that's a plus. uh, of course, the americans and, uh, the west have intelligence. e good. eh, they see. loss of loss, indeed. uh, huge ukrainians. uh, many say, the americans say that the russians have even more losses. i, uh, have regular conversations with my acquaintances, but now, so to speak , not face to face, but via skype there via zoom and they also tell me that your loss is probably no less. here, according to our outlet. i tell the social network guys it's impossible to hide big losses and that's it this is slow progress. uh, it's all about minimizing the loss, that's all i know it's to say credible and our loss. they are several orders of magnitude smaller than those of ukrainians. yes, they are now weaving everyone. e. e, there they throw in an ambulance, they grab them,

there, employees of the military registration and enlistment office at nightclubs . but this is it, yes. saw the story today. there are already 15-16 year olds. uh, guys, it's just that the young men are already loading a grenade launcher and are on the front line. but this is agony. this is a folks assault. it's already the forty-fifth year april forty fifth in berlin i think that everyone sees everything soberly evaluates and that's why they drive the ukrainians. let's, let's, guys , decide something, and i suppose he thinks to himself, well, it's good to win. and if the russians beat you, that's not bad either, we'll sit down at the negotiating table and agree on something. ekaterina how about washington in moscow , there were very, i would say, modest limited expectations that the republican seizure of control of the house of representatives

would significantly change anything in the field of foreign policy and specifically the approach to russia, but here this transition of control has already happened, there are, uh, two committees of the house, which are supposed to be investigating the administration. true, there are two committees on international affairs and on the affairs of the armed forces. they are in the hands of the republicans of such traditional globalists, in whom i do not see much disagreement on foreign policy with the administration. but here are the first signs from the outside. well, how to say trumpist nationalists in the house, who now have control over two committees and the ability to investigate. do you see some encouraging activity of their country. i see division in the republican party. and i believe that a, in connection with this, there will be serious problems with the adoption of the new military budget

that the pentagon plans to adopt. uh, to present to the public as early as march 9 and uh, judging by the a-a investigation of the politician. there are very serious fears that the budget is new, and it will not be adopted in the form that president biden wants, uh. the fact is that politics also notes and not only politics, many analysts talk about that the united states now faces the need to fight on two fronts. let's remember what the general said. e mining about what is possible in the twenty-fifth year, the united states will somehow collide with china and and in this sense, not before the supply, but arms to taiwan, right? uh, to the detriment of taiwan, they cause very serious discussions. and-namely, in the republican field , the very trumpists that you spoke about, they believe that their main opponents are

china and they say that their own ukraine we need to supply less. or maybe not deliver at all, and i think that against this background there will be very serious contradictions, not even with the budget for next year, but also for this year, because we know what is happening now. uh, such negotiations to raise the national debt ceiling. and now just these hawks and conditional doves. of course they are not pigeons, they are more financiers. yes, they are now in such a serious, but conflict over what we actually do with our budget. can the military budget be cut? or we will cut social insurance pension insurance in this case we then our electorate and and i think that in this regard we should expect some progress, if not in the budget of this year, then in the budget of next year, because already even mccarthy said that he would not rule out cutting

military funding if they agreed to raise the national debt ceiling. i think it's worth stocking up on popcorn, as they say now, and keep an eye on this situation of accusations. uh, journalists from hersh. e about naturally nord stream. and how was it blown up? you see some interest in congress in the house of representatives to investigate this situation, while i do not see such a special interest. but what i see is happening in public space, but remember. ah, that today even the hill was saying that they are considering this publication. they still want to know the truth, but remember that fox news, which is the main ruble of the republican party, raised this topic and

actively promotes it, and i still i suspect that they are the same trumpists , perhaps this question is under it. and since, after all, such things, but to forgive, but to the biden government, they don’t want to, and i think that this will be the reason for the next investigations. how do our viewers know, eh? it is almost impossible to get an interview, especially on the air with a congress child. and it’s not our fault, it’s because of the way the congress works, some moods , and like any person who would give us an interview , he was immediately accused of being on genn but that doesn't mean it's completely impossible. you are talking to members of congress, and i had such an opportunity today, of course, not for publication. i mean

