and in this sense, i think that our chairmanship was successful. without any excesses, we organized three so-called, as they say here , landmark events. this is uh, open debate on uh, uh, the risks that arise from uncontrolled uncontrolled transfers of military products, uh , effective multilateralism based on the principle established by the un charter and uh, the middle east, including the palestinian question in the last two of these meetings. uh of the chairmanship of the minister of the state of affairs of russia yes, we have outlined our approaches to non- handedness. this is a separate topic, we can talk about this topic separately in addition to what i will say now, we have outlined our approaches, which are well known to everyone. eh, in response, of course, will be heard known. the new narrative of the west is that it

is not the skin of the aggressor to reason and versatility. that was approximately the leitmotif of the speech of the western countries, uh, they limited themselves to what these ritual formulas of theirs gave, or they really tried, uh, to arrange it from the session of the security council some polemical battle. no, there was no special polemical special controversy. they spoke the theses known to us, which do not repeat the meetings of the meeting, nothing new. as a matter of fact, we did not hear, but there were some attempts. and to prevent you from organizing sessions to show sessions. you probably remember that on the eve of our presidency , the americans and other western countries. uh, there has been a lot of media talk about who and russia

is not eligible to chair the security council that russia should to give up my seat to someone else, but that the americans will closely monitor how we carry out our functions. it was such an ar-preparation and an attempt to exert political psychological pressure. we have never abused our transformative chairman. there are always honest professional performers. and we are chairing the council in february 2022, which coincided first with a special military operation. and then we theoretically had the opportunity to abuse in one issue. we have not become this case. what did you deserve respect for our colleagues. e, and now all of them , all of them after the end of our chairmanship , they thanked us for holding it, and they even did it. those who initially doubted our ability to exercise an effective presidency.

reluctantly, but still, you know, it's very, uh, interesting, what you're saying. and it's certainly reassuring, and we've got a meganian look-alike here, and i remember back in new york. we talked with your e, predecessor vitaly churkin, and then there were also quite a lot of contradictions and public controversy in the security council, but to my pleasant surprise, churkin said that at the level of his personal communication with colleagues , the situation was mine and uh, i even got from using, but because a forces, which was at the same time his partners. uh, just talking about the churkel. i would even say not just with respect, but also with sympathy, but samantha power new york times. what article was written by a positive positive decision and also halizat

zalmekhanizat, they generally fought with churkin desperately on a cash basis. i know it from they had khalizad. well, i don't want to say close relationship. of course not. well, in general, constructive. how is the situation. now you can work normally with representatives of western countries in the security council. of course, they can security council - this is not an institution of noble maidens, which at first, with the start of a special military operation , the anglo-saxon ladies tried to turn it into and not a club of like-minded security council e. it has always been a place where the contradictions of the great powers and those who they argue that advice was effective before and now it has become ineffective.

they are either cunning, or they don’t know history, or they give out what they want for 10, but there was a time in the nineties, when it really seemed to us that we entered a new bright world, and everything will now become different, uh, but that, well, then we had clashes because with that security er. the security council clashes with the interests of the nationalists, the interests of the often indigenous national interests. uh, as i said, the great derzhak is constantly a member council, uh, and uh, and uh, in order to ensure that these interests are ensured and there is an institution of veta, which are not just a privilege, a constantly important tool for achieving a balance of interests, as far as personal personal communication is concerned. e, then with all the representatives of the west and the powers, including the americans, we had e friendly communication outside the council. i have spoken about this many times. uh, the same communication we have

now is an adjustment for what is happening now, because the western countries. uh, the european union first of all, by the way, and to the americans the second turn, they accepted in general they accepted uh, they made a decision. uh, limit your contact with us. uh, it's not our choice, but in the security council, he has nowhere to go from this. moreover, at the expert level, we communicate daily with representatives of these countries, uh, for a long time. more than a year. we didn't meet as five members of the council all the time. and it wasn't our choice either. finally, not so long ago, during our presidency, the french organized such a traditional lunch of the five, er, together with the general king, where all the members five, confirmed the need. there is no dialogue of dialogue, because the security council is not limited only to the situation by discussing the situation around ukraine ; there are a lot of issues that

