you prepared under the field each one to contact them, you could see his direction remember dinners.

no.

on the air of the big game, we will talk today, as usual, about the hostilities in ukraine, about the arrival in new york in order to chair the session of the un security council, foreign minister sergei lavrov, and what contradictory situations and this mission of this mission of the minister of foreign affairs in new -yorke accompanies here. and, of course, the deprivation of the collective west about the supply of further weapons to ukraine and about trying to portray china as a country that successful. uh, intimidated by the united states, american allies and ready. retreat from your cooperation cooperation, which is very valued in china with russia, and finally, the last and very bright news.

fired, the most influential and most independent television commentator in the united states, tucker carlson, it was much said that a man like that kirkalson, but if you want, saved the honor of american television and the american media, because he is his presence on american television. he said that a different point of view and common sense is still possible in america, but it turns out not. but nevertheless, we will start today with what is happening in the donbass, because , unfortunately, it seems to me that if there is any consensus, when we talk about ukraine , it is that the real dynamics in ukraine , at least , in the near future it will be determined no, through negotiations, not through

some kind of confidential conversations, and then , first of all, what is happening in the fields battles and now with us from lugansk komsomolskaya pravda correspondent alexander kots, who recently returned from artyomovsky alexander thank you so much for finding the opportunity. and, of course, we, er, first of all, would like to know your assessment of what is happening in artyomovsk and more widely on the donetsk front. yes, good evening, well, in artyomovsk everything is coming to its logical conclusion. now. and our assault units of the wagner pmc are fighting, heavy and heavy battles in the western quarters of the city. and last week we overcame psychological defensive lines in the ukrainian army, which were divided by the center and e, the west itself along the railway track and the station e, station bakhmud-2. uh, we took this station, we even

passed the road station, we took the first nine-story high-rise buildings, several nine-story buildings, which we took within one day before my eyes, and then a very serious fortified area awaits us. e is called in the military language. and so this is the civil quarter from a real high-rise building, each of which the enemy turned into a firing point at an observation point to the artillery correction point, and so on and so forth. that is, ukrainians are in these houses. employees but what's amazing, uh, when our stormtroopers enter high-rise buildings, they understand that in addition to the enemy , there are also civilians in these buildings who are hiding in the basements and, uh, our fighters have to do, uh, two things at the same time. on the one hand. they knock the enemy out of residential buildings from the other side, and try to save. eh, civilians, and i must say that they come

at the cost of their own lives. that's literally a few days ago, an evacuation group of musicians took out about a dozen civilians, and artillery fire was opened on them, but not the enemy. uh, among the fighters, there were wagner pmcs, as well as the wounded dead, but the civilian was nevertheless taken out without loss and then sent to temporary accommodation centers. i asked them many times why didn't they go to the ukrainian side earlier, as a rule? there is only one answer. we were waiting for the russians, we wanted to leave for russian territory, when the ukrainian military controlled the situation here, we did not have this opportunity. this, probably speaks of the mood e among the local population. uh, as for zelensky’s statement that they won’t leave bakhmut, this can only mean one thing, that, uh, kiev is preparing where blocking strikes on the flanks are, because if this does not happen,

then in the coming weeks there. ah, yet we are pressing that it will be completely released. at the same time, if zelensky is sure that they will not leave him. so they are preparing appropriate military operations, uh, with which they plan to, uh, surround the wagner group. inside artyomovsk. now there are quite serious forces concentrated in the clocks of konstantinovka, and the slavic kramatorsk agglomeration. and with these three blows and on the flanks, i think so, they don’t plan to try to return artyoms to themselves and conclude, uh, our garrison, located inside the assault detachments, in the cauldron. e on the flanks. we now have the armed forces of the russian federation , they must stop the danger. e, so such, but blows. well, they actually do it. i worked with paratroopers of the 106th division tula which cover all the faithful lamps in

