in terms of a woman? he had many children, many all beloved and wives and children. be more selective, please, why can i only go to the toilet, which stands next to me at the age of 9. and my leg bled overnight. yes , all the doctors have already told me that she will not live long. until then. she was somehow able to move on her own. yes, it was much less, since every year it progressed, my illness formed this increase, dramatically. i think everything has changed doctors from god do everything. it's not here. so you i went through pain through tears, i feel nothing, the pain my husband helped me in everything, and we went through a lot, that is, there are chances , you can tell us point by point what ksenia will have to face. what financial and physical costs await them along the way?

good afternoon an event took place today on the air of the big game, which is very important for the development of not only the russian economy. well , for the economies of many eurasian countries, i would say for the consolidation of greater eurasia as a geo-economic and geopolitical unit as a whole, the last missing link appears in the north-south railway route directly by land, linking russia with the persian gulf and the indian ocean. vladimir putin and iranian president ibrahim. raisi. today we participated via video link in the ceremony of signing an agreement on the construction of the railroad cuts. astara is the last section of this north-south route in the railway sense, and this is what vladimir putin said at this ceremony today. listen

, a 162 km long railway line will be laid between the iranian cities of reshi and astera. it would seem that this is a small area, but here it is. establishing direct, uninterrupted or otherwise, experts say, silent railway communication along the entire length of the route north, south, transportation along the new corridor will have significant competitive advantages. in particular. delivery of goods from st. petersburg, say mubabay, will take about ten days for comparison, i will say that the travel time along traditional trade routes is up to 30-45 days. ah, ekaterina yakovlevna here. eh, many actually said that the lack of e routes north south meridian routes. yes, this is one of the biggest shortcomings of the big eurasian project. here's to your point of view. uh,

the formation of this route, how it will affect the economic development in the space of eurasia is really the significance of this step. now it is very difficult to overestimate, because, but this route, both for russia and for the continents as a whole, is a strategic forming system, because we are observing the last uh. here in recent months. say for the past year and a half, there has been a reorientation of trade flows from traditional routes, including through europe to alternative ones, to horizontal routes through the territory of kazakhstan. but these routes. yes, they are alternatives. yes, they are being worked out, but nonetheless. they cannot fully ensure the traffic for which there is a real demand, including with the participation of russian contractors. but in this case, this a-a, trade route, it will largely make up for that the lack of infrastructural capabilities that we need now for the e-e introduction of economic e-e transactions and for supplies to make deliveries to both iran and

the middle east as a whole and in order to partially take over those flows that have now been diverted to overversions. yes, using long routes. that 's what he just said, and our president and this really gives a lot of additional competitive advantages, price advantages , time advantages, and in the case of individual deliveries, for example, the same agricultural goods. this time is of strategic importance, and in fact, this is the route that has now been opened. he will, uh , really close all these very large layers of problems. well, indeed, russia is turning not only to the east, but also to the south, the southern direction towards africa towards the countries of the persian gulf, especially it was rightly noted that in the area of ​​​​the expo of russian agricultural products is of great importance and now the prerequisites are really emerging for in order for russia to stabilize and strengthen this here, already in terms of infrastructure, its turn to the south , meanwhile, the story continues with the recent

destruction of an american missile in kiev, which was destroyed by a russian hypersonic missile dagger. this is also a very important story. after all, the americans present petri from as almost the most perfect system, and air defense in the world, which supposedly can intercept almost everything, even ducks were launched that american petri allegedly intercepted, and russian daggers, so, and tonight, even in the united states , two american news agencies cnn and reuters immediately acknowledged this, saying that the american patrid system in kiev, as they wrote, was damaged. well, here you need to understand that it consists of several elements and was struck by a russian dagger. must be the most important element of this system. uh, launcher. well, now let's talk about what is happening on the fronts of the special operation, and we have a war correspondent in touch, and dmitry astrakhan, who has just returned

from under avdiivka and tell us about what is happening in the avdiivka direction, which remains one of the most important and hottest . uh, trying to scout. combat artillery strikes are probing the front line. first of all. uh, the actions of foot groups. uh tries to get out to find a weak point between positions. uh, for the most part , such attempts are stopped either when they are detected from the air in crowded places. uh, of course, there are also battles already in positions on the whole , from the flanks. e, there is an coverage of avdiivka, and the coverage continues. eh, at the moment. e opponent. well, powerful blows. e. oh, contour, i didn’t take any blows, e, it is limited to reconnaissance in battle, as well as on the entire

front line, where they are trying to grope. uh, the enemy's weak point is the direction. it doesn't work. thank you very much dmitry olegch. keep us updated. take care of yourself. now let's talk about what's going on. in other areas, including the front, of course, in artyomovsk, which remains so far the most epicenter of special operations , we will talk about this with our three traditional military observer boris rozhin boris alexandrovich good afternoon and good afternoon. yes, indeed, now, again, artyomovsk remains at the epicenter of attention, because, and over the past 24 hours, the fortified area has already been finally cleared and the nest, and which was located in a high-rise block, now, in fact, only the domino ukreon remained behind the enemy. these are several high-rise buildings already on the very outskirts and the ruins of the private sector on the south-western drive to the city , in fact, after the loss of the nest. the value of any gifts of the leading artyoms has actually already depreciated, this factor, in fact, is falling