require our joint actions. thank you very much. this is from my point of view. not just, but a very interesting, but also important story, because in general, sometimes one gets the impression that the situation is in the security council. uh, even worse than you wrote it, but before we let you go. i want you to ask a question, but a person who knows the former well ambassador. he is andrey denisov, you know i have a question. eh, very simple. firstly. i am very glad to see vasily alekseevich, we are connected by many years of joint work, and i would like to emphasize the following. all of us, the audience that hears or sees us, must understand that our diplomacy in modern conditions is diplomacy. a country at war, and this is felt first of all, where vasily alekseevich and his employees are located, because work in the un is

a team game. i remember my years at 17 years ago and what it seemed to me then difficult, and sometimes extremely difficult. uh, it just seems like hothouse conditions now, compared to what it is now, so sorry for the long lead time. the only questions i have are vasily alekseevich, all mine. and first of all, as they say, kip-fingers, uh, i cross my fingers. and the question is this. how do you endure all this? helps us helps us. ah, long experience. uh, relaxation uh companionship. e. well, i want to say that i have already said that communication with my colleagues did not stop, never with the exception of only new intermediaries who arrived, uh, arrived here after the start of a special military operation. they did not consider it their duty to come

to me with a courtesy visit, so i know what to say, as they say only on tv, but with all our old colleagues, friends, we continue to communicate outside. uh, the united nations buildings are true. uh, i must say that i'm not a big secret. e. about the level of modern diplomacy, and i think that it is personified by the high representative of the european union on foreign policy jose barrel is the european union foreign minister who recently became famous for a number of high-profile statements. well, what a high representative such such diplomacy of the european union recently. here i was at one reception, where i met my old friend. ambassador of one of the major countries of the european union and i told him. you wanted to come to me for dinner twice already asked about this, i invited you twice, but you don’t come, to which he told me, vasily, you

understand, because we are at the level of the european union a decision has been made not to socialize with you. e, you see, there stands, a settlement of one e of the baltic countries. i know brussels will snitch on me but i'm not afraid of that. here's an example of what is happening here in the non-european union, here again, with regard to the level of diplomacy. during our presidency, a number of countries , four specific countries, did not address us as chairman, when he gave them the floor, they said thank you and proceeded to their speech. we met yesterday. uh, with a cover for they discussed the program of work, they were the chairman of the maya council, and i told them about this, that, of course, this did not go unnoticed with us, but we are polite people. however, everything is petty and unworthy of the members of the council. and i even tell you.

ah, i join, uh, uh, a niche dish and take off my hat to your professionalism, because speaking the way you speak calmly confidently is balanced, but in no way, uh, well, if you want, without showing indignation, but with rhetoric by the actions of your so-called colleagues on safety advice. this is of course from my point of view is not easy and a great achievement. thank you very much. thanks dmitry and thanks to everyone in the studio. i am very glad to see you. hope to see you again soon good luck. thank you general buzhinsky obvious question we talked about the diplomatic front, which, to put it mildly. e was uh, far from hopeless, what happens when we talk about the battlefields in ukraine and one of the participants in our

program. uh, talking about what's going on with the so-called counteroffensive. he spoke about the feelings of the russian military. he said it was like a tightrope. you know, dmitry has the impression that the whole world is looking forward to when this widely publicized, announced offensive will begin. of course, the discrepancy in the statements of the ukrainian leadership is a little alarming. some say, there, well, april 30 has already passed. they talk about may, while others say, but fly the third. they say that it can be and before autumn, that's all. it will stretch. eh, everything. this is accompanied by ritual statements such as, you know, yaroslavna's cry that there is not enough technology. now here's a new one e moaning about aircraft about combat aviation. i understand americans very well. i have more than once. eh, would talk about

