unprecedented and emphasized this is nothing but an attempt by external forces to eradicate the traditional faith and incite enmity. dmitry kochetkov will tell you what else was discussed today in the state duma. usually , laws are passed in one or more readings in the building on the okhotny ryad. but today there are completely different readings, christmas ones. in the duma corridors guests are wearing church vestments. the deputies warmly greet the religious figures. patriarch kirill opens meetings of all denominations , of course, at the church. there is a position on a special military operation. among chaplains already have five dead task. a christian warrior, honestly and most accomplished in fulfilling his duty on the battlefield, preserves spiritual nobility and dignity. fighting the enemy for a christian, it should not turn into hatred for an individual, which

is accompanied by incredible cruelty, as we know . the ukrainian church is subjected to unprecedented persecution from the state authorities. these persecutions are comparable in their reason to mahu and cynicism. except perhaps with persecution for the faith of the twentieth century in our country. this can be regarded as part of a global external order for the destruction of canonical orthodoxy within a single country of ukraine on the issues of protecting spiritual values , all parliamentary factions have a unified position. today in our hall it will be for all faiths, when we talk about global challenges and threats to our country, we must understand the first blows to this. it is against institutions.

in order to destroy the country and enslave a person by the institution of the presidency by the institution of the church and by the institution of the family , therefore, our task is to do everything to protect the family, to protect our faith, by defending our institution of the presidency, we return our country our right to choose. how can we live? because when we talk about challenges, this is very important. we see what happened. with the strange ones who lost their independence, their independence, their sovereignty, the leaders of the faction talk about the challenges that the country faces. overcome the forces to do everything so that people feel the changes for the better. to cope with the males in the future, lay down the foundations for the future development of russia, everything is in our hands. we want to change the world. we must change ourselves. today it seems to me that this is the word.

comes from this hall, i think with the fact that he should change in himself the anti-human ideology that is being imposed by this collective west, all these, uh, their laws recognizing same-sex marriages that parents, maybe not even one and two and not even three four, but there to infinity, all this nonsense from the point of view of common sense from the point of view of christian values. eh, he just pursues exactly that goal to impose an ideology of consumption. and, of course, we oppose for us it is extremely important and coordinated to conduct international politics. hitlers and schols come and go the german people are already there and not only serbia well already bulgaria already croatia hungary i am sure they will join me. many in the last fight. e in human history with nazism in any of its manifestations by the forces of evil,

russia is the russian world, and our holy church will once again win, we have no other choice, and the representatives of france new people let me remind you that until 1934, on the site of the state duma building, there was a temple of paraskeva pyatnitsa on the okhotny ryad. there is a proposal to the deputies representing the believers of the country. in memory of that 500-year-old temple. in one of the premises of the state duma, for the first time, arrange an orthodox chapel, completing the christmas readings, the patriarch and the speaker of the state duma presented diplomas to the young winner of the international competition of children's creativity, the beauty of god world of work guys. now you can see the flora of the state duma in the drawings at the exhibition. family, friends, home and nature dmitry kochetkov alexander rankov dmitry bendarev zulfiya khakimova channel one india is celebrating

its main national holiday today. republic day in the capital hosted a grandiose military parade, foreign guests and tens of thousands of spectators in the ranks of indian -made equipment in the sky, military fighter helicopters, including our modernized judges on the holiday of leadership. vladimir putin congratulated india on telegram, which was published on the website of the kremlin, the president noted that russia attaches great importance from this side. india's achievements in economic , social, scientific, technical and other fields are well known. your country is making a significant contribution. contribution to ensuring international stability and security in addressing important issues on the regional and global agenda , we attach great importance to the relationship of privileged strategic partnership between our states , i am sure that by joint efforts we will ensure further building up mutually beneficial bilateral cooperation. in all directions. this undoubtedly meets the fundamental interests of the friendly peoples

of russia and india. residents of the new regions will begin to receive pensions according to russian standards as early as march 1, mikhail mishustin said at a government meeting. many of those who are entitled to payments now, for obvious reasons, do not have the opportunity to confirm their earnings and experience , special interdepartmental commissions will help them. the benefit will be received and the unemployed will receive more than a billion rubles to speed up work to improve the standard of living in new regions 2 days ago the president received the prime minister on the first results oleg shishkin residents of the new territories that became part of russia should be provided with the same state support measures as other citizens of the country and, first of all, we are talking about the social sphere , the difficult security situation affects the economy of the donbass of the kherson region and zaporozhye, the government proposes to consider the living wage in these regions as specially prepared the government draft law provides for a special procedure for establishing the average subsistence minimum; its size is used

to calculate the volume. e assistance, including a single allowance for needy families, which was introduced in the country on january 1. e, at the initiative of the head of state in these four russian subjects, it will be received by pregnant women, as well as families in which children under 17 are brought up. all-russian measures of social protection will apply to people with disabilities and other privileged categories of citizens next year in the new republics and regions it will be possible to conclude a social contract to receive a subsidy for the poor to study or start a business , such support will help a person overcome the complexity of the situation and stand up another bill regarding pensions for residents of the new territory. it provides that from march 1 pension. for their residents, they will be appointed on the basis of applications according to russian standards; many now do not have the opportunity to confirm their earnings and experience

by providing documents from work, givers or state or municipal authorities. in such situations, specially created interdepartmental commissions will help, the situation has been approved no worse. they will see to it that the rights of citizens are protected. as well as throughout the country, pensions and allowances for them will be indexed from the timely fulfillment of such obligations, the quality of life of people directly depends, and they must be clearly executed in every region of the russian federation. benefit support. benefits. additional payments all this requires legislative regulation of bills for the inclusion of new regions in the system of mandatory social insurance has already been prepared in the document and the rules for assigning according to domestic standards, benefits for pregnancy and childbirth, as well as for care, and for a child under

one and a half years old, which were not previously provided for in donetsk luhansk people's republics, zaporozhye and kherson regions. their residents will also be able to receive compensation in case of accidents. on production and occupational diseases in accordance with ours once again. legislation, moreover, if earlier such payments were assigned to a person in a larger amount before march 1. they will remain in the same volume. another important topic is support for those residents who, for various reasons , are left without work. the prime minister stressed that everything must be done to ensure that payments are provided to everyone who needs it for unemployment benefits. in the new regions of the republics, the government will send billions, rubles, alekshino ekaterina the first russian channel. the builders of the academy of sciences have already installed the third span of the left road part of the crimean bridge. this work was completed ahead of schedule. as a result , traffic on the remaining lanes opened earlier. what was planned with the help of a jack

in a giant structure was moved to the supporting pedestals. and now it should descend and take its design position, as it already happened with the two previous spans. next in line. another one will be installed in 5 days and soon. after that it will be possible to install asphalt traffic, all four lanes should be restored in march. and that 's all for now we are following the development of events, and the information channel on the first will continue the program time will tell. hello , as part of the information channel on the first program, time will tell is working live. i’m artyom sheinin today, as a matter of fact , and it’s already been the twelfth month, as we will talk about a special military operation, which we have been talking about for a long time. i hope we finally stated that this is only

one of the areas of our, and confrontation of our conflict with the american-centric west, which is taking place on the battlefield, that in fact all this all this confrontation is of a much broader nature, and including the nature of this confrontation extends to the economy to the ideological sphere, and if you like, this is the mental part of the mental confrontation or, if you like, mental warfare. ah, ours with the west, that is, this is a conversation about whose, so to speak, semantic attitudes. whose willingness to go to the end in what this or that side considers for right, and this is one of the most important, and many people think that i, in general, agree with them, and the most important component of how it all ends and for whom it all ends, namely the mental war, the strength in it, the determination in it, and understanding moreover, uh, what frontiers and where to retreat is impossible and uh in this

very mental war as well as in the war on the battlefield. and everything is about. all uh, the same thing. it's just that maybe not everyone understands this, because it seems that these are different things. no, they are not different things. it's all the same in today's world and if tonight, ah, the armed forces of the kiev regime tried to make a sortie to cross the dnieper in the area of ​​nova kakhovka and er, this sortie was stopped by our armed forces, it was exactly the same and on the battlefield, but attempts to break through in the ideological in the mental sphere. here i will give you one example, but literally yesterday, which shows that just like on the battlefield, where any attempt to break through or reconnaissance in force must be stopped. a? and if you don't stop, then it is fraught with negative

consequences. here is an example from in my opinion , the mental ideological confrontation of any front yesterday? the international olympic committee also made such a reconnaissance sortie, it must be said, not for the first time, because before that the american olympic committee was the first, which some time ago, through the mouth of its chairman, already made such a kind of small reconnaissance sortie, when something like that, and let's we are, as it were, russians, for example, but without the flag from the anthem, and then we are a lot about they talked about it, and i talked about it and wrote about it, and all this and said that, well, if this is a reconnaissance sortie, then there should be some kind of silence in response to it. well, sometimes it happens when you don’t need to answer for reconnaissance in battle. that 's when the question arises, what to solve your opponent, the opponent, apparently, decided that, well , maybe not there. e, as it were, nothing that we reconnoiter and decided to make another sortie. yesterday, now by the forces

of the international olympic committee, declaring that the international olympic will consider permission. russian athletes attention, who did not support their own. when i read this, i wondered. this is where the international olympic committee is. where is the support anyway? which? well, i wrote in my telegram about this. last night was tougher than words. i can’t tell them on the air, but i roughly wrote that , probably, the international olympic committee somehow confused the ramses a little, but this is the softest thing you can translate because what the hell does the international olympic committee care about supporting an athlete or i personally don’t understand any special military operation at all, because it didn’t even occur to them to find out to support , for example, american e, athletes, certain operations of the united states of america that not all countries of the world support, it doesn’t occur to them to ask athletes,

israel, how are they treat the occupation of the palestinian territories in violation of the un resolution in the same way they do not ask arab athletes how they feel about this, it would never occur to anyone to make criteria for participation in the olympic games, for example, uh, relationship between north korean and south korean athletes. the conflict between this one people can be listed as much as you like, but this criterion was not applied anywhere. why is it attached here? the answer is just at the beginning of what i started with, because they feel that they are here in our russian mental line of defense. perhaps they think they still remember the positions when we discussed it in august in september. here at this turn, that we don’t have very much defensive lines there and that’s why they put all their glue in there and the blows ended with what it will end exactly in the same situation, when he feels that somewhere our positions are not very firm. they

will continue to move there, but yesterday, when the international olympic committee landed in force with this, uh, reconnaissance. to be honest, i was glad, because right away, almost. well, in my opinion, i wrote all these evil words about amok and literally there for an hour and a half. the president of the olympic committee of the russian federation reacted immediately, a, who wrote that ukraine does not agree with the restriction of the international olympic committee on the return of the russians competitions. i thought, well, wow, wow, that is, at least we already have some kind of defense line. as it were , the lugansk direction has already been slowly built. moreover, i was even more glad when, some time after that, the minister of sports of the russian federation spoke in the same vein that, as it were, here, well, there is no place for speculation. oh, and i absolutely support this about it and wrote, then and said now that there is no need to

mix it into one, because this is also my own kind of overton window. yes, i already think so. well, everything has been built, so we are holding on to the defense lines. what was my surprise when this morning i rejoiced yesterday at the statement of the chairman of the olympic committee of the russian federation that i did not agree to read the statement of the vice-president of the olympic committee of the russian federation that, in fact , the statement could - this is already a success. that is, that, as it were, this is generally a good sign, because, well, so to speak, in general, well, as if they are ready to tell us. well, yes, there is no flag without an anthem and for some reason on the basis. well , that's actually a good sign. well, i don’t know, maybe this game of good and bad cops, i don’t know, but i was surprised. and why am i talking about the fact that this, of course, is always a test, because exactly after it appeared today, er, a statement that, well, actually, we are glad, how well they are ready to talk with us. so, on such

conditions. well, basically it's good. right now, a frenchwoman joins this one for a minute, the mayor of paris, where will to take place on the 24th year of the olympic games and says, in general, it’s very. this is their athletes or this whole story says so, but i, like most of the sports movement , are in favor of the russian delegation not performing under the russian flag. that is, she heard in the morning that, like, well, actually, we are glad that you are ready to let us go there on some conditions. she says, yes, they are ready without a flag and without an anthem, she says, moreover, she says that in the twenty-fourth year she thinks that the conflict will already end. that is, she informs us about that. that even when the conflict is over, as some think? well, somehow we are now all this, as it were, a blunder and return, everything as it was, she says no, guys, well, as if even when the conflict ends for you, it will not be like it was. you'll say it anyway, if it

ends, not on your terms, you'll be in a sump somewhere with no flag. without. that is, she has already planned that in the twenty-fourth year it will be like this and we will have to agree to this and is pushing us on this is why i pay so much attention to this, because we in this studio talked about it very often about what is most important. well, at least one of the most important ones. in my opinion, the most important conditions for our victory is our unity, understanding, and readiness to go. until the end, and the understanding that it will not be as it was, and any attempts to rewind there, as it was, are fraught with only defeat for us, because i understand everything, it’s hard to leave the comfort zone. i want to go back to something, to something that was and so further. we often talk about this here, but in order to better explain this thought of ours , uh, which will be very important for what we will talk about later in the program, both about military and political about

geopolitical relations, and a few days ago very important an idea and a very important post was written by alexei chudaev, a repeated participant in our conversations. that's about this mental war and our readiness or incomplete readiness for it. and here i am, right before the broadcast. especially for you , i posted this post. right now during the commercial. read it. it is very clearly and very clearly written what is for us. now here is this obstacle of movement to victory, oddly enough, but you will see that it is not strange there. the logic of the obstacle to movement towards victory is for us the fact that for many, victory is not a goal, but partly defeat, maybe for some, for whom you are now reading a short advertisement, you will have time to read it, then we will return to continue. among them, there is only one way, may my sins

be forgiven for ours, because we have such a people. good hour, good hour. good hour in my soul, but do not rush deep hands wider. it is sewn on the well-groomed paths of the protopole horses horses went out under god under the god of war artillery, we were covered with a little interference a little less, where are my 17 years of premieres for the 85th anniversary of vladimir vysotsky on

saturday in the first season in hand and dress profitably 599 rubles. ola jacket for 1.499 rubles. cancan trousers for 399 rubles.

