i saw this photo.

they laughed, i saw in their eyes that they were laughing. they had to pay for everything.

should have paid. voronin, i did not tell him what he deserved? they are strangers no scum.

tomorrow we will liberate rostov november 28 , 1941, a week after the occupation of rostov-on-don by the nazis , soviet troops under the command of the timoshenko route recaptured

the city of liberation. rostov was the first significant victory of the red army in the great patriotic war. there is a big game on the air and today we will talk about the struggle that take place today on the battlefields in ukraine which takes place it where sergey lavrov is the chairman of the security. well, let's talk about the upcoming political battle in the united states, where, to the delight of the republicans. who is he now ready to promise to run for another term with his unpopular colleague vice president camila harris, but

first let's talk about where it really is decided, and not only the fate of the struggle in ukraine, but also in many ways the fate of the world order about what happens in the fields battles in the first place in the donbass and in the south of ukraine, general bukhinsky you and the cards in your hands. in general, to say that there is something obscene going on. i would not, because, of course, everything is now concentrated around artyomovskaya, uh, pmc wagner, uh, uh? the active reactive support of the troops of the ministry of defense, in particular , the airborne troops, which cover the flanks, continue the actual cleansing of artyomovsk. there was a small piece left in the west. uh, the ukrainians are already on their own, judging by the way they are. ah, negotiations. eh yes and

according to the statements of officials, both military and political, they themselves can no longer understand why they are holding this, uh, small town. uh, what zelensky says is that, uh, with the fall of artyomovsky , the entire defense system of ukraine will collapse. i think that this is a very big exaggeration. uh, they just lose stupidly lose people, and the most prepared people. there, some brigades have already changed three teams. uh, they lose their equipment and that's it. this is to the detriment. uh, well a widely publicized counteroffensive or offensive, because uh, of course, uh, and so they have u personally with trained personnel u not very good. although, of course, one should not underestimate

the mobilization resources. why ukraine is now sufficient, but equipment is being lost. uh, it goes, uh, the consumption of ammunition, so uh, count on the success of the counteroffensive with such losses. uh, of course, not very reasonable in the south and for everyone along the entire front line. yes , there are fights, it’s the same around avdiivka, there, uh. there is less progress, but it is also everywhere, there is such a slow but sure the movement of our troops, e in the southern direction. e, very e. ukrainians with the help through the action of sabotage reconnaissance groups are simply, as they say, feeling our defense. e, revealing weak points from their point of view, but i repeat once again, we will wait for this offensive. although i hope that it will still be our offensive, as far as

the ukrainians are concerned. eh, then again, i repeat what i have repeatedly said. it will just be interesting for me to see how, in the absence of air superiority and very weak military air defense, without having benefits in no component. e of its combat potential, that is, tank troops are not in the artery e, not to mention helicopters, they will successfully, e, carry out an offensive, because the offensive is carried out after all. actually , a breakthrough is first combined in two stages, and then success develops, but for this is a must have. at least two, or even better three chalons, advancing troops with a sufficient amount of equipment. and naturally. eh, once again i repeat the superiority in age. it's perfect necessary components.

well, let's see a, if there is no superiority in the air, which ukraine definitely does not have, and in the foreseeable future there will not be, but if with the help of those air defense systems that they have in large numbers and of the most different types, they are now receiving and which they are training to use if they could prevent russia from using their presence in the air. this would affect the prospective offensive. you understand dmitriev let's figure it out, then from the air defense, to carry out an offensive operation, you need have, uh, well-organized military air defense . military air defense is that, uh, those air defense systems that follow the battle formations of the troops and cover the advancing troops. uh, if you take what ukraine has and what supplies them. uh, western partners, let's say this is a complex.

