eat, milk, a bunch of the benefits of milk that binds us. you close the loan with the guaranteed rate service, and the post bank recalculates its supply at 4.5% per annum and returns the difference. come for money post office bank. below level and triple benefit burger king yes hearty lunch now in just 1999 only in beck someone sees a 120 credit card for everything. and i see the possibility of such gifts without interest to buyers, a credit card 120 for everything rosbank is a real

opportunity day after day god is worrying, and habitual actions no longer help to cope with them without sleeplessness. now megamarket will find us multi-bucks, gifts to friends , family and everyone i love, i will buy everything and give cashback from the discount. so many things i give everything i give. all the world me market or rather, well done now mega-magician hand over. everything, everything works out everything. up to 50% discounts on books and board games umka and cars technopark choose everything for a fun game on wildberries , connect the acceptance of payments by qr-code in the tinkoff business application and accept payments via phone or terminal. open account for business, but tinkov.ru receive

credits instantly and without commission. here is one in the region. russia's premiere concert dedicated to the defender of the fatherland day time chose us on february 23 at the first

two new transmitters sounded, according to the nature of the programs, we also assume russians. masses of new people are all very actively moving around the city of resources. for too lacking , we urgently strengthen the police staff with some contacts. so far, it's very difficult to work. too many of them.

what if they're just trying to distract from what? concentrate on old employees?

what does it mean two more from moscow and again without intelligence? why do they think we are here? pavel mikhailovich good afternoon, comrade nazarov good afternoon. hello seagull later, come sit down. well, how to work? what do you work here? that's all, you know that the very top they beat them on the hands. any contacts with the old agents cut off everyone without exception, something traitors, none of them trust the new ones.

how do you like operational work? ivan korovich, i think, just as you study foreign languages ​​full of cherry plum. see young person. we will now go to the tram stop, if he stays with you, take the next tram and come. then take a taxi and go to this

address. and i was sure not. and now i don't

know.

well, again the whole day was absent? where were you? you said not to let the tail behind him . yes, you said nothing was transmitted to moscow either. no, that is, nothing out of the ordinary. there is nothing. unusual just asked for a gramophone.

thank you gramophone.

why are you not my mother. i'm sorry, i can't and no one can, because that because mom can be only one. but she is your father with you. you love him, and i love him, and your mother loved him very much, and

he has a hard job. he needs serious and important help, he needs it to be calm , he needs to do it so that he does not have to worry about us, so that he knows that everything is fine with us. so let's help him, and don't make it even harder for him. and what if they did this and achieved something by storm, so that we would focus our attention on old employees and keep an eye on them?

do you want around the city?

it's a joke.

car

i learned this text like a parrot. i would like to apologize nicely, behave towards you. i came to berlin specifically to tell you that you are very important to us. if you are ready to continue working with us.

the head of soviet intelligence is now in berlin in berlin yes. i think you're explaining the increased activity of the reds. we already have

no photograph of him, but there is a name and a description of his appearance, about 30 years old, high forehead, wide- set eyes. mi anya, i perfectly understand what you are waiting for touching? yes, only the child has the first blood type, and

the man has the fourth this is not his son pregnancy test new series from february 27 on the first good morning. be late bang. natasha gave me these socks.

for order in the house and careful personal care , smart polaris equipment with discounts of up to 50 percent on wildberries park grant and a grant of three cheeses at an attractive price, only tasty and point gave me these socks.

sbermarket is a benefit in every order products from your favorite stores with discounts up to 60 percent sbermarket, delivery is free 1tv cinema presents, let's agree that there will be no work for the next two weeks.

and it's time to move on to decisive action cipher story with the continuation of the law do you have no? the main thing is not to get there, but when it was going to look for us.

silence people will lead us to the most important katran, he is not the joker, he is the king, he called himself that. i know he did it. it's me alexey fedorov, the developer of the first phantom blockchain and quantum algorithms. and this is the moment when i decided to go into science. i read about modern physics and dreamed of closing its blind spots. develop an interest in science from childhood a decade of science and technology on the science of the russian federation on the day of the defender of the fatherland on the first by car

there is an urgent message from a bro in german counterintelligence, an orientation has appeared on you. does he say that perhaps provocation or something even worse is good? yes

