and the battles of the liberation of donbass from the german invaders and the breaking of the blockade of leningrad , franklin roosevelt said such a phrase, uh, which everyone really, especially overseas, began to forget. he said that the russian people are fighting fascism. by saving himself, he saved the whole world and won not their superiority of weapons, but their superiority of spirit, and we should all remember this. employees of the national guard of the ministry of emergency situations of the federal fisheries agency and the police conducted exercises in the astrakhan region the main task is to stop the illegal extraction of water resources skill honed both on water and under water in training involved aviation. in addition, a new building of the national guard was solemnly opened in the regional center. the head of the department , viktor zolotov, presented the employees with awards and the key to new service machine tasks

. the fight against illegal extraction of biological resources remains only last year, based on the results of resource checks. for him, there is no other person's pain, it always passes through the very heart, and then a miracle happens on the operating table, literally the second birthday. and today is his birthday leonid roshal himself, 90 years on the holiday of the outstanding medic president of non-emergency pediatric surgery and traumatology vladimir putin congratulated the head of state called the work of roshal truly, the noble and merciful leonid mikhailovich is called the children's doctor of the world, because for him there are no borders of barriers and distance when he forgives the little patient badly, admits to

rest, does not know how to accumulate on weekends. sash for a year, go ahead. well, he is always ready to help and share experiences. he has a big heart and the main place in it is occupied by love for children. that is a strong child who dies. you understand what's going on with you. you realize that you are already almost nothing here. well, you work and the child gets better, there is no happiness in life. that's about all we can report. thank you for being with us right now the program time will tell. hello live on the first channel program time

will tell. i am artyom sheinin. today, as always, we will talk in the program about various intricacies of different levels, and the current international politics, in which there are a lot of all sorts of, conflict situations, many confusing situations, many contradictions, many intrigues, and so on and so forth, and all this now, as it were, is strung on one core of the conflict, and on the military conflict on the territory of ukraine, which is the embodiment of the conflict between a conditional american-centric west and many other associations of those who do not want to enter this, uh, american-centric west anymore. and, of course, it now amounts to such. well the main rod of the discussion is that going on in the world, but really. everything , of course, is much more complicated, because here you are moving a little aside , you are moving away from this military-technical, military-political, confrontational trip. here is a little bit to the side and here you

are. vladimir putin, president of the russian federation recep tayyip erdogan, and the president of the republic of turkey, a nato member state, open a solemn ceremony on the occasion of the delivery of russian- made nuclear fuel to the power unit. uh, nuclear power plant akuyu, which marks in fact, turkey's entry into the nuclear era of nuclear energy, as recep taigan said 60 years late, but nevertheless, they entered in 2010, and this station was built there. and now you seem to understand that yes there is a very disturbing confrontational, and such a basic track, but in parallel with this, it happens. here are the processes of this kind, for me. this is further evidence that everything is even more complicated than we now often think. more important

are multi-faceted multi-level and this is also important to remember when we now, of course, will to discuss, uh, again, all these ups and downs, uh , the current, uh, current politics, especially since vladimir putin and recep taip erdogan. yes, by participating in this event. and it's like that. here, however, is such positive news that it says that there are many lines of directions in world development today, nevertheless. here is this reality, about which i am talking, it has not gone away. in a telephone conversation, issues related to the russian special operation were raised, as well as with that very grain deal notorious in different meanings. well, erdogan proposed to create a working group, proactive to resolve the crisis. why wouldn't he suggest that, given that yesterday there was a call, shitin, more precisely, a call to sitin pinu. and it says that this is going closely.

excised and intertwined with many others, but on how the development is going. here is the crisis that is connected with ukraine, and a lot will depend on how it will develop further on seemingly unrelated sites and geographically there in the same south china the sea and a lot of things to do, so we will now break into a short advertisement. and now we're back, so to speak. here in this, as it were , in the base track or in the base track of current events, do not switch to stay in the track. karenzhan pierre and jen psaki two of the casket are the same from the face president obama announced that oh, that is, president biden, i must admit that i'm just reading this text. i myself don’t know what it is why the white house needs such clever quotation marks of the press secretary, firstly, she is the first, a dark-skinned woman. the first member of the lgbt community

to fill this role. it's amazing. whose puppets, who put them and why the biden administration, the most inclusive in history, although there is a gender difference of humanity, but since, roughly speaking, gentlemen. and the race of works it is desirable that they were still, so to speak, devoid of sexual characteristics, sexual abuse, yes, on the students i tried to commit suicide. it was a dark, very dark period in my life. they began to spit on questions of the education of culture. and most importantly faith them. the legion, along with the arrival, is changing the territory of the white house puppet. who does what it's supposed to dumb and dumber, now not in the movie dolls today on the first already in the cinema in all cinemas in the country accept

the challenge. feel the power we are flying into space. julia peresild milos bikovich vladimir mashkov the challenge is already in the cinema corridor of discounts in the active phase. and what does it mean, the star sale is going to give up to 25% discount on pet food, the new pure collection from planet organic with a discount of up to 40%, and you know that you can use mobile communication for three times cheaper 1,200 minutes of conversation 25 gb of internet, as well as unlimited music. three times cheaper.

download magnet app, play the game and win prizes. buy a magnet with a card from the application to participate in the prize draw. play prizes. collect everything in a commercial bank for a loan of up to 5 million. and now you are already arguing the color of the wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank in the branch and the corners are conceived done at 3g speed well, it's as soon as even faster, but you can connect. only here activate megapower 3 5g and be the fastest megafon mobile operator number one simple sandwich in luxury. worthy of your majesty, take care of the fat king of taste. in

russian lotto, in honor of the may holidays , we will draw 30 country houses for 2 million rubles. four editions in a row. buy tickets at stoloto brand stores and on the 900 million jackpot website. set up a tele2 mix subscription for good luck - a unique offer. collect it yourself and pay only for the selected content of this analogues. no. subscription mix can not even buy our tele2 other rules for taking care of your sleep discounts on bed linen and other home textiles from brands on tender night and urban family choose quality at affordable prices at wildberries meet the new card for life from vtb and do better every day monday is a hard day , but getting a free card is easy, and using it for free is profitable tuesday day two share free transfers and feelings. allow yourself more with more cashback.