to call a person by name, but there was quite an interesting informative conversation , first of all, about simon's investigation, we'll talk about it after the advertisement. fatherland , and you, in turn, head of intelligence, from february 20 on the first, you will go to the residents in berlin, show yourself, and there you will change the fitin,

after your first miss. super sale on ozon and today discounts up to 55% off granny's care and beauty products and redmond multi-baker for 3199 rubles. profitable magnet buy cheaper. connect the acceptance of payments by qr-code in the tinkoff business application and accept payments via phone or terminal. open an account for business, but

tinkoff.ru receive credits instantly and without a phone commission. he is so alone on his feet and his back gets tired due to work. i drive little. suspension on a daily basis, but how to protect the joints thanks to the special collagen form of the art neo triple helix contributes support, health, joints just one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine. pay less lakomka 49.90. i don't want to revolve around technology. let them spin around me to do it.

our rules shine brightness, care our color is the perfect basket for one my basket for 169 rubles in kfc with prostokvashino maslenitsa products are tastier because they are 100% natural, so pancakes are an ideal magnet, buy cheaper. meet the chinese new year with discounts up to 50,000 rubles. on tvs four, like yo tv hisense for 44.99 in m.video or eldorado they took a loan of up to 5 million from

sovcombank . 5% gel. diclofenac is a high-quality patriotic alternative before breakfast. it's all done our compositions of the old farm are really tasty. we have a favorable gift period. pyaterochka helps out again. register checks and win prizes. five helps out. and you you know that tinkoff investments has a social network of investors, matvey subscribed to investors with high returns and earns as they do. install the tinkoff investments application and earn the largest social network for investors. he is so alone. for order in the house and personal care smart technology polaris with discounts up to 50% and

the most delicate yogurt there is a big game on the air and we are discussing the resonance that the article of the well-known american journalist saymore well had about who and how undermined nord stream 1 and nord stream -2 and it does an unequivocal conclusion, the united states of america, with the help of norway and not just the united states of america, but an instruction was given personally by president biden and this operation was led by neither more nor less than personally national security adviser jackson and director of the central intelligence agency williams, who

is well known to many in moscow for the period when he was here the american word and ambassador, who was considered competent and reasonable. but i must immediately say about themselves it’s good that he is a person with one side is very very famous and very colorful. but on the other hand , i don't know how to say it. delicately, i'm not a young man myself, but in general, uh, dick is worse than 85 years old. and of course, there are, uh, people who, even at 99, like henry kissinger, are not only completely sane and can have a solid memory, but also impress with their intellect, but with a good master. it's been a few years now since he uh explicitly say. so uh oil at the peak

of his career. and for several years he had a reputation. well i wouldn't say scandalous nodious and he did, but an accusation that was clearly impossible to confirm, for example, he claimed that the american destruction of bin laden was a complete fiction, that it was opening somewhere in pakistan and there was a lot of testimonies, a lot of both american and pakistani and those people who planned the operation and those people who participated in this operation and boasted about them. uh, which one of them actually killed the bin-okay about this, they had disputes, but that was clear. that what is written is good reality is not corresponds, therefore, it is natural for those who did not want to hear to know.

