yes, in recent years, i ’ve really come out of a niche, so to speak, from some. well, such a writer for a certain circle, that is, there are people who read me and they remain my readers with me, but in recent years there have really become several of them. more than that makes me happy. i can’t say that i have moved right into the ranks of the first and the best, but i have increased my readership. do you still think that niche literature is literature that is read less or more, because there are such niches where fans. uh, hundreds of thousands. well, it's not mine. niche. no, mine was. she is quite humble. here i am periodically. it seems to me that i even return to it, because my main goals have never been to increase the growth of readers. i have always wanted to write for myself here. here i am frozen. why does a writer write? eh, there is nothing else, nothing else can. it's the only job that i enjoy. well, i'm being honest or you're just life, right? in fact, how he breathes

writes like that, but it just happened to change, that this has become my profession, and in fact, at the very beginning, you correctly said that how this dynamic happens. and i think that there are cases of a bright start, when a person wrote a book and woke up famous very often this book remains the only one, it happens, but i, by the way, partly have this story too, because when i wrote the dyatlov pass in this book for 20 years. i’m famous, maybe i didn’t wake up, but you didn’t know more than that, this book still feeds me, it actively retakes and so on, but nonetheless. still. i did not want to be the author of the pass. dyatlov, i always wanted to write something new, more interesting for me, and significant, and i probably added to something spirit. well, did you grow up following the detective? well , some kind of specially constructed plot that leads to something. this is nothing to you. yes, no, it seemed, yes, but, to be honest, for all these years there is nothing equal to the history of the dyatlovites. i so met, yes, that is,

such a fantastically mysterious story, which excites absolutely everyone on a par with this story. i can't build anything, just like that. yes, there were very vivid plots, there are others. for example, i have church novels investigating such events within the church, not the most, perhaps, uh, other familiar ones. yes , by the way, i want to reprint this book. i have such an idea. here is about human sacrifice. the story is also based on a criminal case, which is also fantastically interesting, but still it’s not on the wrong level. that is, you are new, leskov in fact affairs, as i suddenly realized at that moment, leskov was very interested. these are the stripes, open areas of life, mysterious , he was engaged in schism, as if obstructed , you know, he was engaged in church life, because in the 19th century everyone wrote about the serfs and the people. yes, quite a lot has also been written about the displaced. but about oh, the clergy. e before leskov, as from

the main characters, practically did not write? there are a lot of us now. of course , there was a certain surge of interest in literature about the church. it was like times, i think, about 15 years ago. and now i think there will be a new wave. i'm from somewhere ah, what do you think about trends or how they say about trends now i don't really like this word. that is, you can predict what will become relevant in the literature. i mean thematic or genres, or is it not worth doing writing or being a writer. he just lives and, uh, writes. how does someone breathe what they said or does he understand what is relevant i mean, even non-commercial success but just what is interesting, what will happen. uh, how are you? eh, between these two pine trees , everything depends, of course, on the writer. i can predict literary he would, to be honest, i can, but until the moment i wanted to take a pen and close the screen so that no one would know, and

directly find out from you straight away so that our viewers would not find out, there will definitely be a return in literature in the near future time. this is already visible. this is felt about the correlative of, perhaps , aspects. there will be interest in returning to this topic. i usually foresee them, but i always don’t have time for them here before i am at the same time a sincere prose writer who is fond of his work, for whom work is life and analysts at the same time, yes , a person who clearly understands what will be new. i don’t know either, i try to understand, and it’s scary, still curious. i also have the feeling that some kind of new axial time is coming. if you recall karl jaspers, he had such a term for today, the time e, the emergence of new religions, the emergence of new ideas, because the world is ruled by an idea, in fact. they mothers real factors correct correct moreover, i'm sorry if i interrupted about the idea to me in modern russian literature. just there are not

