what's up look at me. well, i'm begging you. well, look at me, i would have an accident. yes, you hear me, i was not to blame for anything, my dear. i was worried about you all the time and of course i was not ready to go to work, you can handle it right after the hospital. there is a terrible scandal of this cafe. two drivers presented a statement to

the prosecutor's office, by the way, they are interested in their mental state. as long as you don't come up with another number or something worse. i worked at all. i have learned more about him in the last few months than i have in all 17 years. imagine, it turns out, even bought

some kind of beaten one. now he is gone. do you understand what it all means? i sympathize with you. but what does all this have to do with our family? i can't fix anything, you know? i can't already. you can . don't waste the night. even if you do not agree with her decision, but you are there, you do not know

what will happen next. no one knows. with very well. we were there 10 years ago on new year's eve. and cool.

forgive me, son. what do you need from me? what else do you want?

i give up everything. leave me alone.

there is a big game on the air and today we will discuss the ongoing and growing american assistance to ukraine, assistance to ukraine of other nato countries and a number of american allies who

are not even members of nato and today another meeting of nato defense ministers took place at the american rammstein base in germany and in once again, statements were made about how ukraine needs to be helped and they will help her there on that scale, and for so long some kind will be required. here is what the secretary of defense of the united states said about this states of loydon. countries around the world continue to step up their efforts and think of new solutions together - this contact group clearly states that we will support ukraine in its fight for freedom. we will help ukraine to launch a counteroffensive in the spring by united efforts. we will immediately again provide the support we promised to ukraine. and, of course , this topic cannot do without nato secretary general jens stoltenberg, uh, who was just

seen in the picture, and next to minister austin, and who should have made a statement about, continuing increasing assistance to ukraine , let's listen. it is important that nato allies and partners send more aid to ukraine, just as important is the need to supply more ammunition. it is also important to increase the load on the production of equipment and weapons in order to supply ukraine with the promised and replenish its own stocks. no need here, neither nato allies are not part of the military conflict, what we do as allies, we provide support to ukraine ukraine defends itself. an interesting point of view evgeny bukhinsky lieutenant general, a now a professor at the higher school of economics general i have a simple question. here, the nato secretary general says that nato is not a party to the conflict, but in general , given that there are, uh,

two sides to the conflict in ukraine, it probably makes sense, uh, and to talk about russia's position because, if russia decides that ours is a participant in the conflict, if russia acts on this basis, then the words of mr. stoltenberg, but they seem to hang in the air is nato a participant in the conflict in ukraine dmitry , i am absolutely sure what it is? just you you know in due time, invented. this is what at first no one could understand what it was, but then they formulated it as a hybrid war, then they formulated it as consistent participation. here we need it now. uh says it's mediated. uh is participating in this conflict, i am helping ukraine, but from a legal point of view, until we collide on the battlefield, it is really with the formations of units of the participating countries. nato , you can say that we are not directly

at war with them, but uh, that is the amount of assistance. not even help, but the volume of supplies. e weapons the military equipment that nato carries out is, of course, uh, impressive, and to say that nato is not involved, they are balancing on the brink. uh, a little more, considering what they've already admitted, like, uh. the same himers are operated with the help of american specialists, uh, and intelligence information and escort, and uh, even planning these operations that were carried out near kharkov. ah, and according to kherson, this was all carried out with the help of american e, specialists or american military personnel. well, taking into account the fact that even before the fourteenth year on yours after the fourteenth year. i think that until

1914 there was one floor of the ministry of defense completely occupied by american advisers. well, probably after the fourteenth year. there, all three floors were occupied by american advisers and specialists in operational planning and , uh, organizational logistics intelligence. uh, activities and so on. but if we talk about rammstein, then you know the triumphs. no, such a high-profile event did not happen, despite everything statements about kuleba that there will be surprises. this is the minister of foreign affairs, yes , ukraine, which promised a lot of rammstein surprises, but so far that's even what he said. e austin the key keyword for me is that everyone thinks everyone thinks they are thinking about how to help ukraine, the only decision in terms of significance that was made was to generally streamline supplies, that is, create a band that is apparently not an american group that