the solidar area. e after several attempts by the enemy to attack these positions , the enemy was defeated until all these attempts. uh, they are nipped in the bud. as for zelensky’s words that, even if bakhmut is taken, almost an operational space will open before russia. it seems to me that this is pure cunning, because, nevertheless, this is a 70,000-strong town that we have been taking for several months. yes liberated liberated. not just a point on the map released, actually tens of kilometers russian land. ah. this is not only actually bakhmut itself, it is also many cities and solidarity and experienced and many trees. of course, they are badly broken, but we will restore all this. so it's not just one town. this is a huge huge area. i traveled here from the north and from the east and from the south, and well, you see it is 2 hours, let's say from the lugansk people's republic 2

hours, but it is to the territories that were recently under the control of the enemy, and nevertheless it will still not be a strategic victory it is tactical, but a is waiting for us ahead most serious. uh, a fortified defensive line, going and actually from avdiivka. and there, up to slavyansk, yes, and this is a chain of cities konstantinovka druzhkovka kramatorsk slavyansk, and this, of course, is not an easy job , it will take a very long time to mess around with it, and i don’t think that the ukrainian army will fall down right now after it loses oh, yes now here in the city of e the quality of the enemy’s infantry is not better, but there is a commander’s factor, when an experienced commander leads her name, they can hold the defense and cling to every stone for every window for every in peru you said one very important thing. you just said not the best quality

of the enemy's infantry and this is good news for obvious reasons the enemy is weakening, but it can be bad news if it means that the enemy is preparing. as you also mentioned some kind of deblocking operation and uh, keeps their best forces in reserve, what do you think is happening in this regard, because due to the unusual infantry that is thrown into the artyomovsk meat grinder, they buy time for uh to the formation of one staffing of those shock corps that were preparing for the counter-offensive operation. she. i think e will begin not only in the artyomovsky direction, but immediately in all directions. there will be criminal pressure everywhere, and if they succeed somewhere, they will operate with reserves that they have in

sufficient quantities. a very large concentration of their forces, for example, is located in dnepropetrovsk, from where it is convenient to logistically transfer both to the zaporozhye direction and to donetsk and towards e, kupyansk and estuary, from there to the golden kremensky border, so it will certainly be such a part. uh, stop counter. last question. and probably the most important. and i understand that you can’t uh in many ways and you don’t have to say, but i’ll still try to ask you. this is a question that, of course, interests many. eh, are they fair? assumptions that how do you expect this ukrainian action is also expected by the russian command at the front and what is called? doesn't sit idly by. certainly a serious situation. to tell this on the air, how to

it to qualify about many factors? i just don’t know, well, how big is our supply of ammunition, because artillery will have to fight back and we have a lot of really difficult trials and i don’t know what we have with the reserve for living or how we can operate, because after all, an offensive cannot last forever, sooner or later the enemy runs out of steam, as if they ran out of steam. actually. last year we passed through vast territories in the kiev and kharkov regions and in the luhansk people's republic therefore, if we have a reserve, we will have a great chance to take advantage of the window of opportunity when the enemy fizzles out in his counter-offensives. maybe even advancing somewhere, but if we have the opportunity to freshen up our defensive ranks, we will be able to win everything back. thanks a lot. i heard in moscow from the military. what are they waiting for, what are

you waiting for? what are you, it's like e considered, well , if you want, a predictable situation, but what is predictable is usually reflected. thank you great luck and take care of yourself. thank you, so here it is. uh, disturbing, uh, the situation in the donetsk luhansk region, but on the other hand , with a clear feeling that russia is uh gathering forces and that russia does not, uh, perceive the ukrainian army. russia, as i understand from everything i know, russia is preparing for it very seriously, but so far there is a diplomatic battle going on in the security council.