enough ideas and thoughts, look , all people have learned how to write beautifully, they can tell stories. on the whole, that is, literature with a plot, in my opinion, everything is also very good with this now. they are excellent at working with biographies. e with actual material, but no, there are no thoughts, including ideas , i probably also have some lack of them, because i feel it, with a bang, well, at the level of just some kind of trend, maybe not if there is enough experience as an author, then there are a lot of schools, uh, that teach writing. now it is also truer than time, it did not appear yesterday. and there are a lot of good programs will not. now they are talking, but in soviet times they were just arguing that a writer should e come from a field camp or a factory. well, if you remove this soviet rhetoric, then a person needs experience. dostoevsky speak; in order to write a novel, you need to stock up on one or more strong impressions. i remember it very well, therefore, not only ideas, but maybe that is not enough suffering,

for example, why is a young man, if he is not a genius, yes, but a genius is still not enough, this is an exact product. why is it extremely rare for a young person to write a strong book, a powerful book that will really resonate , that will remain in the history of literature, in principle, will remain on the shelves from such an average reader, because a young person, as a rule, has nothing to talk about if he has not become a witness i didn't experience any unique events, and there is nothing to share comfort and convenience with yet. he can to talk about what he is going through to come to mind and to someone who did not suffer, still no, the idea is also born in a person who, as a rule, has experienced something and rebuilt it. how are these things connected in some fantastic way, therefore, when young authors come to me for advice, and there are a lot of them, i always tell them that there is no need to rush to write a big novel and publish it. live a little. write

and practice. look around. keep a diary of observation, a diary of readers, then something will definitely sprout from this. i i remember how it was with me necessarily, unfortunately, not necessarily not always. it’s just that i teach actors at the moss studio school and there are special masters there in the junior years, they say, write down everything that you see every day, write down the experience, but this does not always lead to genuine feelings. it may remain at the level of, uh, everyday observations, no more, because this is a matter of giftedness, giftedness either exists or not, it cannot be artificially transplanted into a person. uh, talented writers or not, but it's obvious, really, you need open the book in three or four places. read, probably understandable, as a rule. yes , although i am a very reader. it seems good to me. i always give the writer a second third tenth chance. that is, you are tolerantly patient. that is, these would be a couple of sides. if i have already spent money on a book, i

still usually finish it. although this is probably wrong. and i time know time and money. this is the main thing, if i have already started reading, i'm interested. um, can i get something out of there? remember how rakhmetov from of chernyshevsky's novel, what to do, he divided books, he took a book from the shelf and, uh, on the first twenty pages he tried to understand if there was something new and useful, if not, then he would leave the book like this, well, actually useful or emotionally close or gave an oka or interesting all the same, which is more important to me at that moment, because some books leave a feeling, you know, such fatigue and a swimmer who overcame the distance. yes you know you're done. why didn't they even give you a medal. here but you can write in reader's diary. you keep a reading diary. i personally e yes, in some sense, they can read as if a. creativity , provocative questions are ripening in my mind and

, generally speaking, why was the book written? this is the key question that i ask myself. i often talk about it. so that all russian literature of the xix century. well, a great russian novel. vrr, great, russian novel. it's all on the shelf. these are 15 books. okay, 20 books. well, 25 books, but it will already fit here and the corral thought about it, that this is a very small number of dostoevsky 8 reels turgenev six goncharov three leskov there are three or four in different counts. e, tolstoy four and everything, yes more, except for these five there is almost no one. hmm, and now they are being produced. e. well, how many years does it take to produce 20 high-quality novels well, two or three years , i think, oh well, it’s somehow very fast, but things are written that when you read it,

you think, why and why? i? well, i don’t know money, i don’t feel sorry for books, but why did i spend this time so that i would like to give some examples, but i don’t want anyone offend from other authors. mm. i cannot understand what i have left, what i have left of war and peace. i understand that i will lie down in the coffin and i will not forget, but from any or modern book there remains. this is the feeling that something has passed into you. well, of course not. the fact is that our profession is a writer. and in the last 15 years, i don’t know, probably, but it was rapidly losing and now, in my opinion, it has already lost, in general, any sacredness writers. everything now everything is absolute. it's not good, it's not good, that's how it happened. is it like the weather? it became to some extent given none the words really teach this; it has become fashionable. it seems to me that the roots of this hmm phenomenon should be sought in our general enthusiasm for various blogs, you see, we have

