yes, no one will reveal secret documents. ah, maybe there are some moments? he was obviously talking to a person, and not the documents were shown to him. and probably, he hardly had the opportunity to write down, most likely from memory. he could mix things up or rearrange them. but here, as it were, i would rather bet on the fact that it was the explosive device that was planted. uh, norwegians, not americans the fact is that the norwegians probably have the strongest, but the naval one. uh, the special forces of the special operations forces work precisely in cold waters. yeah. and now, i think they'd put it down better than, uh, the rest of the americans, and it all looks terrifyingly plausible. i asked one question. i again know how careful you are expression this is a strong statement of your country. well, you know, providing a high degree of confidence you know under certain and under

certain circumstances. it could generally be considered as kazbeli. yes , when the united states, together with its ally, so to speak, which, by the way, borders on us, yes, and the only country for this own land border as well. they are conspiring to harm us directly. how should we react to this? interest ask. i read this article, too , very attentively re-read it and i have mixed feelings. and mixed feelings precisely because the article is so convincing with such a level of detail that you involuntarily ask yourself a question. and how many people , uh, had to cooperate with a good person, not a single person, here one separately chosen person could not have all this information. that is, there

must have been a significant group, except of that well mentions how it was involved the national security council, that one agency? and the pentagon, another agency , the white house lawyers are involved to find a way to organize this in a way that doesn't necessarily have to notify congress as required by law. if someone wanted to organize such, let's say. why saury is a good person in the past very famous very influential. well, in general , for a number of years, and the inactive de facto pensioner de facto pensioners on the other

hand. i'm kind of like a person myself not very young. i know that when people are close to retirement age or have entered it, they sometimes have a bailiff, and increased activity and if they do not have any other direct responsibilities, then they can focus on this kind of project, but as if this is for them the idea is fixed and they are harder to pursue for a young man. you can break a career or a middle-aged person somewhere, you can even take revenge through children, when directly, well, also breaking their careers. yes, for example, and when a person is so old and ahead of his eternity. he, of course, maybe, uh, make some decisions there not to be afraid, for example, prosecution, right? dmitri here! how do you explain the situation , the president of the united states, er, has not yet spoken to the white house on his behalf, made

a statement that this is complete nonsense. the cia also said that this is complete nonsense. well, probably nothing else. if they had not gone through, if they had gone for this kind of operation , they would have said nothing else and could not, on the other hand, of course, there may be a potential for a very serious scandal. do you think that this president is an experienced and cautious person? what kind of wet one do you have to go? i also tend to believe. uh, samru, to hersh , the article is an extremely convincing article that fits perfectly into the information fund that we read, which we know about explosions. uh, northern streams , i remember the text message she sent to anthony blinkin and previous statements, by the way, by joe biden and victoria nuland that if russia invades ukraine, there will be no nord stream. they didn't

go into details, but they certainly did. they said that they would do something with these, but the turbo lines and now they will do it, and this fully fits not only into the general information background, but also into practice, i would say in a hybrid war textbook, a hybrid war is being waged, either indirectly through ukraine or it is carried out directly, but at the same time you hide your direct participation. this could be a false flag operation. here is such a secret sabotage, but from which you will cut yourself off in every possible way and say no. no. this is complete nonsense you deny, but you directly do it, a bydom believes that the only red line. in this conflict, it is not entering into a direct war with russia, everything else is permissible, including such attacks on critical infrastructure. and such attacks. naturally, they will not be

recognized. naturally, even if we see more evidence of more articles of follow-up that prove that this was done, the united states with the participation of their allies in one form or another. yes, of course, the united states will do its best to refuse this, because the rules again, a hybrid war, but they demand that a not take responsibility for such sabotage. what if you take on the appropriate responsibility and say, yes, i did it, i then it turns out to be belli and you don’t know this anymore. we are now at the center of our analysis of technology strategy thinking about the possibility of launching a journal dedicated to the issues of what in english is called intelligences. it's probably not quite right to say intelligence. well, of course, we look at history, because there are declassified documents there. remember how much there was a fuss about perestroika when

the soviet union was being scourged for claiming that the cia helped parsnips. uh, get a nobel prize. now it's the americans. this was confirmed by the fact that they took out the manuscript, because it was an element of rather informational warfare. we are all fine, and we know about how we participated in a whole series of covert operations, then documents were opened, but now times have changed, let's say, when, uh, the previous president of the united states openly stated that i said to kill general soleimani, yes, an official to a foreign state who are on an official visit to a third state. yes, he was driving from the international airport, so he was in baghdad, so i'm not at all surprised. eh , this is going on, spinning stronger, stronger. my first surprise was when a few months ago there were leaks from the cia from the administration, yes. we helped direct missiles in order to kill russian