catch a thousand rubles, after the first purchase for map, friday is my turn. quietly in magnit and you will understand, 139, 99 unpack the dacha with yandex.markets for 99 rubles. buy ikea products on yandex.market, send one loan application to selected banks and get approved in the app. compare credit card tinkoff leylines with a limit of up to 700,000 rubles. copies and compensate them for air tickets. i’ll have time to fly for free on april 30 and received free service forever tinkov, he’s the only one who will show us, we continue to work live. i start the program

said that once again, at different levels and from different sides, there are talks about the need for dialogue about the need to find a peaceful solution, but the paradox is that there are parallel talks about the ukrainian counteroffensive. no matter how paradoxically they seem, they do not contradict this conversation. i have a feeling that the talk about the need to seek dialogue, a truce, uh, and so on and so forth. hmm, let's say this is the second part of the talk about the counteroffensive. that is, it is not one that contradicts the other. and this, as it were , you know, as in a binary uh ammunition. yes, what is the counteroffensive - this is part of these talks about the truce dialogue, and the talks about the pyramids and the dialogue, they, well, are a consequence of the fact that the counterattack one way or another should result in something. and this

will be a new reality. and as we have discussed more than once, perhaps it depends on what it will be what will happen on earth, and ukraine at the official level, through the mouths of its official representatives , demonstrate, uh, incredible such, as it were rasperchennost confidence, and they do not refuse. that's in skill. here it is, as it were serve here it is so confidently. well, let's see, for example, who. well, let's look at cuba . ukraine's spring offensive will take place, but i won't tell you when, because i don't want to make life easier for russian intelligence. we are preparing, preparing our armed forces, the only goal of this counter-offensive will be the liberation of the entire ukrainian territory, that is, the return of what belongs to us. we will speed up the training from a military point of view of the technician, ammunition and weapons. this is necessary in order for this counter-offensive to be effective here, really funny. while we were watching, konstantin fedorovich noticed

that it was really a spring offensive. there will be ukraine, but i won’t tell you when. well, in general, there is only a little more than a month left of spring, so here, as it were, such a secret has faded. yes, it probably means that the spring offensive can take place both in summer and autumn. or maybe even in winter. here but there is. eh, another one is also very interesting, which began to be highlighted, and such a feature is in their confident rhetoric on the one hand. they are all high with their mouths. they say to the representatives very confidently that it will happen, that they will achieve all their goals , that they will reach there, they will reach everywhere, and that in general, by the end of the year, the ninety-first year and so on, and then they themselves, moreover, sometimes the same people, and changing places , they talk about how ukrainian society is somehow somehow. it is somehow slightly overheated by these conversations and the expectations from this of us are, like, somehow somewhat overstated, moreover, i repeat these are the same people who, well, as it were, formally

work in the same place for work. well, look, here is the minister of foreign affairs. just performed that yes, there she is, and here is the minister of defense for you, and from the same government, which is like this. uh, somehow listen. do you agree that expectations from the counteroffensive in society are somewhat overheated? i agree, who warms them more ukrainian society, politicians or the west ? and those expectations from the counteroffensive are definitely overheated; they didn’t believe in victory before, they wanted ukraine to survive at least somehow minimally, so that at least some part of ukraine would survive, and when they showed success, everyone began to believe in victory this is an interesting point, because we just heard how reznikov's colleague is doing kuleba. this very, uh, overheated overheating of these very expectations. that is, he is supposedly talking about, uh, kuleba,

including, but at the same time, in a certain sense deals with this overheating himself, because all this listed list of so-called victories, well, i won’t talk about it for a long time now. for those who are interested, please read. i wrote about it. just recently there at home, but in principle, uh, really, well, as if the military military of relative victory is kharkiv region. well, no matter how you argue, no matter how you argue. there they are military. this method has made great strides. yes, using our mistakes, there is a lot of things, but it was a real military success. uh, including su, everything else was not military, successes, all the way they achieved military companies anyway. it was many other factors, but he himself speaks. overheating, he lists these imaginary victories, saying that now, in the series of these victories, there should be another a-a victory, that is, on the one hand, he says that society is overheated , on the other hand, this very

society continues to overheat. and i'm wondering. this is some kind of cunning tactic of this chapiteau and such versed in pr guys or they are already there, as if the hemispheres do not coincide at all. given that reznikov is not the first to talk about this? something we have somehow driven our society so fast with these conversations that we will now defeat everyone. here we discussed the ambassador of ukraine to the uk and who i must say to en, in general, a man, uh, he has now gone to the uk, he has held more posts there before. well, that is, in general, he is, let’s say, not such an idiot, that is, this is not danilov and at least not danila there and not a podolak, but again, he says that we per society, and then he himself says, in the same text there, when he said this, he says that, in fact, it is nato that should beg us to join nato because we have already defeated everyone, and we have shown

how can we become again some kind of sensation, or some very subtle game , which well, i do n’t understand one is very interesting. e, the peculiarity of how it is discussed and how it sounds in the information space in which we are and live. i am already repeating the program, because we have such that you should not be there, because this is what knocks our readiness. this means that our military readiness for action. i hope it doesn't rely on watching tv discussions. it would be here in television no, and i'm here, considering my trips to the front, where where do they watch where do they analyze? and so on and so forth, what we are saying here and so on, but the last what guides the commanders of subdivisions in the preparation of their subunits for certain types of combat operations. it's from what they say, so that's in the television uh,

programs. believe me, therefore, here you need to understand that we are discussing informational reality, and how it is connected with those parts of real life about which we somehow understand something. so here is another important part of this reality. this is hmm such an interesting correspondence dialogue, let's say western curators and sponsors of the kiev regime and the kiev regime itself, it means that the curators are such, as if lately, the mantra that we have given is almost already. that's already so much that we have already given so much that now go to the orphanage, because you already have so much and half as much more. well, here's an example for you, the commander of, uh, the combined forces, uh, in europe from four stars. nye, if i'm not mistaken, general christopher kawaili, please. we keep in touch with our ukrainian colleagues and calculated together. how many weapons they need to

carry out a counteroffensive, we have already delivered more than 98% of the combat vehicles promised to ukraine. i i am sure that we have already delivered the weapons they need and will continue our deliveries to support ongoing operations, you know, that is, as he says guys, we have already been waiting for you 98%. you somehow let's already do it somehow let's go to tanks and forward to the mines. and then suddenly it comes out. uh, mikhailo podlyak. and he says something to him, something i doubt. he says, listen to the 97-98% view, this is too high a figure comes from certain mathematics. he proceeds from the fact that he knows the technique must be much more shells, there really is a shortage, especially of heavy calibers and the european union, and we are trying to resolve this issue. i think

this issue will be resolved to some extent. it can also be interesting, that is, does anyone say that we have already given everything to eat, which means that ukraine is there and gay forward and suddenly a podolia, who, in my opinion, was going to drink beer in yalta back in march, and already in august there i don’t know what he was talking about and where he was going to say, no, no, he just doesn’t know anyone, it’s generally funny. that is , he doesn’t know anyone, but the podolak knows. here he is charm tells us, he says, and he somehow questions what the american says, whether it is blackmail or some kind of. i'm true. every time i look at them, all these reznikovs are far away and so on. i can’t, well, they probably read , uh, in the childhood of nikolai nosov, bobik was visiting barbos but hmm , maybe just a podol, he lost some kind of some sense of reality, and he really considers himself, well, there, a partner on an equal footing and so, now we will put them there on view. give more, because we are now

fighting for you. i don't know. or it's again some kind of talent. whoa game. well, in general, in any case, this fidget for his barbos had to be polished, also with stoltenberg, who repeated this mantra again, let's listen. through the contact group led by the united states, nato allies and partners have provided unprecedented support to ukraine, more than 98% of the combat vehicles promised to ukraine have already been delivered. this is more than 1550 units of armored vehicles, 230 tanks and other equipment. including a huge amount of ammunition. in in total, we have trained and equipped more than nine armored brigades of the armed forces of ukraine, which will allow ukraine to strengthen its positions in order to continue the reconquest of the occupied territories and added in brackets, you hear podolyaks. once again, re-read what i'm telling you support is unprecedented. more than 1,550

armored vehicles, a huge amount of ammunition , a huge amount, you know, and in general, go ahead already. oh, and now, accordingly, here, based on what we see in the information space from what you read, you see you analyze, you meet people who, among other things, represent the situation on the battlefield. and uh, up here, what we 're dealing with right now. with this discussion with this bodalov about the finished one, they are not ready. there are weapons. no, weapons. let's go let's not go. what we will achieve what i haven't brought the western press yet, in which every day there is an article from the series that the ukrainians cannot but launch a counteroffensive. but what they will achieve is unclear, la-la in your opinion, given what you know about the earth. this is all now about what? well, as far as i understand, there are several floors, as if the top floor, we can put aside everything related to disinformation for now.

