any prerequisites for cooperation are ending, because a country that considers itself exceptional, and this is the official position of the united states that the americans, exclusive to them, the law is already unwritten. they will demand indefinitely from any other partner states to comply. moreover, it is desirable to attract those obligations by overfulfilling the plan, but they will never consider themselves bound. whatever the obligations, what is allowed to jupiter was not allowed on the bull, and so on and so forth. from my point of view root, in general, of all problems in modern international relations. if soon denoted in one word. here you have been thinking for a long time, what word would i use in order to designate the essence of all problems. well, the source of all the problems of today's world is inequality. here some side allows for itself. not just inequality, but they are proud of it. they consider it their

achievement, they consider it a tool for the realization of those who do not agree with this. they consider, by definition, a threat to the established world order, but this should stop so that russia can return to this treaty and generally have a constructive relationship with the united states. and now we are leaving for advertising and in a few minutes we will talk about the american one. the answer to president putin will be answered, which was given, and by the president, who managed to return from kiev to poland on the day of the defender of the fatherland on the first 432 20 rs fire. it's impossible to just break it to win and now we really see it all, it's something great. what could you touch? become something

more than you could achieve on your own. every person who is there is changing for the better. suddenly it is known in trouble; it is known again in battle; there you can’t lie. you can't cheat there. the first car will come out here and the second car will work. here comes the tank into position. yes, looking for a target. here is a shot, how long they did not come out against us. we have always won, we know how. we are the descendants of the great rare winners and this means the premiere of a special reportage hero on february 23 at the first c on february 25, and today

lavance mascara for 590 rubles. rondell coffee machine with a 40% discount start accepting payments via qr-code in the tinkoff business app and accept payments via phone or terminal. open an account for business at tinkoff.ru, get instant credits and no commission. here 's one love fast. love long. love sweet, we are talking about sleep. what did you think about? you can fall asleep in just 20 minutes, sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily, in the morning sleep lovers addiction february, and today quality toys. sees credit card 120 on everything, uh i see the possibility of a credit card. get 120 days

for everything already in rosbank and you can get a smart column such as gifts without interest. buy. translate shoot a column, win, 123, rosbank credit card 120 for everything rosbank is a real opportunity. and today a 15% discount on hair sprays is a new swivel oak nozzle with two types of spray aqualor breathe the energy of the ocean.

divided by only one my basket 169 rubles. from february 25, and today the new professional sea buckthorn from nature siberika with discounts up to 55% and the polaris robot vacuum cleaner with a discount from 55%. do you know that tinkoff investments has a social network for investors, matvey subscribed to high- yield investors and earns like they do? install the tinkoff investment app and earn the largest social networks for investors. he is so alone. yes, yes, father light, premium to you from me. why are you 6 months old, what is 12 you are also 12. it's just my assistant messed up something, don't worry, i like her less mts premium universal gift for every online cinema ion 50 gb internet book service line mts music. with

love diapers panties yoko-san for 1.099 rubles. write benefits in the search bar, look for different discounts. from february 25 to march 4, grab your phoenix smartphone for 5.99 rubles. set of dishes. skova for 599 rubles. washing gel two pieces for 199 rubles. on the air of the big game, we are discussing

president putin's address to the federal assembly. and now we want to talk for a few minutes about a very peculiar thing. the response that was actually given to president putin by president biden, who is now in arkave for me one of the most interesting statements of president biden is that i am now quoting the war. never necessary. this is the tragedy of the president. putin decided to start this war president putin according to biden. decided to start this war. well, in general, if biden was aware of what the president said today. you are putin. i think he would at least constantly try to give a more detailed explanation of his point of view. let's

listen to what putin said on this issue, who and how started the war even before the start special military operation. negotiations were conducted from kiev with the west on the supply of air defense systems and combat aircraft and other heavy equipment to ukraine. we also remember the attempts of the kiev regime to acquire nuclear weapons. after all, the united states spoke about this publicly and nato quickly deployed its army bases near the borders of our country, secret biolaboratories in the course of manners mastered the theater of future military operations, prepared ukraine, which was enslaved by them, subject to the kiev regime, for a big war and today they admit it. they also admit it publicly openly. not embarrassed, they seem to be proud of being killed by their treachery, calling both the minsk agreements and the normandy format a diplomatic performance, damn it, it turns out

that everything at the time when it burned, donbass , when blood was shed, when russia is sincere. i want to emphasize that it was sincerely striving for a peaceful solution. they played on people's lives played, in fact, as they say in well-known circles. i swear, you uh for the entire period after the fourteenth year. and after the legitimate government was overthrown in kiev, you were very busy active international relations and know well. and what did russia do about the crisis in ukraine can you say that a russia did not try to find a peaceful solution?