it, that it would be so to say. well, let's put it this way. uh, if they decide to start supplying combat aircraft, this will be a turning point, of course, in this operation, because they themselves say that ukrainian pilots are not yet ready to pilot these aircraft. this means that these should be pilots, and they should be based from nato countries. they must be somewhere not on the territory of ukraine, so all this can result in the fact that we will enter direct to direct combat clash with the silinata, but i want to say about something else, that , uh, they have been for several months. uh, they accumulated forces and concentrated the technique. uh, in the pavlodar region, pavlodar has turned. well, given its geographical location. uh, not far from dnepropetrovsk, all areas of the special operation are practically accessible, and they

have accumulated quite decent forces there, judging by the intelligence reports that have become known. eh, it's open source. uh, yesterday's strikes on pavlodar on the railway junction there, well, there is no exact data on what was hit and destroyed, but the ministry of defense said that all the targets that were targeted. they were hit by a lot of very hard explosions. uh, that is ukrainians. i think they suffered very heavy losses there, first of all, in terms of destroying stocks of ammunition and equipment, so i say again that i am waiting for this offensive from the point of view of simply operational art. how does e, not having an advantage in any of the components , not in air superiority, not in

armored vehicles, or artillery, but the only thing they have. uh, very high hopes for precision weapons. these are, uh, rszo, like hymes, but they can't decide. uh, the tasks of a successful offensive. i strongly believe in this, so i'm looking forward to how they will cope with this task, and especially considering that if this is the south direction , it's all in the open. all this is also great for defeat, when they begin to concentrate the grouping to break through our very well-organized defense, so i am like a military man. i'm just with i look forward to when this offensive will begin, if it begins at all. well, i understand your impatience. i am sure that those who are at the front are even more impatient. yes, because there is so much to talk about it already. yes, you must be tired of waiting. but uh, as i understand it, uh, both the command at

the front of hostilities and the general staff in moscow, in general, are very serious about the upcoming offensive. especially considering how the ukrainian servicemen were prepared for this, uh, your point of view, would this be called a counteroffensive, but the ukrainian army or is it the offensive of the collective west that uses the ukrainian army. in this case, it's somehow early . no, well, it's natural that this is a proxy war, that is, a proxy war, of course, ukrainians are fighting with the west. it's simple. so to speak, the instrument is on the other side, of course, and from the west already, uh. starts to get bored. here it is, first of all, uh, i repeat again. this is not a counter-offensive, a counter-offensive is retaliatory action in response to an offensive, when an offensive is repelled and

e, the defending troops go on the counteroffensive. we don't advance. we are conducting operations to force out the cleansing of enemy forces, let’s say from bakhmut and e because of avdiivka, because, well, from avgievka, it’s clear because this is the place where e-u is not shelled from and the president set the task of eliminating as quickly as possible this uh artillery concentration point, ukrainian artillery. what about? i repeat once again, an offensive operation, then the west, in my opinion, is already openly pushing the ukrainians. let's start it's time already, otherwise our audience starts asking questions. with what article do we spend such an amount of money, send such an amount of ammunition equipment, but you still can’t decide. uh, move on to some

decisive offensive action general. thank you very much, we're leaving for advertising and will be back in just a few minutes. this is a discovery. this is new knowledge, new feelings , new emotions. let's never start with this , never made a feature film in space, how is evgeny vladimirovna feeling? i'm a doctor call everyone. whom do you know and says that they must look at them. words

welder of the sixth category georgy petrovich at the age of 62 was distinguished by iron discipline a man with a rod on the word respect, to petrovich grew and polyps for 30 years he was never late for a shift, alas, he was late, because bowel cancer grows on the sly , it is better not to delay the history of the disease. after all, at an early stage,

cancer cured 90% of cases men. pass medical examination for free health, it is important here and now that same feeling when only that he received the money that was needed right now tinkov cash loan money on the card right away. deferral of the first payment up to 90 days to issue a cash loan and receive money right now tinkov is one of a kind . i wish now kfc is a whole basket with a crispy shortcrust. choose your basket from 169 rubles. ozone when you

need something, check out the weekly promotion. ozone choose different products at competitive prices washing powder mine or for 349 rubles. shampoo hay lives for 299 rubles. presents

