avoid excessive losses in networks and improve the quality of their work. well, it will make it possible not to increase tariffs in the future, such organizations should be the president, that everywhere in every city and village, apartments and houses of citizens, industrial social facilities should be reliably provided with warm water, we will allocate 30 billion rubles this year. and in the next 100 billion more for the replacement and construction of new water supply, heat and sewer networks, as well as boiler houses and other heat supply facilities, subject to mandatory co-financing from russian subjects. this, of course, is a huge job, you need help. how can more regions join the implementation of the presidential initiative? another topic of the tourism development meeting, mikhail mishustin emphasized that special attention should be paid to the organization of children's recreation. it should become more accessible, including for residents of our

new regions. that's all for now. we are following the development of events, information channels on the first will continue the program time will tell. live program time will show works information channel on the first with you anatoly kuzichev. let's start with the exclusive of the first channel of the exclusive of our program. time will tell military correspondent anastasia elsukova, who was seriously wounded, got in touch today. here she is on your screens got in touch with our studio nastya from a group of military correspondents came under fire in solidarity dryers, and today, as a real fighter, uh, right from her hospital bed, she gave an exclusive interview to our program live. let's see it. i feel well, in principle, well, satisfactory, of course, the injury is quite serious, i can even show it quickly. what it looks like now my leg , the knee suffered, the knee joint, i want,

of course, to thank my editorial staff very much, our team is very grateful to everyone, of course, who helped me and the musicians who evacuated me from hell, of course, ada, well, it really was hell of course, when screamed at the moment of injury. well, this is logical, and firstly, we had to lead the group, escort that the incident had happened and, well, it’s clear that state of passion, here. e, when then i was not sick, well, how would i start to understand that, in principle, i can’t do anything. now everything will depend on my inner mood and panic is not our friend here at all. the guys do everything they can, the guys help me, the guys help me. i'm kind of supervised and they will help me further. all. i understand that now i need to get together and help the guys evacuate me and that's it, and then everything will be fine. do not forget

that, in principle, i am a gonchanka. i in fact, well since childhood in the war. here are all the attacks. here, in principle, everything from the fourteenth year, what happened yes, in the donbass of the territory of donbass, i saw it all with my own eyes. and, of course, when i grew up, when i got the opportunity to work. i was in a combat war zone, when i realized that i wanted to become a journalist, of course, i went to work as a war correspondent, because i simply could not stay away. i just can't look at all these crimes. eh, the kiev authorities against the civilian population. i they understood that i wanted to somehow change the situation. i want to somehow help our fighters, respectively, well, in fact. because i'm a girl, i can't go to war, but i can go to war on the information front. in general, we are recovering, slowly combat settings. yes, now i am in intensive care, and in the

bandage it is likely that there may be more operations and more than one. well, as it were, the most important thing is that i have become this very thing, the main thing and everything else, in principle, will arrive. nastya just molodchina is really a real fighter. uh, and now i want to convey to you, of course, from our program from me personally nastya to you, most likely, you don’t know the recovery from me, at least the words of great gratitude and admiration because of your composure and for the way you hold on and but in general, what a young man you are. congratulations to you advertising and we'll be back. male female bizon today at the first oops everything is dried up, you need to fix it elifrin helps the mucosa with the inherent action of cold remedies. you're watching your health there, i'm lying, mom needs to check her heart. hello mom.

we signed you up for analysis at gemotest with three basic analyzes for 20,090 rubles. free consultations with doctors of the winners come and get your winnings. buy tickets for special editions. all january wins every third ticket. buy where it is convenient and how convenient in branded stores on the way to work, go shopping or right now on the website stoloto.ru 900 million jackpot or cholesterol jumps blood pressure cardioactive taurine is the best, cardioactive treatment taurine evalar is twice as profitable in price. a with excursions transfer money to mary for 300 rubles. still dialing a phone number for manual transfer tinkov was the first in russia to launch a number scanner. install the tinkov application and transfer money easily and

tinkov without commission, he is the only one. prepare a runny nose, and fever and fight viruses. i choose ergoferon, it combines several effects at once, the fight against viruses , the elimination of symptoms and the removal of acute respiratory viral infections, and it is also suitable for children with colds, viruses remember the season checkron, big artillery, cole word a lot of chicken and french fries new big megaroll. diclofenac akos in a package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance of 5%. 5% gel. diclofenac alternative high- quality patriotic own take part in the field of miracles without leaving the screen, rotate the drum using the red button on your remote control. answer questions and earn points, and we will

