normal

what power, did you watch live? i watched the broadcast worried about my colleagues now, when i look now at disturbing photos, where we have my eldest son, who is also your fan. danka, he knows klim since childhood. and i don’t even have a photograph here. i photographed when it was shown and yes, they stand and like that right on the student’s terminal, that is, they were worried. it seems to me from little to great they all thought they might never come back, certainly not even an option. we've got big plans with cream so we could learn in our commandments how to make more out of this show, because russia has taken many more first steps. but everyone in the world has a feeling

that it is not russia that is leading in this sense. yes , i think that this is this, therefore this film. it seems to me a real concrete step towards this. yes yes. and that it's ok to make a film, uh, in space from the point of view of flight technology, technology, and the flight itself. hmm, it's more difficult. in this sense, that you have to fly here without, uh, a second professional, but the rest of the parts. i just i suppose, say, they did not interfere with life on the iss. yes, of course, they called some kind of turmoil. and how they were received in general like this, when they received it well, that is, we, when we docked the crew that was on board, these are four people, uh, from the american dragan and three of our russia, well, they expected from the russian ship even with us on

the russian segment prepared a meal for us. that is, they warmed up the food there drinks. and of course, the entire station watched the docking itself. uh, and then hay. uh, they were just waiting, when they flew one by one through the passage hatches from ship to the station. yes, of course the guys were waiting. eh, we talked a lot, it was interesting for everyone, when we were filming the film, from time to time we flew in to see it. well, how is it going? this is a real step to bring cosmos closer to an ordinary person who goes to the cinema. watch the film and you will feel that it is possible that there will be much more people who want to fly, because many people i communicate with people have already somehow left the space age, and with young people, many people think that this is unattainable. it's somewhere else some super people on the planet, yes, they are the smartest, the healthiest, the most. strong

just this e projects show what is possible, but it, of course, was. this is sometimes 3.5 months. we have never prepared even tourists for 9 months. now, since it is 3 1/2 months , many tourists again looked in our direction and just right after uh, yuli's climas flew already, two non-professionals already flew. these were two japanese tourists they paid, there 100 million for two and flew also flew for 12 days. that is , it became real, uh, the terms are shorter. although we are up to this was launched, of course, by tourists. well, saying the timing was longer than the film he chose a very correct point of view. you know, they tell you, they say you need to make a movie about space. there are a lot of questions here, the main question is what is this movie about? well, it's clear, we'll fly, it's clear we'll see the land. we understand we see space understand we see rockets. well, about what? a feature film, yes, like

a feature film, that is, yes, yes, what is the grain of films, what is the essence of the film, because the film is about whatever the film is about people. it's always about people. it's always about where you wouldn't fly. he is always about all sorts of destinies, but about the fact that inside the castle of relationships and attitudes towards oneself, experiences between yes experiences. and this is what the viewer reacts to, he reacts, because he can participate in this, yes, he can participate in this, and therefore, it seems to me that the cream has chosen a very correct point of view. he made a movie about how people prepare for this and how this flight looks real and he had this experience. he went through it, yes, and while he and therefore the simulators are real

instructor, so a lot of people directly from the center for only snaps, who, like me , played themselves as inspector doctors and so on. and there is some documentary in this film and that's why it will be so strong. i think that it is doomed to success, that people really seem to have flown. we have traditions. we watch the film the white sun of the desert the day before the start. and when they ask here why such a tradition of film is not indirect transport at all, i don’t understand at all. firstly, they do not understand the essence of this film, but it seems to me that the challenge is also will. it is not necessary to watch it on such a tradition, just before the launch, as all the time, at least for young cosmonauts who have not flown, be sure to listen. i want now about girls. just to ask you about our girl, but tell me about yulia, please, that's how it is in general, there is makeup in the same place. in the same place, how in general, how did she do all this all this? she had a harder

