such a life will be hard and about the productivity of sociality, there will also be questions. and here is the lack of curiosity. you agreed with this too. yes, yes, but you, uh, get it right. yes, it's not that this is your garden stone, but the deans were talking about the guys who come from you. why doesn't it work? i agree. i would like to add here. yes, it’s really difficult for the guys to fish. well, that is, the biggest mistake, for example, in text analysis is that the guys cannot determine the main idea of ​​the text, and we generally analyze it heavily read and we understand this deficit, indeed. yes, because most often the child cannot solve the problem, not because he does not know how to solve it. he doesn't understand her terms. he really can't read it. we understand this. we are currently working on it, to be honest. we are looking for methods that are connected to what with why. this is why here used to be understood there.

yeah, now i don’t understand the information, it seems to me, now is the time for information, there may be a lot, but not of that quality. the fact is that now, well, children who study at school since childhood with a smartphone yes, they are surrounded by sources of easy information, but videos and games of interactivity. that's it. look at the story, when a person reads a book, he sees letters, but the brain processes these letters and builds plots in his head. yes, he almost smells. he is involved in all this, the brain created all these pictures, accordingly, reading enriches it, but when a person receives a finished picture. sorry for all that is not required. everything is atrophying with us, but look, and when we say that children cannot do this. they can't do that, we basically blame ourselves, because the kids are responsible for this, if we're so smart and we all understand what we should do? ok then. naked

phones are taken away at the entrance and returned at the exit . this leads to the fact that children go home. so, yes, what should we do with this, we need to accept that the phone is a soft drug, if we agree that our children consume soft drugs that destroy their mental sphere. well let's keep doing it. if you do not agree, but you need to somehow limit the fact is that if they have e, certain cognitive structures will form there by the age of 17. yes. probably you will no longer be a problem that a person is there in the phone for something, but at the moment when they are formed, well, this is a problem, you understand? well, if there is an emerging tissue here, well, it's roughly clear what you can go to do or sana but the topic of curiosity is still very much i just want to give the impression that e educators do not understand. these deficits do nothing about it. to be honest, we are looking for forms of technology. methods. you know i've been here one time for myself, i wrote out all the requirements for a modern ruku from me. a huge

presentation, because we wrote out from where, i have the existing standards of the professional field, there is a science of pedagogy. nobody canceled it. there are principles, they are very interesting patterns. this is what you need to remember. of course, there are standards and requirements for results. we develop functional literacy. we lay the tasks that develop educational upbringing. in principle, the child should learn the material for the lesson. and that's all you need keep uh, while preparing the lesson for 45 minutes. it's difficult enough. it is clear that every lesson or every lesson in kindergarten, and it cannot correspond to everything, but the teacher remembers this, and in the garden we only through activities, but not to give the child ready-made knowledge. and yet to guide him so that he thinks, so that he finds answers. and why so why is it not interesting, and again, because they have a lot of information that you don’t have to look for, i remember i had a great

soviet encyclopedia. i mean in it and here it seems to me that a colleague is right in that he interrupts what gives an easier one. uh, a picture is easier information that you don't have to work to read a book. we need to work hard to go to the museum. this also needs some effort. and then you opened you easier access to information modern children are too well fed. they not only ate candy, they ate too much content. do you understand? the fact is that well, when we were a little bit younger , we saw two channels on tv, on which sometimes once a week something interesting shows, respectively, this hunger for content. pardon the word now, too , not all podcasts are interesting. well, yes. yes, of course, here, and we quenched at the expense of books, and it was a developing story. i'll say selection. click, in principle, was more relevant, more developing than now, that is, my toys are made with their own hands wooden. it was all

there, yes, but now everything is there, you know, it forms a kind of satiety and laziness. and you can't do anything about it, you can't do anything about it. no, i will say, so humanity has worked the same british worked out this story, for example, speaking inclinedly, the british elite, and they artificially create a certain hunger for children. yes, in order for something to be prophesied correctly, it will be correct, of course, this divorce is not enough, of course. and here we are now caught in this here abounded in something. yes, there is a lot of content after the lack of candy there. yes, this is a dangerous story. and here we are looking at what is happening