where he has just arrived, ministers foreign affairs, sergei lavrov and listen to what he said. in a desperate attempt to assert its dominance through the punishment of the rebellious, rebellious, the united states has gone to the destruction of globalization, which for many years has been touted as the highest good of all mankind, serving the multilateral system of the world economy, the washingtons, who obeyed the rest of the west, use their rules whenever illegitimate steps need to be justified. , against those who build their policies in accordance with international law and refuse to follow selfish interests of the golden billion of dissenters are blacklisted on the basis of the principle who is not with us is against us. lavrov and clearly showed that russia is not just analyzing the situation and is going to

deal with such a situation, listen. let's call a spade a spade. no one allowed the western minority to speak on behalf of all mankind. it is necessary to behave decently and respect all members of the international community, imposing a rule-based order and the authors arrogantly reject the key principle, the un charter sovereign the equality of states is the quintessence of the complex of exclusivity was the proud statement of the head of eu diplomacy barrel that europe is the garden of eden, and the rest of the world is a jungle. well, regarding the garden of eden, in this garden of eden specifically in the city of new york, the ministers of foreign affairs were admitted , whom they and his delegation were absolutely obliged to allow to russia, but did not post, despite

many promises from journalists, but half the minister of foreign affairs, who is also traditionally present at events of this kind. here what did the deputy minister of foreign affairs, sergei ryabkov, say about this, who until the last moment the americans pretended that they were working, a solution was about to be found. this is a game of nerves. this is a mockery. this is another reflection of the fact that colleagues in washington are not just not to be trusted, they are simply not worth listening to. i emphasize, we will find forms. how to answer this so that americans will remember for a long time that this is not done, and they will remember it. senator andrei denisov a.i. is with us today. you have been ambassador to china for many years, but before that you were ambassador and were also first

deputy minister of foreign affairs. so, probably, you know, as usual, the russian diplomats spoke, and what they used sometimes quite firm forever, delicate expression, only sergei ryabkov spoke. well, this means an extreme degree of indignation, or maybe i'm just not very aware of how russian diplomats say normal. well, you are partly right. you know, in the end, both political and human things boiled up. uh, i would draw attention to the fact that the speech of the minister of foreign affairs of russia is also built. enough. well, let's say. not just firm, but harsh expressions, uh, with which he addresses the audience, and the audience, by the way, say e this is the first person of their delegations, to the left of

our minister is sitting, as we see the representative of the united arab emirates yiwu and further alphabetically the united kingdom united stage went, uh, british ambassador barbara woodworth, by the way, before uh moved to the un , she was, according to uh, in beijing and i knew her. well, then the permanent representative united states, they all came. yes, they all came, they are present boycott. this did not happen, well, strictly speaking, there are still certain rules of the game, uh, and they should not be violated, because if the next time comes, respectively, the minister from their side, then uh, a similar choice will arise before uh, let's say their opponents, and our delegation, as we can see, is inserted to the maximum, perhaps, in this case, the level with deputy minister vershinin and ryabkov on the right side. on the left vasily alekseevich nebenzya

the russian federation followed anatoly antonov, uh, there are visible other our diplomats, but they sit there in the back rows, because in each country, strictly speaking, allotted, 5 seats, one in front and four behind, uh, back. so this is what he said, uh, sergey alekseevich erebkov is what was shown here. it's like it was said. uh, in this, i would say not quite official terms. he even had what the diplomats called. yes, quite right, that's why i started the responsibility of what, well, boiled. fine. well, let's listen to another a man who sounds like he's also boiled over to hear what he said we 're facing unprecedented interconnected crises. the multilateral

systems are under greater pressure today than at any time since the inception of the united nations , tensions between leading states are greater than ever. here i am also trying to remember when the general secretary. he spoke with such drama out of such anxiety, much has been said until recently that we are now in the most dangerous situation in the world. after the end of the cold war. or even after the sometimes said caribbean crisis of the 62nd nuclear crisis. and here, to talk about the most dangerous situation after the end of the second world war, when you remember nato was created the warsaw pact. well, in general, there were enough dramatic situations around admission to berlin, i have not

heard anything like that. well, you know, the un secretary general is certainly an informed figure and gives an account of what he said from the rostrum of an open meeting of the un security council as we can see, he is also present here and, as it should be, sits on the right hand of e , the chairman, and i would remind you that he uses the phrase that the first secretary general of this international organization once said that it is being created not to pave the way to heaven, but to prevent a fall into hell. here, apparently, the general secretary. he is like not a daughter, like no one feels that this second option is close enough well. and you yourself think. what is the most dangerous situation. we have now

