and you're already you're bad, eat, let's have another spoonful. and you? miracle grigory ivanovich

yes, nothing. i'm leaving for the active army. take care of yourself. we'll be waiting for news from you. vanya if you meet him, where tell him that i love him very much. what do you promise. friends need to leave the germans on the outskirts. be healthy.

on july 24, 1942, after heavy bloody battles, german troops again entered rostov-on-don, the second occupation of the city began, which will last much longer than the first almost six months, fate will send our heroes further along the roads war. and today we have a conversation with deputy foreign minister sergei

alekseevich, ryabkov sergei alekseevich big. thank you for taking the time for us we know how busy you are and really appreciate your willingness to help us and our audience figure out what is happening between russia and america and today after what happened with the drone attack on the kremlin let's see what just happened said russian president dmitry peskov. such decisions are the definition of goals and the definition of means, and so on, this is all dictated to kiev from washington and to us about this is good. it is known that it is very important for washington to understand that we know this. we understood how dangerous such direct participation in the conflict is. you, uh, have made several statements expressing

concern about where the us-russian relationship is going. but now, when russia has placed direct responsibility on the e-biden administration for what happened with the attack on the kremlin where can these relations go and how can these relations be tried to be brought under control? dmitry thank you for the invitation to the program i i think the assessments made by the president's press secretary are exhaustive. let me remind you that washington also spoke out on this matter. i want to note that, uh, what is observed again? official representatives in washington are trying to demonstrate

detachment and promote theses in the world media. they are washington's involvement in this absolutely unprecedented act of terrorism, an encroachment on the life of our president. what would happen if something like this happened in washington? seconds, not the slightest doubt that the responsibility would be assigned to the strategic adversary before any investigation. russia, we do not resort to terrorist methods, we are working to keep it. relations with the united states from falling into the abyss of open armed conflict. we are already on the verge of on the edge of this

abyss, but you can see that the restraint , the calm tone, the responsible nature of our statements sends a signal to the entire international community that russia's relations with the united states are in the abyss of war of direct open war. will not collide, but she will do everything and is doing everything in order to guarantee under any circumstances and at any turns of this drama, but to defend her own sovereignty and protect territorial integrity. provide security. the security of the country's leadership i want to emphasize that people for whom the doctrinal guidelines of the russian federation in the military sphere in the field

of national security are similar only matter as a kind of material for analysis, and not as a guide for ours. and these people are wrong. we are literally ready to use all means at our disposal to ensure that attacks on the security of the country , attacks on the security of the president of the political leadership are not allowed to be carried out by anyone and the denial by the americans of their responsibility for their involvement in this blatantly outrageous and absolutely unprecedented beyond any conceivable scope of a terrorist act. they can, but that doesn't convince anyone in their time. they

also tried, almost to impose on us responsibility for undermining the northern streams. now, by the way, this topic in europe is once again being exaggerated and inflated. for whom it is calculated for the profane, for those who are saturated to the marrow with hatred for russia, i think that any sane person in any country will understand that we are talking about the fact that the united states continues its escalation course and uses its wards in kiev, their puppets there to organize and the implementation of increasingly provocative and increasingly dangerous acts of provocation. alekseevich i have known you for many years and naturally, i follow your statements. and i can say with confidence that empty threats are definitely not in everyone's style. and when

here you are speaking in such very harsh dramatic terms that you use today from my point of view. this is very significant. that's what worries me, worries me that, and already in washington and more widely in the collective west , a habit has developed that, like a second, uh, nature, russia does not hear and even more so not to take russian words seriously. it is difficult for me to understand this, because, in general, russian warnings. and they often came true, and very serious warnings. like the coup. in ukraine or american intervention in syria, but nevertheless, in general, they don’t want to hear, and therefore i have to come to you. this is a very simple question, which may not be easy for you to answer, if now the channels in russian-american

relations that would give you and your colleagues the opportunity to explain to the american how to say it to the former partner that this time russia perceives the situation as an extreme seriously, the warning that is being given is that these are not empty threats, that this is not blackmail, but, well, if you like, a factual statement about where we are and that russia is warning that it will not work further down this path. channels exist and contacts are made, including as necessary at high political levels on high floors. the question is not the existence of these contacts; the question is