s300 is a mobile version of e, they have e missiles at the current consumption of a rocket in ukraine they are not produced, they have about 2-2.5 months left buki e, a good e system at the beginning of e a special military operation. they had about 65-70 complexes. if you look losses according to the reports of the ministry of defense at the beginning of the operation. that is, now they have somewhere around 25-30 left. and the fact that the american supplied what the western partners supplied is, well, a patriot. e on sans t - these are all systems for covering, e stationary objects, moreover, military air defense, especially here, in the current conditions, when it rains there, it is not just desirable that it be on tracks, because the offensive is not carried out along uh, paved roads. and often , so to speak, across the fields along there where

indicated is the direction of the main or auxiliary strikes there. so that's just the german cheetah. actually, uh , caterpillar, uh, and the british and the british complex that they put everything else is wheeled. that is, uh, if we sum up by uh, military air defense, then uh, they failed to replace the soviet systems with western ones, everything that they have is all means of short-range short-range action. uh, three or four kilometers. these are the same strela, uh, 10, these are the same stingers. this is uh, english complexes german complexes, but uh, that's all, that's what i'm saying, uh, short-range complexes. that is, eh, they will put more. i don't know

anyway. on friday, this rammstein was passing there, the main question was this air defense system well, you understand air defense systems - this is a high-tech system - it’s not even tanks, their production is months, or even years, to give away air defense systems from stock that are on combat on duty. uh, this is suicidal and no one will do it, therefore, with air defense, i have such special prospects. uh, sharply you increase potential. uh, especially military in ukraine i personally don't see it at the moment. uh general. i have known you for many years. i know that you are very accurate in archaic estimates. and that you are very cautious about showing some kind of optimism, because your profession of optimism is not always a virtue. well, yes, i hear what you say. well, in general, there is immediately

great satisfaction on the one hand, that the situation is so encouraging it says immediately fear arises, it will be too good to be true, therefore , my hope is that we will rely on your estimates, but we'll be ready. and i don’t urge you to underestimate the enemy with some more unpleasant option. it is impossible to underestimate it is better to overestimate the enemy. i'm just relying on the data i'm not on the press. i refer. i'm just reading, uh, the reports of the american congress, it is unlikely that they contain completely unreliable information on the delivered samples of equipment for planning supplies for the allocated money. well, there, here and from those reports. i draw this picture of what

ukraine has and what it can have, you know, uh, general with you now. e such an interesting situation in terms of our capabilities. right now i don't have much opportunity to talk to the american military, and for some reason, with a person, they receive calls from moscow from the federal channel. doesn't answer. in general , he does not react very positively, but i do have the opportunity to talk with the military in moscow and i can only say one thing. they don't tell me about the operation plans in any way and are very careful, but in their analysis, but it is obvious to me that, as you just said, they are preparing for this situation very, very seriously, of course, and make a clear distinction between some kind of tactical breakthroughs, which, in general, in such operations, if the operation is well

planned. they are not that inevitable, but in general, you need to treat them calmly, but some kind of strategic breakthrough is a change in the strategic situation. it seems to me that in moscow he is saying, having become determined not to allow it. and when they say they are determined. they do not mean that they sit and move menacingly. the eyebrows they have in it seems that many very serious steps are being taken, and that the success of this offensive does not take place, by the way , there are very great hopes for this offensive in washington. but now , sergey lavrov, who is in new york, spoke about this. let's listen. and now this ridiculous theory has appeared. let's now provide ukraine with a successful counter-offensive and then ask

zelensky's ukraine to start negotiations. well, this is some kind of schizophrenic logic. we want to prevent people from leaving ukraine from the territory of ukraine threats to our security. and these threats accumulated there for many, many years, especially after the coup d'état in february 1914. now there is an article. uh, dmitry, i know of two of the uh 's leading authors and the council on foreign relations, one of whom uh was head of the state department's foreign policy planning office, are aware of this article. and for this he worked in the white house, and the other was at one time in this very planning department of the state department, and then he held major posts in the white house under obama, and here they are warn, there are all the necessary words.