i will undertake to assert that the preservation of the territorial integrity of ukraine until the fourteenth year with crimea and sevastopol until the year 22 with the donbass is not the merit of ukraine, it is our merit, it is the merit of the russian federation, because we sincerely tried to help our ukrainian brothers and sisters, our neighbors, starting from the moment collapse of the soviet union and more 1991, well, fine. we understood in russia how unfair the division of ukraine and russia along soviet administrative borders was. everyone knew very well the history of crimea, the glorious history of sevastopol, but we went for it in order to support the statehood of ukraine although i think that many people , in any case, those who know their history had a heartache, starting from that moment, and then between the ninety-first ninety-second and 14 i say this, as at that time a deputy of the state duma, we received hundreds, and maybe thousands of appeals from residents

of the crimea and sevastopol help, we do not want to live in this country, which does not consider us its citizens. well, quite a set, so to speak, there, uh, criteria. of what to consider as our citizens, and we can now say, unfortunately, but based on the desire to help ukraine maintain its territorial integrity, we did not respond to these appeals until a coup d'état, a coup d'état took place. we russia tried to the last to prevent the launch of the process along the path of political reform. they convinced yanukovych to take the special forces to the barracks. uh, the street was supposed to move away in response to this, what is called you remember the events of february of the fourteenth year, the guarantees of france to germany and partly to poland, and then, so to speak, everything. a coup d'etat took place against the current government. and i think that we were the only country at that time that tried to save

ukraine from a coup d'état. and thus to prevent that civil conflict, which quickly turned into civil war already in the southeast. ukraine , our attempt was to help ukraine not to take this path, we got up, helped them to become we know who. here they are our american ones, so to speak, there, in quotation marks, partners are further the first minsk agreements, the second minsk agreements of 14 and the fifteenth year. what it is? this is an attempt to help ukraine preserve its territorial integrity. it is clear already without crimea without sevastopol on the conditions that were prescribed there direct dialogue with those regions that did not recognize a coup d'état taking into account their specific interests fixing these specifics. legislation in the constitution to ensure that this is guaranteed to continue, so to speak, e cohabitation in a single

state. there was such a possibility. what is the minsk agreement? this is our contribution to ensure that this scenario does not go into e. let's just say, uh, a full-blown conflict with the worst consequences. and here is until the twenty -second year. we tried to do it. we're the only ones as it turns out now sought the fulfillment of the minsk agreements by kiev, because both donetsk and luhansk understood that there were completely different moods there, but somehow he remained within the framework of these agreements. yes, if they were carried out by kiev , kiev would not fulfill them, as it turns out now , the sponsors of kiev did not even try, kiev to move towards this. and then what happened in february happened. e 2022. let me remind you. there was also an element of our attempt to negotiate with the united states. minat as a whole in terms of security design, where there would be a neutral status of ukraine and i remind you that the neutral status of ukraine is an element

of ukraine's declaration of its independence in the ninetieth year of this declaration of independence in 90-90 and ukraine will be a neutral state. ukraine will be a non- nuclear state and ukraine will be a state that respects the rights of all citizens. regardless of their language , nationality, religion, there, well, and everything else, and this was the norm of the constitution of ukraine for many years. let's not forget that either. that's all we tried to offer the us west and nato well apart from some other elements, it is to return ukraine to its constitutional beginnings to its act of self-declaration of independence. we did not impose anything on ukraine yes and that's it, it was overturned. all. it was not thwarted by us and so on. already. sorry, that's the last option. e end of this war, like today. the president of the russian federation rightly said that the end of a war that was not started by us by force, which is a special military operation, yuri

nikolayevich, i will be the devil's advocate and i repeat. uh, what his advisers say. they say look at russia look at ukraine russia is big ukraine is small and russia has the most modern weapons. and ukraine had an army armed with the current kremlin hands. you are, in general, old, uh, soviet brahl, how could such ukraine threaten russia? it did not threaten russia well, 2014, if we return, again , just a few words, i will say, because the castle was the president of russia in it. uh. indicated that the call was from the united states they say. let's not you will not interfere. neither we, let them sort it out themselves, that's all. it's okay to be

a political follower said, yes, but at the same time we saw clearly. this means that the reception of tasks by the embassy was practically the headquarters of the so-called us ambassador general in ukraine, and so on. this is by the way . why am i saying 2014, because this was the starting point for further actions on the part of the united states and the countries of the nato block on e. well, let's talk about ukraine , the formation of ukraine as a territory from which not only aggressively provocative actions against our country would be hatched. they would simply have made the army of 2014 and the army of today, ukraine, different and we must admit it directly. why is it different because the second side of the nato bloc taught, both on the territory of ukraine and in their countries , the crews of combat vehicles to calculate launchers . so, while uh. giving

weapons corresponding to the armed forces of ukraine in order for them to end up fighting the donbass, which means, well, and later they transferred everything to the territory of our country with the possible capture of the donbass as expected of them, therefore , to say that they expressed roughly, farts today were. yes. uh, so, of course, this is utopia by no means. these are fairly modern types of weapons, well-equipped personnel. tactically prepared, but they did not take into account the main thing today the armed forces of the russian federation they e. we yes means under the unconditional leadership of the high command. we have taken a step forward. but preempting part of the development of the latest types of weapons means strategists. these various weapons and so on, which put, well, the united states of america and, of course , the entire ukraine to a standstill, continuing to some extent and the controversy here, these two words, literally dmitry, if you will, means part of uh, with regards to this

treaties that were in the seventies and etc. the main content part my view of the united states at that time, but today it was traced, uh, to make russia weak, to limit it as much as possible. uh, those types of weapons, where, in general, we are superior to the united states and, of course, proceeding from this, in the future, it means developing tactics for forcing our country in some way. uh, means demands from the united states of america. that's right, we are in the month of december of the twenty-first year. we have sent forward the requirements that are relevant on our part to ensure security regarding, of course or our country. well, not least in the whole world community. where were you? rejected by the united states of america and, of course, the united states increased even more, realizing that the time was coming , perhaps they increased the supply of weapons even more. today you know, the defense component and the military