off the agenda, because we are talking about simply cleaning up the last houses that the enemy still has left in the city. there are very heavy losses. he also suffers heavy losses in attempts to counterattack to the north and from artemovsk, according to various sources from 2.5 in order for man to lose from may 10 to attempts, but to cut off our ledges to the north and from the city and territory. the increment there he does not have significant and paid. they were very expensive. and. uh. he is already spending there those reserves that were previously supposed to be used for an attack on the zaporozhye direction. in particular. the same, recreated floor. kozlov, it is used for counterattacks south of artyomovsk, although it used to be stationed in the zaporozhye region and was supposed to attack in the direction of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant and tokmak. well it is again shows the significance of the artyomovsk artyomovsk battle for the entire situation at the front. as

for other areas, traditional battles continued on the seversky ledge. well , in the same place where it is usually the industrial zone of belogorovka. controversial fun razdolovka. there are no significant changes here yet, in the donetsk direction. dmitry already said today there were positional battles there without changes , both to the north, as to the south, there were also girls, positional battles in the western and korains of marinka well, in the ugoldar direction also without opinions, but in a similar way that the situation stable in the zaporozhye direction? kupyansk direction our troops. well, how did they take the attacks in the area of ​​​​silikovka, also in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe two-river, well, they secured their uncaptured village of masyutovka. uh, which is located north of kupyansk in the svatov direction of our troops. uh, there's a little progress. e west of the red estuary. this is or is still a wooded area. uh, in

the dibrov area, that is, there are battles for small fortified areas in the forest periodically. we have progress there. but it's all tactical. how successes, while not seriously changing the situation. in the makeevka area, our troops destroyed a bridge, a stallion across the river, through which the enemy group fought, but here the battles for makeevka continue . in nikolaev, ukrainian uh objects were hit, including troop concentrations and supply depots, well, according to the information already confirmed by the anti-aircraft defense system. now he is trying in every possible way to belittle uh, the value of this blow persecuted are people who filmed the footage of the arrival on the american air defense system, because this is a blow, of course, not only to ukraine, to the ukrainian team or which was caught in a lie, well, to the american military-industrial complex thank you very much boris alexandrovich very interesting keep us informed. well, the kiev regime at the official level creates an impression. and what, and his contour offensive has not yet begun,

that he needs some more time to prepare, he needs to get more ammunition and military equipment from the collective west about this zelensky i spoke in london just the other day, and declared the same the day before. uh, deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine igor zheva, but in fact, at the same time, for example, the franz press agency writes that despite this informational picture that the kiev regime is trying to create, in fact, ukraine's counteroffensive is already. started listen did ukraine really launch the long-promised counter-offensive i'm leaning towards the version that ukraine is keeping russian forces in bakhmut so they can be concentrated on a certain sector of the front, while ukrainian forces are exploring the rest of the territory of hostilities. ivan klich , a researcher at the international center for defense and security in estonia, said previously. it can be said that such operations behind the terrain and preparations for a counteroffensive

will continue at the tactical level until then. until the leadership chooses the best moment to launch a large-scale operation, he told franz a few weeks ago , russian troops went on the defensive, using a large number of soldiers to hold the position in places, placing them on three lines of defense, they also fortified the front line with anti-tank ditches and easily erected barriers from small anti-tank concrete pyramids known as dragon's teeth and trenches for soldiers, so for kiev a counteroffensive can become deadly and costly with in terms of equipment, it seems that now ukraine is testing the effectiveness of this line of defense pierre-razu academic director of the french-based mediterranean the strategic research foundation said that in the current phase of the war, both sides use maneuvers and subterfuge to confuse the enemy before launching a major operation. apparently. each side is trying to provoke the enemy, force him to make a mistake, and then attack. in the most vulnerable place, ivan pavlovich, you agree

that the counter-offensive has already begun, and kiev's rhetoric is about the opposite. these are just the very tricks that the french expert is talking about. well then, if you follow this logic, then the madam painter, who is the deputy minister of defense of ukraine. and he announced the offensive more than a month ago. she pointed out the direction and said it was coming, said it was western , this mess was the west. and in the end , they ask together, we see how they come. and no, they retreat. and where they try, and it is precisely to conduct reconnaissance in battle that they get in the teeth. they are rolling back, and besides , this is ah, they say such strange things, which means that the ukrainian forces are concentrating our troops in kardemovskaya in order to study situation the war is coming. what a study of the situation and everyone understands perfectly well that forces are accumulating and that the ukrainian side is accumulating strength and obvious, which means

that the direction of the main blow was, of course, south zaporizhzhya in the orekhovo region , which was infiltrated by a group of gouges. forgive me, it means ours, but in fact russia or they again, of course, are concentrating and preparing, but they have nowhere to go for new actions, and therefore, just as western experts need to write articles that and most importantly, the enemy of ukraine now is, and time that works against him against her, because the west says money. we have trained your troops. we gave you everything we could, look after all. and e stoltenberg and kobole the commander of the joint forces of nato in europe and that means other generals everyone says that you got everything. if you please, to fight already, finally, the ukrainian side is depicting this, it means that, and the fighting is certainly fierce, but every time we see two or three tanks are used, and a company, well, two

companies, and they try to beat the military personnel, but they are victorious for realizing this is what they still have, artyomovsk fortification, which they allegedly hold. well, the situation is something like relaxing in a different way. they do not hold back, but hold on to the last. here is the area. domino understands, as soon as, uh, they leave . they could have done earlier. most of all, the scandal will be in kiev and then in brussels, and then in washington no one can take responsibility, and therefore they lay the life of non-ukrainian soldiers on this last frontier, because no one nezaluzhny gone missing does not want to comment on anything, in general, as if it is not. and by the way, the information is constantly different, then he is here, and then he is not. well, er here, it seems to me that you need to understand more about what u have on

