stanislavsky will continue about noir why does a friend appear again on the movie screen in soviet this is the same french word. and what about the american genre? well, because the french in the circus years watched american films and said hmm a black film, how they have gloomy a and came up with such a term, which is natural in the thirties. in america , it was not when this critics themselves came up with what kind of techniques were invented by the graphists. here actually. and when we look at the fragment now, the camera shoots a characteristic technique a little from below, but very big face. uh, the actor's hat. yes , as a matter of fact, yes, yes, nikulin. this is typical. well, it's a frame! could be with some double insurance white. for example, why not? in general, this, but the look, yes, sharp shadows? yes, contrasting images, which , by the way, all this came from, as if this camera work is considered to have come from the twenties from a movie. uh, the era

of german expressionism, where there was a separate school of cameramen, many of whom then came to hollywood and all this this here is a mixture of everything in the world in an amazing way then, it turns out on the soviet screen. well, why are they giving this advice ? this experiment is a stylization, because the material and the approach to the solution in general. this, of course, the atmosphere there is completely newar. yes, that is, if noir is something hopeless it is, and here the guide takes the stylistic elements of the genre and overcomes them, the same thing happens, there is another short film in the leader of the redskins, which is absolutely eccentric of which in my opinion, because the whole yeralash in general domestic grew up, because this boy, who can not cope with no parents, even criminals who, through their indiscretion, a is trying to kidnap him. here, uh, grows out of it. in general, well , a separate direction in the domestic children's cinema, as it seems to me, uh, it seems to me that these are the techniques that he uses. they are taken for this, to be sure to beat.

to the viewer, so that he has fun, here is this turn, in principle, cinema to mass cinema genre the return of the genre. as such in the soviet cinema in order to, uh, how can more viewers watched this film and they liked this film, and there are memoirs of one of the authors, gaidai, one of his screenwriters, who said that we checked ourselves all the time when we wrote, but this will be clear to the grandmother from yoshkar-ola. for some reason, they had such an image of a grandmother and why are you cows here, and now, if it seemed to them that it would be, it’s clear they went further, but in order for the viewer to fall in love with these films, of course, it was a coup to create a certain group actors who will constantly work with you appear nickle. fa cinema, gaidai not alone, but immediately with vitsin and morgunov. and the guide has a cent. i was filming even before e, the dog barbosa unusual cross in his first is not very successful. on copper, which i tested. uh, such

censorship problems are obstacles, and the film that was eventually called the groom of the other world. here there is one person, and here vitsin and nikulin and morgunov appear immediately and they appear in such images that are absolutely recognizable. even the costumes. until now, they are standing in the corridor of mosfilm, and we know who it's not even knowing there are no faces. yes, these are dummies, the same as shurik yes, because gaidai is actually on one side. brought a career, alexander remka. on the other hand, he ruined it to a new level, as he himself sometimes thought, because the mask stuck so tightly, and shurik's mask to alexander demyanenko that, in general , at some point he believed that he was a hostage. this is bad for you, but still shurik can you explain what is the uniqueness of this image, after all, it seems that the common features of a student who there is nothing, which has all the time even when he is older. yes, he is like that all the time. not long,

what is the meaning of this mask? it seems to me that first remind ourselves what it looks like? how does it work? do we have a small snippet? drive

shurik in my opinion, a typical representative of the soviet technical intelligentsia. here are the eighties yuri lotsman i recalled that once upon a time in leningrad, if you , in principle, walk in glasses in a certain area , you will definitely be attacked, because why are you wearing glasses there, there is such a prejudice among a soviet citizen to a man with glasses, and a guide makes a man out of him on the one hand. a. well, it seems like not stupid, but on the other hand, he always gets into some kind of stupid situation, so it's nice to laugh at him. actually. these two years also found this, because we laugh at masks. oh, what a loser, charlie chaplin's hero is a tramp. falls into a stupid position all the time. here the approach is exactly the same proven methods, when they always use what has already worked somewhere somewhere and is tested on new audience and proves that these techniques never get old. but if chaplin usually does not get a girl, you say shurik is still a romantic hero . this is such an interesting combination when on the one

