oh what minibus did you have, comrade karmalskaya lidia alekseevna, the carriage was submitted? oh hello. so you are karmal, this is our savior. i don't know what we would do without them. i was delighted on the radio lidochka was lucky that you did not recognize your photograph in the newspaper. but now you are completely different. you are such passers-by. oh what can you do? well, thank you for everything, lida, don't think that i'm impudent. and i thought to you that our son is getting married today. so you can stay here pointed to the scale to act, do not touch. so i visit this shpas memory for the whole life. you are not going anywhere. i can’t refuse her our savior. yes, mariska liked it so much that we can’t wake him up tomorrow at the concert in minsk, we definitely need to be there in the evening. until the evenings. tomorrow we will see alekseevna and what will i say to the leadership. and you say that

they didn’t find us at the station; we spent the whole day on the train. well, a wedding is a wedding. zusi is drinking me a hill bitterly bitter, nicky, you are my life, you are my hesitation, i clean up, long children, young my strong man,

you are my life, wishing you were mine. let's drink to our dear guests. i think that married people are in karmal. well done. well done. is the quail a belarusian song. yes, my mother at 10:00. i think it's an international song. no, this is our song. our you

are mine, you are my pen. i still have goosebumps. i urgently need to make pop arrangements for these songs that the whole country will bake. yes, i really liked it too. i would take something into my repertoire, what kind of people are people here? i just

fell in love friends. but if you liked it so much , then maybe you will stay with our company. a we don't have talent. we saw how it should be. well, i don’t know, volodya in tomsk offered to do his own ensemble. so what’s the problem? interesting suggestion to consider.

we immediately did not realize on the bank to read that the product is ready for use. i cooked for 3 hours, then i even thought that i wanted to put it on everything, like condensed milk, but then i tried it, but i didn’t like the crabs. goodbye.

vladimir revolves not only around you. i promised not to notice eugene men anymore. i didn't see you again. we can't be alone more defenseless. if you need help, contact the members of the team, after all.

please, please do something. i 'll be right there. i'll go with you then.

she won't run away from you, i won't run away from you. go. here are your things for me. guitar or guitar leave?

how is your father? because the same you are even worse. i hate.

the big game is on the air there are many events in the world one way or another related to the crisis in relations between russia and the collective west. president putin supreme commander putin visited two groupings of russian troops that are operating in the clash area in the area of ​​​​contact with ukraine at the same time sergey lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs is in latin america, where he held very constructive negotiations with the leadership of brazil and brazil is now putting forward an important peace initiative, probably not fully acceptable, if we are talking about about

reaching a final agreement, but constructive in that it demonstrates that in the third world among developing countries attitudes towards behavior of the collective west becomes more and more critical. well, finally, in japan, which actually became part of the collective west , it may have been, probably, more precisely, was part of the collective west for some time, but now the masks are thrown off, the big seven of the g7 foreign minister met and called for another sanctions against russia. last warning. china the most. i liked that all countries of the world were warned that if they did not comply with unilateral western sanctions, then for them

there can be the most serious consequences, but they say that the united states is now practicing a policy of containment towards russia in general. they begin to practice a policy of containment in relation to the rest of the world, they say, an independent and large state. such as india and such as brazil that they either have to obey the decisions taken by washington brussels or may not be good. well, let's see what president putin said when he visited the russian groupings of troops. briefly, but specifically, it is important for me to hear your opinion, i would like to start a report of the situation.

and, uh, the supreme commander-in-chief visited russian troops on the line of contact of ukraine literally a day after the unexpectedly announced exercises of the pacific fleet took place. and uh, as i

understand it, they were announced quite unexpectedly and one for granted purpose was to test the military capabilities of the fleet, but it seems to me that it probably was. well, and some political motive to demonstrate that russia, and not e , is mired in the conflict in ukraine and retains e the possibility of action in another theater of operations in the theater, which are increasingly trying to make a theater of operations, the united states japan general bukhinsky your opinion. you know, i completely agree with you, because yes, of course, our attention is now focused on ukraine and the president's visit. by the way, it can be considered. i have a few words. just uh, it can be considered not only as, uh, checking the troops and their readiness for the counteroffensive of ukraine, it

