tv PODKAST 1TV February 6, 2023 1:25am-2:06am MSK
1:25 am
joy is not necessarily joy, but it may be anxiety, it may be anxiety, but still, and how interesting it is for others. here's what he's counting on. the poet almost said here. and what the poet expects, you know, i noticed that dmitry, i noticed that when there were no poems, and you wrote some post on a network that is now banned or now allowed, it does not matter. yes, a good post by and large, a post from shhh short of course, and some enthusiastic ones came to you and thank you for them delighted are the people who said dmitry borisovich a poem and you always twitched, because you always understand the difference. here you are between a poem, but they, well, relatively speaking, they thought that it was written by such a verba yes, which is simply written in the form of prose, but you know the difference between berlin and just fasting, you know the difference between vers libre and prose there rests on the other thrust. remember akhmatova said
1:26 am
that, uh, a poem, when she remembers, she raved about her all the time. it's yours without heroes, what the main difference from all the others. eh, genres - this is a draft in the poem, there must be a draft , which anna andreevna had in mind is a big mystery of the furnace in the furnace, which is the draft in the furnace, probably traction, that is, draft or draft. uh, whirlpool, almaty strain. remember when he keeps his eyes shut on his own traction. he himself also attributed to paper, as a dome to empty skies. and this is actually the answer , and you always clearly understand that poetry differs from e, the best in that it is disturbed or created in a completely different way connections, there is a pool. yes, the funnel that draws it in may be, it may be free breeze. there's another funnel there, when
1:27 am
you stand in my way so young so beautiful. do i offend you, - said. i once, when a girl came to me. she stood in the doorway with frost and smelled of perfume. you feel the difference between the first that i started reading the block, yes, and the essay, which is the same words and pro, is also not different. yes, she came from outside. it's almost impossible. we always feel it, i guess. yes, i have the grace of favorite places, in general money books. can you guess? are we going to do it now? no? but let's try to hit the lion point. here there is such sex, which is called very pretty. let nothing end badly, a very important, in my opinion, thesis now. when you do not know what the text will begin? that's how it will end, sometimes you know, and how it will begin like the earth and the sun to ask. and that is all the same. which text more seems to end
1:28 am
its final element or i will tell you in a different way. you understand what's the matter, when the poems come you get sick. uh-huh you are not well akhmatova she said, remembering some simple woman who helped her with the housework said to another woman just as simple, anna andreevna let her hair down, like a deer, that by itself it already walks funny and buzzes. here is this strange deer with her hair down, who walks humming. it's a sound that came to you, and you can't signal it. it doesn't have to be rhymes. there, perhaps, in fact, it might be drilled, but it comes to you. i will nektate grieve to look for ways, ta-ta-ta. you fly, you are a pity quatrain you write for 2 days, because first it comes to you. mayakovsky told you about this , a goal is coming. and you have to pull. by the way, you notice that i said ta-ta-ta-ta. i thought i'd finish this line. this is just the first aging that came after the break. i didn't finish this line, it's gone, and that made it better. well
1:29 am
, you see, yes, this is a gaping deed, he composed ta-ta-ta for me. yes listen, i really, i forgot about it, so here's the music. uh, poems come to the ghouls, they come to excitement. they come to you not well essay comes images and ideas. still different things. you understand there is no . write creation. you see some strange clot, light. this is the first floor here, more precisely, above. so it's amazing. yes, it's poetry. this is the first floor, but by and large. this roof verse starts from the roof. well, yes, if graphically, of course, that is, there is such a roof, then some strange blue belly and then golden dew. what is the roof all this growing? where and this is the verse. he came to you, he speaks to you in a strange voice language and your task to write down an essay comes. i have a lot of respect for people who write essays because i know how difficult it is. you also rewrite it, but it comes to you in a way and in thought the poem does not come to
1:30 am
you beautifully. i remembered how godunov was cherdyn in the novel. nabokov's gift begins to write poetry. oh thank you fatherland, uh, recognized by you thinks he is proud to release the first collection, and then suddenly, it turns out that this is a lie, and in the end, that you are not recognized as evil. thank you daring, that is all turns over, in general the best novel is on its side, yes. and by the way, the question of poetry. you understand that i'm in this little secret not to go out of the light dmitry you're afraid, if you've already sat down and sit like this, please note that several times i leaned back and went out of the light. so you come out of the light only when the poem is written, when the poem is written, that is, it remains already, right? you can lean back, get out, i see. well, here , uh, we will finish the first part of our program and talk today in the window of the book. this is a book
