i'm thinking in this freaks how cultural drawing of the whole city. i 'm not from the small town of lipetsk. we are in a local television company, but somehow a story was made in the center on april 1st. well, everything, the time was dug up, the street was the main highway, for a very long time we could not do anything with it, and the situation was as follows, we agreed. ah. one teacher brought some shells that were broken there from museums and made a story that in the sewers, well , amphorae were found during excavations, which prove that the city there is thousands of ancient 703. yes, but there are these amfords, it turns out that this is generally some kind of century, there, before the birth of christ, all the newspapers came out the next day with screenshots of the apartment. there was a serious story between, you know, all the media picked it up. they saw a story for the company. that's how tv was believed. well, actually nothing changes, and in due time. now the word prank has appeared there. yes, we had such pranks, we came to the one who had a telephone at home, i mean, well, as a child, i called there. oh, and there. well when people said

no, they just said who the dzhimka was. who are you, what is it, yes, yes, yes. and what are you calling there, and what about where is mom? i say, mom said call cheap tangerines brought. that's almost all in the queue there. everything is there. i say, rather said that they had disappeared and came. oh shit, i’ll run away and there people were going to, damn it, raised money for cheap tangerines, they came to the store, there was nobody there, but one case, i’ll tell you funny, and one producer. uh, let's call him conditionally arthur , that is, there is a story about him, the surname should not be called will. it seems to be invented, which means, uh, until the moment when he really became there on television. it was, uh, a producer and so on, and we worked in the same company together, and he uh, he dreamed. well , that is, i always dreamed of moving forward, in the field there. well, in general, such work is visible, and he dreamed of getting a job in a bank. and so this draw e planned. comrade, he

called him in advance, he says, everything, he says, next week. i arranged for you to make an appointment, it seems that the position is being vacated for you. only you, please, and we went there to work some there. well, such t-shirts-bikes there, some kind of sweater says, you go well, let's get dressed, because after all this, well, as it were, you go to work to get a job, he went there with all the money that he had some there zane there is some expensive suit there, in short, he spent all the money, dressed with a needle, which means that's all. and he just drove up to the bank building, which means at 10:00 in the morning, as it was assigned to him there, it’s darker there in smart thick and there, accordingly, they look at him so early there. yes, good afternoon. well it's you who he says? i'm here at work type i was assigned. and who did he appoint there, uh, now one minute just as unequivocally, and he is recruiting this comrade who came up with this prank. and he says, where are you, he says, i won’t let me under the jar. he says, well, yes, of course, they won't let you in. today, on the first of april , he is nogami, but then he says, otherwise this is how i

got the first elegant bonfire of this kind. well , listen to play this, but it was not the first of april, but here i am, let's say, i performed at a huge stadium as angelica varum for example, it was yes, seriously and we are not something that played out. it was true. it was a story quite by accident angelica i didn't recognize stubborn. i will tell you. it was a group concert. all beforehand. dima malikov should have a duet. eh, that means with masha a thief and for some reason she didn’t come, there was something like that, then it had been very difficult for a long time, and he was with someone with someone to be a huge stadium. so it’s hard to see, yes, and i was like that, i had such a raincoat, there was such a leopard lining inside, as i remember now says tanya also looks like him. you can parody, so we sang the song. yellow leaves over the city, somewhere people don’t fly, then they joked that it was necessary, it’s just that i was like this, in principle, it’s a little like

it can be for me here comrades zhukovka and then it was very similar to agutin to visit and we bought everything. we so on. we thought we had to do something like that. so this is the second composition. this is my co-host karina kross, we don’t do an informal podcast together. by the way, karina has more than 30 million subscribers, we met just on sub-quality format, but from the first moments we have a very cool trend. i would like to say, yes, thank you very much. we all have 30 million subscribers, at least. and as a maximum to say a huge thank you to everyone who is present at this table. i know you all, i respect you immensely, and it is even a little very exciting for me to sit here with you. here's a look for you great. thank you for everything. what are you doing. and what did each of you get for yourself from the podcast, what did you find for yourself , did you discover something in yourself around you? i open

each time, their interlocutors, and moreover, those who are already known, because in our podcast we ourselves invite interlocutors right here who we really want to see for me, for example, lukyanenko is a big, big discovery. i just wanted to jump into this world to me as a writer - this is some kind of incredible universe, any writer. in fact, the universe is sitting to your right. pay attention with living writers. yes, i am grateful for these podcasts. we are afraid of other things. i’ll find out the truth for myself, let’s say the first one i had was an entry about the strugatskys in in principle, strugatsky is my youth. after that, he never returned to them. i happily forgot them. and now getting ready for this transfer. i started reading them. it's so cool, it turned out to dive. at the age of 17-18, remember what it was like then to compare yourself then with the present one, look at

the strugatskys with current eyes, because these new ones generally began to think about them. here something began for them, it happened there in the fifties in the sixties and they survived. before that, imagine there were a lot of people who foresaw the future. but most of them never made it to that point. they survived, but arkady had died earlier as a tanker. boris natanshin lived a long life disappointed than they gave many different interviews to them. certainly very interesting to hear. here is how they assessed what came true, what did not come true, where humanity is going. eh, it's moving. this is really such a great story. i start from the interest of the interlocutor, that is, some interesting person with whom i want to talk, and i ask him there, from someone you love who you want to talk about there, because i noticed that when you impose a topic, you choose , you prepare, you impose a person, then he says, well, without a spark, without interest. it is very important for me that a person presents a book as an emotional event.