can also be considered as preparing our offensive is that the commander of the airborne forces made the main one of the main reports. eh, me personally. uh, the opinion is that paratroopers usually don't defend paratroopers. in general, they are advancing and seizing bridgeheads. but it's so now, uh, a very accurate observation. well, an observation anyway. uh, anyway, i hope that we will not repel the ukrainian counter-offensive, which has been talked about so much lately. nevertheless, our command is preparing our offensive operation, which, i am sure, will be successful. now for uh, oriental theatre, indeed. eh, this is not teaching. it's called a surprise readiness check in the west. it's called snipex and sizies, but we still have this sudden check of combat readiness for the first time in many years. i personally don't remember. in the russian

period, for the fleet to rise in full force and be brought to the highest degree of combat readiness is impressive. uh, the composition of the force means, these are 189 surface ships and auxiliary ships. that's 12 submarines, including, uh, nuclear submarines. these are 89 aircraft of the naval aviation, which interact with the aviation of the military space forces. uh, very much like this, firstly against amphibious defense. and the kuril islands and, uh, sakhalin and preventing deployment. e-e enemy forces in the sea of ​​okhotsk sea of ​​okhotsk . as you know, this is the sea that serves for our e-missile fleet, including the straits between the kuril islands for the entry of our e-submarine nuclear submarine fleet into the oceans. uh tasks,

according to reports from the department of defense completed in full force. i think this check. uh, a very , very clear uh signal is being sent, uh, to the west, primarily to the united states. first, these teachings. well, let's just say that it's not quite synchronized, but they are being carried out, but almost simultaneously with the exercises of the chinese fms in the else strait. it is possible that they are going on, uh, according to a single plan, and uh, you know, uh, the americans should think hard , because such a concentration of fleets, uh, from two sides from the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bokhotsk and from the taiwan strait can quite easily be taken in pincers. uh, the us navy and uh, even those two carrier groups in the

seventh fleet. they won't help much. well, first of all, aircraft carriers. in general , the americans themselves admit that yes. this is projection power in remote theaters, but a very good target. e s especially with the advent of e such weapons. uh, like hypersonic zircons, like ours uh over. uh, fast torpedo shkval that is. uh, the aircraft carrier is no longer invulnerable, as it was still there, say 20-30 years ago, so americans once again say, especially considering. uh, the pace of development of the naval forces of china we, of course, the pace is lower, but the chinese. how with what intensity and e in quantitative and qualitative composition they are building up the naval forces - this, of course, is an impression. as for the possible

and even probable, as many believe, the ukrainian offensive. i had the opportunity to talk to a fairly responsible and informed russian military, and unlike the us military , they need to be criticized. they don't hesitate to share with their plans. a and. e, somehow here they make it clear that they have a different job and voice it. e, possible planned operations are not included in their direct tasks e, but having said this, they say one very important thing. what, uh , this is all the pentagon leak that just happened, and they think it most likely was. uh, the leak is genuine, they disagree with the assessment that it was a situation where us intelligence

managed to learn relatively little about ukraine and a lot of russia they say russia they didn't know everything. and what they learned e didn’t fully understand, and as you said, the general idea is that russia is only going to defend itself, that in general, they don’t think that the pentagon is even seriously counting on this and that it is precisely these russian capabilities. they explain some new tone in many. uh, publications saying that, in general, ukraine needs a few, if you want to humble your ambitions and understand that most likely ukraine will not be able to achieve a strategic breakthrough. as far as i understand, this was your consistent point of view on

for several months now. right now you see the leopards are already coming to the front line, the polish slovak moments are already in ukraine. how do you assess the potential of the ukrainian offensive. today, you understand dmitry, once again i say this all the time, but maybe, of course, i am not competent enough, but for me this is ukrainian. uh, the so-called counter-offensive is generally a mystery, because uh, if you are guided by the postulates of military science, then for an offensive operation. need at least a ratio of three to one in favor of the offensive. i don't see such a correlation. you understand all these leopards, but the numbers are , well, a maximum of three digits, and there are 150 three-digit ones. well, 200, well, even 400 tanks, but this, but this is not the amount that e is able to provide. you are talking about strategic success. i'm not talking strategic. it

doesn't even smell of operational success. the americans have already begun to talk about modest tactical successes, that is, to advance somewhere around 20-30 km in order to get uh, there u objects in the crimea u their own hymers they have e. well, i again list superiority in aviation no. yes, not that the superiority of the number of aircraft. well, poland handed over four there. uh, slovakia also transmitted there, uh, six instant-29s, but they need to ensure at least a concentration of force on the proryva grouping, but at least 10-20 km wide there, they need a multiple more. uh, aviation drones given that, uh , it's a misconception that all drones. the only way to fight. it’s to shoot them down, or with missile systems, which expensive, or anti-drone guns, which