russian aggression, all the necessary words about how we are obliged to support ukraine. well, there is one very interesting expression, uh, what is from the american point of view about the united states looking at the possible entry of ukraine , there are two dangers, one danger is a catastrophic ukraine passed. success, the authors, from my point of view , rightly fear. and what about in moscow instead of to give up and raise your hands? that instead they would do very different things. what do you think, dmitry well, really, i don't see any prerequisites, firstly, for ukraine to win

some kind of decisive victory, uh, in the course. uh, this, uh, already a summer, most likely offensive, and not a spring one, and secondly, of course, if we hypothetically imagine that they will be able to break through the land bridge, uh, to the crimea that russia in this case or even be close to it or be close to it? why, in this case, russia will really sit down at the table negotiations with an e position of weakness, which the united states initially counted on very strongly and made a big bet on this performance, they really did, and they made a political decision that it would be transferred to kiev by a tank, and the infantry fighting vehicles would bridge the stackers, and the systems air defense e, such as e patriot a car domini. and others and so on, not in order to wage this military conflict indefinitely, but in order to try to really achieve some kind of

strategic success, hoping that after that, russia will sit down at the negotiating table, and in fact, in the western press, even a has repeatedly let slip that in this case there will be, to what extent. in this case, the united states will seek to leave crimea to russia, maybe leave russia part of the donbass, but at least return to the borders of the twenty-fourth of february last year , the united states does not even count on this, but really. it seems to me that it would be correct to say that they did not make a big bet on this offensive. they are doing now, because they see that for objective reasons, the apu has the physical ability, but there is no such breakthrough and, uh, there is currently a discussion in the united states about what to do after this offensive, or fail,

or it really won’t even reach half of the tasks set and most, and the often discussed option , which, by the way, is mentioned in this article by richard hus and charles captchine, is freezing the conflict on those borders that exist, but here’s what’s absolutely important said sergey viktorovich lavrov and this option is also russia categorically not satisfied russia is not interested in freezing as a result. yes, de facto part of the liberated lands. russia would have departed , more precisely, all the liberated lands. today would go to russia, but the rest of ukraine would turn into anti-russia on steroids , which would be pumped up with weapons that would be, uh, closely integrated with the west, but not in western institutions and which it still represents. for russia, very serious danger, and this option for moscow is absolutely unpleasant, when i look at a proposal of this kind, and there are many of them,

in addition, which we discussed with you, while they say a lot, uh, other authors, but i haven’t seen dmitry’s corrections anywhere i am mistaken, i have not seen anywhere and when we are talking about the speeches of representatives of the establishment, but the statement that it is not necessary to turn ukraine into anti-russia. uh, that there is no need to arm ukraine with more and more modern weapons. on the contrary, they say that now, if we have to see ukraine accept this kind of peace conditions or rather a truce. this, as it were, should not be done with the hope that russia will fulfill its obligations. uh, the collective west does not fulfill its obligations. and what is called judging others by themselves, but it is said that you can only rely on the fact that ukraine can defend itself and, uh, you general know better than me that when they say that someone

should defend themselves, they usually have in mind that uh for them to feel themselves in safety, and they need to have so many weapons that they will be a danger to a neighbor. this is the correct security dilemma. this is this is really so, because i absolutely agree with dmitry what to leave ukraine eh? uh free to choose your allies. uh, in obtaining weapons - this is completely unacceptable , that is, the settlement must necessarily include the components of the demilitarization of ukraine well, as it was, uh, with many powers, when he held it, it was simply forbidden to have certain types of weapons, first of all offensive heavy, without this, without this, there will be no rest on our borders and a clear one.

uh, understanding in one form or another, and within the framework of any possible agreements, that russia undertakes to fulfill these agreements only if agreements with another country are fulfilled, isn’t it, of course, of course, therefore, these are the security guarantees that ukraine requires which, allegedly, the americans have already promised. uh, almost in july at the nato summit to provide them with these security guarantees, although a reservation is made that only yulia of ukraine must be kept crushing victory, and they will be given security guarantees. let not membership in nato but, uh, very solid in type , so to speak, uh americano israeli american-japanese americano there are many countries that have an agreement with the americans, so dmitry you are absolutely right. when you say that in the american newsgroup they don’t talk at all about somehow taking into account russian interests and preventing ukraine from turning into anti into