what where when is the summer series of games from may 21 on the first we are gathering our thoughts today on about what and how they teach or should teach the modern school olga alexandrovna dmitrieva, director of the shuvalov school in moscow, her electric train, uskov, founder of the school and university in yoshkar-ola. i am vladimir berry , we continue. i am a university lecturer. i expect that people with a secondary education will come to me, that when i say at a lecture today, well, of course, you remember the three great traditions and the power of sophocles and euripides. uh, it's only clear and yes in the phrase that i said to my poor students, but thank god the mountain remember, yes, i have a question here is the meaning of the plan for a meaningful secondary education school. what is it, and what should i do? what to cook here, so we started a little, yes, or what else? maybe we can continue then? yes i am speaking as

a person who well from the side of the university yes, uh has some request and as a person from the business expects. well, some, that's why they opened a school, because in order to have some competencies there, knowledge of skills and abilities and all that. and for me, the key story is the level of development of thinking. now, if a person came out, then, uh, the school has a certain the level of development of thinking, plus definitely erudition, familiarity, plus a certain instrumental apparatus provided there for a secondary education of at least a qualitative volume of nine classes, because something can be done with this person. but if this is not the case, of course, there are difficulties, because these are long cycles. well, 10 years. and what should be done within 10 years, then it is very difficult to say at the optimal time, by the way, yes, then it is very difficult to compensate later, therefore i call all this rich inner peace. there cognitive potentials, blah blah blah. well, now with this, well, great difficulties, really big ones, and er, well, it’s approximately clear what to do? well, that is, it is necessary to remove this one here, well, firstly, at school

there is a lot of workload, there is a lot of workload, but you don’t understand much, that is, they chew on a bunch of facts. they try to remember it, but without any contact, the essence of these things is stealing memory, therefore. remember, well, it's impossible, i think that the memory steals the other what they don't read. yes? well, there are things that develop, please, at any time. can look at your brain just rewiring. you don't remember. you teach poetry there is something. well, there are some standard educational stories here, which, in principle, form memory much less now. well, you know, the teacher is not the same, well, the main teaching corps. sorry, the teacher has gone. sorry for the last 20-30 years, it's just definitely definitely a problem. yes, i don't want to go into a populist story now about what should be prestigious. this, by the way, everything is true, yes, if i understand correctly, the chinese will have the highest paid. let's mean real schools. yes, it's already too late. yes, i agree with

what the wrong teacher went. well, i would n’t generalize like that at all, because inside the system i see people perfectly, and you know how? it seems to me that this is still an attempt to find a magic pill, it is in everything and also. school how is it magical? you gave the tablet to the child, preferably in the ideal school, preferably in the year. yes, not even at three and in in the eleventh grade, some ideal portrait of a graduate, because the school is part of the children's society. here you want to change the children's school honestly, i have a recipe for you. approach the mirror. look at yourself and change yourself. at first, nothing will happen, otherwise , of course, if we are talking about content, look, it seems to me that we are developing a system. now in two directions. the first is the alignment of just such an educational standard for schools throughout the country, that is, a guaranteed minimum quality education should be there, for example, now there will be new federal curricula. there are no more

items on the necessary and unnecessary. all items are needed there, as before. but if you take a profile of some kind. you just add and the second is individualization, because now the guys are very. everyone has different abilities and inclinations, it is impossible to talk about a single approach, each child needs to dump something 40 people were in the class, and they were very different with something of the same level and of all this level of guaranteed content, you know what the basic use in mathematics is. tell us. that's when i studied as a person with knowledge in the scope of the basic exam in mathematics. this is a mark of two , you know, this is two in mathematics, as you know, mathematics is a key subject that develops thinking for a significant part of children now and schools leave with a deuce in mathematics. and this is a guaranteed quality. our children win

international olympiads, there will always be 1.000% who are able to win the olympiad absolutely normal with this, of course. what can be a little politically you zaost? but there is truth in both, what question interests me? again, i'm talking about philosophy. yes, education, which i'm trying all the time. that's what secondary education is. what is this about? here's what i, for example, do not see on this is another problem that worries me very much. we would have discussed this with you sometime, it is extremely practical , but the orientation of education. that's the ultimate pragmatics. i'm here for one a large training center was preparing a program. and so, my colleagues say to me, here write us a program, as a supervisor. i say well they say, and what will be the benefit of your program? i say, in what sense does he say, will it help to pass the exam , that is, we, in principle, operate exclusively with these categories , only the school instills. understanding that a knowledge