and sausages up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, just one card for everything, sugar is elevated or cholesterol is jumping , blood pressure is jumping, cardioactive taurine is the best, treatment of cardioactive taurine evalar is twice as profitable at the price of sovcombank go straight to the point decided to repair everything in the kubanka, a loan of up to 5 million. it's time to drink a hangover vacuum cleaner on yandex.market cyber ​​weeks and hyper jewelry and sokolov watches with a discount of 70% . i said tantum verta. boys make more sore throats with

different flavors. yesterday's not the day before yesterday, or something, i can die paying pay, but what button pay online? can you pay? as you wish, each as it suits him. choose your payment method with the payment system world and system. get 35 gb of the popular social network and video services in yota 350 minutes for 399 rubles. in all salons megafon number

install the tinkov application and transfer money easily and without commission. the bank is worth considering. you're watching your health there, i'm lying down, mom needs to check her heart, let's go to the hemotest tests for 290 yes, he also has a son here. hello hi mom. they signed you up for

tests at the hemotest in your city program country gemotest three basic analyzes for 290 rubles. a free consultation with a doctor continues to work live and starting the program with words about how important it is to be persistent in the mental ideological confrontation. actually we are now moving on to the immediate battlefield. and where? in general , this mental component is also very important, because, of course, our opponents are enemies. choose what you like to call them today. e. they are, of course, their every action. well, formally, military or military technical, they also use it, of course, as such an attempt to push us through in such a psychological sense, because, of course, this is the story with the tanks, which was smeared by them there for several weeks, and because of which well the whole of europe and america followed exactly, and i think many in

the world followed. it was also such a, as it were, cheating, what is it, but, how is it so subconscious? well, they’ll give it, they won’t let it, tanks will give it, they won’t let it, tanks are implicitly promoting the idea that, well, if they give it, then like, remember javelins, remember lavas, remember hymers. yes, these are not children's toys, but each of these operations. she, of course, still had this psychological character, that everything is now, as it were, ed. well, now we’ll start with the fact that it’s a kirdyk or not a kirdyk, which means that biden spoke yesterday, and said that, uh, he decided to send 31 tanks there. and this well, as i understand it, uh, they have less than a battalion, but according to our european ideas. it's about. but, as it were, a battalion, but a tank one. eh, this is to the fact that here, well, this is being presented to some. generally on the battlefield. e action, but in fact it is still only e, and

the battalion, well, many other countries. oh , of course, they also immediately began to subscribe to this, that, here we will give tanks there, and if we give tanks, we will send them to ukraine well, you remember yesterday. he changed his shoes so quickly on the fly, and having said that their goals, it turns out, is their initiative to move these tanks there, and transfer them there, these tanks have already begun to appear today on publications that the british challenger because the british they, of course, just kind of waited for all this for the british challengers to get on the battlefield. uh, already by the end of march a and uh, publications began to appear. uh, that these very american abrams tanks will arrive in poland, uh, in the spring. well, it's like a veil, because what is uh in the spring, well, well, well, in poland they will get in the spring. and when they get from poland to ukraine and

so on, but nevertheless, this is why i say, this is the question of psychological pressure, that is, us, uh, psychologically set everyone up. well, us and us here and the ukrainians, who are also spitting blood there. they are told, guys, like, there will soon be this iron fist. it's like here, that is, it's all the time spring spring spring spring, brand, number of tanks already here, no matter how important. i think that from the point of view of neurolinguistic programming, this is how it works, that is, again, this is a certain milestone, until which you hold on, and then, as it were, help will come, what kind of help it will be. how many of these tanks will be, what can be decided not that a battalion, even a tank regiment, yes, even a tank division, can everything be decided on a front that stretches thousands of kilometers. although, of course, this is also not a toy, but in any case, it’s not uh, not what latvia u conveys, that is, it is clear that when we say that the americans are british there. transferring tanks. well, this, of course, well , sensitive, that is, you can

talk about it with humor, so to speak, but this, of course, is not latvia, which transmits uh, these same quad bikes. and what is very important. oh, which is very important. uh, scooters she passes. here and there here it’s very important to understand that, well, latvian scooters are a reason for such total a trolling, because they just really want to be like everyone else. here, but the tanks - well. the reason for the low-key jokes the british jump out of their pants for joy, because, well, it's like, finally everyone is united. everything now will go the world has united against evil, it means we are evil, and so on and so forth. actually. in my opinion, again to the question that everything is not quite what it seems, this is a confrontation. well, much more more complex than, as it were, with a good west , which means bad russians, uh, the british actually do, but they celebrate, it seems to me, yes, in general, i’m sure of it. first of all

, they defeated the germans, first of all, with this decision about tanks, they bent the germans. and that was the main task. they solved it through the poles through the balts, and so on and so forth, the germans, in turn, despite the fact that yes, they were bent over, they were bent over, they were forced to crawl away. well, listen to the german deputy, because we, too, tend to speak. there are germans, there are all germans now, the germans have a very different attitude to all this, here's a deputy for you, please. you have just said goodbye to the fundamental provisions of germany's foreign policy of the post-war period, germany's special responsibility for the sacrifice of the second world war was meaningful for a young country, and your great predecessors helmut schmidt and brand placed a special stake on the peace slogan. never again meant refusing to supply weapons to conflict zones. it's always been the core german foreign policy.

you will probably go down in history as the chancellor who trampled on this legacy. he addresses the german chancellor , but, of course, they will tell me, well, you understand, this is a deputy, an alternative for germany , it is clear that they are there by position. they will now use every opportunity to get the authorities to agree there in parts. so well, here's the minister of defense of that very germany, a member of the very government that is headed, listen to this story. i don't understand those who are ready to shout hallelujah for about the fact that tanks will now be sent for this no. the topic is about combat. there is nothing joyful, nothing joyful no, says pistorius, and he means a lot of this phrase, because this is the same pistorius who a few days ago, when he and his chancellor had not yet been forced into this decision. and enough. well, so to speak, clearly everyone. uh, she told everyone that well, this action has a price and there may be a price, and said

that this price, in fact, can extend to the well-being of the german people. it's just that this version of the quote does not have it. well, that's easy to check. well, this is now their experience. how will this end for them? the price is not the price, the german people the german people, as they say, they have made their choice. yes, under pressure. let them obviously bent. they resisted as much as they could, but it doesn't matter, we are now interested in reality. which one way or another will start to appear on the train. now we need to talk and discuss. this is ah, despite the fact that in the western world itself, including, uh, in america about these very tanks. it's not like this programming reality. and as already the reality of combat, there are many different all sorts of interesting ideas. well, here you are, for example, the american military about these same abrams, which were transmitted and announced with such pomp. we have known for 30 years that

gas turbine engines are a disaster. this is an engine designed for jet aircraft at 15,000 feet. they are for ground use. and this is an engine that should send the tank towards the enemy at a speed of 50-60 km / h, but the tank does not need driving at such a speed abrams m1 has many problems for the europeans and we do not have enough potential to wage a major conflict. we simply do not have this among the russians. he's got their factories running 24 hours a day and contrary to popular belief. they don't end up with anything. they have more than they need. so it's all very dangerous. that's it, it's very dangerous, he says, uh, an american military realist, and here i'm talking, here lies this line for us. yes, like some kind of political, informational and so on battle. here is the story of the tanks. further

let them deal with it themselves, realities are now important for us, because sooner or later, in one quantity or another, of course , these tanks will go there, but they will do it and we need to understand their pluses and minuses, that is, we now need to move away from this one here are the stories, as if about tanks in general, like some kind of something that, well, how to move more to reality. here we are returning to it, in fact, there is. eh, a lot, but all sorts of other factors that well help us look at , er, the same abrams, well, without any superfluous. uh, arrogance, so to speak, but quite realistic, as it should be in a war , you need to evaluate the enemy; this tank has many advantages, but here are the shots of how this tank is in winter, a is trying to overcome. uh slide, and i think such slides uh in the upcoming theater of operations, about everywhere they are indicative, because it's 80 t - it's good for sand. it probably shows itself well. uh, well, on some other

harder terrain, but few where it was used in the snow. and i think that there are few places where it was used in chernozems, because there are no such places anywhere. looking at this, you don’t need to say. ha ha ha. but that is, it's not irresistible ; moreover, it's okay, it's a training ground there. but here you are, please, already, as it were, biting the reality that are fighting with saudi, i now leave aside the political overtones. who's right there? who is wrong there? well, you can see these men in sandals and, uh, kalashnikovs, but, of course, they probably didn’t bring their entire arsenal here. but these are the guys who, well, obviously they don’t have all the modern air defense systems. and if anyone doesn’t know, these are the same abrams, which burn and, in principle, as far as i understand for the entire time of the conflict. here's one that involves the houthis and the saudis. here's another one. uh, how would abrams end and for the entire time of this conflict with saudi arabia. in general, there is already a dozen of

those destroyed. eh, these same abrams. i say this, to which i say to the fact that this is not something so irresistible. this, too, can and should be worked on. i worked today with the sources. as far as i understand, the rpg-7 will probably not cope with this. and everything that is stronger than the rpg-7. at least in the barrel his mother takes it not a mountain, but everyone will say. well, it's like an image. and there are also german leopards. well, as for the german leopards , they were used in afghanistan where there were an insignificant nine leopards, and six of them were lost by denmark, a powerful tank power and three tanks, but lost. uh, canadians, and 15 more leopards were taken out of but later repaired and returned, that is, it’s also possible to work with them, moreover, the turks used these leopards during the fighting. and in syria, too, uh, they lost these tanks, that is, well, roughly speaking, it’s clear that on

there is something with a screw in this sense andrey vitalievich well, as i understand it, you already, as it were, and you and your colleagues are looking closely, considering looking at discussing, i have been in recent days, well, many, many people have already been sent such a detailed storyboard. uh, you also probably saw, judging by the smile , a detailed storyboard. and how to burn this very leopard, which i will not give here. well, there is a lot of it, who publishes it somewhere, because, well, it’s like impatience. i must have been the first, i won’t bring it, so that i know that if they are in the place where you can fill up this leopard private with some additional sheet, then this is not, as it were, because i suggested. here. well, probably more. a lot of. eh, as if everything that is already purely about these tanks can practically be discussed let's go, artyom , well, first of all. uh, i want to express an opinion from the ground, because uh, no one else knows, uh, let's say the real thing. what is happening and

it is the commanders on the ground. they have the most necessary and useful information, so here's the news from the ground. uh, if we're talking about mentality, then the guys here are absolutely handsome they are absolutely not scared. let 's just say with these information stuffing that these are the strongest tanks, they survived the jewelins, bayraktars and other things, and now they really look at things. but e is the first thing e tells me. he says the main thing is that intelligence works well for us, this is the first thing, so that we know where the tank is in dangerous areas, therefore, we are us. i was assured of the front line with anti-tank weapons that anti-tank weapons were against all these animals that you listed. they yes, guys already. here, according to the storyboard that you said, it has already been printed and

