extremes, either the level of god or the worm, in the middle, like normal people. you won't survive. why suffer? no pity. i really need money. how much

m how much will i owe? how much is this ring worth? this will be my percentage. i still take risks. okay, we'll meet tomorrow and discuss all the details. i'll tell you when and to me. after the third

course i got a job as a nurse. it was necessary to put a drip on one elderly patient. for me it was the first time in a patient after my attempts all hands. i was driven away. i didn't even see you managed put in a catheter since then i have never had anyone. i am a doctor with thirteen years of experience. then i fainted in my first birth. i still dream about the patient's scar after my first caesarean. you are still my best friend. i almost drowned you. same

hello nina alekseevna good

evening, you were looking for me, i was released. thank you , you can move on, i'm on my own. go, i said, and here is also free. artyom vitalievich the proposal to talk has grown old.

let's stay no, i'll stay. you have an operation tomorrow in the morning so everything go then for 5 minutes one. hello.

on the air of the big game today we are discussing how we usually do the conflict around ukraine and what it means for the world order big events are expected tomorrow, when the big twenty foreign ministers, the twenty will gather in new delhi, some have already

accepted. and how they arrived, like sergey lavrov, others, how they stay in the blink of an eye only tomorrow and there will be a very serious conversation, but about whether the g20 will allow them to do what it is supposed to do big, but questions of the world order, pandemics and so on. well, including, of course, it would be legal and probably reasonable to discuss the conflict in ukraine, but the fact is that the united states of the european union sees its task in a completely different way. in order to get through a resolution that would condemn russia, not to put forward peace proposals on ukraine , not to look for a compromise, not to take advantage of this meeting, to have a serious talk with lavrov and with russia's chinese friends, there is no task to condemn russia, as if it helped

ukraine, as if it helped the world order. i think how it would help efficiency the big twenty is difficult to understand. but even today i must mention it, and there is one significant and very sad date on march 1 , 1881, emperor alexander ii alexander ii was killed by terrorists , the reformer king who freed the peasants. the tsar who created an independent judiciary in russia carried out other liberal reforms, but in general, this was absolutely not enough for russian radicals. he had many claims against him , and one very serious claim was his e policy towards poland when the poles

decided that the liberal reforms mean the weakening of russian power and rebelled. and despite the resistance of some of his liberal advisers, alexander ii decided to use force and quickly put an end to the polish uprising . there was predictable indignation in england, especially in france. the lessons of this assassination for our time. i can only say that no liberal policy, but no noble instincts obviously do not stop flights, especially if these terrorists have foreign patrons. well, i

'm thinking about the challenges that will be tomorrow, uh , for russia at the g20 in new delhi. and of course, uh, washington's great expectations are with india. will india be able to convince? can india be pressured into accepting western formulations? and, of course, they hope that china will also show, let's say, receptivity to american arguments and american pressure. this is indeed a big deal for the united states. a game. but here's what's interesting, and i don't know what you think about this, but oleg morozov with your experience not only at home, but also in the executive branch. apparently, the biden administration. do you have secret agents? but i understand that you may not know,

if you know, you don’t know, how can you explain the following statement of the director on the eve of this g20 meeting somewhere about china’s position so much depends. let's listen. the fbi has long believed that the source of the pandemic is most likely a potential wuhan incident. laboratories. let me step back for a second. the fbi has human agents , analysts, virologists, microbiologists, and so on, who study biological threats, including things like new viruses like covid-19 and the fear of terrorist criminals falling into the hands of ill-wishers from hostile states. they may pose a threat. so this is a potential leak from a lab controlled by the chinese government that has led to the deaths of millions of americans. that was the purpose of this

development. i ask you to look at the wording. i have read it twice. uh, the original text, to be sure there is no translation error, not only announced china in estrus e viruses from the laboratory. she said that it was done deliberately in order to kill millions of americans, that there was an investigation, that they were ready to present the facts. the fbi thinks, but i don't have to tell you oleg that, in general, the investigating authorities still expect them not to count. and what will they install and what, in particular, when they make such serious accusations?

