to personal achievements that are supported by society, but this gratitude of society is also important glory and admiration. in general, this gives us something, look. here is a story about astronauts. she is very revealing. perhaps, after all, the question is somewhat of such an iron regularity of our body and our aging, but in a certain purpose of life. so i read studies where they analyzed the dates of death and the date of birth of a person and his children, and it turns out that fewer children die before the birthday of their own than immediately after, that is somehow the body is mobilized to celebrate there to meet with the children, and then let go, in general, how much meanings affect our physiology is known. yes phrase. does a person have a reason to live? he will live. a. if not, why live, then he dies. this must be a very difficult

study. this is exactly what to study. i don't know researchers who could. exactly this is subjected to experimental verification, so that a person has a global meaning. why live prolongs his life about astronauts. here we are good studies have been done, yes, but there is what happened here there are complex studies. viktor frankl, who he made a concentration camp, what did those who understand? why scientific research, but the subjective observation of man. well, of course, we are an experiment. he slagere can not bring two recalled who do not know who is a wonderful psychologist. he ended up in a fascist concentration camp and introduced constant monitoring of himself and those around him and actually freed himself. you created well , a special area of ​​psychology associated with meaning, and he owns a wonderful quote taken from experience in a concentration camp. who

knows? than to withstand anyone, as well as those who understood why they live even in the hellish conditions of a concentration camp, those who were deprived of this meaning survived more often, probably, it was so, if we objectively studied, most likely, we would confirm this. god forbid of course i understand, she has a husband, we do not live in a concentration camp. and imagine a person eating alone. why should he live there for some kind of global goal, and the other person just lives. that is, he, as it were, does not have a global meaning, but he is not at the end of the camp. he just lives, who will live longer, that is, will there be such a sense of the need to live. here's another 10 years. to prolong the life of a person in relation to the one who does not exist, such a need is the question of what, uh, and this question. it's like i don't know the answer. yes, it was very interesting to explore it, but i don't even know how this factor works yet. objectify asking a person

why do you have a reason to live? well, maybe through a profession, after all, agree that people who can support their almost unlimited work. well, artists, writers, scientists, after all, they live more often longer than those whose work is cut off once and for all. well, doctors, for example, you all retired in the hospital. you people, do not treat your professional meanings are disabled. and your neighbor is an artist. he paints pictures paints people should be equalized, if we want to compare not artists and doctors, but two doctors of the same doctor, there is a sense, but there is a sense for an artist of one. meaning artists are also different meanings they have different. in the sense of a hard-to-measure value. of course, this is not physics. we had in russia the study is also an objective study of the life expectancy of different categories of people that academicians have shown. indeed, academicians of the academy of sciences live longer than

mountains. didn't hear it very well. well, yes, and than let's say ordinary processes, that is, it turns out that, well, so to speak, achievements. well here's an opportunity to work long meets a higher career level. and it allows you to live longer. let's dream a little. still, we all want to live longer longer do not age longer to be young cheerful. like me i understand that science is now looking for ways. how to extend the youth of a person to make him ageless, like a rodent from africa, the head of fellow countrymen who say they do not age and hardly get sick, they still die, but some african is more often mentioned. he nailed it there with a shovel. how realistic is it for us to live there for 120 years? yes 130. that's what science says about it now, the question of what

life expectancy depends on, we also conducted studies on twins, twin pairs in russia and then compared with other data. well calculate the percentage, which depends on the environment about which heredity. in general, somewhere in russia, 36% of life expectancy depends on heredity. she is everything else from the environment. and in america it was like a study. there they received 25% of heredity. the rest of the environment. on the one hand. it seems to be so cool, but on the other hand. if you analyze it this way, it does not mean that, let's say, you have passed up to 50 years. yes, this is only 36% can live up to 150. this rather means that there is some kind of, apparently, supposedly life limit that is programmed. biologically and now it is believed that this is a fairly large limit of 100 120 years

