and the east, first of all, the west and russia, which seems to me, the americans will not stop. this it will continue. uh-huh you know, on the one hand what you said is absolutely logical but there are some strange uh signs. i guess i said the wrong weird and unusual signs that something else might be going on. here. let's see what the wall street journal has to say about the idea of ​​negotiations. with russia on ukraine ukraine's close allies in eastern europe are concerned about the emergence of ideas in western capitals that on a certain stage, ukraine will have to prepare for negotiations with the kremlin during the recent visit of mr. biden to warsaw, the us president in behind-the-scenes conversations put pressure on the leaders of the baltic countries. in connection with their frequent calls for the defeat of russia in

ukraine, an informed person said. this has raised doubts among officials as to whether washington considers such a scenario a possibility. last week, mr. biden, following the lord macron , suggested that a shift in emphasis to diplomacy would probably be necessary after possible successes. ukraine in the spring and summer counter-offensive that us and other western officials are hoping for , a senior european official said ukraine's eastern european allies fear coordinated pressure from major western capitals to coax mr. zelensky into negotiations. i disagree with the wall street journal very often, especially with their opinion column articles, actually, when it comes to facts about the news. this newspaper is quite reliable, maybe the most reliable in the united

states here. how do you interpret? it is that in the united states a war begins in the administration, more and more they think that e preached a ram to dream, but you need to start. in general, seriously think about diplomacy, or is this a premature conclusion. you know, i think that last week uh passed uh, there was a team at the headquarters uh, an exercise on maps, uh, on which , by the way, under the leadership of the president of ukraine shamil a, on which all options were lost or options were determined, miscalculated options, and already even the impossible, but the spring counteroffensive or the offensive that will be carried out, but will pass into the armed forces of ukraine, moreover, all americans planned and considered. there was an interesting phrase, which was attended by ukrainian representatives, that is, not ukrainians. there , the ukrainians thought they listened to attention, and so

to speak, but pondered how they would act like that. i think that the americans really bet on a possible success. uh, ukrainians in this offensive. i still think the most likely although it may be, of course, and there is too much talk about it, so it may be disinformation, but it is the most logical. this is really an offensive against melitopol berdyansk in order to cut off this land e, exit e to the crimea. but again , i have little idea how to conduct offensive operations in practically open areas. without uh air support without air superiority, i don't know. i think it's suicidal. although the americans are counting. eh, just for success, but nonetheless. i think the military is calculating the option that there will be no success.

and then in the summer they will have to put pressure on zelensky in order to negotiate in order to prevent the russian troops from going somewhere, for example, in the south there to odessa in the north, kharkov there chernihiv and so on. and karen, we are all wondering about exactly what kind of relationship exists between washington, a and kiev, that is, it is clear that washington is the hegemon, it is clear that kiev basically follows the directions of american foreign policy. it is clear that without american weapons and financial support, kiev can do nothing. but it doesn't answer. uh, to one important question, is the united states, from your point of view , politically and psychologically, uh, able to say to zelensky? listen, friend. we

did everything for you. we supported you, but we have our own internal problems, they begin to ask more and more questions, how do you spend money, and what does this money really go for, what benefit does this money bring on the battlefield, we need some results from you, and enough soon the situation may change. here you psychologically represent such a conversation or do you not think that you will dare to talk like that? you see, he is not as simple as they say, as it seems, and i think that his relations with the americans should not be simplified as much either. it seems to me that he, oddly enough, has his own levers

of pressure on the americans. moreover , the americans are already so deeply bogged down in this matter that, in principle, he starts it with this story, as you know, how it was the film american tail begins wag the dog. he has leverage. and on its own, it holds enough. he is energetic. he managed, as they say, he is very active. he performs everywhere all the time. he creates public opinion. he already has a large number of supporters, so it seems to me that this is not so. it's just that, in fact , the americans just like that. uh, today is the time and i mean, they can do it, but it might look like a defeat to them. and they are completely unprepared for this. they are too deeply involved, in general, in this story. in my opinion. it is obvious that this the conflict is a big conflict, but, in general,

