pskov and use mobile communications three times cheaper than tinkoff, he is the only one. the circle lacks flavor. it's time to switch to holy spring holy spring tune in to the taste you're on the right track if you know your wishes will come true. because you can be sure of your income and our long-term cooperation, a delicious point hit the mark with work. we choose rinival.

this podcast is a must-read with you aglaya na batnikova, director, writer, host of the podcast we are discussing maria's diary bashkirtseva, uh with olga breininger literary anthropologist, writer, translator and vladislav gorodetsky writer author of the book inversion, my lord and architect. i believe that in every person there are certain products of contradiction, and the fact that we note this in the diary of the bashkirs suggests that she is really honest, but she treated her work and this task. olya you studied at marina abramovich uh you are a digital artist. if possible, say so. and if possible, say so. uh. please tell me if there is in the diary of the bashkirs, there are some signs of a conceptual project, when a person

treats his life as material and makes himself the object of his art, if such signs. keu this old diary, i think so, and i think from the moment when she returned to her diary at 15 hmm wrote a foreword, writing in the foreword that she does not like to write a foreword and uh, began to edit his. i think she did. this is to intentionally create a certain image of yourself. and this is the first second. still. she was quite versatile in her interests, er, and in her creative endeavors. and i think she still has it. e , of course, this is not marina abramovic, but she did not have the opportunity to rise to such power and comprehend her own work, but women could not get an education at the end

of the 19th century. that is, we see a thirst for knowledge. she reads a lot of books and knows languages. some classical texts are melting in the original, but nevertheless we understand that she is deprived of a systemic education and she feels it, and despite the fact that she reads very a lot of. uh, well, her possibilities and tools of reflection are quite limited, because after all, this is what education gives us, and she goes in a naive way, but in an intuitive intuitive way, but nonetheless. it seems to me that some kind of vague idea of ​​what the main object of art is. it's not even her diary. these are not her paintings, but she herself, he can be traced, and she is gradually moving towards this is another matter , which is the saddest thing after all, we can never understand the story until we read it to the end, in general, peter brooks has, well-known

a book, a religion on a photo board, and he says that we read, but the narrative is out of order, we honor it. the beginning of the ends, and in the case of the bashkir e-e from the end to the beginning, yes, and in the case of the bashkir we lose that very point of reference, where we can really appreciate the history. you, we understand the school of the beginning is not exactly the finale. we understand that this story is cut short and that's all that it could become . it probably could become many could grow significantly in artistic power and in depth. and this did not happen. by the way, yes here. i think that too. hmm. it could very well have happened. maybe this is the struggle of a previously tragic death, maybe this is part of the image and part of her charm. is not it, there is romanticism in it. but er, it seems to me that the years of such work, which are described in

the last part of the diary, they would give her much more than romantic. extreme death, and how do you guys generally feel about such a turn of events that she abandoned love and relationships. i want to quote on this. one moment i really liked. i below this topic falls. yes, damn it, you point it, she just entered, uh, to study, yes , to the zhulian art school. ah. separately, to say that this studio is julian. it was the only place where women could study women, a serious place where women could be treated, and that's why she doesn't leave paris even though she doesn't like paris. well , one day, uh, they got it. eh, ugly nature. they solved it. uh this moment. i thought, how do you feel? very nice, he was paid

some pennies anyway. so he doesn't care. and so they went to the monastery. we enter. the monastery and we bring with us so much playfulness and fun that solemn peace is revealed. we go to the reception room, er, boarders, and i make sister teresa dance. she wants to recruit me and praise the convent for me. and i also want to recruit her and i praise the world , and she tells them how cool it is to live in monasteries, and maria is told that the world is beautiful, but the recruitment took place only not along the line of religion, but along the line of renunciation from the world and e, the bashkir person naturally turns into a nun when she uh gets in the way of art. she naturally refuses from uh, love from uh, the joy of life from the brilliance from the theaters from what she loves and what has surrounded her all her life. she even eventually stops dressing writes. i don't