are cheaper but not as effective. there are means of rap and this is the main means of combating drones. and our, uh, electronic warfare system, both during the soviet union and in russia, remained one of the best in the world. just as our air defense system and the americans admit it, they have already begun , uh, to worry that russia has the means that can disable satellites in a geostationary orbit of 36,000 km. and not just jamming, but completely incapacitating, so i say, i'm waiting. wanted would be as clean as a military man. third on this counteroffensive. uh, if it will be, of course, although, i repeat once again. i still think we'd rather go on the offensive than, uh, ukrainians. and all these conversations with some numbers, then 200,000, then 400, then 600, then a million, then and the last.

uh, you understand, in order to carry out an offensive operation, you need to concentrate troops, you need to concentrate a grouping, and considering, if you take the southern direction, this is an open area, but where is this grouping, i'm sure that our team, if such concentration was, then it is very such let's say, so varnish, my goal is to launch missiles on bombs with all available forces and means and means. if, uh, well , concentrate such a grouping in a week, now it is already called the thirtieth of april. there the beginning of may the ninth of may, well, to concentrate such a grouping in 10 days. but that's just fantasy. you know? when i watch the history of wars. uh, it always seems to me important to distinguish between local tactical success and change in the strategic situation when talking about

that three lines of russian defense have been created, but in that direction this is why three lines are being created, because they understand that one line, if you prepare a tank fist on it and throw it there, uh, your few, but nevertheless real aviation drones , at some time not a tactical success. it is always possible, but a good example from the history of wars - this is the famous brusilovsky breakthrough, where it was possible to fight, this is the sixteenth year, may, the bars managed to achieve very, very impressive results. but it turned out that these impressive results could not be achieved along the entire length of the front. and it turned out, as brusilov himself wrote, that although he personally became famous and, on the right, began to be considered one of the most serious successful

russian commanders to change the situation. this did not lead to the front, and it seems to me that this must be understood very realistically. i think you need to take the ukrainian offensive seriously, because they received so much from the west, i already read about intelligence data. again. i read about boasting literally in the white house. and that the most sensitive information is transmitted in direct mode, and they are already talking about the fact that they give data about what is happening in individual russian trenches. well, it would be strange if we didn't take things like that, seriously. i think you are absolutely right. at the tactical level, this is essential; at the strategic level, it is not enough. but, uh, when very serious dramatic events take place in ukraine

, others also take place at the same time. i would say much more peaceful stocks, which also have meaning when we talk about the possible reorganization of the world. i am talking, of course, about minister lavrov's trip to latin america , where he has just met with brazilian leaders. let's see what lavrov said while in brazil. we have a common approach to the tasks of reforming the institutions of global governance. there has been a lot about this lately. president voloda silva spoke this concerns both financial institutions and the task of expanding representation in these financial institutions, developing countries, and we are also united in what my colleague said just now. uh, that unilateral sanctions

imposed bypassing the un security councils we consider them legitimate and, uh, they harm because they politicize the work of specialized international platforms. we have touched on the situation that we are now witnessing in the sphere of global governance, when there is a rather tough struggle going on. our western colleagues have retained their dominant position in world affairs. reshetnikov yevgeny is also a lieutenant general, they only occupied major posts in another department of the foreign intelligence service and know how to penetrate. if want at the root of the events. this intelligence knows how to penetrate. this intelligence knows how to penetrate. i think, as they say in such cases. uh, a scout is always a scout. i'm sure your analytical data. you

still have them, especially considering that they headed the analytical department of the foreign intelligence service, but i want to tell you what you need to think about this, moreover, in the words of a representative of the white house. let 's see how admiral carmi described, and he also has two stars, how he characterized them, and the opposition of brazil brazil approached the issue in a meaningful and rhetorical way, suggesting that the us and europe are somehow not interested in peace or that we are responsible for the war. frankly, in this case, brazil is retelling russian and chinese propaganda like a parrot. imagine, well, it is the task of american foreign policy to convince brazil and the white house representative calls them a parrot. well, as dmitry this is still evidence of impotence. this is evidence of just the rage of inner rage. he can't resist. uh, and it's not