after the forty-fifth year, well, in any case, i would not take what to argue with that. fine. here is your, if i may say so, somewhat detached analytical reaction to what you have heard. are we really in such a precarious position, or is it just rhetoric, which , perhaps, goes a little over the edge. i think we are in a critical situation. and we are talking about the coming months. that is, if the most serious thing for these six months does not happen now, until september further. i think it's starting to soften. this tension. that is, we are now approaching, maybe to the peak, the meaning of this tension is certainly connected with that

global geopolitical model, which, in principle, has not changed for centuries. this confrontation of the civilization of the sea of ​​atlanticism was started by britain then the united states by the anglo-saxon world as a whole by land civilizations, which are represented by the russian empire by the russian soviet union. political systems change, the centers of these civilizations may also vary, but there is a fundamental tension between them. makinder, the british founder of geopolitics , said that from this tension the meaning of world history is born. a very deep thought. very fair, and now, when the soviet union collapsed that civilization of the sea, the atlantic policy sharply increased its influence and it turned out that it seemed to this pole that nothing else threatened it, that now the world would only be ruled by one civilization of this two civilizations of the sea, that the victory of the collective west of its the order of its rules, which they can change at will,

this fait accompli, no one strictly disputed it, china in the nineties quietly followed in the process of economic globalization. in general, we were on our knees, completely desiring only one thing, to be taken to the western world, and in fact, we got the impression that the end of this great war of the continents had already happened and the west was finally liberal, e.g., globalist. the west finally won and suddenly something went wrong began to rise, china began to rise to russia and now it turned out that again, uh, land civilization gives know about yourself. and now trump was deciding, in principle, and american realists what do you know better dmitry than anyone else, in principle, were ready to go for this return of eurasia, they would fire pragmatic relations in their own interests. for them, there is no such messianism for

american realists. that is, in fact, there was almost this much polar world, this return of eurasia and alternative policies, everyone almost recognized it, but after the biden revolution. again atlanticism again one polarity again an idea, anglo-saxo. hegemony, which turned out to be just actually soft, soft, faded into the background, made itself felt. and now the tension around ukraine is the tension in the final battle. this uh this geopolitical drama. we are approaching the end of this geopolitical drama. if we hold out now, if we can hold our ground and then successfully counterattack. all multi-polar world is established, but they will do anything or almost everything in order to save in a desperate way. we already see how sharp radical things they go to keep the unipolar

world, so i think the situation. almost worse than in the forward of the second world war, and we are standing. just if not on the threshold, well, almost already inside this third world war from a geopolitical point of view. she 's just opening her toughest, most revealing ones right now. and the most belligerent bloody hot sides. this is no longer a cold war. it's much more serious. we may be able to avoid it, but we will have to face a terrible existential challenge in the near future. time and how we respond, how we withstand this blow, which they are definitely preparing perfectly and but such an attitude towards our delegation is unprecedented in the un during our chairmanship of the security council. well, it's just a challenge and so he throws down the gauntlet it's no wonder that ah ryabkov, uh, s. even without a tie. he speaks in such a tone, just like lavrov, they just frankly humiliate us, frankly slap us on

the cheeks and look at how we will react? i think that if we now say the word that we are teetering on the brink of war. we will absolutely right the war is no longer the cold war. give alexander, i agree with you in everything, except but having said a lot to me, i don’t think that we are already in the third world war. and you, in my opinion, do not mean it yourself, we certainly teetered on the brink of war for many years after the second world war. so unfortunately, this situation is not new to us, although i'm certainly, but very disturbing, but uh now. let's turn to our regular and very authoritative military expert konstantin sivkov so you can hear what, uh, military leaders are saying about