we know that everyone joined the disinformation campaign of russia, even at the state level of the united states of america, when they began to voice there, when such fakes began to be voiced there, which, in general, are even taken seriously not from the meaning, but from the second floor for sure. this one second i want to talk about this floor, after all, in your opinion from the fact that, again, you see, read and analyze the company of disinformation that is being carried out here, uh, including at the state level of western countries and in the press. this is, after all, rather disinformation, which is designed to assure us that they don’t need to be afraid of the offensive, and it’s not ready, or it’s disinformation that, like, drop everything and it’s better to retreat right away, in principle, it’s very like the situation is like that, a. ukraine vsu cannot achieve as a strategic surprise. this is understandable, with our level of intelligence with what is now happens with what we know very well.

approximately how much. in which areas of strategic, as it were, initiatives of strategic surprise , it is impossible to achieve operational surprise , it is also impossible to achieve, because everything that moves to the front is hidden quite quickly, respectively. uh, there is only one calculation - this is tactical tactical surprise. toxic surprise is when what is called the fog of war arises, that is, a sharp increase in hostilities . here here along the entire front line, they go fights to figure out exactly where the most threatening place is difficult. they grope for some point, which they consider promising at the expense. again, their configuration is quite convenient. within 8-10 hours during the night they can transfer sufficiently large configurations to any direction and we will not hide them . in this case, they believe they can break through the fronts further, start developing the offensive, and in order to create this, it

is necessary just russians in this fog of war to confuse, including the main principles, well, not so scary, ukrainian, damn how do you paint it on the cards, that is, respectively, so that we know, well, there are fights , fights are going on. well, okay, we'll continue, you know? they want to repeat only at a more organized high level the situation from september then. after all, they, too, who had just begun to attack at first. well, as we remember, nothing happened on kherson for a week, there were battles along the entire front line, and suddenly it began to pass under the raisins, they themselves did not expect, but it went further that we did not expected, you know? horror, in ours it must be said to ours that we all wrote. well, in this case, i can say, you know, there is a war correspondent. these are bloggers observers 3 days before the attack. everywhere they wrote that kharkov was packed with troops, that the troops in the studio said the same beard, that they were concentrating and concentrating there and

concentrating, so when did you say at our level of intelligence. i didn’t even understand right away, is it like some kind of irony that sounds like your words or not? it's just we pulled up the level of intelligence, just no, of course, we pulled up and then we had this intelligence, but you understand, uh, it’s not called driving. any victory has any defeat. there are several that always make up one of them, the main underestimation of the enemy, you understand the underestimation of the enemy, and the second is confusion, that is, when suddenly everything goes wrong, then you still need to realize that it is not going according to plan, that you need to take emergency measures, what you need it is urgent to intervene in this, and honestly, every missed one will be compensated a little with a three-hour anniversary. this is already, uh, a huge cost to people. it is necessary to transfer technology, you understand? i can say, so i realized that everything was not very good with us when i saw the offensive on the fifth or sixth day. near kharkov, as we are in an open field from our e, mi-26s, we begin to urgently unload bmp-3s and deploy their battle formations, then. i just realized that

there was nothing else left and i just had to do something in the field. so here's the calculation for this first floor. he says again, misinformation of the goal, after all, to get underestimated by the enemy with us, as i understand it, everything is now much better, of course, the fog of war is not going anywhere. why why in this case it must be said that the situation is certainly different enough to remember 2 weeks ago the president personally came to the region and personally heard all the teams more, that is, this indicates how seriously everything is taken uh-huh, but we lingered a little on the top floor, because they just go to the second one. it is very important even i would say the key to you. today, ukraine began a very important trade for itself. you know, as before your phrase, while we are all, as it were, on the shore, let's agree. so, while we are on the beach. let's agree on what to consider our victory. yeah, that is, ukraine, if earlier. understandable so for what kind of victory you provided us with unprecedented support and gave us everything we needed and even a little more so that we, in fact, at what uh, as

it were, at what stage of our actions yeah, everything is written off for us put. where is that how much the question needs to be stopped to get everything you gave aha this is for them now the key question, because they are well aware that the force accumulated is large, well, the minimum estimate is 60.000, and the most, er, as it were, real in the region of 80.000. well we heard the world from fit 200.000. but i think that everything that can be thrown is counted there, but nevertheless, it is absolutely pointless to consider that they can enter crimea with such forces. it is necessary that you simply, well, i don’t know what we should do, consider that in this case they can somehow break through, so to speak, as if relatively speaking, reach melitopol there too unlikely, most likely in this case, if things work out very well for them. unfortunate they will be able to enter to some depth. well , we know the first goal they have, how would the next task be the next next task to take. so poppy go out there behind him and try to start

acting. well, at least ideally, cut the land road to the crimea and start reaching the crimea , that is, the depth of advancement of such a group, maybe. well, the first stage of 60-80 km is the maximum, but will the west consider this a victory lots of loans have been given out, you know? and if we get to this level, and then the hardest fights begin, and everything that you gave us, it ends. and we still need more, but they didn’t give us 4 months. that is 4 months. you promised us that already there zelensky would catch fish in yalta to feed the fish. he wanted a fish, so on the yalta embankment to feed the fish. he said very inaccurately, and he said this phrase sooner or later. i hope, quite possibly, he will feed there just like that, that is, will it be? no, you understand the offset or they will say what guys. well, that's not how things go. so you need something from zelensky , fish on the third floor will take credit. he is

already a military man. ah, command. highly , very practical very well trained, i do not underestimate them in any way . moreover, i consider them a very dangerous adversary, but according to military science, it understands that it is not enough to attack. still gotta keep it. and this also requires strength. that is , the group that is prepared for the attack can be safely cut off from it by three, because if you even reached somewhere, then no, well, if you reached, ideally, you have no one killed, no one injured, then you can, of course, just the name. yes. and if you have worn off, then you need to further re -organize the line of defense and re -cover the hoses. it pulls everything out again and in this case it is clear to everyone that somewhere by the beginning of july the maximum. yeah, maximum, well, usually a military operation of this level is about 21-25 days. and the first stage 10 , taking into account the weather, it is most likely not paradise at the end of may, well, in the middle of may, that is, i say again, 10 days is usually the first stage, after which it goes like

if the breakthrough would start later, as usual, as if the suspension of replenishment, reconnaissance, and then the development stage begins, after which there is consolidation , i say again, 21 days, after 21 days, they still understand that the war will not end, but already a lot what 98% give will no longer arise the question, but by this moment what will you be, what will happen to the russians, what will happen to the russian army? but they, after all, perfectly understand that after giving us a forum for 2 1/2 months, but by and large, with these forces that they have, it would be good for them to attack somewhere at the beginning march, when there was still solid ground, when there was no foliage, when we started offensives in winter, as we said, yes, and when we still did not have such forces, well, you must understand that every week, according to the same the most. uh, they got russian vushniks. at least two brigades, that is, they formed and fielded, you understand, that is, it is clear, therefore, for them really. now is the main phase before when while we are on the shore