watch your pulse, take glycine-revan asparkam reneval reneval we trust rinival we choose rinival. it's still that the translator is to blame. let’s better, i’ll transfer it to beeline’s high-quality internet has become double on your side sovcombank pensioners can get special conditions, so some are already taking a loan, others are happy with deposit interest what you need in the branch and online age of its benefits. our package is cooler than internet mobile communication tv and a cool video service for the price of a regular package in one package of russia

but now there are such memes lying to the russian tune that russia blew up nord stream. i asked, why would they suddenly do this, they immediately exclaimed about you helping putin did the american establishment decide to shut up the tv presenter who cut the truth of the uterus. they want the war to continue. why is it so? ' cause they're getting rich with that kind of money, darling my carlson that you never dreamed of? so go for a walk, he doesn't keep up with the current white house, but he was accused of being a traitor to america, they work for a small group of people who are really you and run the world, the work is not finished yet. more precisely, it is completed for the attacker carlson, he has a huge colossal audience. it

becomes too big to be sunk by carlson, who lives without the heir's doll roof. there's a big game in ukraine tomorrow on first live serious things are happening, maybe even more serious ones are coming, but this week in the united states focuses on something else on the conflict between republicans and democrats in congress on the issue of the national debt and just now, and the secretary of the treasury in the united states did a genathlon in general a rather dramatic statement that if it is not possible to reach an agreement in congress and if it is not possible to agree between congress and the administration, then this may

result in a situation where, after june 1, the united states will not be able to pay there has never been such a commitment in the history of the united states for a long time, and no one knows what it would look like. what could be the consequences of this? it would be a very serious blow to american prestige, but if you like, to the still remaining reputation of the dollar as the leading reserve currency. andranik migranyan mgimo professor what do you think about this i must say that this is not the first case, but it’s true, usually it happened not with the state debt, but with the uh budget of the budget emirates, because the parties have always competed and blocked the adoption of the budget, because each time it was necessary to raise the ceiling of the long state in order

for the state to be able to borrow new money fs. e, would give this money so that e could fulfill his obligations. for budgetary, social and a variety of things , this was the rule before, but now the external debt has been added to this, and i think that this will end. in my opinion, most likely, as usual. this ended in bargaining between democrats and republicans, usually in order to to vote in order to raise the debt ceiling it is necessary that the republicans and democrats find some kind of common agreement and that there are enough votes

towards, and on the other hand, the democrats will go to e, to meet, because otherwise it will really be that actually e, it can end in a very serious collapse, another thing is that, as a rule, those who start this business and do not want to do it. then they have big problems. i remember teda cruz blocking at one of these events, because the democrats will blame the rubber bankruptcies of the senate of the republic yes and yes, because on the one hand there is the temptation to block and demand big concessions, and on the other hand there is always a party that, uh, in general - something conducts. uh, politics is real, executive power. she can always announce opponents. well, in general, irresponsible and people are people who actually lead the state,

e to financial collapse and, in general, the collapse of international relations. i was just a witness myself. here are just two words. last. usually it ends, if it's about paying, uh in state uh, employees and so on and so forth it happens with the budget sequestration, and the budget sequestration then automatically enters the law that distributes people to the right and unnecessary in the first place, that is, a whole range of things that can lead to very serious social consequences. that's why i believe that they will agree, in the end, what is happening now, but with these discussions in congress. you are absolutely correct in mentioning the budget, but because the republicans have already said that they are ready to vote for an increase in the national debt, but they say we cannot

do this if we are not trying to control this ever-increasing american spending under the democrats, and they have put forward their proposals and the democrats, who control the senate. and the white house. they've already said how to say it, given their tone. a you would go somewhere far away is unacceptable. in general, there was none. it was like they showed theirs. eh, there was such an element of contempt. that's how they behave the administration of world politics. and who are you? we control the executive branch. we control the senate like this, and the republicans say, and we are like that without whose consent you cannot raise the ceiling and raise the ceiling, and with the