recently. note. we really write to each other most often. calling for example is considered bad manners. why is he calling me? he must first write sound and speak bad. yes, that's not good either. although i'm before the broadcast. just wrote sent one troops. but in general, i usually don’t do this, but that is, yes, it’s customary to write first and ask permission. we back to the pistol world, and yes, writers. it's fashionable now everyone wants to be writing, or i don't know why. i think it's so easy. a profession that, moreover, is not so well paid, but for some reason everyone wants it. yes write a book publish a book. seeing her in a bookstore is such a strange picture, you correctly noticed that you want to understand how yes, understand why, but readers very often want to understand how yes there are many reading clubs on the internet and offline. how to understand a book? but actually, this is a paradox, because

difficult reading is the last village to the human. it seems to me, yes, otherwise what a tablet once i understood anna karenina, as soon as possible, well, how could i understand this thick novel as soon as possible. i'm already picking up your great novel, which, as it was said somewhere , was greatly reduced in one of the interviews. and let's still talk about this at the moment, the last, apparently book. yes, if i did not leave from life. this novel was shortlisted by our prestigious national literary award big book. this happened to you for the third time, fourth, fourth then. tell me what i missed. i remember that two collections of short stories were from the nineties and the novel enviable feeling, vera plants yes yes yes yes yes. yes, of course, means the fourth time. you, as it is now said shortlisted, do not like this word, but still in the national bestselling. in general, in awards, you are also quite successful. but

this book, of course, hmm surprises. here , it seems, it seems to me, but history is written down on the scale on which a life or movement or several lives flow. tell us about how it all turned out. i every 100 years called this book. and this is a novel from diaries, so that by this you understand how it happened. well, actually we were talking about trends, and here's whether they can be predicted. uh, i really was again, i think, 10 years ago. uh, there was such a fashion on the diary, and it kept for a very long time on the literary diaries on the book, written hmm based on the diary, it continues very long, playing in general, in principle, no, as one of the heroines of this book, says there is no more interesting reading in the world. than other people's days the book is based partly on the authentic diaries of my grandmother ksenia mikhailovna lyoshina, and i

came up with the second line, because i didn’t want to just publish these diaries by somehow rewriting them. but i still wanted it to be a novel, to be a kind of dialogue. eh, a heroine separated by centuries, and a second heroine. i came up with a common hmm with me. she only has the fact that she also lives in yekaterinburg, so well, partially. i gave her my childhood. and how do these first girls interact, then girls, then women. how do they communicate despite the fact that they may not be familiar in 100 years? yes, what rhymes of fate. hmm, i was able to see between them . that's actually the whole book about it, it's still diaries, and there, in general, what is a diary? why people keep diaries do they want you to read them? or they write them for themselves, how frankly can diaries be, there are a lot of questions here. if you say, e what is the most important the question is probably the first two m. why do people who are close to us by blood suddenly turn out to be

non-relatives, and suddenly our relatives turn out to be those who are not connected with us in any way by any blood relationship. this is the first and second question. uh, why some people are drawn more than others are the first for me , too, is read in an obvious way, because there is blood kinship. and there is in another relationship in spirit, but, uh, the crown of all this is marriage. yes, because cancer is not between native people, but marriage, and if a christian marriage, then this is the sacrament uh, any marriage any decision to be close to another person for a long time. this is, uh, but a kind of conviction that he is closer to you than relatives is not so hmm, not always marriage , maybe friendship, maybe, in general, people who accidentally collided who should never have met in this life, suddenly they for some reason, they turn out to be very important relatives to each other, they save each other. we