the weapons systems that america and its allies have already provided to ukraine or are about to deliver in the near future. first, we give the floor to us secretary of defense luidost. in just a couple of short months, the contact group provided more than 230 tanks, more than 1550 pieces of armored vehicles and other equipment. as well as ammunition to support more than nine new armored brigades. we also increased the pace of deliveries of m1 abrams so that ukraine will have more armored vehicles in the coming month m-1, which will be used for training ukrainians will arrive here in germany within a few weeks. all of this is significant progress. i am confident that this equipment, coupled with the training of soldiers, will allow ukraine to continue to operate successfully on the battlefield. well, konstantin give us at least the most general assessment that ukraine is now

receiving, to what extent it met our expectations. and what does this mean for the prospects of the ukrainian offensive operation. so, with regard to technology, it has already been said 250 i’ll put cars, but he was quiet silent that out of these 25.0 cars of modern tanks, there are very few 170 cars, this is one leopard, which corresponds, if possible, to 55 modifications of the eighty-second year. secondly, for nine brigades such a number of tanks is absolutely not enough. yes, i was surprised too. it seemed to me that in the brigade, well , it turns out that there are about forty tanks in the brigade. i'm 40. it turns out about 25-30. that is, one battalion. this is not enough of course for offensive. this is a mechanized brigade that is not prepared to solve the tasks of breaking through the defense. it can solve problems in the development of success, but again, there

is only one of these brigades. will have full-fledged new tanks. all the rest will have outdated models of new tanks. this is what this is a leopard 26 and two. here's another brigade enough just over the brigade. yes, another brigade here shows them periodically. this is an a4 leopard but this a4 leopard 2 is a 1985 vehicle and it doesn't have enough combat stability. it was shown under elbach. uh, the turkish army, highly trained in the management of these tanks, lost 10 vehicles from fire and attacked the city, so there is an understanding of this from the fact that these vehicles are enough, but from the point of view of the fact that they are only going to put abrams there for the next week. and when else will these abrams be on the battlefield. this is a big

big question. in any case, we are talking about the fact that this will happen before the end of the summer, as expected. that is, it is already somewhere closer to autumn and the question is again in the number of these abrams, and then most importantly, the entire power of the tank can manifest itself only when it is there provided with reconnaissance and cover by fighter aviation air defense forces. if this is not there, then anyone there becomes an easy prey. no matter how powerful it is for air strikes for flank strikes of anti-tank weapons and for e-reactive in general, artillery that uses the most aiming combat elements, therefore prospects without gaining dominance of troops and fire superiority in the theater of war there are few actions for the apu even with new tanks. eh, one of a kind. well, here is what the american generals say in response to this: they do not

predict that ukraine will have air superiority, but they understand that this is unrealistic. at least for the foreseeable future, but they say they will put in enough anti-air defense systems to prevent them from taking advantage of their air superiority nicely. this is a real threat. this means that in order for russia to prevent the use of its combat aircraft in the united states of america, they must supply no less than a hundred anti-aircraft missile systems of long and medium range. that is, it is on sams iris and, uh, patriot, to create the so-called multi-echelon, deep and shelonized all high-altitude air defense system. and the most important thing is to provide cover, to provide this air defense system, that means, to take aircraft with rehabilitation surveillance systems, especially at low and extremely low altitudes. what can be provided

only by radar patrol aircraft, but for this american aircraft radar patrol should start patrolling directly on the territory of ukraine, after which they will be destroyed. therefore, there is little opportunity to solve the problem, both in terms of the supply of such a number of single missile systems, and in terms of ensuring their combat stability and information for issuing the target kazan. e. these missile systems. thank you very much. we go out to the advertisement and will be back in just a few minutes and then we are very interested to listen. they start moving. let's cover with the orchestra. the guys work with all types of weapons. it has its own aircraft.

