[000:00:00;00] to a separate school of cameramen, many of whom later came to hollywood and all this, this mixture of everything in the world , surprisingly turns out to be on the soviet screen, but why do i need this experiment is a stylization, because the material and the general approach to solving . this is, of course, the atmosphere there is completely unfamiliar. yes, that is, if noir is something hopeless, and here gaidai takes the stylistic elements of the genre and overcomes them, the same thing happens, there is another short film in the leader of the redskins, which is absolutely eccentric of which, in my opinion, because the whole yeralash in general has grown domestically, because this is a boy who cannot be controlled not by parents, nor even by criminals who, due to their indiscretion, a are trying to kidnap him. here, uh, grows out of it. in general, well, in a separate direction in the domestic children 's cinema, it seems to me, uh, it seems to me that these are the techniques that he uses. they are taken for this, to surely beat the suspect, so that he has fun. this

turn. in principle, cinema for mass cinema genre the return of the genre, as such, to soviet cinema so that, uh, as many viewers as possible watch this film and like this film, and there are memoirs of one of the authors, gaidai, one of his screenwriters, who said , then we all the time, when we wrote, checked ourselves, we said, but this will be clear to the grandmother from yoshkar-ola. for some reason, he had such an image of his grandmother and for some reason there are cows here. and so, if it seemed to them what would happen, it’s clear they went further, but in order for the viewer fell in love with these films, of course it was a good move to create a certain group of actors who will constantly work with you . and vicin something. guess starred even before uh, dog mongrel unusual, cross in his first not very successful comedy, which experienced uh,

so censored. obstacle problems and the film , which was eventually called the groom of the other world, here there is one person, and here nikulin and morgunov appear immediately and personal and they appear in such images that become absolutely recognizable. even the costumes. until now, they are standing in the corridor of mosfilm, and we know who it is without even knowing there are no faces. yes, these are dummies, the same as shurik yes, because gaidai is actually on one side. brought his career, alexander emelianenko ruined it to a new level, as he himself sometimes thought, because the mask stuck so tightly, and to alexander demyanenko shurik's mask that, in general, at some point, uh, he believed that he was in hostage, and there you feel bad, but after all, shurik can you explain what hmm is the uniqueness of this image, after all, it seems. these are quite common features of a student who has nothing, who has everything all the time even when he is older. yeah, he's so mean all the time. what is the meaning of this mask? it seems to me that

at first to remind. what does he look like to himself? how does it work? do we have a small snippet? the driver

shurik, in my opinion, is a typical representative of the soviet technical intelligentsia. here is the eighties yuri lopman. i remembered that once upon a time in leningrad if you, in in principle, you walk in glasses in a certain area , they will definitely attack you, because why are you wearing glasses there, there is such a prejudice among a soviet citizen towards a man with glasses, and a guide makes a man out of him on the one hand. a. well, it seems like not stupid, but on the other hand, he always gets into some kind of stupid situation, so it’s nice to laugh at him, these two years also found, because we laugh at masks. oh, what a loser, charlie chaplin's hero is a tramp. falls into a stupid position all the time. here the approach is exactly the same proven methods, when they always use what has already worked somewhere somewhere and tests it for a new audience and proves that these techniques do not become outdated at all. but if chaplin usually doesn’t get a girl, you say shurik is still a romantic hero. this is such an interesting combination, when on the one hand he is all no,

his science, as it will be later, let’s say ivanovich changes his profession, but at the same time we still go out to another effective genre of romantic comedy that in the soviet union is not so much. in general, people could afford to do well, that shurik was a prisoner of the caucasus. the only thing that comes to mind, and hmm during a date , is to catch a funny song with a girl in general, work. ah, gaidai with music is a separate topic for a dissertation i don’t know. probably because after it is believed that he offended the theological. they use some of his music for a-a one of their first. uh, early comedy works next. i have developed a very creative and lasting union zatsepin which, in general, in my opinion, was not even interrupted until the death of the guide. yes zatsepin is a wonderful composer, with whom i really guess i was lucky. on the one hand, he is a songwriter, in principle, and on the other hand, he is a master of the very instrumental music that is necessary