do not always go for help, when we really need to relatives, that his relationship cannot be canceled. hmm. yes, you can't say. you are no longer my sister. there is no such institution. yes, everything is clear at the level of legal or moral, but you can’t say, you are no longer my mother. you can quarrel. god forbid, i loved my parents very much, so for me, yes. here, but kinship is something that cannot be canceled, but closeness, uh, showers mood is something that, in general, can be canceled and this is more responsible, probably, yes, when such a relationship occurs. yeah , a miracle that is sometimes completely undeserved by a person, but when it happens, you need to take care of this feeling very much and to feed him this applies, of course, to love and marriage and friendship. and in general, all these close and not close ties

to the eighty-fifth birthday of vladimir vysotsky, i don’t know how it will sound. i suddenly burst into your house with a cry with my own. he be patient. i am all in mind, available to all eyes. i started the usual procedure officially. i'm not a composer for this. no no today, as if i didn’t touch the dragon, yes, my voice often happens that in order to become better myself, i’ll lie to a couple of good people. he lies to me, who are you heard to rewrite and began here is such a triumphal procession of these films everywhere everywhere everywhere, well, straight lights in the face. in general, i always ask for the gesture of light in the auditorium. day of vladimir vysotsky tomorrow on

the first, after all , many people write from diaries or on the material of personal fate. and it seems to me that this is already some kind of move that has become obsolete, that this is the web that will open from the spider quite predictably. no , this is the first of the provocative questions. in general, as we know, a limited number of people are quite right. here it is clear that we all play with those minutes that we are given and a new note, we have come up with such a homophone, as linguists say, with darkness. we play with darkness, which is, well, a plural word. here is the darkness about which the night now surrounds our viewers. and we are talking about the most important things, yes, yes, therefore, of course, yes, maybe it has already become such a common technique

, it is always important how you do it. how do you manage with him somehow play, in principle, for, probably, the whole. i don't have one of my favorite books. this is a diary. maria bashkirtseva, and i read it when it was reprinted for the first time only in russia. in ninety, in my opinion, the ninth year, this book was published, and i don’t know how many times i reread it. and although the book was considered very scandalous for the twelfth person. there is nothing scandalous there, and not because maria's mother exhausted from there all seemingly controversial things that masha was somehow arrested not very well. hmm from our spoiled century, looking through the eyes of a modern person. well , this is an absolutely innocent diary, cute, touching smart talented girls, very romantic very beautiful very talented so early tragically passed away, dear viewers. we are talking about this rebel mary of the bashkirs. i also think that

she is not so much a rebel e as hmm a very sharp and sensitive person, well, here comes the middle of our conversation. and i will try to move on to our rubric, starting from the material of your novel every 100 years. i still think that something very important is captured here. a story that is not only about two specific people or one specific family or yours family. e, too, and not only the family of the heroine or heroines, but also to the fate of the country, the fate of russia , because there we are talking about the e of the last quarter of the 19th century. so gently let's say the picture was wrong. yes, so it would be correct to say yes, its last quarters of the twentieth century and a lot of things are repeated, not only the fate of the heroes who, well, of course, grow up , lose their illusions, gain experience, this happens to all people, but some kind of repetitive

dramatic events also happen to the country events. and this is a combination of household details. which are discharged wonderful. no matter how much you ironically over the correct metaphors. here all the words are in the right places. and now we will try to see this great vision on a completely different material. i'll remind our viewers that in the middle of our conversations, we have an aha one of three, either we're talking about a poem, like today, or we're picking up an old book from my e bookcase, or some familiar quote from classical literature. now we will talk about the poem by nikolai zabolotsky which called bystanders. and this poem , uh, very famous uh, for those who love nikolai zabolotsky. i consider him an absolutely brilliant

poet, and this poem simply describes the route from peredelkino station bypassing the cemetery to the town of writers. this is a well-known fact, but i will say it here. i pretend my non- acting. ah, such a normal read. here , uh, the poet tells us what we think about, it’s not often that we are somehow combined. forgive me for the banality, the material and mental consciousness of the spirit, has no material carrier, where is my i in the heart in the brain in the hands in this chair is not clear. yes, after all , there is an immortal soul in us, and from our body is riveted to e, everyday events, the word soul is repeated here. so many times. let's. let's try to read this poem, and just in case, i honestly take my hand with a cheat sheet, because i can go astray, but still the passer-by nikolai zabolotsky is filled with

