in our time, you can’t trust anyone with a password, even to myself, we can watch a movie that you can watch endlessly. and i really work in intelligence soviet intelligence 17 moments of spring. stirlitz, i'll ask you to stay. at the first chef, award-winning and recognized culinary masters tested the products and congratulate you on being awarded the award for the excellent taste of mine makes your dishes tastier.

all day on your feet and your back gets tired on a daily basis, but how to protect your joints partner just one capsule a day for protection joints and spine, whichever is more convenient for you to pay, it’s more convenient for me to use world cards, and it’s more convenient for me by phone. as it suits him, choose your payment method. in pyaterochka

kino 1tv presents the favorite

hunt continues if it weren't there. all the villains were caught. come to

decisive action cinema 1tv presents yes game vertinsky where are your things? no? i don't have any things. dead complexes ancient

drawings that were applied at that time on saturday on the first we contacted. karimov is not your nephew there. and your wife's brother gulnara usmanov from which you have three children? what happened? you came to moscow 2 years ago, found a job, met amira, then came. rustam, you helped him get a job at a construction site. he found out about your second

family. on your own. he wanted me to come home. said he would kill. he found out that samira was expecting a child from me and began to shout at me, he says let's go home. i said "no. then i'll come and tell you everything. and then i passed out. i do not remember anything. or i have, not i found. settings there were traces of blood on the walls on the floor on the place of the fall and straight to the place where

karimov was concreted and this is your blood. help as a result mitigates the punishment if you sit down in any way. either you give us a full alignment, or i report to you at home, but the reason for the conflict with karim. i didn't want to kill him. it was he who wanted me, he writes. he's always been like that. i swear i didn't mean to kill him, you know? did not want. now i won't see my son because of him. samira will have a son. we did an ultrasound. if

you remember your mother on a fishing trip

unfortunately, this is how the diary prayed for our information, it would help us a lot to clarify picture. can you imagine where she could keep it. i don't think she teenagers often hide such things from their parents.

vladimir sergeevich, you will have to go with us to the department. whatever you want, now they will take a sample of your wife for dna testing even more your adopted daughter was pregnant. we want to establish paternity. i will not smear anything anywhere. this is some kind of nonsense. alice knew from whom she tried to use makeev to hide it, and

when she realized what had happened, her childish psyche could not stand it and she committed suicide. do you have something to say? she tried to protect herself from you, she barred the door with a chest of drawers, but already stronger, i have no idea what you are talking about now . the next day. after death, the diary was also not destroyed by you, i will not talk to you without a lawyer. wait. wants a lawyer. it will turn out. first , we will interrogate ulyana because she is a minor, we cannot interrogate her without the presence of relatives or legal representatives. so

you will have to be present while i am ask her questions. no need. i feel a heartfelt confession what kind of wind is going somewhere? kiryuha agree? that's how the accident was built, that you leave like that and that's it, you don't know who. will be able to live there her family did not gather.

stay. what is my choice? and you can't pull. i'm gone in a week. good. will you do it in st. petersburg? i do not know yet.

hello

on the air big game today there were many events in the world, some of them very tragic, the action of saving people who were hit by an earthquake in turkey and syria is still going on very unpleasant. this is what again politicians intervene to save people, many countries are ready to help turkey, some kind of trade begins, especially when we talk about western states, to whom they will give

this help and so that god forbid this help does not fall into the hands. remind me of this legitimate government of syria well, and besides this , of course, as fighting has been going on for almost a year now, and in ukraine, the fighting is still quite fierce, the initiative is still and even i would say not as before, but more and more belongs to the russian armed forces, uh, a lot of talk about the upcoming russian offensive about the upcoming russian counter-offensive. eh, but that's about all we can say for sure. this is the fact that russia in ukraine is actually opposed by 50 countries led by the united states with colossal economic opportunities and are willing to supply ukraine even with their own

weapons, that is, weapons that are already in service with their own armies, and yet the initiative belongs to russia and e on this, in my opinion, agrees with almost all international and even ukrainian observers well, yesterday there was a biden speech, his appeal to the us congress, which he actually presented as his first election speech in preparation for the 2024 elections , where he again wants to run for office of the president, but finally, the last sensation of the day is the exposure of the famous american journalist seymour, harsh, who came to the conclusion that nord stream one and nord stream 2 were deliberately

destroyed by the united states with the help of norway i must say right away that so far , virtually none of the leading american television publications have picked up the accusations. well, i carefully read his article, the article is quite long, and it is written very logically, it has a lot of facts, but it does not contain a single name of a person who would agree to become his source. and this is in a situation where he is talking about such a very large-scale operation, in which several government departments were involved and which should have been known to a significant number of people. on the one hand, this means that such sources could really be good.