. well, something like this and should they say, and we can organize our life in such a way as to live these, well, let it be 100 years. uh, with injury. i have a solid memory. well good health. here, too, we will now talk about psychology, because it is clear that medicine is working on this biology. well , who just does not work looking for their own ways. and we kind of say that we can psychologists to offer for here opportunities somehow here sherits your life to increase her productive period of life let's call it so well, here is my colleague and that's all at st. petersburg university. they devised a strategy. well, the extension of the productive life period of prosperous aging. there are 22 factors. some of them are good sleep, other food control, healthy lifestyle and so on. well, they suggested that our human life consists of three big ones. spheres work in ourselves free time we yes, working already said successful work

prolongs. life is a good prosperous family, loving, in principle, also for life, but it depends on us. we settled on the fact that what we can advise psychologists. this is free time management. but because i can say you need a successful job all without me. if they want, i can say, i recommend you a prosperous, kind, loving, materially prosperous family. so this is understandable without me. but how to organize free time? here is the question. in fact, we have developed a program that allows you to choose the right suitable resources, that is, what to do in your free time. what hobby is recommended for a particular person? what kind of sports hobby is needlework for someone, someone has a solution hobby, someone has an intellectual activity, that is, something like this, that is, to choose the right one. pastime in your free time and thus subjectively increase your time. thank you very much, and yet i will briefly summarize, how to make more time, how to increase it is to do what you love,

no matter how trite it sounds to think about what do you have besides work and home. what are the hobbies? what are the activities to choose the right hobby plan for the long term. and, of course, saturates your life with meaning. thank you very much tatyana thank you very much our viewers and listeners with you podcast from zhedinger, and i am its host grigory tarasevich and many thanks to tatyana berezina, who was in our today's guests professor of the moscow state psychologist of the pedagogical university of the department of extreme psychology. thank you tatyana thank you. hello this podcast is a must read. i'm aglaya for batnikova. director

writer. today we will talk with vadim levital, a writer and literary critic, about the truma novel on the hood and silence at breakfast. hello vadim uh. let 's first talk about this novel for those who have not read it, but we are talking about new york, this is the forty-third year, the second world war and youth. bohemian new yorker a is having a good time and aspiring young writer a gets to know his neighbor's young girlfriend. uh, indeterminate occupation he's me charmed and they have, gentle friendship, let's figure it out. this is generally a novel about love or friendship. well, i would say, first of all, that this novel is still about the main character, that

is, is it the fact that it seems to me that the most important thing in this text in this book is ah and confirmation. uh, the fact that the truman bonnet managed to create a wildly important one, and the female image is served by the fact that we still remember this book and read it. well, here is the image of this main character. it seems to me that he is important, what is on but she, as if as far as possible from the bourgeois ideal of a woman. come on, what is the ideal of a woman, the ideal of a woman, this is, uh, a respectable, but chaste housewife, mother of the family. so she keeps home. she is raising children. she cooks for her husband. i don't know, there's roast beef while the wife is waiting for it. yes, yes, here, this is the ideal of a woman, which bourgeois society presents us as if consciously, yes, but at the same time there is, but

the fantasy of his unconscious. psychoanalysts call it phantasm yes, that is, it is some kind of unconscious fantasy, around which the erotic is organized. not quite, but insofar as the life of the unconscious, it is generally in many ways. uh, erotic. the main thing is that we are not always aware of this fantasy of our unconscious. and even more difficult to understand. how is our inner world. in this case, the inner world of this society. yes, organized around uh, this fantasy about this woman who, in relation to this ideal wife, the mother of the family, is in a relationship of complete opposition . yeah well what could be next from this here, then the mother of the family is beautiful. let's tell you what the legs are. holly doesn't work. she is 19 years old. she. well, you can say the profession of an escort. she accompanies men to restaurants and uh, they give her money for

a toilet 150, then she collects 100 dollars and she always lives on boxes. she has friends. uh, with connections, she's always being offered something to do, but she denies everything. well, we know she lives. uh, without a schedule , gets up, in the middle of the day, then takes a long time to get dressed , puts on make-up, goes to a restaurant around her all the time crowd. uh men, uh, motley and uh, actually hence the question. why does such a girl attract the attention of a hero who is starting to write or why is he so fascinated by her well, i would first ask another question. uh, why does she attract the attention of all these men that are circling around her, how, uh, let's say. there's butterflies around the flower, to say the least a little more rude oh and indeed, let

