let's say, accordingly, i, for my part , see that now people have already begun to trust more. and well, if someone wants to speak out, he can speak out a fine we have, but our penalty for negative statements not in terms of the quality of work, anyone can say that i didn’t like the quality there, we will contact the troops there to consider moments, but we have there is unfounded criticism there, and, as it were, underestimating some of the dignity and other things. we have fines, and the ftc works very well for us. we have a suspension more than for half a year of football subjects, that is, it cannot be said that we do not protect referees, it is simply impossible to discuss it in the khl at all. yes, we can’t criticize, going beyond certain moral standards, if people feel then that they have certain support, they begin to work calmly, as soon as people start to twitch, like zero, well, as in any job, any less, let’s say, starts to worry and anyway , do something wrong in sports, especially if you watch it in hockey. everything is very simple there is a rule in the summer. accepted. well we've been there for a long time

maybe a story. we have a working group , then we send clubs to vote for this or that rule in the khl, and then we insert these rules only then and make them new and send them through the federation to the ministry of sports. that is, we ask the opinion of the clubs, how they want to see certain rules, that is, we offer them a menu, we do not. something recently last year from myself. that's how they will say yes, that's voted. this is how it will be. that's how they took everything under the visor, let's go eat football, as far as i i understand that this is not at all impossible. we have a single fap legislators they develop the rules and directive down i can say that there is some truth in this, because the football rules are so complicated due to the interpretation of the game by the hand of martial arts. uh, what if we start, uh, each federation contributes something? all the same, there are european competitions, in which i hope the referees and clubs will return. uh, conditionally

sergey karasev, because he makes a decision in seconds. or are you from the beardless. he is unlikely he will be able to uh live by the same rules in russia and in some critical situation not make a mistake in europe or vice versa . i think more than any practically international competition is valued for hockey players both in terms of earnings and prestige and everything, and so on and so forth, the russian championship has a position in the personnel markets of the world and so on, it ’s different there. therefore, we have, well, a subordination system. just another european cup. champions league is well, top competition. where everyone strives, therefore, naturally, those who form this competition, they form the rules of the game for us , they are brought to them in a different way. i think it simply cannot be alexey anisimov, who has been a leader for 7 years. seventh seventh run ahead. i will be grateful. in the candidates hockey league football leaders, and refereeing this time in the family even i'm even afraid

to imagine how much i don't remember, i don't remember everyone, why is this happening? well, here, what can be said with the khl, construction began earlier according to new corporate principles, and it came to a certain system that already works there, well , more stable. in our country, too, this happened to us, even if the leaders change, but the composition of the department does not change as such, and we will already say. so, if we assume that i am conditionally leaving. another person comes, which we believe that we have achieved the most important thing, we already have, in principle, the algorithms that have been developed, which are embedded in advertising in digitalization , the root elephant will not happen somewhere else, that is , a person will not come who will say, and now we we will doing it there is completely different. it's just that people don't quite understand. i think uh in judging how uh? coaches conditionally hired slutsky goncharenko and he comes and the team.

suddenly shoots up hmm in refereeing. well, our practice is to say that this does not change. and all the fans have the feeling that if a football referee makes a mistake, he always makes a mistake in favor of someone, that is, the conversation is only about the fact that this is not a mistake with people. and this is a mistake in favor of some team, that is, it is determined says why is this happening? how do you think? and this is a long road that has not yet begun today. it started from there from the back and so far. eh, that mentality won't change. it will continue, and in order to change it , you need to take certain steps, including, well, again, you can’t say that to paulo rfu and many leaders, as i see it, in order to change it for people, you need to show that this is not so . he made a mistake, because not because he wanted to help, supposedly. if you take it because he didn't, a step to the left according to the method, a step to the right did not

tell the swarm at the right moment, his side assistant did not tell him to look for it. here are the errors. and as soon as everyone starts looking for mistakes in this, everything will probably be different, but, so that they don’t think about him, he must have a good salary. and he must understand where he is going, you understand , he must understand that if he judges without errors, then the department will be happy and the fans will discuss beautiful goals. now, what is the main story? you just need to get away from the discussion to judge. yet again. i say, how we try to do it, we try to do as much as possible so that it is just people. well, you can say, to some extent tired. well, that is , we didn’t think of what you want, we explained everything to you, we are not a black room. here's how it's received. here's how we work. here's what these referee looks like. this is how they discuss during the match. i think that according to our metrics, kuyan is now due to these war negotiations that are published, i think that he has one of the best in the rpl,