hand. all busy with his science , as it will be later, let's say ivanovich changes his profession, but at the same time we still go to another effective genre of romantic comedy, which is not so much in the soviet union. in general, people could afford to do well, that shurik was a prisoner of the caucasus. the only thing that comes to their mind, and hmm during a date, is to catch a funny song with a girl in general, work. ah, gaidai with music is a separate topic for a dissertation i don’t know. probably because after it is believed that he offended the theological, and they use some of his music for one of their first er, early comedic works on. i had a very creative and strong union with hooks, which, in general, in my opinion, did not even break until the death of the guide. yes zatsepin is a wonderful composer, with which i really guess i got lucky. on the one hand, he is a songwriter, in principle, and on the other hand, he is a master of the very instrumental music that

is necessary for such a genre of physical comedy yes, a comedy of physical action. and zatsepin recalls that when he kept asking him to make the music faster, faster, faster , and well, the musician can’t play faster either, and zatsepin knew how to make it so that the rhythm of the drums would sound faster. it just felt faster. yes , it was not necessary to play faster, but at the same time, but on screen in combination with the image all this works. let's get back. actually , sveta didn’t get into the film, why didn’t it work out, when oh, a wonderful story, it seems to me, because the film was cut, almost by half. it should have been called differently at first, but not yes, well, how, well, are you making a film? and cut it in half for you. well, how is it? it's trauma, of course. let 's just explain in fact to our listeners and viewers, what was, and two , soviet censorship and its difference from analogues, because, as it were, clear rules, as such

i knew people could make movies in the spirit of judgment with realism back in the thirties, and then kim came and said, sorry a. you are doing something wrong. how did it happen? well, here’s the guide and launches a comedy that bureaucracy is bad, it seems like everything is in line with the times, apparently, someone is somewhere else, and the decree issued that it is necessary to fight with berkotism ryazanov carnival night is also struggling with velvety. and so the guide honestly makes wonderful actors with an artefal plate, and georgy vitsin adds wonderful actors of the second class. a story about how, and a person goes, and in well on a honeymoon, they steal from him, uh, money and documents. immediately, he dies and everyone thinks that he died. this is the same person who left him too. deputy in a completely unnecessary institution, which is called ku-ku, but something there is a prosecutor's office with a lot of signs. if you remember , in ryazanov's office romance there is something similar, too, a building that is hung with a huge

number of meaningless, and the names of meaningless institutions. yes institutions, one of which is led by our hero, his deputy does not accept him back, because according to all the documents he died and the hero cannot get this very piece of paper that he is alive, what remains in the film is still very funny. often this happens. i heard yes, but and uh, there, apparently, there was something too much, and the truth is too funny or too much, showing the absurdity of soviet reality, therefore, that's what was left of the film. eh, horns, yes legs, but on this, i think gaidai learned from this injury, eg interesting story in a.

someone makes ends meet, well, in beware of the car - this topic appeared brightly. by the way, speaking, it appears just the diamond hand. yes, that is, here are these soviet entrepreneurs who are trying to somehow bypass the system to hack this topic.

ryazanov comprehends she more vividly in the sense that he is trying to think about what social justice is, like the zigzag of luck, but here is a film where a is trying to understand how it would be, is it good, and should winning? yes and from a lottery ticket to belong to everyone a with whose money this ticket was bought or only to the one who bought it directly. you guessed it, went a little. it sometimes seems to him that this is all he is not serious about any problems, meanwhile, all this is also present elements of this very one, but market economies that are corroded by soviet society. well, well, in the form of a comedy, because when the hero is screaming, he says, in the neighboring area , party members stole from them, they say, it is necessary to cut out then this phrase is simply passed on to the comedic hero nikulina and here, please, all this can be said. a, but the most interesting thing, in my opinion, is history - it's about how, like a diamond hand, there should have been an atomic explosion at the end. it seems to me that you know better about it, yes, but it’s like what