, it means here, i urgently need all our options for potential recruitment, so that in an hour it would be clear on my desk that, but you yourself banned all new developments back. i don't. you and i need a new source of serious weight and urgently, and in general, it's time to start thinking with your own head. sorry. this fool has already tortured me to the end. i can't anymore, obviously. i'm here for

an invitation. so you still go, well, i 'll look at the lists for an hour. well, great, otherwise they told me that you were leaving. if i don't show up, i'll be suspicious. alright then, see you tonight.

dear guests, i ask for a minute of your attention. i want to raise this glass to our friends from the soviet for those who tirelessly every day contributes to the strengthening and improvement of relations between our great powers?

please translate my name is not so often. at the reception of this level not big bumps.

finally write down urgently a cipher message to moscow in the center. in the kremlin i'm ready to have reasonable fears, and perhaps the re-recruitment of a comrade fitting. president vladimir putin

made a big game on the air today with a big speech to the federal assembly, the expectations were high and the president lived up to them, but not in the way that some expected , there was no bellicose there was no recognition of any mistakes, there were no sensations, but there was calm confidence in russia and in the course pursued by the president and his government. and most importantly, there was again calm confidence in the progress of the russian armed forces in ukraine. fundamentally new statements in the field of international security, then there was such a statement. it was a statement about russia's decision to suspend. your participation in start-3 in

the strategic offensive arms treaty. let's listen to the usa and nato they directly say that their goal is to inflict a strategic defeat on russia and that after that they are going to drive around our defense facilities, including the latest ones, as if nothing had happened. a week ago, for example, a decree was signed on putting new ground-based strategic complexes on combat duty. they are going to stick their knife there too and think so. we just let them in. in this regard, we will simply be forced to announce today that russia is suspending its participation in the strategic offensive treaty. defeats. i repeat, it does not withdraw from the contract no, namely, to suspend its part.

konstantinovich kosachev, deputy chairman of the federation council, and you do not need an introduction, but let me remind you that when we say, here, and today's speech , you are not just a deputy chairman of the federation council, but you headed the international affairs committee and the federation councils and the state duma in the past, you are a professional diplomat . you worked closely with yevgeny primakov. you are well aware of the history of russian american relations. you know, what is the start-3 treaty and how for many years this treaty was considered very important for the security of russia, and now president putin has decided. suspend russian participation in this treaty. what are your thoughts on this matter, when nv3 was submitted for ratification to the state duma, i was heading the international affairs committee in the lower house. responsible for the preparation of the fortification is usually the ratification of the law of ratification consists of

one of one phrase to ratify. here snv-3 was completely different. it was a multi-page ratification law to multi-page agreement and in the ratification law, like one law described all the possible consequences of all or other actions of the parties to comply with it, or including non-compliance. i would like to emphasize that the then ratification law provided for the possibility of its suspension. in the event of a fundamental change in circumstances, there, in the agreement itself and the verification law, every word is in its place, returning to the agreement itself. absolutely, it assumed a completely different level of relations between the country was supposed to. it's written directly. it is an integral part. the actual agreement, where about e, carriers and

warheads. it says directly that the parties are signing this agreement on the basis that they will cooperate with each other, that they will strengthen confidence measures , that they will, well, relatively speaking, for world peace. what is happening now is a radical change in circumstances, but it is quite obvious that the americans do not behave towards the russian federation as, among other things, a partner, therefore, the agreement, as partners, they set the goal of defeating russia , they set the goal of publicly openly creating all possible problems for russia, whether in the economy, in politics or in the military sphere, and not publicly anymore. they are doing everything to ensure that, within the framework of this agreement, formally, going beyond this framework, secure unilateral military advantages for themselves. this has been happening for many years. i would even say