this is not the secret that was known, it was known to a very narrow circle , the government of the united states and many people there, but it was known. be sources, but on the other hand, well, the question arises. why was at least one person from these sources not ready to confirm something publicly. i uh know mr. well personally, although not communicated with him for many, many years. i met him in the early eighties. he was then the lead columnist. it was such an influential liberal new yorker magazine, and it had, uh, a very high reputation as

investigative journalists. he received a police award at one time, the reason i met him was that he was writing a book about how the korean airliner was shot down. and uh, he came to the interesting conclusion that yes, indeed, this liner was shot down, and soviet air force. well, no matter how difficult it was, because the soviet union itself recognized this already at that stage, but it came to a very important conclusion that there was no evidence. and that it was deliberately done with the understanding that it was a civilian passenger aircraft? and this was an important conclusion. and i was especially in solidarity with this conclusion, because i actively quoted in my book as a person who spoke with representatives of the administration about this.

andronicus know the man very well, to whom i told deputy secretary for europe richards yes. a and in general, he gave a completely objective story, but i want to repeat it was 40 years ago, so it's hard for me to judge. it's hard for me to judge. as far as you can trust this article, but i'm sure, i'm sure, and what will be a serious check and accusations of extremely extremely serious with us, who is she the bishop's mark with and a well-known consultant in the field of international security and in the near future? formerly a-a international columnist who specialized in national security issues at the national interests mark good evening. thanks for taking the time to join us. so what 's going on with this article it's

being taken seriously in washington. what's the reaction to it? yes, they take it seriously this morning, and the royers wrote about it. uh, they confirmed that semor is a legendary journalist and a huge figure in the history of american american journalism. e wrote this article, he published it. uh, himself and the white house have already said that this is completely false and complete fiction, and as dmitry well and correctly pointed out , the extraordinary statement requires extraordinary evidence. uh, and it's hard to know exactly where the truth is. yes, and the germans recently said that they have no evidence that russia a did it, and but , as we know, germany , they are categorically not ready to omit the russian investigators. e, e and and.

i have a feeling this may uh remain as one of the many uh mysterious episodes uh of this conflict. and alas, we may never know the truth . uh, where did i say we should set up a commission of third party investigators. countries like turkey brazil india that don't have that kind of political pressure and i understand i'm not trying to be under any illusions about the realism of this proposal. but i think that's one of the only ways e can fully understand exactly what happened. when i read this article, i got on the phone and began to call my contacts in washington, i did not really count on success, because you yourself understand that international trans -atlantic phone calls. they are

, to put it mildly, they are being monitored and i just, uh, just yesterday got a notice from companies. google what uh material about my use of, uh, everything google related was requested by the fbi, so all the people in our uh, all the people, look at me. i kind of explain it a lot. why do people why do people when they receive such calls come from moscow they behave with the predictability of not a single person who would confirm to me what he said well. that's what two people told me, well, everything, maybe, and these were

people, er, with relevant backgrounds with relevant competencies. and you know. i i was expecting what he would say to me. what are you, in general crazy to start obviously. this is the fruit of a sickly fantasy of an elderly person. well, i wasn't told that. and what is most interesting, i found three people who confirmed that there were discussions. how to stop nord stream. and that in these discussions, a very active role played. uh, victoria lund is under secretary of state for political affairs. this is the one who handed out cookies on the maidan and she recently made a statement in congress in the senate, how glad she was. when the north stream turned into a mountain of scrap metal? and that,