khudtsiev called a watermelon on a neckline, he had a legal rain in the film, a scene. e, about the crazy kbeshnik. and in the end. uh, like he said himself, i had to make a sacrifice to save the whole movie. here is such yes and apparently , many soviet directors and couples had a similar strategy. yes, he tried to distract a admissions committee. there is a state cinema with some outrageous frame scene. well, in particular, it is considered a bike such that he mounted a scene with an atomic explosion as an option. and it's so emotional, and everything excited and distracted. for some more. calling things by means of sockeye salmon, they then no longer paid attention. i remind you that this is the gaidai 100 podcast, where we talk about the centenary of the remarkable soviet director. leonid yuryevich gaidai, i am a film historian natalya ryabchikova and we communicate with my colleague stanislav dividensky. and also, if talk about the attractiveness of movement, the attractiveness of actions on the screen and physical attractiveness, when i could

somehow afford to enter the territory of sexuality in soviet cinema. here's what. i don’t even know such sensationalism, or something like what svetlana svetlichnaya does in a diamond hand. for you, as a spectator, we are never shown everything in its entirety. we do not see how, in fact, the bra flies with the light. if it's personal and beyond some frame that cut out of the film no, it was not supposed to be there, in principle. i really like how this theme comes up in the last film of gaidai in fact, bass good weather is on the contrary. ah, it's raining again, where is our soviet a-a such a-a secret agent receives instructions from his commander from his mentor, and he reminds him. and if you are seduced and wants to destroy a beautiful woman, what should the agent and the heroes of the russians do, the hero says he must destroy the beautiful woman, and the mentor

speaks incorrectly, and the hero should not pay attention to a beautiful woman. here's to the cinema, gaidai, yes. the agent must destroy the beautiful woman himself, and the audience. actually. gaidai immediately positions himself as such a director of spectator films and this is actually a strange position for a soviet director, because it was believed that, well , there is some kind of graphic community and it ’s better. rena we are the person who fights the system. but if you shoot a genre movie, even if there is something what games do you play in this one? themes and come up with something that they will definitely cut out later , so that everything else passes, it seems that you are not a serious director, that you are, well, here is the genre, well, mass cinema, while any audience is huge. yes, at the same time, this is the very grandmother from yoshkar-ola, who is clearly watching, clearly understands, there is evidence that films are shown there to the japanese, and gaidai and they understand everything. and this is not a coincidence. it tormented

the guide. there is evidence that he earns a lot of money. yes, on these, or rather, he earns films earns quantity. and he, too, well, he also earned some money for a while, because the success of the guide and his comedy is associated with such a name that is not obvious, like grigory chukhra rai and vladimir pozner, the elder dad of the famous modern tv presenter, if people are through the efforts that was created experimental creative an association where the guide and filmed, and some piles of films and where the system was built, as an expense, motivating the director. uh, the more collects your box office. that, in fact. you earn more yourself. your group is successful it really worked because people were motivated. well, again, this motivation is financial, which actively manifested itself in the nineties. and when the phenomenon already emerged in the late eighties, er, early nineties, cooperative cinema is, again, yes. and why are there some non-obvious things, but simple emotions

, human desires to earn the desire to live well, these are the basic concepts with which the guide worked, it is not by chance again. why is the twenties the twenties in the soviet sense is not and, look at ivan vasilyevich, this play was written in the twenties, and the guide itself refers in some of his films, just to the topic of nep a, which directly occurs 12 chairs again, since sportloto is also a response to the twenties, when they could make films from over these same and here are the films of the last two films of the good weather or at brighton hd ah, and the cooperation operation is again. uh, in fact, such a renaissance of the creative guide. i believe that, well, gaidai has a lot of masterpieces of the sixties and seventies, and then somehow he goes downhill, so that e palm. uh, in this era of stagnation, it’s like ryazanov who make such philosophical films are no longer very funny