not yet lying in the ground. let's agree, after all, what will be ours in reality deed. here is the explanation. it is very important to me, at least. well, i'm kind of slow, but for me it's just now clarified a very important wording. here are all of them. here are kovaly and podolak and all these uh, so here are uh others, all this is such a discussion in absentia. i have no idea what that means, other than perhaps disinformation. this is a very good wording that this is such a bargain on the shore, that when we talk about the counter offensive, we actually mean what we mean, that is, you tell us we gave that one, that one, that one, that one, and if we get with this to where it will be considered the success of the counteroffensive, attention, after which we can count on more. because the talk about more, which is completely , understandable, but cannot be reported now and b will definitely not have time to play any role in

the boarding school in the near future, nevertheless, is already going on. listen, reznikova, for example, what about the planes continues? he says, given that contrasts and planes are already, well, sort of different topics, and yet. listen. partners no longer have technical restrictions on the range of weapons provided to ukraine for political reasons not to provide aircraft to ukraine. today, too, the issue of maintenance and repair is important. what also needs a lot of money, therefore, partners are very pragmatic in making their decisions. they count money. they count the money and pay attention again here is the same story. here you just gave this one, how to say this, and the machine for processing this information, everything in it, as it were, works very well. there you are reznikov, let's have political criteria for obstacles, there are none. well, there, yes, they count money. well, like there are planes, planes and from america he is the assistant secretary of defense for international security. eh, mrs ulander answers very interesting

answers. listen. in the list of defense well ukraine, modern western aircraft occupy about 8th place in the artillery air defense system, and armored vehicles are now higher priorities. that is, she is his these say? yes, there are no obstacles. let's so she says guys. now you don't need planes at all. it's exactly the same conversation they say, come on, let's have planes there. we 'll go now. and where do we need to go so that we can discuss the planes, and these people answer them from there by mouth. ilona says, yes, you will go somewhere already, you don’t need planes at all now. they are in eighth place, and then we'll talk. it's the same in this matrix , it's exactly the same way to write it out. despite what else is there, but the kuleba, which is what he speaks an interesting topic, and this is also such an indicative nuance, please. the supply of f-16 fighter jets to ukraine will rather deter russia than provoke it, the time has come to take this step, too. an interesting story, because

, well, how would i understand that he is a kuleba. and that says it all, but nevertheless, the supply of fighters. by itself it does nothing. they need pilots. we've all heard not happy that pilot is getting ready, 36 months old. okay , the ukrainian pilot, whom no one feels sorry for, but there, but he will be preparing, and there 2 1/2 years, but nevertheless, we are not talking about this, that is, they. as i understand it, the kuleba says , yes, you just give them, well, just give them the planes, let the russians stand there, no matter how they climb, that is, this tour is going on and this is the presence of this bargaining. after all, it is also about something. the question of what should tell us? well, this tells us, in fact , what we have long suspected, that we even firmly know that the west always betrays, always lends even those whom it uses to solve some problems within the framework of this always possible treason for will prepare its audience for

the possible development of events of these events of this development, two, which, in fact, both the head of nato and the american general said. they said, we gave everything to ukraine 98%, well , they gave everything directly, so that no one would doubt toltenberg. i got three kebabs, three bottles, like a soviet comedy, so many days, two, and an imported tape recorder, two questions to you, who pulls your tongue. here is a normal performance before the preparation of the attack, which we staged everything that needs to be staged. what did we put we will not tell you, because we are helping the russian type. so this is what they say, too, but here is the whole list. why because a western layman is sitting, if there is a success of some kind of nato, he will say correctly. this is our success. we gave everything directly 98.3% more likely failure we gave everything we did everything possible, but they

turned out to be such and such thieves and so on and so forth, that is, they are preparing any development of events for their audience and there is a big difference . it lies in the fact that in ukraine, they watch the channels of the united states of america and the uk and in the uk , no one watches ukrainian channels, so they immediately push them out far away. listen, please, please, but for an exclusively ukrainian audience, say. no, they didn’t give us that, we’ll ask for it now, then he pushes the sack out. you say that the planes are needed there, no one will hear it, and in ukraine he looks, what they say. the generals and what he says, the head of nat, therefore, they are preparing for any development of events in the information sphere, and the ukrainians are these pseudo-figures. they continue to inflame their audience and push for war. we have everything. everything is fine. don't listen. what did he say. see. we are how cool we can contradict him. we will now

tell stoltenberg that he gave us not 300 armored personnel carriers 298, where there are two more. this is such a performance, the main goal of which is to prolong the resistance of ukraine in hope, to breathe into the ranks of the armed forces and against the background of no success today somewhere in artyomovsk, bakhmut say, do not pay attention to this. now everything will begin. right now. and yes, it’s fair, but you understand that here, they themselves are already discussing this overheating, or, as he said, the most holy obsession of society with this. it's such a story. and well, for which then in front of his own, at least society. you will have to answer with something, but for the ukrainian society , just like the anglo-saxons for their own, it is also a two-course variant of events, the first variant. why are you so warm? why did you have such expectations? they will not say that they themselves said all this. here you are something waited more here, this painter, who says that everything is already going on, but expresses the

yes series and the second option. well, everything will be great. and there is the most important thing, cherry, which is not always put on any cake, they always supposedly have successes, so he lists what was there. and as you are right, artyom, say there were no military successes listed except for what happened near kharkov. yes, everything else is just propagandistic things that they repeat repeat, which they cannot refuse for their audience. that is, everyone works to my audience that konstantinovich me personally, but you will correct me now. uh, how often do you do this to me personally? leads to the idea that all the talk about the offensive, what is, as it were, such, well, military action. by and large, this is already what i started with, and by and large there are already conversations within the framework of what will be later some kind of i don’t know dialogue truce bargaining,

whatever. name it and, as a matter of fact, and this trade is about the offensive. and what will be counted as an account when they give or not give money for the continuation is at the same time something else that is interesting before the start of the offensive. this is already in essence. bargaining for some future possible negotiating event, as a negotiating position. that is, roughly speaking, now the counteroffensive is in addition to a purely military, let's say, such aspect. this is a bargaining that has already begun about who, from what positions, who wants to discuss what further. i have a feeling that maybe i'm wrong. because , unlike the great patriotic war, it was not said that there is no other outcome for us than unconditional surrender. on at a certain stage, let me remind you that during the years of the second world war, the allies agreed that there could be no

negotiations on a truce about peace, only unconditional surrender, since this obvious statement did not follow. this means that the outcome of any military action. in principle, it is completely foam rubber, perhaps some kind of ceasefire truce, but at some new stage, when some can no longer advance, while others, uh, want to get a break. i may disappoint you or sorry, but i don’t see much point in the fact that we endlessly discuss the ukrainian counteroffensive. i see the point for those in ukraine trying to knock out as much as possible weapons from their western allies as pushers. i see the point for westerners who lay straws. i agree in order to say in case of failure, but we did everything that was not necessary from us. now it all depends. something went