sits on rammstein and coordinates american deliveries, and create something inside nato so that there is coordination, but naturally, under american leadership , coordination of all arms deliveries and streamlining the training system. as for the counter-offensive, i'm confused, you understand, uh, there are some canons of military science, proven by experience, many wars without superiority are better than air supremacy. well, it is impossible to carry out an offensive, especially when you abandon a normal offensive operation, especially if the defender has air superiority, but this has never happened before, but i don’t know, maybe the americans. e, u ukraine had tactical successes in the kharkiv region. e, kherson i understand that these were not strategic, but successes, but still,

it turns out, you can watch. well, you understand what happened here near kharkiv in raisins, but it's just, well, it's a classic. uh, loss of vigilance. i would say so, of course, these are mistakes people. for this they suffered corresponding in kazan, but uh, we took raisins. uh, there are a few more cities near kharkov, and everything calmed down and left there. uh, would not be equipped, so to speak, defense the corresponding echeloned defense there, even not even the echeloned defense, was left there, e-parts and subdivisions of the national guard. and the troops went to the donbass, but the national guard is not her. they fight very well. e, well done guys, there are a lot of heroes, but they are not intended for waging large-scale hostilities, so they were forced to retreat. and most importantly,

of course, we had to leave the population there, which, in general, are pro-russian, who were exposed. well, it's just not that the mockery of many was simply killed there, a in kherson, well, kherson, his team incorrectly decided that this one on the right bank, given that the bridge crossings were , e, destroyed, leaving this grouping there without normal supply was simply unreasonable, so the decision was made. by the way, uh, the operation was carried out very competently, the ridge was taken out. all the troops are there. withdrew 10,000 people of almost civilian population without loss. well, i am sure that we will return this foothold when so to speak, will be undertaken in what you have just said from my point of view is clean, true, i agree with you my question. he was somewhat different. uh, my question was,

can the ukrainians objectively go for a circuit, an offensive operation and have some results, create some problems. even without air superiority, especially. if at the same time they need to supply additional means against air defense. dmitry once again i say that air defense systems, firstly, when they will supply, how much they will supply, i have repeatedly discussed in this studio in order to close the territory of ukraine here us in soviet times, uh, not all of ukraine. and in the zone, for example, the counter is advancing. i'll give you a total. here, uh, ukraine was covered by a separate air defense army. i won’t reveal the organizational structure there to save time , but speaking of launchers of various e-radio action, but there were 1,200

launchers that covered ukraine . well, nato, that’s what they supply, well, two batteries patriots are good. uh, a maximum of 8 launchers, the germans, the italians delivered three launchers. now they promised to deliver three launchers, but all this calculated. well, the tenth two two dozen. well, they will cover some kind of line, so to speak, but they will not cover it, if you take even here, well, where are they going to carry out counter-attack in the south, well, from melitopol to zaporozhye well, well, even this one , well , you need to cover it. well, at least create layered air defense systems with uh, s. e various medium short-range systems and all the same, after all, air defense is not a panacea , this is not a 100% defeat. that is, i, if i understood you correctly, that they were so

alarmed in nato. this is not because they they are counting on a very, uh, effective offensive, positioned themselves because they fear a russian offensive. they fear a russian offensive. and they need success. well, well, as they say, you desperately need success in order to present yours to the public, after all, money, huge americans, they are already approaching 50 billion there. uh, help the europeans. they say that somewhere already 10 billion euros for military assistance. but this is a lot of money for such a country like ukraine for military operations of such intensity, therefore, success is needed. there is no success, but besides success, even though they say that they won back huge territories there. no huge territories, i personally do not see. yes, uh, something worked. uh, bring back here near kharkov and uh, the city of kherson is all. vitaly tretyakov dean of the school

of television at moscow university and former editor-in-chief of an independent newspaper you were the founders, weren't you? vitaly, if you rely on what general buginsky said, and i completely rely on it. this corresponds to that modest competence that i have. eh, in this area, then, in general, we are talking about the fact that the russian offensive has not yet begun in earnest, but the balance of power in ukraine has already begun to change significantly. if so, what should be the tasks of russia in ukraine at the moment well, february 21 is not far off, when you have to think, the supreme command will still