today's u today's conditions. uh, the ukrainian offensive is unlikely to resemble and in general anyone's offensive. it is unlikely that it will resemble the colossal military operations of the second world war model with many thousands, there are tank wedges and so on and so forth, it’s just that the situation has radically changed today everything it can be seen, therefore, a large concentration of troops and large general military operations. they will be immediately destroyed from above, yes, therefore, in fact, you just need to understand that nature, and the actions today are changing significantly compared to what we observed there 70 and so on, and years ago ivan pavlovich completely agrees with what really time is working against ukraine, moreover, in the west they are constantly writing and, uh, these voices are getting louder that time is working against ukraine, not only now applies to this offensive, but also in more i would say medium term. but, for example,

e. prominent military experts of the united states, michael kofman, and robert lee write on the pages of the foreign fs that the west's bet on the ukrainian offensive is wrong? why because firstly the military uh, the fighting will not end with this offensive the war will continue longer term and secondly, ukraine by then in the second half of this year may find itself in a much more weakened position. rather than russia in terms of armaments and military equipment, the big question is whether the west is able to provide this and ukraine with these resources. listen to what they write. politicians put too much emphasis on the coming offensive, not paying enough attention to what happens next and whether ukraine is well prepared for the next stage, it is extremely important that western partners develop a long-term concept of victory for ukraine

, since even in the best case, the upcoming offensive. unlikely to end the conflict in fact, after the counter-offensive, another indefinite period of hostilities and a war of attrition could begin, but with a reduction in the supply of ammunition to ukraine , therefore, the western approach to success must prevent a situation in which the war is protracted, and the western parties are not able to provide ukraine with a decisive advantage if the upcoming offensive will be the culmination of his assistance to kiev, then moscow can assume that time is still on its side, that its battered forces may eventually wear down the ukrainian army to ukraine has maintained momentum and assertiveness western countries must make a number of commitments and draw up a plan of action, after the counter-offensive they should take a wait-and-see approach. otherwise, the west risks creating a situation in which the russian troops will be able to recover

, stabilize their positions and try to seize the initiative this year and next year michael koufman and robert write about the need for what , after all, the publication of the politician stated that, well, the budget for military support for ukraine, which was adopted at the end of last year, is ending. there are six out of the forty-eight billion prospects for the adoption of the new budget under a big question, taking into account the republican majority in the house of representatives, and so far from the clearly stated commitments of the united states in terms of military support to ukraine for the second half of the year, for the fall. this is 31 abrams tanks and so far it seems like everything and that's what you think, i believe that the west will continue to use ukraine as a tool to put pressure on our country. and although they are really starting to expire, the batches of weapons promised in ukraine that have been announced. sometimes even a year ago in these abrams. we have been talking with you for several months already, not before the new year

were announced. and now, finally , gradually they will begin to appear there, and i will appear at the front. they will be more accurate in ukraine, appear in the fall close, while other abrams appeared in germany on which the ukrainian military are trained, while the ukrainian military is being trained on them, the question is that ukraine as a tool is convenient and beneficial for the west, ukraine offers itself, in fact, as this tool, and as long as this motivation remains, there are all opportunities for the west to continue, uh, to support this the activity of the us military budget. indeed, it's not quite clear yet what it will look like next year, but i don't expect what will come of it? even with this managed default potential, which is now being discussed in the united states for the last 20 years has always been part of its budget. e resources allocated for some kind of military expedition outside the country in the amount of at least 50-60

billion. and in the twenty-second year. in the past, this money was without purpose until the beginning of the ukrainian e, a special military operation , and the problem of the west and ukraine is that the war is not about the number of tanks destroyed, but the number of tanks produced and victory is achieved by those who can scale faster deliver these tanks more quickly and in the required quantity to the point of their contact , so far according to the declared nomenclature of deliveries by e-mail, in the general package of western assistance. we don't see anything comparable to what our country could do, even by removing old stocks from storage. the first and second, perhaps decisive, is that russia, within a month of a special military operation, completely eliminated the means of reproducing military power. actually, ukrainians in ukraine are more than their own. not yet. it's true, and he was the most significant in uh among, the composition of all post-soviet republics and

the lack of this own resource for reproduction put ukraine in approximately the same position as the government of afghanistan or as the south vietnamese government at the moment. e, when your own resources completely dry up. they rely entirely on some external support. and if this external support begins to waver, well , just about the fluctuations of the external support, while michael koufman and robert lee write about the need to maintain even the buildup of american military support for ukraine with sight for the second half of this year, and the well-known investigative journalist h is the one who, uh, provided evidence of the involvement of the united states in the subra. nord streams made a new sensational statement in his opinion. uh, according to his sources, there is a group of countries already under the leadership of poland that secretly calls on zelensky to end the conflict, even through the resignation of e zelensky himself and according to

sources. hey samuel. uh, hersh, zelensky does not want to resign, he does not want to end the conflict, therefore he is losing support among western countries, including eastern european countries, how plausible ivanovich is. to be honest, this publication surprised me a little, because according to the information that, uh, which is available, and many of the listed countries. here there are different countries listed there, for example, in hungary listed is a country that takes a more restrained position, but it is there all the baltic states. he listed poland , again, how is it enough to win back p. of course, they occupy a more fighter position and uh, and it's hard to expect from them. the fact that they are calling for something positive there, but oddly enough, i would consider this

informational message. uh, you know, as a matter of fact, a sign that uh hersh leans on very good sources why because, apparently he broadcasts exactly what he is uh told, well, maybe he does not have all the background. e opens. i can guess , uh, two options. here's how it's true first - it's that the countries listed are basically neighbors. well for with the exception of the baltic states, there is talk about what, let's say, we will take there. well, roughly speaking, let's tear ukraine apart, yes, but it may look different. let's take separate parts of ukraine, as it were, for preservation, especially since we have historical grounds for this, so that they do not lose everything there. so we will save for them these pieces of e from the kiev regime, which remain, and in general, this may be a variant