is a value in itself would go even higher, that a person is one who seeks the truth. we generally threw out this bashful or shamelessly this topic is not included in the curriculum. yes, it 's you there on your own, each on your own, and so on. these are the tasks someone thinks about it, such tasks are worth it. do you feel them, do you feel them, do you put them in front of your teaching staff offices, well, first of all, you know, we are now probably back to what it means to be a good person and be a citizen of your country. and three degrees. well, let's say love for the motherland is the first thing to say about it. yes, the second is something for the motherland, and the third is to be able to donate. three absolutely different. here, probably, we have now returned to shaping, and a moral person is now the first task, and the second. i think we'll get back to what you're talking about, probably for

today. well it's less present so from my point of view. i could be mistaken in the society of teachers. yes, this is being discussed. does it feel like a theme or is it the destiny of some units that, you know , some laminations are periodically produced there about oh, how lacking, because there were more pressing challenges and problems, so this is a little bit gone, the second does not negate the importance of instrumentalism. yes, and the practical orientation of electricity education does not bother the level of ideology of teachers, it directly worries very much. you know, when i was 17-18 years old. i looked at who went where and i was horrified by two things. i mean, from your circle here, plus or minus a year or two. yes, who goes to the military and who goes to the teachers, you know? well , the threesomes were those who couldn’t get a job anywhere else. it was just a long time ago

look good. you think that something has become better, that lightness in the pedo, at the table is wonderful. this is wonderful, but for the time being, those same people are teaching us and this is big. well , it's different, just like people are different excellent teachers can be found there 5%. there will always be a shortage of chefs. there is really a problem here. what, relatively speaking , is ideological preparation. there is an instrumental school. now it is mainly focused on a piece of instrumental training . there are some attempts to update the ideological part, but they look let's say. well, not really, well, it's not really difficult, because it's difficult. this is reflection. this is the need to solve such complex issues, for example, as a religious and philosophical plan. yes, but we are either oh, no. no, that's what you all know there. i think you know the next step. we will have a rethinking, but now the integration of subject areas is already taking place,

that it is wrong conditionally in russian it is wrong conditionally to give children each subject separately. and then there is the math. only she alone you need separately, and here there is music. there is a story, they do not intersect in any way. that is, we are talking about such a broad view of the world that it contains all subject areas. they are intertwined. now, if we are talking about such an ideological change in education, tom, from my point of view, the future is behind this. i already remember at one time, probably, when i was teaching, i caught myself on the fact that colleagues, as a rule, don’t know, especially if they have better school there, yes, a mathematician is social science there. and what does the other teach, but if we put such an ideological task cannot be, but, that is, teachers should more or less well understand and be in one way or another in one semantic ideological field. here is something that is being done today. well, at

your specific schools, for example, the story is such that we work with those teachers who are here and, of course, are not there. here is such a cross-functional training, when a math teacher is well versed in history. teachers of literature understands physics well. this is not yet what we can count on. but that's not it less here is the idea of ​​​​cross-subject communications and integration in general of the entire program. she's cool, she can be dragged through some project stories. yes, when we are in a project, children do some kind of project and different knowledge is involved. then we have a system of additional education and a. she's so practical in a way. we have it training there, and there, too, in general, computer science is one of the coolest subjects that form cross-subject connections, because it can integrate almost the entire pool of school ones. e, items, of course, here it is necessary to work a lot. you must be a lot of good pedagogical science, but in order for me to pay attention in terms of school , there is such a subject as history, by the way,

a key subject that is a pool of ideological skills. well, of course, he collects things and forms so. now you understand the destructive subject, studying that version of the history of russia there and the world, by the way, which is now the modern version of textbooks. which is still a marxist version, we form the idea that we are some kind of provincial nation, which always everything was bad. and well, we live like that, okay, but it's not like that, you see, we gave the world first-class literature and science. yes, anything. yes, that is, well, we have operations for which there are a lot of things, but unfortunately, this subject is the history of russia , now we are a so-so subject of social science. well, people should have a clear picture of how the state is getting richer and what it lives on , and why it doesn’t need gold when it has a simple product . how wealth is created, how it is managed society on what man as a subject? can count in this society, well, some legal basis. why don't they have this

