quiet. and what screams brains to confuse the child, if her scarecrow does not return, of course. i call peter and say that i do not go to work. are you sure? yes

, exactly the same color. would you like samples? bubble

here 's the proof. therefore, by the end of the day i expect from each of you a brief report on the above. and the main news on today's agenda, friends. today we are seeing off our friend and colleague. cheers best

friend knows everything around him sherlock holmes on baker street smokes nervously and is silent knows every thief villain paul will give enemies. oh well, everyone rock. well , of course you're throwing us. and just at the very moment when the department really needs you, let's forgive, in my opinion, it was a wonderful 20 years, good luck.

will you take it? guys, have some toast?

there's a big game on the air. today we are discussing the conflict in ukraine. what is happening between the united states and china are some mysterious devices that are flying in american space, and that three of them have already been shot down in the last four days. they say that the balloon was hit the first, and even last week. but this one was shot down by three more. well, i must start with the fact that, in general, i should not be here , i am here to be, in fact, it is not allowed.

uh, this morning, the american embassy published a statement on its website that directs all american citizens not only not to travel to russia but also to leave russia immediately, do not come to russia and, given the unpredictable circumstances of an unprovoked, uh, massive, massive russian invasion of ukraine by the russian armed forces. and then it goes on to explain how, uh, american citizens in russia might face arbitrariness, but unprovoked arrests, how difficult it would be for them to leave russia, and so on and so forth and so on. when i passed this one. first of all, i was surprised. the statement that all american citizens who are in russia must leave immediately, i emphasize must and immediately.

actually. i'm used to the fact that when they say they should, do you mean that some spontaneous earthquake disaster. and you must immediately leave your homes to any place where you are or to be required to do so by some law, which will be in accordance. uh, with the normal rules of american tradition. in this case, it turns out that they should not at all. uh, in this case, this means that you are strongly recommended forcibly voluntarily, no formal punishment is provided for violating this so-called ban, but on the other hand, it is clear what those who this ban

will ignore and may have to have an unpleasant explanation, but, god forbid, if they have access to secrecy or for example , if they are in some kind of program, but for american citizens that allow a facilitated procedure. i am this country, then you, of course, can easily lose it, but this will not scare me. this has already been solved for me by frequent visits to russia and i don't think that, in general, this will be enough of a threat to the majority of american citizens who are here. and speaking seriously. uh, you live in moscow, right, mr. tolin i live in moscow but i represent my native city, sochi, in moscow, where i am registered and in the city, sochi there, too, sometimes there are americans, you used to be in the know. that's to ensure that there were some round-ups, some actions against american citizens, who are matchmakers of the point of view. they would pose

an immediate serious threat to them. no, of course, i am not aware of this, but all the same, i sympathize with you and all other american citizens. and in connection with this, here is a terrible warning. if i understand correctly, it's done, it's from those circumstances that, if such a warning is not made and god forbid one of the american citizens in some way. for something will be punished or suffer on the territory of russia, then in this case without this warning. he this american citizen. maybe then sue the united states for not warning him that it's so dangerous here, so it's a safety net. and who they are more afraid of, their own or others, us or the americans, each in his own way, let him decide. it seems to me that there are reasons to think. in connection with the discussion that is unfolding on the supply of e,

long-range missiles, and on the supply of long-range artillery weapons and how various experts are trying to outdo each other in this. let the officials know too, it's interesting that he was mentioned in this context in the context of the american embassy banning a citizen from being in russia that he was mentioned by missiles, because several people in moscow uh-huh russian citizens who found out about this ban. they couldn't do it so they couldn’t understand, how to see the point in this, that the first thought that came to their mind was that soon, probably, american missiles should arrive, because otherwise the employees of the embassy, ​​the united states, are becoming a sacral sacrifice, right now show on some of our screens. i can only say one thing. uh, i certainly don't know about the life of all american citizens in

russia and i don't even know about the life of all american citizens in moscow well, in general, i know enough american citizens and no serious reprisals , no uh, unknown uh, arrests to anyone. i did not hear, because the conversations would be on these topics. surely there would be . i have not heard such conversations among americans living in moscow. well, god be with him. we've got this kind of funny and nasty episode, but we've got more serious stuff and, uh, more serious stuff. i would like to start. uh, in order to listen to the recent statement by oleksiy danilov, secretary of the national security council of ukraine, where he explains what russia must wait if the ukrainian victory comes. well, russia will cease

