[000:00:00;00] that the soviet union is really a foreign evil for them and a much greater evil than nazi germany compared to the soviet union, which was a great ideological anomaly, at that time in international relations it was perceived both as a geopolitical challenge and as an ideological one, moreover, an existential ideological challenge. uh, for uh, western european. uh, democracies, nazi, germany seemed to be a much more related element. see how much was about the nazi elite the highest elite in the same uk and. by the way, speaking also in the united states, i would like to know your assessment of the actions of the russian allies of the soviet allies during the great patriotic war for them it was the second world war on the one hand. well, they were clearly allies, they fought against hitler, uh, on one side there was a leaf, which

undoubtedly helped the soviet armed forces a lot, on the other hand there were some constant delays with the second front. uh , there was some big distrust of the soviet leadership and the soviet union, but it seems from the other side. we read that, in general, president roosevelt. here he differed from churchill and wanted to somehow negotiate with stalin, if only you could give a general assessment of the actions of the allies in relation to moscow in relation to russia throughout the great patriotic war. here, in my opinion. it is worth continuing this line of geopolitical analysis that we started and note that the third reich nevertheless declared war on two fronts. which, by the way, german geopolitics hitler was categorically not advised to do that, that is, house kaffer said, either you are creating a bloc with moscow with moscow, this was such

a paradoxical moment in the spirit of the factor, the so-called russian german hero , or with the west with america and with england you cannot fight on two fronts. and hitler started. well, on two fronts, thus, from a geopolitical point of view, he did not join either the heartland, or the land civilization, or the sea civilization, creating a problem for both, and i think that britain and america when they saw that hitler had become an independent force in this conflict, they waited for a long time, whether he would limit himself only to a hostel, whether he would become an outpost of western civilization, then what the munich agreement pushed us to. that is, i think there were agents of influence of the same anglo-saxon, very serious powers . hitler himself was an aglophile. he really did not want this conflict with the west. but when it started, i think they went into a serious war with hitler and they fought, seriously

not. i feel like begging anyway. this there was also an existential threat for them, but of course, their task was not to give victory to us, because they did everything possible so that moby alone had real support, and not on me, but when ours began, the power of our people of our state began to show signs the victories here they turned on in order to simply prevent us from reaching the atlantic. and if everything had continued like this, we would have moved in this regard. i think their position was dishonest she was rather hmm let's say double manual with double standards, but it all fits into the same geopolitics, and then the most important thing was the division of europe into two camps and the strengthening of the cordon sanitaire. after that, they immediately began to deal with eastern europe during the cold war in order to re -create a conflict zone between continental europe, that is, germany and

france, let's say, and russia, that is, they are tirelessly engaged in anglo-british geopolitics. they don't sleep in the world. they use allied relations with russia for their own interests . your interest is enmity and war away they are always ready and in the crimean war in all this big game, but they never lose this line. that's what, well, just makes one wonder at some, but the coherence of the sequence of continuity of the geopolitical elites of the glasaxon world. they have the mackinder card in front of them and are not distracted from it for a second. and when we are allies, as in the second world war, and when we are allies of ivante, and when we are opponents in the cold war, the same geopolitical map and the same goal to subjugate dismember restrain growth land civilization, which are russia russian the empire of the modern russian federation from a geopolitical point of view for the anglo

-saxon british american strategists is one and the same and it doesn’t matter at all, we commit some kind of crimes against human rights, we persecuted ethnic minorities, we organized a labor la. since it is important to imagine what kind of ideology we have, but the battle is secondary on a different level, therefore, the conflict that we are talking about today throughout this program crosses both epochs and political regimes and the name of states and ideological systems. but he remains a war with the west. at least to the golosakovsky measures. it's over. uh, long-term situation. rather than our ideological regimes and theirs and ours, ideologies are changing, not only with us, but also with them, and the war remains, therefore, if we talk about today, we have actually come to the moment of truth between our civilization , the civilization of land civilization and the anglo-saxon sea civilization first of all lasts this is the great war of the continents, which in