, honest, as if i consider the garage to be more of a tragedy and the novel i heard than really funny comedies, but nevertheless here, as it were, like this, but new rise, and well, a lot of new formal tricks. that is, if here is the eighties sportloto yes, there are also tricks there, but somehow it already looks a little strange, as it were, here is the epoch, there is such a feeling that it has gone somewhere. a here the nineties is just such an elephant, when well, new growth, nothing is clear, but it seems that burning again does not fit. here you think why the reason for success, or maybe there creative failure. yes, with this film, it seems to me that even fit in, i propose to watch small fragments, yes? please. thank you how much i wang owe. save it katz owes you katya you owe me not to you personally. i mean the kgb oh

if it wasn't for the kgb once i would be in this order, if it weren't for the kgb i would still be tormented assistant professor at odessa university. well, i won't interfere. bon appetit. thank you. i've said two things here, the first is the measure of audience success. i think this is especially true in comedies. and how many phrases will go to the people one of my favorite cash desks, always offered to stay. well, guess later. how can you say that he is not successful, if, uh, so many phrases from deribasovskaya still live in a time when the audience did not go to the cinema so often. i have a favorite piece. the truth is because of the bad and the other. i love him, when we see, and the auditorium of the bolshoi theater and where at some point there is an announcement over the speakerphone of kgb agents against leaving after chasing to the exit, and at that moment all the visual gets up and goes out to the

exit. and even one of the dancers quits, and the ballerina goes out. that is, this guide, and in fact very much, but loved not so much political humor. how much you just loved to joke about some here. their realities, which, well, which have put everyone on edge, so here are the realities, i think this is what is still interesting to see the films of the year. this is the second part. yes, what i like about this is not an anti-soviet. he does not question the fundamentals of the system at all. i remind you that this is a podcast. gaidai 100, where we talk about the centenary of the remarkable soviet director. leonid yavichi gaidai i am a film historian natalya ryabchikova and we communicate with my colleague stanislav diskinsky. in fact, we have already begun to move on to the topic of why the guide is now popular and why does it need to be watched? i personally tried, and in due time, to get to the bottom of the reason for this people's love, and i specially analyzed tv programs for 50 years, how often and what films were repeated on

new year's eve on soviet television, and oddly enough, it turned out that and not so often, that is, a phenomenon of love, guide. this is a phenomenon of repetitions of the last decades, after all, the soviet average has inflamed in the usual way. the new year shows some kind of premiere , how would it be a really exemplary film now , after all, the strategy shows what people really love know , they will definitely look, that they support a certain rating, and really people watch and know and i would like to break this trend and advise viewers to watch the film that a may be the most unknown. if in gaidai this same groom became sveta who is available to us in half of his full form. but, in my opinion, there you can see where the legs grow from. there you can see everything that appears later and this is a very interesting bunch, and soviet cinema and soviet reality of the late fifties and early sixties. here is one movie to watch that i highly recommend. this

but there was no light. and for you to recommend listen, perhaps, diamond arm. why? well, because on the one hand there is no shurik and kaidai's economy is a little violated. here, on the other hand, this is formally, perhaps the richest saturated film. c because there are also references to the italian jalol. yes and uh. well, here are the footage of the nightmare. ah, look at the humpbacked humpbacked by nikulin, this, of course, absolutely somewhere close to the genre of italian cinema and uh, well , the songs of course well, as if the songs were not the main one, and itself in general is how the film is made from a formal point of view. actually, it is precisely the interest, when and in our time, and due to the fact, in my opinion, that e menkens begin to understand, how difficult, but his cinema was arranged, how carefully his team prepared. and in general, as if a movie with her is not so simple as it seems to many modern