uh, this process was coordinated, that this process was coordinated, uh, by the white house, uh , by a specific national security adviser to the president, jake salon. is this proof? that what tsar-mar kharch wrote is proof that it is really true? no, this is not proof. this is proof that this is an important and interesting topic and i would like to hope that this topic will be seriously delved into. and not only journalists, but also, probably, in your congress mark has information that some congressional committees, especially the house of representatives, would like to deal with this issue already. this information is not yet available. this, i think, may be part of a series of investigations about ukraine that

the republicans are planning, but they have not yet given the exact details of what these investigations will consist of, but there are many. i think people who would like to understand, uh, and uh, what exactly was the role of the white house, and if there was no role, then i think it is in the interests of the white house, uh, to support any the initiative to understand and give the whole world confidence in what exactly happened. mark , you have information that some leading publications and tv channels are beginning to investigate this topic. today i already wrote about it and wrote his address that they could not confirm. uh, the statement, mr. grove, so we are already talking about mash. at first it was blogs and individual political commentators, but i think already, large-scale american media are starting

to talk about it, they do not confirm this, but they report, at least about uh, what wrote, let's see where it goes. i fully agree with you. it's difficult if in this case, if i'm a source for roche's role, there are big risks, uh, and big personal reasons why such a source wouldn't be willing to , uh, expose himself, and of course, there are big risks. oleg morozov is the chairman of the state duma control committee and an experienced person in these matters. tell me, now, if this really happened , it would be amazing for you. you would think that this is not just interesting information, something russia should do about it. fah point of view, i would not exactly be surprised. moreover , i am not surprised even now, because when

the explosion occurred on the nord stream. i talked to a man whose names are usually not called on the air - this is a general. uh, retired from our intelligence services, and i asked him what he thought about this, and he told me, he literally predicted that hersh would appear, because he said to hide, uh, the details of such a grand operation. it's just impossible. i can calculate. how many, well, his opinion is the strength of the people specialists of various profiles, from the heat of technicians to radio suppression specialists, who were supposed to provide appropriate e, silence , let's say radio silence, when this event was held, that sooner or later, from his point of view, people will definitely appear who will give. some information about, uh, who did it and, from his point of view, the scale

of this operation, of course, indicated, he did not talk about norway, but he named two countries. i mean the possibility of the special services of these countries, which may be involved. e to this operation, he called america and great britain you, as potential e possible, and the participants in this e, let's just say, just so grandiose military-technical terrorist operation. this is the first second consideration. it is hard to imagine what an experienced person is like hersh, by the way, who received an award for exposing the well-known story of the american special operation in vietnam with ongni. but it was because of this that he received an award when he made the operation of these actions of the us military public. what is he for by the way, the nominee for more than, in my opinion, 15 international journalism awards is very . it’s hard

to imagine a person calibrated in investigative journalism that he can mislead or unverified information about which he has some personal doubts that he , maybe throw in like this and not be responsible for the consequences for his actions, he is too serious for this, and a journalist with great experience and with a great past, i can predict a set-up, but sorry for this, so to speak, term, which is for sure now he will be investigated, of course, the last time we talked with putin, yes, yes. and how much you were paid in moscow well, it is very doubtful, therefore, i am waiting for the next move. i think that hershey has the next move in his pocket, of course, and the confidant to whom he refers, by the way, he refers to the person who gave him this information and it is quite possible that this person may appear. i have no doubt that we will soon witness a sequel. following these e actions as i am almost sure of the american intelligence agencies

relevant public information about this market. you, uh, lived in america for many years you know american society well and you probably know the reputation well reputation was from my point of view your first thing that he is a person with a very clear political stance against the establishment, and in general, i would say left-wing his e , exposing sammy, and the village in e in vietnam a where a war crime was committed and more than a hundred civilians were killed , 504, of which 200 were children. as far as i know these photos biased. because he described very little the situation in which this american detachment found itself. and you know oleg, like,

for example, in iraq. when the americans were on the streets of baghdad and fired from the right and left , it was very difficult to distinguish. who shot civilians or, uh, black civilian military population, and the soviet union had this problem in afghanistan so this is an important point to me this preface to the main thing he could have conflicting views, but he always gave very objective information and disregarding any evaluations. here is the very fact that he gives this information. i would, at least, say that this should be attributed seriously, what do you think i'm dmitry from the very beginning, as you touched on this topic , i wanted to say, i'm not only not surprised that