of the fact that you really are talking about zelensky further. come on, at least something leave uh to us your closest uh sponsor. well, hungary is not a sponsor, but nevertheless, hungary thinks that if you share ukraine , hungary will also participate, despite its low-key position, and the second option, which , uh, can somehow connect with the first, but still it has a separate one here has its own characteristics is that uh, apparently, uh, in the west there are fears that the zelensky regime will play out. and the main thing is that it is important for them that some kind of anti-stub is preserved, so there may be fears that he will play so much that nothing will be saved at all. yes, and they need something to keep that they can continue to use. that's how you talk about steroids on doping. yes, some kind of anti-russia,

so that it can be preserved, and perhaps there really are fears. what do you know, let's wrap it up, because zelensky plays partly partly on the one hand. it is, of course, absolutely an american deep state agent. but he is trying to involve the west directly. and this is already uh for all disasters, so perhaps he they say that you know what, let's go away. and then we will already be with the remnants, and the territories will do what we need, i completely agree with your hypothesis, i think that this is the second option. closest to the truth, including for poland, because the polish claims to the great power are connected with the preservation of this one but the residual anti-russia on steroids in uh what they want to turn e ukraine and moreover, the polish understanding of their security is also connected so that this is not a buffer, of course, about western e

territory, but sharply anti-russian, but still, so that poland itself would not be the immediate front. and if the front, in fact, fits directly into the borders of poland, yes, then, uh, the poles will begin to think much more seriously about their own security. they don't want this, so i think they are really sending signals to the kiev regime to stop and freeze the situation as it is. now. uh, a little ad. after that , we will talk in more detail about the policy of the west towards ukraine 16 years ago, precisely with estonia began a struggle with soviet monuments. today, estonians are only gaining momentum. we have only one enemy, this is russia, let's figure it out, who is kayakalos, and who feeds her so much in hatred for russia, as many of you know, i was born in a family whom stalin exiled to siberia and served in oma kaltz. this unit helped the nazis

exterminate the jews, let me remind you that estonia was the first to recognize zelensky's terrorist regime and said that there would be such a word of help from estonia for our protection, one of the world's largest height of monstrous cynicism. at the end of the pounds support for the peace of the military bases and aggression directed towards moscow that's what they do with the actions of the soros pound. i wonder why kaya kallas was nicknamed as yes , they also call red riding hoods. it turns out her speed and in vain all her skeleton. vy wardrobe, she is like an heir, tutti today on the first success for may tinkov cashback pest, bitch contacts 70 percent in popular categories when buying in your favorite stores. issue any card tinkoff

participates in every song from may 15 to may 28 and get cashback up to 70%. he is the only one when you need something. check out the weekly promotion. ozone choose different products at competitive prices shampoos conditioner nature sibirika for 399 rubles. summer women's beauties, crossby for 999 rubles. everything we love grows in gardens. donya quality, putting off the seeds to juice from the idea. give them the implementation of quality first-hand agree. after rest

i wish now kfc whole basket crispy and juicy crust. choose your basket from 169 rubles. so many discounts for the refrigerator enough. cash loan on the card immediately deferment of the first payment up to 90 days issue a cash loan and receive money right now tinko. he is such a tv present

brought okay? i won't. why kill a useful person raid new series. i tried to live differently, but i can’t, i really can’t, if something happens to him, i won’t be able to live at all. represents we need a real live female voice.

relations in half an hour eat people will lead us to the most important katran he is not the joker he is the king, he is himself so named. i know he did it.

on the air, the big game of the united states is speaking louder and more directly, openly saying that the goal of american policy is not to restore the territorial integrity of ukraine within the borders of 1991, but to integrate it into the west, even if it’s a carcass or a stuffed animal. i’m sorry, but we need to somehow to integrate ukraine into the west, and many say that even ukraine's non-bloc status is not enough. here some symbolic link to the west is necessary. here. hear what one writes one of the most prominent representatives of the american foreign policy mainstream, a former united states ambassador to nato and now president of the chekak council on foreign relations and his dalder. the strategic argument for incorporating ukraine into the west goes to the heart of the conflict without integration. kiev putin and his potential successor will believe that they have a chance to control the country in fact russia realizes its

strategic failure only after the integration of ukraine into the west the west can try reassure ukraine by promising to provide it with all the means necessary for self-defense. as it has been so far, however, without ukraine's integration into the western bloc, the country will become like israel , it will be self-sufficient, mistrustful of its neighbors, focused solely on its own security, ready and able to take preventive action whenever it sees fit and probably even try to create its own nuclear weapons. even without a formal end to the war. not to mention the real us world and other countries. nato must make it clear that they are committed to the security of ukraine and that they will study the possibility of taking intermediate measures to bring ukraine into the alliance. when it was sweden and finland here the mystery is that he talks about the strategic consequences and the strategic goal of integrating

ukraine into the west, but, in fact , the argument is of such an ideological moral character, and it feels some such share of guilt. the west for the fact that we, in general, pushed ukraine into all these hard times. i will inflict heavy costs. we're pumping her up with weapons. she's a handy tool, but we understand the cost. and if we turn our backs at some point. she supposedly, uh, will remain alone u with herself, and this can make her, maybe even anti-western. well, and so on and so forth , this kind of argumentation is not genuinely strategic. i would have expected to hear from him, speaking of strategic language, exactly how it will affect the character security in this part of europe. what balances will emerge? how will ukraine develop polish relations, will ukraine become additional time? for us, this is her excess asset. in which direction will this north atlantic organization be deployed in the conditions when the nodal challenge for the united states this

is china on the horizon of the next few years, all these arguments are not in this text, so it can rather be perceived as uh, well, such another emotional one, dressed in the rhetoric of a strategic e sense, and an argument in favor of everything good against everything bad. i therefore do not believe that this is the statement. now it may be for us some kind of milestone on which we can rely. well, ideally, of course, in the west, they would like ukraine to join us at some stage. yes, with the approach of the vilnius nato summit , which is scheduled for this july, this topic has become especially pedaled. especially considering the fact that kiev and most importantly allies of kiev. so to speak, the main thing is that like-minded people in the face of poland from the baltic countries demand that kiev should have provided something more than the 2008 formula . the fact that ukraine will someday become a member of nato in an indefinite future, but it is absolutely not so simple