that our opponents in washington have made it a rule to convince their wards in europe , but not only to convince themselves in some degree, probably, that a signal emanating from moscow. and this is an element. as they have been saying disinformation companies for many years. you see, people who repeat this every day have many times been captured by their own slurs and their own propaganda. not further than yesterday in hot pursuit of a terrorist attack. of what happened over the senate palace from washington came the next. reasoning that

the information fabric coming from moscow, the signals from russia should be divided by 2, before something is correctly assessed, what is it like neglecting the basics of foreign policy and diplomacy, we have undertaken and will continue to undertake demarches. we chew in detail to the americans where we see potential risks. we continue patiently calmly without emotions to explain to them the unacceptability of further movement. search for laction stairs. we remind them that the risks have multiplied in recent months . but as they say,

there is no magic key here, and some kind of magic solution is needed here, systematic, focused work, without emotions. all channels to deliver such signals will continue to be used. we are waiting for a response from the sound from washington, which will allow us to conclude that they have, at least in the smallest measure, perceived our warning about the gravity of the moment and are beginning to generally perceive what may happen next with a seriousness befitting the totality of the circumstances that we are now dealing with. you used a very important term when you were talking about relations with the russian united states. you said our opponents washington am i right i understand that you meant the administration and

maybe part of the congress. yes, certainly all those who have plunged. headlong into russophobic initiatives into decisions that aggravate the situation and purely on a two-way track between us and, of course, around everything that is happening in ukraine. these people are our opponents. they are our enemies - it's obvious. and when i look at the statements of american officials, i usually hear that the united states supports ukraine because, they say, an innocent victim, not provoked by aggression, but with this is clearly stated by the united states of war. with russia they don't want to. and just now, the new

american ambassador, and lindsey, in his interview with a businessman, said that russia is not perceived. like an enemy. and that it is to the people of ukraine to the zelensky government that they are fighting against russia, and the united states, just as international law requires, supports the ukrainian right to sovereignty. can you admit that the united states is not a party to the conflict? look, the united states has long been a direct participant in this conflict, and it has long been openly hybrid war against my country ukraine is just a tool in their hands. this is the tip, the spear, which is brandished by the collective west , led by the united states, their goal is to destroy the sovereign independent russia as an international factor. they are increasingly tempted to play with the idea of

​​dismembering russia about it. we also speak openly now. this is a direct encroachment on the foundations of our political system, to say that the united states of america is not involved can only be people who throw dust in the eyes and try to confuse the head and in general the international media introduces this narrative of their own in the hope of zara in this way. for the voices of a certain number of those who are not very inclined to understand what was happening, we have repeatedly stated the genesis of the current tragedy in ukraine, we explained. what a purely destructive role the united states played in the events. imagine the one who preceded the coup d'etat in kiev in the fourteenth year, which took place over the long 8 years.

after that, how many efforts were made by diplomatic means to stop stop the attack to stop the aggression against the people of donbass, which was carried out by the kiev regime. it was all ignored. it was all crossed out. and now they're trying to pretend. that they are only helping kiev in some kind of struggle. listen to this upper-mindedness and hypocrisy, i have no other assessments, uh, that are appropriate for the moment within the acceptable range in public discourse. uh, when i look at the conflict around ukraine, i try to find historical precedents, how such conflicts arise and how such conflicts end, and here i am

i look at the conflict between imperial russia and japan, the conflict is very serious and japan alone, most likely, would not have been able to resist russia if it had not enjoyed the support of the united states and , first of all, great britain, but when it came to making peace, both great britain and japan assured russia that in case of peace. these countries will be friendly to russia and ensure that japan becomes friendly to russia and they fulfill all these promises. now let's see how the state us secretary anthony blinkan explains his biden administration approach to supporting ukraine even if

