a brutal murder and appeals will not help here, of course, of course. you know, i would also like to draw your attention to the fact that terrorism today, after the day after the assassination of the tatar ladlin, opened a new ideological dimension . usually the terrorists were islamic fundamentalists. this is an image already flashed by the nazis , nationalist radicals, but liberals or supporters of liberal ideology did not reach direct terror of direct participation, the second destruction of people. i think we've moved on one game is not in the ideological aspect that we know the same big eyelids or sir populists. well, let's be honest, at certain stages of its activity, there was also left-wing terror. right-wing terror existed; left -wing terror existed by fundamentalist islamic pen, but such a direct inclusion of structures either related to khodorkovsky with

a fund for the fight against kaka-corruption and here purely liberal structures based on soros's popper dialogue. we have not yet seen, and this girl, of course, is a consequence show and understand. this is the transition of another red line, liberalism reveals its directly terrorist face, this does not mean that it becomes worse than other ideologies of the witch and we know that other ideologies. in some cases they turned to terrorism. but this is the first. as i know. an example of such a specific targeted destruction of innocent civilians. there, after all, not only vladlen a was the target. yes, he was the main target, but now he is in serious condition, 30 people, including a child, and they are also a case the victims are civilians who have absolutely nothing to do with their own, and this is done under the auspices of liberalism. this is done under the auspices of no war no war, if supporter

no war, go and kill. they say today. this is a completely new turn in the distribution of, let's say, ideological positions on a global scale, liberalism is openly becoming a terrorist ideology, already extremist, the etiology is indicated in the bull. that is, we are already prepared for this, but in a sense we understood the consequences of what would happen if it was in this direction, yes, from will, and today we will see the proof that we still want. i think that in principle , not of course, not all liberalism, just like not all communism, just like not all conservatives and not all muslims, and not even all islamic fundamentalists. may have to be identified with terrorism by terrorists, but we see an example of a liberal act of terror in our peaceful city in st. petersburg carried out against the civilian population, of course, by order. well, this turned out

to be a consequence of ukraine. maybe from western intelligence services, but we are talking about, but already recruiting people with a liberal ideology to commit a terrorist act. so before our eyes yesterday. we have crossed a very serious line, liberalism has discovered its peculiar face well for me, as a critique of the liberal ideology. this is not surprising, but i think that society should think about society for a long time and i am glad that you mentioned terrorists of the beginning of the 20th century to alexander and uh, it was terrorism absolutely right. left there was a little right, radical terrorism was also much more to the left, but they were not liberals at that time ready to start really condemning the terrorists. it was even considered indecent, because the terrorists were against the royal power. but then remember the best of the liberals eh they united and said that

real devilry is happening, that this is not right. and so you said that not all liberals, of course, support terrorism. and i'll tell you now, we'll find out very soon, we'll see. will there be people in the liberal camp who are willing and dare to speak out against their political correctness and say that terrorism is it is unacceptable for us to have no ways, we'll see. will they say it let's see if he says, then who will say, and now dry for advertising. on april 20, in all cinemas

of the country, halva opens the door to the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales , any purchases will become even more pleasant with an installment plan for 10 months and a cashback of up to 10%. and the corridor of discounts is approaching. and what does it mean saledamus star sale smartphone technokamon for 10.990 rubles. and discounts up to 30% on all tokam motor oils easter circulation of russian lotto each ticket is a winning one from of each ticket sold, part of the funds will be

transferred to mercy cases buy tickets in stores and on the stoloto tinkoff website do you know that you can use mobile communications three times cheaper? 1,200 minutes of calls 25 gb of internet, as well as unlimited music, unlimited social media messengers and video services. order a tinkov sim card and use mobile communications, three times cheaper. he is so alone when there is not enough around. it's time to switch to the holy spring holy spring tune in to purity taste. open a business account in uralsib get six months of free service at a favorable rate, uralsib perspectives where

you are i am a photographer, if it’s easy for me to fix skin problems in pictures, then in life their disguise is not an option akriderm of complex action helps fight inflammation. redness of infections from the corner on the skin and doris more confidence in the life of akriderm gk healthy skin beauty discounts up to 80% on sleep products and sleeping bag furniture. and this is cartazone bank, and this is a big cashback on the ozone bank card with a cashback of up to 10% in rubles for shopping anywhere and free maintenance. how much time will i have

after enabling free access to the movie and series on the wink video service, connect?

