and not shit. i am guilty. because i can't live with it. suicide is no longer an option. i'm not going to kill myself, mother. you will be stained for the rest of your life, say that it is not so. you destroyed everything so that we would not know anything, and you do not consider yourself a scoundrel. here you have no children. it changes everything, don't hide behind me. i'm not hiding always thought. about you mother.

now i can't blame you either. i 'll still say everything. both in the press and on the report. i don't want to be your partner. i have seen these children.

we have a difficult task. sounds like an overdose to call an ambulance. you again i saw, following the prompts of a dream, you really have nothing to apologize for. i understand everything, you leave me . i want to be alone. if someone set you up, i'll find out soon it will go with you. i

just can not understand how you are about all this seriously both here and there. premiere of a serial film from january 30 on the first quarter tinkoff was the first in russia to launch a number scanner install the tinkoff application and transfer money easily and without commission tinkoff he is one of the top chefs, awarded with high awards and recognized masters cooking, after testing the products, maheev takes off his hats and congratulates on the award for an excellent university maheev makes your dishes tastier vtb debit card in popular categories and everything will work out.

the penultimate instance of the new season, watch only vovka your favorite films and tv shows a month of zarub a year for half the price of discomfort and stirs up filtrum thanks to millions of micropores filtrum absorbs bacteria toxins, helping to eliminate the unpleasant symptoms of filtrum ste to put things in order in the stomach, and for the tour

transfer money to mary 300 rub. still you dial the phone number for transfer manually tinkov was the first in russia to launch a number scanner. install the tinkov app and transfer money easily and without commission. tinkov, he is the only one with elevated sugar or cholesterol, blood pressure jumps. cardioactive taurine here is the best treatment for cardioactive taurine evalar at twice the price of a movie one tv presents

is there an easier way to look like stars on the air? launch the application to find out what the characters on the screen are wearing.

among them is one, may my sins be forgiven for ours . after all, we are such a people. in kind for an hour, everything

that is prophesied by the archpriest onych, the horses came out under god, under the god of war , artillery closed us. the night of the premiere for the 85th anniversary of vladimir vysotsky on saturday at the first vylezti is equal to 75 children. four adults. we cannot conceal this from the people who are already getting out through the riots mikhail sergeevich in the rostov region, the population is already coming out to block communications between kalmykia and other regions. if you want to tell, another

epidemic an epidemic of fear this will make them listen the state is obliged to finance the fight against hiv to buy medicine disposable syringes, inform the public. and you thought what will happen when people find out that it was the doctors who provoked the epidemic of bathrobes. giving children to doctors will begin to give birth on grandmas. we can accuse the west of unleashing a biological war against the ussr in a separate clinic. well

, i’m creating everyone, we’ll call alarmists and traitors to our motherland on every corner . offer to start a cold war again. tikhom sergeevich is it over yet, or what? you yourself know what is right and how it is necessary, speak the truth. this is the easiest truth. maybe you ’ll tell the truth about golubulin to him perfectly, you’ll accuse me of being healthy. gorbachev will gladly cling to disperse along with the system. i will do the right thing. collect people

need to be trusted, then they will trust us, and the one who is to blame is silent, everything will collapse. all you now the choice is not between truth or lies? you the choice between low lives and millions before us was given the task in the

shortest possible time. to find the source of infection and identify patient zero, comrade shipov and i carried out serious work. epidemiological investigation you are his patient zero. it turned out to be a clipperfil. he got infected in africa, his wife was in connection with ivan, who infected his wife and child, who was hospitalized. in elista, i also want to note that other infected people became infected due to the total non-compliance with sanitary standards by the staff, namely the use of reusable syringes that were not properly sterilized, which led to the virus spreading inside the hospital. again, the very fact of using reusable syringes. and the case in rostov and stavropol, mikhail sergeevich in the case in rostov was often sent to the rostov stavropol clinics. and i'm not asking you

that flagrant negligence has been committed in your department under your leadership. just outrageous. duration good. please, we've got the bulk here. yevgeny ivanovich is right, the virus got into the hospital of rostov and stavropol with children for sheets and spread through syringes. i also want to note that evgeny ivanovich approved my plan for the modernization of the industry. and approved funding for next year. we will purchase disposable syringe system. and we will develop

recommendations for physicians. this is true. yes, but now everything is under control. i think yes, not me, i came to say goodbye. do you respect?

where? in komsomolsk at the ambulance base you imagine, they think that i am also to blame. you always seemed so smart to me, you can't argue such a fool. komsomolsk no one knows to find out you will not have time to come. and what to leave again. well, you didn't do anything wrong. i don't know, maybe in a past life. i don't know. he asked you to leave your number in case. if you need any help, or i still have my number. no. i don't even know when it will be.

you must know. if the second stage begins, you will need help, you will need a person nearby, everything is fine. promise me. what will you call? this is an unprecedented situation. which we have not encountered yet.