1:31 am
ilya grigoryevich ehrenburg's very well-known and very understandable book, the thaw, but it is very important for me that the viewers remember that there are also paper books, they are worth the shelves. yes, i caught myself that, uh, i became , uh, from some point on, buying books, not only of the 19th century. i am not a collector i buy books only for work and for reading, but also the sixties. and even the seventies are also history, and uh, we know perfectly well that the word thaw gave the name to a whole period in the development of the soviet union will not now platitudes to repeat, but this is a production novel. it was criticized very strongly and, uh, i'll just never forget. uh, how it begins the seas personally worried , the word is given to comrade brainin to prepare comrade karteev, that is , we think that this is a steam meeting, and there they are discussing chekhov yes, they are discussing. oddly enough, and
1:32 am
in fact, no matter how hmm succumbed, orenburg to criticism. this is generally the last prose book that he wrote, but still, despite the criticism. she was very important, that is, the human face. this was the fifty-fourth year here. but, and already after some time, and the poem also with the same name became a landmark poem by zabolotsky, it was written earlier . here are two works called the thaw by zabolotsky and ehrenburg. they gave a name to a whole period of our shell, gave the truth to tell, but not in everyone who doesn’t have a thaw, you never know, who doesn’t have pasternak 48, uh, after the camp such a poem and describes how the snows come and move warmly? i think about this speech and
1:33 am
when i didn't know about it, i never thought about it, it's very important. it's very cool what you said, it's a book. e, stands on a shelf and talks to you, even once you don’t take it in your hands. this is my favorite idea, as i love it. these are your ideas that books talk to us even when we do not open them, that you told me on the internet, yes, that the file does not talk to you. you know, yes, yes, you downloaded it, but the book is standing and you remember how you bought what you found gave? who gave it, do you remember? why didn't you read it, or yes, and she threatens you a little, or you want to argue, right? or at least it happens in one word, a paper book is also. eh, now we don’t fight cultures against modern electronic technologies, it’s still important to understand, and the fact that books are not museum exhibits is also yes, because this book is just from my bookcase, but, nevertheless, a witness of time. well, it's very difficult for me. they are alive, like animals, because it's not for them. god would ask this
1:34 am
question some 20 years ago you were simply torn to pieces, well, of course, yes, but now, when in fact this hypocrite has subsided. uh, they threw away the books. you know, practically not, but the worst thing that i did was put this in the entrance, it’s still not a garbage dump. but still in the hallway. yes, i had such a began to endure books. and by the way, here is a very important point. you will never take something out of the apartment and take it away. eh, to the conditional with the parser never. this does not mean that you will re-read, but you will never endure them. they are more eternal than you, that is, i called out. i have a lot of books there, thousands, but i understand perfectly well that they are durable, than i am here temporarily with them, as always there was a modular, flattering. i 'm flattering everything for a while. that's right, books are second nature, and you can't kick it with an ax. you can't uproot the fact that this book is. in the fifty-fourth year , someone was shocked. well, you can’t take it
1:35 am
to zero, forget everything that happened. i really like you. is it true. maybe we could, but another life, this is our cafe on this place, mother always sat. oh, he has changed a lot, a grown man. now. the main thing is that svetka did not collect the loss of her family. sit still, answer questions. value in addition, to be next to awakening the premiere of the serial film tomorrow after the program time you leave me ozone
1:36 am
1:37 am
card yesterday, but it’s more convenient for me by phone by qr-codes, spb you can pay as you wish, each as it suits him. choose your payment method with the payment system world and fast payment systems. on ozon a today up to 45% discount on instant coffee egoist and 25% discount on fish treat for cats for 69 rubles. kfc subscriber is always fully charged with cool equipment. maybe
1:38 am
buy gigabytes of leftovers and even change for a movie tele2 alice turn on our song. you know who everyone is talking about now on this dank day all talk is only about tea richard the incomparable me or richard you both richard royal tea a hearty lunch in just 1999 only in vk rita sport is a variety of chocolate flavors that fills the day with bright colors. your day, your taste, your choice.