's note right away that the image of something wildly archetypal bonnets in the interview speaks of a modern geisha. that is, we must clearly understand that it's all the same. occupation is very strong different from the trade flew. yes, trade flew this one occupation, a prostitute, of course, but uh, you can say that it trades in temptation, it seduces endlessly, but virtual. yes , a femme fatale, of course, but women have difficult fates, a girl, yes, because a difficult childhood, eh. in the horrendous circumstances of the rape, i mean, it's all mentioned. this is an archetypal image for bourgeois literature, but on the other hand, and it is taken from reality, but because these women in new york about those years described not only

hoods, yes, if we take a-a book by henry miller yes, in particular, the famous sex novel, and there there are more than one such as holly golater. there are a lot of such girls described, and again, we know from the interview of the hood from the memoirs of contemporaries there from some articles that e quite a lot of women claimed to be the prototypes of hollila, yes, literally every second person there would like to see me sketched, but we ourselves must note that truman is a documentary filmmaker in general, and in fact, when you read the novel, you understand that the real prototype was still impossible to come up with such a number of real details of some nuances and in general, his feature of his strong point is documentary, and it seems to me that he just found very good material for his documentary history. i think the point here is that this is a collective image after all. this is a novel and no, a documentary essay. come on, not noon fiction, we know it's

hard to get a lot of great nonfiction on the hood. there is the most famous of them here uh, incold uh, murders in russian translation. and this is still roman, and it is important here that this is a collective image, in my opinion. there were just a lot of them, but girls in real life. have you met such girls in real life? or they were only in new york in the forties. no. absolutely not, not only in new york in the forties. eh, and i met her, and with some of our amendments for our time, they live and work. uh, and now uh, the fact is that this figure is, in principle, characteristic of a bourgeois society. yes, that is exactly this logic that there is a conscious fantasy about an ideal woman housewife, blah blah blah and so on and so forth there is an unconscious phantasm and around which it is organized in reality, as if this subject yes, the collective subject of

this society and this fantasy - this is such a tearaway from urva. you see, uh, this is some kind of tear in the fabric of this being. yes , this being is broken into society in this place. yes, because in essence, and what does this image tell us about. e about liberated sexuality, first of all, yes, yes, the characters separately mention that holly is not shy about anything and even at some point, uh, she begins to count the number of her lovers and notes that there were not so many of them. holly speaks and the characters notice that the first time she was generally embarrassed was when she was talking about someone. one way or another , this is a liberated sexuality, liberated from the conventions of bourgeois society from the conventions of marriage. there and so on and so on and so on, it’s not the trade in the body, but it’s sexuality that’s important, right? ah, that is, in to some extent, in principle, this is an idea of ​​freedom, that is, at this point, while bourgeois

society discovers that it is not free internal, but yearns for freedom, hates itself because it has deprived itself of this freedom, hates itself for your cynicism. and for his duplicity and e, that is why this image of e, is associated with some tragic stories. well, the fact is that literature still remains bourgeois, and it must propagate something, yes, that is, it must always, but this woman should still be punished a little another, then he of this novel. i'd say more admiration for holly than, uh. they told nastasya philippines is delighted, but to stab her, nevertheless. all the same, it is absolutely necessary not to slaughter her, you understand? well, holly is going through a disaster too. that is, as a result of her some kind of game with the mafia. she goes every thursday to singsink jail, uh, and sends