a peace deal is reached. it costs a lot. spring is already ending and summer will soon come and the long-awaited counter-offensive of ukraine is about to begin. do you think ukraine will be able to change the balance of power in such a way as to hasten the end of the war ukraine must make an important decision about which direction to go, how far it is ready to go, and how it will achieve its goals, but we are determined continue to support kiev. in addition, we are seriously ready to consider support not only in the short term, with special attention to the immediate counter-offensive, but also in the middle and long term, because ukraine, like many other countries. it is necessary to help create such armed forces that in the future would be able to effectively deter another russian aggression a. if it is not possible to contain it, then so that there is an opportunity to repel it and, if necessary, win. this will put ukraine in the most advantageous position, and

also help to restore the country and continue its integration into europe that is , in other words, in the case of even. the agreements on ukraine offer russia peace, but they offer a situation where the united states will continue to pump weapons into ukraine. moreover, the criteria are the scale of deliveries. just defending ukraine so that ukraine can defeat russia how do you consider this kind of statements is, well , rhetoric, if you like, to cheer up zelensky or do you think that really the biden administration is ready to go so easily into permanent struggle against russia there is no element of novelty in what has just been said. unfortunately, these mantras have been repeated in washington

for a long time. the fact that the united states is determined to inflict, as they themselves formulate it, the strategic defeat of russia is recorded in many documents , including those written in nato under american dictation. i proceed from the fact that the current moment is not the moment when one can talk about real diplomacy. we see that the united states is betting on further this is precisely what we are warning them against, where there is room for political efforts in this rhetoric just now, the rhetoric that has been voiced from washington crosses out the very possibility of a serious discussion on this topic.

no matter how the opposite is recorded in the statements of many major and authoritative political figures outside the united states it depends on washington when kiev stops trying to achieve its goals on the battlefield. our goals are clear, they were determined at the moment of the start of the special military operation. we protect our compatriots. we protect our people. we protect our territorial integrity. we must ensure our security under any circumstances, and we will certainly emerge victorious from this struggle. i don't have the slightest doubt about that. it's time for the united states. it's time to realize that relying on a military solution only prolongs the conflict. it's time for the us to realize that they

are making a major strategic mistake. rejecting the very logic of a normal political process in favor of a geopolitical phantom and their own preference for what they think should be look like a map of greater eurasia, we will not allow them to redraw this map to please themselves. let me go back to the example of uh, the russo-japanese war. one reason why president roosevelt theodor rusult, who was president of the united states at the time in 905, managed to convince nicholas ii and his ministers to sign a peace agreement. it was what he said that he supported japan since. she was

smaller than russia, it seemed to him that japanese rights were being infringed. he forgot to tell him of course, i also wanted to reduce russia's influence in the far east, but he said that if the relevant agreements were signed, he agreed to become their broker and behaved in this role. by the way, honestly enough. he said that in this case, and the uk will be together with the united states, ready. not easy. uh recognize russia as an equal member of the international community, but even support russia and work to secure russian geopolitical interests. i don't do history just to to tell, but some interesting facts. i 'm talking about the fact that in order for diplomacy to have opportunities. in order to

abandon the use of force to resolve the conflict, a throughout history it was considered important to help the diplomats of another country. find a solution that would be acceptable to their state and to their top leadership. do you see such an interest on the part of the biden administration to seek diplomatic solutions with you and your colleagues or in fact everything will be determined on battlefield. dmitry and there are no signs that the current administration in washington is even the least interested in finding a political solution

. let me remind you that last year we got the opposite experience. between moscow and kiev were frustrated and things went to escalation to a complication precisely with the filing of the united states people from kiev interrupted these negotiations when the degree of readiness of the main key links of this potential the agreement was quite high this is a matter of the past, but it is an indicator. this is litmus. a piece of paper about how today's washington is set. so washington needs to make sure from its own experience that its insane immeasurable non-stop. pumping ukraine with all kinds of assistance, both material and intelligence and consulting, and any other desired result for washington, does not