1:39 am
now let's get back to dmitry vodynikov, and i 'll just, yes, just talk about the selection that appeared after a long pause, uh, on the network, and there were poems that came after 10 years of silence. yes, it happens. we know that such, for example, well, in a variety of poets, as it happens, tsvetkov was silent 17 years, as knowledgeable people say, recently deceased . here, but it seems to me that there are still verses here that are directly related to our interlude, i clean the room again. i'm scared. i liked my book, yes, that is, i guessed again, that is, we again
1:40 am
guessed each other. it is very nice. i'm cleaning the room again. i sort out books. it's in the trash , it's in the trash. georgy ivanov must be left. and what is this empty, a pretty notebook, i’ll leave it for beauty. we must leave this nadezhda mandelstam, is this ours for some reason? i say here we are, although i now they are flying alone, tchaikovsky lena schwartz eduard limonov is my nickname of a loser books, dumped in packages in the corridor sometimes slightly tumble. by the way, why didn't i throw away the lemons, because in fact, his diary, a loser - this is not it, i'm eddie, yes, which is a cult book, yes or some other? why couldn't i i didn't read. even that nobody is a loser. i flipped through it at the time, why couldn't i throw it away? this is a very serious question that no one here can answer right now. no, for some reason there's a book that you really can't get out of. even if you haven't read them, you never will, you're not going to, but it's just like the kitten you met in the yard. you could have another, kitty. why one kitten?
1:41 am
maybe i’m saying right now, e can fly, well, don’t fly , but they will be carried out . why? well, yes, this is a mystery, but i think that the books will say this again, speak to us. uh, hmm, not at the moment when we slide through the lines. yes, we looked at the binding. we talked to you about the sides. agreed with you about lemonade. this was said to you by bakhmatova and hmm, when there is a material fact, our conversation about a material object is filled with some other content than if we were sitting somewhere at a lecture and talking about a book in general. here we see a typeface, we see interviewers with such a foreign word of this quality papers are still alive books. so they are alive, but we read them very differently, because there are books that we have never read from the first page to the last. we probably
1:42 am
even started from the middle of eating such books you are different. it doesn't have to be a collection. an essay, for example, it could be, well, a collection of short stories. it could be, even roman seems solzhenitsyn it was in the cancer ward. remember, he is reading some book with the cover torn off. well, it just so happened. it's disrupted, and he can't understand, because it's not our new system there. where is this one is printed on every page, the authors name, yes, and before that they only named it is called, yes, and he reads and is very angry and agrees and disagrees with the author and don’t remember who the author is. no, i do not remember. this is leo tolstoy well, that is, a book. sorry for interrupting the book, it turns out that you can read not only the middle of it, you can even read it anonymously. and yet, she will punch you if there is one to punch, so read the book from anywhere. the main thing is that she refrain from this moment until the moment. how do you close it and not the fact that you are not close it before the finale, well, it's clear, but uh
1:43 am
, modern man it's just that he expects some information from the text, if the text is long, then we remove it, it's such an internet, well, it's understandable, understandable. yes, but nevertheless the long texts are annoying. yes , longread is annoying, that is, very often a literary text. uh, it's not me that annoys me , of course, people who think that there are too few seconds in the courts. yes, that's why he lies on the couch most of these days. yes, here are the series, for example, they watch series, not skipping ads don't skip ads, but the book is kinda too much hmm complicated. that is, such an algorithm that you spend a lot of effort? yes, but it's not obvious, but if you think about some there, e line, everything is a sacrifice to your memory pushkin is a simple understandable pushkin that came to my mind. i ask students. what does it mean that everything is a sacrifice to your memory? it means that, uh, i will sacrifice everything.