component as a whole consists not only of today's expression. it is made up of the spirit of our people people, yes and uh, today. here the guys were sitting at the president's message awarded with dynamism. medals, some without legs are volunteers, there and so on, but this is the spirit of our people, and the applause that sounded in the hall showed the unity of the solidarity of our people around the message of the president, which tells us today, give what you said about the desire of the american side. uh , to keep russian weapons under the control of russia, rather, to have a glorious strong one. i don't have the slightest doubt about it . by the way that kissinger being a man. it would not be denied. well, i want to remind you that then, uh, unlike in the nineties, the minister of foreign affairs,

back then, the ussr was not russia, not kozyr, i want to remind you that dmitry ustinov was the minister of defense. i want to remind you that yuri andropov was the chairman of the kgb, who gave many assessments of american proposals and opportunities, and the main military expert in the soviet delegation was colonel general garkov, who later became, as you know, well, chief constanba. what i want to say is that the soviet delegation was then very strong and, if you like, quite resolute in defending soviet interests and not. the soviet delegation could not get everything that would be good for their country, just as the american delegation could not get it, but i ’m not afraid to say that such disgusting that we see today from the outside, and the administration of such frank contempt for a negotiating partner is so frank

readiness to lie. and you know that they won’t believe you, but simply because you think it’s normal for these papuans from moscow to be treated that way. i'll just add to this my colleagues who were directly involved in disarmament negotiations were told that at the initial stage between the cis first and second , between the second and third, work on the next version began literally the next day. after the previous document was signed, because she is very qualified. she's very thorough. she doesn't like fuss, and it went on for years and then the next good contract came out. here is the first time when this trend was interrupted, just now, acting with nv3, when no negotiations were conducted at all before its extension, the americans refused. then they wallowed vanka, it was, so to speak, with uh, trump, who

said so, we won’t extend it at all. we remember, so to speak, that the last second of it was extended before the exception, well, a second in history. the scale before the expiration date does not change for the next 5 years. and by the way, not everyone knows either. uh, in this contract, the possibility of extension is laid down only once. here, it has already been used for 5 years, it was extended until the beginning of the twenty-sixth year. that's right, more of that possibility. no, that is you also, without doing anything , automatically extend it when the time comes, it will no longer work, in general, in any case, from the point of view of legal technique. yes , it will be necessary either to sign a new agreement there, or, but negotiations are not underway. and now we have moved even further away from these negotiations, then by the word i mean, uh, let's say humanity, because this is not our russian initiative. this is our reaction forced reaction. pay attention to the word you used today. uh, supreme commander president

the russian federation announces this decision i am compelled. report on the decision there was the word forced. this is for us. the only remaining course of action in the conditions, when the americans of all other courses of action. they just didn't leave us. let's talk with marks bishop washington u mark is now uh well known international security consultant and until recently was uh international columnist for national interest magazine. mark welcomes you and thank you for taking the time. well, first question. he's kind of obvious. there were already such and such responses, besides the speech, uh, biden, there were already some responses from washington to putin’s presidential speech dmitry they were both experts and people who have been following the rhetoric around this conflict since february 24

have already learned not to expect big announcements, because every time uh is planned, it's a similar, uh, similar speech. uh people are predicting what could be, uh, the next wave of mobilization or a formal declaration of war against ukraine it doesn't happen every time. i think this time. uh, a lot of experts were careful with their predictions about what the president of russia might say . the fact that russia, uh, at least froze its participation from the cis or call it in the west is not worth an agreement. and that russia might continue or restart, uh

, nuclear testing, uh, and i think a lot of uh in the west are pretty reckless about the threat of nuclear escalation, and i've been hearing worrisome rhetoric over the last couple of months about that russian, but the nuclear arsenal, e, rusty . in general, it is not a fact that these missiles will be launched. eh, and we don't have to worry too much about it. and i think the kremlin also sees this rhetoric and wants to and i didn't think so. i think to threaten it 's the wrong word, but to warn that these abilities are and that we don't know just where is the red line, but where is the red line? i hope that washington thinks about it and understands. what that this red line is. and what to cross that line. maybe, uh, if

we move to this line, it might provoke catastrophic consequences for everyone, including ukraine here. well, here 's russia's decision to suspend its participation in start-3, and this was somehow perceived in washington as serious. and if you want, a warning, e as something that says that in general, the united states. we need to think about continuing our current line with russia to destroy any dialogue, including diplomatic. well, you know, on the surface the answer is no, but on the surface the white house wants to do everything to uh keep this and uh impression that the west united and that they are not afraid of anyone, and that they will continue. eh their ukrainian eslag-z tax policy

for as long as it takes, but this one is what they say in public is what they say behind the scenes. i think it can be very different, because the pentagon. i think there are, uh, serious people who drastically evaluate the russian capabilities and power of the russian not only nuclear arsenal, but also the conditional one, and there are, uh, serious discussions about what this could mean not only for ukraine, but, god forbid, if it is the war will cross, uh, ukrainian borders, so we will never see it publicly. some people admit it because the white house thinks it's a sign of weakness and they don't want to signal weakness and biden's whole speech was about this about this idea that we are united and we will uh for as long as it takes to resist russia but behind the scenes. i think there are discussions going on with a slightly different tone, which is a bit more uh,

integrating important details about exactly what russia is capable of and what russia will go for if we move to some kind of escalation moment. uh, konstantininch, vitya kosachev, speaker of the federation council, your opinion would be interesting. can you ask the brand a question or just comment? uh. well, probably the question is mark uh, please tell me, in uh, the current reaction of the american establishment to, in principle, what is happening in russia with russia uh, the position voiced by the president of the russian federation, what proportion of objective information is present from your point of view, to what extent americans well top to bottom or bottom to top is real understands correctly understands the essence of events, or is it some kind of reaction that simply