in the hospital they used a miniscule with the name of only niva, subsequently, through a patient in a

palestinian hospital, the virus spread person. and it gives 100% certainty. there are paths. that is, it turns out that immunoglobulin, but nothing to do with it. it doesn't matter in general. the problem is, we couldn't handle it. we are a society, like a country. that's all that it will not

return the children. so many years have passed, it's interesting, you know what's the matter. nobody had the courage. even in hindsight, take responsibility. what i want to hear. so that they hear us what humanly told us that a disaster happened, a misfortune happened? forgive us. how can we help you?

uh today in the international spotlight the latest reports about the supply of weapons to ukraine, including heavy tanks, tanks, which we were recently told that they would not be supplied to ukraine in any case, because they wanted to avoid escalation. but today they are not only supplied, but also explains that, in general, there is nothing terrible in this e, not for russia, nor for the world, nor for ukraine itself, why such a change in the american position in the first place, and i would like to ask, and mark bishop, who is known to many of you as a columnist for national interest magazines and a well-known homeland security consultant mark thank you for taking the time. dmitry magician, after all, there were so many

statements that the supply of heavy tanks, but in general, inappropriate and especially the inappropriateness of supply tanks, persuaded that they are very difficult to operate, that they are not suitable for ukrainian conditions, that it will take too long to train, and ukrainian teams use them, what has changed in the last few days? this is dmitry. you very correctly noted that everything you just said. this is what the administration told us for many months. they told us for many months. it will add nothing to the ukrainian military effort. and that it is very difficult these these this equipment. e this equipment to manage is unnecessary for the ukrainian military to train. and it will take a very long time and serve very complex ones, which creates logistical headaches. and after

all this, without explanation, the administration decided to send. there are about 30 tanks, but there are a couple of details here. uh, firstly, they did it in large numbers, so that as part of an agreement with the germans, in order to, uh, open the door to supplies. e leopard 2 tanks. which are german -made in various european countries, but their export requires a license from germany germany said, we will only give. if the white house sends abrums, and now the white house said that we will send, uh, ibram machines. yes, one of the main details is that after that, uh, officials in the biden administration clarified that ibram machines will not come, uh, to ukraine, uh, tomorrow or a week later? or even after two or three they say that it can

take months or even years for this delivery . that's why. we do not really know when these tanks will appear there. and what will be on the battlefield at the moment when they appear and this looks like a maneuver to force the germans to send or leopards, who will probably come before the american ones cross over. but as you rightly pointed out. this eliminates the common problem from what we do not understand. on what basis the administration adopts these decisions. they don't explain to us. why was it possible to send e these tanks or for example a missile system as well. then they decide to do it, it seems that there is no general plan. and this is very worrisome. and i think the american people deserve an explanation from the administration.

e. what basis do they have? so they do n't send something, and then they send it. and where it goes. e, we first said that we would not send, my tanks were sent. we said we would not send. hey hello systems and we sent them. we say that we will not send troops. but this puts us on the trajectory that they are and since they say that they did not pass your troops, then just change their mind without explanation. and i think it's very disturbing mark uh, well, you're alarmed. i am alarmed in moscow, many are alarmed in europe in fact. many were alarmed. but uh, i don’t know who alarmed, who are they, listen, as president biden explained his decision. i want to emphasize that these supplies do not pose any threat to russia, these weapons are not designed to attack

russia. we want this war to end as quickly as possible, but at the same time the president is biden. like you know, said uh it tasks its purpose is to restore territorial integrity. e of ukraine a. uh, washington's definition of territorial integrity includes crimea. now, i'm not convinced. what can you say at the same time that there are no offensive plans and make it clear that ukraine will be helped, and e move in the direction of crimea and even more so try to fuck you, crimea press. here is the question that you have, which i have with these questions. are already being asked by washington or not? well, firstly, i will quickly note that we see in this biden speech that biden or

the one who wrote this speech for him is playing a little bit with semantics, because there is a very big difference. we send weapons to ukrainians to defend themselves against russian offensives or think. uh, a weapon for ukrainians to defend themselves in the sense that they have to take back everything that was lost, including crimea, because a lawyer could say in front of a judge that this is also a turnover. we're just taking back what was ours so this is very important. i think to point out the difference between the two when, uh, questions americans. they say that they support the help of ukraine. they mean the first. that is, they mean, they help the ukrainians to defend themselves against the active offensives of russian troops. and we never had a debate in this country. as for the second one, is it reasonable, is it realistic , and is it worth it to help the ukrainians take