time than, probably, here on earth, because i myself did not see live, how they shoot the film, well , after they returned. eh, here is the earthly part of us she was filmed. that is, i plunged into your profession and became an actor, that is, yes , indeed, firstly, how many people it already is. well, this is separately for klim's work, how did he shoot? one? yes, i don’t know this crowd there , there were 100 people, maybe more, and just like that, if we talk about actors, assistants, of course, there are make-up rooms and so on. that is, yulia had to, she got up every morning in advance. uh, since uh is one place of acceptance, but a water treatment. and what do you have excuse me, what do you perceive in the morning? well , how would you officially understand how it is how is that morning? well, yes, if every 45 minutes dawn and rolled in the windows, can you tell me what time it is now? you can't even tell until you look at your watch. uh, well, officially wake up at 6:00 am and around

7:15-20. the crew should be ready to communicate with the ground and get, uh, tasks for the day. here julia got up early so as not to slow down the people. uh, every head was washed, it's not the easiest thing there, there is no shower, there is no running water, so it had to be cosmic. the more we see in the frames. uh, her hair. i had to get myself in order to apply makeup myself. she did it there in her cabin and took it with her. well, quite small, because you can’t take more than 1 kg with you in general of all personal things. and here is their little cosmetic bag. she somehow went to clean up so that she would not fly apart. there she can i hope when she tells me and i have to prepare, but everyone was afraid that there, well, there will be swelling. yes, uh, well, this can be seen from the frames, well, because they recognize her, there are their colleagues and themselves, that in the first days they didn’t feed rebuilt, firstly, the cheeks begin to rise. well, they rise straight up,

because there is no gravity and such a face. they just prepared my make-up, here at mosfilm. uh, just in case, god forbid , remember the story was that they were afraid that the flash drives did not fly there and so on. well, there are no films, just in case, if something is wrong , so that this is how i looked, uh, in space, i had to make such a grimm just such a mask, so that it turns out you don’t go to put it on for half an hour all day. you look like kost therefore, everyone was afraid, but it seems to me , on the contrary, it is really visible how the human body conducts everything, how it looks a little different than on earth. and it's clear we astronauts did not put on makeup. uh, we don't need it, because it really was to rent us the interior. well, klim took something away from somewhere and promised to return it. by the way, i wanted to say that he natyr something there. no, he filmed. well, he doesn't like it. in its own way, it removed what we always have in its place. we, when we were in the training center, astronauts he was remodeling some rooms there and so

on. now they will probably remake what was. and grandiose, that is, he brought his own vision to this one in general, and what about the flasks? where is this story from? well, this is a fake, but that, unfortunately, we arrived. uh, that's it, they stole something like that , like, yes, they stole all these flash drives and still do. that's what i say until i watch the film, most of the people at the meeting say. oh, it was you who were the commanders there , i remember, i say, yes, it was me, yes, yes. e, a where did you lose your flash drives? everyone thinks that i also went down with them. and it's me quietly, yes be patient does not eat. went down with them. this is oleg for whiskey. in general, you can lose in such a race-flash drive. it's like a finger or a name. wow. here is such an orange, one flash drive. well

, of course, materials shot in 10 days. this is right here the suitcase box was laid all e in foam rubber, so that god forbid well , of course, everyone understood the importance. uh , of course, we put this information, but they left it. uh, there is a copy at the station, we have used our resources. well, temporarily the guys at the station have already looked. well, it's only the space will tell you what was there? ah, but klim e every night, that is, we filmed everything, we go to rest. he did not go to sleep. that is, he is very small, maybe for 2-3 hours every night, he dropped the best frame, because he could not reset everything. we do not have such a large bandwidth filmed. well, very heavy files, so to speak, so the best was dumped while he slept, rested on the ground around the clock in the soup, by the way, were not there during our class. none of you, bitch, came in, no time,

special room. let's call the headquarters like this, yes, uh, in the soup for the film crew. dudin was always there, i don’t know, his understudy, as an operator, his other assistants. m a lot of people who were always ready to help him, that is, he dumped, they looked right there on the big screens, filmed. uh, information, all the material and gave him advice in the morning. well, for example, the camera settings, because it's a raid, it's all manual. naturally, with light. may be the sound and him every morning. we had exactly videoconference every morning for half an hour, he received these zu. eh, how to shoot further. and what turned out well, what didn’t work out very well, so even this one was already enough for me. uh, in order to make a film, so let's dispel this myth, they called me, for example, they called from kind people, kind artists. do you know such? well , the clints. yeah, it's true, yes, they had them, they didn't ask me. they just told me. well, something something director. he even flash drives