a militarized anti-russian on steroids , on the contrary, i see in the american political discourse the assertion that it is in the interests of the united states not to ensure ukrainian territorial integrity by and large, they do not care where the new de facto borders of ukraine will pass, but it is in the interests of the united states to leave a source of military threat for russia in the interests of the united states to keep anti-ukraine as anti-russia in in the interests of the united states to defiantly and emphatically act contrary to the assertions of the security requirements that russia proposes in this connection to join the finland and nato in this regard, of course, and the intention of the united states to keep ukraine let it be in a reduced form, but in a very strong anti-russian orientation and stuffed, er, with western weapons.

this is the interest of the united states in the framework of their long-term hybrid war with russia, they are ready to go and are even interested in freezing the military conflict, but they by no means want to abandon the hybrid war against russia and preserve ukraine in the form of anti-russian anti-roids . how is that times the tool of this hybrid war. unfortunately i have to agree with you. reshetnikov general, you led the analytical departments of the foreign intelligence service, and you served in a number of russian, more precisely, soviet embassies. you know the art of diplomacy well. you don't think so. it is paradoxical that today diplomacy has turned from a peaceful profession within the framework of a hybrid war into a tool for attacking russia, and look what happens with a visit to the security council where he

presides, uh, in rotation on visit this month. i did not see such a thing in new york by sergey lavrov. uh, instead of using the opportunity to talk with lavrov, as if not arranging, not even necessarily, any official negotiations, instead of talking with him on issues of interest, including the united states, by the way, and mr. gelskovichi and some other people who are people who are imprisoned in russia by the americans. generally. uh. first, they decided to isolate lavrov as much as possible. and secondly, i don't i'm afraid to say insult him and his country as much as possible. so let's look at the speech at the security council by the representatives of the united states and

see what expressions she mentions regarding russian actions. despite the fact that the russian armed forces continue their brutal campaign to subjugate ukraine to mr. lavrov, he delivered a long and extensive speech at the un. he raised the issue of aggression. west that lasted for decades, starting with the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki and ending with the invasion of iraq and western diplomats have said that it is russia that is the aggressor today, this illegal, unprovoked and unnecessary war. directly contrary to our most sacred principle, aggressive warfare and territorial gains are unacceptable never said united states ambassador linda thomas greenfield mrs. thomas greenfield brought an american woman to the un or killed willand. whose brother paul weeland is imprisoned in russia, she also demanded the release of a wall street reporter from another imprisoned american. evan gershwich's journal, attention, what expression did she use in relation to russian

actions. it is illegal, not provoked by anything, and there is no need for war. directly contrary to our most sacred principle, aggressive warfare and territorial gains are unacceptable. i'm never wrong, it's a mixture of political correctness. uh, and well, some hypocrisy. well, you know, colleagues just talked about it. uh, war is declared, a hybrid war that involves fighting on all front lines and diplomacy is becoming. e. same front line, it's a hybrid war. and of course. uh, no here, uh, observance of the ethics of observance of some kind. well, it is hoped that e enemy is the americans in this situation. this is to take into account, well , there is no option one e, to harm russia in all

directions from terrorist attacks and explosions of gas pipelines. attacks on ministers on in our president president what do they say? yes. this is a completely understandable line of the americans right now, they are failing very badly at the front. uh, special military operation. let's fight for everyone else directions. and, of course, a diplomat. they are always during uh, a crisis, a warrior becomes victims, uh, the first one of the first victims of such attacks and now, of course, our diplomacy our embassy staff. e, foreign minister, foreign journalists. they receive such blows and will receive these blows, but judging by our sergei viktorovich lavrov. he is ready, uh, for any surprises, and he always has a word, because uh, everything

that the americans say now, that's just what we heard. this that, in general, is hypocrisy and everything is a farce, they know everything, they don’t know why it happened, how it happened perfectly understands everything, but uh, as the russian proverb says , spit in your eyes, it’s god’s dew, so there’s nothing surprising. no, it will continue. it will be a line to continue or whatever fact. uh, they need any situation to discredit russia well, you said, don't be surprised, i'm surprised. uh, and you know me enough to probably believe that the person is not naive, but i am trained in the profession of history, like me. and i lived in america for a long time and i know that when i came to america 50 years ago they had no political. well, let's just say he did not differ