mental anxiety in a three-piece soldier's bag along the railroad ties. he left on foot too late at night to nara station the penultimate composition of the moon and beyond the edges of the barn shines over the roofs. getting up, turning, in the direction of the bridge. he enters the spring wilderness, where pines, leaning towards gost, stand like crowds. showers, here to the pilot of the region, thieves and ribbons rest in the alleys and the dead propeller crowns his monument whiter and in the dark chamber of the universe over sleepy this lithuania rises, that sudden instantaneous peace that pierces the soul.

that marvelous peace before which, agitated and always in a hurry, the living human soul falls silent, with lowered eyes, and in the slight rustling of the kidneys and in the slow noise of the branches, an invisible young man, the pilot, is talking to her about something, and the body wanders along the road , walking through thousands of years and his grief and anxieties run like dogs. at the beginning of his troubles and sorrows, it seems spiritual, and at the end not bodily, because the eternal , indestructible soul in him speaks with the soul of the buried dead pilot, the souls speak of something else. this is an amazing switch from the material plane to

the mental and spiritual plane, which is possible only for bolotsky, to some extent, it is given, and not matveeva in this novel, because uh here we are talking about two uh hmm girls, uh, who are called by similar names xenichka. and what's the point in this rhyme, that the youngest of them xana gets by reading other people's, not someone else's diaries how it all works. firstly, the name really does bear the name xenia, toby the heroine's guest is a stranger, of course, yes, yes, the hotel alien uh-huh and here are both heroines, they are really strangers. they are strangers in their family. they are sometimes strangers to their own country. they are sometimes strangers themselves names are very important to me in general. and by the way, nothing is random. even the title of the book every 100 years, if you make

an abbreviation, then the name, patronymic and surname of the main character sergeevna sergeevna leskova will be fine. i would like them to kill xenia well, first of all, my grandmother's name was xenia mikhailovna, i could not change anything here in this case. it seemed to me that you were true to them, very very suitable for her, in general, the name xenia was not customary to give those years to noble families, sovereign emperor named his daughter xenia and after him the nobles began to rise in price to him, well, in general, it was a pure fashion at the turn of the century there was no, for example, the name dima was only a diminutive broom dmitry yes, there was almost no in the 19th century was not very. it seems popular to me, not as popular as, for example, people of my generation, because in my class, either six or seven, where he studied, everyone was dima, not a single mitya. yes, that is, it was important for me that the name was exactly such, and all the other rhymes - some of them were

laid on purpose, and some i later myself i already saw it, or they even suggested to me, for example, uh, the older heroine of ksenia has a ksenichka. uh, when she is in switzerland here, the second part of the novel is completely devoted to switzerland. yes, she is all afraid of the arrival of a comet that should destroy the earth about this comet is a very comet and in the cabin writes about her in newspapers that she is flying and soon nothing will be left of us. years, of course, sveta is a catastrophe, yes, another xenia tells her a different scale, and an explosion at the sorting station at the serpukhov sorting station. this a completely different story on a different scale, but everyone was also afraid and decided that even i needed these rhymes in order to show that in fact, not so much and much is changing, that is, of course, the world is changing in the sense that he becomes more so you know scary and comfortable. now everything is very conveniently too alive absolutely, that is, a world

where a person forgets that he is dying. he is weak. of course, lethal. yes, and so on. in fact, it doesn’t change so much anyway, why should literature show a person that he still lethally weak. yes? yes, actually not so much not so much we have advanced in the study of people. we still don't know where we're coming from, our bridge isn't complete either. well, people want to know. because it will be with him after death, but i always seemed more interesting question. and what happened to us before birth, and here we also don’t know anything about my thoughts, because zabolotsky’s poem was exactly about this, i was amazed that you chose it? this is my favorite, but revive the soul. we are not buddhists, not no, well, as it were not that we believe the transmigration of souls the eternal soul is indestructible, what was before, where how does this relate to my current needs, treat this absolutely.