because we do not have many players who are perceived positively as well as he and our task is just to create a positive name, so that when it arises, here is some kind of situation, distrust all trust resources. i even have such a cool guy. we believe him. he is his, we understand him, we know him, he made a mistake, he made a mistake. it is not used there on its know. let's talk hockey. can i ask, please tell me. please, how many years can you comment from the sixth year sixteen years in 16 years, have you ever heard that some team after the game skala we won today because the judges helped us. for once i can say that the coach from and the players can smile sarcastically and say that yes , today about any sport, i say, not only, and now we are not our sports at all. no one will ever say that, that is, when people say, now they are there in this or that sport, they helped us. then others come down and say listen, we

won today not because we played well uh-huh, but because he helped us in striped any commentator. you will be told that if he sees three removals in a row from one team. then the fourth with a 95% probability the team will have another not a fact, the second moment, which you also perfectly understand that if there is an ending to the match and if this is even more so the playoffs, then well, you don’t need a referee there. well, as we say, you need to have your head torn off, so that there is a removal, nothing glows at all. that's where the line is, look. i'm so good. you see, he will say, well, you fell. she also has such a thing, like a handle with a concept gay management, but there is it we didn't have, probably three or four years. now it is slowly returning, because we have, uh, the leaders asked for such a story that, according to the principle of how much there is, let's actually sail the overseas league. we do not hide with whiskey in one place, how they burn there when the head comes off. uh-huh . so we have a single line. this is a single

line. next comes the pilaf and the teams all know it. and this is still more your subjective assessment, of course, this is a convenient expression for commentators and for the audience, when they gave three , well, now they will give it always happens, but if you look at the fine, maybe we don’t have two by 10 two by 12. you just need to take statistics, because the game is such a sport, if two equal teams play, approximately always in terms of skill level and there will be 4x4-6 on four eight on 10 rarely, as there are, yes, moments when two equal teams, but one here mess around today, and they will have 2 x 10 there, and there are such cases, of course, but at the same time you you yourself say that there is a concept. here is the feeling that it looks like three, then already, well, in simple terms. what is game management, we all understand that the price of a mistake in the last 5 minutes with a score of 2-3-01. she is different. and, of course, it's philosophy. it is grafted, of course, when the game starts and some kind of removal comes there. it gave him. no one will remember him, and you, even if you get into this game, you understand, that is, you got in and gave there 50

to 50, how is she joking segti? uh-huh not in fifty in fifty o'key you gave. well, everyone understands everything beginning of the game. but if you give a removal that nets fifty in the last 5 minutes, then you lay down. on the ticket table let's call it a party card. do you have an explanation why in football they took var for so long and already when they accepted it, it just doesn't help the game. now, because, because football is a more conservative sport, because ah, unlike hockey. if we need to move forward, as paul said, we make a decision much faster. that is, we sit down, we have a philosophy. we say everything rules are written in favor of the attack, next year. we will also have a new rule in favor of such hockey will be even faster and more dynamic.

and if pavel needs a task, he needs to do it in favor of an attack, there is something pavel cannot do, they have certain limits, maybe, and i heard that our needlework, maybe they wanted to enter hell, but they could not to lead there for these, for these, for these reasons, the same thing as i told you before the transfer that it’s a matter of time when their football referees will explain their microphone solution. yes, they will do it without options, it will already be here. yes, of course, yes, because there are no options, because people need to know everything here and now. that is, i why then i will go to the stadium? why are we coming to this if i have to? well, if i can sit down at the tv and they will explain everything to me. hmm but anyway, any gravity sport should be watched live, no matter what it is, and the video assistant referee is really such a rather curious topic from the point of view that it seemed to everyone this is an absolute panacea that is here. well, yes, the judge may make a mistake, but his colleague will sit, who will have 18 monitors. he will see. this mistake will be corrected, but in fact it's not only in