give. maybe then the process of some kind of rethinking will begin, but all this drags out the conflict, and i repeat. we are at a dangerous point. here let me go from big and, if you like, very mental in some special case, but only significant enough, uh, ma'am. ambassador olin tracy, the new ambassador of the united states , expressed bewilderment in her interview with the kommersant newspaper. why does russia complain about the fact that the american authorities refused russian journalists visas to journalists who accompanied the delegation , which naturally included minister lavrov and you yourself , lintracy, say that russian journalists were issued visas and for some reason they themselves refused, let's go, how was it really? dmitriy

i, uh, was, uh, a witness to everything that happened around the journalistic support of sergeyevich lavrov's trip to new york, uh. eh, for me, by and large , the aspiration was not a surprise. ah, the american side, after the fact, again, uh, present the situation. uh, well, or try to present the situation in a way acceptable to the general public, but the bottom line is that in order to properly cover lavrov's visit to new york , a certain journalistic pool was formed at the end of our chairmanship of the security council.

issued without explanation, then we were told, let the journalists come the day before the plane's departure. well, when they say, let them come, it is assumed that visas will be issued and this should have happened, by all logic , given that the united states is the country on whose territory the un headquarters is located. they are obliged to create favorable conditions for the work of all delegations, which by today's imperative includes a significant media component. well, so that the journalists came on saturday, they were not issued visas, they were told, that e consent of washington no. so it went on the next day, when the minister's plane had already taken off without these journalists. and another day later.

the pikans, in their trademark manner, uh, issued visas, some of these journalists partly didn’t issue anyway, and they say that they could. of course, you can go to new york if you wish, but even if they were directly from the american embassy with issued visas ran to the airport and bought a flight ticket there. i don’t know through istanbul dubai abu dhabi, whatever, but with a follow-up they would have arrived in new york by transfer , at best they would have arrived by the time lavrov had already flown out of there. is this a formal mockery of both people and common sense, therefore, of course , nominally, and the ambassador failed, visas were issued, but not to everyone and not on time, but on purpose so that nothing happened.

from their participation in the coverage of lavrov's trip, but i am very sorry that this incident arose and the way you tell it corresponds to everything that i heard, and not only from russia, but from the country, but, uh, officials, who are they, who told me about it informally, if i regret that such statements are made by american officials, because these persons will have to work with you further. and of course, if we want a constructive relationship, then this kind of episodes do not help the last question. l' one hercegovich, this is what is of great interest to the washington administration of the biden wall street journal correspondent arrested in russia accused of espionage and the united states and the biden administration and the sharp

jornul - this is vehemently denied. i have a simple question for you. apart from this denial, have the american authorities tried to provide russia with information that would be evidence that, uh, defiant journalist is indeed a legitimate journalist. and that he was simply fulfilling the task of his meeting in yekaterinburg and other places and did nothing but what was not permitted, did they try to have some kind of serious conversation with russia. the situation around evan geshkovich, of course, is heated to the limit by the american media and the us administration is directly involved in the creation background around this case, which they assume will affect, uh, approaches. e. here

in moscow to everything that happened. and around eshkovich, geshkovich is really a journalist, but this does not mean that he could not carry out certain tasks that have nothing to do with journalism . they are running a media campaign. they press for pity. excuse the expression, they are trying to put pressure on the political and media to moscow, but there is no other way forward than to conduct a full investigation, consider his case in court and

an appropriate verdict will be issued. and but i just don't see it here. so, my answer to your specific question is no, we have not received anything like this from washington, and thanks to sergey alekseevich, i will ask you the very last question. and i got to say just yes and no. although of course, you can add in the comments. am i doing the right thing in the russian american relationship? when we are very close, as you said, the abyss and that washington refuses to understand this danger and avoiding this abyss at the moment, unfortunately, is difficult by means of traditional diplomacy. even with the greatest goodwill. and this is on the battlefields, but it will be certain, but will it be possible to prevent further escalation

with the use of some new types? dmitry this corresponds to my idea of ​​​​what is happening, i want to emphasize again inexplicably, then with what anger with what washington is acting with hatred for russia in a situation where, by and large, the time has come to think about their own security, and not only about what is happening, uh, on the fields, clashes in ukraine and on the territory of the new constituent entities of the russian federation , to think not only about how consolidate in quotation marks the western camp even more on the anti-russian, yes, and on these chinese platform. and take care of more pressing things. this somehow, in my opinion, does not quite

