tv presents you defending the murderers of the rapists of the enemies of the people and all other scum. no, there are no enemies of the people, there are ordinary people, and they have the right to a fair trial. i will take the zhuravlev case for it and win it. be damned. you don't belong in the profession. cinema one tv

presents no, no, we are without such news silver wolf, which means that dmitry is a lover of france, sooner or later they will put you in jail. so you either break up with her, or you go to work as an accountant by profession. got movie one tv presents but i don't understand how we are where we are and why. witch doctor new series democracy

is the most profitable product for the americans, especially if democracy is exported to countries 10 super oil. here are the pygmies, you know there is no democracy, none of the americans thought to bring aircraft carriers to the penguin. why those who hate jews. it is rightly called anti-semides who are the first blacks who are racist correctly. and why i don’t understand those who can’t stand russian human rights defenders, only stupid americans, and the same stupid europe, they don’t understand what to scare with sanctions, people who scratch their backs with a knife. mikhail zadornov in the first person on saturday at first attention, the russian chinese summit

was given to the ukrainian story and on the eve of vladimir putin said that china's peace initiative as a whole could become the basis for a settlement if the ukrainian conflict is ready for this in the west, according to a signed statement by russia china the russian side positively assesses the objective and unbiased position of the chinese side on the ukrainian issue the chinese side positively assesses the readiness of the russian parties to make efforts. in order to restart the peace talks as soon as possible , the parties note that in order to resolve the ukrainian crisis , it is necessary to respect the legitimate concerns of all countries in the field of security and prevent the formation of bloc confrontation. cease actions that contribute to further inflaming the conflict the parties call for the cessation of all steps that contribute to the escalation of tension and the prolongation of hostilities to avoid further degradation of crises up to its

transition to an uncontrollable phase the parties they oppose all unilateral sanctions imposed bypassing the un security council . it seems to me that everything is really balanced and on the case, and against this background, yesterday volodymyr zelensky at a press conference, just in the fumiokei. that he wants china to have xi jinping join his zelensky peace formula, which, let me remind you , involves reparations from russia there, uh, restoration of the borders of the ninety-first year and so on. sergey is different. somehow i’m reading this joint statement by russia and in china, i don’t get the impression that sitting down and drinking is ready to join zelensky’s formula, but regarding zelensky’s statement , he may have smoked something, because it’s impossible to say such things, but in a normal state it’s impossible. but seriously speaking, this is what happened, and between putin and xi jinping as part of the final political joint statement. this is

very important because there were a lot of different assessments before c's visit. will the ukrainian case enter, the ukrainian part of the joint political statement, or will it enter as it enters we saw that an absolutely harmonious one came in . i will add on my own that in fact this chinese plan 12 point, on which it was completely rejected, the west simply caused hysteria. on the initiative yes, the initiative, namely the initiative was completely. but is this plan being tried or is it an initiative of the correct concept. it very organically adapted to the russian chinese vision of the regional and global situation - this is the time. secondly, it is very important that from the chinese side. this is an initiative of these positions in ukrainian. ah further settlement. they are clearly consistent with and with the political situation and the russian political and russian policy at the current moment, the military situation on the fronts. that is, not now. they immediately

advocate for peace after the natural victory and most importantly the chinese. here is this version of the chinese initiative. it follows from soft such long-term smooth. well, what about a smooth strategy? we see that iranian- saudi reconciliation passed, as it were, also very soft, and it was a sensation and an understandable other case altogether. different situation, but the methodology of the chinese gradualness of smoothness listening to the partner russia in this case, taking into account the military-political situation, it underlies this adaptation, and therefore , in this sense, we can say that putin and xi jinping have found an ideal harmonious form by resolving no contradiction. there are no disagreements here, no serious ones, but here, if before the visit of c in the united states they were worried. what could be announced, or at least could be, a call for an immediate truce in ukraine now after the adoption of this joint statement, and john kirby spokesman. uh,

the national security council says there's nothing but a suspension of hostilities . we don't expect it, and more than that, we don't want it to happen. i do not think that today's meeting gives us high expectations, that hostilities will end soon. frankly, we don't want to see a ceasefire right now. well, they really don't want the fire to stop. here is the logic of american policy at the recent congressional hearings on the ukrainian conflict. i think quite accurately partly quite accurately described by uh, retired general kidcallock, who was the former vice president's national security adviser. us mike pence listen to what he said. i believe that if you can defeat a strategic enemy without using any american troops. you will reach the pinnacle of professionalism because by allowing the ukrainians to defeat him. you will remove the strategic adversary from the