well, i don’t know how, like a girl who went on a date and tells her friends that she and what is he, and she’s on fire, her eye is shining, and everyone understands. well, yes, she had a crush on him girlfriend. here. i also want it to be e nu, to prompt such a small show, where uh man talks about some book that he burns, which hooked on, which became an event for him. that's why i start from the topic of the interlocutor and often began to read books that i, for example, have not read. how can a book even talk? so that people then read this interesting question, like this book, or it is enough for them to listen to the discussions and then they will not just retell what they heard in your podcast and be known as intelligent people. well, first of all, although the podcast is called required reading. i'm not at all implying that people who watch should read the book, necessarily discuss it. i don't even mean. i just

want the person who is watching to be interested and see that there is some kind of book. here, uh, aroused strong emotions. here my interlocutor became an event for him. i believe that literature should be connected through emotions, not through edification, that this should be read. let's all read. let's write down the whole library now. and i want uh, to show that the book is an adventure, that it's cool and that it can, in general, turn life upside down choose a book, how? well, i haven't read it yet. i try to build on the interest of the interlocutor. here is a person who is interesting to me. it seems to me that he can, well, somehow hook the viewer, and i myself am interested in talking to him, and i ask what book you want to discuss, who is an important author for you. each person has several authors who are for him. well

, they know that there are a lot and i try to find here this author, and sometimes it happens to be an author that i personally don't know, and then i already read there, for example, i have never read marings. so, now i'm reading in money and preparing in the program and for myself i open this write or i have a different story, and in fact. this is the most difficult thing in my case in my podcast, because here comes the living real people. they are not actors. they are some kind of boys there, well, here are their living, real, living, real problems. if a person took such a step, he came to television. it means it's real. like this, uh, it's already hot, but the person who comes here to me at the prompt of the psyche comes with a cry. i have such a problem. i'm in such pain. yes, and you understand that if you make this show uh-huh, get out with the profession. yes, because i abuse him. it will be a very dishonest story, but for him you are also a certain challenge. he

goes out to a huge audience to tell more scary. this is very scary, therefore my task is to make a person not be scared not before not during and most importantly, after scary, after there is feedback. you have feedback here, two heroes have already written to us. and uh, it certainly wasn't, you know . oh, a miracle happened, yes, the lame began to walk, the blind began to see, but this is a letter. i understood, i looked from the other side and actually in this, the main task. and look. we are sitting with a psychologist with a real professional psychologist, with whom i just at some point conflict, we have situations when we get out of a rather tough conflict in two concepts, because there is a position of a psychologist often it is cynical, because modern psychology is a rather cynical thing, there is such a tougher position of mine or a christian opposition or a human position and not always our advice or our

view of things coincides, but the hero who comes to us gets a choice of two concepts of reaction or attitude to the situation, which i also think is very useful. how did you come to this podcast? just wondering how long i've been doing. here. this topic, well, i studied at the medical institute, in general i would have been going to a psychiatrist, actually being a psychiatrist and i thought that i closed this story for myself forever. and now i 'm studying to be a psychologist, but not in order to be with a psychologist, but not in order to be an engineer. vladimir romanovich didn't know what in the old days. and where they studied theology for all people studied theology, 99 institute. how many priests came out only on the other side, yes, in order to get

some correct academic, uh, theological knowledge. well, this is such a bit of mythology, of course listen. well what is there we know each other, but yes, well, maxim kozlov ended up as a fak in the classical department. because the ancient texts inevitably gave an opportunity to scientific atheism. after all, they studied not only because they are scientific atheists or, er, brainless, but because it was necessary to go in there were others, of course, the basis of the system carefully. uh, arguments evidence and so on. here is my story with psychology for me. it's so i can have stereoscopic vision. i’m interested in some problem, that is, we can say that some kind of your new life, or maybe this, but the gestalt that you have not closed. you decided to close it, and with the help it coincided. yes, it

coincided. i also have many similarities. i think we all have one thing in common. this is the first channel. let's, let's take the channel. yes, happy birthday. first channel happy birthday. i'm not like that, uh, i want to say. e that the first channel, but in fact. true, there are a lot of e in my life, so i sent several e musical big events on channel one, e, was a member live eurovision on channel one. yes, but i sent a well-known musical group , i will not name it very much, but two songs that i wrote for this group are known to the whole world. i lost my mind and will not catch up with us, and on channel one there was eurovision in which they took part. yes, you can imagine , who gives podcasts a podcast, paws you are here. you can only imagine there is, uh, such a moment that now is very well, in principle, as always, the topic of fathers and children. this is when parents are very

detached from their children. and that's why we i don’t know, we thought so and made such a podcast that connects just the young generation and the adult generation, for example, came to us. uh, razox group. yes, does anyone know of you such a wonderful team i am a bee of waters, in which and in these words i heard from them for a second, if you think about it, the total viewing of this clip is half