decades. you wonder why? i'm talking decades. i want to get ready. e. to remind you of one most curious story. this is a speech by vladimir vladimirovich putin the president of the russian federation 16 years ago at the munich security conference, let me remind you, the seventh year - this is before start-3 and the speech were signed and entered into force. here we are talking about sn-2, so this is what the president of the russian federation says 16 years ago. we have agreed with the united states of america to reduce our nuclear potentials on strategic launch vehicles to such and such levels. well, this is already outdated . i'm not talking about this russia intends to strictly fulfill its obligations further we hope that our partners will also act transparently and will not delay. just in case, for a rainy day , an extra couple of hundred nuclear warheads. and if

today putin speaks from the rostrum of the munich conference, the new secretary of defense of the united states here we will be announced that the united states will not hide these extra charges. not in warehouses, not under a pillow, not under a blanket. i invite everyone to stand up and stand up to greet this. this would be a very important statement. there was no such statement from the side of neither new nor aged another minister of defense of the united states of america and all subsequent years the americans were engaged in the fact that they continued to hide a couple of hundred warheads. now according to our experts. this is both the ministry of defense and the ministry of foreign affairs, the americans , by hook or by crook, took them out of the standings, and i remind you that start-3 provides for a ceiling of 700 carriers. for each side , about 100 snv funds. they've already taken them out, they declared them either dismantled or, uh,

reclassified as something else. excuse me for this not exactly military terminology. and they kind of say it doesn't count. well, as children in the sandbox , they approximately announce it. this is not a sandbox. these are not children's games. this is a matter of strategic stability, on which the americans have been violating their obligations under the agreement for many years. and at the same time they are trying to demand from russia that russia strictly fulfill its obligations, including on inspections, as early as february 8th. that's how long 3 weeks have passed 8 2 weeks february 8 the russian side through an official statement. mida warned that this could not continue indefinitely, we see what the americans are doing. we do not accept what the americans are doing and we demand from the americans that they begin to fulfill their obligations under the agreement again and nothing again again ignoring russian concerns and demands

unfounded demands from russia to allow inspectors to our nuclear facilities and, uh, take any other measures to in order for russia to comply with its obligations , a joint one is added to this. now joint statement by the us party to this agreement , france and the uk not party to this agreement. together, demanding that russia fulfill its obligations under the agreement, that is, the position of the three nuclear powers of nato appears, but we will assume that the entire alliance, in what the president of the russian federation quite rightly said today , is a radical change in circumstances since there are direct threats to the strategic balance of nuclear forces, which means national security russian federation and the reaction of the russian side. uh, let me remind you not to withdraw from the treaty, but to suspend it with what are called possible options for subsequent actions, if the americans, uh, return, uh, a sense

of responsibility for their own obligations. well, a sense of self-preservation, uh, in front of the prospect of the destruction of this agreement. although hope. in fact, they are very many. at least the long term, yes. yury nikolaevich vitkin is the deputy chairman of the house defense committees and you are a professional military man, and er, here. i want to ask you from a purely military point of view. do you have any regrets about the suspension of russian participation in this treaty. i don't even ask good this idea is a bad idea. but is there anything that you think russia could really lose as a result of this decision? well, in this case, i probably would not start from the fact that russia can actually lose in this case. it seems to me that even our country acquires it. in this case, after the decision of the president of russia to suspend russia's activities under the csia treaty. i would like

to point out that the contract terminates legal existence. stopped. yes , and now 2026 ceases, of course, we repeatedly correct. e, konstantin iosifovich says that they have repeatedly paid attention to the need to comply and so on. uh, you have to admit that uh from a military point of view. well, you know, uh. we are used to the fact that the army exists there in order to fight . this is understandable, but at the same time we exist in order to ensure a peaceful existence. this is the main thing, she can look, a component and today is not a secret. we we all understand that the two powers are the united states of america and russia, which means, well, in general, it is. such global powers, uh, containing in uh the substantive part within which the dcm3 treaty is enshrined, while uh, it should be noted that e the united states of america constantly, therefore, accusing russia themselves