for such a genre of physical comedy yes, a comedy of physical action. ah. zatsepin recalls that the guide kept asking him to make the music faster, faster, faster , and well, musicians can’t play faster either, and zatsepin knew how to make it so that pave the drum rhythm to make it sound faster. it just felt faster. yes , it was not necessary to play faster, but at the same time, and on the screen, combined with the image, it all works. let's get back. actually , sveta didn’t get into the film, why didn’t it work out, when oh, a wonderful story, it seems to me, because the film was cut, almost by half. it should have been called something else first instead of yeah, well, how, well, do you make a movie? and cut it in half for you. well, how is it? it's trauma, of course. let's just let us explain, in fact, to our listeners, the viewers, what was, and two by two, soviet censorship and its difference from analogues, because no matter how clear the rules, as such , people could make movies in the spirit

of judgment from realism back in the thirties, and then by whom they came and they said, sorry, but you are doing something wrong. how did it happen? well, here’s the guide and launches a comedy that bureaucracy is bad, it seems like everything is in line with the times, apparently, someone is somewhere else, and the decree issued that it is necessary to fight against the bureaucracy of ryazanov carnival night also struggles with velvety. and so the guide honestly makes wonderful actors the fifth to the artists, and georgy vitsin adds wonderful supporting actors there, a story about how, and a person goes, and they steal, uh, money and documents from him on his honeymoon. immediately, he dies and everyone thinks that he died. this is the same person who left him too. a room in a completely unnecessary institution, which is called ku-ku, but something there is a prosecutor's office with a lot of signs, if you remember in ryazanov's office romance is all something similar , too, a building that is hung with a huge

number of meaningless, and the names of meaningless institutions. yes, in institutions, one of which our hero is in charge of, his deputy does not accept him back, because according to all the documents he died and the hero of the plate cannot get this very piece of paper that he is alive, what is still very funny in the film. often this happens. i heard yes, a and uh, there must have been something too much, and truthful too funny or too much, showing absurdity soviet reality, so that's what's left of the movie. uh, horns, yes legs, but on this, i think gaidai learned from this injury, for example, an interesting story in e. the accumulation there was such a phrase, and which was said by the hero frunze klyuchana, who plays the uncle, yes , the heroine, and we are talking about the traditional way of getting the bride, the theft is so ritualized,

and he says, but in the neighboring area, uh, the groom stole a party member. and of course it looks. well, not very well, yes, and uh, according to all the canons, as it were, an artistic advice and suggests cutting it out. i also wanted to remind, uh, about this, maybe it’s a little obvious, but today more and more research is appearing, historians on how the economy of the soviet union was arranged in general what is the shadow economy, and this is the main material with which it works and gaidai and ryazanov in their films and in the sixties exactly, just exactly in comedy, are the best. in the sense of these themes of social justice. why is someone a speculating petioles in the market? someone's making ends meet, well here's the car - this topic appeared brightly. by the way, speaking, it appears just the diamond hand. yes, that is, here are these soviet entrepreneurs who are trying, but somehow bypass, to hack into the system. this is the topic.

ryazanov comprehends she more vividly in the sense that he is trying to think about what social justice is, like the zigzag of luck, but here is a film where a is trying to understand how, but is it good, and should winning? yes, but from a lottery ticket to belong to everyone and whose money was the ticket bought or only to the one who bought it directly. you guessed it , went a little. it sometimes seems to him that this is all he is not seriously talking about any problems, meanwhile, all this is also present elements. here is this same uh, market economies that are corroded by soviet society. well, in the form of a comedy , because when the hero is shouting, he says, in the neighboring district, the groom of the party, they say it is necessary to cut out then this phrase is simply passed to the comedy hero nikulin and, please, all this can be said. a, but the most interesting thing, in my opinion, history is about as if the diamonds in the hand should have been an atomic explosion at the end. it seems to me that you know better about it, yes, but it’s like what khutsyev called a watermelon on a neckline, he

had a dealer rain in the film, a scene. e about the crazy kgb officer. and in the end. uh, like he said himself, i had to make a sacrifice to save the whole movie. here is such yes and apparently , many soviet directors and couples had a similar strategy. yes, he tried to distract the admissions office. there is a state cinema with some outrageous frame scene. well here in in particular, it is considered a tale such that he has mounted a scene with an atomic explosion as a variant of his hand. and it's so emotional. and everything excited distracted. for some more. calling things by means of sockeye salmon, they then no longer paid attention. i remind you that this is the gaidai 100 podcast, where we talk about the centenary of the remarkable soviet director. leonid yuryevich gaidai, i am a film historian natalya ryabchikova and we communicate with my colleague stanislav divizinsky. and also, if we talk about attractiveness, attractiveness movement, the attractiveness of actions on the screen and physical attractiveness, when