it seems to me that it was a mistake from their point of view to put everything on this conflict. these are such conflicts that happened more than once and they themselves did them more than once, but in this situation it became a fundamental struggle. west with russia, if they lose it, then they really lose their leadership in general, and as they say, the ocean has missed. as you remember in this, i am personally unfamiliar to zelensky. i saw him a couple of times. uh, i didn’t know him either along the moscow corridors, when he was still, uh, a comedian and tv presenter, but here's your observation, it seems to me e, absolutely accurate and one more thing. i’m here dmitry literally added two words three, you need to understand that the psycho zelensky actor. you see, that's why i'm asking you, they don't know this profession well, a person who is an actor, he always

remains an actor and to believe that he is the one he plays, moreover, this is his finest hour. this is his star hour. he never played such a role with him, and now the whole world knows him, as they say, they invite him everywhere, listen, he has absolutely fantastic popularity he never knew, especially as he is an actor. sorry about in my opinion, not bad professional, but average. he had never had such such a glory, a crazy for actors blue-beard, which he played the role of the president, is one thing. he played a role in the provincial frankly speaking in the picture of a provincial country. then ukraine is another matter. today he plays a world role and it is very easy to go too far for sure, here again. i don't know anything about his environment. but here i know a little how it is works in the united states and how it works in russia when a person

suddenly suddenly grows up like this in his e political position, all these slackers appear around who come. he says biden. who is this biden? yes, of course, the collar is addicted to everyone understand. today you are the savior of the free world, and biden is on the eve of the elections. yes, he will not dare to climb against you, and especially so many people in washington paid off. and, of course, here arises. uh, vladimir factor, uh , give this trump, let's see what just happened said e trump about his ability to regulate the conflict in ukraine i will prevent the third world war and i will do it easily. before i even took the oval office. i could resolve this destructive war between ukraine and russia

. it would end quickly. i would solve problems, i would solve them quickly. and it would take me no more than one day. i know exactly what to say to each of them and i got along well with them wallpaper. putin actually told me that if you are my friend, i would hate to see you as my enemy. here you go trump, i know a little, and firstly, i know that when he says such things, he sincerely believes in them. how much will he believe? this, of course, depends on the circumstances, he is a man without a stable foreign policy program, but he is a man with a stable foreign political philosophy, namely, we are america's best the strongest. the wisest especially if i am the trump leader of america and of course we should

be number one in the world. if this does not suit someone, then we will show them this, but with on the other hand, if they do not interfere with us, if they do not touch us, what is the use in their internal affairs? what difference does it make to trump how they will manage their affairs in uh russia? yes, of course, we expose the chinese communist party to him, but we are concentrating on this, to show that china is an enemy, but in fact someone they vote , they do not vote, how they vote. and of course , in principle, it is easier to negotiate with such a person, but at the level of specificity , you know, in russia you know the nineties. the specific person who is as president, and on the one hand , it becomes somehow a little scary how far he is

ready to go, but on the other hand. you understand how to talk to him. there are no such double standards here. it's not this, it's his, it's alive, but haughty self-confidence. and here, uh, at trump. today was, let's say, a far from bad week, we saw him just speak among the conservatives. this is his audience, and the concert against the politician must be understood that when he got there, look at what numbers he got there. uh, great support among the delegates. 62% he was very seriously ahead of all his competitors, including the governor of texas and desantes. i just want to emphasize. this is trump territory. these are his people, so it is not surprising that he is ahead of everyone, but

