you're money every moment, strive for victory, cause that's what champions do. liga stavok become yourself.

today you are doing no problem we will do it.

what, that cyril is alive? well, let it not be here there, but alive means that the realities are somehow interconnected. so, they can be combined , you know, one more argument in favor of your theory, but in fact. all the time comes back to the light. you just don't let her get over it. it's grief to move on. you don't want to hear me. i'm just trying to show the process that is happening to you, you didn't erect a monument to your son, but paid for a monument to this boy inside a kind of substitution. look, as soon as in

reality you were required to make a specific decision about the monument. he made death threats. danger does not seem to you, it is symbolic, no. because for you to erect a monument to your son means to accept his death and say goodbye to your illusion. you keep saying the same thing. then why do you come to me because you have no one else. and i think it's not just that. paul may be somewhere in the depths of your soul, you yourself are not completely confident in your theory. maybe you need someone? who will help you not to lose your final connection with reality? if you were 100% sure you would not come to me. to return chumakov's case for reconsideration due to lack of proof of guilt on circumstantial

evidence, transportation should be carried out, there are no drugs on chumakov. it says dudes this way. what do you want? he called ours, apparently, someone leaked this information to the villain, they filled up the huckster and took the drugs. he is not a killer. he didn't confess. did he commit suicide? i was yesterday.

tonight failed and today we are talking about a very important and very significant anniversary of the anniversary of the complete defeat of the nazi troops near stalingrad, it was, as we well know , the turning point of the battle during the great patriotic war, this is the place where the russian soldier showed who he really is he is really capable and the residents of the city of stalingrad showed it with him. and today , vladimir putin, president putin spoke at this significant anniversary and said a

number of important things, one of which is throws a bridge, and because of the past to the present from the great although the tragic past to the present is also a very difficult situation in which russia is now, let's listen. now, unfortunately, we see that the ideology of nazism, already in its modern form, in its modern manifestation , again creates direct threats to the security of our country. again and again we are forced to repulse the aggression of the collective west. incredibly, the fact is that we are again threatened by german leopard tanks. on board of which they are again going to fight with russia on the soil of ukraine with his hands, followed by

the nazis bandera. those who count, and keep victory over russia on the battlefield. apparently, they do not understand that modern russia will be completely different for them. we do not send our tanks to their borders. but we have something to answer and the use of armored vehicles will not end the matter. everyone should understand this. but what do these words mean, the use of, e , armor of equipment, in the event of such a ukrainian offensive with western weapons, the matter will not end here, a useful explanation was given by the dog secretary of president putin dmitry peskov as new

weapons supplied by the collective west appear, russia will make fuller use of its existing potential in order to respond in the course of a special military operation. but that has been said enough in general terms. well, i think it's been said, so basically it leaves few, uh, alternatives to understand. lieutenant general buginsky, you are not only a very experienced military man, but you are also an experienced statesman. you were involved in international security. you know how moscow's words are understood and our former partners, what do you think, what do you think president putin meant and how do you think his words will be perceived in washington, brussels, london and other western capitals, you know how much i have already read. eh, already accepted and naturally. e in the western capitals of washington in europe , everyone, but they interpret it in the same way that

president putin again threatened to use nuclear weapons. and you know, i, uh, i don't think so. there, perhaps, he had in mind, as , uh, as they say, the last resort, if indeed russia, in accordance with our doctrine will threaten our independence , territorial integrity, loss of territory, uh, everything is possible, but in this particular case, indeed, russia is not all the means. eh, applied. well, the most explicit one, we have so far only used our strategic aviation pointwise only once or twice. and then, without going, in my opinion, within the airspace of ukraine , strategic aviation is not only missiles, there uh x-101 is also, uh, various bombs. uh, different capacities. we

still haven't run. well we don't have that. term like carpet bombing. these are american terms, but, nevertheless , inflicting massive uh massive, uh, rocket-bomb strikes. oh, and on the elements of infrastructure. the same bridges. there is a depot there, well, in general, many, many targets can not be destroyed there, peaceful cities, but elements of military infrastructure, especially transport ones, they can be destroyed. and anyway, we already talked about dmitry some time ago. uh, on your own program, which, of course, trains with tanks that will go to ukraine and this requires a lot of trains in order to to transfer even those promised quantities, there are 100 tanks. uh, it still needs a lot of compounds, uh, which are a very good target. and uh from my point of view. they must be dealt a blow, even

defiantly. so, as for the uh nuclear weapons of tactical nuclear weapons , i will once again repeat my repeatedly repeated conviction. what a limited nuclear war can not be, it will be an inevitable escalation and that's it. this will end in mutual destruction, but if the russian federation really if the russian president wanted to resort to the use of nuclear weapons, the first thing is that he should make all nuclear weapons in our country ; tactical nuclear weapons are first of all stored in centralized warehouses in a centralized one. in the fabulous storage of the twelfth head office, which is responsible for the ministry of defense for nuclear weapons. the first thing to do would be to start. the transfer of warheads from the warehouse storage of these ammunition to airfields , naval bases, and so on, that is,