that's just in relation to brazil is happening in relation to a number of african countries with e. the countries of the middle east so you said at the very beginning that america , the united states promises to react harshly to everything to everything related to one degree or another of support for russia or violation of sanctions, and this is the mood, but nothing works out in lati. erica doesn't really work out, neither in africa nor in asia, it's not very good. and that's why it all breaks out. this is no longer diplomacy. this is not government policy. it's just a threat losing country. it seems to us that she does not lose. yes, it looks like the united states but in reality we are losing a little bit . here, uh, yevgeny petrovich clearly explained everything, but once again i want to san, i will put the emphasis on checking the pacific fleet. but it's clearly visible that we are doing this

together, well, not together, but doing it together with the chinese. they have large-scale, very sharp training exercises. how are we doing it the president invites the minister of defense suddenly announces all this is shown on television at the same time, the minister of defense. china is coming to us we are showing to the united states. guys, we seriously agreed to work together in ispekin, we are seriously agreeing from brazil to african countries, so now it’s really going on. note lavrov e, flew waffles. now i have been to asia in latin america and i think it will fly more than once, because we are conducting an active active battle on this field. on the field of a huge

number of countries, and the united states from impotence. here, ranging from threatening to criticize to scoff at making fun, but this is a losing tactic. we offer economic cooperation. uh, political cooperation. he suggests that stop, otherwise you are parrots, otherwise you are monkeys. yes, yes, he says that my hiroshi nagasaki is a terrible unprecedented use of nuclear weapons that brought so much grief, but he doesn’t say who did it, he doesn’t say who did it at all, and i understand our e, dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, who wrote a lot t- just lying creatures, but also you can’t treat people, you can’t also talk. it was addressed to the japanese. uh in japan so uh maybe overly optimistic, but i think the united states

has a lot of problems in this field, a lot of problems. e me. uh, several times here, our viewers in america, general bukhinsky, you know about this, criticized in absentia for the fact that i had a minister, let's say, uh, from their point of view, personally critical of the united states and probably too supportive of russian policy and when i i hear it. i honestly say, repent absolutely fair remark just now in this e observation from my point of view is absolutely absent. this is something that is absolutely absent in relation to a much more significant phenomenon, and specifically an offensive operation. i mean, they call it unprovoked aggression and absolutely do not understand what they themselves did, which led to

such a change in russian policy, they do not understand talking about creatures, as many of us for me are such expressions of creatures, scum. well how much you honestly for me such expressions in relation to political opponents are not typical, but now, when i hear how brazil is called a parrot. and for what they refuse to admit. and what about american teams? this is for the whole world, when i look, and how about this so-called international criminal court, which the united states not only does not recognize. opposite which us sanctions were applied when he tried to swing at american citizens. and suddenly they say no to the decision of this court. of course, it doesn't concern us and cannot touch it, but russia russia must

comply with it, or now here is the last statement, that they want to create some kind of new international tribunal general on the basis of the ukrainian system of justice, international tribunals. it's called a comrades' lynch, not an international tribunal. well, okay, the big seven gathered in japan, now it’s good for russia there are no disputes, moral and political unity. and here again they e threaten russia and talk about new sanctions. uh, the emphasis is on stricter enforcement of old sanctions and punishment of those countries that refuse to cooperate with these sanctions and some warnings from china, but i have a feeling that they still speak in the big seven of russia and about china in different ways russia is the enemy, and china is the rival of which, as it were,

the united states and the collective west should put pressure to keep it moving in the right direction, but still open conflict. they don't want to deal with china yet. this is my impression. your my impression is that today the fundamental difference in the western, especially the assessment of russia and china in as opponents no longer exist, the united states made a strategic choice in favor of both confrontation with both russia and china, they do it objectively or do you think that they made such a conscious choice. i think they made such a conscious choice, and thereby putting themselves in the position of a sukvag. in fact, what we have already talked about in relation to the russian surprise inspections of the pacific fleet, which is certainly a signal to the united states and a demonstration that not only china is helping russia, but russia is no less helping china, and as a result of the russian-chinese partnership, it is not

possible to defeat russia, china or them, but because we help each other it is impossible to defeat china's russia at the same time. uh, in the pacific. it is impossible to defeat russia with chinese support in ukraine and a in europe . moreover, dmitry, i want to tell you that a is even criticized in the united states today. republicans who favor some a softening of the confrontation with russia in order to increase the containment of china, speaking of, well, what are you talking about, russia is a partner and even an actual ally of china , so uh, about china being an adversary in the united states, there is an absolute consistency with uh, a bipartisan consensus. it is even more durable than anti-russian content, and therefore , they say, it’s not worth it, and, it’s pointless to talk about some, and not even rapprochement, but about some kind of tactical compromise, with russia on ukraine