critics. it's quite difficult and directed. yes? this is a rather complex process of preparation , especially the development stage. and in production, where you need to come up with all these tricks, you can never do this. the movie that gaidai made, if you think that you need to improvise built improvisation, of course, improvisation is always present in the acting of actors, some ideas and things arise in the process of filming, but still you can’t build complex tricks on improvisation from tricks. gaidai has quite a lot. they need to be figured out first. indeed, in this sense, probably, the diamond arm. it seems to me one of the most perfect, uh, films of the gaidai, although ivan vasilyevich may be closer in spirit to me there , but if we talk about mastery, probably the diamond arm. i think we 've made a pretty compelling recommendation and leave our viewers with a choice. which movie in wondering to watch or re-watch? it was a podcast when and 100th movie history natalya ryavchikkova. and my colleague. the history of cinema stanislavsky pleasant viewing.

hi this is a free program podcast. i am maxim tankov and my today's interlocutor is the beautiful anzhelika krylova . well in general, how would i spend my youth here for 21 years. i left and this, as it were, was completely different. i was in the role of an athlete when we left and i became interested in how it works here as a coach, and i came and tried and learned a lot. this is a huge experience for me , i don’t know, but everything seems to be different here, but

the system itself and the preparation, the way i cook, the way i cooked the americans, that’s how i cook the russians. well, maybe a little harder, because here you can. well, not because it’s possible here, because they need it here so soon, because that they are used to. they have been brought up this way since childhood, coaches have been preparing them. in what system, a slightly raised tone, a little more rigidity of the parent requires the same, so they need it, because when i arrived, i started to train couples there for the first year according to that system and with how it was set up, i think this is that didn't work. i had to settle here, but they did not relax. they did not perceive it, because here it comes, as it were, more from the coach. this is the message there goes more this athletes, because they get paid every hour they work.

yes, there is a very high price of insane juice, therefore, probably, there are not so many athletes who are not so many parents who can bring and voice it professionally. at least, approximately how much it costs, well, plus or minus there, depending on the coach. i know, but how much does it cost, for example, an hour, or how much does an hour cost for our parents to hear? uh, well, from 100 dollars there to 160-180. so you still need to take the hall, you still need to take the choreography, you still need to take the acrobats. it's not just only ice, is that all, when did you come back or not? yes , of course, of course, yes, but i kind of. i thought it was just interesting. i myself am such a risky person and and for me it is important to do something for myself, how to extract some experience from this and learn something new. uh. did you know where you were going or

mean what would be ready for school? it was necessary to start everything from the beginning to open your own club. or how it all works now. not well, of course, that i didn’t come anywhere , there was ice, everyone was interested. i have had very large to produce children. even many coaches, probably offended that they came to me, but here i didn’t call anyone like that, i didn’t call anyone, i didn’t invite anyone. they were interested in how it works. for some it worked, for some it didn't work in one of the interviews. you said that a coach is a universal profession, everything will start raising children until i don’t know any professional moments. i uh, in principle, i educate them from the beginning so that they are people, this is the first dinner already. yes of course, i nurture in them. a well, i don't know the spirit of the sport, i don't know from

experience. how should you train, how should you approach training, how should you perform? how to prepare yourself? as if in one or another situation, but how to show yourself how to speak in an interview? what should you wear? there are a lot of nuances that i need to tell them how to look. parents normally react to parents. parents are only happy, they are only glad that it seems to me that they have such a person in a situation where you bring up an athlete alone, and parents bring up at home other and parents together. naturally. this communication with parents is endless, especially when little couples are some kind of younger ones. and the role of parents in figure skating is, in general, colossal. and how without it everything starts with the parents? it’s just that when there are two more parents in a couple, when a single parent has one

parent, the coach comes, and here it turns out to be parents. on a couple and the coach here it turns out a lot of two parents hurt, sometimes the parents do not help. they interfere, and i have to call my parents to communicate with them . everything is set up in the right way. i want the couple to break up, because the couple looks good, and the parents contribute to the conflict in the couple. i don’t need it, as it were, but how can they interfere with parents. they can interfere with the fact that for each parent there is a child. he is better and they see better your time. yes, i don't know what to do. and why is the partner there or the partner not good enough to do it. and why there, for example, an error can occur. there, at competitions there, or about a year, accusations begin, then they come. oh girl, i made a mistake maybe we should change our partner, we didn't