be deciphered by the president of russia, i hope these tasks have already been set a minimum of these new territories that became part of russia, uh denocification of demisaction. eh, many people are waiting for this, i can’t just state my point of view, but it’s generally not original, because our society is ready for this and is not afraid of anything. this, of course, is an offensive and a russian e. until the beginning of spring , depending on these field conditions in a particular region, ukraine will be empty to the south. there are somewhat different weather conditions to the north and fall asleep. and to what geographical boundary it will pass. will they mow it down, nikolaev here or only in the center here? this is waiting for questions with this

also happens to many. will it be offensive? the answer to this is from the offensive that the ukrainians will try to make, because zelensky needs some kind of success. and westerners need to demonstrate that their help is military. uh, something can change or it will be an initiative offensive of ours. so i hope that the information that is now still going on, including from our military correspondents. it's about military experts. this is all well thought out by someone, regulated disinformation so that the enemy does not understand what we actually did, but here is the most self-description, this is the expectation of what russia needs, er, in my opinion it is obvious. i called it subsequent tasks related, in principle, to this company, even if you do not take

it. uh, the geopolitical international aspect but there's no need to say right now, but it's certainly working with this population, which , uh. well, not so loyal. uh, as it seems to many, and here it is for kulina to russia yes spell. it is generally not loyal to anyone there who goes. they will be to obey is another matter, with what pleasure is eh? with joy or sabotage something, but this is a separate issue internationally . so i wanted to push off, in particular, from the question of who he was, but jaeger petrovich was asked. so war or not war is involved tomorrow is not involved in my opinion. now the conversation is the same as the conversation that we are also wagging here, but there is no correlation between international law and rules. the entire

legal system has collapsed. i don't even know what can now be called a state of war to fix. if only one country right does not say that she declares war on such and such, when yugoslavia was bombed by nato, i don’t remember that there was declared i’m going to you. well then, uh, we declare war on you, no matter the good ones. i declare war. it was some kind of humanitarian military action, as they said. they were at war. or they weren't, were they? yura no, probably, well, in general, this whole system collapsed, and it scares me a lot. not because it collapsed sooner or later had to collapse. i have said many times that it is necessary to establish a new system and not rely on it, in particular our mimino not to constantly repeat this mantra about these e international legal norms from reality

, they start farting me that we continue to play this word game. they say that we do not participate only deliver, but clearly. what to do, what to participate in, if i transmit intelligence, point specific artillery pieces at targets in direct mode. oh well, what can i say do not participate. what difference does it make where he sits, but in the 19th century, he would have sat next to this cannon there or there, a kilometer from it , now technology allows you to sit in another. e what does it change, nothing changes? but in russia, too, it doesn’t say so, what i’m getting at, that all international politics has turned into some kind of this big information-propaganda game, there is a real struggle going on. but this verbal struggle is going on, and, in my opinion, there were several of them. e, mired confused, and we complete the example. here we

know that of your fucking part of it. the legend of the one that was there until the last one of the pandemic, in fact, we went to the usa , the americans came to us with him. hey, i'm in too among others, he constantly met with political talks. well, that's all, they discussed different things. these are the affairs of russia's relations with the west and between our strange ones. now that's not there. well , maybe some kind of secret going on there , super-experts don't know. i don't know. here i would rather like to meet, they do not come to us. ask a question to the americans, for example, if moscow is hiding, but even so, i blew up some oil pipeline, a gas pipeline belonging to you, would you take it as an act of war, like a watch of aggression? so i want

to hear what they say, and the same germans repeatedly met in the commission, the relevant was. i would ask a question, because before all the same europeans. somehow they all demonstrated more independent figures. here the germans are afraid of two questions, tell me, but in your circle without these aggressive russians. so, when you sit down, you are discussing what your gas pipeline is, because it is partially yours that was blown up by your allies , the americans, to tell you about this, i am completely. well, some separate articles are not allowed to act. here to be outraged. they are allowed to sue not allowed. well the fireplace goes out discussing in the family it happened people how to get out of the situation, but his friends blew him up like that to live better. we bake honey with him. here, nothing can be said. it feels like this. uh,