comes from those clichés that we have already discussed even today, that uh, americans exclusively, therefore, have a monopoly on the truth. and everything that happens outside of their will, by definition. located under on the other side of the good from the lag beyond. this is a very important question. i can say that we saw that the peak of support for the biden policy was at the very beginning of uh, in february in march in april and that the level of support for the ukrainian strategy of the white house, uh, is gradually falling. falls nearly every month and it falls quite infrequently among republicans republican republicans. this is an opposition party and in january there was an issue that said that 52% of republicans believe that they should immediately turn those arms supplies to ukrainians, so this will only continue. and when the officials in

the biden administration. they say that time is on our side. they told a recent washington article that this part of what they have in mind is, uh, definitely the longer. uh, they don't tell us what the goal is, because what biden says. as long as required, but does not explain. what is the idea of ​​victory victory for ukraine or or victory for the usa in this conflict? uh, the longer we are, uh, they won't, uh, explain the parameters of what 's going on and and where the limits are and and when we're ready to stop. eh, the more people. i think they will uh oppose it. now the other side of that coin is that we are seeing protests against uh, against uh, ukrainian politics. west across europe we 've seen it in france we've seen protests even

in germany e in prague in the czech republic but this is not enough. which means if there is an iron will among politicians to see it through, it doesn't explain what the end is and it's one of the interesting aspects that neither america nor they define what they are ready to accept as victory uh, and i think today's two speeches by uh , biden and vladimir putin showed us that uh, the two sides of this conflict, uh , don't define it until it becomes clear on the battlefield. uh, yuri nikolayevich vitkin is with us , deputy chairman of the defense committee duma do you have any questions mark if you will allow me dmitry today, the beast is torturing, we wanted you to torture in the good sense of the word. uh, please tell me, i’ll continue the question dragged on, but

i want to put ukraine aside in this case. it’s obvious to me that ukraine is being used by the situations of two relations between the state of russia and the countries of the nato bloc well, at the head of the united states, i would like to understand, uh, how much the public of the united states of america means, well, let's talk according to the point of view, well , or not the point of view, even the axioms with their sides. i mean from the side of the white house that russia threatens the united states of america and thus they support, in general, militant rhetoric from their leader , us president jabaitan. as far as this is true or does the public understand it, it is aware that russia does not hatch any plans for the military component of the attack, especially against the united states and so on. please. yes, yes, here. i think the main aspect of your question. and this is what we hear from our baltic and

polish partners. this is the idea that they repeat repeatedly, that if we don't stop uh putin on the territory of ukraine, then we will have to stop him on the territory of poland estonia germany france or maybe even america or this is actually part of the rhetoric of some politicians, uh, high-ranking officials . and and. i think this one is what people are what people believe. i'm not saying it's true or not. i personally have not seen any serious evidence. what is there any intention, uh, to conduct military operations, uh against uh, nato members but, but that's one of the main things. and this reason why uh formed this very strong lobby uh eastern members at home, poland latvia estonia lithuania who say this is an existential moment and to them this and we are fighting

for us. e, the right to exist they are sure. they convinced themselves that the victory of russia, and again, i don’t know what victory means and no one is ready to indicate this. the conditional victory of russia means that there will be attacks on other nato countries, and as long as there is this impression , there will always be uh, this is rhetoric about that we are required to do so. we do. it's not even for ukraine, it's for yourself, because if this war spills over into nato territory, it's already a direct confrontation, and i think one of the things that the kremlin can do. i don't want to give advice, it's not my role. but i think that russian officials can think about how to interpret what is happening, to make it clear, maybe behind the scenes, not necessarily publicly, but then to understand that there is no such intention, that no one is going to

throwing this conflict on the territory of nato countries is unimportant. how will it end what is happening in ukraine that russia does not have these intentions. i think that would put a lot of people in the west at ease. thank you, we will now have to leave the advertisement for stating. no, i want to very briefly draw your attention to the content once again to draw your attention to the content of the president's message to the federal assembly today. indeed, many people really expected much more. stationary militancy, what will he bully there? please excuse me, so to speak, with the biden, who yesterday visited kiev to try something, so to speak, to anticipate. from the point of view of this biden demagoguery. eh, in poland, after all, none of this happened, moreover , a good half, and maybe more, so to speak, 2/3 of the speech was devoted to issues of the domestic russian agenda. and what is important without any serious team

of this agenda. so we put together our plans e not a year ago and not 2 years ago, but already decades ago, and we are moving forward along this agenda, that is, for me, the most important content of putin's today's message. i hope that whoever wants it will read it and hear it back. these are the same. the main thing was that russia was acting on its own agenda. what can't we do? whoever it was to impose, there are not the balts, nor the poles, nor even the ukrainians, that we will act in accordance with our national interests. and we are always ready to restore cooperation, but i repeat once again on the principles of absolute equality and mutual consideration of the interests of the parties. this is a very important part of the president's message. today i am sure that it must be heard in the very west , which expected from him, some, so to speak, backhanded answers from the biden and others like him, but here’s the mark,