continuation of the game, which never and necessarily talk about it in the next segment. but i want to tell you e michael a very specific question. why did the united states drop the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki well, i can clearly say that even truman's words that he clearly said when we dropped this bomb, when we saw how it exploded on hiroshima and nagasaki now we have a cudgel for these russians guys. i mean, it was clear. uh. show e russia to moscow that the united states possesses such weapons, which can demolish entire cities and naturally. and to consider that those interests that will be pursued by the united states of america in great britain and their allies, and russia should give in otherwise, that is, it

was done, not so much against japan although, of course, due to the japanese tragedy. well, you think that this was objectively done against the soviet in the first place. i believe that roosevelt already know, eh? he would have used the bomb the same way as truman i can even tell you in regard to russia, this is actually the twenty-sixth of february 1943 after the battle of stalingrad, when in the state department roosevelt comes out ahead of its members. she said that he is extremely concerned about the russian issue and believes that the plan will be, but this former ambassador of the soviet union is very good, when all of europe west of russia, including france , great britain, including germany, should be organized. like a well-armed military camp to resist russia to hold it back, and already m-m directly

the conference of the forty-fourth year is not before but i beg your pardon for the forty-third year shortly before tehran and the chief of staff of the us army general marshal and the future tablet, right? yes, next year the secretary, yes, he said clearly. uh, ask, ask, the british, what are you going to? and what are we going to do. and when russia is defeated, germany , will not germany help us to throw out the word throw e russians out of europe and , accordingly, thereby ending the war, the market plan. it's the same thing, that is, to capture before the russians do not give europe and the atomic bomb to scare the russians do not. actually become that great power, which she won with the blood of the soldiers, when there was no opening of the second front, because from the day of the promise of the second front. we remember that this is june of the forty-second year, the moment of its opening, june, forty, the fourth , only 5.5 million soldiers died on the soviet german front. i didn't watch,

thank you dmitry should ask you about what happened immediately after the war there is a full sky version of churchill's speech that the soviet union stalin hung up an iron curtain that divided europe that the united states was great britain that they wanted for a liberated europe of democracy freedom to determine their own destiny, and the soviet union on all the territory that the soviet union controlled after the victory over fascism that the soviet union established its total control there? threatened the rest of europe, this forced the organization of nato and c. in general, all historical responsibility for

the conflict that has arisen, and all of the west and east responsibility clearly belongs to the soviet union, led by stalin, is it so it is not. it's completely one-sided. uh, the western point of view, which has, well , not much to do with reality , in fact, the soviet union but objectively needed a security buffer after the great patriotic war. in fact, the soviet union strictly followed, uh, the agreements on the division of spheres of influence in europe, in fact, the united states began to violate, uh, the yalta-poddam agreements, the united states began to prevent that, so that germany remains jointly occupied, and in the future it would become a single neutral state. the united states created. the buffalo trison of west germany integrated west germany into nato, this was a fundamental violation of the potsdam ones. uh, agreements, cold war. unfortunately, it began when

the second world war had not yet ended, and again, geopolitics teaches that the cold war was inevitable, but i would dmitry continue the idea that it was the united states that unleashed the cold war. ah and then in every possible way, but supported her. i would tell you very briefly about the tragedy, george, kenana, uh, a man whom i think everyone knows, and the author of a long telegram, and the author of the article, the origins of soviet behavior in the form of fs. you know, kenen, uh, was really the author of the theory of containment, he argued that there was no alternative to containment of the soviet union, but forty-eighth forty- ninth years. he fundamentally revised his point of view and quarreled with dean attison. e. stuck just a year as the united states secretary of the