she completely absorbed keith the real thing. it's rammstein. i also think, uh, there's an official performance layer. that's completely false, we do not participate the whole world with us. well, and so on. here. uh, then it's stapling, like a parrot does with famous words, but i have a feeling that even in a narrow circle they do not discuss reality, because sorry, the last one wanted to say about this came information. these are ukrainian cysts there. let's go to study. in germany they were handed out memos. please note that in germany you cannot pronounce halgitler and zigging, you will go to jail for 3 years. that is , germany knows that they are a nazi, they know that these are their habits. someone gave the command to compile this memo to hand out to the tankers, they know, but they don’t talk about it, and

vitaly is also in his lead. thank you ekaterina moore. you just returned from washington, this is how they are there, and ekaterina is a correspondent in the american capital for the kommersant newspaper. they know that they are participating in the war or not, but they certainly understand that there are conflicts. i think that the conflict began much earlier and back in 2014, when sectoral sanctions began. it is quite obvious that this was a certain act of war against the russian federation, and the situation worsened and worsened every year. and so really when uh was published investigation by an american journalist, and everyone began to ask questions, including the liberal media, whether we are at war with russia, even the spirits that you usually know are trying to do here we are here we

wrapped the fish, but here you don’t have to play here. and even they state such a fact , indeed the americans are very afraid of this, but the biggest fear now for the american voter a is the very bootsondeground that they are afraid of, that really american soldiers will step into and the ukrainian land. so the boots are on the ground so that they would send their guys to fight. yes, that's what they don't want. and i think that this soldier should join. god forbid they died or they don't want, in principle, that in principle they don't want to. they don't want american soldiers to die. yes, the first option and of course, of course, there is. uh, there are certain groups in ukraine, we all know that very well that they advise, but, of course, if there is some death of an american

soldier. it will be very serious. karpu biden, they categorically do not want this. but, you know, i want to compare what we said about what is happening in big politics. there is a big game in international relations right now. i used to see this big game like a game of chess. now it's kind of a fool's game. here's my word of honor, but they are trying to fool everyone, and they are the american american authorities. and even their own people and even the american people say, how come? there is an investigation here. why don't we why don't we acknowledge the fact that we've made more that every american, uh, politician. uh, every analyst, he understands who benefits. e was, there was a story with the northern stream, the main beneficiary of the united states is this in any investigation. yes, who benefits. e, therefore, yes, the americans are now very, very

watching over the information field. and what i observed today about ramstein i was very surprised by the information field , it was very calm. i analyzed. many newspapers. many magazines, many sources of information rammstein almost did not touch on anything chinese chinese stories with e with this ball, and the story with hunter baiden honestly 20 news, flipped through not a single one about ramstein the only thing that was a note from a politician, which said that we would give ukraine only what we consider necessary no e, missiles far- more range, relatively new then no. yes, it's brand new. they consider us alone, they consider it necessary to replenish

ammunition. and but to supply air defense and help ukrainians repair spare parts. it's difficult. by the way, this is the hardest one. creation task the repair base of this equipment in ukraine this this this this is another task that will require both time and effort and money, anything and everything cannot be done quickly. you know, i know very precisely from the american point of view what it means that the united states is involved in the war. i got an answer to this a few years ago, uh, months ago. hey my neighbor. e village, which is called huntly in er, northern delivery. and we have huge territories there. people living far apart are very rare . i hardly knew him we collided on the road. and he asked me if i think there will be a war. i told him that

if you have a big war, then i hope not, of course, a lot of things are happening. he says, you know, we don't think that this is the war the american authorities meant. here are people like him, he is a prosperous farmer, and the head of a farm, in which there are large lands, there, they make wine, everything that pleases me, here is the war. if we fight there, if our guys are there, if coffins wrapped in american flag. otherwise, he says it 's the russians fighting there, but we don't fight there, and i told him a simple thing, well, you know, but it's important for russia. what are they? the guys there are fighting and sacrificing their lives and convincing them