he writes. hersh. i'm surprised that this can surprise anyone. why because i immediately wanted to say, when dmitry i understand, you like m-th such scientific meticulousness by the sequence of disclosure of the topic, there or the crime actually. i wanted to say right away, he has two source was higher more competent more knowledgeable sources. in general , no one has to evaluate it this is a crime source. sorry. he says that he talks, but he does not name them, but i just say it, and i call it. here, he probably means them too, or at least what they said is his. it just led to the absolute conclusion that the only way they are different is victoria nuland. and this is president joe biden. listen, but

how can you relate to this differently, what kind of more evidence is needed if victoria nuland says to ted cruz everyone remembers this cargo was one of the main opponents of nord stream, there and so on, and she says you were against nord stream. look here. i was against nord stream and nord stream. no, that is, it is actually a confession, you understand? she said that this is what we said, even worse, that is, well, the old man , probably he didn’t really understand what he was saying, when they asked him, he said we won’t allow nord stream to work when it already was completed. and when he was asked, he said, we have the opportunity to prevent this, but kherson will ask about another

source. of course, it doesn’t matter to me if there is a deputy secretary of state and the president of the country, who frankly and publicly told me about this from no other source not needed. uh, you don't need me, to be honest, you need to be completely sure, because i'm sure that he will appear. here it will appear is that people have a motive and we know it for sure. they are public. it's grown a little moreover, i'm surprised from the war. dimitri for one second, i'm literally surprised that while tak was bright, she didn't say anything about it, but i'm more than sure. tonight he will say in the evening and tomorrow we will see it. and it's foxy because it seems that way, he didn't say it's nonsense, it can't be that russia blew up its own quite rightly said that russia

couldn't do it. there is a difference between saying that someone had a motive and that russia could not do it and establishing that someone did this kind of monstrous crime and was prepared to do so in situations where dozens were involved. if not hundreds of people, and this is the secret that was supposed to be an article and uh, i just want to be. in this situation, we say, i want to be sure that we really uh have hard evidence, and the reason i want to be sure. she andronicus is not scientific meticulousness. but because i believe that if this was really done, they should have very serious consequences. it will be so in this. i'm just sure. it breaks a lot of ideas about what is possible and what is not.

just breaks at the root alexander dugin you thought a lot about russia's relationship with america you talked a lot about the difficulty of these relations, but at the same time that america is a very serious country, uh, and we understand american capabilities and uh, you can sometimes establish everything from a high degree of probability or even with absolute accuracy, but the question arises. and what can and should be done about this, if it were proved that the responsibility for this act is borne by the united states and norway, so that you think russia should have done i, first of all i would like to point out that if hersh has real reasons to write this article , other than his own, in general, such a non-conformist

position in the american establishment, then this information could have only one source , also political, uh, this is a source in american society, which is not i agree with the policy pursued by nuland sullivan biden. this is the wing of the democratic hawks or neocons, because neocons are not only in the republican party, they are also among democrats and neocons. and this is not laws that set themselves the direct frank task of building an american empire and maintaining a unipolar world. continued hegemony. west, they are taking successive steps, starting with the maidan, there are still preliminary and subsequent ones that are invested. in the logic of the practically uncontrolled escalation of relations with russia , if someone confirmed this information to hersh, then there are

those in the american government who do not agree with this line, we don’t know them for sure. these may be representatives, as in republicans or leaning towards to republicans, isolationists like trump or just rational politicians who understand that further confrontation with russia will put humanity on the brink. e no existence. after all, andronicus speaks correctly, if we really feel that we are dealing with a terrorist who does not follow any rules. this terrorist has strategic tactical nuclear weapons, then at what point can moscow decide on a primitive such, anticipating a preventive nuclear strike, there are no more rules in other words. i think that this is a hawkish part of the american establishment that unleashed this war in ukraine, the part that is undermining the nord stream is not the only representative of the west and

there are those forces that are now realizing how far. we are all in this confrontation came to you google chopped off. they even cut off my google mail a few years ago, that is , in general, google is just an instrument of direct military control on a global scale. this and that much can be said about others technologies and networks, so if this confrontation is now reaching such an acute point, where are these hawks leading? i think that there are in the west, these informants are good, who are more interesting than his own investigation, than his reception, than his verification. this is my view. these are the informants who took the risk of giving some serious basis and texture to this. to a bold and courageous journalist who just goes against the establishment, really leftist, he criticizes everything that is connected with conservative american politics. but those who gave this information?