that george canon began to advocate cooperation for peace with the soviet union against the cold war, believed that peaceful coexistence was possible, that it was possible to overcome and prevent the institutionalization of confrontation and build what franklin delana russian once stood for and this marginalized kenan inside the united states, he was fired from the state department it became all. and almost an ally of stalin and old age. still, the performance was kicked out, just in the fifty-second year, and just after all, with ken advocated a neutral united, but neutral germany outside of nato , which, by the way, was proposed by the soviet union exactly in the fifty-second year too, but the united states did not support the idea of ​​kenan in the united states, dean atchin's approach about the struggle of the existential struggle defeated. with the soviet union, in fact, it began to be institutionalized, the cold war. hey, thanks dimitri. we go out for a break and

after that our discussion a and we talk about the current situation. and how can you look for a worthy e, exit from it, which would corresponded to russian national interests. thank you attention, motor vysotsky song double 1 he sang each song 6-7 times, then he wiped his sweat and said no, now i'm staying. i got what i wanted. at first i warned the performance that this was no variety concert. never have i been so useless, as i still hate, fucking, inversion of our style, he said bitches did not fight. and so, as if he had gone through a crooked war, they were completely unsuitable for the family. but why are they

lived 12 years with marina, precisely because it was not entirely in the family, it was always pleasant to hear. vysotsky faster, paris seemed to be popping up. what was there we look at. we were offered several films. always censorship, refused to often visit, that in order to become better ourselves we have a couple of good people premiere on the eighty-fifth birthday of vladimir vysotsky the person of all the people who picked up the guitar pentalgin extragel against pain in muscles and joints in it is the highest dosage of the substance from inflammation pain and a special component for better penetration into the focus field pentalgin extragel was created to combat pain, inflammation in muscles and joints. a large

package at a bargain price, getting yota 350 minutes 35 gb of a popular social network and video services for 399 rubles. connect to yota now in all megafon salons big lot of chicken and french fries new big megaroll. kfc take the ozon winter clothing sale in your hands and dress profitably april dress for 439 rubles. jacket finn flare for 2.99 rubles. pants-tubbies for 179 rubles. love fast, love long. love sweet. we are talking about sleep. what are you thinking about? you can fall asleep in just 20 minutes

, sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily in the morning . only in the application are tasty points. up to 70%. buy smartphone 10 for only 15.000 990 rubles. with age, created for nutrition and youthfulness of the eyes, it is recommended to apply daily for three months , three courses a year. tv and haier appliances inspired by life coupon 2 9 nuggets for 69 rubles kfc tantum verde i said boys

tantum verde tablets make sore throats hurt with different tastes . i tell you for sure, maybe he is your favorite cheese onions and cucumbers. tell me, take ambroxol rinival, it seems that he hired everything. we trust revan. we choose roar, and for the tour, transfer money to marijuana for 300 rubles. still dialing

a phone number for manual transfer tinkov was the first in russia to launch a number scanner. install the tinkoff app and transfer money easily and commission-free tinkoff he is one discomfort, and sickens sick and twists everything boils and diarrhea. here we need filters as soon as possible thanks to millions of filtrum microphone like a sponge absorbs various bacteria and toxins, helping to eliminate unpleasant symptoms of filtrum style in order to put things in order in the stomach for the benefit of the whole family point more than 32 million prizes under stickers in the application since january 30 aleksey fedorov developer.

rf is on the air big game in ukraine there is a real crisis around ukraine there is a crisis of honey east and west what started as a special the operation is looking more and more like a major war and uh, the west the united states first, uh, and the uk are escalating more and more, but we are told that in general, president biden is nothing to worry about. more recently, he said that new shipments of american weapons, including abrams , pose no threat to russia, these weapons

are designed to attack russia. we want this war to end as soon as possible, sounds hopeful. well, here's the problem. apparently, uh president biden, for one reason or another, was unable to share his expectations. and with the ukrainian wards of the united states, because this is what president zelensky literally just said about the possibility of negotiations with russia, let's hear. if you can't sleep at night and you're alone with your thoughts , did you imagine what would happen if you were alone in a room with