distributed. e, as they say on the front line, that is, to study the materiel, as they say in advance, they will not participate in battles, but at least the guys already have a printer for sure. e, even color was sometimes used already at the forefront. moreover, there is already excitement, between divisions they are already preparing there. well, let's say, uh, prize money. uh, let's just say, well, the prizes are, uh, very specific, but at the same time there are already sports ones. even interest. e by about who will be the first to fill up this tiger leopard there. and naturally. it only pleases, because the guys have. in addition to the fact that they are very sensibly looking at the picture of the hat , no one is engaged. they are well aware that a concentrated blow. it will be very hard. that is, this is also a kind of olympics in which, as it were , people who support their own participate. from

what we started, we continue, because our fighters are really mentally prepared, the motivation is huge, everything is fine, but they warn everything should. eh, that's a very good job. we must work proactively. we must prepare good concealed positions against these tanks in tank dangerous areas. eh, everyone is well aware that these tanks will not pass everywhere, that is, there are certain areas of the terrain on the map. and there should be other minefields. by the way , here i wanted to just when you say, this is a very important point, that and we roughly understand the performance characteristics of these tanks. we understand their weight, we understand that where it will pass, for example, there is a t-72, a which that is 20, probably less than abrams and still less than a leopard, that is, but those lines that are built on tank-dangerous directions. i just don’t understand this at all, that is, roughly speaking , under uh, these tanks need some more

serious anti-tank fortifications. how, for example, against those tanks that ukraine is now using or eh? for a tank, it's in general, it's all the same. well, let's just say our fighters have never faced each other. uh, with such tanks, but this is the practice that has been developed on the t-64 and t-72. she says that in principle, even what you saw when you visited us, artyom, is enough. yes, you, well , perfectly understood what i was talking about, but here, uh, we still need to talk about engineering barriers. uh, it’s exactly the other things and other things that are exposed tank positions and the most important thing that they constantly tell me about, the guys have more anti-tank weapons for us, because what e is regularly clear, there is a reinforced armored personnel carrier, there are, uh, other positions where in any case there is reinforcement with anti-tank weapons, but as they say , everything is not enough for our soldier. give her more, so yes, he

rights. i'm only voicing, uh, the point of view from the ground. and i think they will hear us and understand perfectly what i'm talking about. yeah, by the way, about anti-tank weapons. uh, as i understand it, starting from spring, these are the same javelins inlavas, and from which they tried to make a cult, as a result, the supply of these javelins and inlaves is certain. i understand guys. eh, there is a phrase in this sense to beat the enemy with his own weapon. it will be relevant, because after all , there were not so many tank battles, probably not all. this is used up i still have one for you. e the question, therefore, about, and also in this regard , as far as you own this matchability, as far as i understand, but for the abrams, especially, there needs some huge amount of fuel and some kind of very fildepers. eh, ramza. ah, because uh, well, how would it be, firstly, 80 tons. e, in my opinion, this is 400 liters per 100 km, and 700 liters is 700 liters per

100 km. so, unlike our t-72s there, it’s impossible to repair them in the field, and so on . hmm and the like . practically see what is known about this, artyom this is abrams, in principle, the same leopards and challengers. they have, in principle, the same, uh, errors, oh, that even those who produced them, in fact, say. this is a very complex system. eh, and they built a completely different principle. that is, if it's very simple with us, i've already told you that the basic principle is reliability and simplicity. that is, his tank is possible. in the field, but i heard, i heard in the field, almost the engine is changing this family. this is all done elementary and using a couple keys are not really needed. and here, uh, there is one for every tank. e your zip has a certain, let's say, trained people, that

is, mechanics. there, in addition to one driver. another whole escort is needed. almost there are up to 30-40 people per tank in addition, in order to serve it, these are, apparently, those who are now enough for everyone. uh, the streets, and they won't go into service. they will go ahead of this tank. i suspect so. it is absolutely true that these tanks are. they just have such errors, but i think not only we are talking about this we know, if they speak even abroad, and somehow they will get out of the situation, but we all must perfectly understand that any absolutely any technique. it even needs maintenance. one exit is how we guys are. yes, they left and worked. uh, on the deuce there, uh, returned. well, somewhere a mine flew in somewhere, they walked around somewhere else. that is, they immediately became. they repaired his tank in service. here, even if there is a rampage of the tank, then this is a whole

problem. this is to get him out. well, 80 t yes, i will try to get out, they are out of the battlefield. therefore, it will be a good target, which, even if it was, as they say, wounded will be killed in the last and here, of course, we win in this regard, but again i want to say, there is no need to engage in throwing a hat 100% now nato is working on this generals they perfectly understand, too, they are not sitting fools, but absolutely true, therefore, uh, you need to look very carefully here. well, as they say, practice will show practice and extreme questions because of the military. well , since you still have both field experience and etc. and hmm as for just those same nato generals who are sitting somewhere and working, and so on. we all noticed that recently, against the backdrop of these conversations about tanks, and all the time they say, tank fist, tank fist, tank fist, we all understand that tanks are not weapons of defense, but offensive weapons

periodically figured and began to figure again zaporozhye direction. and i drew attention to this connection, that exactly at the moment when we were already approaching the moment that the tanks would give and probably give them to the spring, and in both american and european rhetoric. directly noticeable, the conversations returned there again, what ukraine should return , ukraine should return crimea, ukraine should return crimea, crimea attack on crimea, we always supported them, so to speak, when i look at the map. eh, i understand that, in principle, if we are talking about the zaporozhye direction. and if we are talking about crimea, then, in principle , tank, well, logically, according to my amateurish, then, in principle, a tank strike. and with a fist in this direction, if they think about crimea, he the most logical is another matter. what i don’t understand is how much tank wedges or a tank fist, if they have one, you can break through to the crimea at all

, considering that this is an isthmus and i think, i’m sure that they are also preparing there. well, firstly, if they raise it in a media way. e, crimean zaporozhye direction. so you need to look the other side, because ah. well, this has already been tested in practice, as a rule, they try to lift something somewhere, and then , uh, in fact, we get a complete blow. uh, on the other side. that is, e is now the main their task is to confuse and hit in a thin place, as they act. now they operate in small groups. that is, e is a completely nato strategy, in small groups somewhere it reveals uh the truth, but this is how they act now and pla. they don't have tanks. yes, but when tanks appear , we still understand that there will no longer be a kurdish battle near prokhorovka and other great battles that took place during the great patriotic war, because, uh, now there are completely different types. uh, let's say

weapons and other realities uh, realities in general gerasimov even said about this war , that is, we have never seen such a war, and they have never seen such a war, so here i think that they will think for a very long time where and how to strike. and now they are probing this, understand? well , respectively, they probe a lot of things not only. this is now konstantin fedorovich well , a little above the level, what is called e fields to the level of this political and geopolitical confrontation. although it is connected, by the way, with tank easel history, because when yesterday literally yesterday stoltenberg and schultz by not very clear. for me, the reason, well, so to speak, still considered it necessary for us to make a reservation. well, that is, the tanks have already, as it were, given, and they mean that we are such a stoltenberg, we are not a party to the conflict, and because we do not send

soldiers and do not send combat aircraft , the stoltenbergs said this right yesterday. and i noticed yesterday. and today i also thought about it, and, well, how would i state my logic there, that, in principle, no one pulled them by the tongue. well, this is such an absolutely amateurish logic. you correct me now if i’m wrong on my logic, what if stoltenberg himself and stolz himself say, we guys, we are not participants in the conflict, because the border after which we would become participants in the conflict is soldiers and combat aircraft. and we do not cross it. this means, according to my amateurish logic, that if they cross this line by themselves, then, according to their own logic, they are participants in the conflict in an amazing pwm way. they said this yesterday, and today the politics of the publication, which we know that it writes something like that, and then it somehow comes true sometimes. we remember this from january last year. yes

, suddenly he is already starting to write a topic, that ukraine has received its tanks, now it needs jet fighters. and that means that there are many examples of the fact that the kuleba has already said something like that, like it was accepted into work and is already the same. ah. the same policy begins to develop this story, what if it will be, that is, for me here is some subtle moment that they open the overtone window a little further. that is, they are already do not argue. to give a plane or not to give a plane. they are already starting to talk. well , that is, it is clear that we will give the plane, but they write this will be a logistical nightmare because the runways in ukraine are short. and f-16 needs long ones. although , of course, we have f-18s that need short ones and so on and so forth in your opinion. this is the overton window that obviously

continues to open before our eyes. if it is open, and many believe that, of course, it will be open. it doesn't give anymore the reason to argue here is that they are still part of the conflict or not a participant, conflicts and so on. maybe it's time for us, as it were, given that they showed us the edge of this criterion. maybe there already now we somehow need to formulate our reaction already about this to the tanks. over there, the guys are already preparing, but about this political, if you like. well, first of all , i want to say that we are deploying such an all-russian lego to take apart a tank. yes abrams whose it is right? this is probably true for i did not consider those who are specialists to myself to be such. i've added that the olympics are not razberitang. we have break e. break the challenger break the leopard. break break burn and so on.

this is a wonderful olympics and i wish participation, success to everyone who participates in it, children who dismantle tanks , as a rule, break them, then it turns out that when assembling a few extra parts, that we will then raise them, in my opinion, tanks at least before their appearance. are they good or bad conditions for ukraine today's military operation. that no one will give it up answer until it finally happens on the battlefield. uh, but it’s obvious to me that before their appearance they are tanks of psychological warfare, about which we and the same weapons of psychological warfare are arguments about the planes of the next red lines, which either exist or not, let me remind you that in at the beginning, in general, you were talking about this, that there can be no offensive weapons. maybe only defensive and all defensive and germany was worried about colors, which anatoly will deliver to ukraine or not, first in a special military

operation, they had complaints about this, in this part, the appetite, of course, comes with food and the desire to achieve success that cannot be achieved in any other way. it disturbs all the time. e people in the west, who are politicians back, people who believe that it is necessary at all costs to keep victory over russia, it is necessary to damage it. and only this can be some kind of guarantee for us, here. they are fixated on it today. it means that it follows for us, it seems to me, for us, firstly, that we must do everything to ensure that these tanks in such significant numbers on the battlefield directly, where hostilities are being fought, do not appear back to history. haven't arrived. this is the first. the second thing you are talking about bridges about railway conditions. and you can ride about the bridges that the tanks are dismantling, we are dismantling them already, for a year now, this is all assembled completely

and if they are, in fact, then this is a fact, that we didn't use. uh, well, a weapon, uh, effective enough to destroy all this and communications are still , based on our understanding, and the logic of this military operation that there are some restrictions that we voluntarily impose on ourselves in by virtue of the fact that we hope that some kind of voluntary restrictions, since they remove these restrictions, then we must remove them, we must remove them, we must remove the second circumstance. i think that these deliveries, if they are carried out by sea or some other way uh, but they naturally go through the territory of nato countries, but in my opinion. we have a free hand in everything that we may not admit to ourselves, just as they do in undermining the nord stream. yes, in order to arrange any kind of misadventures on the way of these tanks or these weapons to

ukraine where the struggle is being waged. oh, we must do this too. and it's time to resort to this, and it's time to actually strengthen the position of those in germany who say, we are doing this in vain. we swam for it. let them for it will pay. let them for it to analyze all the weak points. how is not necessary. uh, well , asymmetrically, as he liked to say, general secretary brezhnev, we will answer uh, starry asymmetrically, well , let's answer asymmetrically, find again about inventorying all the possibilities in order to inflict damage on him. well , look, and within the framework of this , these possibilities and what criteria should be. well, for example, again, uh, i stubbornly return to the same framework that stoltenberg and scholz drew yesterday, that roughly speaking, here are the personnel and combat aircraft. this is the line, uh, participation or non-participation in the conflict, today there was news that, firstly, the slovaks are already thinking

about what to transfer combat aircraft, and the poles, as the polish edition writes in the spring, transferred several mig-29s there, of course in the form spare parts, but the fact that passed. now i have a question again, absolutely formally amateurish, does this mean that if the line is drawn by the nato secretary general and the german chancellor in the form of personnel and combat aircraft? a poland admits that she has already brought this line. e has crossed, then poland is , a, a party to the conflict, and then i have the following neat question, and in this situation, in your opinion, the fifth article, e, of the nato protocol applies to it, if we consider it in this situation e a legitimate target, since , she is a participant in the osnata conflict. she did not agree on this, but here i want to say that we cannot do anything. eh, to speak out about this, but

in this case they will read themselves as experts. this is their fifth article, not ours. they decide whether to use it or not, so your opinion should not be played here , my opinion is that they will defend the point of view, we do not participate directly for the sake of what stoltenberg said it, for the sake of which he emphasized the wool, in order to once again lay a straw and say, but in fact in fact, we are not involved in the conflict, that they are incredibly planes. there they will be afraid. laugh at some kind of reaction to this, and i want to say that we are here, of course, entering into such. uh, we're going thin ice, but we must understand that we are also for special operations for all kinds of sabotage. we have complete. in my opinion the moral right is not recognizing. they do not recognize this as a war with a nato country. this is a war with us and we will not recognize what will happen to them as a war with them yeah, that is, it is necessary. in this case, all these tails should be swept up in such a way that it is not possible