emotional hostility that exists today, it just went crazy. in general, described enough. uh, meaningful work in the un security council despite the very serious contradictions in congress. we have to look and make sure that it is still possible, because there rage, uh, ignoble, but rises like a wave of history from the other side. and it just shows how polarizing is in american society. and how does it interfere with the decision. in general, very important and in principle, in my opinion, andronicus solvable questions. fine. tell us about carlson's tucker, uh , not everyone in russia is interested in this, of course, but very many uh, they threw him out, uh, he is, in general, for now e did not really explain anything happened to his

plans, but he made a short address to the country. i watched it, of course, but there he didn’t say anything. no, what happened did not say anything about her personal plans and accused the american media of constant lies. and that they discuss problems of little importance and at the expense of very serious problems. well, for the performance of 50-7 million people to be important, people watched it. this is that the future candidate for the post of president , e, dmitry is very good question. e, you know my weakness for such a carlson, but i have always morning, by the way, uh, i wrote to someone that it was as if i had lost a member of my family, because my morning began to watch the nightly program yesterday, and records to us, but she gave such a general direction what is happening in the united

states is a very interesting question. i looked at almost all the comments about what happened and what it could turn into megan kelly whom our viewers probably know she was and she left from there to nbc and from nbc because of black face there and so further. who was kicked out for sex 6 years ago . by the way, he was then kicked out in connection with the accusations that this case was categorically that e was a rally, then 14 years in a row this position was somehow snared, but he was absolutely the champion. e on cable television. always in the first place, the largest audience and so on. such a blow

to the channel, which the channel inflicted on itself , was not here, apparently, the ambitions of robert merdark and his family collided. children. by the way, one of these questions is many there, but one of these moments they say, well, you know, when social events take place in new york or in america in general, events take place receptions, narrow meetings and so on. and when you are billionaires, you have a television company , you have film companies there and you are not invited there because you do not belong to this group of people, that is, such a polarization has occurred that even if you are, uh, even the owner of a republican channel. and in general, you are referred to as radicals.

uh, well, right away, they immediately call them racists , they call them anti-semy here and there, and so on and so forth. etc. well, then already you have to prove that you are not a camel, that is, before the sons of robert murdoch many believe the measures resisted for so long. he didn't want to go for it, but they didn't fire him. here is a very important question. that's it with him, because fox is interesting things, but for us, of course, it 's more interesting if the political future is so political future, moreover, this is the first case when all the leading analysts and leading stars. they said 3.5 million if that's what it looks like they'll open their program wherever it is. all this

the audience will go from fox to him and he 's got really big, and he's always had a big chance, but it's just not his cycle, most likely in the next cycle. he will seriously think about it. i will only tell you one thing. i agree that he has, well, imagine here he is right like this without any political experience. uh, from his extravagant manner from a tv presenter a year and a half before the election to turn. this is probably not his. i can say this, there was one such fawn-fawn, uh, in ukraine, and you remember that with this fawn-fawn it turned out when they decided to promote it well, so we live in an amazing age. i still think that the next republican nominee doesn't seem to be, but i'm not ruling anything out. that's what for us, of course, now central

is not even about who will be president, but the united states and how will china treat russia and you know that there were statements, but the chinese ambassador to france in general? the russian point of view, uh, these are very encouraging, but those who say that other u are post-soviet countries, which, in general, are their legitimacy has not yet been proven by anyone, then there was a chinese statement, like the first statement refuting. is it a storm in a teacup or is it a serious internal chinese debate about their international policy. well, uh, i would say that there was a time when chinese diplomacy was very reserved when the chinese ambassadors. uh, overseas after the people's republic of china avoided any public speaking. and

even more so in the body of the interview. and even more so in foreign languages ​​there was such a time. that time is gone, chinese diplomacy has remained much more flexible much more active and i would say offensive. uh, and examples of word-of-mouth speeches that you talked about, in the first case it was the best went in france in the second case. this is foothun. uh, permanent representative to the european commission of both. i know, especially funa worked closely with him for many years. this is a very experienced diplomat. better. i am no less experienced than he, but in china there is an official position, which is articulated on behalf of the state and which puts everything in its place. therefore, what was said by the official representative of mead after all these statements. this is the truth, the last resort. and