, they say. this one will also e strengthen china , so i don’t see a fundamental difference. but as for those secondary sanctions with which the united states threatens the rest of the world. this is really very important, because it reinforces the fire of western hegemony that leonid reshet just spoke about. because indeed the united states is trying to present the current picture of the world as a confrontation between democracy and autocracies, which is absolutely not true. notice brazil is a democracy just like india is a democracy, but still the united states is insulted democratically elected president of democratic brazil , calling him a parrot because he refuses to dance to the american e, to the american tune. here is the real picture of the world. it's the west against everyone else, and the west has really consolidated the west you're right dmitry said absolute unity in the

g7, but the problem is that this is limited to the g7. well , at most, this coalition includes about 50 countries there, which are entirely focused on the united states. and acts under the other everything else develops cooperation with each other without the west apart from the west and a in the long run builds tools that undermine. ah, dominance. ah. west and the ability of the west to exercise diktat. now the west is threatening everyone with secondary sanctions, thereby weakening its influence and its attractiveness in relation to these countries, uh, which it threatens and stimulates, so that these countries abandon the dollar, build new institutions of global governance, like a new bank, brix and so on and so forth, that is, the west,

in fact, in its impotence, cuts that branch, and which is already significantly filed and which will soon. it seems to me that it will already crack here , we have certain disagreements. i'm not sure they have practical value. it seems to me that washington did not finally decide consciously. that china is the same adversary at this stage, uh, like russia , and that at least experienced and analytical people clearly see this different, but where are you absolutely right, that at the political level this distinction is ignored. and what is important to us. this is that the biden administration at least decided that it can simultaneously run into russia and china without sacrificing the possibility of media contacts with china , because for one reason or another, china -

it will endure from their point of view, and in china, how do you understand? well, china refuses to tolerate it. a note the first visit of li shangfu of the minister of defense of china was to moscow the first visit of september was to moscow biden and xi jinping last spoke in bali actually, when biden tried, but to create some kind of stable basis for us-china relations. none of this worked out, and since then the white house has been saying that the biden administration tried many times to organize their telephone conversation and somehow get in touch with beijing, but beijing refused. naturally, especially after the disruption of tony linkin's visit to china because of the history of e-balloons. it seems to me that china has drawn a conclusion that and so the confrontational policy that

the united states is pursuing against it it is irreversible that this is indeed a strategic choice, at least yes, the current political elite, as the united states and a. china is of course preparing for this increasingly intense clash with the united states. uh, one of our colleagues. here even from my point of view. very figurative uh, comparison is an observation, more precisely, that in washington and in the european union they urgently demanded from china uh that the pin called zelensky and they told me, well, in general, in vain. they say that there was no chinese answer, the answer was that the minister china's defense came to moscow is this is cooler. e some kind of call, which, moreover , you acted would not take place on the introduction, but

under pressure. and we'll be back on the ad in just a few minutes. the world's first movie filmed in space, you 've never seen anything like it you're ready to fly into space vladimir mashkov feel the power accept the challenge from april 20 in the cinema. fantastic shopping even during the period of discounts and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant in installments for 10 months and cashback up to ten percent in the active phase. and what does it mean a sale, that on the ozone star sale a polaris wi-fi multicooker with a 50% discount, and a synergetic washing gel for 899 rubles. children on the fluff of peru and you or

happen to be allergic to pollen. we always have cetrin on hand. cetrin is quickly absorbed and protects against allergens, thanks to just one tablet a day there is no reason to endure allergies . this is in one of my tariffs watch and control beeline tv in the tariff up and profitable, add home internet sees all the possibilities at once free airport transfer. increased cashback for five categories increased process on a savings account, discover a truly premium

service rosbank premium real opportunities in fix price stores baking dish for only 62 rubles. a four-sided grater for only 26 rubles. 30 kop. a baking sheet for only 62 rubles. fix price for everything low price on the site daily the steering wheel is so many excellent options for housing for recreation, something pulls somewhere lathered. love fast. love long. love sweet. we are talking about sleep. and what did you think about with wilson you can fall asleep after 20 minutes, sleep soundly during the night and wake up easily. in the morning, order online with a discount of 50 ruble deluxe for the price of one kfc application, they took everything in a combatant loan up to 5 million. and now you are already ruining the wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank. dacha

specially for you only in pyaterochka global village is ripe for your table. prepared for the common cold, and the temperature and the fight against viruses. i choose ergoferon, it combines several fighting effects at once with viruses elimination of symptoms. arvi relieves inflammation, and colds are also suitable for children, viruses season remember ergoferon at speed and you can connect only with us we activate the operator.