to teach us directly in something, but they work to divert the need. you tell me, if i understand you correctly, the next thing is to apply a missile attack on an airfield in some kind of zheshiv and that's too much. yes, but to make something in this victim explode explode. it’s like it’s already time to start, because otherwise you tell me you ’re a peaceful, shy person, but how would you tell me, because otherwise they will never end this appetite for you. i will give an example if we no longer insert something militant, but very important for the exodus of everything that happens, down the throat. you probably noticed, that is, here we are 2 days ago, responding to the publication of a respected newspaper. the moskovsky komsomolets were instructed to find out whether lukoil's daughter in bulgaria really delivers , of course, fuel and e of various kinds through a chain of intermediaries. yes, she delivered at the moment when in the summer they were just organizing

an offensive in the kharkov direction. so, it means lukoil from this, he said from surveying that we are not supplying anything. and it is true that he does not supply anything directly. but after all , when at an oil refinery, in fact, different traders buy oil or products. they don't transport them. endless swiss to switzerland switzerland where are they in place at the level of documents? they are changing the direction of supplies and i am sure that this is the direction of supplies. it is ultimately aimed at transferring it all to the right place. why the european union has abandoned restrictions on the supply of our oil to romania and bulgaria yes, because they are closest to the battlefield. uh-huh, they want to receive our oil in order to deliver it to where they want via the shortest supply chain. this is absolutely not difficult, so the excuse is that we don't know who buys us from them. we don't know who ours

is the free market. they are good up to a certain point. from this moment, when they start. yes, of course, at the beginning we both supplied gas and didn’t supply anything, but these are dual-use products , obviously, used during the war, and now we must yes, it can be detrimental to ourselves, well, impose a restriction on this so that pumpkin moment - this is fuel, this gasoline, this kerosene and came to the right place. please, please, do this, i understood, and even better, somewhere before he came somewhere. as you said in the previous paragraph, i am parasitized by this, because such thoughts never occurred to me, where they can come from to a fighter of the airborne assault brigade, that maybe somewhere they would already start to explode there, uh , somehow by itself. yes, so, here , and another interesting line of its kind, which in my opinion, but again i can be wrong, but was translated by the official representative of the european country of the bloc member

nato a, to which i’m wondering, should we somehow react or not to the question that appetites are growing and growing, because not that this appetite does not reduce, but sounds like anna lena burbock, and once again -english and i don't know if she ever speaks german with a thick accent. today, she said it in english, but it doesn't matter. she said it. means to her colleagues in the european union as an official, the ministers of foreign affairs of the federal republic of germany and said to the following phrase, please. i have already spoken in recent days. yes, we must do more to protect ukraine yes, we must do more and nerd, but the most important and decisive. it 's what we do together. and we don't play games in europe because we see a war against russia and not against each other. i thank god for me in this case, that she speaks in a language that is not native to her, in a familiar

english language. i listened to it many times. she literally says the phrase. we are at war. we are fighting against russia, there are no women in her, what is on her mind is on her tongue. this is interest ask. actually, you helped me answer it, the question arises, the minister of foreign affairs of a nato country in the presence of other nato members, because in the eu all nato members except austria say that we are fighting russia, no one tells her, and we do not fight a schoolchild. we are not waging war against russia , no one tells her this, that is, this is a common place. this is an official who says this official thing. we are waging war against russia, the question arises, in your opinion from the point of view and mental ideological. whatever we want, we must now somehow reformulate our position on the world in relation to the country that it represents. they are waging war against us. and we are doing something against them. i'm afraid not yet. it is clear that the lady is eager to get into

avraambentrop. let me remind you that he was hanged in 1946 by the decision of the tribunal, but , apparently, before that we should slightly change our attitude to what is happening, because russia has not even come to the economic war with europe yet. there are a huge number of those same supply chains, and elementary. yes, uh, like the same plastic supplies from ukraine that were needed for e or cable for the german car industry. yes, there are a lot of components, because any technique. she's tricky. it requires huge amounts of straight rare earth metals, and neon and so on. eh, as long as it's all delivered. i can understand germany why? they agreed to put tanks there, they need ukraine for two reasons. this is their resource base once and

for all if the west believes that russia will give up and leave and will pay with this reparations. it was german business that was going to restore everything there with our money. i confiscated money from us, this is the last chance. they consider german industry not to die. that is, in this sense. you tell me the following, that they are also partly indirect and that is why they end up delivering their tanks there, because everything that these tanks destroy there will be moved and so on. they then themselves also count on our money. i mean, they're cashing out twice in the same place absolutely. so that's what they're going to here as we talk. about how to come to war. yes. it ’s clear that we are too far embedded in this global economy, but they cut us off the more they cut us off. all the more our hands are untied, and it is not a matter of hitting a polish airfield. although the americans they didn't say that. no, it's very scary,

rand corporation is the largest. uh, the united states think tank wrote a huge article russia's reaction what would happen if russia hit harder, so it would be a disaster for america because they couldn't respond. it will be a shame for america because that in the event of our strike on the polish airfield. he even park check himself will perish. they 'll raise their paws and say, well, it just so happened, knowing, uh, the tricky nature of rent, what kind of thing is that? provocation, of course, this is a provocation. it’s just that they’re further, uh, what they write, that it’s time to think about how to get out of this situation ren is the first to think, it’s about what you think, when he writes, it’s he who thinks how to get out of this situation, or rem thinks how to convince us that this can be done without signing further into this situation in the grass to poison here in the twenty-first year he wrote, but a huge report, which for some reason ours missed. and

the mosaic war about the war is a mathematical model of the war of colonel bluth, this is the name of the mathematical model developed in the twenties of the last century. this is a colonial war. how can colonial forces, limited by contingents, win against the enemy, they introduced this mosaic war until the moment of our partial mobilization. after we found damage, uh technique, and uh, forces this model ended. yeah, new no. not yet there is no new model, but all other models. they are already at risk of nuclear escalation, which they cannot afford and then admit from what you are telling me. you say i'm right. you understand that they have some strategies operational stupor. yes, that's right, that's why they don't know now, these are the tanks. well, we understand that they will not reach there, that these tanks are ready, they are needed only for defense, that they can fight with

ours. out of hiding this means these tanks are so wondering why? why would it suddenly me i just don't understand tanks. you say it's clear. it's not clear to me. yes, such a quantity is the number of tanks that can be delivered. here is e. that vulnerability e of the relationship to modern weapons, the lack of attack helicopters and aircraft, e, which could attach a titanium tank means that these tanks e are not for breaking through everything, that is, you are talking about the fact that these tanks are in that quantity and with that logistics around them, they are clearly not for flushing, but for defense, and this is how to say so. well, he talks about supplying defensive weapons in general oriental cross kindergarten. it seems to me that this is why the poles are like this. defend the east armchair when we get there. i see. and now we will continue this conversation. this is the story that they always

have a math in their head, a math is always in their head, and they always calculate their profit. they talk about ideology about freedom about progress blah blah blah blah blah, but there is always very clear mathematics in their heads. i’m just now, so as not to waste time, because this is a rather long fragment, those who are interested, we will talk about it further articulates very clearly. this is an american tectoker, a former officer. here i am right now , right now i’m going to go to advertising. i 'll post it right now. you listen to him right now. well, i don’t know there, there is a minute and a half or two, there is clear american mathematics, how do they understand? why this conflict is beneficial for them, everything is purely about money, we read, we return after a short advertisement. i generally have a problem with memory after the accident, every morning. open your eyes around me so much is happening incomprehensibly. he does not know in what world he will wake up. you see

a cross, it means, today i am with cyril and he sees me because he no longer has a mother without a beloved wife without an only son and will hate me for cyril hnutsya awakening the premiere of a serial film from monday on first when it hurts

somewhere here neobutin, it acts selectively on pain, spasm and violation of the neobutin stool, when it hurts somewhere here, if there is one halva by installments for 10 months. until 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, just one card for everything. create fashion looks with your favorite dolls and enjoy magic world with play sets. choose toys with discounts up to 50% on wildberries increased sugar or cholesterol jumps blood pressure cardioactive taurine is the best, the treatment of cardioactive taurine evalar is twice as profitable in price. the king of taste, that is, the perfect girl. this is the one that always wants, but can never think of it, in general, what men have been talking about since february 2 on

yandex.market cyberweek and hyper discounts up to 70%. buy a real not 10 smartphone for only 15,000,990 rubles. there's a share of analyzes for 290 rub. yes, and here he also has a son. hello hi mom. they signed you up for tests in gemotest, in your city there is a program country gemotest three basic analyzes for 290 rubles. free doctor's consultation ideal basket for one my basket for 169 rubles. in kievsky and for the excursion, transfer money to mary, 300 rubles each. still dialing a phone number for manual transfer tinkoff was the first in russia to launch a number scanner. install the tinkoff application and transfer money easily and without commission tinkoff he is one of a kind the cure for cystitis is the most beneficial with overpayments in presents

damn you, what do you do never the highest energy of the defendants, would the lawyer be the best? if you think so, then you have no place in the profession. movie odin tv

presents we specially went to the north of france . you gave me the keys yourself, but this does not mean that you can come as to your home. i'm not going to jail because of this freak. it was necessary to bang him right there in the restaurant. so, if something was following my order, did you understand? time will tell keep going straight

on the air to talk about what drives the conflict in ukraine which fuels. naturally. west in terms of diverse interests. i was just leaving for advertising and offered to listen to the reasoning of one american, so on the topic. well, what are their uh. well, what is called? what is their gesheft? well, whoever listened, well done and by the way, they immediately began to write how it is shaning on the air, which means they hang this very guys. there is such a thing called a timer. here, for what time i put it in the channels at such a time. i also have time to read the comments on your advertisement. if suddenly who thinks what it means, this is it, and so, in a nutshell, what it says, this is an american person. he says that, taking into account our military budget, all the money that we spend on supporting ukraine is 14 dollars a month from every american. it's a little like a lot of

whining. he says we are for 14 dollars a month. each by proxy, without losing a single person, but as if we are crushing ours, like we have a chance to defeat our military adversary. well, there, for short, right there with him digital layouts, well, who didn’t have time or didn’t want to, and you’ll listen in vain later, but something doesn’t go quite according to the plan about the thunders, because two e, parties have come about what our favorite said, mm nund. vick the united states does not have time to send abrams tanks to ukraine cross. but what will you do? we have prepared. we have already calculated everything already know. where are we going to take them, so we can already say with the hussites , you understand, they don’t have time, and then it’s very interesting to the question that they don’t know what to do, and the events of the coming months on ukraine may be critical to the fighting. there you are, as it were, a military man, and from the point of view of information , what is it about? this is about the fact that, uh, the americans, uh , let's say, uh, drove their so-called

partners, that is, we already know that germany and others will supply their tanks. but here they are, well, well, they won’t reach the abrams, and then if suddenly, if we put something, and the decisive events are like the guys here, if you can. so exactly absolutely right, that is, you know, that's when there is an instigator. yes, he started a fight and then became with side and looks and then takes the side that, as it were, will already win. e in this battle or fight, that is , they have been conducting such a policy since the time of the great patriotic war. we all remember very well the opening of the second front. that is, it is still unclear at the beginning they were on the sidelines. e. well, let truman write about it. let them kill each other. as much as possible the same. i think we learn from history, unlike them. we remember, we know our history. and

just like that, yes. eh, you need to take it from there, it's clear well, the question is that we learn from history, but i still do. eh, and in fact, many agree with me that we proceed from history. they come from mathematics. and for them, mathematics, as it were, is more important, what if we spend so much 14 dollars per person here. yes, i'm talking about it all. it starts like this, as if a man means in tiktok and ends with corporations like that, lock martin, which you also say, martin already loses his appetite. today only wrote about the f-16 politician. we will all increase production, guys. give your old ones there, and they will approve the sale of the transfer of fighters to third countries. and we, therefore, this is the most and in general to the question of why they need it. this is the official data that e 49%, 49%, this is an increase in sales as well. uh, guns, yeah, in