, and as forinpolis writes, there has already been a very serious split on the issue of integration and the speed of ukraine's integration into nato and there are very serious disputes. listen to what is written one question dominates the discussions of american and european leaders and for ukraine it has existential significance when ukraine joins nato at the moment for this question no answer controversy over it is causing tension behind the scenes of the north atlantic alliance, according to four people familiar with it. last month at a meeting of foreign ministers. the biden nato administration supported the position of germany and hungary and opposed poland from the baltic countries, who proposed during the vilnius summit to develop a specific action plan and outline the possible dates for ukraine's entry into nato florence and also managed to talk with other nato representatives, both former and and active.

they are pessimistic about the broad scope it will take to bring ukraine into the alliance even if kiev wins or the dynat is given the go-ahead to formally start the process of ukraine's accession to nato, the debate on the timing of ukraine's accession to nato touches the very foundations of the western concept of the post-cold war world order in the last three decades of nato enlargement of the european union . . the east with the aim of incorporating the states of the former soviet bloc has become the core of american and european politics. leaders are now facing the prospect of expanding its borders at the expense of countries that are in the midst of a war and negotiations on expanding borders are acquiring an increasingly harsh geopolitical coloring ivan tsarevich here. pay attention to the west was, as we see in a difficult situation. on the one hand, the very paradigm of western politics after the cold war is focused on the expansion of nato without any borders. well, apart from the russian border. and as we see in everything the west does, including its refusal to even seriously discuss russian security guarantees, from the end of the first year from this paradigm.

the west does not want to give up, it is fighting for this paradigm now through ukraine but on the other hand, to enter the third world war , to be drawn into an open military clash with russia, i also somehow don’t want to, what do you think about this, and i would pay attention to your listeners here's what and when we talk about the american system of hegemony, we must understand that these systems are hierarchical, the united states is above everyone, then we are their vassals, so to speak first level. now these vassals have been robbed the most. these are the western european states, then comes. eastern europe which was next adopted and so on. and in principle, the system is the same as built. uh, well, about like a pyramid scheme, right? that is, you constantly need to expand, because in this food chain you are all the more significant, the more there is someone after you , the one who is after you and those who are robbed are your sixes. now we

are seeing what is very important for poland for the baltic states get ukraine like that's someone who's after them? yes, here is the one who is on their errands and will be them. to give something to help in conspiring with those who are at the very top to rob this very middle in the form of western e in the form of western europe and it is clear that this middle is resisting. she doesn't want them to say so. now, if we consider nato as a closed system , someone who will behave aggressively towards them has come. therefore, therefore, they are leading the business to leaving on leaving. uh, the kiev regime there is what remains of it, as you know, such a dog, but they don’t want it to be just such a post dog at all, which runs by itself. here's what they don't want in any form of independence

, even, it turns out, the israeli israeli said. yes, even the israeli model is not suitable for standing. yes, about 8 months ago, just zelensky once said in despair that you know we don’t need this europe , if we still rush, israel, uh, build on the israeli model of our state, of course, they want to be rude saying the remnants of the kiev regime should not be put on a chain let them in the house, and put them on a chain, that’s what it’s all about, and they want to drag poland and the baltic states into the house in order to rob there. here it is. uh, the middle richest fat layer in this food chain is western europe and as i say all the time, they lie to each other, so they endlessly lie about it. well, uh, in addition to the split within nato over the speed of integration of ukraine a, which, of course, will not happen. and there is another split within the collective west. it is of an economic

nature. and it's a split between united states and the european union on protectionism. uh, the war of subsidies begins, biden started this war, and by signing the inflation control act, which offers very serious subsidies to manufacturers of american car manufacturers of electric vehicles and high-tech products, and, as the politician writes, france emmanuel macron, apparently disappointed in the readiness of the united states seriously as - wants to discuss something with the european union and wants to go the same way and adopt its own act on subsidies already within france and within the european union listen, emmanuel macron has moved into a verbal skirmish with washington, proposing concrete measures to counter us subsidies for electric vehicles. apparently. the move will further heighten transatlantic tensions. france , home to auto giants such as renault and stillantis