premiere on football with denis kazansky on sunday at the first in the big game big bookmaker venline general partner of the russian premier league big game is on the air, and now we are moving to washington where the correspondent, businessmen of ekaterina moore are with us on skype ekaterina is very glad to see you. say we were just discussing a terrorist act that just took place in saint petersburg. this is somehow being discussed in the united states. in the meantime , the united states is just waking up, the news has just arrived, and the official reaction, i don’t see it yet, but, of course, it’s on all tv channels. this is a picture of what happened, and

therefore, yes, of course, washington is aware of this situation and, as far as i understand, correspondents are trying to connect it. uh, including with the uh that happened with dugin, but so far , i haven’t noticed any official reaction from washington, ah, after some time after the terrorist attack against daria dugina was committed, and in the new york times , an article appeared where it was said that the american intelligence services were specifically cia analysts but there is enough evidence to conclude that there was a terrorist attack. if not organized, then at least sanctioned, and it was emphasized by high authorities in kiev that there was no evidence about this, that president

zelensky knew about it, uh, personally, and it was said that the united states would find ways to explain to the ukrainian country that such actions not allowed. although in the end the article said. and what about washington, the biden administration proceeds from the fact that this unfortunate episode, as it was said there, that he cannot escape, and i immediately had a question to prevent the full support of ukraine. and if you are not ready to do anything about this, then, in general, what is the purpose of the conversation with ukrainian officials? i asked when i was in autumn. i had the opportunity to ask one official. eh, knowledgeable enough. uh, are there any measures being taken to ensure that things like this never happen again? repeated, and i was told. we told

the ukrainian about it. uh, i asked, but here you are , so you said that they understood or they are called, in general, and i was told for obvious reasons. we cannot go into details, but we said it so that we would be understood. do you have any information that would show that kiev was clearly and clearly told by washington that terrorism, especially terrorism on russian territory, is absolutely unacceptable from point of view of american national interests. i noticed from a publications in the press when the topic of nord stream was discussed and here is this alternative version. and the fact that a pro-ukrainian group is behind the nord stream explosion. and they were just listed there. uh, all these here, and

unfortunate like you, said incidents and a. well, since we know that we aspirant is always in such deep cooperation with the white house, uh, and uh, journalists, if they used to talk about what we suspect is possible, then, but in these publications directly ah, not that kiev itself yes, but ah , about a, about kiev, tuned, but elements actually accused. uh, in these terrorist attacks here, and so they are including on the crimean bridge and me, you know , there is a feeling that the kiev regime is actually now walking on the edge. i think that this is a very serious warning for the zelensky cabinet and for him that something needs to be done about terrorism and such approaches.

it is natural for the united states to accept such approaches, and it is unacceptable to agree. uh, i agree with you in part that such approaches are unacceptable for the united states, or at least at least clearly contradicts the american public position, but when the famous article appeared in the new york times that some ukrainian organizations were involved in undermining the northern streams, i thought it was interesting.

now, senator, let's move on, uh, to a more fundamental topic, not yet so tragic, but to be honest, if you look at where we're going, there's not much that can be ruled out. i'm talking about, uh, what new concept of foreign policy has just been adopted in moscow and i'm talking about the tragedy of not in terms of what the new russian concept will lead to, but in the fact that we have come to a world situation where our previous ideas

are ideas that it is still possible to negotiate, that contradictions are under control, that dialogue with the west is not hopeless. and, apparently, most of these representations. in general, you have to leave in the past. well, that's the way it is. uh, the new concept of russia's foreign policy is a serious document, by the way, not very large for this type of document, but very capacious and saturated. it's not just reading and you must read carefully. you must read carefully for a long time, weighing each word. it is quite obvious that this is not the fruit of armchair reflections. this is a vital document. let's listen to what sergey lavrov said on this occasion as the most important resource, the course for unlocking