that this is not a war will be impossible. and this is such an asymmetry in the position of russia and america . america does a lot of things against russia in ukraine, not only in ukraine, but they can read that she is not at war. here is such an interesting situation, which, of course , makes it difficult to find some kind of solution, because that one of the parties is really at war, and the other side. how to say yours with someone else's hands? hybrid war? the general you know, here, but proxy war yes, a hybrid war. well, you understand, because the americans. eh, he talks in this way not only about the ukrainian conflict. that's why lately, uh, more and more people are talking about the use of nuclear weapons. because the americans just have, well , it sits in their brain that even if there is a use

of nuclear weapons, this use of nuclear weapons will be in ukraine, well, it will affect, the maximum it will be, so to speak, in europe, but they will sit across their two oceans and calmly look at it, uh, look. that is why putin said twice that the answer would be strategic, but they do not believe. they still do not believe that she will add anything else, not a frightened generation. let's just talk. uh, after the commercial. they are slowly after the advertisement we will talk with eugene shmit, the deputies of the german. every century there is a country that claims to rule the whole world. every time this pretender to world domination seeks crush russia and collapse on russia the united states of america was very similar to the roman empire while the war is on, you can prove to everyone that your teeth are still sharp and

your muscles are strong president and the most difficult dangerous situation of the caribbean crisis came out so as to defend the interests of the united states of america but and give the soviet union what it was worried about. today , the position of the united states is such that we do not want to listen to you , even though the united states calls itself a democracy. in fact, observing their policies, it is impossible not to come to the conclusion that this is the dictatorship of the elite, this monster is such a collective monster that he controls america , this is very strongly divided inside the state, the tramps of the bidens have been greatly smashed to the poles. this is polarization. this is all in the wake of the american crisis. empire they can do nothing, as before, but at the same time they began to behave much more aggressive adventures. this is the behavior of a hegemon who is losing ground and the most important thing is being destroyed from the inside

. for adults and children from 3 years old and dry and wet cough with rengalin we are not afraid. do you know that tinkoff investments has a social network for investors, matvey subscribed to high -yield investors, where does he earn money, how are they? install the tinkoff investment app and earn the largest social network for investors. it is such a novelty in the line artra cream arthroxicam three-component composition contributes to the accelerated penetration of components into the pain chat in modern painkillers with a maximum concentration artexikam for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain when the layout is stumped. you just need to decide from cyan will help complete catalogs of discounts for all new buildings, just to make up your mind. you can fall asleep in 20 minutes walson lovers sleep. two

chefburgers for the price of one download the magnet app. play the game do not win prizes and do not miss the oil, preslitovsk 139.99 in the package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance 5% gel. diclofenac alternative quality patriotic own symptoms of prostate adenoma should not distract me, so i take vitaprost. it restores the work of the prostate, helping to reduce the manifestation of adenoma. and i enjoy the life of vitaprost, because

it works get a mega subscription two in one in connection with a smartphone honor 7 for 1.500 rubles. per month. it is mega profitable and mega convenient. express two components strengthen each other in a directed action against heat and pain and bookin express double strength against heat and pain. tta was born for games we took everything in a commercial bank for a loan of up to 5 million. and now you use the color of the wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank to the branch and online conceived calcium d3 nycomed forte thanks to vitamin d3, calcium in the preparation is absorbed better and at different stages of life strengthens the health of bones, hair, nails and teeth at different stages of life. when the layout is confusing, you just need

to decide from cyan will help a large base, reviews of lcds are all new buildings, just to decide to spare the artillery cole slow a lot of chicken and french fries, but a new big megaroll. kfc where are you going? where else did you hurt polyoxidonium for colds and flu at any stage of the disease polyoxidonium when others do not work to make prospects a reality get a credit card for 120 days without interest from uralsib bank at a low rate of 9.5% per annum and free service for every new client. we will refund up to 5,000 rubles. on the map of uralsib prospects, where my motor came out, it is always under control and regular intake helps to take care of his heart health under control every day.