this was evidence of children already. until then they are all in the state. let's just say in peacetime, all tactical nuclear weapons. well, there was such a song and our armored train is standing back back of the siding. it can be translated, but for now. in my opinion. it didn't come to that. here is the moment of truth. we will repeat again. here is the moment of truth for will. uh, when a decision is made to supply the aircraft, the aircraft , of course, will obviously be based outside the borders of ukraine , then the russian command will carry out strikes on the airfield in poland romania and slovakia, well, they are unlikely to be based somewhere in the depths, and then let, uh, the nato command, the american command think whether to enter into a direct, so to speak, armed confrontation, a military

clash with russia or not, and we will already answer. uh, i got a call from a well-known journalist from washington and asked what i thought about putin's speech, and specifically, did he mean, uh, nuclear weapons. i will now repeat what i told e to him and i hope you will argue with me and even correct me. if you think that i unintentionally misled. and he said, i told him the following, i told him that e putin is a fairly straightforward person and speaks russian well. if he wanted to say that he was going to use nuclear weapons, whether strategic or tactical, he would have known how to formulate his thought. well, that's what i said. that, it seems to me, his words should be taken as a very serious warning, especially after

peskov's explanation that they wanted to emphasize in moscow that those who are going to conduct offensive operations against russia against russian territory. the russian territory is protected, i said to all the power of russia no less than the nato countries defend their territory with the fifth article of their charter, you still need to understand that if the territory of russia itself turned out to be a sub-massed strike, then you need to understand that the entire russian arsenal can be used in such situation and i reminded him, i don't know if he will quote me or not. well, i reminded him that in the united states for many years, until the soviet union broke up and the soviet union of its allies had

superiority in tanks explained for many years that the normal response to soviet offensive operations would be tactical nuclear strikes and explained that tactical nuclear weapons are of course a very dangerous escalation step, but they do not necessarily lead to the use of strategic weapons. it depends on some kind of tactical nuclear weapon, what power. and most importantly, on what targets. let's say you strike at american bases or do you strike at someone else? who, in general, but for the united states well, let's say not fundamental and i made a mistake no dmitry you are absolutely right. uh, remembering the story. and in general, the americans very often, you understand, here are tactical nuclear weapons. they were the first, so to speak, to invent tactical nuclear weapons precisely as a compensator for their own. uh, well, let's just say

a compensator for soviet superiority in armored vehicles, not only in tanks and in artillery in tanks armored personnel carriers. uh, by the way, the same is true with missile defense, which we have been discussing with the americans for a long time. eh, after all. they said it first. e roberta e da roberta robert makmara goes on to say that missile defense is a weapon of potential aggression, indeed. well, and now they are convincing that they are against missile defense. this is the one, so to speak. e is a completely completely defensive weapon shield, which, so to speak, protects them from some kind of failures in the country , therefore, you are absolutely right and another thing is that you understand the use of tactical nuclear weapons, why do i say that escalation is inevitable? uh nuclear clash, there can

only be two sides, it's the united states and the russian federation well of course, the english. the french have them there, 3,5 boats, but the french, they immediately distance themselves and say that we will not participate in any welding, our nuclear weapons are designed to protect only our national territory, that is , no one can allow russia and the united states a loss for ourselves, so the escalation will be first tactical, then strategic, with any use of nuclear weapons there will be a desoldering of our strategic nuclear forces. just like the american ones. and there, as they say. how will it go? in short, their nazarov is outstanding film director general director of mosfilm, i want to ask you, well, you have a lot of experience and analyzes of foreign policy situations. well, artistic first and foremost. you have more than just artistic talent. well, you have that intuitive vision, which is also very important in politics.

i want to ask you a hypothetical question , uh, uh, if uh, as the analysts in washington say, there is a plan to create an armored fist and there will not only be tanks, there will be hundreds of armored personnel carriers that, like you you know, bradleys are called tank killers. this will be supported by new long-range artillery, which will be able to strike at the crimea and uh, plus, as the general just said , an air defense system. they let you cover the offensive. and they tightened up these systems, including patriots, so that russia could not use its superiority in aviation. and this is how they will go. these columns, well, not those decks that can break russia, but nevertheless, the real strength is real, and now, if they go in

the direction of the crimea to cut uh, ground bridge, crimea here you are as an artist. if you see this, almost 30 countries are involved, right? it will not seem to you that this is a total foreign invasion against russia. well, if 30 countries are involved, of course, this will be the name of the total ground second ground troops that will be involved in this, that they will be predominantly or even only ukrainian, but if they are fully armed by the west, trained by the west, financed by the west, if the factories are already working in 2-3 shifts to supply the ukrainian army needs ammunition. you will make a distinction, a, between just uh helping uh, some country with

which and your own invasion. well, you understand, firstly, here is the picture that you drew with such total participation of some kind of super weapons. i think it is impossible to imagine without the direct participation of military personnel. e countries, they will act as advisors. well i think they will plan. i cannot imagine such complex weapons systems which are in question, so that they can quickly train ukrainian military personnel with them for 2-3 months, how they will be trained is another question and how long it will last. but i think that putin's phrase should be taken exactly as i agree with you, since he said it, the first, and the second moment. uh, well, the president of russia is generally very experienced in politics, very experienced

and, in general, very weighing his words, so i think that the very mysteriousness of this phrase is also the ultimate goal of this phrases, that is, our opponents must be. with a certain in a certain ignorance, but in an ignorance that carries a threat, so i still perceive it this way, here is his phrase. i don't take it as an immediate announcement that we will certainly deliver a nuclear strike, i don't take it either. i'm sure that's not what he meant. oh well, i would like to add here, because during the second world war there was a threat that the nazis would use chemical weapons against the allies and against the red army and, accordingly, our troops. even the search engines today are working on the fields of past battles, every fighter of the red army. he had a gas mask. it was a real threat.