what a real army band that plays harsh war music, just like handsome guys, the idea is, we now have one thing to do is to protect the inhabitants of donbass and lugansk to unite ukraine, so there is no point in being afraid. people who cried with happiness when you came to get them. music lessons premiere on sunday at pervoi

meet the new card for life from vtb you took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank. and now you are using wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank conceived done already in the cinema in all cinemas of the country force, we are flying into space. julia peresil'f bikovich vladimir mashkov

and how is the internet at speed? even faster, and you can connect, only with us activate megapower with 5g and be the fastest mobile operator number one taking care of your sleep discounts on bed linen and other home textiles from brands noch, tender and urban family one capsule daily for joint protection. in and. check your credit score and get approved for

a loan in the app compare pay less picnic bar 47.90. i love this quality, it's an active wear that surpasses any of my choices. tele2 is a unique offer, collect it yourself and pay only for the selected content and there are no analogues to this. a mix subscription can be purchased not even by our tele2 other

rules the staff of the big red package rushes to your aid at the moment when the pain makes you climb the wall the taxonal is charged against your will the leader in the category and what this means a sale, that on the ozone star sale, the polaris wi-fi robot vacuum cleaner with a discount of up to 55% and synergetic washing gel for 899 rubles. once, thirty-two-year-old galina, an accountant, was called to a meeting in a new village. and suddenly her head began to spin, weakness took possession of her whole body at night, her heart pounded, then suddenly froze in her chest, and during the day flies appeared in front of her eyes. did she really fall in love she did not know that an increase in the rhythm or fading of the heart at rest are signs of cardiovascular disease, my dears. just go through the screening free health, important here and now what does it mean? yes? for us it is to run to reach

to jump to achieve. this is come on, this is a derby that does not leave indifferent millions and trust each other and the soul that lives in everyone else this house in front of our champion, who brought equal glory and breath, which they hold and which are pawned. this is our dynasty of thousands of children and one common home. this is what grandfather means for us , a long-term partnership that has become a real friend, thank you, congratulations to the sports society, dynamo science. all is just getting started and will definitely work. on the air is a big game, we are talking about big politics, events taking place in ukraine and around it konstantin first i want to say

from the point of view of harsh military science on formal grounds. we are already in the state of the third world war. and this is world war iii. it still has a relatively hybrid character. but all tendencies are already slipping into traditional warfare. there is a second situation. not only much worse. 40 than in the forty-fifth year is much worse even than before the beginning of the second world war and the reason is very simple for the first time in many, many centuries , a state of affairs has developed when western civilization was on the threshold. its disappearance in the form in which we know it , the transition into some other entity. at the same time, it turns out that the globalist elites are on the verge of destruction, which , thanks to their advisership, lost a grandiose geopolitical operation to establish global e-e global domination in

the early nineties in the nineties at the beginning of the anniversary of their policy. first of all began to carry out globalization without reaching. the destruction of the sovereignty of states, in particular china, in the chinese phenomenon is due to a simple china. it received everything it needs from the west from the united states of america and its economic potential and technologies would not have been globalization, there would not have been china's jump for sure. on the part of russia , the situation is also existential and if we lose, we disappear from the map of the world. perhaps even physically, that is, our country will be divided into a bunch of small countries, the peoples of our country in general, will basically also physically destroyed, so the conflict is an existential retreat of one of any of

the parties means death. this is a very deep thought. and i agree with your general direction. i'm a little uh , worried about the wording, and i often find that in our conversations we don't agree on the wording any more than we don't agree on the substance of the issue, so i'll give you my wording there. and maybe we are , in fact, close. it seems to me that i am very close to alexander dugin on the wording. we participated in using different. although, because each of us has a different education , a different past, so for me the third world war. can't be hybrid, because for me world war iii. this is when we left the stage of hybrid warfare, and that is why we are so afraid of the third world

war, because we proceed from the fact that this means the use of nuclear missile weapons. and not just. uh, nuclear weapons, but strategic nuclear weapons. and here this case is so serious and the consequences are so dramatic and they said that i at the very least, one would like to hope that the mechanisms of containment can still work; they do not want to hope that, let's say so. uh, my level of confidence in the common sense of the biden administration is not much different from your level. alexander. i mean, it's very low, but still. i do not think that bideno, despite his mature age , wants to die. i don't think he wants to die with the blacks of his family and