nevertheless, as it were, this is a very important part of the party - this is no longer some kind of marginal minority. this is a real political force. those, let's see how it looks across the country among republicans. it doesn't look like that, it's convincing, and trump doesn't have such a gap with the landing, but, nevertheless, it's still very big anyway very big truth. eh, the fact is that when you look at this table, it's a little misleading, because voting is not at the national level, but by state and by state it is not. okay, looks like a trump in the leading states, especially in those that will vote early, but nonetheless. this is a serious political force, and it would be very strange if when biden thinks about the conflict in ukraine he only thinks of moscow and the kiwi, but does not think of a man

called trump how do you uh? it seems, vladimir, you know the american language well. history, what conclusions biden will draw from the trump factor in this situation, but it seems to me that baidun is unlikely to have any other way out but to play the same game that he started in ukraine, and in this sense, not overestimating trump's capabilities, however. it seems to me that the american elections are some kind of chance when the line can be somehow changed, because why is it difficult for biden to win back with a zabain is the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan and the second major second major defeat. i think for him and for the party will be very tangible, and the arrival of a new president gives a chance for the establishment to somehow correct this position. although this does not mean that they will send us humanitarian aid the next day after the election, of course not, and one should not think that america will significantly correct its

course with the re-election of the president, but nevertheless, some adjustment, more bytes are possible i don't think it's a political extreme small probably. you know when you look at american political discussions, unfortunately, i have the same impression that many in moscow have from negotiations with the united states, when, for example, president putin is not only president. putin does not hear about our arguments. we brought so many. we have proven so much. not only do they not hear. they are not even interesting in the way they work in american political discussions today, but in general they pay less and less attention to the quality of the arguments, and more and more pay attention to who is behind you, what kind of you have a political force?

whether you are a talented lone artist, but an attractive actor without a continent, or are you a potential president of the united states and that's when a person like trump appears and when more and more people appear in congress, which may not be by conviction. and according to a, if you want political expediency, they start approaching trump in their positions, then this has, uh, influence on the media and as a result , like it or not, but some kind of discussion arises, not a single one, the leading newspaper will not want to be in a situation where they don't have articles on their pages that are close to the point of view of one of the two leading candidates for the presidency, so i may be

wrong here. how will it all work and the liberals, all of a sudden e can’t penetrate the target, and not to trump , and not naturally to vladimir putin but it seems to me that they will begin to take these arguments not only from trump, nor arguments from moscow and more seriously, because if trump says that i want and can negotiate with putin, then the idea of ​​​​an agreement with putin is a it is more difficult to imagine it, as they are trying to present it today, as the idea of ​​a semi-criminal as an idea, if you want political corruption, in general, it seems to me that all this will become significant, er, less predictable and the intensity of the political struggle will grow, including in the discussion about the ukrainian conflict. and now we're going to commercials and in just a few minutes we'll be back and look at what's going on in berlin and

is there really any significant anti-war movement emerging in germany? get a free credit card for 120 days without interest, and we will return up to 5,000 rubles. each ural perspective is where you are. you are here because you want to know what benefit is i actually, everyone wants to know benefit is the megapower of your tariff that you choose super speed and bonus gigabytes. though unlimited in the social network, you won’t believe what you have to do for free activate the lego powers that you need in the megafon application mobile operator number one love fast love long love

sweet. we are talking about sleep. what are you thinking about? you can fall asleep in 20 minutes sleep during the night and easy to wake up in the morning sleep lovers addictions. we also accept an accident report online, and osago payments apply for osago in tinkoff

insurance and receive payments in case of an accident just behind tinkoff, he is one of a kind once faced with cystitis. i am in two states of pain and frequent urge or fear that he will return again with dual action against cystitis helps to relieve unpleasant symptoms and reduce the risk of new flare-ups by march 8th. how long will i have after switching on?

it's winx watch for free for 60 days and rate one of the best collections of movies and series on the winx video service, you definitely don't want drama in 60 days of drama. i will provide you, let 's comedy winx video service from rostelecom the first yandex smart tv with alice control your voice 4k ultra hd image contrasting the smallest details minimalist design. thousands of movies and series personal recommendations smart tv yandex with alice tablet

what was popped up just where there was nothing was nonsense. go you i premiered on football with denis kazansky on sunday at the first, i myself played for a long time. well , for a long time, and you, i don’t play, i train.