generals, and in ukraine yes, officially. this was rejected, but was leaked by a journalist. it seems to me that people have already lost so much you know. hypocrisy last refuge of virtue yes , people don't even want to be hypocritical anymore, they leak it, it's because they are proud of it which, in theory, should have stopped the administration. this is what a pipeline is after all. it was not only russian, but also german. and that gas from there was supposed to go to several other european countries, and germany to the nearest ally. there is a lot of goodwill in germany depends, when we talk about nato's confrontation with ukraine, how will the reaction be if it turns out

that the united states really did something like that? the reaction will be such that germany will take a pensive, taciturn position and say that germany is conducting its own investigation, which indeed exists outside of this process. no comments will be given. yes, there will be statements from the opposition no sanctions against america, especially no sanctions against america, moreover, even if they ask hmm minister of foreign affairs, germany on lena berkova what she thinks about this article about the whole situation. she will say something like that she herself would be ready to undermine these flows, that in general, she did not hide the fact that she is against this project, but they do not see it. generally. she has no problem with that. by the way, is this? an important circumstance in the context of what we have just said about the position of germany and the opposition of scholz, when in your

government there are partners in the ruling coalition. i'm talking about the green party working actually. on the one hand they work against the course that the social democrats of the low-key course are trying to pursue, then this is hmm the situation is quite new for german politics and hmm hardly any other chancellor of recent german history has faced the fact that his own kind. in fact, they conduct their own foreign policy completely, based on such an uncritical understanding of transatlantic solidarity, that is, to do everything so that american-german relations flourish at the same time. no matter what happens around and in this i mean, there will be no reaction to the northern streams 2 from the german government now. thank you let's look at the reaction of one

american journalist. uh, who believes that the reaction should be very strong, strangely, and germany in america itself , but this is perhaps the only influential journalist who has so far spoken clearly on the issue of the investigation themselves on the map. this is so carlson fox's lead commentator. there is a show there and it is really the most popular in terms of the number of views. tv columnist america but him trusts one half of the american population that votes republicans, and the other half simply organically cannot stand it. let's hear what he said about this. joe biden denied any involvement in blowing up the nord stream gas pipeline and blamed the jubaiden on russia, and his entire administration assured us that somehow russia was inexplicable. apparently simple,

because they are villains who blew up their own gas pipeline. it was a deliberate act of sabotage and now the russians are spreading lies and disinformation. he said that in september it was clear at first glance that this was not true. why would putin suddenly do this? after all, in this way he will only harm himself, several official investigations were carried out and not a single evidence of russia's involvement was found. now we have real answers to what happened, this was done by the biden administration, seriously investigative journalists seymour hersh, behind whom half a century of experience wrote the following quote in june last year. united states marine corps divers operating under the guise of a highly publicized nato exercise also known as boltovs, 22 were installed. guided explosives, which after 3 months destroyed three of the four lines and the nord stream gas pipeline, said a source directly familiar with the planning of the operation. this passage has a sequel. quite

possibly the most compelling material you'll read this year. and you should definitely check it out. it describes in detail the meetings of the national security advisers, the meeting in bely house, when exactly all this was planned. what type of explosive was used, how it was detonated, and on what day there are so many details that it just can't be true. this is true and none of the high-ranking officials of the us government deny this, giving any specifics, not a single reporter is following this. it's just amazing. this is surprising, if we talk, in general, about long-term journalists, and, uh, the normal sound logic of political struggle. but when you look at the american reality, it's not surprising at all, because putin and russia are demonized, because no one in the political mainstream wants to be accused of being a tool, but in the hands

of moscow, because they will be told to when they give some arguments, that simon, as something discovered with them , will not even argue on the merits, but simply say ukraine is a victim of aggression. you are objectively a tool, and the receptors of a totalitarian aggressor. how can you do this and huge money from the military-industrial complex huge funds from the federal the us budget that goes to kiev and part of which goes back to washington for lobbying purposes, all this will be used against those who want to do a really serious investigation, so for me, uh, absolutely uh, there is no uh possibility to expect u new year something