crimea back because it is ending in a completely different operation and many people have serious questions about it, including republicans in congress. i think questions. you have already heard these questions after the speech of the military or not yet enough time has passed. eh, it's been a while. i have heard them so far from commentators and journalists. uh, i have not heard them yet from members of congress, and these questions will be. i expect they will be from members of congress. at least not like some, i'm not sure about the scale. but i think it opens up opportunities for them. uh, hmm start a serious debate about uh the nature of our involvement in this conflict because biden we criticized him. uh, i criticized him and many others for not explaining what the purpose is, and he gave some

version of the purpose. he says the ukrainians should take back absolutely everything including what was lost in 2014, okay, but i think the american people now have a right to have an opinion about this. is it worth taking these risks and these costs or not? e, brand, and carlson, he also comes out programs at 8 o'clock, when there was already some kind of reaction, since carlson or not yet. i have to be honest, i'm not sure about yours. i know that he talks about these things very often. i wouldn't be surprised if he commented, he's one of the many who ask. actually, very obvious questions. uh, which are probably too few people asking, but i'm thinking more and more about where this is all going and and

the fact that we're not that the american people didn't subscribe to uh, the idea that ukraine should uh have a total victory over russia because what to help. e the victim of aggression to protect himself and help. uh, ukrainians have full unconditional victory on the battlefield. these are two completely different goals with completely different risks and costs. well, of course mark in moscow, uh, how can you guess not fully agree with the soft enemy? there is that ukraine, uh, is a victim of aggression, but i understand that, uh, this is, in general, the point of view adopted in america and is especially important for me. if i understand you correctly, that even people who somehow sympathize with ukraine, that they are who i am, are nevertheless not ready to support ukraine to the bitter end. for what it's worth, brand

thank you so much and hope you see you soon see us live again. thanks a lot. ruslan pukhov is a well-known military expert well known to the united states. what's going on? we say, if i understood marco correctly, then i had the feeling that, in general, this decision to supply abrams was more political than military- motivated. is this so and what are the consequences for russia for the military situation in ukraine , do you know that this delivery looks like such a very cynical step on the part of the american administration and even russophobes such as polyakov because if you really want to change the course of hostilities, you need to set it. well, let's say 300-350 tanks are the homeopathic doses that these

tanks will be supplied to, we know, yes, the germans. and how much do you expect during the year the germans will deliver, 16, the americans, or 30, or 20, or 40 all americans, 31 all give a little bit, yes, but it looks like. although they could have splashed much more fire that, with all this rhetoric, that it is not. we are for everything good against everything bad we are for so that peace comes as soon as possible, so that everyone sits down at the negotiating table, this just resembles the situation of the classic dragging out of the war, that is, let the russian ukrainians kill everything. as long as possible. yes . that is why we are going to supply and add fire, this fuel a little bit. that's why this is the biggest question that probably no one will ever give an honest answer. everyone will say that they can give exactly the amount they can for one reason or another, but i have the impression is that, uh, the hidden meaning is precisely in this. well, if we return to technology, of

course, we must understand that either abrams or a leopard is a formidable weapon. yes, a strong, long-range cannon, and a good engine is powerful even more powerful than ours. however, it’s not the gods that burn yes, but a number of these systems are vulnerable, the same leopard’s armor is actually cardboard, no matter how they try to strengthen it structurally, it is well protected only by a weak projection, a already on the side and behind and on top it is very vulnerable and ammunition in the bow, in fact, spread out around the crew, therefore, i think that these tanks will be vulnerable to both our tanks and our artillery, as we know, uh, long-range artillery was the most formidable enemy of tanks in this war, especially by adjusting shells such like our krasnopol. and, of course, helicopters, because an attack helicopter is the same as the black shark k-50 or k-52 oligators, its variant, not 28 mi-28n night hunter, in principle, carry

up to ten, but missiles, which, under a successful set of circumstances can e destroy up ten tanks. therefore, i think that we will be able to give a worthy answer to any number of tanks that will be delivered. let's not talk about any of the ones that are showing up right now, most likely, according to experts in washington, it will be between 80 and 120 tanks realistically over the course of a year. and, of course, you know very well that it will not be limited to this, because there will also be a armored personnel carriers, including those that are unlikely to have an anti-tank gun. that is, it will be a serious force. at the same time there will be delivered, but new missiles, but for the haymoros, which will give the ukrainians the opportunity to shoot from a greater distance and, of course, it is planned to give ukraine new

air defense systems in order to, and not allow the dominance of russian aircraft. here is such a force, if they tried to organize it into a fist, a breakthrough. is that they would all just go or they would have some real potential. well, you know, war does not know any hypothetical scenarios. here is the experience of 11 months. we see that ukrainians, in principle, use tanks to a large extent, singly and as such. well, maybe a long-range sniper rifle, so, uh, until the ukrainians massaged a large number of tanks, including, because then they will become easy prey for our aviation for our e-barrel artillery for volley fire artillery, so we don’t know how they will use it . we must be prepared to experience such use, western technology is complex. yes. uh, you know, there is such a maximum of armed circles,