, will adapt its policies by the end of this year to encourage the purchase of clean cars from european manufacturers. - said president, urging the rest of the eu countries to take similar measures. the move will become part of the cleaner production bill next week. it should be adopted at a meeting of the cabinet of ministers, and in the summer it will pass through the parliament the text of the bill proposed by the minister of economy and finance, brunor. it will also include other measures inspired by the american experience. such as the provision of tax incentives for manufacturers of heat pump accumulators and solar batteries, ekaterina yakovlevna your opinion the war of subsidies has begun, and with it, respectively, a fragment. the de-globalization phase may be, if not the entire world economy, then at least the western part of the world economy is absolutely right, the war of subsidies has begun, it is absolutely expected. she is absolutely logical. and there are two factors here. actually. why is europe now following this path, because on the one hand, europe is really losing

very serious competition in a number of areas, losing, uh, to china in the first place turn, but, and she is forced in the conditions of the current crisis in the conditions of rising prices, she is forced to use any leverage, including protectionist ones, to support her own industries, that is, in the first place. where she loses, she loses the fight in the field of household and electronics. she loses the fight in the car area of ​​the building. including, just the electric car, the construction of electric production, electric cars and e, it is now at risk of losing its competitive advantages in the field of aviation. uh, building in the area. uh, hmm space machine building and that's it in order to keep these horse racing. advantages of price competitive advantages in the first place, because the quality point of view is increasingly difficult to compete and will resort to these tools, subsidies, the second very important point in terms of increasing. uh, such a progressive increase in interest rates in europe and in the uk in the united states, but at

the same time, this gap in interest rates remains there are risks, and we are seeing this now it is important for europe to preserve and retain capital to prevent it from flowing to other countries, other regions of the world and, in fact, creating more competitive conditions. here in the country. this is also another incentive for e. here. uh, carrying out such a policy, what does it lead to? you are absolutely right. this, in the first place , leads to tension between the united states. and even i would say not the eu, but its individual largest economies, where is this competition on these fronts, which i outlined most strongly with france with germany in the future, to a lesser extent, but also with italy, but this competition will intensify, and, of course. this is another disintegration. factor for the eu as an integration association. well, here is another area where europe at least wants to position itself as the vanguard of the collective west and go ahead of the united states. this is a violation of those taboos

. overcoming those taboos regarding the supply of weapons of military equipment, which have traditionally been considered very dangerous , fraught with an escalation of a military conflict in by its exit from its own ukraine, it was not the united states but great britain that was the first to supply ukraine with long-range storm shadow missiles and struck, thereby. this is, uh, a very dangerous taboo, and now french lemonade is already here. he writes that the elysee palace is also considering the possibility of supplying french long-range missiles, and to pay attention to the kiev regime, the united states so far says that it does not want to supply its own long-range atakams missiles. at the same time , the uk has already come close to in order to overcome one more , today the last of the taboos discussed in terms of providing kiev with dangerous fighter jets from the point of view of the escalation of weapons , a meeting of the prime ministers of great britain and a.

of the netherlands, respectively, rishi sunoka and a brand ryukta e in iceland where the council of europe summit was held and following this meeting it was stated that the uk and the netherlands agreed to work on creating an international coalition with the aim of purchasing f-16 fighter jets for ukraine, that is really a question moves into practice. yes , of course, the united states has not yet said its yes, which is required to provide the f-16. poland and germany immediately announced that they did not have e f-16s in the public domain, which they would like to transfer to ukraine , that is, it is not yet clear how everything will develop, but what worries me here is the decrease in fear in the west in general and in the uk in particular, a about escalation risks. really. here, and there is a decrease in the danger of reducing the perception of the danger of that the actions they take can

lead to an unacceptable escalation, from their point of view, unacceptable. here, look, for example, what timati snyder, a professor at yale university, writes about this about reducing these escalation risks. one after another weapon systems that were thought likely to escalate were delivered without any negative consequences for almost 15 months of war, despite russia's nuclear threats and concerns. west, nuclear weapons were not used by those who predicted an escalation in if the ukrainians resist the supply of western weapons or the defeat of russia , so far they have been wrong when the russians talk about a nuclear war, then the safest response to this will be to ensure that they are defeated in it in a nuclear war. well, it is absolutely no coincidence that, against this background, ukraine, the kiev regime appeals precisely to the same decrease in fear back in the west and says do not be afraid of russia, nothing will happen. see. we have given so many things to the west, and

nothing happened, so there is no need to be afraid of this particular argument, for example, dmitriy kuleba comes running, who yesterday published the following article in american forex and listen . many taboos have been broken in the last 14 months when it comes to western military assistance to ukraine since february 2022. discussions on each new type of weapon started with no and ended. yes, it took a long time to dispel the fears, including the argument that moscow shouldn't be provoked after all, none of the military supplies had the same f-16 effect. nothing different. instead of dwelling on fears that will never materialize, we most urge the united states and its allies to consider the benefits of providing ukraine with f-16 fighters ivan pavlovich, in this situation, i am less concerned about the f-16s themselves. yes, they most likely are not some kind of miracle weapon, but it worries me. here itself, the principle that worries me most is the reduction

of fear back in the west and the reassessment of the risks of escalation. hasn't the time come to strengthen this fear, you know, in general, military history, europe has shown many times. how about here namely, ah, appetite came with eating it was. well, remember, at least hitler and his first victories one after another in europe , which to him yes, he decided that he would not win, and in the end it all ended in the forty-fifth year and the fall of berlin. and here the situation is about the same. it just looks a little different, but in a different plane, as far as it concerns, purely a-a military-industrial complex, but nevertheless the same. and you know, even in the state of cuba i saw edotka's pessimism. he said, well, and well you give us those 50. actually, what will change. he says the same thing, nothing will change. and this is precisely the main reason. they initially expected that each new wunderwaffe

would not change our position. and their successes fly away and each time they were tempered by the fact that their successes were not there. look at the situation, shededu, last thursday they said that they had handed over these missiles, and already on friday evening, they struck at luhansk. what happened the planes that carried out the attack were shot down, and the next attacks the missiles have already been intercepted, while the west has become perplexed. here's the vanderwaffe for you. here the situation is the most, so it's understandable. and you are just saying, what is important for them here is the trend, the weapon itself. they do not really believe in absolutely any of these, but systems. although that's enough. well, it's a great system. nobody argues with this, by the way, he noted about the french. after all, the french are cunning. after all , this is a rocket in that it is a french, uh, and british joint development. so rather than actually already in business, and in that sense, not he needs to turn out the macron, he likes to cast a shadow, so this is the trend.