that could be serious let the administration down with one very important exception. if some committees of the house of representatives that are controlled by republicans, and not just republicans, but republicans , populists, trumpists, if they called protagonists of this investigation by the secretary of state's national security adviser. cia director victoria nuland is the secretary of state, who by the way is mentioned many times, if they were called to investigate and demanded that they give sworn testimony right here, fucking, it was a problem for the administration, because blowing up a pipeline that belongs to e , damn russian. well, this is excusable from the point of view of the american

political minstream. and here's the congressional doctor, here's the oath. this is serious crime. but it's not all that simple, because as you well know dmitry, according to the rules of congress, such hearings can be public and such rumors cannot be secret. and there will probably be enough democratic committee members and supportive mainstream republicans who will say, let's make these hearings secret and warn the committee members that it would be a serious crime to reveal who happens at the hearing, most likely, this will not work to the end, rather everything, there will still be some a leak. well, it would be difficult for me to turn this into a real threat to the administration. and of course, the main question in this

situation. and how should russia relate to this and what could russia do about this, we will discuss this after the advertisement? vyacheslav tikhonov’s ninety-fifth birthday is shouted during childbirth we are the dialect of the area where we were born, so you will shout mommy in ryazan. a movie that you can watch endlessly

i never thought that i would be bored. without you. i don't know what your profession is. i always was with you very interestingly disorderly. thank you. february on pervoy new in the line artra cream arthroxicam three-component composition promotes accelerated penetration of components at the beginning of modern painkillers maximum concentration for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain. enable payment acceptance in the tinkoff business application and accept payments via phone or terminal.ru. alice turn on our song. life with discounts on

yandex.market was born for games tele2 presents but show me what i get first when buying fast love long love sweet. we are talking about sleep. you

can fall asleep in just 20 minutes , sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily in the morning for those who like to sleep. the mattress is some kind of magical magic mattresses and pillows in asconi, with a discount of up to 50%, only in february they took everything from a commercial bank for a loan of up to 5 million. and now you use loans from sovcombank to the branch and online in the color of the wallpaper we have preserved for you the taste of the bright sun and the power of fire in every seed of jane, so that in an instant at the click you will enjoy gin seeds know we love and eat, symptoms, adenomas, prostate should not distract me, so i pretend. it simply restores the functioning of the prostate, helping to reduce the manifestation of adenoma. and i enjoy the life of vitas because it works perfectly for one of my basket for 169 rubles.

gifts for loved ones on yandex market with discounts up to 70%. for example, kitford trimmer for 590 rubles. to maintain cholesterol and blood pressure in the normal range. choose atheroclefit bio it will take cholesterol and pressure under control atheroclefit bio evalar did you know that in tinkoff investments is a social network for investors, millions of people share experiences maxim is a real investor and does not hide it. how much does matvey earn while following maxim and other investors with high returns copy their trades and earn as they do install the tinkov investment app and earn russia's largest social network for investors. he is the only one who says you need to get out of your

comfort zone. but how long have you been in it for a month bam ends the schedule? look, you can enjoy peace, like a cat on belly, because the defender of artificial intelligence works on mts messengers will save you from spam calls. and send a report with a transcript. connect with qr cat. there is a big game on the air and we are discussing accusations against the biden administration that the administration is responsible for blowing up nord stream 1 nord stream 2 and carried out this operation in close cooperation with norway. well, it’s clear that in russia there is less widespread indignation about this, it’s clear what can be done about this, but indignation, uh, show

easy and natural, if you believe, of course, that the biden administration is really responsible for such a crime. but find the right answer. which would not put russia in some kind of predicament, which would not lead to some new e, attempts to effectively try to isolate russia is not so easy. what did you do dmitry i would divide into diplomatic efforts and military-political efforts in the field of diplomacy? i would sharply intensify work with the world majority and make the most of this opportunity for and evidence that the west is waging war against russia because the message that the collective west sends to everyone else is that we are only defending ukraine, we are not a party to the conflict. we only defend

ukraine against russia directly, no matter how we act. this is proof that not even proxies act directly, but with their own hands, and moreover, they act even against their allies in europe. this proves the fact of the west's war against, and russia second. i would sharply intensify work with those on nationally oriented forces in germany and europe that still remain there. and this is not only an alternative party for germany, the left in germany is also hungary , this is a number of others. in europe - these are political forces in france in italy in other countries, that's how the united states acts against them and the economic difficulties that exist within the countries of the european union us policy here in addition to proof that it is the united states, together with norway, which, by the way,