, we just have a video from the landing of our colleagues. and by their faces you can see that the flash drives were with them. hallelujah

you knew the guys before the start, here they are back, do you think their worldview has changed, they have become different, but enough time has already passed. it seems to me that according to yulia, i communicate more with klim, but i also communicated with yulia, and it seems to me that yulia somehow became aware of her awareness, even a little look . here is an acting woman, because she is like a woman, like a mother , this is really such a step that hmm everything is turned upside down and everything is analyzed absolutely and it seems to me that one has that the second one our children got more, and not so quite deep ones. well, not simple souls in a good sense, but it seems to me that something like this has appeared. hmm, i don’t know, i can’t speak. it is at the energy level that one feels that they have expanded. yes, i do, yes i do, according to the climate, but klin

is always so calm in him. you know, when he thinks, you understand that there is a kind of universe that rotates there, that there are some processes going on there, and there are many of them at the same time after space. i told me that something has changed a lot, but i just convinced that he was not from this planet. right. so julia is also such a versatile person who can do everything and dance and sing and play everything and fly into space, by the way, about acting. can i ask you for your role? at least you play yourself, but still you and you are officially the actor of this film. yes, the official actor, and moreover,

when the film was just born. i have read the script. there were a lot of different astronauts involved. uh, in life it turned out that so many astronauts, especially on board, could not provide him with it, and therefore, i am from the commander, who was somewhere in the background, and in my opinion, i didn’t have a single remark at all, maybe one or two today i began to acquire these expressions, then prices appeared, where not just a monologue dialogue is going on and it was necessary to learn how to walk, acting or what? in ukraine, klin, who for some reason already said something. and why didn’t you learn the words, we were reading on, well, on the ground already at baikanur, that is, everyone was already working out each scene, and i read my words there. it seemed to me, well, what did you say there a couple of phrases the touch must be exactly what he came up with along with the screenwriter. well, on the one hand, it's kind of easy to play yourself. yes, astronaut. antona shklava plays in that scale. well, in short, shooting ranges, but on the other hand, emotions, when

it was necessary there, well, i tried to say, in my own way the climate. it's all somehow in its own way. no, somewhere it hit somewhere, but still it was at least ten, a duplicate, every every scene. i, well, we can't understand astronauts. how can you do the same thing 10 imagine at all imagine could you be in movie. where are you not? now even offer some kind of like. well, let's say on the ground. come on, let's have a read. i won't go like that anymore. how do you tell clients? well well, yes, maybe with some kind of agent well, like this, so that not well , maybe i would stigmatize, i would say that yes, no problem. well, dear friends. we have created our challenge and the courage of despair of love , the determination of the touching beauty of our vast land and the broad soul of man. don't be afraid to challenge yourself and take it today with you. i am anton shkapper, and

also my space guests are a theater actor and cinema darling, bikovich, and theater actress yevgenia ohrenenko. it was a space history podcast. we don't land. we continue our flight, congratulations on the premiere. dream. fly and you will succeed, and most importantly, go to the movies. enjoy watching. we've all learned a little bit of something and somehow. well, where would it be without islan sergeevich hello today, we gathered our thoughts about what and how they teach or should teach a modern school. olga alexandrovna dmitrieva director of the shuvalov school of the city

moscow electric, uskov founder of e, school and university in yoshkar-ola. i'm vladimir hello friends. hello, i had deans in my podcast. e two moscow universities and at the end of the program. i asked them what they lack in first-year students, that is, those who come to them after school. and so i want to share their answer with you and listen to what you think about this . the first thing you said is that there is not enough independence; they are very dependent on the opinions of parents, classmates, classmates, friends, and so on. the second one is missing curiosity. nothing is interesting and the third is missing. as one of the deans put it, self-sacrifice, and then he really explained a little, he said that they are not ready to wait, they want to endure here and today we will remember this famous one, and the experiment is now one candy or three, but the day after tomorrow, yes, choose. for the most part, today i would like you and i to start with this. we ourselves agree, we disagree