wrong, but it's not our fault, because they must respond to the requests of their ultimately, voters, no matter how they despise them, no matter how they manipulate them. anyway, this is a natural question. it will arise. especially when approaching any election date in any other western country. what i really would like to understand. we discuss all these topics and proceed from the fact that we must repel the ukrainian counteroffensive, and this is our task at this stage. we are preparing potential coordination, we are supplying our armed forces. strengthening our battle formations in order to repel the ukrainian counteroffensive or we prepare our forces. we do everything the same as i said, in the first case, in order to develop our own offensive and further

advance through the territory of ukraine. that's the question. i would really like to get an answer from me. you won't get it, because i don't have all the information about it, other than propaganda. about english noise is more crackling than anything else that is present on both sides in any hostilities. i represent it. of course, i would understand that, as in any war , in any hostilities. there are different parts. there are different commanders. on the other side on this side to varying degrees. we must recognize this motivated by the vision of fighting to the bitter end. well, today we are confronted with those reports that we hear from pmcs. wagner, we see that these people are trying to get their way without considering losses and so on. far from everyone. we heard that there are different

commanders. in any war. in any army. they also exist. there are different periods in the course of the war even from our own experience, we have repeatedly cited the example of the kursk and other stalingrad battles of the stalingrad battle. we won no one has any doubts, but then we took a strategic pause and moved on to defense a little. who says why we have actually gone over to this defense, because sometimes we varnish. own past. we crossed over, because we were under the same kharkov, suffered a serious defeat after stalingrad. we don’t usually talk about this, and during the battle of kursk itself, not everything was so simple. uh-huh if that direction which he supervised, in which rokossovsky commanded and the tooth standing behind him. everything was successfully completed in that direction, where vatutin was the commander. in fact, he made a very serious breakthrough and although putin is certainly a hero of the war, but for the kursk bat he did not receive any award, i want to note,

because this is how he was assessed by the actions of the rate, again he is a heroic death. he confirmed by his fate that he was a talented commander, patriot, and so on, but this does not mean that he did not make mistakes. and the battle of prokhorovka which we we are proud, in fact, this is a battle during which we lost a huge number of tanks. because in addition to everything else, these were light tanks to a large extent there near prokhorovka, and the commander of this army, the captain, also did not receive any award for this victory near prokhorovka, which in fact was not a victory, but very difficult, exhausting, played, of course, its role in the final result, but at that moment it was difficult to consider it a victory, therefore everything happens and kharkov also happens, but discussing endlessly, how we will reflect in the inter-offensive and so on. yes, it is necessary in certain audiences. i can even say, as a special propagandist. yes, in the military specialty. now it's called the

psychological warfare officer in these classrooms. having specialized it is necessary, why do they say it? why don’t i say this and so on, but if we endlessly this , in the end it gets on the nerves, not only me it gets on the nerves of people who watch our programs, including those at the front, you probably watch, because it’s endless discussing. where will they attack? here will advance will be able to advance accumulated. are they weaponized or not? at that moment, when they switched to strategic defense on the curonian others. this is not the first time i have said this word to inform our public without being informed. you know, we have moved to strategic defense. now we are waiting for hitler to attack, and we will repel him there , everything is fine, we did not conduct such propaganda, because it would be strange if we were talking about one thing, we will win, we will reach berlin, we will demand. we said it at every stage this war. and if we do, so today we will win, tomorrow is not. tomorrow we will defend ourselves, and then if we defend well, maybe there will be a truce

, if with this approach, in my opinion, success will be achieved, but it is impossible, at least psychologically, to fight to the end. uh-huh well, actually, i'm the question that you asked. no, i'm not the first program in which we discuss this. by the way, notice. we didn't discuss it. you are the first who started discussing this about where they will be attack and so on. i ask these questions about it and ask that i can not know where the uh, so to speak, will attack. uh, these are all military men, but looking at the map. in general , it is clear where they are given what task they have. and they have a task, as rightly so, colleagues said to demonstrate success and further the question i ask. okay , what are the possible scenarios for the development of events, in your opinion, they demonstrate, for example, success and receive even more weapons for this success. and then it's one alignment or further. you rightly say they do not demonstrate

success and we then what we then stay there and say. well, let's try again or go ahead. well, listen, we really can't stay there. we declared at the very beginning of this special military operation through the mouth of the president that we must. well, at least then it's not a shlacher. sonya zaporizhia, they have not yet been with us. uh, well, partially, at least as it is now under control, but we still have not reached the borders of the donetsk region, which are already accepted into the composition as a subject of the russian federation well, i'm not talking about kherson zaporozhye, therefore, it at least needs either an explanation, or correction , or bringing the matter to an end. you know perfectly well that this is not the first time in this audience. we are talking about the fact that if we do not cut them off from the sea, then this means that in the future the threat remains for the flight of drones to sevastopol from odessa, i will once again call the airfield in the school. where do they come from, they launch periodically and so on are not a threat.

not only crimea has it, the caucasus also has it uh, our entire russian south has it and most importantly. this preserves the ability of ukraine to receive by sea everything that it can receive to trade, and so on. that is, this is a condition for a real victory. of course, you can pretend that we won. so we won and we ourselves are carried away by this, no one reads this. we convince ourselves that we have won. this, in my opinion, is a dangerous path, because, unlike those who were absolutely confident from the very beginning, that we would reach the polish border. from the very beginning i explained and said that it is unlikely that we can set yourself such a goal. the most important thing, as you rightly said, is that it is necessary not only to conquer, but also to keep, we must keep in our composition that very western ukraine that adjoins this polish border. or it will be another trojan horse in the roster now it's definitely too early.

do we need to keep it or not to keep it , you would quite rightly say at the border, you see the dpr, here, and then you can discuss further. and that, too, is still to the border. here is the dpr well, the pmr, too, in my opinion, quite right, therefore, yes, i agree here, but, in fact, uh, this is a story, what is it anyway? ah, successful or less or more successful, developing ukrainian counter-nalams or failed contrast, but why are we discussing this? because everyone understands and it is said that this will not end there. after all, i’m talking about this, that we all understand that in any scenario of this counter -offensive, even at any of its earliest points, this is still not even the end of the company. and this is, well, just like one more episode. sorry i want to say. this is the same as, according to the stanislavsky system, this gun hangs on the wall.