can imagine, if it were used against large cities, what enormous sacrifices would be, but the warning of our side, by the way, here churchill's allies played their role, and saying that if there was such an attack on the ussr or great britain germany will instantly receive a devastating retaliatory strike and this deterred hitler from using e, chemical weapons even up to the end of world war ii. as for the tanks. well, today for a whole week , probably even more we are talking about the abrams, we are talking about leopards, there are different numbers, and from 200 to 300 tanks that can be delivered, and to ukraine either in april, or in may or in the summer. well, let's take a historical example. today we are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the victory near stalingrad. at the battle of stalingrad

, the germans deployed the fourth tank army near stalingrad, which had about a thousand tanks in the course. the battle of kursk was not prepared. uh, the newest tanks. this tiger is a panther, by the way, armor, and the gray tiger is comparable to the armor of abrams and leopards, and there is different information, but nevertheless , look what happened that during the battle of kursk the germans had air superiority had trained the crews are excellent, trained crews, having artillery and support for the interaction troops, and on the northern face of the kursk bulge, and wedged from our defense only 10 km in the south , 30 and further their destruction went, therefore i am, uh, deeply convinced that yes, but ukraine can, we should not underestimate ukraine can create this armored fist and , accordingly, conduct offensive

operations. but how will she e succeed if there is no air supremacy, because air supremacy, what then, what today is decisive and even what, and as they say, what will be leveled. sasha uh dominance air superiority does not mean anything, that is, without air support, without the interaction of military branches, without the interaction of artillery. eh, such a gift will lead. er, well, maybe linear. yes? e lost? yeah but uh, i think uh in just a few days. uh, such a blow, it will simply fizzle out and the tanks will burn. this hmm anti-tank weapons today allows you to do this, as for the situation today and in comparison, but its current situation, let's say eighty years ago, you know, parallels are also being asked, and ukraine has lost the strategic initiative that it wanted to acquire. and

he didn’t have, in principle, a strategic initiative. here was the operational plan. i mean, those offensive actions that i did not take at the end of last year and today, in fact, on the entire front of my own. ah, the ukrainian troops, they are bound by battles, they bear very heavy losses. i think that we don’t know exactly the number of their losses, because they hide, and they cannot create groups, but forces and means in order to increase the blow in some chosen direction. here is the offensive advertised by him. e in the spring, and this year it should, uh, have under it there are some reasons for the advantage, including in the strategic plan, there is no such thing, so here they are talking about what is happening at the front here, but in fact in many areas. this is the zaporizhia section.

this is the donbass, of course, there is a shortage, and the ukrainian forces of those reserves that they may have been preparing for some kind of offensive, therefore, speaking about the situation, we now have the opportunity to prepare calmly prepare calmly prepare our forces and means. this enabled us to do what, by the way, what we left this kherson bridgehead, and shortened the front line in the kharkov direction. it is your business, certain forces and means that can be used by decision of the commander-in-chief in the right place at the right time. but as for putin's words, let me also make one remark. i completely completely agree with you dmitry. and, of course, there is, and in putin's words there is a warning and one must read the doctrine. and the russian federation, the military, everything is clearly spelled out there, when there will be a threat to the security of the existence of the russian state to our

population. ah, the aggressor. naturally. and as the last means to protect, and our population will use nuclear weapons , this is also all spelled out, but it’s also true that today in the arsenal of our armed forces what is available in open sources. yes, there are enough weapons. the same strategic aviation that comrade general mentioned. look at the years of the second world war and the british and we used five-ton bombs. well, you can imagine some kind of destroyer force. that is , it is comparable, uh, to tactical nuclear weapons. and even more and if massively used, and strategic aviation, then, accordingly, the defense of one way or another of the ukrainian troops at a certain stage. it can simply collapse, they will collapse there, damn it, even even before and the pillboxes are so strong this is a bomb on the decline, and at the last moment what we

have not yet used before a, but a massive amount of artillery in certain areas. look, the battle of stalingrad, when we launched a counteroffensive, it was 200 gun kilometers 200. ah, today we we beat pointwise and let's see how events will develop further. thank you. i wanted one remark here mentioned. uh, how many foreign military personnel are fighting there, uh, poles. uh, all of a sudden, for no apparent reason , today they issued a figure that more than 9,000 people have already retired from the armed forces, you know, in a normal state. they have uh, the strength of the armed forces is 150,000. usually somewhere around 2-3% are fired annually. that is somewhere around 3-4.000. they have quit in the normal sense here by nine, but interpret that they were just scared. they want to fight, i wouldn't. i think that these are just the people