22, total gun sales increased 49% from 21. and here the question still arises. this is some kind of political common sense interests and so on, then where you need to push or this covers everything. no, of course, this does not cover everything, but it betrays the obvious interest of the military-industrial complex, which we were warned about since we are competing in knowledge of the history of president eisenhower, that he rules the united states military-industrial complex interest in supplying at the expense of, of course, the american budget of the american taxpayer, or at the expense of, uh, foreign countries, which will be all this appetite of the military-industrial complex. than what actions can be interrupted? well that is rude saying that this should happen, so that someone would tell the guys to these people who have such profits, we kind of understand everything, but the step of

the rapuzki is kind of fraught. well, uh, first over the military-industrial complex. no matter how influential he is, there is still a political leadership of the country, there are authorities who make or do not make some decisions, and they worry about this situation and in today's situation, they can create this situation. no , well, uh, we are trying to create it all the time. first of all, the fact of its existence. secondly, achieving results, because, uh, all the talk about the fact that this shaft of weapons will come on, among other things, requires us to double our efforts and speed up the implementation of our military measures. this pushes us to this, i'm not about to break into unprepared attacks of the offensive there, the ninth attack or something like that psychic, but in any case it's unconditional. uh, it seems to me that our military-political leadership is taking into

account developing plans. directly the introduction of hostilities takes into account the fact that there is a build-up , there is coordination not only with us, but also with them, and so on. you understand what's the matter. i think, by the way, one more suggestion. i think that it also found its executor a long time ago, but you need to buy a couple of uh tanks they don’t need from some hussites, abrams. or, let’s say, there is a challenger where they exist in other countries in order to conduct tests with us. i hope you have already done and somewhere in kubinka have already dismantled assembled, then dismantled again and already in those printouts, about which andrey vitalievich speaks, there, in fact. just like that. they did not just appear in order to say something like this, where he has all this and and, but they got acquainted with it. you just have to face them. i agree it is necessary to be more broad, as if to acquaint with this. e, since i have to, but

in this sense, here is still a question. here, well , about what, well, you can influence them here, what is the complexity of it today, by the way, it is true that not an american, but an italian politician has expressed, but it is very significant that every time we say that we must increase our efforts on the battlefield, that we must plan operations. we need betrayal. yes i agree. well , let it sound cynical, but the more success we have on the battlefield, the more we grind, unfortunately, the ukrainian manpower . yes, we are burning american weapons. well, we 're burning american european weapons, which they will produce even more and even more will earn, and military force. we are a human resource. we are grinding, ukrainian slavic russian right now here we are watching these shots of how they rake people into the army there. well listen in odessa rakes in cherkassy falls ill in kirovograd to conquer most of these people. in this video , you can hear them speaking russian. that is,

in principle, our success is inevitable. well, this war is not going anywhere, but they are grinding with our hands, in fact , part of us, but in some places i zombify, but it’s definitely not all of this problem, they definitely don’t have it, but she definitely is. we definitely have here. here, but, unfortunately, nothing can be done about it as long as they are on the other side of the front with weapons in their hands discussing another choice in any war. that's the way it was in the civil war in 1918. it was the way, anytime. yes, there are already talks. no, i'm talking about something else. well, here's the italian minister of defense, who speaks very cunningly. he says that you need to know how to supply more weapons there, and save ukraine's attention. thus the war remains between the two peoples and not expands. he gives them out. the main thing is that we say that the more we build up our successes at the front. yes, i'm faster for that, and they say, well, for them, we grind ourselves to each other. and what is it to them that this person, about whom i spoke, going to

advertising. he talks about it, we soar, he spends 14 dollars a month, not a single american soldier dies, which is kind of bad for you. that is, that is, after all, i ask them a question, how to put pressure on them, the problem lies in the fact that those who are sitting in kiev do not care about it, and the people who have to ask them from them until they are able. this is true. that is the question further about, again, money interests. e of capitalism, but about the fact that someone sells weapons, and someone's eyes are on fire to destroy more with these weapons, and then restore them for our money. there is another point of view, who wants to restore. you say the germans believe that they will, but what reads uh, believes, uh, tucker carlson again on the other hand soaked. this conflict enriches people american arms corporations plan to get rich in the largest bank of the world. goldman sachs, an enthusiastic director of the company, said that ukraine's recovery provides good economic

incentives for real income and investment. just imagine whose money it will be yours, of course, for the restoration of ukraine. and these guys will make good money on this. do you understand how it works? i understand how it works, but the same question is being asked again. how can we in this conflict, in which they are fighting through ukraine , they do not care. how many ukrainians will die , they don’t care what destruction will be, and if they don’t do not care, then they do not care just because they expect them, uh, to earn money on them too. that is, they have, roughly speaking, the situation is almost win-win, because if it works out for them, they will earn on the restoration. and if it works out, not according to them, they will not make money on the restoration, but all this restoration will fall, and the more they destroy, it will fall on our shoulders and the restoration of the physical and the restoration of communication between people. uh, this kind of hatred that boils on both sides and in the war, nowhere without

you can't get away with it, that is, according to my feelings. and you have to dissuade me now, because we do not have much time. according to my feelings, for now, where the americans are sitting. well , these are all black rocket gp morgan and so on. they don't have a drop of no on either side. in any case, they have a buy-in that is not like that, it’s not their own, it’s not their own benefit. so our our our expenses have uh zone. uh vulnerabilities. every system has a vulnerability, right? here and when the same investment appraisal is carried out, we will e with it to them treat as they treat us. yes, here is the mathematics of the economics of investment, and so there are strengths , there are weaknesses. there is a possibility. there is a threat. yes, the same homosax. here is the fed, uh, in the twentieth year spent stress if one american bank, that is, the big five falls. this destroys 38% of the american banking system. yeah. and we can influence it in some way. well,

maybe. yes, they are very afraid of it, perhaps yes do not tell further, because it is like machine tools. don't say where yes there is europe and there is, let's say the city of rtm. there is a gas pipeline these are so beautiful. these tankers, and if by chance jan hits. and there how many tons of gas here you are, how beautiful will it be? are you under any sanctions yet? not yet. well, wait. well, how is it that you are on the air of the federal peace-loving countries in general, which do not cross any red lines, and you suddenly start to think of it as atlantic cables. but everything will end if there is one of, well, even one cable, there was a case when gibraltar, uh, so much one cable was damaged, yeah, connecting africa and europe yeah, and already a gigantic problem. yeah, if transformative, yes, not yet near the coast,

given that it ’s not clear who and no one wants to know in the west who exploded the nord streams. so this same someone, maybe this cable, probably also saw fish from the sueski. here's the parsley. me all the time. maybe it was her, maybe she didn’t get drunk, as if by the nord stream and as if drawing an eskimo canal and supplies of everything. from southeast asia, after all, in fact, 95% of machine memories for the whole world do only three companies and we know. so call, no, i will not call. that is, you know, but they won't tell us correctly, but we knew and you know it even reaches the elementary level. here is the german auto industry. yes, and if you don’t put glass for the car there, yeah, and who supplies china with agan? well, why should china not supply any component of its own there? yes , the e machine is not necessarily the glass of the e relay, we do not supply any e element there.

let's not talk about it, let's interrupt the chinese supplies. well, well, then they will not achieve their goal again quarrel us with the chinese eradication, which one still does not leave the other. well, as if they are standing on the sidelines, but at least they do not join the station look again , it turns out it is not necessary to immediately interrupt. yes , but just to do this, it's all just taken off the tongue to threaten, knowing that you won't do it. it's like saying 28 times that if you do it, it will take the conflict to a new level of escalation, because it's a redline, then the redline crosses and it turns out that there are many shades. red. and it’s even better not to talk about the reddest doing something here, i ’m asking that there are a huge number of opportunities, yes and a huge e in a row from what i know, and we have an educational program. in any case, it is educational for the presenter. i learn a lot of new and useful things here. here's yesterday.

i had mikhail gennadyevich delyagin standing here who said that there are two ways of inflicting an economic impact comparable to a nuclear strike. the first is the abolition of intellectual property, the second complete diaphrasing of our economy, these blows, in your opinion, will be effective against them in order to force them to start scratching their own places. well, revelation. uh, so-so, because, uh, it's not that much money, we'll take away from them like this, but intellectual property. yes, because the whole structure of the world economy and this dominance of the americans, it is built on intellectual property, yes, and when we look at any product, you have any smartphone. yes? here the chinese collect iphones earn only 10 dollars on that, uh cost assemblies. yes, yes, i understand the logic, then. tell me, let's go back to the beginning of the program, to this, so to speak, determination is not solved. we know that the abolition of intellectual property. we'll

hurt them enough to start scratching their heads. should they continue to play in this game , what is holding us back today, in your opinion, it’s very short that we are built in there for the time being aha strongly built in or do we want to remain strongly built in before that, because there is still something we have to destroy, based on such, then there is, roughly speaking, as i understand it, that we, uh, if we uproot ourselves from there. we are in general, and you will tear some roots for yourself. well , here we rise, yes, let's allow the wto why are we still porto why are we following when a total economic war is being waged against us? and we are in this one, but i don’t know, because we seem to be very embedded there. that's very , very well, it happens, in fact, that's like an answer, but i don't know, it's also very revealing. well, that is, if you don’t know, then i don’t even know it. well, then, we will keep asking these questions. and really why? well, we will ask them after the advertisement and not this time. the experience is shared by

the heat concerts will go you simply will not return. vladimir vysotsky

increased sugar or cholesterol jumps blood pressure cardioactive taurine is the best, the treatment of cardioactive taurine evalar is twice as profitable in price. if the delivery causes inconvenience, order the medicine at pharmacy.ru 10% discount on the first order. to do well, but a little bit is not the point, but to take a loan with state support and produce more goods. here is the case in the center. my business is

assistance in obtaining preferential loans and other measures to support entrepreneurs, at the center of my business is a big deal for small businesses, and for excursions, transfer money to the sea for 300 rubles. still dialing the phone number for manual translation tinkov launched the first number scanner in russia. install the tinkov app and transfer money easily and without commission. tinko. he is such an ideal basket for one my basket for 169 rubles. in kfc on yandex.market cyberweek and hyper discounts up to 70% buy smartphone 10 for only 15.000 990 rubles. which medicine for cystitis is the most profitable in terms of price? nolar is more profitable up to 50%. it’s not a simple avalor treatment of cystitis without overpayments sovcombank from go straight to the point they conceived repairs, they took everything in the kubanka a loan of up to 5 million. and now sports from the light of the wallpaper in children’s loans from sovcombank in

the branch and it is conceived made by a movie 1tv seems

they don’t want to punish. 1tv cinema presents where we are going next

well, the end of the program, firstly, so that you don’t get higher, that this such evil americans make money on this conflict, and poor europeans are such living gnomes, as if in flight, here is news for you that confirms that this is not so. here are the norwegians, who were very active in saying that we will transfer weapons, we will transfer weapons, we will transfer weapons. why were they so active all of a sudden? that's why they were so active with the guys, the profit from oil supplies during this time during this conflict increased by 200%, well , someone hung out there, apparently, reads everything about sagged norway's oil and gas revenues increased by 20%. tricky question. do you think norway is interested in having this situation somehow resolved in the near future? my amateurish answer is no, it is not interested in any way. that's why, well, as it were, we ourselves must somehow

move it all somewhere. and apparently. we seem to be getting something. i don’t know what, well, the same victoria well, who during our broadcast with you said that somehow abram would not be able to get there by the end of spring, she was speaking in the senate, said, here's another thing washington is ready to ease sanctions against moscow for the sake of serious negotiations on ukraine and the withdrawal of russian troops from there, and here i cannot but say that the ministry of foreign affairs. i was pleased with the boundless, instant reaction, and to konstantin gavrilov, the representative of russia at the negotiations on the destruction in vienna, he said that for the sake of negotiations. e that he does not see that the united states was ready for negotiations. this is this, this is work, so they said so and immediately once in the face of the ugly fox face, here so, it seems to me, a big game should be played. although it happens in different ways, it can be intellectual and polite, for example, on the first channel in the program there is a big game, now

there is a lot more to watch. good evening, big game on the air today, russia launched a new massive missile attack on ukraine's military and energy infrastructure. at the same time, it must be understood that, taking into account the decision of the united states and its european allies to supply western tanks to the kiev regime, the escalation of hostilities inside ukraine will continue the press secretary of the president of russia and dmitry peskov, it seems to me, gave an adequate assessment of this decision, saying that the supply of tanks speaks of the direct involvement of the west in this conflict and that this involvement is growing. this is undeniable in turn. uh, russian security council secretary nikolai patrushev said that the events in ukraine were the result of many years of preparations by the united states for a hybrid war against russia and their attempt

to prevent the formation of a multipolar world. at the same time, the decision of the west to provide tanks to the kiev regime so turned an already not always sober head. vladimir zelensky that he, apparently, completely lost all connection with reality, and in an interview with sky news, he stated that he was not interested in negotiations with russia and that the russian president was quoting no one for him, well, this all confirms, the need for the inevitability of the continuation of the russian special operations to the bitter end without any halftones and how this special operation is developing right now we talk to our traditional military observer. yury podlyakokoy yury ivanovich good evening. and so tell me what the main thing happened today. well , today we had another powerful missile strike in the morning. even from our night, i would say, yes, there were several attacks with geraniums at night, and judging by the information that i received, there were arrivals in kiev, kharkov

