when revolutionary battles were going on in paris , he was divided to be there and also to write about it . the man brought down the first russian tolstoy magazine did not bankrupt him. and as if, well, with him he stopped leaving the library for reading. here is but this already graduate school. this is an accounting occupation. hmm, here it is. eh, let's say i really wanted to too. well, where else to go for a person with literary ambitions. i really worked a little in the newspapers in the usual areas of the newspaper, then the newspaper, and then i was already from graduate school, i had already passed somewhere in newspapers and there for 13 years. this is a whole whole, it was a whole epoch or the same, too, on the newspaper there was a wonderful publication and an influential and debatable embrace, unlike other soviet ones, if i were the director or the minister, how was the heading for this, if the minister were the director, this was the second . the tractor was a debate about life, and i

worked in the first notebook and the literary one, and then the newspaper also consisted of two notebooks, 16 pages, the last page was humorous for the first eight pages or pages, and the second for literature. oh uh public problems. economist remind, so it is dear to you. well, our viewers wrote, printed, and wrote sadly. well, you're glorious. here's what i think you might disagree with. you always left some traces that you patented. i don’t know, you revive one word to feel, but there is no such person in the literary workshop who does not know what, but there is a word you revive, because sergeyevich invented it and was accepted. well, it's probably true, but they don't claim it. yes i hope please tell me that's what it was at that moment, well, in that era. i

mean, already the seventies, of course, the years to a greater extent, which i also partially found out what the book of criticism was like. it came out with a circulation of 10 or even 20,000 copies. it is beyond the present moment. yes and here is a book and immediately after that they still went to write, they are different, who wrote a monographic work about some class or a classic of the nineteenth century or a classic of the soviet era. i have no personal work. not even about anyone though i would have prepared several editions of babarykin and other writers of the early 20th century, who, after all , in those years, so it was at first the most, in theory. i have a close up book. these were portraits of the most interesting stupid people, so not all of them. there, of course, could not be there, for example, his forces in brodsky were naturally there or henry could not be a subwoofer. or i don’t know sergey

gandlevsky, that is, the authors who were either in exile or in the underground, but did not recognize the soviet power, but the rest i had there martynov boris slutsky yevgeny vinokurov yes , you never know the wonderful darkovsky among others. by the way, i have a book from tarkov and opened with essays on elders, that is, his martynov and his tarkov. you are the author of the preface to the legendary book of the eighty-second year, arseniy of tarkovsky, plump gray. well , in general, it must be said that literary criticism, of course, it seems to me from uh, 2020 at that time uh, was very important. that is, they listened to her. she somehow created a literary space. for example, alla martinchenko will write in barcelona of tarkovsky that he sounded like a contemporary and everyone takes it for granted that tarkovsky made his debut in the sixty- second year. he published his first book. not

exactly a debut, but the first book, and at this time he is 55 years old debuts together with, er, demolished stew and companies, so the comparison is later than them. mm. even later than them. of course, in the late 50s, it began to be published and was read in dushevshenko. by the way, i left a successful article events. i was told they corresponded heard about it. well, in general, it is, yes it is. yes. indeed, it was so much more appreciated. actually, three things. uh, firstly, the so-called courage , that is, to say that the other, for other censorship editorial reasons, did not dare to say, for example, for the first time i quoted gumilyov, whom i then loved very much without naming. she said already, as one old poet said and then it was so fashionable. i remember the collection of the institute

of slavic studies was canisters, where in the note there are wonderful two sugars vyacheslavovich ivanov nikolayevich axes are both dead now, and the oksky gave another footnote. and there it was. as you say, and as said for nonsense for failures for loss. his dear and for the fact that it could be otherwise for the fact that there is no need for another georgy ivanov mr. v. ivanov remember the rules, however, i remember exactly this quatrain, because i saw him then , by the way, and there is one of the main er, well, such theses of our my, but today, our podcast together. you know, i would just like to say even at the very beginning. here you are encouraged to read. but i appeared on the white light, well, and somehow became fragile, while still being mastered in literature, when literature was one of the most important

things in the country and this appeal. this is your today's call would sound strange. yes, it was not necessary to call once and do not like and went to the stadium to listen to the culture was literature. look into society there was literature built around this. i even wrote in the preface in one of my books, literature was one of the most important things in the country and how i am now annoyed. what about me i say that our culture has gone to the point where this old device is. well, you know, almost gone. we are trying to prevent this, as if culturally speaking. incidentally, i am the authors of the aphorism. eh, or even proverbs are not given to everyone, but to compose a proverb. i composed yevgeny yevtushenko said that the poet of russia is more than a poet, and i came up with the idea that a poet in russia is no more than a poet. and this describes, unfortunately, the end of an era, and the literature of centrism, with