putin that would help end the war. i'm not interested in meeting him and talking to him. why because we met with him as part of the normandy format even before the start of a full-scale invasion. i see that this is a man who says, but rather does the other too late too late, who he is now after a full scale invasion. he is for me. here, uh, president biden and his administration. they say that new american weapons and other nato weapons are being provided to president zelensky for the sake of achieving peace in order to strengthen ukraine's position in the negotiations, but clearly

president zelensky has a completely different understanding of the situation, and his advisers have an understanding situations. if possible, it goes even further. here is what his adviser mikhail podoliak just said, how he sees the methods of war between ukraine and russia that they already live somewhere in another reality, like moscow petersburg yekaterinburg and so on. everything will be subject to the escalation of the war. but this escalation is an internal problem of the russian federation, so i hear. e that there will be such blows, this is an internal problem of russia, that is, apparently, e he means that russia is either carrying blows. by itself. i get the feeling that

it's just, uh, these people are, uh, mocking some normal logic, but uh, it's pretty obvious that they're not interested in negotiating. and what, when they talk about, in addition to the weapons that they have already been promised, that they be provided with modern ones. combat aircraft, they mean, not just keep these aircraft on airfields, which impress russian negotiators? general buginsky you are well acquainted with the situation on the fronts of ukraine and with the conflicts between russia and the west. eh, so what? uh, who can produce and what forces can both sides use in this confrontation, can these new weapons help ukraine to carry out the plans of mr. podolia

and mr. zelensky's hopes that he will be able to somehow return crimea to ukraine, you know, uh. i have a firm conviction that, uh, our western former partners, they they just pushed themselves into a corner. for the past year they have been repeating, beating their chests, that they will lay down, but will not allow the defeat of ukraine. victory, or rather the defeat of russia, is inevitably a lot of analyses. their articles come out with a statement by politicians both in the united states and in europe that they believed the ukrainians that they really will win and what will happen to them? uh, biden is already repeating a prayer. we will help you as much as necessary, and they believed that the west would really be with them to the end and deliver there is anything you like, well, about the strikes on the territory of the russian federation there, what the podiak has just

said there. e. well, you know what they launched two soviet drones. there, a little altered and one flew to engels , the other flew there. yes, yes, some target on the territory of the russian federation, this does not mean that they have some kind of ability , uh, to hit targets deep in russian territory, yes, and frankly speaking, as of today, the americans do not have such means, uh, to e from the ground not from the air, not from the sea, viz. the earth is a parasite of the target in the depths of the russian federation, but in principle, when they see this escalation, they see it. the pace of e-e deliveries, well, by themselves there are 30-100 tanks. uh, they uh, naturally. don't underestimate this. ah, but all this talk , that they need thousands, in principle, theoretical , of course they can bet a thousand from them , but it seems to me that they are moving

by leaps and bounds to the fact that they will soon have to choose. whether to start a serious war. that's right, the united states. i am nato , of course, this is, of course, such a bloc. e, i i say, 80% of nato's combat potential is the united states. russia, if it is , so to speak, especially if it comes to aircraft, it will be forced to carry out strikes on targets in poland, romania, slovakia , where delivery is carried out, unloading before manning. uh, these uh types of weapons. as for aircraft, i don’t yet see the possibility for them to be based on the territory of ukraine, which means they should be based somewhere on the territory of the general. excuse me for taking what you're saying is now a very serious thing that you don't spoke. uh, before you say that russia will have to be forced to move for limbs. uh, fighting into

enemy territory, no matter what this strange person, yes, and then the united states will have to decide. uh, intervene or them. and for my allies, as they are, like a baidan, again beats myself in the chest that i will defend the territories of our allies every day, because i think and buy. den despite all his so to speak, beginning there will not call these medical terms. still he understands that any armed clash by the directly organized forces of the russian federation is a direct path to a nuclear apocalypse. illusions. there shouldn't be any here. there are people there who do not understand this, but they think that there are people who can explain it to them, so i once again repeat the russian federation first, but only in extreme circumstances, can go for it. and so, let the americans decide for themselves.