if something struck me in the president’s speech, this in addition to what we discussed already with the withdrawal of the temporary withdrawal from the start-3 treaty, i was struck by the extent to which the president’s speech was calm, balanced and clearly believed that ensuring normal lives for the citizens of russia this is number one this is number one this seems to me the answer to your question. thank you very much. and now we are going to advertising and we will return to this topic . president's message. and how he tried to answer this message of the president. there are 8 billion people in the world, and at least 7 billion of them are americans. just got to such a degree

of political enmity and hostility has not been in the united states since the civil war of the mid-19th century, greater europe is becoming an instrument for the eurasian global strategy of the united states will be formed by itself, the united states will patronize europe europe will try to someone yanukovych's russia and africa is the simplest and most difficult thing in this situation. it is to convert illegal power into the power of laws. and this can only be done in the world by one single country. this is the united states of america the united states of america considers itself a gem destined to rule the world. they want it to be like this forever. this will not be the premiere of the decline of the american empire on february 24 at the first someone sees a credit card 120 for everything, and i

i see the possibility of days for everything already in rosbank and you can get it interest-free, buy a transfer. take down the column. win a credit card from the bank 120 for everything rosbank is a real opportunity. there are 200 people here and give everyone different things that i can help you a psychic, but there are conditions dmitry catch a gift premium thank you, but i

need to find so many gifts or or give everyone the same link that everyone will find something for themselves brilliant of all my flights and no spring water in coffee mts premium universal gift for everyone online movie theater on 50 gb of internet, a book service line and mts music give a subscription and get a cashback of gratitude. she already knows further herself. love quickly, love long, love sweetly, we

proson. what do you think? you can fall asleep in just 20 minutes sleeping soundly during the night and waking up easily in the morning sleep lovers do not cause addiction. in the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales, buying gifts will become even more pleasant with an installment plan for 18 months and a cashback of up to 10% halva just one card for any gifts, dear. masha from march 8, elena stepanovna shurochka congratulations, the men do not celebrate. running for tickets wins every second ticket. buy in branded stores and on the site we will draw prizes for a million chefburgers for 129 rubles. kfc the vtb team will offer a solution that is more familiar, but looks.

who thinks what is there to think, when there is a deposit in vtb with delivery up to 9.5% by a reliable bank, money grows much faster, and the details are at this point ru, and you are an athlete master of sports with a maximum yield of up to nine and a half percent vtb and everything will work out for you too at 12. it’s just that my assistant messed up something, don’t worry, i like her less mts premium universal gift for every online cinema 50 gb of internet book service line mts music.

undermined from within, the monarchs ceased to exist on march 2, 1917. the empire was a national project, while the ussr was conceived as a global project. including the new lands, russia fed and developed its premier periphery. film first east february 27 on the first

aired big game i don't know why president biden decided today to make a general speech to the people of russia to what extent it was connected with president putin's address to the federal there was a desire on the part of the president to demonstrate to the citizens of russia that, and the united states actually does not wish them any harm, and would like to end the war in ukraine as soon as possible . well, such a paragraph in biden's speech

alerted me from this point of view. let's let's listen. russia will never ever be able to defeat ukraine free people do not want to live in a world of hopelessness and darkness. it was a very unusual year, unusual in its cruelty , in the cruelty of the russian military and mercenaries who commit war crimes , crimes against humanity, without any remorse. conscience. they sow destruction. they rape and use violence as a weapon of war. they kidnap ukrainian children, hoping to leave ukraine without a future. they are shelling the ukrainian railway stations of the hospital schools. we cannot turn a blind eye to all these horrors that russia is doing in ukraine . why i wanted to draw attention to this time i did it, because, of course, such things, they say, are not accidental. and uh we remember how things like that were said. uh,

before the united states decided to bomb. oh yugoslavia. we remember how things like that were said before the united states destroyed gaddafi. and of course it was. uh, the informational propaganda preparation of the american intervention. usually in iraq words of this kind. they, as it were, mean not just a certain reaction to the actions of the enemy, but also certain plans, and, if e, the biden wanted to convince russian citizens that the united states does not wish them harm. and it was easier to say. let's start peace talks. without any preconditions, we are ready to support the ladies in such negotiations in every possible way, we will not dictate to ukraine what positions they should take, but we agree that diplomacy should be given the opportunity to work, where so far

artillery worked. well, uh, boris said, it means quite another thing that he is talking about the intentions of his administration. well, i’ll start with a quote from today’s message from the president of russia, where he recalled the assessments of american experts since 2001 that over 900,000 people around the world were unleashed by the us military operations and another 38 million were injured of varying severity. yes, this is an assessment, firstly, the actions of the united states of america, which are trying to present the actions of russia as almost the only case of e military operation in the history of the modern world after the end of the cold war. well , here are the descriptions on the net that we hear and which are in fact an absolute lie. now, if i leave russia

out of the brackets there, there are some barbaric things that he listed, but if russia really used its combat capabilities to its full potential. that is , the line of contact or the front line? now it would be in a completely different place much to the west. or maybe already on the westernmost border of ukraine and the fact that she is there now does not pass is the best confirmation for me that russia is acting with absolute compliance. uh, the rules of, let's say , civilized warfare with minimal consequences for the civilian population from a miner with maximum preservation of objects such as the hospitals and kindergartens mentioned by biden. so what he says is a direct lie. and why is a direct lie heard from his mouth, yes for the simple reason that biden is not needed. peace in ukraine, but not for this they trained