she is dangerous, of course. we are all just asking ourselves. they are there and we are here. well, even if they hand over the planes, this will not solve anything. yes, but 50 aircraft. yes, ah, the only thing they can do, but to hang on means to shoot missiles of such a long-range type, and outside the air defense coverage area, this is, as it were , the only thing that they cannot capture airspace in air battles. and what's next yes, everyone sets himself question. and what's next and with this, the europeans are intimidating themselves. now you understand. our task now is work time, natasha, well, let's look at how they wind themselves up, and this works against them. well, it seems to me that this is a gradual increase in the bar , first tanks, then long-range missiles. now the fighters are talking about the fact that ukraine suffers military defeats and definitely doesn’t win military victories. because if it supported military victories, then this transition would not have been the second they would have on the escalation ladder.

really understand russia. so i see in these statements the lack of a real understanding of russia that russia can not answer directly. now, not right now, but a little later and asymmetrically. and third, of course, one of russia's main priorities in this conflict as a whole is in a hybrid war with the west in general and a special operation. in particular , there should be systematic work to increase the fear in nato of the united states in europe and the fear of a nuclear war, because this fear may have weakened. i'm in it i see a very serious problem. now we will break for a short advertisement, then we will continue. specially military operations i came at the call of my heart over the years, of course, they were already approaching, as a military specialist , i considered it necessary to be at a difficult time for russia, it was here that i just took the word

of the military registration and enlistment office, it was such a time for russia that i had to again become a system with their former fellow men . eh, our fathers, our grandfathers during the great patriotic war stood for our homeland. many even children fled to the front to get into the hands of weapons and fight with it. now nazism is rearing its head again, so if anyone doubts doubts, everything is simpler, join our ranks. take up arms, defend our homeland. victory will always be only for us, until we destroy the nazis, we have not calmed down. serve under the contract get to the may tinkov cashback fest, bitch contacts 70 percent in popular categories when buying in your favorite stores. issue

any tinkoff card participates in every song from may 15 to may 28 and get a cashback of up to 70 percent it seems she was settled in another room. i mean, here's one to one, as in the picture this brutal, brave, handsome man is not there, i persuaded me to go rock climbing with you , switching without adventures with hotels. for 169 rubles. welder of the sixth category of life

open buy a mug for 99 rubles. it fights against itching, swelling and inflammation of allergies , allergies, not along the way, your task in nature for purchases from 450 rubles. in the check there is a smart week with halva. how much does it cost to prepare for the repair season, only four thousand rubles a month, what a smart girl you are an offer for a share in installments for a halva card?

as if he went, our deftly gave results , there were signs of increased enemy intelligence activity. give the order to collect all the components of the bomb. operation valkyrie premiere of the serial film you can't catch.

bloodhound why are you telling me all this? do n't you fight her?

yes, this is a big game on the air, the passage of a year after the start of the hybrid war against russia in the west, many come to the correct conclusion that they lost miserably in the economic war against russia, or at least losing at the moment. listen to what the british magazine spectator writes about this. the west entered the sanctions war with an exaggerated sense of its own influence on the whole world, as we found out, non-western countries have no particular desire to impose sanctions against moscow against russian oligarchs. the results of such miscalculations are obvious . in april last year, the imf predicted that the russian economy would shrink by 8.5% and in 2023 another 2.3%, but it turned out that last year russian gdp decreased by only 2.1%. and on this year the imf even predicts a slight growth of 0.7% the russian economy is not destroyed.

she simply reorganized, reoriented to the east and south and not to the west , ekaterina yakova well, it seems that in this regard, the west is also unfolding its economic war against the east-south, which russia has turned and which maintains intensive trade economic relations with russia, that is the west starts an economic war against the world majority. with secondary sanctions, it's a top priority sanctions policy of both the us and the european union for the current year, it seems to you that by doing so, the west will simply undermine its global and economic positions even more quickly. absolutely true, because on the one hand, we have really been observing for the last month that the adaptive resource of both the russian economy and friendly business, not only the official positions of the authorities, but also friendly business is very high, much higher than the west expected . indeed, independent clusters are being formed, which are now geared up for work chains are being rebuilt with russia. added value is being implemented

some new joint investment projects and that's it. this e is aimed at maintaining the connection of commercially beneficial relationships. there is another very important point, which is connected with the effect of secondary sanctions, because what secondary sanctions lead to. they lead to a crisis of confidence in global reserve currencies against the dollar, and now also for the euro, since the eu is also on the path of replicating the practice of secondary sanctions and this is happening everywhere, regardless of friendly is the country in relation to russia. these are unfriendly countries. negotiations are now underway everywhere to increase e- payments in national currencies, and indeed, the united states has already responded. they understand perfectly well that this war they do not win and cannot win, uh, alone. and by all means they are trying to consolidate the west. and we, in fact, even what do we expect from uh our big seven now, which will be in uh, a couple of days, because the main items on the agenda are pressure on russia yes, but yes, maybe even more, uh, an important central element of this discussion is pressure on china

, yes, this is pressure on china, and this is due to some purely economic pragmatic interests that we have already spoken about today, and this is due, among other things, to the effects of this economic tandem between russia and china and those countries that are already oriented not only to russia, but also to these two countries and are trying to maintain this system of global, but rather, supplies and the integration of their own economies. with china as a major economy. uh, the world and with russia already like here with tandem yes in this case, well, in the west, in fact, many experts. they understand that the situation in the world is not a confrontation between russia and the west, and even more so not even a confrontation, democracy, autocracy , which the bidens love to talk about so much, but a confrontation between the west and everyone else, that having unleashed a hybrid war against russia, the west is actually very sharply accelerated the consolidation of the world majority , this phenomenon of the world majority of countries was formed, who do not want to dance to the tune of the west, who want to develop themselves.