acted within the framework of these standards. and , of course, uh, not respecting, 167 bass today, as far as i understand, i could be wrong , plus or minus, one figure 167 bass usa they exist outside the country today. i don't accidentally said to the substantive part of the two global states of russia and the united states, because the very combination of these bases already speaks of a military one. e. well, let's say, uh, the military is an aggressively provocative component in relation to the entire world community. eh, at the same time, i'm saying directly, if before the city of the cis implies the obligations of one side of the obligation on the other side, and when the parties , represented in this case by the united states, do not fulfill these obligations, then we should not. as they say be calm, contemplate what u us trying to turn a whipping boy this will never happen and it should be noted that hmm correctly the president told the supreme

commander of russia that you guys are interested. ask a question. not only do they not ask, they demand that the word was even used, it requires compliance with start-3 on our part, while not paying attention to non-compliance with ours. that is, give them the opportunity to check the defense. hence, the corresponding bases. there are ours on our side. give the next flights, there and so on and so forth. well a lot components and, of course, hmm, that the decision of the supreme drug addict was made. we saw today and i was a participant and konstantinovich means when people generally applauded this decision. that says a lot. this does not just say what it means, well, we clapped for the sake of clapping, but because internal and external support for this decision. eh, in my opinion it was. it can be seen that at the same time, it means that i will tell you that within the framework of the message of those postulates

that were designated, in my opinion, one of the components, probably the main practically. this is just the decision to suspend russia in the dcm3 agreement. i talk to several international security experts , and none of them expressed it. sorry, e about this decision. suspend russia's participation in the treaty. and in general. you know, there was a certain sense of relief even among the people, if you want a sense of justice, because given the nature of the relationship, given the way the united states behaves in relation to russia well, the idea is that american inspectors will come to check russian progress strategic weapons. this is somehow , moreover, despite the fact that we are absolutely sure. it is known that the americans

are now not only supplying ukraine with e-arms, and not only sharing with them such common satellite coordinates, so to speak, where what is located, they are engaged in goal setting. they target the ukrainian soldiers who are behind these highmars launchers and so on. they specifically suggest on targets on the territory of the russian federation and then they say, and let's stop by, so to speak, let's figure it out. what is the next goal we will have, there simply cannot be another explanation here, and one more circumstance. i'm sorry, i'll correct you a little. today is not the president. he said that several hundred. e us bases outside. e territories here are the exact numbers. i then checked it out, uh, over 730 of them. this is all around the world, of which 37 are in europe in five countries of allies, us allies

in nato, at six bases there in italy, two in just five countries, six american nuclear weapons are stored on six american bombs. well, according to intelligence experts, in any case, there are anyone else. not just somewhere on the territory of the united states, like ours. we keep our nuclear weapons on the territory of the russian federation, the americans still have american nuclear weapons. at the same time, they are carried far out of the territory of the united states and brought up, which is called as close as possible to our borders, when we talk about danger expansion of nato, when we talk about the danger of permanently deploying significant forces and weapons, which can be more dangerous than american nuclear, e , ammunition located on american bases in the west on the territory of the allied countries, and now let's add nuclear weapons to this

the potential of france and great britain, about which the americans have been stubbornly silent all these years. let's take a look at how they did it. uh, on their terms of extending start-3, in the end this did not happen, but one of the preliminary conditions of the american was the inclusion in this treaty of china with its nuclear potential, because they say it poses a danger, and the french do not consider the americans, and the british do not consider the americans. let's only agree on what is dangerous for us, our beloved americans. there was this verbal nonsense. thank god, so to speak, then. she remained outside the decision of the two presidents. the newly elected biden. and uh, vladimir vladimirovich putin is about to renew without any start-3 conditions whatsoever, but all this was in the americans, then and continues to be still in place to ensure unilateral advantages for themselves. and also load. add. not only russia’s obligations, but also china’s in general, having taken out of

brackets their allies, france and great britain, which have now simply opened up, having signed a joint statement of demands to russia to comply with start-3, let me remind you. to you, that for not even years, but decades, minata have been practicing some kind of joint nuclear missions of the incomprehensible destination. almost all nato countries are non -nuclear, while the nato missions are joint and they are nuclear, and a plus is added to this. uh, it's already there now, uh, the idea that nato is being declared over and over again, at first quiet, and now more and more officially, nato is being declared a nuclear alliance, wow and we should stay within the bilateral treaty. moreover, at the same time, unilaterally comply with it. thank you for your attention, i will not say who is the most interesting, if allowed, it means that the most interesting is me just listened to it recently. now the performance of the canoe has already taken place.