the potential of strategic partnership with our great neighbors the people's republic of china , the republic of india, the countries of the islamic world, as well as with the states of the african continent of latin america and the caribbean , is being confirmed commitment to solving all problems that arise in the arctic region. but further, if you look at the doctrine of the concept, it is very clearly stated that it provides for preventive strikes, if necessary, and it says that in general the west is the collective west, they are no longer in the category of partners. they are not even in the category of countries with which we will deal, and these are not friendly countries, and in relation to them. in general, we are talking about not only not so much

an agreement. how many? if i understand correctly, and the ability to prevent and uh, destroy their ability to conduct hostilities , a serious conclusion. no, absolutely serious, perhaps even the most important in this document, after all, what is it about, what should we be ready for now and in the future in our relations with, relatively speaking, the west. with hostile forces on the world stage, this is the first and second thing they need to keep in mind when they expect our reaction to hostile ones. we somehow use this word unfriendly. let's talk directly hostile action against our countries these hostile actions have not yet gone beyond the information war of the hybrid war, but, nevertheless, the word war. we are already using. like, uh, like a fact, like a given? this is probably the most. the main thing in this

document is exactly what i mean when i say that it is in demand for time. uh, sergey viktorovich, in the very passage that you, uh, turned on and showed, spoke about our relationship. uh, uh, let's just say with the countries with which we have constructive relations, mentioning, first of all, china and india will not hide for obvious reasons. i opened this concept this document first of all found the page. this is exactly the page where it is said first about china and then from indie about india, there are no new formulas that, for example, would not have been used in our political lexicon before this concept, but the very fact that all this built in such a way that we have e partners with whom we have the right to count on constructive cooperation and it is indicated there, how this is determined cooperation both in the case of china and in the case

of india e. i think this is a very important element. e of the new document, like all the rest. here is another main element. and this is what is clearly uh, provided opportunities. uh, the use of force in circumstances that were previously unthinkable, such as the possibility of preemptive strikes. if you know they're going to hit you. yes and some of this is not formulated in detail, some measures regarding, as senator e, a former ambassador said denisov take some measures against hostile states to prevent them from pursuing a destructive policy towards russia . what does this mean from your point of view when we talk about the power aspect of russian diplomacy. so, first of all, i want to fix more than one important point, that

war is far from being only armed struggle. and when we talk about modern warfare, it's mostly non-armed struggle. this is a complex method of information in the broadest sense of the word and economic confrontation of economic warfare. that's why first of all, i want to fix that this document will be adopted. against unfriendly states, well, not a vision , this is a confrontation with loaded states and those methods of confrontation in the economic information and psychological spheres that the russian federation does not use today, unlike the west apparently. it would not be applied, in what is the most severe and it will be very destructive measures for the western world. as for the military aspect of the power

aspect? well, first of all, you should expect the adoption, of course, the adoption of a new military doctrine. this is clear. e, a new document on the basis of state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence will be adopted, since this document, which was adopted in 2020, takes into account the new ones. the provisions of this very doctrine on external external external activity. here it assumes a change in the principles of the use of nuclear weapons. i assume that given that we are ready to deliver, including preventive strikes, appropriate changes will be made, in principle. that is, it will be enabled. the principle of the possibility of using nuclear weapons, including in the preventive version . this is absolutely clear. in extreme circumstances, when the survival of the country

is clearly under threat, because there is always a certain list. the use of any weapon with it, any forceful measures , presupposes a redefinition of the list of specific conditions, this list of specific conditions will be published so that the other side knows and does not cross these very lines and boundaries. so there are some very big changes ahead. today, the russian federation has taken a real step, demonstrating the determination of our goals of the transfer and redistribution of the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus. this is also a very important demonstrative step in terms of military strategy. this is not obligatory. the russian federation has the opportunity to get any point on the territory of russia even without dumplings. oh, i beg your pardon on the territory of europe, the territory of the world. yes, i say europe e even without the use of strategic nuclear forces with tactical nuclear weapons. here is but a appearance in

belarus such weapons. it's a demonstrative mode step, so that's exactly what they 're worried about in context. of the document that we are just considering as a document, that is , there is a very tough aggravation of russia's relations with the western world on the one hand, but there is one more important point. anglosactions they work not just on the current state. first of all, they analyze trends, and the trend for the anta-saxons is very bad. it is enough to remember one short phrase that these people threw, which will confirm the pin and which is discussed very actively in the western world in particular in the manuals. he said we will build a new world together with russia. these keywords do not need any official contracts in the form of block contracts.