some coded messages about the weather. she gets paid uh 500 dollars for it, i think, or something along those lines, there's 200 when you get severance pay, well, not bad money. not bad money of the year, yes, and she conveys some messages. here she is referring to the conversation. actually with a hero. and he is the only one who guesses, probably, that these are not just messages about the weather, and in the end, when she starts playing herself, she tries to become a good wife, mother, but conditionally, yes, for pregnancy. she cooks different dishes at home. she is expecting a child for the wedding. and in general, uh, so to speak, refuses, you can say, from his lifestyle , plans to move to some other status, because a disaster happens. i arrest. she should fly away in disgrace. e in rio de janeiro, and it’s clear that

for a new yorker to fly to rio de janeiro is like flying from moscow to siberia yes, to exile in the village to an aunt in deeper rats. yes. and it's a shame, you know , the scandalousness of breakfast at tiffany's, after all, well , novels of course, that with this punishment, the frame is completely different. ah, well, the artistic frame lies in the fact that at the beginning they find out that she is in africa yes , and in general somehow here she travels around africa you saw her in many accompaniments of some kind of expedition, and some kind of portraits are drawn from her , that means, here. well, it looks like holly agrees. they are with each other. well, for sure , it turns out there that the scandalous thing is that and why is she not punished, or something, but how does it happen? she should, like, sit and cry for being so bad, and

sitting means bad behavior. she travels through africa some men. this is a terrible scandal. these are horrors. a nightmare should not be like this, and in this scandal that truman hoods does some kind of slap in the face to society. uh, bringing out holly is not yes and in that sense he is the predecessor. uh, the next generation of writers and beatniks. uh, all kinds of kiruaks and so on and so forth paves the way for them, but of course, this is a slap in the public taste. yes, and the self-image of the narrator. yes, uh yes, let's say two things about him, what uh, first. uh, it's implied transparently that she refers to the people of the moonlight, yes, lost to women. yes, but on the other hand, the narrator himself says that he as they would say now, running from mobilization, both of these, of course, make him

an absolute outcast for the american society of the 40-40s. yes, he is absolutely not patriotic at all and an outcast of the outcast, not uh, causing contempt, do not look. yes, it is not clear how they earn money, doing some kind of creativity, which no one else pays for and no one pays for, but let's note that this is what brings him closer to holly, of course. these are two outcasts, two outsiders, two outsiders. yes, two places are scandals of this society. yes, this one a woman of otorva and a young man without a certain occupation, a yesterday's female society and only such a narrator, a can earn the trust of this heroine and can, but authentically tell about her, but, because any other narrator would be unreliable. well, let's start with the fact that he understands her. she does not perceive him when the bull is in the first place, because he is lost to

women, and secondly, he is not rich. that is, she can be sincere and open with him, and he knows her real, that is, not her mask, with which, relatively speaking, she hunts. yes, and her as a person who let him in. he is close. maybe, e, to describe it, the fact of the matter is that no one else could describe it; no one else understands it. you understand her, only he, because he, too, is in a situation, uh , opposition, but to this bourgeois society and its ideals, but i would not say that they directly oppose themselves to ideals, because they are already hanging out in clubs, and he expensive alcohol. they enjoy, in my opinion, let's say that. so, uh, successful. uh, the lifestyle of successful rich people. they are like at least imitate it this already. i think in particular. it seems to me that it is fundamental that, and they are both in this structure, but are

in the same position. this brings them closer. this allows them to understand each other and that is why this narrator. or maybe tell about it plainly yes, with understanding. this podcast is a must read. i am aglaya on batnikova, director, writer, host of a podcast, visiting me. vadim levintal, writer and literary critic. we're talking about truman's novel capote breakfast tiffany, i also want to draw attention to the fact that uh holly is in in general, she doesn’t behave very nicely, that is, a friend comes trying to take away the gentlemen and holly, while she goes to the toilet, informs everyone with the help of ephemisms that she has a venereal disease. eh, this is a bad deed, ugly, and there this life is not on the boxes, it is not necessary if the ability to handle things is no less to handle