i would like to point out that there is a certain set of language that balances each other, but they are all quite general , when china declares respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. he never says whose and what cases he has in mind, and there are many such cases , this is by no means only ukraine therefore, in china there is a principled position that, uh, which follow unswervingly chinese diplomacy and there is some room for flexibility. that's what we see, well you have. eh, tell me, there is some concern that china has decided for dark reasons, but you know, i don’t see signs of this, to be honest, and it’s not about whether i see them or not. whether i have such a concern or not, and the point is in

the objective interests in the objective position of the people's republic of china and this is a state with a pragmatic policy, both inside it and from its own, uh principles, it will not recede. and even more so, it is useless to exert any pressure on china. you know china many times better than i do, but when i look at their diplomacy, it seems to me that this is it. well, that's not french zigzags. if i may say so, there is no such e-gallic e, if you want the eccentricity that sometimes manifests itself in the current french government. i think when they chose their fundamental course. and this, it seems to me, is clearly a course towards e-cooperation with russia, then this is serious and for a long time. if not something extraordinary will happen. you

absolutely agree with this. and this is confirmed in our joint documents signed at the highest level by china and russia , including during the recent visit of the chairman of the city. here. uh, when we talk about this region, there is a country there that is kind of considering, but opportunities. changes in their policy, their position on ukraine, their previous unwillingness to expose lethal weapons to ukraine, and just now their president, yun suk, yeok, i don’t hope i pronounce the name correctly just visited washington and as i read his statement, he did not announce military assistance to ukraine but said that they are ready to consider such a possibility if some undesirable for them happens, and the events in this country in ukraine i mean how to interpret it? this, in my opinion, does not

need to be interpreted at all. it's obvious we can, you know, the classic form. yes, but we'll see what outweighs , either yes, or, but, most likely, still in this case, but i would say a few words about republic of korea this is its official name. i think that too little attention is paid to this country in our video space. this is a key state , located literally at the crossroads of interests of our country, primarily for us , china, japan, with which, by the way, the relations of south korea, to put it mildly, leave much to be desired. well, the northern part of korea , the democratic people's republic of korea , in general, the entire region, this country is modest in its geographical and demographic parameters. but it's definitely one of the leaders. world economy, moreover, one of the leaders of the world industry, moreover, the modern innovative industry. this is a country

actually devoid of natural resources, but e harrows, developing and producing the most, most importantly producing, and, therefore, dependent on foreign economic relations. and this is where the situation comes in. if you want, they say these are the anvils of power and the charybdis according to pleasant, i won’t talk about this for military-political reasons, uh , i’m simply not able to object in the united states of america to seoul on the territory of korea a significant military contingent of the united states of america has been deployed substantially. yes, yes, quite right. this is a very serious power. e, so e, as for relations , the newly elected president, by the way, tell e washington e, as for relations with the united states, korea is objectively deprived of the opportunity to somehow raise its voice there

to demand something. she can only ask to ask, what to read to ask to take into account her objective features, which still make her follow some kind of flexibility, this also concerns relations with china and relations with our country, because korea is present in our economy. ke is not only through trade, but also through investment and is present quite seriously. well, the truth is now because of the sanctions, let's say. so this is a few. uh, faded into the shadows, but trade cooperation did not stop. and here i would like to say, and most importantly, apparently, the purpose of the visit of the president of south korea to america was the statement of the request not to respond. well, let's say, in such a sharp oh-oh, a way to show a certain understanding objective situation and note immediately after this visit was followed by the announcement

that the deputy minister of foreign affairs of south korea is going on a visit. in russia, yes. well, even more so. yes, that means that the figures have also chosen an acceptable and familiar one for such rather serious conversations. of course, on the one hand, the president, on the other, the deputy minister of foreign affairs. these are different weight categories, but the fact itself suggests that in this case, apparently, our korean neighbors follow the classical called taoist philosophy, which says that if there is an up there must be a down, if there is a right there must be a left. if there is a nose, there should be a tail, here the main thing is to balance and balance, so it seems to me that this is where we started in this design, yes, a comma but uh, well, at least, well, if it doesn’t outweigh, then it will be very significant. thank you very much advertising