i could somehow afford to enter the territory of sexuality in soviet cinema. here's what. i don’t even know such sensationalism, or something like what svetlana svetlichnaya does in a diamond hand. here is for you, as a spectator guide. we are never shown the whole thing. we do not see how , in fact, the bra flies with the light. if it's personal and then some frame that was cut from the movie of the coin. right there in basically, it was not intended. i really like how this topic appears in the last film of gaidai on the basovskaya tree, good weather on the back. ah, again this rain, where is our soviet, and such a secret agent receives instructions from his commander from his mentor, and he reminds him. and if you are seduced and want to destroy a beautiful woman, what should the agent and hero of russia do? she says the hero must destroy beautiful women himself, and the mentor speaks incorrectly, and the hero

pay attention to a beautiful woman. here is the cinema, gaidai - yes. the agent must destroy the beautiful woman himself, and the audience. actually, gaidaya immediately positions himself as such a director of spectator films and this is actually a strange position for a soviet director, because it was believed that, well , there is some kind of graphic community and it’s better to close your film, everything will be cut, but you will be rena we are the person who fights the system. but if you shoot a genre movie, even if there is something some won, that the themes and come up with something that they will definitely cut out later, so that everything else passes, it seems that you are a frivolous director, that you are, well, here is the genre, well, mass cinema, while any audience is huge. yes, at the same time, this is the grandmother from yoshkar-ola, who clearly looks at this, clearly understands, there is evidence that films are shown there to the japanese, and gaidai and they understand everything. and this is not a coincidence. it tormented the guide. there is evidence that he

earns a lot of money. yes, on these, or rather, he earns films earns its quantity too. well, it also earned some moment, because the actual success of the guide and his comedy is associated with such an unobvious name as e grigorievich region and vladimir late senior dad of a famous modern tv presenter and flowers, people whose seats were created experimentally creative, where not, where guide and filmed, and some piles of films and where the system of urban calculation was built motivating director. uh, the more your box office collects. that, in fact. you earn more yourself. your group is successful it really worked because people were motivated. well, again, this motivation is financial, which actively manifested itself in the nineties. ah, and when the phenomenon of co-operative cinema arose in the late eighties. again, it is, yes. and why are there some non-obvious things, but simple

human emotions, the desire to earn the desire to live well, these are the basic concepts with which the guide worked, it’s no coincidence, again. why the twenties are the twenties in the soviet union and a. look ivan vasilievich is a play written in the twenties, and the guide itself also addresses in some of his films, just to the theme of the nep and which directly occurs 12 chairs again. yes, how it is, how the plateau loves it - this is also a response to the twenties, when they could make films on these same films , the last two films of deribasovskaya and good weather or brighton. d ah and operation cooperation is again. eh, in fact, such a renaissance of creativity. gaidai is considered that, well, gaidai, here are many more masterpieces of the sixties and seventies, and then somehow goes downhill, so that, uh, the palm tree. uh, in this era of stagnation , ryazanov, as it were, pulls out who make such philosophical films are no longer very funny , honestly, as i would consider the garage, rather

a tragedy and office romance. we didn’t live really funny comedies, but nevertheless, here, as it were, there’s a new upsurge, and well, a lot of new formal tricks. that is, if here is the eighties sportloto yes, there are also tricks there, but somehow it already looks a little strange, as it were, here is the epoch, there is such a feeling that you have gone somewhere. a here the nineties is just such an elephant, when well, a new growth, nothing is clear, but it seems that burning again does not fit. here you think, why the reason for success or maybe there is a creative failure, when with these films, it seems to me that even fits in, i here propose to watch small fragments, it is very important to please. please, please. thank you so much i bath this katz you owe katya you owe me not to you personally. i mean the kgb oh if it wasn't for the kgb would i