has now profited very significantly from gas supplies. e to the european union. it seems to me that this can, but cause certain, at least political movements and turbulences in europe. and lastly, in the field of military-political affairs, the united states has indeed moved from a proxy war to direct participation. truth hiding. well, we know that the united states is heavily dependent on infrastructure outside the united states outside of sovereign zone. the united states is the satellites in space are the cables, uh, that are at the bottom of the uh atlantic ocean. and why not say so, but make it so that sometime something from this exploded, that, it seems to me, is only an understanding that the sword is sharp on both sides. maybe in this case somehow stop. you were not afraid that if russia goes down this path. uh, along the way of explosions, uh,

diligence of cables. e that this is a further escalation, which will be against the interests of the escalation is already underway dmitry, that's just the point, but it seems to me that if russia does not take any action, then the united states will be accepted. it’s like not russia’s readiness, but somehow to adequately and harshly react to such sabotage by the united states and the united states will commit new sabotage. only an understanding of what action can result in. to a retaliatory strike as in the field of nuclear deterrence. it seems to me that this situation can somehow be stabilized. artyom , what do you think, is there something that russia could do in europe, especially in germany? supported russian positions created problems for the united states well, if you want, it would help russia, uh, somehow strengthen its prestige with its attractiveness in europe

it does not seem that at the moment, if we take the german direction , russian diplomacy and public and public relations , but does a lot to convey the position of the russian federation on the situation in ukraine and on other important issues, but the problem is that in germany the political mainstream of the information mainstream is arranged in such a way that those people who speak, and even with a moderate position, such as the social democrats now find themselves in a certain information bubble and it is extremely difficult to break through it. and in my opinion the situation. now it has developed in such a way that both a diplomatic and a military response. maybe, yes, only on the front line and, yes, well, ukraine, and only positive dynamics in the course of hostilities, which

the russian armed forces will demonstrate , will increase the likelihood of a diplomatic return. was sure we understand what germany can and what germany can't really do, for example, can it be that they will cancel the supply of leopards? we can talk here rather than about the abolition, as about some kind of tough decision that will be made by scholz, we can talk about some bureaucratization of these procedures, to which the german bureaucracy, known for its specific strength, is quite, but capable, we can talk about dragging out this process, and its emasculation. is it possible, is it possible, or is it likely? everything will depend on the dynamics that will be on the front line in ukraine, this is exactly what will happen to determine, including the position of berlin

, therefore questions thanks to ruslan that, well, cards in hand, as you know, winners are not judged by them will rise in price, therefore, if a decisive victory is won in ukraine if there is a war. in a special military operation will be completed in our favor, then everyone will bite their tongues and teach on their hind legs and will not have to respond in any other way. if , for one reason or another, something goes wrong , it will not matter at all. what flow and when was undermined, well, as an ivantechnical answer. i am an expert on military-technical cooperation. i would suggest increasing the supply and transfer of technologies, which we have refrained from for one reason or another, and to china and iran, those countries that, pursuing an independent foreign defense policy, voluntarily or unwittingly, put pressure on american interests in the asian pacific, uh,

hypothetical theater of operations and e in the middle east. well, how would i say this , i really want to agree with you, but i immediately imagine. how would uh react, japan israel especially israel, which is extremely nervous about, uh , any military supplies to iran, and israel is quite an important player for russia, and israel is able to supply ukraine with a lot of serious weapons. you're right. but you have to remember the thing that will never make it, israel is a de facto ally of the united states, there are not su-35s flying there, but f-35s. therefore, of course, we must maneuver. of course, we must understand the attention, interests, of israel, but if you need to choose between the interests of russia and the interests of israel i hope that we will still

choose our own interests. they are of interest to a difficult state. because i really want to accept. ah, tough decision. well, i also want, when we talk about our analytical program, to be realistic and not get involved in situations that could be against russian interests by saying, i predict that there will be a tough response from russia, a serious, real, concrete one. unless, unless some serious investigation takes place in america itself, which would showed that the article, without reflecting reality, if there were really serious hearings in congress, if there were really serious journalistic investigations, and moreover, all this happened

quickly enough and i want to repeat seriously, then, of course, if a good article was discredited, that russia would not act on its basis. this is obvious, but if only in the uh administration. and congress decided to hush up this kind of investigation. are you sure russia has a certainty that the administration desperately wanted to prevent the operation of nord stream one and especially nord stream 2 without return is irreversible. uh, uh, it is natural for russia to think that the united states is not, let's say, not a supporter of the organization, in principle , of military operations, and when they consider something necessary in the interests of american national security, who is ready to go?