will be back in a few minutes. poland is setting the standard for what used to be called russophobia. today it is already mainstream. we hear almost nothing. about the role of the soviet union or, more broadly, the role of russia in recent history. poland poland we are dealing with historical censorship. poland would like, of course, to lead troops to ukraine between our countries there will be no more borders with such a hybrid way to fight with russia because of this the answer is nothing. can not take responsibility for the formation of a new world order, the polish spoke about plans to participate in the nato program for the joint use of american nuclear weapons.

i've never been as strong as today we should discuss the prospects for the creation of free and independent states in the post -russian space. poles have a very bad trait in the ruling polish gentry. she can never stop the premiere in time. poland, poisoned by hatred on sunday at the first, we are no longer those readers for whom perseverance is important. we do not need to look at our true face on one screen, what to be on the same wavelength in order to feel like masters?

and mts is creating an ecosystem of digital services that are constantly changing and changing as usual. what is this new logo? mts yes, but that one, but that one is not the same, that same feeling when you just received the money that was needed right now tinkoff cash loan to the card right away. postponement of the first payment up to 90 days to issue a cash loan and receive money right now, he is the only one. injections

thank you, finally everything, as we dreamed . we look and what am i? thank you donklik, domklik, the largest database of new buildings. find your dream apartment at home click service building number one professional italian hair care best prices for line, intense from the content your hair deserves the best. choose for you. ice cream pearl of russia 399 will you approve

a loan? compare will help to find the confidant. check your credit score. try the application and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms in comparison, if a loan, then in the application for purchases from 450 rubles. terpelizov's drawings, and it tastes so good to me, like you, there don't overwork anymore move control your emotions. watch your pulse, take glycine-reval asparkam rinival reval we

trust reval we choose. sberbank represents a profitable loan with the lowest rate over the past 10 years from four percent per annum apply for a loan at sberbank and receive monthly cashback. obviously profitable premiere on football with denis kazansky on sunday at the first big game of the big bookmaker of the russian premier league on the air is a big yes, and now we'll talk about that for obvious reasons. uh cares about the citizens of russia as military actions

in ukraine as an action of the ukrainian authorities. uh, how can they affect normal life in russia, and so far in russia, life is not surprising, but surprisingly normal , and this, of course, is a great merit of both the russian armed forces and the russian authorities. well , i’ll say the healthy optimism of the russian federation, but, in my opinion, in kiev they don’t hide that we are in this normality, but they want to refuse and that they are becoming more and more impudent. although their capabilities are still very limited general. what can be done so that zelensky and i don’t know how to call them colleagues, not colleagues, but members of his group, so that they have

a clear understanding that trying to disrupt the normal life in russia may turn out to be for them, darov you know, they are already uh disrupting the normal course of life in the border regions that they are asking the west for more uh missiles with longer and longer range in order to , to get to before the cities, uh, in the depths of russian territory, but for now the west is very restrained in this regard, fearing an uncontrolled escalation, but, on the other hand, the ukrainians. e. now there is a tendency to unleash such a terroristic e the activity of the terrorist war, and even the statement e of officials. uh, when one says that it is necessary to switch to basayev’s tactics of capturing, uh, small cities in

the border areas, others say that it is necessary to carry out the more terrorist acts, even if not very large ones, the better . and lately we have been seeing this activity and this uh, just yesterday. uh, undermining e-e tracks in the belgorod region. as a result, he went off the tracks, uh, the freight train is and uh, various, well, political assassinations are uh, shelling uh, drones, not just shelling, but strikes by unmanned e surface ships, ships of sevastopol also shelling, e, unmanned strike weapons of sevastopol here just yesterday, so to say that