invite the most active ones to the air of channel one. watch on 1tv.ru. cinema 1tv presents we launched two drones , one at the stadium the second to monitor

one more perimeter is needed. why drive away for coffee, how long we sit here, but it's time to have a cup of silver wolf. i came to me from the street. i work with real situations every day. i know where you came from you will find them without a navigator represents. the frame is one substitution that we can understand, only after the examination we continue to work live. it's gone by the other day. they all call them that, but that's why we let's go terminology to act a historical

meeting, which each of them is historical at the american airbase in germany rammstein well, there, respectively, uh, the leaders of the relevant departments discussed, uh, assistance to ukraine, all possible and impossible, and before the historical meeting in rammstein ended, ukraine was already announcing the next historical one. it will be in february, and once again great historic hopes are pinned on it. here are the words of the ukrainian minister of defense. coming home after ramstein 8 with every encounter. i see how the trust of our partners in ukraine is growing, it's all thanks to to the hard work of our soldiers and representatives, more trust means more weapons to protect our land, sea and sky, bracket nine will be held in february. here it is interesting, of course not, it is clear that trust is steadily growing and so on. that's right i remember, i remember in soviet times the soviet press, all these clichés about steady growth. everything else, but here's what else is interesting, firstly, not everything is so

simple. now andrei of france will tell us yesterday, yes, about more trust, more weapons there, well, in appearance, at least to a certain extent, formally, not everything is so clear-cut. and also this ellipsis after the sea and such m-m. clearly not by chance significant and the sky. i'm still no way. not just the same , please, about the sky. actually a serious allusion. somehow, maybe three weeks ago, we discussed that sooner or later ukraine would be given combat aviation, because it would attack actions. it is always the totality of all elements. one element removed from the theme does not work. that is conditionally to them that now is not enough. they have enough tanks and aircraft for a full offensive. the americans have intercepted by weight because they have declared to the whole world that they will now lead, they will plan actions, and they will put pressure. all partners to hand over their weapons and immediately said, we will go to melitopol, everything, that is, they have already burned their bridges of some maneuvers, and in this situation, remember, we said that in the twenty-second year they pawned money and trained ukrainian pilots in january

, courses on f-16 ended. and here on ramstein. purely by chance, in my opinion, danya said, you know, and we thought here we will someday take american f-35s. come on, we will give our f-16s to ukraine, that is, stuffing is already underway until a decision has been made, but what is the actual result on the ranks of 50 countries, it seems solid, everything is cool, but only 14 countries wanted to transfer something to someone via a little, someone a little more somewhere estonia said listen, we know that the americans will protect us. let's so we're all we have. everything from you all five-millimeter guns and all tenth years. well, that's all there, these 20 guns are all for you and let's set an example with russia. as for the history of russia, it lowered diplomatic relations, so to speak, to chargé d'affaires, in my opinion. yes, me too. now is high time. well, and so it lowered the fact, everything went recalled. well, or rather, they send it to everyone, they want to show the americans, they will say, look, we will become the flag that will put pressure on germany, we will show the whole world that we are not afraid to empty our arsenals, that everyone has acted an example, that

did the germans get along? why? here too it would seem that there are actually many versions, but in fact we understand that this is a war of transnational corporations. we have a secretary of the security council, which is not strange. the west is a country that is controlled by western capital uh-huh, that is, military multinational corporations. as a rule, they are multinational universities , maybe even three, that is, yes, such a large conglomerate and managers who push through, that is, history. we see that now american companies with their headquarters. they dominate, they want the soap bubble of a conditionally invincible leopard to burst right there in ukraine, realizing that, well then, german industry. serious problems may ensue. they will change for themselves, by the way. that is, this is not accidental, as if intrigue, that is, i assumed today, or a smoke screen, they are there, so to speak, they supply everything that is needed for it, but they arranged such a production for us, and we look and think , the last put the seller will not push through, but in fact, well, in fact, in fact