it is not on the moon, a profitable loan is much closer in the post office bank at only 4.5% per annum with a guaranteed service, the post office bank rate, from what news kiev creates stuffing about the kidnapping of people from a nuclear power plant , there are no documents, there is no invoice, here they are sucked from the finger. why did the head of the ukrainian foreign ministry take up arms against pushkin and his poem poltava and what could do pushkin how do i describe the great betrayal of mose, because this is part of the russian history of the exchange of history for modern ukraine, this is a common thing and how a letter to an unknown girl saved the life of a russian soldier. i wanted to help the soldier feel that he is fighting for his own people for the truth about this and much more. antifreak is coming soon on first air, there is a big game on the air and we will now

talk about talking about freezing further arrest of russian assets, and how they can be transferred to ukraine, therefore, general reshetnikov is now underway, and discussions in the united states and, uh, here's what u said about this, and the united states attorney general, city, we are using the new powers granted by congress to transfer certain assets of the russian oligarchs that we have seized to the restoration of ukraine. i want to express gratitude to the many employees of the department of justice involved into this work. i also want to thank our partners. both at home and abroad for joining us in this important investigation effort. atrocities in ukraine, we will do everything in our

power to help ukraine achieve justice for its own. the people and we will work so much. how long will it take to bring to justice those who are involved in the cruel crimes of the russian regime. you know, general, when the united states became the united states, when they were created, and the founding fathers did not use the word democracy, they often use the word freedom freedom of speech freedom of religion. and as you know, both in the united states are under attack today, but there was another very important freedom, the freedom of private property, that the state cannot take away from you what is legally yours , and now the united states attorney generals are declaring that it is possible to confiscate the assets of russian citizens? which , i emphasize, are not accused of anything in particular, who

are not fighting in ukraine, who are not necessarily associated with any organizations that take part in their actions. just do not like can not even say that not necessarily supporters. e vladimir vladimirovich putin, but they, at least, are not actively acting against the russian authorities, and for this they say you can confiscate their assets and transfer them to ukraine what do you think about this, but i will immediately quote dmitry suslov, he said, this, uh, there will be turn the rest of the world against the united states of america precisely because the united states is always together. then with europe they emphasized that private property is sacred. this is the holy of holies for e, all this propaganda and ideology, and to some extent it was all observed great. back and now, it turns out that you can give? i don’t know, dmitry

, correct me, but it seems to me that when the usa was created, e very strongly, e, the word law was popularized. and now you can give instructions to the ministry of justice, draw up such a document , take such measures that would ensure that there is a law does not violate does not violate the law, but there are tasks and this task must be completed, in general, for me now american democracy. this is a form of dictatorship. this is the specific form dictatorship, there is a dictate of a certain group that are in power and are trying to task the minister of justice. look how he spoke. he said that i would confiscate, and after that the spell crime of the cruel undead went. in general , they have nothing to do with the case. yes , instead of explaining how and why

they do it. he just poured a set of such purely propaganda formulations on his head. and, of course, this i don't think that he will be very successful in doing this, but probably, but it really uh will set up the rest of the world that they they still want to keep for themselves, uh, turn against, the united states of america, uh, in the rest of the world, even in china, private property is respected, i even say, because there officially, uh, the communist party is headed by it is respected and respected, and uh, they try not to touch it. yes, and here there is a desire to inflict damage on the enemy, we will abandon all our principles, yes, the most real principles. uh, dmitry look, garland to the minister of justice, he is sometimes called

the prosecutor general, he performs both other responsibilities. this is american practice. now, he referred to the law passed by the congresses. and you know, he is right to a certain extent, there is indeed a law adopted by congress, but in general it used to be that laws should not contradict the constitution, and not just the constitution in the way someone wants to interpret it today. and since the founding fathers meant it, because if a the constitution is somewhat outdated. so you can accept an amendment to the constitution, this has not been for many decades, do not mess with amendments make it easier, but they adopt some kind of law and this is the law, but in general it becomes the norm. but only because it was adopted by a majority in congress or not even in congress, the assembly of some state. i