what irony is absolutely serious and many things. in fact, it is impossible to explain it is impossible to explain these strange coincidences that occur in life, you know , i very rarely write about myself. does he read himself ? it’s interesting, but this really happened to you , well, how would it look like in reality, if i wrote what really happened with happened to me. nobody would have believed me, because my whole life is a series of things i want to emphasize. and say that's what you need to expect from one matveeva and why is it not written? because it's a secret. it's intimate, i don't want to expose it, and i don't really understand it yet. you can give some literary form, well , coincidence and surprising cases in some kind of rhyme. i really love the theme of twins, for example, and the fact that we come across in life very often people who are similar either to us or to some important people for us, this follows haunts all observant people. and i

even wrote a whole collection of stories on this topic, because i write just such collections of the cycle, united by some idea. it seems to me that we don't know anything about twins either, that is, literature is always like something, a complex double. even if it's not literally a coincidence, yes and sometimes it's who we hide the authors from. i mean speak. no, it's not me, it's him, and sometimes it's completely pure fiction. but yes, there is always some, second, third the fourth level, the more difficult. prose, the more these levels, the more interesting it is to parry and open them. well, this, of course, should be dealt with, probably, after all, to the letter. i'll check out or very, very gifted talented readers who sometimes proofread what the writer didn't even want you to read. yes , uh, gifted readers are able

to. port-argotorio and paralysis from the purgatory of iran , his friends came up with it for him. those who helped him were friends, critics, literate readers. and aksakov and apollon grigoriev, of course, and belinsky, who fought with this now, what shall we say, what is this sense? no, of course there is. despite the fact that gogol did not invent it. that is, the book is such a self-continuing book, of course, the book was written when it was read. yes, and here we answer our question, which we posed a little higher. and why are books actually written so that they read and probably re-read, yes, and it is still desirable to read not one, but a little more and several generations, because there is a double and a reader in the offspring. yes. uh, how our word will respond double happens and posthumous very often this is a very important story for some attentive readers, but

then again, if you're lucky, there is almost no irony in this book. well, there is, you know, in general, in principle, i have a peculiar sense of humor. well, not everyone, as it understands, may not have responded. i just, uh, want to know how you are irony yes, isn't it too much this is very ironic most irony? believe me, well, we live in a time when, without a grammatical error, i don’t like russian speech, as i said. pushkin yes, as a bezronic subtext. well, it seems almost impossible to have a serious conversation. i just really like what is in the books of hanna matveeva, in particular in this book. eh, a serious conversation is possible, even if there is irony and although i am tempted to ask what is abridged there, if there are so many hundreds of pages in the book, but tell me here again i want to make such a kirdish gesture, only we only have a podcast. let them talk, let

them read. you can find out what was not included in the book, she is actually matveeva. i wrote this will not be very long. too long 10 years. i have been collecting material for quite some time. i had to visit all the places that i write about, that is, the geography of the book, arshin, this is more switzerland and khabarovsk riga petersburg in general, the mass of some places where i had to be sure to be. then i, in principle, entered this topic for a very long time, and then i could not get out of it people who write great novels. they know this effect. that is, it is not difficult to start a book. there, in general, everyone can and it is very difficult to finish difficult to get out of this material. you begin to live in it, you feel comfortable in it. it's like watching the show you like so it never ends. and, well, sometimes the tv shows really don't end with preferences, but the novel had to somehow leave the point. and when i do this, i realized that the book

turned out so that its binding is not will survive, and my publishers and i decided that we would still try to shorten it. and it turned out what happened, but in fact they cut it very carefully and not a single character was practically injured. no, one storyline. i cut it, but hmm at least i'm sorry, but you know, i actually tried to be very neat like that. and i think someday i'll publish a director's cut. i have such ideas, yes, you know, i'm being pursued, here's our conversation. smoothly decided to end exactly on the note that you say, i am also sorry to end our conversation, because we were unable to talk about many things, both about new books and about your native ural, as such a place of power for modern literature, but i am sure that all this is still ahead. and today i am very grateful to you that you spoke so wonderfully about your prose today. we