understanding? i think you look. what is the story now, relatively speaking, school education there corresponds to the realities of the mid-sixties. well, the last reboot of the system was something like this then , relatively speaking, at the party. it was a kind of vision that children should know and be able to understand. now we are dealing with a reduced version. here is the same vision, as if reassembling a rethinking it was not, well, some systemic big. well, we live. with this somehow, firstly, as far as i understand, history textbooks are different and indeed. yes, they are changing now. and the minister recently said that a new textbook has been written, so maybe something is already there. yes, you wanted to propose to my colleague. so he says that in the history of our guys to teach everyone, they bet on the victory of our country. and let's bet on the good in our education with us, er, believe me. it also exists. maybe that's if we have such a habit of constantly talking bad, and our teachers and our schools. it seems to me that it has remained stereotyped so much

that we no longer see good changes behind it. and they also got good food, but you don’t understand it enough. yes, 5% is good. what can he count on 95% of parents who well want better for their children, but they can count on what they have, unfortunately, plus some level of awareness, so these 95% of parents of awareness are also not very much the parent at home can create the right environment for the child. let's start with the family. a you know, here is the word wednesday, yes, here it is, maybe not strictly on our topic, but i would just like to devote a few minutes to this topic. yes, because the word wednesday is a lot. this means that in my time i talked with a wonderful philologist, a teacher and philosopher. e, yuri anatolyevichemlin. god bless him, he actively used the word wednesday. well, almost conditionally, we have yes, and i don’t remember how she started the conversation. he says, at the age of 5, i ran to my mother and said, i

know all the bad words, and my mother said, and i i know. and dad knows them, but we don’t do that. and this is not how we do it. yes, what creates the environment. it's just really great. yes, that's what is accepted, in general, the whole culture about it is accepted. this is not accepted by both the school and the family, and we are all the church there and the society, we all owe this to you , in fact, the main environment that forms everything, you understand, this is the main connection asks why children do not read so parents do not read, reading family, you know what happens to children here to a child. yes, he is another year, and he is already taking a book and poking a book finger, despite the fact that he is holding the book upside down, because he is so circle, it is clear that we remind those very bad parents that papa draws so much. smoking is bad, right? today we are gathering our thoughts about what and how they teach or

should teach a modern school olga alexandrovna dmitrieva director of the shuvalov school in moscow and electric trains, uskov, founder of a school and a university in yoshkar-ola. i am vladimir grigorievna, we continue. all the same, i want to discuss one, but a pragmatic topic, because it comes up all the time. here you can't get away from it. this is the use and the pros and cons of the use as briefly as possible. what should you be afraid of, what should you not be afraid of. well, i would like to say there are no ideal things at all, including any ideal toolkit, but for today. this is so far the only such mass, and objective control and measuring material , my observations show that no miracles have happened in the sense that anyone, as he studied for 11 years, gets approximately the same plus or minus results in points. that is, in principle, the exam does not spoil all this talk about the fact that 11 years old, an excellent student could not get together and gets a deuce. so let's put it on the facts, probably, for me, the exam

is about education. it's about academic integrity. it's about diligence, it's about getting together, it's about being able to manage your time and much, much, which is also, in principle, modern children. elementary schools train in these test uniforms, so they are used to it. uh, what would i pay attention to there is the main uh, such a message goes so that there is no training for the exam yes, so that for real knowledge was not lost, but for this it seems to me that we see this problem, and we are already changing it too. for example, we now have such an interesting format in moscow, that is, uh, the guys finish the eleventh grade and all the required subjects until february , and since february motsali is directed to introduce a new schedule of new practice. we are only preparing for the unified state examination and they are level, for example,

one needs to compete for 100 points, and the other at the minimum salary of february of the eleventh grade is a very interesting project. it will pass now, we will be ready to share it. and in basically, i think that changes in federal curricula, that all subjects are important, will also help us. get away from training at the exam i think that this is an ambivalent attitude towards the exam on the one hand. i agree with olga alexandrovna. this is a good tool that measures the quality of school preparation on a single scale throughout the country. well, the way she is, let's say. yes , and this is also a transparent way to enter a university , which is also important, yes, and this is its value, what is the problem with the use. i see that the exam remained practically, the only contour of the effective management of education, what we will prescribe in the unified state examination and will teach, you understand? well, excuse me, well, it's wrong. there should be a different education management circuit that forms the agenda, understanding the quality of training at