then they, in general, will be ready to present some evidence, because otherwise it is just a gift to the enemies of america. tell me, when you think about this accusation and you occupy a high position in the duma, the control committee, which you head, probably also has something to do with this kind of problem. do you have any information. and that china deliberately wanted to kill millions of americans while kicking out hundreds of thousands of its own citizens. well i think you guess my answer. no, you can't be more than that. and within the framework of the commission that deals with biological threats, where i have the honor to be a member of this parliamentary commission that deals with the development of issues related to biological, and laboratories in ukraine that were funded by the pentagon.

we interviewed a lot of experts, including on the question of how history is seen as a ska view , including american experts who acted as witnesses, let's say, whom we invited, and, uh, the idea that that it is a man-made virus. she, of course , wanders quite actively in the air, but none of the most radical ones, there are specialists and accusers in tula in the other direction about the chinese lion into the anti-chinese in the american river. remember the american no one turned his tongue to say it straight. this china is to blame, or whoever did it deliberately, you know, i had very good teachers in politics. well, i'll name one, for example, as evgeny maksimovich klimakov. uh, from whom i studied in politics and in direct and in a figurative sense, that is, watched how he acts. and he explained some things to me. and you know, after all, the most important thing in politics is the question of how americans behave.

this is the ability to achieve results. yes, for what you can retreat. you can take a step back in something for a while in order to achieve a result later. it seems to me that the americans for the years of their such political dominance. this is the feeling that we are holding god by the beard. and we may have lost it all, uh that skill which must be in politics. they won very often. leading myself. uh , shamelessly, impudently cynical and apparently, these easy victories of the period of the unipolar world taught them to this kind of behavior, and the world has changed radically, just changed. you know how, uh, uh , it's february 24th. and suddenly we

woke up in a completely different place and what do you know the most important thing in this world? that it turned out that those who are dissatisfied with the way it works, the former world that existed before february 24 is much larger. than satisfied. how once satisfied, you can count. almost on the fingers, this is what such a relatively close-knit group around the united states is, the rest of the dissatisfied are all dissatisfied in different ways. i understand that there is dissatisfaction with china's modern measures in india, bangladesh, south africa, and other countries, which i can name many, many, many, they are dissatisfied in various ways. but everyone is dissatisfied with something, everyone is ready to change something in this world, the americans do not want to hear it. that's when they go to delhi in order to bend everyone over and say, sign this committee, where the word war will be, what they don't want to do, for example, the chinese indians for various

reasons for various reasons, but the americans are pushing through, this is blackmailing them, including here. at the gates of the statement believe that there is somewhere near victory, in my opinion. the world has changed so much that you can’t behave this way precisely because you stop achieving the desired result, the harder the americans put pressure on the whole world in the desire to force everyone to return, this one was worth it, uh, i’m more understandable with her, they get the opposite effect and back responses, in my opinion. here today. eh, i am not i know how the dialogue will end. e on the case about even this communiqué. i do not exclude that something will be corrected there, cleaned and maybe it will appear. although now i have big doubts to pull out, i firmly know that india, china, bangladesh and many other participants in this event have completely different understandings of what needs

to be done to ensure their own security. what should be done to ensure equal conditions? economic trade all the time in the world energy security, which today largely tied to the place and actions of russia thank you andrey denisov and you had a very , impressive career, including right about that in quality and your analytical opinion of this kind of behavior from the united states american pressure, moreover, public pressure on china as blinkin says, either the chinese will behave as we tell them, or we tell them that we will get you into very serious trouble. here it will come down to americans term or it can have any real consequences. uh, well, i'm convinced that the deadline

of course, it will not come down and the consequences, of course , will be another matter, that our chinese colleagues, what is called playing for a long time, does not mean that they will cut, as they say, sabers from the shoulder. it's possible that hmm uh, you know the feeling. i am a star. that's it, yes it can come. a little later, because in china they know how to wait, but this is such a general philosophical reasoning. i would still. uh, that's what he said, here, uh, about my impressive u there for almost 10 years, it's not for me to evaluate, but here's what the last without small three years were impressive. that's for sure, because it was just covid. i survived the covid in china literally from the first almost until the fall, returning almost to the last days, and i remember well both the beginning and how it all developed. and of course hmm we 've been following this very closely, quite.