this is not strong, a real intrigue. the task of dragging them there and breaking the whole of europe was trying to make their own plane. eurof fighter, and so on. all americans. all this was crossed out, they were closed, they were looking to buy the f35 and all countries, including germany, would buy the f-35 for all funerals at an expensive price. that's how it works. now everyone thinks, so we have a future tank, the british said, we have our own tank industry. in 2009, they closed everything that is. it's old, there won't even be spare parts, but we will probably be european do jointly americans. they don't say guys. we introduced abrams x a month ago, it's so american. and yes. yes. this is what you will be buying. everything will be done so that everyone is interested in the abrams-x100, it is necessary to do so that the leopards show. well, i'm making it easy. pointed out with full advice, so to speak, senselessness, unsuitability, so to speak, and so on, and weakness, correctly i understand for business. yes, yes, and what didn’t fit on leopards and germany? why did this feel right? of course not, here

sensations. at you such about it they also speak on sensations. you should have these. so they have achieved their goal. well , actually, why are they called rammstein historically, because for the first time, 52 countries absolutely clearly stated that they are a military coalition acting against russia , but i could not imagine such a thing even there a year or two ago, but i personally could not, that is, uh, 48 countries the crimean platform, which you prevented, grew and became 52 yes, a military bloc that will act against russia, complete with barrel's statement that let's remember history. uh, russia after hard wars is still a renaissance. in difficult wars , barrel is simply a genius. i do not know eugene publicly now public rhetoric. he said, remember now with napoleon and hitler now russia will always gather there and so on. that is, he actually equalized himself,

and when he announced the investigator, and then further. simply the main thing, therefore we must supply weapons to ukraine. yes, and then listened to clearly read, so that russia does not get off its knees, yes, what task russia should next hitler perfectly at all. well, this is your wording, not mine. he mentioned napoleon hitler's comma and the current europe he mentioned. and who is this then, if not the heir, well, what is the task before them and why do they hang smoke addiction or leopards? they need to deprive russia of the status of a superpower economically, they are already close to this, they are ready to decide. this is still by military and political means, then america has one time. china it is very convenient and its own. america decides completely, and ukraine is a passive pledge here and russia also does not move anything. it is clear that they are yes, i understand that they are all against russia and so on, it’s another matter that, if you believe

andrei frantsevich, then, of course, all 52 or how many 50 are against russia, but jesus would still be suppressed in the historical sense , because wait for the delivery, here in the dry, as they say, the remnants of 14 countries have confirmed their deliveries, all the rest have not confirmed. ramstein nine will be 25. i understand, but following the results of this historic ramstein, after all, the vast majority of people, it means that they are at war with russia in a rhetorical sense and have been supplying them economically for 14 years. well, that's a fact. it's a fact, please, just a few fights for real. what about mr. what is the problem? yes, there are barrels medvedev and uh, in this case, again, the former president said absolutely correctly, and this is well understood in europe and very much not only in europe that if you are heading for the military defeat of the russian

federation, you must understand that defeat nuclear power in an existential conflict, a will entail a nuclear war, or the risk of defeat? i'll paraphrase mr. medvedev a little there he said confusingly, but the risk of defeat will lead to the fact that this is a power. e, choosing between her defeat precisely in the existential one, that is, the conflict on which her existence depends. i think there is no one who will argue with the fact that our existence as a state depends on the outcome of the war in ukraine. this is if we find ourselves at risk, we use nuclear weapons, and for now we say goodbye to everyone after hiroshima and nagasaki, it doesn’t work because it doesn’t work correctly, i explain to you and will not use it, respectively, for a person who is poorly versed in international relations, apparently or poorly read medvedev , not a single nuclear state since hiroshima and nagasaki was not in a war, on which the exodus of which depends on the existence of this state,

there was no such thing right away, historically such an option, at least one example. yes, hello, hello, what is it like say, please, there is no example and there cannot be such a thing, but, let's say, wait, then again. just need to be clear, so that you understand, what, so to speak, discussed. e single yegorka means since the second world war of 1945, not a single state. uh-huh, the nuclear state did not face such a level, so to speak, problems or there are prospects, either it wins in this means, in this company and the crisis of the winner emerges from this, or its very existence is in question in front of more than one such state, until was it possible to choose? i just thank you when mr. medvedev with his statement, but a large article was published in the atlanta edition, where