who allegedly resigned from the armed forces , took off their shoulder straps and went to fight in ukraine . that is, now we, in principle, know somewhere around five to six thousand polish military personnel are fighting in ukraine. brigade it's so reinforced. uh, the american brigade , which is, indeed, that is, in fact, it must already be bureaucratically involved, of course, i would add more. well, here evgeny petrovich is a brilliant professional, military, of course, amateur, but i do, but i'm interested, but i don't know if you agree with me or not, what , uh, this operation, and of course, like any new war. it is a new strategy, some kind of new pattern of military operations. it seems to me that in general, under the conditions of the current unmanned war, it is generally very difficult to concentrate forces for delivering the main blow, but what is the main blow, the main

blow - it is necessary to pull together the equipment, there should be big big ones. uh, so to speak, crowds of people, so to speak, all this should be, uh, we are hidden disguised. look at the current, with the current unmanned mass unmanned aircraft in general. it has generally become very difficult to do. i think that this war to a certain extent speaks of how, in the first world war, that defense is higher than attack has become today, as it seems to me very difficult. roughly speaking, if the germans had drones in the battle of stalingrad, most likely they would have discovered these clusters. as they say, our blows, which then led to the encirclement. i i mean it's not that easy. i don't know where such a thing will now be a simple matter. well, let's go to the commercial and be back in a few minutes. and after that general yes.

an analysis of the situation shows that there is an opportunity to strike a crushing blow. i decide to defend the house, stalingrad on sunday on the first hot comedy from the apartment, i just thought that the fourteenth of the fifteenth what men are talking about is simple pleasures already in the movies. and today a 30% discount on coffee beans, jacobs sweet dream from unison with a huge discount on ozon and your customers

can pay for the purchase of the phone. connect the acceptance of payments by qr-code in the tinkoff business application. create a payment code on your phone or terminal in a few seconds. accept payments by qr-code from clients of more than 100 banks.ru. receive credits instantly and without commission. tinkov begins to decrease in severity, regardless of the type of virus, so kagocel is higher.

come to the magnet and you will understand, butter, this is 137-99, when you have already achieved a lot. the main thing is not to stop, 30 years. megaphone is just the beginning. thank you for being with us sovcombank and you immediately conceived repairs to the point . you took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank . home textiles from the brand vasilisa choose bed linen and other assortment with discounts up to 70% on wildberries works

on february 13th to 20th and another snowmania in march for 499 rubles. mixit set for 259 rubles. drill-screwdriver deck for 799 rubles. and from the excursion, transfer money to the sea in the bath.

patricia's phone number for manual transfer tinkov was the first in russia to launch a number scanner install the tinkov application and transfer money easily and without commission tinkov he is the only one who says you need to get out of your comfort zone, but how long have you been in it for a month spam ends traffic. look, you can enjoy peace of mind, like a cat on its belly, because mts messengers work at zero, and the artificial intelligence defender of mts individuals will save you from spam calls and send a decrypted report. connect using qr cat mur svetlana resolutely author resistant varieties of wheat and a participant in the russian bread project and this is the moment when i decided to feel someone, father experimented there and apples, and my interest in science will grow.

cultivate interest in science from childhood decades of science and technology of the russian federation there is a big game on the air and we are talking about the anniversary of the victory at stalingrad and how this anniversary affects our perception of what is happening today in ukraine, your general slavy yes, i want to answer karen georgievich. uh, to his question. you know you are both right and wrong with on the one hand, many analysts both in the west and in our country say that we have rolled back about 30-40 years ago, because, from the moment of the collapse of the soviet union, all the conflicts that have been waged, well, all armed conflicts, all wars, led by the americans. yugoslavia libya e, syria all this was air cruise missiles, carrier-based foreign aircraft and very few ground troops. uh, and everyone thought , and many of us thought so, yes, and the first two

weeks of our operation - it was also a classic like this, uh, modern uh, conducting hostilities, when a massive missile bomb daru is inflicted , the airfield network is destroyed, the air defense system e, basing points. uh, warships and naval bases, which has been done. after that, of course, the party that suffered such a blow, it draws the appropriate conclusions. and uh, he proposes to start peace negotiations, which was done, and we, uh, by the month of march, came to what the ukrainians requested, uh, negotiations and negotiations. were carried on, in spite of all their such eccentricity, there, er. throw pants there some kind of sweater hats there are some frayed caps on the head, but nevertheless, the text was practically agreed upon until i arrived in kiev. boris johnson and

handed over, so to speak, brought the consolidated position of the west to the last ukrainians are fighting. we will help. ah. so, here, uh, no one imagined that there would be such a massive use of artillery. now actually it's well, let's say 60% war, uh artillery, like in the first world war, like well, i take the second world war, that's right, focusing there 200 barrels on a kilometer of artillery barrels, there are mortars and so on, but tank battles, but who thought that in europe in the 21st century there would be tank battles, and everything goes to what they will be, but so far there are no such battles, but if they really now they will create there, uh, two corps, as they promise, however, i don’t know where they will get forces for two corps. but even if they take it, then there are these armored fists. we will of course answer. we have a sufficient number