it is understandable, like any comparison. it uh is such a small truism that now, when you look at american f-16 aircraft, it resembles a swiss watch. and when you look at the russian court 30 or mig-29, it's a flying tank. would you like to fight on a swiss watch or a flying tank? yes , respectively, uh, this is uh, a complex technique that requires, say. the same aviation has good lanes. she demands something completely different. uh, culture is one of the reasons. why did the soviet union greet germany because soviet designers understood that such a tank needed to be made? well , for example, the t-34, so that god forgive the collective farm and vanka could sit down for him and begin to dominate. and the small kolkhoznaya could evacuate it, and we made almost 50,000 of them, and the germans made wonderful tiger tanks of all models, but they did not make more than 6,000 of them. therefore, now the ural wagon plant

delivered about 100 tanks last year. uh, the exact numbers are classified, but we know it's around 100. yes, a little over 100, with a delivery scheduled for this year of about 150 tanks, so we also need to make our own tanks to fight enemy tanks, they must have modern ammunition. well, i already talked about artillery and attack helicopters. that is, the left one is correct, understood? this is not the power that is able to. suppressing the russian armed forces is not a force that should intimidate russia. but this is a serious real force, so remember a few months ago when we talked about another stage, a special military operation. we said that our main problem was that we had little trained infantry, which, relatively speaking, one russian soldier tried. well, speaking like this with black humor, surround three ukrainians now after the mobilization. we have closed our

ranks. we have reduced the line of contact between the front lines. and accordingly, we have every opportunity to inflict a decisive defeat on the ukrainians. however, we must always remain sober. yes, because war is an unpredictable thing. you know, everyone loves to talk. there, the horse, eats, oats, the volga flows into the caspian sea. here he eats fish. here is my cat, for example, eats fish. yes so and here. we have all the prerequisites for victory . how do we implement them? of course, it will depend on the soldiers from our military leaders, who, as everyone says, even in washington, have learned a lot in recent months and proved their abilities, in which they used to be in the west. at least they were not ready to admit, but now they recognize and fear. well, successfully taking solidarity with the beater is unconditional. uh, arrogance, uh, both from ukrainians and from their , uh, western. e curators. we see that

the offensive continues. however, we must understand that while war loves speed, war does not loves to stretch. yes, therefore, uh, of course, uh, ideally uh, our planners should plan, and solve this ukrainian problem of cutting this knot city this year. we cannot afford luxury, but to fight, as we will create hussein for 7 years. well, the last thing anyone would like to say. what if russian military planners, uh, should want to finish in 23 ? can you imagine how long it takes to want to finish in the twenty-third year of the president, biden to enter him in the twenty-fourth year of the presidential election, but in a state unfinished war in ukraine, and god forbid , the american forces will experience some kind of failure there under the american ones. i mean , but the ukrainian ones, which in fact

are not just american wards, but operate under american control. and i can imagine that if you, let’s say, and donald trump was e. biden’s rival in the presidential election, i can imagine that trump said, so senator andrey denisov, who was not so long ago at the over the years, according to china and so, when i think about why washington and i must say in berlin and brussels decided on this escalation, it's because they uh, either convinced themselves, or is it profitable for them to say, that, uh, russia is already doing everything it can, that no further serious retaliatory slaves can be expected from russia. and in particular. they began to say that there was no need to intimidate. and washington brussels is the collective

west, and russian atomic weapons, both strategic and tactical, because russia will not dare to do this. they see no signs that russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons as well, but i'm not as political as they say. moscow will not agree to this, because this will lead to complete isolation of russia in the people and in particular. they hint that the united states managed to influence india and china to clearly tell e russia that the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine would be absolutely unacceptable for china and india. that's when i hear it. first of all, i'm trying to understand, that's the nature of this conversation, when the chinese leaders, when the indian example, then they call putin and say you have no right. we wo

n't let you. i'm talking like this. just a little bit. it's hard to imagine a little, knowing the characteristic relationships. well, besides, there really would be such a sharp reaction, and in new delhi in beijing, absolutely regardless of what the ukrainians would do in response to what russia could take such steps in emergency circumstances. uh, well, you see the position of the people's republic of china regarding the conflict in ukraine it is well known, it is quite, a definite public one has been repeatedly articulated and its essence, in short, boils down to the fact that it is necessary to look for the possibility, most likely, of ending the military phase of the conflict and moving to peaceful, negotiating, uh, ways to resolve it. everyone knows this in the context of this position. uh, china has repeatedly and very

negatively assessed the escalation of the associated conflict associated with the growing supply of weapons. well, first of all, well, actually nato is a strange nato led by the united states. america's score never changed. i think the new escalation phase uh of the conflict uh will get the proper assessment from the chinese side, i haven't seen it yet, but most likely it will be just that, as for the question you asked. well, you know, i'm in this regard, having some experience. eh, distrustful person. it seems to me that there is what is called out of the pigs. um, apparently western. uh, members of this proxy. war proxy. the proxy of the military operation, to a certain extent, calms down themselves, trying to find