it was said. no, you know, it’s not in the event of russia’s defeat that a nuclear war will be better than russia’s victory, and they tried in every possible way to prove that in fact this war is of an existential nature. and for america , too, if america loses it will not, but this is not so, perhaps, some part of the american elites think so, which simply does not see the world differently, except as a world with american leadership, i will paraphrase one or no policy. why do we need a world without american leadership, so we are ready for this, how would all the mountains burst into a nuclear conflict, but as they think, and absolutely all the elites and america's security is real in the event of a defeat in ukraine, it is not threatened by disintegration. not there zintegration does not destroy. it's true, it's all fact, nonetheless. look, nevertheless, the stakes are very high for us, however, it’s not that i don’t know there, they smelled the blood, but they realized that there was another chance. so i don’t want to often talk about it, that it’s fair for us says that there will not be another chance there for the next 100 years. if not used, it is,

therefore, of course, the stakes are raised escalation, so to speak, uh happens. and look, a fragment. i want to let you read and listen to a fragment of the article, and the new york times, how do they describe, so to speak, the current situation and what prospects does attention see? although the war has reached a stalemate, fighting continues and both sides are preparing for a new round of fierce offensives in late winter or spring. this means that the wide and dirty fields of ukraine soon , ukraine and its supporters will again witness a full-scale tank and trench war. it is hoped that western weapons will play a decisive role and the boards of it are more likely to contain the russian offensive and even push the russians back how far another question is to convince russia that a negotiated peace is the only option. that's why the upcoming fight has a decision? well , here is the mysterious, of course, last phrase, but alexei viktorovich. especially since russians all the time talk about the need negotiations, while ukraine

prohibits itself by law. there were no negotiations, but nevertheless the task is to convince russia that peace through negotiations is the only option. for this, it is necessary to discard the russians, etc. well , they are rising, i would formulate the situation like this: this is the fear of victory and the hope of defeat, the fear of victory, this is true, and especially in relation to some of our expectations that we will not succeed, and the new york times is formulated in approximately the same way in this article, i.e., uh, they are, uh, afraid russian victory and hope that, in general, the russians will not succeed, and then and then in their picture of the world, as it was rightly said. e world. just come to the status quo. well, that is, what is meant in our opinion. that's even on your here you did not accidentally pay attention to the phrase. it looks like

an absurd peace through negotiations, the only possibility, so ukraine should be given more weapons. well, that is, this, as the bulgarian president justly noted, is right along orel. yes, peace is war, but nevertheless less you their picture of the world, er. the only way to peace, er, is the military defeat of russia in a different matter that western civilization, having produced a huge amount of firing pieces of iron . uh, very little has spawned, uh, people capable of really fighting and killing for global hegemony. not for your home, not for your interests, but for the global hegemony of some guys from new york and washington, and it turned out that the only one who is ready to die for this is thousands and tens of thousands. these are not our ukrainian brothers. and in this sense, the bulgarian president rightly asks, even now, for example, there is a shortage

of weapons. and what will happen when the shortage of people begins, who then will force russia to negotiate on their terms? here, well, uh opinion, i understand with him uh with this opinion, well, ano coincides with the opinion of a large number of peoples and poles in ukraine in europe. well, they themselves are such greyhounds and the most passionate, so to speak - this is, at least, rhetorical again. well , the poles, of course. well closest closest huge anti-war demonstration with posters. no need to pull. you don't want ordinary people. well, you understand that they asked everything there. they still remember the volyn massacre, it sounds more like it plays very well. even now, over the past few publications , yes, yes, polish ones. of course, they remember another thing, that you remember their leader, how he is there , we catch this bread and forget this enmity. well, there and so on. well, in general, of course, they

remember, but they do everything to make it forgotten, although , in addition, we remember that famous polish monument. no, it was written on the memo who will forget it on earth. let for the lord i have forgotten you on it or something. it seems, well, how it would have been for them until recently. holy well, bye, so to speak, bye. duda did not break bread, please, here are meetings in the ramshtan format, not very disturbing and, of course, one cannot treat them with humor. they are becoming more and more frequent, and oddly enough, the position of katherine here is very close to me. column of the head of the french foreign ministry. she says, let's focus on helping the people of ukraine after all. not only on posts weapons. here it is closer, because although they have a lot of iron, as they say, they produced, but the pieces of iron are very serious. if here you were someone on the air san, not only in zhukovsky, where to put on a farm bar-salon, yes , bordzhi, look, how is the eurofighter typhoon, what are his capabilities? i did not begin to be ironic, and because if there is such a thing, wait, nothing has been reanimated. he said that like here business suits purely, business suits. eh, jazz, business, they say something to him there. uh, well, rested, but uh or us so