be in that order if it wasn't for the kgb i would be up to until now he was tormented by an assistant professor at the odessa university. well, i won't interfere. bon appetit. thank you. i've said two things here, the first is the measure of audience success. i think this is especially true in comedies. and how many phrases will go to the people one of my favorite cash desks, always offered to give up. well , guess later. how can you say that he is not successful, if, uh, so many phrases from deribasovskaya still live in a time when the audience did not go to the cinema so often. i have a favorite piece. the truth from this movie the other i adore him when we see him, and the auditorium of the bolshoi theater and where at some point there is an announcement over the speakerphone of kgb agents against leaving after chasing to the exit, and at that moment all the visual gets up and goes out to the exit. and even

one of the dancers leaves, and the ballerina goes out. that is, this gaidai is really very, but he beat them, not so much political humor. how much you simply loved erase in the address of some. their realities, which, well, which everyone was stuffed with, so here are the realities, it seems to me this is what is still interesting to see the films of the year - this is the second part. yes, what i like about this is that he is not an anti-soviet. he does not question the fundamentals of the system at all. i remind you that this is the gaidai 100 podcast, where we talk about the centenary of the remarkable soviet director. leonid yuryevich gaidai , i am a film historian natalya ryabchikova and we communicate with my colleague stanislav diskinsky. in fact, we have already begun to move on to the topic of why the guide is now popular and why does it need to be watched? i personally tried, and in due time to get to the bottom of the reasons this people's love, and i specifically analyzed tv programs for 50 years, how often and what films were repeated on new

year's eve on soviet television, and oddly enough, it turned out that ah, not so often, that is, the phenomenon of love , guide. this is a phenomenon of repetition of the last decades. still, soviet television usually tried to show some kind of premiere on new year's eve. and it would be really like a movie now, after all, the strategy shows what people really love , they know exactly what they will support a certain rating and indeed people watch and know, but i would like to break this trend and advise viewers to watch the film that a may be the most unknown. if in gaidai that same groom became sveta who, but is available to us in half of its full form. but, in my opinion, there you can see where the legs grow from. there you can see everything that appears later and this is a very interesting bunch, and soviet cinema and soviet reality of the late fifties and early sixties. here is one movie you can see which i highly recommend. it

didn't become light. and for you to recommend, listen, probably, the diamond arm. why? well, because on the one hand there is no shurik and kaidai's economy is a little violated. here, on the other hand, this is formally, perhaps the richest saturated film. c because there are also references to italian. dialo yes and uh. ah here is these here frames nightmares. u look hunchbacks performed by nikulin this, of course, absolutely somewhere close to the genre of italian cinema and uh, well, the songs of the song of course well, as if the songs are not the main one, but in general the way the film is made from a formal point of view. actually, it is precisely the interest, when and in our time, and due to the fact, in my opinion, that e mankens are beginning to understand, how difficult, but his cinema was arranged, how carefully his team was preparing. and in general, as if a movie with her is not so simple as it seems to many modern critics. it's

quite difficult and the director. yes, this is a rather complicated process of preparation, first of all , the development stage. uh, in production where you need to come up with all these tricks, you will never be able to make the kind of movie that gaidai made if you think that you need to improvise here built improvisation, of course, improvisation is always present in the acting of actors, some ideas of things arise in the process of shooting, but still- you can't build complex tricks on improvisation from tricks. gaidai has quite a lot. they need to be invented first, really in this sense, probably, the diamond hand. it seems to me one of the most perfect, uh, films of the gaidai, although it may be in my spirit ivan vasilievich is closer there, but if he was an electrician, probably the diamond arm. i think we've made a pretty compelling recommendation and leave our viewers with a choice. which movie in fortune teller to watch or re-watch? it was a hint guess , wait, i'm the history of cinema natalia ryavchikkova. and my colleague. the history of cinema

stanislavsky pleasant viewing. you see, here what kind of thing, it turns out, is now the most popular query on the search engines dmitry quarterly, where is he to the point, right? where is he? well, besides being physically faster, yes, where is he, and i think the case, where is he 2.000, where are you? well, as i promised you in the first, where to come? here in the first you came nowhere, in principle, i rest to restore. yes, you can do whatever you want, how to say it, but for now i enjoy life, i watch hockey as a fan in general. so dmitry quarterly. today we have. my name is denis kazansky, this is a podcast, hockey is not football, and we are talking about another sport dmitrievich well , you have already started talking about how the hockey observer is now retired, like