russia, it's just that at the world championships they saw so many completely inexplicable decisions of the judges who are sitting in front of the monitors. you can explain to us why. we all studied, just different times, please, from that moment. i think the experience of exams is the most vivid experience in life that a person has is when you prepared. these are exactly the situations of a child when you are conditionally prepared, not ideal, but you taught, you come to the exam, and you are experiencing this important situation for you. and this is the feeling of the brain of humanity, which drives you into a trap. you say yes it's two times two is four. or maybe five. if this is adrenaline and so on for you, well, this is a property of the brain that starts looking for you arguments for this or that how it happens when a judge comes, uh, to the monitor, firstly, there are human relationship. you want to support yours, uh, of course, well, yes, the situation there is normally 50 to 50. i probably see the criteria in favor

of this one moment. that is a black and white situation. well, it seems to me that we, well, not so much just have not yet super-trained inexperienced orbiters. they make these mistakes. this is one of the natures of very experienced referees. who the fat is? it seems to me that they don’t have so many mistakes like that, they happen. but this is usually connected, well, with your understanding. that's the moment i understood everything, being also in a nervous situation much more interesting happens with us from the moment to improve, when already the chief arbitrator comes to the monitor. uh-huh, and it would seem in the obvious for all situations leaves his decision in force. this is what it already looks like for everyone. not really. it’s understandable. and we’re just getting into it, and i have an assumption that this is due precisely to the fact that the judges, since intellectual people begin to calculate in their heads that the moment 50 to 50 changing the decision is minus 0.5. anyway i leave the old ones, maybe they will support them

too, but there is a bonus, there is a rating and so on, that is, they do not think about the game. they think how their work is evaluated unconditionally. when we speak, we are in this pressure that is created around them. it no longer only means when the club shows against the pressure that it will be in him to enjoy. you might just be under stress. that's just to fall into this trap and make the wrong decision, which is difficult to explain, when he will evaluate the same moment with a colleague. looking just there getting ready for the match on tv in the room on the bed. he will say easily, only you are on this stress, you just have to, well , not many people have work related to stress. they experience this moment for them, it was once in the eleventh grade, or at the university, and since then their life has been going to some kind of knurled sequence, and they think that any decisions are made. well , it’s relatively easy for those who are engaged in some kind of project work, for whom constant d2 calls and so on, these people do not have question. how can you make the right decision just recently there was a precedent in league e will not be discussed. i'm just going to go to

this agreki, maybe you haven't heard the head coach of the weak lokomotiv did not deliver. yes, you know the game, yes, that is the story. yes, they put the game of the goalkeeper's son and mogu papa the stage could against each other. play it would be history. he said it's not show business. hockey. this is a completely different story, and in the refereeing of the khl there is the concept of a war room. for me, this military rhetoric has always been incomprehensible. why why it is clear that this is a club, that this is show business , some sort of gain. well, why in hockey? that's exactly what uh, well, how would such a military vector be, this is a game. yes, you can’t imagine denisov everything ingenious is simple in general from the very beginning. she. e, when they looked, when they created it a long time ago, well, var- lum was called, yes, then it somehow happened, or we were called military slang a couple of times and since then it has been military. and when she was already in the military, like at one time, there was even a meeting with the hand of the driver saying, well here you somehow rename it there, well, not

the military there, situational and some other, that is, nowhere in the official documents. it is a video viewing room. well, imagine every time the room says video views. well, imagine how he says, here, and now the judge will go through the military, specially trained people are going on, moreover, no one knows them if it's wet. yes, of course, the room, we always announcers represent the arbitrators in the field, then we introduce the arbitrator in the war, which helps the military. well, actually paul rights. there sit the generals who manage the processes. what is why? this is a fundamental difference in hockey. firstly, we have not published for a long time. uh, the hilts of hockey clubs don't know who judges them. they have not been excited about this for a long time already. that is, they know. they find out when people go out an hour before the game, this and that, not always, because, well, when they already go out or already the television pops up someone or already, well, you can see who judges these people, they are independent, they obey. and according to the regulations of the main

arbiter. no one should know them, because some pressure should be exerted on them. let people have to sit and calmly make decisions. this, of course, is the difference between hockey and football. and these are the people who work every match. there are five of them every day . well, as a shift, they work for me, yes, and therefore they have no problems, and unlike football. uh, let's say when they make a decision at the request of the coach. and if earlier it didn’t take long, they discussed it with the judge, but now, in order to speed it all up, we guys said. you don't need to talk to him. he just came. you have a solution. you said, he quickly left and announced to everyone there will be decisions to orbit the path of the barbarian. announce the chief judges. you will start very soon. yes, yes, we are just uh, this activity seems to be reasonable to some extent why because it brings clarity clarity, but there are several nuances at the stadiums in russia there are no repetitions, because as far as people will understand it, to be honest, i don’t quite understand sure. i'm not even up to myself personally