of tanks and combat vehicles, and infantry we have something to answer. on the other hand, you absolutely right. uh, unmanned, aviation plus uh, early warning and control aircraft, such as avax , avax coordinates their activities. e, firstly, collects reconnaissance information and , if necessary, one of the main functions there is nothing to coordinate there yet, but from our side , our e, and the fiftieth, and not coordinate the activities of our aviation over ukraine, this was not before. on the one hand, this greatly simplifies the activity of aviation. eh, on the other hand. uh, makes it difficult, of course, the defending side to counteract this aviation, therefore, of course, it became much more difficult, but to concentrate troops to strike in some direction. but i think that our

general staff is working on this and various. tactical methods of resolving the forces of significance in several directions. i think there is. uh, military science is moving on, so i think when it comes to going on the offensive. i think our general staff will come up with a surprise. so what did they say now? i think it's very important. what about how it will fight, especially the offensive of the russian army is working hard the general staff is working and a lot of other things. and the last thing i had in mind was to create the impression that the ukrainians have a real opportunity to win. i absolutely exclude such an option, no, but i exclude it not because i am a fatalist and i think that it cannot be so. and i am sure of it,

because i know what the russian army is doing. how the russian army is preparing, and how the country is preparing, well, the ukrainian army has weaknesses discovered, by the way, the general, that they underestimate the russian army, as hitler underestimated the soviet army after the soviet difficulties in the war with finland it seems to me that many in the west, including those in the american command, underestimate. here the russian army and how it is changing and strengthening. this is the first. secondly, i hear more and more messages from a variety of sources. uh, falling morale in the ukrainian army. uh, it seems to me that this is becoming an indisputable factor, and of course, the morale of the armed forces plays a very, very big role, and in ensuring victory, well, the third rampant corruption.

and now zelensky is expelling his e, to replace the deputy minister, he is organizing searches of his politicians, the former minister of internal affairs, and this , of course, reflects the general situation with corruption and this reflects the difficulties that exist today in supplying the ukrainian armed forces and in ensuring that the huge western help reached those for whom it was intended. you know, i have uh always admired the attitude of the sea. that the enemy must be taken seriously not in order to be afraid of him, but in order to to beat him, and therefore i prefer to proceed from the fact that the enemy will succeed, that it will not be the ukrainian anatov generals who will actually be in command of him, that they will plan the operation, but will be in

the american committee of the chiefs of staff, that they will carry out these things, you know the general, than me, but war games are team games uh, and will do things that the ukrainian army itself uh could not be ready for, so i think that we should be ready. and to the fact that there will be some serious attempt, and therefore, uh, i am very against the cap of the captivity. and i am for what the russian military industry is doing now, working in three shifts. and when i look, that's how much tanks the ukrainian armed forces can increase. i notice another number. how much modern tanks is increasing during the same time , the russian armed forces. and here i am giving the word. yes, dmitry, i am very short. you

understand, it seems to me absolutely right that the ukrainians are underestimating. eh, well, very big. i think they were captured. uh, this information war, which is waged against russia by the collective west and the ukrainians. here i am one example. uh, somewhere, too, on your program there was a plate with cnn data how much russia lost e how many tanks lost there and how many tanks ukraine lost means russia lost 1.416 ukrainians, 446? six, given that at the start of hostilities . ukraine had 2,800 tanks in service. now they say that they have tanks catastrophically lacking, our ministry of defense gives that almost all tanks, including those that were delivered and countries of eastern europe have almost been destroyed, but nonetheless.

these are the data that the fantastic ukrainians give to cnn, in my opinion, they believe in them, so they believe that it is there, even if the americans give them these missiles, but with a range of 300 km, which can reach the northern crimea well crimea well, they will give 10-18 missiles there. hmm , they can inflict some kind of demonstrative gift , i am sure that these missiles will intercept them. they are easier to intercept than, uh, haimasa, who are also successful intercepts. and nothing here serious attack. i completely agree without superiority ray air supremacy no offensive operation is possible, but it's science is simple. well, there has never been such a thing that without e-e air, an operation was successfully carried out. yes, even against an enemy who has dominance in the air. well, that's why the ukrainians themselves admit that without e-e combat

aviation, they are capable of some separate breakthroughs, but they are not capable of any strategic successes. i want to go back a little to 80 years. battle of stalingrad that's how it happened that the soviet union won it, but it's true, when you think about where the situation was at the beginning of september forty-two, when the nazi tanks broke through to the volga , it was very difficult to imagine that literally even after 2 months less than 2 months, and the german army , the germans, their allies will be surrounded and soon. after that, they will be defeated. how did it happen here dmitry you are absolutely right in the very forty-second year of the nazi reich, he reached the maximum of his expansion. see the whole of europe, it is under the nazi swastika, the germans, another 150 km from moscow, they went to the volga, they went to the caucasus , they wanted the maikop oil

fields, which we had time to glory. god blow on them. and everything seemed to be here, the world lies before them, and with their eyes before their feet. further they middle east meet there. in the area of ​​​​india with japan and, accordingly, there will be a fortress of europe and even a fortress of eurasia , as hitler dreamed of, and with the help of our oil it will wage a war for 10-15-20 years. well, in the end, even put and the united states will force, and the united states will surrender and it will some kind of peace beneficial specifically to germany well, look at the month of september with stalingrad in ruins august 23 completely barbaric bombardment of the city when 40,000 civilians who still remained in stalingrad died in one day well, just then in september, and general of the army zhukov, along with vasilevsky. they meet with stalin, they come from the front to moscow. there they say, to the supreme commander of the clan