thank you very much. well, i think the latest decision is the supply of weapons. they are associated with that in washington, london, brussels, in berlin, in general, they came to the conclusion that, for some period, and the difficulties of the russian army and tactical, e, success of the ukrainian, that this period has come to an end and that in order to prevent the defeat of ukraine that some drastic measures are required, but this is not the only disappointment that uh, the opponents of russia had another disappointment, of course, that there was no serious opposition. e russia inside the country, you note that less and less, and in the west they write about russian oppositionists about people who have decided to leave russia about people who, oh, very harshly criticize

russia, and not only how the war is being waged. but the very fact that russia here has decided to defend its interests firmly and does not speak at all does not speak at all about other people who are becoming more and more now with us on the teleconference. and vladimir grubnikov is the head of an important volunteer organization . ah, great courage. you were , uh, in a ukrainian prison. they accused you of all kinds of political crimes. you were in quality. the exchange of prisoners of war and now you led, as i understand it, not just led the creation of a new volunteer organization that helps the russian army. could say in two words. what do you do? yes certainly

not political crimes in the first place. i was accused of sabotage and terrorist activities. well, basically, uh, but it doesn't really matter right now. i'd like to talk about something more important, uh, first of all , what hmm and that's how it was, but right the west is seen helping ukraine with weapons. and uh, maybe uh, this help just says that and just ukraine is losing, and therefore the west, uh, means, u does not really let you lose, if you pay attention to how the word began, then at first, the west in general, uh, waited just watched and waited. and how the situation will develop and did nothing for the first time there, and the supplies went, then why and how is it happening now that the more military

failures we have. the worse the trends, the more and the west will stick, that is, it is showing impudence that it is supplying various weapons. and this should be considered first. that is, the better we fight, the less chance that the west sets something up, the worse it is for me , the more chances that he will be impudent at first to set up later, maybe, to participate in this, this moment itself needs to be clearly taken into account and understood. this is the first second point. e cooperation with the west ah. many people say that the supply of weapons has begun. that's just from the age of 22. in fact , the supply of various equipment, unofficial arms shipments, and so on. they were from well, the fourteenth year, at least a plus. of course, this is serious work with personnel that the west carried out training of officers training of personnel training of various directions, that is , they specifically made a point, spears from ukraine, which were a shaft that they held themselves , but the tip should be maximum.

it is refined and smeared with poison as much as possible, therefore , this is the main function of ukraine , it has no other functions, it must either fulfill its function to destroy russia, or this tip must break. here and sunk into oblivion. and if we win, it will be so, well, it should be noted that, but the supply went in different directions, for example, in the directions of the same connection, for example, that is, the coronazi army. she, uh, from the fourteenth year. e, i was very seriously involved in the moments of digitalization of communications , the transition of a huge number of divisions to a digital communication format to the dmr standard. uh, equipment was used for this, for example, from the same motorola company that is now, for example, you can’t buy it yourself for the russian federation. that's why they seriously prepared for war. they seriously sharpened this blade of an arrow, and a must be understood.

for all that this enemy was preparing for war. he knew that there would be a war, he prepared for it and prepared very, very seriously. that's why now we must understand that through the proxy of ukraine we will choose a completely collective west. this means that we must fight him as effectively as possible. so, and we must surpass them not only numerically, technically and so on. well, surpass them in all other respects. so, uh, including. uh, if there are any problems with the russian army, for example, digital communications. here is how i would like to point out certain points. yes, and then these moments. uh, they are being decided, including at the expense of civil society. and when certain problems arise, for example. there, with the same manager of radio stations, excitement, for example, with insufficient communications, the fighters often have to purchase, for example, analog communications, because they do not have any. well i mean in mind, for example, a unit of the people's