driving has changed. it has changed dramatically, well , it has changed dramatically, and most importantly, i sleep well at night, in general, as you know , you wake up like this usually, as it used to be. here is the player. here i did this situation and in this one i did it. that's how he did it, why he did it wrong and you start to think something, uh, you try to get into your head to analyze. well , that was then, it's not now. you sleep peacefully and enjoy waking up, you go there or fitness, you go or you go for a walk. in general, some household chores. all this you know, a pensioner's routine. your brother andrew and so long ago he defended his doctoral pedagogy. this is the time when you now you got hmm more without any of you somehow used your development too. he's done well, in general, he has always been fond of these moments. well, i'm definitely not going to defend my doctoral dissertation in my life. i probably

can't. but once again, well, you read something interesting there in psychology, there , in some kind of fiction, you also read physiology there, well, something like that, but i can’t say that i’m a fan of these, well, once again i say you watch a lot of hockey you watch football. here the magnificent passed the world cup, as if, well, here, you worked, just in the two top clubs of our country cska and ak bars well, lokomotiv well, less degree. let's still be objective, you can compare the pressure that is here in the central sports club and the current that is in kazan well, let's do it, in general, the first two years. in cska, my shift was sergei fedorov , who is now the head coach. it was very comfortable for me to work with him, and as the first 2 years in kazan, the schedule in the case of the cube was very it's comfortable to work, yes, and cska is,

you know, the great great club. uh, soviet times. the pressure was probably greater, most likely it was from the outside. well, probably the leadership needed a specific result. yes, but, uh, sergey fedorov, he, uh, in this regard, well done, he kept you know this in this regard. you know how sponge was soaking everything and it was very comfortable to feel with him, taking on many things. well, after the third year, he left and already, as it were, he had to deal with this situation himself. well, i'm back to ready for this. when you accept a big club that you have to understand in kazan a little bit different, the local press shakes the situation there very much. that is , slutsk spoke a lot about this, how she worked in rubin. well, i say it again, this is a lot. and the most important thing is sometimes. that's nothing.

you see, that's nothing, the team plays well. no, you don't play like that. here, here , in each, as it were, large team. i think there are some. the moments are different, but the pressure is still there, which is curious, because you are perhaps the first third coach in uh, throughout league to which i let the camera into the locker room, and she followed you not only in the home match and away. it was a big series that ak bars did. well, in general, when they were invited at all, when they were invited to kazan . the most important person is the president of tatneft, he is clear. i was told by 70% of our players uh-huh and openness. we must be open to the press, and i believe that we have succeeded in doing so. yes, by and large i am. i didn't want to do it. but, probably, the direction

that kazan ak bars took was openness. i to this did not interfere allowed. we are in the dressing room. still, there were. eh, there were some inconveniences. you know, when we play a coffin somewhere a little bit. oh, not the player, but the director starts there. e from the corner in the chamber. there it sometimes annoyed myself crushed by these sensations. well, it happened once and the director got it. well, what did you get? well, i wanted to know, sometimes you need to have a heart-to-heart talk in a team so that there are no extra ears. we sometimes clean up doctors and doctors there, so that there would be no guys, uh, we just need someone with the guys to talk one on one so that the players and coaches remain, the most difficult conversation of which team? well, i would like to leave it. at home, well, what i say to the guys with the players,

it remains, it remains in the locker room. gagarin's cuba is still a dream for you. why am i asking if there is a head coach in karpin, because the national team that works in rostov who, well, said that, well, titles are not the main thing in this situation for you. no. i think that. well, i don't know what he was. what he was thinking. well said if he said, so it is for him. well, anyone wants to strive for something, to touch something. well, again, on the way to this , there are a lot of moments, a lot of nuances. you see, this is a lot of jigsaw puzzles to put together. well, let's talk about them, because we know quite curiously, but really the coaches who came from the first attempt took gagarin's cuba, you had enough of such attempts. you were very close, and you survived. such a feeling, we will begin the whole gamut of feelings. from what happened in cska