, that we have a plan, and the strategic encirclement of the german grouping is better than the german army of the sixth army of paulitz, which elite in the german army together with the allied forces. in order to turn the tide of the war, ah, i imagine stalin at this moment, when two generals report to him, such a plan, and stalin says the idea is good, but let's keep the city first. eh, and yet. anyway, we will prepare this operation. that is, since september, actually began to prepare. this is the contour-sleeping operation. why it was successful, and i will give only one figure. look in the forty-second year, germany is only one germany steel was smelted twice as much as the soviet union 20 million germany we are 8 million. the same for coal the same for cast iron the same for electricity, the military-economic potential of germany only germany was much higher than the soviet union and if we take all of europe united under the nazi swastika czech factories that

worked for germany french factories that worked for germany factories. ford , by the way, are american factories that the germans privatized american factories. they also worked for germany in southern france in a collaboration regime. that is, this is a total advantage, but nevertheless the forty- second year. we produced three times more tanks than germans. 24,000 older tanks, mostly the latest t-34s. what is it? this is a phoenix that has risen from the ashes. maybe, but the fact is that this kind of industrial development was planned even before the war. we were prepared for our country to be attacked by aggression. and our factory were built like dual purpose factories. the same moscow factories that were evacuated, for example, the plant for e-calculating e, printing machines , he made automatic ppsh refrigeration equipment. uh, katyusha and this

economy of mobilization economy made itself felt, just at the end of the forty-second year, when we accumulated reserves and forces that broke through, uh, german defenses. and not the german romanian defense, because the talent of our commanders lies in the fact that they correctly chose the direction of the main attack, where the least combat-ready, and the allies in germany, these are romanian units, so in just 3 days there was an encirclement of 330,000 enemy groups. and at first, pauli could not even believe hitler and asked him to allow him to withdraw the sixth army from what you say was starting as an encirclement, which hitler said categorically no, and before the start of our counteroffensive. ah, they let the officers go on vacation, they absolutely did not expect our strike. it was an unexpected blow. after all, all movement. again informed today. the situation all the movements of our troops were carried out only at night. uh

guards, the strictest radio silence, so that it was impossible to peling. what parts? well, let's put it this way, but stalin it was vasiliev with him. eh, alias. yes, they are a pseudonym, that is, but a code name, and hmm konstantinov is a bug. uh, and mikhailov is vasilevsky and so on. that is, the germans also could not figure it out. and who is there from the team to ours is directly at the front. and these information measures have borne fruit. so i want a similar one a little bit of a different kind. this is where the nazi invasion began. uh red at the beginning, the army fought courageously in places, fought heroically, as in the case of the brest fortress of a separate unit, beautiful e fought, and under the grave then near smolensk well, in general, there was a retreat and at the beginning, many

people, let's say, retreated unorganized. they ran. frankly, there were hundreds of thousands of airmen and there were people who, well, did not very clearly want to fight the soviet regime. how did it happen? that after the terrible retreat from kharkov, the terrible, very painful for the red army, because the red army is there went on the offensive and timoshenko commanders of these forces had the highest expectations. and suddenly, somehow , an army of victors appears that was ready to stand and indeed. well. nothing, uh, they could not be intimidated, including fear for their lives, how did this happen? well, i think there are, of course, several reasons, i would refer to here

, uh, there are. i don't know. probably you heard the deceased now in one valeryevich kozhinov was such a historian. uh, soviet russian philologist, who wrote the history book? here are some of his arguments, it seems to me that he just touched on this topic. why why frankly speaking , not just the forty-first year along with heroism, but they fled about this , konstantin semyonov wrote strongly to run. yes, there was a matter, what they were draping, as he said all this was, but here he and he explained. these are several reasons. the first reason is that e for a long time they could not. realize that this is a war? she is destruction. only when they already realized this, and they realized this already during the battle of moscow, when several hundred

thousands of soviet war films, actually mired already by this time by the germans , when they realized that this was not just a war, so to speak, we will fight and, as they say, then someone will agree, namely the war. she is destruction. then what is called? as they say in russian, they rested the second, by the way, in my opinion, a very interesting point that notes leather. i think it was an important moment. he writes that the german army in 1941 had an average level of education of eight grades, while that of the soviet army was four. and in the war already kind of technical warfare is of colossal importance for education, and he just says that in the forty-third year there are a large number of junior officers. they were 10 year olds. here is my father. he came to the front in the forty -third year yuri bondarev this is the whole