ukraine, first i was in power there, and then inciting me, or maybe, at first, even to uchka ukraine, to russia and then it was power to me there. well, this is not a platitude, true for americans. ukraine is now another e-figure. here in this great chess room. uh, game uh, where the real players are, on the one hand, the united states, and on the other hand, other centers of power that the americans are trying to subdue under themselves in the same way that they have already subdued europe, and ukraine, alas, will continue to bleed. once again i will repeat. this is not our choice. it's not ours goal, but it will continue to bleed both literally and figuratively, just because washington decided so from the current speech. biden, one more confirmation there. absolutely correctly drew attention to the fact that, uh, these pharisaic words, uh, caring for the russians

is not worth a penny against the background of what the americans continue to do in ukraine with ukraine yes , if you allow literally konstantinovich is enough i correctly said a lie, i would use the word here, probably, you can’t call nonsense nonsense in any other way from the outside. this means the baidana that sounded. listen , the owner arrived today, which means their owner e to poland and begins to talk about the actions of our country and free people from ukraine, allegedly from that side. and we have that people are not free on the territory of russia and today shelling replaces the concept of shelling taking place, which means that it’s not ukraine , i know the tactics of the conduct of hostilities, which means that i myself participated in the action and the armed forces, and in ukraine they know how our guys acted armed the forces of the russian federation when they acted act continue the surgical method as much as possible doing. in order for the civilian population not to suffer, listen, the city

is practically destroyed, and civilians are walking around. we did everything, perhaps to evacuate them, to provide them with food and so on. so today the united states of america and how many people died in the donetsk people's republic in the luhansk people's republic, i was there and how much it costs , absolutely civilians, so, uh , a notification is going on, yes, and a military violation of the convention today, the united states of america once again showed its bright, pronounced face, as not just accomplices. and as accomplices in the commission of war crimes occurring in this territory. i am repeatedly in this studio abruptly, diverging. e with the administration. e, he was talking about the fact that personally the president of the united states a has, it seemed to me , an element of common sense and does not want

to unleash the third world war. he spoke about this many times. and it seemed to me which is very important. this is still very important, but the action of president biden. of course, they raise doubts about his real understanding that it is not enough to talk about the need to avoid war. uh, you need to subdue your actions. this is a very important goal. but uh, when president biden talked about how, with the help of the usa and nato , ukraine stood against russia, and here he is, he could even come to kiev he forgot to say that he came to kiev with the permission of moscow russia yes, he came to kiev with the permission of russia, he forgot to say that one one of the most important tasks of the russian military

operation was, of course, i hope that you will agree with me, it was to create an earthen bridge of the crimea , this was one of the main tasks. this task was accomplished, and uh, he uh forgot to say that although the president of the united states did manage to mobilize the west against russia, he forgot to say that in order to defeat russia, the only chance to do this was if the resistance of nato lost the support of the russian people. and that level of unity of the people of the people of russia of the peoples of russia which we see today against nato pressure seems to me really is absolutely unique and very few. who could be sure that this will happen a year ago and uh, no

, i just want to hope that those reasonable people who still remain in the united states, including in the american establishment, will find the opportunity to tell the president whether, then publicly, whether in privately. he talks to members of congress on a regular basis, whatever they find. it is possible to tell him that he has taken america to a very dangerous point. what does he carry for this is a personal responsibility and that so the disaster he is playing with is absolutely out of proportion not absolutely out of proportion to what the united states is trying to pull off in ukraine it was a big game see you next week. good evening , you have been watching the matador program lately

, the name of this person does not leave the pages of newspapers and magazines, quite often you can see him on the tv screen. but it seems to us that these numerous speeches do not give a complete picture of him, and therefore today we dared to introduce you another eduard limonov what else is it the brotherhood of harsh men of revolutionaries and terrorists of love of devotion, in which my soul could finally rest, or i’m still a religious sect preaching love, love of people to each other, by all means, love .

edward for the majority of readers in our country there has been a certain tilt in the perception of your work. here you are known, rather, as a political publicist than an author of works of art, and we would like to correct this established imbalance and hear from you an authorized biography of eduard savenko and the writer eduard limon. you want me to retell you a fairly brief authorized version. i was born

on february 22, 1943 in the city of dzerzhinsk, gorky region , in the family of a soldier in a chemical plant . because it was dark. my dad turned out to have flashlights in his pocket riding breeches. my dad lit the way for my mom. that's how they met. and that's how i am was formed, so to speak, was innate as a result. copulation of a couple who would meet under flowers from the witches dropping bombs

on the innocent city of dzerzhinsk. here we are such an ironic introduction to the biography, so that the biography looks like, in short, the following must be said. so until 1967. i lived in kharkov from 1967 to 74. i lived in moscow 74 to 1980. i lived in new york in 1980 and for 1.000.592. i live in paris, i suppose, apparently, in order to live in moscow or kolyma, who knows?

i wanted to go back uh to my period

adolescence and youth, the so-called kharkov period and told about it in more detail. well, that's just what i'm talking about. time has written at least three books, something like a trilogy of trilogy. this was our great epoch story, published in the banner in the eleventh issue of 89. there , uh, it tells about uh early childhood, uh, the son of a lieutenant. savenko and this is the end of the forties to 47 to 50 approximately the second book is called the teenager savenko this is 1958, khrushchev times, the teenager hooligan and yegor the scene is a worker, a suburban settlement.

