our means of e-e air defense , which, in fact , was demonstrated with the help of our reb, the navigation system was suppressed, and the control system was suppressed to lead to a loss of control, and he lost control. he. well, in this case, unfortunately, it fell on the residential sector, but it did not reach the goal where it was, but was originally directed. well, most likely, these were arms factories. of course , we understand where he flew. and where can fly from drones? well, as i already said his distance is up to 1.000 km. accordingly, we can speculate. uh, here , within a radius of a thousand kilometers to where he can fly to any daily settlement, he absolutely overcomes this distance about up to 5 km. uh, he can climb, uh, but he's also capable of flying. uh, extremely low. uh, heights, which is just uh, here, this is the most difficult. when

intercepted, when he can fly at extremely low altitudes, but again, i repeat. uh, our air defenses can quite successfully resist this kind of thing. this is good. this is good news, but the bad news is that they have similar drones, again of soviet production , which they would modernize themselves at least come up with something, but the truth is, yes, but as far as i know , they don’t produce them anymore, and they have no, there is no technical base for basses to be further produced in soviet times , and they modernize them and launch new ones, they don’t have new ones, and, as far as i know, there is no way to produce them. but they have the globe of ukraine who studied what now to urgent news in in mariupol, there was an attempt on the life of police chief mikhail moskvin, let's say right away, fortunately. he is alive, but received a concussion . the car exploded a few meters from him, and now another terrorist act is not some. also, how to deal with this, no? and what else did they want to show to these theoretical in mariupol, where

vladimir putin came recently and we showed footage of how he drove a car himself behind the wheel. and here, then, they are trying to demonstrate. what exactly is this, that is, on the one hand. we see that well in time president. although his trip was not announced and so on. it was a kind of signal that this is our territory. our special services are working here, if possible, to ensure the safety of the first person, and everyone else should feel calm here as well. apparently in order to destroy this thesis. they are trying to commit not just a terrorist act in mariupol. yes, in relation to a fairly high-ranking official who is responsible for law and order there. and this is another very important signal. they purposefully hit people who these places, or new regions that come to establish life there, that is, well, this is targeted terror spreading fear to people who want to do something for these. that is, this is initially an absolutely terrorist goal-setting as far as what can

be done, well, our special services already work like that. we understand perfectly. what amount of work they have to do the deferred amount of work of the rf five gunners is revealed. well, let's put it straight in the current conditions of confrontation. unfortunately such. uh, well, the situation. they happen very cool, that they are called connected well to the conversation yuryevich podlyako, he is in direct contact with us yerevan now hello well, that's about electronic warfare with this, and the drone and spa about their attacks are terrorist methods. in general there is for sure to add. tell us about drones, please. most of all, of course, thousands of kilometers are of interest. flight range, what to expect? well, in fact, such drones have also been repeatedly mentioned. the most important thing is accuracy hits because shoot nowhere. well, in fact, it doesn’t make sense, something about the low population density on the territory of the russian federation. or maybe a big city, but then again, the enemy, he is obviously trying something like, well, so that, well, he is not

accused of so that the blow was on a peaceful city. they try to find more or less. at least some targets tied to military operations, and this can be done only in two cases, if very accurate guidance through the satellite is going on, but in order to correct your e-trajectory, but still a few hundred kilometers of flight, respectively, then the rocket is detected and this immediately gives us the opportunity to use the means of either rap or air defense if it goes in a passive so-called mode on the terrain map, then the accuracy may well suffer greatly, and we saw the difference in previous attempts, but the difference it goes already hundreds of meters, and in this case it is very critical. what was the reason for that? that this rocket, or rather, the drone fell, is clearly not where it was planned, either rap, or the fact that it was very inaccurate guidance, it is pointless. now guessing has no data the military claims that it was the rf principle. it may well be, given the circumstances that were, that is, if this is really rap, well done, as they say, keep it

up keep it up, if this is definitely a dream. such well, it means that nothing fundamentally shines for them there, because with such accuracy, well , nothing fundamentally serious will be achieved. and how many such drones do they still have tens or hundreds in stock, well, the fact is that such drones have become in service member countries, i don’t know how much they are in what condition they are in, but again, judging by the data that the germans have, they are being modernized, in fact they are installing new electronics. uh, i don’t know about the rest of the fuel there and so on. well, in general, there is such information that it is not completely undergoing modernization and, accordingly, tens of tens may be units. they have already used them, probably, their a couple dozen second hand. and i think much less. they still have a feeling, maybe more like the situation on the fronts. well maybe the main news over the past few days is that the deputy minister of defense of ukraine announced that no one should talk about the counteroffensive of the armed forces, but because they still ask the question. well, where