so i think that this is a very good signal that there are those in the west who understand that it is still impossible to cross some lines in this confrontation and it is better to openly declare that one of us is there from our own for them someone crossed these red lines, let alone make excuses. well , at least let them know that we've got the public's attention on this, that it won't go unlawfully. and that you are going too far in provoking russia to unpredictable actions. but if our nuclear enemy acts unpredictably, blowing up the gas pipeline, violating in general all possible conventions approached european partners. well, then there are no rules, and if there are no rules in a nuclear confrontation, then humanity stands, for something very important. uh, i think uh , we all have reason to be, shall we say

, healthyly suspicious of the intention of the biden administration and how far they are willing to go in their rather arrogant schemes, but a healthy suspicion. this is not certainty. and if uh, really it turned out that they carried out such an operation, which would be not only, uh, criminal, not only very daring, but it would simply be shown from my point of view. well, not only the lack of rules, but i'm not afraid to say the lack of common sense. there is one very important point. after all, look today , our e, village security council patrushev said that we still do not have information confirming it. eh, what hersh wrote. i want to note this precisely as a manifestation, but on a high level, if you want

responsibility for every word in this situations. why why do i consider the fact of discovering the release of real evidence, let's say, if indeed the americans, with the help of the norwegians, did this as a positive fact, because then if this becomes a reality, if it gets the americans proof, those who make political decisions will have to think seriously. and what in this situation can be a real non- spontaneous? the answer is when something falls down and these red buttons are pressed, but the real one is well thought out. a weighted , serious response from a nuclear power is russia. i believe that biden and all those who are behind this action will have a lot of opponents within american society. this is a positive thing. mark i know you've watched listened to the speech happens. uh, i had the correct impression that

this speech was, first, but very focused on domestic issues, second, that he was republican. although he spoke of bipartisanship , he offered nothing real other than the ability to support his own policies. and thirdly, that he spoke very patronizingly. e. about china and well, in general, a spoke to russia in fact, like a ravine, what do you think? dmitry i don't think anyone had, it wasn't a surprise that biden discussed foreign policy so little. and that he did not discuss any big news or changes in approach, uh, ukraine or china, but surprised me, including that he spent so little time on russia and china, meaning, russia dash ukraine and

china. we, i think, there were seven sentences about china and he didn’t say anything directly about the balloon that yesterday, uh, flew to the american airspace. he very indirectly said that we are ready, we will defend our territorial territories from any threats, but he did not discuss the details of what happened to this balloon. and you know. this is interesting. uh, as a rule, the presidents use this every year for an appeal to advertise themselves and their fehe, especially in the case of biden, who are going to run for 24 again, but in this case, biden. uh, when he spoke about ukraine, and this, too, by the way, was rather short. he, uh, just said, that's our approach. we have built a strong coalition and we will support ukraine, uh, for as long as islam gazeteks requires. uh, he didn't

say how long, how long. eh, this is required for what? i mean, what's the purpose, and he didn't even try to sell what 's going on, like like the success of politics. i would sing at home, he did not talk about the ukrainian victories , he did not talk about the defeat of russia instead . he just said very briefly, this is our approach and we will continue this work. and maybe you can say that he is trying to give himself at least a little flexibility. eh, in case prospects for future negotiations that could be uh, in the future yes, i think it generally illustrates that reflects. and the feeling of uncertainty that many in the pentagon and the white house have about the course of this conflict and how it can end? e loist. eh, mrs. uh, the pentagon secretary said recently that ukraine has a very small

window to carry out some kind of offensive. ah, members of congress. eh, more and more often they say that this is a conflict. uh, it's unlikely to end, uh, with a decisive victory for one side or the other, and uh, marclay. eh, chief. uh, serviceman. uh, countries have said to say repeatedly that it's in our best interest to seriously think about what future negotiations might look like, so there's no feeling. triumph on the contrary, i think many people have feelings of deep insecurity, and i think this is one of the reasons. why biden chose to talk about this so quickly and not go into details, because in fact the details are quite disturbing for uh american citizens, who many of them do not understand the danger of this conflict, the escalation potential and how easy it can uh explode