money. this is all. e, in general, not pretty, but nevertheless e we see that by the end of the book. for example, i already cried from sympathy. to holly for how kind she is. magnanimous, what a wonderful person he is, and in in general, some of its qualities are manifested. yes, generosity courage. these are the actions in what things, that is, in what this optics of the author is manifested, uh, allowing us to see a wonderful person in her. good, listen, well, firstly, she knows how to be friends. yes, she is friends with a storyteller, who tells us all this, but she loves animals, after all, she loves animals in many ways. sincerely in their manifestations. yes, she says that, uh, how i differ from other women, then i am still each of my men. trying to love such a recognition is worth a lot, and i would suggest you, uh, conduct a mental experiment. so you say, so, here, she does not know how to handle money there blah blah blah. and let's try to build from the contrary. yes

, it means a woman who knows how to handle money on the farm, who means firmly on her feet knows what she wants, always tells the truth. e. never sets up his girlfriends, there and so on and so on and so on. and about such a woman, you can write a novel. well, somehow here's a movie translation, right? well, try to remember at least one roman e, in which, as it were, that heroine, who now represents this official bourgeois ideal, would be told. after all, you can’t think of a single one, there is one in which a woman becomes natasha rostova yes, at this moment the novel ends. further, there is nothing to tell. well, firstly, there is nothing to tell, and secondly, there is still a mention of the word female, that is, some kind of terrible deeds. yes yes yes yes. well, holly, we fortunately do not see in this state. we see how she tries to enter it, but then the situation throws her out, as if from

champagne, and in the end she remains uh in this. by the way, the main difference from the film, because in the film it is still, well, it seems to land, but on this right. yes , a runway, runway, and in the book , on the contrary, it breaks away on the third space one. let's discuss the movie. ah, how it differs from the book in the book there is no love story between the narrator. uh and uh heroine between them friendly love friendship relationship. i would say friendship admiration, but no way and no yes , there are no erotic experiences in this sense, but in the film we are told e story, well, relatively speaking, cinderella yes, like i met a prince. there is also such a moment that breakfast at tiffany's in the film is some kind of, almost tiffany's product placement, they hang out in this store

, open some boxes. by the way, i’m not a film critic, but i’m sure that this store paid for everything there, for sure, that it paid for everything in the store, but the fact is that in the e book itself in the novel itself, e. only typhoid does not exist, as a kind of paradise for holly and why is she telling fred about this paradise. she is called heroes red after her beloved brother. i mean, she says, i'll call you fred. it doesn't matter what your name is, if you're fred and now, it's conditional to our fred. uh, shares her intimate feelings with him because she gets depressed. she has seizures, then longings. she calls this climb on the wall, and then we understand where it comes from, because she had a difficult childhood. yes, she generally wandered around potehas, ran away from home. and so e tiffany for her is a place where there is a calm place that saves her from depression.

she arrives there and lets her go. and i think it's completely different than what we see in the movie where we just see in a jewelry store. yes, this is not beaten in any way, but it seems to me that the important thing here is that this very store. uh, this, in principle, is not like the image of her, it is, in principle, a bourgeois paradise. this is what a bourgeois paradise looks like. you come, and there it means, uh, they sell you. uh, expensive. and you have money in the area. yes, they sell for a high price means all sorts of beautiful things dream. yes , they carry coffee with you there. this is a bourgeois paradise. and here it is important, after all, that when she speaks, and then they climb the wall, they sleep as a narrator, but remember the word angst. yes, angst. well , let's not confuse the audience here at all, but let's just say one thing, that in accordance with the philosophy of the haider. this is the very feeling of angst, and it is something that is born,

in general, they say consciousness. yes, that is, outside, but this what it is called is on there can be no wall of consciousness. and what does it mean that a bourgeois paradise, where there is no a? whom and the creation can not be you become, like a vegetable, yes, and that is why, in the book, we are rather glad for her that she ended up in africa? yes, there is travel. well, who does not want to travel around africa means spending the night in a hut in africa. and that's it. it also seems extreme to me, and on the other hand, how objectively sad is the finale of the film, when we understand that, well , everything will never happen to this heroine again in her life usa she just yes, she became boring, so now it will be a soup pot to the largest one, and so on until the end of life a and b surrounded. so these jewels and so on and so forth. well, there is nothing more to say about you. but about the one that travels around africa, we feel that there