russian premier league there is a big game on the air and now with us via skype from berlin yevgeny schmidt bundestag deputy from the alternative party for germany yevgeny we are very glad to see you. you are now our regular contributor and really appreciate your feedback for your information. and i'll start good evening. i'll start with , uh, this is probably a very natural question for you, but the german chancellor uh was just washington d.c. and it looked like uh. well, if you like, not just the most constructive and the warmest possible meeting, the warmest meeting that could

possibly be expected between the german chancellor and the us president. how do you assess the results of these negotiations? for me , it looks more like a subordinate was called to the carpet to the boss, that is, exactly. so, in this perspective, the relationship between germany and the united states looks like, that is, the whole policy and with regards to the supply of weapons, uh, to ukraine and in the economic support. and in general, in general, support for the conflict. it is all lined up not in the interests of germany, but. that's precisely in the interests of overseas ambitions, so, say , unfortunately, there is no need for any equal relations, that is, in this case, of course, there are certain disagreements regarding the supply of tanks. that is. uh, germany, as you know, rests does not want to be one on one. uh, let's say , with a not very prozhev-minded russia

, therefore, sets the conditions that, uh, so that america also fulfills its promise americans are cunning, dodging, trying. uh, by all means, uh, delay the delivery of abrams, as we know, there, it seems that these abrams, which will have to be delivered, have not even made them yet, and germany should right now and from the stocks of its bundeswehr, supply tanks, moreover, how it became known e, not enough ammunition. germany no, not the tanks themselves, too, but nonetheless. here , according to pressure from the outside, germany has to expose precisely its defense , the defense capability of the year precisely. here is the continuation of the conflict for the sake of precisely further escalation. what do you think germany will be able to deliver to ukraine especially when you talk about heavy weapons over the next three to four months.

i'm talking about three to four months, because, apparently , this is, and the schedule that you offer washington, uh, to zelensky for the start of the ukrainian so-called offensive. well , we are talking about exactly 14-20 tanks, which will be taken from uh, from arsenal of the bundeswehr. that is, that germany has agreed to allocate what it is able to. uh, although as we know, germany itself is very strongly not equipped with tanks, that is, the technical equipment is also subject to criticism and the number of combat-ready units. very very few. well, as we see, once again a decision is made against the national interest of the country in the context of defense capability, nevertheless. here germany took on such obligations in this area that germany can specifically provide and

plans to provide ukraine, well, in general, the only known figures there were discussed back in germany, uh, 100 tanks. someone there has purchased or is negotiating the purchase of 100 tanks, but we are talking about old modifications , that is, those that are in long-term storage, but, firstly, they are very morally obsolete, and secondly, to remove them from a long storage. they will have to do some pretty deep work there, that is, right now these tanks are going to the conflict zone. e, as we know, it’s impossible to put it, but another another problem is ammunition, that is, now the question of shell hunger is acute. e in ukraine that is, those shells that were delivered run out of new ones. e in germany yes, and in europe as a whole , not in sufficient quantities, that is, strange, they are already baring their warehouses, but mass-producing.

uh, over the past decade, europe and germany have forgotten how, that is, we are talking about some kind of small deliveries, that is, it is precisely conveyor, uh, production, uh, ammunition at the moment that is not established, so now the question is very acute not only about heavy equipment , but also about what she should shoot. that is, as we know and the very same uh here is the armored carrier that germany supplied how many around, uh, supplies of shells, a copy was broken for them, that is, switzerland refused in brazil, it seems, they also didn’t give consent, and uh, after some kind of difficult negotiations in germany, she herself decided, that is, the wound metal corporation itself decided to establish production in your own country. well, all this shows how much, how much the problem of lack of ammunition itself. it is how acute it is and the same problem was discussed, including in the usa, that is, proposals were made. including transfer the production of ammunition production