in love for the soviet union. and it cannot be said that there were no double standards. of course they were, but this degree of combination of arrogance and irresponsibility. no, i haven't seen one. uh, correct me dmitry. it seems to me that this has become the handwriting of the current uh administration behind the word. i completely agree with you, and dmitry really. this is the hybrid war that we are seeing now it is much more dangerous than the cold war, and the second half of the 20th century and the behavior of the united states that we observe the behavior of the biden administration. ah, it's based. it seems to me that a significant part of the american political elite. still lives in the paradigm of the end of the history of the victory of the united states in the cold war. they believe that russia is a country

that was defeated, then back in the ninety-first should know. the place should develop, as indicated, the united states and be built into the american-centric world order. and the fact that russia refuses to follow this path after this alleged defeat in the cold war makes the united states hysterical, and now the rhetoric of diplomacy, the information war is really very different. here, dmitry, you really lived a lot in the united states during the cold war , even during the cold war in america , efforts were supported by efforts for intersocietal dialogue, yes, between representatives of the russian soviet expert community and the american expert community. this it was considered mandatory and positive now not only that visas are not issued, but the biden administration and the fbi issue arrest warrants and prosecute the few russian civil activists who are still trying

to support between russia and the united states. natural dialogue is a clear illustration of the current situation. well, i understand this situation to me, my lawyers in washington, uh, they say that i can safely come. uh, to america, no one will detain me, because i did not violate any american laws. well, i'm not a lawyer. these people are very competent former high-profile federal prosecutors, but i tell them. tell donald trump about it. here, tell him, but about this driving to the law chose. i fully agree with what dmitry said, but it also seems to me that one factor is at work, the factor of the unstable situation in the united states itself. this is the party or group that now holds power. she is so aggressive towards us and for the reasons that we have given, because they feel that

they miss out. e. in total, all the leashes both in their own country and on the world stage. and this fury is also dictated by this factor that we seem to be losing or , god forbid, we will lose, but i will allow myself to ask you a very important question provocative from my point of view. do you agree with the assessments that sound a and b in moscow and washington that, uh, the danger of a new world war. now the highest since 1945. this is not a simplification, not an attraction. i do n't think there was any other situation. this is how the current ones are going the war in europe is practically going on classic war with the front line sacks of artillery with tanks and planes. and of course, uh, sucked in. ah, great countries.

russia and the us nato, therefore, somewhere to cross the line, it may even be imperceptible, well, imperceptible to uh, maybe not superficial experts, but for the military, ordinary military may be imperceptible. we are really, uh, in a risky situation are in a risky zone. i have to agree with you. i believe that there is no need to whip up passions and there is no need to panic, because there is a very big danger that we will think that when we when we talk about possibilities, we mean that in fact these possibilities are already, as it were, predetermined to become a reality of history. and this is probably not the case, but it seems to me that the situation of the generals is dangerous, of course, dangerous. i am completely petrovich. i agree, of course, no one here knows.

what kind of treaty on conventional armed forces in europe? it is still in force, but we just don’t participate in it, so, uh, hmm, there was a lot of talk in the early 2000s that the whole treaty was no longer just obsolete. he's outdated. uh, in essence, because these tanks e, artillery systems infantry fighting vehicles. eh, everything. it's already yesterday. now high tech. there, drones, cruise missiles, helicopters, planes are what the americans have demonstrated for 20 years there in yugoslavia in iraq , in iraq, in libya, that is, first bomb everything pooh and then, so to speak, enter the defeated capital, but it turned out not to be so and indeed. e now, we have already come to that line, the americans simply drove themselves into a corner with their rita that either we win or that's it. a great power driven into a corner, even