have to change her and that's what happens. i kind of just work with the younger group. she is very heavy. it’s just that it’s already easier for me to interact with the older group with you, as if it were less talk and less pressure from parents. they seem to trust the coach already. it is no longer interesting to find out where this line is, how much the athlete and the coach can, uh, get closer. well, in general, i am a very caring person, as if initially without even talking about coaching. well, it's simple , maybe sometimes too much, but they are still small. young and how i feel that i should take care of them before, but sometimes, maybe, i don’t want to go too far. i would like to give them freedom too, so that they learn how to act in this or that situation, how to resolve some topic, which, in which they made a mistake, how they even come to dance. how dance duets are created, how it all happens. well, now the station is very

young, as it were, when i skated, the dancing began. so i myself came about 13 years old, like this, 14, well then it was necessary, as it were, in a solitary cad-then they didn’t even take it. to me it seems that there was no first category, there were cms and masters of sports. well, there's more. now the dancing is already beginning, it can begin in ten years out of nine. i have couples skating, as if small. well, this is very interesting to me. i would like to create such a dance school in general, many people really ask if there is a children's school. it seems to me that the conditions are only the conditions i recall that in today's my interlocutor. this is the beautiful anzhelika krylova, a two-time world champion, silver medal winner of the olympic games and now a successful coach. uh, ice dancing. by the way, the stars from star diseases pryganovskiy and now they are so badly praised. i want

to write directly to the fans' chat, what are you finishing? i want to close this. i, because we also follow the guys. this is too first met. even earlier than you thanks to ice age kids. so i immediately saw her talent there and everything else, but here i am it seems to me that they pay too much attention to just these laudatory speeches, because at such a young age. it's probably dangerous fight. well, how to fight hard fight. well , it's good that they listen, and as if sometimes it's just very hard. well, in general, they have such a fate. not very successful, because when they practically became number one in the world and could win several world championships, and a pandemic happened, then with the situation in the world, and they are already in this state for almost 3 year it turns out, how does this affect two or two, how does it affect motivation?

how do they find strength or and in general, how do you find yourself in them to inhale. wishes not work well, we just love what we do, this is probably the first thing that love and, as it were, dedication to our work, in spite of everything, of course, we believe that someday the day will come when we will be able to perform at international arena. i don’t know how it would be interesting for them to develop their development, they are interested in searching just like me, probably, in this we found a common core of our team. and it works for them. i hope this will continue. we are in dancing on ice. i mean, russian athletes always. well were in the lead ahead of the rest, that is, two pairs per 50 became the olympic games. what happened why in dancing on ice? we are so lagging behind now, that is, with the departure of the sitting, we are not lagging behind in any way. we just don't

need to perform right now. it’s hard for the arena to say that we are lagging behind. we just didn't compare them. we only had bronze in vancouver, then we had bronze with difficulty, obtained there in sochi and in the eighteenth year without a medal at all. i don't know, failures happen. it must have been such a failure, starting with us. more likely, because due to an injury i had to, as it were, leave the sport. although nobody expected this and thought that we would skate for another 4 years , we had strong hopes that we would win in 2002 or not? of course, this here gave such a failure, because no one else was on an overbuch, but he had to become the first pair and immediately quickly join it . you and

marina, and here they are, just picked up and there were changes in the rules in general , changes in the dances, so this is what happened. i i don't know why it took so long. well, at that time it was like 2002. and you had a very dramatic story in the legs at the 1998 olympics and a second-place career. here after many years. how do you look at it now, that is. and yes, well, they didn’t give it, you can say they won there, well , why didn’t they give us a very fair and equal fight with oksana goryachuk and evgeny platov. naturally with olympic champions. it was very difficult to fight and of course, and they had more experience and titles already more and we did not have the opportunity to win in the games they have not a single championship of two olympic games, of course we hoped, well