to exist within the borders that it is now a colonial country. it will become much smaller in the form that it is now, it cannot and will not exist. and it will not depend on them. we all know what will happen in a free ochkria , what will be a free tatarstan, what will be a free dagestan, all this will happen in the near future, it is necessary to prepare for this and there is no need to pretend that if they have nuclear weapons, it won't happen it will happen it will happen regardless of what anyone in their office dreams of. well , what if someone thinks that mr. danilov, uh, misspoke or what? uh, maybe he didn't express his point clearly, or maybe he's being quoted out of context. let's hear one more statement. this is an adviser to the president of ukraine mikhail podyako. russia

on kubych indeed russia has accumulated a lot of manpower, which, unfortunately, we need to destroy as quickly as possible. that is, we in a day should be done not by a thousand funerals for russia, but by 2.5 three, and preferably 5,000. only this can begin to finalize this war only destruction, destruction and destruction. these are the three tools that we urgently need at this stage . we also need 155 mm shells. we also need missiles for air defense, and they will also talk about this in rammstein. konstantin, you are the first deputy chairman of the duma committee; in the cis you are a well-known expert on ukraine and , in general, all these topics of the near abroad. that's when you hear it? that's what you think about the prospects for the reality of any negotiations with these kinds of people. well , firstly, i want to say that we have not been surprised for a long time. uh, some stopped being surprised at first on a special military operation. i stopped doing this back in

the nineties, because it was at that time that i encountered the objectivity of the political class of ukraine. let me remind you that for the first time i was banned from entering ukraine in the ninety-sixth year. but uh, to be more specific, uh there is no downside to desire. at the podolia or at danilov to talk about how russia will fall apart are they now in the warm? as i understand it, offices, unlike their fellow citizens. away from the front lines and can give space to their imagination at the congress, he will also give him congresses. this is a well-known saying. in this case, applying to all these statements, i want to say that they sound like music to many politicians in the west, who makes himself believe that there is a grain in this, there is a perspective. we know

it's here. uh, there's such a number of political public figures, in mostly the main ones, who today freely discuss this topic and in your program we cited a statement of swashbuckling, for example , just now such a meeting was held in the european parliament, which was called the forum of free peoples, the post of russia will not tell you anything the names of the people who participated there, nothing to anyone will not say, well, they collected them in the european parliament. they issued a whole declaration in the hated russian language, where they talk about the fact that they, as representatives of these free peoples, gather at all to organize the process of self-determination of the separation of the collapse of the russian federation means, these are outcasts, of course, but the fact that these outcasts are being collected, uh, in the presence of the european parliament, says a lot, you know, it even reminds you a little. here are the times of the second world war, when, to

prove that all civilized europe, together with him, hitler collected. the french are there. dario created a division from charlem not from the french, but they don’t say that the italians, the hungarians, the romanians, just fought on our front, they were the first to run there near stalingrad and doomed paulus to defeat, so, uh, i'm sure that negotiations with representatives of the semi-gangster field are semi-clown, e political power. in kiev, of course, it makes no sense to carry on. moreover, today, serious negotiations on the settlement of everything that is happening are hardly possible, because the positions of the parties are absolutely opposite. uh, the west itself has doctrinalized the idea that the west of ukraine, together with the west, has no other goal than the military defeat of another goal, that the conditions for any talks are the withdrawal of russian

troops, not only from donetsk luhansk there , zaporozhye kherson region, but also from the territory of crimea, which since 2014, as it returned to the russian federation, is absolutely meaningless, uh, talking about. it is about how a lasting peace could be achieved under these conditions, something that , in principle, is possible, and even then, not now, but under some promising circumstances due to some circumstances that suit both sides. these are negotiations in a temporary ceasefire in this temporary ceasefire. the fire may last a long time, but again, this is absolutely not the prospect of today today. in fact , both sides have not exhausted their hopes for a turning point. today, ukraine excites itself by the fact that western weapons have arrived, are now arriving. they will create an opportunity for her. although any military expert here they are and, probably, better than i will say about it, they understand that 10 20 30 100 tanks,