some arguments that justify, maybe even in their own eyes. uh, such a change, a change of position and uh, a focus on even more uh, a sharp inflating of uh, the military component of the conflict, but of course we don’t know what was or could be in the negotiations, let’s say the officials of china india well and visavis of the united states of america but that the question could sound in the way it alludes to. uh, i have the united states of america. in this case, just as an observer, it causes great and well- founded doubts. this is despite the fact that china and india first. these are countries with nuclear weapons. secondly, these are countries that have repeatedly declared that they are opposed to the use of nuclear weapons. i was able to talk to a

linguist indian diplomat and i asked him exactly this question, and he began by saying that the use of nuclear weapons was highly undesirable for the government of india. and if suddenly it was applied, what is called for no reason at all, so that, just, uh, to achieve victory over ukraine, what would it really be for india he said, do not want to use the word unacceptable. and this would cause us very serious concern, and he said in moscow, but i know about it, but he said that everything, of course, depends on the circumstances. if this was a response to the escalation, uh another country. uh, if it turned out that under threat, uh, territorial integrity, but the russian federation,

if u ukraine set itself or rather, it was set the task of threatening the security of russia and the territorial integrity of russia who said that india would never welcomed such russian actions, but reacted without understanding, and then he said, he smiled and said. he says, you know, dmitry still everything depends on what the result would be and says the final one, if the result was a quick end to the war. and on some mutually acceptable conditions, well, who would condemn that the war was finally ended, you know, this is a joke, the winners do not judge, and they continue to imitate them quite rightly. it just fits into the box. well so normal logic, if not common sense. i want to be understood correctly, or more precisely,

the main thing is not to be misunderstood, i do not call on a television program for the use of nuclear weapons. this is a very serious decision and it is absolutely right in the russian leadership that such decisions are made only in case of emergency , but i will respond differently to the idea in washington that you can follow the path of creeping escalation and, uh, at the same time reassure the american congress to the american press and the american people that nothing to worry about what is president biden, uh, saying, uh, with his honest open face? i do not want a third world war, there will be no third world war. and now, if the president of the united states really believes in this and does not understand that it is not enough not to want war, but it is required. if you want to take

concrete steps to prevent such a war , then i think that it would be dangerous people in washington, what do you think ruslan, well, you know, everyone terribly wants to be known as churchills. yes, because it is so beautiful, yes, and so wonderful, heritage and such a wonderful pr and no one wants to be branded as a chamberlain, because it's terrible. this is the munich agreement, this is what appeasing the aggressor. look, what ended for some reason, no one wants to think where the attempts were born and plotted them, by the way, at the initial stage, the first world war did not block. the bloodbath turned into a terrible drama, in which millions of people died and the european continent was horrified, so people made every effort to get out of this war. here we are now already in this situation of escalation we've been here for 11 months. and as some observers notice there in different ways. uh,

the calculations of the caribbean crisis was 13-14 days, and rolled back. now it seems that most people live. here in this you know, uh, twitter tik-tok paradigm. it should be very beautiful and bright to say on television. you need to make a very nice meme. yes, and the fact that then millions of people are washed with blood. i, as a person dealing with military issues for more than 25 years before the maidan, i traveled a lot to ukraine, so i was amazed all the time there, and how much the people are, well let's say so neutral or about russian and as far as as soon as a person. it popped out from somewhere . he immediately instantly became a terrible russophobe. i remember how i was told in the ministry of defense that even under yanukovych yes, the problem was to transfer money to crimea to our servicemen. they tried to take away the lighthouses from us. we were constantly put up with some kind of obstacles, and therefore no one

understands that the russian start was almost a year ago, a special military operation. it was truly an ultimatum. we have done everything possible to influence this hostile education by non-military means. thank you. with us now is semyon pegov, a well-known war correspondent, semyon is very glad that you have prepared this film and even more glad that you agreed to show it on channel one , before we show your film, could you say a few words. under what conditions did you film it and what is it about? and colleagues i greet you, but the film, perhaps, is probably too strong a word, this is a special report, rather about how the day before throughout. e two days unfolded an operation to destroy the enemy’s temporary deployment point in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe settlement of orlovka, which is also located near donetsk, aveyskaya direction - this is the settlement where the enemy was

concentrated on the battalion, and several companies were stationed directly in the houses. from where they had already evicted, civilians were deployed in the nearby landings, and the uniqueness of this report lies in the fact that we managed to accompany the operation at all its stages. that is, we did not just work with artillerymen, which struck at the location of the enemy, we managed to visit the headquarters of the drones that we occupy. intelligence, which, in fact, found this target, uh, delivered it. uh, all the necessary materials for the command proved that this goal is expedient, judging by the fact that there really is a large number of personnel equipment and then , interacting with the gunners, they corrected the fire. i took our units and destroyed the enemy. in