correspond to the established image of american politicians. american diplomats yes, and the military, too, we urge them to come to their senses. thank you very much. you are calling them to reason. this is very important, and at this time, the russian troops are showing that if they don’t come to their senses, then the price, as you said, can be very high and not only for ukraine and not only for russia but in this case, definitely for the united states thank you very much and i hope , we will see you again soon on our program. goodbye. best wishes. this is a discovery. this is

new knowledge, new feelings, new emotions. never start from this no feature films have ever been filmed in space. how is yevgeny vladimirovna feeling because this is a feat? so i was very worried, but everything is reliable. i am a doctor. i know you want to exhale crying call everyone you know and tell them to definitely watch it. the first time was scary, there was an infinity of dishwashing up to 50% on panty diapers, haggis that same

feeling when you just got the money that you needed right now. let's all i can one for 600 rubles. by receipt , collect a collection of unique coins and win prizes for a coin with a fiver. diclofenac in a package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance 5% 5% gel. diclofenac alternative high-quality patriotic one , you can set the tariff, how you want to unscrew the gigabytes to the maximum, and a minute to

the minimum, you can not walk iota without a hat at -20. this is really impossible. the third column is ready with your fresh croissants and rolled around. welcome to the new ap of the international teboil brand.

friendly service is always waiting for you here. cozy cafe and quality fuel. you were good, like at home magnet price, what you need candy 29.99 unpack the cottage with yandex.market. from tele2 a unique offer, pay only for the selected content, and not even our moments will be able to purchase analogues. subscription, mix, adjust how profitable i am a photographer for you. if in the pictures

it’s easy for me to fix skin problems, then in life their disguise is not an option akriderm complex action helps fight inflammation, reddening of infections and itching on the skin and gives more confidence in life akriderm gk healthy skin, beauty. send one loan application to the selected banks and get approval in the app in comparison pyaterochka oh, olga soon your exit to the kitchen to go out to cut, and with straws a cube and a rosette of cucumber here without saving stickers and get stylish knives with a discount of 99 rubles. in your kitchen. more standards are set by what was previously called russophobia. today it is already mainstream. we hear practically nothing about the role of the soviet union or, more broadly, the role of russia in recent history. poland poland

we are dealing with historical censorship. poland would like, of course, to lead troops. uh, there will be no more border between our countries in ukraine. they are very happy about ukraine because they were given the opportunity to fight with russia with such a hybrid way , because of this the answer is no longer ready to take responsibility for the formation of a new world order. hello poland in the polish newspaper spoke about plans to participate in the nato program for the joint use of american nuclear weapons. never yet was as strong as today should discuss the prospects for the creation of free and independent states of the russian ruling space. she can never stop the premiere in time. poland poisoned with hatred on sunday on first

broadcast is a big game, we will now have a conversation with konstantin kosachev , deputy chairman of the federation council and not only a very serious and significant statesman, but a person who has been chairman of international issues for many years. e committees on international affairs and the duma and councils of the federation and held major positions in the executive branch. thank you, very glad to see you, but i want to ask you right away. uh, tough nasty question not about you. and about where we are in international relations. uh, we just had a conversation with, uh, deputy

foreign ministers sergei alekseevichkov, and he said to the united states that this is an enemy? and even an enemy. and you know ryabkov no worse than me, and you probably agree that such expressions are not easy to use. that is, we now live in a world where the united states has become an adversary, and perhaps even an enemy of russia and uses ukraine as a battlefield with russia and mobilizes the collective west against russia, and yet, when we drive around moscow, when we see what something that is a little out of the ordinary is because of the preparations for the parade. and they, because of the fact that the enemy is preventing someone from doing it, is preventing

some normal course of life, when they came to the conclusion that the united states really become an enemy. isn't this the first time this has actually happened, if you remember the worst moments of the cold war and the united states of america and the then soviet union treated each other like an adversary? but i would still call the current moment, uh. e. the worst of post-war history is the worst in bilateral relations between our countries, because if you compare then, uh, both sides acted, if you like , by uh, trial and error. well, the americans placed their missiles in turkey, how will the soviet union react, here is the soviet union reacted by placing its missiles in cuba