generation, which they have already graduated from ten years. these are bondarev's lieutenants. here, they are already the level of education has already been a year, and they have become battalion commanders. yes, my father was a commander. there reconnaissance brigade, then the battery commander. here is yuri bondar, and it seems to me that these arguments, of course, are very convincingly, but then, probably, it is important that both the general staff and the middle and high command learned how to fight. well, uh, no, there is no doubt that the germans had a superbly trained hmm army, as zhukov said, the germans wrote in the defense of iron on the offensive of the motor, of course, and uh, but by the forty -third year, who still has colossal experience in the war, he has 2 years of experience. they were already at war by the forty-first year, so it

was of fundamental importance by the forty- third year. here is this moment he uh, here are these moments all they got up to work in our favor and plus. i’ll say more about tanks, because it was a concept. it's not just that it was the correct electoral concept of the concept of the germans. hitler's concept was to produce high-tech complex machines, by the way, by the way, similar to what is happening now. i myself served in a tank unit at one time in the soviet one, but i don’t know if our current level i hope that it is high, but in general in the soviet army the emphasis was placed on mass machine tools, these tanks are essentially t-34 our tanks, they are essentially simple tanks. they assembled easily. they could be mass- produced or they could be easily or easily mastered by the crews. that is, in my opinion, in general, it’s still absolutely, probably, in general, the concept of conducting, but the germans set it.

uh, this one for these complex panthers, tigers, which could not be produced much, but they counted on the fact that in this way they would be able to penetrate. but in this sense they lost. well, of course, you can’t help but talk, but listen to heroism, german historiography, which i, by virtue of my profession, do well i know, in general. still, there is an element of nazism all the time. and this is a common thing russian winter crushed massive russian. this means that there were more soviet mass soldiers, but at the same time you read viktor nekrasov in the trenches. listen to stalingrad. well, well, he was a participant in the battle of stalingrad in battalions of nine bayonets in order to make a counterattack. the battalion commander gathered everyone, including cooks, and he recruited 30 people and had no replenishment. that's how

they fought. this is how they fought unusually, generally the same as because they have. uh, paulus lost. in german historiography, he is like an ugly duckling, but in fact he was one of the most brilliant and generally the best german generals who was entrusted, one of the developers of one barbarossa, a participant in the war in france, that is, one of the best generals. and, by the way , it must be said, by the way, to a certain extent, his task is the same after the encirclement. i i occupied i wanted to do a film very much read. there, his memoirs of this adam were very interesting for his adjutants. yes he your task. in my opinion, it did. in what sense? after all, if he had surrendered earlier, they would have been able to destroy this group. our rushed

all our soviet troops were blocking, they were also in the caucasus there was the fourth yes army, who was there the second guards and the sixth army was german, right? yes, that is, many historians also blocked this, they say, and the war would have ended, because it would have been not only the stalingrad encirclement, but plus , they would not have allowed these troops to leave, that is, paulis held the front until succeeded in withdrawing the troops. that is, in this sense, he was not as simple as ours. e, they describe and fulfilled their tasks. and by the way, capitulation - as a result, he didn’t announce it, because he didn’t announce it on the street, he didn’t sign it himself, but trusted him, but when he was asked to announce the second group there. he says, no, i'm not right, that is, in this sense he was a real nazi and a real prussian officer. i am saying this to

show what class of the army we fought with and how we defeated whom in general, i will say one thing about the american army. and it is the american generals who will plan the main operations. firstly, i even tell you that, in general, i respect the american army very much and underestimate it, too , would be a very big mistake. this is a very well armed army. this is a very well trained army. this is a professional army. and it's good, a paid army, and as a result, people are attracted there, uh. in general, not just educated, but often very capable of motivating. that's the problem. after vietnam, this army never she was actually involved in punitive operations, the outcome of which was predetermined, like this army

, like the people who command this army, how would they be able to deal with a real war if it came to a direct clash between nato and russian troops. i think that in the pentagon they could not be sure of anything here. i would like to add one thing here . the question also concerns the decision-making of the command at the front and higher headquarters. an interesting incident happened the day before our counteroffensive, and near stalingrad one corps commander, and the tank corps, which was supposed to complete the encirclement of the german polish, wrote a letter to stalin personally over the head and the commander of the front. and through to ah, the chief of the general staff, that i'm not sure, i'm not sure about the outcome of this operation, because we are not prepared. we do not have fuel, there is not enough ammunition, the crew is not trained, and so on. stalin called

vasilevsky and said. how so? why are our troops really not ready, well, vasilevsky, uh, dissuaded him and said that everything is in place. the troops are coming. yes , there are separate mistakes, and we are ready and then we began, uh, picked up the phone, called at vasilevsky volsky and calmly, calmly, giving confidence. let's say to this commander, who will carry out one of the main tasks of the upcoming counteroffensive, but gave him, in fact, parting words that there is no need to panic here. we're all set. be confident, and that's confidence, then. she was present at most of our commanders and volsky after 4 days he closed the ring, this is confidence, you understand what we lacked in the forty-first forty-second year, this confidence in making certain decisions responsibly was fear. i'll make this

decision, but i'm circling around my troops, or uh, get punished or something, and here the troops are liberated. here it is in a good way already liberated. here it is, and the desire to win, no matter what and, uh, make a decision without looking back, then something will say. in fact, this is how the germans acted in many respects at the beginning of the war, but now the germans began to act as a spy, and ours the commander, having received this confidence, led his troops to new and new victories. thank you e we're leaving commercials, we'll be back in a few minutes and the general. i ask that, uh, give us your assessment of how the hostilities are developing in ukraine now, it's so easy to shoot mirny districts of the city

are killing civilians. i went to fight there. i think that there is to sit and wait until no, his name is called, but they didn’t call me, i myself took it and left. oh damn, hello, for the first time in my life, i took the machine wow, before that only in competent games saw guys. all kinds of weapons of months of hard training come boys. after they visit the combat, their eyes change shot, they follow each other. so the guys run. come on, come on, come on, come on, come on sitting here hiding. and my son stands up for the honor of our country. this is how we were brought up, we are raising our children like this .