. according to of course you will refute something. it seems to me that lately, uh, we have been brought up on the contrary conditionally. well, let's say, but in my childhood i have in childhood were very strict parents, so my children i allow everything or you know me at school. uh, they taught me to walk in formation. i didn’t like it so much, so i grew up and decided to open my own private school so that the children could go there as they wanted. yes, i have already thrown a pebble into the garden, and we have made a lot of bets on success on substantive success. again, successful for what, so that you are competitive. why is it competitive, so that you sleep well, sweetly, that you lived comfortably and this led to what is gone, probably, something most important from education for that is, we stopped forming good people, and, uh,

so that they, well, at least in some way make efforts on themselves, because education is actually about the effort, when you are not given ready-made knowledge, when you are a little on tiptoe, as if trying to reach out, but the vygotskys still talk about this, yes, and the profitable ones spoke. we 'll talk some more and i agree with olga alexandrovna in everything, but i'll add a little the fact is that here i am, for example, at school taught to walk in formation. i liked it, and in my private school. i miss this. so why are you? the fact is that the founders are not the person who determines the format by more than 100 percent. yes, there is a teaching staff the teaching staff is forming the format and now the teachers are not ready. uh, teach the kids to walk in formation. although it would never hurt to add this at all, in fact, discipline and diligence have never spoiled anyone. that's why. listen, and here, maybe it's a trifle. yes, i'm just students today wrote a test, and i say, guys, well, they 're done, we're attaching a simple story. here is

from the middle. well, a large streaming quarter of the amphitheater, i say, rent it out, uh, well, to the extreme one sitting on the edge, and then it’s simple from top to bottom, that is, two procedures in two moves three times had to be explained, we barely collected the papers. i'll develop my thoughts, but the deans have been voiced. yes, what is the problem in children , thinking is not formed, the quality of thinking is not formed at all, the quality of thinking has fallen significantly. and what does this thinking mean? well, a lot of things, yes, a lot of things for example, the ability to abstract. it develops there by the age of 12 and should actively develop high school, or just logic, yes or just the basics of systems thinking. let's say there is practically nothing, a low level of subjectivity. well, as we say, when a person thinks he is led , this is normal for him. yes, he does not know who he is, where he is, why where and what should be in a good version, that there are schools in a bad version. they work on subjectivity, there are several types of elite schools, there in moscow right on

subjectivity subjectivity, that is subjectivity is a bit of a dangerous road. yes, and you work in yoshkar, of course , but subjectivity needs to be balanced, because active work in subjectivity leads to an increase in goncentrism, and life will be difficult for such a person about the productivity of sociality. there will also be questions wasp. ah, lack of curiosity. you agreed with this too. yes, yes, but you get it right. yes, not that this pebble is your garden, but the deans were talking about the guys who come from you. why doesn't it work? i agree. i would like to add here. yes , it’s really difficult for the guys about the meaning. this is the biggest mistake, for example, in text analysis, that the guys cannot determine the main idea of ​​the text, and we generally have a hard time analyzing what has been read. and we understand this deficit, indeed there is, because most often a child cannot solve a problem, not because he does not know how to solve it. he doesn't understand her

terms. he really can't read it. we understand this, and we are now, frankly, working on it, and we are looking for a methodology that what is connected? this is what, they used to understand it there, so i heard such a subtext, yes, now i don’t understand a lot of information. it seems to me now is the time for information, maybe a lot, but not of the same quality. the fact is that now, well, at school there are children who have been with a smartphone since childhood. yes, they are surrounded by sources of easy information. well, videos and games of interactivity. that's it. look at the story, when a person reads a book, he sees letters, but the brain processes these letters and builds plots in his head. yes, he almost smells. he is involved in all this . the brain created all these pictures accordingly. it does not enrich, develops, but when a person receives a finished picture, sorry for everything that is not in demand. everything is atrophying with us,