ammunition on the territory of the united states, it seems, how this production facility traveled there. but there are still final questions. i don't think it's been resolved. eugene last question, we hear and see protests in germany about protests in ukraine and when we see these footage. it looks quite impressive on the other hand. we hear that it is not possible to somehow coordinate the efforts of your party or leftist forces, and we have encountered obstacles to some effective joint actions. tell us about the situation in this area. really gaining in germany turns the protest anti-war movement for peace in ukraine although, of course, the ruling politicians. this is all put up, as if, how the interests of moscow are represented, but nevertheless, the germans are getting more and more tired of the conflict. more and more

concern is growing that after the supply of tanks. uh, uh, also deliveries of aircraft will follow, and then the next logical step will be the direct participation of german soldiers in the conflict, so all this, of course, causes acute concern among the population. people were not allowed to take to the streets. like here the saturday before last, a mass demonstration of more than 50,000 people took place in berlin, bringing together representatives of both left and right forces. eh, but in the bundestag. naturally, so far it has not been possible to somehow unite these protest populations, that is, the authorities are trying to split them. that is, if a demonstration is declared leftist, then with attacks, how can you act with rights? uh, they are trying with all their might to discredit the peace movement, but nevertheless, nevertheless, as i said, 50,000 came out. and that's just the beginning, that is the protests will only escalate. thank you very much. we hope to see the base on

our program soon and goodbye. well, now we're changing the subject and talking about the seventieth, uh, death of joseph stalin and uh, vladimir you have a very interesting interview in the latest issue of your historian magazine, when you discuss, uh, is there a real possibility, but let's say it delicately that stalin helped to die? let's listen, a quote from your interview interview that you conducted to accurately no one and authors offering such versions does not provide any serious evidence. and what evidence can there be, let's say medical evidence ? we have a history of stalin's illness with a description of the signs of his condition. in recent days, they can rather be interpreted as a manifestation of a completely natural process. and this process has been going on for several years. usually such diseases seriously affect

the personality of patients. in general, everything lies on the surface. this is the medical side, alas, we talked, as i understand it, not only with this professor, whom you quote looked at the opinions of many different people from medical authorities to historians and looked at documents. you killed your wife, that there was no act of poisoning, that this is really the situation with a man who, for many years, but if not faded, then at least his illness progressed. well, you know for historians, of course, the most serious argument - this is a document. i think that no matter what scenario there is still no place for documents. we will never find out, because even if we assume the most conspiratorial version no one records such things on paper, but the arguments that, uh, we managed to collect, then, including the opinions of a fairly well-known and prominent researcher of the era,

stalin, oleg vitalyevich khlebnyukan. still , the first convinces me of two things. and apparently health. stalin was not ideal by march 1953 and physical grounds. in order to the sad ending were on the face of the other side. why a hardy version of what you could kill because uh degree? uh people's fears, who were around him the inner circle of the inner circle for their destiny. uh , by this time they had reached a fairly high point; this was due to the fact that stalin , apparently, at the end of his life planned to seriously change this environment. we know that he alienated molotov from himself molotov's wife by this moment polina zhemchuzhina was in the places of the decision of freedom mikoyan was distant ah and ah, that's all. this created fear among people from the inner circle that they, too , would become victims at some point, and some of them

political decisions, this creates the basis for the assumption that he could be liquidated. uh, it's hard to say 100% that it wasn't, but i 'm still inclined to believe that, uh, there's very little chance that it was violence, most likely. it was the death of an elderly man who did not receive help in time. and even then, perhaps, and help in this situation. at least, if you believe the conclusion of doctors, it hardly helped, at least yes, at that level of medicine, you know the koran there is a point of view that genius and villainy is not shared. we know that, unfortunately, this is far from the case with many leaders. well, let's say, uh, napoleon will be a good example. and, of course, we don’t have time right now to give any detailed characteristics of stalin. but for you, as a very erudite and very