care how i look anymore. yes, she becomes. here's to this path of service. this is pure monasticism and she dies virgins. therefore, the unit of ideological recruitment, when a person is offered an idea through which it seems to him, he will be able, well, either to approach some desired state or to open up in this case, yes, she is very, and as if they successfully offer this idea, which becomes a vector of teleology of its further movement. i do not agree with the fact that it was a nun who recruited, of course there is another. it seemed to me that it was his voluntary saying that the rhymes happened she was the punk of her time. it seems to me that she refuses this path precisely because it is too predictable and obvious too simply, that is , this is a choice in the direction of something complex, that she comes from expectations. no, she goes her own way,

do not look back at any expectations. well, that is, not trying to break them, not trying to fix them, she just has a different one. way i have the third version. although she lists quite a lot of loves. and all the time i had the feeling that this was falling in love, you know, like medieval kurtaz poetry, when there is a beautiful lady, when she needs to be loved and written, but at the same time a knight writing poetry, he doesn’t even know and has never seen this beautiful lady, that is, the essence is in this, and the essence is simply to love, and to be in this state to be inspired emotionally. yes, and i think that for a long time for the bashkirts, and love was not seriously interesting for her, it was important to feed, and feed to catch inspiration, but it seems to me that if she

thought seriously about the family, this prevented her from working. this disturbed her. uh, devoting oneself to painting, and that's why all loves are platonic, because it's very convenient for the artist, but on the other hand. and this is hmm the last months of her life. she's right here, i think, i believe. she was a little sorry that it happened that way, that on my part it’s very stupid not to do, the only thing worth it, the only things that give happiness, make you forget all the sorrows of love, and by love two loving beings appear to each other as absolutely perfect physical and moral relations, especially moral. well, you can immediately see that a person has practice. no, it's true, but, in my opinion, it's wonderful and it's very expensive in fact, but she

actually had a real love story that ended badly and having already passed it, she went into denial. let's just say because she faced. uh, metro tunnel, yes, this is the cardinal's nephew, a young man who courted for a very long time confessed his love, but uh, for that he called to marry this kiss with him. one was sorry, but the kiss was with him, the kiss was a violation of, let's say, the secular rules of the aristocratic, that is, the bashkir self-assessed this as a moral fall , this kiss taught her a terrible thing, that he allowed a person to kiss himself. ah, because it broke her reputation, as she thought, because the wedding never happened, and it didn’t happen because the cardinal was against it. this marriage, and er, the young man, depended on his parents. he said, i can’t go there, i can’t do it, i can’t do it, because my

parents didn’t tell me and it turned out that he was such a dependent person. and, of course, basking in it was disappointing and the fact that he ended up giving up on it. well, she, however, also refused in the sense that she did not want to accept catholicism. she wanted to remain orthodox. but at least that's how i assessed the situation, if she had accepted catholicism, probably this marriage would have been more real, but she was disappointed in this man by this, therefore such an emphasis on morality in this quote. it seems to me that she understood the essence of what was happening from the very beginning. namely, that he simply expects guarantees from her. he tries in every possible way to get from her what she says, yes, to do. e, decide on a feat, for my sake. everything will be open from my side. and she does not give this guarantee, because she knows that she will be constrained by her, that if something happens, they will remember all this later and blame him. everything is fine. and we can talk about bashkirs, how to describe or and how are the pioneers of a woman who declared

some kind? eh, well, let's just say the prosaic beginning is already feminine in literature. or we uh can't uh call her a serious writer. i think we can call her a pioneer pioneer. that's already enough. but on this. probably we will modestly put an end to it, because if you go into details and analyze this text from a literary point of view. well, we may not have anything left, in fact, but to give it its due, as literature. you mean, well, lisa has a face bank, only the term is intermediate literature, and he is very fortunate because he is an invaluable member. but this is all that is not the main one. actually, there are artistic works and diaries. memoirs, they are just the same, uh, refer to this

intermediate literature. i think it's bashkirian. well, i started my diary. eh, well, how such a peculiar project and she herself says about it, that if i die without becoming famous as an artist. uh, at least you'll be interested in this, uh, literary document, right? uh, yes, that is, uh, originally she had. uh, very understandable. premise. ah, understandable intention. she wants to step over. e death. she wants to last into the future even after her death. yes, she chooses art, as a path exactly, in order to become permanent, she is afraid of oblivion, but , because she hmm what have you been discussing now for 150 years, yes, and including, because she didn’t believe, but the immortality of the soul, she has, yes, and history she believed in god very much, in spite of e. her constant appeal. here he