thank anna matveeva for having a conversation with her in the podcast today. let them say let them read i say goodbye, goodbye. thank you and, as always, enjoy reading. hello, i'm a pilot astronaut about shkapler and today we will talk about how the selection of the cosmonaut team takes place, who is taken, who is not taken in the future, how the preparation for space flight is going on, how they fly from the point of view of medicine, how further happens, of course, rehabilitation after returning to earth. look, we are familiar with you, but it is necessary, of course, to introduce you to the general practitioner, deputy head

of the clinical department of the medical directorate of the cosmonaut training center named after yuri alekseevich gagarin, maria vasilevskaya. first, watch what you're doing what are your functional responsibilities anton i, as a representative of, uh, our entire large medical management unit, i want to briefly talk about what medicine is in general at the cosmonaut training center and we have a board in our honey, as you know, five departments engineering, which supports the work of the medical departments, the clinical department, where i work, and two other cases that deal with purely space hmm medical cases. this is the department of training for space flight factors and the department of medica physiological and psychological preparation. and we also have, as it were, our own optical division, which also provides us with medicines and medical products for astronauts. but the clinical department, where i work. this, most of all

, probably looks like what an ordinary person considers a polyclinic, that is, this is the unit that controls the health of the cosmonauts precisely by checking them. health, that is, we have the usual doctors general practitioner. i am a surgeon doctor - a laryngologist, an ophthalmologist, a dentist to a neuropathologist. we have pidemiologists. and so we monitor the health of all these doctors, the cosmonaut, and plus we check them as an expert, because the astronaut is not just a person. and this is a person who performs a very important state mission. and these professions, associated with a high risk to life, they are regulated. and therefore , the state of health should, uh, fit into the framework of the order. as you know, we have a special order, a special order for cosmonauts, a special space order, which he still takes his story with gagarina no russian, but our order, uh, 2001.

they soon issued a new order, which they have been reworking for 20 years 20 years. yes, and everything is spelled out there, than braids. can it hurt, why can't it hurt? what salads can hurt? they are people. what are the stages of verification. you are now opening the curtain, yes, secrets that an astronaut is not super. healthy people, that they, like ordinary people, have some of their own disease features. yes, this is our body. yes, astronauts are still super healthy people, but who, like all people, with age and as a result of their professional activities , they can get sick. sometimes occasionally. and we need to notice it in time to prevent it. if you need to cure, so you know , in our order it is written how often a medical certificate is passed, yes, control and became every 3 months. here anton knows every 3 months ago to take tests to go through all the ecg specialists many times a year

. bullying doctors begin to bully in full. well, in connection with that. here we are such experts we check. we still we select astronauts. yes, this is for us in general, how does this happen? yes? this is a completely special function of ours, which, uh, well, is associated with great responsibility, because sometimes people yes, for their part, you imagine, it comes to worry. you must have been worried too. this is a dream is a dream of a therapist in a person's dream. he wants to come, and the closer he seems to strive for his dream, the more he tunes into my memory. here were the selections in 2010, it turns out in the eighteenth and in the twentieth year. and it's always very the exciting responsibility of all these selections. uh, at first you somehow know the ads do with on the site are laid out. yes, what are

the simplest requirements of tanthropometry, that is, certain height, certain weight, there must be parameters in order for a person to fit. mm, in fact, in cosmetics , the spaceship descends, the suit climbed. yes, then we have some, by the way, i'm just not plump and short from 150 to 190 and weight from 50 to 95 camera. well, there still has to be a certain lie. body length sometimes a person has a suitable height, that is, uh, height, sitting, yes, rosseti rossetiya. in this way, the torso is measured with a tape, because in the blackberry is a person who is in a certain position on the ground. and if his torso is too long, then he simply may not fit. well, then it was all over, okay?