creative person, for several minutes. who was stalin for you? well, stalin in my opinion there was only one figure of the key figures, in general in world history, there, how to him, i do not belong to the stalinists and i relate to him like a historical figure. as they say, by the way, once again i will say that i run the risk of incurring the wrath of a part of the public. i am not a supporter of renaming volgograd stalingrad . the main reason is that this will split russian society, and this will be extremely negatively perceived by many of our caucasian republics. many caucasians today are fighting as part of the russian troops, so this will simply hurt and this must be understood, not to mention that it was, of course, one of stalin's mistakes, in my opinion, criminal mistakes,

because there was a betrayal, but betrayal was quite a lot among russians and ukrainians. so this is a separate question, but what is the stalinist figure. i think it remains so alluring, or something, it is generally in history. well, history is villainized by what artists do in history. in history , in general, the main efficiency. he was a very effective policy. he achieved all the goals that he set for himself, all the goals that he set for himself, he achieved. these political leaders in general, i don’t know , can be counted on the fingers, so plus to this is it for us. yes, uh, as they say, many russians. and in general for our country. uh, this figure is interesting because in general, he, he brought our country. well , the soviet union at that time generally russian

civilization to its historical pinnacle. here's how to not talk about it. it was historical, you repeat it because , from my point of view, this is the key phrase he brought russian civilization to its historical peak. that, in fact, is not the russian empire, not a post, uh, history. after him , there was no 53 year when stalin soviet died the union of russian civilization controlled beijing and controlled virtually all of eastern central europe, this has never happened, plus for the first time in the history of russian civilization. it has become superior in many aspects of the technology of western civilization, because before that , western civilization for centuries has always been superior technologically, that is, nothing can be done about it. this is the

efficiency that accompanied this political leader. i say, i'm removing this moment there, villainy, you understand, in principle. unfortunately, these are questions that artists ask. we put them in our works, but russian creative intellectual creative intelligentsia, not only russian, but it is absolutely for history. this, unfortunately, does not matter. history appreciates winners effectively winners in this sense, here is churchill he was not effective, because all his plans, although he was extraordinary. he lost the british empire, so he lost the british as a result of his activities. it was the main russia under stalin acquired russia has acquired a fantastic, as they say, e. hmm territory of influence. yes, and this has never happened, i never said that

it was colossal in russia. listen, france almost became part of the ussr in france , the communists won the elections in 1947, italy greece, it was something incredible. this was, of course, to a large extent his personal merit for all that i repeat. i am not a supporter of renaming cities there memory. in general , i think that such figures, you know, they do not need. here in these, as it were, i would say cheap. gestures and respect for the monuments, this is too big a figure who has his own account with the history of god general, what do you think, and stalin as a military leader, but before i tell the rest what is a military leader. i'll just say a few words about his death. i also do not believe that this one, that he was poisoned there, he had a stroke, judging by

all the documents. and this is the golden hour. e, which all doctors say in case of a stroke, he is critically important, he was well missed with very large so to speak, e gaps passed there half a day until they opened the doors and saw that he was lying. well vladimir in your interview. he can come back to this later and give an explanation for this, but you are absolutely right there was a big gap. yes, now about the role of stalin in the great patriotic war, of ​​course, i agree with karen georgievich. stalin was. uh, very effective policy. stalin was. here is one of, uh, such qualities of a politician - this is the ability, uh, to select the right people. this cannot be taken away from stalin. yes, he had so to speak. one of them is very suspicious. judging by there was a literature, so these purges, especially among the komsomol of the red army, when there i don’t remember the numbers, but there is a huge