1:44 am
if only you remembered me. is it your memory of me or is it my memory? e about you. and what does it mean to sacrifice your memory? that is here you can pick up 5-6 values, that is, reading, in fact, is such a massage of consciousness that we have lost, we used to have calluses here, now it’s impossible to write a pen, by the way, to the question of a dragonfly. i mean my book. yes, i'm not talking about the book. ah. for me it was a revelation because, you know, it's not about the dragonfly. yes, there is about everything else, but i, uh, there are not so many references, except for krylov, yes, uh , dragonfly and ant, and in literature, especially in e. great golden yes, our russian literature is not so much interesting i wonder which one you mention. i have a willingness to hear the chirp. ah, dragonflies. uh-huh or something. maybe it’s not the arrow, the rustle at last the arrow there, it’s the sound that is heard or the song of the dragonfly, this is surprising, because
1:45 am
the stuffy air is silent, like a premonition of a thunderstorm. ta-ta-ta heard the stump, uh, dragonflies dragonflies, right? yes, the dragonfly does not sing at all. he meant grasshoppers. i specifically became the discovery. it's really. there is a literary study that, well, the dragonfly does not sing. she, she generally flies scientifically flies. she can't be heard. this grasshoppers that is, we still have a fake dragonfly in russian literature, but not quite like that, because taking into account something there is no picture at all, he has such a global picture. eh, a picture of a dragonfly, well, no, you can hear the night of the world's silence. is it, is it night somewhere? all this is symbolism, i'm sorry, but if you say meow, kitten, you say meow, kitten, this is true, not quite true, but i know. we drink tea over the abyss, listening to the chirping. er, yes it is. this dragonfly and
1:46 am
the meow of a kitten say well over the abyss. i have my own dragonfly. uh, already cooked now occurring. uh, well, this, of course, is arseny tarkovsky. do you remember where he has a dragonfly. i learned to open the notebook with grass and the grass began to sound like a flute, i loved the correspondence of sound and light, and when the dragonfly sang its hymn between green frets, passing like comets. i knew that any dewdrop is a tear. it’s amazing and it turns out that she doesn’t actually sing, and he writes not because he heard her, but because this dragonfly came from krylov that you hissed this thing the dragonfly does not sing, if we have it, if god sends us a viewer i love you very much please, look, gentlemen, and ladies, look, really. eh, really. is the sound of a dragonfly heard, because if the sound of a dragonfly is not really emitted. you just
1:47 am
kind of understand. yes, the butterfly also gives some kind of sound here, that it is climbing? we hear something there, if there is no specific sound, then krylov and tarkovsky write to me, and not to an existing dragonfly. this is the most amazing, well, in general, the image is beautiful, it's wonderful. i think you write about it, because why is it wonderful, because, the word is stronger than life. uh-huh no, dragonflies that sounds, but all russian literature. just because of tyutchev's misuse of the word dragonfly , her voice rings. it's brilliant, but there in every rustle of the spike-scraping wings further at tarkovsky. e knew that in every facet of the huge eye, in every rustle, there was a pro-facet about the shooting, he took it from krylov clearly, check, lord, i beg you , lord there, check, i think, i think that this will be homework for today
1:48 am
night. but we still talk and uh, well, here there is such a stamper. this is the new sincerity. we promised to return to this word. we return to him. and i very uh, loved and love. eh, your books, but now, perhaps, we can say earlier, i don't know, of course, yes, i have two e's in front of me. this book is a holiday book of poems, and how to live in order to be loved, but thin beautiful, er, little books. and then there were big disputes, then it was, well, the turn of the eighties and nineties. the first half of the nineties, so then there was a discussion about whether it can be preserved in poetry? well sorry for the term, a lyrical hero, if anything, you can, but the vodnik proved that he can, i'm ahead of him. uh, we are who, but a whole play, yes, which tell us about it, because they captivated these books by returning to a direct statement through
1:49 am
all sorts of modernisms absolutely right. when you said that it was in the 90s and 90s, the conversation in literature was only about the fact that everything postmodernism , moreover, modeling was completely misunderstood, because postmodernism is not a freebie. it's not boring. it's not with constant quoting postmodernism is a challenge. when you say that there is no up, down. yes, you can really perceive it as a tragedy, as a drama, as a comedy. there they were perceived only as a game. well, okay. yes , i didn’t just rearrange these cubes and inflate the balls and launch the balls. this game reveled in the complex, but the readers did not understand, well, understandable, because the readers did not hurt him this dragonfly. by the way, the most predatory creature one of the most terrible. yes , she did not fly in and did not try to eat him see, giant dragonfly, so dragonfly, like the first plane, then the lord tried to eat the other forces, but they're a melodious dragonfly that's not known to sing. i
1:50 am