, i mean. ah, the caribbean crisis. well, both sides of it pulled back. it's different now because the united states of america is uh trying to test russia's strength. they just put it in front of them. well , in front of their allies or satellites. e task of destroying russia as, uh, a potential threat. as an enemy, as an adversary, whatever else, that is, the task is to get rid of russia and write it off forever in the archive. eh, in my opinion. e, staged for the first time in e. history of foreign policy united states of america in general in modern history. this is extremely dangerously dangerous for the simple reason that when it comes to a nuclear power in this case russia it cannot under any circumstances be defeated, then everyone must understand, we understand perfectly well that the united states of america as a nuclear

power cannot fail. uh, they , uh, will eventually go for the use of nuclear weapons, to avoid such a defeat, the same with russia god forbid it comes to this, but of course russia will never under what circumstances will not allow itself to be defeated and, if necessary, use all the means at its disposal to prevent this defeat, when it comes to relations with a nuclear power. as a matter of fact, there are only two alternatives, either to try to defeat, thereby provoking it to use nuclear weapons. once again , i repeat it is to provoke. or negotiate with this nuclear power to negotiate with your adversary. this is what happened during the cuban missile crisis. this is something that happened repeatedly after that, and in the situation around the war on the korean peninsula and in the situation around the war in vietnam and afghanistan, and in many

other cases. now, for the first time, the americans are not trying to negotiate. and this is extremely dangerous, i completely agree. this appears both in some of the most fundamental situations and in specific situations, like with evan hercegovich on something from a fundamental situation. of all. you said the most important thing to understand about the war in ukraine russia cannot lose this will not happen, because this will not happen. and this does not mean that there cannot be some tactical failures. they are okay, war is war, but the united states is talking about something much more far-reaching. they talk about delivering a strategic defeat to russia. but it is enough to look at the military doctrine of russia. if we are talking about a situation that would

jeopardize a real and serious threat to russia's sovereignty and territorial integrity, then in general it is said, in my opinion, clearly konstantin ivanovich that russia in this case will consider itself in the right and even obliged to use all the means that are available in the russian arsenal. this is exactly what i need to be constantly reminded of. i would like to make it clear that this is how our nuclear doctrine is written. uh, the option of using nuclear weapons is an absolutely extreme option. there are only two exceptional cases where it is possible to use nuclear weapons in both cases. this is a response to aggression against our country. it's uh, no way in this case, it’s not a tool for russia to achieve some external political goals, i don’t know any economic geopolitical

goals, but if the situation approaches the extreme, of course, russia created and maintains its nuclear weapons on alert not in order to accept its defeat of some others planes and e and measurements. why is this happening i ask myself this question. are the americans? eh, that's not enough? assess the severity of the situation. here is my answer is that the fatal role in this sense for americans are played by their self-perception of themselves as exceptional nazis and the resulting two consequences - the illusion of permissiveness and the illusion of impunity. look how many times the americans have acted aggressively outside the legal field in relation to other

countries. here, uh, recently the chinese, by the way , calculated that for almost 250 years of the existence of the united states of america there, they were not at war for only 16 years. i have not verified this figure, but here are the chinese chinese analysts. eh, they took her out and after all once americans. no, they answered for their actions. they did not answer for their actions. let's say when on the first of september 1939 hitler attacked poland and the americans declared their neutrality. few people now remember england and france declared war on germany. let a strange sit-down war. it did not lead to hostilities, but the americans in relation to nazi germany in the first initial stage of the war declared their neutrality, the americans did not bear any responsibility for the fact that they insanely dragged out the opening of a second front,