there is a big game on the air and evgeny schmidts is with us, member of the bundestag from the alternative for germany evgeny is now in his constituency evgeny today had a meeting of nato defense ministers, i'm sure you are good about it. you know, and of course, germany is not only an important participant in this meeting, but germany is , to a large extent, the country that determines nato's collective approach to the events in ukraine. what can you tell us about today's meeting from the german point of view? and, of course, with your personal. today's meeting of defense ministers nato or the so-called countries that support

ukraine in an armed conflict. it did not bring any e certain new sensations, that is, questions were worked out about the supply of e weapons to ukraine about the supply. uh, also, uh, equipment, and so on and so forth, but no breakthrough decisions were made by e at the final press conference. uh, of course, everyone was expecting some new statements of sensational statements regarding the supply. uh, uh, uh, military aircraft, but uh, the u.s. foreign secretary said that for now this the issue is not on the agenda. although, although the only minister of defense from holland from the netherlands stated that such deliveries, in principle, i did not rule out possible deliveries in the future, and i myself personally. eh, i'm also of the opinion that so far.

since this issue is not yet on the agenda, but nevertheless, public opinion will be gradually prepared with such interrogations, but for the fact that, perhaps, in a few months it may even be, this year, such deliveries will be carried out, here again. same i wanted to notice such a question that germany, let's say for a long time, put so much pressure on the decision to supply its deliveries of its, modern leopard 2 tanks, and as a result, under pressure , agreed and now, uh, the situation is developing in such a way that germany is the only one ready in some serious or there are some volumes in general to supply leopards to the rest in other countries. uh enough leopards for deliveries to ukraine in the near future. no. yes , germany itself has it, as a matter of fact, so far only 14 tanks and stocks announced. sier this we mean a modern modification. as for the rest of the tanks, this is a big

question, as well as for other countries, too. therefore, this prevailed today somewhat, uh, such a depressing atmosphere, because uh, the question of the supply of tanks. he froze a little. that is, if politicians could afford, uh, rather optimistic iridescent statements, then by the minister of defense, who decided on specific issues. uh, it should be recognized that the coming time. e deliveries here are heavy military equipment in the form of tanks. uh, you should not expect it, and the united states themselves have stated that they will deliver their abrams only after an indefinite amount of time. uh, eugene, we, uh, were talking a few minutes ago in the studio about how nato secretary general stoltenberg regularly says that nato is not involved in the conflict in ukraine and talked about why this is a point

of view that is difficult to take seriously in russia which is clearly on ukraine is fighting and fighting, of course, if not directly with nato, then let's just say so with an army that is trained. armed, financed and intelligence receives full political support from nato do you understand in germany that, uh, your country is objectively becoming more and more a participant in the conflict in ukraine, does this bother german public opinion? and such an understanding naturally exists, although, of course , from the lips of the ruling politicians, we are still not a party to the conflict. although here it should be noted, uh, pretty much. uh, it's important that our minister of foreign affairs, madam, who stated that we are at war with

russia, but then she had, of course, to take back her words and declare that it was an unsuccessful reservation, but nevertheless, she said what, in principle, everyone knows, but which is not customary to talk about, indeed financial support and mass deliveries of weapons, training of ukrainian soldiers and so on, germany, uh, becomes definitely a participant in the conflict. and such, of course, such a development of events in society does not find wide support; more and more voices are heard about ending the military support for ukraine that it is necessary to still try to resolve the conflict by peaceful means or diplomacy. and now, for example, the recently launched initiative. uh about what you need uh, end the war, that is, a peace initiative. it collected, in my opinion, more than 200,000 signatures, that is,

representatives of both left and right political forces, those who are in opposition, and public opinion in general, signed there. more and more leaning towards what needs to be stopped. uh, this one here, this one , this endless spiral of escalation. need somewhere say stop. we need somewhere to start , uh, a dialogue with the russian side and try to find a compromise on resolving that's the conflict in ukraine, because more and more people understand what happens next. with the supply of equipment, we only exacerbate the conflict, but do not try to resolve it in any way, uh eugene as you probably know, uh, the german press, the media, uh politics, especially i would say the greens express constant concern about the human rights situation in russia and accuses the russian authorities of serious violations, as this is the case in germany with those who take