but look, and when we say that children cannot do this, they cannot do that, we, in fact, blame ourselves. yes, because children are not responsible for this. and if we are so smart, and we understand all this, what should we do? well , it's good in schools, phones are taken away at the entrance and returned at the exit leads. this is to that at home children go. so, yes, what should we do with this, we need to accept that the phone is a soft drug, if we agree that our children consume soft drugs that destroy their mental sphere. well let's keep doing it. if you don't agree, but you need to limit somehow. the fact is that if they have e, certain cognitive structures will form, where there is to 17. yes. probably you won't have any problems. the fact that a person is there on the phone is something, but at the moment when they are formed, well, this is a problem, you know, then there is a fabric emerging here , well, it's pretty clear what you can try to do, but the curiosity is still very much to me . these deficits

do nothing about it. to be honest, we are looking for forms of technology. methods. you know, once i wrote down all the requirements for a modern lesson for myself. i got a great presentation because we were writing. well, i'm here, the existing standard professionals are more there, firstly, there is the science of pedagogy. nobody canceled it. there are principles there, they are very interesting patterns. this is what you need to remember. of course, there are standard requirements for results. we develop functional literacy. we lay the tasks that develop educational upbringing. in principle, the child should learn the material of the hands. and this is what you need to keep. uh, when preparing a lesson in 45 minutes, it's hard enough. it is clear that every hand or every lesson in kindergarten, but it cannot correspond to everything. but the teacher, the teacher , remembers this, and in the garden we are only through activities only do not give the child ready-made

knowledge. and yet to guide him so that he thinks, so that he finds answers. why so? and they, again, due to the fact that there is a lot of information that you don’t have to look for? i remember this i had the great soviet encyclopedia. i mean into it, and here it seems to me that it’s time for a colleague to interrupt what gives an easier one. uh, a picture is easier information that you don't have to work to read a book. we need to work hard to go to the museum. this is also needed work hard. and then you opened it. you had easy access to information, modern children are too full. they not only ate candy, they ate too much content. do you understand? the fact is that when we were a little younger, we saw two channels on tv, on which sometimes once a week something interesting shows. accordingly, this hunger for content. sorry, for that word now, too, not all podcasts are interesting. well, yes. yes, of course, here it is. we

deleted at the expense of books, and it was a developing story, but i i will say the selection of click books, in principle, was more relevant, more developing than now. that is, we made toys ourselves with our own hands. it was all yes, and now everything is there, you know, it forms a kind of satiety and laziness. and you can't do anything about it, you can't do anything about it. no, i will say, so that humanity worked out this story, the same british, for example, speaking inclinedly, the british elite, and they artificially create a certain hunger for children. yes, in order for something to be prophesied correctly, it will be right, of course, not enough, of course. and now we have got into this abounding something. yes, there is a lot of content after the lack of candy there. yes, this is a dangerous story. and here we are watching what is happening today we are gathering our thoughts about what and how they teach or should teach a modern school olga alexandrovna

dmitrieva director of the shuvalov school in moscow, her train, uskov, founder of the school and university in yoshkar-ola. i am vladimir grigorievna , we continue. i am a university lecturer. i'm waiting for people with a secondary education will come to me that when i say at a lecture today, well, of course, you remember the three great traditions and the power of sophocles and euripides. uh, it's only clear and yes in the phrase that i said to my poor students, but thank god the mayor remember, yes, i have a question here about the semantic plan in a meaningful secondary education school. what is it, and what should i do? what to cook here, so we started a little. yes, otherwise it can continue? yes i am speaking as a person who, well from the side of the university yes, uh has some request and how a man from business is waiting. well, some, that's why we opened a school, because we have some knowledge knowledge there. skills and all that and for me the key story is the level of development of thinking. now, if a person came out of e, it means