general, we were able to visit. uh, where uh the headquarters of the drone is located and we saw in real time how the targets were hit, and also managed to go directly to the artillery crews to see how they work and now i think you yourself will see everything. thanks a lot. we will watch your report. thank you today we have an absolutely unique opportunity to accompany the operation to destroy the air defense, uh, the enemy in the avdeevsky direction of the air defense, well, this is a temporary deployment point. uh, there are clusters from a company to an enemy battalion. it is there in the region of 200 dash 400 personnel, as well as artillery, including self-propelled guns, which hit donetsk directly . here he is, here he is. yes, yes, they found him a self-propelled gun, they are shooting at the moment in donetsk. let's work it

out quickly now. someone who quickly aims , someone opens fire first. all our guns, of course, are carefully camouflaged, hidden in landings and advanced to the firing line. only when the target has already been declared is now 100 b - these are self-propelled howitzers, and the 152 mm caliber comes out. in fact, at the edge will continue to work on fortifying the enemy area, just in orlovka not a quiet thing right now, working in the avdeysk direction, i understand that just success and its guarantee. 19 19

40 meters to the east is the position of the enemy, where , in fact, there was personnel serving lightly armored vehicles, including nato, which helped the enemy to restrain our offensive on the avdeysky lines. now, of course, to our attack aircraft. now it will be much easier. there are actually several for one position machines. eh, just in mode. uh, non-stop

is in the fields, according to the principle, carousels replace each other, that is, such a revolver on the outskirts of donetsk, is constantly loaded, as soon as the enemy tries to take some contours, attacking actions, tries to move them somewhere and his scouts blocks movement. right there, uh, rocket artillery. enters the fight. after our gunners attacked the traffic rules, i will remind you of the enemy’s temporary deployment points in the orlovka area. yes avdeevskoe direction. they at the nazis began to try counter attack on the other flanks. literally. tonight, our scouts discovered enemy infantry in the amount of twenty people. and as a result of which ours does not grow with its own combat vehicles, it should have failed . on them, the fire impact of the

enemy infantry was destroyed a little. tell us about this car, what is fundamentally different from tornado. the machine differs from the same hail in that, e, an automatic fire guidance system is built into it. that is, the calculation was the machine is induced directly from the cab. uh, what lets reduce the time to open fire? well, how long does it take, for example, to deploy the car to work out to collapse? uh, and, in general, evacuate from the place where the work was going on? all this in the complex will take 5 minutes no more than 5 minutes. they say that nutov's equipment is elusive, of course, it is really mobile, if we are talking about artillery installations, such as caesar's three sevens and so on, but we are not far behind either. in particular , tornado can also very actively move along the front to work out and again go into cover. the opponent's crow collapsed under

solidarity there is no doubt that our unit will be able to push through the neo-nazis, and in the avdiivka area. including thanks to our artillery, an unmanned e-scout, which is directly in the mode, 24/7 accompanies our attack aircraft on the outskirts of kovdeevka and another settlement near donetsk, especially for the big game and channel one. thank you very much semyon. this is a very interesting report. and we would like to ask you one question and i will not ask it to you . and ruslan pukhov, who is probably well known to you. this is one of the leading russian military experts, and he understands these issues much better.

i am ruslan semyon, please tell me that in your special report and over the past 11 months we have seen the revival of the role of artillery, conflict and questions are constantly exaggerated, but shell hunger. for ukrainians, this opinion of experts is growing stronger in the media space. please tell me which of this information is true. there is such a projectile voice overcome. is this a problem or has never been. not really, of course because there is some work on certain sectors of the front, as well as our supply unit and, of course, enemy units. most importantly, who will get out of this situation, who on what flank will be able to accumulate the required number of shells to complete the task , will also calculate the enemy’s plan, will be able to predict it and say. so leaving

a certain amount of ammo in order to prevent him from counter attacking it all, in fact, happens absolutely in live mode. yes, and it kind of is, maybe maybe even a military secret. yes, therefore, of course, to reveal the real situation about how much ammunition we have there or in another place is not entirely from our point of view. right. well, the fact that we have something to work with and the fact that the guys on the other hand are trying not to use ammunition, what is called there in vain just for the sake of shooting milk or there for some formal purpose that everyone understands that until our industry is fully mobilized , every ammunition is needed to use this understanding as accurately as possible , and of course, and everyone adheres to this particular line. thanks a lot. thanks for the great reporting. and for this interesting conversation. and now i want to move on to a slightly different topic and completely different. i don’t want to