naturally. this was actually our task and, uh, for our part. i can only confirm that there are no signs that, based on the opinion of the assessment of specialists, are seriously evidence, or in favor of this version. well, at least not was, but to pay attention to mr. ray's statement, no. such a high-like familiar to us already, it simply says that this is how it is. and excuse me, for god's sake , for all sorts of fantasies, but uh, i'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but involuntarily you start to believe. e in such constructions about a certain deep state and the deep state. yes, well, look. recently, we have seen the story of this unfortunate balloon, yes, which is generally absurd, but nevertheless frustrated, the visit of blinkin. here and here now, but what is it for statement at the moment of the ministerial meeting

preceding this group itself 20 m or or apparently we just live in a world where everything is upside down and where there are kingdoms. that's the whole point, i joked, what's there, maybe not without the russian special services. it was, of course, a joke. i hope i understood this, but there is an element of truth in every joke and i wanted to show that i can find some sound logic here. and it's very difficult. especially. if you know that christopher is not some crazy political nominee, no radical left or some crazy non-conservative. this is a professional law enforcement officer of the judiciary. a and. i know that indeed in washington his professionalism is respected and all of a sudden

this. general buzinsky, i know that you are closely following what is happening on the fronts of ukraine; there is even a pointer in front of you. there is a map in front of you . we need to know, especially about what is happening in the south of ukraine bakhmut and so on. you know, well, along the whole front, here is the matchmaker, severskaya bakhmut carbon. eh, basically e goes e. well, i wouldn't call it a strategic offensive, but it's uh, it's offensive. it's not a separate one. uh, big strategic offensive operation. this is really such a squeezing out , grinding of the uh of the ukrainian armed forces , the main thing now, of course, is artyomovsk or bach. here, uh. i think that, uh, well, these are

all operational environments, tactical environments. this is all, of course, such terms are more journalistic full circle not yet, but the only road that, uh, leads yet, along which, uh, the ukrainians can still get out of this ring. uh, she's under fire. e by the influence of russian e russian troops. and therefore, uh, after uh, i’m sure that, well, i don’t know the days of the week, maybe, but in the end, this operation, which has been going on for almost half a year, will be completed after that , a certain uh, operational space , uh, this is this the so-called second line, the third line is kramatorsk slavyansk well equip it completely. eh, just like and the ukrainians simply do not

have time for the second line. and therefore, i think that e, it should go further faster, moreover, you understand, i have a very ambivalent impression about the supply of uh equipment. eh, words to ukrainians. many promises, a lot of sums are called astronomical, but, nevertheless, the germans complain that there are no tanks and the air defense systems that they handed over to ukraine exposed berlin, those tanks that were promised there 300 pieces, it turns out that they are not there, there are only a third, then there are somewhere around 100 and that, they need, so to speak, to repair aircraft, but aircraft. it seems to me that the americans are biden. at first, he said very carefully that there were no plans yet, and the deputy minister of defense spoke and answered the question. um, i don't remember the senators or how he says the shift to cook his airmen in the ward. come on, now,

do you train pilots? no, we’re not preparing, because who doesn’t know, will there be more planes, because if you order new ones, and the americans, in principle, from the availability of such equipment as air defense system aircraft, they don’t supply there is too much coding, there are a lot of very, uh, parts which need change or remove they prefer. uh, export options still do. uh, made to order, so he says if new it's 3-6 years old. if you say so, older models, but i think that we are talking about just out of stock, if they transfer it, it will be 1-2 years, that is, you understand that it will be there in 3-6 years. no one knows from ukraine and in 1-2 years no one knows either. moreover, i am absolutely sure that the american leadership, especially the military leadership. although the military, this is not a frightened generation, they also say, but on airplanes, although any military man understands that they cannot be based in ukraine. i have already expressed my

position, so. based in adjacent countries, most likely in poland , but then we will be forced to strike at these airfields, but it’s easy to think of another way, if the plane flies in, launches missiles there, we will strike at our troops returns to this airfield. well, it doesn’t happen, and then the americans will have to think about starting world war iii for them, or wait a bit and tell the poles, but this is yours private bussiness. understand so to speak. now let's hear what they think about washington, maybe not so much a third world war, but on the expediency of further arms supplies to ukraine and with us from washington, the brand of bishops s, a specialist in international security and, until recently, observers on national security in national interest brand magazines. i'm assuming