when they arrive, they are not able to make a difference on the battlefield on such a large section of the front. yes, in addition to such masses forces involved on both sides, so everything that relates to the negotiations reflects. just on the one hand, the desire, for example, to lure you into the topic of negotiations in order to cool down, let's say, the mood. uh, fight , advance, win, and so on, uh, inspire those who speak. no, it's not necessary. let's now now through here's a little bit more and we'll agree on something. quite recently , it was completely abandoned. that idea that supposedly richard behrs, who is now head of the cia and was once the ambassador of the united states in moscow williambers. excuse me, but that he is supposedly going to change land for peace and is ready, on behalf of the united states , to cede 20% to the territory of ukraine, i don’t know

how they consider these 20% there, in exchange for the fact that russia will stop its offensive. so, now everything is in limbo, because no one can fully explain exactly what will happen in the near future. so there are, uh, fears of a russian offensive. there are victorious arguments, like kuleb, that they, too, are about to go on the offensive. actually in fact, apparently, but because these topics of negotiations are so loud, they sound so loud and they promise more and more weapons, that ukraine, the ukrainian regime is beginning to languish and it needs to be inspired, and through it, inspire all the unfortunate. citizens of ukraine who still believe that they are able to resist in this case the movement of russian troops and, uh, the transition of more and more large territories under the control of the russian armed forces when one thanks ruslan pukhov, a well-known military expert and you,

in addition, a member of the public council under the ministry of defense. i'm uh attentively following the statements from washington brussels on deliveries to ukraine, and now it's not entirely clear to me what has happened literally in recent days. it would seem that there was a meeting not quite recently that they agreed on what kind of weapon they would give, they managed to convince. uh, the chancellor to provide for the guys, and the french promised to give their tanks. and washington said that we would give abram to our son immediately. we will give and as i thought there would be some kind of pa. after that, what will be the next negotiations? how to deliver faster? how to put more? and suddenly, suddenly, right here, what is called treason right off the bat, talk begins about the supply of strike aircraft for

delivery. e new multiple launch rocket systems, and systems. e with a longer range, which could allow ukraine to carry out attacks on the crimea and either ukraine is preparing for some kind of big offensive and i really want to speed up this preparation, or it starts to come to my mind more and more and konstantin hinted at this. why is this something in washington, brussels and in kiev they know and fear that maybe they are afraid of some kind of serious russian offensive and want, on the one hand , to prepare as much as possible for this, to help prepare kiev, but even such a cynical thought occurred to me. or maybe you were talking about alibis for american citizens, if they make claims, i thought about alibis for other american citizens

of the united states of america who if there would be a successful russian offensive. they could say that again another afghanistan that again the biden administration, as if dashing swing. the blow is weak. and that washington somehow considers it necessary to demonstrate that the beloved zelensky needs to be given everything he wants in order to protect himself from accusations of a political position, what do you think? i am sorry. i would like to add to this list that all the washington post just today wrote an interview with one expert on the nuclear objection, which says no longer about planes and tanks, but that, in fact, to win, ukraine needs to be given nuclear weapons. otherwise, she will be defeated, so you have to choose or the defeat of ukraine or give her bombing a huge number of different opinions. and as you remember, even this table of wise men will not answer the questions of one fool. yes, so if we

pay attention to all this, calm umber. eco said that he hates twitter and social networks, that now any idiot is able to spread his opinion and it does not pass. what kind of filtering, if we return to the situation on the ground, it is quite obvious that the ball is on our side of the field, yes, and the americans are european allies and, accordingly, the uh ukrainians themselves figures are trying to intimidate us with all these statements of theirs. i think that we are partly to blame for this. we ourselves somehow love. uh, americans are so handy, but i don't know, a handy whipping dummy. let's remember for 20 years. uh, a senseless stay in afghanistan, then biden decides to actually stop trying to remove him at the same time, a madura. yes, then the almost simultaneous decision to stop doing this