yes, this gun is something that must happen, he is an offensive offensive. it should be for everyone it hangs for us for the ukrainians and for the west which of course, so we discuss that no matter which way this gun is fired and will it hit somewhere play? at this moment , the play will not end, it will continue on, and in fact, we are all discussing options, no matter how where it will shoot will hit or will not hit there will be further some development of events refute the effort in china that says, let's finish. but not me. i don't refute the effort at all, because because i don't consider myself to be china at all, china is showing some effort. we will talk about them later today, who speaks. let's end the same way. i like this very lol de silva brazilian, and then, when the day before yesterday, in my opinion, from che- enough to look for the guilty in this conflict. let's all think about how to stop it. i understand that lulu da silvia from brazil, of course, he

is not interested in looking for who is right and who is wrong. lola has been there for 9 years before silva, did not know about donetsk, not about lugansk, not about the russian language at all . here are the youth. he is, as it were, well done in his own way, he is also like that. the peacemaker he says, yes, let's, that we are looking for the guilty finished and everything is there somewhere there stop we already like everyone is tired already lambad it's time to dance, and we all mean talking about it all here for you, please, uh, as if a- a british analyst, by the way, an analyst. well, it seems to me quite realistic, perspective, please. the united states, which provided 75% of military equipment to protect ukraine, will soon enter another election cycle, ideally, biden. i would like the war to be over by the end of 2023 before the u.s. primaries start in early 2024, assuming the spring offensive kicks off in the next few weeks, this gives ukraine 6 months to win this war will be difficult. achieve because attacking is harder than

defending. even if all the promised tanks arrive on time they are not enough to breach the russian defenses. in addition, the allies did not provide ukraine with aircraft to support such an offensive. it is unlikely that ukraine will be able to turn the tide of hostilities. and this will force the west to force zelensky to sit down at the negotiating table, but it will be almost impossible to achieve an acceptable result of the negotiations for ukraine. that 's actually what i was talking about when i asked my question on the fedorovich website that everyone understands that the conversation is like a military counteroffensive, but everyone understands that a conversation about this, uh, sooner or later, either now or even later and in a few cycles there will be some kind of coercion of ukraine to peace, because it already seems clear to everyone that all these talks we will defeat russia to force her to surrender her and no, no matter how pointless it is to continue this conversation. at what point does it all begin. that's what this conversation is about and therefore when we discuss

the success or failure of this counteroffensive. it is a question of whether it will last another six months or then another six months or another six months. here is what conversation, you see, here it is necessary to understand. er, several things. the first uh, the current algorithm, if you look at it, then uh, here is the initial success in the russian troops, then there were victories in mariupol then everything froze, then it meant at the same time, more precisely, with this russian, the russians had to leave kiev. we had to leave kharkov ourselves first to withdraw the troops. here we had to, it also had to, because we didn’t have our army was not ready for such a war. this is absolutely clear to everyone, we built an army for local wars, there, in syria, there is georgia somewhere else, but we are not building an army that is for a european war. everyone cheers in unison. they destroyed it for 20 years and shouted that we don’t need boys with standing necks, we don’t need cropped corps and armies, which are now

missing, like blood from the nose with their old equipment there, with anything, but you don’t understand them. in the end, we realized that you know this, when you come up, grab the weights, suddenly, you understand, it ’s hard for you to drag me. uh huh, we then focused on what we could, and the west focused on what we could, he they started pumping by september. they have reached, in principle, the maximum, well , the maximum. enough big superiority they tried to use, but since then everything has stood still for the west today victory looks like at least a few defeats of russia that will force her to make a political decision to withdraw from the war, ideally. i agree. if they can force her to look for some kind of mediators for the winter, then it will be read that russia lost the war, they let her crawl out, most likely, it will continue like in yugoslavia they will start with political crises. everyone who was connected with this war was democratically swept away by the public, but we will solve our problems for us

. it is quite obvious that not a single war of defense wins. for us for me, for me it is absolutely clear why surovikin, taking troops in the fall. he said that there will be the most unpopular decisions, but we will not go forward. well, he didn’t say that, i was clear to everyone that the offensive we were waiting for. we all then also expected the autumn offensive, but it did not happen. why? because he knew very well what was to come. it is practically impossible for us to make in a year from an army, as if compact , to re-create an army of a big war, a large european army, at least 1.5 million ground troops. and at that time, i remind you, we had at best 400,000 who could fight, and now, well, we called for 300,000. so we are now recruiting 240,000 contractors. that is, we already have about 700-800,000 contract cores there , about 250-300,000 more. these are the conscripts who are currently undergoing training. hmm, those

who have called up another 300,000. conscripts who cannot be used in hostilities, well, 300,000 conscripts who were fired over the past year have become mobilized. they are gone now, they have not become mobilized. we can mobilize them for us at any moment. task in this case, bring our industry to a level that would allow us to take the next step. that is , we have now actually come to equality with the sun, we are slightly inferior. still, in terms of people in terms of the number of personnel , technically this is without question. it's all obvious and certainly by the end of autumn. we will increase more. that is, i believe that our combat capabilities for e, a period somewhere in november, that is, october-november will become maximum, and certainly, and in the west and, accordingly, in the apu. this is the window of opportunity to inflict another defeat. it is very fast for us, it is declining very important, so for us i am finishing the question, so

for us the questions are to win. it does not matter. the question is not today, it is a question of accumulating strength and going into the development of that, the question is to win. it is necessary at any cost now to do something like this, for everyone to see. that's just in the development of what konstantin fedovich spoke about. and what are you talking about now? now this is already a kind of saying. well, such a specific core of the answer to the question. as a matter of fact, what, in theory, should be our goal now, and there it’s not just in discussion, but in considering this upcoming counter-offensive, that is, for us , you tell me and i’m starting from your logic now, a story in which a we we just reflect it, and they don't move anywhere. it is necessary and at this stage it is enough, because you tell me that if we conditionally repel this offensive, it does not achieve its goals, then we also have the opportunity to wait until the autumn when we reach the peak of our capabilities. and their, respectively, the opportunity to achieve something will end or what? there is a very

big danger for ukraine. why , again, are they pulling and why is it going? this is a bargain, they are well aware that for them this is an opportunity to inflict some kind of defeat on us. but if this doesn't work out, then they can get the hardest strategic defeat in this area, which may affect the entire war about this today, by the way, is very good. e, said stupid hero of russia who said that be, well, as it were, i do not reveal to anyone, as he said e secrets, but be, as it were, ours in our teams. i would let ukraine stick into our defense for 30-40 kilometers, get involved, and then hit the flanks, because we have the strength for this. but what will happen to ukraine if this group is prepared for, uh, offensives. suddenly it becomes more critical. i don't i say surrounded, and suddenly you find yourself in a critical situation. nobody wants to think about this in kiev because it’s too scary to think about it, because in the situation in which they rhetorically

drove themselves to try to go forward, and then roll back. in a military sense, they always have it , and in the political and rhetorical sense there is no one troops in the battles. you can’t just take it and bring it out, you will have to leave at least a third to die, that is, relatively speaking, their a counteroffensive is like, uh, well, it turns out from what you describe. and why are they careful, it's like a one-way ticket, that is, they can't, either they will arrive or the regroupings will fly away, as we have been calling them since september. uh, no, yes, they won’t get involved, when they won’t get involved. now let's break for a short advertisement and continue. the reign of the male chivalrous just well, the firm times are not waiting for everyone who wants to see you, the russian state must run as soon as possible, where to run away from the kings anyway. you

crown prince of russia, to whom i began to leave. will you be the queen of the court, did your grandmother know you, our son alexei did not know where he disappeared? they have him he smells they have in russia at the order of the sovereign there is peter of russian cinema with a crown historical trilogy of vitaly melnikov for the ninety-fifth birthday by directors alexei

grigorievich bank beginning may 1 up to 66% discount on an eye patch hazel is worthy of your majesty the king of taste burn fill out a bunch of applications for loans in banks. compare will help fill out just one loan application and get approved for best conditions, and the largest banks for comparison, if the loan is in the application compare this week basque duo for 349 rubles. in

the application. i love this quality, this is clothing for an active life, surpassing any other. my choice is gloria jeans a client of rosbank premium all the possibilities at once airport unlimited access business lounges increased cashback, increased interest on the savings account. discover rosbank real opportunities. trying to guess if your loan will be approved.