it was easy for him to accuse them. these accusations are relatively easy to ignore. but here, uh, i have to tell one thing to the american press. on the one hand, she has become today. e, as it is sometimes called corporate, is guided by interesting large companies that are its owners, sponsors and very much upholds political correctness, but on the other. i don't know do you agree with me ekaterina and they really like to compete with each other and the idea that there are such accusations and someone else will find. confirmation of the word uh, and here is australia first. eh, it seemed to me. well, this is not how they think , but the leading american publications work, and i spoke

with a leading american journalist today and received confirmation that the leading publications are slowly searching and checking, so what they will be able to find there. this is what is called not yet evening, as far as the congress is concerned. uh, they paid a lot of attention to this article. they took her very seriously, an acquaintance also with a specific reputation, as the author, and even those who are very concerned about these accusations. they are not in a hurry to publicly bear the verdict, they are very concerned. and i'll tell you what they are concerned about. are they less concerned that they blew up russian or german property? they are less concerned about what will not be done. uh, russian gas to europe, they are concerned about something else. they are concerned

that from their point of view they were offended and insulted, because there of them is a decision, because as well described. this is in his article the white house and the cia deliberately planned the operation in such a way that they were not obliged to inform about this secret operation called in america active mech.

you are like a military specialist. here you read the description well, very detailed how this operation was carried out, who carried out all this , your opinion from a military-technical point of view. this looks like the truth. but before answering your questions. so i want to make one remark about what, uh, what, what is real, what is unreal. you know, i, uh, in 2001 in the month of october at the beginning of october. uh, 3 weeks after the attacks. uh, i was at the pentagon in new york. i saw this round hole, here in e. the pentagon building is absolutely pristine lawn. the grass is so green not just planted, but it proves that there was a plane that crashed and evaporated, just evaporated not a single detail, therefore, in america

, everything is possible now about the wires that this is an act of terrorism. this , in my opinion, no one doubts what hersh wrote with all the details, but retelling them does not make sense from a military-technical point of view. everything is described very reliable and very knowledgeable. how it was done. uh, how was this planned cover exercise? yes, it 's very plausible. i am sure, i completely agree with you, dmitry, that our intelligence and, uh, the foreign intelligence service, military intelligence. now they are working closely to check to really get reliable documentary information about who planned, how this operation was carried out, i must say that the americans are playing on the verge, because they have elements, uh, vulnerable elements of critical infrastructure

these cables are internet cables, uh, that go along the bottom of the ocean, this and gas pipelines are, well, a lot of things that can be broken, so to speak, either by undermining or cutting, well , in general, uh, critical damage, therefore , uh, if the americans think that this will be left unanswered, they are not deeply mistaken. yes, it's not right away. yes, you need to check it will take several months, six months, but i am absolutely sure that there will be an adequate answer. and i want to do a uh scientific uh opinion poll around this table. we believe are we that the biden administration is unambiguously responsible for what happened with the nord stream. judging by what i see from the information that exists at the moment. i believe that since the us is the main beneficiary of this incident as well.

i think yes. yes. i think it 's the us behind it anyway. no, that answer is obvious, of course, yes, but soon i answered so briefly, then a couple more words. here we are dirty in these inside. we are europeans russians inside american games what is the conflict between congress and apparatus. the white house always exists, they are dissatisfied with each other, who withheld what, we know this is not news, so this is dinner, i understand but even if it specifically explains that the cia administration's biden are to blame for this, they committed this gifted given command or undermining, that it will change it will change something in the american elections inside. yes, but they do not recognize the legal guilt of the united states, this will then give rise to claims and so on. so, this is their internal wiring. how to say no e impression no

influence on the in general world situation, as long as we ourselves do not undermine something like this, it will not affect. you know, i am absolutely sure that without the approval of the president, without the approval of the administration, this is, uh, such a terrorist act, it could not be more than that, or maybe it could have been committed if only the cia was involved in this, but this operation without uh, the armed forces could not be carried out. the pentagon will not go. uh, so to speak, it's not the pentagon's duty to report to the cia. uh, rigid disciplined structured organization without the knowledge of uh, the president. that wouldn't be possible, and i'm not 100% sure the credibility of the article is good. although what you said general about what military-technical uh country. it looks