which nothing can be done. yes, that's how it is i continue with criticism. here's what else i wanted to say courage was evaluated. well aware of course. this is understandable, and the third one is the very valuable qualities of writing in quality. matter, yes, that's how he himself wrote, how he builds a phrase, how the instrument of paragraphs of criticism is science or literature. as a matter of fact, yes, that's when this dispute flared up from the very beginning took aside those who think that criticism is literature, of course i am also for this that physics is literature of the same kind as a friend, others, of course, epic lyrics and criticism. the same. this is such a statement based on the material, er, of the books read, and not on the material of reality, as literature absolutely agrees with you, science works in categories. true false. correct false true or false, and correct criticism is no correct change. yes, it’s just

that some become well-known, some leave the sinkovsky editor already mentioned by us. uh, magazine reading library. he wrote about the first volume of dead souls, it's a dirty imperfect terrible work. e birds. the hotel arrives two russian peasants are standing there, and he is laughing. what kind of french women or what, but this opinion is difficult to argue, but it is gone. yeah , reality argued him, so criticism is not science, of course, it's scary. for headaches, there is askofen p at an affordable price and askofen ultra with a reinforced composition to combat headaches and migraines. askofen when the head hurts now russia is on sale. and tens of thousands of them are sold only on auto.ru. at first i did not believe the question.

why are you not on auto.ru yet? are you starting? deposit the best interest in sberbank reliable investment ideas, let's repair, make repairs more profitable to do on credit, take to pay off sabantuy. let's take a big car will be something to remember percent.

it's time to switch to the holy spring holy spring tune in to the taste well , the bridegroom is dedicated to those for whom you chose what to wear, now you choose a hamburger or a chickenburger for only 35 rubles. only in the application it’s delicious and the point is all the routes, on anything, build the city application in the maps well, now let’s go back to our conversation with the editor-in-chief of the znamya magazine to literary critics sergei ivanovich chuprinin, i will forever remember your book. if i'm not mistaken, the eighty-sixth year, i didn't find it on my shelf quickly before leaving here. criticism is criticism. a

or eighty-eight, maybe 88, probably, right? this is your book, and it, uh, first drew the eye of the researcher even now. yes, not about a bunny for criticism. what heroes were there, how they fought and competed with each other then it was, and very different writers wrote well. it is very important to write. it's good for me to write separately so that it was still interesting to read, yes, that's why i dreamed. yes indeed. i firmly believe that criticism is criticism. and that book, it probably was really, in general, just the very first, the only very first, then not so long ago, about five years ago, i reprinted it with the addition of essays. it does not even consist of an article, it consists of essays on figures, but figures, yes, but the key figures of the goldfinch, which you have already

mentioned before the completely new people that have appeared. here are at least publications in the nineties in the early 2000s, here's another thing i found. eh, book. well, of course, it is not the earliest wonderful. here is a picture of the library. yeah not okay. true, the ninetieth year is the thirty-seventh number. here, i once read a book called the situation. this is a book, despite its modest size. here is a paragraph of theirs in quotation marks conservatives are. for example, the burial places of the open information society are ours . even the current publicity is upsetting, which, to be honest, is far from freedom of speech in one single country, and even more so before the free exchange of information on an international scale, but you know the style is recognizable to you, well, as if it was written not even yesterday, but just today, that is, nothing has changed in the imprint, imprint, what

circulation, yes, speak. yes, i predict that the circulation is 50 thousand, my god 150.000 150.000. it diverged. here in this book pamphlet the situation was interesting. eh, far away. this is not always the case, now sergei ivanovich’s speech is not generally criticism, we will return to this. and now the very thing that i have prepared for you today. and this poem by boris pasternak is a thunderstorm, instantaneous for a century, pretending to be a simple analysis, i will say two things, but firstly, i will still read this poem. according to a book close to your heart, because this is a venerable poet's library. uh series, second edition in blue, this book came out in sixty-fifth. i check myself. yes, it was in the sixty-fifth year, and most importantly, that its compiler and author of the article. e hmm and andrew data accrual is absolutely

such a classic edition. and why you are close to your heart, our dear interlocutors will learn from the second part of our program. although they accepted it, he said that he was a child. thaw yes, this says a lot. well, the second thing i pretend. ah, my simple analysis. uh, that's what uh, here hmm everything is complicated and this poem can be said. so it will be a rose of mercury a dinner of lilacs at this time he has picked up an armful from the field and trafina for these houses, as if prose, that is, the sentence flows from one line. in another they can be read in poetic rhythm. and you can read and merge. there is one incomprehensible word trafil here. well, the german verb prefen trave get rophan - it will be possible to get it, and so on. uh, uh, this poem is talking about. how do you, of course, remember a very simple thing, yes, that at night, and lightnings

snatch out a familiar uh, picture that we remember, uh, by the way they see during the day, but