'm in this culture in this language for me it's this is my story my culture when these people speak. that russian weapons are such rubbish, this is this, and this is rust, this is a mobilizer, this is gravel. that is it such. from them comes absolute rubbish. here is the dirt and filth. these people

have always hated and hate. why? because for them, this is russia, if they rule this russia, if they do not rule this russia , who needs such a russia, by the way, was the logic of the people who raised them, these are the berezovsky gusins, they were kingmakers, and they said, if we are not kingmakers if we don't make kings, if we don't rule from the back of these leaders and politicians, then why do we need this country ? is this their position, or are we we'll be back. and we will lead this country or let this side of the container fly. thank you uh, there were all sorts of, how to say, not very complimentary articles about me during the weekend in america, and i generally react to them very calmly, but one thing

touched me in the uh edition under the name of the politician, uh, who uh constantly uh, defends ukraine and those who are its subdivision of the united states except for me, it was said that i take a pro-russian position. and it hurt me a lot, because i can't take a pro-russian position. one simple because i'm russian and, uh, for me this is decisive in this case. a find find an american jew. who would not feel some natural feeling of sympathy for israel find an american ukrainian who, even if he does not like the current ukrainian regime, did not want anything good in his country. i did not speak about

any fields. where even in the years when poland , uh, was in general in the soviet orbit, and the american poles criticized the soviet role, but were very careful that you to call for some kind of sanctions against their country, and for me as for a russian here is the position of this opposition of yours, fuck the opposition, to me it is humanly incomprehensible and unacceptable. i don't see a full explanation for it. it seems to me that i explained or they will correct it, it seems to me that she should go to hell, and it seems to me that i explained. they were just in power two decades ago, and they know that this position used to be welcomed. i will tell you. i agree with each of you, but the next time we talk about this topic, i would like to

call a psychiatrist. thanks it. there was a big game, see you on the air tomorrow. thanks a lot. you are kind, sweet, sympathetic and terribly lonely, you have been waiting for years for a marriage proposal from a man or for years, hopefully, to meet someone who will make this proposal, but all in vain. this means only one thing your program does not work, and therefore i offer you my course, which has already helped hundreds of thousands of women throughout russia, a short course in a happy life. lord, now you

hear my voice, then you are on the right ways our first lesson will be on how to meet a man for a long-term relationship. you will be surprised to learn that there are some very simple rules, following which you will always bathe in male attention. rule one. feel free to go places where you can always meet a lot of men.

always smile at a man who shows interest in you. yes, things your dating will not lead to marriage, you will be left with memories of a pleasantly spent century, when all attention was focused on you. he can he is fond of racing or mountain climbing or he likes to deal with complex mechanisms. or maybe he'll let you decide. what

will be your first date of a harmonious relationship in accepting a man for who he is, and not trying to remake him.

what was it? i'm sorry i prevented

you from cleaning me. himself with a man after meeting. i want to

help you understand love. i have only one question for you.

who are you cursing in front of? do you really want to be stabbed somewhere in the corner?