idiocy. yes, but in general, certain concessions. let cosmetics in in relation to cuba, if we prove our condition and deliver a sensitive blow to the ukrainian regime, then certainly. just like now phrases are heard for washington or from other american cabinets that i don’t know there, we need to remove putin , we need to unwind russia, they will rewind it in the same way as they rewinded it in the previous two cases, so i think we must be firm we must be determined to win . well , the war has its own logic . zakiev they are not fighting for the regime. the war is such a cruel thing that people are fighting for the death of their comrades. yes, people are already involved. yes, that's the whole point. and now, uh, remember in your time. it was revealed that the nationalists deliberately staged provocations around

slavyansk in order to shed blood precisely so that those soldiers and various kinds of formations who did not want to uncover the weapon so that they were forced to do this, because blood was shed on their part, which was organized. thanks to these ultras and western ukraine. here konstantin was told that you have ceased to be surprised at everything that the ukrainian authorities do and say. i can't stop being amazed by everything. uh what says and does uh, the administration of the bydna. well, it's true, uh, biden is a very experienced person in the field of foreign policy. in this case, secretary of state anthony blinkin is a very experienced person. and jack salim is the national security assistant. e he studied successfully worked as the most remarkable smart people as the most leading professors. e in the area. ah, foreign policy. and frankly, not in the ability, in

you can’t refuse society, and now alexander lukin, scientific director of the china institute of modern asia, explain if it can be explained how it is that the united states but at the moment when all these hostile gestures are made against russia, when all these military preparations simultaneously create a new serious incident with china . so i want to understand that, from your point of view, such a spontaneous course of events and the administration found itself under some kind of internal pressure responds to all these, and steps are balls of stat, no one could not understand what exactly is running there , why does it go astray? ah or ah, you can't see it. we are at least with an armed eye, but there is some serious

strategy behind this. well, here it’s rather necessary to talk about the usa and not about china, because here i’m talking about china in general, now not really, and the fact is that china, just like russia, has long turned into a factor of us domestic policy from a foreign policy factor and uh, in the us as far as i understand, but any group hmm yes and existing. uh, well, let's say there are republicans. there are also different the direction of the democrats, but no one wants to look like a weakling. and now china is one of those things, so in a relationship you have to look cool. and uh there are some differences between say biden and some over other biden. e, sticks to his course, which he

succinctly expressed in the phrase chew gum go at the same time. this means how to put pressure on china at the same time, but at the same time talk about what is beneficial to the united states. well, this is a rather strange course, because china obviously will not go for it, but for some reason, biden and his staff think it's possible. this is the original idea. this expression belonged to the former word in michael's russia and he used it specifically in relation to american policy regarding russia, and i always wanted to ask him. what does that mean? here's what you'll be talking about at the same time. well, go talk, actually, in principle, you need a caesa. it worked, but i wanted to ask if you don't mean that lightning go uh, say chewing gum spit it in the face

of the person you want to deal with negotiations and hope that these negotiations will end in success. well, this course. uh, maybe, uh, kind of done to very pragmatic people. well, because, as you rightly said , it comes down to something like this, that i'm telling you that you are a pig, but at the same time, come on, by the way, we will agree that we will buy something from you. yes, well, probably, if you really want to sell, then someone can go for it. well, in general , it’s unpleasant for a person that he is lead, they are such pragmatic people or there are no chinese, in principle they can, but on the other hand, the chinese have a different idea, which means they have such an expression to lose face. this is the worst thing that can happen to a chinese. and if they call you what a good word is , or they criticize there and you don’t answer. well, you lose face in front of your citizens, and in china, too, there is public opinion.

and also in relation to the united states and foreign policy in general, and by the way, public opinion is there, but much tougher than the position of the government, so the government, as if constantly on it, turns out to be pressure. that's what you're talking about here in taiwan, of course, this is public opinion, it's difficult in chinese. well, so to speak, e in the chinese political system to catch. well , somewhere it breaks through there on the internet and so on. all you know is that you're being so soft-spoken in taiwan. and that the united states cannot figure it out and so on, of course, maybe this is not a very realistic proposal of the people, but it exerts pressure and therefore it is difficult not to answer, so i understand this situation, but you mean it. with these balls, for example, in particular, now e means after congress 20, if there are some indicators that china has decided to somewhat soften