could not exist in this air. and i realized that i really need to do something impossible, some kind of inhuman feat. though weak and no enough person. i need to start doing and say no. uh , direct statement, perhaps why it was coined. it's damn his new sincerity, because new, actually led the first time dmitry alexandrovich yes, just in the game sense, well, yes, there is a very indirect relationship to this, and it was. it was my ministry. uh-huh. i mean, it was a ministry. this is curious about the ministry, of course, i understand, i started telling you from this that an essay cannot be a ministry. an essay is not a ministry. your job. it may even be your gift of thought. this is some kind of thought, maybe a service, only something magical elements - this is magic. uh-huh, that's the fire you keep there, or the coal, remember? yes, this is it was. yes, it's very loud right now. but yes. this was my ministry. i quarreled with people
1:51 am
and the right people. i've said a lot of stupid things. i am very sorry about myself for the stupid things that i said about all my arrogance in all my outrageousness. forgive me, please, darkness but it is now in separatists to repent of their mythical sin. yes, yes, i did it again, i would do it, but it's understandable, but look, not everyone perceived this as the discovery of something new. rather, it was the overlap of the old usual. need to be loved, well really necessary, but it was impossible to say so. at that time it was impossible to say, because remember what it was. eh, how they how they explained postmodernism. this is when you used to be able to say i love you. and now i must say, as i once said, the hero is such and such. i love you. this is supposedly aerobatics. he has already worked. he was not interesting, even if you do not say something, as he said it is. it's all the same because of you, of course, he said that it was necessary to make sure that she returned to poetry. i love you. you know my baby that's big now
1:52 am
once was small he had such a postmodern project. who is telling me? dad come on. e. hmm let's write a book, sign it with my name e, that is, e, called his name. so the book will be like this. once i sit, and i consider a novel on a bench. anna karenina goes on all on career yes, the last one is locked on the end and the last phrase. what a wonderful novel you are closing? yes, well, you've already said it somewhere. i'm on the air. no, it's amazing, but it's a good good story. eh, then you don’t need to write anything, everything is ready, but this is not leo tolstoy because it is, as it were, a hybrid of the same root. you came up with a very good trick. here you can include the key thing, then you have not paid anything from here. uh, all possible attempts to teach writing to correctly arrange words. if behind this you can write it incorrectly, so that words although then you already work with this too. you yes
1:53 am
, your task is to make a person break through the walls. i have something attached to your this. uh, there's a vault to crush your own wall your bones your own inertia your feelings, what can you write? and then you start writing. i have a very good example. hey, i have a young student. well , as a young adult, he's in his 30s . he wrote me a poem that was trite. i do not remember anything. i said, dear misha, what about? wrote. he says, you see, my grandmother loved very much. uh, mayakovsky counted him in his farmangel. and i say stop. you are now retelling your poem no, you have written a real poem. i have already said this several times on different broadcasts, but i am not on any broadcast did not say, and it will be exclusive that he wrote a poem just yesterday, which begins with these lines and continues really great-grandmother and mayakovsky that is, you can even do what was already impossible to do. you understand. yes,
1:54 am
of course, of course, uh, this is a beautiful, uh, service story about hmm, sincerity of feeling that cannot be imitated by any means. we, uh, serve the person we love. yes, we serve our family. we serve our children. even if we don't really want to. yes, they have grown we continue our lives with them. by the way, they didn’t really listen to me to healthy parents, whom we love, the more that you also have a little book that has already died, but nonetheless. we serve nothing useful , this dog does not bring us dreams. from what they say, well, through their ill health, of course, but to serve is one of the ontological ones. yes, he is logically rich pronouncing oncological e, qualities of a person signs of a person. here listen. you know that in fact, my most. i i love all sorts of not something about scientific. and uh,
1:55 am
popular scientifically is that science did not pull, the mind is not enough. and this is a well-known story, when primitive people, and by and large, being in a fairly wild state, when they became people, they became people when a was confirmed by excavations when it was found. by and large, an elderly man, he was already a 40 skeleton with a forty-year-old man. this is basically an old man who had a broken leg, who had missing teeth, who had an overgrown wound from a spear or from something, but he was always external. he lived means him he was a useless member of the team, but his feeding. yes, yes, a person becomes a person when he does something that should not be done. it is useful for her in this service, among other things, dostoevsky chernyshevsky chernyshevsky how we remember the novel, what should we do? there? eh, pragmatics reigns, yes, that is, you need to do what is useful to you, and the hero of dostoevsky in the same year the story of a note from the underground came out
1:56 am