here. uh, here the europeans developed the vater all over the world, now the americans are in its place f6 f35. that is, if no, of course, i will not take part in this kit at 35, you have too big sixteen and euro fighter is also too expensive, an expensive car to participate under a billion euros, one thing costs there, so, of course, e will not her to send it, but still, still we compared last week discussed the difference in tactics and strategy. that's the tactics of the germans now, but we don't want to. let's put abrams first then, maybe we are our leopards, and strategies are one. unfortunately, the strategy is to somehow defeat russia economically on the battlefield. you know, morally strategy somehow, uh, defeating russia doesn't sound like much of a strategy. it looks like a distant, so to speak poorly articulated target. here, well, strategies, as far as i understand, yes strategies. this is a

set of tactical decisions, isn't it. yes, these are something to do. it's not a strategy, it's understand your perseverance here in these tactical ku. which at first did not add up, but the ceiling of oil prices, for example, and now this is also such an additional separate strategy in a single strategy, and, unfortunately, something works out for them, therefore, here ahead of the curve, then the mysterious of a very interesting story. if you want, there about the oil price ceiling. it can be discussed, but so to speak, and the meaning of this act, so to speak. now perspectives. or you can just look at the income, let's say the twenty-second year of russia precisely for exactly in this industry and be surprised against whom the twenty-second is, right? yes, for whom is this ceiling? on whom? or rather, against whom on the right he says all this, this is a mysterious story. here, history, of course, history, of course, will judge somehow and put everything in its place, but so far it looks like an explanation in the most logical way. uh, such americans are completely cynical and purposefully just spread rot and

drown europe, it’s clear what they have ahead of them, as goals for both russia and china, but for now, so to speak in moving towards these goals, europe is methodically destroying. in the economic sense, at least, isn't it true? and remember anatoly at all. so, when there was such a deal between biden and well, even before schultz, it was determined when nord stream-2, that is, biden allowed nord stream-2, in fact, to open in exchange for the construction of two terminals in germany for receiving slurry on natural gases. but he blew up nord stream 2 and that's it. this problem was solved the terminal was built now they opened the third lng rate terminal already 115 billion cubic meters per year. it's already themselves. you confirm my, so to speak, hypothesis will cope, which means they will cope. that's the thing. lord, this is a challenge. what do you understand, and for the price and the price will be 360 ​​dollars, we just want 3,000, and the americans. this is the market price. the thing is, look for who benefits. kirill valeryevich dear, who

got the most out of all this, do you think it is clear that in the united states well, thank god that we have agreed. okay nonetheless. that's what this article is about. yes there is thank you alexey viktorovich well, he agreed with me a little bit so paradoxical, but we are already accustomed to these paradoxes, the paradoxical conclusion that they say, uh, you need to convince russia that only for appointing peace through negotiations is the only possible option. and for this it is necessary, of course, to fight endlessly. here is such a movement towards peace, despite the fact that russia daily today, for the last time, sergey viktorovich lavrov said through his lips that we are ready for negotiations, and so on and so forth, but they have their own plan they have their own, not even their own strategy tactics and stakes are raised. that's where they 'll rise to. you see, nina also said an offensive thing. yes, they are no longer afraid. it sounds , uh, annoying and unpleasant, but it probably seems like the truth to make them start to be afraid. it is necessary to strike at the centers to make a decision. in kiev, this has been discussed many times, and who will be answered in moscow. try it means, uh, i'm talking about uh, peace and negotiations. yes. er,

see what the problem is, kind of, they're right today. well, those who say that in order for negotiations to take place, they are partly right to continue the war, because today there is no room for compromise, in general there are no options at all, how to negotiate not between russia and the west. and even more so between the russian federation and ukraine, all the more we do not want to talk with kiev correctly, which means that they are occupying our territory, no one will give us our territory just like that. there they need to be taken away, i mean, kherson, zaporozhye, slavyansk, and so on. this is all our current territory, in addition, they occupy our future territories, which we will take away, but only when one of the parties is on the battlefield, but in this case, of course, the chances are an order of magnitude. we have the most difference in potential, but they hold a complete military victory, or at least a very tough military victory over the enemy.