you've been following the recent ones. mi debates in the house of representatives regarding the supply of weapons to ukraine and these were generally serious objections of fear or it is like loud voices, they are significantly reduced. good afternoon. i will say that uh republicans are now quite uh and divided about the draft on this issue. there are three main groups. uh, within the republican party. this is the first one, these are people who believe that it is necessary to increase the scale of supplies to ukraine , they need to be sent, as one senator said, if it shoots immediately send, uh, long-range missiles, fighters, everything that is immediately, they are not afraid of escalation, as they are worried white house e did not worry did not pass, but simply send send and crushers of this point of view. e,

there are e high-ranking influential committees. these people are like the second group. i would say that, as most republicans stand now, these are people who generally agree with white politics. at home, and this is constantly sending weapons, but at the same time sending slowly and escalating slowly, so that there is a couple of months between the new category of weapons that they decided to send, for example, uh, first uh, missile systems, then after another month or a month and a half, tanks and so on. ah, but even these people even these, uh, republicans in congress think there should be a higher level of oversight, that we should seriously investigate, where is our uh going, what are we spending our money on?

uh, how many of these weapons reach front a and and i would say that there is, uh, hmm, an absolute consensus among the republicans that it is true that we need oversight, and that the level of this oversight should be increased and today's uh hearings in congress, i think the beginning of this process where they start uh, the republicans start asking questions about uh , about uh, if our weapons are being used effectively and our help is being used effectively, but there is also a third group of people having fun, like uh representatives of the florida margians or silent, who believe that help needs to be stopped completely immediately and it's a pretty small but vocal faction within the republican party. that being said, it is a faction that reflects the opinion, if not the majority

, of the republican vote or how at least half. and just uh, the mood of support for ukraine is endless, limitless among republicans is quite low, if we are talking about elections. vote in congress, it is still quite high. i was talking the other day with an american friend of mine who is, uh, a prominent businessman, uh, and a big donor to the republican party, and he was blown away. uh, i'm contrasting the mood in a liberal suburb of washington called besezda and what's going on where i live in rural america other people other faces and others sympathy. but in the conversation all hang out. and as he said, ukrainian flags, and where i

live, a couple of russian flags appeared, and this reflects. i don't want to say the trend of most of the local voters but it's also kind of, if you want a political statement, given where american politics is going, and molly to say that in america there is, if not the danger of civil war, this is a very serious political split potentially with big consequences. i would say that we are certainly in the middle of a moral panic, where it is very difficult. it is sensible to assess what is happening and this panic is localized, where you completely correctly noted in the periphery people live a completely different life, they care about completely different things. i don't think. it's completely different. uh, big cities and a lot of washington. there are people who

take this very seriously, but on all counts, the level of investment by the american people in this conflict is very low. if anything, then again, according to polls, many more americans consider china to be serious rival, so people don't want that. i'm not sure how people understand this. and that's one of the things republicans who support biden's policies are saying. we need to explain to people why this is so important. ukraine because we have to support our allies on the eastern flank of nato because if ukraine loses, then russia can attack poland and the baltic countries and so on. i'm not sure how much people even get into this debate, this debate, which is very loud in washington, but then again, people in other states and in the peripheries don't live with it at all, and i

don't think it will change, but that's why people are completely against a catastrophic escalation. if we are serious about saying that we will move to a point where we have to decide whether to continue this conflict already with direct participation or or still think about negotiations, of course, the vast majority of people will not want this, and even among the people among the american voters who support help. uh, polls showing very often they support. help with a condition with a condition that we must help, but at the same time create a basis for negotiations and for peace. they are unlimited help that can lead us into a direct clash with russia , something that no one has any interest in. if, again, we are talking about voting or about the last americans. thank you very much. we know you have to go. thank you for taking the time and we hope

to see you again soon on the air of our program. we're heading to the commercial now and will be back in just a few minutes. throughout the soviet period, azerbaijan actively developed the republic was one of the main oil resources of the soviet union in terms of culture. soviet georgia continued the tradition that was born back in the 19th century, when there was more freedom in the caucasus than in traditional russian cultural centers during the years of soviet power, armenia turned into an advanced industrial graar. it became a republic with universal literacy, a developed higher education with its own science, culture, literature, art. premiere century ussr film