chernyshevsky was already arrested at that time. he says that a man only begins then, when he does something inappropriate inexplicable. this is reasonable selfishness. yes, just reasonable selfishness, maybe it's good that a person is waiting for his own benefit. he understands that if he takes care of this forty-year old man, useless by their standards, then someday he will not leave him to die. yes, and they will give him some kind of bone that he can possess. so maybe chernyshevsky is also right, any dedication pays off. yes, any dedication becomes. ah, the main eye. very wrong. do you understand how only you say any dedication pays off. that means movement. so you started to count, you started to bargain, no, the donation itself. it's the fact she's disinterestedly another thing that she can pay off. or maybe i should buy, you know, the sailors rushed to the amza. why, he didn't really know
1:57 am
if it brought anything. uh, it hit me when the distant sakranin. e, presenting his novel or above, he said that he was dedicated to those who never found out how the war ended in this. it's all about when he speaks to you, high absolute you don't know should not know or everyone, when everything works out, only then everything works out. black square. malevich has arrived. well, yes, but he did it. it seems to me that we are in our conversation today. uh, they wrote another one, which, by the way, could have been, and we were not comically with you, we had such a rather dramatic one, but listen. we are the truth. we actually wrote several such moments with you, which can become the keys to new essays by dmitry otdelnikov. thank you so much for coming uh our transmission and as always. i say the same thing and most importantly for yourself, read with
1:58 am
pleasure. thank you. friends, hello this is a sex in the light podcast. i am anna banshchikova, i will talk today with a sexologist, a beautiful beautiful woman, my friend, and dear nazar aliyeva, we will talk about such an important topic about the sexual education of children. i had a situation where i have three children, my eldest 15 13 has two boys 13-15. you know, my daughter is also five years old, and somehow i was there, i don’t know there, let’s say my daughter saw how mine was there, but the eldest son washes in the shower, this team ran in horror. mom, did you see that he was in pain. you know, there are some we just and you , as it were, she was very small, she was 3 years old. and you're in such a state of disarray. you know what in general, how and what to say there, you start
1:59 am
to say something, something there, here he is a boy. there you are a girl. she in sense, and that have him there such at all? mom is what it is like, that is, all these questions or there, and some even here are small children, but you understand there mom , and here you have sisi and when i have here sisi you start like a fool. says something, you're still small. so you will grow up there, and you will also have, in short, and every time this is a stopper, in fact, absolutely this is for all parents. and what can we say about children who are adults? well, yes, i was actually going to tell you about this, that it is very important that the information that we give the child corresponds to his age. and here is the situation that happened to your daughter. yes, when she saw her brother's penis and was afraid of this word. here i am on purpose i emphasize that you need to directly say daughter, cockerel, there is a penis, well, somehow it sounds so strange when you started explaining to a child where his eyes are, where they wear these ears. yes , somehow she somehow themselves they all understood where the ears were. he mama look, here it is show
2:00 am
your eyes. here are the eyes. but this is the spout, and here are the handles and suddenly some kind of zone. yes, and here is the vulva. don't study. yes , it’s strange, yes, if a child doesn’t know from childhood , he doesn’t call the vulva and is called a cookie, because he can go to tell, yes, what i sad today, because dad ate it again. we cookie is a true story. it's so in the garden did not recognize incest sexual abuse that could have been stopped earlier. if a child called a spade a spade, that is, a girl called things so simply and therefore said so, that is, so that they could m-m name what they have there with their organs, where they hurt, where they tried to touch, then, if teach the child, he will come and tell the truth. you know, i remember too, probably, everyone at school started talking to you, and i actually, kind of, well, never told anyone this story. at my school, too, probably, everyone at school had me there, i don’t remember any teacher, there was physics or mathematics. and how do i remember that somehow he somehow touched me, and what is it? like a child, i don't understand what it is? i don't even have to tell anyone. i don't get it right at all. this is not
2:01 am
normal, in general, that it is already terrible. more there, but i often hear this argument that earlier in the soviet union, under the union, everything was not like that, everyone lived there, they respected each other. all it was clean and everything was, of course, that is, nothing even about this about it, even think like that, that is, and we were so neophiline, in fact, that we did not even understand what it meant, as it were, in general, in in principle, i didn’t understand, i can tell you that i went to the usual soviet moscow kindergarten, and i saved my sisters twice. once, apparently, the dophiles, who were already trying to lead him all over the island behind the house , somewhere in the yards, beckoning her with a candy, she is the second time in broad daylight in the tram there are other people with an egyptionist. well in fact, he took out his penis and tried to wipe himself off and all his sister. i was seven years old. i somehow settled down in my head that with other people's uncles. yes, what is it that it is something dangerous, i felt that it was something dangerous. yes, mom herself never spoke to us. just need to understand the parents. for example, i never. honestly, i have three children and i have never talked.