kharkiv saltovsky, the village is a very autobiographical story, a rather cruel book with prices of all sorts of natural gang rape. pretty spooky in particular, the third book is hmm from the trilogy. this is a young rascal. yes, i've almost forgotten the name of my own, and this is the end of the sixties. that's all of the kharkov period. i have released two books of lemon, young, scoundrel and teenager. i'm incredibly envious and i'm terribly offended that limonov's wonderful work was published by us during the great epoch. i don't syntax publishing house, but znamya magazine got it, and so it was very bitter for me to read, uh, from some of our literary

critics. e slanderous words that lemons, allegedly sings of stalin, sings of the military and even sings of the kgb, and i just could not understand, have our critics really forgotten how to count. i am talking now about this story, that they did not see that the whole story was written from the point of view of a five-year-old, in my opinion, a five-six-year-old child. forgive me, please, if any of you love - whatever, smart whatever wonderful and liberal will say that he already hated comrade stalin at the age of 5 and understood everything about the party of the government, then say goodbye to such a person. there is nothing to do, nothing to do, because obviously either he is a complete blockhead or he is lying, as on this one, as far as i know, and the pseudonym of lemons arose, just

during your kharkov life. yes , yes, the pseudonym is an artificial surname, created from nothing she was born as a result of a literary game hmm and uh hmm there was a group hmm writing such young men, we were someone ourselves called blankets, someone bukhankin. they gave me lemons, that, well, it was an artist, it seems that it was his idea and to call me a lemon, not even the name itself, and then this surname or this pseudonym stuck to me so much that i just didn’t know anyone there , like a tip, and everyone called like a lemon here. well, i preferred i leave. and this is how the transformation of a boy from a working village into an avant-garde poet happened. where did it start?

i had an interest in early childhood in the history of geography, about 15 years old along with an interest in such a kind of hooligan kind of gangster life, in those years i had the ideals of this being done. eh, such a big godfather. we all had such an ideal in the workers' settlement, there was no other. at hand was the opportunity to become or some kind of komsomol boss. and uh, what didn't suit anyone? either, or here , i really plowed seriously, or like many people of my generation who found, were in the same conditions of the same class of the same class with me. we are completely honest about it. dreamed a little later, all this appeared, you know , rock music from the air. uh, the first tape recorders,

somewhere in the riga factory, began to be produced. and that changed it. uh, the ideal hero of our time has become, uh, some and elvis presley anyway the man with the guitar. well, we were still praying for the campaign, so, i dreamed of being a bahan, but at the same time i had 15 years of age. and a passion for literature. i read poetry for the first time before that, i hated poetry, i didn’t refuse to take it in the library at all, where he read a lot more. briefly speaking speaking of which, the library saved me in general, and i remember that they gave me blok’s youthful poems such a book of their own with some kind of lilac branches. i've cleaned myself terribly already. i do not want now at all not for me, or what? i want to keep reading my books on the geography of exploring some distant lands, but this book was handed to me, and i really liked it. i remember i read these

verses. in one of my cases of students , the mother died, and i sat in his garden, and there the old women sang, drank, uh, this and the mother. this is a church rite and really was such the lush spring is already pouring, the lilac has drained. i 've been reading these youthful poems of blok and the thing was done from that began, my literary career interrupts the time of time with other interests. but i think it was then that i was killed in my lifetime. uh, poetry and literature from me on the free wind my letters fly away my letters will live for a long time or not, who will tell you, who will say instead of their own letters or a weak old citizen or a skinny

i know that your first fame is such all kharkov was even poetic before . uh, due to the fact that the trousers are superbly wider. and you know, i was looking for such a profession for myself, because before that i worked at several kharkov plants at a turbine plant, sickle and maybe i worked, by the way, for quite a long time, almost two years in the sixty-third 64 years and they definitely didn’t fly away in real somewhere, writing out papers, and in the beginning, a cutter. then i worked as a miner and worked well on the honor roll, at the same time i stole a little bit, it was such a working life to say every evening we went very well a lot of money earned and every saturday we went to the biggest one. in the city we went to

the city, it was called let's go to the city on saturday we went to the crystal restaurant and everyone there drank about 800 g of the best cognac. hmm, then i got tired of it. i'm in the woods on some kind of adventure, so my path has been twisted enough. but when i seriously began to write poetry, that is, seriously already having found my own style. i was about two already, and 22-23 years old, and then i was feverishly looking for a profession, who would give me money, but i would not have to go to work. this is how i found this job. i began to sew trousers, i sewed them , of course, illegally without paying any. uh, what's it called? let's go or something, that means it will give me some, gave me a certain mobility at the same time and allowed me to survive later in moscow without a residence permit.

i did not have the right to work, but i feverishly, so to speak, he held on to this freedom of his in the sixty- seventh year. you left kharkov forever and went to moscow, uh, to serve this reason. the cause of the cause, and naturally, like these three sisters on the cheekbones of chekhov, only in moscow was the center of the capital also or among the phillinist heroes. in rome, rome is all dirty every every province dreams, and in the capital i also heard that there are such smagists. and uh, i remember that i was madly wanting to come and get to know this very magicians, who are, uh, the new youth literary movement. i was also looking for some new ways of expression and would like to be with the best people of my country and in a natural way. and of course we're scared

i didn’t have to leave kharkov, having no residence permit, no apartment, but i was going to this my first migration. like, probably, actually the first migration and uh, hmm came and began to live and endured a lemon. limonov, of course, is not an easy figure, and my meeting with him took place somewhere in the year 68. yes, something like that, we are 69. i think sixty-eight. i really liked the first verses that i saw once by chance. on our sretensky march in the workshop of ilyusha tabakov, we were all friendly then and lived approximately concentrated in one some in one