the third south today at the first fantastic shopping even during discount periods. from february 25 to march 4

how beautiful you came up with everything yourself, how on time. i have issued tinkoff platinum me heat for the better. have time to get a tinkoff platinum credit card before march 31 and get free service forever tinkoff he is such an ideal basket for one my basket for 169 rubles. at kfc my life is moving forward in these clothes. i feel at all 100 gloria jeans card 120 days with a low rate of 9.5% per annum ural prospects where you are

always in control of the motor. take out osago insurance in tinkoff and receive payments in case of an accident just behind tinkoff he is the only one to please your loved ones with discounts of up to 70 percent on yandex.market buy a vitek kitchen machine for 4990 rubles. 1 hour. the rest later. this is how to find, the money of an old

jacket pay on time, and the post office will return the bank, the difference is recalculated in money supply credit 4.5% per annum come for the money post bank. i feel uncomfortable for you. now mega is convenient and mega profitable get a mega subscription for a year and pay once a month for communication and new smartphone. this is a convenient megaphone, someone sees a credit card 120 for everything, and i see the possibility of a credit card. get 120 days for everything already in rosbank and you can get no

interest for buyers to enter, remove the head , win, rosbank credit card 120 for everything rosbank is a real opportunity. i premiered on football with denis kazansky from march 5 on sundays on the first i myself played for a long time. well, for a long time, and you, i don’t play, i

train. in a big game a big bookmaker online general partner of the russian premier league we talked about a big game on the air a few minutes ago about some actions of the united states of the american allies, which are rather difficult to explain from the point of view of sound logic. well, there are some actions of ukraine that seem to go even further, because they potentially really threaten, but either with the destruction of ukraine or even a third world war. i mean, general, the latest reports about the appearance of some ukrainian drones that allegedly strike in russian

territory. while blows, mostly. let's just say unsuccessful and harmless, but what about does it say suggestive? and let's just listen to what he said. e adviser to zelensky and mikhail podlyako. ukraine does not hit the territory of the russian federation ukraine is waging a defensive war so that they occupy all their territories. it is an axiom that panic and disintegration processes are growing in the russian federation, which is expressed in an increase in internal ufo attacks on infrastructure facilities of an internal internal attack on russian infrastructure facilities. i want to note that those who do not remember. uh, figurative expressions of mr. podlyako, he is usually not shy about using threats, including the territory of the russian federation in

moscow and so on, and therefore such a statement of his is somewhat reassuring, and to some extent fantastic that russia is again striking in itself, it caused the following reaction in the kremlin we do not believe them, - said the press secretary of the president of russia dmitry peskov. responding to a request to comment on the statement of the adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine mikhail podlyako that kiev does not strike on the territory russian federation general your opinion you know, well, it's complete nonsense, of course, uh, of course it's ukrainians. eh, it's a little different from my point of view. uh, the nuances of american behavior have changed, because, of course. eh, whatever it does. u is already outside the territory of ukraine. i think that this is not amateur performance, it is all , so to speak, under the guidance and with the blessing of the americans, but here, uh, those

attempts to inflict some damage, uh, to our strategic airfields. in particular , engels in the saratov region, e swifts uh tu-141, which the americans have finalized in terms of the guidance system. you are convinced that it was the americans who finalized it. of course , because it’s not, because there are haircuts no, well, well, firstly, this is the data swift tu-141 is a reconnaissance drone. this is not a shock, a drone. no, they themselves, and, uh, not at all, well, they could, of course, uh , attach to remove reconnaissance equipment and make, so to speak, a warhead with explosives, but guidance, uh, guidance system. moreover, guidance was carried out according to satellite. of course, these are not ukrainians. i have it here. personally, i have no doubts, but what followed. you see