all the progressives, transgenders and so forth, so i do. i hope i do. i hope that it will not come to the worst for us, e no, but the situation is very , very serious, already a remark only quickly, because i can say so in the dynamics of the options for the development of a hot traditional world war. i had to participate in many many exercises. i practically can't tell you. no one ever comes to the immediate use of nuclear weapons. first, combat operations are carried out with conventional weapons, somewhere there something is pressed, they begin to try, uh, scare the enemy with a warning that look retreat. we now nuclear weapons are applicable to the americans. we even have a theory limited to nuclear war, that is, they can use nuclear weapons against groups, russian troops of china, but on the territory of third countries, without affecting the territory of russia. we are also

the same on our side, that is, uh, don’t touch ours we will not touch russia, but it is no longer a pity. that's basically, which that's why the transition to nuclear exchange. this is an extremely complex procedure and transition to it is very unlikely. even at the beginning of the hot third world war. i want to remind you that hitler having huge safe chemical weapons and did not dare to use it , for this reason also hyper. well, here it is from my point of view. uh, very encouraging news, and they are not inclined to take common sense again. as a matter of course, but still the situation is very alarming, far from hopeless. but let's go back, what is called not to our sheep, but to our regional issues and let's see what, uh, chinese diplomats say. and these are their performances. it seems somewhat contradictory, that's just in time.

in the united states and among american allies to be very happy about the statement by e, the chinese foreign minister, about how china will not supply any weapons. e russia, well, understandable ukraine, let's listen. regarding the export of military products, china takes a prudent and responsible position. china will not supply weapons to the parties to the conflict, and will also control the export of dual-use goods in accordance with the law. well, uh, some western ones. observers are very rejoiced at the magazine of the national interest, where, with which i was associated for many years as its publisher. hey, there's even an article. uh, one professor who said. well, how great, but the chinese managed to scare, and it worked in diplomacy, of course, in

diplomacy it’s like coercive diplomacy in intimidation diplomacy. it seemed to me that it was like a little premature joy, and here it happened. this episode is not only with a very important episode. e with a trip, and the minister of defense of china in everything he said here to russia, but i wanted to bring the latest statement of the chinese ambassador to france, let's hear it here, he will quickly, please , your position, because at times it seems a little ambivalent about your ukrainian crimea. it depends it's independence. he is either ukrainian, or there is no problem in the future in the history of crimea was originally russian khrushchev handed over crimea to ukraine in soviet times, but it agrees with international law. as you know, crimea belongs to ukraine. of course, you can argue, but he agrees with ukrainian international law to go post-soviet

countries do not have a real status in the international legal field , there is no international treaty specifying their status countries. well, you can introduce the senator. uh, what indignation arose, and in europe especially, of course, the baltics, uh, in ukraine, u poland, and even some group of deputies of his parliament, uh, demanded. uh, to get this ambassador kicked out altogether? and, that is, they declared persona non grata. in general, i could not fully understand, and indignation over this about, and especially could not understand, monsieur borel's indignation. let's hear what he had to say about the chinese ambassador's statement. unacceptable statements by the chinese ambassador to france questioning the sovereignty of countries that became independent with the collapse of the soviet union in 1991, the eu can only

assume that these statements do not reflect china's official policy. well, wait. and what is it to question someone 's sovereignty? for example, i have a very authoritative source who shows that, in general, this can be done. here let's listen to what the same mr. barrell said about china's sovereignty in the case of taiwan, europe should actively participate in this situation, which affects us in economic commercial and technological aspects. that is why i call on the navies of the eu countries to patrol the taiwan strait to reaffirm europe's commitment to freedom of navigation in this critical area at the same time, we must be vigilant and avoid provocations. we recognize ai eu and the united states. we all recognize

with russia that china is one country. it's part of china and mr. barrel no, we can't let china exercise its sovereign rights, what's going on? uh, you know, uh somehow comment on the words of the barrel, in my opinion, such a thankless task, he said so much. well, let's call a spade a spade, stupidities that are unacceptable for a diplomat of such a high rank that, in general, uh, he is already reacting to these statements of his. eh, somehow you know with a certain share condescension, as for the story of, uh, lushaie, according to china in france, this is an experienced diplomat who speaks french, who, not for the first time , gets into such a mess when he suddenly tries to

portray him, so to speak. uh, you know, some like that, that's how boxers have punching bags. uh, really hmm past episode. eh, about a year and a half or two years ago, he still didn’t marry a national.