all levels, and so on. e teacher training system. well, and other things. this is practically non-existent, so the teachers went down because they just work out so that the exam is good, especially in the senior classes, this is a problem. and here are colleagues, and picking up what you said, that's what you think. that's what i see, again, like a teacher who comes here, uh, i look at there when i run into teenagers there, here are my children in middle school now. yes, i understand that they teach a lot of interesting things. they have such a big rich context on different subjects. well , whatever one may say, and then the time comes for the oge first, and then the exam they are told, so guys, the school is over, the school is over. we are now ready. that is, relatively speaking, you chose these three exams and you don’t even study three subjects, you study not three subjects, and you are preparing for the exam in these three subjects. and it loads this one so much, i understand perfectly well, as a teacher, that any oral exam is more subjective than a test. well, let’s talk, if you didn’t understand something, the child

said something, he wanted to say one thing, you heard another element of subjectivity in an oral interview. always present yes, the test is more objective. well, the test only tests certain skills. even inside items. what to do with it? again, not the exam itself, but preparation for the exam, and that's it. part of the whole exam yes. here i am, for example, for ensuring that there are mandatory interviews for admission to universities, so that they are not the same for everyone as they are now. yes, far from everyone, so that they are evaluated, and that they play their role, because the university knows how i once was. one public figure who checked with us was looking for. you generally should not take exams in the person concerned. i say, of course, i'm interested, that's why i have to accept, because you won't get it right now, then i'll teach. that's what you think, so i agree wanted to assure, we know it, that is. we are absolutely honest about seeing these deficiencies, and we are trying to fix this now in the system. i understand all the subtleties of the complexity of the issue and in what

position i put it in this issue, but there is a system. it allows something other than the use of course. well, those were twists. we fix them. we believe that it is possible in a different way and we are absolutely convinced of this, but you practically what are you doing to have a private lyceum? yes, we say that we give you education, and we give you a quality education. and if you have it, you will have the unified state examination. well, at the very least, you will pass in the region of 250-270 points and it’s normal. we do not set tasks there, so that they get sky-high scores. yes, we have selected children, but they are not 100%, that is, children, in principle, with average abilities, and you know, i’ll even say that. my daughter is currently in 11th grade. and now they had guys in the class and some of them were. well, they’re so mediocre , well, she’s mediocre in the eighth grade on the street and she entered and you know, i don’t have middle schools there now, they all blossomed imagine

you worked with them for 4 years, they all blossomed doesn't matter. what? well, this is a little bit from the fact that they work with them, they cook, well, in such a team that somehow everyone has something, it blooms and all that. i surprised myself. in general, the task was difficult. the difficulty of nine children, of course, was not. so the task is just to teach them well from beginning to end. now she has lessons in all subjects. yes, the exam is something going on somewhere. there is even some kind of preparation for the exam, but there are lessons in all subjects, and they follow the program according to literature in physics in mathematics, as it should be until the end of the eleventh grade. just surrender from and to quality to teach in all subjects universally. we teach to read to analyze information, and to compare, we really develop thinking to classify. this is the same on all objects, another point. why the unified state examination here we have a private university and yes. well, as if we have a selection. here's

how the selection system works. eh, so now in russia and in europe, by the way, it's about the same. we have a similar system. you passed some exams got some points i saw my place in the ranking, if i entered above the line, if i did not put it below the line. absolutely stupid system, you understand, well, how could it not be possible to select relevant people according to it, imagine in a ballet school, would you select according to the unified state examination so that it was yes? for example, i teach programming there, and a certain specific test is also required there, and there russian people ask mathematics, computer science , for example, computer science of communication , by the way, it’s relevant, well, russian mathematics is better, physics, we’d better select hmm yes, yes, because it’s basic subjects that just form the thinking of computer science, where it is generally not clear how they teach and how they check. that's it . well, you can't pick from those three. so, in our case, we set the task for objects to find people with interesting human potential. what is it? well, relatively speaking , the stack of motivation. come on, what a person from life

needs a level of subjectivity. yes, relatively speaking, as far as he has, or potentially a rich inner world can be formed, because what a person will create in this life. he will create their rich as inside the world job interview. no, we have a whole chain, we have a whole chain, that is, first they come to public events where we talk. what options for professional implementation exist for the next 50 years and where should they go? well, we say, you will definitely go in for 50 years. you have enough work. yes, then we have. uh, dive into the professional. that is, they say, i want programmers there, and we do an immersion in the subject. this is a workshop for saturday sunday. they are there for saturday sunday sinks make minimal results, but you have a deep selection - it's quite difficult. there's an interview. they write essays, we go camping with them, you know, right? and naturally, as it were, well, some kind of picture is emerging. now, for example, students are mainly engaged in selection. they look at this, perhaps, by the way, to say the value, but private schools, yes, which we have, unfortunately,