if she drove herself it is dangerous, of course. i say, if they make a decision, and do not make a decision on the supply of military aircraft, i repeat once again that it cannot be based on the territory of ukraine for objective reasons, it means that it will be based on e, the territory of poland, romania or slovakia will take off from there. what kind of crews will be there. it doesn't matter ukrainian or nato - it doesn't matter anymore, but we will be forced to strike at these airfields. and then the americans will have to make very difficult decisions to start a third world war, or still abstain again. i hope, i hope they're smart enough not to use their planes from, uh, nato airfields. i hope so, too. optimistic ah, but uh, i honestly think the biden administration doesn't want to take things to a direct military confrontation. russia and nato ahh and ahh, all

the hysteria that we periodically hear about the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine is an information war aimed at trying to discredit russia in the eyes of the world majority, so i agree. uh , the probability of a hot third world war is still less, but today, but uh, you should not relax. and uh, the understanding that the risks are nonetheless higher than ever since 1945 should still have a deterrent effect on the united states. here dmitry told me a very important thing, that before the most difficult times of the cold war there was some kind of dialogue. i don’t think that if there was such a dialogue now, we would be able to agree on something, but i i think that if he was and the right people and a hundred from another country were invited, then i

think that the american delegation would return to washington with the understanding that further pressure on russia should be ignored, and russian concerns, that this could be very very dangerous, but there is no such dialogue today, we go to advertising and listen to the american perspective, and our regular art brand expert, which i want to remind you, no is not responsible for the foreign policy of the administration. orchestra guys work with all types of weapons.

let's go on a combat mission. we have now come here voluntarily, so there is no point in being afraid. fifth floor minus one for the first time i saw people who were crying with happiness when we came and they got it, guys, russian speech. you are the only one talking here. yes , we will evacuate you, as i, without a leg , took me to the zakukry, and he carried me. i never thought there were such people. these are the kind ones who invest scales. music lessons premiere on sunday on the first

are you traveling? who even thought of coming here? let's go to this cool hotel in mountains im very beautiful. aren't you afraid of heights, still holding on to me, you will have such different procedures to settle in, and the sedative is on vacation. why you can arrange any kind of adventure without adventure with hotels. choose a hotel on mts travel and get up to ten percent cashback

on trips around russia every day we like to put on new looks with friends. we like it with friends. our choice is gloria jeans. they took a loan of up to 5 million from sovcombank. and now you are already ruining loans from sovcombank to the branch and online by design done. i'm a photographer.

if in the pictures it’s easy for me to fix skin problems, then in life their disguise is not an option akriderm of complex action helps fight inflammation, reddening of infections and itching on the skin and gives more confidence in the life of healthy skin, beauty, tinkoff leylines credit card with a limit of up to 700,000 rubles. save a mile and make up for the name of the air ticket. fly for free i will have time to apply for t-april 30 and received free service forever tinkoff he is the only one send one loan application selected by banks and get app approval. collect a collection of unique coins and win prizes for a coin with a fiver. meet the new card for life from vtb and do better every day monday

is a hard day, but getting a free card is easy, and using it for free is profitable tuesday second day share free transfers and feelings, little friday. allow yourself more with a big cashback, thursday, catch a thousand rubles, after the first purchase on the card, friday is my turn and my cashback. do better every day. get a new card for life will help to know the confidant. check your credit score. try the application and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms. if credit then application. compare unpack the dacha with yandex.market. 1990 rub.

the universal, false ukrainian propaganda task is not just to defeat the enemy, but to erase it mentally. why did they call tsiolkovsky a pole , they don’t use the polish language, they never spoke in a house in russia, they allegedly sell ashtrays from the skulls of the ukrainian military for 10 million rubles. noticed attack from the us ip address how much did it cost to promote this chic stuffing millions of rubles spent on growing this truth against lies, soon antifreak tomorrow on first air is a big game and now a well-known american expert on public security problems is in touch with us from washington and a recent columnist for the magazine national interests of the marquebishop with mark on