on the first sale, get super sale on ozone and today 30 percent discount on coffee beans, jacobs sweet dream from unison with a huge discount on ozone they say you need to go out from the comfort zone. but how long have you been in it a month spam ends, traffic. look, you can enjoy peace of mind, like a cat on its belly, because on mts messengers work at zero, and with the option of mts and the defender , artificial intelligence will save you from spam calls and send a decrypted report. connect with qr cat murkov investment.

install the tinkoff investment application and earn the largest social network in russia for investors tinkoff he is so alone this basket is divided into only one my basket for 169 rubles. at kfc cherkizovo imagine what we're going to have for dinner tonight i'm cooking. own farms and natural spices are impossible to resist cherkizovo and it tastes so good to me. discover the whole world in the new sportmaster application hundreds of articles sportmaster media bonuses for steps in the sports activity tracker. poster power broadcast stylists free online

training more features in new versions. upgrade sportmaster live without leaving the sport can pay for the purchase of a phone. accept payments by qr-code from clients of more than 100 banks. open a business account but tinkoff.ru get credited instantly and without a commission and you will understand what you need . hello

. i heard a lot about your tele2 exchange. well , show me that i will first receive discounts when buying gadgets and other entertainment for tele2 subscribers. new currency. and i told you that you can use tele2 minutes in different ways other rules russia for one my baskets 169 rubles. and for excursions money to transfer the scanner number. install the

tinkov app and transfer money easily and without commissions. tinkoff he is one of a kind. come to magnesium. there is a big game on the air and we are discussing what is happening now on the fronts of ukraine and about the extent to which the anniversary of stalingrad , the heroic tragic battle of stalingrad , can serve as a lesson for us in our modern decisions, general, as regards the situation on the e-e front. it `s naturally. the main thing is the donetsk sector of the front. here is

this arc from kupyansk to marinka. uh, the most fierce battles take place precisely on this one on this arc, and the basis is again the main points of this arc. this is how they bang and seversk well , here many say that bakhmut, which, in general, opens it to take it and opens the way for us in slavic, kramatorsk and actually further. i am already liberating the entire territory of the former donetsk region or the donetsk people's republic should go much faster. well, here many do not have such fortifications, there are not such, well, of course, kramatorsk is very fortified. but i think that now everything is already over for the zakromatorsky , uh, so to speak, the steppe is beginning. eh, the main thing. uh, they threw all their strength on retention artyomovskoe or bakhmut. uh, because surrender, well, many journalists tell us

the operational environment, but so, if we speak exactly in science. there is no such thing as operational encirclement, either there is encirclement or there is no encirclement until, uh, the ring is closed. and in general, everything that concerns operationally is, so to speak, tasks. the operational association, that is , the combined arms army, while it operates there. uh, pmc wagner with the support of our paratroopers i think that in the next few years well, i won’t give forecasts, because the battles are very difficult cling to every house. the only thing that uh, well, i think, plays in our favor is that there are practically no civilians left, so uh, from my point of view, our aviation. it could have been more active, but i say this, this is the business of the general staff. how to strike? that is, the initiative is in our hands, uh, offensive operations of a tactical

nature are going on along the entire arc and further there, uh, to zaporozhye. e. the pace of advancement is not very high yet, but this is all due to the fact that you have to, uh, actually take uh, very fortified settlements fortified areas plus ukraine well. in such an impression that he is throwing all available reserves to hold these settlements. and why don't they, uh, follow the advice or at least a hint from washington. what can be it's not worth fighting so desperately, it's better to retreat and prepare reserves, you know? it seems to me that here, uh, the ukrainians are not very good now, uh, with morale, because for them, uh, the defense or surrender of artemovsky is already acquiring such a fundamental symbolic meaning, they will surrender this one will be handed over to artyomov. uh, seversk and

beyond. just to the front. it can simply fall, but you know. in any company there is always a turning point, after which a chaotic retreat begins. it seems to me that the ukrainian command is afraid of precisely this, given the very heavy losses. but judging even now, the americans have already begun to give, and close to the real ratio, that they are losing three-digit numbers every day. in terms of personnel and very poor training of personnel, when there is enough, there really is on the street, like, uh, that's all social networks are crowded uh and the next day literally to the front. they fight there for 20 minutes, raise their hands and surrender. this , of course, is not the kind of contingent that can resist. i would agree here, uh, with comrade general. and uh, really, if a goes, uh