number of divisional divisional level of the brigade level of the regimental level, and the army surrounded. that is, they cleaned a lot. e people and uh not just cleaned out, and many of them were simply shot, but nonetheless. yes, and the second mistake, of course, stalin - this is what he did not believe in general. uh, intelligence, especially military intelligence. uh, general golikov took over. unfortunately, the position of such conciliation, and uh, in general, he didn’t report to stalin what they reported to him there, in all the additional residency battalions around the world and illegally the same sorge who, uh, was given completely verified information, but nevertheless they were at first war. uh, there for two days, he or three days did not get in touch. and after that, he , uh, in general, managed to organize and place

the right people. and very young people. remember the thirty-year-old people's commissars there who organized. uh, relocation of industry to the east. merkulov is there same. uh, it was done very effectively, very competently, moreover, he brought back a lot of uh commanders from uh camps, uh, who showed themselves very well during the great patriotic war. well, and then, uh, stalin during the war already , when he gained self-confidence, i must say, uh , he really relied on the sheath of people on the same zhukov rokossovsky, there everyone was all the commanders of the fronts who ended the war, it was all uh , so to speak, well, he is the people appointed put forward by e, personally by stalin . therefore, i believe that his role e in victory, she's huge, of course. thank you. and vladimir, how would you respond to what the general said

about the gap between the time when stalin a had a stroke and when they began to provide him with medical care, here in the interview. to which you referred, and professor khlebnyuk noticed a very important thing, the system that was created by stalin inside his team inside his guard was such that in fact it did not allow, even theoretically did not allow people who could potentially help him provide, because everything it was necessary to coordinate each of the members, the politburo. he was afraid to make decisions alone, he was afraid to go to him, the same applied to security officers, that is, in a certain sense. uh, this is the effective system he built. she had some limits. and as it is not paradoxical it turns out, and this limit came together or even provoked a certain one. in the sense of the physical departure of stalin, but what about? here petrovich said, but they did not become during the war. i would also

add stalin, which is surprising when it takes for a long time already such a high post and being already quite a young man turned out to be very obedient. because if we look at the strategic decisions that he made in the forty-one-forty-two years, when we say in january of forty-two. he instructed to go on the offensive along the entire front line and by the end of the year to clear the territory of the soviet union from the nazis. they are completely different from those decisions that begin to be made already in the second half of the forty-second forty- three subsequent years, that is, obviously he becomes more receptive to the arguments of the professionals of those generals and marshals who have already gained experience in military a and in fact this is, well, such a teamwork in a certain sense, but which knows the temperamental comrade of stalin, in principle , maybe uh, not everyone expected him . thank you, i will ask you, probably a very unfair, but from my point of view, a very important question. that's when you think the rest. do you

think that russia should be ashamed of him , should be proud of him, and both, maybe something completely different. i'm asking you namely, as an artist on an emotional moral level there is no shame and pride. those are not the words. russia must accept it, as, in my opinion, an inevitable part of its great history. this is it in my opinion. figure. stalin she, for all her tragedy, and she was absolutely necessary, and without her it would be impossible to imagine. actually. it seems to me that only for this she appeared in order to win this war, create conditions and win. yes, it was cruel, but you know, i recently read an interesting one there, remember this one was shipilov some. yes, yes, i remember not reading it, there

is a very interesting phrase there. he says i was present at zhukov's meeting after stalin's death with georgy zhuk and he was asked zhukov stalin was cruel. to which zhukov replied. yes, he was cruel, but the times were cruel. it is very difficult for us to make any judgments of our own without understanding, without feeling the fabric of the time in which he acted in this sense. it seems to me that we should just accept this figure and accept with respect to our own history. is not question to be ashamed. it's not a matter of being proud. eh, in general, historical figures of this magnitude. well, it seems to me that they cannot be proud of them there , here is gaia or caesar. here is a bright one, the image of which overshadows western civilization. they adore you. oh well, actually, the person who took the city's pipe hands of children. massively it is, well,