it is very much, but when it comes to special operations , the fact that the administration denies this, but russia also denied everything, if you go for this kind of act, then admit his. but unless it is convincingly proved impossible, therefore, of course, i think that in such a situation, the russian leadership in practice would be forced to proceed from the fact that the united states went for it. and this, of course, would create the same phenomenon that we all talked about, namely, what if you don’t answer this. then you actually encourage in the other direction, but further and more dangerous actions of this kind, i will not predict what the russian leadership would do if such a situation arose,

but i have no doubts based on the conversations i had in moscow over the past 2 days with officials. i have no doubts. what kind of russian response would follow and that this response would be concrete and real. it was a great game, see you next week. dear passengers we have scored a proper height in the podcast. everyone wants to fly will last approximately 36 minutes and i hope you enjoy today . i am the monitoring pilot leonid yakubovich. i want

to talk to you about love. so about love which never pass and is given at one time by god burns in us and smolders us like a small flame, even if it has already passed. let's talk about aviation, let's talk about people who at least once, if they held a helicopter handle or a steering wheel horn in their hands, it will be all their lives. you are in aviation. how many years ago? in the ninety-fourth year, i entered the kachin higher military aviation school for pilots, amazing coincidence, my first independent flight was in the ninety- fourth year of the trinity on what type? of course you came, right? by profession, well

, the specialty in the diploma was to be a pilot engineer. how many studied 2 years? what is this time? what have you learned about your profession? yes, especially for 2 years, nothing was particularly learned, well, aerodynamics, of course, a lot of specialized sciences was the theory of gas turbine engines of design, the strength of the aircraft were simulators were e-e l-39. here albatross had to sit at least once, well, more than once. yes, there are somehow simulators, so this is a big word now it's trainers. and there, that only devices, these alarm clocks were more often all digital, too. yes, and there were definitely stepper starters in the next room, but you left after 2 years, right? and highly

prepared. i look, i'm just a backstory before the quality of the school. i also, uh , visited such a second moscow city aeroclone, i have valikhina. i'm fifty- second i was there right away, i'm fifty- second. yes, there were three of their aero clubs, there was the first helicopter. uh, airplane gliders are second, and these paratroopers are third. no no. i i asked the 52nd aerobatic pilot , they put us first on the yak-18t. at least not so approximately. at the fifty-second, we immediately learned the second cabin or the first, first, second. what did you feel there? well, what did you do melman barrels. this is what i did many years later. a so a a then we were only doing park chores. here, mainly on the provision of the airfield. so they came there on their own clean. e, as they say, on a purely initiative, the air rose. uh,

this injury was for me because i studied fine? i passed the whole theory, here, and these were the nineties, when we somehow had this fuel 0 and the story was very funny, because i drove up for the first time, a tanker, we were preparing for the plane to take off, and i got up on latch, and i filled the tank from there a fountain went. and most importantly, an engineer. e airfield. we have an intelligent transmission can not. i learned a lot about myself. here, yes, he said what and what, what are you doing? every drop is worth its weight in gold. so there was a case when my pilot instructor the kingdom of heaven to him vasily vasilyevich khromov i don't know whether you knew or not, well, it doesn't matter, and he came up, we had two. we then here, too, humble a bandmate we went in the summer heard that you are good guys. throw yourself on rock, scissors, paper. so he had a stone,

i had scissors and flew. l he here and after many years in 2007. i have already flown at this airport. i started our conversation with this, but still a circus school. lord almighty i'm talking about this because the number of my friends of my acquaintances who have passed circus school. yes, gennady viktorovich klyaver oleinikov, aka yes. who taught you? oh, because i would ask something, it was vova tochilin in those days, or very much robert, but the saints were people, it was something , you studied in the circus in the country. yes , these people were not there. alexander anatolyevich shcherbin used to teach memory there. well, then we met with him. eh, many years later. i was there for a short time

and studied there for a year in pike. in shchukinskaya yes, in the workshop of marina aleksandrovna panteleeva vision but this is happiness, the pike is of course, well not without it, no, it’s clear even after the pike how much you worked. where did you work? at first i worked in the satire theater there for four or five seasons, then i had such an experimental theater theater of mikhail ugarov. yeah well, then i quit the theater. well, it's good anyway. you have gone into the profession. why did it suddenly pull back into the sky, in general , someone brought it, someone said there is an oracle. how is it all for this? well, how, uh, as it was rightly said at the beginning of our program that this is for life, this does not go anywhere. who got there. this impossible to convey.