promasses. i'm talking about how you can do it, you understand, the value of private schools is that they can give other models and everyone will food friends, we'll figure it out. i mean , once again, i’m definitely the last such final to you. the question is taking into account the fact that today we tried to collect from young teachers who come to school. what are you waiting for? first of all, you know, i expect, probably, the readiness to develop and learn all my life and devotion to my work in them all the same, and in all of us , all the teachers still need to invest a lot. they know that we are learning all our lives. now, if you are ready to learn all your life, you are ready to be really flexible and know how to listen and hear communicate and understand, then, yes, come on, come on, let's go together, but in the first place. i put all the same human qualities, because the social sphere is about people. it's about children. good man.

this is also, if not a profession, then most of it . it is true that professional things can be learned by human beings. no thanks alexandrovna absolutely agree. i would add two things. the first rich inner world, the teacher teaches with methods, and with his rich inner world, first of all, the second history is obligatory a teacher must love. children children should be drawn to him. if this is the case, then the teacher will do just fine. if not, sorry don't. thank you very much olga alexandrovna dmitrievna director of the shuvalov school in moscow yuri viktorovich uskov, founder of the school and university in yoshkar-ola. i am vladimir grigory, today we gathered our thoughts about what and how they teach or should teach in a modern school.

hello this is a letter podcast. my guest today is the director of the moscow circus on tsvetnoy boulevard maxim yuryevich nikulin the son of a brilliant man, yuri nikulin, your dad was not just a brilliant man, a brilliant artist, but also a front-line soldier who went through the entire war, so today we will talk about him. dad went to the front. uh, he wasn't 18. well, there was such a special call. and he, in general, immediately got into the finnish war, and then, without having time to demobilize, he already got into the great patriotic war, so he fought for almost 7 years. i read about the memory of your dad, how in front of his eyes i just cut off the head of a soldier, you understand a lot, the first it is impossible to forget the person killed in my presence, we were sitting in a firing position and barely from the villages. suddenly, a shell exploded next to our gun

and a man was sitting loading a fragment and cut off his head. listen, a seeker is walking in the hands of a couple, and the upper part of the head is cut off, like a razor of the name death in the war. it would seem that it should not shock, but every time it shocked. i saw a clearing, which were lying in rows, dead people, how they went in such an attack , so a machine gun was looking for them all. i saw bodies torn apart by shells and bombs, but the most insulting ridiculous death, which is killed by a stray bullet, accidentally falling on a fragment , it is impossible to survive such. go to war any war of all rings, we dealt with the topic of war on the radio, when we worked we did the transmission of victory, building a chronicle of the history of the war day by day according to bureau reports. e about those events that happened that very day there or here, and then i understood these real front-line soldiers. they are very verbose. they are very difficult to talk to. i remember how much work it cost us in the studio in the rest there already

worked to talk three times. e lungs. get rid of the tires. and my father, this book, which is now being erased, i learned more about military life from it. than called to tell i will read your monuments during one of e's halts. we were sitting by the fire and talking peacefully, my friend, also a muscovite showed everyone the letters, and in them drawings of his son. and here is a guy who draws well with me, he said, he is happy, and in the third grade his wife writes that he was bored at that time , he passed by the platoon commander. he pulled out a clip from his pistol and threw it to my earth. ku asked to clean it, please, the soldier i know that the gun without albums presented for a long time to the temple, sly winks at us with the words oh, tired of living, pulled the trigger. apparently, he decided to joke, and then a shot rang out the guy froze, fell to the ground, and in his temple he has a red hole in his teeth smoking a cigarette, a terrible death, ridiculous. silly fate. yes, fate.

probably i'm not a big fatalist, i'm closer to think. i believe that not only there, someone decides everything for us. we also stand on this the earth also depends on our actions. our life. so i started talking about the fact that the war of the rings of the soul, and i'm cruel. and if people obviously. and the fact that we only have it clean, that it’s even for her, but in large numbers it didn’t seem to your dad , it’s true, as i remember, the uncle got, and who also seriously fought and many others, that’s what she didn’t break, probably changed, probably left some imprints. there he made his prints to others, but did not break. i was embittered, not everything was done. it's here hatred for everything every time it dies before my eyes, comrades. i always tell myself, after all, it could also be me about the death of the gun commander volodya andreev, what a great guy he sang wonderful songs , wrote good poems and how ridiculous