is the contour of the offensive already there, soon artyom will be captured by your opponents, that is, we have liberated, but there will be no counteroffensive. well, there are different versions. why not? but in this case it doesn't matter. the important thing is that it was forbidden for information workers to ask the military these questions in general, because, well, it is clearly visible that something is not going well with them. well glued not only weather conditions. in fact, many elite units were thrown, and in scattered attacks, even inside the cauldron. there is information that they got there on the floor of the boiler. they are also fighting there, respectively, the reserves are being smeared in order to keep the artemys, although it turns out to be harder to keep, every day there is a cleanup, that is, a significant part of the industrial zone has already been cleaned up. uh, several schools of critical importance were taken from the school here wa why because it is not the enemy's defense nodes, respectively, having lost some school, the whole microdistrict is lost, uh, on which this school is a pattern of defense around and every day quite significant parts of the city are squeezed out and it is clear that after some time there will simply be no one to counterattack and if our units are free to at that point

, it's a counterattack. they will just be pointless. it will be harmful, because, and some of the best parts will be destroyed in this counterattack senselessly aimlessly. and it will frustrate others stepping on the operations that are planning aloud, we already talked to you today. marat khairul from the artyomovsky direction. he says that, in principle, our troops can take the only route that is now , and connects with a group of e, in the rear of these ukrainian military, but we do not do this, because it is very convenient to shell this route, respectively, to destroy all the supplies of attempts to exit. is this really such a tactic or is there some other such, different plan in it. well, i don’t agree with this point of view, because it was like that, we launched attacks in order to cut it, nevertheless, according to my information. i did this to you, therefore, well , this is probably already on our part, but a good mine with not very successful and some moments of action. no attempt has been made to cut this umbilical cord until they are unsuccessful,

because the enemy is throwing reserves there and will hold it for them. this is goal number one to keep the umbilical cord from being cut. marat said that there the artillery is almost directly on fire , the mortars are already firing, which means several kilometers, that is, they are standing at the position of the mortar. here, well, respectively, urban building positions of mortars. can be set easily and 2-3 km. they will work on this route. range. before this race. still , the place is less than 2 km, respectively, it’s not even that it’s not a matter of direct fire. direct is here, as in places only nature gives. well , they are now trying to go around these places through the mud. ah, that is, it succeeds of course, but nevertheless, in any case, does the whole road shoot through or or is it necessary for tours? well, if we want to completely cut the umbilical cord. yes, definitely well, her adversary trying to keep, but it is in this direction. by the way, the key engines were taken yesterday, i really hope for good news in the near future. denouement with artyomovsk is already msc well, in any case.

the extrusion is not so much there. actually left. uh, every day it doesn't matter where we squeeze them from, and again , any squeeze can become critical. that is, after which the defense. it just starts to crumble until it crumbles, but in fact the situation is such that it can happen absolutely at any moment. can briefly in other directions, so as not to single out directly, artyomovsk, if it is clear there, the matter is the most hot spot, but other directions. there are also your very serious boyids. yesterday the artillery rumbled all day and night. that is, apparently, our troops will now be in the next today, as i understand it, will attack tomorrow will attack, then the next powerful attempt. marlin are coming too. what intense fights. well, the wedding direction. here, the enemy already admits that we are gradually squeezing them out of the nuts. stallion. more and more places and the enemy already, in principle, does not really resist. you understand that there are convenient positions to hold here, but there is no territory, and why is the stallion interesting in the western throws, is it

elevated and therefore it is easy to build there, is it a lot? what the enemy is doing now, rolling back to these lines, surrendering them , i understand that he does not have the strength to hold them. thanks a lot to yuri ivanovich fedoliakov. let's establish a direct connection with the news that literally plunged the entire western world into shock - this is vladimir putin's statement about the placement tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and this is what our president said in an interview with our colleague pavel zarubin. alexander grigoryevich lukashenko has long raised the question of deploying russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus. well, not here either, nothing out of the ordinary. uh, first of all, the united states has been doing this for a decade. they have long deployed tactical nuclear weapons in six states on the territory of their e, allied countries of nato countries in europe, in this sense they are right. he says,

well listen. we are your closest allies. why do the americans do it as their ally on their territory, they teach, by the way, their crews. their pilots use this weapon if necessary. we agreed that we did the same without violating our obligations. i would like to emphasize this without violating my international obligations and not proliferation. e nuclear weapons. we are already on hand. uh, our belarusian colleagues to re-equip their aircraft with aircraft of the belarusian air force 10 aircraft are ready for use of this type of weapon. we have already , uh, transferred the first one in belarus to our well-known very effective iskander complex. and it can also be a carrier, uh, starting from april 3 , we are starting to train the crew.