repeatedly said on our program in 2020 that i saw no reason for the u.s. supreme court to challenge the election results. because according to the law, according to the law, which authorized the states to have their own electoral practice, there were no really big violations, the thing is that the elections were simultaneously stolen for me absolutely clear. they were stolen very beautiful and very civilized for humanitarian reasons, if you like, and the democrats decided to remove the period, in some states and where they had either control, or just like georgie, a lot of influence, where they neutralized the possibilities of pogroms committed by black americans, and they passed laws that

let people vote. by mail without any verification, well , providing the desired result, but such laws and now such laws appear in regarding the confiscation of the property of the oligarchs, yes, and not only the oligarchs, but also say russian state property. here, look what dmitry peskov said about this. now it is becoming obvious that it is impossible to pack these gangster actions of the collective west to block our assets into the norms of international law, and it doesn’t work in any way with the legitimization of these steps, whatever one may say, it’s all the same their actions look illegal we demand that this is all unblocked and we consider it illegal we are convinced that any attempt to legitimize this is doomed to failure. this is an important statement for, uh, two reasons, well , the first reason is that this is an important statement on

an important topic by the presidential press secretary, but look, what expressions do peskov use in gang practice? he didn't say that before. we haven't talked like that before. and this really creates a situation where even, uh, when the ukrainian conflict can be somehow resolved, then i think a return to the status quo, including the attitude towards the american elite, which used to be in russia it seems to me that it will be, uh, very, very difficult, and i want to ask you a general of god. well, what to do? still, here is the solution to the crisis. in general, i really don’t want to negotiate with these people, but nevertheless, lavrov, in my opinion, quite reasonably told e while in brazil that russia

is open to peace initiatives, and russia has tough conditions when it comes to reaching a peace agreement, but there is no preface in order to start negotiations on how you imagine it would be possible to agree with ukraine, imagine, well, with ukraine e. well, sooner or later , of course, you will have to decide this, or rather, end this conflict and end this conflict, of course, most likely at the negotiating table. but uh, before you sit down at the negotiating table. you need to complete the assigned tasks. i think that is, well, the bare minimum. this is the liberation again of the territories that became part of the russian federation. these are four regions, but i don’t say this about crimea at all from my point of view, as the president said. this is a question that is closed forever. and therefore, if ukraine is

to insist on its completely unrealistic position, that is, the withdrawal of completely russian troops to the borders of the ninety-first year. but then these negotiations may never take place at all, but it is symptomatic that recently a lot of analytical articles have begun to appear, in which the authors are the last article of foring fairs, ah, where the authors write these authors to the head of the council on foreign relations speeches and his colleagues advised too, who held major positions in the white house. yes, and the first er half of this article is what ukraine needs to provide. maximum help to everyone, for ukraine to achieve maximum success, and the second part , it has a completely different tone, so that ukraine doesn’t achieve it anyway, uh, you need to, uh, move on to

plan b, because u achieve the goals that are set, uh, before ukraine is simply not realistic. therefore, it is necessary to look for a diplomatic solution, and then the search for some options begins. yes, that's something to leave russia something from somewhere russia must leave. yes, there needs to be a solution some question of restoration there, well, the word reparation. they uh, i don't think they use it, but nevertheless, there is already talk that, uh, in spite of , well, first of all, uh, they also write that the help of the united states is not unlimited. eh, the barrel is not bottomless, moreover, after the loss of the chamber, representatives of the administration, the baidan becomes more and more difficult. uh, so to speak, uh, ensure the allocation of new tranches and new assistance to ukraine a. if, god forbid, they lose the presidential election, then in general it is possible, uh, with a high probability

forget about providing military assistance to ukraine therefore, you need to seize the moment. the biden administration still has time to somehow end this conflict, but they, of course, they cannot change themselves, but on ukrainian terms. yes, uh, one can promise russia the lifting of some sanctions, uh, as an encouragement, but all sanctions uh can be lifted only after a peace settlement is reached on conditions. well, ukrainian conditions, which is natural, if well, the truth is, you know ukrainian conditions can e, depending on the situation on the battlefield. they can do so very quickly. modify and become very close to reality, so we'll wait and see, but in any case, i'm also convinced that this is so long, it turns out.