a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit raid, apply and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best conditions for comparison, if the loan is in the application compare movie one tv presents i want to participate.

if it is necessary, i will return yulia and i will do anything. kino one tv presents allo kol hi. now i'm a prime minister's spy, i didn't give you permission for any cameras.

substitution, and this we can understand only after the examination. will show we continue to work live. here, in fact , in the development of what we just talked about in the previous partly speaking, well, about the counteroffensive, as part of some kind of broader one. eh, let's say a process. we have just come to the conclusion that it is clear that the war, in any scenario of this contour, the offensive will not end. and now the question is what will happen next, uh, there are some, let's say, countries or there are some, let's say, of such a point of view that it is necessary to somehow stop all this, as if by a certain world it is not very clear. what a world not very. it's clear. what kind of dialogues, but there is, in particular, yesterday's telephone conversation with

the dolphin with e, zelensky was, including on this topic. today, foreign minister, china's scurvy. even further. here developed this rhetoric, please. no matter how difficult the crisis, it must be resolved through negotiations, no matter how difficult the conflict, there is only one way to solve his political telephone conversation with the sizenpin. and volodymyr zelensky , this is an important step taken by china to promote a political solution to the ukrainian crisis, and once again demonstrates china's consistent position to promote peace and negotiations. and with all due respect to comrade tsingan. i i understand that the minister of foreign affairs of china and he, of course, needs it. well, it is natural to say that this is a very big step, as it were. and this is definitely an important step. e, undertaken by china to promote a political settlement. but i still don't really understand the big step. well, as if in the direction of what, given that china is now striding to the side, where are these

funny reznikov danillas, zelensky, and so on and so forth, although it is clear that china is not talking to them in this situation. and with those who are behind them, but that's all these are the jolly guys. at least formally, they should agree to something like that. but look at the prime minister of ukraine after this telephone conversation, where the chinese give such clear, verified wording as in fact, as if they were talking with grandfather zelensky, here is the project. the conversation between the president of ukraine and the president of china opens a new stage in our cooperation and relations with the chinese republic. we fully understand what our path to peace means. this is the restoration of ukraine within the borders of 1991, ensuring guarantees from international structures. only then can we be sure of a stable and just world. after all, i ’m talking about this, which is quite obvious that

zelensky did not discuss any borders and the ninety-first year of xi jinping with zelensky. and by the way, today peskov said about this that they didn’t discuss this issue with putin, so even now , against the background of this yesterday’s conversation, these guys are starting to wind up on him, as it were, their own meanings and it’s not very clear how them where they plant, especially since they are not quite. they are behind them many people without any weapons and without whose money they are nobody. here's what these guys are saying. well, let's get started. well, let's start with the czech cheerful for nothing, what are we listening to the general? i do not think that china is interested in resolving the military conflict between russia and ukraine in the short term china benefits from the current partnership with russia as well as the weakening of the west due to the need to support kiev. in addition, beijing is learning from the conflict and observing the reaction of the west to russia's actions so or so let's get the european commission, please. this is important , and china's long-awaited first step as a member of the un security council, the chinese leadership

should use its influence to force russia to stop its aggressive war to restore the territorial integrity of ukraine and respect its sovereignty as the basis of a just world. note that this is no longer squirming. this is already like a european , let it be a press secretary, but nevertheless european. he again invests in the concept of the peace process. in fact, none agreements. they have no idea about the agreements. they have already begun to say that china, uh, can, uh , do something, if it just forces russia to go on their terms, and so on. well, that is , roughly speaking, these and these are not negotiable, in principle. well, as a demonstration of this, here you are. well , as a matter of fact, such indications, transmitted by my way of respected buildings, such as fori, fairs, are americans, as if europeans in the background. here is the conversation truce dialogue blah blah blah. listen. europeans must convey to china that

its rejection of any supply of lethal weapons to russia is a fundamentally european stance, and not just the rhetoric of governments taking the example of the united states should constantly emphasize that the war in ukraine is existential for europeans and preventing chinese intervention is a fundamental european interest, getting involved in a conflict. china will lose europe for its part, officials. the united states must convince beijing of the patience and firm determination of the united states to support the war effort ukraine, a demonstration of this fortitude and commitment to the cause of ukraine should help beijing see more clearly the risks of its participation in the war. there is a feeling that china scored, of course, by acting as a peacemaker , but, in general, i don’t really understand how they will rake through all this. and you, well, indeed, china acted as a peacemaker. this must be understood, not just the desire for world peace. this is a challenge to the united states. america on another field in the economy there is already a military sphere, and

now in the sphere of meanings and international guides. after all, if china is the peacemaker today, in europe, it will extinguish the conflict , it has already extinguished the difficulties between iran and saudi arabia. and tomorrow you look in latin america they will come to repay conflicts. after that, something will be extinguished in africa and the question will arise like this, and now we have the main china in the world. ok then. as soon as you tell us about it, so that we understand what all the other countries are saying, but you describe the situation to me in the case of the ukrainian crisis, that then for china your logic goal is not a movement, everything is important to fix yourself, as peacemaker, and there it will turn out. it will not turn out not so important. we have fixed ourselves, so look, or how erdogan came up with peaceful initiatives to resolve this crisis. why? well, music is good for elections, but brazil well, because it is also good, firstly, a socialist, secondly, for peace, thirdly, he is there, uh, in general, while we understand that he is not erdogan nilula de silva can’t do anything from the word in order to really achieve something and

they don’t lose anything in this sense from china, the question is different oh, and the struggle for hegemony or for broken american hegemony? here, everyone gives in their own way. china is forced to move in this direction. he said, a b and the americans are coming and the west is starting to try to unwind him in this movement. here, this european commissioner speaks and generally says how how. well, i don't know who the activist at the rally is aggressive water. yes, yes, yes, in general , ukraine cannot squeeze out its own in negotiations, this is a new stage in our cooperation. i just wanted to be curious. what was the previous one this is when china was thrown, when it was, uh, so to speak, by the motor sich enterprise and then, by a call from washington, it was all withdrawn for 9 seconds of chainsaws, having talked about it with zelensky and also forgot about the sanctions imposed by zelensky on khoomi. this means that there has never been and cannot be any cooperation between china and ukraine. why? well, listen, it's obvious to us that ukraine is just

a geographical concept, ruled from washington. and the chinese do not understand that this is a province ruled by their main worst enemy, but since they said that they peacekeepers they must move. but that is, it is, as it were, for them to enter enemy territory. well, such a bridgehead, of course, but in this situation, zelensky says, and we will not negotiate, if he puts forward conditions that directly contradict. well, not just our understanding of the good and evil of our constitution, but what kind of negotiations can there be? and what will china do then, it will offer for the second third fourth time and then as these american generals say. i did everything, perhaps we will return to this uncompromising pro american leaders are drowning europe in blood. and we are china. we are for peace. but where is there, and you latin america also has a problem. we are flying to you, but now not the americans, and now the chinese, that is, the west, it is necessary to nip china as a peacemaker in the bud.