negotiating table, and then we can concentrate what we need to concentrate against our main enemy at the present time. this is china and what worries me. so it's that i don't think we need to put american troops in there if we fail to do so to us. we may have to fight another european war. this will be the third time, nikolai alekseevich well, it seems to me that about the possibility of the united states entering the war with russia in the event of a ukrainian defeat, this general kelk got excited, but as for weakening russia with a proxy war through ukraine and accumulating strength for this to contain china is here. i think he had enough of an impact. well, he managed to contradict himself in one speech with what happens when they, by the way, that they need to solve the problems of the united states of america by proxy, and here i see, and you will agree that this is exactly what they are trying to do, and then he said, that if this does not work out, we must ourselves fit into the war. of course not, but

the american strategy is really aimed at weakening russia, they do not hide this in any way, but in a situation where now russia and china are even more clearly showed that the same interests support the territorial integrity of sovereignty and this is not only a matter of secrecy, the question arises. and you will support ukraine, former american partners threatening to enter into a conflict from russia from china, these same openly say that after you want to deal with russia, you will deal with china in china, there are many people who speak english. some of them watch american channels and perfectly understand what they are saying. american generals therefore the americans found themselves in a situation where their strategy after the rapprochement between russia and china, but it turned out to be yesterday's strategy, it is absolutely necessary to come up with something different, as for the statements. uh, mr. kirby

who says we're against a truce to stop hostilities. he doesn't say the most important thing. we americans are against a truce to stop hostilities , which will take place at the initiative of china, this cannot be allowed at all, because then china becomes a diplomatic superpower that can stop the conflict. here in the usa why doesn’t it work, but it came out china and somehow magically everything stopped. no, it’s impossible, therefore, the second reason for the time being, why they will continue the conflict wars is simply to make sure that the chinese peace initiative is not implemented, because the americans themselves remembered a few months ago they also talked about the talks about stopping. but now he's talking about it. china means. they should, in defiance of china, talk about the continuation of the war, and they do it quite frankly , but it seems to me that here you are absolutely right. and it seems to me that some kind of the amount of time after the attempted kiev spring offensive, on which the united

states is placing a very large bet. john kirber himself will speak, and now it's probably time for a certain truce to freeze the conflict, because the united states will be physically unable to supply ukraine with the same amount of weapons any longer, the house of representatives, which is under the control of the republicans, is unlikely to approve about the same amount. , which was approved by the previous composition of the chamber representatives when nancy palace was speaker and so on. and then, in the opinion of the united states, the time for a truce will come, but they will already initiate it , they want to, er, initiate, and not china. well , now, of course, they are doing it. here is this powerful bet on the spring offensive. and europe, in principle, goes for broke. giving away almost all of all weapons reserves and and recently , the german build, uh, cited the words of a high-ranking nato official who told when, when, where, in the opinion of the north atlantic alliance, it can attack

kyiv regime. here's what he said according to birt magazine. training, technology, logistics , intelligence, partners now give ukraine everything for a successful counteroffensive. we expect it in the spring or summer, the next 6 months will be key in the war. not only for ukraine but also for russia's allies, russia rightly believes that the main blows will be inflicted in the luhansk and zaporozhye regions. and the goal of its offensive in the southeast will be to break the land corridors to the crimea. well , let me remind you that even lloyd austin, at the beginning of the year he also spoke about the intention of intentions just to cut. uh, a land bridge to the crimea and here is the head of the united states general staff , the head of the joint committee of chiefs of the stovs, mark miles, once again. e stated that he did not believe in the possibility of a military victory. and anyone in this conflict, listen to what he said. it will be

extremely difficult for ukraine to oust all russian troops this year. this will be a very difficult task. this is not impossible, but extremely difficult in the world of probabilities. i don't think it is probably this can happen, but i don’t think it will happen ivan pavlovich your assessment of the prospects for the spring offensive and do you agree with this scenario, which i wrote the bild at the same time, the luhansk region and the zaporozhye region with the aim of cutting off the land, you know, in general, here are the estimates westerners about this offensive are well miles away. uh, worded it in the style of you know, and lewis carroll probably, incredible, and so on. cheshire cat is like that, you know, they perfectly understand that emily is voicing it. that a yes and no, nowhere. it is necessary to collect the maximum amount of strength and try to strike something that this blow will fail. they also perfectly understand, by the way, here are the fish.

uh, the journalists who described a strange position in the article, it means that the strike should be a solution, and cutting off the crimea, uh, and for some reason the strike should be delivered in two places. this is ok. what forces should be involved if they are simultaneously in the north, luga