the rhetoric towards the united states. i think this is due to the fact that, well, already in china , sit-ping i wanted to show myself. well, such a powerful leader before the congress, yes, to show it means that he is a tough person, but that congress passed, he strengthened his position, specific issues need to be addressed. well, here china is natural, we need cooperation with other countries, including the united states, these are the most important trade partner. there or 800 billion dollars of trade turnover. well, he understands, of course, that you can’t make friends with them there, but somehow do it there. eh, more or less normal dialogue is mutually beneficial, so this story has been softened a bit. in the usa, it seems, too, even here linkin said something there such that with china. that's a little the atmosphere is improving, but here it comes into force. this is american

history, that there are many different towers, as they say, right? or i don't know what the entrance is. yes, we have an entrance and an entrance. uh, and uh, every entrance wants to be cooler than the other and so, uh. here comes the ball. which, by the way, no one knows what it is, the americans say that supposedly some kind of reconnaissance, but they also shot down several balls, where they will reconnoiter for equipment. uh, the items they knocked down, like, they didn't even look like octagonal octagonal balls. that is, this is already a ufo, these are plates. well, you see , i think that if they found anything , everything that looks like reconnaissance equipment is in there. they would demonstrate, but so far they will not demonstrate anything. so it's unlikely whether. e can. well, at least not very reliably, it seems that someone decided that we should give it back. well, we need to show our firmness. and so, it means that they showed

their firmness and began to put pressure on their government there. and yes, there may be republicans or someone criticizing. uh, so there is also a group within the democratic party that is criticized there. yes biden for what you have to do not go. and chew gum, but just go, yes, spit out the gum. so, it means that i didn’t decide to demonstrate firmness, but the chinese look at them and say, well, how, but we kind of agreed with you that we will mitigate this. and you cheated us again, what kind of fools, it means that they also begin to answer. naturally, they can not answer. so they answer there that they also recently discovered some kind of ball there or something, so that we will also shoot down. eh, so, well, and in general they began to respond harshly. and now this is american, well, as it were, the lack of a strategy, as you say? why, when sally over there

was studying with someone. i don't know who, when there was jazz it was different people there. and there, maybe they are, well, some kind of hostile towards russia, especially in life they took a position, but at least it was possible. understand what they want in us relations yes to nature, they opposed the creation in eurasia, er, russian chinese union now. eh, how would these people here they are too small, who in america there decide foreign political issues they are not up to it. they don't think witty at all. they think in some momentary things as a result there, well, they create the impression that china has no one to be with talk. they agreed with some, others put pressure on them, and everything went the other way around, it’s very difficult to survive

. you agreed. we thought we would have an understanding. why are you doing this? it reminded me a lot. you know who the statement is from moscow. i want to say that china is simply adhering correctly, in my opinion, from the point of view that it is in the peace process. wins because he is growing and he needs to prolong this moment. as a result, he would, of course, like to minimize these problems, and he is being thrown all the time precisely because america is losing the world of competition. we go out on advertising for just a few minutes, and then when we return, we will talk about the military situation in the donbass. the west has exposed the war crime of ukrainian militants in the actions of ukraine, they are completely on the face. why was kiev

so afraid of the publication of this investigation ? there is a special convention that, by the way, ukraine signed and does not perform, as well as the song of a ten-year-old boy who sings along with the whole country, what are you drinking? with russians, this is a little different. antifreeze coming soon. tomorrow on the first they say you need to get out of your comfort zone, but how long have you been in it for a month you are running out of traffic. look , you can enjoy peace of mind, as messengers work on the belly of a cat . artificial intelligence protector will save you from spam calls and send you a decrypted report. connect with qr cat reality.

we will refund up to 5.000 to each new client rub. on the uralsib map, prospects are where you are. for order in the house and careful personal care, smart polaris equipment with discounts up to 50% on wildberries oops everything is dry, you need to fix the oliphrine help of the mucous membrane with the drying effect of cold remedies when planning is confusing. you just need to make up your mind from cyan to help complete catalogs of discounts for all new buildings, just to make up your mind , they took everything in the room for a loan of up to 5 million.