serves god with her like a magic wand, or just such a saying, but deep religiosity, there, of course. no, she is mystically gifted , so to speak, because she has a premonition of her death. and uh, somehow describes her original path, how short she writes from the very beginning. i will die, early and so on. maybe so, yes, or maybe, uh, that everyone at this age, uh, feel, uh, all teenagers. maybe they'll die soon? yes , but in particular , the average life expectancy at that time was much lower than now, so it's too early to die. well, perhaps, for that time, 25 is, in fact, even it wasn't early. it seems to me that if she was a true religious, then, and she would not have such an obsession with glory, because vanity a and religiosity are not very compatible with humility. that's the way it was generally said

that the service of the arts and the service of god is probably not the same thing. of course not. me too, by the way. do you think it's the same thing i think it is? well, the forms, uh, that can even be in childhood yes, the forms, and we can say that the bashkirs come to the emancipation of their female feminism, olga will say something about this. you are in do you understand this? she tried to write a little, and feminists ridiculed her for it. eh, here it is again . that part of the life that she spent, let's say. e in the conventions of a patriarchal society, probably not, but when she radically breaks with just what about the scenario of a secular beauty. yes, that's the perfect wording. here we can already talk about something serious. yes, she

paved the way for women who followed in her footsteps, but on the one hand, for example, liza dyakonova, who probably really was one of the first real feminists in russia and bashkirtsev m. she had a low opinion, a competitor. they are too far apart in time to be competitors. lisa was no longer the first. yes, there is also elena uh, we have the thirties, well, the peak of her literary career, she died in 1842. and here she is, by the way, and despite the fact that she was, m-m, a completely inconspicuous figure, eh, but at the same time quite popular she was his reader, but was published in the library for reading yasenkovsky. she spoke. uh, some m-th questions that can be called low. why don't women get access to education? why are we so limited

compared to a man in what we can do, that is, in the case of elena gan, it was some kind of conscious uh statement, probably an example for example. yes , she showed by example, that such a path is possible and it is worthy of respect, and it is possible, really cool. but in general, so, if you want to convince people that they need something or about it. know to convince or show, so you prove your life with your work, at least it indicates a problem on indeed in his painting. she has, uh, there are female figures that are either turned with their backs there, uh, in the picture there is a meeting there, uh, the boys gather in the foreground and talk, and in the distance the silhouette of a woman is turned away in the distance, not a woman, a little girl who turned away. and it's, of course, uh, saying about that place about a woman's place. they are a woman's fair place in current events. yes. e, however. i

think the bashkirs managed to immortalize their name in one way or another. yes, we know her , we talk about her and she continues to inspire people like the first one goes and it’s great that if she didn’t introduce the life of a russian aristocrat in europe actually lived in russia then perhaps we would be able to third not in connection with feminism somehow more confidently, because well , there were bestuzhev courses, that is, women's issues were growing, and it seems to me that she would have received there. uh, the environment in order to develop in anyway to think in this direction. this was a must -read podcast with you aglaya na batnikova, director, writer, host of the podcast, in my guests were olga breinberg, a writer and literary anthropologist. translator and vladislav gorodetsky writer architect. we

discussed maria bashkirtseva and her diary. hello this is a podcast by fire and i am its host denis gorelov with a story about the main domestic tv shows of the month. but the truth should be stipulated that if there is no suitable domestic series in the week, then we are talking either about a foreign series or about some important film, e.g. a domestic film. uh, central cinema distribution, first of all, the conversation will be about the picture cheburashka a for 14 years in the domestic box office held the absolute record of the film avatar of 3 1/2 billion rubles. which could not only be surpassed, but not even one