militia, and this is being decided. by the forces of the wonderful civil society of the russian federation, which monitors the situation as much as possible, which is maximally involved in the process, which helps in all possible and impossible ways, and for the military, and perhaps closing those moments where the state does not quite have time, but to resolve these issues, for example, purchase of equipment building networks on the backbone, backbone equipment, that is, in particular, digital radio stations this moment. uh, uh, the involvement of the population in helping their army makes it directly, and the people's army, and the people and the army are united in this respect. here, uh, what you're doing is working for the army now. that is, for example, women conflict camouflage nets. and i do. these large candles are made by potbelly stoves, for example, with their own forces. yes, uh, someone donates money in large quantities, someone brings in automobile transport, which is very much in short supply at the front, because mobile

transport is a big problem big problems there is absolutely, but that's what civil society is for, that is, where the state can not keep up. it sort of solves moments, and thanks to russian civil society , many problems that the army has , they are being solved, but here it should be noted that our opponents work systematically and there are, for example, moments that civil society can solve. maybe, for example, to supply, for example, the missing thermal underwear. and for example, there are military personnel or uniforms. there are those who can only be coordinated with the military, for example, and supply e. e the same connections. that is, it goes directly, and the coordination with the command is the coordination with the units. that is, that the volunteers supply something, but the head of communications takes everything there. i mean, it's all networking and so on, but there are things that civil society can't solve on its own. for example, if problems start there. with

ammunition and so on, civil society cannot solve these issues, so here it is more important that the state should be included in the process as efficiently as possible. the state must understand that it is no longer its own. this is a war, and a war by a completely collective west, where we will either win, or, uh, we will be completely destroyed and with the awareness of this, with the consciousness that we can lose, but that is why we must win, and uh, the majority of the population - this is the better they understand, the more it is included in this process is the second, if given to military personnel. and everything that is possible and, trying to get involved in this process as much as possible. thank you and thank you for having us. and, of course, big. thanks for all this great noble work that you are doing. thank you. thank you. eh, well, for me, here's for me. that's what more and more people in russia are getting involved in this

kind of work. it seems to me very important. and andranik, when do you look at russian society today? is my impression correct that while the voices of the opposition are often the loudest and are more noticed in the west, it is that part of russian society that represents vladimir the chest, that this part is becoming more and more active and does it without any order without any administrative resource. if you want, well, according to the voice of your heart. well, i think it's obvious that a huge number of people who left here for different countries, berlin and so on, which broadcast from there. they once again

proved that they did not understand their country , moreover, they misled their european and overseas patrons , the japanese. in fact, there is a contract between russian society and the authorities, the authorities do whatever they want, just to be left alone society. and if suddenly broken. this is what the agreement looked like. it's that it's not your point no, it's here i 'm talking about them the point of view of the composers' asylum, and they said, therefore, but if now suddenly the authorities. they will move on to some measures that will require some effort from society. here the power will not resist mobilization - this is the collapse of the power of the war, there is an increase,

scale, and so on. this is the collapse of power. the economy will collapse, everything will fall apart. they turned out to be wrong in everything, because i was shocked. they convinced themselves and the west they convinced that there would be no mobilization, the army would increase. uh, trained contingents will not go into battle, everything that is happening right now is exactly the opposite of how they assessed the state of russian society. that is, i cannot say what we already see today. mobilized russian society is ready like this young man. uh, so, uh, to engage in volunteer activities, but i see that in society there are a huge number of people who, until recently, were quite critical of the authorities. even before the war

, they begin to think that their state their society is threatened very seriously. eh, a very serious problem. and if there is no mobilization today, it will probably be too late tomorrow for these things. i'm watching the general. i have a short question for you. eh, society is increasingly accepting this battle as its own. power shows on the one hand and determination on the other. i would say healthy oversight. president putin says that the russian armed forces will receive everything the russian one needs. uh, the industry has the opportunity for the russian economy to give a serious and effective response.