and this is true, and now, when, in response to attacks on china, the best allowed himself to speak out that well, look, here, as they say on his own situation , they began to accuse him, almost of some attempts to impose his ideology, that is how he expressed it. in any case, the ambassador of france to china, mr. uh, billy uh, so, in general , it’s not a habit, as far as this situation is concerned , nothing hmm uh, let’s say u not politically correct from the point of view, both historical and political, in principle, the chinese went did not say and declare him persona non grata there. as suggested by some

out there, let's say extremists. eh, nothing. and i think that's all of it, of course. eh, just some hmm well, let's just say screams and nothing more than that, but what about eh? taiwan then, maybe, maybe in this whole situation. uh, one can also see a trace of the dissatisfaction of the west in general and the american uh, the leadership and the president of the united states uh with what uh, the president of france macron allowed himself during his stay in china. actually, he didn’t say anything special, but, nevertheless. his statements were considered as e. well, let's say it's a departure from the collective line. the west openly accused him of this matter. well, partly kind of. i would also, e, remember that china offered its e.

the settlement plan in ukraine, and from our point of view, it contains much more elements that, in principle, in the future could form the basis of some kind of agreement, because all the other plans or projects that they are trying to pass off as plans. they are absolutely unacceptable by definition. eh, maybe that's one more time. uh, you also know china, so you can anoint the gates with tar. here's what happened around this statement. e, i i apologize for the fact that i will forgive on this is due to the fact that we have, firstly, little time. she had some questions. besides, here it would be desirable to receive the simple answer. from your point of view, did the united states of the european union manage to intimidate china and force china to refuse any military-technical assistance to russia or not? well, this uh question is yours. e

has an absolutely rhetorical character, because the answer to it is clear even before you see, yes, unfortunately, it is not clear to intimidate. china is impossible, especially such kind of statements. indeed, persons authorized in the people's republic of china to speak out officially on foreign policy issues, and there are very few such persons. this is primarily the minister of foreign affairs, and hmm in china, to be honest, this one does not violate these rules. he speaks out on a wide range of issues, primarily based on china's national interests and the need to protect these interests. e from any kind of attacks of nit-picking attempts to understand something, not to run into unnecessarily. well , that's right, so there's nothing here surprising and suggests that china, in

principle, somehow changed its assessment. well , just now we had a visit from the minister of defense, a newly appointed, uh, chinese general to this position. uh, that is, our military and military-technical ties with the people's republic of china are completely legal, fully compliant with any norms of international law, they are, well , in any case, uh from the american side. well, they won't affect them in any way. senator thank you very much, we're leaving for advertising and in just a few minutes the brightest american news of the day was the dismissal of the famous american taxon independent-thinking tv commentator.

it is a great honor in response to the barbaric bombardment by the germans of moscow of the leningrad cities to cure and deliver the first bomb of a strike to a military facility and government institutions . tv-3 bombers are not the newest, not the fastest today - this is the only machine that can do such a difficult task. maximum damage to an important strategic object of the city difficult to fly? rings air defense, and of course, fighter jets. get ready for air combat 1941 wings over berlin big premiere

coming soon on first one can you use your mobile phone for three times cheaper? 1,200 minutes talk time 25 gb internet plus unlimited music and video services. order a tinkoff sim card and use mobile communications 3 times cheaper than tinkoff he is so alone after a vacation with such a traveler. i need another vacation to extend for 2 days. it was a wonderful holiday. well, look how happy we are. came here, come on even in this classy hotel procedures.

beautiful promises of a sunset full of tenderness, feel more lose friends, dance be

yourself, play. do what you like. the word is yes, for those who love to be themselves up to 700,000 rubles. coin miles and compensate for airfare with them. i’ll have time to fly for free before april 30th and get free service forever tinkov gloria jeans cult daniil for