application. this is a variety of flavors of chocolate, filling the money with bright colors your day your taste your choice. i lead a sedentary lifestyle sport on a daily basis, but how to protect the joints thanks to the special collagen form of the triple helix art neo provides support. joint health. artem just one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine. ormatek has everything you need for your bedroom up to 80% off on sleep products and bedroom furniture armatek sleep expert.

choose gifts for your loved ones and give from everything hearts. big love comes to magnet download magnet app. play the game and win by giving gifts from the bottom of our hearts magnet. hello, buy a station on yandex market.

up to 50% discounts on books and board games umka and cars technopark choose everything for a fun game on wildberries did you know that tinkoff investments has a social network for investors, matvey subscribed to high-yield investors and earns like they do install the tinkoff investments application and earns the largest social networks for investors. he is so alone. and now we are transferred from our studio in moscow

well, the dynamics of the situation is steadily progressive along the entire front line. can you constantly hear the entire report from the ministry of defense? i am specifically located on a certain sector of this front, several divisions of our armed forces are working in this sector, uh, these divisions are on a daily progressive basis. that is, meter by meter, kilometer by

kilometer, they take the lines and free them from the enemy, respectively, my unit directly helps to find these targets targets to transmit assault reconnaissance to transmit artillery, these targets are destroyed. that is, we have always said for a while that this is the equipment that is currently supplying nato to the territory of ukraine, and the equipment that reaches lbs of the line of contact today is our units. it's all over the front line. we find this equipment and destroy it accordingly, so that there is no shelling of the wrong population or cities and our armed forces, respectively, which are located here and continue their fighting. ukrainian

units use their equipment, do you feel any vulnerability? uh, your units in connection with the appearance of this nato equipment well , of course, the situation has absolutely changed. e from the first days of the operation today today , of course, nato equipment is coming here in echelons and flooded the entire front line. well, and, accordingly, the equipment, modern serious uh equipment that closes the sky - this is air defense that works, which they let our aircraft work, which they let ours work drones, but, nevertheless. e. what our officers and military units were taught before the operation, all this

is applied and, accordingly, we destroy any equipment, no matter what is supplied, no matter how modern it is, but indeed a lot of equipment has come lately. you probably clearly see that as soon as information about the supply of nato equipment to ukraine passes and our intelligence is already the one that, well, is already seriously monitoring the movement of this equipment, and it starts destroyed on the way to the borders of ukraine, that is, destroyed. long- range missiles are destroying the energy network of railway tracks. well, what breaks through, as they say, to the line of defense. well, we are already setting fire to the equipment here , looking out for it and, accordingly. we are destroying, but nevertheless it’s hard not to say that all this is easy, but today

there are eyes in the army today. this is our division of our intelligence. oleg, thank you so much, and i can just say on a personal level that when i look at what opposes russia how much the ukrainian army receives in total, i just don’t know about deliveries of such a scale in a short time and what the russian army is doing under these conditions. it is not only possible to hold their positions, but to move forward. this, of course, says a lot about the quality of the russian army and about those who serve you tremendously in it. thank you. yes, i want to add that really. and we are moving slowly. but this is also taking into account the task of ensuring that, uh, there are as few losses as possible on our part, therefore, we measure several times. well, then cut off confidently cut off so that the verteleria

would not get the air attacks of our guys, so we now have minimal losses along the entire front. this is very important. it costs a lot. and i would like to thank our. uh, we have a citizen who is at the moment, what to do , maybe work 24 hours a day, so that the equipment, probably of the best quality and the best military equipment, comes to us at the front and supports. just our side of our guys. this is very important and we are here we see how, uh, now the mechanism is twisted and how confident our defense industry is now, everything is working, but accordingly, it ’s easier for us here. victory will be ours. oleg is great to you. thank you. thanks to those who found the time and all sorts of good luck, and most importantly, and most importantly, stay alive and healthy. take care of yourself.