it will be enough of that phrase, of course. i want to remind you that there was no official agreement on the existence of the union union of the union of the united states of america great britain of the ussr against nazi germany, there was no specific agreement on specific actions. and we already have these agreements with china therefore blow. and this is also a very serious bad trend of reversal, non-european non-western countries from the west is a collective decision to increase or reduce production volumes. in oil, with a corresponding increase in oil prices, this is a terrible blow to the western economy. it's got to go clearly, no one in the west expected that russia would be able to find, uh, strange peck, who would support this. there's a big game on the air

. so, to beijing. and the president of france , macron, is sent, and france has very serious economic relations. and with china the european union has very serious economic relations with china, but the macron, as i understand it. uh, the task assigned to him, including washington in the european union, is not just to talk about expanding and strengthening economic cooperation, but also to convince china to distance itself from russia and at least not supply lethal weapons to russia, you will get something for yourself imagine that e china's leaders primarily squatted the pin and the leadership of the foreign political bloc. uh, generally listens to this kind of words, first of all, nothing new. there is absolutely none here.

uh, obviously secondly, these are, of course, tolerances, but it seems to me that these are all elokvens, uh, the eloquence of the same macron of other european representatives, mrs. whether to give weight to the words of the macron himself, and this hmm, you know, a kind of such a rhetorical fee justifying his, uh, policy in the eyes of the american patron, because for europe for europe from the point of view. uh, if you want her survival relationship with china has extremely high. uh, meaning china is the place where europe can do business, given that uh china is related to uh, hmm, this is purely loyal and positive for china. europe is the european union - this is the largest partner.

last year, they gave almost 700 billion us dollars 675, if exactly with a huge positive balance, as from the united states, it must be said in favor of the benefit of china and it seems to me that we will hear all sorts of such rhetorical exercises in public. where to without this, but at the negotiations, probably still closed to the outside world , the conversation will turn to things that are much more important for europe. alexander, i have a personal question for you again. sorry, we are relatively familiar. recently i knew, of course, you are well on your work. well, now i had the opportunity, what is called to observe here in action, and i was struck by your ability to be at the same time a person, a very decisive look and a very pragmatic, when it comes to concrete actions, and the conclusions that

russia must make use of the current situations. i would like to ask you. this is how you would like to see relations with the collective west, after all that has happened, given that the collective west we can hardly cancel. it seems to me that i generally believe that the stronger the freer independent sovereignty russia will be, the better relations with the collective west will be. it's just that we have to go over the point of dependence to the point, and the west-philia to the point e, when perceiving western civilization as a norm, as a model, as who, why we follow and what we unconditionally accept the more. russia will be turned to itself, to no western civilizations, which are mentioned in this brilliant doctrine. in my opinion, a very relevant doctrine of our foreign policy, finally a sovereign doctrine of our e

foreign policy, the better, no matter how paradoxically our relations with the west will be built. i believe that the globalist elite is far from the entire west, unipolar supporters of a unipolar world and the imposition of liberal hegemony on us. this is far from the whole west west - this is childbirth and cultures and states with their own national interests , globalists and liberals are now throwing all this into the furnace of their fanatical ideology. it makes these countries unfriendly. she makes up the concept of the collective west, she leads with us. this is the elite of the global globalist the elite is waging a real war with us, but it is also waging a war with its peoples with all those who do not agree with its extremist terrorist ideas. and we have. the more we are stronger, the more sovereign we are and the more we will be attractive to the west of the real west