say to the front, let’s say, to another center of american attention, but to the asia-pacific and you know that not so long ago the prime minister of japan, kashida, visited washington, and that a very large program of militarization of japan was announced unprecedented, as far as i understand from the time, and the second world war. that, uh, japan, in general, is positioning itself more and more actively. and as a containment center for china, uh, working together with the united states and how washington hopes also with the indians, australia, and so on. if you want a moment in the us-japanese cooperation will take place in early february. e, visit to beijing a anthony b. linke to

the secretary of state. mostly. basically one way or another e about military affairs. and it's hmm it's extremely dangerous, disturbing the escalation of the change in the japanese position, of course, brings even more tension. you are an already troubled region there is no open. uh, let's say the fighting, as we say on the western flank, the confrontation, but hmm. this is playing with fire leads to constant balancing. well, literally on the edge. after all , there is a korean peninsula. there are contradictions connected with korea, there are, uh, the situation around taiwan, aggravated due to the fault of the initiative from the americans, and there are a number of other points. well, maybe, uh, a little further away from this particular area. i mean the situation in relations between

india and pakistan. and where is between china and india? unfortunately, there is also calm at the border, while it is far away, but so on. in a word, this region, which is still recently. it was so quite to itself. hmm, relatively calm, as far as, in principle, a large region can be calmer than the modern world. now it has turned into another hot spot against this background. uh, blinkin's hanging. it's uh, well, how to say? this is a continuation of this development. contacts that were between the top leaders of the united states and china at the end of last year, then uh citipin and biden, agreed that there would be a visit from blinkin and uh, the thing is that the statement of the american side. they are fundamentally at odds with the case. uh, with the practical steps that the americans are taking for sure from blinking on nicknames from all

sorts of reassuring statements that we are loyal to the three kamenikeis, we see china as partners or are aiming for some kind of military confrontation and so on. all this has already been said more than once, and that's it. it turned out. basically, a play on words. e. it will be like, most likely, framing e, when moving to the main part of the americans' entries, namely attempts. that's what we've been talking about, uh, bow china uh. well, let's put it this way, uh hmm separator of the americans' arguments, at least to some extent, but i have already spoken about this and am ready to repeat that i do not believe that i am not only not believed, this is not a question in the world i do not believe. it's more of a question. well , let's say political analysis. it seems to me that, as he said. how did you say? chief

chinese negotiator at the first meeting top diplomats of china and the united states in enchorage no vanchorage, i think it was in hawaii in the twenty-first year. e that e, if you want to feed this muck to the chinese people, you will not succeed. well, here's uh one thing that i understand blinkin will be trying to feed u while in beijing is the uh american stance on cooperation. china with russia , let's hear what the press secretary of the white house of carinchampires has just said about this. the united states found that the chinese companies supplying non-lethal aid to russia what the united states is telling

the chinese government about this we are monitoring the situation closely. first the wars. we will continue to bring information to china about the consequences of providing material assistance to russia in the war against ukraine, we have said many times. what the support for russian aggression against ukraine will lead to, we said, we warned, we gave facts, and we made it very clear what the consequences would be. can you imagine that you were that kind of tone spoke to the chinese leadership. blinkin is still not the lady we just saw on the screen, it is. well, a little different caliber. uh, diplomats are experts talking. he will most likely be the same. but what about the chinese side, most likely it will also answer, as it answered before, no e, no material. as you say, we

do not provide assistance to russia. yes, as a matter of fact, she does not need it, and in response they will declare what, again, they always declare. what in order to create the conditions for the transition of the conflict in the peaceful phase, it is necessary to stop the escalation in the supply of weapons to the kiev regime, and, it seems to me that the events in just the last few days that led to the political escalation of the conflict give rise to such a formulation of the question, after all, you can, of course, from a military point of view, talk about . the potential of the supplied weapons, the means to counter them, and so on. this military analysis is quite correct, but it seems to me that in this case i am not an expert in military affairs, but it seems to me that the political the significance of what is happening significantly outweighs the military component from the point of view of precisely the escalation of confrontation. well,

you know well e, not only china well , you know japan quite well and you, of course, have come across a lot, but with japan and when you were deputy foreign minister and according to russia, he is, i don’t know how to say this, yours is right instinctive feeling, here the united states does not make the mistake of speaking out. uh, gina out of the bottle by japanese militarization. can the united states be sure that this retarization of e is not will turn against the united states itself because, uh, the japanese leadership is traditionally very pro-american, but the mood in the country and even in the japanese parliament, and they include a large element of distrust and even irritation towards the united states. well, we see. what

emotional tension the events take on in european. e theater, e precisely in force. e that instantly wakes up instantly. uh, historical memories historical assessments, this also applies to germany and other european countries uh, it’s quite possible and i can't judge it. definitely , i’m still not ponist, and the mood in japanese society should still be guided by some sociological measurements, but it seems to me that this is also possible, but this argument that you mentioned is rather in order to feed it to domestic american audiences at this stage. well, hardly. eh, you can translate into a practical plane those questions about which you said that it would not end, so, as you know, let the cockerel live in the forest. she is his and kicked out, probably far from that. but the fact that japan is recklessly