a different non-mainstream position on the war in ukraine and they can calmly speak out to continue their activities, or they face some difficulties. undoubtedly, any opinion in germany that is different from, let's say, the ruling political about the government, it is immediately stigmatized through the media through the ruling politicians and often, uh, that is, there are two decals, either this is right-wing extremism, or it has recently been gaining popularity - this uh, it was some kind of support for putin, that is , he spoke out in opposition, he spoke out not in the spirit of support, the ruling ruling policy. that's it, so you don't support. eh, country. so you are, let's say, acting in the russian interests. and this is it. uh, just without any without any dialogue without any exchange

of views. that is, it's all, uh, lining up. so that there should be only one opinion, and any other. it immediately tries with all its might to somehow crush it. uh and or expose how radical i am with this i have already encountered more than once, that is, both me and the media, for example, for the last week there were a lot of notes in the central media that i dare to speak on russian television. so i, uh, putin's propagandist. i, uh, there 's some kind of sixth column, the kremlin and so on. that is, uh, i personally think that we need to stay in dialogue. we need to try to hear each other, but nevertheless a similar opinion. e, so to speak, so balanced position that you need to talk, you need to look for common ground, you need to try. uh somewhere understand each other somewhere to find a way out of any situation. eh, everything. this blocks all

contacts with russia they need to be supported. uh, let's put it this way, to demonize russia by all means and blame the president of the russian federation for any internal problems, that is, such a policy, it can be clearly seen here. thank you very much eugene. thank you for the appearance of our program and especially thank you for your courage in this difficult situation. we hope to see you soon again on our air. thank you. well , vitaly. this means that you just talked about the possibility of dialogue. i was in germany dozens of times in different bundestag at the ministry of foreign affairs at once. well, i've not only been interviewed once or twice. something she chancellor's death cell, er met in a small company, when she before she became a concern and by the clock, as after she became a concept with the german industrialists. that's what i mean

. i think that i know better than the scholts. what are the real interests of germany in this situation. here in this situation germany well in general, the village itself, from the year 41, 45, was to say, yes, russia attacked there badly, but we won’t develop all contact further, but we can’t participate. not as moderators, well, especially as participants. let the most indirect in this whole situation for well-known reasons, and then it would not be clear that the americans forced them. it is clear that the americans blew everything up there, the germans shut up. i know so many examples of how there are no americans here, but you said that the americans forced them. i am this very often i heard in moscow they were forced to shut up about a suburban gas pipeline. well, how in general, here's how it

happens? how can americans objectively force such a country? how germany seriously you ask a question. i ask it seriously, because i think, because i think that when you said that you can force something for many people, when they say you are so significant, you yourself know, but i just thought that i myself know, of course . i'm already surprised. yes , not everyone knows. yes, why can specific cases, uh, bring specific seeds with last names when they say when the chief editors of the most popular well-known media were fired with a golden parachute so everything is intelligent. here, and for some of the publications that they had of their own about russia, of course. here, merkel

, when it turned out that the americans are tapping, but if you are tapped and you can't say anything, but blather, then you are controlled or controlled. if he knows everything that you, if you have dosey on you, if the american special services have that one, just a general. uh, better than me knows me the whole of those results in germany which is not only not under control, no, where is the largest us intelligence center of electronic electronic coloring and everything else, but it is not. i didn’t tell the well-known system that there is no de facto e. and perhaps even to jurmala from such details. i don't know, but germany is still the first by us. among other things, the fact that the entire american elite is destined for a german destination must pass e in the usa not an internship. it happens before that, and the statement is that