the first question. he's inevitable. and president biden. he announced his decision to run today. here, listen to what he said. every generation has a moment when it comes to standing up for democracy to stand up for our basic freedoms i believe it's our duty. that's why i'm running again for president of the united states, join us. let's finish the job. but uh, here i don’t see anything prejudicial on the one hand on the other hand. in general, i do not see anything meaningful. and this, of course, is fairness for the sake of a statement about the decision to run. this is not a presentation of his election program, as was perceived, but a statement of the byte, as something inevitable or there is, uh, some kind of intrigue, and they somehow talk about it from different points of view. dmitry

good evening. the announcement was inevitable, but a lot was written about the exact day when he decides to announce it, and before that they wrote that he wants to choose the right day and the right moment. i have to be honest, i'm not quite sure why today or today is the right time, but the statement itself was pretty much expected. he had to do it sooner or later. it was he who released, uh, a three-minute video to announce his uh re-election campaign where i thought it was obvious to everyone that his main, uh, his main narrative in 24 would be, uh, an attack on the trumpists. and this is, firstly, this is the most important thing, and, secondly, he will talk a lot about abortion, because in

america it has become an important topic because of uh because of decisions. uh supreme court there's nothing out of the ordinary, i think. and by the way, they canceled the debate, uh, the democratic national committee, uh, decided recently that uh, there will be no debate between presidential nominees from democratic party, so i think he 'll get the nomination fairly easily. as for what will happen on the part of the republicans, we don't know yet . as you rightly said it's easy to avoid debate, he controls the democratic national committee to avoid it. the debate with the republican candidate will be more difficult and it will be especially difficult for him, because he is a man of the same age trump, by the way, is close to him in age, but no one perceives trump

as an old man, but nym is a different situation and i guess if he avoided debate, you could be a political problem for him. how do you think? yes, if trump , by the way, trump recently, would say in all honesty. we should note that trump also hints that he may not be interested in the debate. and you know if dimitri is close, i mean, if the polls show he's pretty close to, uh, the san andreas rande is floris gov. furry for whom we're guessing wants to run in 2004 as well, then maybe there's a debate going on, but if polls now show a huge lead that trump is about 30 points ahead of the paratroopers, then i think he may be he will want to not debate. whether it succeeds or not is a second question, but it's different

than what i had in mind. uh, i just spoke today with someone very close to trump, and he confirmed that while a has no interest in debating other candidates, because he thinks he is so ahead of them that he would just let them get closer and at his own expense. but the desire to debate baid, as i understand it, is there and very much and he has regret. e that during the last election campaign, if he puts it that way, he still did not dare to smear, beaten on the wall of such mercy. i think he will not show, but okay, at the moment we understand how it will all look like, but we just don’t understand. what trends show the poll of public

opinion. there are different results of the last polls, which i saw more sharply, i pulled something, and there i managed to get ahead in comparison with the ballroom. you know it's very early. and we have to be careful when we think about polls, uh april 23. how much more could change? i have seen different questions, to be honest, but we must not forget that they are very often unreliable in 2016. questions showed until the last second that anthon will crush e trump, so i think his election campaign is definitely following the requests carefully and, as you know, every company has its own internal issues that give a fairly more accurate information, but trump takes the threat very seriously. odessa he a is putting out endless advertisements against him

because i think he sees it as a serious threat. and he wants this threat fairly early in the electoral cycle to be eliminated as well. but as you rightly pointed out. doesn't want to be deported with a smiley. he thinks this clash will work out in his favor. called in moscow. uh, big interest scandal with the dismissal of tucker carlson fox's interest, of course, is associated with fame. i would even say a celebrity tacker, but also with the fact that he is known for his independent positions on russia with his critical attitude towards ukraine and generally gave the impression of a person who allowed himself independent thinking in the united states in a large media corporation, which we see less and

less. and in moscow, uh, in general, they don’t understand. why is such a popular commentator, who had 3 1/2 million viewers, why was it taken like that with one kick, uh, kicked out, even if there are suspicions that it concerns, and the son of merdak now heads fox news and wrote about him, what first of all, he has different views than a ruportometer to a less conservative one, and another thing is that he really wants to be correct and when both in relation and rakalson. there are some accusations that he was not sensitive enough to transgender people, did not adore feminists too much. and that such things can upset him very much, and there is even a suspicion that