, dnepropetrovsk region. mykolaiv , zaporizhzhia region, there were a lot of arrivals in the donbass, that is, according to the locations of the high level. well it's already traditionally, we always work, so points, and this afternoon there were, uh , several waves of cruise missile strikes , objects were hit in kiev a-a, odessa nikolaev vinnitsa lvov regions, zhytomyr, in my opinion, there is no surprise, but i don’t remember. yes, well, in my opinion, it was yes in the zaporozhye regions, and in general. we struck blows on some infrastructure. air defense objects were also hit, as well as traditional places, clusters of apu and folds. uh, enemy supplies. as i understand it, now this traditional blow is probably coming soon who the news it will not be, but still. this is gradually knocking the energy base out of zelensky's regime, because let me remind you of energy. first of all, this is not only the blood of the economy. well, and the blood of the army, because the transfer of all this is thanks to energy, and on the fronts, this is another one. well, as if in a day at the letarian

battle, our guys entrenched themselves on the outskirts of coal. now the artillery, the whole day, today the artillery worked, well, the city is real. today, seeing it was evening his lidar real video of the city is on fire, then there is our processing, and the position of the enemy is full powerful. well, as i understand it, this is a harbinger of the fact that in the near future there will already be an assault on high-rise buildings directly. after that, i hope everything ends here. she zaporozhye direction is also artillery. ours prevails as a whole. and the enemy cannot conduct any serious counter-battery fight here, and this allows us to take daily, and take a certain amount of 1 2 3, when he was five a day, and in strong points and gradually advance the front line to the north. and maryinskaya avdeevskoe direction. and here our troops continue to attack in the area of ​​​​the small western outskirts and move in the direction of karlovka, the artyomovsk direction . our troops are developing an offensive from the south in two directions. this is ivanovo and e hours in

yar, moreover. i really hope that you often come to yar our guys. this is before we knock out the enemy from behind artyomovsk, because if we are from artyomovsk and you, well, as if, if the enemy withdraws the main forces from rakimov’s hour to yar, a frontal assault, it will still be more associated with large let me reiterate the problems. why is up often important? it is already in the enemy's next line of defense, if we take yar often , then we will completely break plans in this way. uh, vsu, for the defense of donbass from our troops. uh, directly the lines of defense, the following ones have already been laid down and built in the area in front of the slavic kramatorsk druzhkov and , accordingly, often you yar and to the north of the northern direction. here the enemy tried to carry out today to the north, like a criminal counterattack. she drowned in our fishing line. yes, we are confidently moving forward in the three directions of the north south-east . thank you very much, yury ivanovich, but we see from your reviews that our armed forces are slowly but surely moving forward. i would say

gnaw forward, and moreover, in the donbass and in the zaporozhye region. e, vsu, forced to retreat, but retreating. they are committing an increasing number of war crimes. first of all, this, of course, is the shelling of obviously peaceful cities and towns. a and. and they get hit. that's right, knowing that there are no military installations there. here is one of these, uh, settlements of cities, where, but regularly. uh, where they bomb regularly. uh, civilian facilities. this is gorlovka, and now we have a direct connection with us , the mayor head of the administration of the city of gorky gorlovka ivan sergeevich prikhodko ivan sergeevich good evening. tell me ukrainian shelling continues tell me what is going on today at the present hour? yes good evening dmitry vyacheslavovich unfortunately, the last three days have plunged us partially and in the absence

of electricity, and also the lack of water, because that ukraine continued unfortunately its. research in the region, so to speak , the destruction of the civilian population of the donetsk people's republic and russia e. i. this is sorry for the black humor. the fact is that yesterday there was a targeted strike, which began at 15 minutes past 3 15-15. eh, and only the substations that feed gorlovka with 110 kw were struck, these are three substations. this is the substation zavodskaya knitted а-а. all of them were put out of action, uh, the city was completely without electricity. and you perfectly understand that 150,000 people live and 120,000 of them practically live in a one-story building - this is heating, glory. god was more or less, but the weather was warm, but the power engineers showed courage and heroism yesterday.

they managed, and on the remaining reserve lines, we launched almost all the boiler houses in our city at night, there were five boiler houses, and by the morning we also launched, and therefore ukraine continues its actions to destroy infrastructure facilities. and because of this, by the way, the natural supply of water supply to the city of gorlovka and yesterday, alas, there were again two wounded, and there were 14 apters of cities, including a and the central part of the city. and the day before yesterday , houses were struck, which are located directly next to the central square of the city. and this is along the avenue - along dimitrova boulevard there were direct hits on high-rise buildings. as a result , they were injured. but in principle already, well, probably a month, and more or less in the center was calm. the last three days, and the shells are flying through the city center. as for the military

situation? well, around the hill, then from the western part. basically, for now. positional battles are going on statically, and from above towards artyomovsk continues, probably a slow advance, as yerevanych said to the fortified areas, we will secure the areas, because it is, well, just the strongest equipped strong points, and including such a strong point, it was turned into the same the very third rise, which is located on the canal, rural donetsk, or rather, all that is left of it now, and from the southern part there are battles with pinking. uh, from the southern part there are fights for the highway that connects konstantin near artyom. it has already been partially cut in places, so the fighting continues. and we live a life that, in principle, we have already been living for 10 months. and everything else is unchanged

dmitrievich e. thank you very much ivan sergeevich and we are entirely with you and the russian armed forces. and uh, the armed forces of the donetsk people's republic proper are doing everything, and in order to put an end to the suffering of the civilian population of donbass and in the foreseeable future, it will certainly be taken artyomovskoe. this will also push the armed forces of ukraine further, including from gorlovka and we hope that there will be less shelling, but in any case, thank you very much. well, by the way, the united states recommends e vsu. stop defending artyomovsk and focus on the great spring counteroffensive that the united states is talking about more and more openly and, uh, the decision to hand over the tanks. this is certainly a transfer of the conflict to a new stage of escalation, both at the level of practice and at the level of rhetoric tanks. it's totally offensive

weapons, not defensive ones, and the united states has been openly talking in the past few days about what their task is. allowing ukraine to go on a massive offensive joe biden yesterday, uh, in his address on tanks, was just talking about this planned offensive. and that the supply of tanks is called for. this offensive is strengthened by a high-ranking unnamed white house official, who even stated that the united states will support russia's offensive operations in ukraine , including in crimea, and will help, ukrainians to retake back their territories, including crimea well, recently we were discussing the less ambitious, but nonetheless , not less important, lloyd austin 's statement in the washington post by max booth that, in the opinion of the us secretary of defense, realistic tasks this year is an offensive into the zaporozhye region and

cutting the land corridor. e russia in the crimea this is a loud rhetoric rito. offensive, but let's now compare the scale of this rhetoric with the real scale of military assistance and the increase in military assistance that the united states and its allies provide to ukraine, and it seems to me that when we compare rhetoric with real numbers, there is a kind of gap. here are the same abrams. ah, they won't come within the next few months, maybe they will come at the end of this year, but uh and tony fact , the pentagon has clearly stated that these abrams are still in production. before e will be transferred. e ukraine, the german defense minister of the story said that the very first tanks. leopard can reach ukraine only in the end of march, again, if we look at, er, how many tanks, in principle, can be collected today in europe well,

here the data of different media differ yes, but here, if we compare. and there are several sources, it turns out that in the next few months , ukraine can be transferred from 80 to 100, but no more. uh, western tanks leopard tanks plus challenger two. uh, the british are still 60 to 80 at the end of the year. that is, in just this year - this includes more abrams if they reach the end of the year, a maximum of 200 tanks. yes, this is the figure obtained from and once again i emphasize open sources. well, and finally, experts, including the authors of the new york times, point to a huge number of technical problems that ukraine and, uh, western countries will face in terms of the logistics of servicing repairs, ammunition, and so on and so on for dissimilar tanks, because that they will be given heterogeneous, namely

heterogeneous tanks or leopards. dina or a leopard, two challengers and, in the end, an abrams in this i want to ask andrey frantsevich. does the hat fit the loud rhetoric of the united states with the massive and decisive offensive of ukraine, which supposedly should generally, if not almost put an end to the military conflict and ensure victory for the west, so you correctly said that you met the real actions that they are taking, that they have too loud rhetoric and the americans did not notice how they are from the quiet suppression of the whole world and pushing their weapons there instead of those that were sent to ukraine themselves involved in the conflict and declared themselves that they are practically. the main thing here in this counter-offensive in the direction of crimea, moreover, it is not clear whether it was their miscalculations, or whether he convinced zelensky. they

inflated this soap bubble of their invincible weapons, so there conditionally 200 of their tanks equals 2,000 of ours. though that has nothing to do with it, of course. to reality, therefore, the fact that they will form a brigade and cups there. it won't change anything at all. we have already said here that the combat capabilities of the ukrainian t-72 tanks or upgraded by the poles. the so-called polish version of the brigade tried to unblock solidarity. it has been so dissolved in a narrow section of the front that it is out of the question, and it is not enough to attack the layered defense that we have made of zaporozhye with all the engineering structures. well , actually, but a similar assessment that the scale of our assistance is not enough for some kind of decisive and, all the more so, a victorious offensive. strange as it may seem, but it is also shared by e, the head of the united of the joint chiefs of staff in the united states, general milli, whose rhetoric contradicts the rhetoric of his own formal chief of the secretary of defense, loid. austin

, listen to what mark milley said back on ramstein. uh last week, when the scope was already discussed. provision of tanks from a military point of view, i still argue that this year it will be very , very difficult to drive russian troops out of ukraine with military means from every five of its lands occupied by russia. i believe that the line of defense. maybe further stabilize. i think it's entirely possible to do so. i also think that depending on the supply of weapons and the training of personnel for their use, it is very possible that the ukrainians will be able to carry out a significant tactical or even operational offensive operation to liberate them. as much of the ukrainian territory as possible. let's see how it will develop, but i think that in the end this war, like many warriors in the past, will end at a kind of negotiating table and there will be time for this determined by the leaders of both countries, both russia and ukraine here. please note that mark

willy is not talking about a decisive, but about a tactical or operational-tactical offensive of ukraine - this is the maximum. what the chief military officer of the united states is counting on but at the same time, the united states is in any case warming up its military economy and expanding its military-industrial complex. new york times. she announced that the united states intends to increase the production of shells by 500%. first of all, 500 155-mm caliber, which is now the most used by e ukraine and ukraine and e to bring the volume of their production within two years to 90,000 shells. today, 14,500 shells are produced per month. yes, that is, but several times over. in addition, the united states has recently increased its exports dramatically. e of its military products and uh, this is how the pentagon officially announced that over the past year this export has grown by 49%, from 34 and almost

thirty-five billion dollars to almost 52 billion dollars, primarily due to europe , which transfers its weapons to ukraine and imports american first. ah, weapons. that is, this is clear evidence that the united states is a beneficial recipient from the continuation of the military conflict, europe only loses, but europe does not want to lose either. and today the chairman of the european people's party in the european parliament. these are the largest, and the party in the european parliament is the german manfred werner weber. i'm sorry. e said that the eu also needs, against the backdrop of the current conflict , i quote a kind of war economy, that the eu also needs to transfer its economy on a military footing and build up your own epc, but vladimir viktorovich for now. it seems to me that they are building up only american vk europeans. will the europeans succeed, but

they can strengthen their own vc, and here is the second question, if possible, can the build-up of the american vc become an incentive for the withdrawal of the american one? so, in general, in the fact that there are a lot of such, i would say undercover economic intrigues, because today everyone is seriously talking about the fact that this is a discussion about who is the first supplies tanks or apards, abrams, and so on, that this is essentially clearing the european market from behind lying equipment and filling it with new deliveries and the united states of america, of course, the americans see this as their economic benefit, and the question of the military economy. e, he will certainly get up sooner or later and get on the agenda. the fact is that the war economy. it is not limited to the production of 500-600 or some number of aircraft tanks or ammunition there. it's, uh, the whole system

because when, during world war ii, the american economy was a war economy at that time , consumer credit was limited , domestic consumption was significantly restrained. some other sectors of the economy, because the entire economy worked for the war. so, of course, before such a development of events. i hope the body doesn't arrive. eh, but it can’t reach it due to how much the mentality of people working in the united states of america has changed and, uh, the processes that them in the economy exist, therefore, approaching the second answer to your question. yes, it can stimulate a certain element of accelerating the pace of economic growth, but now in america there is one problem that is kind of like a shifter. on the one hand she is good on the other hand. this is bad. after the pandemic. it turned out that in most sectors of the economy there are not enough

workers, but wages are growing. today , unemployment in the united states of america is at its lowest level. it would seem that we should be proud of this. this hinders the economic growth is precisely due to the fact that reserves increase capacity. even those products that are available today, even after the post-mondemic growth in demand for consumer goods, do not give this effect, then, of course, today, rebuild the economy so quickly. and we see that events are developing quite quickly so quickly, uh, it will be extremely difficult to expand the economy, and vasily, very briefly, if possible, the united states does not hide the fact that they are now trying to use this conflict in ukraine to heat up their economy. in including under the confrontation with china and they will be able to at least catch up with china in terms of the military pace of military production. well, in some areas it is difficult to catch up, primarily in military shipbuilding, because they have lost the chinese civil shipbuilding. they just

siphon resources from their giant civilian sector of the military and build somewhere twice as many ships a year there. eh, what? hmm the americans are the same order of the other directions, the chinese have, unlike the us and everyone else uh, for real, advanced mobilization planning, with research and direct preparation for the transfer of civilian sectors of the economy to a military footing and apparently their production capacity in key areas is greater than anyone else, for example, they account for 70% of the world market, small drones. here is what is widely used, well, ukraine, that is , there is the potential for increasing the production of an unlimited part. but it seems to me that behind the decision of the united states to transfer tanks to ukraine and more politics in fact in fact, than military factors, we will talk about this after a short advertisement.