, not only a domestic one, but not a single foreign film over the next 14 years, but hmm, the competitors were quietly selected , first shot the 2013 film stalingrad a. then the film moving up crossed the bar of 3 billion rubles. and already then in re. i painted this picture that sooner or later the avatar will fall. who could have known that he would lie under the cheburashka under the rootless cosmopolitan who arrived from brazil in boxes of spot oranges, but it happened just like that, cheburashka won, cheburashka made the result, the box office collected all the christmas money of our magical country, and as such was immediately burned by all russian film critics, along with teeth, along with ears, together with 6 billion rental fees and orange peels that flew with him from brazil, cheburashka was fiercely criticized for having teeth, otherwise

the lamb was run over because he did not look like e, the ideal image created by eduard uspensky so that it was an absolute lie, uh, and showed that my colleagues didn’t read a damn book about crocodile gena this is how cheburashka was depicted by edward uspensky from the animal with teeth and ears. fat and gluttonous, and at the right moment, when the thieves tried, uh, to steal all sorts of building materials from the construction of the house of friendship , who wrote on the fence the inscription caution evil cheburashka imagine that tiny with drooping ears, lovely, cheburashka, which the artist painted leonid shvartsman for the cartoon novel. kachanov in the sixty-ninth year as the evil cheburashka was completely impossible, but nevertheless, in no way did the creators of the new film sin against the original. why, on the contrary, did shvartsman create cheburashka with increased touchingness, and in

the sixty-seventh year , the ostankino television tower was built. as a result , the television series began to cover the entire vast space of our country and the question suddenly arose that there was not enough suitable studio content for television. a certain number of cartoons were ordered, and cartoon but for saturday and sunday shows in their sixty-ninth year came out, the first series of e, the franchise well, wait a minute, the first series of the cheburashka franchise , the first series of e of the series about e, the bremen town musicians and the first winnie the pooh. you can imagine how gifted people were then created on their own from the cartoon if they were given a task. they released four brilliant cartoons in 2 years. uh, launching entire long series on the air. ah. well , it was at this moment in the country that e was formed middle class with their very lonely very unhappy. uh, very imaginative and secluded children of intelligent

parents. that's just such a spokesman for all these children was the tiny cheburashka with his sweet smile and with his pride on his drooping ears. and many years have passed since then. ah, children with e. hmm, there are no more drooping ears. now all children have teeth. they are all loudmouthed. gluttonous e, charming cute and all of them, if you hug them for a long time, they will definitely bite off an ear like this cheburashka, ah, similar to a modern child, was created by the artists of the new painting, for which thanks to them they absolutely fell into demand, but a separate clarification in the book was adjacent to it. uh, beautiful crocodile gena working at the zoo. it’s clear to everyone that films are made only about one hero in the film d’arkhanyan and the three musketeers, the hero d’artagna, all the rest are just a background, and in the film romeo and juliet the main one is either romeo if you play leonardo dicaprio or juliet if you play her olivia

hasile galina ulanova staged fifty of the fourth year or a stamp, and accordingly, if two cartoon characters were wandering around a modern city with people, and they would simply draw attention to each other, and hmm, the result would be perfect. that's right, therefore, the producer's decision to make crocodile gena a living person was absolutely sniping, magnificent and fair, the producers of iloyan, the hat of the otradsukoy zhalinsky, uh, quite widely known in the profession as vampires of the middle lane - this is also their work. and besides, with the same director dmitry dyachenko, they did, just e already well, the last film the last bogatyr and more or less imagine how to spud the modern viewer. and it was clear that the role of the new crocodile man, uh, required an artist with a completely animated plasticity

of a cartoon look and cartoon behavior. therefore, ah, when hmm, perhaps the best nudification artist of our time, sergey ilyevich, garmash a picks up an accordion and sings. let pedestrians run clumsily through the puddles , it is clear that he is the best crocodile in the world and absolutely gorgeous. his backing dancers are also quite animated sergey lavygin and dmitry lysenkov, so this is a combination of a fairy tale and reality, but it was sustained in the picture. e is the most subtle, but one of the major differences. this synthesis is the ability, uh, to pronounce an absolutely monstrous blizzard. on the serious side. so the artist dobronravov, with a very serious look , says that a serious tornado is capable of carrying away cheburasheks. uh, with their light weight , literally thousands per 2 km. and this, by the way, is the same sign or artist, about which artist dobronravov, of course, is the same, and