life is completely normal in the border areas. i wouldn't, but from my point of view. you just have to be very tough. i think, as i think, that here is a blow to the pavlograd - it was a kind of. the answer to uh, the last series, what it was, were strikes against concentrations of ukrainian troops and equipment that they had been accumulating over the past several months. to start his famous attack on most likely in the southern direction. although from there they also supplied the group, which is living its last days. uh, in artyomovsk or bakhmuti, and uh, a group that resists all-events, therefore, i think that what the west is afraid of does not provide missiles to me, i am absolutely sure that the west, uh, is afraid of the beginning of such carpet bombings, but ukrainian

cities, because russia is quite capable in russia is quite capable of doing. because not without reason, uh, the kiev authorities are simply begging. uh, west to put them. uh, the more, well, the maximum number of air defense systems. forgetting that air defense systems are not tanks. this is very uh, expensive technological and difficult and long systems to manufacture, there are not so many of them in service. even the same united states of america is not superfluous, and the fact that, uh, they announced that another battery, uh, patriot arrived in ukraine but these are four launchers . well, you can cover up some object, but they objectively lack air defense means, e-e rocket for our complexes. they have they are already coming to an end in ukraine, they are not producing what the americans are ready to supply them. the same there 4.000, missiles are missiles. eh, air. uh, air to air, unguided missiles, this is not e solve the problems

of creating a layered anti-aircraft defense. on defense, to prevent, uh, indeed, such very massive bombardments of ukrainian cities. e. it seems to me that you are an absolutely right general, what is better is the most effective and quite accessible for russia, e, the defense of its territory. this, of course, the vision of successful operations in ukraine and the last blow to pavlodar should also be interpreted as a response to ukrainian provocations of terrorist attacks, but it must be considered as a completely meaningful and expedient military operation to prevent. e ukrainian offensive, but nonetheless. i'm worried it won't hide you. what for the curators and admirers of ukraine for all their adoration of ukraine, even the carpet

bombing of ukraine will not scare them very much, because after all, their love for ukraine does not go so far that they the ukrainian civilians were also really worried, so my question is to the condron. is it possible somehow, from your point of view, that's really realistic, and from a practical point of view, to convince the administration of a warrior to convince a significant one. at least part of the congress, of course, their information that if they cross some kind of red line in russia and there is no need to mark this red line , everyone understands that strikes on russian territory, associated with great destruction and loss of life, then this is for any normal state, including united states redline. if the opportunity to convince the united states do not eat on strikes yet on the united states. is it possible

to convince that they are playing a very risky game, knowing the usa i have been dealing with this country all my life. i know that they cannot be convinced of anything by the american administration's means of persuasion alone. this infliction of a heavy defeat on ukraine is a threat to the liquidation of ukraine as a state, only in this case the american administration will look for its place, because as soon as such blows are delivered. it's a ricochet there will be strikes on america against the washington administration of the babaid, but personally they will simply lose everything after afghanistan, this will be the second biggest defeat, because the biden himself raised the question. so this is our war. this is, firstly, not only will be the defeat of america, it will be the defeat

of democracy against authoritarianism, well, as authoritarian regimes. they 're looking at us and china first . well, this big thing will have consequences. so we don't need to hit america. we need to achieve decisive turning point in ukraine this is, of course, very wise. uh, let's say to achieve another, ah, ah turn, uh in ukraine, i don't know what you all the rest think it's obvious to me that this is a fundamental task of the russian leadership, but if the russian leadership, uh, so uh, focused on this task that they are doing nothing else to keep the country safe, then it would not be the russian leadership that i know. well , to convince washington with words is a waste of time. you can find

some words and some formulas to washington understood from my point of view one obvious truth that there are some things that russia will not allow itself to do without a really very tough a and a destructive answer for the west or rodnik is right. it's a hopeless case, you know? no , it seems to me, mine, naturally and close, incomparable with the experience of andronic in all deliberations, er, the experience of staying in the united states and communicating with colleagues. e, says that there is still some kind of edge, indeed , this is all, it is, but something at the end, like they say they understand. after all, they are, well, not really, what is called untethered there are some things, well, first of all, related to the quantity and quality of the military potential of the defense potential of our country, which in america well, at least. measure