you can write for a few more seconds for a few seconds. yes yes yes. do you think this is an autobiographical novel listen. well, to be honest, i wouldn't have studied in detail. biography as a hood i think that, probably, maybe, why not, we again protrum, on the hood we know that he is a great artist, but he is also a great journalist. yes, he wrote a lot of books. just documented, and books great. you see, cold-blooded murder. this is a documentary novel orders. indeed quite a well-known famous murder that took place. ah, terribly cruel. yes, in fact, such murders in america happen not only in america, but one such is not one, but the hoods in this book are issued through one. this is a murder and through the description of this town , a description of all these characters. well, that is living people, yes, and those who were killed by these two young people of the murders. he

spins their biographies. yes, and so on and so forth, but he shows. eh, that is, he goes from the private to the general. yes, he shows, in general, how this society is arranged, and breakfasts at tiffany's he introduced points from the particular general to this. yes, you are absolutely right. it seems to me that in this sense, breakfast at tiffany's is also such a photograph of e society in many ways, a at dryhabern. it looks like this character. how do you associate it anyway? the film worked anyway, still became , uh, material for a hollywood movie. this classic film is also important because, again, since it is so popular, it is obvious that, ah, this is some kind of very important fantasy, again, yes, for the people who watch and watch this film it’s another matter that i it seems to be a separate piece. you imagine the hall, of course, in a completely different way. well, of course, such a sheep, she

is, as it were, hovering in the clouds. and just like that , she doesn't. here is this predatory nothing uh, not dangerous. yes, this is the bomby deer. probably the eyes too. here they are, but holly has a terrible past at some point , fred notices that some suspicious man of fifty years is following her on the street. uh begins to get close to him to find out what's going on and this man uh tells him that it turns out holly is his wife. he is a stichasa farmer and she is his wife, whom he married at the age of 13 and her name is lula. and he already had a lot of his own. he already had many children of his own. uh, and he says looking for my owner. here and uh, the heroes find out that it turns out that holly's name is actually lamey. here and uh, holly unexpectedly

meets with love this ex- husband of hers. she, that is, we assume that she can be done at all? something she does not know him, yes, because some simple person. e there just dressed, maybe it smells very good with her, smells like manure, and here holi, who can be said, e, rotates in the company of hollywood stars and producers. uh, in the best clothes, very fashionable famous so say itel and, but suddenly we see, quite unexpectedly for me, at least, that she throws herself on the neck of this ex-husband of hers, consoles him, spends the night with him, escorts him to the bus, tries to explain to you that she is no longer lomey, but it seems to me it's quite such a touching feature, but i just wanted to go back to the condrihan, that i can't imagine an udreburn, a texas farmer. it’s completely different, but this woman on the screen shows that she’s all these

horrors so that she doesn’t worry yes, yes, yes, yes, i i also wanted to mention. uh, there is such an interesting twist that holly, uh, is still an ac in communicating with men. i consider a virtuoso and this manifests itself, by the way, including, uh, and in the fact that when this man she chose leaves her her husbands, having learned that her reputation was ruined by her arrest and connection with the mafia, he is a diplomat, and he urgently leaves without saying goodbye, leaving her some kind of terrible letter, uh, and she is in the hospital because she has nerves miscarriage and come to her. uh, fred brings this letter. she tells him. i need make up her lips, because a girl cannot read such letters. uh, without yes, yes, yes. well, not only is it stupid, there, in general, she