as far as i understand, it means that he noted that he didn’t speak directly about the start treaty, but kosynovosish correctly says that they relocated a number of weapons, which means that the nuclear component of the country of europe is in the immediate vicinity of our border, and biden said that in the event of an attack on one of the countries vlog nato means, but the alliance will use article five. that is, as , roughly speaking, an attack on nato as a whole and who will be entitled to defend themselves, that is, he the subtext already understands that you guys are watching, so don’t cross, as we say now, the red line is biden in relation to us. this is the first second point, but at the same time high-ranking officials. nato has already stated that they are asking for a demand, whatever you want to conditionally call it, to return to our country to the start treaty. so three a, he said that the guys needed from the usa and russia means to renew the treaty before look, while the un’s strange position so i don’t want

to say here that all organizations, but in the face of gutesh, which means, which today, uh, well, in my opinion, in every day. with each step, he shows more and more a certain position, a subjective look in relation to our country in relation to the united states in relation to ours negatively towards them, as they say, to some extent , positive it has been repeatedly said that the us is not fulfilling its obligations, that it is fulfilling its obligations. but all these, uh, he means, as they say, they looked through their fingers at all this happening, therefore, uh, in my opinion taken quite seriously , a rather seriously important decision was made precisely to ensure the security of our country within the framework of the suspension. uh, russia's actions before the city, i have my own attitude to this. i am not an arms control specialist. i look at it from such a broader political perspective. i remember

hearing in the united states senate believe it or not in 1973 about the first strategic arms limitation treaty and, uh, a number of committee members. senate international affairs there were serious questions. how can you, uh, uh, enter into an agreement of this kind, and with a country like the soviet union, a country that , uh, helps vietnam kill u americans, and , as it were, with a country with which the united states had a stable tradition in the division and henry kinchenger, who was not then secretary of state. he was assistant to the president for national security. he said that we had been carefully preparing this treaty for a number of years. we believed very difficult

negotiations with the soviet country, but we had it is not easy to find any general solutions. we found them a compromise in this treaty. they are all perfect, but this is among other things mutual trust. creating a climate when we can work together on other issues key in what kisinger said was a contribution to an atmosphere of mutual trust. and now, when this atmosphere of mutual trust today , from my point of view, completely ceased to exist, when the biden administration does not even try to pretend that they somehow respect and take seriously russian arguments. i do not want to say something about chronicity in these circumstances, to have an agreement is one of the goals of which mutual trust is not.

with all due respect to henry kissinger, i would argue with his then interpretation. uh, the reasons, uh, the appearance of the first, uh, agreement of treaties on strategic e-arms in the seventy-second year, from my point of view , the reason was exactly the opposite . the union did not yet have that destructive force, which, well, could completely destroy this or that country. they destroyed nagasaki. sorry in reverse order, but it was one way or another with everything. the monstrous scale of the corresponding catastrophes, nevertheless , is the sixty-third year of such a localized e-regional use of atomic weapons. just recently , on the sixtieth anniversary of the sixty- third year, we recalled the appearance of the hydrogen bomb , the thermonuclear bomb. as where already the power

was measured not in kilotons, but in megatons and the risks that, as a result of the use of this new type of weapon, sakharov then, so to speak , was horrified by what he invented to carry. uh, together with colleagues , the use of these weapons would definitely have completely destroyed the territory of the united states of america of the soviet union there, and anyone else very quickly led to the fact that the first, uh, agreement appeared first. e prohibition of tests in three areas. this is the same sixty-third year. the first treaty in the sphere of control, let's say over weapons, and preparations began for an agreement that would er to balance the strategic offensive expressions in what suddenly turned out to be a complete demon. have uh, 10 or 100 uh more nuclear warheads there. it turned out to be completely pointless. eh, the guarantee of mutual destruction and all the trust that follows from this, from my point of view , appeared a little later, like some kind of such a

