the second part of our program wants to be accepted so he said that he is a child. thaw yes, this says a lot. well, the second thing i pretend. ah, my simple analysis. uh, that's what uh, here hmm everything is complicated and this poem can be pronounced, so it will be prose merk the lilac catcher at this time he has picked up an armful from the field and thinks mitrafilaksky. it is like prose, that is, the sentence flows from one line to another, they can be read in poetic rhythm. and you can read and merge. there is one misunderstood word here. trachel. well, the german verb trefen, herbs, windmills - it will be possible to get it and so on. well, this is what this poem is about. as you, of course, remember a very simple thing, but that at night, and lightnings snatch out familiar pictures that are remembered. we e by the way they see during the day, but

at night they e look, as if photographs snatched from the darkness, we recognize the familiar, which seems unfamiliar to us, this is what we are talking about here. well, uh, thunder and lightning are presented in such a personified form this is a photographer. if you remember the old days, the photographer, crouched down on his big camera, put on, uh, pulled the trigger on his head, pulled the trigger in parallel, pressed uh, another trigger, twitched the magnesium flash, everything, this, uh, zarya here is such a picture, but the most important thing in at the end, yes, sergei ivanovich , this poem is absolutely amazing, and the reader is not always enchanted by this beautiful complexity, and boris pasternak gets to the end with a beautiful obscurity, an instant thunderstorm for a century. and then said goodbye to summer

at a half-station, who took off his hat, took 100 blinding photographs at night as a keepsake of thunder, was freezing. at that time, a bunch of lilacs, having picked up a bunch of lightning from the field, they trafiled to light up the management’s house, and when the building covered the forest, a wave of evil kinship spread. and like coal according to the drawing , a downpour struck, all the lashes began to blink. the collapse of consciousness. here it seemed to rage. even those corners of the mind, where it is now as bright as day, what happens at the end, and in another place boris pasternak says that a work of art. whatever they are, they always talk about the moment of their birth. this is very a subtle note it has right.

attitude to what pasternak gives us in poetry, because this poem is not about how lightning snatches familiar pictures from the night, but about how this very poem is born before our eyes and at the end we see an amazing insight when the cover of the building spilled wave of malice. and as charcoal in the drawing , i mean a charcoal pencil, of course. e, the downpour struck everyone. why do we weave? because the jets are parallel, as if branches intertwined in a wattle fence, and became brighten the collapse of consciousness. and it seemed to light up. even those corners of reason. where now it is as bright as day, not a thing to illuminate those parts of consciousness where it is dark, this is not the most, the main thing is not the most. the main thing is to take pictures out of the darkness. the most important thing is to understand that even what seems to you to be light, clear, transparent, but familiar. even this is incomprehensible to you until you

bring yourself into this poetic state. the main thing is not to snatch the light out of the darkness, and the main thing is to see a different quality of the light, even those corners of the mind where it is now as bright as day. light up with a new color. i understand. this is precisely at the moment when thunder and lightning in the complex, deliberately complicated image of a photographer light these candles and, uh, strive to get into the management’s house and give us a picture that is familiar to us by day and not visible at night boris pasternak thunderstorm. instant for a century. well, now we will return to the conversation by sergei ivanovich ah, after this beautiful poem, which i love very much, in which even the words are rearranged for the keys, yes. an instant thunderstorm for a century is an inversion, this is

not a very natural word order in let's return to our conversation and talk about your editorial work. firstly, it is very important to me how literary magazines live now. how the znamya magazine lives what has changed and i would very much like to talk about your projects. here from this series, and here we see one volume from e two-volume, e, created by sergei ivanovich accepted by the new russia world of literature. let's start with it, it's an amazing project. there is a famous russian writer dictionary, where articles are written about all writers who there was at least one book of the 19th century. a huge team of 19th-century authors is working on this seven-volume edition. they write and continue to write the latest tom is not yet out. and here he took one more. e wrote, and these two volumes, this is a wonderful work. i think that

in that is, in 200 years, but in these twenty or thirty. uh, years will be judged by m-m, for example, there are derbenekhi here in this book. no, petrovich well, everything is clear here. this is a poet, a songwriter. there are also people here namely, like villages-aa derkach db no one knows, but they have books, what can you say about this work of his. it's not criticism , it's quite already. i usually say that my basic profession is a critic, and having been engaged in editorial activity for the last 30 years, as an editor, and editorial activity to a certain extent interferes with buckwheat studies. you lose your freedom of movement. well, yes, you seem to be squeezing some kind of self-squeeze after you, after all, a magazine and some too bold statement of yours critical can be used professionally incorrectly for some cautious same