it is, nevertheless, it remains indeed a part of western civilization, as its inevitable and necessary essence. so it seems to me, and from stalin from this point of view, so i understand that i, for example, sometimes i think how i would have been at that time, probably, i would have been imprisoned, at best, who with my character and my own i admit it, but, nevertheless, it could have been at all, because a , again. as you know, as vladimir , many historians believe that steel was going to expel all jews from moscow and place them, in conditions. well, let's just say, when it's not so big, you see, it seems to me. that's what exactly stalin was absolutely not e. to what extent was the national question for him? uh,

let's just say, there is such an american resolution called the party hater. uh, the man who was equally ready to hate everyone said it to penetrator and i just wanted to say something just the other way around. of course, i would like a person who has done so much for russia and achieved so much that he does not have this dark country, and it was good, but the history of mankind, the history of russian civilization , made him what he was and for me personally. eh, stalin will always be the generalissimo of victory. for me steel it will always be the man who made the victory possible, because there were these terrible and irresponsible purges before the war, but there were five-year plans without which the victory would also have been

absolute. it is impossible for me personally for me he is a representative of the tragic and heroic stage of russian history, and i certainly do not think that russia should be ashamed of this part of its history and i certainly do not think that russia should for this part of history, as many in the baltic states want and poland that russia should somehow be punished for this. well, two words. you are wonderful words. they said, i'll just add my late father, a front-line soldier shortly before his death. i asked him, that's may 9, when did the war end? i felt something, and he told me such a phrase, which he never said, about which i was very sunk. he said, you know it redeemed everything. it redeemed it all. here, it seems to me, this is a very important phrase from a person

who went through 3 years of the front. and as they say, that's all. i understood, despite my youth, that i felt what was in the country , this is what you said, my father was very an outstanding person and very liberal views, but he was some kind of a front-line soldier. yes, absolutely everything is said. it was a big game and see you back on the air this week. every time they ask me, and how would you compose melodies, honest composer, the real one he will tell you is just an angel, you know, he flew by. we ourselves do not know how all this is happening dear alexei lvovich. thank you very much for your music. no, the sky is blue. we are not supporters of different things.

any person of any author has, of course, a dream to leave non-russians, so many songs and wonderful music. creative evening since february 25, and today high-quality toys stationery vimi, with discounts on ozone hair spray lekata for 310 rubles. they took everything in

the room a loan of up to 5 million. and now you use wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank to the branch and the plan is done. download the magnet app. play the game and win prizes and don't miss the shipiginsky pasta 499. also suitable for children. please mom gifts with discounts on yandex market

holiday dreams new in the artra line cream arthroxicam three-component composition promotes accelerated penetration of components at the beginning of modern painkillers maximum concentration of arthroxicam for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain choose gifts for your loved ones and give with all your heart. big love comes download magnet app. play the game and

win a magnet, a juicy chickenburger and crunchy gifts from the bottom of our hearts with a yield of up to 9.5% in a bank branch right now. if skin care, then only complex, if makeup, then natural, if gifts, then the best ones run to podruzhka stores for bargains. contributes to the treatment of tears, strengthening the immune system and restoring strength trekrezan. be healthy. it is high time to change the provider three times the tele2 lock. firstly, you can include home internet in the tariff. secondly,

i have been at tele2 for three months and thirdly, you can easily connect to it right now. and you don't even have to go anywhere to switch to the tele2 home internet side. how cool is the novelty in magnet cosmetic mascara divage boltingration magnet cosmetic caring means loving

these people, regardless of their ethnicity, for the rest of the world were and will be russians.

part one who are you? i think he speaks russian, we will all speak this language like that. soviet and russian moviegoers have always been surprised that in hollywood action films in the image of russians, vilely, there were representatives of various nationalities of the ussr

, so in one of the films of the famous rocky series , the main negative character was a siberian by the name of drago did not bother that it sounded like the surname refers to the carpathians or bessarabia.

but they didn’t crumble in any way, no less famous film, red heat, where the name of the main russian character. in general, for a western viewer, a collective russian is a person who