here's to this growing challenge. but nato is in ukraine , i think there is, because you already know in the west, and well, i don’t take ukrainians, er, in the west, and right now i have a screen in front of me. i look at the numbers that cnn gives, citing american sources. tank losses. it turns out that russia lost 1,600, 50 tanks there, and ukraine only 460. but this, well, this is nonsense. it is nonsense. uh, we don’t have such losses, and ukrainian losses need to be multiplied by three, what the ministry of defense gives, and also by four by five. but our industry, especially after the presidential decree on partial mobilization , which, by the way, i have already spoken about this more than once, concerns not only the conscription of people for e service, but also industry and our industry. now. really. she. uh, the only thing i want. it seems to me

that we need a separate law to transfer our defense industry to military flights. in the meantime, it is the defense of the military-industrial complex to give armor to the selgota. there was such a great patriotic war. uh, because some businesses do. and regardless of the form property, because we have a lot of uh, enterprises, even those included in rostec, they are honest, and which sometimes begin to show some, so to speak, so to speak, insist on their decisions to transfer many enterprises. we have already switched to three or four shift work. 7 days a week 24 hours and the missiles do not end and the shells do not end and the high-precision weapons do not end. eh, although according to the calculations. west, they should have all ended long ago, so dmitry i have no doubt that our industry, which has not yet reached full power, when it comes out at full power, there will be no problems at all. that's when we

think about how this war is. may end. there is, of course, the first question of what russia is capable of both in military-technical and economic terms and in terms of, if you want the determination of society's readiness to do everything necessary to prevent the victory of opponents, is another question. what is happening with the enemy, and first of all with the united states, and we see, of course, what the president of his administration says. well, let's listen what the former just said about this war. a president trump who wants to run again for president comes first with tanks, then with nukes. stop this crazy war now

, it's so easy to do. andronik, do you imagine the possibility that if russia, as we expect family from responding adequately and effectively to the military challenge in ukraine, that in america there will be not marginals, but real political forces that , will try seriously give another, if you want an interpretation of american national interests and reach some kind of at least temporary agreement with russia, definitely dmitry i have been studying america for almost 50 years. and the history of america and all these monstrous involvement in various adventures of the war and so on speak about this. look at the year. putin chirac and schroder said there is no need to bargain for iraq, this is

not necessary at all. 2008. i come there , the election campaign, and even all those people who voted with both hands for invade iraq everyone said we are to blame we miscalculated. it is monstrous to leave from there, otherwise, in general, we are finished, that is , every time, as soon as, but only for this, as soon as the americans get in the face. i'm sorry, but you can't say otherwise, when they got in the face in iraq in afghanistan in the end, when the war starts, you can't be sure of anything, and the second. americans make a lot of mistakes, but in

the end they make the right decision, and the right decision. wars, proxies of wars, and even more than proxies of wars, is a withdrawal, because otherwise it could end up in very dire consequences for america. and i want to ask a metaphysical question. and president biden is proud and , logically, with reason to be proud of how he managed to build the entire collective west against russia, there really is such a unity, i am the west. at least. at least i didn’t see and i must admit honestly, i didn’t expect him to such an extent, in my opinion, president biden himself didn’t expect him, but in the process is not talked about, uh, in the west.

i'm getting the impression more and more that russian society has also rallied, that some new organic connection between the authorities, invisible to the growing connection, has arisen. leading the war and mobilization, i mean, not only not so much the military. how much is the mobilization of all the country's resources in the name of victory and how many in society, and as andranik rightly said among the people. uh, there may be different points of view on this and i know people who uh had a different position than russian authorities in relation to ukraine i know such people. i'm just watching. how to measure how it is a situation, how it is a war? whether it's hybrid in many ways, the real one

continues to expand in the eyes of so many people. it seems to me that the patriotic war is becoming and how did it start? it's not so important for them anymore. it is important for them that they are opposed by the power and will of the collective west, and this, of course. a very important source of russia's strength in a confrontation with nato and, uh, with other opponents of russia, your opinion on this issue. i think what we are in is already within the framework of a special operation war. it just doesn't fit, a special war. the operation does not imply such a massive involvement of the people of society, when we say that society is already taking part in this conflict, and not only in new territories, but also in russian society, and more and more is included in this confrontation to call it a narrow technical such a point operation language does not