moving towards an aggravation of confrontation not only with china why are we talking only about china, because our country is next to the russian federation this is a threat to us in our far east after all. this will not benefit e at all, normalizing the situation around the korean peninsula in a word is just eh, just another reckless step without miscalculating it. well, at least in the medium term. here, i would say so, thank you, and you heard ruslan another reckless move. that's what i want to talk to you about, right after the first one. your ticket here is your car everything is in its best form alone you are given a dream in a colorful paradise

three centuries of continuous cinema, as surgery with sterile linen comes true everything that is prophesied leaves the train to heaven a happy path. oh, how we want, how we all want not to die, namely. the earth hero did not lose heart and does not cry out for our cries. he is deaf. one of us went to heaven. he will meet god there, probably god you passed him hello, and they will call nothing will survive. we have a few years left. we have lived, and as expected

, everything that is prophesied comes true, the train goes to heaven happy. as we want, as everyone. we want not to die, namely, on the eighty-fifth birthday of vladimir vysotsky, the hinges are the weakest points. why do you need

so many cards, if any, one halva with an installment plan of 10 months? until 6%. everything i need from different maps is in halva, just one map for everything is based on history. you know he's all talking now? fantastic me or richard you both richard royal tea lying. mom needs to check her heart, let's go to gemotest, they have a campaign for tests for 290 rubles. yes. it also has a son. hello hi mom. they signed you up for tests at gemotest, in your city there is a program country gemotest three basic analyzes for 290 rubles. free

medical consultation. tov cybernedelnik market buy a kitfort upright vacuum cleaner for only 1.000 790 rubles. and

pay split. the point does not work polyoxidonium for colds and flu at any stage of the disease polyoxidonium when others do not work for one my basket for 169 rubles. at kfc, pay less discount.

hypothermia is not scary if you strengthen the immunity of the bladder ronex, a unique combination of three natural components of cranberry demonose vitamin d3 that support the protective barrier of the bladder uranect triple protection formula and a course of 7 days. there is a big game on the air and we are talking about the foreign policy of the united states, policies that have greatly contributed to the conflict in ukraine around ukraine and policies that many fear now will create a new conflict, a new hotbed of tension, and on pacific far east direction. and

so, when you look at the growing american military presence in the pacific region, the efforts of the united states to organize some new military paramilitary groups are openly directed against china and to some extent against russia . actions usually give rise to opposition. well, you know, it's very interesting to watch. uh, americans for many years. uh, they built their relationship on a bilateral basis, well, there the usa thailand yes there the usa indonesia and now we see the creation the attempt to create such a pacific is an attempt to create, uh, an anti, chinese union based on australia, japan, the united states, and uh, hmm, the involvement of india is what is so

alarming for russia, that is, the americans are switching to such multi-format things, you know, when the americans fail to do something then to subdue and make american they usually try to internationalize these problems. and this is now a rational problem. well, that is, we will also decide here. we are the most important thing here. we are well aware that we are also married, yes. throughout the wonderful territory that the voice of albania is estonia but of course it is as important as the voice of the united states but we are well aware that without the permission of the united states nothing will be there. and by the way, it's doubly strange to see now that the americans are actually indulging in, uh, remilitarization. e hmm germany, because if germany or metalizes, i think it will definitely not seem a little to everyone, and it will be worse than japan, because these are like genes yes, just recently the great and thinker jurgenkabermas said uh the notion that a terrible thing has been happening

for more than 70 years germany has been made a big, but pacifist giant, and now it is being elementalized. so, just like how, how kissinger was called, there he was a useful putin idiot who survived from the mind of a person, but he understands what he is talking about. his youth fell on the time of the third reich, and he remembers what grief he brought. uh, metallized germany, so of course. look at what the americans are doing both in europe and in the asian-tikhovensky region. to me at least very strange, especially now with the biden, the biden, with all its not obvious mistakes of an eighty-year-old elderly gentleman. after all, this is a person who was already quite mature when there was a caribbean crisis, this is a person who came here and met with gromyko, and in contrast to a huge number of presidents. before him, advisers cannot fool him. like it was with trump, like it was with young obama, tell him something and stress that they know this topic. better

biden, professional international. why is he behaving like this? irresponsibly, i have absolutely no words, except that here is the thirst to show myself. here is a strong leader of the dark day was not afraid to take responsibility for the failure of the operation against cuba. although he didn’t plan it, yes, he was not afraid to seem like a weakling, when he actually succumbed to khrushchev and pulled out jupiter missiles from turkey, but the truth must be said, there were no social networks then. he was going to, uh, get them out of there under all conditions, so i would