region. as they say, my workshop was on lansky lane? and that's where i first encountered these lemons, then. so he came from kharkov and at first i read, by chance, three verses, which were lying on the table in the workshop. with these verses, i generally devoted a lot of time to poetry, not because i myself studied a lot. i didn't do much, to say the least. basically. i had friends about this artists. i have always been very indifferent to poetry. and when i ran into these three poems struck with their originality, originality and surprise. they had irony, there was a moment of some kind of revelation, there was a moment, so to speak, uh, and the usual

kind of imagery. this is how our physical acquaintance began. i loved myself very much. well, this can be, so to speak, this any of us pushkin has great lines about this . whom to love, of course, himself, but the daffodil sat in him, of course, very deeply. it was even sometimes simply charming, because it crossed all sorts of boundaries. here's how to say it statistic, right? i have read both to you. in my thoughts i will support another person a little for a brief moment and let go again and rarely. there are rarely such people to lie in their heads for half an hour the rest of the time. i ’m fighting here myself, i caress myself, i wet myself for a kiss and i admire myself from a distance and i’ll thoroughly examine the shirt. i laid out the climbers and even on my back, trying

to look, i rush to reach, but the mirror will help, interacting with two, i will see a mole, which i have been stroking on the skin for a long time. i love her. no, positively by others is impossible. i would be busy. well, the other flashed his face , waved his hand, something white, managed to go somewhere, and i'm always with me. i was anti-crunch in khrushchev’s carelessness, and these anti-crustations under gorbachev’s anti gorbachev what do you want to say that i should be happy, because i’m sitting now and i can see mr. yeltsin as he opposed the soviet system, it was this system from rogues. we russians must discard any illusions about the twenty- first century, it will not be a century of prosperity, and a century of fierce struggle from them for the national interests of russia and others for its

enslavement of the global subscription from above society. he never kept the figures in his pocket, which was characteristic of the liberal idea, which received everything that could be obtained from the soviet government. i am alone, i do not call anyone for me. try to understand, uh, what is happening, move your brains with the prime minister of the century, the outstanding russian thinker alexander zinoviev february 24 at the first pentalgin extragel contains a special component for better penetration into the hearth pain and inflammation pentalgin extragel against more inflammation in the muscles and joints someone sees a credit card 120 for everything. and i see the possibility of a credit card. get 120 days for everything already in rosbank and you can get such

gifts without interest buyers maikolomka won a rosbank credit card 120 for everything rosbank is a real opportunity. download the magnet app. play the game and win, call with a card from the application magnet multi-trainer 599, give gifts from the heart 20 seconds. it would seem so little but not for viruses. and dad in the body they begin to multiply time works against us, but there is arbidol, it prevents the virus from merging with the cell and the mechanism of virus reproduction is disturbed arbidol is ready to fight influenza viruses and other sars go to the supermarket and buy on a scooter. we will give you a 35% discount and free delivery in 15 minutes. order profitably in clothes. for me, the main feeling is naturalness

, confidence. freedom is my choice. gloria jeans pain. there may be a different mechanism for the development of pain, one it doesn’t matter what caused the pain, if there is pentalgin, a universal remedy against various types of pain, thanks to the combined composition, pentalgin acts against pain, wherever it is independent of the causes of its occurrence, pentalgin will do without pain, closed a loan with a guaranteed rate service, but that's not all, how not everything is paid on time , and the post bank will return the difference in money, recalculating the delivery credit of 4.5% per annum. come get the money from the post office, dear. masha since march 8 elena stepanovna shurochka congratulations guys can't cope in company stores and on the website let's raffle off prizes of one million. you have a strong

cough, its cause is sputum and inflammation in the bronchi, a combination of the three components of cadelac. broncho complex. fights the causes of a wet cough, contributing to its completion codelac broncho triple action against cough burn gifts from the heart and do not miss in the magnet cosmetic shaving foam argo to improve cerebral circulation of the brain , memory restoration, fatigue reduction and improvement now i will not forget the dream on the object. incredible sound adjusts

choose gifts and give with all your heart. download the magnet app. play the game and win, we give gifts from the bottom of our hearts to reduce the temperature of the four components against the main symptoms, cold and flu maxicoldrin to tie up the symptoms. colds. i am svetlana reshetneva. the author of resistant wheat varieties and a participant in the russian bread project, and this is the moment when i decided who i want to become my father experimented with apple mouths, and he will grow up my interest in science. cultivate an interest in science from childhood decade of science and technology rf read

anything to your mind. i remember my poems very badly, but i will try to read a short aging written in new york, in my opinion, they drank working beer and silently, then they smoked a worker, for long hours and minutes, in addition, the volga carry fuel oil workers on troubled water looks in bad gloomy mood. any work brings only grief. oh sweet idleness with- sun and sea. now, if you are a farmer, pirates to worms, but we would all be a farmer, as far as i know, you were not in direct

confrontation, the existing authorities were not dissident as well, but nonetheless. uh, what was the reason for you going back? with the authorities of those years, i really had practically no disagreements. we must distinguish. from which of the authorities? that is, for example , i always approved of the foreign policy of the soviet union and throughout the entire seventy-five-year soviet history i approved and now i continue to approve and i think i remain in the same positions, but the cultural policy within the country. i never approved but uh, i believe that the country's cultural policy was carried out, not so much by some communist party or by the secretaries of the central committee , because it was carried out.