the package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance 5% 5% gel, diclofenac is an alternative to a high-quality patriotic one to pay. the map is yesterday, but it’s more convenient for me to have a qr-code with a phone. pay and which online pay button can you pay? as you wish, each as it suits him. choose your payment method with the world payment system and the fast payment system. button are left the most favorable

price up to 50% for 69 rubles. kfc tele2 and other entertainment subscribers due to 290 rubles. yes, and here he also has a son. hello hi mom. they signed you up for tests in gemotest, in your city there is a program country gemotest three basic analyzes for 290 rubles. free consultation of a doctor from the russian lotto has been raffled off. come for winnings in branded stores. stoloto buy tickets for special draws. the whole of january wins every third ticket increased

sugar or cholesterol jumps blood pressure cardioactive taurine is the best, the treatment of cardioactive taurine evalar is twice as profitable by price. cinema one tv presents, let's agree that there will be no work for the next two weeks. bastards how can you shoot at an artist in pyatigorsk from a height? it's time to move on to decisive action cipher story with no continuation, the main thing is to get there.

cinema one tv is not necessary. we're going to crash like that. why are you doing this? i ask you to take it. major new series

the frame is one substitution, and we can understand this only after the examination. big game we were talking before the break about that american rhetoric ah-ah, which is very loud about that ukraine is now allegedly inflicting some kind of decisive defeat on russia does not really correspond to the real amount of assistance that the united states and its allies provide to ukraine and many observers e. in the west , they say that in reality the united states does not expect to defeat russia in reality. right now we are witnessing some kind of psychological warfare operation and an attempt by the united states to play escalation for the sake of, yes, escalation or, more precisely, escalation for the sake of negotiations, namely, to try to scare

russia with the rhetoric that right now ukraine will strike some kind of decisive blow that the united states will always support ukraine and that there are no red lines, will increase the quality and quantity of uh, the supply of weapons and, as a result, will try to force russia to go to some disadvantageous. negotiations on western terms are not for her. here, listen to what the new york times and the rosdald columnist write in this regard. yes, the official position of the white house is that ukraine will have our support all the way to victory, but a cautious approach to president biden and his team to deliver weapons that could radically change the balance of power pushing kiev into negotiations concerns about large investments to the detriment of our commitments in asia all indicate that the immediate goal of the white house is a profitable truce and not the complete defeat of russia while this policy is not aimed at completely suppressing

russian mobilization or driving the russians out of ukraine, this policy is aimed at weakening any new offensive potentially to push the russians back from their positions and show moscow that a protracted war will be no easier to win than a short one , which russia initially hoped for, this escalation suggests that you need to continue to convince the russians and so on, they will be open concessions that we could not achieve. he andrey andreyevich what do you think about this hypothesis - this is the form of negotiations and of course. the american political leadership and military leadership, as we saw the words of mark miele see, at the end of this negotiation process. they strive to create the conditions under which these negotiations will be more convenient for ukraine, as the main tool for the west, which interpret what is happening as its own war with russia and someone is already making public reservations that our war, and therefore the future, is possible. our victory, does this mean that defeat will also be common for them,

but ultimately, the united states is now using this tool to build up, uh, immobilize military support for ukraine from its allies. and europe all this rests on one big information bubble that needs a little more help to add a couple of dozen more tanks and the situation will change dramatically they work in the mode of such a television series, when every month, in fact. looking for good news influx. uh, dopamine, and this monthly ramstein ritual, uh. shared photos inspired speeches it's such an endless series waiting for uh a good ending for them but what if the denouement is different this is what i'm talking about in order for their idea of ​​escalation, for the sake of escalation, to work, russia needs to pay off on this, but i very much doubt that russia will buy into this, that russia will enter into negotiations that are unprofitable for itself.

even if ukraine goes over to some kind of offensive in zaporozhye or in another area that is now being talked about, but actively in washington, in this case, the united states will need to. after russia refuses to play by their rules, they will either need to admit their defeat . and this is unacceptable for them, or go to such a real escalation, when you can really happen a direct military clash, that is, not only quantity, but also qualitatively build up the american one. e, help. ukraine either increase it poorly, but quantitatively dragging out the conflict and thereby creating the prerequisites for such a very protracted conflict , gradually outgrowing frozen conflicts, and this particular scenario. two very prominent representatives of the american establishment are described as the most likely. he is a former united states ambassador to nato and wodalder, and now chairs the chicago council on international affairs. relations and professor james gold geir, who works at the bryunik institute and sensory university. the expulsion of russian

troops from all of its territory, including crimea, will be an extremely difficult undertaking. even with more military assistance from the west than now, achieving such an exodus will require the defeat of a heavily dug-in and fortified russian defense and risks starting a direct war between nato and moscow, that is, the doomsday scenario that no one needs russian president vladimir putin does not show any signs that he is ready to give up his imperial dream of controlling ukraine and it will be equally difficult to convince the ukrainian government to cede territory to the occupying forces in exchange for an unreliable peace , given that both belligerents have serious motives to continue hostilities is much more likely, a third outcome protracted exhausting conflict, which is gradually frozen on the line of contact, which does not suit either side. well actually ivo dalder and james gold guyre describe korean script. borisovich here. how likely do you think. uh, here is this script, or rather its implementation and dalder and gold gear. they really analyze

really. the next trend or it's their dreams, but uh look the situation is evolving. so support uh fighting ukraine support ukrainian resistance. they can take quite a long time, and in fact, when we are talking about the supply of these there, within 200 tanks. uh, well, obviously this hardly allows you to break the russian army there or inflict defeat, but in conditions when stocks of equipment of soviet origin are running out. this allows us to support ukrainian ones. uh, ukrainian troops. give them the opportunity to continue to resist. it can go on for a long time and, uh, eventually. eh, because. uh, ukraine even losing territory will not go to any peace. well , somewhere we will probably stop, uh, with the line of actual control, which will pass along

the front line, somewhere on the territory. ukraine where will it stop? eh, it's hard to imagine in korea we observed a similar after the stabilization of the front line, there were attempts to change it. they did not lead to significant results, the sides suffered losses and went against the background. all this protracted two-year negotiations with the full understanding that there will be no political agreement, only a truce well, this scenario is more feasible if the kiev political regime is preserved, yes, and russia, it seems to me, will do everything in order to win, that is, not to achieve this stabilization according to the korean scenario, about which gold gear and a dalder write, namely to win. yes, and it is victory that is the defining goal of our special operation, but in any case. here is another very important imperative. and the supply of tanks, especially the decision of the united states a to supply their

ambergris in general. put yes declare what they supply, but uh make it so that these abrams actually come to ukraine maybe uh, next year or at the end of uh, at the end of this year. this is to maintain unity in nato, because many western observers have already started talking about the fact that nato arose last week, but the deepest split arose, actually since the beginning of the 2000s with the invasion of iraq by the united states, not the ability of the united states and germany to agree on a key issue, the priority issue tanks , and many are already wondering whether there will be whether such splits will appear in the future, and it seems to me that , as now, after the tanks , supplies of even more dangerous weapons to ukraine are beginning to be discussed, these new, e, splits within nato inevitable. yes, here is poland and the baltic countries, and they are already saying that the tanks are beautifully delivered.

now let's supply military aircraft. now let's substitute long-range missiles and so on. listen to what bloomberg writes about this. now that the tank delivery is over, one u.s. official said the debate will move on to other items on ukraine's wish list, such as the transfer of fighter jets and army tactical missile systems known as atsms, which in turn fuels the already raging discussions about the dangers of giving ukraine weapons capable of striking russia, such a move could lead to russian attacks on the armories and other supporting infrastructure of nato countries such as poland, having acquired modern tanks, zelensky will undoubtedly return to his successful tactics pressure on allies. demanding more and more. including long-range artillery and fighters , atlantic council analyst christopher skala andrei

france notes how do you assess the prospects deliveries and fighter planes and long-range rackets of it and whether you expect in connection with even discussions of these issues. new splits within nato let's start with deliveries. moreover, there will be many processes, they are stretched over time for years. about half a year, somewhere else, when something happened in the fall, and there at the end of summer there was an informational occasion that the americans put $ 100 million into the budget for the training of military pilots of ukraine in the usa for three types of american aircraft, well, we talked and forgot, and the training period is over now in january and now that time is coming, but americans they are consistent. they don’t want to deliver their advanced aircraft immediately to ukraine they want to replace their aircraft in nato countries in european countries, these are soviet waters, because how would the soviets end the competition, perhaps the euro-fighter will win another french rafael and so immediately the americans

give their and immediately takes over the market. they now completely occupy the market for tanks and begin to close the market for aircraft, so locked martin is the manufacturer of the f-16. he said everything is not a question, colleagues are sending. and in the soviet ukraine, we will immediately deliver ours to you; moreover, there will be attack helicopters already appearing, and pictures of how ukrainian pilots train without aviation. they will not be able to move forward, well, it will be very difficult to freeze the conflict according to the korean scenario. they dream about it, but they won’t be able to, because our military-industrial complex was preparing for such a large-scale war, unlike them, but the supply of not only tanks, but also aircraft and long-range missiles. naturally, the issue of escalation is even more relevant. and by the way, today donald e, also criticized the social network of the decision on deliveries there, like e ukraine, stating that this could drag the united states into a nuclear war, hinting at the consequences of the threat of escalation, and this conflict thinks so, not

only donald trump here, but apparently the chief columnist of the most liberal of the mainstream american newspapers, the new york times. steven david enger david senker, yes , many probably even know him personally, but wrote today that the decision to supply tanks, and do er, the two main goals of the biden administration in this conflict is to protect ukraine on the one hand and prevent a direct military clash with russia on the other hand , these two goals are increasingly contradictory to each other. yes , this is written by the chief columnist, and the new york times newspapers. e. david senker. a. but a, nevertheless. e in the united states they say that this supply decision is a discussion of the supply of aircraft and, uh, even long-range missiles, but is based on

a significant revision on a significant reassessment of the risks of escalation in the direction of their reduction, that supposedly the united states is no longer afraid that russia will strike a direct blow at nato territory and, moreover, will switch to vertical escalation, that is, to nuclear escalation. here, in particular. listen to what cnn editor writes about this, neither to patton walsh. the latest package of western aid says two things, firstly, these countries are not concerned about the violation of russian red lines, the long-standing belief that some elements of nato's aid to ukraine risk going too far by provoking a nuclear power. secondly, these nato members are increasingly less concerned about being attacked by russia itself in the near future, rather than handing over weapons that they themselves will urgently need in the event of such a conflict. here andrei andreevich is a reassessment of the risks of escalation. she is real or imaginary. they really aren't afraid anymore. uh,

russian repercussions or they're trying to impress us. you know how nixon is with his matman stretch what's all in vietnam? they are no longer afraid of anything, they can go to the end. russia, not be afraid of escalation, not be afraid, and so on. this is how they really changed their assessments or they are trying to create such an impression. what do you think and what should we do in this regard? three key questions that i hardly have time to answer within two minutes, but they became hostages. they became hostages. e three key circumstances. the first is the holidays - this is the strategic thinking in europe of the elite. learned how to weigh security risks on their own and relatively speaking, play on their own, and do not trust entirely in the united states , which after the second world war provide a nuclear umbrella for western europe after the cold war extended it to the east, and they trust the assessments in the united states by the europeans. yes, but now we are talking about the united states that they have allegedly ceased to be afraid of escalation. those own