puts on makeup for a long time before reading this letter. well , when she reads this letter, when it is clear that he left her and never. will not appear again. eh, he writes. god bless you and your child all the best. he is actually the father of this child. and here she is reading this and i was completely shocked by what she, uh, says. well, what a rat, but i loved him, and that's it. and there is no more talk about him. that is, she instantly forgets about it. eh, that is, she after the blow, he gets up, dusts himself off and runs with a brisk gait. i wouldn't have been able to do it this easy. uh, for example, uh forget a man, even if he is a scoundrel and hurt, but holly absolutely shocks me. she is, in general, a samurai in the female sense , well, yes, to live like a wolf with wolves, and how else to survive in this e-cynical world, which is arranged according to the principle man is a dead wolf to man. today i am tomorrow, because these are the key principles of, uh, the same

capitalism, the torch that the united states brought through the entire twentieth century yes won't survive. i don’t have any beautiful soul there, uh, i don’t know, the heroine of some soviet book. yes, now it doesn’t occur to some such beautiful stuffy idealist there, yes, who, for ideals, for public goods, there, and so on and so forth. he doesn’t have it instantly, as if rolled into asphalt, eaten to survive, you can only survive on such a moderate amount of cynicism, but he still loves the kitten. and also a kitten. you see, she, uh, is trying to pretend that she doesn’t care about this kitten, like, you’re not his name, you’re not his name, and generally brought us together fate. i am not attached to him, and then, it turns out that he is attached, that is. you see here is such a dichotomy on the one hand. she is cynical and tries to be cynical on the other side. it does not always work. that's all the same , that's her nature, and initially this is a kind person, such as by nature kind. yes, but it

still breaks through. she generally sees a name, she doesn’t give the cat and the heroes don’t call by name. that is, she tries not to become attached to people, probably the stomach instead of weakness, of course for vulnerability. what is the name holly galightly? have you read the novel in the original? yes, she is english. what do you think this book? i read in russian. i, uh, read incubus in english at one time. well, fuck the golatel for anyone who understands english, this is obvious. explain the word holliday. yes. yes, let's say that this is the name that she took for herself, this is her pseudonym, which she herself came up with, woman, holiday woman holiday. is it naked? hmm e, i would say so, if you approach the translation creatively. this is something like your own on the board, that is, a person with which is easy to communicate something outcast. and here she is

for these men of hers, she is so naked, that is. uh, no need to stress. everything is fine. i am my own, well, that is, they are predators, yes, and an predator in this aquarium, she is a piranha, i wanted to talk more about the fact that this novel was a breakthrough for the hold on the hood. yes, he made him famous. and why do you think his early works were not noticed, maybe it's in the image of this and holly, maybe he really met such a girl, and she became his muse. it seems to me that some one particular girl most likely was not there, most likely the image is collective. he would just see a lot of girls like that. well, because there are too many of them in real life, then they raised their hands and shouted that it was me it was me it was me, well, as if they even filed a lawsuit, because she really had

a surname. well, and she was completely different. i didn't even know her. well there, well, when 20 women come out and say it's a prototype. i obviously have a collective image. and by the way, let's say it like this in forwarding, that some features actually speaking biography, and this very heroine. this features a biography of the mother of the mist hood. yes, this difficult childhood, early marriage gave such pies, a teenager a girl, generally traumatic, but at the age of thirteen, and very early uh, an independent life, and a lonely independent life in a big city, in my opinion, is also in new york. now i remember exactly, maybe he took the traits of his mother precisely in order to bring this holly to some kind of figurative pedestal. you can say so, maybe, in any case, so or

otherwise. the luck of the hood is that this uh collective image hit the mark, yes, that is, it really reproduced as much as possible, uh, convincingly and as closely as possible some very important uh story for the unconscious of this very bourgeois society. that is, if there was no hit on the bull's-eye, then, well, there would not have been such a success for the book, yes, and the success of the book of the book is always ensured by hitting the bull's-eye in some kind of problematic wound, where it generally fester bleeds. and so, when there is a writer or artist in the widest i mean, yes, he will stick his first society like that. but you can’t ignore it, sometimes it’s remembered for a long time. and all this is a problem, that just such a woman will tear off these opposite