turn not in afghanistan, nor in chechnya, nor in the first nor in the second, but in the chechen company. we did not appeal to the people, did not involve these huge masses in this confrontation, therefore , i think that's something. uh, as he said, wonderful. this is a man, yes, a simple one, huh? the person who speaks, but he is not quite simple, he is a candidate of medical sciences, and in general, a well-known study. that's fine, but in any case, a person who was in prison, who is engaged in a specific specific activity. he tells us, in fact, a kind of metaphysics, just world history that our confrontation with the west. this absolute existential conflict. an ontological conflict is a conflict between two mutually exclusive, if you will , mutually exclusive civilizations. we could coexist if we were given the opportunity to be russians ourselves, to build our own eurasian civilization, and we never

denied them this right to be the west, but they don’t want to. so they want everyone to be the west, or not to be anyone, and in this russian, what you rightly spoke about today, the approach of the west is not necessarily hitler's biological cultural western technological racism is the whole point, they are not allowed. the existence of other civilizations and russia, the periphery of the outskirts and the garbage heap and their civilization , deprived of sovereignty, deprived of independence, deprived of culture, deprived of identity, not only the state does not want to be. that's what's important people don't want and people sometimes. now he is included in this confrontation, even more than our state. the state is the beginning, but then the processes began already, real metaphysics, when suddenly our population. it would seem sleeping, immersed in domestic issues. i woke up and realized myself as a single russian people open to other peoples.

they proved that they understand what the unity of historical destiny means. they rushed to the front to save the state. and now i'm finishing the last one. i think this is the most serious and most terrible war in our history. this is a major war, the one we are entering is not a local conflict. when we talk about a truce about some treaties, yes , we want peace, we want an end and we are worried about this tragedy, which each of one way or another, someone to a greater extent , someone to a lesser extent, through their own loved ones, tests us. and this is very serious. er, a serious thing, but nonetheless. we all understand that the end of this war can only be our victory, only our victory. it is our right to be a people, to be a state, and in this respect there are contradictions between society and the authorities. no. those who are not included in this union of victory are the metaphysical union of russian civilization, but they set themselves,

as android said, simply outside of culture. i think that it is obvious to us that, most likely, before some e comes. progress is being made at the talks, which are practically not taking place at all now, and that there will probably still be serious trials and very real challenges before then, but i also think that this is what it shows. now russia is giving grounds to those in america who do not want this dangerous escalation and are not ready to die, and for ukraine to seize crimea, it seems to me that these forces will have real arguments in order to seek a negotiated solution. may not be perfect. let it not be final , at least for a decision that would put an end to the dangerous escalation that we are seeing today and which, from my point of view. neither

america nor russia, nor especially in ukraine, is needed. it was a great game, see you next week. you are kind, sweet, sympathetic and terribly lonely, you have been waiting for years for a marriage proposal from a man or for years, hopefully, to meet someone who will make this proposal, but all in vain. this means only one thing your program does not work, and therefore i i offer you my course, which has already helped hundreds of thousands of women throughout russia, a short

course in a happy life. we follow our son in the theater. why are you sitting alone? it's hard to tear your ass off with labots, and he said, among other things, that he liked you, even if he didn't like me. every ninth man out of ten likes your daughter. this is cool. although, she likes the tenth just 10 tips hides. so no, it's not very interesting,

to be honest, thank you of course the agreement, because it's not my type. oh, oh, look at her, you know, right? maybe spit on their delicious their predilection. and that i should not give a damn about my taste , my addictions, and the new one for the sake of interest, but i'm interested in this pregnant wife of my own. you'll always have time to return. hmm very interesting. love, do you ever think about this question, what is behind these endless meetings, parting , confessions, kisses, while you are young. you can from you an illusion that chains, but matured convinced that the universe did little happiness, love does not believe to be compared with illness. she measures decides strength decides reason, we repeat that for the sake of love we are ready