that e school has a certain level of development of thinking, plus definitely well-read, well-read, plus a certain instrumental apparatus provided there for a secondary education of at least a qualitative volume of nine classes, because someone can do with this person. and here, if no, of course, there are difficulties, because these are long cycles. well, 10 years. and what should be done within 10 years, then it is very difficult to say at the optimal time, by the way, yes, then it is very difficult to compensate later, so i call all this rich inner peace. there is cognitive potential. blah blah blah. now, with this, well, there are big difficulties, really big ones, and, well, it’s approximately clear what to do? well, that is, we need to remove this one, well, firstly, at school there is a lot of workload, there is a lot of workload, but there is little sense you know, that is, they chew on a bunch of facts. they try to remember it, but without some kind of contact with these, they steal the memory, so it’s impossible to remember, well, it’s impossible. i think the memory is stealing by others what they don't read. well, there are things that develop

memory. yes, at any time. you can see your brain is just rewiring. you do not memorize, they teach poetry there is something. well , there are some standard educational stories here, which, in principle, form memory much less now. well, you know, the teacher is not really the same here, well, the main teaching building. sorry, i'm off to teach. sorry for the last 20-30 years, it's just definitely definitely a problem. yes, i don't want to go into a populist story now about what should be prestigious. this, by the way, is all true, yes, if i understand correctly , the chinese will have the highest paying school. yes, it's already too late. finally. with what that not that teacher went. well, i wouldn’t generalize like that at all, because inside the system i see people perfectly, and you know that, as it seems to me, these are all sorts of an attempt to find a magical tramplika for everything and also a school, like a magic pill. you sent your child, preferably to the perfect school, preferably in a year. yes, not even at three and in

the eleventh grade, some ideal portrait of a graduate, because the school is part of the children's society. here you want to change the children's school honestly, i have a recipe for you. approach the mirror. look at yourself and change yourself. at first, nothing will happen, otherwise, well, of course, if we are talking meaningfully, look, i think we are developing a system. now for two directions. the first is the alignment of just such an educational standard for schools throughout the country, that is, there must be a guaranteed minimum of quality education, for example, now there will be new federal curricula. there are no more items on the necessary and unnecessary. all items are needed there, as before. but if you take a profile of some kind. you just add and the second is individualization. because now the guys are very different. everyone has their own abilities, inclinations cannot be talked about some unified approach, each child needs

to dump something 40 people were in the class. they were very different than a single level and all such a level of content quoted , you know what the basic use in mathematics is. tell us. that's when i studied as a person with knowledge in the scope of the basic exam in mathematics. this is a mark of two, you know, this is two in mathematics, as you know, mathematics is a key subject that develops thinking, you understand, a significant part of children now and schools leave with a deuce in mathematics. and this is guaranteed quality our children win international olympiads there will always be 1.000% who are able to win olympiads. absolutely normal. well , this is understandable. what can be here? you are sharpening a little polemically, but there is truth in both of them. what question interests me? here, again, i'm prophylactic. yes, education,

which i'm trying all the time . that's what secondary education is. what is this about? here's what i, for example, do not see on this is another problem that worries me very much. we once it would have been discussed with you, it is extremely practically sharpened, but the orientation of education. that's the ultimate pragmatics. i was preparing a program here for a large training center. and so, my colleagues say to me, here write us a program, as a supervisor. i say well they say, and what will be the benefit of your program? i say, in what sense does he say, will it help to pass the exam, that is, we, in principle, operate exclusively with these categories, only the school instills. understanding that knowledge is a value in itself let's go even higher, that a person is one who seeks the truth. we are generally bashful or shamelessly thrown out this topic is not. we get up on the plan, yes, it's you there yourself , each on your own, and so on. these are the tasks someone thinks about it, such tasks are worth it. do you feel them