thing. yes yes yes. you control yourself, and the soul according to the spiritual inclinations of the latter. well, 30 years, probably no less. i'm sorry, i'm highly fire word to enlighten. it is not so important to win an argument, although i have taken part in various literary disputes in my lifetime. anyway, glory. you’re typing god right now, i’ll tell you, and you’re 50-7 years old opa, here’s some serious data and some discussion articles and all that. yes, because it is more interesting for me to share my experience and add to my experience, but some new additional knowledge. why did the idea come about

in the dictionary, it was such a time, in general, when i took up all this, she stopped writing things that were not very clear about literature, what was happening in life was incomprehensibly literary-centrism. it seems to be over, what happens to the writers who live outside the russian federation, no one knows anything about mm writers of authoritative brand-nosers, as i call them? well, everything seems to be known here. well, yes, if the names are even more modest, but it’s also worth remembering gogol, yes, tell the sovereign emperors that such peter ivanovich bob lives now. yes of course, this, of course, in fact, every person who takes up a pen is there and then he took it and came and fixed it. but it’s so at least somehow, otherwise, no one but you, yes, yes, then another idea arose that you maybe

these are on your own, but again forgive the high-profile encyclopedic studies and, indeed, my most favorite book came out. life according to the concepts is beautiful, this is an attempt. hmm to give a theoretical outline, literature, based on the current flowing literary facts, knows what it is to write a table or put under the knife, er, well, you are not talking about this later time, but nevertheless. here are the current students. i'm not sure they understand what it means and somehow transformed in the last decades of the twentieth century in the first current storyline. and what happens to roman well, and so on and so forth is curious in the form of dictionary entries. this is the author's, of course, a reference book again. er, because that's my point of view. well, what can he be?

well, this is what is interesting to read at the literary institute a course that i call an introduction to the modern literary space on pt with from the very beginning i say, my children called my children. naturally, they are my grandchildren and right-wingers, and already some with father's money em what are copyright courses? this is my point of view. you can science not quite science, of course, but probably your thaw stuff let's round it all off with them. still. this is also not science and the same with the essence. the first time i flooded with this was in the late eighties, the time was such in the yard. here it is, again, to take a break moronic, which then resulted in perestroika. that's what but the image of our very culture i am released the t-300 in some tamtology selected works, which sounded the most, which were the most passed, then

30 years of life have passed radically. maybe it has changed and it occurred to me to return to this again, that is, the image of the past is changing in the present, of course, yes, definitely, definitely. ugh definitely. i decided to return to this again to release an ontology and it is pointless, because all these texts are now studied in life . she usually began with me on march 5 , 1953. no, from the day of death , steel ended in the sixty-eighth year, when the troops of the warsaw pact entered prague. exactly, this is the end of another story. the era about which the other is 15 years old, but curious. by the way, this is the time between these times of such a sharp renewal of drastic changes everywhere. that's what they call movement.

they were repeated in the xx century in russia three times and each time for 15 years, the silver age of movement, the thaw of movement. and that's what we call class restructuring. well, during this time , just appeared in the press, a huge fantastic number of documents and archival documents and memoirs and codes of correspondence, and what is there just not a huge word is very important. for example, i couldn’t just fit this huge tom and tom sergeevich , he is so huge in a large format, it’s true, yes. so i started building. this is the most simple. to the primitive it would seem that the way in chronology, of course, but such a number happened here and so-and-so, damn it, well , the most unexpected, for example, rapprochement. in the new

in the world at the same time in the pioneer magazine brodsky the fire the first publication of the wrestlers two nobel laureates within one month huge, stunning events with the release of one day and the military and the inconspicuous publication of a nursery rhyme long in sudebrodsky will, as it were, say that i have a fire yes yes yes, yes, yes, yes, great, how close everything is, how everything changes, i’ll say that the book is glory, i married god for him , now the second one is being prepared. it has already been actually handed over to the publishing house by the president. i really want to rule longer, so that there is less inaccuracy and more right. i posted on social media.

yes, yes, books, but the fact that someone calculated, no, it was not at all like that for all my social networks under this reader, and in the short film there will also be a lot of gratitude for this, too, i’ll say. what it is.