, i'll be back. uh, the same cis treaty, of course, uh , russia had many reasons for dissatisfaction, there and this is a well-known issue of re-equipment, but one of the arguments that was voiced. when the president of the russian federation, uh, announced his message, these are attempts, uh, of ukrainians with american help , the president said about this. i think that he definitely has verified data on striking our e at the airfield basing our strategic aviation. well , besides the fact that such are the blows that they inflict on belgorodskaya in e. kursk regions. these are the drones. uh, the so -called suicides, and they, too, they are fraught with escalation. you see, everyone is talking, why doesn’t it intercept them? well, the air defense system is a very complex such system. she covers, and mostly objects, uh, military

military-state objects. eh, but she can't. uh, especially a country like russia with such a territory to cover the entire territory. well, as an israeli, for example, they have three echelons there, but the territory is small, so almost everything is covered, and then they let through, and uh, we need to cover all the power plants. all uh, oil storage facilities, everything, but there are a lot of critical infrastructure facilities that we just, well, physically cannot create such an air defense system . so i think they are just playing with fire, huh. but all this i say, it will lead to an escalation, that we, uh, well, i've been waiting for this for a long time, that we will give up and some of the self-restraints will start to strike and not only in terms of energy infrastructure and energy, but also in production sites where

equipment is repaired and manufactured. mostly repaired and correct me. if i didn’t fully understand you, you are actually saying that they are playing with fire in the sense that even if they succeeded in something, it would cost them incredibly dearly, of course, and no one hides this, and the president he spoke about it and his press secretary talks about it and the military say that the answer will be and the answer will be that it will show little. thank you oleg again you in the house you have a committee, uh, which you head and which look at what is happening inside the country and look at you have control functions. uh, gives you. uh, as i understand it, uh, access to information about some internal processes, including opposition to the radical opposition, terrorism, and so

on. do you have any information that would confirm that these dronov strikes could, as it were, agree with some of their own ukrainian radicals. they talked about it sir podlyak, that this could be a matter, but of the russian internal opposition. well , i definitely don’t have such information, hypothetical one can imagine. uh, probably such a situation, but i really trust our source in our special services. just a few days ago, the president met with the elite of our special services, uh, and the corresponding ones were set up. i think that if you imagine what a conditional underground is, it exists and it is behind, uh, these strikes. sorry i'm hiding. uh, mostly the radical russians boasted

immigrants settled in kiev and they said that they might have some kind of network inside russia that would allow them to listen to this. this is the last thing that immigration can say today. if tomorrow, uh, some heavy rain falls over moscow, i think they will announce. this is the result of their efforts, but let's be honest, let's say that a it is clear that there is an internal terrorist threat and the president directly spoke about this and set the task for our special services so that they eradicated, and this threat and we, by the way, see the fruits of this activity, we now and then receive information that some other russian group has been exposed , liquidated or eh. so to speak, its action was stopped by such our special services, but i repeat once again, i absolutely agree with our military specialist that in 99% of cases the gifts

that are applied on the territory of the russian federation are the work of ukraine, with absolute e? authorization and support of the united states of america for one simple reason, because indeed today a system of guidance and drones and all other systems that strike, including on the territory of the russian federation, is impossible without the use of these communication systems with e hmm and american satellites with american guidance systems, which they actively share. uh, with ukraine, moreover, we heard so many statements that were later refuted by reality, such as, for example, allegedly not participating. this is following zelensky's statement that they have nothing to do with the assassination attempt on e. i give

uh, dugin to murder the murder of daria dugin, when today we already have information for sure that this means a woman who, uh, is accused by our e bodies of this crime she where is she, as it is rightly put, she served in uh special services, and ukraine and received appropriate training. uh, just like the terrorist attack on the bridge. let's admit that today we are confronted by an enemy who does not shy away from any methods and means to inflict damage on us, and this accordingly requires counter and active actions from us. here am i i warmly support that when we mark some red lines. it would be very good for us to make it clear to our opponents , including washington, that if these red lines are crossed, the answer is tough

, consistent and very indicative, it is inevitable, as was the case with the crimean bridge. after that, the answer was so revealing that everyone understood the connection between this terrorist attack and its consequences. and of course it's let's say uh when we talk about ukraine is no longer just an adversary. and this is a frank enemy, and the enemy, uh, sorry for the expression with limited intellectual ability. and as president putin says with limited social responsibility, and in general people are capable of the most idiotic adventures. even if for them they may be suicidal. uh, the consequences are still paying for it. they do it. unfortunately, for now. uh, all these suicidal acts are paid handsomely. we will now move on to another subject. uh, and that's of course what 's going on in new delhi and what u got there with,

china i want to ask more broadly than what will happen tomorrow? we will find out tomorrow. well, china looks at the statement of the fbi director china looks at threats, and anthony blinkin china looks at how anthony blinkin, a, who flies from central asia, how he openly restored. there, the leaders of the central asian states tried to restore not only against russia but also against china, as china sees the policy of the united states, despite the fact that the chinese are still really dependent on their role in the world economy, including their trade with the united states european union, they are opposed. speaking interests in china is how they try to combine the protection of their national interests and the protection of their economic interests, that's the point.