2:02 am
that's how you say, you need to sit down with the child and somehow start talking about it, that is, it was not like this in your thoughts, and somehow all this. i never know. mm, that is, you need to need to put the child on and somehow tell everything about it, which, well, it’s very convenient to take a book, for example, for children, there are now many magnificent books translated into russian. and there i have, probably, about everything. uh-huh my daughter chooses which one she wants to read and naturally, when i was younger, we skipped some topics for which she had not yet reached. and what directly to read the book or how? yes, and there are drawings in these books. it's not just about sex there. yes, there is it's a big misconception that it's all about sex , we show porn to children directly. there is no there about intimate places. there's direct hygiene there about something that, and not necessary with everyone in a row. hug and touch. yes, and you are exactly the same, if you want to hug someone, ask permission, that is , such very banal things about e-socialization about the fact that the internet, yes, and as if i never had it. i believe, i believe, i
2:03 am
bring up my children with such freedom and no limits. that is, they watch whatever they want. and in general, how is it with me, honestly speaking of which, it’s scary that now we’re going out to talk about the older guys. uh, that they can climb on any site, yes, and see something that is for the child's psyche, in general, uh, well, it's scary. i can’t imagine myself seeing it there, i don’t know, at such an immature age. i can't imagine what would happen to me. to what extent it is necessary to restrict putting some kind of bans, or then it’s all the same, all these bans always, then they will see somewhere, because we live in the same modern world , you can’t get away from this. and how about this to be at all. when i think about it, i feel really scared. i know that they, of course, climb there. and how they cope with it is not clear. look, i agree with you. we live in a digital world. yes, and our children at one, two or three can already eliminate all these blockages and you need to put a ban on the child, or still, of course, where you can, you need to protect the child. yes , especially repulsive material. well, you know the citizens, i also had an example. here in my youth there i was friends with such a girlfriend, and she
2:04 am
lived there with me in the neighborhood. she was engaged music all day long, and everything was forbidden to her. her parents didn’t go anywhere so strictly and raised her, then she grew up and turned 16 years old there. she went down in general in all serious, that is, it is not necessary to protect until 16 16 is already too late. it's late. i mean, i know the five-year plan there, for example, they didn’t forbid me anything there. yes, my dad, i don’t know , he asked me there, at the age of 12, we’ll go there for a smoke, he says something there. come on, let's stop, let's go smoke, dad, i don't smoke, they don't do it there. i'm like, really, nothing like that. i've never been banned from anything and they didn’t talk to me about it, but i didn’t do some things, i just didn’t do it, and that ’s it, as if maybe because i had such freedom, that is, it’s also not clear what to do with it. how better. look, first of all, what are the key principles that agree with you that raising children here in freedom - it is good to educate them so that it is freedom, well, limited, where there is a danger to children and educate them so that they know how you are alone you do not know what he is
2:05 am
watching. yes, maybe he climbed there on some i don’t know the site there, that he died there, for sure, he will see it. yes, violent porn is simple, because since the internet, porn content has also grown exponentially, and now my friends, whose sons accidentally stumbled upon a time, turn to me. not because dad left something there or there , i faced the earliest already in four-six years. ah, the boys stumbled upon when they saw sexual intercourse. uh, uh, in some kind of porno material, and this, well, first of all, i want to reassure parents with someone would not be lonely. secondly, they all didn't see the audition. it is clear that they are watching all this, and they see all this, and it is clear that they stumbled like this. it’s hard to stumble, the fact is that apparently, probably , as i think, as a mother too, as if the moment is intuitive such as i think that i am, the main task of parents is to teach how to separate, how to peel off the grains? yes, to teach the child to see to hear, probably, right?
12 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on