i fully understand the position of the ministry of internal affairs in this case . why? because everyone now has gadgets, in principle, anyway. everyone watches reruns, of course, why can’t they be shown on the monitor. well, probably, i think that it will take some time for them to analyze and also some innovations, because when the judge will pronounce his decisions. some of the people we already understand that they did not see at all what happened, how it will all look. well, quite strange. if a person has already looked at the phone, then, as a rule, they have already described in the telegram channels what this solution is and so on, that is, it will be interesting to see how the strapping will do it if they show it with a replay, because the ban on replays is just a requirement, including regulatory bodies and uefab, because it affects safety there, an ambiguous moment some debatable how it looks like. it is very interesting. it seems to me that this will be correct. if , again, we are talking about the fact that this is a safety issue, then replays are introduced in hockey. yes , and now on hockey you can see. what happened, as i understand it, yes, but not all

cities fall into it. well, we ourselves have withdrawn from the initiative. this is the departmental continental hockey league. who wants to participate in the experiment, so that we show all the removals and everything that the judges look at moscow military room and 12. we thought that the club of clubs would be less, well, 12 out of twenty-two clubs would be we want to show. it's great. this is cool. let's watch the security guards pavel says that the security guards are not happy with the security requirement, because the cost of fines is high if foreign objects are flying pieces from rockets, i once flew in when i condemned a piece of a rocket. well, there was, well, a piece of a small rocket, when azgan judged the gestures, and there is not far from the baikon, well, about 200 km. this was such a good city. yes, if you digress, there is a small one. well, there was a piece of the rocket. it costs some money. according to the regulations, we always have quite large ones. but look , paul has already said that the man who

sits in the stadium. he must not be harmed. what's the difference, he goes into the gadget and looks at the same thing, and here's a simple picture quickly goes, the repetition of a difficult solution is watched there for 5 minutes. and here they are, poor fellows, sitting there, then there is no internet, then something else , and here they sit and suffer, they don’t know how to entertain the director in ptsk, he doesn’t know which grandmother to show, how she sits, knocks with a ratchet there, but here everyone is revealed on the scoreboard. and you can sit quietly discussing and understanding how this or that decision is made, and i will say more i have. i am an optimist in this regard, when they show certain deletions, which are basically, well, of course, the court is mistaken. they there are no correct questions, but the game fans will have fewer questions. they will think and understand, because we are already in hockey. uh, the tv picture is on the bench, where the coaches stand and all the repetitions are repeated. they turn their heads with hockey players. they see. why the fan should be deprived, he came to look, he came, he found a business to look. yes, you need

to fulfill the essence of energy. he needs to scream. this is what a good story is right, but if he sees that there was a deletion, but it was we understand and understand that we will get problems when i am in this removal. no, we understand this, but we will now look at the experiment for a month for pilaf and then we will come to the club again and ask the guys, after all, what do you want, but in our rules it is clearly stated that, if one of the players starts, that is, if in football this will show on the scoreboard or run, listen, here is the monitor, here we have clearly spelled out 2 minutes at once. that is, it is not a one-way road. two way road, players. must understand that yes, judging such same. well, the same people. they are wrong. you need to mind your own business as the main coach . the caries coach says that when i go to toronto, i know perfectly well how it will be judged there. and what is there to expect? correctly , i understand that the football players and hockey players of judge yes come under the same pressure in st. petersburg. in

st. petersburg, yes, and in moscow, any big club. uh is under pressure. but it's like a given, which i think is absolutely stupid to deny. this is connected with media and which accompanies the club, which can put pressure if zenit have spartak have cska have locomotive dynamo well krasnodar in rostov competent services that work. well, you are in any city. i do not think that to come to rostov and in his georgievich. we can leave somehow. so uh without nervous shocks hmm i don't think it's connected exactly there somehow with them there zenith actually addresses about refereeing quite rarely. well, what is not strange? no , i can't say it's not weird. well, their objectivity is stronger than many clubs, they have a lead. i think if there was a situation such that they would not be there plus two points or minus two points, the situation would change, no matter how significantly.