regardless of what the west wants and regardless of the west and that the west is turning into a global minority. here is a very interesting speech on this topic made by fiona hill , a former special adviser to president trump on russia and an employee of the brookings institution, and she spoke at the lennorthaere conference in tallinn , listen to what she said. the brutal war that vladimir putin ignited has turned , as is often the case, into major regional conflicts war with global consequences war has become. a proxy war for the rise of russia and other countries against the us the war in ukraine is perhaps the event that makes pak's departure from the americano obvious to all in his desire for war. russia has deftly exploited deep-rooted, international resistance, and in some cases open challenges to continued us leadership in global institutions. not only is russia seeking

to push the united states to the margins of europe, but china also wants to minimize and contain military and us economic presence in asia so that both countries can secure their respective spheres of influence, but there are other countries that we traditionally consider to be middle or swing powers. the so- called rest of the world. and they would also like to see the us up to a different size in their regions and have a greater impact on global affairs. they want to decide whether they receive guidance that suits their interests. in short, in 2023. we hear a resounding no to us dominance, and we see other countries' visible desire for peace. without hegemons. you are a very remarkable speech here, because russophobia prevails at the lendard ameri conference, uh, and many people there say that russia is allegedly defeated, but fiona kill claims that this is actually a defeat , united states andrey andreyevich here is the realization of it. can it lead to

some changes in american foreign policy? if so, what a mysterious place in which it decided to share these thoughts, indeed estonia is hardly the audience in which these arguments will become the basis for some practical action, and uh, it really sounds like some russian analyst a few months ago was talking about specific strategic implications on purpose. and the line that the west has chosen in relation to our country. tomorrow, after all, i could say that this is a small eastern european crisis. and although we do not agree with the russians. here sooner or later. we will agree anyway, we will not scale it up to a global confrontation, but it was the west who chose the line to escalate this crisis and to offer it to all the strange world, as the nodal eschatological crisis of the 21st century are you with us or are you against us? choose a side immediately. if you find yourself on the wrong side, then you know that we will take actions against you that

will probably resemble what is happening now in ukraine, and this is the conclusion that any analyst based on realism will come to absolutely sane. uh, common sense and knowing history, understanding the thinking of the elite of different countries, the fact that individual american analysts. this is a good healthy sign, but unfortunately. the critical mass of these analysts is not yet enough in washington for this to become mainstream. well, i’ll add that fiona hill is english by birth, so maybe it’s not even american mainstream. well, while the united states is increasing pressure on those countries that want to act in their own interests. they are in the interests of the united states and one of these countries is georgia, and the current government, which actually welcomed the decision of russia abolish unilateral visas for citizens of georgia a. to restore direct flights and today direct flights between russia and georgia are allowed, and right there

, very tough pressure fell on tbilisi from both the european union and the united states, the representative of the foreign policy service. the eu of peterstan , said that tbilisi causes concern for and what kind of european path georgia is and what , according to brussels, georgia is obligated even without being a member of the eu, even without being a candidate in europe members of the european union are obliged to coordinate the decision with the european union in foreign policy, that is, fully yes , focus on what they say. e in brussels the united states in the face. uh, pattala of the representative of the state department, the leader-patel threatens with sanctions, e, georgia, and even brought in heavy artillery in the person of francis fukuyama , the very one who at one time proclaimed the end of history. and so. hear what fukuyama recently wrote about georgia in fore face because

the united states is its nato allies focused on russian president vladimir putin's war in ukraine, russia's efforts to bring another country into its orbit have gone largely unnoticed, as in many countries that were once part of the soviet union, georgia's population is largely pro -european and pro-nato and this orientation only strengthened in the years since moscow invaded the country in 2008, which resulted in russia occupying about 20% of its territory. however, the current leaders of georgia not only failed to support ukraine in her own fight against russian aggression. they also stepped up anti-western propaganda efforts. earned moscow's praise for not joining western sanctions and trade restrictions on russia and instigating a russian-style crackdown on georgia's vibrant civil society in march. they even tried to pass a law defining pro-western and pro-democratic civil society organizations as agents of foreign influence with the support and

approval of moscow by the georgian government. building an authoritarian state in the image and likeness of russia the united states and its allies should impose secondary sanctions on georgian companies and entities that help russia evade sanctions. here, as you see, then similar pressure. i would say carpet bombing of georgia even with the involvement of fuyama. dmitrievich, i will allow myself to disagree with you here, because , of course, it looks. now, i wouldn't say it didn't call this carpet bombing. these are clearly the ones that were not written by fukuyama. here are the turnovers very uh, such recognizable turns of speech phrases and so on. apparently this is his georgian co-author. um, and there fukuyama, apparently, since he is a member of all these liberal networks, it means that, according to the rules of network marketing, he should also participate in all this in all this. but in fact, a very interesting example is georgia, because

many try to present the matter in such a way that , well, okay, if it comes to sovereign development big, you can still understand, russia is china, and we see where to go for small ones on the example of georgia and on the example of serbia is the same. benefit and sovereignty go together. if you are forced to refuse sovereignty , then they want to deprive you of material development, and for small states now in the modern world, sovereignty and economic development are identical, i completely agree with you that the united states is pushing georgia and serbia away from itself. in principle, all those countries that want to act in their own national interests, and not in the interests of their overseas uncle. now we're handing over the word to the news and the big game will be back in this studio at 23:00 or skip.