, for its peoples, for its cultures, for its societies. after all, we today, in the eyes of many western people, are an example of normality, an example of logic, an example of rationality, not even aggressiveness, not an aggressive policy. no, we are a model of tradition, and in front of that monstrous post-modern tree of such a distortion of perversion, according to which this globalist elite follows, we are not against the west , it is not the peoples of the west that are unfriendly for us, but these globalist elites, i i believe that strengthening myself globally developing myself walking the sovereign path. we are not on the path of confrontation. we wanted to build a multipolar world without this confrontation , the globalist elite did not give us this. they themselves imposed this confrontational scenario on us. if we stand strong, we will win , we will strengthen ourselves and be open to our

true multipolar partners. the west will also become our friend, but as soon as we give up the slack, go to some kind of truce , re-acknowledge their absolute rightness, and the end will simply destroy us if we are wrong. i agree with you. i will make a reservation that when we say anglo-saxons, then i think, constantine, we are talking, of course, not about the entire population of great britain with its prime minister of england of indian origin and uh of the non-united states with their uh, colored black half indian half. uh, black vp. we are specifically talking about the globalist elites who have taken control of the anglo-saxon countries in this case the united states of great britain about how the american globalist elite

is trying to crack down on another one more, and a person who opposes her defense this time. it's a little bit of a former president. from the united states itself see you on the air tomorrow still pulling the strings of olaf scholz western puppet schultz will remain in his post if he continues to behave like a biden lap dog very much mr. schultz tried to hide the fact that in plain sight only a small part of the work done work. so schultz is who own, his personality changes from feeling grandiose to complete insignificance. it was called emetic schoitz because of the infusion of emetics into the esophagus. ochicha john was tortured to death, very much surprised and i can’t believe so far not one of the dead. you are a bunga deputy. don't you start

the investigation precisely with your mediocrity , precisely because he is not capable of any bright steps, he is afraid of any tough opposition. eh, ordinary housingism. dolls of the heir here tomorrow at the first bank and you know that you can use mobile communication is three times cheaper? 1,200 minutes of talk time 25 gb of internet, as well as unlimited music, unlimited social media messengers and video services. order a tinkoff sim card and use mobile communications three times cheaper than tinkoff, he is such a halva that opens the door. to the world of fantastic

shopping sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with a 10-month installment plan and a cashback of up to ten percent. unpack the dacha with yandex.market. buy a cordless drill-driver boxing bot for 499 rubles. and you can on the weekend, and you can also win 100 million and an apartment, if you think that up to a profitable loan, as far as the moon, then no. a profitable loan is much closer to the post office banks 4.5% per annum with a guaranteed rate service in each post bank at every step along the ground post office, bank, love, love fast, love long, love sweet, we are talking about sleep. what are you talking about? think selson. you can fall

asleep in just 20 minutes, sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily in the morning sleep lovers do not cause addiction 0.5.0. on wednesday, two twisters for the price of one in the kfc app, we are no longer those readers for whom perseverance is important. more has shown us its truth. we do not need to look at the same screen that being on the same wavelength spent. i already worked and it is not necessary to always be at home to feel like hosts. mts creates an ecosystem of digital services

that are constantly changing and changing habitually. what is this new logo? mts yes, but that one, and that one is no longer the same, someone sees the three letters rko, but business sees opportunities.

galina for adults and children from 3 years old and dry and wet cough with rengalin we are not afraid i will have time to issue a tinkoff black space card before april 16 and get free service forever tinkoff he is such a

quiet one. quiet. give me a call please. please, i really need to go to the hospital . you need your dog. take away it's not my dogs, i 'll pay for the call. well, come on, where i'll just dial you myself.

i need the phone number of sklifosovsky in moscow sklifosovsky 6 686 67, 22a where are you calling? 867 quietly, 22

no need to call moscow, quietly, quietly. hello urgently this one, how quiet it is, how germanovich it is can't call. well, where did you go? you? hey. so listen to me carefully today , scheduled for a kidney transplant. i urgently need to get in touch for a decision on kidney transplantation, he knows me . well, what happened to you? so, look, let's without further ado. my kidney has just been cut out of a human. she is in a container for

transporting organs from moscow, i am 300-400 kilometers away. this kidney will live to moscow in general. just had an operation. ugh. minutes 40 hour blue square written biometrics lodge