, we worked very hard, but that's how fate decreed. well, maybe they kept us so that we would not leave after this olympiad and continue. and if my injury turned out differently and no one is fate, it's just fate, yes, why is it considered that you won the olympic games and that you will leave? that is , you can hold an athlete so that he becomes the second one the next there is another 4 years. this very hard why do you think so? what people really can not? there is three times to become four times, here we have approximately evgenia's key. i do not know this athletes depends. maybe he keeps himself in good shape in shape from an athlete from a coach. and first of all, from the athlete’s health, because both injuries and psychological ones. it’s very difficult and the new young generation is growing up and new favorites during this time, i don’t know how

the athlete should feel from the situation that he can withstand another 4 years of such great stress. for a long time. we had in dancing on ice straight and such indisputable leaders. well, last years, i mean, yes, charlie was there and looked and then get caught and now there is someone and why did this ferry manage to be like this, well, an almost invincible leader, that is, it would be impossible for them to be a unique couple at all, so i want to say , they started as inirs, and they immediately spoke to them, but this is a talent and this is their as if the combination in a pair is their relationship , it is some kind of magical, so to speak, it affects people. without even talking technique execution of the elements. yes, they were looking for a lot of interesting things, but this harmony

is theirs. she, of course, was very captivating, because no one could fight them. but, and then uh, get caught zaron. naturally, their jump was generally huge. which no one expected and the right programs and the right image and programs and the choice of style. and this also greatly influenced them. they chose their own style, which was not like the others, then they all began to imitate them. but it was already boring. i just want to explain to the audience what are you virchu from my cat is a two-time olympic champion, and from canada yes, and charlie and meryl it and meryl david charlie white olympic champion from sochi 2014 from america well, it’s understandable that ron comes across the french who train in canada tessa with scott they were trained by russian russian trainers. this is a laid down school, as it were, both techniques and systems.

here we can say that in general all this success of the american north. figure skating school, this is thanks to russian specialists, because when you all left there and started there to train, i mean, you raised this one, i mean, the third one you raised this kind of in the usa and maybe the failure of us is connected with this, because you were not here, but you were there well, maybe at that time there was perestroika damn there were many difficulties. and in principle, there were many undersports at that time, so many russian coaches left, probably almost everything except for her or anatolyevna tchaikovskaya malinin jumps on thursday, but this is also a talent. the boy is born like that. probably this is not for everyone, maybe everyone wants and everything train and many train. the same coach, but not everyone can do it

depends on the talent of the character of the child. naturally, returning the genome, which should be in the child. i don’t know what platform was laid down in childhood in order to become, for example, a successful dancer. or with what it is better not to come right away, for example, figure skating, but for me it is very important that the child hears the music, feels the music and can interpret it. but this is probably the first thing, as it were, that i see emotionality in children. well on horseback there around it is possible to teach landing some details. and of course, so that the child likes it, so that he has a sporty character , so that he can and wants to overcome himself, because it is very difficult, as it were, for children to train and spend so much time on the ice, especially in dancing, because dancing , it's boring with children , initially you are engaged in the base, and the bases

are engaged with the children, no matter how interesting it is for them, boring and hard. here, someone can also stand it, someone can’t stand it, but there must be a sporty character, what is sporty character, well sporty character is what you have to overcome yourself to overcome some difficulties. this is already built into the child from childhood. yes, but he should be. this is interesting. interesting second, trying to make the process interesting in the process, there is the choice of music selection. that's what we want to work on today. it's natural to participate. well, the fact that he is working today is support, let's go, only support. they want there, for example, no twist, well, practically from me. it all comes out. they trust me i'm planning a workout. sometimes i don't. sometimes it spontaneously suits me when i feel, looking in