with approximately the same expression on his face , evgeny pavlovich leonov once said on a striped flight that a tiger needs to walk along the deck at night so that there is no rickets and with exactly the same expression. eh, in turn. he says that he has a new animal - this is such a special eared belarusian shepherd dog. in addition, in the syntheses of fairy tale and reality, the artists savelyev and kuzmina played an excellent role. they found e with splendid. let already crumbling old mansions of modern times art-decorative, and all along our south coast, usually a fairy tale in our films and cartoons is depicted either with disney turrets, which is already completely splashed in the teeth, or with some kind of italian red roof tiles, which also in general , this has no relation to our south. and as for the erdekosh mansions. they

just create a feeling. let a little crumbled a little bit withered, but still wonderful fairy tales cheburashka eventually collected 6 billion 600 million rubles. and i will say, as an expert. at we simply do not have such a large number of viewers , there is not such a capacity of the film market to collect 6 billion from the outside, eh. uh, it’s obvious that thousands, or even tens of thousands of families, went to this picture for the second, third and fourth time, which completely, e, dispels the whole world, that e cheburashka raised his money during the christmas week, when the audience goes to the cinema the most, because the children want to go to the cinema, and adults can take them there. they do not work. and how do we as a rule, for the past 5 years, and the first week moved apart. from any hollywood premiers, so that they do not interfere

with the domestic prime minister. so even if we had hollywood and there was, uh, in the first 10 days, than no one would interfere with the lambs, and besides , it’s completely impossible to get people to go to the film for the second, third, fourth time, uh hmm, which they will watch exclusively without rome. and the film a wonderful film hit. e. went in and hooked. as for my colleagues, i’ll say the following, ah, when a film collects such gigantic money, it’s not worth telling what the author succeeded, and what they didn’t succeed in criticizing in this situation is worth just sitting up straight and thinking about what director dyachenko and producer iloyan, hat, father to dzhalinsky know about our viewers and our homeland, which we don’t we know why they work for an audience of 25 million people, and we only work for 2,000 internet users, of which half are familiar mothers. and so, what are those curses and mass anathiema that

fell on the film cheburashka e, on the net and in paper publications. eh, pretty unfortunate draw e. hmm my profession for this us guys and do not like to remind. this is a podcast by harry by fire and i his leading days burned with the story. going domestic serials of the month with some interspersing of foreign serials or major films of the central theatrical distribution, the next number of our program will be the series wendy a compound word. uh, and not even a translation, since this proper name vendi is the name of a girl from the addams family who was once played by christina ritchie and who has now become the main character of the series directed by tim bart and barton have nothing to do with the family. adam with the former did not, however. everyone guessed that sooner or later he would have to have with his great passions for skull skeletons, as well as

a bride’s corpse, and domestic resources could not agree on how to write this word among themselves, so the word, wendy in russian, is written in a variety of transcriptions . ah, a monstrous sight, but nonetheless. uh, family habit. addam is in the country. and everyone knows that it is absolutely impossible to surpass christina, however, the new performer dzhana artek uh, perhaps looks quite simple. and as for everything else from burton personally, i expected more, and he himself has always positioned himself as an utter rebel, but he is a conformist fighter with all sorts of standards , norms and obsolete prejudices, and at first in general, uh, he fully complies with his mmm a troll uh, everything, for which the rest of the 6 billion inhabitants of the earth cannot stand his homeland, but for a sugar smile for

free advice for the constant cult of some unknown, whose freedom is only in america and beyond. no, she is nowhere as a result at the very beginning of the younger brother. uh, wendid. adams gets gone and she announces to the public pool of obi brat with two bags of goldfish to the song edith piaf nori darian, to which the stirlitz thought so well everyone is perfectly anticipating what will happen next, because it is already clear to everyone that goldfish are in bags called piranhas and that now all these fish. she will shake out into the pool. this is a wonderful sight with her , the picture of the girl begins. after that, they are referred to some kind of hogwarts a boarding school called nevermore after its main alumni and from head to toe nevermore was uh, the refrain of his most famous thief poem and the school is populated by all