what e? they are special and do not combine, as we see political interests prevail, and apparently, if there are at least some signs of logical thinking left in washington, they most likely believe that, in general, the economic base is in full compliance, by the way, with the theory of marxism, economic the basis is so strong that in the policy of the superstructure one can allow whatever they want and allow themselves. china of course reacts to this with extreme displeasure. including including even, as it seems to me, this is a purely personal , you know, detached opinion, it may even be contrary to such a traditional manner of restraint and balance in assessing certain political events and building your policy regarding your partners, but first of all the leading key ones, and as it certainly is the united states of america

, and, as for the twenty, china is certainly interested in her still focusing on the main issues of its agenda. and this, of course, a lot depends on china on the world economy and china depends on the world economy in the same way that the world economy depends on it and is exchanged for all sorts of things. directly. of course have. uh, the g7 is the big seven, which is trying to carry out some of its own, uh, means political installations, but still, everyone conducted by the secluded states of america, maybe even without the united states of america, the rest of the members of this same seven. hmm , perhaps they would be inclined to have a more constructive conversation, because the west as

a whole is also experiencing quite serious economic difficulties and it needs a conversation in the twenty. well, probably to the same extent as china in one word. everything interfered in the house in the house. twenties. so, to paraphrase, uh, and famous quote. uh, so uh, to complete uh this part, i would say. so china still. focused on practical issues will certainly try to somehow neutralize the politicization of the g20 agenda, but at the same time we see what he is experiencing. uh, growing irritation from the absolutely shameless and devoid of any logic e position of the american partners. thank you very much. we'll be back in just a few minutes. the ability

of a good melody is no competition in the 20th century genius, it is necessary to write work to work to be realized. this is right at the level of the disease. it hurts. need to write. really about coffee came to moscow procoffe returned to the country where he was definitely expected . magnificent orchestras were waiting for him. almost the best performers of that time about coffee, you were very good at performing it, as you paid no one, like no one. listen to this and it concerns you. i never pay attention to people's remarks. which were not presented to me too independent disposition for some kind of excessive originality, which already, as it were, rolled over the image of the soviet composer. prokofiev learned that he was the second formalist in the country, while the formalist was in fact affairs.

in l'etoile, gifts only for love with up to 50% discounts on your favorite fragrances, gift sets for your soulmate and even flowers, absolutely everything for gifts to your loved ones in letual, an exclusive fragrance from soda for 750 rubles. the halva card opens the door to the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales, buying gifts will become even more pleasant with an installment plan for 18 months and a cashback of up to 10% choose gifts for your loved ones and give with all your heart. big love is coming download magnet app. play

the game and win give gifts from the heart this basket magnet is divided into only one my basket for 169 rubles. in kfc, only in the sportmaster mobile application, new arrivals of the original adidas kill buy profitably with the promotional code 15 online sportmaster guarantee the authenticity of the goods. how to hint at a diamond gift from sokolov, you can do this, but it’s better to give a hint of minus 55% on everything sokolov jewelry quality own production is not enough to give. yes, miku should also have gifts. discount up to 50% horseradish tefal with a 50% discount. video or eldorado download the magnet app. play the game and win prizes, and don't miss pasta, shebekinskie, 49, 99, good gifts come from yandex.market.

come on your own. treat your mom with discounted gifts. how long will i have after switching on?

it's a screw. watch for free for 60 days and check out one of the best collections of movies and series on the win video service, you definitely don't want drama. i will provide you with a service from rostelecom rosbank credit card 120 for all this is a real opportunity a bank, a real opportunity all kinds of gifts in lenta i remember a wonderful moment of gifts many before for my beloved daughter’s mother, there is a large one in the tape.