i can’t say that they helped zenit in some match there or something else, they took all their points there, if we can watch the last matches with spartak they have there, on the contrary, there were some questions about refereeing, but they are connected with key decisions, so this is a conditionally defined myth that zenith has some kind of exclusive relationship. i have to him or the judges have. uh, everyone in the subcortex can't get away from this unwillingness to make an inexplicable decision against a big club is exactly what we do, so that the decisions are still made right, because when choosing , you yourself understand that making a decision is a wrong mistake to make in relation to a small club. well, no matter how unpleasant it will be, the deuce is all the negative consequences, understandable bonuses and so on, but against a big club. this is also a plus there for a week of the head river and everything else after roman barychevberg went down from the bed to the bench it became easier to judge in st. petersburg after

roman borisovich shooter went down from top to bottom, our ska team is in third place in terms of the number of penalty minutes. and he answered your questions to the question that he does not play does not play in the majority, but not easier. and you know, both easier and not easier, firstly, he gains experience. i'm talking about staff now. yes, you can see how when he was just starting, how he behaved on the bench, as now and then completely two different people, what was at the beginning now. well, it's plain to see. well, it's like an experience. and then, uh her line of conduct is his. maybe there he doesn’t run around the shop and doesn’t scream, doesn’t get indignant. there, in rare cases, he asks simply to explain this or that decision, but after talking with the guys. they say that the limit is correct. and even sometimes, maybe even joke with them. there , a fan ran out in kazan, when you remember, peter played in kazan, they lost, the fan ran away, in my opinion, and roman borisovich

of the main one, says some kind of gesture. he says to remove. well, that is, such good ones you know. good working relationship no with this and we, unlike football. they have 4-5 clubs there, and everyone understands that this pool will play. uh, first place we have a sufficient number of clubs, which if we take it now, if you take the table this year, yes, that is, we have it in the east. so it's just incomprehensible there, any of the six clubs has never been like this, never in siberia in the first place. well, i don’t know. if you don’t want to offend siberia with football, i don’t know, probably, like, uh, well, something good is average. this is on the table rostov confidently goes in first place and, moreover, they are clapped in turn by all the leaders who come to him. well, yes, probably, so rostov yes, not with those players, well , everything is with the extra class players, but here, uh. you have e every year the number of applicants, it increases. and now it's there 10-12. we have already said that for me, again

, such militaristic rhetoric about the war room is strange. there is another phrase that brings football to the brink of the game. lie detector, correctly i understand that all this is atavism. and this, then, to which we will never return. well, never say never, you understand how it is that for some reason we fixate a little bit on the wrong, we have a problem. eh, it exists in football. uh, the case of the seagull that has been brought to court is negotiating. there are guilty and so on, so to say that we will never have this problem. well i think it would be a hypocritical match. yes , match-fixing will come and refereeing and so on. we have referees constantly excluded, mostly young ones due to problems with rates. well, no matter how we stick it out, because it negative side of our life, but also to say that i absolutely believe that we will not have these problems, but now we have it. well, it's

not mine, it's deportation due to the game this year we had another one. or rather, last year. here in the fall one arbitrator was ruled out the splash screen. there were even two or three. we are constantly doing this disciplinary code. uh, i don't know, was the ethic invented for the studio accepted. we are engaged in this work and in this case, no matter how the oligarchs are, as the main problem there, that we we are still holding him for entertainment, that it will not be his. the phenomenon remains to be checked anyway. there will be no polygraph. well , for now, at least i'm so. why didn't you want to be tough? see? we have a different approach, how similar it is, i will tell you, as leaders, how i see it. i, if you give a contract to a person, then you trust him. don’t give him a contract then, i reason like this, because the built system in hockey is made in such a way that it follows him, the military room checks his total control, which cuts moments on him, then we look at all this, if

an inspector is present at the match, the inspector checks him after these moments, the director of the refereeing department should issue him something and another plus. if it's something like that, let's say, god forbid , it's resonant and i'll check it out. that is , he has such total control and such a number of cameras. we have our own google video system, unlike football, and take it and do it cut and understand the apology, where he made the wrong decision, let's say so elementary, but it will be necessary now such suicidal judge to take, well just even think about it and we have no problem. with this we do not speak, but the handle of the clubs. uh, they killed us, they nailed one question from their ripper. why wrong? uh, it's, well , it seems to me that in people it undermines the trust somewhere. definitely, i understand this, pavel , why does he say this? it's not his desire to come, polygraph as a leader? you did not come, he said everything from tomorrow. everything on the polygraph is not. and it's probably more than that. well, they have