believable to me, it's very important because again it's good. he is still now, if possible, so they say tired loner. and if he did not have a witness statement. that's how he could write it all. so authentically prefers hard. for me the main thing is different. for me, the main thing is that even if it was not done, the way it was described hash, it doesn't matter much in practice, because it has been established that it was a terrorist attack. this, when i said it was installed, i mean, it was not installed in moscow, but it was recognized by the leading nato countries that investigated it, the swedes. this was recognized and recognized by the biden administration itself, catherine is right, the united states , of course, is not the beneficiary, but the main thing is different. who could do it, but could the poles do it? and they have some kind of khveda capabilities,

they could do it, although they are not yet a nato country, but nato is very closely linked, they could have some opportunities. well, i personally thought about the british, who, by the way, have divers and submarines quite like him in these matters. uh, advanced, but if it was done by someone else, you. i personally, the general, cannot imagine that the united states did not know about it. i can’t imagine this, that is, in this situation, if this was not done directly on instructions from washington, then it was done by the american allies , partners and the biden administration, knowing about she refused to tell the truth about this right and even pointed her finger at russia as possible as possible, if you want the main culprit in this crime from my

point of view. this is worse than irresponsible. this is a serious blow to those tiny remnants of trust in the great dragons that we still have left and i believe that uh yes in congress. they certainly have their prerogatives. and they will have their own perspective. from what point of view they quite mature the accusations, but i believe that if there are responsible people out there, and i hope there are a few left out there. they just have to understand that objectively this act puts the united states in immediate danger of a direct strike from russia and undermines the reputation of the united states as any reliable partner it was a big game see you on the air tomorrow.

i'm larisa guzeeva this is a podcast of letters. today we are talking about the great maria callas visiting me. maria vardenko playwright by screenwriter sergei bulanov music critic and we today we will talk about maria callas about what letters she wrote to whom and whether she actually wrote them, because one of the most famous letters turns out to be yours yes, tell me why and how suddenly you introduced, uh, all the delusions. come on, so we start watching the voice in the process of studying various materials on her life. i was shocked that she was idolized, as a singer was idolized , as a trius, but no one loved her, as a daughter and as a woman she was, uh, an unloved

child who was born instead of the deceased boy. she had an older sister for 6 years. if that's why she fell in love with an adult, yes, she loved papa first of her husband, who was hers. over 30 years too old and i'm not at all unsure. whether she loved him, she, uh, found dad in him. in any case, she found in him a man who was absorbed in her work. he loved her as an object of investment, that is, it was completely obvious that he fell in love with me. he, of course, did a lot for her, and there is a lot of evidence about how she walked around with his finger so she was obsessed with jewelry after her very difficult childhood, very poor and such, when she worked for the whole family, and of course she was, by the way, never went on stage in jewelry. i was in monaco yes, in the casino, where the exhibition. here her

costumes were jewels, and all the glass. yes, yes, and so she meets a pineapple who tells her. come on, you're already straining to sing something. but in general, this is to whom this 100 years has surrendered enjoyed with the great yachts of money, how much do we have? let's travel and live you have your pleasure the person who told her, relax, be free only love is needed from you and nothing more. i think that of course, uh, she's a hostage of her gift, when you're thirteen years old from the age of 14 get up on the galleys. first you earn for your family. just for food. you feel responsible for your sister and mother, you feel responsible for what it means, uh, she is such a poor child from a talent show, that is , her mother began to exploit from the age of 13. i can't even fingertips right now. transfer. which of the great actors musicians singers from prosperous and well-fed families to remember offhand. for example, i

can’t because everyone goes into this profession in order to free themselves, to become rich and famous and independent, therefore there is nothing like that in the fate of maria calla. no, by the way , she's also not from here, so to speak, it didn't fall from the sky for seven billion. that 's why, just, i would not exacerbate just so much to linger on the fact that aha , how unfortunate she was. childhood would be happy. i have nothing to sing about, so she is the hostage of her gift. she put it first on her, her lord. uh, he just kissed her on the very throat and gave her the opportunity not to turn bricks, but to go out to her son, where millions of applauded. she very quickly became famous, she was loved by the whole world in a very short time, not that she considered herself, but she did not leave a slave, as for dolgov, of course, she was a servant of her pressure. firstly, it gave her the opportunity to communicate with the greatest and most famous people of the whole world with the same pineapple, she would not