beautiful one. uh, a beautiful framework for realizing completely just plans to prevent a nuclear conflict with its well-known devastating consequences. here is further. yes indeed element of trust. began to become more and more significant and the missile defense treaty, destroyed by the americans and the treaty of conventional armed forces in europe which is in an adapted form. so they entered into force, russia ratified it, let me remind you, because not a single nato country has ratified it and the treaty on intermediate and shorter-range missiles was destroyed by the americans and the treaty on open skies was destroyed by the americans. they were all based on horses in one way or another. well, mutual deterrence once, but mutual trust two and here i would quote kissinger with great pleasure, but indeed they were all consistently destroyed by the americans for one reason. they suddenly realized that it was. god be with him with this balance

of power. we are realistically able to achieve a unilateral military advantage over russia over china over anyone else who will be challenging us, so to speak , and therefore us americans. here is the whole system of agreement in the sphere. uh, no longer needed in arms control. and if now russia reacts to us actions, they suspended their participation in this treaty. to be honest, i would predict that the americans would have found the opportunity to somehow destroy it sooner or later, and in fact, this was already happening . yes, well, this is a fact, but they would have been before yura and they would have also put him under the knife and p- from this point of view. he will now say a very important thought. pay attention, the president of the russian federation today announced not the withdrawal from the agreement to suspend our participation in it, because we are still interested in that it is preserved, but not on the same conditions on which it lived to the present day. it is in conditions of absolute

equality of parity and transparency of the actions of the parties and ensuring guaranteed mutual security. well, along with confidence-building measures, until the americans begin to do their part of the job of preserving and observing this treaty, a return to it from my point of view is absolutely impossible, which i’m talking about, 50 years ago, there were very complex contradictions in relation to very large, and trust there was no question of trying to install it in the process of work, but uh, i'm sure you understand the difference between how the diplomats of the two sides worked, then and today at dobrynin and even his deputies yulia vorontsova which they knew well they had free access. the white house is not only dobrynin regularly. he met with president nixon, but in the absence of

dobrynin, vorontsov met with the president. i mean, not in a group, but came to him to discuss how to find some general solutions. so, when today the russian embassy in washington is practically isolated, when they refuse to work together on almost any issue, when russian diplomats are denied any access to the united states . some kind of ability. work together, but i want to declare to you now with sovereignty that the united states has some level of confidence in the russian authorities. i can now prove to you on one very short example sunday. the us authorities got in touch with

the russian government and informed that president biden would go. right now from poland to kiev by train. you understand that it would not be difficult to make this train. well, let's just say it didn't make it. or not even cause any damage to the american president, but simply put him in a very awkward position, just information in advance, but in the fact that there are absolutely such plans and thus , so to speak, further so more decisive just to make this information public, yes, and and the american side asked that this information not be disclosed, and the russian side agreed and did not disclose it. and when the russian side, as you know, konstantin is better than me, when the russian side spoke in

confidence with their american colleagues, the next day. this appeared on the front pages of american newspapers, and with great artistic exaggeration. well , nothing, for me there is no surprise. uh, here, where the slogan is proclaimed, the actual exclusivity ends any trust ends any equality ends any prerequisites for cooperation, because a country that considers itself exceptional, and this is the official position of the united states that the americans are exclusive to them, the law is already unwritten. they will demand indefinitely from any other partner states to comply. moreover, it is desirable to attract those obligations by overfulfilling the plan, but they will never consider themselves bound. whatever the obligations, what is allowed to jupiter was not allowed to the bull, and so further and the like. here, from my point of view , is the root of all problems in general in modern

international relations. if soon denoted in one word. here you have been thinking for a long time what word i would use in order to designate the essence of all. problems well, the source of all problems in today's world is inequality. this is the side that allows for not just inequality, but they are proud of it.