into something very terrible european. continent brand, thank you so much. and we will certainly contact you. uh, very, very soon at a new meeting on the air of a big game. you heard, uh, bishops mark. tell me, do you have the feeling that the biden administration? maybe someone in congress that they are starting to think about the american role in this company in ukraine and what? there may be some prospect of an american, but if you want a new persistent negotiations, you see such an opportunity, i honestly see the mere fact that biden almost did not touch upon foreign policy issues, he says, then that even in the white house they put

him on blinkin, he himself, if he is in good shape, has an understanding that the zero effect in foreign policy is everywhere, the past the year was the year of the defeat of american foreign policy in the middle east in china in the ukrainian direction , all attempts to isolate russia will force all other countries, except europe, to apply sanctions, to put pressure on there and so on , ended simply monstrous. crashes defeat, and the second most important thing, i would like to say, moreover, none of the serious analysts are led into any doubt that the same situation is happening in europe , the german economy is in recession , the french are outraged and say, listen, at what prices you sell us your gas is

now a shameless exploitation not of africa but of western europe, which is supposedly the closest ally, and supposedly. they were unhappy that trump was not very polite to him. and is it polite or impolite? now they are just being robbed. the whole world. i am german, of course, this is a church. this is the occupied side. but this cannot go on indefinitely. that's why it seems to me for this reason. he spoke to me about foreign policy, and moreover, why didn’t he talk about russia and ukraine, because after all, there are more and more serious voices. uh, it is heard both in the united states and in the west that this administration policy is putting america and the world on the brink of nuclear war. and that it is unacceptable and a very

small remark. i wanted to say when some terrible criminal actions take place, as a rule, there are two questions, who made and who ordered. here, as a rule , it is easiest to find who did it, and often it happens. even ours are some kind of lawsuits, but everyone says, well, they didn’t find customers. here we are now dealing with nord stream one and two, when the customers are known. now god bless the republican, uh , house of representatives, which can create a commission, and the commission was right. here dugin is absolutely correct. what is it if they are affected outside of these structures ? structures that were involved in the secret services, there i don’t know the norwegian stuff, they

will definitely start talking. it’s just that the house of representatives needs to create a commission and this commission would start investigating, and then we will find real executors who will say, yes, these guys told us, so they gave us a command and they were given this criminal order and we filled out executed the criminal order. but what can we say, but it's an interesting idea. it's very intriguing what the house of representatives will do, and i see really people in the chamber, uh, who support trump, which we can tentatively call as american nationalists, not globalists, who are suspected of being overly involved in terms of involvement. shal- war in ukraine, but will they be ready, but to support something

what will look like in the eyes of the american press, like supporting russia as a teenager putin i don’t know, this is an open and, from my point of view , very, very interesting question. but i wanted to ask you what oleg is talking about when you look at what is happening in the united the states of america talk a lot, uh, oh, we talked today about uh double standards. oh, ah, american hegemony, they are colonism, but you have a feeling that the big problem for russia and not only russia is that the united states. in general , surprisingly unprofessional people manage, that is , people who know a lot, and who have great sources of information, but who either

themselves. and they turned off critical thinking, or somehow it happened like this with them, then someone's evil will. well, just people who don't lend themselves. you know, you said even stronger than i would have allowed myself to, being a citizen of the russian federation, i asked a question. yes, yes, but you are absolutely right. here's what often happens. unfortunately, when politics is not the mind. not common sense. and that original idea, in which he once believed, hung this icon, speaking, already now in russian himself. there, in the right corner, it means that when he enters the house, he is baptized on her, so that his surrounding reality does not happen. he does not knock him down. here from this ideological sent. here at i have an idea now that not only people who are not competent will become in power in the united states,