met and when in life, if by that time she was no longer a greek diva, but also the first voice of the world. listen, she has a fan, as marlene dietrich and all the stars for that time differed, which is not easy. uh, i wrote, i don’t know, in such a superlative degree and so appreciated it, what are you talking about, and here hostage hostage - i meant hostage as like a person who is everything, being, which is laid for this voice, you understand, glory to god , the lord gave it to her further, the choice was already hers. a now i want to dispel some rumors and legends, because you are doing this in more detail. and you know, she didn't have children. and yet maria turned out to be not a ballerina. yes, where they value this short segment so much, when she can shine on stage and at more than 30 is already

retiring, and so on. it does not affect you in any way, on the contrary, a hormonal explosion. and it only strengthens the voice. you eat better. why didn't she have children? is it true that she had abortions from pineapple according to him, so to speak? under his pressure. yes, she had two. pregnancy. this is one of the first time one of the required abortion. he said that he had two children and had not yet had any kind of jacqueline , and even that famous letter that you wrote. yes, if possible, i want to read, maybe not all of it. yes, they travel a lot. explanation. you didn't believe that i could die of love. know the same, i died the world was deaf. i can't sing anymore. no, you will read this. i'll make you. you will hear my lost voice everywhere. he will haunt you, even in your sleep he will surround you he will deprive himself of reason and you will give up, because he knows how to take any fortress. he will get

you out of the pink hugs of the jacqueline doll, he will avenge me for him, he surrendered in thousands of tens of thousands, he stepped in front of your bear ear, but he will take it. revenge. no, you won't turn away. you will drink to the bottom of the confession of my voice, numb with grief, who refused to publicly choke on insults , who considered it impossible to be abandoned in the whole hearing, he was in the session of the arias, and therefore aria he could not bear the baseness of your feeling, he retreated, but he knows not will give you rest. he will avenge me for my public shame for my current loneliness and without a child. whom god gave so late, and whom you ari you forced me to kill. this is your letter. it was you who wrote this letter that misled him. a huge number of people, because many people think that this is really a letter from maria anas. yes, my own. papa sent me letters from maria

callas with words. look how talented maria was, it turns out she not only sang wonderful. she also wrote wonderfully. since it was written in the year 2004, when i was still working as a journalist, i wrote essays in all sorts of ways. i also began to read this letter and i think, my god, she really writes very well somehow. and the main thing is somehow close to me, so i just completely forgot, because i went to work in the cinema. and i already forgot everything , although i even published a book by that time, and the story was that i was doing an essay by maria callas, i decided, since such a great figure, i shouldn’t write anything, huh? uh, somehow removed copyright with a look. i decided every moment of her life. i am consecrated in the films and yes, and in the book after all. it was 2004. still not out yet. here is this remarkable, and volume, edited by nikolaevich about, kolos

wonderful completely collected memories. i decided to just make a witness. what a tom wolf - this is her fan from america . by the way, mine is growing completely. i am also very, by the way, excellent, he speaks russian, he does not communicate with anyone at all. who wants to know something okal, yes, this is a terrific person. i decided to just make such an excerpt, consisting from various testimonies that were then not so known to her housekeeper, her chauffeur, her man, whom he introduced to pineapple. i have not met anywhere. they met at the reception. in monaco, but she was with her husband. she was now with a lady, and she now after a while sent her an invitation on her own along with her husband. they went there and there she had all sorts of stop-cock blown off in front of her husband's eyes. yes, it completely blew