when the soviet union single-handedly fought nazi germany they did not bear any responsibility when they used nuclear weapons for the only time in history against hiroshima and nagasaki but we can continue chemical weapons indefinitely in uh vietnam uh aggression against yugoslavia overthrowing legitimate governments. uh, in iraq and libya for completely bogus reasons. well , in the end, the complete collapse of afghanistan . all these events, in fact , should have led to, uh, the responsibility of the united states of america, they should have would, well, bear some. if not punishment, then at least public condemnation and this did not happen even once. they skillfully learned to switch the attention of the public to some other subjects, but something went wrong with pavel's test tube, but you think, so to speak there. well, this is how the problem turned out. let's talk about something better. the americans also say in every such case, and

now they have the feeling that this is all-forgiveness. here is their own impunity can go on forever that they will bring this situation to a close. since they uttered the slogan of the strategic defeat of russia to the end. here pay attention to march april, e last year, when it seems to have been outlined. ah, negotiations. i am sure that at that time the american was actually pulled. i’m talking specifically about the americans, not about the ukrainians, that here the americans make a decision in the same way as before they dragged it out, the time is 8 years, uh, supposedly the implementation, but in fact the sabotage of the minsk agreements in those 8 years from 14 to 22 year and in march-april, and 22 years the americans were playing for time in order to simply give ukraine the resource it needed , primarily a military resource for a retaliatory strike. well, use ukraine already for their own purposes.

all this is happening and now, from my point of view, the americans continue after april last year, for the whole next year , to drag out the time as much as possible in order to ultimately achieve the strategic defeat of russia, as they believe, this is another cardinal mistake that is worse than a crime on the part of the american diplomacy on the part of american policy on the part of american military strategists. would you agree, by the way, that the most terrible deception is hinted at, when people especially statesmen are deceived by themselves and here in the united states in the last uh decades after the end of the cold war. it developed gradually, but confidence developed. what are nuclear weapons? it's not a factor in determining the balance of power, but it's a very convenient point of view

. right. because nuclear weapons are strategic nuclear weapons. especially this where russia has the balance in the united states in tactical nuclear weapons. russia even has superiority and, uh, the united states, if they would recognize that these nuclear moments are an essential element of the military balance and send them to tell themselves to behave more carefully about this, because if we squeeze russia into a corner. then she has the opportunity, and she has reason to think that these opportunities will be respected, therefore, in washington they convinced themselves that nuclear weapons can not be counted when talking about scenarios military clash. and if so, it begins to seem to the united states and their ally that everything or almost everything that you

think about this is possible. well, god forbid we live to the point where the americans have to actually see that they are radically wrong. you know from my point of view. uh, a feature of the american mentality. now, at the current stage of development, they do not, in principle, consider it necessary to negotiate anything with anyone. here we are, in the united states of america we have set up our own own life, as we see fit, and everyone else will have to agree with this. if they do not agree, then they will simply suffer from this - no signs of compromise. and by the way, this applies not only to opponents of open opponents in the face of russia or, for example, china. this also applies to the relations of the united states of america with their allies, whom they shamelessly cheat in the economy, whom they shamelessly u spy on in cyberspace, and uh,

whom they shamelessly use for their own geopolitical purposes. unfortunately, and here i would like to talk separately about the responsibility of the european nato allies of the united states of america for what is happening. this is an important topic. let's do it. we're just going to the ad first , we'll be back in just a few minutes. when i came to paris i was not known for fashion, as it were frozen between the seventies and nineties. and inside this there is such a fermentation, as it were. almost no one in our country is represented. what is couture authentically it is a high hand sewing high-end sewing, which is placed on the stage of living retirement of architecture. i think he has all the qualities of a young motelier. after all, i

myself was once young, and what especially attracts in him. this fashion sense artist deals with the theme of costumes in dress and most of the time it should favor big members of power. how long she lives, however, she practically lives a lecture until the next reading for six months. think its level corresponds to the international fashion. congratulations to valentina of memory, vyacheslav zaitsev and valentin yudashkin on saturday on pervy pay less macfa pasta at 44.90, when you need something, go to the weekly ozone promotion choose different products at competitive prices for 499 rubles. serum for the face. lika is for 329 rubles.

799 tele2 other coffee rules black card 299

sausage papa can do everything for home and kitchen from polaris appliances with wi-fi control will help save time, and practical utensils for cooking a place. choose with discounts for 169 rubles.