maybe they decided to sell it altogether. uh, trick to someone connected with the democrats, and before that they wanted to get rid of. what do you think about this kind? e judgments? dmitry i will tell the details so far are rather rather murky. we , as you correctly noted the last reports. it is said that the bearded man's son was personally involved at a high level in the decision to fire him. and he found out he was fired 10 minutes before it was. eh, it's been announced. yes, it's confirmed. yes, that is, it was not some kind of friendly agreement. definitely not, if it was , i think we would already know his next step, as it stands now, it's not clear if he has further plans, where to go, what

to do, but i don’t want to offend anyone either, but one of the main reasons why people watched the fact that younger than 40 years old was such crosses, he has a huge audience that will follow him on any platform. i don't know what form it will take, but i doubt very much that he has decided to retire now. and you would be surprised if he decided to become president. that's a good question. we've heard there were quite a few rumors. not based on anything. so far, that he is negotiating with the desantes and or strand so that they give him offered the role of vice president. i don't want to go into that theory, but i'll tell you. in general, i will not be surprised at all if the republican administration will be in the 24th year. uh, if he is invited to the office in some role, maybe a clearing, which who knows, all i can say is that it is very interesting. eh,

yesterday about him japan i when i read about what his companions and people who support him wrote about him. it was almost as if he had died, they wrote about him, as if he were some kind of war hero who died in fight and he did, but listen he's young. and if you look at his biography, he never stayed anywhere for more than 4 years. they're on cnn or m. cis so i think he's got his whole career ahead of him, and it's a mistake to think it's a hit that he won't bounce back from. um, well, here's another opinion that's widely held. uh, in moscow, it’s like, no matter what the specific reasons, and layoffs are so irokrasona. this is likely less of a reason, but more of a convenient excuse. and what is the main reason uh its uh so unceremonious

defocus. this is that he was not a globalist, that he allowed to speak honestly about what is happening in the united states and speak honestly about american foreign policy and did not differ in russophobia. how would you comment on such an assumption in moscow you know, usually when such a big decision comes to this truth decision that cost the news fax millions of dollars their shares, uh, fell like a stone immediately after it was known, usually it's a number of factors, you noted political differences between and son. i think definitely. it probably played a role. we know that so had a personal problem with a choked call top floor fax machine, that is, uh producers. uh, management exits and so on. they had personal conflicts. uh, there were rumors that after

it was impossible to separate it from what happened between dominion and fax. i'm talking about spain domaine vs fax news uh, the fax had to pay 800 million dollars. there were rumors that uh he was told not to discuss, this is a risk and this process, and he thinks that he has complete editorial freedom, and he wanted it discuss and they didn't agree, so i don't want to get too, uh, throw ideology into it, because when there's so much money at stake, it can't be so much about ideology. i think it's a whole bunch of different factors, of course his political views don't help. i'll just quickly note that this accentuates the split between the gop old guard, the neo conservative and the new young uh. uh, the populist new right,

which i think is the main man, thank you so much. uh, like just one thing. uh, yes, of course, the fact that carlson held independent positions could and most likely played a role in saying that he held these independent positions in relation to the management of his company. well, of course it happens. well, i have a strong feeling that , uh, behind these specific disagreements about the lawsuit, uh, the domini company, that behind them was still a much more fundamental question, did the democrats steal the election? and the twentieth year and this is directly related to the election campaign. and i think the removal of tucker crossan, most likely in

to some extent reflected someone's desire, someone 's desire, to remove him at least for a while from the big media arena, when it would be necessary to organize the persecution of republicans and personal trump. mark thank you very much. we hope to see you soon. thank you and now we are going back to advertising, literally in a few minutes the history of great britain throughout europe is directly related to what is happening now in ukraine, the main performer of all this, friends. my name is elements of russia we perceive it as clown, but i can't guarantee you that talking about this character will fight.