the initiatives in the western camp and do not let anyone close to the levers of control of this crisis when ukraine tried. uh, by provocation to involve directly polyakov hitting rockets on polish territory, a step quickly rather without a hitch, and explained to everyone what exactly happened. ukrainian rocket fell on polish territory, there are no circumstances that, uh, should lead. the escalation of this crisis, and from the point of view of the united states, they are solving their important task of eliminating any centers of strategic thinking in europe by creating a coalition with the eastern europeans, very noisy emotional people who are charged with war. they are the first to donate their entire military arsenal to ukraine fearing a really direct clash with russia, they believe that the theater will be limited to just this, and in this absence of their, uh, strategic thinking by us, maybe the americans would tell them. take your time, everything is loaded and together they solve one

problem, and the consolidation of control over europe , but at the cost of the fact that individual european countries thoughtlessly completely weaken the flanks. er, nato's borders with russia, er, behavior that would not have been possible during the cold war, when any battalions e, which could occupy a certain border. uh, this contact. i think the americans are still keen to keep this crisis under control, they are strongly opposed to vertical escalation and hope to reach a point of balance, uh, which is more comfortable for them and allows them to declare victory, the west in this war, but they do not have in mind. and that this victory will be achieved, that it will be decisive, and maybe even that it will resemble the korean scenario, because in that scenario both sides announced their victory uh feature of the situation. after all, the fact that this line allows the americans not to worry about

the territorial configuration. ukraine victory. it will be possible to announce even if there is very little left of ukraine. but it was there that the government put ukrainian control over the territory, and they were instrumental in our common western victory . and look, we consolidated everything. eh, i regret that the ukrainian government has assumed this function of the instruments of western politics and admits it quite. frankly speaking to syria statements and interviews pity the ukrainian society, which supports this government on the ukrainian people. it's a pity in the first place, the ukrainian government. i don’t feel sorry at all, but voluntarily and purposefully made itself an instrument of anti-russian policy, as for strategic thinking , in europe it’s not like even holidays, but in europe coma e strategic thinking, the united states it seems to me that they allow this to continue again, playing out. it seems to me that this map of psychological warfare against russia trying to play with russia in escalation for the sake

of negotiations, but not on russian, but on their terms, then russia will certainly not agree to this. we will now break for a few moments, and then we will talk about china eternal field and general speed on the eve of the international day of remembrance of the victims of the holocaust vladimir putin met with the chief rabbi and chairman of the jewish communities of russia apu to fire, donetsk and our air strikes for targets in several regions of ukraine , the tank gambit is first the abrams leopards , then how long will they wait for american armored vehicles in kiev, and why does the pentagon arrange such games? the eradication of the traditional faith and incitement of hostility, but

on the spiritual front and attempts to pit the fraternal peoples patriarch kirill at the christmas parliamentary meetings. how did the builders install the third span on the left of the highway part of the crimean bridge along the knurled road, do they plan to resume the payment of housing and communal services without a commission in march in all lanes? with a free debit card from the airborne forces order on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out sovcombank, move away and immediately conceived the repair, took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank .

best, cardioactive treatment. taurine evalar is twice as profitable at the price of tele2 represents i heard a lot about your tele2 exchange well , show me what i get first in the cinema discounts when buying gadgets and other entertainment subscribers. now minutes. new currency. tele2 other rules attention when poisoning allergies and hangovers to drink vacuumed. and recently, i suddenly clearly realized that all people are the same, what men are talking about is simple pleasures on february 2, an excursion to transfer money to mary for 300 rubles. still dialing a phone number for manual transfer tinkoff was the first in russia to launch a number scanner. install the tinkoff application and transfer money easily and without commission tinkoff is the only one. this is our food. she gives me strength, sausage. dad, maybe

you're watching a hefty one there, i'm lying on my mother's heart to check. hi, hello, mom, we signed you up for tests at gemotest with three basic tests for 290 rubles each. free doctor's consultation. if the delivery causes inconvenience, order the medicine at pharmacy.ru 10% discount on the first order. they say you need to get out of your comfort zone, but how long have you been in it infuriating spam ends, traffic. look, you can enjoy peace of mind, like a cat on its belly, because on mts messengers work at zero, and with the mts option with a defender artificial intelligence will save you from spam calls and send you a decrypted report. connect with qr cat moore every day.

that's life. you have time. you accurately calculated everything. you have enough strength. you take good care of your health. it returns strength, supporting the nervous system, the immunity of muscles and bones. the latest generation of aquatrin vitamin d is better absorbed than other number one forms. take as much as your family needs this winter. the discount works , we transform, look at the mirrors for 25.99 in m. video eldorado masha you have zhenkov, call me back. you still have free calls. order a sim card on the website tinkoff.ru and get free minutes forever tinkoff is one of a kind. what is the most cost-effective medicine for cystitis, not just for malar more profitable up to 50% not frastenovar. treatment of cystitis without overpayments.

why do you need so many cards if there is one halva with an installment plan for 10 months? and sausage cashback up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, only one card for all diclofenacase in a package with a man contains the maximum concentration of the active substance 5% five percent gel. diclofenac alternative high-quality patriotic one on the air, the united states continues to increase its contractual policy not only in relation to russia, but also in relation to china, which they consider as the main and long-term strategic rival and such us actions as a chip semiconductor war. and as already announced, the visit of the new speaker of the house of representatives kevin mccarthy to taiwan is being organized by

the pentagon a as a statement from the administration biden that while china is allegedly helping russia, e, in the ukrainian conflict, all this indicates that it is turning towards the information course. washington doesn't want a uh visit. uh, tony linkin in china, which will take place, by the way, at the end of next week , will be largely devoted to the denormalization of relations, but rather to pressure and blackmail. well, not everyone in the united states shares the point of view, but the need for further confrontation. with china today. uh, the leading american forrinface magazine published a very interesting article by former united states treasury secretary henry ponson he was secretary of the treasury during the second administration of bush jr. and henry paulson, just believes that and this confrontation against china is counterproductive for the united states itself and makes it weaker, listen, china and

the united states are rapidly moving from competitive but sometimes cooperative relationships to relationships that are in almost every sense confrontational as a result of the us facing the prospect and putting its companies at a disadvantage compared to their allies, which limits their ability to commercialize innovations. this could lead to a loss of market share in third countries for those who fear that the united states is losing the competitive race with china. us actions threaten to make fear a reality. the us is trying to organize a coalition of like-minded countries. first of all, the democracies of asia and europe to balance china and put pressure on it, but this strategy does not work. it hurts both the us and china, and in the long run it will probably hurt the americans more than the chinese. while many countries share washington's distaste for china's politics and behavior , none of them follow washington's methodology on this issue. even the closest strategic partners of washington are not

ready for a confrontation with china, trying to contain or economically disintegrate it on the same scale as the united states vladimir dmitrievich do you agree that this is what the us economic war against china is doing the united states is weaker and with respect to china and in general in general, who is the winner, and who will be the loser in this economic war usa china you know what we are seeing happening today is, in fact, such a global conflict in the global world economic system and look at it through the eyes through the eyes of the economy, and uh, what is happening in it today is what many colleagues have already clearly noted, uh , the increase in the inconsistency of the actions of the united states because, on the one hand, trying to fight one enemy practically on the battlefield, and the united states of america immediately arranges economic battles with another of its own. a powerful

enemy in economic terms, and these contradictions are not so much as there is a rupture of relations with china, something else, the very contradictory nature of these relations. it seems to me that it aggravates the situation in the united states of america well, firstly, if we remember the same trump. after all, he put pressure on china, wanting to connect economic agreements with them, so that china would agree to buy in the usa, we always talk about a military power in the usa, but it is an agricultural power, a very large agricultural product, because it is an important huge and potential market for american products, that now we can say that china will be happy to import if you have products from the united states, i think that we are hardly talking about that today the americans are actually actively intriguing to replace european weapons with their own weapons in europe in other countries of the world, but china, as colleagues say correctly, does not lag behind in the global arms market, and i do not exclude that at no stage will it begin to gather southeast asian competitors in this part

of the market as soon as the wind changes. uh, so to speak e in the gas market. a fleet of lng tankers, they are quite calmly dependent on chinese imports. and all this together suggests that further deterioration of economic relations with china will, of course, harm the united states. america, uh, vasily borisovich well, henry paulsen makes another very important thesis that the united states will lose not only in this binary the us equation china but also lose in the third world that the more the united states puts pressure on china, the weaker becomes the american position in africa in the middle east in latin america for many of which china has already become the main trade and investment partner. do you agree with this and will the united states be able to move china's position in the global south of the sudden world or as we call it the world majority.

well, in fact, china has been a partner in terms of trade in goods for a number of years. number one for both the middle east and africa. and even for latin america, it may be inferior, in some of these regions , to the americans in terms of investment, and even then, there we are already talking about comparable values. uh, because china concentrated at home. e the main industrial production. that is, there, in terms of nominal gdp, it is less than the united states , but in terms of industrial production. this is already incomparable magnitude. it is also the main consumer of any raw material, respectively, for any developing country that exports raw materials and semi-finished products china is the locomotive of the economy. the united states only controls the financial infrastructure there, under which, uh, thanks to which these relations develop. therefore, in principle, we see that even countries where the uh policy

is not very friendly towards china are not particularly ready to confront it. and the position of even japan of south korea in relation to energy is much more restrained than that of the united states. well, in europe , turning to the european topic, something is happening that, in fact, we have already talked about many times were talking at this table, and the flow of leadership and political influence from the traditional european leaders of france and germany to the new europe to the countries of central eastern europe, primarily to poland , is what steven ellenberger , the main columnist for the new york times in europe, writes about in particular ? persistent persuasion from eastern and central europe played a decisive role in the decision this week to provide western tanks to ukraine after months of disputes and resistance, the war is also accelerating, what scholz hinted that the balance of power in europe is shifting along with its center from old europe, which

valued and developed its ties with moscow to new members in the east and north, power shifted to the east. and ukraine will consolidate this trend, said irina pulul, director of the berlin office of the european council on foreign relations, hans kundani from chad hamhouse, who has written extensively about germany and the european union. sees a psychological shift in europe poles and central europeans feel more confident, while french and the germans are leaning towards a defensive position , he noted. well, against this background, the old europeans are pursuing a policy that in english is called bent vang, that is , forced accession to the winner and especially brightly. this can be seen in the example of germany , which ashes head says that their previous policy aimed at cooperation and increased interdependence with russia was supposedly wrong false wrong, but in poland and the baltic states they were supposedly right in everything and thus balticization or colonization is taking place

german foreign policy, a and we all heard, for example, yesterday's statement by german foreign minister johann lena berg, who said that we , meaning by us west europe, are waging war against russia and not with each other yes, and. uh, the day before yesterday, state secretary of the german foreign ministry toby oslindr said that the next decades will be devoted to the formation of european security, not with russia, but against russia run for the better and that's in the medium term. as long as europe is like that. that's how burbuck linder describes it, and steven erlanger, uh, it's interesting to us. what are we to do? europe it is not the first time that we are confronted with a united europe in the course of our history , the episodes of this confrontation have been

repeatedly. some of them were lengthy. an attempt to build security in europe without russia is doomed to failure. this means that europe will be immersed in a systemic permanent crisis if colleagues believe that once you set such a task, you can solve it and forget it, they are very much mistaken if they want to receive this stream of military information more than once in generations, namely on a daily basis and live in constant tremor from what will now e probably they just forgot. what did the peaks of military crises look like during the cold war and you can read the memoirs of your ancestors, for example, how everyone rode there in a tram silently expecting that american or soviet missile exercises could lead to direct confrontation. i think that this is a short memory and the feeling that, uh, now is the time of opportunity

, everyone sees certain excitement in trying to use the military tool to solve their own problems, the calculation is based on the fact that this confrontation can be won and as a result of this victory there will be available significant resources that can make up for the deficits and the problems that europe has now but what if not, what if it turns into one such long, bleeding line contact, which will doom these frontier countries to permanent residence, to the lack of economic opportunities, to poor demographic dynamics, to political instability, to a sense of a dead end of historical development. i do not see now any theses in this discussion that could revive this e, reality of confrontation, but we will come to it if europe continues the children this way, and vladimir 2.000. right now, the european union has already begun discussing the tenth package of anti-russian sanctions and ursula fondulein, head of the european commission. and uh, the poles say that it will be aimed primarily at

plugging holes, that is, preventing bypasses. the already imposed sanctions does this mean that the european union is moving to secondary extra-territorial sanctions in relation to third countries very briefly, what will this mean? yes, and they began to do this already in the ninth package gradually and plug holes, the most important ones to introduce their own.