only the west has the right to decide. who is right, who is wrong? who to put up, who to fight, who to exist, who to divide, and who to unite? what is it about understood? well, that is, e, i asked you questions, you essentially answered that this is the concept of the goal of nothing. uh, the movement is everything, well, or if we say in another way that, as they say, i won’t catch up . so at least you’ll warm up a little clarification, the goal is to break the hegemony in the united states in this matter, so it’s just not a linear movement. this is the failure to achieve peace on the territory of ukraine, this is what i mean. this achievement is different. i mean exactly this, that on this material, china , as i understand it, is solving problems that are not directly related to restoration at all, as in some kind of truce there is a dialogue and so further. it seems to me that this is very cynical and therefore very logical that it is said that china, in connection with all these backwoods calls and the positions that it gives, let me remind you. 12 in my opinion, or how many points

of china's peace program in this story is the process important to him? and whether the result will be achieved is the second question, in fact . and it doesn’t seem to me that there are such naive people, uh, in beijing, who expect that the result will be achieved, which, most likely, will soon follow from the west. anxiety about the fact that now, uh, the former is sent to russia as a special representative. why does the west need a person in kiev who will keep an eye on everything that happens from china, but obviously on the other hand, we must also understand. and i think that this is all that is happening should inspire some of our red-hearted political scientists. in general, the old truth. which was said

back in the 19th century that our only allies are the army and navy. we must understand that china certainly has its own own interests, which do not necessarily have to coincide completely with ours and do not coincide on a number of issues, another thing is that we understand that china , of course, is not interested in the defeat of russia and is interested, because this is a prologue to an attack on china in one way or another shape, china really. by the way, i completely agree with the president of the czech republic who was not a general or president, china in my opinion, the direct benefit from the cessation of these hostilities and, let's say, the restoration of relations. although it is unlikely that the cessation of military actions will lead to the restoration of relations between russia and the west will not lead unconditionally. ukraine will partially remain ; they will continue to pump up weapons anyway , induce them to and so on. and not only ukraine

, but china today. well, you know that 60% of the oil that was said to be new today is 60% of the oil that we supplied to the west. we are now delivering to asia, mainly to china to india yeah, china obviously has, uh, quite specific bonuses from the fact that russia the west is simply pushing russia into the union. china china, of course, feels confident in this regard and therefore it can afford these gestures, which, as gestures , really look very noble and which, of course, in this situation make people think. and who is the leader after all, who is actually the right country that achieves the right goals? it's china or uh, the united states the united states has taken a stand from her indicated that no peace now needs a truce prematurely and so forth. they are waiting for

a counteroffensive. china never about the counteroffensive did not express everything. sizinpin's statement yesterday contained the opening phrase that the ukrainian crisis is of a complex nature. but that's the general thing we've always said, that it doesn't really start. e crisis in ukraine since february 24, 22. it actually begins in 1991 with the belovezhskaya pravda agreement and further develops at different stages in different ways, showing itself, therefore, it seems to me that this should be taken calmly on our part . uh, if someone had such an idea, uh, stop counting on the fact that well, uh, someone will come and our problems in ukraine will not be solved for us. we must respond very politely to all this, support,

like everyone else, the rhetoric in the world and understand that the world. it will really be peace for us if we achieve our goals. it is clear now that we will break through for a short advertisement, and then we will finish breaking through. the western countries of nato, they arranged a training ground from ukraine and dragged us into this war. i believe that a lesson needs to be taught behind us , our families and the memory of our ancestors. all of us are not we want to let this war into our country to our people. we all have ideas here, we don’t have a week here, who is new, we train. they quickly capture contract. meet the new card for life. on the best terms

and only we need rest after rest, and only we have a comedian. maybe in all seriousness to advertise the tank, not only we have the fsb bank that supports us throughout the fsb, we believe people on the website daily rus only excellent housing options for recreation, something pulls somewhere soapy. tele2

a unique offer, collect it yourself and pay only for the selected content, and this has no analogues. not even our tele2 will be able to purchase a subscription in an instant; other rules took everything in the room for a loan of up to 5 million . unpack the dacha from yandex.market for 8.000.990 rubles. tinkoff airlines credit card with a limit of up to 700 thousand rubles, miles and compensate for air tickets with them. fly for free i will have time to issue until april 30 and get a free

service forever tinkoff he is such a one movie one tv presents the need for a movie 1tv presents the grachov choir written

by the year should not be understood by the person renaissance

here, uh, when we discuss what is happening around china now and china i want to recall one very recent our story, strangely repeated only on the new circle the history of russia and yugoslavia remember, when russia suddenly became yugoslavia, but when it all started with yugoslavia, russia began to breed in russia, they began to remind that it or with partners. she is with europe, she is with the americans, that we understand your sympathy for the serb, but russia can’t get in there, russia can’t do anything, because, well, then how are you destroying everything that you actually created today and we then, by the way, many people said that don't you see that what is happening with yugoslavia will happen with russia or in 15 serbs said, uh, then milosevic spoke about this already in prison. you see, history repeats itself, now china, in principle, if i think it still has enough in this case analysts and the mind understand that what

is happening now with russia and china is what will happen, then it will happen with china simply, because many things. why come up with something new if the old one is already working well and china's wiring to the world. now. she just took it, shook it off in the dust. you said good things about the world. you raised the flag on this matter. great, let's go. now guys. we will remind you and me peace is with us friendship is chewing gum with us trade. how many there 900 billion? we have everything with you in general and are you really here in you can’t help yourself in this state of yours, we understand that russia is important to you, but be peacekeepers, put russia at the negotiating table, like the milosevics of russia, be a peacemaker, put a horse at the table, and then chernomyrdin will fly in and everything, surrender, you understand, and you you will then pretend that everything was not so. and in general, it’s not because of the airfield that you foolishly took there with - slatina, then another foreign minister will have to be a little bit. yours will give everything to nato and you will sit waiting for your contingent to let through,

and it is no longer independent. there for someone tails mark. they are trying to repeat the situation today it is quite obvious, but in fact you just now, when you said this, i now take a fresh look. we showed her yesterday, uh, the track record of the special representative, mm. china now in ukraine about which we are really both of you quite rightly said that well, yes, this is such a small foothold, and which may be, they will not achieve anything meaningful. yes, but they will play their game, which is very important, they will play their game the chinese, for whom ukraine is also just a board. it's just a field. and so, it seems to me that on this and ah, you can now complete. well, in this, well, in understanding what is happening, here we often said the word sovereignty here in the studio , here sovereignty is, among other things,

when you don’t rent yourself out in order to have someone’s board ukraine for last. how about years. she first rented herself out to be the u board for the u west american-centric and now just the same already in this game. it becomes the board on which the chinese now play their combination with the americans. and here is the story. eh, this is a lesson that, of course, needs to be learned. uh, including us, because the comrade, uh, is dashing. after all, he studied the history of the soviet union, in which he worked from the eighty -first year, and i hope that he, being a special representative, of course, for ukraine, nevertheless, for his leadership. and that's what you just said about, very important, interesting, will certainly convey to me for the time being to add to this conversation, there is nothing more than three words that have recently become for me. well, it 's just that the dolls of the heir are such a support in the life of the heir here.

karenzhan pierre and jen psaki two from the casket are the same from the face. why does the white house need such incredibly smart press secretaries in quotation marks, who do they serve ? i have read this and am not familiar with the term. i'll check. let's see what our team meant by this term. at i have a question for you, as a specialist in the united states. why does the white house choose such people?