indeed, a very important point, uh. what, yes , a lot of nato technology is coming in, and i really don't want us to underestimate its quality of opportunity. i believe that the cap is zakidatelskie. uh, the mood and some such a sarcastic irony when we talk about what ukraine gets, i think it's not appropriate yet, but i think it's different. what is not said enough about the fact that, in general , russia is not sitting idly by, looking at what nato is doing, that the military industry is working in three or even four shifts and that new weapons are coming in. moreover, weapons are very often of very high quality, sometimes clearly superior to what

the collective west can provide ukraine with. and so i would like to ask you how it copes from your point of view. uh, russian military industry with this task, it means generally amazing, if you compare the size of the gross national product of the nato countries and russia let's face it, and this is not in russia's favor , but when i read western reviews, western analysis of hostilities in ukraine says, so russia despite the darkest predictions in the past in fear. in general, it shows itself to be a very serious and reliable manufacturer of high-quality weapons. this is not how you know russian history. at least since the time of ivan iii can be considered through the prism of such an ongoing struggle for military-technical independence. the fact is that until josef stalin came to power

, we were very dependent at all times on foreign technologies, once it could be danish technology, once it could be swedish french. well, for example, few people know that, uh , during the war with napoleon, the imperial army received 100,000 weapons from the british, our entire army then was 120,000, and we, in fact, finally reached 100%, and independence here in the field of arms production at the time of the collapse of the soviet union in the middle of the 18th century, we invented a unicorn that had not yet been for years. i'm not talking about that. i'm talking about the fact that e on a number of positions. well, for example, during the crimean war. we already had steam ships, but the mechanics on them were the british, there was a collision, yes, the war with england, therefore, russia is modern russia, being the heir to the soviet union , of course, they have, uh, a wonderful military-industrial complex, but it must be mentioned that this is

yeltsin's timelessness of the 1990s. it was not in vain, so our industry, as it were, exists at three speeds, there are absolutely unique things. well, there, uh , the s400 systems, yes, the s500 and the bunktuator, that is , in the field of air defense, we are probably really the best in the world. there are things where we are at the level. well, the tank, the structure can be deported for a long time is the t-90 tank is the best in the world. but the fact that for a number of parameters it is certainly good and it carries out its tasks. all the same spots, which do not shit. all industry our engine is weaker than that of a leopard, but in general it is a formidable fighting vehicle, and until recently there were a number of gaps where we lagged behind and one of them was, of course, an unmanned aerial vehicle, and we saw it, yes, ukrainians. they were at the first stage in significant numbers, we have much less. and in an amazing way , in fact, during this year, the country was able to saturate the troops and was able to saturate. uh, other

law enforcement agencies have a fairly large number of drones, and they, uh, are produced by a number of companies, and in sufficient quantities. it is, of course, very gratifying that in such a short time, when the task was set , the country is able to mobilize, but, unfortunately, it must be added that there are still many problems and for a number of positions i will not say where we are still going to catch up. well, i’ll tell you this, again, i don’t want to beat the drum howl and love myself in the chest, but as a person who nevertheless lived most of his life in america and , uh, in general, he proceeded from the fact that that russia there is still much to be learned in the field of modern technology, especially electronics.

what is happening now on the part of russia really impresses me, but nevertheless, in nato, they don’t say that since there are such opportunities in russia, then it is necessary to negotiate with russia, but they say that since in russia there are such opportunities that it is necessary to further arm e ukraine. and back, well, there were a huge number of interpretations. why was russia not allowed? what russia ca n't do speak and not only in nato in the united states in e. england are beginning to say that, in general, there is nothing to be especially afraid of in terms of further escalation by arming ukraine. let 's hear what the secretary general has just said about this. nato was really talking last year about whether nato should create a no-go zone over ukraine and send its warplanes

there in order to enforce the no- fly zone regime . nato member countries can transfer planes to ukraine so that the ukrainians themselves use these planes. these are absolutely two different things. because if nato countries put their aircraft on ukraine in order to ensure a no-fly zone over ukraine, this would imply that nato becomes a direct participant in the conflict, but here we are talking about something else, if nato member countries will supply their aircraft to ukraine, then this does not mean that nato becomes a party to the conflict, but in this statement, i especially like it. sorry for my his vulgar language makes one want to ask stoltenberg. are you really such a complete idiot or do you think we are an idiot, but how can you seriously say to a person at this level that nato is not a participant in the conflict, because we decided that we are