because it’s hard for me to say. i know a little there, uh, sullivan's biography. well, to say that a person is not competent, i probably won’t turn my tongue with a biden. it’s easier here, after all, firstly, he changed his shoes so many times with age and then in his life. and for various reasons, including such great values ​​that he suddenly began to defend today and which he once defended completely, or rather, interpreted completely otherwise, uh, the bideno is still more such a political animal. and speaking of his advisers, they are people with brains and people, uh, who are endowed with intellect. but this is a great idea, it certainly makes. in my opinion they make colossal mistakes. here, i will support this thought that was expressed in connection with the assessment of what biden said. just think about it, but what kind of trump would he have in his hands if he said, look, my policy of supporting the ukrainian regime gave this result. this is the main

my external political outcome, shut up about china because you had problems with it there yesterday. e ball. and here's ukraine , where you could throw cards on the table, and he says a phrase that everyone read. e. that's right, today he said this analyst has a wonderful surname. he said that he said, we will support as much as necessary and everyone read it quite unambiguously. yeah, so if it suddenly becomes clear that americans do not need this today, then this will change. and if this changes, why are we paying this price today for this alleged success, which in fact here i will argue with a sandal, there is one success. they are so, but more old europe that mother do not grieve. that's what i'm saying, especially the germans that you strip and rape your ally. if you can call it political it's political cynicism,

because your dividends are your cream. they certainly take it off enough to say that st. petersburg today they are burning in europe at insane prices, he said the same thing about this, but i want to repeat it with biden. today this trump card does not exist, and this is if we take relations in russian the track is the main thing, here the whole nerf you either win and then win the cards on the table, or you don’t have anything to say and say, really nothing, so it seemed to me that this is such a very uh, such an understandable signal just, tem uh to the republicans, oh, who you said, who are waiting today, where will the old biden stumble. they want to pick up power and it is clear that they will have completely different tasks within the political and it is clear that a certain part of american business. today puts on them, so today they have trump cards appeared both with the hersh investigation and with this downed ball and with, therefore, with ukraine and with those. in my opinion, the mistakes that biden made in his speech, as they also

correctly noticed, appealing to the republicans. he insulted them so politically several times. yes, they even shouted from the audience that you are a liar, this is such a format that is not very familiar to a. i don't know there are better experts than me, as it happens, but i read it. it's just that the republicans didn't like this position very much. they were offended. and this is also one small. uh, the argument that they will take biden seriously both on the ukrainian track and on the chinese and domestic political track, you know oleg when i spoke, uh, about the professionalism and common sense, uh, of the american foreign policy elite, i definitely didn’t mean that this people who are not aware. and that they are incompetent in the narrow sense. well, somewhere i agree with you somewhere. i say that they are blinkered by the main idea that leads them as politicians, and this changes the logic of behavior

, changes common sense, but they don’t find some correct solution. e many years ago or an introduction. i had a conversation with former president richard nixon, who was no longer president, and he asked a rhetorical question that he liked to ask. and most importantly, for a politician and in general for a leader, this question was often heard and, in general, my instinct was always to say. well, of course, one must be honest, and the second is to say that a person must be knowledgeable. well, the third one won't hurt. if he is smart, the more talented, but, but, unfortunately, interesting, yes, here it is. yes , but happiness is to communicate with him, because the most

important thing for a leader is to speak english. yes, i don’t know how it’s good to translate it into russian. this is a combination of wisdom and common sense, yet decisiveness and determination, quite competent in a narrow professional sense , well-informed people that they didn’t have this judgment, because after what they consider the victory of the united states in the cold war they had. the phenomenon of triumphalism is weakening, if you want a phenomenon of arrogant uncertainty, in fact, the possibilities of the united states and with irritation against everyone who puts these

possibilities in doubt and i am very interested in your opinion alexander, because you are a person, again, thinking on a different level , not only on a level, if possible, so to speak, analytical logic, but also high metaphysics, firstly, do you agree with my observation and secondly, well, how to deal with such people, you know, here, firstly, uh, it seems to me that biden did not affect foreign policy, in principle, you know very well in this, because in america in the american in the american voter. it's not interesting in general. this is also important, that is , we should not forget that for them it is generally indifferent to them, they are interested in internal affairs. but here's what you're saying who we're dealing with is a serious question to me that it's a serious matter, that it's just now and like 4 years ago and more.