only then will there be an opportunity for negotiations. but it won't be comfortable. explain to me that this is too great a difference in potential. well, if we proceed from the fact that we are at war, as if from ukraine, which is not true, that everything already acknowledged 10 times, only of course the difference and not comparable. and if we assume that we are in the area with the same fifty-two countries that would be mentioned in 53 countries , we would have few chances, but we are not at war against fifty-three countries, because these 53 countries do not fight in full themselves program, that is, the dispatch of national armies, the complete transfer of their national economies, the complete a-a investment of the entire military-industrial complex, and so on. our economy is much smaller. than it would be very difficult to win from the war, but we are not at war with fifty-three countries. from ukraine and we are at war with partially conditional poland, which supplies its mercenaries , we are partially at war with the united states, which supplies its weapons. and there are also several countries that are a little jacked up in this process, and now if for ukraine this is

really an existential conflict, and they are ready to put everything they have into this war and for us this is all the more so then it’s no longer for one of the countries. this conflict is not at some point when uh, how would further participation will be too risky they will say that 100 basta or will provide moral support. they won't be at some point here at some point. i'm wondering . we need to inflict a very serious military defeat on the ukrainian army once, to show that further investments are not unpromising and something needs to be done that will make them believe that volodin and medvedev's warning that if they cross the red lines in arms supplies, that is the order of a nuclear war there is a need. and actions in ukraine as harsh as possible, but predictable i'm afraid of this question in kiev, the destruction of the decision-making center in washington well, it's not

i who met it screaming inside. there is no contradiction here, because it speaks, but about a symbolic act so that people understand some kind of people who well, no one is afraid anymore, no one believes something to say that these russians are completely nobody when water is above your head, no matter how much you are already talking about water and your head today. guys, if you can, the greater the laws of people's relations. they constants for many centuries within the framework of these laws of international relations of the strong are respected. what did the first one say? there are tools that do what they want, but the weak suffers as they should. for almost two and a half thousand years, this law has already been working on relationships. the situation is much more complicated than just highly respected, but highly respected. so diplomacy is zero. this means that we cannot offer anything. here it is not backed by force. yes, and here you are always responsible for humanism systems

humanism for pacifism and stuff, well, okay. here you have it. if the option, or rather, you won’t even ask if i’ve been here for me, it’s now become the last days, as in recent weeks it has become obvious that there is no other solution, unfortunately, there are no problems, and there was no military path at all no options. well, okay, nonetheless. here we are, we rolled into this whole story for almost a year, it has been going on. so you think there is now some option. eh, permissions. these are the conflicts of this problem, except for the military, of course. you conditionally say this path is the path of diplomacy, it is not particularly specific. georg i say that the situation here is rather complicated and it is impossible to speak, and this is not a one-sided situation, that it’s over to strike at the center of decisions, so everyone will suddenly get scared, because there will be a third world war, and then the americans will come back , something like this, but some kind of primitive you think, yes,

a complex scheme, then talking is not very fast. you understand, yes, tactical dice, oh which we talked about in the first part. this means there will be a ranged weapon of the atakamese that they tell them what to do. i ask, they are about tactical dice. you said there is. of course, there is a way, so to speak, not a military one. i'll tell you how to negotiate briefly negotiate because we are also going to the diplomat. we take one step forward and two steps back. we first go- why not? because at first you can talk, it means that we agreed and told. yes, this is a great formula, and i even could have it, i would not necessarily be dear expert like you, to hear this word? yes? thank you, you can, here i give you this rule. decode for me. who agrees, what does the space of compromise look like? let's have to negotiate with those who are in the political arena today. unfortunately, we did not choose those authorities that are now in kiev, in washington , in paris, putin is persuading him to come out and say, come on, come on, putin. no, it's not necessary. you