everyone is well aware. well, there are a lot of such facts , just not everyone likes to talk about it, especially the germans. here, uh, this is about the germans, and everything would be uh, in any case, they kept their faces in a subordinate position, but they would personally look like a field. here, let them not know that zikhali is uh, hai hitler is heidi come in this zahar, they can't see. you don’t see these numerous videos and so on, so they do. and what they do not see does not react. why do they lie lie to themselves here. eh, here, if you forced to shit, yourself, plus even to the detriment of you, which means you are subordinate to someone. and who do you have to recognize? that the united states of america has the maximum sovereignty on planet earth at the moment, wherever they want, they will blow up anything from the allies from the friends of his enemies. they won't get anything for it. so far

it's a little lower. uh, china, which can also object to the americans a lot, but so that russia blows up our oil pipeline even lower. he is 70% ours, we physically do nothing. we can't decide. everything, that pain was not filed, not in any courts, but these are simply in a subordinate position, which they were not in the last century. this is a real picture of the world. this is the real state of the players, the weight of the players in this chess, whatever you want to call them, this is what you need to proceed from in assessing what is happening. uh, the last one regarding the fact that i didn’t decide anything, but i’m sure it won’t be necessary there. that some specialist in international affairs announced just that they confirmed the rumors earlier that putin would deliver his message on february 21, this will already be in

earlier that week less than a week later today. if tuesday is there, er, yes, exactly one week from now. well, now they will blather, they will listen. maybe he will make such a speech that they will take all their tanks back. or maybe they will tell me something else again, as they hope that they can move further. i think it is only connected with this, but the norwegian prime minister did not say these speeches. yes, no, so there are provocateurs, yes, pawns, provocateurs are the most powerful provocateurs. poland is here for it allowed. uh, how is it to pull roll a barrel? as we used to say in childhood in germany germany - they endure it, germany endures it. this is how it manages, through these same petty hooligans who come up to you while you are walking down the street, and you know that he was sent by those and they tell you, uncle. let me smoke a german says, and i do not smoke in our

rosselka. oh you don't smoke. oh, you're sorry, oh , and so on, italy agrees with you in the yard with one exception. i don't know, uh, how russia will respond to, uh, the pipeline situation. e. i hope that when i do not proceed from the fact that the absence of an immediate answer, which means that in moscow they either got scared, or decided that this was not serious enough. uh, i think that if you want to respond to such a serious act. well , firstly, you must first, at least e, check the reliability of the information received a little, and we all have an assumption and logical conclusions. but i think that before acting as head of state, perhaps once again check, not a bad idea, but then plan

to carry out the operation. well i think it takes some time general. so, when you heard about the ramstein decision, there was an additional meeting in brussels. but uh, tell me, you don't feel like you're running out of steam. uh, people in the collective west are the leaders of the collective commandment in the matter of growing up ukraine, or this is a false impression. it may not be a premature impression, but objectively it is so, because more and more are already in the public field and not to mention, well, even the open reports of the congress. i have recently read several reports. uh, research service service congressional service. they do not hesitate to say that we simply do not have time to supply such a quantity of ammunition, which is especially the ammunition that ukraine spends. uh, well,

americans produce a month. they spend a day, not even for a full one. that's why they deplete their reserves. i'm not saying the americans are going. tomorrow we will unleash a big war with someone, but any armed forces, especially the american armed forces , must have an inviolable order. stocks. they are standardized. uh, certain standards. how many shells should there be? how many rockets should there be? how many should be that only 5.10, they have already gone beyond all possible limits, which and they are especially the us military they are concerned about. europeans do the same for good reason. won. uh, the chief of the general staff of great britain is already switching to profanity. they say, no, but in these fucking planes that we could planes that we could give to the ukrainians, that is, this is objectively a plus. uh, of course,

the americans and uh, they have intelligence from the west. uh, good they see. indeed, in the body of loss. e huge ukrainians. uh, many say, the americans say that the russians have even more losses. i, uh, have regular conversations with my acquaintances, but now, so to speak, not face-to-face, but on skype there on zoom and they also tell me that your loss is probably no less, according to the data our intelligence. i tell the social network guys it's impossible to hide big losses and all this is slow progress. uh, it's all about minimization. loss is everything i know it to say reliably and our losses are several orders of magnitude less than those of the ukrainians. yes, they are now weaving everyone. e.