sorts of freaks who try to look original but they can't do anything because freaks now it's fashionable and freaks are absolutely everything at the moment when rebellion becomes the norm and standard m-m. he uh gets pretty boring, when you see another girl with purple hair, you immediately remember the truth that, uh, the more ugly the girl's face, the more furious shade. she dyes her hair. and therefore, some kind of mass riot that exists in the school. eh, she looks pretty mundane and usual, and the heroine herself does almost everything that girls at her age do, welcomes, as usual, a plump bespectacled man is checked by a psychoanalyst, does very, very standard things, which for some reason are considered a rebellion. the fact is that, ah, the liberal public, but installed

first in the usa and then in all the rest countries their baptismal norm, and against which this thing is already quite dangerous to rebel and no timbat. he will not do this, otherwise he will simply be burned at the stake in his center. beloved hollywood in addition, firstly, and modern american cinema shoves african americans into any hole where they never were and could not be, secondly, in all moments of the picture, a woman always dominates, and any woman, positive negative men occupy some secondary position, as suffering persons get hit by the horns, sometimes they are more or less, but reasonable interlocutors, but, in principle, does not interest the heroes in all other positions. tim burton in the same way follows the categorical norm, and modern american life, including the norm

of the curse of our country. last year, i literally noticed that the cannes competition, ah, set simple and iron conditions, that only paintings that challenge some kind of social standard are taken into the competition, and at that moment i just thought that the challenge was in social standards, just m-m throws our side, but at the same time this is not the challenge that america is ready to accept when you want to be in a hurry with a haze. and when you want to be funny sprouts, cheese, you are a terrible lightning. and what are you ready to try the new bigs went breaking. let's go , i'll have time to get a tinkoff black space card before april 16 and get free

service forever tinkoff, he's the only one. less chemistry cough pills rinival.

how are you there? don't overwork, move more , control your emotions. follow your pulse. take glycine-reneval asparkam rinival renival we trust renival we choose. burger king has become more profitable, we return 50 rubles. according to the maps of the world from the chaliapin series , one could expect any uh producer, zhukovushakov. eh, there are worthy ones, who have already made in the past years the series of sofia godunov and grozny, and-a series from our russian middle of the ages. in general , it was made so high quality that even the main zealot of the e-e

of ancient russian antiquity or a handful of kholmogorov did not really attack these paintings. godunov even praised this, after all, a serious word expert. and the truth is, probably, they should have invited director alexei andrianov to stage their permanent author, who staged all these three series, as well as for other producers, did the akunin spy. ah, but andrianov is unknown. and now he is filming an adaptation of some french detective, and the series was filmed by jaguar anashkin, the director of the film e, zulikha opens her eyes, which, frankly, passed through domestic e-e channels without much success, and his screenwriters were natalya nazarova timur rosenbaya, known as gravediggers our e serious prose classics fedor ivan chaliapin e, was a figure, to put it mildly, complex and contradictory, as they always say about a character with a bad character, and somewhere around 2/3

of his memoirs, and the chaliapin e are full of incredible compliments, and all sorts of rave reviews hmm about his voice and that diligence is certainly wonderful and important, but about his incredible success both here and abroad. a plus. in addition, another quarter of the memoirs was written by chaliapin himself. he published two books, however, knowledgeable people. they say that they were all written by alexei maksimovich races, with which chaliapin was seriously friends, but quarreled, only later on the monetary issue of paying those very lower ones, and of course fyodor ivanovich also spoke about himself in the most exalted ones there, but parallel to this. the memoirs of a shaiping friend, our first impressionist, have come out. e konstantin alekseevich korovin, who, with a kind of sympathetic friendly smile