not participants in the conflict, in fact, there are two countries and if russia decides that nato is a party to the conflict, then this will be enough. uh, to e nato - i really didn’t like it. and there could be bad consequences. here i want to understand, but there is, if from your point of view the real danger is a creeping, but very dangerous escalation in ukraine of course, it always exists from the moment of the outbreak of hostilities and such widespread support for ukraine from the outside. the nato bloc who believed that this was just the war that nato needed in the united states in order to, just in case, uh, remove russia from the board to prevent it from achieving victory , thus weakening not only russia but also a potential and real ally, china

of course, this risk always exists. yes in addition, add to this also the number of idiots. as you said, there are military-political and other structures of retired and active people who are ready to sign for this, they exist and we are studying , we are familiar with the thoughts of retired generals, what the statutory ones have in the language of the retired generals in the mind of the acting ones. this is all quite, perhaps, i want to note that, it seems to me from such an er, emotional psycho-neurological point of view. here is the abundance of these statements that we are ready to deliver even more and must deliver even more. and they come from different mouths. here they are bill browder said that more tanks is the same wonderful browser that we tried for stealing gazprom shares , now he is crushing from american citizenship in order

to pay less taxes, which laments that the russian economy in which he supposedly invested once stole gazprom shares, uh, it's still holding on. we should crush it faster, and he says that more missiles more tanks more planes. this is not a military specialist at all. he expresses a certain point of view of the american and western establishment. so, uh, well, let's remember the experience of american participation, warriors. that's at least during the cold war in active hostilities. after all, before they did, in fact, capitulate in vietnam before that, nixon and kissinger, by the way, made an attempt to suppress resistance by mass bombing, not only of vietnam, but also of laos and cambodia, that is , to demonstrate themselves what they are now feverishly trying to prove. this is what these arms deliveries. they will lead to fracture. they feel that it is the goal to defeat russia to defeat it

eludes ukraine cannot overcome cannot withstand this tension. the economy collapsed. yes, with the help of some grants and opportunities. today it is half supported. but it's not forever. in addition, it’s a pity for our own money that is used for this , because ukraine is still being forced to pay its debts. she pays her debts. including the debts of naftogaz and so on. and uh, what about the red lines. you you know, i am generally an english expression, as far as i understand, goes back to the attack of light cavalry under a balaclava. well, from there it went the red tone line. red line, but uh actually i think that we did some hints of a warning. we didn’t deliver such massive strikes on the energy system of ukraine until the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge happened, we uh, when the conversation began that crimea is a completely legitimate target . we do not recognize it as part of the russian federation, deputy

chairman of the security council, our former president of the russian federation dmitry medvedev said that there could be very serious answers to all these speeches. putin said that not only in response to tanks. we can give not only armored responses in this case a question to us. what kind of answer do we have in mind, i believe that we have the moral right to move on to all sorts of special operations. in the end. this armament floats, flies and travels to the borders of ukraine, and a ship with these armored personnel carriers has just unloaded, yes. in western germany, he sailed to the united states, why not something similar to what happened to the northern stream happened to him. we don't necessarily have to recognize this in our actions. but generally speaking, by their behavior, the countries of the west give us how? it seems to me that you know the right to such behavior when i hear that russia can endlessly e

nuk, and shove and insult. and who uh is has no consequences, uh, and it's not very difficult to u have a conversation on that level. with people who have at least some knowledge history, and putin warned in 2007 in munich because if it had to continue its previous course, then it would run into stiff resistance russia ran into pushed already in 2008 first of all, and before that, russia warned that if they recognized independence in the west, kosovo, then this will be a precedent that russia will use in the case of abkhazia, this is exactly what happened and abkhazia now, like south ossetia, is definitely in russia and further they are not in russia they are recognized as independent states independent states tests

related to russia uh, v uh 2.000. uh, in the thirteenth year, moscow repeatedly expressed concern about what was happening in ukraine with the maidan, and especially began to express concern in 2014 after the overthrow of yanukovych, and that the ukrainian radical nationalists would not move crimea and seize it. there, the power, having removed the lawful in ukrainian laws, was already elected by the supreme council to the supreme council was called. yes, the supreme council is now called the state council, then supremacy was a russian warning. it was predictably ignored, and russia did what it did. but, and then for many years, and russia says that it is necessary to comply with the minsk agreements.