when you lead uska 3-0 and then it all turns around and then wins the overall series , they go further than what you learned then. this is history. well, i understand, we did one little wrong thing there, after 3.0 they invited the guys there, they wanted to relax the guys a little, it was not necessary to do this, they invited them there, well, a little bit, uh, not that we were invited to celebrate. uh. artists, uh, a little, well, they wanted to relax the guys a little. there is no such an evening as a narrow team, you know, uh, purely like that. it probably played a little. such a negative role, that is, they believed that everything was over. i wanted a little more. i wanted a little different, i wanted them a little bit, so that they were so, well, collected. let them loosen up a bit. well, it did it, probably purely mine, probably the mistake was, where we are a little bit here, and then such a will. here it was, a mini-concert of such a small

standard was and the musicians were and led. eh, such a person. well, in general, things all here. uh, so here we are, probably, and here it is, well, that's what he said, as i understand it, here i shouldn't have played hockey here. in general, especially since 3:0, such a viper was big, but even then everything went a little bit. so awry. these feelings, when the series breaks down, right after the match, what it is, not very pleasant at all, not very pleasant, but the most difficult feeling was after the seventh game the next year, when we lost with magnitka. here, here, like this, it was more there, they just missed the thread, but they already fought, but somewhere it didn’t work out. uh, hmm, we got everything with a magnet and won the sixth game. in magnitogorsk, you know, they should have been somewhere, but this is how it really happened there could be

an installation before the seventh level, maybe the last break before e, so as a result , timki brought this puck there, what was there, what went wrong, what will you take with you? it won't happen again at the next club. no, but it's a lot of pressure. i say this a lot again, these were some mistakes. basically here. you can remember, score in the fifth game there, roman lyubimov shoots. uh huh bulit who for a minute is this please this is this and everything would be predetermined, again a lot, if a lot, if a-a in the final game. this is someone who is stronger in spirit, who is stronger i say again, well, well, the goalkeeper is still, in general, by and large. the goalkeeper here has a lot of power, the kitties did a lot. the series are very good with a view and played very cool. let's expand on the topic here, too, because it is related to football last at

the end of last year. i think you heard how cristiano ronaldo's case rumbled so much when he went to an interview and talked about how that he is not satisfied with the approach of the coach, the coach does not respect you and therefore something needs to be done next, it was clear that this was a break in the contract and then cristiano saudi arabia had a feeling that you had such stories, and you had your own cristiano in the team i mean both zaripova and iradulova. at least in the hockey environment, this is what they have been talking about for years. i don't know, you know, i was very lucky that i worked with these guys, but let's do it. let's say so. in general. sasha radulov was so you know such a peak of form and age was good and played very well. and simple guy, he taught me something. i tried

to teach him something to him, but in terms of work ethic, this man was an example in everything for training. he was the first, starting with the warm-up and ending with the last exercise on the ice, you know, this man, who hmm did not put up with anything, he is a competition- competition moment, he manifested this e everywhere. i say the basketball warm-up begins, he must win, and the one-on-one game begins, let's say the fight on the ice. ice training he has to beat it in everything you know, it motivated everyone around everyone it was such a great example for the youth. and i think that then a lot of guys. uh, looking at sasha radulova, a lot of guys got up. and you, as a coach, again, return to radulova to zarepov, when there is such authority in the locker room, when he can even surpass the coach in sensations. so he is again cristiano

, for example, such a situation was, how comfortable it all was. you know, radulov is never. here i say again, he may have something there, but he never crossed. we feel very comfortable with him. yes, there were some small working moments there, and there on the ice. well , she had enough, you know, if he even went over something a little bit, she had enough courage, but this is a human person. he can come up after the game the next day and how to apologize or find out how we would be with them, uh, we are very so, well, in positive moments, uh situation, no matter how we analyze him a word until we say. let's probably so i’ll say a programmer, after all, you know, i came, when danis’s team was already 37 years old. he is already quite already

. adulthood was such a serious age. so, well, in general, he still played and scored. in general, here, uh, it’s definitely impossible to compare these sradulovs at that moment it would have blown very hot and it was hot for the reefs at that age when, let’s say, i worked at cska ah, let’s say, zaripov was either in kazan or or in magnitogorsk, after all, at that time they were very like that. well, very cool the most titled hockey player, in my opinion, in russia, yes, here he is, he is such a guy. in this regard, there is and he is the legend of kazan , you know, the picture worked very hard for me very well, and i had no problems with it. here you have it, you should probably ask him, you should ask him, but i