the roof off. as they say now, i don’t understand, listen, in monaco , the roof didn’t blow off at the reception, but she’s famous. i am christina in my opinion, yes. but suddenly it broke, maybe, when she saw all this splendor and imagined herself in these scenery. no. no, this is the pure love of a woman ocean sea. yes, pure hormones. i had such a complete feeling, because to explain it like this, we can also have a crisis. yes, firstly, he robbed her, that is, the relationship. she probably earned much more than he earned anything at all. he, of course, sacrificed for the woman. a rich man, and for the sake of living on it, he refused twenty-seven, or something, enterprises and said his family, who could not accept the fact that he was marrying some very young stove is unknown. yes, i know what he wants to say . it's hardest to believe in love. to the oligarch to

the billionaire here you can somehow it's hard for me to imagine a nudiva, a beauty who made herself. she was absolutely fat truth. yes, here are the photos of youth. she lost 60 kilograms. no, she lost a kilogram, probably 40 or 40. that's it, well, that's it. well, this is a lot and has turned itself into just a dream of millions. and how is it not affected the voice. this is generally how colossal it should be and suddenly she falls in love. uh, in ugly not young being married. well, the pineapple player, too, aristotle, too, was not free by that time, but he was yes, well, he was in a state of divorce and big ones. uh, how to say big upheavals not first love for a second. yes, he had a lot of any. here i am a little bit here always here at this place, well, a pragmatic jacqueline, which we, too, have no less time there. not zero,

there is such an american, very material. here after the president she is, of course, only pineapple, but do you believe in absolutely believe. i know that she was absolutely, not calculating , made them one. they were two greeks, two of the most, so i’m not even talking about the fact that they are famous greeks, but listen, well , they will always understand their own, especially in a foreign land, especially when it was a time of troubles . what a terrible one, this is straight after the war. here, yes, the first years, when, well, it was difficult one by one, but here they are absolutely understandable common childhood. yes one kitchen relatives one language after all. i think language also matters. well, let's get back to the yacht, here on the yacht this is a mystery, this is a mystery, and they soon developed and no longer

hide. yes. already officially she came out as samassis, i completely lost my head in the light of it. people who knew her wrote that if she were a little more cunning, then she would, well, at least slow it down, she wouldn’t tell anyone, she cheated on her husband with anassis, which happens with opera, she wrote to her husband confession in a letter, what allowed him after years. e already, when she was gone . to litigate for the inheritance of her funds and everything else, there was a small piece of paper where she wrote to him that i was leaving everything mine, which means a state of bast. it was just the same momentary impulse that, out of love for him, she and he used this scrap in the first place. yes, i know, i have a letter. dear herbert, what is happening to my mother, i can’t

get away from this, she’s in the hands of ordinary corrupt intermediaries who make money on that the usual fact that she is simply i am the mother of my husband, everyone considers a billionaire , while he has not a single centime of his own. he appropriated everything that i had, not only a house and jewelry for happiness. he had to give up on the idea of ​​getting 50% of my cd sales. someday i'll tell you everything i can only say for eight whole years. i went out of my way to make this marriage real when i discovered that he transferred everything to his name. this turned out to be the last straw. yes of course you agree that before i didn’t have a very happy expression on my face, didn’t they even mention it in the press, and the journalists started arguing, why and what goes wrong for me, these are all said. i think larisa no , she was not happy with him. she was not happy with him, like cherno, it seems to me, well

, even if today, well, looking around , where there is money there are big problems, especially in relationships i say again, it is very hard to love to keep believing. uh, when next to earn do not know to eat. uh, huge fortune. she was constantly on tour, but he went everywhere with her, if you mean her husband and they didn’t let him go somewhere alone, by the way, she performed in the subway. well, after all, she wasn't a belashvili who depended on her master, you know, for a bowl of soup, she didn't have to pretend to be in love. she immediately became, uh, a very wealthy woman, as soon as she started drinking on the big stage, they immediately had contracts, and she didn’t have the same fate, you know, a periodic stove. in the cabaret, then there was no one to replace for her. this one here's an operetta story.