, do you put them in front of your teaching staff, well, first of all, you know. we have now probably returned to what it means to be a good person and to be a citizen of one's country. and three degrees. well, let's say love for the motherland is the first. talk about it, but the second is to do something for the motherland, and the third is to be able to donate three absolutely different things. here, probably, we have now returned to shaping, and a moral person is now the first task, and the second. i think we'll come back to what you're talking about, probably for today, but it was less so from my point of view. i could be wrong. but the community of educators. yes, this is being discussed. does this feel like a problem, or is this destiny some units, which are some kind of momentation. there are periodically produced

about how, oh, how not enough, because there were more pressing challenges and problems, so it's gone a little, the second does not deny the importance of instrumentalism. and the practical orientation of education does not bother the level of teachers' ideas, it really does. you know, when i was 17 or 18 years old, i looked at who went where and i was horrified by two things. i mean, from your circle there, plus or minus a year or two. yes, who goes to the military and who goes to teachers? you see, the threesomes were those who couldn’t get a job anywhere else, that was a long time ago. do you think something got better, or what? since then, the competition at the table has been great, it's great, but for now , those same people are teaching us, and this is a big problem. well, it's negative. yes different, like people different teachers can be found there 5% will always be very doctors. yes, five percent

is not enough. there is really a problem here. what, relatively speaking, is ideological preparation. there is an instrumental school. now it is mainly sharpened into a piece of instrumental prepared , there are some attempts to update the ideological part, but they look let's say. well, not really, not really, but it's hard because it's hard. this is reflection. this is the need to solve such complex issues, for example, as a religious philosophical plan. yes, we talked. oh, no, no, that's what you all know there. i think you know the next step. we will have a rethinking, but now there is already an integration of subject areas, that russian into russian is incorrect conditionally give children each item separately. and then there is the math. she's the only one you need. but there is music, but there is a story, they do not intersect in any way. that is, we are talking about such a broad view of the world that it

has all the subject areas, they are intertwined. now, if we are talking about such an ideological change in education, then from my point of view, the future lies with this. i already remember at one time, probably, when i taught, i caught myself on the fact that colleagues, as a rule, don’t know, especially if they have there, well, school, yes, a mathematician there is social science. and what does the other one teach , but if we set a worldview task , this cannot be, but, that is, teachers must understand more or less well and be in one way or another in one semantic worldview field. something is being done for this today, but at your specific schools, for example, the history is such that we work with those teachers who are here and, of course, are not there. here is such a cross-functional training, when a math teacher. literature teachers are good understands physics. it's not sickening yet, what can we expect? here but nevertheless. here is

an idea about cross-subject connections and the integration of the whole program in general. she's cool, she can be dragged through some project stories. yes, when we are in a project, children do some kind of project and different knowledge is involved. then we have a system of additional education. and a. it is so a bit practical in terms of our training there, and there, too, in general, computer science is one of the coolest subjects that form cross-subject connections, because it can on itself integrate almost the entire floor of the school. e, items, of course, there is a lot of work to be done. you must be a lot of good pedagogical science, what i would like to pay attention to in terms of school is such a subject as history, by the way, a key subject that is a worldview pool of skills. well, of course, he collects things and forms so now this destructive subject, you understand, studying that version of the history of russia there and the world, by the way, which is now the modern version of the textbooks that we still form the marxist version the idea that we are some kind of provincial nation that has always had everything

bad. and well, we live like that, okay, but it's not like that, you see, we gave the world first-class literature and science. yes, anything. yes, that is, well, we have something for which there is an opera and there is a lot of things there, but unfortunately, this subject of the history of russia is now we are a so-so subject of social science. well, people should have a clear picture of how the state is getting richer and how it lives, and why it doesn’t need gold when it has a simple product and what’s not there, there is a void. here, children have absolutely no understanding of how material values ​​​​are created, how society is managed for what a person, as a subject. can count in this society, well, some legal basis. why don't they have this understanding? i think you look. what is the story now, relatively speaking, school education there corresponds to the realities of the mid-sixties. well, the last reboot of the system was something like this then, yes. relatively speaking, the government party had a certain vision that children should know, be able to understand, here we are now we are dealing with reduction.