a system. we have something else, we even have judges banned social networks. they don't even have instagram, and everyone was grateful to me when we banned instagram so we could have more free time. they don’t have instagram we are in pilaf when we are gathering offspring, and we say, don’t read, uh, soviet newspapers, there aren’t any before lunch, don’t read any appetite, so here our podcast is called football, not hockey and hockey football. today we have united hockey into football. why is the shirt wearing hockey? moreover , football is not hockey just from the number of people involved, football is a cheap sport, which everyone is doing. it seems to me that this is the most important difference of his therefore, popularity is here, well, the most lying on the surface alexey why hockey football? i agree with pavel about the fact that their sport is simpler, but, in a word, the mentality is beautiful. pavel kamantsev refereed hockey bosses in our

country. thank you very much for your time. what is this girl and where does she live? what if

she doesn’t smoke, what if she doesn’t drink, and we will take such a company. let's take a seat, quell, dress beautifully, speak beautifully and heal paranoia and 19, but we will take you with such mugs, and we will take a seat, hello on the perch, my years are already somehow good. yes, guys , the main question on our agenda is, after all, who is alice zhen, well, this is a symbol of unblemished

beauty. and uh wisdom. i think, that is, uh , long before the term healthy lifestyle uh, alice appeared and she suggested to us the right path not to that, to a happy long life not to drink and not smoke. here, yes, so well, who is this? masha knows everything everyone knows. yes? mash makar masha and bears yo cool masha me. i look at you to me can't believe it. how many years have i known you, and you are still the same, only your hair is getting longer. the first time we got to know your hair is absolutely. that's for sure. the first time i saw it on tv too. well, i've seen it somehow. that's exactly the famous clip that was filmed there in india, remember. well, that hairstyle had hidden potential. yes, i know, i had friends. little girls they all cut their hair. here, right under the car in front, you still have to choose, either a bald head,

or a stomach, you need something like that, zhenya is also all the same hairstyle is the same e evgeny fiklistov the leader of the group the end of the film thank you i also adore juha, guys, adored, people adore my work and yours and yours are no longer easy. i hope to be not an extra element. i am konstantin mikhailov, television and radio hosts with thirty years of experience, many do not live as long as i already do all this and i do not regret anything , yes, today we are talking about the distant year 2002, when, let's say , the star factory was formed. this year what else happened this year mtv absolutely transformed into this year ort has become the first channel.

estimate a lot more interesting things happened this year, and we'll talk about it all the question to fill you, dear friends, what from uh let's say the brightest phenomena of show business, but you already existed by this time in 2002, as you already closed at all, and you are not. and we just had shootings for 2002 , there were shootings, by the way, just on channel one with a song and it was, it ended right away with congratulations from the president and the first song of 2002 sounded with alice's song and with all the politicians there was gorbachev, zhirinovsky there, everyone was in the frame, i threw it there. i remember that we passed, how it happened that i threw flowers into the valley. i actually threw. and completely different flowers for another shooting day. so it was such a year here, i still remember that in 200 there is no ear, they don’t tell you. now i didn't have. they just didn't even say it out loud. there, the chinese flowers along you get into the share

of your song. yeah he's in the valley on no well it was yeah funny but i remember by the way here we are remember for the beginning of the two thousandth for sure. i do not remember, but, in my opinion, back in 2002. and i remember that someone gave me a pager. the pager was completely unnecessary stuff. so nothing at that moment, but we already, as it were, would leave a woman. yes mobile mobile phones appear already there colored with games. it was possible to play some kind of snake or something like that, and then they appeared somewhere, he could dial already without an operator, and then mobile phones appeared, where you could call directly, in general in the nineties me with email note. book, i think what a modern person i am. what do you associate masha with in 2002, please tell me that you had a project masha and the bears closed, but not forever, as life showed for a short time for 4 years, phones died, a mobile appeared,

so 2002. i do not associate nature with any show business in the village. utrish forest, the sea looks so beautiful, you simply extended your life by 4 years. got away from it all. and what were you doing? you just somehow spiritualized something inhaled pure energy. uh, fields of the russian field or something hugged birches, gave there. in short, i was surrounded by beautiful people who, just like me, enjoyed nature and simply lived from the heart. in the forest, they went to the spring for water, set fire to pots, prepared a ride on them, spent the night, slept under the stars.