and on july 1 we are completing the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus. so, everything that the president of belarus has asked and all the questions that they have in this regard, are being implemented and all our agreements will take place in the very near future, when i what conditions the weapon itself can be transferred, but we are transferring it to me, neither the united states is transferring it to its allies. they're just and we're basically doing the same things they've been doing for decades. they u have certain countries as allies and they are preparing them, uh, carriers, and they are being trained by the crew. we are going to do the same thing , this is exactly what alexander grigorievich asked for.

good tactful adequate russians the answer leaves no more questions after the words of vladimir putin, ukraine asks to convene an emergency meeting of the un security council western tv channels, as if on cue, began to broadcast that a new round of escalation was beginning due to russia's fault a new escalation from vladimir putin he announced plans to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of the neighboring republic of belarus i think that putin, as usual, is trying to raise the threat level, as only you use the word nuclear. regardless of what kind of nuclear weapon it is, it is frightening and attracts attention that putin is manipulating the situation using escalation as arguments. this dispute this conflict with the west becomes increasingly tense putin said on

state television. what is this? britain's response to ukraine supplying shells with uranium for tanks the kremlin or falsely claims that the shells have nuclear companies. nuclear weapons outside its territory this announcement comes as the rift with the west is growing more and more over a war in ukraine that is not going to end. in an interview with the national state tv channel, mr. putin said that the construction of a special storage facility would be completed by july. the white house already responded to this news. we saw the message about the russian statement, we did not see any reasons for changing the readiness of our nuclear forces, no signs that russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons. putin operates to the fact that the us has six bases where

they store nuclear weapons. putin, as we often see in the conflict in ukraine, says you 're done now it's our turn. now we are going to do it. as long as president putin possesses nuclear weapons , europe cannot be safe as long as countries continue to regard nuclear weapons as anything other than global problem. this helps putin cover up his behavior now tactical nuclear weapons are moving to belarus , that is, closer to nato territory if you imagine the situation, the distance from brest in belarus to warsaw is only 170-180 km. thus, vladimir putin will have a second foothold where he can deploy tactical nuclear weapons near kaliningrad separated from the main russian territory, that is, next to the comparison zone made by president putin sharing of nuclear weapons.

nato is misleading and cannot be used to justify the step announced by russia. well, sometimes this kind of madness forcing speaks of a hopeless reaction to reality. nikita why did they all wake up like that? i’m wondering what kind of answer they were expecting from us when they made a statement that they would supply shells with combined uranium. well, apparently, it was another e. uh, the provocation is designed to ensure that there is no answer, and well, let's just say the story is there with red lines about that the west has already crossed them, and so on. it really has accumulated and it has accumulated in our society. many people ask where are these really red lines that definitely cannot be crossed, so a ammunition with combined uranium. yes, it was a clear challenge, which said that the west would not reckon with any concepts in the field at all, i don’t know humanitarian law there, because the united uranus, as we have already dealt with the experts. this is from genocides in fact, targeted at

the united states is acting in a classic manner. you don’t understand this differently, but in germany there are us tactical weapons on the territory and poland said several times at the highest level, we are ready, please, let’s, we will create all the conditions and it was perceived normally, pass it on to us as soon as we are with our pop ally yes , military-political belarus, we agree that yes, our tactical nuclear weapons will be on the territory of belarus. this is putin's escalation. he threatens. uh, means the whole world uh, nuclear apocalypse, then. well it here is a classic manipulation tool. in this case, i am deeply convinced that this is the right step. moreover, it is even more preventive, because you know to place on the territory of belarus after and this american tactical nuclear weapon would appear, for example, on the territory of poland, on the territory of finland, sweden now. i think, uh, the likelihood of deployment is even closer to our borders. it seemed to have decreased, therefore, in this case, this is an absolutely correct step. and most importantly, as we see

one of these, not exactly the initiators, but one way or another was itself, belarus , because it understands perfectly well that this escalation is on its borders, and i want to remind you that by the twenty-fifth year, a 200,000-strong contingent, nato. they want to locate on the territory, actually the baltic states and poland from the countries of eastern europe, but it is not clear how the military infrastructure of the newly minted members of sweden and finland will develop. yes, on our borders, therefore , in order to secure and here, uh, decide initial questions. this step is absolutely strategically correct. but honestly, i again looked at the history, of course, there are very few other places where this kind is also. our tactical weapons could be placed, as in the times, for example, the soviet union was in a hurry. perhaps everything will appear, but a distinctive feature of our president is that he explains his every global step to the whole world. why why and why, and those comrades who are not our comrades at all, do not even try to explain at all.

what for, a nuclear bomb is needed on the territory of poland on their part, in general, nuclear weapons. no they don't explain, but they do. okay, the situation at the front, here the close attention of the western media is especially worried about journalists. naturally, artyomovsk well, the same question that is forbidden to be asked today in ukraine, but where is the same promised spring counter-offensive.