, described his friend as a huge two-meter child with a rather specific, and absurd and capricious character in his memoirs, you could already get acquainted with a real chaliapin, a who ate in three throats, uh, sang in 4 throats , constantly jammed with conductors, quarreled with everyone for a fee. and he said that only birds sing for free, and hmm, at the same time, he constantly invented some incredible sheiker with investing his money in various candle factories or in railway lines or somewhere else, and all sorts of different ones, when all this stories and the operation fell through he said, absolutely. and it is possible to live in this country, this phrase appears in korovin's memoirs somewhere on the stretch. uh, every every five

pages, and it all ended with the fact that e chaliapin once again said it was absolutely impossible to live in this country and stopped living in this country and grumbled at the country in which he moved to the end of his life, as capricious people often do. and when he became famous and you have ambition, uh, in contracts. he began to demand some utter bird's milk, and firstly 1,000 rubles. for the exit. secondly, they subscribed for a whole year to a bed for their friend gorky, and finally two soldiers with naked sabers, and near the dressing room to scare away journalists. ah, the head of the director of pirate theaters , telyakovsky, laughed terribly and signed all the contracts. at the same time, he said that he would still give nothing but money, and chaliapin would still lose contracts, and chaliapin immediately lost contracts, and, despite the incredible success, popularity and, uh, a wonderful life. still, in some ways he resembled chekhov 's ekhov, and hmm, at the same time, everyone

treated him especially tenderly, and, all the more so , korovin himself, the author of the world, it was important that parallel to all his focus. eh, fyodor ivanovich still worked incredibly. sing he could all night long, scaring the neighbors, but he taught all the arias of all his operas, including women's ones, in order to have an idea about, a. well in action, like a director like a specialist watching the battlefield from above, in addition, he was extremely grateful, eh. to his friend the dramatic artist mamontadal, who taught him how to learn the arias from the beginning, reading them like poetry, but among opera artists. it was completely unacceptable. everyone got drunk at once. uh, i'm leading the leading, uh, starting phrase. and chaliapin initially read poetry e hmm with

sheet. and it gave him more or less understanding. and with what intonation to sing. and if the most popular in those years, and in subsequent years, tenners, uh, always performed the same character, the lyrical hero is a lover, then bass chaliapin could perform completely different characters and hyper-villains and superheroes, and he always needed to more or less understand . and what does he sing let's say so uh that's why he became so famous not only on the stage, but also on the international he was the first person who suited the kings from a dramatic point of view and for this dalsky was extremely grateful to science, and as a result, everything came off, firstly, fyodor ivanovich's gigantic growth was one meter ninety-five centimeters, which makes an indelible impression on women. even though they don't admit it. secondly, an outstanding voice. uh, incredible industriousness at last. uh

, fedor ivanovich actively lobbied the russian opera at the moment when the first sprouts began to appear throughout europe and russia in particular. the first beginnings of nationalism. historians. they say that nationalism appeared along with universal literacy, and in the ancient centuries, the aristocracy was absolutely cosmopolitan, taught a variety of languages ​​​​and more or less tied to ethnic priorities. as for the illiterate masses. either they sat in their ghettos and did not take any part in public life, but they began to take it exactly at the moment when, uh, mass literacy went on, the flip side was that literacy was the emergence of nationalism, just at the end of the 19th century, which, in fact, and coincided with the mood of chaliapin, uh , actively promoting our stage, and the opera

rimsky-korsakov and glinka, contrary to the wishes of the director of the imperial theaters of the former vsevolozhsky before telyakovsky it is clear that the whole conflict is always built on e, hmm, all sorts of different anecdotes from the life of a star. e, the people treated chaliapin absolutely as vysotsky in his time, and , firstly, they adored, secondly, familiarity. thirdly, he constantly told how each of the citizens of our country has. he thumped with stemlodia. everyone was drinking with fedya, just like that. zhe and e, from these stories, by and large , the series am is formed, since e is the main the advantage of the hunchback performer is his gigantic growth. uh, all the other, uh, characters surrounding him, the author had to somehow slightly lower, and they took on the role of very

serious and powerful people, and artists with a powerful comic temperament. there mammoth plays. eh, the standard and wonderful comedian yan tsapnik, who is remembered in the film mainly by the fact that his hero pisses from the parapet, the director of the vsevolozhsky noble and majestic character plays the same, e, comic artist boris kamon hmm and so on and so forth all together. e as a result of e, with some stormy chaliapin spree turns into absolutely. kovsky good