lavrov let zelensky said many times that there is an opportunity for negotiations with russia which to speak means about in short, everyone is friends. come on in general, unfortunately, you do not receive, please, an existential challenge. listen, we are ready to negotiate, but the peculiarity is that each of the parties is ready to even start negotiations only on its own preconditions , therefore. one by one i ended your taurus quiet silence, please, i stopped interrupting your speech because i thought it did not carry any meaningful element. forgive me, please alexey viktorovich e, so this is not a war goes on until one of the parties can not

continue as soon as one of the parties. at least one of any will not be able to continue it, negotiations will begin on preliminary conditions, which will be the winning side and water. i mean, their strategy is to make us become this side that cannot continue , and our strategy should be to make them all become the side that cannot continue, just you are the only way to become a diplomat. so, alexander says specific things when i create for you good good. if this is not the case suggest me another form to speak with by whom. let someone come out with arakhs, so it is necessary to agree with sarakhs. went out. if there is an opinion, they constantly change, do not change for them, which it is, generally from a perspective, at least theoretically. i think

that the americans have already come up with it. and, unfortunately for ukraine, they are implementing it so hugely, this is a topic that they have already tested in korea, but let's share it. well, i learned the conditional northern southern but not about, for example, the left bank according to the situation that will be at the moment when the negotiations will finish and let's make a picture out of the part that is close to the americans, but let's make the part that is not close to the americans . let the russian world show what it is capable of, that is, and this north south korean option, most likely, the americans now understand it, because this is the goal of the economic leveling of russia. they, in principle , decided for themselves and this is for it is important for them to fight for a day, most likely, they are already starting to get bored with elections in 2 years, with whom in a year. the issue must be resolved. they will lay it down to compete burning. i agree with pork, there will indeed be a division of ukraine according to the results, but the problem is

that at least all russian territories should enter the russian part of ukraine. and this means it will not be limited to the dnieper. we have part of the territory located on the west on the right bank is not true. so here the question of division will be such, but, to which they will really come to the side and understand that conditionally russia cannot advance further and the west of it is already further to advance. that's all. maybe they will go, look, korean war. well look. yes, but nonetheless. here's the general denominator for everyone. yes, everyone categorically disagrees with each other, but people still use the word section, and you are the same. and dear respected george, unfortunately, this is advertising on channel one. who knows who to add the address of the stores to them you show the lists, something didn’t show me. and if it was you who came to the hospital with hiv, do you want to dump me here? how to find out? ca

n't stand patient zero. big premiere, watch after the program vremya

and sausage with cashback up to 6%. all that i need from different cards is in halva, just one card for everything, which medicine for cystitis is the most advantageous in price . burger king delivers with cashback trekrezan promotes the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections, strengthens the immune system and restores strength trekrezan. be healthy.

well done, you take care of your health there, i’m lying down, mom needs to check her heart, let’s go to hemotest, there is an action for analyzes for 290 rubles. yes. it's there also has a son. hello hi mom. they signed you up for tests in gemotest, in your city there is a program country gemotest three basic analyzes for 290 rubles. free doctor's consultation movie one tv presents

to be such a moody river movie 1tv presents hello chief of intelligence. now you have nothing of your own. there is

only someone else's. someone else's life. we are talking about this now and how it so happened historically that europe has always considered itself superior to russia has always been considered, so to speak, it became possible to arrogantly receive us, how to live, how to walk with their territories, how to treat their subjects, and so on, so, so to speak, the tradition has been for many, many centuries. and now the

minister of foreign affairs of russia, sergei lavrov, in the words of a classic reminds, what can happen and always happens if you threaten russia people's scales, why should she threaten him? and you are russia, what angered you the excitement of lithuania leave this dispute of the slavs among themselves old domestic disputes already a question weighed by fate, which you will not resolve for a long time these tribes have been at enmity among themselves, bowed under the gasors, then theirs is our side, who will stand, in an unequal dispute, puffy lyakh or true, growth, slavic streams will merge into the russian sea. here's the question leave us, you haven't read these

bloody tablets you don't understand alien family civil thank you see you. it's not too bad that zhenya was taken away. i want it back. how many years have you been raising someone else's child. he was two and a half years old at the time when i took him to me a child, where have you been. and why the child was all dirty hungry i will stand on my feet and not a damn thing for all this time for this is not done together.